1:
2: \chapter{Discussion and Conclusion}
3: \label{ch:lbconc}
4: \section{Summary on Establishing the \lb\ Signal}
5:
6: %Previously, in $ \simeq 115$~pb$^{-1}$ of data, a signal of
7: %$56 \pm 14$ events was observed~\cite{leptonp_lambdab} with a
8: %fitted Gaussian mean of $5600 \pm 25$~MeV and wider fitted
9: %width of $86 \pm 20$~MeV. This data sample was formed by
10: %selecting all events containing $J/\psi$ particles
11: %identified using p13 tracking and muon identification. It
12: %was subsequently reprocessed using a special p14 ``htfaa-
13: %extended" d0reco that allows for the reconstruction of
14: %tracks out to higher values of impact parameter. The number
15: %of reconstructed $\Lambda$ and $K^0_S$ particles as a
16: %result of this reprocessing increased by approximately a
17: %factor of 2, and the subsequent increase in the number of
18: %reconstructed $\Lambda^0_b$ was estimated to be about 60\%.
19:
20: %In this previous work, the fitted signal mass width in the
21: %data was substantially greater than that predicted by the
22: %Monte Carlo. A great deal of effort was expended to try to
23: %understand this mismatch, and it was first suspected that
24: %the errors in the data were not a good representation of
25: %reality. In retrospect, a statistical fluctuation in the
26: %mass peak beside the central peak value is thought to have
27: %occurred resulting in a greater width and an overestimate
28: %of the actual signal yield. Subsequently, the lifetime
29: %information in the signal region was also found to be
30: %inconsistent with the original signal
31: %expectation~\cite{daria_lambdab}. This inconsistency is in
32: %contrast with the current mass peak whose significance
33: %increases substantially with lifetime cuts. In addition, a
34: %narrower fitted mass width of $39 \pm 8$~MeV in the
35: %current sample and analysis is also consistent with the
36: %Monte Carlo prediction of $35 \pm 2$~MeV.
37:
38:
39: We observe evidence for the \lb\ baryon using the
40: exclusive decay \lbdec\
41: followed by $J/\psi \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^-$ and
42: $\Lambda \rightarrow p \pi^-$.
43: The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of
44: approximately 225~pb$^{-1}$.
45: We find 48$\pm$10 \lb\ candidates and determine the mass of \lb\ baryon to be
46: $5630\pm10$~(stat)~MeV.
47: This result is consistent with previous $\Lambda^0_b$ baryon mass measurements~\cite{pdg2004}.
48: The \lb\ yield following lifetime-related cuts also indicates
49: that the signal contains a lifetime distribution different from background.
50: The decay \bddecks\ is used as a test sample,
51: so for completenness, we also show the results for \bd\ meson.
52: We find 300$\pm$39 \bd\ candidates and determine the mass
53: of the \bd\ meson to be $5270\pm5$~(stat) MeV.
54:
55: \section{Summary of Preliminary Lifetimes}
56: We were able to extract the lifetimes of \lbdec\ and \bddecks.
57: ~The lifetime of the $\Lambda^0_b$ baryon has been measured to be
58:
59: \begin{equation}
60: c\tau(\Lambda^0_b) = 408 \pm 89~{\rm (stat)}\pm 20~{\rm (syst)}~\mu{\rm m}.
61: \end{equation}
62:
63: \begin{equation}
64: \tau(\Lambda^0_b) = 1.36 \pm 0.30~{\rm (stat)} \pm 0.07~{\rm (syst)}~{\rm ps}.
65: \end{equation}
66:
67: This result is consistent with the world average~\cite{pdg2004} of
68: $\tau(\Lambda^0_b) = 1.229 \pm 0.080$~ps.
69:
70: The lifetime of the $B_d$ baryon has been measured for completeness:
71:
72: \begin{equation}
73: c\tau(B_d) = 428 \pm 35~{\rm (stat)} \pm 12~{\rm (syst)}~\mu{\rm m}.
74: \end{equation}
75:
76: \begin{equation}
77: \tau(B_d) = 1.43 \pm 0.12~{\rm (stat)} \pm 0.04~{\rm (syst)}~{\rm ps}.
78: \end{equation}
79:
80: This result is in agreement with the world average~\cite{pdg2004} of
81: $\tau(B_d) = 1.536 \pm 0.014$~ps.
82: Finally we report the ratio $\tau(\Lambda_b)/\tau(B_d)$:
83: \begin{eqnarray}
84: \frac{\tau(\Lambda_b)}{\tau(B_d)}|_{exp}=0.95 \pm 0.22~{\rm (stat)} \pm 0.05~{\rm (syst)},
85: \label{eq:lbratioexp}
86: \end{eqnarray}
87: which is consistent with previous world measurements and with the theoretical predictions.
88: Although the data used in this study are limited we look forward to adding more
89: data and should be able to
90: carry out a competitive measurement of the $\Lambda^0_b$ lifetime via this exclusive decay channel.
91: %This signal will be used as a starting point for measuring the mass
92: %of the \lb\ baryon, including a systematic error. It should be
93: %noted that the mass of the $J/\psi$ is approximately 27~MeV below
94: %its known PDG mass. Corrections of the magnetic field value and
95: %energy loss will be incorporated to correct the momenta of tracks, and
96: %the uncertainty on this correction and its performance on other
97: %known resonances will be used to estimate a systematic error on
98: %the \lb\ mass.
99:
100: %The ratio of the $B^0_d \rightarrow J/\psi K^0_S$ and
101: %\lbdec\ signals, after correcting for Monte Carlo efficiencies,
102: %will also in the future be used to measure the production
103: %ratio:
104: %$$
105: %\frac{f(b \rightarrow \Lambda_b^0) \cdot
106: %Br(\Lambda_b^0 \rightarrow J/\psi \Lambda)}
107: %{f(b \rightarrow B^0_d) \cdot
108: %Br(B^0_d \rightarrow J/\psi K^0_S)}.
109: %$$
110: