1: \newpage
2:
3:
4: \begin{figure}[ht]
5: \begin{center}
6: \vspace*{-1.cm}
7: \begin{tabular}{cc}
8: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
9: \epsfxsize=8.cm\epsffile{qq_pre.eps} &
10: \epsfxsize=8.cm\epsffile{qq_fin.eps} \\
11: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
12: \epsfxsize=8.cm\epsffile{ee_pre.eps} &
13: \epsfxsize=8.cm\epsffile{ee_fin.eps} \\
14: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
15: \epsfxsize=8.cm\epsffile{mm_pre.eps} &
16: \epsfxsize=8.cm\epsffile{mm_fin.eps} \\
17: \end{tabular}
18: \end{center}
19: \caption{On the left the comparison between the real and simulated
20: data is shown at preselection level for different variables for the
21: \qqbar, ee, and $\mu\mu$ topologies in the neutralino search.
22: On the right the visible energy distribution is shown for
23: the events selected at the final stage, after the likelihood
24: selection. The signal distribution contains the contribution of
25: all generated mass combinations and is arbitrarily normalised.
26: % to 1 pb.
27: }
28: \label{fig:neulike_datamc}
29: \end{figure}
30:
31: \newpage
32:
33: \begin{figure}[ht]
34: \begin{center}
35: %\mbox{\epsfysize=17.0cm\epsffile{fig_mj_mjg.eps}}
36: %\mbox{\epsfysize=17.0cm\epsffile{fig_mj_mjg_V2.eps}}
37: \mbox{\epsfysize=17.0cm\epsffile{99_fig_mj_mjg_sig.eps}}
38: \caption[Data-MC comparison]{ {
39: %\footnotesize
40: Comparison of real data from 1999 (\sqs\ in the range
41: 192--202~\GeV) and simulation
42: for the neutralino multijet selection
43: without photons (a,c,e) and with photons (b,d,f),
44: at the preselection (a,b),intermediate (c,d), and final selection(e,f)
45: stages.
46: %The expected background (filled histogram) is divided into
47: %four-fermion (dark shading), two-fermion (intermediate shading),
48: %and two-photon processes (light shading).
49: The distributions expected for \XN{3}\XN{2} production with
50: \XN{3}~$\to$~\XN{2}\qqbar\ and \XN{2} decaying to \XN{1}\qqbar\
51: or \XN{1}$\gamma$ are shown as dashed histograms where
52: \MXN{3}=112~\GeVcc, \MXN{2}=75~\GeVcc\ and \MXN{1}=41~\GeVcc.
53: The signals are normalised to cross-sections of 0.8~pb (e) and 0.1~pb (f).
54: }}
55: \label{fig:neu_mjet99}
56: \end{center}
57: \end{figure}
58:
59:
60:
61: \newpage
62:
63: \begin{figure}[ht]
64: \begin{center}
65: %\mbox{\epsfysize=17.0cm\epsffile{fig_mj_mjg.eps}}
66: %\mbox{\epsfysize=17.0cm\epsffile{fig_mj_mjg_V2.eps}}
67: \mbox{\epsfysize=17.0cm\epsffile{00_fig_mj_mjg_tot_sig_2.eps}}
68: \caption[Data-MC comparison]{ {
69: %\footnotesize
70: Comparison of real data from 2000 (\sqs\ in the range
71: 204--208~\GeV) and simulation
72: for the neutralino multijet selection
73: %PJ without gammas (left) and with gammas (right) at, from
74: %PJ top to bottom, the preselection, intermediate, and final selection
75: %PJ stages.
76: without photons (a,c,e,g) and with photons (b,d,f,h),
77: at the preselection (a,b),intermediate (c,d), and final selection(e,f,g,h)
78: stages. In (g,h) only the data collected with the TPC sector 6 on are shown.
79: %The expected background (filled histogram) is divided into
80: %four-fermion (dark shading), two-fermion (intermediate shading),
81: %and two-photon processes (light shading).
82: The distributions expected for \XN{3}\XN{2} production with
83: \XN{3}~$\to$~\XN{2}\qqbar\ and \XN{2} decaying to \XN{1}\qqbar\
84: or \XN{1}$\gamma$ are shown as dashed histograms where
85: \MXN{3}=112~\GeVcc, \MXN{2}=75~\GeVcc\ and \MXN{1}=41~\GeVcc.
86: The signals are normalised cross-sections of 0.8~pb (e),
87: 0.1~pb (f,h) and 0.4~pb (g).
88: }}
89: \label{fig:neu_mjet}
90: \end{center}
91: \end{figure}
92:
93: \newpage
94:
95: \begin{figure}[ht]
96: \begin{center}
97: %\mbox{\epsfysize=17.0cm\epsffile{fig_ml_st.eps}}
98: %\mbox{\epsfysize=17.0cm\epsffile{fig_ml_st_V2.eps}}
99: \mbox{\epsfysize=17.0cm\epsffile{99_fig_ml_st_sig.eps}}
100: \caption[Data-MC comparison]{ {
101: %\footnotesize
102: Comparison of real data from 1999 (\sqs\ in the range
103: 192--202~\GeV) and simulation
104: for the neutralino multilepton search
105: %PJ (left) and asymmetric tau search (right) at, from
106: %PJ top to bottom, the preselection, intermediate, and final selection
107: %PJ stages.
108: (a,c,e) and asymmetric tau search (b,d,f), at
109: the preselection (a,b), intermediate (c,d), and final selection (e,f)
110: stages.
111: %The expected background (filled histogram) is divided into
112: %four-fermion (dark shading), two-fermion (intermediate shading),
113: %and two-photon processes (light shading).
114: The dashed line in (e) shows the multilepton signal expected for
115: \XN{3}\XN{2} production with \XN{3}~$\to$~\XN{2}\ellell\ and
116: \XN{2} decaying to \XN{1}\ellell\ where \MXN{3}=103~\GeVcc,
117: \MXN{2}=51~\GeVcc\ and \MXN{1}=45~\GeVcc.
118: In (f) the dashed line shows the tau cascade signal for
119: \XN{2}\XN{1} production with \XN{2}~$\to$~\stau$\tau$ and
120: \stau~$\to$~\XN{1}$\tau$ where \MXN{2}=75~\GeVcc, \mstau=44~\GeVcc\
121: and \MXN{1}=37.5~\GeVcc.
122: The signals are normalised to a cross-section of 0.4 pb.
123: }}
124: \label{fig:neu_mlxt99}
125: \end{center}
126: \end{figure}
127:
128:
129: \newpage
130:
131: \begin{figure}[ht]
132: \begin{center}
133: %\mbox{\epsfysize=17.0cm\epsffile{fig_ml_st.eps}}
134: %\mbox{\epsfysize=17.0cm\epsffile{fig_ml_st_V2.eps}}
135: \mbox{\epsfysize=17.0cm\epsffile{00_fig_ml_st_tot_sig.eps}}
136: \caption[Data-MC comparison]{ {
137: %\footnotesize
138: Comparison of real data from 2000 (\sqs\ in the range
139: 204--208~\GeV) and simulation
140: for the neutralino multilepton search
141: %PJ (left) and asymmetric tau search (right) at, from
142: %PJ top to bottom, the preselection, intermediate, and final selection
143: %PJ stages.
144: (a,c,e) and asymmetric tau search (b,d,f), at
145: the preselection (a,b), intermediate (c,d), and final selection (e,f)
146: stages.
147: %The expected background (filled histogram) is divided into
148: %four-fermion (dark shading), two-fermion (intermediate shading),
149: %and two-photon processes (light shading).
150: The dashed line in (e) shows the multilepton signal expected for
151: \XN{3}\XN{2} production with \XN{3}~$\to$~\XN{2}\ellell\ and
152: \XN{2} decaying to \XN{1}\ellell\ where \MXN{3}=103~\GeVcc,
153: \MXN{2}=51~\GeVcc\ and \MXN{1}=45~\GeVcc.
154: In (f) the dashed line shows the tau cascade signal for
155: \XN{2}\XN{1} production with \XN{2}~$\to$~\stau$\tau$ and
156: \stau~$\to$~\XN{1}$\tau$ where \MXN{2}=75~\GeVcc, \mstau=44~\GeVcc\
157: and \MXN{1}=37.5~\GeVcc.
158: The signals are normalised to a cross-section of 0.4 pb.
159: }}
160: \label{fig:neu_mlxt}
161: \end{center}
162: \end{figure}
163:
164:
165:
166: