1:
2:
3: \chapter{
4: The E831/FOCUS Experiment at Fermilab
5: }
6: %\label{chDetector}
7:
8: FOCUS is a high-energy photoproduction experiment that took data during the Fermilab 1996--1997 fixed-target run. A bremsstrahlung-generated photon beam with energies ranging from approximately 20 to 300~$\gev$ was incident on a BeO target. While the primary purpose of the FOCUS experiment is to study the photoproduction of charm and the properties of charmed mesons and baryons, the experiment has also been able to collect an impressive sample of light quark events. This chapter will give a brief overview of the FOCUS experiment and its detector.
9:
10:
11: \section{Physics Overview}
12:
13: The FOCUS experiment has been at the forefront of charm physics since its analysis efforts began around 1998. Improving on its predecessor, E687~\cite{expE687}, FOCUS has been able to reconstruct over one million $D$ mesons (see Fig.~\ref{fig_goldenmode}). Over thirty papers have been published on topics such as semileptonic charm decays, charmed baryon lifetimes, CP violation in the charm sector, and the spectroscopy of charmed meson and baryon excited states\footnote{A list of publications and more detail concerning ongoing physics analyses can be found at http://www-focus.fnal.gov/}.
14:
15: {
16: \begin{figure}[p]
17: \begin{center}
18: \leavevmode
19: \epsfxsize=4truein
20: \epsfbox{ch2/goldenmode.eps}
21: \end{center}
22: \caption[The FOCUS $D$ meson signal in three different final states]
23: {The FOCUS $D$ meson signal in three different final states. $L/\sigma>5$ was applied, where $L/\sigma$ is the $D$ meson decay length over its error.
24: \label{fig_goldenmode}}
25: \end{figure}
26: }
27:
28: \section{The Accelerator}
29:
30:
31: During the Fermilab 1996--1997 fixed-target run, 800$\gev$ protons from the Fermilab Tevatron were used to feed an array of fixed-target experiments. In the Main Switchyard, the proton beam extracted from the Tevatron was split into a meson beam line, a neutrino beam line, and a proton beam line. The FOCUS photon beam originated from the proton beam line. Figure~\ref{fig_tevatron} shows the general layout of Fermilab and the fixed target lines.
32:
33: {
34: \begin{figure}[p]
35: \begin{center}
36: \leavevmode
37: \epsfxsize=5truein
38: \epsfbox{ch2/tevatron.eps}
39: \end{center}
40: \caption[A schematic of the layout of the Fermilab accelerator complex]
41: {A schematic of the layout of the Fermilab accelerator complex.
42: \label{fig_tevatron}}
43: \end{figure}
44: }
45:
46:
47: The 800~$\gev$ protons of the Tevatron are generated in a series of five stages, each stage increasing the energy of the beam. The process begins with the Cockcroft-Walton, where electrons are added to hydrogen atoms to form negatively charged ions. The negative electric charge allows the $H^-$ ions to be accelerated across an electrostatic gap to an energy of 750~$\kev$. Next, the $H^-$ ions are fed into a linear accelerator (Linac). The Linac accelerates the $H^-$ ions from 750~$\kev$ to 400~$\mev$ using a series of RF cavities. Once at the end of the accelerator, the ions are stripped of their electrons in a thin carbon foil, the result of which is a 400~$\mev$ proton beam. From the Linac, the proton beam is picked up by the Booster synchrotron. With a relatively small diameter of 500 feet, the Booster accelerates the protons from 400~$\mev$ to 8~$\gev$. By way of the Main Injector, the protons are now ready to enter the much larger Main Ring, a synchrotron with a 4 mile circumference housed in the same tunnel as the Tevatron. The Main Ring brings the energy of the protons from 8~$\gev$ up to 150~$\gev$. In the final stage of acceleration, the protons are transferred from the Main Ring to the Tevatron. Using 1000 superconducting magnets, the Tevatron boosts the proton energy from 150~$\gev$ to its final energy of 800~$\gev$ for fixed target experiments.
48:
49: During the fixed-target run period, the Tevatron held 1000~proton bunches separated by 20~$\ns$. The acceleration process went through a one minute cycle: 40~seconds were spent filling the Tevatron with 800~$\gev$ protons, and then during the remaining 20~seconds the protons were extracted from the Tevatron and routed through the Main Switchyard. The FOCUS experiment was located in Wideband Hall at the end of the proton fixed target line. Data collection within the FOCUS experiment was divided into separate ``runs,'' periods of roughly one hour of running.
50:
51:
52: \section{The Photon Beam}
53: %\label{secDetectorBeam}
54:
55: {
56: \begin{figure}[p]
57: \begin{center}
58: \leavevmode
59: \epsfxsize=4truein
60: \epsfbox{ch2/e831_beam.eps}
61: \end{center}
62: \caption[Generating the high energy photon beam used by FOCUS]
63: {Generating the high energy photon beam used by FOCUS.
64: \label{fig_beam}}
65: \end{figure}
66: }
67:
68: Once the 800~$\gev$ protons have been extracted from the Tevatron and sent down the proton fixed target line, the proton beam is converted to a photon beam~\cite{E831beam} through a series of stages (see Fig.~\ref{fig_beam}). The process begins 365~m upstream of the FOCUS experimental target where the 800~$\gev$ proton beam interacts with the 3.6~meter long liquid deuterium production target. This interaction results in a spray of all varieties of charged and neutral particles. The charged particles are swept away by dipole magnets and collimators, leaving only neutral particles, primarily photons, neutrons, and $\klong$'s. These neutral particles are sent through a lead converter that converts most of the photons in the neutral beam to $\epem$ pairs. The $\epem$ pairs are guided around a thick beam dump using a series of dipole magnets, and the remaining neutral particles in the beam are absorbed by the dump. The series of dipole magnets leading the $\epem$ pairs around the neutral particle dump consists of (1) the Momentum Dispersing Dipoles, the magnets that initially cause electrons to bend one way and positrons the other; (2) the Momentum Selecting Dipoles, which are optimized to select electrons and positrons with momenta around 300~$\gev$; and (3) the Momentum Recombining Dipoles, the magnets that recombine the electrons and positrons into a single beam. Once around the neutral beam dump, the $\epem$ beam is further focused by the Focusing Quadrupoles.
69:
70: The $\epem$ beam can now be used to generate a photon beam using the bremsstrahlung process. About 40~m upstream from the FOCUS experimental target, the $\epem$ beam is sent through a lead radiator. The individual electrons and positrons radiate photons through bremsstrahlung. Because of the extremely high energy of the $\epem$ beam of around 300$\gev$, the radiated photons travel in a direction nearly identical to the original direction of the $\epem$ beam.
71: After radiating, the electrons and positrons are swept into instrumented beam dumps (the Recoil Positron and Recoil Electron detectors) by the Sweeping Dipoles, and only a high energy photon beam remains. The mean photon beam energy is around 150$\gev$, but in addition there is a long low energy tail reaching down to around 20$\gev$.
72:
73: The energy of each photon in the beam nominally is measured by the beam tagging system. Before entering the Radiator, the energies of the electrons and positrons are measured by a set of five silicon planes interspersed between the Recombining Dipoles. After passing through the Radiator, when the electrons and positrons are swept to opposite sides of the experimental target, their energies are again measured, this time by lead-glass calorimeters, the Recoil Electron and Recoil Positron detectors. The energy of the radiated beam photon is then just the difference in energy of the electron (or positron) before and after the Radiator. In the case of a multiple bremsstrahlung event, the energy of the extra noninteracting photons is measured by a small central calorimeter, the Beam Gamma Monitor, and this energy is subtracted from the original measurement. In other words, the tagged photon beam energy ($\ebeam$) is calculated from:
74: \begin{equation}
75: %\begin{center}
76: \ebeam = E_{INC} - E_{OUT} - E_{BGM} ,
77: \label{eqn_ebeamtag}
78: %\end{center}
79: \end{equation}
80: where $E_{INC}$ is the incident electron (positron) energy before radiating, $E_{OUT}$ is the electron (positron) energy after radiating, and $E_{BGM}$ is the energy of any additional photons produced in a multiple bremsstrahlung event. The energy resolution of the beam tagging system is approximately 16 GeV.
81:
82:
83:
84: \section{The Spectrometer}
85:
86: The FOCUS detector, building upon the previous E687 photoproduction experiment~\cite{expE687}, is a forward multi-particle spectrometer designed to measure the interactions of high energy photons on a segmented BeO target (see Fig.~\ref{fig_spectrometer}). BeO was chosen as the target material to maximize the ratio of hadronic to electromagnetic interactions. The target was segmented into four sections to allow for a majority of charmed particles to decay outside of the target material.
87:
88: {
89: \begin{figure}[p]
90: \begin{center}
91: \leavevmode
92: \epsfxsize=5truein
93: \epsfbox{ch2/e831_spectrometer.eps}
94: \end{center}
95: \caption[The FOCUS spectrometer]
96: {The FOCUS spectrometer.
97: \label{fig_spectrometer}}
98: \end{figure}
99: }
100:
101:
102: Charged particles emerging from the target region are first tracked by two systems of silicon strip detectors. The upstream system, consisting of four planes (two stations of two views), is interleaved with the experimental target, while the other system lies downstream of the target and consists of twelve planes of microstrips arranged in three views. Once this initial stage of precision tracking is complete, the momentum of a charged particle is determined by measuring its deflections in two analysis magnets of opposite polarity with five stations of multiwire proportional chambers. The measured momentum is used in conjunction with three multicell threshold $\check{\rm C}$erenkov counters to discriminate between pions, kaons, and protons.
103:
104: In addition to excellent tracking and particle identification of charged particles, the FOCUS detector provides good reconstruction capabilities for neutral particles. $K^0_S$'s are reconstructed using the ``one-bend'' approximation described in Ref.~\cite{E831ks}. Photons and $\pi^0$ are reconstructed using two electromagnetic calorimeters covering different regions of rapidity.
105:
106: Three elements of the FOCUS detector are most important for the analysis of the charm decay $D^0\rightarrow K^-\pi^+$ which we use to search for CPT violation. First, the tracking system provides a list of charged tracks and their momenta. Second, the particle identification system classifies the charged tracks as pions, kaons, or protons. Third, the triggering elements require that events satisfy a certain number of requirements before they are recorded. Further information on other detector elements (e.g., the calorimeters) can be found elsewhere~\cite{EricThesis,LinkThesis}.
107:
108:
109:
110: \subsection{Tracking}
111:
112:
113: The purpose of the tracking system is both to reconstruct the paths particles have traveled through the spectrometer and to measure the momenta of these particles. The first task is accomplished by a series of detecting planes normal to the beam direction and placed at advantageous positions throughout the spectrometer. Each plane consists of an array of parallel silicon strips or wires, depending on the detector type, which send out a signal when a charged (ionizing) particle passes through a silicon plane or close by a wire. Knowing which wire or strip a particle has passed near or through provides a one-dimensional coordinate of the position of the particle on the detecting plane. By grouping planes at various tilts, or views (see Fig.~\ref{fig_pwc}), into stations, an ($x,y$) coordinate can be calculated at various positions of $z$, where $z$ is the distance from the target, and $x$ and $y$ are horizontal and vertical coordinates, respectively. Connecting the ($x,y$) coordinates from station to station ($z$ position to $z$ position) results in a track, the path a charged particle has followed through the spectrometer.
114:
115:
116: %{
117: %\begin{figure}[p]
118: % \begin{center}
119: % \leavevmode
120: % \epsfxsize=4truein
121: % \epsfbox{ch2/pwcwiress.eps}
122: % \end{center}
123: % \caption[A rough sketch of the different PWC views]
124: % {A rough sketch of the different PWC views. Charged particles passing through these planes ionize the gas around one of the wires, the charge is collected on the nearest wire, and then recorded, giving a one-dimensional coordinate of the particle. Combining views, the (x,y) position of a particle can be calculated at a given value of z.
125: % \label{fig_pwc}}
126: %\end{figure}
127: %}
128:
129: \begin{figure}
130: \begin{center}
131: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{ch2/pwcwiress.eps}
132: \caption[A rough sketch of the different PWC views]{A rough sketch of the different PWC views. Charged particles passing through these planes ionize the gas around one of the wires, the charge is collected on the nearest wire, and then recorded, giving a one-dimensional coordinate of the particle. Combining views, the ($x,y$) position of a particle can be calculated at a given value of $z$.}
133: \label{fig_pwc}
134: \end{center}
135: \end{figure}
136:
137:
138: The second task, measuring a track's momentum, is accomplished by observing the deflections of the charged particle in known magnetic fields. In FOCUS, this is accomplished by using two different large aperture dipole magnets. The first magnet (M1) provides a vertical momentum kick of 0.5~$\gevc$, while the second magnet (M2) provides a larger vertical momentum kick of 0.85~$\gevc$ in the opposite direction. Having different strengths for the two magnets allows sensitivity to a larger range of momentum. A low momentum track will be measured well by M1, but may be bent out of the acceptance by M2. A high momentum track may not be deflected enough by M1 for a good momentum measurement, but will be picked up by the stronger M2. The momentum of a track is calculated by using
139: \begin{equation}
140: %\begin{center}
141: p=\frac{Kick}{\Delta S}
142: %\end{center}
143: \end{equation}
144: as the track passes through either magnet, where $Kick$ is the constant momentum kick of one of the magnets and $\Delta S$ is the change in vertical slope of the track as it passes through that magnet.
145:
146: The FOCUS tracking system consists of several distinct subsystems. The upstream system consists of silicon strip detectors placed among the target elements (referred to as the target silicon system~\cite{E831tsil}) and silicon strip detectors placed just downstream of the target region (referred to as the SSD system). %The upstream tracking system is shown in figure~\ref{fig_target}.
147: Charged tracks are followed through the two dipole magnets by the downstream tracking system, which consists of five stations of proportional wire chambers (PWC). Three stations of PWC are between M1 and M2, and two are downstream of M2.
148:
149:
150: %{
151: %\begin{figure}[t]
152: % \begin{center}
153: % \leavevmode
154: % \epsfxsize=4truein
155: % \epsfbox{ch2/target_e831.eps}
156: % \end{center}
157: % \caption[The FOCUS target region]
158: % {The FOCUS target region.
159: % \label{fig_target}}
160: % \vskip 0.25in
161: %\end{figure}
162: %}
163:
164: %\begin{figure}
165: %\begin{center}
166: %\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{ch2/target_e831.eps}
167: %\caption{The FOCUS target region.}
168: %\label{fig_target}
169: %\end{center}
170: %\end{figure}
171:
172:
173:
174: The silicon strip detectors in the upstream system are essentially reverse-biased diodes with charge collecting strips etched on the surface. When a charged particle passes through the interior of the silicon, electron-hole pairs are created. The internal electric field pulls the freed electrons to the surface of the silicon where they are picked up by the conducting strip, amplified, and registered in the data acquisition system.
175:
176: The target silicon system, the silicon strip system placed among the target elements, is composed of two stations of two planes of silicon strip detectors with strips oriented at $\pm45^{\circ}$ from
177: the horizontal. The first station is between the second and third target elements, and the second station follows immediately after the last target element (see Fig.~\ref{fig_spectrometer}). The planes are $25\times50~\mm$ in size (the larger dimension is vertical), and the strips have a width of 25~$\micron$, giving 1024 different channels per plane.
178:
179: The SSD system, the second system of silicon strip detectors, begins just downstream of the target system and extends downstream approximately $30~\cm$, still upstream of the first dipole magnet. It consists of four stations of three planes each with the silicon strips oriented vertically, and $\pm45^{\circ}$ from the horizontal. The stations are each $6~\cm$ apart except for the last, which is separated by $12~\cm$. The first station (i.e., the most upstream) consists of $25~\mm$ long strips. In the central region the strips are 25~$\micron$ wide and in the outer region the strips are 50~$\micron$ wide. The other stations consist of $50~\mm$ long strips, with widths of 50~$\micron$ in the central region and 100~$\micron$ in the outer.
180:
181: Tracks in the upstream tracking system are found in three steps. First, clusters are formed within each plane. That is, regions where adjacent strips have fired are grouped together. By measuring the amount of charge collected, the cluster is forced to be consistent with having been formed by a single charged track. Second, projections are formed within each station. In other words, clusters within planes are joined to form a very short track segment within a station. Finally, tracks are formed by connecting the station projections. The last step is accomplished by fitting different combinations of station projections with straight lines and taking the best fits to be the tracks.
182:
183: The downstream tracking system is composed of five stations of proportional wire chambers (PWC). A PWC operates on roughly the same principle as a silicon strip detector. When a charged particle passes through a PWC, the PWC gas is ionized and the ions drift through an electric field and are collected by parallel metal wires. The charge is collected at the end of a wire giving the one-dimensional position of a track. Arranging the PWC planes within a station at various tilts, or views, gives an ($x,y$) coordinate for a PWC station.
184:
185: Five stations of four PWC planes each are interspersed throughout the FOCUS spectrometer. The planes within a station are oriented vertically, horizontally, and at $\pm11.3^{\circ}$ from the horizontal. The first three stations (most upstream) are placed between the magnets M1 and M2, and the last two stations appear downstream of M2 on either side of the last $\check{\rm C}$erenkov counter (C3). The first and fourth stations have the dimensions of $76\times127~\cm$ and have a wire spacing of $2~\mm$. The second, third, and fifth stations are $152 \times 229~\cm$ and have a wire spacing of $3.3~\mm$.
186:
187: Tracks in the downstream system are reconstructed in three steps. First, hits in the planes with vertical strips are connected from station to station with straight lines, referred to as $x$ view tracks. The line segments formed from hits in this view are straight since it is the projection unaffected by the magnetic field, i.e., it is the non-bend view. Second, the other three views (the horizontal wires, and $\pm11.3^{\circ}$ wires) are combined within each station to form short projections. Finally, the $x$-view tracks and station projections are combined by fitting to two straight lines, one before M2 and one after, and with a bend parameter to take into account the track's bending through M2.
188:
189: Once tracks have been found in the upstream and downstream tracking systems, they must be linked together. This is accomplished by refitting all the hits of the upstream and downstream tracks with three straight lines and two bend parameters corresponding to the amount of deflection resulting from M1 and M2. With two opportunities to measure the momentum, tracks can be linked by enforcing consistency. Doubly linked tracks, where one upstream track is linked with two downstream tracks, are allowed to accommodate the possibility of photons converting to $\epem$ pairs that do not significantly separate until after M1.
190:
191: The momentum resolution for charged tracks depends on the momentum of the track and whether the track has passed through M1 and M2 or just M1. For tracks only deflected by M1, the resolution is given by:
192: \begin{equation}
193: \frac{\sigma_p}{p}=0.034\cdot\frac{p}{100~\gevc}
194: \sqrt{1+(\frac{17~\gevc}{p})^2} .
195: \end{equation}
196: For tracks extending through M2 the momentum resolution is:
197: \begin{equation}
198: \frac{\sigma_p}{p}=0.014\cdot\frac{p}{100~\gevc}
199: \sqrt{1+(\frac{23~\gevc}{p})^2} .
200: \end{equation}
201: For low momentum tracks, the momentum resolution is limited by multiple scattering within the detector material. The momentum resolution for high momentum tracks is limited by the spacing of the wires and strips and uncertainties in the alignment of the detector planes.
202:
203:
204:
205: \subsection{Particle Identification}
206: %\label{secDetectorcerenkov}
207:
208: Particle identification in FOCUS is provided by a series of three $\check{\rm C}$erenkov counters, which are based on the principle that when a particle travels through a medium with a velocity greater than $c/n$, where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum and $n$ is the index of refraction of the medium, then the particle will radiate photons. Being sensitive to these radiated photons, a $\check{\rm C}$erenkov counter can determine whether or not the velocity of a particle is above or below the velocity threshold, $c/n$. This velocity threshold corresponds to different momenta thresholds for particles of different masses\footnote
209: {The momentum of a particle, $p$, is given by $p = \gamma mv$, where $m$ is the mass of the particle, $v$ is the velocity and $\gamma = (1-\frac{v^2}{c^2})^{-1/2}$.}, and this is what allows a $\check{\rm C}$erenkov counter to distinguish between particle types. For example, if the velocity threshold of a $\check{\rm C}$erenkov counter were $0.9999\,c$, then the momentum threshold for a pion would be 9.87~$\gevc$, while the momentum threshold for a kaon would be 34.9~$\gevc$. So, if a track had a momentum of 20~$\gevc$, as determined by the tracking system, then the $\check{\rm C}$erenkov counter would fire if the track were a pion, but would not fire if the track were a kaon. In this particular example, the $\check{\rm C}$erenkov counter ideally could cleanly distinguish between pions and kaons for all tracks with momenta between 9.87 and 34.9~$\gevc$.
210:
211: \begin{table}[t]
212: \centering
213: \caption[Properties of the three FOCUS $\check{\rm C}$erenkov detectors]{Properties of the three FOCUS $\check{\rm C}$erenkov detectors.
214: \label{tab_cerenkov}}
215: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
216: \hline
217: Counter & Material & $\pipm$ Threshold & $\kpm$ Threshold & $\ppm$ Threshold \\
218: & & $\,\gevc$ & $\,\gevc$ & $\,\gevc$ \\
219: \hline
220: C1 & 80\% He, 20\% $\rm{N}_2$ & 8.4 & 29.8 & 56.5 \\
221: C2 & $\rm{N_2O}$ & 4.5 & 16.0 & 30.9 \\
222: C3 & He & 17.4 & 61.8 & 117.0 \\
223: \hline
224: \end{tabular}
225: \vskip 0.25in
226: \end{table}
227:
228: By using three different $\check{\rm C}$erenkov counters filled with gases of different indices of refraction (see Table~\ref{tab_cerenkov}), FOCUS can cleanly distinguish between pions, kaons, and protons over a wide range of momentum. Now, for example, a 20~$\gevc$ pion, a 20~$\gevc$ kaon, and a 20~$\gevc$ proton will all have different signatures. The pion will fire all three counters C1, C2, and C3; the kaon will only fire C2; and the proton will not radiate at all. Notice that there is ideally a clean separation between pions and kaons with momenta all the way from 4.5~$\gevc$ to 61.8~$\gevc$. E687 used a particle identification system based only on these thresholds and logic tables.
229:
230: FOCUS has improved on this system by measuring the angle with which photons are radiated by a particle traveling with a velocity above threshold. This provides additional information about the particle's velocity, $v$, since the angle of radiation, $\theta$, is given by
231: \begin{equation}
232: \cost=\frac{c}{nv} .
233: \end{equation}
234: Therefore the higher the velocity is above threshold, the larger the ring of the emitted photons. The measurement of the angle has been made possible by dividing the back of the $\check{\rm C}$erenkov counters into arrays of cells, with smaller cells near the center of the counter and larger cells further out from the center.
235:
236: FOCUS has implemented a system called CITADL for particle identification based on the detected rings in the counters~\cite{E831id}. The CITADL system works by assigning likelihoods to different particle hypotheses. For example, if a particle of given momentum (measured by the tracking system) were a pion, then we can calculate its velocity and the angles of radiation and thus know which cells in which counters should have fired. The likelihood for the pion hypothesis is then calculated based on the status of these cells. If a given cell should be ``on'' given the pion hypothesis, and the cell was found to be ``on'', then the total likelihood for the pion hypothesis receives a contribution of
237: \begin{equation}
238: L_{\mathrm{cell}}=(1-e^{-\mu})+a-a(1-e^{-\mu}) ,
239: \end{equation}
240: where $\mu$ is the expected number of photoelectrons in the cell, $a$ is the accidental firing rate, and Poisson statistics has been assumed. If the cell was found to be ``off'', then the total likelihood receives a contribution of
241: \begin{equation}
242: L_{\mathrm{cell}}=1-[(1-e^{-\mu})+a-a(1-e^{-\mu})] .
243: \end{equation}
244: The likelihoods are summed over all the cells in the ring of cells that should have fired given the pion hypothesis to give a total likelihood for the pion hypothesis:
245: \begin{equation}
246: L_{\pi} = \sum_{\mathrm{cells}} L_{\mathrm{cell}} .
247: \end{equation}
248: Similarly, likelihoods are calculated for the $e^{\pm}$, $\kpm$, and $\ppm$ particle hypotheses.
249:
250: To convert the likelihoods to $\chisquare$-like measures, the CITADL system introduces the variables
251: \begin{equation}
252: W_i = -2\ln(L_i) ,
253: \end{equation}
254: where $i$ indicates the hypothesis under consideration, i.e., either $\epem$, $\pipm$, $\kpm$, or $\ppm$. The $W_i$ with the lowest value indicates the most likely particle hypothesis. Since kaons and pions dominate the hadronic final states, useful parameters for particle identification are the "pionicity", defined as
255: \begin{equation}
256: \mathrm{Pionicity} \equiv W_K - W_{\pi} ,
257: \end{equation}
258: and the ``kaonicity'', defined as
259: \begin{equation}
260: \mathrm{kaonicity} \equiv W_{\pi} - W_K .
261: \end{equation}
262: Increasing the ``kaonicity'' requirement, for example, decreases the chances a pion will be misidentified as a kaon.
263: %%%
264: %An example of the effect of "kaonicity" on kaon identification can be seen in figure~\ref{fig_misid} where a sample of putative $\kpkm$ events has been selected using various "kaonicity" criteria. Fig.~\ref{fig_misid}.a shows the mass spectrum of these events plotted as if they were $\pip\pim$ events. With the loosest "kaonicity" requirement, $\mathrm{"kaonicity"} > 1.4$ for both kaons, the $\rhoa \rightarrow \pip\pim$ decay is clearly visible, indicating that many of the putative $\kpkm$ pairs are misidentified $\pip\pim$ pairs. Tightening the "kaonicity" requirement from 1.4 to 2.6 to 6.0 for both kaons, the pion contamination is greatly reduced and the $\rhoa$ signal disappears. In the $\kpkm$ mass spectrum (figure~\ref{fig_misid}.b), the $\rhoa$ signal manifests itself as a broad enhancement at a mass of around 1200~$\mevcc$ for the loosest "kaonicity" requirement, and disappears as the "kaonicity" criteria are tightened.
265:
266:
267: %{
268: %\begin{figure}[p]
269: % \begin{center}
270: % \leavevmode
271: % \epsfxsize=4truein
272: % \epsfbox[0 250 567 567]{ch2/misid.eps}
273: % \end{center}
274: % \caption[The effect of "kaonicity" on kaon misidentification]
275: % {The effect of "kaonicity" on kaon misidentification. (a) The mass spectrum for putative $\kpkm$ events plotted as if they were $\pip\pim$ events. The appearance of the $\rhoa \rightarrow \pip\pim$ decay indicates misidentification. The dashed line marks the $\rhoa$ mass. The black line is the mass spectrum for the loosest "kaonicity" requirement: $\mathrm{"kaonicity"} > 1.4$ for both kaons. The red and blue lines are for "kaonicity" greater than 2.6 and 6.0, respectively, for both kaons. (b) The corresponding $\kpkm$ mass spectrum for the same series of "kaonicity" requirements.
276: % \label{fig_misid}}
277: %\end{figure}
278: %}
279:
280:
281: \subsection{Triggers}
282: % \label{secDetectortrigger}
283:
284: Whenever an interesting event occurs in the detector, data must be read out and stored. The trigger system is responsible for discriminating between interesting and uninteresting events. The trigger decision takes place in several stages and there are several different triggers based on different physics questions. The data for the $K^-\pi^+$ analyses included in the remaining chapters are obtained through the hadronic trigger. While triggering elements are located throughout the spectrometer and serve various purposes, the hadronic trigger imposes only three simple criteria on events.
285:
286: First, like all other triggers, the hadronic trigger requires a coincidence in TR1 and TR2. TR1 is just downstream of the target assembly, and TR2 is just downstream of the SSD system. A coincidence in TR1 and TR2 guarantees that at least one charged track has passed through the SSD system.
287:
288: Second, in addition to having tracks in the SSD system, the hadronic trigger requires at least two charged tracks to traverse the entire downstream tracking system. The OH and $\hxv$ detectors are located just after the last PWC station and are designed to count charged tracks. The $\hxv$ detector covers the inner region of the acceptance and the OH detector covers the outer region. The hadronic trigger requires either two charged tracks be detected by the $\hxv$ or one charged track register in the $\hxv$ and one in the OH. Both the $\hxv$ and the OH include a vertical gap from top to bottom to allow $\epem$ pairs to pass.
289:
290: Finally, a minimum hadronic energy of 18~$\gev$ as determined by the hadronic calorimeter is an additional requirement imposed by the hadronic trigger. This requirement ensures the presence of hadronic tracks (as opposed to $\epem$ tracks).
291:
292:
293:
294: \section{Data Collection}
295:
296: Over the course of its running, the FOCUS experiment collected 6.5 billion events recorded on 5926 tapes, each tape holding 4.5 Gigabytes of data. The data was collected over approximately 6500 runs, each run corresponding to roughly one hour of running time. The data was processed in four separate stages.
297:
298: (1) PassOne was where all the major reconstruction was performed, e.g., track reconstruction and particle identification.
299:
300: (2) Skim1 separated the PassOne output into six large superstreams based on different physics criteria. One of the superstreems was the hadronic meson decays also called as ``SEZDEE'' (Super EaZy DEE) stream. This stream included all hadronic decays of $D$ mesons. This stream was still large (approximately 300 8mm tapes, 1.2 TB worth of data).
301:
302: (3) In Skim2, the superstreams were separated into separate substreams by requiring more specific physics criteria. One of the substreams of SEZDEE was tuned to select $D^0\rightarrow K^-\pi^+$ decays by requiring that the invariant mass of $K^-\pi^+$ is between 1.7\gev~and 2.1\gev, have a decay length significance greater than 2.5, and a confidence level of secondary vertex greater than 1\%. After these cuts the data was reduced to a size of $\approx 63$~GB.
303:
304: (4) In the final stage, the $K^-\pi^+$ data was copied to the local disks at one of the Indiana University High Energy Physics clusters.
305:
306:
307:
308: