1: % File Generated 2004-1-11
2: %%%
3:
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: % FOLLOWING A GENERIC HEADER FOR TEX
6: % nothing here relates to author list
7: % may be deleted or replace by more updated code.
8:
9: % Based on RevTEX4
10:
11: \documentclass[twocolumn,prl,superscriptaddress,showpacs]{revtex4}
12: %% \setlength{\topmargin}{-1.0cm}so
13: \usepackage{graphicx}
14: %%\usepackage{dcolumn}
15: \begin{document}
16: \title{Exclusive $\rho^0$ meson electroproduction from hydrogen
17: at CLAS}
18:
19:
20: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
21: % include other start up commands
22: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
23: % List of authors
24: % Generated from the clas database.
25: % Concerns about content related to future author lists email clasmbr@jlab.org
26: % Concerns about content related to this publication must be sent to first authors
27: % While writers of a publication will start with this list,
28: % they maintain their own corrected verions as part of the developing publication.
29: %
30: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
31: % commands
32: % define a shorthand notation XXX for affiliation names and addresses
33: % \newcommand*{\XXX}{Name, Address}
34: % use the new commands
35: % \affiliation{\XXX} standard
36: % \altaffiliation{\XXX} current address if different from above
37: % to add the University and address information to each author
38: %
39: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
40: %
41: %
42: %
43: %
44: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
45: %
46: % date generated 2004-1-11
47: %
48: % List is based on a time range
49: % start boundary 1= Fri Jan 01 00:00:01 EST 1999
50: % end boundary 1 = Tue Jun 01 00:00:01 EDT 1999
51: % Full and Term members (and recent term) within the data recording period are made authors
52: %
53: % Last window is the current members time window
54: % Including all term members that are currently members (term authorship bylaw)
55: %
56: % Limited members are the responsibility of the first authors of the paper
57: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
58: %
59: %
60: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
61: % Database contains a list of periods for each person
62: % If a person is found to be a full or term member
63: % then the affiliations at that time are listed
64: %
65: % The current affiliation is checked if it is different from
66: % the affiliations listed then a current location is added
67: % The publication status is checked. Some people are not interested
68: % in any CLAS pubs and this is recorded in the database.
69: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
70: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
71: % Photon only people have been excluded
72: % Electron only data assumed
73: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
74: %%%%%%%%%%%% Institutes Number and definitions %%%%%%%%%%%
75:
76: % FIRST time through establishes the order
77: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
78: \newcommand*{\ORSAY }{ Institut de Physique Nucleaire ORSAY, Orsay, France}
79: \affiliation{\ORSAY }
80:
81: \newcommand*{\INFNFR }{ INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy}
82: \affiliation{\INFNFR }
83:
84: \newcommand*{\SACLAY }{ CEA-Saclay, Service de Physique Nucl\'eaire, F91191 Gif-sur-Yvette,Cedex, France}
85: \affiliation{\SACLAY }
86:
87: \newcommand*{\JLAB }{ Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, Virginia 23606}
88: \affiliation{\JLAB }
89:
90: \newcommand*{\WM }{ College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187-8795}
91: \affiliation{\WM }
92:
93: \newcommand*{\ASU }{ Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1504}
94: \affiliation{\ASU }
95:
96: \newcommand*{\UCLA }{ University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1547}
97: \affiliation{\UCLA }
98:
99: \newcommand*{\CMU }{ Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213}
100: \affiliation{\CMU }
101:
102: \newcommand*{\CUA }{ Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064}
103: \affiliation{\CUA }
104:
105: \newcommand*{\CNU }{ Christopher Newport University, Newport News, Virginia 23606}
106: \affiliation{\CNU }
107:
108: \newcommand*{\UCONN }{ University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269}
109: \affiliation{\UCONN }
110:
111: \newcommand*{\DUKE }{ Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0305}
112: \affiliation{\DUKE }
113:
114: \newcommand*{\ECOSSEE }{ Edinburgh University, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, United Kingdom}
115: \affiliation{\ECOSSEE }
116:
117: \newcommand*{\FIU }{ Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199}
118: \affiliation{\FIU }
119:
120: \newcommand*{\FSU }{ Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306}
121: \affiliation{\FSU }
122:
123: \newcommand*{\GEISSEN }{ Physikalisches Institut der Universitaet Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany}
124: \affiliation{\GEISSEN }
125:
126: \newcommand*{\GWU }{ The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052}
127: \affiliation{\GWU }
128:
129: \newcommand*{\ECOSSEG }{ University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom}
130: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG }
131:
132: \newcommand*{\INFNGE }{ INFN, Sezione di Genova, 16146 Genova, Italy}
133: \affiliation{\INFNGE }
134:
135: \newcommand*{\ITEP }{ Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, 117259, Russia}
136: \affiliation{\ITEP }
137:
138: \newcommand*{\JMU }{ James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807}
139: \affiliation{\JMU }
140:
141: \newcommand*{\KYUNGPOOK }{ Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, South Korea}
142: \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK }
143:
144: \newcommand*{\MIT }{ Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307}
145: \affiliation{\MIT }
146:
147: \newcommand*{\UMASS }{ University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003}
148: \affiliation{\UMASS }
149:
150: \newcommand*{\UNH }{ University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824-3568}
151: \affiliation{\UNH }
152:
153: \newcommand*{\NSU }{ Norfolk State University, Norfolk, Virginia 23504}
154: \affiliation{\NSU }
155:
156: \newcommand*{\OHIOU }{ Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701}
157: \affiliation{\OHIOU }
158:
159: \newcommand*{\ODU }{ Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529}
160: \affiliation{\ODU }
161:
162: \newcommand*{\PENN }{ Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 15260}
163: \affiliation{\PENN }
164:
165: \newcommand*{\PITT }{ University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260}
166: \affiliation{\PITT }
167:
168: \newcommand*{\RPI }{ Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180-3590}
169: \affiliation{\RPI }
170:
171: \newcommand*{\ROMA }{ Universita' di ROMA III, 00146 Roma, Italy}
172: \affiliation{\ROMA }
173:
174: \newcommand*{\RICE }{ Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005-1892}
175: \affiliation{\RICE }
176:
177: \newcommand*{\URICH }{ University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia 23173}
178: \affiliation{\URICH }
179:
180: \newcommand*{\SCAROLINA }{ University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208}
181: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA }
182:
183: \newcommand*{\UNIONC }{ Union College, Schenectady, NY 12308}
184: \affiliation{\UNIONC }
185:
186: \newcommand*{\VT }{ Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0435}
187: \affiliation{\VT }
188:
189: \newcommand*{\VIRGINIA }{ University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901}
190: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA }
191:
192: \newcommand*{\TURKEY }{ Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey}
193: \affiliation{\TURKEY }
194:
195: \newcommand*{\YEREVAN }{ Yerevan Physics Institute, 375036 Yerevan, Armenia}
196: \affiliation{\YEREVAN }
197:
198: \newcommand*{\NOWNCATU }{ North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411}
199:
200: \newcommand*{\NOWECOSSEG }{ University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom}
201:
202: \newcommand*{\NOWSCAROLINA }{ University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208}
203:
204: \newcommand*{\NOWJLAB }{ Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, Virginia 23606}
205:
206: \newcommand*{\NOWOHIOU }{ Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701}
207:
208: \newcommand*{\NOWFIU }{ Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199}
209:
210: \newcommand*{\NOWODU }{ Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529}
211:
212: \newcommand*{\NOWINFNFR }{ INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy}
213:
214: \newcommand*{\NOWCMU }{ Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213}
215:
216: \newcommand*{\NOWCUA }{ Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064}
217:
218: \newcommand*{\NOWINDSTRA }{ Systems Planning and Analysis, Alexandria, Virginia 22311}
219:
220: \newcommand*{\NOWASU }{ Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1504}
221:
222: \newcommand*{\NOWCISCO }{ Cisco, Washington, DC 20052}
223:
224: \newcommand*{\NOWUK }{ University of Kentucky, LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY 40506}
225:
226: \newcommand*{\NOWUNCW }{ North Carolina}
227:
228: \newcommand*{\NOWHAMPTON }{ Hampton University, Hampton, VA 23668}
229:
230: \newcommand*{\NOW }{ }
231:
232: \newcommand*{\NOWTulane }{ Tulane University, New Orleans, Lousiana 70118}
233:
234: \newcommand*{\NOWSACLAY }{ CEA-Saclay, Service de Physique Nucl\'eaire, F91191 Gif-sur-Yvette,Cedex, France}
235:
236: \newcommand*{\NOWGEORGETOWN }{ Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057}
237:
238: \newcommand*{\NOWJMU }{ James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807}
239:
240: \newcommand*{\NOWURICH }{ University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia 23173}
241:
242: \newcommand*{\NOWCALTECH }{ California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125}
243:
244: \newcommand*{\NOWMOSCOW }{ Moscow State University, General Nuclear Physics Institute, 119899 Moscow, Russia}
245:
246: \newcommand*{\NOWVIRGINIA }{ University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901}
247:
248: \newcommand*{\NOWYEREVAN }{ Yerevan Physics Institute, 375036 Yerevan, Armenia}
249:
250: \newcommand*{\NOWRICE }{ Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005-1892}
251:
252: \newcommand*{\NOWINFNGE }{ INFN, Sezione di Genova, 16146 Genova, Italy}
253:
254: \newcommand*{\NOWROMA }{ Universita' di ROMA III, 00146 Roma, Italy}
255:
256: \newcommand*{\NOWBATES }{ MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Middleton, MA 01949}
257:
258: \newcommand*{\NOWKYUNGPOOK }{ Kungpook National University, Taegu 702-701, South Korea}
259:
260: \newcommand*{\NOWFSU }{ Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306}
261:
262: \newcommand*{\NOWVSU }{ Virginia State University, Petersburg,Virginia 23806}
263:
264: \newcommand*{\NOWORST }{ Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-6507}
265:
266: \newcommand*{\NOWGWU }{ The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052}
267:
268: \newcommand*{\NOWMIT }{ Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307}
269:
270: \newcommand*{\NOWWM }{ College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187-8795}
271:
272: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% authors %%%%%%%%%
273:
274: \author{C.~Hadjidakis}
275:
276: \affiliation{\ORSAY}
277: \affiliation{\INFNFR}
278:
279: \author{M.~Guidal}
280:
281: \affiliation{\ORSAY}
282:
283: \author{M.~Gar\c{c}on}
284:
285: \affiliation{\SACLAY}
286:
287: \author{J.-M. Laget}
288:
289: \affiliation{\SACLAY}
290:
291: \author{E.S.~Smith}
292:
293: \affiliation{\JLAB}
294:
295: \author{M.~Vanderhaeghen}
296:
297: \affiliation{\JLAB}
298: \affiliation{\WM}
299:
300: \author{G.~Adams}
301:
302: \affiliation{\RPI}
303:
304: \author{P.~Ambrozewicz}
305:
306:
307: \affiliation{\FIU}
308: \author{E.~Anciant}
309:
310:
311: \affiliation{\SACLAY}
312: \author{M.~Anghinolfi}
313:
314:
315: \affiliation{\INFNGE}
316: \author{B.~Asavapibhop}
317:
318:
319: \affiliation{\UMASS}
320: \author{G.~Asryan}
321:
322:
323: \affiliation{\YEREVAN}
324: \author{G.~Audit}
325:
326:
327: \affiliation{\SACLAY}
328: \author{T.~Auger}
329:
330:
331: \affiliation{\SACLAY}
332: \author{H.~Avakian}
333:
334:
335: \affiliation{\JLAB}
336: \affiliation{\INFNFR}
337: \author{H.~Bagdasaryan}
338:
339:
340: \affiliation{\ODU}
341: \author{J.P.~Ball}
342:
343:
344: \affiliation{\ASU}
345: \author{S.~Barrow}
346:
347:
348: \affiliation{\FSU}
349: \author{M.~Battaglieri}
350:
351:
352: \affiliation{\INFNGE}
353: \author{K.~Beard}
354:
355:
356: \affiliation{\JMU}
357: \author{M.~Bektasoglu}
358:
359: % \altaffiliation[Current address:]{\NOWOHIOU}
360: \affiliation{\OHIOU}
361: \affiliation{\ODU}
362: \affiliation{\TURKEY}
363: \author{M.~Bellis}
364:
365:
366: \affiliation{\CMU}
367: \author{N.~Benmouna}
368:
369:
370: \affiliation{\GWU}
371: \author{B.L.~Berman}
372:
373:
374: \affiliation{\GWU}
375: \author{N.~Bianchi}
376:
377:
378: \affiliation{\INFNFR}
379: \author{A.S.~Biselli}
380:
381:
382: \affiliation{\CMU}
383: % \affiliation{\RPI}
384: \author{S.~Boiarinov}
385:
386: % \altaffiliation[Current address:]{\NOWJLAB}
387:
388: \affiliation{\JLAB}
389: \affiliation{\ITEP}
390: \author{B.E.~Bonner}
391:
392:
393: \affiliation{\RICE}
394: \author{S.~Bouchigny}
395:
396:
397: \affiliation{\ORSAY}
398: \affiliation{\JLAB}
399: \author{R.~Bradford}
400:
401:
402: \affiliation{\CMU}
403: \author{D.~Branford}
404:
405:
406: \affiliation{\ECOSSEE}
407: \author{W.J.~Briscoe}
408:
409:
410: \affiliation{\GWU}
411: \author{W.K.~Brooks}
412:
413:
414: \affiliation{\JLAB}
415: \author{V.D.~Burkert}
416:
417:
418: \affiliation{\JLAB}
419: \author{C.~Butuceanu}
420:
421:
422: \affiliation{\WM}
423: \author{J.R.~Calarco}
424:
425:
426: \affiliation{\UNH}
427: \author{D.S.~Carman}
428:
429: % \altaffiliation[Current address:]{\NOWOHIOU}
430:
431: % \affiliation{\CMU}
432: \affiliation{\OHIOU}
433: \author{B.~Carnahan}
434:
435:
436: \affiliation{\CUA}
437: \author{C.~Cetina}
438:
439: % \altaffiliation[Current address:]{\NOWCMU}
440:
441: \affiliation{\GWU}
442: \author{S.~Chen}
443:
444:
445: \affiliation{\FSU}
446: %\author{L.~Ciciani}
447:
448:
449: % \affiliation{\ODU}
450: \author{P.L.~Cole}
451:
452: % \altaffiliation[Current address:]{\NOWCUA}
453:
454: \affiliation{\CUA}
455: \affiliation{\JLAB}
456: \author{A.~Coleman}
457:
458: % \altaffiliation[Current address:]{\NOWINDSTRA}
459:
460: \affiliation{\WM}
461: \author{D.~Cords}
462:
463: \affiliation{\JLAB}
464: \author{P.~Corvisiero}
465:
466:
467: \affiliation{\INFNGE}
468: \author{D.~Crabb}
469:
470:
471: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}
472: \author{H.~Crannell}
473:
474:
475: \affiliation{\CUA}
476: \author{J.P.~Cummings}
477:
478:
479: \affiliation{\RPI}
480: \author{E.~De~Sanctis}
481:
482:
483: \affiliation{\INFNFR}
484: \author{R.~DeVita}
485:
486:
487: \affiliation{\INFNGE}
488: \author{P.V.~Degtyarenko}
489:
490:
491: \affiliation{\JLAB}
492: \author{L.~Dennis}
493:
494:
495: \affiliation{\FSU}
496: \author{K.V.~Dharmawardane}
497:
498:
499: \affiliation{\ODU}
500: \author{K.S.~Dhuga}
501:
502:
503: \affiliation{\GWU}
504:
505: \author{J.-P. Didelez}
506:
507: \affiliation{\ORSAY}
508:
509: \author{C.~Djalali}
510:
511:
512: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}
513: \author{G.E.~Dodge}
514:
515:
516: \affiliation{\ODU}
517: \author{D.~Doughty}
518:
519:
520: \affiliation{\CNU}
521: \affiliation{\JLAB}
522: \author{P.~Dragovitsch}
523:
524:
525: \affiliation{\FSU}
526: \author{M.~Dugger}
527:
528:
529: \affiliation{\ASU}
530: \author{S.~Dytman}
531:
532:
533: \affiliation{\PITT}
534: \author{O.P.~Dzyubak}
535:
536:
537: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}
538: \author{H.~Egiyan}
539:
540:
541: \affiliation{\JLAB}
542: \affiliation{\WM}
543: \author{K.S.~Egiyan}
544:
545:
546: \affiliation{\YEREVAN}
547: \author{L.~Elouadrhiri}
548:
549:
550: \affiliation{\CNU}
551: \affiliation{\JLAB}
552: \author{A.~Empl}
553:
554:
555: \affiliation{\RPI}
556: \author{P.~Eugenio}
557:
558:
559: \affiliation{\FSU}
560: \author{L.~Farhi}
561:
562:
563: \affiliation{\SACLAY}
564: \author{R.~Fatemi}
565:
566:
567: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}
568: \author{R.J.~Feuerbach}
569:
570:
571: \affiliation{\JLAB}
572: \author{T.A.~Forest}
573:
574:
575: \affiliation{\ODU}
576: \author{V.~Frolov}
577:
578:
579: \affiliation{\RPI}
580: \author{H.~Funsten}
581:
582:
583: \affiliation{\WM}
584: \author{S.J.~Gaff}
585:
586:
587: \affiliation{\DUKE}
588: \author{G.~Gavalian}
589:
590:
591: % \affiliation{\UNH}
592: % \affiliation{\YEREVAN}
593: \affiliation{\ODU}
594: \author{G.P.~Gilfoyle}
595:
596:
597: \affiliation{\URICH}
598: \author{K.L.~Giovanetti}
599:
600:
601: \affiliation{\JMU}
602: \author{P.~Girard}
603:
604:
605: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}
606: \author{C.I.O.~Gordon}
607:
608:
609: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}
610: \author{R.W.~Gothe}
611:
612:
613: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}
614: \author{K.A.~Griffioen}
615:
616:
617: \affiliation{\WM}
618:
619: \author{M.~Guillo}
620:
621:
622: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}
623:
624: \author{M.~Guler}
625:
626:
627: \affiliation{\ODU}
628:
629: \author{L.~Guo}
630:
631:
632: \affiliation{\JLAB}
633: \author{V.~Gyurjyan}
634:
635:
636: \affiliation{\JLAB}
637:
638: \author{R.S.~Hakobyan}
639:
640:
641: \affiliation{\CUA}
642: \author{J.~Hardie}
643:
644:
645: \affiliation{\CNU}
646: \affiliation{\JLAB}
647: \author{D.~Heddle}
648:
649:
650: \affiliation{\CNU}
651: \affiliation{\JLAB}
652: \author{F.W.~Hersman}
653:
654:
655: \affiliation{\UNH}
656: \author{K.~Hicks}
657:
658:
659: \affiliation{\OHIOU}
660: \author{H.~Hleiqawi}
661:
662:
663: \affiliation{\OHIOU}
664: \author{M.~Holtrop}
665:
666:
667: \affiliation{\UNH}
668:
669: \author{E. Hourany}
670:
671:
672: \affiliation{\ORSAY}
673:
674: \author{J.~Hu}
675:
676:
677: \affiliation{\RPI}
678: \author{C.E.~Hyde-Wright}
679:
680:
681: \affiliation{\ODU}
682: \author{Y.~Ilieva}
683:
684:
685: \affiliation{\GWU}
686: \author{D.~Ireland}
687:
688:
689: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}
690: \author{M.M.~Ito}
691:
692:
693: \affiliation{\JLAB}
694: \author{D.~Jenkins}
695:
696:
697: \affiliation{\VT}
698: \author{K.~Joo}
699:
700:
701: \affiliation{\UCONN}
702: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}
703: \author{H.G.~Juengst}
704:
705:
706: \affiliation{\GWU}
707: \author{J.H.~Kelley}
708:
709:
710: \affiliation{\DUKE}
711: \author{J.~Kellie}
712:
713:
714: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}
715: \author{M.~Khandaker}
716:
717:
718: \affiliation{\NSU}
719: %\author{D.H.~Kim}
720:
721:
722: % \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK}
723: \author{K.Y.~Kim}
724:
725:
726: \affiliation{\PITT}
727: \author{K.~Kim}
728:
729:
730: \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK}
731: %\author{M.S.~Kim}
732:
733:
734: % \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK}
735: \author{W.~Kim}
736:
737:
738: \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK}
739: \author{A.~Klein}
740:
741:
742: \affiliation{\ODU}
743: \author{F.J.~Klein}
744:
745: \affiliation{\CUA}
746: \affiliation{\JLAB}
747:
748: \author{A.V.~Klimenko}
749:
750:
751: \affiliation{\ODU}
752: \author{M.~Klusman}
753:
754:
755: \affiliation{\RPI}
756: \author{M.~Kossov}
757:
758:
759: \affiliation{\ITEP}
760: \author{L.H.~Kramer}
761:
762:
763: \affiliation{\FIU}
764: \affiliation{\JLAB}
765: \author{S.E.~Kuhn}
766:
767:
768: \affiliation{\ODU}
769: \author{J.~Kuhn}
770:
771:
772: \affiliation{\CMU}
773: \author{J.~Lachniet}
774:
775:
776: \affiliation{\CMU}
777:
778: \author{J.~Langheinrich}
779:
780:
781: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}
782: \author{D.~Lawrence}
783:
784:
785: \affiliation{\UMASS}
786: \author{T.~Lee}
787:
788:
789: \affiliation{\UNH}
790: \author{Ji~Li}
791:
792:
793: \affiliation{\RPI}
794: \author{K.~Livingstone}
795:
796:
797: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}
798: \author{K.~Lukashin}
799:
800: % \altaffiliation[Current address:]{\NOWCUA}
801: \affiliation{\JLAB}
802: \author{J.J.~Manak}
803:
804:
805: \affiliation{\JLAB}
806: \author{C.~Marchand}
807:
808:
809: \affiliation{\SACLAY}
810: \author{L.C.~Maximon}
811:
812:
813: \affiliation{\GWU}
814: \author{S.~McAleer}
815:
816:
817: \affiliation{\FSU}
818: \author{J.W.C.~McNabb}
819:
820:
821: \affiliation{\PENN}
822: \author{B.A.~Mecking}
823:
824:
825: \affiliation{\JLAB}
826: \author{J.J.~Melone}
827:
828:
829: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}
830: \author{M.D.~Mestayer}
831:
832:
833: \affiliation{\JLAB}
834: \author{C.A.~Meyer}
835:
836:
837: \affiliation{\CMU}
838: \author{K.~Mikhailov}
839:
840:
841: \affiliation{\ITEP}
842: \author{R.~Minehart}
843:
844:
845: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}
846: \author{M.~Mirazita}
847:
848:
849: \affiliation{\INFNFR}
850: \author{R.~Miskimen}
851:
852:
853: \affiliation{\UMASS}
854: \author{L.~Morand}
855:
856:
857: \affiliation{\SACLAY}
858: \author{S.A.~Morrow}
859:
860:
861: \affiliation{\ORSAY}
862: \affiliation{\SACLAY}
863: %\author{M.U.~Mozer}
864:
865:
866: % \affiliation{\OHIOU}
867: \author{V.~Muccifora}
868:
869:
870: \affiliation{\INFNFR}
871: \author{J.~Mueller}
872:
873:
874: \affiliation{\PITT}
875: \author{G.S.~Mutchler}
876:
877:
878: \affiliation{\RICE}
879: \author{J.~Napolitano}
880:
881:
882: \affiliation{\RPI}
883: \author{R.~Nasseripour}
884:
885:
886: \affiliation{\FIU}
887: \author{S.O.~Nelson}
888:
889:
890: \affiliation{\DUKE}
891: \author{S.~Niccolai}
892:
893:
894: \affiliation{\ORSAY}
895: \affiliation{\GWU}
896: \author{G.~Niculescu}
897:
898:
899: \affiliation{\JMU}
900: \affiliation{\OHIOU}
901: \author{I.~Niculescu}
902:
903:
904: \affiliation{\JMU}
905: \affiliation{\GWU}
906: \author{B.B.~Niczyporuk}
907:
908:
909: \affiliation{\JLAB}
910: \author{R.A.~Niyazov}
911:
912:
913: \affiliation{\JLAB}
914: \affiliation{\ODU}
915: \author{M.~Nozar}
916:
917: \affiliation{\JLAB}
918: f
919: \author{G.V.~O'Rielly}
920:
921:
922: \affiliation{\GWU}
923: %\author{A.K.~Opper}
924:
925:
926: % \affiliation{\OHIOU}
927: \author{M.~Osipenko}
928:
929:
930: \affiliation{\INFNGE}
931: \author{K.~Park}
932:
933:
934: \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK}
935: \author{E.~Pasyuk}
936:
937:
938: \affiliation{\ASU}
939: \author{G.~Peterson}
940:
941:
942: \affiliation{\UMASS}
943: \author{S.A.~Philips}
944:
945:
946: \affiliation{\GWU}
947: \author{N.~Pivnyuk}
948:
949:
950: \affiliation{\ITEP}
951: \author{D.~Pocanic}
952:
953:
954: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}
955: \author{O.~Pogorelko}
956:
957:
958: \affiliation{\ITEP}
959: \author{E.~Polli}
960:
961:
962: \affiliation{\INFNFR}
963: \author{S.~Pozdniakov}
964:
965:
966: \affiliation{\ITEP}
967: \author{B.M.~Preedom}
968:
969:
970: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}
971: \author{J.W.~Price}
972:
973:
974: \affiliation{\UCLA}
975: \author{Y.~Prok}
976:
977:
978: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}
979: \author{D.~Protopopescu}
980:
981:
982: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}
983: \author{L.M.~Qin}
984:
985:
986: \affiliation{\ODU}
987: \author{B.A.~Raue}
988:
989:
990: \affiliation{\FIU}
991: \affiliation{\JLAB}
992: \author{G.~Riccardi}
993:
994:
995: \affiliation{\FSU}
996: \author{G.~Ricco}
997:
998:
999: \affiliation{\INFNGE}
1000: \author{M.~Ripani}
1001:
1002:
1003: \affiliation{\INFNGE}
1004: \author{B.G.~Ritchie}
1005:
1006:
1007: \affiliation{\ASU}
1008: \author{F.~Ronchetti}
1009:
1010:
1011: \affiliation{\INFNFR}
1012: \affiliation{\ROMA}
1013: \author{P.~Rossi}
1014:
1015:
1016: \affiliation{\INFNFR}
1017: \author{G.~Rosner}
1018:
1019:
1020: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}
1021: \author{D.~Rowntree}
1022:
1023:
1024: \affiliation{\MIT}
1025: \author{P.D.~Rubin}
1026:
1027:
1028: \affiliation{\URICH}
1029: \author{F.~Sabati\'e}
1030:
1031:
1032: \affiliation{\SACLAY}
1033: \affiliation{\ODU}
1034: \author{K.~Sabourov}
1035:
1036:
1037: \affiliation{\DUKE}
1038: \author{C.~Salgado}
1039:
1040:
1041: \affiliation{\NSU}
1042: \author{J.P.~Santoro}
1043:
1044:
1045: \affiliation{\VT}
1046: \affiliation{\JLAB}
1047: \author{V.~Sapunenko}
1048:
1049:
1050: \affiliation{\INFNGE}
1051: \author{R.A.~Schumacher}
1052:
1053:
1054: \affiliation{\CMU}
1055: \author{V.S.~Serov}
1056:
1057:
1058: \affiliation{\ITEP}
1059: \author{A.~Shafi}
1060:
1061:
1062: \affiliation{\GWU}
1063: \author{Y.G.~Sharabian}
1064:
1065: % \altaffiliation[Current address:]{\NOWJLAB}
1066:
1067: \affiliation{\JLAB}
1068: \affiliation{\YEREVAN}
1069: \author{J.~Shaw}
1070:
1071:
1072: \affiliation{\UMASS}
1073: \author{S.~Simionatto}
1074:
1075:
1076: \affiliation{\GWU}
1077: \author{A.V.~Skabelin}
1078:
1079:
1080: \affiliation{\MIT}
1081:
1082: \author{L.C.~Smith}
1083:
1084:
1085: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}
1086: \author{D.I.~Sober}
1087:
1088:
1089: \affiliation{\CUA}
1090: \author{M.~Spraker}
1091:
1092:
1093: \affiliation{\DUKE}
1094: \author{A.~Stavinsky}
1095:
1096:
1097: \affiliation{\ITEP}
1098: \author{S.~Stepanyan}
1099:
1100: % \altaffiliation[Current address:]{\NOWODU}
1101:
1102: \affiliation{\JLAB}
1103: \affiliation{\YEREVAN}
1104:
1105: \author{B.E.~Stokes}
1106:
1107:
1108: \affiliation{\FSU}
1109: \author{P.~Stoler}
1110:
1111:
1112: \affiliation{\RPI}
1113: %\author{I.I.~Strakovsky}
1114:
1115:
1116: % \affiliation{\GWU}
1117: \author{S.~Strauch}
1118:
1119:
1120: \affiliation{\GWU}
1121: \author{M.~Taiuti}
1122:
1123:
1124: \affiliation{\INFNGE}
1125: \author{S.~Taylor}
1126:
1127:
1128: \affiliation{\RICE}
1129: \author{D.J.~Tedeschi}
1130:
1131:
1132: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}
1133: \author{U.~Thoma}
1134:
1135:
1136: \affiliation{\GEISSEN}
1137: \affiliation{\JLAB}
1138: \author{R.~Thompson}
1139:
1140:
1141: \affiliation{\PITT}
1142: \author{A.~Tkabladze}
1143:
1144:
1145: \affiliation{\OHIOU}
1146: \author{L.~Todor}
1147:
1148:
1149: \affiliation{\URICH}
1150: \author{C.~Tur}
1151:
1152:
1153: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}
1154: \author{M.~Ungaro}
1155:
1156:
1157: \affiliation{\RPI}
1158: \author{M.F.~Vineyard}
1159:
1160:
1161: \affiliation{\UNIONC}
1162: \affiliation{\URICH}
1163: \author{A.V.~Vlassov}
1164:
1165:
1166: \affiliation{\ITEP}
1167: \author{K.~Wang}
1168:
1169:
1170: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}
1171: \author{L.B.~Weinstein}
1172:
1173:
1174: \affiliation{\ODU}
1175: %\author{A.~Weisberg}
1176:
1177:
1178: % \affiliation{\OHIOU}
1179: \author{H.~Weller}
1180:
1181:
1182: \affiliation{\DUKE}
1183: \author{D.P.~Weygand}
1184:
1185:
1186: \affiliation{\JLAB}
1187: \author{C.S.~Whisnant}
1188:
1189: % \altaffiliation[Current address:]{\NOWJMU}
1190:
1191: \affiliation{\JMU}
1192: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}
1193: \author{M.~Williams}
1194:
1195:
1196: \affiliation{\CMU}
1197: \author{E.~Wolin}
1198:
1199:
1200: \affiliation{\JLAB}
1201: \author{M.H.~Wood}
1202:
1203:
1204: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}
1205: \author{A.~Yegneswaran}
1206:
1207:
1208: \affiliation{\JLAB}
1209: \author{J.~Yun}
1210:
1211:
1212: \affiliation{\ODU}
1213: \author{L.~Zana}
1214:
1215:
1216: \affiliation{\UNH}
1217:
1218:
1219: \collaboration{The CLAS Collaboration}
1220: \noaffiliation
1221: %
1222:
1223: %The Southeastern Universities Research Association (SURA) operates the
1224: %Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility for the United States
1225: %Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-84ER40150.
1226: %
1227: %
1228: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1229: % FOLLOWING A GENERIC TAIL FOR TEX
1230: % Nothing here relates to author list
1231: % Suggestion for acknowledgements. Could be deleted.
1232: \date{\today}
1233: \begin{abstract}
1234: The longitudinal and transverse components of the cross section for
1235: the $e p\to e^\prime p \rho^0$ reaction were measured in Hall B
1236: at Jefferson Laboratory using the CLAS
1237: detector. The data were taken with a 4.247 GeV electron beam
1238: and were analyzed in a range of $x_B$ from 0.2 to 0.6 and of $Q^2$
1239: from 1.5 to 3.0 GeV$^2$. The data are compared to a Regge model
1240: based on effective hadronic degrees of freedom and to a
1241: calculation based on Generalized Parton Distributions.
1242: It is found that the transverse part of the cross section is well
1243: described by the former approach while the longitudinal part can be
1244: reproduced by the latter.
1245: \end{abstract}
1246: \pacs{13.60.Fz, 12.38.Bx, 13.60.Le}
1247: \maketitle
1248:
1249:
1250: Understanding the precise nature of the confinement of
1251: quarks and gluons inside hadrons has been an
1252: %ever-lasting
1253: ongoing problem
1254: since the advent, about 30 years ago, of the theory that governs their
1255: interactions, quantum chromodynamics (QCD). In particular, the
1256: transition between the high energy (small distance) domain,
1257: where quarks are quasi-free, and the low energy (large distance)
1258: regime, where they form bound states and are confined in hadrons,
1259: is still not well understood.
1260: \newline
1261: \indent
1262: The analysis of elementary processes, such as the exclusive electroproduction
1263: of a meson or a photon on the nucleon in the few GeV range, allows one to
1264: study this transition. In the case of exclusive meson electroproduction,
1265: the longitudinal and transverse polarizations of the (virtual)
1266: photon mediating the interaction provide two
1267: qualitatively different pieces of information about the nucleon structure.
1268: \newline
1269: \indent
1270: Longitudinal photons, whose transverse size is inversely
1271: proportional to their virtuality, truly act as a microscope.
1272: At sufficiently large $Q^2$, small distances are probed, and
1273: the asymptotic freedom of QCD justifies the understanding
1274: of the process in terms of partonic degrees of freedom and the use of
1275: perturbative QCD (pQCD) techniques. In particular, it has been recently
1276: shown~\cite{Collins97,frank97} that the non-perturbative information can be
1277: factorized in reactions such as exclusive
1278: vector meson electroproduction. Here the process can be described in
1279: terms of perturbative quark or gluon exchanges whose momentum, flavor,
1280: and spin distributions inside the nucleon are parametrized in terms of the
1281: recently introduced Generalized Parton Distributions
1282: (GPD's)~\cite{Ji97,Rady,Mul94}. This is the so-called
1283: ``handbag" diagram mechanism which is depicted in
1284: Fig.~\ref{fig:diags} (right diagram). At higher $\gamma^*p$ center-of-mass
1285: energies, $W$, than considered in this letter, 2-gluon exchange processes
1286: also intervene~\cite{frank97,param_GPD}.
1287: At low virtuality, $Q^2$, of the photon, hadronic degrees of freedom
1288: are more relevant and, above the nucleon resonance region, the process
1289: is adequately described in terms of meson exchanges (Fig.~\ref{fig:diags},
1290: left diagram).
1291: \newline
1292: \indent
1293: For transverse photons, however, this description in terms of
1294: quarks and gluons is not valid. A factorization into a hard and
1295: soft part does not hold~\cite{Collins97,frank97} and
1296: even at large $Q^2$, there is no dominance
1297: of a ``handbag" mechanism as in Fig.~\ref{fig:diags}. ``Soft"
1298: (non-perturbative) and ``hard" (perturbative) physics compete over
1299: a wider range of $Q^2$, and in practice it is necessary to take into account
1300: non-perturbative effects using hadron degrees of freedom.
1301: In order to access the fundamental partonic information when studying
1302: meson electroproduction processes, it is therefore highly
1303: desirable to isolate the
1304: longitudinal part of the cross section, which lends itself, at least at
1305: sufficiently high $Q^2$, to pQCD techniques and interpretation.
1306: In this approach, however, several questions remain to be answered.
1307: What is the lowest $Q^2$ where a perturbative
1308: treatment is valid? What corrections need to be applied to
1309: extend its validity to lower $Q^2$ ?
1310: %
1311: \begin{figure}[h]
1312: %\vspace{-3.cm}
1313: %\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,height=12cm]{diags.ps}
1314: \includegraphics[width=1.\columnwidth,bb=75 375 550 600,clip=true]{diags.ps}
1315: %\vspace{-3.25cm}
1316: \caption[]{The mechanisms for $\rho^0$ electroproduction at intermediate
1317: energies: at low $Q^2$ (left diagram) through the exchange of mesons, and
1318: at high $Q^2$ (right diagram) through the quark exchange ``handbag" mechanism
1319: (valid for longitudinal photons) where $H$ and $E$ are the unpolarized GPD's.}
1320: \label{fig:diags}
1321: \end{figure}
1322: %
1323:
1324:
1325: The aim of this letter is to address these
1326: questions using the recent measurement of the longitudinal
1327: and transverse cross sections of the $e p\to e^\prime p \rho^0$ reaction,
1328: carried out at Jefferson Laboratory
1329: using the CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer (CLAS)~\cite{clas} in Hall B.
1330: This elementary process is one of the exclusive reactions on the nucleon
1331: which has the highest cross section, and for which the extraction of the
1332: longitudinal and transverse parts of the cross section
1333: can be accomplished using the $\rho^0$ decay angular distribution.
1334: On the theoretical side, formalisms and numerical estimates for both
1335: hadronic and partonic descriptions of the reaction have been developed,
1336: which can be compared to the transverse and longitudinal components
1337: of the cross section, respectively.
1338: \newline
1339: \indent
1340: In the following, we will present the analysis results of the
1341: $e p\to e^\prime p \rho^0$ reaction. Data were taken with an
1342: electron beam energy of 4.247 GeV impinging on an unpolarized liquid-hydrogen
1343: target.
1344: The integrated luminosity of this data set was about 1.5 fb$^{-1}$.
1345: The kinematic domain of the selected sample corresponds to
1346: $Q^2$ from 1.5 GeV$^2$ to 3.0 GeV$^2$. We analyzed data for
1347: $W$ greater than 1.75 GeV, which
1348: corresponds to a range of $x_B$ from 0.21 to 0.62.
1349: Our final data sample included about $2\times 10^4$
1350: $e^\prime p \pi^+ \pi^-$ events.
1351: \newline
1352: \indent
1353: The $\rho^0$ meson decay to $\pi^+\pi^-$ was used to identify
1354: the reaction of interest. We identified the
1355: $e p\to e^\prime p \pi^+ \pi^-$ reaction using the missing
1356: mass technique by detecting the scattered electron, the recoil proton, and
1357: the positive pion. The electron was identified as a negative track with
1358: reconstructed energy deposition in the calorimeter which was consistent with the
1359: momenta determined from magnetic analysis, in combination with a signal
1360: in the Cerenkov counter. The proton and pion were identified as positive tracks,
1361: whose combination of flight times and momenta corresponded to their mass.
1362: Figure\,\ref{fig:im} (left plot) shows a typical
1363: missing mass distribution for $e p\to e^\prime p \pi^+ X$ events.
1364: Events were selected by the missing mass
1365: cut -0.03 $< M^2_X <$ 0.06 GeV$^2$, consistent with a missing $\pi^-$.
1366: Fig.\,\ref{fig:im} (center) shows the
1367: resulting $\pi^+\pi^-$ invariant mass spectrum. The $\rho^0$ peak is
1368: clearly visible, sitting on a large non-resonant
1369: $\pi^+\pi^-$ background.
1370: \newline
1371: \indent
1372:
1373: \begin{figure}[h]
1374: %\vspace{-1.cm}
1375: \includegraphics[width=1.\columnwidth,clip=true]{figure2_new.eps}
1376: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
1377: \caption[]{Left plot: an example of a squared missing mass
1378: $M^2_X(ep\to e^\prime p\pi^+X)$
1379: spectrum (for a scattered electron momentum between 1.9 and 2.2 GeV).
1380: Points with error bars show the experimental data and the solid lines represent
1381: the results of simulations for the channels $e^\prime p \pi^+\pi^-$
1382: (dashed line), $e^\prime p \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ (dotted line)
1383: and the sum of the two (solid line). The vertical dashed line
1384: is located at the missing mass squared of a pion. Central and right plots:
1385: an example of the $\pi^+\pi^-$ and $p\pi^+$ invariant masses,
1386: respectively (for the interval 1.63 $< Q^2 <$ 1.76 GeV$^2$ and
1387: 0.28 $< x_B <$ 0.35). Points with error bars show the experimental data and
1388: the lines correspond to the results of fits for the channels
1389: $e p\to e^\prime p \rho^0$ (dashed line),
1390: $e p\to e^\prime \Delta^{++} \pi^-$ (dash-dotted line),
1391: non-resonant $e p\to e^\prime p \pi^+ \pi^-$ (dotted line) and
1392: the sum of the three processes (solid line).}
1393: \label{fig:im}
1394: \end{figure}
1395: %
1396:
1397: The unpolarized
1398: $e p\to e^\prime p \pi^+ \pi^-$ reaction is fully defined by seven independent
1399: kinematical variables which we have chosen as: $Q^{2}$ and $x_{B}$, which
1400: define the virtual photon kinematics; $t$, the invariant squared momentum transfer
1401: between the virtual photon and the final pion pair ($i.e.$ the $\rho^0$ meson when
1402: this particle is produced); $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}$, the invariant
1403: mass of the $\pi^+\pi^-$ system; $\theta_{\rm hel}$ and $\phi_{\rm hel}$,
1404: the $\pi^+$ decay angles in the $\pi^+\pi^-$ rest frame; and $\Phi$, the
1405: azimuthal angle between the hadronic and leptonic planes.
1406: The CLAS acceptance and efficiency were calculated for
1407: each of these 7-dimensional bins using a
1408: GEANT-based simulation of several hundred million events. The event distributions
1409: were generated according to Ref.~\cite{genovamc}, which includes the
1410: three main contributions above the resonance region to the
1411: $e^\prime p \pi^+ \pi^-$ final state: diffractive $e p\to e^\prime p \rho^0$,
1412: $t$-channel $e p\to e^\prime \Delta^{++}\pi^-$, and
1413: non-resonant (phase space) $e p\to e^\prime p \pi^+ \pi^-$. Each of these contributions
1414: to the event generator was
1415: matched to the world's data on differential and total cross sections,
1416: and then extrapolated to our kinematical domain. We were then able to extract
1417: a total cross section for the $e p\to e^\prime p \pi^+ \pi^-$ channel in good agreement
1418: with world's data where the kinematics overlapped.
1419: The event generator also includes radiative effects following the Mo and
1420: Tsai prescription~\cite{MoandTsai} so that radiative corrections could
1421: be applied in each ($Q^2$, $x_B$) bin.
1422: \newline
1423: \indent
1424: The main difficulty in determining the $\rho^0$ yield stems from
1425: its large width ($\Gamma_{\rho^0}\sim 150$ MeV),
1426: which does not allow for a unique determination of
1427: the separate contributions due to
1428: the resonant $\rho^0$ production and
1429: non-resonant $\pi^+\pi^-$ pairs. We simultaneously fitted the two 3-fold
1430: differential cross sections $d^3\sigma/dQ^2dx_BdM_{\pi^+\pi^-}$ and
1431: $d^3\sigma/dQ^2dx_BdM_{p\pi^+}$ to determine the weight of the three channels
1432: mentioned earlier, leading to the $e^\prime p \pi^+ \pi^-$ final state
1433: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:im}, central and right plots). The mass spectra of the
1434: $\rho^0$ and $\Delta^{++}$ are generated according to standard Breit-Wigner
1435: distributions
1436: and the non-resonant $p \pi^+ \pi^-$ final state according to phase space.
1437: This background estimation procedure, along with the CLAS acceptance modeling,
1438: is one of the dominant sources of systematic
1439: uncertainty which, in total, ranges from 10\% to 25\%. More sophisticated
1440: shapes for the $\rho^0$ mass spectra were also investigated
1441: but led to consistent numbers of $\rho^0$'s within these error bars.
1442: \newline
1443: \indent
1444: The final step of the analysis consisted in separating the longitudinal
1445: and the transverse parts of the $e p\to e^\prime p \rho^0$ cross section.
1446: The determination of these two contributions was
1447: accomplished under the assumption of $s$-channel helicity conservation (SCHC)
1448: \cite{Bauer}. This hypothesis states, in simple terms, that the helicity
1449: of the
1450: %vector meson is directly transferred to the virtual photon.
1451: virtual photon is directly transferred to the vector meson.
1452: The SCHC hypothesis originates
1453: from the vector meson dominance model which identifies vector meson
1454: electromagnetic production as an elastic process without spin transfer.
1455: \newline
1456: \indent
1457: The validity of the SCHC hypothesis, which is only applicable
1458: at small momentum transfer $t$, can be tested experimentally through the analysis
1459: of the azimuthal angular distribution. We found that the $r^{04}_{1-1}$
1460: $\rho^0$ decay matrix element~\cite{schilling}, which can be extracted
1461: from the $\phi_{\rm hel}$ dependence, was compatible with zero at the
1462: 1.7 sigma level. We also found that the $\sigma_{TT}$ and $\sigma_{TL}$
1463: cross sections, which can be extracted from the $\Phi$ dependence,
1464: were, respectively, 10.6\% $\pm$ 11.8\% and 0.4\% $\pm$ 5.4\% of
1465: the total cross section. They are therefore consistent with zero, as they
1466: should be if SCHC is valid and, in any case, don't represent potential
1467: large violations of SCHC. Let's also note that all previous experiments
1468: on electromagnetic production of $\rho^0$ on the nucleon
1469: are consistent with the dominance of $s$-channel helicity conserving amplitudes
1470: (the helicity-flip amplitudes which have been reported~\cite{desy,h1,zeus,hermes2}
1471: never exceeded 10-20\% of the helicity non-flip amplitudes). We can
1472: therefore safely rely on SCHC for our analysis.
1473: \newline
1474: \indent
1475: The decay angular distribution of the $\pi^+$
1476: in the $\rho^0$ rest frame can be written as~\cite{schilling}:
1477: \begin{eqnarray}
1478: W(\cos\theta_{\rm hel})=\frac{3}{4}\left[ 1-r^{04}_{00}+(3r^{04}_{00}-1)\cos^2\theta_{\rm hel}
1479: \right],
1480: \label{eq:r04_rho}
1481: \end{eqnarray}
1482: where $r^{04}_{00}$ represents the degree of longitudinal polarization of
1483: the $\rho$ meson. Under the assumption of SCHC,
1484: the ratio of longitudinal to transverse cross sections is:
1485: \begin{eqnarray}
1486: R_\rho=\frac{\sigma_L}{\sigma_T}=\frac{1}{\epsilon}\frac{r^{04}_{00}}
1487: {1-r^{04}_{00}},
1488: \label{eq:r_rho}
1489: \end{eqnarray}
1490: where $\epsilon$ is the virtual photon transverse
1491: polarization.
1492: $r^{04}_{00}$ was extracted from the fit of the background-subtracted
1493: $\cos\theta_{\rm hel}$ distributions
1494: following Eq.~\ref{eq:r04_rho}
1495: as illustrated in the insert in Fig.~\ref{fig:r04},
1496: and was used in Eq.~\ref{eq:r_rho} to determine
1497: $R_\rho$.
1498:
1499: %Due to limited statistics, this procedure could be performed only for the
1500: %two $Q^2$ points which are shown on Fig.~\ref{fig:r04} with
1501: %the existing world data in a
1502: %similar $W$ range ($W\approx$ 2.1 GeV)~\cite{desy,cornell},
1503: %which also entered our fit.
1504: %We then were able to obtain the following parametrization of $R_\rho$ as a
1505: %function of $Q^2$: $R_\rho$=0.75$\times (Q^2)^{1.1}$.
1506: %We note that by comparisons with the world's data~\cite{hermes,fermi}
1507: %at higher energy, this parametrization changes with $W$.
1508:
1509: Due to limited statistics in the CLAS data, this procedure could
1510: be performed only for the
1511: two $Q^2$ points which are shown on Fig.~\ref{fig:r04} and where our points
1512: are found to be compatible with the existing world's data. We then have
1513: fitted the $Q^2$ dependence of $R_\rho$ including, in
1514: order to take into account a potential $W$ dependence of the ratio $R$,
1515: only the world's data in the $W$ domain close to ours
1516: ($W\approx$ 2.1 GeV)~\cite{desy,cornell}. The
1517: following parametrization, whose power form is motivated by
1518: the perturbative PQCD prediction that $\sigma_T$ is power suppressed
1519: with respect to $\sigma_L$, was found :
1520: \begin{eqnarray}
1521: R_\rho=0.75\pm 0.08 \times (Q^2)^{1.09\pm 0.14}.
1522: \end{eqnarray}
1523:
1524: %
1525: \begin{figure}[h]
1526: \vspace{-.4cm}
1527: \includegraphics[width=1.\columnwidth,clip=true]{figure3_new.eps}
1528: \vspace{-.4cm}
1529: \caption[]{
1530: %The ratio R=$\sigma_L$/$\sigma_T$ as a function of $Q^2$
1531: %for $W\approx$ 2.1 GeV. The other data are from DESY~\cite{desy}
1532: %and Cornell~\cite{cornell}.
1533: The ratio R= $\sigma_L$/$\sigma_T$ as a function of $Q^2$ for $\rho^0$ meson
1534: electroproduction on the nucleon. The other data are from ~\cite{desy,cornell,
1535: hermes2,hermes3,chio,fermi,h1,zeus,nmc}. The insert shows one of our
1536: $\cos\theta_{\rm hel}$ distributions with a fit to determine $r^{04}_{00}$.}
1537: \label{fig:r04}
1538: \end{figure}
1539: %
1540:
1541: It is customary to define the
1542: reduced cross section for $\rho$ meson production as the
1543: electroproduction cross section divided by the flux of virtual photons~:
1544: \begin{eqnarray}
1545: \sigma_T +\epsilon \sigma_L=\frac{1}{\Gamma_V(Q^2,x_B)}\times\frac{d^2\sigma^{e p}}{dQ^2dx_B},
1546: \label{eq:sigtot}
1547: \end{eqnarray}
1548: where the virtual photon flux is given by~:
1549: \begin{eqnarray}
1550: \Gamma_V(Q^2,x_B)=\frac{\alpha}{8\pi}\frac{Q^2}{M_p^2E_e^2}
1551: \frac{1-x_B}{x_B^3}\frac{1}{1-\epsilon}.
1552: \label{eq:sigtot2}
1553: \end{eqnarray}
1554: In this notation, and in Fig.~\ref{fig:siglt}, the longitudinal and transverse
1555: $\sigma_T$ and $\sigma_L$ cross sections are
1556: integrated over $t$, $\Phi$, $\theta_{\rm hel}$, and $\phi_{\rm hel}$. The
1557: $t$ dependence of $\sigma_T +\epsilon \sigma_L$ can be parametrized
1558: by $e^{-b | t-t_{\rm min}|}$ ($-t_{\rm min} < -t < 1$ GeV$^2$),
1559: where $-t_{\rm min}$ is the smallest value of momentum transfer for a given kinematic bin.
1560: We measured the exponential slope $b$ to range from 1.19 to 1.74 GeV$^{-2}$
1561: for $x_B$ between 0.31 and 0.52.
1562:
1563:
1564: %
1565: \begin{figure}[h]
1566: \includegraphics[width=1.\columnwidth,clip=true]{figure4_new.eps}
1567: \vspace{-0.4cm}
1568: \caption[]{Cross sections $\sigma_L$ (left) and $\sigma_T$ (right)
1569: for $e p\to e^\prime p \rho^0$ as a function of $Q^2$ as
1570: measured in this experiment. The dotted line represents the
1571: Regge model of Refs.~\cite{laget1,laget2}
1572: while the solid line describes the GPD model of Refs.~\cite{param_GPD,Goeke}.
1573: The systematic error is indicated by the shaded zones
1574: at the bottom of the plots.}
1575: \label{fig:siglt}
1576: \end{figure}
1577: %
1578:
1579: The longitudinal and transverse cross sections are plotted in Fig.\,\ref{fig:siglt}
1580: as a function of $Q^2$ for four bins centered
1581: at $x_B$ of 0.31, 0.38, 0.48, and 0.52. These values correspond to $W$ values of 2.2,
1582: 2.0, 1.9, and 1.85 GeV, respectively.
1583: The data are compared to two theoretical approaches. The first
1584: one is based on hadronic degrees of freedom with meson
1585: Regge trajectory exchanges in the $t$-channel (as illustrated
1586: in Fig.~\ref{fig:diags}, left graph).
1587: This approach has been successful in describing, with very few free parameters,
1588: essentially all of the available observables of a series of forward exclusive reactions
1589: in photo- and electroproduction of pseudoscalar mesons ($\pi^{0,\pm}$,
1590: $K^+$~\cite{ourpapers}, $\eta, \eta^\prime$~\cite{taiwan}) above the resonance
1591: region. For the $\rho^0, \omega, \phi$ vector mesons, as well as for Compton
1592: scattering, such an approach has been recently developed in Refs.~\cite{laget1,
1593: laget2,laget3}.
1594: In the case of $\rho^0$ electroproduction, the contributing meson trajectories are
1595: the $\sigma$, $f_2$, and Pomeron, the latter being negligible in the $W$ region
1596: investigated in this experiment. This Regge model was normalized by adjusting
1597: the $\sigma$ and $f_2$ meson-nucleon couplings to reproduce
1598: existing photoproduction data (see for instance, Refs.~\cite{batta}).
1599: There is little freedom in the choice of parameters when one uses data
1600: from all three $\rho^0, \omega$, and $\phi$ channels, which together constrain
1601: all photoproduction parameters. The only remaining free parameters
1602: for the electroproduction case are
1603: the squared mass scales of the meson monopole form factors at the electromagnetic
1604: vertices for the diagrams of Fig.~\ref{fig:diags} (left plot). They have been
1605: determined from the $Q^2$ dependence of the world's data, in
1606: particular from the Cornell~\cite{cornell} and HERMES~\cite{hermes} experiments,
1607: to be approximatively 0.5 GeV$^2$, in accordance with known meson form
1608: factor mass scales.
1609: \newline
1610: \indent
1611: As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:siglt}, this Regge model provides
1612: a fair description of the transverse and longitudinal cross sections.
1613: There is some discrepancy at large values of $x_B$, but at those values
1614: some $s$-channel nucleonic resonances decaying into $\rho^0 p$ may contribute, a process
1615: which is not taken into account in this Regge $t$-channel approach, and might explain
1616: the missing strength in this particular kinematical domain.
1617: The calculation was also done for the Cornell~\cite{cornell} and
1618: HERMES~\cite{hermes} data, where, general agreement is found as well
1619: (the longitudinal cross section is also overestimated as one goes
1620: to smaller $x_B$, as in our $x_B$= 0.31 bin).
1621: \newline
1622: \indent
1623: We now turn to the handbag diagram approach (Fig.~\ref{fig:diags}, right plot),
1624: which is based on the QCD factorization between a ``hard" process (the interaction between a quark
1625: of the nucleon and the virtual photon, along with a one-gluon exchange for the formation
1626: of the final meson) and a ``soft" process (the parametrization of the partonic
1627: structure of the nucleon in terms of GPD's). As mentioned in the introduction,
1628: this approach is only valid
1629: at sufficiently large $Q^2$ when the longitudinal cross section dominates
1630: the QCD expansion in powers of $1/Q^2$. Unfortunately, the value of $Q^2$ at which the
1631: ``handbag" mechanism becomes valid is unknown, and especially for meson electroproduction,
1632: it must be determined experimentally.
1633: \newline
1634: \indent
1635: In the case of $\rho^0$ production, only the unpolarized GPD's $H$ and
1636: $E$ contribute to the amplitude of the reaction. In the calculation,
1637: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:siglt}, we neglect the contribution due to
1638: the GPD $E$ because it is proportional to the 4-momentum transfer between
1639: the incoming virtual photon and the outgoing meson, and our data cover small
1640: momentum transfers. For the GPD $H$ we use
1641: the parametrization of Refs.~\cite{param_GPD,Goeke}. The other ingredient
1642: entering the (leading order) calculation of the handbag diagram is the treatment of
1643: the strong coupling constant $\alpha_s$ between the quarks and the gluon.
1644: It has been ``frozen" to a value of 0.56, as determined
1645: by QCD sum rules~\cite{Bal96}. The freezing
1646: of the strong coupling constant $\alpha_s$ is an effective way to
1647: average out non-perturbative effects at low $Q^2$ and is supported by jet-shape
1648: analysis of the infrared coupling~\cite{dok}.
1649: \newline
1650: \indent
1651: As mentioned earlier, the handbag diagram calculation can only be compared
1652: with the longitudinal part of the cross section.
1653: Figure~\ref{fig:siglt} shows a good agreement between
1654: the calculation and the data at the low $x_B$ values. As for the Regge model
1655: discussed above, the two highest $x_B$ bins might contain some additional
1656: nucleonic resonance ``contamination", which are not included in the ``handbag"
1657: approach. Variations in
1658: reasonable ranges of the parameters entering the GPD's were studied, and results
1659: were found to be stable at the 50\% level. This provides confidence in
1660: the stability, reliability, and validity of the calculation based on the prescription of a
1661: ``frozen" $\alpha_s$. Let us also note that this calculation
1662: reproduces reasonably well the HERMES data~\cite{hermes}, which were taken at
1663: neighboring kinematics.
1664: \newline
1665: \indent
1666: A signature of the handbag mechanism is that, independent of any
1667: particular GPD parametrization adopted, the (reduced)
1668: cross sections should follow a $1/Q^6$ dependence at fixed $t$ and $x_B$.
1669: In this analysis, due to the lack of statistics, $\sigma_L$ is integrated over $t$, which
1670: means that it is proportional to $t_{\rm min}$, this latter variable
1671: changing as a function of $Q^2$.
1672: %\footnote{The determination of the dependence of the cross sections as a function of
1673: %$Q^2$ at fixed values of $t$ and fixed $x_B$, which is one of the ultimate goal
1674: %of this program, is impractical due to the lack of statistics in the present experiment.}.
1675: This $1/Q^6$ scaling behavior at fixed $t$ and $x_B$ can therefore not
1676: be directly observed in our data, which is modified by the
1677: (trivial) kinematical $Q^2$ dependence of $t_{\rm min}$. Nevertheless, agreement between
1678: the data and the GPD calculation, which also contains this trivial $t_{\rm min}$ dependence,
1679: should be interpreted as confirmation of the leading order prediction based on the
1680: ``handbag'' diagram.
1681: \newline
1682: \indent
1683: In conclusion, we have presented here a first exploration of exclusive
1684: vector meson electroproduction on the nucleon
1685: in a region of $Q^2$ between 1.5 and 3.0 GeV$^2$ and $x_{B}$ between
1686: 0.2 and 0.6, which is a kinematical domain barely explored.
1687: The Regge model, based on ``economical'' hadronic degrees of freedom, is able to describe
1688: % this new notation, should not be introduced in the conclusion.
1689: %using a few effective
1690: %parameters such as the $g_{\sigma NN}*g_{\sigma \rho \gamma}$ and $f_2 NN$ coupling constants
1691: %and meson form factor mass scales,
1692: the transverse cross section data, along with the
1693: other existing vector meson photo- and electroproduction data.
1694: Furthermore, the more fundamental ``handbag'' approach, with a standard parametrization
1695: of the GPD $H$ and the extrapolation to low $Q^2$ by an effective freezing of $\alpha_s$,
1696: provides a fair description of the longitudinal part of
1697: the cross section. Therefore it seems possible to understand the longitudinal
1698: part of the $\rho$ meson production cross section in a pQCD framework, which potentially
1699: gives access to GPD's. The transverse cross section, on the other hand, for which no factorization
1700: between soft and hard physics exists, can be described
1701: in terms of meson exchanges.
1702: These tentative conclusions need of course to be confirmed by a more extensive
1703: and thorough exploration of the $x_B,Q^2$ phase space which is currently
1704: under way with a much larger data set~\cite{propo}.
1705:
1706: We would like to acknowledge the outstanding efforts of the staff of the
1707: Accelerator and the Physics Divisions at Jefferson Lab that made this experiment possible.
1708: This work was supported in part by the Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, the
1709: French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique,
1710: the French Commissariat \`{a} l'Energie Atomique, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National
1711: Science Foundation, Emmy Noether grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Korean Science and Engineering Foundation.
1712: The Southeastern Universities Research Association (SURA) operates the
1713: Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility for the United States
1714: Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-84ER40150.
1715:
1716: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1717: \bibitem{Collins97}
1718: J.C. Collins, L. Frankfurt and M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56} (1997) 2982.
1719: \bibitem{frank97}
1720: L. Frankfurt, W. Koepf and M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 54} (1996) 3194
1721: \bibitem{Ji97}
1722: X. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78} (1997) 610; Phys. Rev. D {\bf 55} (1997) 7114.
1723: \bibitem{Rady}
1724: A.V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 380} (1996) 417;
1725: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56} (1997) 5524.
1726: \bibitem{Mul94}
1727: D. M\"uller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F.-M. Dittes, and J. Horejsi,
1728: Fortschr. Phys. {\bf 42} (1994) 101.
1729: \bibitem{param_GPD}
1730: M. Vanderhaegen, P.A.M Guichon and M. Guidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 80} (1998) 5064;
1731: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60} (1999) 094017.
1732: \bibitem{clas}
1733: B. Mecking {\it et al.}, Nucl. Inst. Meth. A {\bf 503} (2003) 513.
1734: \bibitem{genovamc}
1735: P. Corvisiero {\it et al.}, Nucl. Inst. Meth. A {\bf 346} (1994) 433.
1736: \bibitem{MoandTsai}
1737: L.W. Mo, Y.S. Tsai, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 41} (1969) 205.
1738: \bibitem{Bauer}
1739: T.H. Bauer {\it et al.}, Rev. of Mod. Phys. {\bf 50}, No.2, (1978) 261.
1740: \bibitem{schilling} K. Schilling and G. Wolf, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 61} (1973) 381.
1741: \bibitem{desy} P. Joos {\it et al.}, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 113} (1976) 53.
1742: \bibitem{h1} C. Adloff {\it et al.}, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 13} (2000) 371;
1743: S. Aid {\it et al.}, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 468} (1996) 3.
1744: \bibitem{zeus} J. Breitweg {\it et al.}, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 12} (2000) 393.
1745: \bibitem{hermes2} A.B. Borissov {\it et al.}, HERMES Report 01-060 (2001).
1746: \bibitem{cornell} D.G. Cassel et al., Phys. Rev. D {\bf 24} (1981) 2787.
1747: \bibitem{hermes3} M. Tytgat, PhD thesis, HERMES Report 01-014 (2001)
1748: \bibitem{fermi} M.R. Adams {\it et al.}, Z. Phys. C {\bf 74} (1997) 237.
1749: \bibitem{chio} W.D. Shambroom {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 26} (1982) 1.
1750: \bibitem{nmc} N. Arneado {\it et al.}, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 429} (1994) 503.
1751: \bibitem{laget2} F. Cano and J.-M. Laget, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 551} (2003) 317.
1752: \bibitem{laget1} J.-M. Laget, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 489} (2000) 313.
1753: \bibitem{Goeke}
1754: K. Goeke, M.V. Polyakov and M. Vanderhaegen, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 47} (2001) 401.
1755: \bibitem{ourpapers} M. Guidal, J.-M. Laget and M. Vanderhaeghen,
1756: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 400} (1997) 6; Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 627} (1997) 645;
1757: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 57} (1998) 1454; Phys. Rev. C {\bf 61} (2000) 025204;
1758: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 68} (2003) 058201.
1759: \bibitem{taiwan} W.-T. Chiang, S. N. Yang, L. Tiator, M. Vanderhaeghen,
1760: D. Drechsel, Phys. Rev. C 68 (2003) 045202.
1761: \bibitem{laget3} J.-M. Laget, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 699} (2002) 184.
1762: \bibitem{batta}
1763: M. Battaglieri {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87} (2001) 172002;
1764: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90} (2003) 022002.
1765: \bibitem{hermes} A. Airapetian {\it et al.}, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 17} (2000) 389.
1766: \bibitem{Bal96} P. Ball and V.M. Braun, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{54} (1996) 2182.
1767: \bibitem{dok} Y. Dokshitzer, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A \textbf{359} (2001) 309, hep-ph/0106348.
1768: \bibitem{propo} JLab experiment E99-105, spokesperons M. Gar\c{c}on, M. Guidal
1769: and E. Smith.
1770: \end{thebibliography}
1771:
1772:
1773: \end{document}
1774: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1775: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1776:
1777: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1778: %%%%%% Author by Institute %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1779: %%%%%%%%%%%%%% no of authors =211
1780: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%RPI
1781: %% G.~Adams RPI
1782: %% M.~Bellis RPI
1783: %% J.P.~Cummings RPI
1784: %% A.~Empl RPI
1785: %% V.~Frolov RPI
1786: %% J.~Hu RPI
1787: %% M.~Klusman RPI
1788: %% Ji~Li RPI
1789: %% J.~Napolitano RPI
1790: %% P.~Stoler RPI
1791: %% M.~Ungaro RPI
1792: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%FIU
1793: %% P.~Ambrozewicz FIU
1794: %% L.H.~Kramer FIU
1795: %% R.~Nasseripour FIU
1796: %% B.A.~Raue FIU
1797: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%SACLAY
1798: %% E.~Anciant SACLAY
1799: %% G.~Audit SACLAY
1800: %% T.~Auger SACLAY
1801: %% L.~Farhi SACLAY
1802: %% J.M.~Laget SACLAY
1803: %% C.~Marchand SACLAY
1804: %% L.~Morand SACLAY
1805: %% S.A.~Morrow SACLAY
1806: %% F.~Sabati\'e SACLAY
1807: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%INFNGE
1808: %% M.~Anghinolfi INFNGE
1809: %% M.~Battaglieri INFNGE
1810: %% P.~Corvisiero INFNGE
1811: %% R.~DeVita INFNGE
1812: %% M.~Osipenko INFNGE
1813: %% G.~Ricco INFNGE
1814: %% M.~Ripani INFNGE
1815: %% V.~Sapunenko INFNGE
1816: %% M.~Taiuti INFNGE
1817: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%UMASS
1818: %% B.~Asavapibhop UMASS
1819: %% D.~Lawrence UMASS
1820: %% R.~Miskimen UMASS
1821: %% G.~Peterson UMASS
1822: %% J.~Shaw UMASS
1823: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%YEREVAN
1824: %% G.~Asryan YEREVAN
1825: %% K.S.~Egiyan YEREVAN
1826: %% Y.G.~Sharabian YEREVAN
1827: %% S.~Stepanyan YEREVAN
1828: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%JLAB
1829: %% H.~Avakian JLAB
1830: %% W.K.~Brooks JLAB
1831: %% V.D.~Burkert JLAB
1832: %% P.L.~Cole JLAB
1833: %% P.V.~Degtyarenko JLAB
1834: %% H.~Egiyan JLAB
1835: %% L.~Guo JLAB
1836: %% V.~Gyurjyan JLAB
1837: %% M.M.~Ito JLAB
1838: %% F.J.~Klein JLAB
1839: %% K.~Lukashin JLAB
1840: %% J.J.~Manak JLAB
1841: %% B.A.~Mecking JLAB
1842: %% M.D.~Mestayer JLAB
1843: %% B.B.~Niczyporuk JLAB
1844: %% R.A.~Niyazov JLAB
1845: %% M.~Nozar JLAB
1846: %% E.S.~Smith JLAB
1847: %% D.P.~Weygand JLAB
1848: %% E.~Wolin JLAB
1849: %% A.~Yegneswaran JLAB
1850: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%INFNFR
1851: %% N.~Bianchi INFNFR
1852: %% E.~De~Sanctis INFNFR
1853: %% M.~Mirazita INFNFR
1854: %% V.~Muccifora INFNFR
1855: %% E.~Polli INFNFR
1856: %% F.~Ronchetti INFNFR
1857: %% P.~Rossi INFNFR
1858: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%ODU
1859: %% H.~Bagdasaryan ODU
1860: %% M.~Bektasoglu ODU
1861: %% L.~Ciciani ODU
1862: %% K.V.~Dharmawardane ODU
1863: %% G.E.~Dodge ODU
1864: %% T.A.~Forest ODU
1865: %% C.E.~Hyde-Wright ODU
1866: %% A.~Klein ODU
1867: %% A.V.~Klimenko ODU
1868: %% S.E.~Kuhn ODU
1869: %% L.M.~Qin ODU
1870: %% L.B.~Weinstein ODU
1871: %% J.~Yun ODU
1872: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%ASU
1873: %% J.P.~Ball ASU
1874: %% M.~Dugger ASU
1875: %% E.~Pasyuk ASU
1876: %% B.G.~Ritchie ASU
1877: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%FSU
1878: %% S.~Barrow FSU
1879: %% S.~Chen FSU
1880: %% L.~Dennis FSU
1881: %% P.~Dragovitsch FSU
1882: %% S.~McAleer FSU
1883: %% G.~Riccardi FSU
1884: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%JMU
1885: %% K.~Beard JMU
1886: %% K.L.~Giovanetti JMU
1887: %% G.~Niculescu JMU
1888: %% I.~Niculescu JMU
1889: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%GWU
1890: %% N.~Benmouna GWU
1891: %% B.L.~Berman GWU
1892: %% W.J.~Briscoe GWU
1893: %% C.~Cetina GWU
1894: %% K.S.~Dhuga GWU
1895: %% Y.~Ilieva GWU
1896: %% H.G.~Juengst GWU
1897: %% L.C.~Maximon GWU
1898: %% G.V.~O'Rielly GWU
1899: %% S.A.~Philips GWU
1900: %% A.~Shafi GWU
1901: %% S.~Simionatto GWU
1902: %% I.I.~Strakovsky GWU
1903: %% S.~Strauch GWU
1904: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%CMU
1905: %% A.S.~Biselli CMU
1906: %% R.~Bradford CMU
1907: %% D.S.~Carman CMU
1908: %% R.J.~Feuerbach CMU
1909: %% J.~Kuhn CMU
1910: %% J.~Lachniet CMU
1911: %% J.W.C.~McNabb CMU
1912: %% C.A.~Meyer CMU
1913: %% R.A.~Schumacher CMU
1914: %% L.~Todor CMU
1915: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%ITEP
1916: %% S.~Boiarinov ITEP
1917: %% M.~Kossov ITEP
1918: %% K.~Mikhailov ITEP
1919: %% N.~Pivnyuk ITEP
1920: %% O.~Pogorelko ITEP
1921: %% S.~Pozdniakov ITEP
1922: %% V.S.~Serov ITEP
1923: %% A.~Stavinsky ITEP
1924: %% A.V.~Vlassov ITEP
1925: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%RICE
1926: %% B.E.~Bonner RICE
1927: %% G.S.~Mutchler RICE
1928: %% S.~Taylor RICE
1929: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%ORSAY
1930: %% S.~Bouchigny ORSAY
1931: %% M.~Guidal ORSAY
1932: %% C.~Hadjidakis ORSAY
1933: %% S.~Niccolai ORSAY
1934: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%ECOSSEE
1935: %% D.~Branford ECOSSEE
1936: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%WM
1937: %% C.~Butuceanu WM
1938: %% A.~Coleman WM
1939: %% H.~Funsten WM
1940: %% K.A.~Griffioen WM
1941: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%UNH
1942: %% J.R.~Calarco UNH
1943: %% G.~Gavalian UNH
1944: %% F.W.~Hersman UNH
1945: %% M.~Holtrop UNH
1946: %% T.~Lee UNH
1947: %% L.~Zana UNH
1948: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%CUA
1949: %% B.~Carnahan CUA
1950: %% H.~Crannell CUA
1951: %% R.S.~Hakobyan CUA
1952: %% J.T.~O'Brien CUA
1953: %% D.I.~Sober CUA
1954: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%deceased
1955: %% D.~Cords deceased
1956: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%VIRGINIA
1957: %% D.~Crabb VIRGINIA
1958: %% R.~Fatemi VIRGINIA
1959: %% R.~Minehart VIRGINIA
1960: %% D.~Pocanic VIRGINIA
1961: %% Y.~Prok VIRGINIA
1962: %% L.C.~Smith VIRGINIA
1963: %% K.~Wang VIRGINIA
1964: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%SCAROLINA
1965: %% C.~Djalali SCAROLINA
1966: %% O.P.~Dzyubak SCAROLINA
1967: %% P.~Girard SCAROLINA
1968: %% R.W.~Gothe SCAROLINA
1969: %% M.~Guillo SCAROLINA
1970: %% J.~Langheinrich SCAROLINA
1971: %% B.M.~Preedom SCAROLINA
1972: %% D.J.~Tedeschi SCAROLINA
1973: %% C.~Tur SCAROLINA
1974: %% C.S.~Whisnant SCAROLINA
1975: %% M.H.~Wood SCAROLINA
1976: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%CNU
1977: %% D.~Doughty CNU
1978: %% L.~Elouadrhiri CNU
1979: %% J.~Hardie CNU
1980: %% D.~Heddle CNU
1981: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%PITT
1982: %% S.~Dytman PITT
1983: %% K.Y.~Kim PITT
1984: %% J.~Mueller PITT
1985: %% R.~Thompson PITT
1986: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%DUKE
1987: %% S.J.~Gaff DUKE
1988: %% J.H.~Kelley DUKE
1989: %% S.O.~Nelson DUKE
1990: %% K.~Sabourov DUKE
1991: %% M.~Spraker DUKE
1992: %% H.~Weller DUKE
1993: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%URICH
1994: %% G.P.~Gilfoyle URICH
1995: %% P.D.~Rubin URICH
1996: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%ECOSSEG
1997: %% C.I.O.~Gordon ECOSSEG
1998: %% J.J.~Melone ECOSSEG
1999: %% D.~Protopopescu ECOSSEG
2000: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%OHIOU
2001: %% K.~Hicks OHIOU
2002: %% M.U.~Mozer OHIOU
2003: %% A.K.~Opper OHIOU
2004: %% A.~Tkablazde OHIOU
2005: %% A.~Weisberg OHIOU
2006: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%VT
2007: %% D.~Jenkins VT
2008: %% J.P.~Santoro VT
2009: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%UCONN
2010: %% K.~Joo UCONN
2011: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%NSU
2012: %% M.~Khandaker NSU
2013: %% C.~Salgado NSU
2014: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%KYUNGPOOK
2015: %% D.H.~Kim KYUNGPOOK
2016: %% K.~Kim KYUNGPOOK
2017: %% M.S.~Kim KYUNGPOOK
2018: %% W.~Kim KYUNGPOOK
2019: %% K.~Park KYUNGPOOK
2020: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%NONE
2021: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%UCLA
2022: %% J.W.~Price UCLA
2023: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%ROMA
2024: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%MIT
2025: %% D.~Rowntree MIT
2026: %% A.V.~Skabelin MIT
2027: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%GEISSEN
2028: %% U.~Thoma GEISSEN
2029: %%%%%% institute %%%%%%%%%%%UNIONC
2030: %% M.F.~Vineyard UNIONC
2031: