1: \section{Off-line analysis} \label{sec:analysis}
2:
3: The main goal of the off-line analysis is the extraction of the relevant physics informations from the large amount of raw data recorded by the DAQ system. This task includes both the raw detector pulse analysis (e.g. amplitude evaluation, noise rejection, gain instability and linearity correction) aiming at producing reliable n-ple's (a proper number of parameters fully describing each bolometric pulse) and energy spectra, and the following multi-dimensional analysis aiming at obtaining the sought physics results (e.g. \BBz or DM interactions). The identification of the single background sources is also an important goal of the second-level analysis.
4:
5: \subsection{First-level analysis}
6: As described in a previous section, when the output voltage of one detector exceeds the trigger threshold,
7: the acquisition system records a number of converted signal samples. The acquired time window (\ca few sec) must fully contain the pulse development in order to allow an accurate description of its waveform. The existence of a pre-trigger interval just prior to the production of the pulse (``baseline'') guarantees that a small fraction of the number of acquired samples can be used to measure the DC level of the detector (which can be directly correlated to the detector temperature).
8:
9: The fact that for each trigger an entire waveform is sampled and recorded implies that off-line analysis of a large body of data will require a significant effort. Nevertheless, this effort will be justified because of the useful information that can be extracted from the signal waveform. The following are important goals for the (first-level or \emph{pulse}) analysis (FLA):
10: \begin{enumerate}
11: \item{maximization of the signal to noise ratio for the best estimate of the pulse amplitude. This is accomplished by means of the optimum filter (OF) technique \cite{gatti86};}
12: \item{correction of the effects of system instabilities that change the response function of the detectors (gain ``stabilization'');}
13: \item{rejection of the spurious triggered pulses by means of pulse shape analysis;}
14: \item{identification and rejection of radioactive background pulses by means of coincidence analysis.}
15: \end{enumerate}
16:
17: The OF technique is frequently used with bolometers to evaluate the amplitude of a signal superimposed on stochastic noise. This algorithm has proven to provide the best estimate of the pulse amplitude under general conditions. Relative to a simple \emph{maximum--minimum} algorithm, this technique allows the evaluation of the signal amplitude with much higher efficiency resulting in an effective improvement of the detector energy resolution. The following information is needed to implement the OF technique: the detector response function (i.e. the shape of the signal in a zero noise condition) and the noise power spectrum. Once these are known, the OF transfer function is easily obtained and used as a digital filter for the acquired pulses. The role of the OF transfer function is to weight the frequency components of the signal in order to suppress
18: those frequencies that are highly influenced by noise. The amplitude of the pulse is then evaluated using optimally filtered pulses. Effective pulse-shape parameters can be deduced from the comparison of the filtered pulses with the filtered response function (e.g. rms difference after proper time synchronization).
19:
20: In processing the data off-line, the following parameters are evaluated and recorded to disk for each digitized pulse (\emph{n-ple}):
21: \begin{enumerate}
22: \item{the \emph{channel number} i.e., the number of ADC channel that exceeded the trigger threshold;}
23: \item{the \emph{absolute time} at which the pulse occurred with a precision of 0.1~msec;}
24: \item{the \emph{OF amplitude} i.e. the amplitude of the optimally filtered signals}
25: \item{the \emph{baseline}, obtained by averaging a proper number of points from the pre-trigger interval. Since the detectors are DC coupled, it provides a direct measurement of the detector temperature at the creation of the signal;}
26: \item{the signal \emph{rise} and signal \emph{decay times};}
27: \item{the \emph{pulse shape parameters}, obtained by comparing the acquired pulse with the expected response function of the bolometer after OF or adaptive filters. A further powerful technique is based on the use of artificial neural networks (ANN);}
28: \item{the \emph{pile-up fraction}. Pile-up is usually efficiently rejected by pulse-shape analysis even if this technique can't identify the rejected pile-up events. In order to improve the pile-up rejection and quantitatively evaluate its rate (e.g. for short-time coincidence analysis), the Wiener-filter algorithm is implemented~\cite{press91}.}
29: \end{enumerate}
30:
31: The next PLA step is the gain instability correction.
32: The OF amplitudes are corrected to reduce or cancel the effects of system instabilities responsible for the variation of the ratio between the energy E deposited into a given crystal and the amplitude $\Delta$ V of the
33: corresponding electrical pulse. According to equation (\ref{eq:maximum}) of our very naive detector model there are three instabilities that can modify the ratio $\Delta$ V/E (where V=V$_b$*G is the output voltage given by the product of the bolometer voltage V$_b$ and the electronics gain G): i) a variation in the electronic gain G, ii) a variation in the bias V$_{Tot}$ and finally iii) a variation in the temperature T$_b$ of the crystal.
34: The electronic system is designed to guarantee a stability of G and V$_{Tot}$ within 0.1\% . It is however, much more difficult to maintain stability within 0.1\% of the detector temperature on long time scales.
35: At a temperature of 10~mK this would require maintaining the temperature of 1000 crystals to an accuracy of 10 $\mu$ K for a period of several days.
36:
37: To overcome this problem, and as already mentioned in previous sections, a silicon resistor glued to each crystal is used as a heater to produce a reference pulse in the detector. It is connected to a high precision programmable pulser that produces a fast voltage pulse every few minutes dissipating the same amount of energy
38: (E$_{ref}$) into the crystal each time. These voltage pulses mimic pulses produced in the crystal by particle interactions and are used to measure the value of the ratio $\Delta$ V/E. Any variation of the amplitude of the reference pulse is due to variations of the $ \Delta$V/E ratio. The OF amplitude of the reference pulse is
39: therefore used to measure, every few minutes, the actual value of $ \Delta$ V/E while the baseline of the reference pulse provides the contemporary measurement of the value of T. A fit is then used to obtain the values of $ \Delta$ V/E as a function of temperature.
40: Therefore, in this step of the off-line analysis, the OF amplitude of each pulse is corrected according to the given value of $ \Delta$ V/E(T[t]) for the detector temperature at which the pulse has been generated.
41: The effectiveness of this technique has been proven in the MiDBD experiment, where a typical
42: temperature fluctuation over a day ranged from a few tenths to \ca 100 $\mu $K .
43: After correction, these fluctuations were reduced to less than 1~$\mu$ K \cite{alessandrello98s} (Fig.~\ref{fig:stab}).
44:
45:
46: Pulse shape analysis is very useful in rejecting spurious signals produced by microphonics and electronic noise. A confidence level is determined for each pulse shape parameter and for the rise and decay time of each pulse.
47: Signals falling within these intervals are defined as ``true'' (or physical) pulses, while signals having one or more of their parameters outside of the relevant interval are rejected as noise. The use of more than one pulse shape parameter results in better reliability of the rejection technique.
48:
49: The linearization of the detector response is critically important for energy calibration. The final step in data processing is the conversion of the OF amplitudes into energy values. The naive bolometer model
50: previously used assumes linearity; several parameters depend however on the crystal temperature, rendering the corresponding equation non-linear. Accordingly, the relation between $ \Delta $ V and E will be obtained periodically by the use of radioactive calibration sources. The ratio $ \Delta V/E $ will be measured for several gamma lines, and the data will be fit to the model previously described, but taking into consideration the fact that the bolometer resistance and the crystal heat capacity are temperature dependent. This will provide the calibration function of E as a function of $ \Delta$V, that will then be used to convert the OF
51: amplitudes into energy values.
52:
53:
54: Finally, the close packed array of the crystals will allow the rejection of events that left energy in more than one single crystal. This will be particularly useful in rejecting a very high energy gamma rays that enter from outside of the array. The small angle Compton scattering in a single crystal can mimic a double beta decay event, a dark matter scattering, or a solar axion. The probability that this photon would escape the rest of the array without a second interaction is small. In addition, background events from radioactivity within the structure of the array will also have a significant probability of depositing energy in more than one crystal. This will also be true for high and intermediate energy neutrons. In the final stage of off-line analysis these coincidence events can be identified from the data which will contain the detector number, signal time, pulse energy, and pile-up parameter.
55:
56: \subsection{Second-level analysis}
57: Since the main goal of CUORE is the search for \BBz of \tect, the same will also hold for the second-level analysis (SLA). In CUORICINO, most of the tools of this analysis are powered by the experience gained by the Milano group during the previous experiments on \BBz of various nuclides. Since many institutions participating in CUORE have a similar experience, we are planning to merge the various analysis techniques of the different groups to apply them to double beta decay processes in order to obtain a single powerful standard analysis procedure. Nevertheless, it will be essential to be able to guarantee a safe cross-check of the results, so that independent analyses from the various groups will be encouraged.
58:
59: Detection efficiencies for the various transitions will be evaluated by means Monte Carlo simulations specifically designed for the CUORE detector. An updated collection of the most recent calculations for nuclear matrix elements will be kept and updated (according to the various nuclear models). That will be essential to derive reliable results for the effective neutrino mass parameter, the right handed current parameters, or the majoron coupling parameter.
60:
61: Physics analysis for Dark Matter and axion searches in CUORE will be completely designed and realized in the framework of CUORICINO. In order to improve the noise rejection near threshold an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach will be improved (the possibility of an ANN trigger is under investigation). The effectiveness and reliability of the rejection techniques based on the selection of multi-dimensional confidence intervals (strongly depending on the suitability of the chosen parameters) will be tested in CUORICINO and methods to calibrate the rejection efficiency will be defined. Time stability of threshold parameters will be a major issue.
62: