1: %

2: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands

3: %\section{\label{sec:introduction}Introduction}

4: 

5: % figures should be put into the text as floats.

6: % Here is an example of the general form of a figure:

7: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label

8: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.

9: % Use the figure* environment if the figure should span across the

10: % entire page. There is no need to do explicit centering.

11: 

12: % \begin{figure}

13: % \includegraphics{}%

14: % \caption{\label{}}

15: % \end{figure}

16: 

17: % tables should appear as floats within the text

18: % Here is an example of the general form of a table:

19: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label

20: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.

21: % Insert the column specifiers (l, r, c, d, etc.) in the empty braces of the

22: % \begin{tabular}{} command.

23: % The ruledtabular enviroment adds doubled rules to table and sets a

24: % reasonable default table settings.

25: % Use the table* environment to get a full-width table in two-column

26: % Add \usepackage{longtable} and the longtable (or longtable*}

27: % environment for nicely formatted long tables. Or use the the [H]

28: % placement option to break a long table (with less control than 

29: % in longtable).

30: % \begin{table}%[H] add [H] placement to break table across pages

31: % \caption{\label{}}

32: % \begin{ruledtabular}

33: % \begin{tabular}{}

34: % Lines of table here ending with \\

35: % \end{tabular}

36: % \end{ruledtabular}

37: % \end{table}

38: 

39: 

40: \section{\label{sec:data}Data Samples and Event Selection}

41: 

42: \subsection{Colliding Beam Data}

43: 

44: The colliding beam data used in this analysis were recorded during the

45: period March 2002 - August 2003, when the instantaneous Tevatron

46: luminosity ranged from 0.5 to 4.0~$\times 10^{31} ~{\rm cm^{-2}

47:   s^{-1}}$.  

48: 

49: %Collision data are typically recorded for an uninterrupted

50: %interval of several hours, called a "Run". Each run has a separate set

51: %of calibrations for all detector components. Calibrations that may

52: %vary over a Run, such as beam luminosity and beam positions, are done

53: %for "Run Sections" of 500,000 events each. In order to insure precise

54: %understanding of our trigger and selection efficiencies, the quality

55: %of the data is examined in each run. All detector components must be

56: %within operating specifications in order for data for that run to be

57: %used in the analysis. 

58: 

59: Cherenkov light detectors in the very forward region ($|\eta|\geq

60: 3.7$) record information on the instantaneous and total integrated

61: luminosity of the Tevatron~\cite{clc}.  The total integrated

62: luminosity for this period is $193 \pm 12~{\rm pb}^{-1}$; after quality

63: requirements on the silicon tracking, the data sample used for this

64: analysis amounts to $162 \pm 10~{\rm pb}^{-1}$ for CEM electrons and CMUP muons,

65: and $150 \pm 9~{\rm pb}^{-1}$ for CMX muons.

66: 

67: For the primary data samples used in this analysis, the detector is

68: triggered on high momentum electrons and muons. The electron hardware

69: triggers require an XFT track with $p_T \geq 8 ~{\rm GeV/c}$ matched

70: to an EM cluster with $E_T \geq 16$ GeV and the ratio of hadronic to

71: electromagnetic energy less than 0.125. The muon hardware triggers

72: require an XFT track with $p_T \geq 8 ~{\rm GeV/c}$ matched to muon

73: stubs in the joint CMUP configuration or in the CMX.  A complete

74: version of the offline lepton selection is performed online in the

75: last stage of triggering, and repeated in offline processing with

76: updated calibration constants.  Other secondary datasets described in

77: Sec.~\ref{sec:secvtx} use a jet trigger with a certain $E_T$ threshold

78: or an electron trigger with relaxed $E_T$ requirements.

79: 

80: \subsection{Monte Carlo Samples}

81: 

82: The understanding of acceptances, efficiencies, and backgrounds relies on 

83: detailed simulation of physics processes and the detector response. 

84: Most measurements of acceptance and efficiency rely on 

85: {\sc pythia}~v6.2~\cite{pythia} or {\sc herwig}~v6.4~\cite{herwig1,herwig2}.

86: These generators employ leading order matrix elements for the hard parton 

87: scattering, followed by parton showering to simulate gluon radiation and 

88: fragmentation. Each generator is used in conjunction with the CTEQ5L 

89: parton distribution functions~\cite{cteq}. For heavy flavor jets, we 

90: interface to {\sc qq}~v9.1~\cite{qq} to provide proper 

91: modeling of $b$ and $c$ hadron decays. 

92: 

93: The estimate of the $b$-tagging backgrounds due to higher order QCD

94: processes such as $Wb\bar b$ requires special care. 

95: %Although PYTHIA and

96: %HERWIG properly model the case where a gluon jet ``splits'' into

97: %collinear heavy flavor quarks, these generators fail in the

98: %non-radiative configurations where the quarks are widely separated. 

99: This study of backgrounds in the $b$-tagged sample uses the

100: {\sc alpgen} program~\cite{alpgen}, which generates high multiplicity

101: partonic final states using exact leading-order matrix elements. The

102: parton level events are then passed to {\sc herwig} and {\sc qq} for

103: parton showering and $b$ and $c$ hadron decay.  Further discussion of

104: {\sc alpgen} can be found in Sec.~\ref{sec:hffracs}.

105: 

106: The CDF II detector simulation reproduces the response of the detector

107: to particles produced in $p\bar p$ collisions.  The same detector

108: geometry database is used in both the simulation and the

109: reconstruction, and tracking of particles through matter is performed

110: with {\sc geant3}~\cite{geant3}. Charge deposition in the silicon

111: detectors is calculated using a simple geometrical model based on the

112: path length of the ionizing particle and an unrestricted Landau

113: distribution.  The drift model for the COT uses a parameterization of

114: a {\sc garfield} simulation, with the parameters tuned to match COT

115: data~\cite{cot}.  The calorimeter simulation uses the {\sc

116:   gflash}~\cite{gflash} parameterization package interfaced with {\sc

117:   geant3}.  The {\sc gflash} parameters are tuned to test beam data

118: for electrons and high-$p_T$ pions, and they are checked by comparing

119: the calorimeter energy of isolated tracks in the collision data to

120: their momenta as measured in the COT.  Further detail on the CDF II

121: simulation can be found elsewhere~\cite{paulini}.

122:   

123: \subsection{$W$ + Jets Selection}

124: 

125: The selection identifies events consistent with the $W$ + jets

126: signature containing a high-momentum electron or muon (hereafter

127: referred to as ``lepton,'' $\ell$), large missing transverse energy, and

128: hadronic jets.  The event selection is summarized below.

129: 

130: The offline electron selection requires an EM cluster with $E_T \geq

131: 20$ GeV matched to a track with $p_T \geq 10\,\mathrm{GeV}/c$.  The

132: cluster is required to have an electromagnetic fraction and shower shape

133: consistent with an electron deposit. The extrapolated track is

134: required to match the shower location as measured in the shower

135: maximum strip detector, and to have a momentum consistent with the

136: shower energy. Finally, since the electron from $W$ decay is expected

137: to be isolated from other energy deposits in the calorimeter, the

138: energy in a cone of radius $\Delta R = 0.4$ around the electron

139: cluster, but not including the cluster itself, is measured, and the

140: isolation ratio of the energy in the cone to the energy of the

141: electron is required to be less than 0.1.

142: 

143: Photon conversions in the detector material are a source of electron

144: backgrounds.  A conversion is defined as a pair of tracks (one of them

145: the electron) satisfying the following cuts:

146: \begin{itemize}

147: \item oppositely charged,

148: \item $|\Delta(xy)|<2\,\mathrm{mm}$, and 

149: \item $|\Delta(\cot\theta)|<0.04$,

150: \end{itemize}

151: \noindent where $\Delta(xy)$ is the distance between the tracks in the

152: $r-\phi$ plane at the point where they are parallel in that plane, and

153: $\Delta(\cot\theta)$ is the difference between the cotangents of the 

154: polar angles of the two tracks. 

155: Electrons that are part of an identified conversion 

156: pair are not considered further in the electron selection. 

157: 

158: The offline muon selection requires a COT track with $p_T \geq

159: 20\,\mathrm{GeV}/c$ matched to a CMUP or CMX muon stub.  The matching

160: is based on the extrapolated track position at the chambers, accounting

161: for the effects of multiple scattering. The

162: energy in the calorimeter tower containing the muon is required to be

163: consistent with the deposition expected from a minimum ionizing

164: particle.  Backgrounds from cosmic rays are removed by requiring that

165: the track extrapolates to the origin, and that the minimum ionizing

166: tower energy deposit is within a narrow timing window around the beam

167: crossing.

168: 

169: In these high momentum lepton samples, the signal of the neutrino from

170: $W \rightarrow \ell\nu$ is large missing transverse energy, $\met$.

171: The $\met$ is calculated as the vector sum of the energy in

172: each calorimeter tower multiplied by the azimuthal direction of the

173: tower. If isolated high momentum muons are found in the event, the

174: $\met$ is corrected by subtracting the muon energy in the calorimeter

175: and adding the muon $p_T$ to the vector sum.  The selection finally

176: requires $\met \geq 20\,\mathrm{GeV}$.

177: 

178: In addition to the direct $t \rightarrow e \nu_e b$ and

179: $t \rightarrow \mu \nu_{\mu} b$ modes, this event selection has a 

180: small acceptance for top final states with $W \rightarrow \tau \nu$ and

181: a subsequent leptonic $\tau$ decay, or with high momentum semi-leptonic 

182: b quark decays. 

183: These are included in the signal acceptances calculated in Sec. IX. 

184: 

185: $Z$ bosons and top dilepton decays that contribute to the inclusive

186: high $p_T$ lepton dataset are removed by flagging the presence of a

187: second lepton.  Any event with two leptons satisfying the lepton

188: identification is removed, as well as those events where the second

189: lepton is an electron in the plug calorimeter or a muon that fails the

190: CMUP requirement, but has one CMU or CMP muon segment.  Finally, we attempt

191: to remove $Z$ bosons without a well identified second lepton by eliminating 

192: events with one lepton and certain second objects which form an invariant 

193: mass between 76 and 106~GeV/$c^2$ with the primary lepton. For primary 

194: muons the other object is an

195: opposite-signed isolated track with $p_T > 10$ GeV/c. For primary

196: electrons the second object may be such a track, an electromagnetic

197: cluster, or a jet with $E_T > 15$ GeV and $|\eta| \leq 2.0$ that has

198: fewer than three tracks and an electromagnetic energy fraction greater

199: than 95\%.  The correction for the residual $Z$ boson contribution to

200: the $W$ + jets sample is described in Section~\ref{sec:checks}. Small

201: contributions from $Z \rightarrow \tau \bar{\tau}$ where a $\tau$ is tagged 

202: are treated as a separate background, and described in Section~\ref{sec:m2bkg}.

203: 

204: \begin{figure}

205:   \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{Wmass1jet.eps}%

206:   \caption{\label{fig:wmass}Transverse mass of the identified lepton

207:     and inferred neutrino, consistent with $W$ boson production 

208: (162 $\mathrm{pb}^{-1}$ data sample).}

209: \end{figure}

210: 

211: The number of jets produced in association with the leptonically

212: decaying $W$ in the event is measured by selecting jets of cone radius

213: $\Delta R = 0.4$, with $E_T \geq 15\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $|\eta| \leq

214: 2.0$.  The jets are clustered after removing towers associated with

215: the selected isolated electron from the leptonic $W$ decay, and after

216: correcting the tower $E_T$ for the location of the primary vertex $z$

217: coordinate. The number of events in each jet multiplicity bin is shown

218: in Table~\ref{tab:pretag}.  The overall ${\rm acceptance \times

219:   efficiency}$ of this selection for $t\bar t$ events in the

220: lepton+jets channel with three or more jets, including the leptonic

221: branching ratios, is roughly 4\% for the electron channel, 2\% for

222: muons in the CMUP, and 1\% for muons in the CMX.

223: 

224: The presence of the $W$ boson in the selected events is verified by

225: calculating the transverse mass of the lepton and the missing energy:

226: $M_T = \sqrt{(E_T(\ell)+E_T(\nu))^2 -

227: (\overrightarrow{P_T}(\ell)+\overrightarrow{P_T}(\nu))^2}$. The

228: distribution of this variable for all events passing the requirement

229:   of a lepton, missing energy, and at least one jet is shown in

230:   Fig.~\ref{fig:wmass}, and displays the Jacobian edge associated with

231:   $W$ production and decay.

232: 

233: \begin{table*}

234:   \caption{\label{tab:pretag}Number of events selected, before

235:     $b$-tagging, for each jet multiplicity.}

236:   \begin{ruledtabular}

237:     \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}

238:       & $W$ + 1 jet & $W$ + 2 jets & $W$ + 3 jets & $W$ + 4 jets & $W$ + 3 jets & $W$ + 4 jets \\ 

239:       & & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$H_T > 0$} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$H_T >

240:         200$~GeV} \\ \hline

241:       Electrons & 8828 & 1446 & 241 & 70 & 117 & 63 \\

242:       Muons & 6486 & 1002 & 146 & 37 & 63 & 28 \\

243:     \end{tabular}

244:   \end{ruledtabular}

245: \end{table*}

246: 

247: As a final optimization step, the selection will incorporate an

248: additional cut on the total transverse energy $H_T$ of all objects in

249: the event. Events from $t\bar t$ production have, on average, a

250: significantly greater total transverse energy than background events.

251: The optimization of this requirement and acceptance

252: corrections and uncertainties will be discussed in

253: Sec.~\ref{sec:optimization}.

254: 

255: Because the $t\bar t$ signal is expected to contribute significantly to

256: the sample of events with $W$ + 3 jets or $W$ + $\geq 4$ jets, an excess

257: of observed events over the expected background with those jet multiplicities 

258: is assumed to be entirely due to $t\bar t$ production.  The observed results

259: for events with $W$ + 1 jet or $W$ + 2 jets, where the $t\bar t$ contribution

260: is negligible, serve as a check of the background prediction. 

261: 

262: In Reference~\cite{chicago}, the momentum spectrum of the leading jets in 

263: the  $W$ + 1 and 2 jet events is shown to be a reasonable model of the

264: backgrounds in the  $W$ + 3 or 4 jet events, and is used in deriving a 

265: completely independent estimate of the b-tag backgrounds to top

266: production in the $W$ + 3 or 4 jet channels. The estimated background, 

267: $18 \pm 4$ events, is in good agreement with our overall  

268: estimate of $23 \pm 3$ (for $H_T>0$), derived from an explicit calculation 

269: for each contributing background process (see Sec.\ref{sec:m2bkg}). The 

270: independence of these background estimates allows for a combined 

271: cross section calculation which will appear in a future paper. 

272: We note here that the technique of Reference~\cite{chicago} will

273: work only in the study of top quarks in the $W$ plus jet mode, and we 

274: consider it a cross-check on our more general technique for 

275: calculating b-tag backgrounds, which will be employed in other 

276: b-tagging analyses at CDF.

277: 

278: The final cross section calculation, $\sigma_{t\bar t} = (N_\mathrm{obs} -

279: N_\mathrm{bkg})/(\epsilon_{t\bar t} \times \mathcal{L})$, depends on the

280: product $\epsilon_{t\bar t}$ of signal acceptance and selection efficiency, the

281: expected number of non-$t\bar t$ background events $N_\mathrm{bkg}$, and

282: the integrated luminosity $\mathcal L$.

283: 

284: 

285: 

286: 

287: 

288: 

289: 

290: 

291: 

292: 

293: 

294: 

295: