1: %% ****** Start of file template.aps ****** %
2: %%
3: %%
4: %% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
5: %% Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
6: %%
7: %%
8: %% Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
9: %%
10: %% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
11: %%
12: %
13: % This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.0
14: % Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
15: % That way, you always have this original template file to use.
16: %
17: % Group addresses by affiliation; use superscriptaddress for long
18: % author lists, or if there are many overlapping affiliations.
19: % For Phys. Rev. appearance, change preprint to twocolumn.
20: % Choose pra, prb, prc, prd, pre, prl, prstab, or rmp for journal
21: % Add 'draft' option to mark overfull boxes with black boxes
22: % Add 'showpacs' option to make PACS codes appear
23: %\documentclass[aps,prl,showpacs,twocolumn,groupedaddress]{revtex4} % mimic journal output
24: %\documentclass[aps,prl,showpacs,groupedaddress]{revtex4} % for submitting to hep-ex
25: \documentclass[preprint,showpacs,eqsecnum,epsf,aps,floats,tighten]{revtex4}
26: \usepackage{graphicx} % needed for figures
27: \usepackage{dcolumn} % needed for some tables
28: \usepackage{bm} % for math
29: \usepackage{amssymb} % for math
30:
31: \def\CLB{CL_{\it B}}
32: \def\CLS{CL_{\it S}}
33: \def\CLSB{CL_{\it S+B}}
34: \def\Hpm{ {\it H}^{\pm\pm}}
35: \def\HpmLR{ {\it H}^{\pm\pm}_{\it L(R)}}
36: \def\HpmL{ {\it H}^{\pm\pm}_{\it L}}
37: \def\HpmR{ {\it H}^{\pm\pm}_{\it R}}
38: \def\HppL{ {\it H}^{++}_{\it L}}
39: \def\HmmL{ {\it H}^{--}_{\it L}}
40: \def\HppR{ {\it H}^{++}_{\it R}}
41: \def\HmmR{ {\it H}^{--}_{\it R}}
42: \def\Hpp{ {\it H}^{++}}
43: \def\Hmm{ {\it H}^{--}}
44: \def\ppbar{{\it p}\overline{\it p}}
45: \def\ttbar{{\it t}\overline{\it t}}
46: \def\bbbar{{\it b}\overline{\it b}}
47: \def\qqbar{{\it q}\overline{\it q}}
48: \def\pz{\phantom{0}}
49: \def\pzz{\phantom{00}}
50:
51: \begin{document}
52:
53: \title{
54: Search for Doubly-charged Higgs Boson Pair Production in the
55: Decay to~$\bm{\mu^{+}\mu^{+}\mu^{-}\mu^{-}}$
56: in $\bm\ppbar$ Collisions at $\bm{\sqrt{s}=1.96}$~TeV}
57:
58: \input list_of_authors_r2.tex % input Dzero author list
59: \date{\today}
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62: A search for pair production of
63: doubly-charged Higgs bosons in the process
64: $\ppbar\to\Hpp\Hmm\to \mu^+\mu^+\mu^-\mu^-$ is performed
65: with the D\O\ Run II detector at the Fermilab Tevatron.
66: The analysis is based on a sample of inclusive di-muon
67: data collected at an energy of $\sqrt{s}=1.96$~TeV,
68: corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $113~$pb$^{-1}$.
69: In the absence of a signal, $95\%$~confidence level
70: mass limits of $M(\HpmL)>118.4$~GeV$/c^2$ and $M(\HpmR)>98.2$~GeV$/c^2$
71: are set for left-handed and right-handed
72: doubly-charged Higgs bosons, respectively, assuming $100\%$ branching
73: into muon pairs.
74: \end{abstract}
75:
76: \pacs{14.80.Cp
77: \hspace{2cm} FERMILAB-Pub-04/045-E}
78: \maketitle
79: Doubly-charged Higgs bosons appear in theories
80: beyond the Standard Model,
81: in particular, in left-right symmetric models~\cite{bib-lr},
82: in Higgs triplet models~\cite{bib-theo} and in
83: Little-Higgs models~\cite{bib-little}.
84: The models predict dominant decay modes to like-charge lepton pairs,
85: $\Hpm\to\ell^{\pm}\ell^{\pm}$.
86: Pairs of doubly-charged Higgs bosons
87: can be produced through the Drell-Yan process
88: $\qqbar\to\gamma^{*}/{\it Z}\to\Hpp\Hmm$.
89: Next-to-leading order (NLO) corrections to this cross section
90: have recently been calculated~\cite{bib-spira}.
91: The pair production cross sections
92: for left-handed states in the mass
93: range studied in this Letter are about a factor two
94: larger than for the right-handed
95: states due to different coupling to the {\it Z} boson.
96: Left-handed and right-handed states are distinguished through their
97: decays into left-handed or right-handed leptons.
98: The cross section also depends on the hypercharge $Y$
99: of the $\Hpm$ boson.
100:
101: The $\Hpm$ decay width into leptons
102: is given by $\Gamma^{\ell\ell}=(8\pi)^{-1}|h_{\ell\ell}|^2
103: M_{\Hpm}$, where $h_{\ell\ell}$ is the Yukawa coupling to
104: leptons~\cite{bib-theo}.
105: A limit on $h_{\mu\mu}^2/M_{\Hpm}^2$, where $h_{\mu\mu}$ is
106: the Yukawa coupling to muons, can be
107: derived from the expected contribution to the anomalous
108: magnetic moment of the muon, $(g-2)_{\mu}$~\cite{bib-huitu}.
109: This yields upper limits on the
110: Yukawa coupling $h_{\mu\mu}$ of the order 0.1
111: for $M_{\Hpm }= 100$~GeV$/c^2$.
112: Requiring that $\Hpm$ bosons decay
113: within about $1$~cm of their production restricts
114: the sensitivity to $h_{\mu\mu}$ to
115: approximately greater than $10^{-7}$.
116:
117: Experiments at the CERN LEP collider
118: have searched for pair production of doubly-charged
119: Higgs bosons in ${\it e}^+{\it e}^-$ interactions.
120: Mass limits for decays into muons of $M(\HpmL) > 100.5$~GeV$/c^2$
121: and $M(\HpmR) > 100.1$~GeV$/c^2$ were obtained by the OPAL
122: collaboration~\cite{bib-OPAL},
123: and a limit of $M(\HpmLR) > 99.4$~GeV$/c^2$
124: by the L3 collaboration~\cite{bib-L3}.
125: Similar limits were set for decays into electrons~\cite{bib-OPAL,bib-L3}
126: and $\tau$-leptons~\cite{bib-OPAL,bib-L3,bib-DELPHI}.
127: Our measurement represents the first $\Hpm$ search at hadron colliders, and
128: it extends significantly the range of sensitivity
129: for left-handed doubly-charged Higgs bosons decaying into muons.
130: All limits in this Letter are given at $95\%$
131: confidence level (CL).
132:
133: The D\O\ Run II detector comprises
134: a central tracking system, a
135: liquid-argon/uranium calorimeter, and an iron toroid muon
136: spectrometer~\cite{run2det}.
137: The central tracking system
138: consists of a silicon microstrip tracker
139: (SMT) and a central fiber tracker (CFT), both located within a 2~T
140: superconducting solenoidal magnet.
141: The SMT strips have a typical pitch
142: of $50$--$80$~$\mu$m, and a design optimized for tracking and vertexing
143: capability in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|<3$.
144: The system has a six-barrel longitudinal structure,
145: each with a set of four layers arranged axially around the beam pipe,
146: and interspersed with sixteen
147: radial disks. The CFT has eight thin coaxial barrels,
148: each supporting two doublets of overlapping scintillating fibers of 0.835~mm
149: diameter, one doublet being parallel to the collision axis, and the other
150: alternating by $\pm 3^{\circ}$ relative to the axis.
151: The calorimeters consist of
152: a central section (CC) covering $|\eta|$
153: up to $\approx 1$, and
154: two end calorimeters (EC) extending
155: coverage to $|\eta|<4.2$,
156: all housed in separate cryostats~\cite{run1det}.
157: Scintillators between the
158: CC and EC cryostats provide sampling of showers at $1.1<|\eta|<1.4$.
159: A muon system resides beyond the calorimetry, and
160: consists of a layer of tracking
161: detectors and scintillation counters before 1.8~T iron toroids,
162: followed by two more similar layers after the toroids.
163: Tracking at $|\eta|<1$
164: relies on 10~cm wide drift tubes~\cite{run1det}, while 1~cm mini-drift
165: tubes are used at $1<|\eta|<2$.
166:
167: This analysis~\cite{bib-marian} is based on inclusive di-muon data recorded
168: between August 2002 and June 2003. The events are triggered
169: by requiring two muon candidates in the muon scintillation
170: counters and at least one reconstructed muon using
171: the muon wire chambers.
172: The integrated luminosity is measured using two scintillator hodoscopes located
173: on either side of the interaction region.
174: For the di-muon triggers the integrated luminosity is $113\pm 7$~pb$^{-1}$.
175:
176: Event selection proceeds in four steps.
177: The first step (selection S1) requires at least two muons.
178: Each muon used in the analysis must have a
179: transverse momentum $p_{\it T}>15$~GeV$/c$,
180: where $p_{\it T}$ is measured with respect to the beam axis.
181: The muon tracks are reconstructed using
182: wire and scintillator hits in the
183: different layers of the muon system.
184: These must be combined
185: successfully with a central track reconstructed in the SMT and CFT
186: detectors to measure the muon momentum.
187: A requirement on the timing of
188: hits in different scintillator layers is used to
189: minimize background from cosmic rays.
190:
191: The second set of selections (S2) is based on
192: isolation criteria based on calorimeter and tracking information,
193: and is designed primarily to reject background
194: from muons originating from semi-leptonic {\it B} hadron decays.
195: The direction of each muon track is projected through
196: the calorimeter. For at least two muons,
197: the sum of the transverse energies of the calorimeter cells in an annular
198: ring $0.1<R<0.4$ around each muon direction is required to be
199: $\sum_{\text{cells},i} E_{\it T}^i< 2.5$~GeV,
200: where $R=\sqrt{(\Delta\phi)^2+(\Delta\eta)^2}$ and $\phi$ is
201: the azimuthal angle.
202: In addition, the sum of the transverse momenta of all tracks
203: other than that of the muon in a cone of $R=0.5$ around the muon track
204: is required to satisfy
205: $\sum_{{\text{tracks}},i} p_{\it T}^i< 2.5$ GeV$/c$.
206:
207: Selection (S3) applies to events with just two muons and
208: requires a difference in azimuthal
209: angle $\Delta\phi<0.8\pi$.
210: It is applied to reject ${\it Z}\to\mu^+\mu^-$ events and
211: to reduce background from semi-leptonic {\it B} hadron decays.
212: This selection also removes the remaining background from cosmic muons.
213:
214: The final selection (S4) requires at least one pair of muons in the event
215: to be of like-sign charge. These pairs are considered
216: candidates for $\Hpm\to\mu^{\pm}\mu^{\pm}$ decays.
217:
218: The geometric and kinematic acceptance is taken from a
219: {\sc geant}-based~\cite{bib-geant} simulation of the detector.
220: All other efficiencies are determined from ${\it Z}\to\mu^+\mu^-$ data.
221: The single muon detection and reconstruction efficiencies, and the
222: efficiency of the isolation requirement
223: are measured by using one muon to tag the event
224: and the second muon to measure the efficiencies.
225: The trigger efficiency is measured
226: by analyzing events with calorimeter-based triggers which
227: are independent of the muon system.
228: To obtain the signal and background rates,
229: corrections are applied to the simulation so that it
230: reproduces the measured efficiencies.
231: The total signal efficiency for our event selection is
232: $(47.5\pm2.5)\%$ and does not depend on the mass of the
233: doubly-charged Higgs in the mass range studied.
234: \begin{table}[htbp]
235: \caption{\label{tab-all}
236: Expected number of events
237: %and efficiencies
238: for a signal with $M(\HpmL)=100$~GeV$/c^2$,
239: background events from Monte Carlo
240: for the available integrated data luminosity, and number of observed events
241: remaining after each selection cut.
242: The simulation of {\it Z} decays includes the Drell-Yan contribution.
243: %Only statistical uncertainties are given.
244: }
245: \begin{ruledtabular}
246: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
247: Selection & 2 muons & Isolation & $\Delta \phi<0.8\pi$ & Like-sign\\
248: & $p_T>15$~GeV$/c$ & & & \\
249: & S1 & S2 & S3 & S4\\
250: \hline
251: %Signal: & & & & \\
252: %Efficiency & $69\%$ & $62\%$ & $55\%$ & $(47.5\pm2.5)\%$ \\
253: Signal & $9.4$ & $8.5$ & $7.5$ & $6.5$ \\
254: \hline
255: ${\it Z}
256: \to\mu^+\mu^- $ & $4816$ & $4055$ & $359$ & $0.3\pm0.1$\\
257: $ \bbbar $ & $391$ & $18$ & $3.0$ & $0.8\pm0.4$\\
258: $ {\it Z}\to \tau^+\tau^- $ & $40$ & $34$ & $2.4$ & $<0.1$ \\
259: $ \ttbar $ & $3.0$ & $2.1$ & $1.5$ & $0.11\pm0.01$ \\
260: {\it ZZ} & $0.1$ & $0.1$ & $0.1$ & $0.05\pm0.01$ \\
261: {\it WZ} & $0.6$ & $0.5$ & $0.4$ & $0.23\pm0.01$ \\
262: {\it WW} & $3.5$ & $3.1$ & $1.9$ & $<0.01$ \\
263: \hline
264: Total & & & & \\
265: background & $5254 \pm 47$ & $4113 \pm 43$ & $368 \pm 14$ & $1.5\pm0.4$\\
266:
267: \hline
268: Data & $5168$ & $4133$ & $378$ & $3$ \\
269: \end{tabular}
270: \end{ruledtabular}
271: \end{table}
272: %
273: \begin{table}[htbp]
274: \caption{\label{tab-like}
275: Expected number
276: of background events from Monte Carlo for the available data
277: luminosity, and number of observed events
278: remaining after each selection cut, with
279: selection S4, requiring at least one like-charge muon pair,
280: applied together with S1.
281: Only statistical uncertainties are given.
282: The contribution from {\it WW} events is negligible.}
283: %Only statistical uncertainties are given.}
284: \begin{ruledtabular}
285: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
286: Selection & 2 muons & Isolation & $\Delta \phi<0.8\pi$ \\
287: (Like-sign) & $p_T>15$~GeV$/c$ & & \\
288: & S4 \& S1 & S2 & S3 \\
289: \hline
290: $Z\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^- $ & $0.9 \pm 0.3$ & $0.6\pm 0.2$ & $0.3\pm 0.1$ \\
291: $ \bbbar $ & $95.1\pm 3.3$ & $4.4\pm 1.9$ & $0.8\pm 0.4$ \\
292: $ Z
293: \to \tau^+\tau^- $ & $<0.1$& $<0.1$& $<0.1$ \\
294: $ \ttbar $ & $0.24 \pm 0.01$ & $0.11\pm 0.01$ & $0.11\pm 0.01$ \\
295: {\it ZZ} & $0.06 \pm 0.01$ & $0.05\pm 0.01$ & $0.05\pm 0.01$ \\
296: {\it WZ} & $0.29 \pm 0.01$ & $0.27\pm 0.01$ & $0.23\pm 0.01$ \\
297: \hline
298: Total & & & \\
299: background & $96.6\pm 3.3$ & $5.4\pm 1.9$ & $1.5\pm 0.4$ \\
300: \hline
301: Data & $101$ & $5$ & $3$ \\
302: \end{tabular}
303: \end{ruledtabular}
304: \end{table}
305:
306: Distributions of the di-muon mass and of $\Delta\phi$ after
307: selection S1 are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig-cut1}.
308: The data are compared to the sum
309: of Monte Carlo (MC) contributions from different
310: background processes.
311: In events with more than two muons, the
312: di-muon mass and $\Delta\phi$ are calculated only for the
313: two muons of highest $p_{\it T}$, independent of their charge.
314: Both signal and background events are generated with
315: {\sc pythia~6.2}~\cite{bib-pythia}.
316: The NNLO cross-section is used to normalize the
317: ${\it Z}\to \mu^+\mu^-$ sample~\cite{bib-nlo}.
318: {\sc pythia} does not provide a good description of the jet
319: multiplicity in {\it Z}+jets events.
320: Since the $\Delta\phi$ distributions
321: are expected to be sensitive to the number of jets,
322: the simulated ${\it Z}\to \mu^+\mu^-$ events are
323: re-weighted to reproduce the distribution of
324: jet multiplicities observed in data.
325: There is agreement between data and MC simulation,
326: for both the normalization and shapes of the di-muon mass and
327: \begin{figure}[htbp]
328: \includegraphics[width=1.0\columnwidth]{pic1.epsi}
329: \caption{\label{fig-cut1}
330: Measured distribution of (a) di-muon mass and
331: (b) $\Delta\phi$ compared
332: to the sum of MC background processes after selection S1.
333: Di-muon mass and $\Delta\phi$ are calculated for the two
334: highest $p_{\it T}$ muons, independent of their charge.
335: }
336: \end{figure}
337: $\Delta\phi$ distributions (Fig.~\ref{fig-cut1}).
338: The number of events remaining after each selection
339: and the efficiencies for a signal
340: of a mass of $M(\HpmL)=100$~GeV$/c^2$ are given in Table~\ref{tab-all}.
341:
342: The background contribution from
343: $\ttbar$ and di-boson ({\it WZ, ZZ} and {\it WW}) production
344: is also estimated by MC simulation.
345: The NLO cross section is used for $\ttbar$ events~\cite{bib-nlott}.
346: Higher-order QCD corrections to di-boson production are approximated
347: by multiplying the LO cross section given in
348: {\sc pythia} by a $K$-factor of $1.34$.
349:
350: When the requirement of having at least one pair of like-charge muons is
351: applied simultaneously with S1, most of the background
352: from {\it Z} boson decays is removed, and only 101 like-sign events remain
353: (Table~\ref{tab-like}). Since no isolation requirement is imposed
354: at this stage, the largest remaining background is from $\bbbar$
355: production.
356: {\sc pythia} is used to estimate this background
357: by generating inclusive jet events with
358: a minimum transverse momentum
359: of $30$~GeV$/c$ for the hard interaction.
360: The inclusive {\it b} quark production cross section
361: $\sigma^{\it b}(p_{\it T}^{\it b}>30\mbox{~GeV$/c$})$ was
362: measured by D\O\ to be $54\pm 20$~nb in the rapidity interval
363: $|y^{\it b}|<1$ at $\sqrt{s}=1.8$~TeV~\cite{bib-run1}.
364: This cross section is extrapolated via {\sc pythia} to the full $y^{\it b}$
365: range and to $\sqrt{s}=1.96$~TeV, and is then used to normalize the
366: $\bbbar$ MC sample.
367:
368: Distributions in di-muon mass and $\Delta\phi$
369: for the like-sign events are compared to the {\sc pythia} $\bbbar$ simulation
370: in Fig.~\ref{fig-like}. Since data and Monte Carlo are in good agreement,
371: the efficiency of the $\Delta\phi$ requirement is taken from the simulation.
372: The data are used to determine the isolation efficiency.
373: Out of 101 like-sign events, five remain after applying the isolation
374: requirement (S2).
375: Assuming that all like-sign events originate from $\bbbar$ processes,
376: the isolation efficiency for $\bbbar$ events is found to be $(5\pm2)\%$, and
377: the background from $\bbbar$ production
378: in the final sample is expected to be $0.8\pm0.3$ events.
379: Adding a systematic uncertainty of $37\%$
380: on the measured $\bbbar$ cross section~\cite{bib-run1}
381: yields a total uncertainty on the $\bbbar$ background of $50\%$.
382: \begin{figure}[htbp]
383: \includegraphics[width=1.0\columnwidth]{pic0.epsi}
384: \caption{\label{fig-like}
385: (a) Di-muon mass and (b) $\Delta\phi$ for the two like-charge muons
386: with the highest $p_{\it T}$. The 101 events remaining in the data
387: after the selections S1 and S4 (points with error bars) are compared to
388: the {\sc pythia} $\bbbar$ simulation (open histogram).
389: The five data events remaining after the isolation selection are shown
390: separately (full histogram).
391: }
392: \end{figure}
393:
394: Another potential background is from
395: ${\it Z}\to\mu^+\mu^-$ decays which are
396: not rejected by the $\Delta\phi<0.8\pi$ requirement,
397: and in which one of the
398: muon charges is misidentified.
399: For very high $p_{\it T}$ tracks,
400: the uncertainty on the measured curvature
401: can cause such a flip
402: of the track curvature. Most of these tracks have $|\eta|>1.62$, because
403: there are fewer CFT layers in this region.
404: The ${\it Z}\to\mu^+\mu^-$ simulation predicts
405: $0.3\pm0.1$ events after the final selection.
406: We have also estimated the probability
407: for charge misidentification using data.
408: The upper limit is given by the
409: ratio of like-sign (5) to opposite sign (4133) events after the selection S2
410: (Tables~\ref{tab-all} and \ref{tab-like}), and equals $0.12\%$.
411: Since 378 events remain before the like-sign requirement, then
412: assuming that the charge-misidentification probability is independent of the
413: $\Delta\phi$ requirement, less than $0.5\pm0.2$
414: background events are expected due
415: to charge misidentification. This is in good agreement with the simulation.
416: \begin{figure}[htbp]
417: \includegraphics[width=1.0\columnwidth]{pic3.epsi}
418: \caption{\label{fig-cut2}
419: (a) Di-muon mass and (b) $\Delta\phi$ for the two like-charge muons
420: of highest $p_{\it T}$.
421: The data are compared to the sum of MC background processes after
422: all selections.
423: The open histogram shows the distributions
424: for a left-handed, doubly-charged Higgs boson with a mass of $120$~GeV$/c^2$.
425: Since the $\Delta\phi$ requirement is only applied
426: to events with two muons, events with more than two muons
427: can contribute for $\Delta\phi>0.8\pi$.
428: }
429: \end{figure}
430:
431: The production of {\it W} bosons decaying into
432: $\mu\nu$, in association with jets,
433: is another source of background, but mainly at low di-muon mass.
434: By extrapolating to $p_{\it T}>15$~GeV$/c$
435: the steeply falling $p_{\it T}$ spectrum of muons that fail the isolation
436: requirements in di-muon events from a sample of ${\it W}\to\mu\nu$+jets data,
437: we estimate this contribution to be less than $0.1$ events.
438: The expected background rate,
439: as determined from the data, is in agreement with the MC simulation.
440:
441: Three candidates remain in the data after the final selection.
442: The di-muon mass and $\Delta\phi$ distributions for these
443: events are compared to the sum of MC backgrounds
444: in Fig.~\ref{fig-cut2}.
445: Two events have two negatively-charged
446: muons and one positively-charged muon.
447: Of the two, one has $\Delta\phi=2.48$, and it has the highest
448: like-sign di-muon mass ($183$~GeV$/c^2$) of the three candidates.
449: The like-sign di-muon mass of the second event is $63$~GeV$/c^2$ and
450: the invariant mass of the two highest $p_{\it T}$ muons
451: of opposite charge in this event is 91~GeV$/c^2$.
452: The third event has two positively-charged muons with a mass of $62$~GeV$/c^2$.
453: The higher $p_{\it T}$ track may be interpreted as a
454: case of charge misidentification since it traverses the CFT in a region with
455: less than 16 layers.
456:
457: \begin{figure}[htbp]
458: \includegraphics[width=0.98\columnwidth]{cl.epsi}
459: \caption{\label{fig-cl}
460: Confidence level $\CLS$ as a function
461: of the mass $M_{\Hpm}$ for (a) left-handed and (b)
462: right-handed doubly-charged Higgs bosons.
463: Masses with $\CLS<0.05$ are excluded by this analysis.
464: The mass regions excluded by LEP are also shown.
465: The impact of systematic uncertainties is included in the limits.
466: The dashed curve shows median expected $\CLS$ for no signal.
467: }
468: \end{figure}
469: Since the remaining candidate events are consistent with
470: a background observation, $\Hpm$ mass limits
471: are derived using the program
472: {\sc mclimit}~\cite{bib-tom}. It provides the confidence level for
473: the background to represent the data, $\CLB$, and the confidence level
474: for the sum of signal and background hypothesis, $\CLSB$,~\cite{bib-limit}
475: taking into account the expected mass distribution for signal and
476: background, and the mass resolution.
477: The mass resolution varies between
478: $\approx 7.6$~GeV$/c^2$ for $M_{\Hpm}=80$~GeV$/c^2$ and $\approx 30$~GeV$/c^2$
479: for $M_{\Hpm}=200$~GeV$/c^2$.
480: The expected rate for signal as a function of the Higgs mass
481: is determined by the NLO cross section~\cite{bib-spira},
482: the signal efficiencies, and the measured luminosity.
483: The $95\%$ CL limit for signal is defined as
484: $
485: \CLS=\CLSB/\CLB,
486: $
487: requiring $\CLS=0.05$.
488:
489: The following sources of systematic uncertainty
490: affecting the normalization of the signal are taken into account:
491: The systematic uncertainty on the luminosity
492: is estimated to be $6.5\%$.
493: The total uncertainty on the efficiency
494: amounts to $5\%$, and is
495: dominated by the uncertainties on the
496: efficiency to reconstruct an isolated muon and on
497: the trigger efficiency.
498: The uncertainty on the NLO $\Hpm$ production cross section from
499: choice of parton distribution functions and
500: renormalization and factorization scales
501: is about $10\%$~\cite{bib-spira}.
502: The uncertainty on the background from MC
503: is $27\%$ (Table~\ref{tab-like}).
504: This includes the statistical uncertainty
505: and the systematic uncertainty
506: on the measured $\bbbar$ cross section~\cite{bib-run1}.
507:
508: The systematic uncertainties on signal and background are taken into account
509: in the limit calculation through averaging over possible values of
510: signal and background, as given by their
511: probability distributions, which are assumed to be Gaussian~\cite{bib-tom}.
512: This procedure weakens the limit on the mass by about 1~GeV$/c^2$.
513: Other sources of systematic uncertainties,
514: such as interpolation procedure used for the
515: cross sections and the description of the mass resolution,
516: were examined and found to be negligible.
517:
518: Figure~\ref{fig-cl} shows $\CLS$ as a function
519: of the mass of a doubly-charged Higgs boson.
520: The median expected $\CLS$
521: indicates the sensitivity of the experiment for our luminosity,
522: assuming that there is no signal.
523: Taking into account systematic uncertainties,
524: a lower mass limit of $118.4$~GeV$/c^2$ is obtained for a left-handed
525: and $98.2$~GeV$/c^2$ for a right-handed doubly-charged Higgs boson,
526: assuming $100\%$ branching into muon pairs, hypercharge $Y=|2|$, and
527: Yukawa couplings $h_{\mu\mu}>10^{-7}$.
528: This is the first search for doubly-charged
529: Higgs bosons at hadron colliders.
530: It significantly extends the previous mass limit~\cite{bib-OPAL}
531: for a left-handed doubly-charged Higgs boson.
532:
533: \input acknowledgement_paragraph_r2.tex % input acknowledgement
534:
535: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
536: \input list_of_visitor_addresses_r2.tex % input visitors address
537:
538: \bibitem{bib-lr}
539: J.C. Pati and A. Salam,
540: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 10}, 275 (1974);
541: R.N. Mohapatra and J.C. Pati,
542: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 11}, 566 (1975);
543: G. Senjanovic and R.N. Mohapatra,
544: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 12}, 1502 (1975).
545: T. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 25}, 1355 (1982) and Addendum ibid
546: {\bf 27}, 657 (1983);
547: \bibitem{bib-theo}
548: See, for example:
549: H. Georgi and M. Machacek, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 262}, 463 (1985);
550: J.F. Gunion, R. Vega, and J. Wudka, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 42}, 1673 (1990);
551: J.F. Gunion, C. Loomis, and K.T. Pitts, hep-ph/9610237 (1996).
552: \bibitem{bib-little}
553: N. Arkani-Hamed {\it et al.}, JHEP 0208, {\bf 021}, (2002).
554: \bibitem{bib-spira}
555: M. M\"uhlleitner and M. Spira,
556: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68}, 117701 (2003) and private communications.
557: \bibitem{bib-huitu}
558: A.J. Davies and X.G. He, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 43}, 225 (1991);
559: K. Huitu {\it et al.}, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 487}, 27 (1997);
560: F. Cuypers and S. Davidson, Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 2}, 503 (1998);
561: G.W. Bennett {\it et al.}, hep-ex/0401008, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.
562: \bibitem{bib-OPAL}
563: G. Abbiendi {\it et al.}
564: (OPAL Collaboration),
565: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 577}, 93 (2003);
566: G. Abbiendi {\it et al.}
567: (OPAL Collaboration),
568: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 526}, 221 (2002).
569: P.D. Acton {\it et al.}
570: (OPAL Collaboration),
571: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 295}, 347 (1992).
572: \bibitem{bib-L3}
573: P. Achard {\it et al.}
574: (L3 Collaboration),
575: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 576}, 18 (2003).
576: \bibitem{bib-DELPHI}
577: J. Abdallah {\it et al.}
578: (DELPHI Collaboration),
579: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 552}, 127 (2003).
580: \bibitem{run2det}
581: V. Abazov {\it et al.} (D\O\ Collaboration),
582: to be submitted to Nucl. Instrum. Methods A;
583: T. LeCompte and H.T. Diehl, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. {\bf 50}, 71 (2000).
584: \bibitem{run1det}
585: S. Abachi {\it et al.} (D\O\ Collaboration),
586: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Methods Phys.\ Res.\ A {\bf 338}, 185 (1994).
587: \bibitem{bib-marian}
588: M. Zdra\v{z}il, PhD Thesis, State University of New York,
589: Stony Brook (2004) (unpublished).
590: \bibitem{bib-geant}
591: R. Brun and F. Carminati, CERN Program Library Long Writeup W5013, 1993
592: (unpublished).
593: \bibitem{bib-pythia}
594: T. Sj\"ostrand {\it et al.}, Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 135}, 238 (2001).
595: \bibitem{bib-nlo}
596: R. Hamberg, W.L. van Neerven, and T. Matsuura,
597: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B{\bf 359}, 343 (1991),
598: Erratum ibid. B{\bf 644}, 403 (2002).
599: \bibitem{bib-nlott}
600: N. Kidonakis, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 014009 (2001);
601: N. Kidonakis, E. Laenen, S. Moch, and R. Vogt,
602: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} 114001 (2001).
603: \bibitem{bib-run1}
604: S. Abachi {\it et al.}
605: (D\O\ Collaboration),
606: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 3548 (1995).
607: \bibitem{bib-tom}
608: T. Junk, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Methods A {\bf 434}, 435 (1999).
609: \bibitem{bib-limit}
610: R. Barate {\it et al.}
611: (ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL Collaborations and the LEP Working Group
612: for Higgs Boson Searches),
613: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 565}, 61 (2003).
614: \end{thebibliography}
615:
616: \end{document}
617: %
618: % ****** End of file template.aps ******
619:
620:
621: