1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc1.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc1.tex 1.2 2000/07/24 09:12:51 spepping Exp spepping $
4: %
5: \documentclass[fleqn,12pt,twoside]{article}
6: \usepackage{espcrc1}
7:
8: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
9: % \documentstyle[12pt,twoside,fleqn,espcrc1]{article}
10:
11: % if you want to include PostScript figures
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13: % if you have landscape tables
14: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
15:
16: \usepackage{color}
17: \usepackage{amssymb}
18:
19: % put your own definitions here:
20: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
21: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
22: % ...
23: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
24: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
25: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
26: \setlength{\parindent}{.5cm}
27: \setlength{\mathindent}{0cm}
28: \definecolor{vert}{rgb}{0,0.5,0}
29:
30: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
31: \hyphenation{author another precision unraveling integral secondly distri-butions Post-Script}
32: %for 9th International Conference on the Structure of Baryons (Baryons 2002), Newport News, Virginia, 3-8 Mar 2002.
33: % declarations for front matter
34: \title{Nucleon longitudinal spin structure at COMPASS~\footnote{Prepared for 10th International Baryons Conference (Baryons 2004), Palaiseau, France, 25-29 Oct 2004.}}
35:
36: \author{Y.Bedfer\address{DAPNIA/SPhN, CEA Saclay \\
37: F91191 Gif/Yvette, France} for the COMPASS collaboration}
38:
39: \begin{document}
40:
41: % typeset front matter
42: \maketitle
43:
44: \begin{abstract}
45: The nucleon spin structure is studied at COMPASS via the
46: measurement of the spin dependent properties of
47: deep inelastic muon-deuteron scattering. Both inclusive and
48: semi-inclusive observables are investigated, with the emphasis
49: put on the latter. This allows to access, in particular,
50: the gluon polarization ($\Delta G/G$)
51: and the flavor decomposition of
52: the quark helicity distributions.
53:
54: Results from measurements with longitudinal target polarization are presented, as well as uncertainties expected from the first 3 years of data taking.
55: \end{abstract}
56:
57: \section{INTRODUCTION}
58: COMPASS~\cite{spectro} is a fixed-target
59: experiment installed on the CERN SPS M2 beam line. One of its goals is the unraveling of the spin structure of the nucleon. In
60: this respect, it attempts to answer questions left open
61: by the measurements of the double spin asymmetry in
62: inclusive deep inelastic lepton-nucleon scattering $A_1$.
63:
64: First, the gluon distribution $\Delta G$ remains largely undetermined. QCD fits of
65: present world data can only but poorly constrain it from the
66: $Q^2$ dependence of $A_1$, for lack
67: of lever arm in $Q^2$.
68:
69: Secondly, inclusive data alone do not allow to separate quark and
70: anti-quark distributions.
71:
72: In COMPASS, additional information is brought by
73: semi-inclusive measurements. These are performed with transverse as well
74: as longitudinal target spin orientations, which allows to
75: investigate also the transversity distribution, {\it cf.}~\cite{transverse}.
76:
77: Finally, in the inclusive measurement of $A_1$, COMPASS
78: reaches unprecedented precision in the low Bjorken $x$
79: domain, which will bring improvement in the knowledge of the integral of
80: the $g_1$ structure function.
81:
82: \section{EXPERIMENTAL ESSENTIALS}
83: The COMPASS spectrometer is described in~\cite{spectro}.
84: Its experimental setup was designed to allow a precise determination of
85: asymmetries. Thanks to its simultaneous measurement of both orientations of
86: target spin in 2 oppositely polarized target cells, $u$ and $d$, and
87: to a frequent reversal of spin orientations, the acceptance and incident
88: muon flux cancel out in the formula for the cross-section asymmetry $A_{{\mu}N}$:
89: \begin{equation}
90: A_{{\mu}N} = \frac{1}{2}\quad \frac{1}{P_b \times P_tf}
91: \left(\frac{N_u^{\Uparrow\uparrow}-N_d^{\Uparrow\downarrow}}{N_u^{\Uparrow\uparrow}+N_d^{\Uparrow\downarrow}}+
92: \frac{N_d^{\Uparrow\uparrow}-N_u^{\Uparrow\downarrow}}{N_d^{\Uparrow\uparrow}+N_u^{\Uparrow\downarrow}}\right)
93: \label{AmuN}
94: \end{equation}
95: where $N$ is the counting rate, $\Uparrow\uparrow$ and $\Uparrow\downarrow$
96: denote the 2 spin configurations, $P_b$ is the beam polarization ($\sim$76\%),
97: $P_t$ and $f$ are the $^6LiD$ target polarization ($\sim$50\%) and,
98: process dependent, dilution factor ($\sim$40\%).
99:
100:
101: The experiment has accumulated $\sim$3~$fb^{-1}$ of data in its 3 years of running
102: from 2002 to 2004. About half of these data has been analyzed so far.
103:
104: \section{\boldmath$\Delta G/G$}
105: In COMPASS, we access the gluon distribution via the photon-gluon fusion $PGF$
106: process, whereby a virtual photon couples to a gluon via a $q\bar{q}$ pair.
107: We consider two
108: different selections of the $PGF$: open charm and high $p_T$ hadron
109: production. Both have been successfully used to directly measure the
110: unpolarized gluon distribution at the HERA collider experiments (with the
111: difference that high $p_T$ refers to the production of jets there).
112: For both, hard interactions are selected irrespective of
113: $Q^2$, by, respectively, the charm mass and
114: the $p_T$ cut. But the 2 selections differ largely in terms of statistics (higher for high $p_T$)
115: and background. In the high $p_T$ case, not only do physics background processes
116: contribute significantly
117: but their impact can only
118: be evaluated by a Monte Carlo modelization of the experiment. The intricacy of
119: the problem becomes larger at low $Q^2$, where processes involving resolved
120: photons dominate. Therefore, two sub-cases are further considered, {\it viz.}
121: $Q^2>1$ and all $Q^2$. A determination of $\Delta G/G$ has been obtained for
122: the sub-sample with $Q^2>1$ and for the much bigger sample with all $Q^2$
123: only the projection for the precision expected
124: from the 2002-2004 data is so far available. The 2 values
125: are plotted on Fig.~\ref{DG} and discussed in~\cite{pt2}.
126:
127: For events with open charm production, $PGF$ enters alone at leading
128: order (in the limit where the nucleon's intrinsic charm is neglected). The main
129: difficulty lies in the combinatorial background associated with their
130: selection by the identification of a $D^o$ meson from its $K\pi$ decay.
131: This is a major concern in COMPASS where the vertex resolution is
132: not sufficient to reconstruct the decay vertex, because of the thickness
133: of the target. Special care is therefore taken to optimize the use of the data.
134: First, the favorable cases when the $D^o$ comes from a
135: $D^*\rightarrow D^o\pi$ decay are counted separately, {\it cf.} Fig.~\ref{DG}.
136: Secondly, a weighting procedure is applied for the
137: derivation of
138: $\Delta G/G$:
139: \[\Delta G/G = \frac{1}{P_T P_b f}~~\frac{\sum_i^{\Uparrow\uparrow} w_i - \sum_i^{\Uparrow\downarrow} w_i}{\sum_i^{\Uparrow\uparrow} w_i^2 + \sum_i^{\Uparrow\downarrow} w_i^2}~~~~~~~~~~w_i = \frac{\langle a_{LL}\rangle_i}{(1+B/S)_i}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\]
140: where $a_{LL}$ is $PGF$'s analysing power and $S$ and $B$ are the signal and
141: background counting rates. In these conditions, the precision is expected to be $\delta\Delta G/G \simeq 0.24$, with direct and $D^*$-tagged $D^o$'s
142: contributing about equally. This projection is plotted on Fig.~\ref{DG}.
143:
144: \begin{figure}[h]
145: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.44\linewidth}
146: \includegraphics*[width=0.99\linewidth]{D0_from_Ds_2003.eps}
147: \vspace*{1cm}
148: \end{minipage}
149: \includegraphics*[width=0.54\linewidth]{deltag_compass.eps}
150: \vspace*{-1.5cm}
151: \caption{Left: $D^o$ peak in the $K\pi$ invariant mass distribution of $D^*$-tagged events for 2003 ({\it i.e.} $\sim$1/4 of total) data.
152: Right: $\Delta G/G$: Results from
153: COMPASS high $p_T$ $Q^2>1$ (2002-2003 data, {\it i.e.} $\sim$1/2 of total) ~\cite{pt2}, compared with results from
154: HERMES~(all $Q^2$)~\cite{hermes}
155: and SMC~($Q^2>1$)~\cite{smc},
156: and projected error for
157: COMPASS high $p_T$ all $Q^2$ and open charm channels from all of
158: 2002-2004 data. The curves show the
159: parameterizations of $\Delta G/G$ {\it vs.} the momentum fraction carried by the gluon, $x_g$, from~\cite{GS}.}
160: \label{DG}
161: \end{figure}
162:
163: \section{INCLUSIVE \boldmath$A_1$}
164: The inclusive $A_1$ is derived from (\ref{AmuN}) through $DA_1 \simeq A_{{\mu}N}$,
165: where $D$ is the depolarization factor from the muon to the virtual photon.
166: The data selection is actually not literally inclusive: at low $x$
167: a charged hadron is required in the final state, as was done by the
168: SMC experiment~\cite{A1}. This removes the
169: background from elastic and quasi-elastic scattering and allows for the
170: interaction vertex to be unambiguously located in either of the target
171: cells. The kinematical domain is restricted to $Q^2>1$ and
172: $0.1<y<0.9$, which makes the measurement cover nearly the same $x$ domain
173: as SMC.
174:
175: The results for the 2002-2003 data~\cite{publi} are shown in Fig.~\ref{A1}, together with results from SMC~\cite{A1}, HERMES~\cite{hermesA1}
176: and E155~\cite{e155}. They significantly improve the accuracy in the region $x < 0.03$.
177:
178: \section{SEMI-INCLUSIVE \boldmath$A_1$}
179: At the difference with the inclusive case, semi-inclusive measurements
180: allow to separate quark and anti-quark contributions. This is
181: possible when two conditions are met. First, the hard scattering and soft fragmentation
182: processes must be proved to factorize. Secondly, the current fragmentation
183: (arising
184: from the struck quark) must be clearly separated from the target one.
185: One also needs a large enough set of independent measurements in order to
186: get a meaningful flavor separation. COMPASS intends to compute the following
187: asymmetries:
188: $
189: A_1, A_1^{h^+},A_1^{h^-},A_1^{K^+},A_1^{K^-},A_1^{K^o_s}
190: $, which, on its deuterium (isoscalar) target, gives access to the
191: following combinations:
192: $\Delta u+\Delta d,\Delta \bar{u} +\Delta \bar{d},\Delta s +
193: \Delta \bar{s} $.
194:
195: The analysis is under way. Preliminary results have been obtained
196: for the asymmetries $A_1^{h^+}$ and $A_1^{h^-}$ and are shown on Fig.~\ref{A1},
197: together with results from SMC~\cite{A1h}.
198:
199: \begin{figure}[t]
200: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.49\linewidth}
201: \includegraphics*[width=0.99\linewidth]{A1_publi_all.eps}
202: \end{minipage}
203: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.49\linewidth}
204: \includegraphics*[width=0.99\linewidth]{A1_publi_all_zoom.eps}
205: \end{minipage}
206: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.49\linewidth}
207: \includegraphics*[width=0.99\textwidth]{A1_hp_release_SMC.eps}
208: \end{minipage}
209: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.49\linewidth}
210: \includegraphics*[width=0.99\textwidth]{A1_hm_release_SMC.eps}
211: \end{minipage}
212: \vspace*{-1.cm}
213: \caption{$A_{1,d}~vs.~x$ from COMPASS 2002-2003 data compared with the results from other experiments ({\it see text for the references}). Top: Inclusive (with a zoom on the low $x$ region). Bottom: Semi-inclusive ($z=E_h/E_{\gamma^*}>0.2$ to select current fragmentation).}
214: \label{A1}
215: \end{figure}
216:
217: \section{OUTLOOK}
218: COMPASS has demonstrated its ability to significantly contribute to the
219: understanding of the nucleon's spin. It is to complete the analysis of
220: its first 3 years of data by the end of 2005, yielding 2 measurements
221: of $\Delta G/G$, via the high $p_T$ and open charm channels, with respective
222: precisions of $\sim$0.05 and $\sim$0.24. While less precise, the open charm
223: channel will provide a model-free determination. The experiment will resume data taking in 2006.
224:
225:
226: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
227: %\bibitem{proposal} COMPASS collaboration, CERN/SPSLC 96-14 (1996).
228: \bibitem{spectro} G.~Mallot, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A { 518} (2004) 121.
229: \bibitem{transverse} R.~Webb, 10th Int. Baryons Conference (Baryons 2004), {\tt arXiv:hep-ex/0501031}.
230: \bibitem{pt2} K.~Kurek, 10th Int. Baryons Conference (Baryons 2004), {\tt arXiv:hep-ex/0501051}.
231: \bibitem{hermes} A.~Airapetian {\it et al.} [HERMES Collaboration], Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ { 84} (2000) 2584
232: \bibitem{smc} B.~Adeva {\it et al.} [Spin Muon Collaboration (SMC)], Phys.\ Rev.\ D { 70} (2004) 012002
233: \bibitem{GS} T.~Gehrmann and W.~J.~Stirling, Z.\ Phys.\ C { 65} (1995) 461
234: \bibitem{A1} B.~Adeva {\it et al.} [Spin Muon Collaboration (SMC)], Phys.\ Rev. D { 58} (1998) 112001.
235: \bibitem{publi} E.S.~Ageev {\it et al.} [COMPASS Collaboration], {\it submitted to} Phys.\ Lett.\ B.
236: \bibitem{hermesA1} C.~Weiskopf [HERMES Collaboration], Bologna 2001, *Deep inelastic scattering* 555.
237: \bibitem{e155} P.~L.~Anthony {\it et al.} [E155 Collaboration], Phys.\ Lett.\ B { 463} (1999) 339
238: \bibitem{A1h} B.~Adeva {\it et al.} [Spin Muon Collaboration (SMC)], Phys.\ Lett.\ B { 420} (1998) 180.
239: \end{thebibliography}
240:
241:
242: \end{document}
243: