1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw (with options: `6s')
8: %%
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %%
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %%
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.8 2002/06/02 15:34:15 frank Exp $
16: %%
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you
20: %% are satisfied that your installation is
21: %% complete and working.
22: %%
23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting
24: %% potential problems.
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27: \input{aipcheck}
28:
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
31: %%
32: %% The class supports further options.
33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
34: %%
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36:
37: \documentclass[
38: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
39: %% ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
40: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
41: %% , % add further options here if necessary
42: ]
43: {aipproc}
44:
45: \layoutstyle{6x9}
46:
47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48: %% FRONTMATTER
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50:
51: \begin{document}
52:
53: \title{Generalized Parton Distributions\\
54: and\\
55: Deep Exclusive Reactions:\\
56: Present Program at JLab}
57:
58:
59: \author{Michel Gar\c con}{
60: address={DAPNIA/SPhN, CEA-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France}
61: }
62:
63:
64:
65:
66: \begin{abstract}
67: We review briefly the physical concept of generalized parton
68: distributions and the experimental challenges associated
69: with the corresponding measurements of deep exclusive reactions.
70: The first data obtained at Jefferson Lab for exclusive photon (DVCS)
71: and vector meson (DVMP) electroproduction
72: above the resonance-excitation region are described.
73: Two upcoming dedicated DVCS experiments are presented in some detail.
74: \end{abstract}
75:
76: \maketitle
77:
78: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
79: %% MAINMATTER
80: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
81:
82: \section{Generalized Parton Distributions}
83:
84: The physical concepts and underlying theory of generalized parton
85: distributions (GPD) were to be reviewed at this Workshop by A. Sch\"afer,
86: who could not attend.
87: We certainly missed his insight and rigor on the subject.
88: In a much more heuristic way than he would have done, I recall some
89: of the main features of GPDs.
90:
91: In the Bjorken limit, exclusive processes of the type $\gamma^*p\to
92: p\gamma,\pi,\rho,\omega\cdots$ are described in term of a handbag
93: diagram. The corresponding amplitude factorizes~\cite{Ji97,Col97}
94: into a hard scattering
95: process involving one participant parton (e.g. $\gamma^*q\to\gamma q$)
96: and a soft rearrangement in the nucleon parameterized by four GPDs,
97: denoted by $H,E$ (``unpolarized'' or more exactly independent of the
98: quark helicity) and $\tilde{H},\tilde{E}$ (``polarized'').
99: In addition to the scale variable $Q^2$, these are
100: functions of three variables:
101: $x$, the average longitudinal parton momentum fraction before and after
102: the hard scattering; $\xi$, half the difference between these two momentum
103: fractions, and a four-momentum transfer squared $t$.
104:
105: An oversimplified physical image can be
106: given in terms of ordinary quantum mechanics.
107: Schematically, a nucleon reduced to a 3-quark configuration
108: can be described by a wave function
109: $\psi(x_1,\vec{k}_1, x_2,\vec{k}_2,x_3,\vec{k}_3)$ where $x$ is
110: again a parton longitudinal momentum fraction and $\vec{k}$ its transverse
111: momentum. An ``ordinary'' parton distribution is given by the
112: probability integral
113: \begin{equation}
114: q(x)\sim\int |\psi(x,\vec{k}_1, x_2,\vec{k}_2,x_3,\vec{k}_3)|^2[dX]
115: \end{equation}
116: with $[dX] = \delta(x+x_2+x_3-1)\delta^{(2)}(\vec{k}_1+\vec{k}_2+\vec{k}_3)
117: dx_2dx_3d\vec{k}_1d\vec{k}_2d\vec{k}_3$.
118: In this representation, a GPD can be thought of as an overlap integral
119: \begin{equation}
120: H(x,\xi,t)\sim\int
121: \psi^*(x-\xi,\vec{k}_1+\vec{\Delta}_{\perp}, x_2,\vec{k}_2,x_3,\vec{k}_3)
122: \cdot\psi(x+\xi,\vec{k}_1, x_2,\vec{k}_2,x_3,\vec{k}_3) [dX]
123: \end{equation}
124: The off-diagonal character of the GPD appears in the change of longitudinal
125: momentum: a GPD thus expresses the {\it coherence} between states of
126: different longitudinal momenta.
127: Kinematically, this rearrangement cannot
128: occur without a non-zero squared momentum transfer $t=f(\xi,\vec{\Delta}_{\perp})$.
129: Through a Fourier transform with respect to $\vec{\Delta}_{\perp}$ at
130: $\xi=0$, GPDs can be related to spatial transverse distributions of
131: partons. Thus, through the $x$-$t$ correlation, the GPDs contain information
132: about the transverse distribution of partons of given $x$. This opens the
133: way for a femto-photography of the nucleon. Qualitatively, this correlation
134: between the transverse position $\vec{b}$ and the longitudinal momentum
135: $\vec{p}$ gives also access to information about the orbital angular
136: momentum of the partons ($\vec{b}\wedge\vec{p}$).
137:
138: This picture can be extended to include quark-antiquark configurations
139: in the initial and/or final states.
140:
141: \section{Experimental challenges}
142: At high virtuality $Q^2$ of the exchanged photon,
143: the measurements of exclusive production reactions
144: are very challenging.
145: Precision measurements require high luminosity $\times$ acceptance
146: since the cross sections are small. Exclusivity is necessary for
147: a quantitative comparison with theory and for a detailed study of
148: scaling laws. This puts high demands on resolution and/or
149: complete coverage of reaction products. For example, in the
150: $ep\to ep\gamma$ process, it is in principle sufficient to
151: identify two of the three particles in the final state and
152: measure their momentum vector (this is the case in the first
153: two graphs of figure~\ref{fig:res}). In practice, as beam and secondary
154: particles energies increase, it becomes increasingly difficult
155: to separate DVCS from exclusive $\pi^0$ production when measuring
156: only the scattered electron and proton (third graph of fig.~\ref{fig:res}).
157: It is then
158: necessary to detect all three particles in the final state.
159: \begin{figure}
160: \label{fig:res}
161: \includegraphics[height=.5\textheight]{res.eps}
162: \caption{Squared missing mass for performed VCS or DVCS experiments. From top
163: to bottom:
164: $ep\to epX$ from MAMI (850 MeV beam energy)~\cite{Fon02},
165: from JLab/Hall A (4 GeV) ~\cite{Fon02},
166: and from JLab/CLAS (4.2 GeV)~\cite{Ste01},
167: $ep\to e\gamma X$ from HERMES (27 GeV)~\cite{Air01}.
168: }
169: \end{figure}
170:
171:
172: \section{Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering}
173:
174: The first measurements of beam spin asymmetry in the $\vec{e}p\to ep\gamma$
175: exhibit an azimuthal dependence
176: characteristic of the interference of a helicity conserving process
177: such as DVCS with the Bethe-Heitler process~\cite{Ste01,Air01}. Moreover
178: the magnitude of this asymmetry is agreement with models based on GPDs,
179: including small higher-twist contributions and next-to-leading order
180: $\alpha_S$ corrections. Note however that the
181: same results may also be described within a Regge model~\cite{Can03}.
182:
183: Since then, other CLAS data taken at beam energies of 4.8 and 5.75 GeV
184: are being analyzed as well. This is still based on the study
185: of $ep \to epX$ configurations. At 4.8 GeV, the resolution still allows
186: to perform a shape analysis of the missing mass spectra, similar to
187: the procedure in Ref.~\cite{Ste01}, thus separating the $\gamma$ and $\pi^0$
188: contributions~\cite{Gav04}.
189: An exemple of such a separation is given in the third graph of fig.~\ref{fig:res},
190: where each contribution is independently calibrated using subsets
191: of unambiguously identified events~\cite{Ste01}.
192: At 5.75 GeV, the missing mass resolution worsens
193: and precludes such an analysis. The pion contribution is then minimized
194: (but not yet quantified) through an approriate choice of kinematical cuts,
195: guided by a Monte-Carlo simulation of both processes~\cite{Ava04}.
196: In both cases, earlier results are confirmed, and the higher
197: statistics allow for a finer binning, in $Q^2$, $x_B$ and/or $t$.
198: The measured beam spin asymmetry, at fixed $x_B$ and $t$,
199: is consistent with a $1/Q$ behaviour, as expected from the leading-twist
200: (handbag) contribution to DVCS.
201:
202: Target spin asymmetries, using a polarized NH$_3$ target, were investigated
203: as well~\cite{Che04}. Here again the contribution of the $ep\to ep\pi^0$
204: process remains to be quantified.
205:
206: Dedicated experiments now aim at detecting the three particles in the final
207: state, in order to ensure a complete exclusivity in the measurements.
208: See figure~\ref{fig:exp}.
209:
210: In CLAS~\cite{Bur01}, the photons emitted in a forward cone (3-14$^{\circ}$) will
211: be detected in a new inner calorimeter, consisting of 424 small lead-tungstate
212: crystals read by avalanche photodiodes. In addition, a specifically designed
213: two-coil solenoid will focus the background low energy electrons
214: along the beam axis. A 100-crystal prototype was tested with success
215: in December 2003. The whole experiment is to be mounted in February 2005.
216:
217: In Hall A~\cite{Ber00}, a lead-fluoride calorimeter is mounted in direct view of
218: the target, along the direction of the virtual photon, for each of
219: three spectrometer settings for the scattered electron. The recoil
220: protons are detected in a concentric annular plastic scintillator array.
221: The experiment is currently running at the designed luminosity of
222: 10$^{37}$ cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$. A follow-up experiment will study
223: DVCS on the neutron~\cite{Ber03}.
224: The quasi-free $e(n)\to en\gamma$ reaction will
225: be measured using a liquid deuterium target and complementing the
226: proton array with thin scintillator for proton/neutron discrimination.
227: The DVCS beam spin asymmetry on the neutron
228: has been shown to be more sensitive to the quark total angular
229: momentum in the nucleon.
230:
231: \begin{figure}
232: \label{fig:exp}
233: \includegraphics[height=0.4\textheight]{exp.eps}
234: % \includegraphics[width=3cm]{res.eps}
235: \vspace{-4cm}
236: \caption{Shematic views of dedicated CLAS (left) and Hall A (right)
237: DVCS experiments. The standard CLAS detection is not shown;
238: the new solenoid and calorimeter are positioned at the
239: center of the CLAS toroidal magnet.
240: }
241: \end{figure}
242:
243: Double DVCS ($ep\to epe^+e^-$ proceeding through
244: $\gamma^*q\to\gamma^*q$) has the potential to access
245: GPDs at a tunable kinematical point $x=f(\xi,q'^2)$,
246: where $q'^2$ is the virtuality of the outgoing photon
247: (or equivalently the invariant mass of the corresponding
248: lepton pair)~\cite{DDVCS}. Positrons were cleanly selected in
249: CLAS and $ep\to epe^+X$ configurations analyzed~\cite{Mor03}.
250: Although
251: $ep \to ep e^+e^-$ events could be clearly identified,
252: the analysis faces a theoretical and experimental challenge:
253: there are two electrons in the final state. Antisymmetrisation
254: was not taken into account in the calculations. Experimentally,
255: the kinematical variables depend on the identification
256: of an electron either as scattered or coming from the lepton pair.
257: One of the two possible choices result in the observation
258: of clear peaks associated with very low $Q^2$ vector meson
259: production. Our preliminary conclusion is then that the observed
260: $ep\to epe^+e^-$ events cannot be interpreted in the
261: framework of DDVCS and GPDs.
262:
263: \section{Deeply Virtual Meson Production}
264:
265: The hard electroproduction of mesons, or DVMP,
266: should also proceed through the same handbag diagram.
267: In this case, factorization has been demonstrated for longitudinal
268: virtual photons~\cite{Col97}. According to the nature of the emitted
269: meson, one probes different GPDs ($H$ and $E$ for vector mesons,
270: $\tilde{H}$ and $\tilde{E}$ for pseudoscalar mesons) and
271: different flavor combinations (e.g. $\rho$ vs $\omega$, or
272: $\pi^0$ vs $\eta$). The difficulty here is in isolating the
273: contribution of longitudinal photons and reaching high enough
274: $Q^2$, since the additional gluon exchange necessary to produce the meson
275: moves the asymptotic regime to higher values of $Q^2$.
276:
277: Longitudinal cross sections have been extracted for $\rho$
278: electroproduction at 4.2 GeV~\cite{Had04}. A similar analysis
279: for higher energy (5.75 GeV), with higher statistics data,
280: is underway. In this channel, both the CLAS and HERMES data
281: are in semi-quantitative agreement with a model based on
282: GPDs, and including an effective description of higher-twist
283: effects.
284:
285: The $\phi$~\cite{San04} and $\omega$~\cite{Mor04} channels
286: have been analyzed as well. In the latter case, a determination
287: of the emitted $\omega$ spin density parameters led to the
288: conclusion that helicity is not conserved between the virtual
289: photon and the emitted meson. Thus the handbag diagram does
290: not dominate the reaction $ep\to ep\omega$ and the longitudinal
291: cross sections could not be extracted.
292: The $\omega$
293: channel thus appears the most challenging one to access the GPDs.
294: Within a Regge approach,
295: it was shown that this behaviour is due to the dominantly
296: transverse $t$-channel $\pi^0$ exchange, or rather the exchange
297: of the corresponding saturating Regge trajectory~\cite{Lag04}.
298: Only for the $\omega$ channel is this specific exchange contribution
299: dominant.
300: This calculation
301: gives a new insight in the high-$Q^2$ and high-$t$ behaviour of such
302: exclusive reactions~\cite{Lag04}.
303:
304:
305:
306: \section{Conclusions}
307:
308: Generalized Parton Distributions have merged as a powerful, attractive
309: and unifying concept for the nucleon structure. The relation
310: between GPDs and deep exclusive reactions still needs experimental
311: validation. There are experimental indications that the handbag
312: diagram is at work in DVCS and this is being studied with increased
313: statistics data sets at CLAS. In DVMP, extensive data sets on
314: vector meson production, also from CLAS, will be coming shortly.
315: Dedicated DVCS experiments, in Hall A (2004) and CLAS (2005), will measure
316: beam spin asymmetries, detecting all three particles in the final
317: state to ensure full exclusivity.
318: They should establish on firm grounds the validity
319: of the approach. Detailed tests of scaling will be performed.
320: If scaling is indeed observed, or deviations thereof understood,
321: these experiments, in conjunction with theoretical input,
322: will provide the first significant measurements of GPDs.
323:
324: %\begin{theacknowledgments}
325: %
326: %\end{theacknowledgments}
327:
328: \begin{thebibliography}{}
329:
330: \bibitem{Ji97} X. Ji, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 55} (1997) 7114;
331: A.V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56} (1997) 5524.
332:
333: \bibitem{Col97} J.C. Collins, L. Frankfurt, and M. Strikman,
334: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56} (1997) 2982-3006.
335:
336: \bibitem{Fon02} H. Fonvieille, private communication.
337:
338: \bibitem{Ste01} S. Stepanyan {\sl et al.} (CLAS collaboration),
339: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87} (2001) 182002.
340:
341: \bibitem{Air01} A. Airapetian {\sl et al.} (HERMES collaboration),
342: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87} (2001) 182001.
343:
344: \bibitem{Can03} F. Cano and J.-M. Laget, Phys. Lett. {\bf B}551 (2003) 317.
345:
346: \bibitem{Gav04} G. Gavalian {\sl et al.} (CLAS collaboration), preliminary results.
347:
348: \bibitem{Ava04} H. Avakian {\sl et al.} (CLAS collaboration), preliminary results.
349:
350: \bibitem{Che04} S. Cheng {\sl et al.} (CLAS collaboration), preliminary results.
351:
352: \bibitem{Bur01} V. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri, M. Gar\c con, S. Stepanyan {\sl et al.},
353: CEBAF experiment 01-113.
354:
355: \bibitem{Ber00} P. Bertin, C. Hyde-Wright, R. Ransome, F. Sabati\'e {\sl et al.},
356: CEBAF experiment 00-110.
357:
358: \bibitem{Ber03} P. Bertin, C. Hyde-Wright, F. Sabati\'e, E. Voutier {\sl et al.},
359: CEBAF experiment 03-106.
360:
361: \bibitem{Had04} C. Hadjidakis {\sl et al.} (CLAS collaboration), hep-ex/0408005.
362:
363: \bibitem{San04} J. Santoro {\sl et al.} (CLAS collaboration), preliminary results.
364:
365: \bibitem{Mor04} L. Morand {\sl et al.} (CLAS collaboration), in preparation.
366: M. Gar\c con,
367: contr. to the {\sl 10th Int. Symp. on Meson-Nucleon Physics
368: and the Nucleon Structure},
369: Beijing, Aug. 2004.
370:
371: \bibitem{Lag04} J.-M. Laget, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70} (2004) 054023.
372:
373: \bibitem{DDVCS} M. Guidal and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90} (2003) 012001;
374: A.V. Belitsky and D. M\"uller, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90} (2003) 022001.
375:
376: \bibitem{Mor03} S. Morrow, M. Gar\c con {\sl et al.} (CLAS collaboration),
377: preliminary results.
378:
379:
380:
381:
382: \end{thebibliography}{}
383:
384: \end{document}
385:
386: \endinput
387: %%
388: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
389: