1: \documentclass[11pt]{cernrep}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{colortbl}
4:
5:
6: \textwidth 163mm
7: \textheight 243mm
8:
9: \newcommand{\Pt}{{P_t}}
10: \newcommand{\Et}{{E_t}}
11: \newcommand{\dphi}{\Delta\phi}
12: \newcommand{\phizj}{\phi_{(Z,jet)}}
13: \newcommand{\Dbzj}{Db_{(Z,jet)}}
14: \newcommand{\Ptzj}{\Pt^{Z+jet}}
15: \newcommand{\ptzj}{$~\Pt^Z$ and $\Pt^{jet}~$}
16: \newcommand{\PTzj}{$~\Pt^Z-\Pt^{jet}~$}
17: \newcommand{\ptgj}{$~\Pt^\gamma$ and $\Pt^{jet}~$}
18: \newcommand{\la}{\langle}
19: \newcommand{\ra}{\rangle}
20: \newcommand{\zpj}{~``$Z^0+jet$''~}
21: \newcommand{\gpj}{~``$\gamma^{dir}+jet$''~}
22: \newcommand{\rrr}{\to} %{\rightarrow}
23: \newcommand{\HR}{\rule{1em}{0.4pt}}
24: \newcommand{\pth}{\hat{p}_{\perp}^{\;min}}
25: \newcommand{\Db}{\Pt(O\!+\!\eta>5)}
26: \newcommand{\Ptz}{\Pt^{Z}}
27: \newcommand{\Ptj}{\Pt^{jet}}
28: \newcommand{\ptz}{$\Pt^{Z}$~}
29: \newcommand{\ptg}{$\Pt^{\gamma}$}
30: \newcommand{\ptj}{$\Pt^{jet}$}
31: \newcommand{\Fptzj}{(\Pt^{Z}-\Pt^{jet})/\Pt^{Z}}
32: \newcommand{\Djj}{(Pt^{jet}\!\!-\!\!Pt^{J})/Pt^{jet}}
33:
34: \newcommand{\ZJ}{(\Pt^{Z}-\Pt^{J})/\Pt^{Z}}
35: \newcommand{\Zpart}{(\Pt^{Z}\! \!-\! \! \Pt^{part})/\Pt^{Z}}
36: \newcommand{\Jpart}{(\Pt^{J}\! \!-\! \! \Pt^{part})/\Pt^{J}}
37:
38: \newcommand{\hmm}{\hspace*{-1.3mm}}
39: \newcommand{\aaa}{\hspace*{.39cm}}
40: \newcommand{\bbb}{\hspace*{.39cm}}
41: \newcommand{\han}{\hspace*{.54cm}}
42: \newcommand{\has}{\hspace*{.53cm}}
43: \newcommand{\hass}{\hspace*{.11cm}}
44: \newcommand{\had}{\hspace*{.54cm}}
45: \newcommand{\hbn}{\hspace*{.59cm}}
46: \newcommand{\hbd}{\hspace*{.64cm}}
47: \newcommand{\hcn}{\hspace*{.71cm}}
48: \newcommand{\hcd}{\hspace*{.65cm}}
49:
50: \newcommand{\lt}{\!<\!}
51: \newcommand{\gt}{\!>\!}
52: \newcommand{\llt}{\!\!<\!\!}
53: \newcommand{\ggt}{\!\!>\!\!}
54:
55: % R O T A T I O N
56: \newcommand{\IR}[1]{\rotatebox{90}{\ #1}}
57: % C O L O R S
58: \newcommand{\Blu}[1]{\color{black}{\ #1}}
59: \newcommand{\Gre}[1]{\color{black}{\ #1}}
60: \newcommand{\Red}[1]{\color{black}{\ #1}}
61: \newcommand{\Yel}[1]{\color{black}{\ #1}}
62: \newcommand{\Mag}[1]{\color{black}{\ #1}}
63: \newcommand{\Cya}[1]{\color{black}{\ #1}}
64: \newcommand{\coltab}{0.96}
65:
66: \suppressfloats[!]
67:
68: \begin{document}
69:
70:
71: \begin{center}
72: {\bfseries \large On the application of ``$Z^0+jet$'' events for determining the gluon distribution
73: in a proton at the LHC.}
74:
75: \vskip 5mm
76:
77: D.V.~Bandurin$^1$, ~~N.B.~Skachkov$^2$
78:
79: \vskip 5mm
80:
81: {\small
82: {\it ~Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia}\\
83: %$\dag$
84: {\it
85: E-mail: (1) dmv@cv.jinr.ru, (2) skachkov@cv.jinr.ru
86: }}
87: \end{center}
88:
89: \vskip 5mm
90: \begin{center}
91: \begin{minipage}{150mm}
92: \centerline{\bf Abstract}
93: \noindent
94: It is shown that the samples of \zpj events, collected at the LHC with the integrated luminosity
95: $L_{int}=20~fb^{-1}$,
96: may have enough statistics for determining the gluon distribution inside a proton in the region
97: of $2\cdot 10^{-4}\leq x \leq 1.0$ at $Q^2$ values in the interval of
98: $0.9\cdot10^3\leq Q^2\leq 4\cdot 10^4 ~(GeV/c)^2$. A possibility of the background events
99: suppression by use of the \zpj events selection criteria is also demonstrated.
100: %
101: %Monte Carlo events produced by the PYTHIA 5.7 generator are used here.
102: \\
103: {\bf Key-words:}
104: proton, gluon distribution function, $Z^0$-boson
105: \end{minipage}
106: \end{center}
107:
108:
109: \thispagestyle{empty}
110:
111: \vskip 9mm
112:
113: \setcounter{page}{1}
114: %------------------------
115: % |
116: \section{Introduction.} %|
117: % |
118: %------------------------
119:
120: Many important predictions for the production processes of new particles %(Higgs, SUSY)
121: at the LHC require a good knowledge of the gluon distribution function in a proton $f^p_g(x,Q^2)$.
122: Thus, determining the proton gluon density
123: directly in the LHC experiments, especially in the region of small $x$ and high $Q^2$,
124: would be very useful.
125:
126: One of promising channels that can be used for measuring $f^p_g(x,Q^2)$ is
127: the direct photon production process in association with one jet
128: %\\[-8pt]
129: %\begin{equation}
130: $pp\rightarrow \gamma^{dir}\, +\, 1\,jet\, + \,X$.
131: %\label{eq:g-dir}
132: %\end{equation}
133: %defined at the leading order by two QCD subprocesses
134: %$qg\to q+\gamma$ and $q\bar{q}\to g+\gamma$.
135: It was studied in detail in \cite{BKS_GLU,BALD00,GLU_BKGD}
136: %
137: \footnote{see also \cite{MD1}}. % and for experimental results see \cite{ISR,UA2_g,CDF2}).
138: %
139:
140: Here for the same aim %to estimate a possibility of extraction of information on the gluon density in a proton
141: we consider the \zpj production process (see also \cite{MD1,Wom}), %(\ref{eq:zpj})
142: analogous to the \gpj process above: \\[-12pt]
143: \begin{equation}
144: pp\rightarrow Z^0\, +\, 1\,jet\, + \,X.
145: \label{eq:zpj}
146: \end{equation}
147: %with the subsequent $Z^0$ decay via leptonic ($\mu^+\mu^-,e^+e^-$) channels.
148: The process (\ref{eq:zpj}) is caused at the parton level by two subprocesses:
149: Compton-like scattering\\[-7mm]
150: \begin{eqnarray}
151: \hspace*{6.34cm} qg\to q+Z^0 \hspace*{70mm} (2a)
152: \nonumber
153: \end{eqnarray}
154: \vspace{-3mm}
155: and the annihilation process\\[-5mm]
156: \begin{eqnarray}
157: \hspace*{6.32cm} q\overline{q}\to g+Z^0. \hspace*{70mm} (2b)
158: \nonumber
159: \end{eqnarray}
160: Here we suppose that $Z^0$ boson decays in the following via leptonic channels $Z^0\to \mu^+\mu^-,e^+e^-$,
161: the signals from which can be well reconstructed by using electromagnetic calorimeter, tracker and muon system
162: \cite{TP,TR,MS,CMS_zpj}
163: %
164: \footnote{The estimations done here are based on the geometry of the CMS detector \cite{TP}.}.
165: %
166:
167: \setcounter{equation}{2}
168:
169: In the case of $pp\to Z^0/\gamma^{dir}+1~ jet+X$ in the region of $\Pt^{Z/\gamma}\geq 30~GeV/c$
170: (where $k_T$ smearing
171: effects are not important \cite{Hu2}) the cross section of \zpj production is
172: expressed {\it directly}
173: %
174: \footnote{In contrast to, for instance, the cross section of the inclusive photon production
175: process, also used for the extraction of data on $f^p_g(x,Q^2)$, that is expressed as integral
176: over the proton momentum fractions $x_a$ multiplied by $f^p_a(x,Q^2)$.}
177: %
178: in terms of parton distribution functions $f_a^p(x_a,Q^2)$ and
179: the cross sections of the elementary scattering subprocesses (e.g. see \cite{Owe}): \\[-15pt]
180: \begin{eqnarray}
181: \frac{d\sigma}{d\eta_1d\eta_2d\Pt^2} = \sum\limits_{a,b}\,x_a\,f_a^p(x_a,Q^2)\,
182: x_b\,f_b^p(x_b,Q^2)\frac{d\sigma}{d\hat{t}}(a\,b\rightarrow 1\,2)
183: \label{eq:cross_gl}
184: \end{eqnarray}
185: \noindent
186: where the incident parton momentum fractions $x_{a,b}$ can be found from the $Z^0$ and jet
187: parameters via \\[-22pt]
188: \begin{eqnarray}
189: x_{a,b} \,=\,\Pt/\sqrt{s}\cdot \,(exp(\pm \eta_{1})\,+\,exp(\pm \eta_{2})).
190: \label{eq:x_gl}
191: \end{eqnarray}
192: We also used the following designations above:
193: $\eta_1=\eta^Z$, $\eta_2=\eta^{jet}$; ~$\Pt=\Ptz$;~ $a,b = q, \bar{q},g$;
194: $1,2 = q,\bar{q},g,Z^0$.
195: Formula (\ref{eq:cross_gl}) and the knowledge of the results of independent measurements of
196: $q, \,\bar{q}$ distributions \cite{MD1} allow the gluon distribution $f^p_g(x,Q^2)$
197: to be determined in different $x$ and $Q^2$ intervals after a suppression of the background events contribution.
198: %with an account of the selection efficiencies of \zpj events.
199: %and the contribution of background, left after the used selection cuts (3)--(10)
200: %(see Section 2.2).
201:
202: %----------------------------------------------------------------
203: % |
204: \section{Definition of selection rules.}
205: %|
206: % |
207: %----------------------------------------------------------------
208:
209: \noindent
210: 1. We shall select the events with $Z^0$ boson
211: %
212: \footnote{Here and below in the paper speaking about $Z^0$ boson we imply a signal
213: reconstructed from the lepton pair with leptons selected by the criteria $2-4$ of this section.}
214: %
215: and one jet with\\[-5pt]
216: \begin{equation}
217: \Pt^{Z} \geq 30~ GeV/c~ \quad {\rm and} \quad \Pt^{jet}\geq 25 \;GeV/c.
218: \label{eq:sc1}
219: \end{equation}
220:
221: The jet is defined according to the PYTHIA \cite{PYT}
222: jetfinding algorithm LUCELL having
223: the cone radius counted from the jet initiator cell ($ic$) %in the $\eta-\phi$ space
224: $R_{ic}=((\Delta\eta)^2 + (\Delta\phi)^2)^{1/2}=0.7$.
225: A jet pseudorapidity $|\eta^{jet}|$ is limited by $5.0$ according to the CMS detector geometry. % \cite{HC}
226: %Comparison with the UA1 and UA2 jetfinding algorithms
227: %is presented in Sections 5 and 6.
228:
229: \noindent
230: 2. To guarantee a clear track identification of a lepton from the decays of $Z^0\to \mu^+\mu^-,e^+e^-$
231: in the tracker and muon systems and most precise
232: determination of its parameters we put the following restrictions on leptons
233: %
234: \footnote{Most of the $e,\mu$ selection cuts are taken from \cite{TR,MS,CMJ}.}:
235: %
236: ~\\[-5mm]
237:
238: (a) on the transverse momentum value $\Pt^l$ of any considered lepton:\\[-7pt]
239: \begin{equation}
240: \Pt^l \geq 10 ~GeV/c;
241: \label{eq:sc2a}
242: \end{equation}
243:
244: \vskip-2.0mm
245: (b) on the $\Pt$ value of the most energetic lepton in a pair:\\[-5pt]
246: \begin{equation}
247: \Pt^l_{max} \geq \Pt^l_{CUT}
248: \label{eq:sc3b}
249: \end{equation}
250: This cut depends on the energy scale \cite{CMS_zpj}.
251: So, we have taken $\Pt^l_{CUT}= 20~GeV/c$ for events with $\Ptz\geq 40~GeV/c$ and
252: $\Pt^l_{CUT}= 50~GeV/c$ for events with $\Ptz\geq 100~GeV/c$.\\[-5mm]
253:
254: (c) on the value of the ratio of $\Pt^{isol}$, i.e.
255: the scalar sum of $\Pt$ of all particles surrounding a lepton, to $\Pt^l$ ($\Pt^{isol}/\Pt^l$)
256: in the cone of radius $R=0.3$ and
257: on the value of maximal $\Pt$ of a charged particle surrounding a lepton in this cone:\\[-10pt]
258: \begin{equation}
259: \Pt^{isol}/\Pt^l \leq 0.10, \quad \Pt^{ch} \leq 2 ~GeV/c.
260: \label{eq:sc3c}
261: \end{equation}
262: The isolated high-$\Pt$ tracks (what takes place in case of the leptonic $Z^0$ decays)
263: should be reconstructed with a higher efficiency
264: %(at least $98\%$ over all pseudorapidity region $|\eta|\lt2.4$ \cite{MS})
265: and with generation of a lower number of fake and ghost tracks \cite{TR,MS}.
266:
267: \noindent
268: 3. A lepton is selected in the acceptance region \cite{TR,MS} :\\[-10pt]
269: \begin{equation}
270: |\eta^l|<2.4.
271: \end{equation}
272: \noindent
273: 4. To select lepton pairs only from $Z^0$ decay we limit the value of the lepton pair invariant mass
274: $M_{inv}^{ll}$ by
275: %
276: \footnote{A narrower mass window can be used with the statistics growth.}:
277: %
278: \begin{equation}
279: |M^Z - M_{inv}^{ll}| \leq 5 ~GeV/c^2.
280: \label{eq:sc3}
281: \end{equation}
282: with $M^Z$ taken to be $91.2~GeV/c^2$.
283:
284: \noindent
285: 5. We select the events with the vector $\vec{\Pt}^{jet}$ being ``back-to-back" to
286: the vector $\vec{\Pt}^{Z}$ (in the plane transverse to the beam line)
287: within the azimuthal angle interval $\dphi$ defined by the equation:\\[-5pt]
288: \begin{equation}
289: \phizj=180^\circ \pm \Delta\phi
290: \label{eq:sc4}
291: \end{equation}
292: where $\phizj$ is the angle between the $\vec{\Pt}^Z$ and $\vec{\Pt}^{jet}$ vectors:
293: $\vec{\Pt}^{Z}\vec{\Pt}^{jet}=\Pt^{Z}\Pt^{jet} cos(\phizj)$, ~~~
294: with ~$\Pt^{Z}=|\vec{\Pt}^{Z}|,~~\Pt^{jet}=|\vec{\Pt}^{jet}|$.
295: Here we limit $\Delta\phi$ values by $15^\circ$.
296:
297: \noindent
298: 6. The initial and final state radiations manifest themselves most clearly
299: as some final state mini-jets or clusters activity \cite{CMS_zpj,BKS,GPJ_D0}.
300: To suppress it, we impose a new cut condition that
301: was not formulated in an evident form in previous experiments: we select the \zpj events
302: that do not have any other jet-like or cluster high $\Pt$ activity by taking values of
303: $\Pt^{clust}$ (with the cluster cone of $R_{clust}=0.7$), being smaller than some threshold
304: $\Pt^{clust}_{CUT}$ value, i.e. we select the events with\\[-7pt]
305: \begin{equation}
306: \Pt^{clust} \leq \Pt^{clust}_{CUT}.
307: \label{eq:sc5}
308: \end{equation}
309: %($\Pt^{clust}_{CUT}=15, 10, 5 ~GeV/c$ are most effective as will be shown in Section 7).
310: %Here, in contrast to \cite{BKS_P1}--\cite{BKS_P5}, the clusters are found
311: %by one and the same jetfinder LUCELL while three different jetfinders UA1, UA2 and LUCELL
312: %are used to find the jet (with $\Pt^{jet}\geq 30~ GeV/c$) in the event.
313:
314: \noindent
315: 7. We limit the value of the modulus of the vector sum of $\vec{\Pt}$ of all
316: particles that do not belong to the \zpj system but
317: %except those of the \gpj system, that
318: fit into the region $|\eta|\lt5$ covered by
319: the calorimeter system, i.e., we limit the signal in the cells ``beyond the jet and $Z^0$'' regions
320: by the following cut:\\[-7pt]
321: \begin{equation}
322: \left|\sum_{i\not\in jet,Z^0}\vec{\Pt}^i\right| \equiv \Pt^{out} \leq \Pt^{out}_{CUT},
323: ~~|\eta^i|\lt5.
324: \label{eq:sc6}
325: \end{equation}
326: %\stackrel{def}{=}
327:
328: \noindent
329: The importance of $\Pt^{out}_{CUT}$ and $\Pt^{clust}_{CUT}$
330: for selection of events with a good balance of \ptzj was already shown in
331: \cite{CMS_zpj,BKS,GPJ_D0}. In this paper they are fixed as $\Pt^{out}_{CUT}=10~GeV/c$
332: and $\Pt^{out}_{CUT}=10~GeV/c$.
333:
334: %In Sections 5 and 6 it
335: %will be demonstrated once again for the case of \zpj events.
336: %The set of selection cuts 1 -- 7 we call as ``Selection 1''.
337:
338: %As in \cite{gpj} we use here, introduced for the first time in \cite{BKS_P1},
339:
340:
341: As we show below the presented selection criteria
342: guarantee practically a complete suppression of the background events.
343:
344: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
345: % |
346: \section{The study of background suppression.} %|
347: % |
348: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
349:
350:
351: In principle, there is a probability, that some combination of $\mu^+\mu^-$ or $e^+e^-$ pairs in
352: the events, based on the QCD subprocesses with much larger cross sections
353: (by about 5 orders of magnitude) than ones of
354: the signal subprocesses (2a) and (2b),
355: can be registered as the $Z^0$ signal. %This type of background we call as ``combinatorial background''.
356:
357: Firstly, to study a rejection possibility of such type of events by about 40 million events
358: with a mixture of all QCD and SM subprocesses with large
359: cross sections existing in PYTHIA
360: %
361: \footnote{Namely, having ISUB=11--20, 28--31, 53, 68 in PYTHIA \cite{PYT}.}
362: %
363: including also the signal subprocesses
364: %
365: \footnote{ISUB=15 and 30 in PYTHIA \cite{PYT}.}
366: %
367: were generated with the only $Z^0$ decay mode allowed: $Z^0\to \mu^+\mu^-$.
368: Three generations were performed with different minimal $\Pt$ of the hard $2\to 2$ subprocess
369: %
370: \footnote{i.e. CKIN(3) parameter in PYTHIA \cite{PYT}.}
371: %
372: $\pth$ values: $\pth$= 40, 70 and 100 $GeV/c$.
373: The cross sections of different subprocesses
374: serve in simulation as weight factors and, thus, determine
375: the final statistics of the corresponding physical events.
376: The generated events were analyzed by use of the cuts given in Table \ref{tab:sb_mc0}
377: (see also Section 2)
378: %
379: \footnote{Notice, that the cuts used in Table \ref{tab:sb_mc0} are weak enough.
380: For instance, they do not limit (directly) $\Ptz$, $\Pt$ of the most energetic lepton in the pair
381: (as well as they do not include $\Pt^{clust}_{CUT}$ and $\Pt^{out}_{CUT}$).}.
382: %
383: \\[-5mm]
384: \begin{table}[h]
385: \small
386: %\nonumber
387: \caption{List of the applied cuts used in Tables \ref{tab:sb_mc1}, \ref{tab:sb_mc2}.}
388: \begin{tabular}{lc} \hline
389: \label{tab:sb_mc0}
390: ~~ \hspace*{148mm} ~~\\[-3mm]
391: \hspace*{14mm} {\bf 0}. Total number of $l^+ l^-$-- pairs (No selection); ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\\[1pt]
392: \hspace*{15mm}{\bf 1}. $\Pt^{l}>10~~GeV/c$, $|\eta^{l}|<2.4$; \\[1pt]
393: \hspace*{15mm}{\bf 2}. $|M_{\bf Z}-M_{inv}^{ll}|<20~~GeV/c^2$; \\[1pt]
394: \hspace*{15mm}{\bf 3}. 1 jet events selected; \\[1pt]
395: \hspace*{15mm}{\bf 4}. $\Pt^{isol}/\Pt^l \leq 0.10,~\Pt^{ch}<2 ~~GeV/c $;\\[1pt]
396: \hspace*{15mm}{\bf 5}. $|M_{\bf Z}-M_{inv}^{ll}|<5~~GeV/c^2$; \\[1pt]
397: \hspace*{15mm}{\bf 6}. $\dphi<15^\circ$. \\\hline
398: \end{tabular}
399: %\vskip-2mm
400: \end{table}
401:
402: To trace the effect of their application let us consider first the case of one
403: (intermediate) energy, i.e. the generation with $\pth$=70 $GeV/c$.
404: Each line of Table \ref{tab:sb_mc1} corresponds to the respective cut of Table \ref{tab:sb_mc0}.
405: The numbers in columns ``Signal'' and ``Bkgd'' show the number of muon pairs in the signal and (combinatorial)
406: background events remained after a cut. Column ``$Eff_{S(B)}$'' demonstrates the efficiency
407: of a cut.
408: %%
409: %\footnote{
410: The efficiencies $Eff_{S(B)}$ (with their errors) are defined as a ratio
411: of the number of signal (background) events that passed under a cut
412: (1--6) to the number of the preselected events after the first cut of Table \ref{tab:sb_mc0}
413: %
414: \footnote{The number of events after the first cuts is taken as $100\%$.}.
415: %%
416: \begin{table}[h]
417: \small
418: \begin{center}
419: \vskip-1mm
420: \caption{A demonstration of cut-by-cut efficiencies and $S/B$ ratios for generation with
421: $\pth$=70 $GeV/c$}
422: \hspace*{0mm} \footnotesize{($Z^0\to \mu^+\mu^-$).}
423: %\hspace*{5mm} \normalsize{(combinatorial background).}
424: \small
425: \vskip0.1cm
426: \label{tab:sb_mc1}
427: %\begin{table}[h]
428: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|} \hline %\hline
429: Selection & Signal & Bkgd & $Eff_S(\%)$ &$Eff_B(\%)$ & $S/B$ \\\hline
430: %\rowcolor[gray]{\coltab}%
431: 0 & 401 & 850821 & & & $5\cdot10^{-4}$ \\\hline \hline
432: 1 & 245 & 15842 &100.00$\pm$0.00 &100.00$\pm$0.000 & 0.02 \\\hline %\hline
433: 2 & 226 & 467 & 92.24$\pm$8.51 & 2.948$\pm$0.138 & 0.5 \\\hline
434: 3 & 99 & 12 & 40.41$\pm$4.81 & 0.076$\pm$0.022 & 8.3 \\\hline
435: 4 & 81 & 10 & 33.00$\pm$4.24 & 0.063$\pm$0.020 & 8.1 \\\hline
436: %\rowcolor[gray]{\coltab}%
437: 5 & 72 & 4 & 29.39$\pm$3.94 & 0.025$\pm$0.013 &18.0 \\\hline
438: %\rowcolor[gray]{\coltab}%
439: 6 & 62 & 0 & 25.31$\pm$3.60 & 0.000$\pm$0.000 & -- \\\hline
440: \end{tabular}
441: \end{center}
442: \end{table}
443:
444:
445: We see from Table \ref{tab:sb_mc1} that initial ratio of $\mu^+\mu^-$ pairs in
446: signal and background events is very small ($5\cdot10^{-4}$)
447: %
448: \footnote{That is mainly due to the huge difference in the cross sections of \zpj events (from subprocesses
449: (2a), (2b)) and the QCD events.}.
450: %
451: %The total number of $\mu^+\mu^-$ pairs corresponds to the $0th$ selection in Table \ref{tab:sb_mc1}.
452: A weak restriction of the muon transverse momentum and pseudorapidity
453: in the first selection increase $S/B$ by about 2 order
454: (as $5\cdot10^{-4}\to2\cdot10^{-2}$).
455: The invariant mass criterion and one-jet events selection make $S/B=18.0$ and
456: the last criterion on the azimuthal angle between $Z^0$ and jet
457: ($\dphi<15^\circ$) suppresses the background events completely.
458:
459: The information on other intervals (i.e. on the event generations with $\pth=40$ and $\pth=100~GeV/c$)
460: is presented in Table \ref{tab:sb_mc2}.
461: Line ``Preselection (1)'' corresponds to the first cuts in Table \ref{tab:sb_mc0}
462: ($\Pt^{\mu}>10~~GeV/c$, $|\eta^{\mu}|<2.4$) while line ``Main ($1-5$)'' corresponds to the result of
463: application of criteria from 1 to 5 of Table \ref{tab:sb_mc0}.
464: {\it After application of all six criteria of Table \ref{tab:sb_mc0} %the last criterion ($\dphi<15^\circ$)
465: we have observed no background events in all of the $\Ptz$ intervals}
466: with the signal events selection efficiency of $25-33\%$.
467:
468: Analogous simulations in PYTHIA were done to estimate a background
469: to the \zpj events with the subsequent $Z^0$ decay via $e^+e^-$ channel. By about 20 million events
470: were generated at $\pth$= 40, 70 and 100 $GeV/c$
471: %To study a rejection possibility of such type of events by about 40 million events
472: with a mixture of all QCD and SM subprocesses. The results are given in Table \ref{tab:sb_ec2}.
473: As in the case of $Z^0\to \mu^+\mu^-$,
474: no background events were found after application of all criteria of Table \ref{tab:sb_mc0}.
475: \begin{table}[h]
476: \small
477: \begin{center}
478: \vskip-1mm
479: \caption{Values of efficiencies and $S/B$ ratios for generations with
480: $\pth$=40, 70 and 100 $GeV/c$}
481: \hspace*{5mm} \footnotesize{($Z^0\to \mu^+\mu^-$).}
482: \small
483: %\hspace*{5mm} \normalsize{(combinatorial background).}
484: \vskip0.1cm
485: \label{tab:sb_mc2}
486: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline %\hline
487: $\pth$& Cuts& Signal& Bkgd &$Eff_S(\%)$&$Eff_B(\%)$&$S/B$\\\hline \hline
488: 40 &Preselection (1) & 89& 1090&100.00$\pm$0.00 &100.00$\pm$0.00 &0.08\\\cline{2-7}
489: $(GeV/c)$ & Main ($1-5$) & 30& 0& 33.71$\pm$7.12 & 0.000$\pm$0.000 & -- \\\hline \hline
490: 70 &Preselection (1) &245& 15842&100.00$\pm$0.00 &100.00$\pm$0.00 &0.02\\\cline{2-7}
491: $(GeV/c)$ & Main ($1-5$) & 72& 4& 29.39$\pm$3.94 & 0.025$\pm$0.013 &18.0\\\hline \hline
492: 100 &Preselection (1) &497& 37118&100.00$\pm$0.00 &100.00$\pm$0.00 &0.01\\\cline{2-7}
493: $(GeV/c)$ & Main ($1-5$) &127& 4& 25.55$\pm$2.54 & 0.011$\pm$0.005 &31.8\\\hline %\hline
494: \end{tabular}
495: \end{center}
496: \vskip-9mm
497: \end{table}
498:
499: \begin{table}[h]
500: \small
501: \begin{center}
502: \caption{Values of efficiencies and $S/B$ ratios for generations with
503: $\pth$=40, 70 and 100 $GeV/c$}
504: \hspace*{5mm} \footnotesize{($Z^0\to e^+e^-$).}
505: \small
506: \vskip0.2cm
507: \label{tab:sb_ec2}
508: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline %\hline
509: $\pth$& Selections& Signal& Bkgd &$Eff_S(\%)$&$Eff_B(\%)$&$S/B$\\\hline \hline
510: 40 &Preselected (1) & 48& 1404&100.00$\pm$0.00 &100.00$\pm$0.00 &0.03\\\cline{2-7}
511: $(GeV/c)$ & Main ($1-5$) & 20& 3& 41.67$\pm$11.09 & 0.214$\pm$0.123 & 6.7 \\\hline \hline
512: % & $1-6$ & 17& 0& 34.38$\pm$9.81 & 0.00$\pm$0.00 & --- \\\hline \hline
513: 70 &Preselected (1) &95& 5396&100.00$\pm$0.00 &100.00$\pm$0.00 &0.02\\\cline{2-7}
514: $(GeV/c)$ & Main ($1-5$) & 35& 2& 36.32$\pm$7.32 & 0.037$\pm$0.026 &17.5\\\hline \hline
515: % & $1-6$ & 29& 1& 30.52$\pm$6.48 & 0.010$\pm$0.013 &29.0\\\hline \hline
516: 100 &Preselected (1) &191& 18158&100.00$\pm$0.00 &100.00$\pm$0.00 &0.01\\\cline{2-7}
517: $(GeV/c)$ & Main ($1-5$) &61& 2& 31.68$\pm$4.67 & 0.008$\pm$0.007 &30.5 \\\hline %\hline
518: % & $1-6$ &59& 0& 31.94$\pm$5.66 & 0.000$\pm$0.000 &---\\\hline \hline
519: \end{tabular}
520: \end{center}
521: \end{table}
522:
523:
524: The practical absence of a background to the \zpj events allow
525: to use them for an extraction of the gluon distribution in a proton $f^p_g(x,Q^2)$.%\\[5mm]
526:
527: %===============================================================================================
528: %
529: \section{Estimation of rates for gluon distribution determination.}% at the LHC using \zpj events.}
530: %
531: %===============================================================================================
532:
533:
534: In Table~\ref{tab:B30} we present the distribution of the number of the events,
535: based on the subprocesses $qg\to Z^0+q$ and $q\bar{q}\to g+Z^0$
536: (with the decays $Z^0\to\mu^+\mu^-, e^+e^-$), at integrated luminosity $L_{int}=20 ~fb^{-1}$
537: in different $x$ (defined by (\ref{eq:x_gl})) and $Q^2 (\equiv(\Ptz)^2)$ intervals.
538: These events satisfy the cuts (5)--(13) of Section 2. We see that
539: at $L_{int}=20 ~fb^{-1}$ one can collect about half a million of
540: \zpj events in the interval of $30\leq\Ptz \leq 200 ~GeV/c$.
541: \begin{table}[htbp]
542: \small
543: \begin{center}
544: \caption{Numbers of \zpj events (with $Z^0\to\mu^+\mu^-, e^+e^-)$ in
545: $Q^2$ and $x$ intervals for $L_{int}=20 ~fb^{-1}$.}
546: \label{tab:B30}
547: \vskip0.1cm
548: \begin{tabular}{|lc|r|r|r|r|r|c|} \hline
549: & $Q^2$ &\multicolumn{4}{c|}{ \hspace{-0.9cm} $x$ values of a parton} &All $x$
550: &$\Pt^{Z}$ \\\cline{3-7}
551: & $(GeV/c)^2$ & $10^{-4}$--$10^{-3}$ & $10^{-3}$--$10^{-2}$ &$10^{-2}$--
552: $10^{-1}$ & $10^{-1}$--$10^{0}$ & $10^{-4}$--$10^{0}$&$(GeV/c)$ \\\hline
553: %\begin{tabular}{|lc|r|r|r|r|>{\columncolor[gray]{\coltab}}r|} \hline
554: % & $Q^2$ &\multicolumn{4}{c|}{ \hspace{-0.9cm} $x$ values of a parton} &All $x$
555: % \\\cline{3-7}
556: % & $(GeV/c)^2$ & $10^{-4}$--$10^{-3}$ & $10^{-3}$--$10^{-2}$ &$10^{-2}$--
557: %$10^{-1}$ & $10^{-1}$--$10^{0}$ & $10^{-4}$--$10^{0}$ \\\hline
558: %&\hmm\hmm 1600-2500\hmm & 3996 & 18820 & 20363 & 1268 & 44447\\\hline
559: %&\hmm\hmm 2500-3600\hmm & 1626 & 12896 & 13750 & 1323 & 29595\\\hline
560: %&\hmm\hmm 3600-5000\hmm & 937 & 8652 & 10692 & 689 & 20970\\\hline
561: %&\hmm\hmm 5000-6400\hmm & 248 & 5236 & 6724 & 579 & 12786\\\hline
562: %&\hmm\hmm 6400-8100\hmm & 83 & 3968 & 5952 & 386 & 10388\\\hline
563: %&\hmm\hmm 8100-10000\hmm & 28 & 2921 & 4519 & 303 & 7771\\\hline
564: %&\hmm\hmm 10000-14400\hmm& 0 & 2811 & 3940 & 689 & 7440\\\hline
565: %&\hmm\hmm 14400-20000\hmm& 0 & 1157 & 2287 & 331 & 3775\\\hline
566: %&\hmm\hmm 20000-40000\hmm& 0 & 827 & 1984 & 661 & 3472\\\hline
567: %\multicolumn{6}{c|}{}&{\bf 140 644}\\\cline{7-7}
568: &\hmm\hmm 900-1600\hmm & 36818 & 91689 & 94905 & 4957 &228369 & 30--40\\\hline
569: &\hmm\hmm 1600-2500\hmm & 14833 & 56722 & 57403 & 3708 &132667 & 40--50\\\hline
570: &\hmm\hmm 2500-3600\hmm & 4957 & 33148 & 38029 & 3065 & 79199 & 50--60\\\hline
571: &\hmm\hmm 3600-5000\hmm & 2195 & 20812 & 25882 & 3065 & 51954 & 60--71 \\\hline
572: &\hmm\hmm 5000-6400\hmm & 454 & 11693 & 13887 & 2043 & 28077& 71--80\\\hline
573: &\hmm\hmm 6400-8100\hmm & 341 & 8476 & 10860 & 1249 & 20925& 80--90\\\hline
574: &\hmm\hmm 8100-10000\hmm & 38 & 5979 & 8098 & 1438 & 15552& 90--100\\\hline
575: &\hmm\hmm 10000-14400\hmm& 38 & 5638 & 9157 & 1816 & 16650& 100--120\\\hline
576: &\hmm\hmm 14400-20000\hmm& 0 & 2800 & 5562 & 908 & 9271& 120--141\\\hline
577: &\hmm\hmm 20000-40000\hmm& 0 & 1816 & 4389 & 1438 & 7644& 141--200 \\\hline
578: \multicolumn{6}{c|}{}&{\bf 590~308}\\\cline{7-7}
579: \end{tabular}
580: \end{center}
581: \end{table}
582:
583: The contributions (in $\%$) of the events originated from the subprocesses (2a) and (2b)
584: %
585: \footnote{and passed selection cuts (5)--(13)}
586: %
587: as functions of $\Ptz$ are presented in Fig.~\ref{fig:procs}.
588: From this figure one can see that the fraction of the ``gluonic'' events originated from the Compton
589: scattering (2a) noticeably dominates over all considered $\Ptz$ interval and
590: varies from about $60\%$ at $\Ptz\approx 30~GeV/c$ to about $85\%$ at $\Ptz\geq 100~GeV/c$.
591:
592: The $x-Q^2$ kinematic area in which one can study the gluon distribution $f^p_g(x,Q^2)$
593: by selecting \zpj events (with the leptonic decay modes of $Z^0$)
594: %$Z^0\to\mu^+\mu^-, e^+e^-$
595: is also shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:zpj_xQ2}.
596: %The number of events in different $x$ and $Q^2$ intervals of
597: %this area is given in Table \ref{tab:B30}.
598: From this figure (and Tables~\ref{tab:B30})
599: it is seen that during first two years of LHC running
600: at low luminosity ($L=10^{33}\,cm^{-2} s^{-1}$) it would be possible to extract an information
601: for determination of $f^p_g(x,Q^2)$ in the region of
602: $0.9\cdot10^3\leq Q^2\leq 4\cdot 10^4 ~(GeV/c)^2$ with as small $x$ values as accessible at HERA
603: but at higher $Q^2$ values (by 1--2 orders of magnitude).
604: It is also worth emphasizing that the sample of the \zpj events selected for this aim can be used
605: to perform a cross-check of $f^p_g(x,Q^2)$ determination by using \gpj events
606: %to which were devoted two last our works
607: \cite{BKS_GLU,BALD00,GLU_BKGD}.
608: It is especially important in the region of lower $Q^2$ where
609: we have quite a sufficient statistics of \zpj events, on the one hand, and a higher
610: background contribution to the \gpj events, on the other hand.
611: The area that can be covered with \gpj events is also shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:zpj_xQ2} by dashed lines.
612:
613: \begin{figure}[htbp]
614: \vskip-7mm
615: \hspace{10mm} \includegraphics[width=.90\linewidth,height=79mm,angle=0]{all_zev.eps}
616: \vskip-9mm
617: \caption{The contributions of the events originated from the subprocesses (2a) and (2b)
618: as a function of $\Ptz$. Full line corresponds to the ``$qg\to q+Z^0$'' events,
619: dashed line -- to the ``$q\bar{q}\to g+Z^0$'' events.}
620: \label{fig:procs}
621: \end{figure}
622:
623: \begin{figure}[h]
624: \vskip-2mm
625: \hspace{37mm} \includegraphics[width=.53\linewidth,height=7.9cm,angle=0]{plotz22.eps}
626: \vspace*{-5.0mm}
627: \caption{LHC $(x,Q^2)$ kinematic region for the process
628: $pp\to Z^0 + jet+X$ ~~(with $Z^0\to \mu^+\mu^-, e^+e^-)$.}
629: \label{fig:zpj_xQ2}
630: \vskip2mm
631: \end{figure}
632:
633: ~\\[2mm]
634:
635: %==================================================================
636: \section{Summary.}
637: %==================================================================
638:
639: It is shown that the samples of \zpj events with a clean topology,
640: most suitable for the absolute jet energy scale setting %at the LHC energy
641: %
642: \footnote{As was shown in \cite{CMS_zpj}, the chosen cut conditions noticeably suppress
643: initial and final state radiations, i.e. the contributions from the events caused by next-to-leading order diagrams}
644: %
645: \cite{CMS_zpj} and with the suppressed combinatorial background contribution from the QCD events,
646: can provide an useful information
647: %event samples with large statistics
648: for the gluon density determination inside a proton.
649: The corresponding measurements can be done in a new kinematic region, not covered in any previous
650: experiments, of $2\cdot 10^{-4}\leq x \leq 1.0$ with $0.9\cdot10^3\leq Q^2\leq 4\cdot 10^4 ~(GeV/c)^2$.
651: The study of gluon distribution $f^p_g(x,Q^2)$ obtained from the analysis of \zpj events can be used
652: as the independent cross-check of the $f^p_g(x,Q^2)$ determination from the \gpj events
653: \cite{BKS_GLU,BALD00,GLU_BKGD} as well as from the analytical solutions of the DGLAP equations describing
654: the $Q^2$ evolution of parton distributions at small $x$ \cite{Kot}.
655:
656:
657: ~\\[5mm]
658:
659: \noindent
660: {\bf Acknowledgments}
661: \newline
662: We thank P.~Aurenche, D.~Denegri, M.Dittmar, M.~Fontannaz, J.Ph.~Guillet, M.L.~Mangano,
663: E.~Pilon and S.~Tapprogge for helpful discussions.
664:
665:
666: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
667: %\bibitem{Au1} %1
668: %P.~Aurenche {\it et al.}
669: %Proc. of "ECFA LHC Workshop", Aachen, Germany, 4-9 Oktob. 1990,
670: %edited by G.~Jarlskog and D.~Rein (CERN-Report No 90-10; Geneva, Switzerland
671: %1990), Vol. {\bf II}.
672: \bibitem{BKS_GLU}
673: D.V.~Bandurin, V.F.~Konoplyanikov, N.B.~Skachkov,
674: ``\gpj events rate estimation for gluon distribution determination at LHC'',
675: Part.Nucl.Lett.{\bf 103}:34-43,2000, hep-ex/0011015.
676: \bibitem{BALD00}
677: D.V.~Bandurin, V.F.~Konoplyanikov, N.B.~Skachkov,
678: ``Events rate estimation for gluon distribution determination at LHC'', hep-ex/0207028.
679: Proc. of the XV ISHEP
680: %International Baldin Seminar on High-Energy Physics
681: ``Relativistic Nuclear Physics and Quantum Chromodynamics'',
682: Dubna 2000. Eds.A.M.~Baldin, V.V.~Burov, A.I.~Malakhov. Dubna, 2001, v.I, pp.375-383.
683: \bibitem{GLU_BKGD}
684: D.V.~Bandurin, N.B.~Skachkov,
685: ``On the possibility of measuring the gluon distribution in proton with
686: ``$\gamma+jet$'' events at LHC'', hep-ex/0210004 (To appear as CMS Note).
687: \bibitem{MD1} %18
688: M.~Dittmar, F.~Pauss, D.~Zurcher, Phys.Rev. {\bf D56} (1997)7284.
689: \bibitem{Wom}
690: J.~Womersley, A talk at CMS Week meeting, Aachen, 1997.
691: \bibitem{Hu2} %11
692: J.~Huston ATLAS Note ATL-Phys-99-008, CERN,1999.
693: \bibitem{TP}
694: CMS, Technical proposal, CERN/LHCC 94-38.
695: \bibitem{TR}
696: The CMS Tracker Project, CERN/LHCC 98--6, CMS TDR 5, CERN, 1999.
697: \bibitem{MS}
698: The CMS Muon Project, CERN/LHCC 97--32, CMS TDR 3, CERN, 1997.
699: \bibitem{CMS_zpj}
700: D.V.~Bandurin, N.B.~Skachkov
701: ``On the application of \zpj events for setting the absolute jet energy scale
702: and determining the gluon distribution in a proton at the LHC'', %Dubna, 2002,
703: hep-ex/0209039.
704: \bibitem{Owe} %7
705: J.F.~Owens, Rev.Mod.Phys. {\bf 59} (1987)465.
706: \bibitem{CMJ}
707: S.~Abdullin, A.~Khanov, N.~Stepanov, CMS Note CMS TN/94--180 ``CMSJET''.
708: \bibitem{BKS} %25
709: D.V.~Bandurin, V.F.~Konoplyanikov, N.B.~Skachkov.
710: ``Jet energy scale setting with \gpj events at LHC energies.
711: JINR Preprints E2-2000-251 -- E2-2000-255, JINR, Dubna.
712: \bibitem{GPJ_D0}
713: D.V.~Bandurin, N.B.~Skachkov.
714: ``\gpj process application for setting the absolute scale of
715: jet energy and determining the gluon distribution at the Tevatron Run II.'' D0 Note 3948, 2002.
716: \bibitem{PYT}
717: T.~Sjostrand, Comp.Phys.Comm. {\bf 82} (1994)74.
718: \bibitem{Kot}
719: A.V.~Kotikov and G.~Parente,
720: Nucl.Phys.{\bf B549} (1999)242.
721:
722: \end{thebibliography}
723:
724:
725: \end{document}
726:
727: