1: \begin{figure}[p!]

2: \begin{center}

3: \begin{tabular}{cc}

4: (a) & (b) \\

5: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{sqpre_01.eps} &

6: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{sqpre_02.eps} \\

7: (c) & (d) \\

8: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{sqpre_03.eps} &

9: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{sqpre_04.eps} \\

10: \end{tabular}

11: \caption{Comparison of data and simulation at the preselection level in the

12: non-degenerate squark analysis. Plots include all DELPHI data from 189 to 208

13: GeV: (a) visible energy, (b) acoplanarity, (c) combined b-tagging variable, (d)

14: maximal transverse momentum of a charged particle. The expected

15: signal distributions at $\sqrt{s}=200~\GeV$ are shown for one possible

16: stop and sbottom signal 

17: ($ M_{\tilde {\mathrm q}}$=90~\GeVcc, \MXN1\ = 60~\GeVcc), with arbitrary

18: normalisation.}

19: \label{fi:mcsquark}

20: \end{center}

21: \end{figure}

22: 

23: \newpage

24: 

25: \begin{figure}[p!]

26: \begin{center}

27: \begin{tabular}{cc}

28:  (a) & (b) \\

29: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{nneffi_stogdm.eps} &

30: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{nneffi_sbogdm.eps} \\

31:  (c) & (d) \\

32: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{nneffi_stomdm.eps} &

33: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{nneffi_sbomdm.eps} \\

34: \end{tabular}

35: \caption{Number of events as a function of the signal detection efficiencies

36: in the non-degenerate squark analysis:

37: (a) 1998 data at 189~\GeV: stop analysis for $\DM >20~\GeVcc$,

38: (b) 1999 data from 192 to 202~\GeV: sbottom analysis for $\DM >20~\GeVcc$,

39: (c) 2000 data with TPC sector 6 off: 

40: stop analysis for $5 \leq \DM \leq 20~\GeVcc$,

41: (d) 2000 data with TPC sector 6 on: sbottom analysis for $5 \leq \DM \leq 20~\GeVcc$. The efficiencies are for a given combination of  squark and LSP masses,

42: indicated in the parentheses. }

43: \label{fi:sqnneffi}

44: \end{center}

45: \end{figure}

46: 

47: \begin{figure}[p!]

48: \begin{center}

49: \begin{tabular}{cc}

50: (a) & (b) \\ 

51: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{etra.eps} &

52: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{ncha.eps} \\

53: (c) & (d) \\

54: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{pmis2.eps} &

55: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{ptra.eps} \\

56: (e) & (f) \\

57: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{re_acop.eps} &

58: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{re_ptra.eps} \\

59: \end{tabular}

60: \caption{Comparison of data and simulation in the 

61: nearly degenerate squark analysis at preselection and final selection 

62: level. The distributions of (a) the total 

63: transverse energy, (b) total number of charged particles, 

64: (c) angle between the missing momentum and the beam axis and 

65: (d) transverse momentum 

66: are shown at preselection level. At the final selection

67: level the distributions of (e) the acoplanarity and (f) the transverse

68: momentum are shown. 

69: All DELPHI data from 189 to 208~GeV is included.

70: A signal corresponding to 

71: \mstq\ =60~\GeVcc\ and  \DM\ =4~\GeVcc\ is also shown

72: (with arbitrary normalisation at preselection level and normalised to

73: a cross-section of 0.16 pb in (e) and (f)).

74: %(multiplied by 50 at preselection level).

75: }

76: \label{fi:datamc-dg}

77: \end{center}

78: \end{figure}

79: 

80: 

81: 

82: 

83: 

84: