1: \documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,tightenlines,superscriptaddress,showpacs,byrevtex]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,tightenlines,superscriptaddress,showpacs,byrevtex]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[aps,prl,showpacs,twocolumn,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
4:
5: \usepackage{graphicx} % Include figure files
6: \usepackage{xspace}
7: \usepackage{epsfig}
8: \usepackage{multirow}
9: \usepackage{dcolumn} % Align table columns on decimal point
10:
11: \newcommand{\mb}{\ensuremath{M_{\mathrm{bc}}}\xspace}
12: \newcommand{\de}{\ensuremath{\Delta E}\xspace}
13:
14: \newcommand{\thr}{\ensuremath{\theta_{\mathrm{thr}}}\xspace}
15: \newcommand{\acp}{\ensuremath{\mathcal{A}_{CP}}\xspace}
16: \newcommand{\br}{\ensuremath{\mathcal{B}}\xspace}
17: \newcommand{\lr}{\ensuremath{\mathcal{LR}}\xspace}
18: \newcommand{\ks}{\ensuremath{K^0_S}\xspace}
19: \newcommand{\bb}{\ensuremath{B \overline{B}}\xspace}
20: \newcommand{\wq}{\ensuremath{\mathcal{W}_q}}
21:
22: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.1}
23:
24: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
25: \def\myspecial#1{} %% to print official version
26: %\def\myspecial#1{\special{#1}} %% to print DRAFT version
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28: \def\calL{{\mathcal L}}
29: \def\calH{{\mathcal H}}
30: \def\calF{{\mathcal F}}
31: \def\BR{{\mathcal B}}
32: \def\Mbc{M_{\rm bc}}
33:
34: \begin{document}
35:
36: \myspecial{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 300 50 translate 5 rotate
37: /Times-Roman findfont 18 scalefont setfont
38: 0 0 moveto 0.70 setgray
39: (\mySpecialText)
40: show grestore}def end}
41:
42: %% Path to search for included postscript graphics files
43: %\graphicspath{{figures/}}
44:
45: %\vspace*{-3\baselineskip}
46: %\resizebox{!}{3cm}{\includegraphics{belle.eps}}
47:
48: %\preprint{\vbox{ \hbox{ }
49: % \hbox{BELLE-CONF-0524}
50: % \hbox{LP2005-159}
51: % \hbox{EPS05-496}
52: %% \hbox{hep-ex nnnn, if available}
53: %}}
54:
55: \title{\quad\\[0.5cm] \Large
56: Measurements of $B$ Decays to Two Kaons}
57:
58: %\input{author}
59: \tighten
60:
61: %%% Paper: B -> K K
62: %%% Journal: Physical Review Letters
63: %%% Contacts: Y. Chao (john@hep1.phys.ntu.edu.tw)
64: %%% Non-responding authors or those who said NO are commented out.
65: %%% ====================================================================
66: %%% Click the RELOAD button on your web browser to see the updated file.
67: %%% ====================================================================
68: %%% Use \input{author} to insert this material into your latex file.
69: %%%%% Force institutions to appear in alphabetical order when typeset.
70: %%%\affiliation{Aomori University, Aomori}
71: \affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk}
72: \affiliation{Chiba University, Chiba}
73: \affiliation{Chonnam National University, Kwangju}
74: \affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221}
75: %%%\affiliation{University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt}
76: \affiliation{Gyeongsang National University, Chinju}
77: \affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822}
78: \affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba}
79: \affiliation{Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Hiroshima}
80: \affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing}
81: \affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna}
82: \affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow}
83: \affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana}
84: \affiliation{Kanagawa University, Yokohama}
85: \affiliation{Korea University, Seoul}
86: %%%\affiliation{Kyoto University, Kyoto}
87: %%%\affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu}
88: \affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne}
89: \affiliation{University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana}
90: \affiliation{University of Maribor, Maribor}
91: \affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria}
92: \affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya}
93: \affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara}
94: \affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li}
95: %%%\affiliation{National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung}
96: \affiliation{National United University, Miao Li}
97: \affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei}
98: \affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow}
99: \affiliation{Nippon Dental University, Niigata}
100: \affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata}
101: \affiliation{Nova Gorica Polytechnic, Nova Gorica}
102: \affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka}
103: \affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka}
104: \affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh}
105: \affiliation{Peking University, Beijing}
106: \affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544}
107: %%%\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973}
108: \affiliation{Saga University, Saga}
109: \affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei}
110: \affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul}
111: \affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano}
112: \affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon}
113: \affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW}
114: \affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay}
115: \affiliation{Toho University, Funabashi}
116: \affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo}
117: \affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai}
118: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo}
119: \affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo}
120: \affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo}
121: \affiliation{Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo}
122: %%%\affiliation{Toyama National College of Maritime Technology, Toyama}
123: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba}
124: \affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061}
125: \affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul}
126: \author{K.~Abe}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
127: % \author{K.~Abe}\affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo} % TohokuGakuin
128: % \author{N.~Abe}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
129: \author{I.~Adachi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
130: \author{H.~Aihara}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
131: % \author{K.~Aoki}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
132: % \author{K.~Arinstein}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
133: \author{Y.~Asano}\affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba} % Tsukuba
134: % \author{T.~Aso}\affiliation{Toyama National College of Maritime Technology, Toyama} % Toyama
135: \author{V.~Aulchenko}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
136: \author{T.~Aushev}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
137: % \author{T.~Aziz}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay} % Tata
138: % \author{S.~Bahinipati}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
139: \author{A.~M.~Bakich}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
140: \author{V.~Balagura}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
141: % \author{Y.~Ban}\affiliation{Peking University, Beijing} % Peking
142: \author{S.~Banerjee}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay} % Tata
143: \author{E.~Barberio}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
144: \author{M.~Barbero}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
145: \author{A.~Bay}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
146: \author{I.~Bedny}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
147: \author{U.~Bitenc}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
148: \author{I.~Bizjak}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
149: \author{S.~Blyth}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
150: \author{A.~Bondar}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
151: \author{A.~Bozek}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
152: \author{M.~Bra\v cko}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba}\affiliation{University of Maribor, Maribor}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
153: \author{J.~Brodzicka}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
154: \author{T.~E.~Browder}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
155: % \author{M.-C.~Chang}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
156: \author{P.~Chang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
157: \author{Y.~Chao}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
158: \author{A.~Chen}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
159: \author{K.-F.~Chen}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
160: \author{W.~T.~Chen}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
161: \author{B.~G.~Cheon}\affiliation{Chonnam National University, Kwangju} % Chonnam
162: \author{R.~Chistov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
163: % \author{J.~H.~Choi}\affiliation{Korea University, Seoul} % Korea
164: \author{S.-K.~Choi}\affiliation{Gyeongsang National University, Chinju} % Gyeongsang
165: \author{Y.~Choi}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
166: % \author{Y.~K.~Choi}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
167: \author{A.~Chuvikov}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
168: \author{S.~Cole}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
169: \author{J.~Dalseno}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
170: \author{M.~Danilov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
171: \author{M.~Dash}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
172: \author{L.~Y.~Dong}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
173: % \author{R.~Dowd}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
174: \author{J.~Dragic}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
175: \author{A.~Drutskoy}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
176: \author{S.~Eidelman}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
177: \author{Y.~Enari}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
178: % \author{D.~Epifanov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
179: % \author{C.~W.~Everton}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
180: % \author{F.~Fang}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
181: \author{S.~Fratina}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
182: % \author{H.~Fujii}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
183: \author{N.~Gabyshev}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
184: % \author{A.~Garmash}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
185: \author{T.~Gershon}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
186: \author{A.~Go}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
187: \author{G.~Gokhroo}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay} % Tata
188: % \author{P.~Goldenzweig}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
189: \author{B.~Golob}\affiliation{University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
190: \author{A.~Gori\v sek}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
191: % \author{M.~Grosse~Perdekamp}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % RIKEN
192: % \author{H.~Guler}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
193: % \author{R.~Guo}\affiliation{National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung} % Kaohsiung
194: % \author{H.~C.~Ha}\affiliation{Korea University, Seoul} % Korea
195: \author{J.~Haba}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
196: % \author{F.~Handa}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
197: % \author{K.~Hara}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
198: \author{T.~Hara}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
199: % \author{Y.~Hasegawa}\affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano} % Shinshu
200: \author{N.~C.~Hastings}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
201: % \author{K.~Hasuko}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % RIKEN
202: \author{K.~Hayasaka}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
203: \author{H.~Hayashii}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
204: \author{M.~Hazumi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
205: % \author{I.~Higuchi}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
206: % \author{T.~Higuchi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
207: \author{L.~Hinz}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
208: % \author{T.~Hojo}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
209: \author{T.~Hokuue}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
210: \author{Y.~Hoshi}\affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo} % TohokuGakuin
211: % \author{K.~Hoshina}\affiliation{Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo} % TUAT
212: \author{S.~Hou}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
213: \author{W.-S.~Hou}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
214: \author{Y.~B.~Hsiung}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
215: % \author{Y.~Igarashi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
216: \author{T.~Iijima}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
217: \author{K.~Ikado}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
218: \author{A.~Imoto}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
219: % \author{K.~Inami}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
220: \author{A.~Ishikawa}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
221: \author{H.~Ishino}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
222: % \author{K.~Itoh}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
223: \author{R.~Itoh}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
224: \author{M.~Iwasaki}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
225: \author{Y.~Iwasaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
226: % \author{C.~Jacoby}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
227: % \author{M.~Jones}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
228: % \author{R.~Kagan}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
229: % \author{H.~Kakuno}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
230: \author{J.~H.~Kang}\affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul} % Yonsei
231: \author{J.~S.~Kang}\affiliation{Korea University, Seoul} % Korea
232: % \author{P.~Kapusta}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
233: \author{S.~U.~Kataoka}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
234: \author{N.~Katayama}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
235: \author{H.~Kawai}\affiliation{Chiba University, Chiba} % Chiba
236: % \author{H.~Kawai}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
237: % \author{N.~Kawamura}\affiliation{Aomori University, Aomori} % Aomori
238: \author{T.~Kawasaki}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
239: % \author{N.~Kent}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
240: \author{H.~R.~Khan}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
241: % \author{A.~Kibayashi}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
242: \author{H.~Kichimi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
243: % \author{H.~J.~Kim}\affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu} % Kyungpook
244: % \author{H.~O.~Kim}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
245: \author{J.~H.~Kim}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
246: \author{S.~K.~Kim}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
247: \author{S.~M.~Kim}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
248: % \author{T.~H.~Kim}\affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul} % Yonsei
249: \author{K.~Kinoshita}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
250: % \author{N.~Kishimoto}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
251: % \author{S.~Kobayashi}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
252: \author{S.~Korpar}\affiliation{University of Maribor, Maribor}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
253: % \author{Y.~Kozakai}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
254: \author{P.~Kri\v zan}\affiliation{University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
255: \author{P.~Krokovny}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
256: % \author{T.~Kubota}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
257: % \author{R.~Kulasiri}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
258: \author{C.~C.~Kuo}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
259: % \author{H.~Kurashiro}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
260: % \author{E.~Kurihara}\affiliation{Chiba University, Chiba} % Chiba
261: % \author{A.~Kusaka}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
262: \author{A.~Kuzmin}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
263: \author{Y.-J.~Kwon}\affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul} % Yonsei
264: % \author{J.~S.~Lange}\affiliation{University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt} % Frankfurt
265: % \author{G.~Leder}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
266: \author{S.~E.~Lee}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
267: % \author{S.~H.~Lee}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
268: % \author{Y.-J.~Lee}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
269: \author{T.~Lesiak}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
270: \author{J.~Li}\affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei} % USTC
271: % \author{A.~Limosani}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
272: \author{S.-W.~Lin}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
273: \author{D.~Liventsev}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
274: % \author{J.~MacNaughton}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
275: \author{G.~Majumder}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay} % Tata
276: \author{F.~Mandl}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
277: % \author{D.~Marlow}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
278: % \author{H.~Matsumoto}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
279: \author{T.~Matsumoto}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
280: \author{A.~Matyja}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
281: % \author{Y.~Mikami}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
282: \author{W.~Mitaroff}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
283: % \author{K.~Miyabayashi}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
284: \author{H.~Miyake}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
285: \author{H.~Miyata}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
286: \author{Y.~Miyazaki}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
287: \author{R.~Mizuk}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
288: \author{D.~Mohapatra}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
289: \author{G.~R.~Moloney}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
290: % \author{T.~Mori}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
291: % \author{A.~Murakami}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
292: % \author{T.~Nagamine}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
293: \author{Y.~Nagasaka}\affiliation{Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Hiroshima} % Hiroshima
294: % \author{T.~Nakagawa}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
295: % \author{I.~Nakamura}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
296: \author{E.~Nakano}\affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka} % OsakaCity
297: \author{M.~Nakao}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
298: % \author{H.~Nakazawa}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
299: \author{Z.~Natkaniec}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
300: % \author{K.~Neichi}\affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo} % TohokuGakuin
301: \author{S.~Nishida}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
302: \author{O.~Nitoh}\affiliation{Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo} % TUAT
303: \author{S.~Noguchi}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
304: \author{T.~Nozaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
305: % \author{A.~Ogawa}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % RIKEN
306: \author{S.~Ogawa}\affiliation{Toho University, Funabashi} % Toho
307: \author{T.~Ohshima}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
308: \author{T.~Okabe}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
309: \author{S.~Okuno}\affiliation{Kanagawa University, Yokohama} % Kanagawa
310: \author{S.~L.~Olsen}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
311: \author{Y.~Onuki}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
312: \author{W.~Ostrowicz}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
313: \author{H.~Ozaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
314: \author{P.~Pakhlov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
315: \author{H.~Palka}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
316: \author{C.~W.~Park}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
317: % \author{H.~Park}\affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu} % Kyungpook
318: % \author{K.~S.~Park}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
319: \author{N.~Parslow}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
320: \author{L.~S.~Peak}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
321: % \author{M.~Pernicka}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
322: \author{R.~Pestotnik}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
323: % \author{M.~Peters}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
324: \author{L.~E.~Piilonen}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
325: % \author{A.~Poluektov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
326: % \author{F.~J.~Ronga}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
327: % \author{N.~Root}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
328: \author{M.~Rozanska}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
329: % \author{M.~Saigo}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
330: % \author{S.~Saitoh}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
331: \author{Y.~Sakai}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
332: % \author{H.~Sakamoto}\affiliation{Kyoto University, Kyoto} % Kyoto
333: % \author{H.~Sakaue}\affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka} % OsakaCity
334: % \author{T.~R.~Sarangi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
335: \author{N.~Sato}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
336: \author{N.~Satoyama}\affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano} % Shinshu
337: \author{K.~Sayeed}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
338: \author{T.~Schietinger}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
339: \author{O.~Schneider}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
340: % \author{P.~Sch\"onmeier}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
341: % \author{J.~Sch\"umann}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
342: % \author{C.~Schwanda}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
343: \author{A.~J.~Schwartz}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
344: % \author{T.~Seki}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
345: % \author{K.~Senyo}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
346: % \author{R.~Seuster}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
347: \author{M.~E.~Sevior}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
348: % \author{T.~Shibata}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
349: \author{H.~Shibuya}\affiliation{Toho University, Funabashi} % Toho
350: % \author{B.~Shwartz}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
351: \author{V.~Sidorov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
352: % \author{V.~Siegle}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % RIKEN
353: % \author{J.~B.~Singh}\affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh} % Panjab
354: \author{A.~Somov}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
355: \author{N.~Soni}\affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh} % Panjab
356: % \author{R.~Stamen}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
357: \author{S.~Stani\v c}\affiliation{Nova Gorica Polytechnic, Nova Gorica} % NovaGorica
358: \author{M.~Stari\v c}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
359: % \author{A.~Sugiyama}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
360: \author{K.~Sumisawa}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
361: \author{T.~Sumiyoshi}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
362: \author{S.~Suzuki}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
363: % \author{S.~Y.~Suzuki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
364: \author{O.~Tajima}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
365: % \author{N.~Takada}\affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano} % Shinshu
366: \author{F.~Takasaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
367: \author{K.~Tamai}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
368: \author{N.~Tamura}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
369: % \author{K.~Tanabe}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
370: \author{M.~Tanaka}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
371: \author{G.~N.~Taylor}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
372: \author{Y.~Teramoto}\affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka} % OsakaCity
373: \author{X.~C.~Tian}\affiliation{Peking University, Beijing} % Peking
374: % \author{S.~N.~Tovey}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
375: \author{K.~Trabelsi}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
376: % \author{Y.~F.~Tse}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
377: \author{T.~Tsuboyama}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
378: \author{T.~Tsukamoto}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
379: % \author{K.~Uchida}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
380: \author{S.~Uehara}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
381: \author{T.~Uglov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
382: % \author{K.~Ueno}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
383: \author{Y.~Unno}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
384: \author{S.~Uno}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
385: \author{P.~Urquijo}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
386: \author{Y.~Ushiroda}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
387: \author{G.~Varner}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
388: % \author{K.~E.~Varvell}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
389: % \author{S.~Villa}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
390: % \author{C.~C.~Wang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
391: \author{C.~H.~Wang}\affiliation{National United University, Miao Li} % Lien-Ho
392: \author{M.-Z.~Wang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
393: % \author{M.~Watanabe}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
394: \author{Y.~Watanabe}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
395: % \author{L.~Widhalm}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
396: \author{E.~Won}\affiliation{Korea University, Seoul} % Korea
397: \author{Q.~L.~Xie}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
398: \author{B.~D.~Yabsley}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
399: \author{A.~Yamaguchi}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
400: % \author{H.~Yamamoto}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
401: % \author{S.~Yamamoto}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
402: % \author{T.~Yamanaka}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
403: \author{Y.~Yamashita}\affiliation{Nippon Dental University, Niigata} % NihonDental
404: \author{M.~Yamauchi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
405: % \author{Heyoung~Yang}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
406: % \author{P.~Yeh}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
407: \author{J.~Ying}\affiliation{Peking University, Beijing} % Peking
408: % \author{S.~Yoshino}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
409: % \author{Y.~Yuan}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
410: % \author{Y.~Yusa}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
411: % \author{H.~Yuta}\affiliation{Aomori University, Aomori} % Aomori
412: \author{S.~L.~Zang}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
413: % \author{C.~C.~Zhang}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
414: \author{J.~Zhang}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
415: \author{L.~M.~Zhang}\affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei} % USTC
416: \author{Z.~P.~Zhang}\affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei} % USTC
417: \author{V.~Zhilich}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
418: % \author{T.~Ziegler}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
419: \author{D.~Z\"urcher}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
420: \collaboration{The Belle Collaboration}
421:
422:
423:
424: \begin{abstract}
425: We report measurements of $B$ meson decays to two kaons
426: using 253 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected with the Belle detector at the
427: KEKB energy-asymmetric $e^+e^-$ collider. We find evidence for signals in
428: $B^+\to \overline K^0 K^+$ and $B^0\to K^0 \overline{K}^0$ with significances of $3.0
429: \sigma$ and $3.5 \sigma$, respectively. (Charge-conjugate modes included)
430: The corresponding branching fractions are measured to be
431: $\br(B^+\to \overline{K}^0 K^+) = (1.0\pm 0.4 \pm 0.1)\times 10^{-6}$ and
432: $\br(B^0\to K^0 \overline{K}^0) = (0.8\pm 0.3 \pm 0.1)\times 10^{-6}$.
433: These decay modes are examples of hadronic $b \to d$ transitions. No signal is
434: observed in the decay $B^0\to K^+ K^-$ and we set an upper limit of
435: $3.7 \times 10^{-7}$ at 90\% confidence level.
436:
437: \end{abstract}
438:
439: \pacs{11.30.Er, 12.15.Hh, 13.25.Hw, 14.40.Nd}
440:
441: \maketitle
442:
443: %%%% >>>> keep the final version single-spaced
444: \tighten
445:
446: {\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
447: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
448:
449: %\newpage
450:
451: %\normalsize
452:
453: %\newpage
454:
455: Recent precise measurements of the branching fractions \cite{br} and
456: partial rate asymmetries \cite{acp} from the decays $B\to K\pi, \pi\pi$
457: provide essential information to understand the $B$ decay mechanism and
458: to probe possible contributions from new physics.
459: The rates for these decays constrain the hadronic $b \to s$ and $b \to u$
460: amplitudes. Here we report results on $B^0 \to K^0 \overline{K}^0$ and
461: $B^+ \to \overline{K}^0 K^+$ decays, which are examples of $b \to d$ hadronic
462: transitions.
463: We also discuss a search for $B^0\to K^+ K^-$, which is sensitive to effects
464: of final-state interactions (FSI)~\cite{fsi}.
465: The results are based on a sample of 275 million $\bb$
466: pairs collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB $e^+e^-$ asymmetric-energy
467: (3.5 on 8~GeV) collider~\cite{KEKB} operating at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance.
468:
469: The Belle detector is a large-solid-angle magnetic
470: spectrometer that consists of a silicon vertex detector (SVD),
471: a 50-layer central drift chamber (CDC), an array of
472: aerogel threshold Cherenkov counters (ACC),
473: a barrel-like arrangement of time-of-flight
474: scintillation counters (TOF), and an electromagnetic calorimeter (ECL)
475: comprised of CsI(Tl) crystals located inside
476: a superconducting solenoid coil that provides a 1.5~T
477: magnetic field. An iron flux-return located outside
478: the coil is instrumented to detect $K_L^0$ mesons and to identify
479: muons (KLM). The detector is described in detail elsewhere~\cite{Belle}.
480: Two different inner detector configurations were used. For the first sample
481: of 152 million $\bb$ pairs (Set I), a 2.0 cm radius beampipe
482: and a 3-layer silicon vertex detector were used;
483: for the latter 123 million $\bb$ pairs (Set II),
484: a 1.5 cm radius beampipe, a 4-layer silicon detector
485: and a small-cell inner drift chamber were used\cite{Ushiroda}.
486:
487: Charged kaons are required to have a distance of closest approach to the
488: interaction point (IP) in the beam direction ($z$) of less than 4 cm and
489: less than 0.1 cm in the transverse plane.
490: Charged kaons and pions are identified using $dE/dx$
491: information and Cherenkov light yields in the ACC.
492: The $dE/dx$ and ACC information are combined to form
493: a $K$-$\pi$ likelihood ratio,
494: $\mathcal{R}(K/\pi) = \mathcal{L}_K/(\mathcal{L}_K+\mathcal{L}_\pi)$,
495: where $\mathcal{L}_{K}$ $(\mathcal{L}_{\pi})$ is the likelihood that the track
496: is a kaon (pion). Charged tracks with $\mathcal{R}(K/\pi)>0.6$ are
497: regarded as kaons. Furthermore,
498: charged tracks that are positively identified as electrons or muons are
499: rejected.
500: The electron identification uses information composed of $E/p$ and $dE/dx$,
501: shower shape, track matching $\chi^2$, and ACC light yields, while
502: information from the KLM, $dE/dx$ and ACC are combined to identify muons.
503: The kaon identification efficiency and misidentification
504: rate are determined from a sample of kinematically identified
505: $D^{*+}\to D^0\pi^+, D^0\to K^-\pi^+$ decays, where the kaons from the
506: $D$ decay are selected in the same kinematic region as in
507: $B \to K \overline K$ decays. The kaon efficiency is measured to be
508: $(84.24\pm 0.13)\%$ for Set I and $(82.84\pm 0.14)\%$ for Set II, while the
509: pion-fake-kaon rates are $(5.40\pm 0.08)\%$ and $(6.86\pm 0.11)\%$,
510: respectively.
511:
512: Candidate $K^0$ mesons are reconstructed through the $K_S^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-$
513: decay. We pair oppositely-charged tracks assuming the pion hypothesis
514: and require the invariant mass of the
515: pair to be within 18 MeV/$c^2$ of the nominal $K_S^0$ mass. Furthermore, the
516: intersection point of the $\pi^+ \pi^-$ pair must be displaced from the IP.
517:
518:
519: Two variables are used to identify $B$ candidates: the beam-constrained mass,
520: $M_{\rm bc} \equiv
521: \sqrt{E^{*2}_{\mbox{\scriptsize beam}} - p_B^{*2}}$, and the energy difference,
522: $\Delta E \equiv E_B^* - E^*_{\mbox{\scriptsize beam}}$, where
523: $E^*_{\mbox{\scriptsize beam}}$ is the run dependent beam energy and
524: $E^*_B$ and $p^*_B$ are
525: the reconstructed energy and momentum of the $B$ candidates in the
526: center-of-mass (CM) frame, respectively. Events with
527: $M_{\rm bc} > 5.20$ GeV/$c^2$ and $|\Delta E| < 0.3~{\rm GeV}$
528: are selected for analysis.
529:
530: The dominant background is from $e^+e^- \to q\bar q ~( q=u,d,s,c )$ continuum
531: events. Event topology and $B$ flavor tagging information are used to
532: distinguish between the spherically distributed $B\overline{B}$ events and
533: the jet-like continuum backgrounds.
534: We combine a set of modified Fox-Wolfram moments \cite{pi0pi0} into a
535: Fisher discriminant. A signal/background likelihood is formed, based on a
536: GEANT-based~\cite{geant}
537: Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, from the product of the probability density
538: function (PDF) for the Fisher discriminant and that for the cosine of the angle
539: between the $B$ flight direction and the positron beam. The continuum
540: suppression is achieved by applying a requirement on a likelihood ratio
541: $\mathcal{R} = {\calL}_s/({\calL}_s + {\calL}_{q \bar{q}})$, where
542: ${\calL}_{s (q \bar{q})}$ is the signal ($q \bar{q}$) likelihood. Additional
543: background discrimination is provided by $B$ flavor tagging.
544: For each event, the standard Belle flavor tagging algorithm \cite{tagging}
545: provides a discrete variable indicating the probable flavor of the tagging $B$
546: meson, and a quality $r$, a continuous variable ranging from zero for no
547: flavor tagging information to unity for unambiguous flavor assignment.
548: An event with a high value of $r$ (typically
549: containing a high-momentum lepton) is more likely to be a $B \overline B$
550: event, and a looser $\mathcal{R}$ requirement can be applied. We divide the
551: data into $r>0.5$ and $r \le 0.5$ regions. A selection requirement on
552: $\mathcal{R}$ for events in each $r$ region of Set I and Set II is applied
553: according to a figure-of-merit defined as
554: $N_s^{\rm exp}/\sqrt{N_s^{\rm exp}+N_{q\bar{q}}^{\rm exp}}$, where
555: $N_s^{\rm exp}$ denotes the expected signal yields based on MC simulation
556: and the assumed branching fractions, $1.0 \times 10^{-6}$, and
557: $N_{q\bar{q}}^{\rm exp}$ denotes the
558: expected $q\bar q$ yields from sideband data ($M_{\rm bc}<5.26$ GeV/$c^2$).
559:
560:
561: Background contributions from $\Upsilon(4S) \to B\overline B$ events are
562: investigated using a large MC sample, which includes events from $b\to c$
563: transitions and charmless decays. After all the selection requirements,
564: no $B\overline{B}$ background is found for the $B^0 \to K^0 \overline K^0$
565: mode. Owing to $K$-$\pi$ misidentification, large $B^0\to K^+\pi^-$ and
566: $B^+\to K^0 \pi^+$ feed-across backgrounds appear in the $B^0\to K^+ K^-$
567: and $B^+\to \overline{K}^0 K^+$ modes,
568: respectively. A small charmless three-body contribution is found at
569: low $\Delta E$ values for these two modes.
570:
571:
572: The signal yields are extracted by performing unbinned two dimensional
573: maximum likelihood (ML) fits to the ($M_{\rm bc}$, $\Delta E$)
574: distributions.
575: The likelihood for each mode is defined as
576: \begin{eqnarray*}
577: \mathcal{L} & = & {\rm exp}\; (-\sum_{s,k,j} N_{s,k,j})
578: \prod_i (\sum_{s,k,j} N_{s,k,j} {\mathcal P}_{s,k,j,i}) \;\;\;
579: %\mbox{and} \\
580: \\
581: \mathcal{P}_{s,k,j,i} & = &
582: P_{s,k,j}(M_{{\rm bc}\;i}, \Delta E_i),
583: \end{eqnarray*}
584: where $s$ indicates Set I or Set II, $k$ distinguishes between events
585: in the $r<0.5$ and $r>0.5$ regions, $i$ is the identifier of
586: the $i$-th event, $P(M_{\rm bc}, \Delta E)$ is the two-dimensional PDF of
587: $M_{\rm bc}$ and $\Delta E$,
588: $N_j$ is the number of events for the
589: category $j$, which corresponds to either signal, $q\bar{q}$ continuum,
590: a feed-across due to $K$-$\pi$ misidentification, or
591: background from other charmless three-body $B$ decays.
592:
593: All the signal PDFs ($P_{s,k,j=\mathrm{signal}}(M_{\rm bc},\Delta E)$)
594: are parametrized by a product of a
595: single Gaussian for $M_{\rm bc}$ and a double Gaussian for $\Delta E$
596: using MC simulations based on the Set I and Set II detector configurations.
597: The same signal PDFs are used for events in the two different $r$
598: regions. Since the $M_{\rm bc}$ signal distribution is dominated by
599: the beam energy spread, we use the signal peak positions and resolutions
600: obtained from $B^+ \to \overline{D}{}^0\pi^+$ data
601: ($\overline{D}{}^0 \to K^0_S\pi^+ \pi^-$ sub-decay is used for the $K^0 \overline K^0$
602: mode, while $\overline{D}{}^0\to K^+\pi^-$ is used for the other two modes) with
603: small mode dependent correlations obtained from MC.
604: The MC-predicted $\Delta E$ resolutions are verified using the
605: invariant mass distributions of high momentum $D$ mesons. The decay mode
606: $\overline{D}{}^0\to K^+\pi^-$ is used for $B^0\to K^+ K^-$,
607: $D^+\to K^0_S \pi^+$ for $B^+\to K^0\pi^+$ and
608: $\overline{D}{}^0\to K^0_S\pi^+\pi^-$ for $B^0\to K^0 \overline K^0$.
609: The parameters that describe the shapes of the PDFs are fixed in all
610: of the fits.
611:
612: The continuum background in $\de$ is described by a linear function
613: while the $\Mbc$ distribution is parameterized by an
614: ARGUS function $f(x) = x \sqrt{1-x^2}\;{\rm exp}\;[ -\xi (1-x^2)]$, where
615: $x$ is $\Mbc$ divided by half of the total center of mass energy \cite{argus}.
616: Therefore, the continuum PDF is the product of this ARGUS function and the
617: linear function, where the overall normalization, $\xi$ and the slope of the
618: linear function are free parameters in the fit.
619: These free parameters are $r$-dependent and allowed to be different in Set I
620: and Set II. The background PDFs for charmless three-body $B$ decays for the
621: $K^+ K^-$ and $\overline{K}^0K^+$ modes are each modeled by a smoothed two-dimensional
622: histogram, obtained from a large MC sample. The feed-across backgrounds for
623: these two modes from the $K^+\pi^-$ and $K^0\pi^+$ events have
624: $\Mbc - \de$ shapes similar to the signals with the $\de$ peak positions
625: shifted by $\simeq 45$ MeV. The methods to model the $K^+K^-$ and
626: $\overline{K}^0 K^+$ signal PDFs are also applied to describe the feed-across background.
627:
628: \begin{figure*}[htb]
629: \hspace{-1.0cm}
630: \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{kk-comb.eps}
631: \caption{$M_{\rm bc}$ (left) and $\Delta E$ (right) distributions for
632: $B^0\to K^+K^-$ (top) and $B^+\to \overline{K}^0 K^+$ (middle) and
633: $B^0\to K^0 \overline K^0$ candidates. The histograms show
634: the data, while the curves represent the various components from
635: the fit: signal (dashed), continuum (dotted), three-body $B$ decays
636: (hatched), background from mis-identification (dash-dotted),
637: and sum of all components (solid). In the $K^+ K^-$ mode, there is
638: a large contribution from misidentified $K^+ \pi^-$ but no significant
639: signal excess. In the $\overline{K}^0 K^+$ mode, the signal and misidentified
640: $K^0 \pi^+$ contributions are comparable in size. In the $K^0 \overline{K}^0$
641: mode, there is a signal excess but no misidentification background.}
642: \label{fig:kk}
643: \end{figure*}
644: %\end{figure*}
645:
646: When likelihood fits are performed, the yield for each background
647: component ($N_{s,k,j}$ where
648: $j=q\bar{q}$, feed-across, charmless) is allowed to
649: float independently for each $s$ (Set I or Set II), and $k$ bin (low
650: or high $r$ region). For the signal component, the same branching fraction
651: is required by constraining the number of signal events in each $(s,k)$
652: bin using the measured efficiency in the corresponding $(s,k)$ bin.
653: Table \ref{tab:kk} summarizes the fit results for each mode. We observe
654: $13.3 \pm 5.6\pm 0.6$ ${K}^0 K^+$ and $15.6 \pm 5.8^{+1.1}_{-0.6}$
655: $K^0 \overline K^0$ signal events with
656: significances of $3.0 \sigma$ and $3.5 \sigma$, respectively. The second
657: errors in the yields are the systematic errors from fitting, estimated
658: from the deviations after varying each parameter of the
659: signal PDFs by one standard deviation, and from modeling
660: the three-body background, studied by excluding the low $\Delta E$ region
661: ($<-0.15$ GeV) and repeating the fit. At each step, the yield deviation is
662: added in quadrature to provide the fitting systematic errors and the
663: statistical significance is computed by taking the square root of the
664: difference between the value of $-2\ln\mathcal L$ for the best fit value and
665: zero signal yield. The
666: smallest value is chosen to be the significance including the systematic
667: uncertainty.
668:
669: Figure ~\ref{fig:kk} shows the $\Mbc$ and $\de$ projections of the fits
670: after requiring events to have $|\de|<0.06$ GeV and $5.271$
671: GeV/$c^2 < {M_{\rm bc}} < 5.289$
672: GeV/$c^2$, respectively. The feed-across yields are
673: $47.1\pm 8.7$ in the $K^+K^-$ mode and $16.4 \pm 6.1$
674: in the ${K}^0 K^+$ mode. The amounts of the feed-across background are
675: consistent with the expectations of
676: 49.1 $K^+\pi^-$ and 18.8 $K^0\pi^+$ events, based on MC
677: simulation and measured branching fractions \cite{hfag}.
678: The MC modeling of the requirement on the likelihood ratio, $\mathcal{R}$
679: is investigated
680: using the $B^+\to \overline{D}{}^0\pi^+ (\overline{D}{}^0\to K^0_S\pi^+\pi^-$
681: for $K^0K^0$ and $\overline{D}{}^0\to K^+\pi^-$ for the others)
682: samples. The obtained systematic errors are $\pm 2.9\%$ for
683: $B^0\to K^0 \overline K^0$ and $\pm 6.8\%$ for the other two modes. The
684: systematic error on the charged track reconstruction efficiency is
685: estimated to be around $1$\% per track using partially
686: reconstructed $D^*$ events.
687: The resulting $K_S^0$ reconstruction is verified by comparing the
688: ratio of $D^+\to K_S^0\pi^+$ and $D^+\to K^-\pi^+\pi^+$ yields
689: with the MC expectation. The resulting $K_S^0$ detection systematic
690: error is $\pm4.5\%$.
691: The final systematic errors are then obtained by quadratically summing the
692: errors due to the reconstruction efficiency and the fitting systematics.
693:
694:
695: \begin{table*}[htb]
696: \begin{center}
697: \caption{Fitted signal yields, reconstruction efficiencies, product of
698: efficiencies and sub-decay branching fractions $({\cal B}_s)$, branching
699: fractions and significances for individual modes.}
700: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
701: \hline\hline
702: ~Mode~ & Yield & Eff.(\%) & Eff.$\times {\cal B}_s$ (\%)& ${\cal B}(10^{-6})$& Sig.\\
703: \hline
704: ~$K^+K^-$ &$2.5^{+5.1}_{-4.1}$ & $15.5$& $15.5$ & $<0.37$& 0.5\\
705: ~$\overline{K}^0K^+$ &$13.3\pm 5.6$ &$14.5$ & $5.0$ &$1.0\pm 0.4\pm 0.1$& 3.0\\
706: ~$K^0 \overline K^0$ &$15.6\pm 5.8$ &$28.7$ & $6.8$ &$0.8\pm 0.3\pm 0.1$ & 3.5\\
707: \hline\hline
708: \end{tabular}
709: \label{tab:kk}
710: \end{center}
711: \end{table*}
712:
713: With 275 million $B\overline{B}$ pairs, we find evidence of $B^+\to \overline{K}^0 K^+$
714: and $B^0\to K^0 \overline K^0$ with branching fractions
715: $\br(B^+\to \overline{K}^0 K^+) = (1.0\pm 0.4 \pm 0.1)\times 10^{-6}$ and
716: $\br(B^0\to K^0 \overline K^0) = (0.8\pm 0.3 \pm 0.1)\times 10^{-6}$. These are
717: examples of hadronic $b \to d$ transitions. Our measurements
718: are consistent with preliminary results reported by the BaBar collaboration
719: and agree with some theoretical predictions
720: \cite{bjorken, pqcd, pqcd_kk, fleischer, chiang}. It has been suggested that
721: the branching fraction and CP asymmetry of the mode $B^0 \to K^0 \overline{K}^0$,
722: which originates from the flavor-changing neutral current process
723: $\bar{b} \to \bar{d} s \bar{s}$, may be sensitive to physics beyond the
724: Standard Model \cite{fleischer}. Measurements with larger statistics are
725: needed for this purpose. No signal is observed in $B^0\to
726: K^+K^-$ and we set the upper limit of $3.7 \times 10^{-7}$ at the 90\%
727: confidence level, using the Feldman-Cousins approach \cite{feldman} taking
728: into account both the statistical and systematic errors \cite{pole}.
729:
730:
731: We thank the KEKB group for the excellent operation of the
732: accelerator, the KEK cryogenics group for the efficient
733: operation of the solenoid, and the KEK computer group and
734: the NII for valuable computing and Super-SINET network
735: support. We acknowledge support from MEXT and JSPS (Japan);
736: ARC and DEST (Australia); NSFC (contract No.~10175071,
737: China); DST (India); the BK21 program of MOEHRD and the CHEP
738: SRC program of KOSEF (Korea); KBN (contract No.~2P03B 01324,
739: Poland); MIST (Russia); MHEST (Slovenia); SNSF (Switzerland); NSC and MOE
740: (Taiwan); and DOE (USA).
741:
742: %\newpage
743:
744: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
745:
746: \bibitem{br} Belle Collaboration, Y. Chao {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 69},
747: 111102 (2004);
748: Belle Collaboration, Y. Chao {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94},
749: 181803 (2005); BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett.
750: {\bf 89}, 281802 (2002).
751: BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94},
752: 181802 (2005).
753:
754: \bibitem{acp} Belle Collaboration, Y. Chao {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett.
755: {\bf 93}, 191802 (2004); Belle Collaboration, K. Abe {\it et al.},
756: hep-ex/0502035; BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett.
757: {\bf 93}, 131801 (2004); BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert {\it et al.},
758: hep-ex/0408089.
759:
760: \bibitem{fsi} H.-Y. Cheng, C.-K. Chua, and A. Soni, hep-ph/0502235;
761: C.-K. Chua, W.-S. Hou and K.-C. Yang, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 18, 1763 (2003);
762: S. Barshay, L. M. Sehgal and J. van Leusen, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 591}, 97
763: (2004); C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, I. Z. Rothstein and I. Stewart,
764: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}, 054015, 2004.
765:
766: \bibitem{KEKB}
767: S.~Kurokawa and E.~Kikutani, Nucl. Instr. and. Meth. A {\bf 499}, 1 (2003),
768: and other papers included in this volume.
769:
770:
771: \bibitem{Belle} Belle Collaboration,
772: A.~Abashian {\it et al.}
773: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A {\bf 479}, 117 (2002).
774: % Belle Collaboration, A. Abashian {\it et al.},
775: %Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A {\bf 479}, 117 (2002).
776:
777: \bibitem{Ushiroda} Y. Ushiroda (Belle SVD2 Group),
778: Nucl. Instr. and Meth.A {\bf 511} 6 (2003).
779:
780:
781: \bibitem{btohh} Belle Collaboration, Y. Chao {\it et al.},
782: Phys. Rev. D \textbf{69}, 111102(R) (2004).
783:
784: \bibitem{geant}
785: R.~Brun {\it et al.},
786: GEANT 3.21, CERN Report No. DD/EE/84-1 (1987).
787:
788: \bibitem{pi0pi0} The Fox-Wolfram moments were introduced in G. C. Fox and
789: S. Wolfram, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 41} 1581 (1978). The modified
790: moments used in this paper are described in Belle Collaboration,
791: S. H. Lee {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}, 261801 (2003).
792:
793: \bibitem{tagging} H. Kakuno {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
794: A {\bf 533}, 516 (2004).
795: %\bibitem{tagging} H. Kakuno {\it et al.}, hep-ex/0403022 (2004).
796:
797: \bibitem{argus} ARGUS Collaboration, H. Albrecht {\it et al.},
798: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 241}, 278 (1990).
799:
800: %\bibitem{anom} A. J. Buras, R. Fleischer, S. Recksiegel and F. Schwab,
801: %hep-ph/0402112 (2004); V. Barger, C.W. Chiang, P. Langacker and H.S. Lee,
802: %hep-ph/0406126 (2004).
803:
804: \bibitem{hfag}
805: Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag.
806: % J. Alexender {\it et al.}, Heavy Flavor Averaging Group,
807: %hep-ex/0412073.
808:
809: \bibitem{bjorken} J.D. Bjorken, Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.) {\bf B11},
810: 325 (1989); H-n. Li and B. Tseng, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57}, 443 (1998).
811:
812: \bibitem{pqcd} Y.-Y. Keum and A. I. Sanda,
813: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 67}, 054009 (2003).
814:
815: \bibitem{pqcd_kk} C.-H. Chen and H.-n. Li, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 63},
816: 014003 (2001).
817:
818: \bibitem{fleischer} R. Fleischer and S. Recksiegel, Eur. Phys. J C{\bf 38},
819: 251 (2004)
820:
821: \bibitem{chiang} C.-W. Chiang, M. Gronau, J. L. Rosner, D. A. Suprun,
822: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}, 034020 (2004).
823:
824: \bibitem{feldman}
825: G.J.~Feldman and R.D.~Cousins, Phys. Rev. {\bf D57}, 3873 (1998).
826: % G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{57},
827: %3873 (1998).
828:
829: \bibitem{pole}
830: %The Highland-Cousins method for calculating upper limits with
831: %systematic errors is described in J. Conrad {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bf
832: We used the method described in J. Conrad {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bf
833: D67}, 012002 (2003).
834: % J. Conrad {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{67}, 012002 (2003).
835:
836:
837:
838: \end{thebibliography}
839: \end{document}
840:
841: