1: % --- Search for Bs->MuMu and Bd->MuMu Decays
2: % --- in ppbar Collisions at roots=1.96 TeV
3: %
4: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
5: % Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
6: %
7: % Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
8: %
9: % See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
10: %
11: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
12: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
13: %
14: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
15: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
16: %
17: % 1) latex prl.tex
18: % 2) bibtex prl
19: % 3) latex prl.tex
20: % 4) latex prl.tex
21: %
22: %%%%\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,prl]{revtex4}
23: \documentclass[showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,preprint]{revtex4}
24: \usepackage{graphicx}
25: \usepackage{dcolumn}
26: \usepackage{bm}
27:
28: \topmargin -0.2in
29: %%%\textheight 9.75in
30:
31: \def\ra{\rightarrow}
32: \newcommand{\GeV}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{Ge\kern -0.1em V}}}
33: \newcommand{\MeV}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{Me\kern -0.1em V}}}
34: \newcommand{\cm}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{cm}}}
35: \newcommand{\um}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\mu m}}}
36: \newcommand{\pp}{\ensuremath{p\overline{p}}}
37: \newcommand{\pb}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{pb}^{-1}}}
38: \newcommand{\bs}{\ensuremath{B_s^0}}
39: \newcommand{\bd}{\ensuremath{B_d^0}}
40: \newcommand{\bsd}{\ensuremath{B_{s(d)}^0}}
41: \newcommand{\bu}{\ensuremath{B^{+}}}
42: \newcommand{\mm}{\ensuremath{\mu^{+}\mu^{-}}}
43: \newcommand{\mmss}{\ensuremath{\mu^{\pm}\mu^{\pm}}}
44: \newcommand{\hh}{\ensuremath{h^{+}h^{-}}}
45: \newcommand{\bsmm}{\ensuremath{\bs\ra\mm}}
46: \newcommand{\bdmm}{\ensuremath{\bd\ra\mm}}
47: \newcommand{\bsdmm}{\ensuremath{\bsd\ra\mm}}
48: \newcommand{\bjk}{\ensuremath{\bu\ra J/\psi K^{+}}}
49: \newcommand{\brbsmm}{\ensuremath{\mathcal{B}(\bsmm)}}
50: \newcommand{\brbdmm}{\ensuremath{\mathcal{B}(\bdmm)}}
51: \newcommand{\Mmm}{\ensuremath{M_{\mm}}}
52: \newcommand{\Lxy}{\ensuremath{\vec{L}_{T}}}
53: %%%\newcommand{\ctau}{\mbox{$c\tau\,$}}
54: \newcommand{\ctau}{\ensuremath{\lambda}}
55: \newcommand{\pting}{\ensuremath{\Delta\Phi}}
56: %%%\newcommand{\iso}{\ensuremath{\mathit{Iso}}}
57: %%%\newcommand{\iso}{\ensuremath{R_{\mathrm{Iso}}}}
58: \newcommand{\iso}{\ensuremath{\mathit{I}}}
59: \newcommand{\ptmm}{\ensuremath{\vec{p}^{\:\mm}_{T}}}
60: \newcommand{\cdf}{CDF~II}
61: \newcommand{\svx}{SVX~II}
62:
63:
64: \begin{document}
65: % ============================================================================
66: % --- TITLE PAGE
67: % ============================================================================
68:
69: %%%\begin{flushright}
70: %%%CDF/PUB/BOTTOM/6875 \\
71: %%%submitted to PRL
72: %%%\end{flushright}
73: %%%\vspace*{0.50in}
74:
75: \begin{center}
76: {\bf{ Search for \bsmm\ and \bdmm\ Decays \\
77: in $p\overline{p}$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s}=1.96$~TeV }}
78: \end{center}
79:
80: \font\eightit=cmti8
81: \def\r#1{\ignorespaces $^{#1}$}
82: \hfilneg
83: \begin{sloppypar}
84: \noindent
85: D.~Acosta,\r {15} T.~Affolder,\r 8 T.~Akimoto,\r {53}
86: M.G.~Albrow,\r {14} D.~Ambrose,\r {42} S.~Amerio,\r {41}
87: D.~Amidei,\r {32} A.~Anastassov,\r {49} K.~Anikeev,\r {30} A.~Annovi,\r {43}
88: J.~Antos,\r 1 M.~Aoki,\r {53}
89: G.~Apollinari,\r {14} T.~Arisawa,\r {55} J-F.~Arguin,\r {31} A.~Artikov,\r {12}
90: W.~Ashmanskas,\r 2 A.~Attal,\r 6 F.~Azfar,\r {40} P.~Azzi-Bacchetta,\r {41}
91: N.~Bacchetta,\r {41} H.~Bachacou,\r {27} W.~Badgett,\r {14}
92: A.~Barbaro-Galtieri,\r {27} G.J.~Barker,\r {24}
93: V.E.~Barnes,\r {45} B.A.~Barnett,\r {23} S.~Baroiant,\r 5 M.~Barone,\r {16}
94: G.~Bauer,\r {30} F.~Bedeschi,\r {43} S.~Behari,\r {23} S.~Belforte,\r {52}
95: G.~Bellettini,\r {43} J.~Bellinger,\r {57} D.~Benjamin,\r {13}
96: A.~Beretvas,\r {14} A.~Bhatti,\r {47} M.~Binkley,\r {14}
97: D.~Bisello,\r {41} M.~Bishai,\r {14} R.E.~Blair,\r 2 C.~Blocker,\r 4
98: K.~Bloom,\r {32} B.~Blumenfeld,\r {23} A.~Bocci,\r {47}
99: A.~Bodek,\r {46} G.~Bolla,\r {45} A.~Bolshov,\r {30} P.S.L.~Booth,\r {28}
100: D.~Bortoletto,\r {45} J.~Boudreau,\r {44} S.~Bourov,\r {14}
101: C.~Bromberg,\r {33} E.~Brubaker,\r {27} J.~Budagov,\r {12} H.S.~Budd,\r {46}
102: K.~Burkett,\r {14} G.~Busetto,\r {41} P.~Bussey,\r {18} K.L.~Byrum,\r 2
103: S.~Cabrera,\r {13} P.~Calafiura,\r {27} M.~Campanelli,\r {17}
104: M.~Campbell,\r {32} A.~Canepa,\r {45} M.~Casarsa,\r {52}
105: D.~Carlsmith,\r {57} S.~Carron,\r {13} R.~Carosi,\r {43}
106: A.~Castro,\r 3 P.~Catastini,\r {43} D.~Cauz,\r {52} A.~Cerri,\r {27}
107: C.~Cerri,\r {43} L.~Cerrito,\r {22} J.~Chapman,\r {32} C.~Chen,\r {42}
108: Y.C.~Chen,\r 1 M.~Chertok,\r 5 G.~Chiarelli,\r {43} G.~Chlachidze,\r {12}
109: F.~Chlebana,\r {14} I.~Cho,\r {26} K.~Cho,\r {26} D.~Chokheli,\r {12}
110: M.L.~Chu,\r 1 S.~Chuang,\r {57} J.Y.~Chung,\r {37} W-H.~Chung,\r {57}
111: Y.S.~Chung,\r {46} C.I.~Ciobanu,\r {22} M.A.~Ciocci,\r {43}
112: A.G.~Clark,\r {17} D.~Clark,\r 4 M.~Coca,\r {46} A.~Connolly,\r {27}
113: M.~Convery,\r {47} J.~Conway,\r {49} M.~Cordelli,\r {16} G.~Cortiana,\r {41}
114: J.~Cranshaw,\r {51} J.~Cuevas,\r 9
115: R.~Culbertson,\r {14} C.~Currat,\r {27} D.~Cyr,\r {57} D.~Dagenhart,\r 4
116: S.~Da~Ronco,\r {41} S.~D'Auria,\r {18} P.~de~Barbaro,\r {46} S.~De~Cecco,\r {48}
117: G.~De~Lentdecker,\r {46} S.~Dell'Agnello,\r {16} M.~Dell'Orso,\r {43}
118: S.~Demers,\r {46} L.~Demortier,\r {47} M.~Deninno,\r 3 D.~De~Pedis,\r {48}
119: P.F.~Derwent,\r {14} T.~Devlin,\r {49}
120: C.~Dionisi,\r {48} J.R.~Dittmann,\r {14} P.~Doksus,\r {22}
121: A.~Dominguez,\r {27} S.~Donati,\r {43} M.~Donega,\r {17} M.~D'Onofrio,\r {17}
122: T.~Dorigo,\r {41} V.~Drollinger,\r {35} K.~Ebina,\r {55} N.~Eddy,\r {22}
123: R.~Ely,\r {27} R.~Erbacher,\r {14} M.~Erdmann,\r {24}
124: D.~Errede,\r {22} S.~Errede,\r {22} R.~Eusebi,\r {46} H-C.~Fang,\r {27}
125: S.~Farrington,\r {28} I.~Fedorko,\r {43} R.G.~Feild,\r {58} M.~Feindt,\r {24}
126: J.P.~Fernandez,\r {45} C.~Ferretti,\r {32} R.D.~Field,\r {15}
127: I.~Fiori,\r {43} G.~Flanagan,\r {33}
128: B.~Flaugher,\r {14} L.R.~Flores-Castillo,\r {44} A.~Foland,\r {19}
129: S.~Forrester,\r 5 G.W.~Foster,\r {14} M.~Franklin,\r {19}
130: H.~Frisch,\r {11} Y.~Fujii,\r {25}
131: I.~Furic,\r {30} A.~Gajjar,\r {28} A.~Gallas,\r {36} J.~Galyardt,\r {10}
132: M.~Gallinaro,\r {47} M.~Garcia-Sciveres,\r {27}
133: A.F.~Garfinkel,\r {45} C.~Gay,\r {58} H.~Gerberich,\r {13}
134: D.W.~Gerdes,\r {32} E.~Gerchtein,\r {10} S.~Giagu,\r {48} P.~Giannetti,\r {43}
135: A.~Gibson,\r {27} K.~Gibson,\r {10} C.~Ginsburg,\r {57} K.~Giolo,\r {45}
136: M.~Giordani,\r {52}
137: G.~Giurgiu,\r {10} V.~Glagolev,\r {12} D.~Glenzinski,\r {14} M.~Gold,\r {35}
138: N.~Goldschmidt,\r {32} D.~Goldstein,\r 6 J.~Goldstein,\r {40}
139: G.~Gomez,\r 9 G.~Gomez-Ceballos,\r {30} M.~Goncharov,\r {50}
140: O.~Gonz\'{a}lez,\r {45}
141: I.~Gorelov,\r {35} A.T.~Goshaw,\r {13} Y.~Gotra,\r {44} K.~Goulianos,\r {47}
142: A.~Gresele,\r 3 C.~Grosso-Pilcher,\r {11} M.~Guenther,\r {45}
143: J.~Guimaraes da Costa,\r {19} C.~Haber,\r {27} K.~Hahn,\r {42}
144: S.R.~Hahn,\r {14} E.~Halkiadakis,\r {46}
145: R.~Handler,\r {57}
146: F.~Happacher,\r {16} K.~Hara,\r {53} M.~Hare,\r {54}
147: R.F.~Harr,\r {56}
148: R.M.~Harris,\r {14} F.~Hartmann,\r {24} K.~Hatakeyama,\r {47} J.~Hauser,\r 6
149: C.~Hays,\r {13} H.~Hayward,\r {28} E.~Heider,\r {54} B.~Heinemann,\r {28}
150: J.~Heinrich,\r {42} M.~Hennecke,\r {24}
151: M.~Herndon,\r {23} C.~Hill,\r 8 D.~Hirschbuehl,\r {24} A.~Hocker,\r {46}
152: K.D.~Hoffman,\r {11}
153: A.~Holloway,\r {19} S.~Hou,\r 1 M.A.~Houlden,\r {28} B.T.~Huffman,\r {40}
154: Y.~Huang,\r {13} R.E.~Hughes,\r {37} J.~Huston,\r {33} K.~Ikado,\r {55}
155: J.~Incandela,\r 8 G.~Introzzi,\r {43} M.~Iori,\r {48} Y.~Ishizawa,\r {53}
156: C.~Issever,\r 8
157: A.~Ivanov,\r {46} Y.~Iwata,\r {21} B.~Iyutin,\r {30}
158: E.~James,\r {14} D.~Jang,\r {49} J.~Jarrell,\r {35} D.~Jeans,\r {48}
159: H.~Jensen,\r {14} E.J.~Jeon,\r {26} M.~Jones,\r {45} K.K.~Joo,\r {26}
160: S.~Jun,\r {10} T.~Junk,\r {22} T.~Kamon,\r {50} J.~Kang,\r {32}
161: M.~Karagoz~Unel,\r {36}
162: P.E.~Karchin,\r {56} S.~Kartal,\r {14} Y.~Kato,\r {39}
163: Y.~Kemp,\r {24} R.~Kephart,\r {14} U.~Kerzel,\r {24}
164: V.~Khotilovich,\r {50}
165: B.~Kilminster,\r {37} D.H.~Kim,\r {26} H.S.~Kim,\r {22}
166: J.E.~Kim,\r {26} M.J.~Kim,\r {10} M.S.~Kim,\r {26} S.B.~Kim,\r {26}
167: S.H.~Kim,\r {53} T.H.~Kim,\r {30} Y.K.~Kim,\r {11} B.T.~King,\r {28}
168: M.~Kirby,\r {13} L.~Kirsch,\r 4 S.~Klimenko,\r {15} B.~Knuteson,\r {30}
169: B.R.~Ko,\r {13} H.~Kobayashi,\r {53} P.~Koehn,\r {37} D.J.~Kong,\r {26}
170: K.~Kondo,\r {55} J.~Konigsberg,\r {15} K.~Kordas,\r {31}
171: A.~Korn,\r {30} A.~Korytov,\r {15} K.~Kotelnikov,\r {34} A.V.~Kotwal,\r {13}
172: A.~Kovalev,\r {42} J.~Kraus,\r {22} I.~Kravchenko,\r {30} A.~Kreymer,\r {14}
173: J.~Kroll,\r {42} M.~Kruse,\r {13} V.~Krutelyov,\r {50} S.E.~Kuhlmann,\r 2
174: N.~Kuznetsova,\r {14} A.T.~Laasanen,\r {45} S.~Lai,\r {31}
175: S.~Lami,\r {47} S.~Lammel,\r {14} J.~Lancaster,\r {13}
176: M.~Lancaster,\r {29} R.~Lander,\r 5 K.~Lannon,\r {37} A.~Lath,\r {49}
177: G.~Latino,\r {35}
178: R.~Lauhakangas,\r {20} I.~Lazzizzera,\r {41} Y.~Le,\r {23} C.~Lecci,\r {24}
179: T.~LeCompte,\r 2
180: J.~Lee,\r {26} J.~Lee,\r {46} S.W.~Lee,\r {50} N.~Leonardo,\r {30} S.~Leone,\r {43}
181: J.D.~Lewis,\r {14} K.~Li,\r {58} C.~Lin,\r {58} C.S.~Lin,\r {14} M.~Lindgren,\r 6
182: T.M.~Liss,\r {22} D.O.~Litvintsev,\r {14} T.~Liu,\r {14} Y.~Liu,\r {17}
183: N.S.~Lockyer,\r {42} A.~Loginov,\r {34}
184: M.~Loreti,\r {41} P.~Loverre,\r {48} R-S.~Lu,\r 1 D.~Lucchesi,\r {41}
185: P.~Lukens,\r {14} L.~Lyons,\r {40} J.~Lys,\r {27} R.~Lysak,\r 1
186: D.~MacQueen,\r {31} R.~Madrak,\r {19} K.~Maeshima,\r {14}
187: P.~Maksimovic,\r {23} L.~Malferrari,\r 3 G.~Manca,\r {28} R.~Marginean,\r {37}
188: M.~Martin,\r {23}
189: A.~Martin,\r {58} V.~Martin,\r {36} M.~Mart\'\i nez,\r {14} T.~Maruyama,\r {11}
190: H.~Matsunaga,\r {53} M.~Mattson,\r {56} P.~Mazzanti,\r 3
191: K.S.~McFarland,\r {46} D.~McGivern,\r {29} P.M.~McIntyre,\r {50}
192: P.~McNamara,\r {49} R.~NcNulty,\r {28}
193: S.~Menzemer,\r {30} A.~Menzione,\r {43} P.~Merkel,\r {14}
194: C.~Mesropian,\r {47} A.~Messina,\r {48} T.~Miao,\r {14} N.~Miladinovic,\r 4
195: L.~Miller,\r {19} R.~Miller,\r {33} J.S.~Miller,\r {32} R.~Miquel,\r {27}
196: S.~Miscetti,\r {16} G.~Mitselmakher,\r {15} A.~Miyamoto,\r {25}
197: Y.~Miyazaki,\r {39} N.~Moggi,\r 3 B.~Mohr,\r 6
198: R.~Moore,\r {14} M.~Morello,\r {43} T.~Moulik,\r {45}
199: A.~Mukherjee,\r {14} M.~Mulhearn,\r {30} T.~Muller,\r {24} R.~Mumford,\r {23}
200: A.~Munar,\r {42} P.~Murat,\r {14}
201: J.~Nachtman,\r {14} S.~Nahn,\r {58} I.~Nakamura,\r {42}
202: I.~Nakano,\r {38}
203: A.~Napier,\r {54} R.~Napora,\r {23} D.~Naumov,\r {35} V.~Necula,\r {15}
204: F.~Niell,\r {32} J.~Nielsen,\r {27} C.~Nelson,\r {14} T.~Nelson,\r {14}
205: C.~Neu,\r {42} M.S.~Neubauer,\r 7 C.~Newman-Holmes,\r {14}
206: A-S.~Nicollerat,\r {17}
207: T.~Nigmanov,\r {43} L.~Nodulman,\r 2 K.~Oesterberg,\r {20}
208: T.~Ogawa,\r {55} S.~Oh,\r {13}
209: Y.D.~Oh,\r {26} T.~Ohsugi,\r {21}
210: T.~Okusawa,\r {39} R.~Oldeman,\r {48} R.~Orava,\r {20} W.~Orejudos,\r {27}
211: C.~Pagliarone,\r {43}
212: F.~Palmonari,\r {43} R.~Paoletti,\r {43} V.~Papadimitriou,\r {51}
213: S.~Pashapour,\r {31} J.~Patrick,\r {14}
214: G.~Pauletta,\r {52} M.~Paulini,\r {10} T.~Pauly,\r {40} C.~Paus,\r {30}
215: D.~Pellett,\r 5 A.~Penzo,\r {52} T.J.~Phillips,\r {13}
216: G.~Piacentino,\r {43}
217: J.~Piedra,\r 9 K.T.~Pitts,\r {22} C.~Plager,\r 6 A.~Pompo\v{s},\r {45}
218: L.~Pondrom,\r {57}
219: G.~Pope,\r {44} O.~Poukhov,\r {12} F.~Prakoshyn,\r {12} T.~Pratt,\r {28}
220: A.~Pronko,\r {15} J.~Proudfoot,\r 2 F.~Ptohos,\r {16} G.~Punzi,\r {43}
221: J.~Rademacker,\r {40}
222: A.~Rakitine,\r {30} S.~Rappoccio,\r {18} F.~Ratnikov,\r {49} H.~Ray,\r {32}
223: A.~Reichold,\r {40} V.~Rekovic,\r {35}
224: P.~Renton,\r {40} M.~Rescigno,\r {48}
225: F.~Rimondi,\r 3 K.~Rinnert,\r {24} L.~Ristori,\r {43}
226: W.J.~Robertson,\r {13} A.~Robson,\r {40} T.~Rodrigo,\r 9 S.~Rolli,\r {54}
227: L.~Rosenson,\r {30} R.~Roser,\r {14} R.~Rossin,\r {41} C.~Rott,\r {45}
228: J.~Russ,\r {10} A.~Ruiz,\r 9 D.~Ryan,\r {54} H.~Saarikko,\r {20}
229: A.~Safonov,\r 5 R.~St.~Denis,\r {18}
230: W.K.~Sakumoto,\r {46} G.~Salamanna,\r {48} D.~Saltzberg,\r 6 C.~Sanchez,\r {37}
231: A.~Sansoni,\r {16} L.~Santi,\r {52} S.~Sarkar,\r {48} K.~Sato,\r {53}
232: P.~Savard,\r {31} P.~Schemitz,\r {24} P.~Schlabach,\r {14}
233: E.E.~Schmidt,\r {14} M.P.~Schmidt,\r {58} M.~Schmitt,\r {36}
234: L.~Scodellaro,\r {41} I.~Sfiligoi,\r {16} T.~Shears,\r {28}
235: A.~Scribano,\r {43} F.~Scuri,\r {43}
236: A.~Sedov,\r {45} S.~Seidel,\r {35} Y.~Seiya,\r {39}
237: F.~Semeria,\r 3 L.~Sexton-Kennedy,\r {14} M.D.~Shapiro,\r {27}
238: P.F.~Shepard,\r {44} M.~Shimojima,\r {53}
239: M.~Shochet,\r {11} Y.~Shon,\r {57} I.~Shreyber,\r {34} A.~Sidoti,\r {43}
240: M.~Siket,\r 1 A.~Sill,\r {51} P.~Sinervo,\r {31}
241: A.~Sisakyan,\r {12} A.~Skiba,\r {24} A.J.~Slaughter,\r {14} K.~Sliwa,\r {54}
242: J.R.~Smith,\r 5
243: F.D.~Snider,\r {14} R.~Snihur,\r {31} S.V.~Somalwar,\r {49} J.~Spalding,\r {14}
244: M.~Spezziga,\r {51} L.~Spiegel,\r {14}
245: F.~Spinella,\r {43} M.~Spiropulu,\r 8 P.~Squillacioti,\r {43}
246: H.~Stadie,\r {24} A.~Stefanini,\r {43} B.~Stelzer,\r {31}
247: O.~Stelzer-Chilton,\r {31} J.~Strologas,\r {35} D.~Stuart,\r 8
248: A.~Sukhanov,\r {15} K.~Sumorok,\r {30} H.~Sun,\r {54} T.~Suzuki,\r {53}
249: A.~Taffard,\r {22} R.~Tafirout,\r {31}
250: S.F.~Takach,\r {56} H.~Takano,\r {53} R.~Takashima,\r {21} Y.~Takeuchi,\r {53}
251: K.~Takikawa,\r {53} M.~Tanaka,\r 2 R.~Tanaka,\r {38}
252: N.~Tanimoto,\r {38} S.~Tapprogge,\r {20}
253: M.~Tecchio,\r {32} P.K.~Teng,\r 1
254: K.~Terashi,\r {47} R.J.~Tesarek,\r {14} S.~Tether,\r {30} J.~Thom,\r {14}
255: A.S.~Thompson,\r {18}
256: E.~Thomson,\r {37} P.~Tipton,\r {46} V.~Tiwari,\r {10} S.~Tkaczyk,\r {14}
257: D.~Toback,\r {50} K.~Tollefson,\r {33} D.~Tonelli,\r {43}
258: M.~Tonnesmann,\r {33} S.~Torre,\r {43} D.~Torretta,\r {14} W.~Trischuk,\r {31}
259: J.~Tseng,\r {30} R.~Tsuchiya,\r {55} S.~Tsuno,\r {53} D.~Tsybychev,\r {15}
260: N.~Turini,\r {43} M.~Turner,\r {28}
261: F.~Ukegawa,\r {53} T.~Unverhau,\r {18} S.~Uozumi,\r {53} D.~Usynin,\r {42}
262: L.~Vacavant,\r {27}
263: A.~Vaiciulis,\r {46} A.~Varganov,\r {32}
264: E.~Vataga,\r {43}
265: S.~Vejcik~III,\r {14} G.~Velev,\r {14} G.~Veramendi,\r {22} T.~Vickey,\r {22}
266: R.~Vidal,\r {14} I.~Vila,\r 9 R.~Vilar,\r 9
267: I.~Volobouev,\r {27}
268: M.~von~der~Mey,\r 6 R.G.~Wagner,\r 2 R.L.~Wagner,\r {14}
269: W.~Wagner,\r {24} R.~Wallny,\r 6 T.~Walter,\r {24} T.~Yamashita,\r {38}
270: K.~Yamamoto,\r {39} Z.~Wan,\r {49}
271: M.J.~Wang,\r 1 S.M.~Wang,\r {15} A.~Warburton,\r {31} B.~Ward,\r {18}
272: S.~Waschke,\r {18} D.~Waters,\r {29} T.~Watts,\r {49}
273: M.~Weber,\r {27} W.C.~Wester~III,\r {14} B.~Whitehouse,\r {54}
274: A.B.~Wicklund,\r 2 E.~Wicklund,\r {14} H.H.~Williams,\r {42} P.~Wilson,\r {14}
275: B.L.~Winer,\r {37} P.~Wittich,\r {42} S.~Wolbers,\r {14} M.~Wolter,\r {54}
276: M.~Worcester,\r 6 S.~Worm,\r {49} T.~Wright,\r {32} X.~Wu,\r {17}
277: F.~W\"urthwein,\r 7
278: A.~Wyatt,\r {29} A.~Yagil,\r {14}
279: U.K.~Yang,\r {11} W.~Yao,\r {27} G.P.~Yeh,\r {14} K.~Yi,\r {23}
280: J.~Yoh,\r {14} P.~Yoon,\r {46} K.~Yorita,\r {55} T.~Yoshida,\r {39}
281: I.~Yu,\r {26} S.~Yu,\r {42} Z.~Yu,\r {56} J.C.~Yun,\r {14} L.~Zanello,\r {48}
282: A.~Zanetti,\r {52} I.~Zaw,\r {19} F.~Zetti,\r {43} J.~Zhou,\r {49}
283: A.~Zsenei,\r {17} and S.~Zucchelli,\r 3
284: \end{sloppypar}
285: \vskip .026in
286: \begin{center}
287: (CDF Collaboration)
288: \end{center}
289:
290: \vskip .026in
291: \begin{center}
292: \r 1 {\eightit Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 11529,
293: Republic of China} \\
294: \r 2 {\eightit Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439} \\
295: \r 3 {\eightit Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Bologna,
296: I-40127 Bologna, Italy} \\
297: \r 4 {\eightit Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254} \\
298: \r 5 {\eightit University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616} \\
299: \r 6 {\eightit University of California at Los Angeles, Los
300: Angeles, California 90024} \\
301: \r 7 {\eightit University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093} \\
302: \r 8 {\eightit University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California
303: 93106} \\
304: \r 9 {\eightit Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria, CSIC-University of Cantabria,
305: 39005 Santander, Spain} \\
306: \r {10} {\eightit Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213} \\
307: \r {11} {\eightit Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago,
308: Illinois 60637} \\
309: \r {12} {\eightit Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia}
310: \\
311: \r {13} {\eightit Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708} \\
312: \r {14} {\eightit Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois
313: 60510} \\
314: \r {15} {\eightit University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611} \\
315: \r {16} {\eightit Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica
316: Nucleare, I-00044 Frascati, Italy} \\
317: \r {17} {\eightit University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland} \\
318: \r {18} {\eightit Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom}\\
319: \r {19} {\eightit Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138} \\
320: \r {20} {\eightit The Helsinki Group: Helsinki Institute of Physics; and Division of
321: High Energy Physics, Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, FIN-00044, Helsinki, Finland}\\
322: \r {21} {\eightit Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 724, Japan} \\
323: \r {22} {\eightit University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801} \\
324: \r {23} {\eightit The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218} \\
325: \r {24} {\eightit Institut f\"{u}r Experimentelle Kernphysik,
326: Universit\"{a}t Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany} \\
327: \r {25} {\eightit High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba,
328: Ibaraki 305, Japan} \\
329: \r {26} {\eightit Center for High Energy Physics: Kyungpook National
330: University, Taegu 702-701; Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742; and
331: SungKyunKwan University, Suwon 440-746; Korea} \\
332: \r {27} {\eightit Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
333: Berkeley, California 94720} \\
334: \r {28} {\eightit University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom} \\
335: \r {29} {\eightit University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom} \\
336: \r {30} {\eightit Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
337: Massachusetts 02139} \\
338: \r {31} {\eightit Institute of Particle Physics, McGill University,
339: Montr\'{e}al, Canada H3A~2T8; and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
340: M5S~1A7} \\
341: \r {32} {\eightit University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109} \\
342: \r {33} {\eightit Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824} \\
343: \r {34} {\eightit Institution for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, ITEP,
344: Moscow 117259, Russia} \\
345: \r {35} {\eightit University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131} \\
346: \r {36} {\eightit Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208} \\
347: \r {37} {\eightit The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210} \\
348: \r {38} {\eightit Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan}\\
349: \r {39} {\eightit Osaka City University, Osaka 588, Japan} \\
350: \r {40} {\eightit University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom} \\
351: \r {41} {\eightit University of Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica
352: Nucleare, Sezione di Padova-Trento, I-35131 Padova, Italy} \\
353: \r {42} {\eightit University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,
354: Pennsylvania 19104} \\
355: \r {43} {\eightit Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University and Scuola
356: Normale Superiore of Pisa, I-56100 Pisa, Italy} \\
357: \r {44} {\eightit University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260} \\
358: \r {45} {\eightit Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907} \\
359: \r {46} {\eightit University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627} \\
360: \r {47} {\eightit The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021} \\
361: \r {48} {\eightit Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1,
362: University di Roma ``La Sapienza," I-00185 Roma, Italy}\\
363: \r {49} {\eightit Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855} \\
364: \r {50} {\eightit Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas 77843} \\
365: \r {51} {\eightit Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409} \\
366: \r {52} {\eightit Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, University of Trieste/\
367: Udine, Italy} \\
368: \r {53} {\eightit University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan} \\
369: \r {54} {\eightit Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155} \\
370: \r {55} {\eightit Waseda University, Tokyo 169, Japan} \\
371: \r {56} {\eightit Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201} \\
372: \r {57} {\eightit University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706} \\
373: \r {58} {\eightit Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520} \\
374: \end{center}
375:
376: %%%\author{CDF Authors}
377: %%%\affiliation{CDF Institutions}
378:
379: \begin{center}
380: (Received 19 March 2004) \\
381: (published Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf{93}}, 032001 (2004))
382: \end{center}
383:
384: \begin{abstract}
385: We report on a search for \bsmm\ and \bdmm\ decays in \pp\ collisions
386: at $\sqrt{s} = 1.96$~TeV using $171\:\pb$ of data collected by the \cdf\
387: experiment at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider. The decay rates of
388: these rare processes are sensitive to contributions from physics beyond the
389: Standard Model. One event survives all our selection requirements,
390: consistent with the background expectation. We derive
391: branching ratio limits of $\brbsmm < 5.8\times10^{-7}$ and
392: $\brbdmm < 1.5\times10^{-7}$ at $90\%$ confidence level.
393: \end{abstract}
394:
395: \pacs{14.40.Nd, 13.20.He}
396:
397: \maketitle
398:
399: % ============================================================================
400: % --- BODY OF PAPER
401: % ============================================================================
402:
403: The rare flavor-changing neutral current decay \bsmm ~\cite{qconj} is
404: one of the most sensitive probes to physics beyond the Standard
405: Model (SM)~[2-6]. The decay has not been observed and is currently limited
406: to $\brbsmm < 2.0\times 10^{-6}$ at $90\%$ confidence level
407: (CL)~\cite{bsmmruni}, while the SM prediction is
408: $(3.5\pm 0.9)\times10^{-9}$~\cite{smbr}. The limit on the related branching
409: ratio, $\brbdmm < 1.6\times 10^{-7}$~\cite{belle}, is approximately 1000
410: times larger than its SM expectation. The \brbsmm\ can be significantly
411: enhanced in various supersymmetric (SUSY) extensions of the SM. Minimal
412: supergravity models at large $\tan\beta$~[3-5] predict
413: $\brbsmm\leq\mathcal{O}(10^{-7})$ in regions of parameter space consistent
414: with the observed muon $g-2$~\cite{gminus2} and also with the observed relic
415: density of cold dark matter~\cite{wmap}. $SO(10)$ models~\cite{so10}, which
416: naturally accommodate neutrino masses, predict a branching ratio as large as
417: $10^{-6}$ in regions of parameter space consistent with these same
418: experimental constraints. $R$-parity violating SUSY models can also
419: accommodate \brbsmm\ up to $10^{-6}$~\cite{arnowitt}. Correspondingly, the
420: \brbdmm\ can be enhanced by the same models. Even modest improvements to
421: the experimental limits can significantly restrict the available parameter
422: space of these models.
423:
424: We report on a search for \bsmm\ and \bdmm\ decays using the upgraded
425: Collider Detector at Fermilab (\cdf) at the Tevatron \pp\ collider.
426: The \cdf\ detector consists of a magnetic spectrometer surrounded by
427: calorimeters and muon chambers and is described in detail in Ref.~\cite{TDR}.
428: A cylindrical drift chamber (COT) provides 96 measurement layers,
429: organized into alternating axial and $\pm2^{\circ}$ stereo
430: superlayers~\cite{COT}, and a five-layer silicon microstrip detector
431: (\svx) provides precise tracking information near the
432: beamline~\cite{SVX}. These are immersed in a $1.4$~T magnetic field and
433: measure charged particle momenta in the plane transverse to the beamline,
434: $p_{T}$. Four layers of planar drift chambers (CMU) detect muons which
435: penetrate the five absorption lengths of calorimeter steel~\cite{CMU}.
436: Another four layers of planar drift chambers (CMP) instrument $0.6$~m of steel
437: outside the magnet return yoke~\cite{CMP}. The CMU and CMP chambers
438: each provide coverage in the pseudo-rapidity range $\left|\eta\right|<0.6$,
439: where $\eta = -\ln(\tan\frac{\theta}{2})$ and $\theta$ is the angle of the
440: track with respect to the beamline.
441: %Cherenkov counters~\cite{CLC},
442: %covering the pseudo-rapidity range $3.7<\left|\eta\right|<4.7$,
443: %measure the inelastic interaction rate used to estimate the integrated
444: %luminosity, $\mathcal{L}$~\cite{LUMI}.
445: The dataset reported here corresponds to an integrated luminosity of
446: $\mathcal{L}=171\pm10\;\pb$~\cite{LUMI}.
447:
448: The data used in this analysis are selected by dimuon triggers.
449: Muons are reconstructed as track stubs in the CMU chambers. Two
450: well-separated stubs are required and each is matched to a track reconstructed
451: online using COT axial information~\cite{XFT}. The
452: matched tracks must have $p_{T}>1.5\;\GeV/c$. A complete event reconstruction
453: performed online confirms the $p_{T}$ and track-stub matching
454: requirements. If the overlapping CMP chambers contain a confirming muon
455: stub, the track is required to have $p_{T}>3\;\GeV/c$. The
456: two tracks must originate from the same vertex, be oppositely charged, and
457: have an opening angle inconsistent with a cosmic ray event. The invariant
458: mass of the muon pair must satisfy $\Mmm < 6\;\GeV/c^{2}$. Events in which
459: neither muon is reconstructed with a CMP stub must additionally satisfy
460: $p_{T}^{\mu^+}+p_{T}^{\mu^-}>5\;\GeV/c$ and $\Mmm > 2.7\;\GeV/c^{2}$.
461: This set of triggers is used for all the data included here and
462: events passing these requirements are recorded for further analysis.
463:
464: Our offline analysis begins by identifying the muon candidates and matching
465: them to the trigger tracks using COT hit information. To avoid regions of
466: rapidly changing trigger efficiency, we omit muons with $p_{T}<2\;\GeV/c$.
467: To reduce backgrounds from fake muons, stricter track-stub matching
468: requirements are made and the vector sum of the muon momenta must satisfy
469: $| \ptmm | > 6\;\GeV/c$. To ensure good vertex
470: resolution, stringent requirements are made on the number of \svx\ hits
471: associated with each track. Surviving events have the two muon tracks
472: constrained to a common 3-D vertex satisfying vertex quality
473: requirements. The two-dimensional decay length, $| \Lxy |$, is calculated
474: as the transverse distance from the beamline to the dimuon vertex and is
475: signed relative to \ptmm. For each $B$-candidate we estimate the proper decay
476: length using
477: $\ctau=c\, \Mmm | \Lxy | / | \ptmm |$. In the data, 2981 events survive all
478: the above trigger and offline reconstruction requirements. This forms a
479: background-dominated sample with contributions from two principal sources:
480: combinatoric background events with a fake muon and events from generic
481: $B$-hadron decays (e.g. sequential semi-leptonic
482: decays $b\rightarrow c\mu^{-}X\rightarrow \mm X$ or double
483: semi-leptonic decay in gluon splitting events
484: $g\rightarrow b\overline{b}\rightarrow\mm X$).
485: %
486: %%%Using the best previously published limit as an estimate
487: %%%for the branching ratio, we expect at most about 28 (9) \bsdmm\ decays to
488: %%%survive these cuts.
489:
490:
491: We model the signal decays using the Pythia Monte Carlo (MC)~\cite{pythia}
492: tuned to inclusive $B$-hadron data~\cite{lannon}. The Pythia events are
493: passed through a full detector simulation and satisfy the same requirements
494: as data. To normalize to experimentally determined cross-sections, we require
495: $p_{T}(\bsd)>6\;\GeV/c$ and rapidity $\left| y \right| < 1$.
496:
497: To discriminate \bsdmm\ decays from background events we use these four
498: variables:
499: the invariant mass of the muon pair (\Mmm);
500: the $B$-candidate proper decay length (\ctau);
501: the opening angle (\pting) between the $B$-hadron flight direction
502: (estimated as the vector \ptmm) and the vector \Lxy;
503: and the $B$-candidate track isolation (\iso)~\cite{iso}.
504: Figure~\ref{fig:SvB} shows the distributions of these variables for
505: background-dominated data and MC signal events.
506: %
507: \begin{figure}
508: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{svb_prl.eps}
509: \caption{\label{fig:SvB} Arbitrarily normalized distributions of the
510: discriminating variables for events in our background-dominated data
511: sample (solid) compared to Monte Carlo \bsmm\ events (dashed).}
512: \end{figure}
513: %
514:
515: A ``blind'' analysis technique is used to determine the optimal selection
516: criteria for these four variables. The
517: data in the search window $5.169 < \Mmm < 5.469\:\GeV/c^2$
518: are hidden and the optimization performed using only data in the sideband
519: regions, $4.669 < \Mmm < 5.169\:\GeV/c^2$ and $5.469 < \Mmm < 5.969\:\GeV/c^2$.
520: The search region corresponds to approximately $\pm4$ times the two-track
521: invariant mass resolution centered on the \bs\ and \bd\ masses~\cite{masses}.
522: We use the set of (\Mmm, \ctau, \pting, \iso) criteria which minimizes the
523: {\it{a priori}} expected $90\%$~CL upper limit on the branching ratio. For a
524: given number of observed events, $n$, and an expected background of
525: $n_{\mathrm{bg}}$, the branching ratio is determined using:
526: %$
527: \begin{equation*}
528: \brbsmm \leq \frac{N(n,n_{\mathrm{bg}})}{2\,\sigma_{\bs}\,\mathcal{L}\,\alpha\,\epsilon_{\mathrm{total}}}
529: \end{equation*}
530: %$,
531: where $N(n,n_{\mathrm{bg}})$ is the number of candidate \bsmm\ decays at 90\%
532: CL, estimated using the Bayesian approach of Ref.~\cite{bayes}
533: and incorporating the uncertainties into the limit.
534: The {\it {a priori}} expected limit is given by the sum
535: over all possible observations, $n$, weighted by the corresponding Poisson
536: probability when expecting $n_{\mathrm{bg}}$. The \bs\
537: production cross-section is estimated as
538: $\sigma_{\bs}=\frac{f_s}{f_u}\sigma_{B^+}$, where
539: $\frac{f_s}{f_u}=\frac{0.100}{0.391}$~\cite{HFWG} and $\sigma_{B^+}$ is taken
540: from Ref.~\cite{BXS}.
541: For the \bdmm\ limit we substitute $\sigma_{\bd}$ for $\sigma_{\bs}$,
542: $f_d$ for $f_s$, and assume $f_d = f_u$.
543: The factor of two in the denominator accounts for the charge-conjugate
544: $B$-hadron final states. The expected background, $n_{\mathrm{bg}}$, and
545: the total acceptance times efficiency, $\alpha\,\epsilon_{\mathrm{total}}$,
546: are estimated separately for each combination of requirements.
547:
548: For both signal and background, the variables \ctau\ and \pting\ are the only
549: correlated variables with a linear correlation coefficient
550: of $-0.3$. Thus we estimate the number of background events as
551: $n_{\mathrm{bg}} = n_{\mathrm{sb}}(\ctau,\pting)\, f_{\iso}\, f_{M}$,
552: where $n_{\mathrm{sb}}(\ctau,\pting)$ is the number of sideband events passing
553: a particular set of \ctau\ and \pting\ cuts, $f_{\iso}$ is the fraction of
554: background events that survive a given \iso\ requirement, and
555: $f_{M}$ is the ratio of the number of events in the search window to the
556: number of events in the sideband regions. Since \Mmm\ and \iso\ are
557: uncorrelated with the rest of the variables, we evaluate $f_{M}$ and
558: $f_{\iso}$ on samples with no \ctau\ or \pting\
559: requirement, thus reducing their associated uncertainty.
560:
561: We estimate $f_{\iso}$ from the background-dominated sample for a variety
562: of thresholds. We investigate sources of systematic bias by
563: calculating $f_{\iso}$ in bins of \Mmm\ and \ctau\ and conservatively
564: assign a relative systematic uncertainty of $\pm 5\%$.
565: Since the \Mmm\ distribution of the background-dominated sample is well
566: described by a first-order polynomial, $f_{M}$ is given by the
567: ratio of widths of the search to sideband regions.
568:
569: MC studies demonstrate that our estimate of $n_{\mathrm{bg}}$
570: accurately accounts for generic $b\overline{b}$ contributions, while two-body
571: decays of $B$-mesons ($B^{0}_{s(d)}\ra\hh$, where $h^{\pm}=\pi^{\pm}$ or
572: $K^{\pm}$) are estimated to contribute to the search region at levels at
573: least 100 times smaller than our expected sensitivity.
574:
575: Using these background-dominated control samples, $\mu^{\pm}\mu^{\pm}$
576: events and \mm\ events with $\ctau<0$, we compare our background predictions
577: to the number of events observed in the search window for a wide range of
578: (\ctau, \pting, \iso) requirements. No statistically significant
579: discrepancies are observed. For example, using the optimized set
580: of selection criteria described below and summing over these control samples,
581: we get a total prediction of $3\pm1$ events and observe five. Another
582: cross-check is performed using a fake muon enhanced \mm\ sample.
583: By requiring at least one of the muon legs to fail the muon identification
584: requirements, we reduce the signal efficiency by a factor of 50 while
585: increasing the background acceptance by a factor of three. In this sample,
586: using the optimized requirements, we predict $6\pm1$ and observe seven events.
587:
588: We estimate the total acceptance times efficiency as
589: $\alpha\,\epsilon_{\mathrm{total}}=\alpha\,\epsilon_{\mathrm{trig}}\,\epsilon_{\mathrm{reco}}\,\epsilon_{\mathrm{final}}$,
590: where $\alpha$ is the geometric and kinematic acceptance of the trigger,
591: $\epsilon_{\mathrm{trig}}$ is the trigger efficiency for events in the
592: acceptance, $\epsilon_{\mathrm{reco}}$ is the offline reconstruction efficiency
593: for events passing the trigger, and $\epsilon_{\mathrm{final}}$ is the
594: efficiency for passing the final cuts on the discriminating variables for
595: events satisfying the trigger and reconstruction requirements. For the
596: optimization, only $\epsilon_{\mathrm{final}}$ changes as we vary the
597: requirements on \Mmm, \ctau, \pting, and \iso.
598:
599: The acceptance is estimated as the fraction of \bsdmm\ MC events
600: which fall within the geometric acceptance and satisfy the kinematic
601: requirements of at least one of the analysis triggers.
602: We find $\alpha=(6.6\pm0.5)\%$. The uncertainty includes roughly equal
603: contributions from systematic variations of the modeling of the $B$-hadron
604: $p_{T}$ spectrum and longitudinal beam profile, and from the statistics of the
605: sample. It also includes negligible contributions from variations of the
606: beamline offsets and of the detector material description used in the
607: simulation.
608:
609: The trigger efficiency, including the effects of the offline-to-trigger
610: track matching, is estimated from samples of $J/\psi\ra\mm$
611: decays selected with a trigger requiring only one identified muon. The data
612: are used to parameterize the trigger efficiency as a function of $p_{T}$
613: and $\eta$ for the unbiased muon. The efficiency for
614: \bsdmm\ decays is determined by the convolution of this parameterization with
615: the $(p_{T}^{\mu^{+}},\eta^{\mu^{+}},p_{T}^{\mu^{-}},\eta^{\mu^{-}})$ spectra
616: of signal MC events within the acceptance. Including the
617: online reconstruction requirements, the trigger efficiency
618: is $\epsilon_{\mathrm{trig}} = (85\pm3)\%$. The uncertainty is dominated by
619: the systematic uncertainty accounting for kinematic differences between
620: $J/\psi\ra\mm$ and \bsdmm\ decays and also includes contributions
621: from variations in the functional form used in the parameterization,
622: the effects of two-track correlations, and sample statistics.
623:
624: The offline reconstruction efficiency is given by the product
625: $\epsilon_{\mathrm{reco}}=\epsilon_{\mathrm{COT}}\,\epsilon_{\mu}\,\epsilon_{\mathrm{SVX}}$,
626: where $\epsilon_{\mathrm{COT}}$ is the absolute reconstruction efficiency of
627: the COT,
628: $\epsilon_{\mu}$ is the muon reconstruction efficiency given a COT track,
629: and $\epsilon_{\mathrm{SVX}}$ is the fraction of reconstructed muons which
630: satisfy the \svx\ requirements. Each term is a two-track
631: efficiency. A hybrid data-MC method is used to determine
632: $\epsilon_{\mathrm{COT}}$. Occupancy effects are accounted for
633: by embedding COT hits from MC tracks in data events. The MC
634: simulation is tuned at the hit level to reproduce residuals, hit width and
635: hit usage in the data. For embedded muons with $p_{T}>2\;\GeV/c$, we measure
636: $\epsilon_{\mathrm{COT}}=99\%$. Using the unbiased $J/\psi\ra\mm$
637: samples, we estimate the muon reconstruction efficiency, including the
638: track-stub matching requirements, to be $96\%$.
639: A sample of $J/\psi\ra\mm$ events satisfying our COT and
640: muon reconstruction requirements is used to determine
641: $\epsilon_{\mathrm{SVX}}=75\%$.
642: The total reconstruction efficiency is given by the above product,
643: $\epsilon_{\mathrm{reco}}=(71\pm3)\%$.
644: The uncertainty is dominated by the systematic uncertainty accounting for
645: kinematic differences between $J/\psi\ra\mm$ and \bsdmm\ decays and also
646: includes contributions from the variation of the COT simulation
647: parameters and sample statistics.
648:
649: The efficiency $\epsilon_{\mathrm{final}}$ is determined from the \bsdmm\ MC
650: sample and varies from $28-78\%$ over the range of (\Mmm, \ctau, \pting, \iso)
651: requirements considered in the optimization. The MC
652: modeling is checked by comparing the mass resolution and \ctau,
653: \pting, and \iso\ efficiency as a function of selection threshold for
654: \bjk($J/\psi\ra\mm$) events. The \bjk\ MC sample is produced in the
655: same manner as the \bsmm\ sample. The \bjk\ data sample is collected using
656: dimuon triggers very similar to those used in the analysis, but with
657: a larger acceptance for \bjk\ decays. We make the same requirements on the
658: dimuon tracks and vertex as employed in the analysis.
659: The MC efficiency is consistent with the sideband-subtracted data efficiency
660: for a range of cut thresholds within $5\%$ (relative),
661: which is assigned as a systematic uncertainty on $\epsilon_{\mathrm{final}}$.
662: In both the data and the MC samples the mean of the three-track invariant mass
663: distribution is within $3\:\MeV/c^2$ of the world average $B^+$ mass. The
664: two-track invariant mass resolution is well described by the MC.
665:
666: The optimal set of selection criteria uses a $\pm 80\;\MeV/c^{2}$ search
667: window around the \bs\ mass, $\ctau>200\;\um$, $\pting < 0.10$~rad and
668: $\iso > 0.65$. The mass resolution, estimated from the MC for the events
669: surviving all requirements, is $27\;\MeV/c^{2}$ so that the \bd\ and \bs\
670: masses are resolved. We define a separate search window centered on the world
671: average \bd\ mass and use the same set of selection criteria for the \bdmm\
672: search. The total acceptance times efficiency is
673: $\alpha\,\epsilon_{\mathrm{total}}=(2.0\pm0.2)\%$ for both decays.
674:
675: Using these criteria one event survives
676: all requirements and has an invariant mass of $\Mmm=5.295\;\GeV/c^{2}$, thus
677: falling into both the \bs\ and \bd\ search windows as shown in
678: Figure~\ref{fig:results}. This is consistent with the $1.1\pm0.3$ background
679: events expected in each of the \bs\ and \bd\ mass windows.
680: We derive 90\% (95\%) CL limits of
681: $\brbsmm < 5.8\times 10^{-7}$ $(7.5\times 10^{-7})$ and
682: $\brbdmm < 1.5\times 10^{-7}$ $(1.9\times 10^{-7})$.
683: The new \bsmm\ limit improves the previous
684: limit~\cite{bsmmruni} by a factor of three and significantly reduces the
685: allowed parameter space of $R$-parity violating and $SO(10)$ SUSY
686: models~\cite{arnowitt,so10}. The \bdmm\ limit is slightly better than
687: the recent limit from the Belle Collaboration~\cite{belle}.
688: %%%We expect significant improvements to this analysis as we work to increase
689: %%%the signal acceptance, reduce background contributions, and collect
690: %%%more data.
691:
692: \begin{figure}[h]
693: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{results_prl.eps}
694: \caption{\label{fig:results} The \mm\ invariant mass distribution of the
695: events in the sideband and search regions satisfying all requirements.}
696: \end{figure}
697:
698: % ============================================================================
699: % --- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
700: % ============================================================================
701: We thank the Fermilab staff and the technical staffs of the participating
702: institutions for their vital contributions. This work was supported by the
703: U.S. Department of Energy and National Science Foundation;
704: the Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare;
705: the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan;
706: the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada;
707: the National Science Council of the Republic of China;
708: the Swiss National Science Foundation;
709: the A.P. Sloan Foundation;
710: the Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung, Germany;
711: the Korean Science and Engineering Foundation and
712: the Korean Research Foundation;
713: the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council and the Royal Society, UK;
714: the Russian Foundation for Basic Research;
715: the Comision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Spain; and
716: in part by the European Community's Human Potential Programme under contract
717: HPRN-CT-20002, Probe for New Physics.
718:
719: % ============================================================================
720: % --- BIBLIOGRAPHY
721: % ============================================================================
722:
723: %%%\bibliography{prl}
724: \begin{thebibliography}{99.}
725:
726: \bibitem{qconj}
727: Throughout this paper inclusion of charge conjugate modes is implicit.
728:
729: \bibitem{lots}
730: S.~R.~Choudhury and N.~Gaur, Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf{B451}}, 86 (1999);
731: K.S.~Babu and C.~Kolda, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf{84}}, 228 (2000);
732: P.H.~Chankowski and L.~Slawianowska, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf{63}}, 054012 (2001);
733: C.~Bobeth {\it{et al.}}, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf{64}}, 074014 (2001);
734: A.J.~Buras {\it{et al.}}, Phys. Lett.\ {\bf{B546}}, 96 (2002);
735: S.~Baek, P.~Ko, and W.Y.~Song, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf{89}}, 271801 (2002);
736: A.~Dedes and A.~Pilaftsis, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf{67}}, 015012 (2003);
737: G.L.~Kane, C.~Kolda, and J.E.~Lennon, \verb+hep-ph/0310042+.
738:
739: \bibitem{dedes}
740: A.~Dedes, H.K.~Dreiner, and U.~Nierste,
741: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf{87}}, 251804 (2001).
742:
743: \bibitem{arnowitt}
744: %%% R.Arnowitt, B.Dutta, T.Kamon, and M.Tanaka
745: R.~Arnowitt {\it{et al.}}, Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf{B538}}, 121 (2002).
746:
747: \bibitem{baer}
748: H.~Baer {\it{et al.}}, JHEP {\bf{07}}, 050 (2002).
749:
750: \bibitem{so10}
751: R.~Dermisek {\it{et al.}}, JHEP {\bf{04}}, 037 (2003);
752: D.~Auto {\it{et al.}}, JHEP {\bf{06}}, 023 (2003).
753: %%% R.Dermisek, S.Raby, L.Roszkowski, and R. Ruis de Austri,
754:
755: \bibitem{bsmmruni}
756: CDF Collaboration, F.~Abe {\it{et al.}},
757: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf{57}}, 3811 (1998).
758:
759: \bibitem{smbr}
760: G.~Buchalla and A.J.~Buras, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf{B398}}, 285 (1993);
761: {\it{ibid.}} Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf{B400}}, 225 (1993);
762: {\it{ibid.}} Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf{B548}}, 309 (1999);
763: M.~Misiak and J.~Urban, Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf{B451}}, 161 (1999).
764:
765: \bibitem{belle}
766: Belle Collaboration, M.\-C.~Chang {\it{et al.}},
767: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf {68}}, 111101(R) (2003).
768:
769: \bibitem{gminus2}
770: Muon g-2 Collaboration, G.W.~Bennett {\it{et al.}},
771: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf{92}}, 161802 (2004).
772:
773: \bibitem{wmap}
774: D.N.~Spergel {\it{et al.}}, Astrophys.\ J.\ Suppl.\ {\bf{148}}, 175 (2003).
775:
776: \bibitem{TDR}
777: CDF~II Collaboration, R.~Blair {\it{et al.}}, FERMILAB-PUB-96/390-E (1996).
778:
779: \bibitem{COT}
780: T.~Affolder {\it{et al.}}, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf{526}}, 249 (2004).
781:
782: \bibitem{SVX}
783: A.~Sill {\it{et al.}}, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth. A {\bf{447}}, 1 (2000).
784:
785: \bibitem{CMU}
786: G.~Ascoli {\it{et al.}}, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth. A {\bf{268}}, 33 (1988).
787:
788: \bibitem{CMP}
789: T.~Dorigo {\it{et al.}}, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth. A {\bf{461}}, 560 (2001).
790:
791: \bibitem{LUMI}
792: D.~Acosta {\it{et al.}}, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth. A {\bf{494}}, 57 (2002);
793: S.~Klimenko, J.~Konigsberg, and T.M.~Liss, FERMILAB-FN-0741 (2003).
794: %%%Our luminosity is estimated using
795: %%%the average of the inelastic cross sections reported in CDF Collaboration,
796: %%%F.~Abe {\it{et al.}}, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf{50}}, 5535 (1994) and E811
797: %%%Collaboration, C.~Avila {\it{et al.}}, Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf{B445}},
798: %%%419 (1999).
799:
800: \bibitem{XFT}
801: E.J.~Thomson {\it{et al.}}, IEEE Trans.\ Nucl.\ Sci. {\bf{49}}, 1063 (2002).
802:
803: \bibitem{pythia}
804: T.~Sj\"{o}strand {\it{et al.}}, Comp.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf{135}}, 238 (2001).
805:
806: %%%\bibitem{cteq}
807: %%% H.L.Lai {\it{et al.}} (CTEQ Collaboration), Eur.\ Phys.\ J {\bf{C12}} 375
808: %%% (2000).
809:
810: \bibitem{lannon}
811: K.~Lannon, Ph.D.\ thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003,
812: \verb+http://www-lib.fnal.gov/archive/thesis/fermilab-thesis-2003-21.shtml.+
813:
814: \bibitem{iso}
815: The $B$-candidate isolation is defined as
816: $\iso=| \ptmm | /(\sum_{i}p^{i}_{T} + | \ptmm | )$, where the
817: sum is over all tracks within an $\eta$-$\phi$ cone radius of $1$, centered
818: on \ptmm\ and satisfying standard track quality requirements; $\phi$ is the
819: azimuthal angle defined in the plane transverse to the beamline.
820:
821: \bibitem{masses} The mass windows are centered on $5.369\:\:\GeV/c^2$
822: and $5.279\:\:\GeV/c^2$ for the \bs\ and \bd\ searches, respectively.
823:
824: \bibitem{bayes}
825: K.~Hagiwara {\it{et al.}}, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf{66}}, 010001 (2002).
826: %%% K.Hagiwara, {\it{et al.}}, \Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf{66}}, 010001-233 (2002).
827:
828: \bibitem{HFWG}
829: $f_x$ is the probability that a $b$ quark fragments to produce a $B_x$ hadron.
830: We use the updated 2003 values from the Particle Data Group,
831: K.~Hagiwara {\it{et al.}}, \verb+http://pdg.lbl.gov/+.
832: %%% http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/
833:
834: \bibitem{BXS}
835: CDF Collaboration, D.~Acosta {\it{et al.}}, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf{65}},
836: 052005 (2002). This corresponds to a measurement at
837: $\sqrt{s}=1.8$~TeV. No correction is made to account for the increased
838: $\sqrt{s}$ since it is small compared to the uncertainties on the
839: measured $\sigma_{B^+}$.
840:
841: \end{thebibliography}
842:
843: % ============================================================================
844: \end{document}
845:
846: