1: % edited : shorten, remove L1 , L2 details, MBC 6/4/03
2: % edited (for grammar, mostly!) by M. Chertok 6/2/03
3: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc2.tex %%%%%%%%%%
4:
5: %
6:
7: % $Id: espcrc2.tex 1.2 2000/07/24 09:12:51 spepping Exp spepping $
8:
9: %
10:
11: \documentclass[fleqn,twoside]{article}
12:
13: \usepackage{espcrc2}
14:
15: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
16: % \documentstyle[twoside,fleqn,espcrc2]{article}
17: % if you want to include PostScript figures
18: \usepackage{graphicx}
19: % if you have landscape tables
20: %\usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
21: % put your own definitions here:
22: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
23: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
24: % ...
25: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
26: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
27: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
28: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
29: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
30: % declarations for front matter
31:
32: \title{Selection of Tau Leptons with the CDF II Trigger System}
33: %Dedicated triggers for physics processes involving $\tau$ leptons at
34: %CDF
35:
36: %\author{E.Vataga\addressmark[PIS]\thanks{Corresponding author. Tel.:
37: %+39-050-2214415; fax: +39-050-2214317; e-mail:
38: % Elena.Vataga@pi.infn.it} for CDF-II Collaboration}
39:
40: \author{S.Baroiant\address[DAV]{Department of Physics,University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA},
41: M.Chertok\addressmark[DAV],
42: M.Goncharov \address[TXS]{Department of Physics, Texas A\&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA},
43: T.Kamon\addressmark[TXS],
44: V.Khotilovich\addressmark[TXS],
45: R.Lander\addressmark[DAV],
46: P.Murat\address[Frm]{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL 60510, USA},
47: T.Ogawa\address[WSD]{Department of Physics, Waseda University, Tokyo 169, Japan},
48: C.Pagliarone\address[PIS]{Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, I56100 Pisa, Italy},
49: G.M.Piacentino\addressmark[PIS],
50: F.Ratnikov\address[RTG]{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854,
51: USA}
52: A.Safonov\addressmark[DAV],
53: A.Savoy-Navarro\addressmark[Frm]\address[PRS]{LPNHE Universites de Paris 6 et 7/IN2P3-CNRS, Tour 33, RdC 4, Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France},
54: J.R.Smith\addressmark[DAV],
55: D.Toback\addressmark[TXS],
56: S.Tourneur\addressmark[Frm]\addressmark[PRS],
57: E.Vataga\addressmark[PIS]\thanks{Corresponding author.
58: Tel.: +39-050-2214415; fax: +39-050-2214317; e-mail: Elena.Vataga@pi.infn.it}}
59:
60: \begin{document}
61: \begin{abstract}
62: In Run II of the CDF experiment, traditional dilepton triggers are
63: enriched by lepton ($e$ or $\mu$) plus track, di-$\tau$ and $\tau$
64: plus missing transverse energy triggers at Level-3 dedicated to
65: physical processes including tau leptons.
66: %The ability to trigger
67: %on taus is made possible by the upgraded CDF trigger system, in
68: %particular the tracking processor and the refined tracking
69: %information available at Level 2. For the lepton plus track
70: %triggers, the $P_T$ thresholds for both objects can be set
71: %relatively low while maintaining a reasonable rate.
72: We describe
73: these triggers, along
74: with their physics motivations, implementation and cross-sections and
75: report on their initial performance.
76:
77: \vspace{1pc}
78:
79: \end{abstract}
80:
81: % typeset front matter (including abstract)
82:
83: \maketitle
84: \section{Introduction}
85:
86: Run II of the Tevatron produces $p\bar{p}$ interactions
87: with an instantaneous luminosity about $10^{32}$ ${\rm
88: cm^{-2}\,s^{-1}}$. The CDF Detector trigger system \cite{TDR}
89: decreases the resulting initial event rate of 2.5 MHz
90: %$7.6 MHz$
91: down to 70 Hz for data storage and offline analysis, with the goal
92: of efficient extraction of interesting physics events from the
93: large minimum bias background. One important subset of these physics
94: signatures includes $\tau$ leptons. Events with $\tau$'s are
95: important for the study of various Standard Model (SM) processes
96: such as $Z\rightarrow \tau\tau$, $t\bar{t}$ with
97: $W\rightarrow \tau \nu_{\tau}$, $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$
98: and also to extend the reach of searches for physics
99: beyond the SM. These
100: physics goals drive us to look for $\tau$-like objects starting with
101: Level-3 of the trigger, and our implementation selects events with
102: two leptons in the final state: $e\tau_h, \mu \tau_h,
103: \tau_h\tau_h$ and also $\tau_h\nu$,
104: as well as $ee, e\mu$ and $\mu\mu$. With "$\tau_h$" we
105: indicate hadronically decaying $\tau$'s, while the $e$ or $\mu$ can
106: be either produced directly or through a leptonic decay of the
107: $\tau$.
108:
109: %\section{CDF Trigger System}
110: These tau triggers
111: benefit from the upgraded CDF trigger system, in
112: particular the tracking processor at Level-1 (L1) and the refined tracking
113: information available at Level-2 (L2) \cite{TDR,XFT}.
114:
115: %The CDF detector utilizes a three-level trigger system.
116: %Level-1 (L1) uses custom designed hardware to find physics objects
117: %with a subset of the detector information and makes a decision
118: %based on simple counting of these objects: for example, $\mu$ or
119: %$e$ with $P_T>$ 6 GeV/$c$. The most significant upgrade in the L1
120: %trigger for Run II is the addition of track finding: a new fast
121: %trigger processor (XFT\cite{XFT}) find tracks in the central drift
122: %chamber (COT) in the $r$-$\phi$ plane with a resolution of $\delta
123: %P_T/P_T > 1.6$ \% and $\delta\phi=4\;\mu$rad in $2.7\;\mu$sec
124: %after a collision.
125: %The XFT also matches tracks to muon stubs or
126: %calorimeter towers, and the L1 decision is generated in $4\;\mu$s
127: %with accept rate about 50 kHz. L2 operates after detector readout
128: %and has an accept rate in the range 200 to 300 Hz. All the
129: %information used in the L1 decision is available to the L2 system,
130: %but with higher precision. Track collection available at L2 is
131: %2-dimensional and includes tracks with $P_T>$ 1.5 GeV/$c$. In
132: %addition, jet reconstruction is made by a L2 cluster finder. The
133: %L3 trigger benefits of the full detector resolution including 3-d
134: %track reconstruction and tight matching of tracks to calorimeter
135: %and muon-system information. Its algorithm structure is based on
136: %the CDF offline analysis software and is used to reconstruct
137: %events in a processor farm with a final accept rate of 50 to 70
138: %Hz.
139:
140: \section{Implementation of the $\tau$ Triggers}
141:
142: \subsection{$\tau$ reconstruction}
143: Taus promptly decay in leptonic or hadronic (65\%) modes with at
144: least one $\nu$ in the final state. Hadronic $\tau$ decays have
145: the distinct signature of a narrow isolated jet with low
146: multiplicity (1 or 3 prongs) and low visible mass ($<M_{\tau}$).
147: The basis for our triggers, therefore, is a $\tau$-cone algorithm
148: for the reconstruction of these decays. To build the
149: $\tau$-cone object, we start with a narrow calorimeter cluster,
150: above a suitable $E_T$ threshold,
151: matched to a seed track with momentum above a $P_T$ cut. The region
152: within an angle $\Theta_{Sig}$ from the seed track direction is
153: used to define a cone of tracks to be associated with the $\tau$.
154: The region between $\Theta_{Sig}$ and $\Theta_{Iso}$ defines the
155: isolation cone: we require that no tracks with $P_T$ higher
156: than a fixed low threshold be found in this region. At the Level-3 (L3)
157: of the trigger, $\Theta_{Sig}$ and $\Theta_{Iso}$ have values of
158: $10^{\circ}$, and $30^{\circ}$, respectively, and are determined in 3
159: dimensions.
160:
161: We have implemented 4 different triggers for physics processes
162: with $\tau$'s in the final state, installed in the CDF
163: trigger tables in January 2002. Below we describe their main
164: features.
165:
166:
167:
168: \subsection{Electron plus track, Muon plus track}
169:
170:
171:
172: The selection for the $e$ plus track trigger starts with L1 and L2
173: requirements of a single EM tower with $E_T>$ 8 GeV with an associated
174: XFT track with $P_T>$ 8 GeV/$c$ and a second track with $P_T>$ 5 GeV/$c$.
175: At L3, these conditions are refined and
176: charged track isolation around the reconstructed (2nd) track is
177: imposed.
178: The current average cross-section for this L3 trigger is $\sim$29 nb.
179: For the muon plus track trigger we require a muon stub matched at
180: L1 to an XFT track with $P_T>\; 4 GeV/c$, with an increased track
181: threshold of 8 GeV/$c$ at L2. The "track" requirements are identical to
182: those for the electron plus track trigger. The current average
183: cross section for this trigger is $\sim$16 nb.
184:
185:
186:
187: \subsection{Di-$\tau$,$\tau$ plus Missing Transverse Energy}
188:
189: At L1 the di-$\tau$ trigger requires 2 calorimeter towers with $E_T>$ 5 GeV
190: and 2 matching XFT tracks with $P_T>$ 6 GeV/$c$, separated by an angle of
191: $\phi>30^{\circ}$. L2 requires cluster
192: $E_T>$ 10 GeV and imposes track isolation. At L3, using the
193: full reconstruction code, 2 $\tau$ candidates with seed track
194: $P_T>$ 6 GeV/$c$, and originating from the same vertex: $|\Delta
195: Z|<10$ cm, are required. The L3 cross section for this trigger is
196: $\sim$12 nb.
197:
198: The $\tau$ plus missing transverse energy (MET) trigger
199: requires $E_{MET}>$10 GeV
200: at L1. At L2 this is increased to $E_{MET}>$20 GeV and a
201: calorimeter cluster with an isolated track with $P_T>$10 GeV/$c$
202: is required. This is followed by full event reconstruction at L3,
203: requiring at least one $\tau$ candidate having seed track $P_T>$
204: 4.5 GeV/$c$. The present trigger cross section is 5 nb.
205:
206:
207:
208: \section{First Results}
209: The study of $Z\rightarrow \tau_e \tau_h$ is performed using
210: $72 \;{\rm pb}^{-1}$ of data taken with the electron plus track
211: trigger \cite{safonov}. The track multiplicity associated with the $\tau_h$
212: candidate found in events passing selection cuts is shown in
213: %figure below.
214: Fig.~\ref{fig:ztt}. We observe a clear $\tau$ signal over
215: background levels even before requiring an opposite sign charge
216: for the electron and the $\tau_h$. The mass distribution of the
217: electron-$\tau_h$-MET system in the data is also found to be
218: consistent with the $Z\rightarrow \tau\tau$ hypothesis.
219:
220:
221: \begin{figure}[htb]
222:
223: \includegraphics*[width=18pc]{ztt_ntrk.eps}
224: %\epsfig{ztt_ntrk.eps}
225: \caption{Track multiplicity for the $\tau$ candidate.}
226: \label{fig:ztt}
227: \end{figure}
228:
229: %\section{Summary}%
230: %
231: %CDF II successfully implemented specific triggers for $\tau$-like
232: %objects. 4 dedicated triggers has been part of trigger tables
233: %since January 2002. First physics results based on data collected
234: %with one of these triggers are presented and a number of analysis
235: %are in progress.%
236: %
237: %\section*{Acknowledgments}
238: %
239: %The authors would like to acknowledge the organizing committee of the
240: %conference.
241:
242: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
243:
244: \bibitem{TDR} The CDF II Detector: Technical Design Report, Fermilab-Pub-96/390-E (1996).
245:
246: %\bibitem {SUSY} S.Abel {\it et al.}, Fermilab-Pub-00/349 (2000),
247: %hep-ph/0003154, hep-ph/0008070.
248:
249: \bibitem{XFT} S. Holm {\it et al.}, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. {\bf 47:895}(2000).
250:
251: \bibitem{safonov} A. Safonov, in Proceedings of
252: 38th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and
253: High-Energy Hadronic Interactions, 2003.
254: FERMILAB-CONF-03/153-E.
255:
256: \end{thebibliography}
257:
258: \end{document}
259: