1: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}

2: % Uncomment next line if AMS fonts required

3: \usepackage{iopams}  

4: \usepackage{graphicx}

5: 

6: \def\fig#1{Fig.~\ref{#1}}

7: 

8: \newcommand{\pp} {\mbox{$p+p$}}

9: \newcommand{\ptt} {\mbox{$p_T$}}

10: \newcommand{\pttrig} {\mbox{$p_{Ttrig}$}}

11: \newcommand{\ptassoc} {\mbox{$p_{Tassoc}$}}

12: \newcommand{\kt} {\mbox{$k_T$}}

13: \newcommand{\jt} {\mbox{$j_T$}}

14: \newcommand{\vkt} {\mbox{$\vec{k}_{T}$}}

15: \newcommand{\vjt} {\mbox{$\vec{j}_{T}$}}

16: \newcommand{\kty} {\mbox{$k_{Ty}$}}

17: \newcommand{\jty} {\mbox{$j_{Ty}$}}

18: \newcommand{\mkt} {\mbox{$\langle k_{T}\rangle$}}

19: \newcommand{\mjt} {\mbox{$\langle j_{T}\rangle$}}

20: \newcommand{\mkty} {\mbox{$\langle|k_{Ty}|\rangle$}}

21: \newcommand{\mjty} {\mbox{$\langle|j_{Ty}|\rangle$}}

22: \newcommand{\mRMSkt} {\mbox{$\sqrt{\langle k^2_T\rangle}$ }}

23: \newcommand{\mz} {\mbox{$\langle z\rangle$}}

24: \newcommand{\mztrig} {\mbox{$\langle z_{trig}\rangle$}} 

25: \newcommand{\mpt} {\mbox{$\langle p_T\rangle$}} 

26: \newcommand{\mpttrig} {\mbox{$\langle p_{Ttrig}\rangle$}} 

27: \newcommand{\mptassoc} {\mbox{$\langle p_{Tassoc}\rangle$}} 

28: \newcommand{\cf}{\mbox{\sl CF}}

29: 

30: \newcommand{\snn} {\mbox{$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$}}

31: \newcommand{\meanpt} {\mbox{$\langle p_{T} \rangle$}}

32: \newcommand{\piz} {\mbox{$\pi^{0}$}}

33: \newcommand{\pbar} {\mbox{$\overline{p}$}}

34: \newcommand{\lbar} {\mbox{$\overline{\Lambda}$}}

35: \newcommand{\npart} {\mbox{$N_{part}$}}

36: \newcommand{\npartav} {\mbox{$\langle N_{part} \rangle$}}

37: \newcommand{\ncoll} {\mbox{$N_{coll}$}}

38: \newcommand{\ncollav} {\mbox{$\langle N_{coll} \rangle$}}

39: \newcommand{\ut} {\mbox{$\langle u_t \rangle$}}

40: 

41: \def\bgi{\begin{itemize}}

42: \def\endi{\end{itemize}}

43: \def\bge{\begin{equation}}

44: \def\ende{\end{equation}}

45: \def\bgc{\begin{center}}

46: \def\endc{\end{center}}

47: \def\gev{\mbox{~GeV\ }}

48: \def\gevc{\mbox{~GeV/$c$\ }}

49: \def\gevcc{\mbox{~GeV/$c^2$}}

50: \def\mevc{\mbox{~MeV/$c$\ }}

51: 

52: \def\simge{\stackrel{>}{\sim} }

53: \def\simle{\stackrel{<}{\sim} }

54: \def\la{\langle }

55: \def\ra{\rangle }

56: 

57: % A useful Journal macro

58: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1}{\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}

59: \def\JournalAPPEAR#1{submitted to {#1}}

60: \def\IJMPA{{Int. J. Mod. Phys.}~{\bf A}}

61: \def\JPG{{J. Phys}~{\bf G}}

62: \def\NCA{Nuovo Cimento}

63: \def\NIM{Nucl. Instrum. Methods}

64: \def\NIMA{{Nucl. Instrum. Methods}~{\bf A}}

65: \def\EPJ{{Eur. Phys. J.}~{\bf C}}

66: \def\NPA{{Nucl. Phys.}~{\bf A}}

67: \def\NPB{{Nucl. Phys.}~{\bf B}}

68: \def\PLB{{Phys. Lett.}~{\bf B}}

69: \def\PLC{Phys. Repts.\ }

70: \def\PRL{Phys. Rev. Lett.\ }

71: \def\PRD{{Phys. Rev.}~{\bf D}}

72: \def\PRC{{Phys. Rev.}~{\bf C}}

73: \def\ZPC{{Z. Phys.}~{\bf C}}

74: \def\APPB{{Acta Phys. Polon.}~{\bf B}}

75: \def\etall{{\it et al.}}

76: 

77: 

78: \begin{document}

79: 

80: \title[]{PHENIX measurement of jet properties and their modification

81: in heavy-ion collisions}

82: 

83: 

84: \author{Jan Rak\dag \hskip 2mm for the PHENIX Collaboration 

85: \footnote[3]{For the full PHENIX Collaboration list and acknowledgments, see Appendix 

86: ``Collaborations'' of this volume}

87: }

88: 

89: \address{\dag\ Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3160}

90: 

91: 

92: \begin{abstract}

93: The properties of jets produced in $p+p$, $d+Au$ and $Au+Au$

94: collisions at \snn=200~\gev\ are studied using the method of two

95: particle correlations. The trigger particle is assumed to be a leading

96: particle from a high \ptt\ jet while the associated particle is

97: assumed to come from either the same jet or the away jet. From the

98: angular width and yield of the same and away side correlation peaks,

99: the parameters characterizing the jet properties are extracted.

100: \end{abstract}

101: 

102: %Uncomment for PACS numbers title message

103: %\pacs{00.00, 20.00, 42.10}

104: 

105: % Uncomment for Submitted to journal title message

106: %\submitto{\JPA}

107: 

108: % Comment out if separate title page not required

109: % \maketitle

110: %\section{Introduction}

111: The high-\ptt\ particle yield measured at RHIC (\snn=130 and 200~GeV)

112: was found to be strongly suppressed in $Au+Au$ central collisions

113: \cite{RAA_02}. Furthermore, the measurement of high-\ptt\ particle yield

114: in $d+Au$ induced collisions \cite{RdAu} confirmed that the

115: suppression can be fully attributed to the final state interaction of

116: high-energy partons with an extremely opaque nuclear medium

117: \cite{quenching_WangMiklos,quenching_Wang}.

118: Parton propagation through the excited nuclear

119: medium should be accompanied by stimulated gluon radiation, which

120: results in the modification of fundamental properties of

121: hard-scattering such as broadening of parton transverse momentum \kt\

122: \cite{Urs_ktBroadening,Ivan_dAu} and modification of jet fragmentation

123: \cite{Wang_fragModif}. Thus the measurement of jet fragmentation

124: properties in heavy ion collisions, compared to the results for $p+p$

125: collisions, should provide more detailed insight into the process of

126: formation and materialization of excited nuclear medium.

127: 

128: 

129: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

130: \section{Jet angular correlations}

131: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

132: 

133: We explore the systematics of jet fragmentation by the method of

134: two-particle azimuthal correlations. This method, which worked well at

135: ISR energies ($\sqrt{s}$=63~GeV) and below \cite{CCORjt}, is an 

136: alternative method to the full jet reconstruction when the use of the

137: latter is difficult or impossible due to high-multiplicities, as in

138: heavy ion collisions.

139: 

140: Jets are produced by the hard scattering of two partons

141: \cite{Feynman1,Feynman4}. Two scattered partons propagate nearly 

142: back-to-back in azimuth from the collision point and fragment into the

143: jet-like spray of final state particles (see embedded schematics on

144: \fig{CFnc} where only one fragment of each parton is shown). These

145: particles have a momentum \vjt\ perpendicular to the partonic

146: transverse momentum, with component \jty\ projected onto the azimuthal

147: plane. The magnitude of \mjt\ measured at lower energies 

148: has been found to be $\sqrt{s}$ and \ptt\ independent \cite{CCORjt}. 

149: 

150: Despite the naive expectation of parton collinearity in the transverse

151: plane, it was found that each of the partons carry the effective

152: transverse momentum $\vec{k}_{T}$, originally described as

153: ``intrinsic'' \cite{Feynman5}. The measurement of net transverse

154: momenta $\la p_{T}^2\ra_{pair} = 2\cdot\la k_{T}^2\ra$ of diphoton,

155: dimuon or dijet over the wide range of $\sqrt{s}$ in $p+p$ collisions

156: gives \mkt\ as large as 5\gevc\ \cite{kt_E609_Apana}. Clearly, this

157: value can not be attributed to the intrinsic transverse momentum

158: given by the constituent quark mass ($\approx$300~\mevc) and the NLO

159: re-summation techniques has to be invoked \cite{Werner}.

160: \begin{figure}[h] 

161: \bgc

162: \resizebox{7.5cm}{5cm}{\includegraphics[viewport=0 0 565 500,clip]{fig/correl}}

163: \resizebox{7.5cm}{5cm}{\includegraphics[viewport=0 0 565 500,clip]{fig/CF1_41}}

164: \caption{\label{CFnc}

165: {\sl Left:} 

166: Measured correlation functions in $p+p$ collisions for both 

167: particles in the $3.0<p_T<4.0$ range. Solid

168: line corresponds to the fit of the two Gaussian functions representing the

169: intra-jet and inter-jet correlation. Dashed line represents the

170: uncorrelated background distribution.

171: {\sl Right:}

172: The correlation functions from $Au+Au$ data with $2.5<\pttrig<4.0$ and $1.0<\ptassoc<2.5$.

173: The dashed line represent the $cos(2\Delta\Phi)$ background distribution and the solid

174: line represent the contribution of jet correlations.

175: }

176: \endc 

177: \end{figure}

178: \vskip -0.5 cm

179: The analysis uses two-particle azimuthal correlation functions (\cf) to

180: measure the distribution of the azimuthal angle difference ($\Delta

181: \phi = \phi_1 - \phi_2$) between pairs of charged hadrons (see \fig{CFnc}).

182: The correlation function is defined as

183: $C(\Delta\phi)=\mathcal{N}\cdot{N_{cor}\over N_{uncor}}$ where

184: $N_{cor}$ and $N_{uncor}$ are the observed $\Delta\phi$ distributions

185: of charged particle pairs in the same or mixed events, respectively and

186: $\mathcal{N}$ is the normalization factor.

187: 

188: We fit the measured \cf\ by two gaussians, one for the near-side

189: component (around $\Delta\phi =0$) and one for the far-side component

190: (around $\Delta\phi =\pi$), and a constant for the uncorrelated pairs

191: in case of $p+p$ and $d+Au$ collisions. In case of $Au+Au$ correlation

192: functions, the background distribution has a ``harmonic'' form

193: $1+2a^2_2\cos{(2\Delta\phi)}$ with $a_2$ as a free parameter.

194: 

195: For two-particles with average transverse momenta \mpttrig\ and

196: \mptassoc\ from the same jet, the width of the near-side correlation, $\sigma_N$,

197: can be related to \mjty\ as

198: \bge

199: \langle| j_{T y} |\rangle \approx  \sqrt{2 \over \pi}

200:    {\mpttrig\mptassoc \over \sqrt{\mpttrig^2+\mptassoc^2}}\; \sigma_{N}

201: \label{eq_jt}

202: \ende

203: if we assume \mjty$\ll$\mpttrig\ and \mjty$\ll$\mptassoc.

204: In order to extract \mkt\ from the width of the away-side peak width

205: $\sigma_F$, we started with the relation between $\la|p_{out}|\ra$,

206: the average transverse momentum component of the away-side particle

207: $\vec{p}_T$ perpendicular to trigger particle $\vec{p}_{Ttrig}$ in the

208: azimuthal plane, and $k_{Ty}$ given in

209: \cite{CCORjt}, \cite{Feynman5}.  We note however, that

210: \cite{Feynman5} explicitly neglected $\mztrig=\la\pttrig/p_{Tjet}\ra$

211: in the formula at ISR energies, where $\mztrig\simeq$~0.85,

212: while it is not negligible at \snn=200~GeV. Taking $\mztrig$ into

213: account we derived

214: \bge\label{eq_kt}

215: \mkty\mztrig =

216: {1 \over x_h\sqrt{2}}

217: \sqrt{ \mptassoc^2\sin^2\sqrt{2\over\pi}\sigma_F - (1+x_h^2)\la|j_{Ty}|\ra^2}

218: \ende

219: where $x_h=\mptassoc/\mpttrig$. Equation (\ref{eq_kt}) indicates that in order

220: to extract the magnitude of \mkty\ the external knowledge of the

221: \mztrig\ is needed. We have analyzed the \ptt-dependence of the \piz\ invariant cross

222: section measured in $p+p$ collisions \cite{pi0ppPRL}. In the

223: $p_T>3$\gevc\ region where the power law function with the power of 

224: $n=8.05\pm0.06$ provides the best description of the data, we

225: assumed that the final state parton distribution function has the same

226: shape as the \piz\ invariant cross section and we found \mz$_{p_T>3}$=0.75$\pm$0.05.

227: Knowing \mztrig, $\sigma_N$ and $\sigma_F$ and using (\ref{eq_jt}), (\ref{eq_kt}) the

228: \mjty\ and \mkty\ can be calculated. The results for $p+p$ and $d+Au$

229: are shown on \fig{jkt_ppdAu}.

230: 

231: \begin{figure}[h]

232: \bgc

233: \resizebox{7.5cm}{5.5cm}{\includegraphics[viewport=0 0 514 500,clip]{fig/jt}}

234: \resizebox{7.5cm}{5.5cm}{\includegraphics[viewport=0 0 514 500,clip]{fig/kt}}

235: \caption{\label{jkt_ppdAu}

236: {\sl Left:}

237: Extracted values of \mjty\ as a function

238: of \ptassoc\ in $d+Au$.

239: {\sl Right:}

240: Variation of \mkty\ with \pttrig\ for $p+p$ and $d+Au$.

241: Boxes drawn around the data points indicate the systematic error bars.

242: }

243: \endc

244: \end{figure}

245: \vskip -0.5 cm

246: The \mjty\ and \mkty\ values are extracted using ``fixed'' and

247: ``assorted''-\ptt\ correlation technique. The former method explores

248: the correlation between particle pairs of the similar values of

249: \pttrig\ and \ptassoc\, whereas the assorted method uses asymmetric

250: pairs. The values of \mjty\ in $p+p$ and $d+Au$ data are in good

251: agreement and the average value \mjty=324$\pm$6~MeV/c (\mjt=$\pi\over

252: 2$\mjty=510$\pm$10~MeV/c) has been obtained.  Within the systematic

253: and statistical errors it is not clear whether or not the \mkt\ values

254: follow the rising trend seen at lower energies \cite{CCORjt}.

255: Nonetheless, averaging the $h^{\pm}-\pi^{\pm}$ and $h^{\pm}-h^{\pm}$

256: data over \pttrig\ in case of $p+p$ data we found 

257: \mkty$_{pp}$=1.08$\pm$0.05~GeV/c (\mRMSkt$_{pp}$=$\sqrt{\pi}$\mkty$_{pp}$=1.92$\pm$0.09~GeV/c) 

258: and for $d+Au$ data \mkty$_{dAu}$=1.36$\pm$0.07$\pm$0.12~GeV/c 

259: (\mRMSkt$_{dAu}$=2.42$\pm$0.12$\pm$0.21~GeV/c).

260: 

261: A similar analysis has been done also for $Au+Au$ data for various

262: collision centralities, characterized by the average number of

263: participants $\la N_{part}\ra$. We have studied the angular width and

264: the associated yield per trigger particle for

265: 2.5$<$\pttrig$<$4.0\gevc\ and 1.0$<$\ptassoc$<$2.5\gevc.  However, in

266: this case, there is no justification of using $D(z)$ extracted from

267: $p+p$ data so we report only \mztrig\mkty\ (see \fig{jkt_Au}). Whereas

268: the \mjty\ values shows essentially no dependence on $N_{part}$, the

269: away-side width and \mztrig\mkty\ reveals a rather dramatic raising

270: trend compared to $p+p$ and $d+Au$ indicating strong final state partons' interaction with nuclear

271: medium.

272: \vskip -0.3 cm

273: \begin{figure}[h]

274: \bgc

275: \resizebox{7.5cm}{5.5cm}{\includegraphics[viewport=0 0 565 500,clip]{fig/jtkt}}

276: \resizebox{7.5cm}{5.5cm}{\includegraphics[viewport=0 0 565 500,clip]{fig/yield}}

277: \caption{\label{jkt_Au}

278: {\sl Left:}

279: Centrality dependence of the \mjt\ and \mztrig\mkty in $Au+Au$ for

280: 2.5$<$\pttrig$<$4.0\gevc\ and 1.0$<$\ptassoc$<$2.5\gevc\

281: The dashed and solid lines represent the values of \mjty\ and

282: \mztrig\mkty\ measured in $p+p$ data. Brackets indicate the systematic error bars.

283: {\sl Right:}

284: Associated near-side (solid circles)

285: and away-side (hollow crosses) yield of 1.0$<$\ptassoc$<$2.5\gevc\

286: particles per trigger particle found in the \ptt-bin

287: 2.5$<$\pttrig$<$4.0\gevc. Errors are dominated by systematic error.  

288: }

289: \endc

290: \end{figure}

291: \vskip -0.5 cm

292: The associated near and away-side yields in $Au+Au$ are found to be

293: rather constant or slightly rising with centrality in contrast of

294: measurement done at higher \pttrig-range

295: \cite{STAR_b2b_suppression}. This observation seems to indicate strong

296: jet rescattering rather than the full jet absorption in neclear

297: medium.

298: 

299: \vskip -0.5 cm

300: \section*{REFERENCES}

301: \begin{thebibliography}{100}

302: 

303: %\bibitem{RAA_01}

304: %	K.~Adcox \etall, \Journal{\PRL}{88}{022301}{2002}.

305: \bibitem{RAA_02}

306: 	K.~Adcox \etall, \Journal{\PRL}{91}{072301}{2003}.

307: 

308: \bibitem{RdAu}

309: 	S.~S.~Adler \etall, \Journal{\PRL}{91}{072303}{2003}.

310: 

311: \bibitem{quenching_WangMiklos} 

312: 	X.~N.~Wang and M.~Gyulassy, \Journal{\PRL}{68}{1480}{1992}.

313: 

314: \bibitem{quenching_Wang}

315: 	X.~N.~Wang, \Journal{\PRC}{58}{2321}{1998}.

316: 

317: \bibitem{Urs_ktBroadening}  

318: 	C.~A.~Salgado and U.~A.~Wiedemann, hep-ph/0310079.

319: 

320: \bibitem{Ivan_dAu}

321: 	J.~Qiu, I.~Vitev, nucl-th/0306039.

322: 

323: \bibitem{Wang_fragModif}  

324: 	X.~N.~Wang, \Journal{\NPA}{702}{238}{2002}; X.~N.~Wang, nucl-th/0305010.

325: 

326: \bibitem{CCORjt} A.L.S. Angelis \etall, \Journal{\PLB}{97}{163}{1980}.

327: 

328: \bibitem{Feynman1}

329: 	S.~M.~Berman, J.~D.~Bjorken, J.~B.~Kogut, \Journal{\PRD}{4}{3388}{1971}.

330: \bibitem{Feynman4}

331: 	J.~F.~Owens and J.~D.~Kimel, \Journal{\PRD}{18}{3313}{1978}.

332: %\bibitem{Feynman4}

333: %	R.~P.~Feynman, R.~D.~Field and G.~C.~.Fox, \Journal{\PRD}{18}{3320}{1978}.

334: 

335: \bibitem{Feynman5}

336: 	R.~P.~Feynman, R.~D.~Field and G.~C.~Fox, \Journal{\NPB}{128}{1}{1977}.

337: 

338: \bibitem{kt_E609_Apana}

339: 	L.~Apanasevich \etall, \Journal{\PRD}{59}{}{1999}.

340: 

341: \bibitem{Werner}

342: 	D.~Boer, W.~Vogelsang, hep-ph/0312320.

343: 

344: \bibitem{pi0ppPRL}

345: 	S.~S.~Adler \etall, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett., hep-ex/0304038.

346: 

347: %\bibitem{HERMES}

348: %	A.~Airapetian \etall, \Journal{\EPJ}{21}{599-606}{2001}.

349: 

350: \bibitem{STAR_b2b_suppression}

351:         C.~Adler \etall, \Journal{\PRL}{90}{082302}{2003}.

352: 

353: \end{thebibliography}

354: 

355: 

356: \end{document}

357: 

358: 

359: 

360: 

361: 

362: %The major difficulty here is to disantengle the weakly correlated

363: %background and the contribution induced by jet correlation. We use the

364: %two-stages fitting procedure where to streng 0f the background correlation is

365: %determined from the simultaneous fit to the reaction-plane differentil

366: %correlation function andthe jet function is 

367: 

368: %In the first stage we fit simultaneously two correlation

369: %functions. One is constructed only for pairs with the trigger particle

370: %aligned within $\pm$30eg cone with the reaction plane and the second

371: %correlation function is constructed for pairs perpendiculy to the

372: %reaction plane within $\pm$30eg. 

373: