1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc2.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc2.tex 1.2 2000/07/24 09:12:51 spepping Exp spepping $
4: %
5: \documentclass[fleqn,twoside]{article}
6: \usepackage{espcrc2}
7:
8: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
9: % \documentstyle[twoside,fleqn,espcrc2]{article}
10:
11: % if you want to include PostScript figures
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13: % if you have landscape tables
14: %\usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
15:
16: % put your own definitions here:
17: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
18: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
19: % ...
20: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
21: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
22: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
23: \newcommand{\tjusan}{\theta_{13}}
24:
25: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
26: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
27:
28: % declarations for front matter
29: \title{The KASKA project -- a Japanese medium-baseline reactor-neutrino
30: oscillation experiment to measure the mixing angle $\tjusan$ --}
31:
32: \author{Masahiro Kuze\address{Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of
33: Technology,
34: Tokyo, 152-8551 Japan}
35: (for the KASKA Collaboration\thanks{The KASKA group institutes at the
36: time of the workshop were:
37: KEK,
38: Kobe Univ.,
39: Niigata Univ.,
40: Rikkyo Univ.,
41: Tohoku Univ.,
42: Tokyo Met. Univ. and
43: Tokyo Tech.
44: %\uppercase{N.T}amura, \uppercase{M.T}animoto, \uppercase{H.M}iyata,
45: %\uppercase{H.N}akano, \uppercase{R.W}atanabe, \uppercase{T.I}wabuchi,
46: %\uppercase{M.S}asaki (\uppercase{N}iigata \uppercase{U}niv.),
47: %\uppercase{Y.S}akamoto (\uppercase{R}ikkyo \uppercase{U}niv.),
48: %\uppercase{N.I}shihara, \uppercase{H.S}ugiyama (\uppercase{KEK}),
49: %\uppercase{T.H}ara (\uppercase{K}obe \uppercase{U}niv.),
50: %\uppercase{F.S}uekane, \uppercase{K.I}noue, \uppercase{T.A}raki,
51: %(\uppercase{T}ohoku \uppercase{U}niv.),
52: %\uppercase{M.K}uze, \uppercase{H.F}uruta (\uppercase{T}okyo
53: %\uppercase{I}nsititute of \uppercase{T}echnology),
54: %\uppercase{T.S}umiyoshi, \uppercase{H.M}inakata, \uppercase{O.Y}asuda,
55: %\uppercase{K.S}akuma and \uppercase{T.N}akagawa (\uppercase{T}okyo
56: %\uppercase{M}etropolitan \uppercase{U}niv.).
57: })
58: }
59: \begin{document}
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62: A new reactor-neutrino oscillation experiment, KASKA, is proposed
63: to measure the unknown neutrino-mixing angle $\tjusan$ using the world's
64: most powerful Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power station.
65: It will measure a very small deficit of reactor-neutrino flux
66: using three identical detectors, two placed just close to
67: the sources and one at a distance of about 1.8km.
68: Its conceptual design and physics reach are discussed.
69: \vspace{1pc}
70: \end{abstract}
71:
72: % typeset front matter (including abstract)
73: \maketitle
74:
75: \section{Introduction}
76: %
77: The investigation of the mixing phenomena of the leptonic sector will
78: be a major theme of particle physics in next few decades, as
79: has been that of the quark mixing in the past.
80: While two neutrino-mixing angles, $\theta_{12}$ and $\theta_{23}$,
81: have been measured to be fairly large~\cite{SK,SNO,K2K,KamLAND},
82: only upper limits have been obtained for the remaining angle $\tjusan$.
83: The best limit is $\sin^2 2\tjusan<0.2$ for $\Delta m^2=2.0\times
84: 10^{-3}~\rm{eV}^2$ from CHOOZ~\cite{CHOOZ}, and this smallness in
85: contrast to the other angles is a mystery that challenges in building up
86: a theory to explain the origin of the mixing. Not only the measurement of
87: the angle itself is of high scientific interest, but also knowing the range
88: of this parameter is a crucial input in planning for future
89: very-long-baseline oscillation experiments to detect the leptonic
90: CP-violating phase $\delta_{CP}$, using very intense beams of
91: neutrinos (and anti-neutrinos) from Superbeam facilities or
92: Neutrino Factories.
93:
94: It has been shown~\cite{minakata}, also nicely in the plenary session
95: of this workshop~\cite{thierry}, that the detection (or setting new
96: upper limit) of $\tjusan$ by $\bar{\nu_e}$ disappearance experiments
97: with reactor neutrinos gives complementary information to that from the
98: planned $\nu_\mu \to \nu_e$ appearance experiments with accelerator
99: neutrino beams. Therefore, having both kinds of experiments,
100: preferably concurrently, would be useful in the exploration of
101: the mixing phenomena in the lepton sector.
102:
103: The KASKA experiment will try to achieve the mission using
104: reactor neutrinos from KAShiwazaki-KAriwa nuclear power station
105: in Niigata, Japan. Its conceptual detector design, background and
106: systematic-uncertainty consideration and physics reach will be discussed
107: in the following.
108:
109: \section{The experiment}
110: Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power station, owned and operated by
111: Tokyo Electric Power Company, is the biggest source of reactor
112: neutrinos in the world, with a power of 23.4~GWth.
113: The station has seven reactors, which are clustered into four and three.
114: %as shown in Fig.~\ref{site}.
115: The two clusters are separated by about 1.5~km in distance.
116: The purpose of the KASKA experiment is to detect a small
117: deficit of anti-neutrinos due to $\tjusan$ mixing:
118: %
119: \begin{equation}
120: P_{\bar \nu_e \rightarrow \bar \nu_e} =1-\sin^22\tjusan \sin^2\frac
121: {\Delta m^2_{13} L}{4E_{\nu}} + \boldmath{\mathcal {O}}(10^{-3}).
122: \label{eq1}
123: \end{equation}
124: %
125: Note that the value of $\Delta m^2_{13}$ is very close to
126: $\Delta m^2_{23}$ measured by SK and K2K, as $\Delta m^2_{23}
127: >> \Delta m^2_{12}$.
128: With the neutrino energy considered (the detected neutrino
129: energy peaks at 4~MeV), the oscillation maximum occurs at
130: 1-2~km, and other effects (last term in Eq.~\ref{eq1})
131: become negligible.
132: Therefore, the experiment is a pure $\tjusan$ measurement and
133: detects a small deficit due to $\tjusan$ and $\Delta m^2_{13}$,
134: while the KamLAND experiment measured a large deficit due to
135: $\theta_{12}$ and $\Delta m^2_{12}$ at a distance of about 180~km.
136: %
137: %\begin{figure}
138: %\includegraphics[width=18pc]{site2.eps}
139: %\caption{The reactors and the planned detector positions.
140: %\label{fig:site}}
141: %\end{figure}
142: %
143: In order to minimize the systematic uncertainties related to the absolute
144: neutrino-flux estimation and absolute detection efficiency,
145: it is planned to have multiple detectors,
146: ones close to the source (near detectors) and the other close to the
147: oscillation maximum (far detector).
148: %As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:site},
149: KASKA will have two near detectors for the two reactor clusters,
150: each at a distance of approximately 400~m. The location of the
151: far detector will be at about 1.8~km from both clusters,
152: corresponding to the $\Delta m^2_{23}$ value measured at SK and K2K.
153:
154: Figure~\ref{fig:detector} shows the schematic view of the planned
155: detector. It consists of the central target region and a few
156: buffer and veto layers surrounding it.
157: The neutrino target is 8 tons of liquid scintillator (LS) contained
158: in an acrylic vessel. The LS is loaded with 0.1\% of Gadolinium (Gd).
159: The detection is via inverse-$\beta$ reaction,
160: \begin{figure}[tb]
161: \includegraphics[width=20pc]{detector2.eps}
162: %\vspace{-15mm}
163: \caption{Schematic view of the KASKA detector.
164: \label{fig:detector}}
165: %\vspace{-5mm}
166: \end{figure}
167: %
168: $\bar{\nu}_e + p \rightarrow e^+ + n$,
169: %
170: which produces a prompt signal due to the positron energy loss
171: and its annihilation with an electron.
172: As the recoil energy to the nucleon is very small, it gives
173: a measurement of the incoming neutrino energy.
174: Then the neutron is captured by Gd, which emits several
175: $\gamma$-rays whose total energy amounts to 8~MeV.
176: This gives a delayed signal, and taking a coincidence
177: of the two signals in time sequence (the typical capture time
178: is 30~$\mu s$)
179: greatly reduces the background.
180:
181: The target region is surrounded by the $\gamma$-catcher region,
182: which is a 60-cm thick layer of LS without Gd loading,
183: but with the same light output as the target LS. It detects
184: $\gamma$ rays that escaped from the target region, thus improving
185: the energy reconstruction of the prompt and delayed signals.
186:
187: Out of the $\gamma$ catcher is the buffer region, a 90-cm layer
188: of non-scintillating paraffin oil. This works as a shield against
189: background $\gamma$ and $\beta$ rays from radioactive elements
190: contained in the photomultiplier (PMT) glasses.
191: The PMTs are attached at the outer surface of this region.
192:
193: The outermost layer is the cosmic-veto region, a layer of
194: LS with weak light output. This layer will be viewed
195: by PMTs attached to the outermost part of the detector.
196: It detects the cosmic muons entering the detector, giving
197: a veto signal against background events associated with them.
198:
199: In addition, there will be cosmic-ray tracking devices
200: at the top and bottom of the detector. They will reconstruct
201: the passage of the cosmic rays and will be used to estimate
202: the background coming from muon spallation products.
203:
204: In order to reduce the cosmic-induced background to a very
205: low level, the detectors will be located in underground
206: vertical shafts. The near detectors will be placed at a depth
207: of about 70~m. The shaft for the far detector will be about
208: 200~m deep, due to the smaller signal event rate.
209: The expected cosmic-muon rates for the entire detector volume
210: are roughly 100~Hz for the near detectors and 10~Hz for the far detector.
211:
212: Following sources of background are considered:
213: \begin{itemize}
214: \item{Accidental coincidence of $e^+$-like singles rate and neutron-like
215: singles rate.}
216: \item{Fast neutrons, mimicking a prompt signal (by recoiling a proton,
217: for example) and then captured, thus producing a correlated background.}
218: \item{Long-lived spallation products, such as $^9\rm{Li}$ or $^8\rm{He}$,
219: induced by cosmic ray. Their decay involves $\beta$ and neutron emissions,
220: thus constituting a correlated background.}
221: \end{itemize}
222: With enough shaft depth and shielding, it is possible to keep the
223: background at the level of 1\% of the signal, with an uncertainty of
224: 0.3\% or less.
225:
226: \begin{figure}[tb]
227: \includegraphics[width=20pc]{sensitivity_new2.eps}
228: %\vspace{-15mm}
229: \caption{ KASKA 90~\% C.L. sensitivity after three years of running.
230: The $\Delta m^2_{23}$ region allowed by Super-Kamiokande~\cite{SK}
231: at 90~\% C.L. is also indicated.
232: \label{fig:sensitivity}}
233: %\vspace{-5mm}
234: \end{figure}
235:
236: With a running period of three years, the far detector will collect
237: about 30,000 neutrino events, i.e. with a statistical error of 0.6\%.
238: During this period, the near detectors will collect 300,000 events
239: each, providing also inputs for reactor science using the very
240: precise neutrino $\beta$-spectrum. The main source of systematic
241: uncertainty comes from the relative acceptance difference between
242: the near and far detectors, originating, for instance, from the
243: target volume. The analysis of the systematic sources can be found
244: elsewhere~\cite{suekane}. It is possible to control the systematic
245: uncertainty well below 1\%.
246: The uncertainty related to the absolute neutrino-flux estimation,
247: which was fairly large in the earlier-generation reactor experiments,
248: becomes negligible thanks to the multi-detector configuration.
249:
250: Figure~\ref{fig:sensitivity} shows the expected sensitivity~\cite{suekane}
251: on $\sin^2 2\tjusan$ as a function of $\Delta m^2$, which improves
252: on CHOOZ limits by one order of magnitude.
253:
254: \section{Status and prospects}
255: The collaboration currently consists of seven Japanese institutes,
256: and is growing. Two-year R\&D funding was approved and has started
257: from FY 2004. The R\&D includes 1) boring study of geologies at the
258: location of one of the near detectors, followed by in-situ background
259: measurements (cosmic rates and $\gamma$ backgrounds) at the bottom of the
260: 70~m bore shaft, 2) building of a prototype detector (1.2-m diameter
261: sphere) to study the energy-reconstruction systematics, and 3)
262: development of readout electronics. With more institutes joining,
263: further tests and developments are envisaged. The negotiations
264: with the electric company and authorities have been progressing
265: successfully. With an appropriate funding profile, the earliest
266: schedule could be to start detector and shaft constructions in 2006
267: and to start data-taking in 2008.
268: %
269:
270: \begin{thebibliography}{0}
271: \bibitem{SK} Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562
272: (1998); Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3999 (2000),
273: Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 101801 (2004).
274: \bibitem{SNO} SNO Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002).
275: \bibitem{K2K} K2K Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 041801 (2003).
276: \bibitem{KamLAND} KamLAND Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90,
277: 021802 (2003).
278: \bibitem{CHOOZ} CHOOZ Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C27, 331(2003).
279: \bibitem{minakata} H.~Minakata, H.~Sugiyama, O.~Yasuda, K.~Inoue and F.~Suekane,
280: Phys. Rev. D68, 033017 (2003), hep-ph/0211111.\\
281: Erratum, ibid. D70 (2004) 059901.
282: \bibitem{thierry} T.~Lasserre, plenary contribution in these proceedings.
283: \bibitem{suekane} F.~Suekane,
284: Proceedings for NOON04, hep-ex/0407016.
285: \end{thebibliography}
286:
287: \end{document}
288: