1: \section{One-dimensional \mx\ analysis}

2: \label{sec:mx}

3: We  already published a measurement of \Vub\ on

4:  \Bxulnu\ events with $\mx<1.55\gevcc$~\cite{Aubert:2003zw} and 

5: subtracting backgrounds with a one-dimensional fit to the \mx\ distribution

6: (see Fig.~\ref{mxfit}). The values for the shape function parameters used

7: were $\lbarsf = 0.48 \pm 0.12 \gev$ and $\lonesf = - 0.30 \pm 0.11 \gev^2$

8: and a correlation of -80\%~\cite{Cronin-Hennessy:2001fk} (see Fig.~\ref{fig:ellipses}).

9: Since this publication, there have been developments in the theoretical

10: interpretation. Here we report the updated measurement of \Vub\ obtained

11: by varying the shape function parameters as stated in Sec.~\ref{sec:theosys}, the new central value being

12: $\lbarsf=

13: 0.545\gevcc$ and $\lonesf=-0.342$.

14: The experimental systematic errors considered are the same and correspond to the sum in quadrature of $\sigma_{det}$, $\sigma_{ul\nu}$,

15: $\sigma_{bkg}$, $\sigma_{MCstat}$, and $\sigma_{breco}$. 

16: The measured total inclusive branching ratio is

17: \begin{equation}

18: \rusl=0.0234\pm 0.0027(\rm stat.)\pm 0.0026(\rm sys.)^{+0.0064}_{-0.0038} (\rm theo.)

19: \end{equation}

20: which translates into a total inclusive branching fraction

21: \begin{equation}

22: \BR(\Bxulnu)=(2.53\pm 0.29(\rm stat.)\pm 0.28(\rm sys.)^{+0.69}_{-0.41} (\rm theo.))\times 10^{-3}.

23: \end{equation}

24: From the relationship between the inclusive branching fraction and \Vub (obtained from Eq. 2 in Ref.~\cite{Gibbons:2004dg} 

25: having updated the OPE parameters to the measurement of \babar~\cite{Aubert:2004aw})

26: \begin{equation}

27: |V_{ub}| = 0.00424 \left( \frac{\BR(\Bxulnu)}{0.002}

28: \frac{1.604 ps}{\tau_B} \right)^{1/2} 

29: \times

30: (1.0 \pm 0.048 (\rm OPE + m_b)).

31: \label{eq:vubextr}

32: \end{equation}

33: Here the average \Bz\ and \Bpm\ lifetime is $\tau_B=1.604\; \rm

34: ps$~\cite{PDG04}. The ``$OPE+m_b$''

35:  uncertainty is due to perturbative and non perturbative corrections , 

36: and to the uncertainty on the $b$-quark mass ($\rm m_b$). We then obtain 

37: \begin{equation}

38:  \Vub=(4.77\pm 0.28 (\rm stat.)\pm 0.28 (\rm sys.)^{+0.65}_{-0.39}(\rm theo.)\pm 

39: 0.23({\rm OPE+m_b}))10^{-3},

40: \end{equation}

41: consistent within the shape function  errors with the 

42: published $\Vub =(4.62\pm 0.28 (\rm stat.)\pm 0.28 (\rm sys.) \pm 0.40 

43: (\rm theo.)\pm 0.26(\rm OPE+m_b))\times 10^{-3}$.

44: 

45: