1: \chapter{Establishing the \lb\ Signal}
2: \label{ch:recolb}
3:
4: \section{Data and Monte Carlo Event Samples}
5:
6: The data used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of
7: approximately 225~pb$^{-1}$ collected between April 2002 and
8: January 2004. This analysis is described in Ref.~\cite{leptonp_lambdab} and repeated in Ref.~\cite{leptonp_lambdab_update}.
9:
10:
11: \subsection{Dimuon data sample}
12:
13: The data used in this analysis was part of a skim that was
14: called the ``D'' skim, which included
15: either $D$ mesons for semileptonic studies or $J/\psi$'s
16: for exclusive channels. The dimuon requirements on this skim are:
17:
18: \begin{itemize}
19: \item two muons with opposite charge;
20: \item $p_{T}>1$ GeV for each muon;
21: \item number of CFT hits $>$~1 for each particle;
22: \item at least 1 muon with $nseg=3$; $nseg$ is a muon quality cut that describes the hits in the muon detector layers.
23: \item for $nseg>0$, $p_{T}(\mu)>1.5$~GeV;
24: for $nseg=0$, $p_{T}>1$ GeV;
25: \item 2.5~GeV~$<$~Mass$(\mu^+\mu^-) < 3.6$~GeV;
26: \item for a muon with $nseg=0$:
27: \begin{itemize}
28: \item $p_{T}(\mu^+\mu^-)>4.0$ GeV;
29: %\item $nmtc()>=0$, as described in MuonParticle class;
30: %\item $CalEsig()>0.015*CalNLayer()$, as in MuonParticle class;
31: \item $p(\mu) < 7$~GeV;
32: \item $p_{T}$ of second muon $>2.5$~GeV; and
33: \item $\chi^2$ of global muon track fit~$<$~25 for both muons.
34: \end{itemize}
35: \end{itemize}
36:
37: %$nseg$ is a quality cut on the muons, it incorporates the number of scintillator hits in A and BC layers.
38:
39: \subsection{Primary vertex reconstruction}
40:
41: To determine the primary vertex, the AATrack package~\cite{AATrack} is used:
42: \begin{verbatim}
43: AATrack v0-10-06-01
44: beam spot file version 2.09
45: \end{verbatim}
46: that follows the procedure as outlined in Ref.~\cite{primary}. A primary vertex is determined for each event by minimizing a $\chi^2$ function that depends on all the tracks in the event and a term that represents the beam spot constraint.
47: The beam spot is the run-by-run average beam position, where a run typically lasts several hours. The beam spot is stable during the periods of time when the proton and the antiproton beams are kept colliding continously, and can be used as a constraint for the primary vertex fit. The initial primary vertex candidate and its $\chi^2$ are obtained using all tracks. Next, each track used in the $\chi^2$ calculation is removed temporarily and the $\chi^2$ is calculated again; if the $\chi^2$ decreases by 9 or more, this track is discarded from the PV fit. This procedure is repeated until no more tracks can be discarded. The PV resolution achieved by using this procedure is 25~$\mu {\rm m}$.
48:
49: \subsection{Secondary vertex reconstruction}
50: To reconstruct secondary vertices
51: (i.e., $J/\psi$, $\Lambda$ and \lb\ vertices),
52: the BANA package~\cite{bana} is used.
53:
54: \subsection{\lb\ Candidate Selection}
55: Further cuts are used to select $J/\psi$ mesons:
56: \begin{itemize}
57: \item Require that a primary vertex reconstructed.
58: \item For dimuons forming a vertex, require:
59: \begin{itemize}
60: \item distance from primary vertex to $J/\psi$ vertex $<10$~cm.
61: \item Limited number of track measurements downstream ($<1$)
62: of the vertex and missed hits upstream ($<5$) of the vertex.
63: \end{itemize}
64: \item 2.8~GeV~$<$~Mass$(\mu^+\mu^-) < 3.35$~GeV; and
65: \item number of SMT hits for each muon $>=1$.
66: \end{itemize}
67: Figure~\ref{fig:jpsi_incl} and Fig.~\ref{fig:jpsi_excl} show the
68: $(\mu^+\mu^-)$ invariant mass for all inclusive events
69: and for events containing a $\Lambda$ candidate, respectively.
70:
71: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
72: \begin{center}
73: \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,width=100mm]{lb_tex/inclusive_jpsi.eps}
74: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($\mu^+\mu^-$) system for
75: all the events. The signal is described by a
76: double Gaussian function and the background by a second order polynomial.
77: The signal mean is $3070.0 \pm 0.1$~MeV and the fitted
78: widths are $\sigma_{1}=55 \pm 1$~MeV and $\sigma_{2}=100 \pm 1$~MeV.}
79: \label{fig:jpsi_incl}
80: \end{center}
81: \end{figure}
82:
83: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
84: \begin{center}
85: \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,width=100mm]{lb_tex/jpsi_exclusive.eps}
86: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($\mu^+\mu^-$) system for
87: all the events containing a $\Lambda$ candidate. The signal is described by a
88: double Gaussian function and the background by a second order polynomial.
89: The signal mean is $3069 \pm 1$~MeV and the fitted
90: widths from double Gaussian function are $\sigma_{1}=52 \pm 1$~MeV and $\sigma_{2}=91 \pm 5$~MeV.}
91: \label{fig:jpsi_excl}
92: \end{center}
93: \end{figure}
94:
95: To select $\Lambda \rightarrow p \pi^-$ candidates, we require:
96: \begin{itemize}
97: \item two oppositely charged tracks forming a vertex;
98: \item the higher momentum track is assumed to be the proton;
99: \item limited number~($<1$) of track measurements downstream of the vertex;
100: \item number of CFT hits $\ge 1$ for each track;
101: \item 1.105~GeV~$<$~Mass$(p \pi) < 1.125$~GeV;
102: \item $p_{T}(\Lambda)>0.4$~GeV; and
103: \item $\Lambda$ candidates falling within a $K^0_{S}$ mass window
104: of 0.465~GeV~$<$~Mass$(\pi^+\pi^-) < 0.52$~GeV are removed.
105: \end{itemize}
106:
107: Figure~\ref{fig:lam_excl} shows the invariant mass of $(p \pi)$
108: for all events containing a $J/\psi$ candidate.
109: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
110: \begin{center}
111: \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,width=100mm]{lb_tex/lam_exclusive.eps}
112: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($p,\pi$) system for
113: all the events containing a $J/\psi$ candidate. The signal is described by a double
114: Gaussian function and the background by a second order polynomial.
115: The signal mean is $1115.3 \pm 0.1$~MeV and the fitted widths
116: are $\sigma_{1}=4.6 \pm 0.1$~MeV and $\sigma_{2}=2.0 \pm 0.1$~MeV for a double Gaussian function.}
117: \label{fig:lam_excl}
118: \end{center}
119: \end{figure}
120:
121:
122: Once good $J/\psi$ and $\Lambda$ candidates have
123: been found in the same event, the two muons
124: from $J/\psi$ are combined with the reconstructed neutral $\Lambda$ track
125: to form a \lb\ vertex. Further requirements are made on the vertex:
126:
127: \begin{itemize}
128: \item vertex $\chi^2(\Lambda_{b})<10$;
129: \item $p(\Lambda_b^0) > 5$~GeV;
130: \item $xy$ distance from $J/\psi$ vertex to
131: $\Lambda$ vertex $>$~0.3~cm;
132: \item assuming that the higher momentum track is the
133: proton, $p(p) > 0.8$~GeV; and
134: \item collinearity of \lb\ $>$~0.99, where collinearity is
135: defined as the cosine of the angle between the momentum of \lb\ in
136: the $xy$ plane and the direction from primary to secondary in
137: the $xy$ plane.
138:
139: \end{itemize}
140:
141: Figure~\ref{fig:mass_jpsilam} shows the invariant mass
142: of $(\mu^+\mu^-\Lambda)$
143: subject to the above cuts.
144: The signal is modeled with a Gaussian function, and
145: the background by a constant plus an exponential function. The exponential function is taken for the fact that there is a large shoulder on the left of the signal due to partially reconstruced $B$ mesons.
146: The number of signal events
147: extracted from the fit is $ 48 \pm 11$ with a mean
148: of $5630 \pm 10$~MeV and a width of $\sigma = 39 \pm 8$~MeV.
149:
150:
151: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
152: \begin{center}
153: \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,width=100mm]{lb_tex/lbjpsilam.eps}
154: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,\Lambda$) system for
155: all $\Lambda^0_b$ candidates. The signal is described by a Gaussian function and the background by a constant plus an exponential function.}
156: \label{fig:mass_jpsilam}
157: \end{center}
158: \end{figure}
159:
160: To check the validity of the signal for the presence of
161: long lived signal for lifetime measurement purposes,
162: the decay length cut and decay length significance cut were varied.
163: Figure~\ref{fig:decay_and_sig} shows the decay length and decay length
164: significance in data.
165:
166: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
167: \begin{center}
168: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/decay_length.eps}
169: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/decay_length_sig.eps}
170: \caption{Top: decay length distribution; and bottom:
171: decay length significance distribution for data.}
172: \label{fig:decay_and_sig}
173: \end{center}
174: \end{figure}
175:
176: A transverse signed decay length is defined using the vector
177: between the $\Lambda_b^0$ vertex and the primary vertex,
178: $\vec{L}_{xy} = \vec{x}_{\Lambda_b} - \vec{x}_{PV}$, and forming:
179: $L_{xy} = (\vec{L}_{xy} \cdot \vec{p}_T(\Lambda_b))/|\vec{p}_T(\Lambda_b)|$.
180:
181: Figures~\ref{fig:dl0.01}, \ref{fig:dl0.02}, and
182: \ref{fig:dl0.03} show the invariant mass of
183: the $\mu^+\mu^-\Lambda$ system
184: subject to the above cuts and adding $L_{xy} > 0.01$~cm,
185: $L_{xy} > 0.02$~cm, and $L_{xy} > 0.03$~cm requirements, respectively.
186: The number of signal events extracted from the fit
187: in each case is $33 \pm 8$, $33 \pm 7$, and $31 \pm 6$, respectively,
188: with the signal-to-noise increase in each case as expected
189: for a signal with lifetime.
190:
191: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
192: \begin{center}
193: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/lbjpsilam_dl0.01.eps}
194: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,\Lambda$) system for
195: all $\Lambda^0_b$ candidates
196: plus the requirement $L_{xy} > 0.01$~cm. The signal is described by a
197: Gaussian function and the background by a constant plus
198: an exponential function.}
199: \label{fig:dl0.01}
200: \end{center}
201: \end{figure}
202:
203: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
204: \begin{center}
205: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/lbjpsilam_dl0.02.eps}
206: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,\Lambda$) system for
207: all $\Lambda^0_b$ candidates
208: plus the requirement $L_{xy} > 0.02$~cm.
209: The signal is described by a Gaussian function
210: and the background by a constant
211: plus an exponential function.}
212: \label{fig:dl0.02}
213: \end{center}
214: \end{figure}
215:
216: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
217: \begin{center}
218: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/lbjpsilam_dl0.03.eps}
219: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,\Lambda$) system for
220: all $\Lambda^0_b$ candidates plus the requirement $L_{xy} > 0.03$~cm.
221: ehe signal is described by a Gaussian function and the
222: background by a constant plus an exponential function.}
223: \label{fig:dl0.03}
224: \end{center}
225: \end{figure}
226:
227: Figures~\ref{fig:dls2} and \ref{fig:dls4} show the invariant
228: mass of the $\mu^+\mu^-\Lambda$ system
229: subject to the above cuts and adding
230: $L_{xy}/\sigma(L_{xy})>2$ and $>4$, respectively.
231: The number of signal events extracted from each fit is $37 \pm 8$ and
232: $31 \pm 6$, respectively, with increased signal-to-noise, again
233: indicating lifetime information in the signal.
234:
235: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
236: \begin{center}
237: \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,width=100mm]{lb_tex/lbjpsilam_sig2.eps}
238: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,\Lambda$) system for
239: all $\Lambda^0_b$ candidates plus the requirement $L_{xy}/\sigma(L_{xy})>2$.
240: The signal is described by a Gaussian function and the background by a
241: constant plus an exponential function.}
242: \label{fig:dls2}
243: \end{center}
244: \end{figure}
245:
246: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
247: \begin{center}
248: \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,width=100mm]{lb_tex/lbjpsilam_sig4.eps}
249: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,\Lambda$) system for
250: all $\Lambda^0_b$ candidates plus the requirement $L_{xy}/\sigma(L_{xy})>4$.
251: The signal is described by a Gaussian function and the
252: background by a constant plus an exponential function.}
253: \label{fig:dls4}
254: \end{center}
255: \end{figure}
256:
257: Figures~\ref{fig:ctau370}, \ref{fig:ctau740}, and
258: \ref{fig:ctau1000} show the invariant mass of
259: the $\mu^+\mu^-\Lambda$ system
260: subject to the above cuts and adding
261: proper lifetime cuts $c \tau > 370$~$\mu$m,
262: $c \tau > 740$~$\mu$m, and $c \tau > 1000$~$\mu$m requirements, respectively.
263: The number of signal events extracted from the fit
264: in each case is $18 \pm 5$, $7 \pm 3$,
265: and too small to allow a fit, respectively.
266: This fractional event loss is consistent with
267: the signal having a lifetime of the order of a $B$ hadron.
268:
269: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
270: \begin{center}
271: \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,width=100mm]{lb_tex/lbjpsilam_ctau370.eps}
272: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,\Lambda$) system for
273: all $\Lambda^0_b$ candidates
274: plus the requirement $c \tau > 370$~$\mu$m. The signal is described by a
275: Gaussian function and the background by a constant plus
276: an exponential function.}
277: \label{fig:ctau370}
278: \end{center}
279: \end{figure}
280:
281: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
282: \begin{center}
283: \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,width=100mm]{lb_tex/lbjpsilam_ctau740.eps}
284: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,\Lambda$) system for
285: all $\Lambda^0_b$ candidates
286: plus the requirement $c \tau > 740$~$\mu$m.
287: The signal is described by a Gaussian function
288: and the background by a constant
289: plus an exponential function.}
290: \label{fig:ctau740}
291: \end{center}
292: \end{figure}
293:
294: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
295: \begin{center}
296: \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,width=100mm]{lb_tex/lbjpsilam_ctau1000.eps}
297: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,\Lambda$) system for
298: all $\Lambda^0_b$ candidates plus the requirement $c \tau > 1000$~$\mu$m.
299: The signal is described by a Gaussian function and the
300: background by a constant plus an exponential function.}
301: \label{fig:ctau1000}
302: \end{center}
303: \end{figure}
304:
305: \clearpage
306: \subsection{Monte Carlo event samples}
307:
308:
309:
310: \subsection{MC Signal \lbdec}
311:
312:
313:
314:
315: To simulate the decay chain \lbdec, $J/\psi \rightarrow \mu ^+ \mu ^-$,
316: $\Lambda \rightarrow p \pi^-$, we use the {\tt evtgen} decay model
317: and the pythia generation program~\cite{pythia}.
318: Below we show the decay file used.
319: \begin{verbatim}
320: ;
321: DECAY LAMB
322: CHANNEL 0 1.000 PSI LAM
323: ENDDECAY
324: ;
325: DECAY PSI
326: ANGULAR_HELICITY -1 1. 0. 1.
327: ANGULAR_HELICITY 0 1. 0. -1.
328: ANGULAR_HELICITY 1 1. 0. 1.
329: CHANNEL 40 1.000 MU+ MU-
330: ENDDECAY
331: ;
332: DECAY LAM
333: CHANNEL 0 1.000 P+ PI-
334: ENDDECAY
335: ;
336: \end{verbatim}
337:
338:
339:
340: %The \bs\ proper lifetime is 439 $\mu$ m in the EvtGen ptable file.
341:
342: %The \bd\ proper lifetime is 464 $\mu$ m in the QQ ptable file.
343:
344:
345:
346: Before passing the generated events through
347: the suite of programs for the detector simulation,
348: hit simulation, trigger simulation, and track and particle reconstruction,
349: we apply the following ``pre-GEANT'' selection cuts using the d0mess
350: package~\cite{d0mess}:
351:
352:
353: \begin{itemize}
354: \item presence of the decay chain \lbbardec.
355: \item $p_T{(\mu)}> 1.5$~ GeV and $0.8 < |\eta| < 2.0 $ or
356: $p_T{(\mu)}> 3$~GeV and $0.8 < |\eta|$.
357:
358: \end{itemize}
359: ``GEANT'' is a detector simulation tool, and is described in detail in Ref.~\cite{geant}.
360:
361: We apply the kinematic and quality cuts as described in
362: the previous section.
363: After kinematic cuts, we end up with $50000$ events.
364: Since the $\Lambda$ is a long-lived particle, it decays at the GEANT
365: processing stage, so out of $50000$ events, $31500$ events contain
366: the decay $\Lambda\rightarrow p \pi^-$.
367: The same analysis cuts as data are applied.
368: The number of events passing all event selection criteria is 315.
369: The reconstruction efficiency after the kinematic cuts is
370: $\epsilon=(1.0 \pm 0.06)\%$.
371: %Although not elaborated here, this efficiency
372: %and the observed rate of $\Lambda^0_b$ leads to a production
373: %rate consistent with expectations.
374: Figure~\ref{fig:lb_mc_mass} shows the invariant mass of the combination ($\Lambda,J/\psi$) for the Monte Carlo sample. The mass and the width observed in MC
375: are M($\Lambda,J/\psi$) =5642~$\pm$~2~MeV and $\sigma =35 \pm 2$~MeV respectively. The mass is slightly lower in data compared to MC due to uncertainty in D\O\ momentum scale,
376: and the fitted width observed in data is consistent with
377: that obtained in the MC.
378:
379:
380:
381: \vspace{5mm}
382:
383: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
384: \begin{center}
385: \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,width=100mm]{lb_tex/mc_lbjpsilam.eps}
386: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of $\Lambda^0_b$ candidates
387: in MC simulated events.
388: A double Gaussian function was used to model the signal,
389: and a constant plus an exponential function was used for the background.}
390: \label{fig:lb_mc_mass}
391: \end{center}
392: \end{figure}
393:
394:
395: Figure~\ref{fig:decay_length_mc} shows the decay length and
396: decay length significance distribution from the MC
397: within the mass window of \lb.
398: These distributions clearly indicate that the signal candidates have
399: a long lifetime component, as expected.
400: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
401: \begin{center}
402: \includegraphics[height=8.0cm,width=90mm]{lb_tex/mc_decay_length.eps}
403: \includegraphics[height=8.0cm,width=90mm]{lb_tex/mc_decay_length_sig.eps}
404: \caption{Top: decay length distribution; bottom: decay length significance
405: distribution for MC simulated events.}
406:
407: \label{fig:decay_length_mc}
408: \end{center}
409: \end{figure}
410:
411: %\section{$\Lambda^0_b$ Lifetime Measurement}
412:
413:
414:
415: \section{\bd\ Event Selections}
416:
417: The decay \bddecks\ has similar topology to \lbdec\ decay and has higher statistics, making it a good test sample.
418: Both decays are reconstructed the same way,
419: the only difference is $K^0_{S}$ is that a reconstructed
420: $K^0_S \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-$ is combined with the
421: $J/\psi$ instead of a $\Lambda$.
422: To select $K^0_{S} \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-$ candidates, we require:
423: \begin{itemize}
424: \item two oppositely charged tracks forming a vertex;
425: \item limited number of track measurements downstream ($<1$) of the vertex;
426: \item number of CFT hits $\ge 1$ for each track;
427: \item 0.465~GeV~$<$~Mass$(\pi^+ \pi^-) < 0.52$~GeV;
428: \item $p_{T}(K^0_{S})>0.4$~GeV.
429: \end{itemize}
430:
431: Figure~\ref{fig:ks_excl} shows the invariant mass of $(\pi \pi)$ for all events containing a $J/\psi$ candidate.
432: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
433: \begin{center}
434: \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,width=100mm]{lb_tex/ks_exclusive.eps}
435: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($\pi^+\pi^-$)
436: system for
437: all the events with a $J/\psi$ candidate. The signal is described by a double
438: Gaussian function and the background by a second order polynomial.
439: The signal mean is $493.5 \pm 0.1$~MeV and the fitted
440: widths are $\sigma_{1}=5.9 \pm 0.1$~MeV and $\sigma_{2}=11.7 \pm 0.1$~MeV.}
441: \label{fig:ks_excl}
442: \end{center}
443: \end{figure}
444:
445:
446: Once good $J/\psi$ and $K^0_{S}$ candidates have
447: been found in the same event, the two muons
448: from $J/\psi$ are combined with the reconstructed neutral $K^0_{S}$ track
449: to form a \bd\ vertex. Further requirements are made on the vertex:
450:
451: \begin{itemize}
452: \item vertex $\chi^2(B_{d})<25$;
453: \item $p(B_d^0) > 5$~GeV;
454: \item collinearity of \bd\ $>$~0.99, where collinearity is
455: defined as the cosine of the angle between the momentum of \bd\ in the $xy$
456: plane and the direction from primary to secondary vertex
457: in the $xy$ plane.
458: \end{itemize}
459:
460: Figure~\ref{fig:mass_jpsiks} shows the invariant mass
461: of $\mu^+\mu^-K^0_{S}$
462: subject to the above cuts.
463: The signal is modeled with a Gaussian function, and
464: the background by a second-order polynomial.
465: The number of signal events
466: extracted from the fit is $300 \pm 39$ with a mean
467: of $5270 \pm 5$~MeV and a width of $\sigma = 38 \pm 5$~MeV.
468:
469:
470: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
471: \begin{center}
472: \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,width=100mm]{lb_tex/bdjpsiks.eps}
473: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,K^0_{S}$) system for
474: all $B^0_d$ candidates. The signal is described by a Gaussian function and the background by a second order polynomial.}
475: \label{fig:mass_jpsiks}
476: \end{center}
477: \end{figure}
478:
479: Figures~\ref{fig:ksdl0.01}, \ref{fig:ksdl0.02}, and
480: \ref{fig:ksdl0.03} show the invariant mass of
481: the $\mu^+,\mu^-,K^0_{S}$ system
482: subject to the above cuts and adding $L_{xy} > 0.01$~cm,
483: $L_{xy} > 0.02$~cm, and $L_{xy} > 0.03$~cm requirements, respectively.
484: The number of signal events extracted from the fit
485: in each case is $299 \pm 30$, $298 \pm 25$, and $278 \pm 22$, respectively.
486:
487: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
488: \begin{center}
489: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/bdjpsiks_dl0.01.eps}
490: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,K^0_{S}$) system for
491: all $B^0_d$ candidates
492: plus the requirement $L_{xy} > 0.01$~cm. The signal is described by a
493: Gaussian function and the background by a second order polynomial.}
494: \label{fig:ksdl0.01}
495: \end{center}
496: \end{figure}
497:
498: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
499: \begin{center}
500: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/bdjpsiks_dl0.02.eps}
501: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,K^0_{S}$) system for
502: all $B^0_d$ candidates
503: plus the requirement $L_{xy} > 0.02$~cm.
504: The signal is described by a Gaussian function
505: and the background by a second order polynomial.}
506: \label{fig:ksdl0.02}
507: \end{center}
508: \end{figure}
509:
510: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
511: \begin{center}
512: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/bdjpsiks_dl0.03.eps}
513: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,K^0_{S}$) system for
514: all $B^0_d$ candidates plus the requirement $L_{xy} > 0.03$~cm.
515: The signal is described by a Gaussian function and the
516: background by a second order polynomial.}
517: \label{fig:ksdl0.03}
518: \end{center}
519: \end{figure}
520:
521: Figures~\ref{fig:ksdls2} and \ref{fig:ksdls4} show the invariant
522: mass of the $\mu^+,\mu^-,K^0_{S}$ system
523: subject to the above cuts and adding
524: $L_{xy}/\sigma(L_{xy})>2$ and $>4$, respectively.
525: The number of signal events extracted from each fit is 300$ \pm $~27 and
526: $259 \pm 21$, respectively.
527:
528: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
529: \begin{center}
530: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/bdjpsiks_sig2.eps}
531: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,K^0_{S}$) system for
532: all $B^0_d$ candidates plus the requirement $L_{xy}/\sigma(L_{xy})>2$.
533: The signal is described by a Gaussian function and the background by a
534: second order polynomial.}
535: \label{fig:ksdls2}
536: \end{center}
537: \end{figure}
538:
539: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
540: \begin{center}
541: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/bdjpsiks_sig4.eps}
542: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,K^0_{S}$) system for
543: all $B^0_b$ candidates plus the requirement $L_{xy}/\sigma(L_{xy})>4$.
544: The signal is described by a Gaussian function and the
545: background by a second order polynomial.}
546: \label{fig:ksdls4}
547: \end{center}
548: \end{figure}
549:
550: Figures~\ref{fig:ctau460}, \ref{fig:ctau920}, and
551: \ref{fig:ctau1320} show the invariant mass of
552: the $\mu^+,\mu^-,K^0_{S}$ system
553: subject to the above cuts and adding $c \tau > 460$~$\mu$m,
554: $c \tau > 920$~$\mu$m, and $c \tau > 1320$~$\mu$m requirements, respectively.
555: The number of signal events extracted from the fit
556: in each case is $153 \pm 16$, $60 \pm 10$, and $22 \pm 7$, respectively. These numbers are consistent with an exponentially falling $B$ lifetime.
557:
558: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
559: \begin{center}
560: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/bdjpsiks_ctau460.eps}
561: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,K^0_{S}$) system for
562: all $B^0_d$ candidates
563: plus the requirement $c \tau > 460$~$\mu$m. The signal is described by a
564: Gaussian function and the background by a second order polynomial.}
565: \label{fig:ctau460}
566: \end{center}
567: \end{figure}
568:
569: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
570: \begin{center}
571: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/bdjpsiks_ctau920.eps}
572: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,K^0_{S}$) system for
573: all $B^0_d$ candidates
574: plus the requirement $c \tau > 920$~$\mu$m. The signal is described by a
575: Gaussian function and the background by a second order polynomial.}
576: \label{fig:ctau920}
577: \end{center}
578: \end{figure}
579:
580: \begin{figure}[h!tb]
581: \begin{center}
582: \includegraphics[height=6.0cm,width=60mm]{lb_tex/bdjpsiks_ctau1320.eps}
583: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of the ($J/\psi,K^0_{S}$) system for
584: all $B^0_d$ candidates
585: plus the requirement $c \tau > 1320$~$\mu$m. The signal is described by a
586: Gaussian function and the background by a second order polynomial.}
587: \label{fig:ctau1320}
588: \end{center}
589: \end{figure}
590:
591:
592:
593: