1: \section{Extraction of \Vub}
2: \label{sec:vub}
3:
4: Using the \mx-\Q\ analysis we measure the partial
5: branching fraction for charmless semileptonic decays in a selected phase
6: space region. To translate this into a measurement of the total
7: branching fraction, and therefore \Vub, we need the fraction of events
8: inside the measurement region
9: (referred to as ``acceptance'' in the rest of the paper)
10: as an external input.
11:
12: In the following we use two different theoretical calculations of
13: Bauer, Ligeti and Luke~\cite{Bauer:2001yb} (BLL) and
14: Bosch, Lange, Neubert and Paz~\cite{Lange:2005yw,Bosch:2004th,Bosch:2004cb} (BLNP)
15: for calculating acceptance corrections. Both BLL and BLNP use
16: operator product expansions (OPE) to calculate QCD effects.
17:
18:
19: \subsection{Results using acceptances from BLL}
20: \label{moments}
21:
22: Bauer, Ligeti and Luke
23: perform an OPE-based calculation to second order in
24: the strong coupling constant $\alpha_s$ and $b$-quark mass $m_b$.
25: They focus on the region chosen for the measurement of the partial branching
26: fraction where non-perturbative effects are small.
27: In particular, they have shown that the theoretical uncertainties of the
28: extrapolation to the full phase space are much reduced by restricting the
29: selection to regions of higher values of \Q, rather than just restricting
30: \mx\ to a region below the charm meson mass.
31:
32: Based on these calculations we can convert the measured $\Delta \BR(\Bxulnu)$ into \Vub\ by
33: \begin{equation}
34: \label{eq:dbrvub}
35: |V_{ub}| = \sqrt{\frac{192 \pi^3}{\tau_B \, G_F^2 m_b^5}\frac{\Delta \BR(\Bxulnu)}{G}}
36: \end{equation}
37: where $\tau_B = 1.604\pm0.012$~ps~\cite{PDG04} and $G$ is a theoretical parameter calculated in the
38: BLL approach~\cite{Bauer:2001yb}.
39: The first factor under the square root is
40: 192$\pi^3/(\tau_B G_F^2 m_b^5)=0.00779$.
41: To extract \Vub, we take $G=0.27$ as computed by BLL for $m_b$(1S) =
42: 4.7~\gevcc. We then infer the $b$-quark mass in the 1S scheme from the \babar\ measurement
43: of \mbk~\cite{Aubert:2004aw} by using the prescription in~\cite{Battaglia:2003in},
44: obtaining $m_b$(1S) = 4.74~\gevcc. G is then
45: recomputed by rescaling the original BLL value by the ratio
46: $(4.74/4.7)^9$~\cite{ligeti},
47: obtaining $G=0.291\pm0.055$.
48: The 19\% error on $G$, which turns into a 9.5\% error on \Vub, is the sum in quadrature of
49: uncertainties due to: residual SF effects, higher order terms in
50: the $\alpha_s$ perturbative expansion, a 80~\mevcc
51: uncertainty on the $b$ quark mass, and ${\cal{O}}(\Lambda^3_{\rm{QCD}}/m^3)$ terms in the OPE expansion.
52: The uncertainty on the $b$ quark mass is the dominant source, contributing about 15\% to the
53: uncertainty on $G$. Eq.~\ref{eq:dbrvub} yields
54: \begin{equation}
55: |V_{ub}| = (4.82 \pm 0.26_\mathrm{stat} \pm 0.25_\mathrm{syst} \pm 0.46_\mathrm{th+SF}) \times 10^{-3}.
56: \end{equation}
57:
58: \subsection{Results using the theoretical calculations by BLNP}
59: \label{sec:theonew}
60:
61: Bosch, Lange, Neubert, and Paz have performed calculations of the
62: differential decay rates for \Bxulnu\ and \Bsg.
63: The authors presented a systematic treatment of the SF effects,
64: incorporating all known corrections to the rates, and provided an
65: interpolation between regions of phase space that can be treated
66: reliably by OPE calculations and others that depend on SF.
67: They have introduced a parameterization of the SF. The parameters
68: describing the SF cannot be calculated, rather they have to be taken
69: from experiment.
70:
71: On the basis of these SF parameters, the partial rate for \Bxulnu\ can
72: be predicted for the measured phase space, and related to \Vub,
73: \begin{equation}
74: \Delta\zeta \, \Vub^2 =
75: \int^{\mathrm{\mx^{cut}}}_{0}\int^{}_{\Q_{\mathrm{cut}}}
76: \frac{d\sigma}{d\Q d\mx} d\Q d\mx,
77: \end{equation}
78: such that
79: \begin{equation}
80: \Vub = \sqrt{\frac{\Delta{\cal{B}}(\Bxulnu)}{{\Delta \zeta \, \tau_B}}}.
81: \end{equation}
82: BLNP give results and uncertainties in terms of the reduced decay rate
83: $\Delta \zeta$, defined in units of $\Vub^2$~ps$^{-1}$.
84:
85: We rely on two measurements of these SF parameters, one based on the
86: photon spectrum in \Bsg\ decays, the other on moments of the hadron
87: mass and lepton energy spectrum in \Bxclnu\ decays.
88: The analysis of \Bsg\ decays can be used to determine the SF parameters in a given
89: renormalization scheme~\cite{Kagan:1998ym}.
90: Likewise the moments of the lepton energy and hadronic invariant mass in
91: \Bxclnu\ decays are sensitive to the heavy quark
92: parameters, as shown in an OPE calculation~\cite{Gambino:2004qm} in
93: the kinetic scheme.
94: In
95: both cases, the heavy quark parameters entering the calculations can be related to
96: \lbarsf\ and \lonesf, see {\it{e.g.}}~\cite{Neubert:2004sp,Benson:2004sg}.
97:
98: The Belle Collaboration has measured the photon spectrum in \Bsg
99: decays~\cite{Koppenburg:2004fz} and, based on a fit to the spectrum,
100: has determined $\lbarsf = 0.66 \gev/c^2$ and
101: $\lonesf=-0.40\gev^2/c^4$~\cite{Limosani:2004jk}. They also provide
102: a $\Delta\chi^2=1$ contour, which we use to estimate theoretical uncertainties.
103:
104: These SF parameters translate to $\mbsf = 4.52 \pm 0.07$ and
105: $\mupisqsf = 0.27 \pm 0.23$~\cite{Bizjak:2005hn}.
106: This results in
107: $\Delta\zeta = (21.6 \pm 4.0\pm^{2.4}_{2.3})\Vub^2$~ps$^{-1}$,
108: where the first error is due to the limited experimental knowledge of the
109: SF parameters and the second to theory uncertainties,
110: and consequently
111: \begin{equation}
112: |V_{ub}| = (5.00 \pm 0.27_\mathrm{stat} \pm 0.26_\mathrm{syst} \pm
113: 0.46_\mathrm{SF} \pm 0.28_\mathrm{th}) \times 10^{-3},
114: \end{equation}
115: where the errors are due to statistics, experimental systematics, shape function parameters
116: and theoretical systematics, respectively.
117:
118: Alternatively, the \babar\ collaboration has determined
119: \mbk\ and \mupisqk\ in the kinetic mass scheme from fits to moments
120: measured for \Bxclnu~\cite{Aubert:2004aw}.
121: The values have been translated into the SF scheme by following the
122: prescription in~\cite{Neubert:2004sp} resulting in
123: $\mbsf = 4.61 \pm 0.08$ \gevcc and $\mupisqsf = 0.15 \pm 0.07$, with a correlation
124: of -40\%.
125: The systematic error due to the uncertainty of the SF parameters is reduced, due to the
126: significantly better precision obtained in the \babar\ moments analysis.
127:
128: By using the results of the \babar\ moments analysis we get
129: $\Delta \zeta = (25.04 \pm^{4.91}_{4.06\mathrm{SF}}\pm2.45_\mathrm{th})$ $\Vub^2$~ps$^{-1}$. Again, the
130: error is due to the limited experimental knowledge of the
131: shape function parameters.
132: This translates into
133: \begin{equation}
134: |V_{ub}| = (4.65 \pm 0.24_\mathrm{stat} \pm 0.24_\mathrm{syst} \mbox{}^{+0.46}_{-0.38 \mathrm{SF}} \pm 0.23_\mathrm{th}) \times 10^{-3}.
135: \end{equation}
136: