1: \section{Event Selection and Reconstruction}
2: \label{sec:strategy}
3: The event selection and reconstruction and the measurements of branching fractions
4: follow closely the strategy described in Ref.~\cite{Aubert:2003zw} and represent the
5: basis for the \mx-\Q\ analysis presented here.
6:
7:
8: In this paper we study the recoiled $B$ candidate opposite of
9: a fully reconstructed $B$
10: in hadronic decay (\breco), which is a moderately pure
11: sample of $B$ mesons with known flavor and four-momentum.
12: We select \breco\ decays of the type $B \rightarrow \Db Y$,
13: where $D$ refers to a charm meson, and $Y$ represents a collection of
14: hadrons with a total charge of $\pm 1$, composed of $n_1\pi^{\pm}+
15: n_2K^{\pm}+ n_3\KS + n_4\piz$, where $n_1 + n_2 < 6$, $n_3 < 3$, and
16: $n_4 < 3$. Using $D^-$ and $D^{*-}$ ($\Dzb$ and $\Dstarzb$) as
17: seeds for $B^0$ ($B^+$) decays, we reconstruct about 1000 different
18: decay chains. Overall, we correctly reconstruct one $B$ candidate in 0.3\% (0.5\%) of the
19: \BzBzb\ (\BpBm) events.
20: The kinematic consistency of a \breco\ candidate with a $B$ meson
21: decay is checked using two variables, the beam-energy-substituted mass
22: $\mes = \sqrt{s/4 - \vec{p}^{\,2}_B}$
23: and the energy difference,
24: $\Delta E = E_B - \sqrt{s}/2$. Here $\sqrt{s}$ refers to the total
25: energy in the \FourS center of mass frame, and $\vec{p}_B$ and $E_B$ denote
26: the momentum and energy of the \breco\ candidate in the same frame.
27: For signal events the \mes\ distribution peaks at the $B$ meson mass, while
28: $\Delta E $ is consistent with zero. We require $\Delta E = 0$ within approximately three
29: standard deviations, as determined from each decay channel.
30:
31:
32: A semileptonic decay of the other $B$ meson (\brecoil) is identified by the
33: presence of a charged lepton with momentum in the \brecoil\ rest frame ($p^*$) above 1\gevc\ .
34: In addition, the detection of missing
35: energy and momentum in the event is taken as evidence for the presence
36: of a neutrino.
37: The hadronic system $X$ is reconstructed from charged
38: tracks and energy depositions
39: in the calorimeter that are not associated with
40: the \breco\ candidate or the identified lepton. Care is taken to eliminate
41: fake charged tracks, as well as low-energy beam-generated photons and energy
42: depositions
43: in the calorimeter from charged and
44: neutral hadrons due to beam backgrounds. The
45: neutrino four-momentum $p_{\nu}$ is estimated from the
46: missing momentum four-vector $p_{miss} = p_{\Upsilon(4S)}-p_{\breco} -p_X-p_\ell$,
47: where all momenta are measured in the laboratory frame, and
48: $p_{\Upsilon(4S)}$ refers to the \FourS\ meson.
49:
50: Undetected particles and measurement uncertainties affect the determination
51: of the four-momenta of the $X$ system and neutrino,
52: and lead to a leakage of \Bxclnu\ background from the high \mx\
53: into the low \mx\ region ($\mx < 1.86$~\gevcc).
54:
55: In the sample of reconstructed $B$ decays (\breco) two backgrounds need
56: to be considered: the combinatorial background from \BB\ and continuum events,
57: due to random association of tracks and neutral clusters, which does not peak
58: in \mes, and the \BB\ background whose \mes\ distribution has the same shape as the signal.
59: After applying all selection criteria, the remaining combinatorial
60: background is subtracted by performing an unbinned likelihood fit
61: to the \mes\ distribution. In this fit, the combinatorial
62: background originating from $e^+e^-\to q\bar{q}$ ($q=u,d,s,c$) continuum
63: and \BB\ events is described by an empirical threshold function~\cite{Albrecht:1993pu}, and
64: the signal is described by a modified Gaussian~\cite{cry} peaked at the $B$ meson mass.
65: In addition, to further reduce the effects of the combinatorial background,
66: only events with $\mes >$5.27~\gevcc are considered.
67:
68: To reject the background in the sample of semileptonic decays we require exactly one
69: charged lepton with $p^*>$1\gevc,
70: a total event charge of zero, and a missing mass consistent with zero
71: ($\mmiss < 0.5$\gevccsq). These criteria partly suppress the dominant
72: \Bxclnu\ decays, many of which contain an additional neutrino or
73: an undetected $\KL$ meson.
74:
75: In order to reject the peaking background coming from $\Dstar$ we use
76: a dedicated method, the partial $\Dstar$ reconstruction.
77: We explicitly veto
78: the $\Bzb\to\Dstarp\ell^-\overline{\nu}$ background by searching candidates
79: for such a decay with a partial reconstruction technique, that is
80: only identifying
81: the $\pi^+_s$ from the $\Dstarp\to \Dz\pi_s^+$ decay and the
82: lepton: since the momentum of the $\pi^+_s$ is almost collinear with the
83: \Dstarp\ momentum in the laboratory frame, we can approximate the
84: energy of the \Dstarp\ as $E_{\Dstarp}
85: \simeq m_{\Dstarp} \cdot E_{\pi_s} /145 \mevcc$ and estimate the neutrino mass as
86: $ m_{\nu}^2 = (p_B - p_{\Dstarp} - p_{\ell})^2 $. Events with $ m_{\nu}^2 >- 3$~\gevccsq\
87: are likely to be background events and are rejected.
88: Finally, we veto events with charged or neutral kaons in the
89: recoiling \Bb\ to reduce the peaking background from \Bxclnu\ decays. Charged
90: kaons are identified \cite{Aubert:2001tu}
91: with an efficiency varying between 60\% at the highest (4~\gevc)
92: and almost 100\% at the
93: lowest momenta. The pion misidentification rate is about 2\%. The
94: $\KS\to\pi^+\pi^-$ decays are reconstructed with an efficiency of
95: $80\%$ from pairs of oppositely charged tracks with an invariant mass
96: between 486 and 510~\mevcc.
97:
98: