hep-ex0311019/analysis_slepton.tex
1: \subsection{Slepton searches}
2: \label{sec:slepana}
3: 
4: %%%MBDEL:begin
5: %%The data collected at centre-of-mass energies between 189 and 208 GeV
6: %%were used to search for the supersymmetric partners of electrons, muons
7: %%and taus. 
8: %%The complete year 2000 data set was analysed,
9: %%MBDEL:end
10: %%MBADD:begin
11: 
12: Supersymmetric partners of electrons, muons
13: and taus were searched for. 
14: In this paper, data collected at 
15: centre-of-mass energies between 189 and 208 GeV
16: were analysed, and were combined with previous 
17: results \cite{slep}.
18: %The complete year 2000 data set was analysed.
19: %% ??? is this true for smuons and selectrons as well ???
20: %%MBADD:end
21: %{\it but all tracks in the region of the damaged sector of the TPC were ignored,
22: %and the estimated slepton efficiency was reduced accordingly}.
23: 
24: The track selection and the general event preselection described in 
25: sections \ref{sec:trksel} and  \ref{sec:presel}, respectively, were used.
26: The analyses were then performed in two stages. Firstly, a loose
27: selection was used to obtain a sample of low multiplicity events. 
28: %%%MBDEL:begin
29: %%Events with less than 10 charged particles
30: %%and a visible invariant mass above 4.5 \GeVcc\
31: %%were retained for further analysis.
32: %%%MBDEL:end
33: %%MBADD:begin
34: Events with less than ten charged particles
35: and
36: a visible invariant mass above 4.5 \GeVcc\
37: %%, and
38: %% a missing transverse momentum above 4. \GeVc\
39: were retained for further analysis.
40: Different selections were then applied in each of the three channels.
41: 
42: \subsubsection{Selectron searches}
43: \label{sec:selana}
44: 
45: To search for selectrons, the general topology required was two
46: acoplanar electrons and missing energy. 
47: All candidates with exactly two well reconstructed and isolated
48: particles (according to the definition described in section~\ref{sec:id&jet}), 
49: oppositely charged and with momentum above 1 \GeVc,
50: were first selected. 
51: One of the two charged
52: particles was required to be tightly identified as an electron, and 
53: the event was rejected 
54: if the other was identified as a muon.
55: 
56:  At this stage of the selection
57: the sample consisted mainly of Bhabha and two-photon events.
58: Satisfactory agreement was observed between the data and simulated
59: background, as shown in 
60: figure~\ref{fig:slep1}~\footnote{In order to show the different background
61: contributions, the largely dominant Bhabha background was suppressed 
62: in these plots by demanding
63: that the opening angle between the two tracks was below 176$^\circ$.
64: }.
65: 
66: A series of tighter cuts reduced the SM background further.
67: As two-photon events are predominantly at low polar angles and with low
68: momentum, the visible energy was required to be greater than 
69: 15~GeV, the energy deposited in the low angle STIC calorimeter
70: less than 4~GeV and the
71: total transverse momentum with respect to the beam axis greater than 5~\GeVc.
72: To reduce the number of Bhabha events an upper limit on the visible
73: energy of 100~GeV was imposed, while also requiring that the neutral
74: energy not associated to the charged particle tracks be less than 30~GeV.
75:  Events were also rejected if there were more than four neutral clusters
76: in total, each with energy above 500~MeV. Bhabha events are coplanar
77: and with a large opening angle, hence it was demanded that the 
78: opening angle between the two tracks be lower than 165$^\circ$
79: and the acoplanarity
80: %~\footnote{The acoplanarity angle is defined as
81: %the angle between the two tracks in the tranverse ($xy$) plane.} 
82: be greater than 15$^\circ$.
83: Constraints were also imposed on the momenta of the two particles,
84: requiring that both tracks had momentum greater than 2 \GeVc. 
85: %It was further required that the missing momentum vector pointed to an
86: %active region of the detector.
87: 
88: \subsubsection{Smuon searches}
89: \label{sec:smuana}
90: 
91: 
92:    Smuon pair-production with decays to muon plus neutralino is expected
93:    to give acoplanar muons and missing energy.
94: All candidates with exactly two well reconstructed and isolated
95: particles (according to the definition given in section~\ref{sec:id&jet}), 
96: oppositely charged and with momentum above 1 \GeVc,
97: were first selected. 
98:  At least one
99:    of the particles had to be loosely identified as a muon. It was further
100: required
101:    that neither particle be identified as an electron. The selected
102:    sample consisted mainly of two-photon events and fair agreement 
103:    between real data and simulated background was observed 
104:    (see figure~\ref{fig:slep2}; 
105:    the slight discrepancies visible in figure~\ref{fig:slep2}(d), in the
106: tail of the two-photon distribution at about 40~\GeVc, and for high momenta,
107: are in kinematic regions rejected in the next step of the analysis).
108: 
109:    To reduce the SM background further, a series of tighter cuts
110:    were applied. To remove two-photon events, the visible energy was
111:    required to be greater than 10~GeV. Also, the energy in the STIC
112:    had to be less than 1~GeV. It was also demanded that the transverse
113:    momentum be greater than 5~\GeVc.
114:    To remove  \eeto $\mu^+\mu^-$ events, an upper limit of 120 GeV on the
115:    visible energy was imposed, whilst also requiring the unassociated
116:    neutral energy to be less than 10~GeV, with no more than two neutral
117:    clusters. This background was further suppressed by accepting only
118:    events in which the opening angle between the tracks was less than
119:    165$^\circ$ and the acoplanarity was greater than 15$^\circ$. 
120:    To reduce $t$-channel W pair contamination, events were rejected if the 
121:    positively
122:    charged muon was within 40$^\circ$ of the e$^+$ beam direction, or the 
123:    negatively charged muon was within 40$^\circ$ degrees of the e$^-$ beam 
124: direction.
125: 
126: 
127: \subsubsection{Stau searches}
128: \label{sec:stauana}
129: \input{analysis_hmstaus}
130: 
131: 
132: 
133: 
134: 
135: 
136: 
137: 
138: