1: %
2: % Template for Belle 2005 Summer conference papers
3: %
4: %
5: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
6: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
7: %
8: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
9: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
10: %
11: % 1) latex apssamp.tex
12: % 2) bibtex apssamp
13: % 3) latex apssamp.tex
14: % 4) latex apssamp.tex
15: %
16: %%% Use this for e-print submission
17: %%% You also need to do the following:
18: %%% * Comment out widetext, use eqnarray and \nonumber
19: %%% (for the first line) for eq:likelihood
20: %%% * Change the figure size to 0.6
21: %%% * Put preprint numbers and the Belle logo
22: \documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,tightenlines,superscriptaddress,showpacs,byrevtex]{revtex4}
23: %
24: %%% Use this for PRL submission
25: %%% You also need to do the following:
26: %%% * Comment out widetext, use eqnarray and \nonumber
27: %%% (for the first line) for eq:likelihood
28: %%% * Change the figure size to 0.6
29: %%% * Comment out preprint numbers and the Belle logo
30: %\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,superscriptaddress,showpacs,byrevtex]{revtex4}
31: %
32: %%% Double-column style
33: %%% You also need to do the following:
34: %%% * Use widetext for eq:likelihood, comment out \nonumber
35: %%% * Change the figure size appropriately (should be less than 0.5)
36: %%% * Comment out preprint numbers and the Belle logo
37: %\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
38: %
39:
40:
41: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
42: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
43: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
44:
45: \usepackage{graphicx} % Include figure files
46: \usepackage{dcolumn} % Align table columns on decimal point
47:
48: \graphicspath{{ps}}
49:
50: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.1}
51:
52: \begin{document}
53:
54: \vspace*{-3\baselineskip}
55: \resizebox{!}{3cm}{\includegraphics{belle.eps}}
56:
57: \preprint{\vbox{ \hbox{ }
58: \hbox{BELLE-CONF-0516}
59: \hbox{LP2005-PAPER-151}
60: \hbox{EPS05-488}
61: % \hbox{hep-ex nnnn, if available}
62: }}
63:
64: \title{ \quad\\[0.5cm] Observation of $D_{s1}(2536)^+ \to D^+ \pi^- K^+$}
65: %Observation of the decay $\dss \to D^+\pi^- K^+$
66:
67: %%%% >>>>> insert the authorlist here. BEFORE the abstract !!!!! <<<<<
68: %%%% >>>>> obtain the latest summer conference authorlist from the
69: %%%% >>>>> authorship confirmation web page
70:
71: %\collaboration{Belle Collaboration}
72:
73: %%% Paper:
74: %%% Journal: Summer 2005 conference papers
75: %%% Contacts:
76: %%% Non-responding authors or those who said NO are commented out.
77: %%% ====================================================================
78: %%% Click the RELOAD button on your web browser to see the updated file.
79: %%% ====================================================================
80: %%% Use \input{author} to insert this material into your latex file.
81: %%%%% Force institutions to appear in alphabetical order when typeset.
82: \affiliation{Aomori University, Aomori}
83: \affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk}
84: \affiliation{Chiba University, Chiba}
85: \affiliation{Chonnam National University, Kwangju}
86: \affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221}
87: \affiliation{University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt}
88: \affiliation{Gyeongsang National University, Chinju}
89: \affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822}
90: \affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba}
91: \affiliation{Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Hiroshima}
92: \affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing}
93: \affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna}
94: \affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow}
95: \affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana}
96: \affiliation{Kanagawa University, Yokohama}
97: \affiliation{Korea University, Seoul}
98: \affiliation{Kyoto University, Kyoto}
99: \affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu}
100: \affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne}
101: \affiliation{University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana}
102: \affiliation{University of Maribor, Maribor}
103: \affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria}
104: \affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya}
105: \affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara}
106: \affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li}
107: \affiliation{National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung}
108: \affiliation{National United University, Miao Li}
109: \affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei}
110: \affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow}
111: \affiliation{Nippon Dental University, Niigata}
112: \affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata}
113: \affiliation{Nova Gorica Polytechnic, Nova Gorica}
114: \affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka}
115: \affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka}
116: \affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh}
117: \affiliation{Peking University, Beijing}
118: \affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544}
119: \affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973}
120: \affiliation{Saga University, Saga}
121: \affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei}
122: \affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul}
123: \affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano}
124: \affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon}
125: \affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW}
126: \affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay}
127: \affiliation{Toho University, Funabashi}
128: \affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo}
129: \affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai}
130: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo}
131: \affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo}
132: \affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo}
133: \affiliation{Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo}
134: \affiliation{Toyama National College of Maritime Technology, Toyama}
135: \affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba}
136: \affiliation{Utkal University, Bhubaneswer}
137: \affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061}
138: \affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul}
139: \author{K.~Abe}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
140: \author{K.~Abe}\affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo} % TohokuGakuin
141: \author{I.~Adachi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
142: \author{H.~Aihara}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
143: \author{K.~Aoki}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
144: \author{K.~Arinstein}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
145: \author{Y.~Asano}\affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba} % Tsukuba
146: \author{T.~Aso}\affiliation{Toyama National College of Maritime Technology, Toyama} % Toyama
147: \author{V.~Aulchenko}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
148: \author{T.~Aushev}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
149: \author{T.~Aziz}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay} % Tata
150: \author{S.~Bahinipati}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
151: \author{A.~M.~Bakich}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
152: \author{V.~Balagura}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
153: \author{Y.~Ban}\affiliation{Peking University, Beijing} % Peking
154: \author{S.~Banerjee}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay} % Tata
155: \author{E.~Barberio}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
156: \author{M.~Barbero}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
157: \author{A.~Bay}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
158: \author{I.~Bedny}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
159: \author{U.~Bitenc}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
160: \author{I.~Bizjak}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
161: \author{S.~Blyth}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
162: \author{A.~Bondar}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
163: \author{A.~Bozek}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
164: \author{M.~Bra\v cko}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba}\affiliation{University of Maribor, Maribor}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
165: \author{J.~Brodzicka}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
166: \author{T.~E.~Browder}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
167: \author{M.-C.~Chang}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
168: \author{P.~Chang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
169: \author{Y.~Chao}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
170: \author{A.~Chen}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
171: \author{K.-F.~Chen}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
172: \author{W.~T.~Chen}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
173: \author{B.~G.~Cheon}\affiliation{Chonnam National University, Kwangju} % Chonnam
174: \author{C.-C.~Chiang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
175: \author{R.~Chistov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
176: \author{S.-K.~Choi}\affiliation{Gyeongsang National University, Chinju} % Gyeongsang
177: \author{Y.~Choi}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
178: \author{Y.~K.~Choi}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
179: \author{A.~Chuvikov}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
180: \author{S.~Cole}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
181: \author{J.~Dalseno}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
182: \author{M.~Danilov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
183: \author{M.~Dash}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
184: \author{L.~Y.~Dong}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
185: \author{R.~Dowd}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
186: \author{J.~Dragic}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
187: \author{A.~Drutskoy}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
188: \author{S.~Eidelman}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
189: \author{Y.~Enari}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
190: \author{D.~Epifanov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
191: \author{F.~Fang}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
192: \author{S.~Fratina}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
193: \author{H.~Fujii}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
194: \author{N.~Gabyshev}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
195: \author{A.~Garmash}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
196: \author{T.~Gershon}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
197: \author{A.~Go}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
198: \author{G.~Gokhroo}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay} % Tata
199: \author{P.~Goldenzweig}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
200: \author{B.~Golob}\affiliation{University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
201: \author{A.~Gori\v sek}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
202: \author{M.~Grosse~Perdekamp}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % RIKEN
203: \author{H.~Guler}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
204: \author{R.~Guo}\affiliation{National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung} % Kaohsiung
205: \author{J.~Haba}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
206: \author{K.~Hara}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
207: \author{T.~Hara}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
208: \author{Y.~Hasegawa}\affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano} % Shinshu
209: \author{N.~C.~Hastings}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
210: \author{K.~Hasuko}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % RIKEN
211: \author{K.~Hayasaka}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
212: \author{H.~Hayashii}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
213: \author{M.~Hazumi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
214: \author{T.~Higuchi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
215: \author{L.~Hinz}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
216: \author{T.~Hojo}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
217: \author{T.~Hokuue}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
218: \author{Y.~Hoshi}\affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo} % TohokuGakuin
219: \author{K.~Hoshina}\affiliation{Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo} % TUAT
220: \author{S.~Hou}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
221: \author{W.-S.~Hou}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
222: \author{Y.~B.~Hsiung}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
223: \author{Y.~Igarashi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
224: \author{T.~Iijima}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
225: \author{K.~Ikado}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
226: \author{A.~Imoto}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
227: \author{K.~Inami}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
228: \author{A.~Ishikawa}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
229: \author{H.~Ishino}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
230: \author{K.~Itoh}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
231: \author{R.~Itoh}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
232: \author{M.~Iwasaki}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
233: \author{Y.~Iwasaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
234: \author{C.~Jacoby}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
235: \author{C.-M.~Jen}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
236: % \author{M.~Jones}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
237: \author{R.~Kagan}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
238: \author{H.~Kakuno}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
239: \author{J.~H.~Kang}\affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul} % Yonsei
240: \author{J.~S.~Kang}\affiliation{Korea University, Seoul} % Korea
241: \author{P.~Kapusta}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
242: \author{S.~U.~Kataoka}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
243: \author{N.~Katayama}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
244: \author{H.~Kawai}\affiliation{Chiba University, Chiba} % Chiba
245: \author{N.~Kawamura}\affiliation{Aomori University, Aomori} % Aomori
246: \author{T.~Kawasaki}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
247: \author{S.~Kazi}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
248: \author{N.~Kent}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
249: \author{H.~R.~Khan}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
250: \author{A.~Kibayashi}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
251: \author{H.~Kichimi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
252: \author{H.~J.~Kim}\affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu} % Kyungpook
253: \author{H.~O.~Kim}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
254: \author{J.~H.~Kim}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
255: \author{S.~K.~Kim}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
256: \author{S.~M.~Kim}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
257: \author{T.~H.~Kim}\affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul} % Yonsei
258: \author{K.~Kinoshita}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
259: \author{N.~Kishimoto}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
260: \author{S.~Korpar}\affiliation{University of Maribor, Maribor}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
261: \author{Y.~Kozakai}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
262: \author{P.~Kri\v zan}\affiliation{University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
263: \author{P.~Krokovny}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
264: \author{T.~Kubota}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
265: \author{R.~Kulasiri}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
266: \author{C.~C.~Kuo}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
267: \author{H.~Kurashiro}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
268: \author{E.~Kurihara}\affiliation{Chiba University, Chiba} % Chiba
269: \author{A.~Kusaka}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
270: \author{A.~Kuzmin}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
271: \author{Y.-J.~Kwon}\affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul} % Yonsei
272: \author{J.~S.~Lange}\affiliation{University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt} % Frankfurt
273: \author{G.~Leder}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
274: \author{S.~E.~Lee}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
275: \author{Y.-J.~Lee}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
276: \author{T.~Lesiak}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
277: \author{J.~Li}\affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei} % USTC
278: \author{A.~Limosani}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
279: \author{S.-W.~Lin}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
280: \author{D.~Liventsev}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
281: \author{J.~MacNaughton}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
282: \author{G.~Majumder}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay} % Tata
283: \author{F.~Mandl}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
284: \author{D.~Marlow}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
285: \author{H.~Matsumoto}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
286: \author{T.~Matsumoto}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
287: \author{A.~Matyja}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
288: \author{Y.~Mikami}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
289: \author{W.~Mitaroff}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
290: \author{K.~Miyabayashi}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
291: \author{H.~Miyake}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
292: \author{H.~Miyata}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
293: \author{Y.~Miyazaki}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
294: \author{R.~Mizuk}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
295: \author{D.~Mohapatra}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
296: \author{G.~R.~Moloney}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
297: \author{T.~Mori}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
298: \author{A.~Murakami}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
299: \author{T.~Nagamine}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
300: \author{Y.~Nagasaka}\affiliation{Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Hiroshima} % Hiroshima
301: \author{T.~Nakagawa}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
302: \author{I.~Nakamura}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
303: \author{E.~Nakano}\affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka} % OsakaCity
304: \author{M.~Nakao}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
305: \author{H.~Nakazawa}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
306: \author{Z.~Natkaniec}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
307: \author{K.~Neichi}\affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo} % TohokuGakuin
308: \author{S.~Nishida}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
309: \author{O.~Nitoh}\affiliation{Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo} % TUAT
310: \author{S.~Noguchi}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
311: \author{T.~Nozaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
312: \author{A.~Ogawa}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % RIKEN
313: \author{S.~Ogawa}\affiliation{Toho University, Funabashi} % Toho
314: \author{T.~Ohshima}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
315: \author{T.~Okabe}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
316: \author{S.~Okuno}\affiliation{Kanagawa University, Yokohama} % Kanagawa
317: \author{S.~L.~Olsen}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
318: \author{Y.~Onuki}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
319: \author{W.~Ostrowicz}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
320: \author{H.~Ozaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
321: \author{P.~Pakhlov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
322: \author{H.~Palka}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
323: \author{C.~W.~Park}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
324: \author{H.~Park}\affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu} % Kyungpook
325: \author{K.~S.~Park}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
326: \author{N.~Parslow}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
327: \author{L.~S.~Peak}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
328: \author{M.~Pernicka}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
329: \author{R.~Pestotnik}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
330: \author{M.~Peters}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
331: \author{L.~E.~Piilonen}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
332: \author{A.~Poluektov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
333: \author{F.~J.~Ronga}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
334: \author{N.~Root}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
335: \author{M.~Rozanska}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
336: \author{H.~Sahoo}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
337: \author{M.~Saigo}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
338: \author{S.~Saitoh}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
339: \author{Y.~Sakai}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
340: \author{H.~Sakamoto}\affiliation{Kyoto University, Kyoto} % Kyoto
341: \author{H.~Sakaue}\affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka} % OsakaCity
342: \author{T.~R.~Sarangi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
343: \author{M.~Satapathy}\affiliation{Utkal University, Bhubaneswer} % Utkal
344: \author{N.~Sato}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
345: \author{N.~Satoyama}\affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano} % Shinshu
346: \author{T.~Schietinger}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
347: \author{O.~Schneider}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
348: \author{P.~Sch\"onmeier}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
349: \author{J.~Sch\"umann}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
350: \author{C.~Schwanda}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
351: \author{A.~J.~Schwartz}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
352: \author{T.~Seki}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
353: \author{K.~Senyo}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
354: \author{R.~Seuster}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
355: \author{M.~E.~Sevior}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
356: \author{T.~Shibata}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
357: \author{H.~Shibuya}\affiliation{Toho University, Funabashi} % Toho
358: \author{J.-G.~Shiu}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
359: \author{B.~Shwartz}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
360: \author{V.~Sidorov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
361: \author{J.~B.~Singh}\affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh} % Panjab
362: \author{A.~Somov}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
363: \author{N.~Soni}\affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh} % Panjab
364: \author{R.~Stamen}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
365: \author{S.~Stani\v c}\affiliation{Nova Gorica Polytechnic, Nova Gorica} % NovaGorica
366: \author{M.~Stari\v c}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
367: \author{A.~Sugiyama}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
368: \author{K.~Sumisawa}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
369: \author{T.~Sumiyoshi}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
370: \author{S.~Suzuki}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
371: \author{S.~Y.~Suzuki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
372: \author{O.~Tajima}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
373: \author{N.~Takada}\affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano} % Shinshu
374: \author{F.~Takasaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
375: \author{K.~Tamai}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
376: \author{N.~Tamura}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
377: \author{K.~Tanabe}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
378: \author{M.~Tanaka}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
379: \author{G.~N.~Taylor}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
380: \author{Y.~Teramoto}\affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka} % OsakaCity
381: \author{X.~C.~Tian}\affiliation{Peking University, Beijing} % Peking
382: % \author{S.~N.~Tovey}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
383: \author{K.~Trabelsi}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
384: \author{Y.~F.~Tse}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
385: \author{T.~Tsuboyama}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
386: \author{T.~Tsukamoto}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
387: \author{K.~Uchida}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
388: \author{Y.~Uchida}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
389: \author{S.~Uehara}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
390: \author{T.~Uglov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
391: \author{K.~Ueno}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
392: \author{Y.~Unno}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
393: \author{S.~Uno}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
394: \author{P.~Urquijo}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
395: \author{Y.~Ushiroda}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
396: \author{G.~Varner}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
397: \author{K.~E.~Varvell}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
398: \author{S.~Villa}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
399: \author{C.~C.~Wang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
400: \author{C.~H.~Wang}\affiliation{National United University, Miao Li} % Lien-Ho
401: \author{M.-Z.~Wang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
402: \author{M.~Watanabe}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
403: \author{Y.~Watanabe}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
404: \author{L.~Widhalm}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
405: \author{C.-H.~Wu}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
406: \author{Q.~L.~Xie}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
407: \author{B.~D.~Yabsley}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
408: \author{A.~Yamaguchi}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
409: \author{H.~Yamamoto}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
410: \author{S.~Yamamoto}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
411: \author{Y.~Yamashita}\affiliation{Nippon Dental University, Niigata} % NihonDental
412: \author{M.~Yamauchi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
413: \author{Heyoung~Yang}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
414: \author{J.~Ying}\affiliation{Peking University, Beijing} % Peking
415: \author{S.~Yoshino}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
416: \author{Y.~Yuan}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
417: \author{Y.~Yusa}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
418: \author{H.~Yuta}\affiliation{Aomori University, Aomori} % Aomori
419: \author{S.~L.~Zang}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
420: \author{C.~C.~Zhang}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
421: \author{J.~Zhang}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
422: \author{L.~M.~Zhang}\affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei} % USTC
423: \author{Z.~P.~Zhang}\affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei} % USTC
424: \author{V.~Zhilich}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
425: \author{T.~Ziegler}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
426: \author{D.~Z\"urcher}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
427: \collaboration{The Belle Collaboration}
428: %\noaffiliation
429:
430: \begin{abstract}
431: We report the observation of the decay $D_{s1}(2536)^+ \to D^+ \pi^- K^+$.
432: We also measure the helicity angle distributions in the decay
433: $D_{s1}(2536)\to D^{*+} K^0_S$ and thus constrain the contributions and the phase difference of $D$ and $S$ wave amplitudes in this decay.
434: The results are based on a 281~fb$^{-1}$ data sample collected with the Belle detector near the $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance, at the KEKB asymmetric energy
435: $e^+ e^-$ collider.
436: %We report the observation of the decay $D_{s1}(2536)^+ \to D^+\pi^- K^+$.
437: %The ratio $\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}^+\to D^+\pi^- K^+)/\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}^+\to D^{*+}K^0D^+\pi^- K^+)$) is found to be
438: %$2.8\pm 0.2\pm0.4\%$. We also studied the angular distributions in the $D_{s1}(2536)^+ \to D^{*+}K^0_S$ decay and constrained
439: %the contribution of the S wave component to the total width with the relative phase of S and D wave amplitudes.
440: %These results are obtained from the $281\,{\rm fb}^{-1}$ data sample collected
441: %with the Belle detector near the $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance, at the KEKB
442: %asymmetric energy $e^+ e^-$ collider.
443: \end{abstract}
444:
445: %\pacs{13.65.+i, 13.25.Gv, 14.40.Gx}
446:
447: \maketitle
448:
449: %%%% >>>> keep the final version single-spaced
450: \tighten
451:
452: {\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}}
453: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
454:
455: \section{Introduction}
456:
457: Two states $D_{sJ}(2317)^+$ and $D_{sJ}(2460)^+$ have been discovered recently both in continuum $e^+e^-$ annihilation near $\sqrt{s}=10.6$ GeV/c$^2$
458: and in $B$ meson decays~\cite{dsj},~\cite{dspipi}.
459: Their decay properties are consistent with the assumption that these are $J^P=0^+,1^+$ states with $j=L+S_{\bar{s}}=1/2$. Here
460: $L=1$ is the orbital momentum, $S_{\bar{s}}$ is the spin of the light antiquark. However, their masses are unexpectedly low~\cite{dsj_theory}.
461: This has renewed interest in measurements of P-wave excited charm mesons.
462:
463: %In particular the $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D_s^+ \pi+\pi^-$ decay channel
464: We report the first observation of the decay $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+$ (the inclusion of charge conjugate modes
465: is implied throughout the paper). The
466: $D^+\pi^-$ pair in the final state is the only $D \pi$ combination that cannot come from a $D^*$ resonance. Note that $D^{*0}$ mesons can only be produced
467: virtually here since $M_{D^{*0}} < M_{D^+} + M_{\pi^-}$.
468: %
469: The $D_{s1}(2536)^+ \to D^+\pi^-K^+$ and
470: $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D_s^+\pi^+\pi^-$~\cite{dspipi} modes are the only known three-body decays of the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$.
471:
472: In addition, we have performed an angular analysis of the $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+} K^0_S$ mode.
473: In the limit of infinite $c$ quark mass this decay of a $J^P=1^+$, $j=3/2$
474: state should proceed via a pure D-wave~\cite{HQET}.
475: The corresponding decay of its partner, the $D_{sJ}(2460)^+$, which is believed to be a $1^+$, $j=1/2$ state is energetically forbidden, but if it were
476: allowed it would proceed via a pure S wave.
477: Since heavy quark symmetry is not exact, the two $1^+$ states can mix with each other. In particular, an S wave component can
478: appear in the decay $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^* K$.
479: Moreover, even if the mixing is small, the S wave component can give a sizeable contribution to the width because
480: the D wave contribution is strongly suppressed by the small energy release in the $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^* K$ decay.
481: The angular decomposition in S and D waves for the analogous decays of the $1^+$, $j=3/2$\ \ $D_1(2420)^{0,+}$ mesons to $D^{*+}\pi^-$, $D^{*0}\pi^+$
482: was performed more than 10 years ago by CLEO~\cite{cleo},
483: but currently no results on the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ exist.
484:
485: This study is based on a data sample of $253
486: \,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ collected at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance and
487: $28\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ at an energy $60\,{\mathrm{MeV}}$ below the
488: resonance with the Belle
489: detector
490: at the KEKB asymmetric-energy
491: $e^+e^-$ (3.5 on 8~GeV) collider~\cite{KEKB}.
492: The Belle detector is a large-solid-angle magnetic
493: spectrometer that
494: consists of a silicon vertex detector (SVD),
495: a 50-layer central drift chamber (CDC), an array of
496: aerogel threshold \v{C}erenkov counters (ACC),
497: a barrel-like arrangement of time-of-flight
498: scintillation counters (TOF), and an electromagnetic calorimeter
499: comprised of CsI(Tl) crystals (ECL) located inside
500: a super-conducting solenoid coil that provides a 1.5~T
501: magnetic field. An iron flux-return located outside of
502: the coil is instrumented to detect $K_L^0$ mesons and to identify
503: muons (KLM). The detector
504: is described in detail elsewhere~\cite{Belle}.
505: Two inner detector configurations were used. A 2.0 cm beampipe
506: and a 3-layer silicon vertex detector was used for the first sample
507: of $155\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$, while a 1.5 cm beampipe, a 4-layer
508: silicon detector and a small-cell inner drift chamber were used to record
509: the remaining $126\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$~\cite{Ushiroda}.
510:
511: In Monte Carlo, $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ from $e^+e^-$ annihilation, particle decays and the detailed detector response is simulated using the
512: {\tt PYTHIA}, {\tt EvtGen} and {\tt GEANT} packages~\cite{mcpackages} respectively.
513: The $D^0$ and $D^+$ decay modes used in reconstruction are generated with their resonant substructures taken from the PDG~\cite{pdg} but
514: neglecting any interference effects.
515: The width of the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ resonance in the simulation is set to zero.
516: Only the D wave matrix element is used for the $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0_S$ decay.
517: As is shown below no clear resonant substructure is visible in the decay $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+$.
518: Therefore, it is simulated as a three-body phase space decay.
519:
520: \section{$D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+$ decay and calculation of $\frac{\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}^+\to D^+\pi^- K^+)}{\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}^+\to D^{*+}K^0)}$.}
521:
522: $\pi^{\pm}$ and $K^{\pm}$ candidates are required to originate from the
523: vicinity of the event dependent interaction point.
524: To identify kaons, the $dE/dx$, time of flight and \v{C}erenkov light yield
525: information for each track are combined to form kaon $\mathcal{L}_K$ and pion $\mathcal{L}_{\pi}$ likelihoods and the requirement
526: $\mathcal{L}_K/(\mathcal{L}_K+\mathcal{L}_{\pi}) > 0.1$ is imposed.
527: $K^0_S$ candidates are reconstructed via the $\pi^+ \pi^-$ decay channel.
528: $D^0$ and $D^+$ mesons are reconstructed using $K^-\pi^+$, $K^0_S \pi^+\pi^-$, $K^-\pi^+\pi^+\pi^-$ and
529: $K^0_S \pi^+$, $K^-\pi^+\pi^+$ decay modes, respectively.
530: All combinations with masses within $\pm20$~MeV/c$^2$ of the nominal $D$ mass are selected and then a mass and vertex
531: constrained fit is applied.
532:
533: Candidate $D^{*+}$'s are reconstructed using the $D^0\pi^+$ mode. The slow $\pi^+$ momentum resolution suffers from multiple scattering.
534: It is improved by a track refit procedure in which the $\pi^+$ origin point is constrained by the intersection of the $D$ momentum
535: and the known region of $e^+e^-$ interactions. The same procedure is applied to the slow $\pi^-$ and $K^+$ from the
536: $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+$ decay.
537: The $M_{D^0\pi^+}$ mass is required to be within $\pm 1.5$~MeV/c$^2$ around the $D^{*+}$ nominal value.
538: The $D^{*+}$ mass constraint fit is not applied. Instead, the mass difference $M_{D^0\pi^+K^0_S} - M_{D^0\pi^+}$ is used for $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ where the
539: errors in $D^{*+}$ momentum essentially cancel out.
540:
541: It is known that the momentum spectrum of the excited charm resonances from continuum $e^+e^-$ annihilation is hard.
542: In addition, due to the strong magnetic field in BELLE
543: the reconstruction efficiency for slow $\pi^{\pm}$ and $K^+$ mesons is larger for higher $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ momenta.
544: Therefore, to reduce the combinatorial background, it is required that $x_P > 0.8$, where the scaled momentum $x_P$ is defined as
545: $x_P = p^\ast/p^\ast_{\text{max}}$. Here $p^\ast$ is the momentum
546: of the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ candidate in the $e^+e^-$ center of mass frame. $p^\ast_{\text{max}}$ is the momentum which the candidate would have
547: if it carried all of the beam energy $E^\ast_{\rm beam}$ in the same frame:
548: $p^\ast_{\text{max}} = \sqrt{E^{\ast 2}_{\rm beam}-M^2}$.
549:
550: The mass $M_{D^+\pi^-K^+}$ and the mass difference $(M_{D^0\pi^+K^0_S} - M_{D^0\pi^+}) + M^{\rm{PDG}}_{D^{*+}}$ for all
551: accepted combinations are plotted in Fig.~\ref{res}. Here and in the following the PDG superscript denotes the nominal mass value from~\cite{pdg}.
552: A clear peak for the new decay channel $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+$ is visible in Fig.~\ref{res}.
553: The mass spectrum of the wrong sign combinations $D^+\pi^+K^-$ shown by the hatched histogram has no enhancement in the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ region.
554:
555: \begin{figure}[htb]
556: \includegraphics[width=0.54\textwidth]{fig1_lp.eps}
557: \caption{$D_{s1}(2536)^+$ mass spectra for $D^+\pi^-K^+$ (top) and $D^{*+}K^0_S$ (bottom) decay modes. The latter is calculated using the mass
558: difference $(M_{D^0\pi^+K^0_S} - M_{D^0\pi^+}) + M^{\rm{PDG}}_{D^{*+}}$.
559: The hatched histogram in the top plot shows the corresponding spectrum of wrong sign $D^+\pi^+K^-$ combinations.
560: The fit is described in the text. The fit results are listed in Table~\ref{fit}.}
561: \label{res}
562: \end{figure}
563:
564: To calculate the number of $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ decays, the distributions in Fig.~\ref{res} are fit
565: to the sum of two Gaussians. Their central values are required to be equal.
566: To ensure that the second Gaussian is always wider than the first one, its width is chosen to be of the form
567: $\sigma_2=\sqrt{\sigma_1^2+\Delta\sigma^2}$.
568: The position of the peak, $\sigma_1$, $\Delta\sigma$, the fraction of events in the first Gaussian and the total number of events in two Gaussians are allowed
569: to vary in the fit.
570: The background for the three-body $D^+\pi^-K^+$ mode is parameterized by the second order polynomial multiplied by the
571: function $(M-M^{threshold}_{D^+\pi^-K^+})^2$, where $M^{threshold}_{D^+\pi^-K^+} = M_{D^+}^{PDG} + M_{\pi^-}^{PDG} + M_{K^+}^{PDG}$.
572: For the two-body $D^{*+}K^0_S$ mode the background parametrization is chosen to be of the form $\sqrt{M-M^{threshold}_{D^{*+}K^0_S}}$
573: times a first order polynomial, where
574: $M^{threshold}_{D^{*+}K^0_S} = M_{D^{*+}}^{PDG} + M_{K^0_S}^{PDG}$.
575: Table~\ref{fit} contains the fit results together with the parameters of the Gaussians obtained from Monte Carlo.
576: There is a small fraction of events that contribute two entries to the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ signal region in the mass plot.
577: The last row in the Table~\ref{fit} shows the excess of such events in comparison with the same number averaged over the left and the right
578: sideband.
579: The signal and the sidebands are defined as
580: $|\Delta M_{D_{s1}^+}|<5$ MeV/c$^2$, $10$ MeV/c$^2$ $<|\Delta M_{D_{s1}^+}|<20$ MeV/c$^2$,
581: respectively, where $\Delta M_{D_{s1}^+}$ is measured relative to the peak position obtained from the fit to
582: Fig.~\ref{res}.
583:
584:
585: \begin{table}[htb]
586: \caption{ Fit results of the spectra shown in Fig.~\ref{res}:
587: number of events in two Gaussians, fraction of events in the narrower 1st Gaussian, $\sigma_1$,
588: $\Delta\sigma$ and $M_{D_{s1}}-M_{D_{s1}}^{PDG}$. The last three values
589: are given in MeV/c$^2$.
590: Note that the value of $M_{D_{s1}}^{PDG}$ is known with errors of $\pm0.34\pm0.5$ MeV/c$^2$.
591: The sigma of the 2nd Gaussian is $\sigma_2=\sqrt{\sigma_1^2+\Delta\sigma^2}$. The 3rd and 5th columns contain the corresponding Gaussian parameters
592: obtained in Monte Carlo.
593: The number of double counted events after sideband subtraction
594: is given in the last row.}
595: %The last row gives the excess of events with two entries in $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ signal region in the mass plot in comparison with
596: %the same number averaged over the left and the right side band.}
597: \label{fit}
598: \begin{tabular}
599: {|@{\hspace{0.3cm}}l@{\hspace{0.3cm}}|@{\hspace{0.3cm}}c@{\hspace{0.3cm}}|@{\hspace{0.3cm}}c@{\hspace{0.3cm}}||@{\hspace{0.3cm}}c@{\hspace{0.3cm}}|
600: @{\hspace{0.3cm}}c@{\hspace{0.3cm}}|}
601: \hline
602: & $(D^+\pi^-K^+)_{Data}$& $(D^+\pi^-K^+)_{MC}$& $(D^{*+}K^0_S)_{Data}$& $(D^{*+}K^0_S)_{MC}$ \\ \hline
603: %N events & $\bf { 802 \pm 56}$ & $ 6180\pm 83$ & ${\bf 3474 \pm 64}$ & $5061 \pm 72$ \\ \hline
604: N events & $\bf { 802 \pm 56}$ & & ${\bf 3474 \pm 64}$ & \\ \hline
605: 1st G. fraction & ${\bf 0.58\pm0.07}$ & $0.769\pm0.014$ & ${\bf 0.60 \pm0.04}$ & $0.862\pm0.013$ \\ \hline
606: $\sigma_1$ & ${\bf 0.79\pm0.07}$ & $0.478\pm0.011$ & ${\bf 0.98 \pm0.04}$ & $0.746\pm0.014$ \\ \hline
607: $\Delta\sigma$ & ${\bf 3.1 \pm0.6 }$ & $1.85 \pm0.11 $ & ${\bf 2.46 \pm0.15}$ & $2.49 \pm0.18$ \\ \hline
608: $M_{D_{s1}}-M_{D_{s1}}^{PDG}$ & ${\bf -0.51\pm0.06}$ & $0.014\pm0.008$ & ${\bf -0.42 \pm0.03}$ & $0.023\pm0.012$ \\ \hline
609: double counting & {\bf $28-\frac{20}{2}=18$}& & {\bf $105-\frac{18}{2}=96$} & \\ \hline
610: \end{tabular}
611: \end{table}
612:
613: To cross-check the results, the $D^+$ mass spectrum is plotted in Fig.~\ref{dp} for the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ signal
614: and sidebands. The latter is normalized to the area of the signal interval.
615: The sideband subtracted plot shown in the bottom of Fig.~\ref{dp} is fit
616: to a double Gaussian as above and a constant background.
617: The resulting yield $739 \pm 51$ is consistent with the yield
618: $679\pm48$ obtained from the fit of the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ mass spectrum.
619: The constant background level is found to be $-0.4 \pm 0.6$, which is consistent with zero.
620: %Other fit parameters are determined to be $\sigma_1=2.7\pm0.7$, $\Delta\sigma=7.5\pm1.2$ MeV/c$^2$, $D^+$ mass shift: $0.7\pm0.3$ MeV/c$^2$.
621: %%fraction of events in the narrower Gaussian: $0.35\pm0.13$.
622: The enhancement in the $D^+$ mass region observed
623: in the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ sidebands (top plot of Fig.~\ref{dp}) is due to
624: combinations of a real $D^+$ with a random $\pi^- K^+$ pair in the event.
625:
626: \begin{figure}[htb]
627: \includegraphics[width=0.54\textwidth]{fig2_lp.eps}
628: \caption{$D^+$ mass spectrum for the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ signal band ($|\Delta M_{D^+\pi^-K^+}|<5$~MeV/c$^2$, open histogram in the top plot)
629: and the sidebands ($10<|\Delta M_{D^+\pi^-K^+}|<20$~MeV/c$^2$, normalized to the signal interval, hatched histogram).
630: Here $\Delta M_{D^+\pi^-K^+}=M_{D^+\pi^-K^+}-M_{D_{s1}}^0$,
631: $M_{D_{s1}}^0$ is the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ peak position in the top plot of Fig.~\ref{res}.
632: The bottom plot shows the difference. The solid curve shows the results of the fit described in the text.}
633: \label{dp}
634: \end{figure}
635:
636: Due to the low momenta of the final state particles, the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ reconstruction efficiency strongly depends on its momentum,
637: which is found to be harder in data than in Monte Carlo.
638: %Therefore to calculate $\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+)/\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0)$ the
639: %ratio of differential efficiencies for these two channels is convoluted with the measured in data $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0_S$ momentum spectrum.
640: %
641: %
642: %
643: Therefore
644: %$\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+)/\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0)$
645: the ratio of $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ branching fractions is calculated
646: % from the number of observed $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+$ decays given in Table~\ref{fit} the following quantity is used
647: using the following formula:
648: $$\frac{\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+)}{\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0)} = $$
649: $$\frac{(N_{D\pi K}-n_{D\pi K}^{\rm \bf dbl\ cnt})}
650: {
651: (N_{D^{*+}K^0_S}-n_{D^{*+}K^0_S}^{\rm \bf dbl\ cnt})
652: }
653: \left[\frac{\sum_{p_i}{N_{D^{*+}K^0_S}^{p_i}\frac{\epsilon_{D^+\pi^-K^+}^{p_i}}{\epsilon_{D^{*+}K^0_S}^{p_i}}}}
654: {\sum_{p_i}{N_{D^{*+}K^0_S}^{p_i}}}\right]^{-1}
655: \!\!
656: \frac{\mathcal{B}(D^{*+}\!\!\to\! D^0\pi^+) \mathcal{B}(D^0) \mathcal{B}(K^0\!\! \to\! K^0_S\! \to\! \pi^+\pi^-)}
657: {\mathcal{B}(D^+)}.$$
658: Here, $\epsilon_{D^+\pi^-K^+}^{p_i}$ and $\epsilon_{D^{*+}K^0_S}^{p_i}$ are the reconstruction efficiencies
659: in individual momentum bins of $D_{s1}(2536)^+$, $N_{D^{*+}K^0_S}^{p_i}$ are the
660: number of $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0_S$ decays
661: observed in a
662: given momentum bin,
663: % obtained by the sideband subtraction method in individual bins,
664: and the sum runs over the momentum bins with $x_P>0.8$.
665: $N_{D\pi K,\ D^{*+}K^0_S}$ and $n_{D\pi K,\ D^{*+}K^0_S}^{\rm \bf dbl\ cnt}$
666: are the total number of decays obtained by performing the fit to the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ mass
667: spectra and the number of double counted events, respectively (see Table~\ref{fit}).
668: $\mathcal{B}(D^0,\ D^+)$ is the sum of branching fractions of $D^0$ and $D^+$ modes used in the reconstruction~\cite{pdg}.
669: For modes with $K^0_S$'s in the final state the branching fractions are in addition multiplied by
670: $\mathcal{B}(K^0 \to K^0_S \to \pi^+\pi^-)=\frac{1}{2}\cdot \mathcal{B}(K^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)$.
671: The dependence of the efficiency on the initial
672: polarization of the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ is checked and found to be
673: negligible.
674: The efficiency does not
675: depend on the $D^{*+}$ helicity angle in the $D^{*+}K^0_S$ decay and thus on the proportions of S and D waves.
676: For the $D^+\pi^-K^+$ mode the efficiency is independent
677: of the $D^+\pi^-$, $K^+\pi^-$ masses and the $D^+\pi^-$ helicity angle.
678: The ratio of branching fractions is found to be
679: $$\frac{\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+)}{\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0)} =
680: %$$
681: %$$\frac{(802-18)\pm56}{(3474-96)\pm64}\cdot\frac{{\rm eff}_{D^{*+}K^0_S}}{{\rm eff}_{D^+\pi^-K^+}}\cdot
682: %\frac{\mathcal{B}(D^{*+}\to D^0\pi^+) \mathcal{B}(D^0) \mathcal{B}(K^0 \to K^0_S \to \pi^+\pi^-)}
683: %{\mathcal{B}(D^+)} =
684: (2.8\pm 0.2\pm0.4)\%.$$
685: %The first error is statistical, the second comes from the errors in branching fractions of intermediate resonances~\cite{pdg},
686: %in the reconstruction and charged kaon identification efficiencies, from comparison of different $D$ modes and from the stability of
687: %the fit.
688: %
689: The systematic error receives contribution from different sources listed in
690: Table~\ref{syst}.
691: A possible difference between the data and Mone Carlo in evaluation of the
692: tracking efficiency was estimated using partially reconstructed $D^{*+}$
693: decays. The tracking errors due to slow $K^+$, $\pi^{\pm}$ and pions from $K^0_S$ are added
694: linearly. The uncertainty in the kaon particle identification is estimated using $D^{*+}$ decays.
695: Uncertainty in the ratio of $D^+$ and $D^0$ efficiencies was determined by a
696: comparison of different decay modes used in the reconstruction. The
697: largest contribution to the systematic uncertainty arises due to the
698: fitting model and was evaluated by comparing the fit results using
699: different binnings of the $D^+\pi^-K^+$ and $D^{*+}K^0_S$ mass spectra. The largest discrepancy
700: (in the $D^+\pi^-K^+$ decay mode) is taken as the systematic error.
701: %
702: Finally, the
703: contribution due to the assumption that the efficiency does not depend on
704: the decay angles of the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ and its initial polarization, $D\pi$ helicity angles
705: and $M(D^+\pi^-)$ is evaluated by comparing
706: the yields of events using either an average or differential efficiency
707: in the specified variables.
708: %
709: %Finally the
710: %contribution due to the assumption that efficiency does not depend on
711: %the $\cos\alpha$, $\beta$, $\cos\gamma$ and $M(D^+\pi^-)$ is evaluated by comparing
712: %the yields of events using either an average or differential efficiency
713: %in the specified variables.
714: %
715: The total systematic error is found to be
716: 12\% (Table~\ref{syst}).
717:
718: \begin{table}[htb]
719: \caption{Systematic uncertainties for $\frac{\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+)}{\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0)}$.}
720: \label{syst}
721: \begin{tabular}
722: { @{\hspace{0.3cm}}l@{\hspace{0.3cm}} @{\hspace{0.3cm}}c@{\hspace{0.3cm}} }
723: \hline\hline
724: Source & Uncertainty, \% \\ \hline
725: Slow $\pi^{\pm}$ tracking efficiency & 1.5 \\
726: Slow $K^+$ tracking efficiency & 1 \\
727: Slow $K^0_S$ tracking efficiency & 5 \\
728: Slow $K^+$ particle identification & 1.2 \\
729: Ratio of $D^+$ and $D^0$ efficiencies& 3.5 \\
730: Fit to $M(D^+\pi^-K^+)$ distribution & 8.5 \\
731: Efficiency independence on $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ polarization, & \\
732: $D\pi$ helicity angle and $M(D^+\pi^-)$ & 1.1 \\ \hline
733: Total & 12.0\\ \hline\hline
734: \end{tabular}
735: \end{table}
736:
737: The $D^+\pi^-$ and $K^+\pi^-$ mass distributions for the
738: $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+$ decay are shown in Fig.~\ref{mdpi_mkpi}.
739: The $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ signal yield is obtained from fits to the $D^+\pi^-K^+$ mass
740: distribution in bins of $D^+\pi^-$ and $K^+\pi^-$ mass.
741: All Gaussian parameters except the total
742: number of events are fixed in the fit to the values obtained from Fig.~\ref{res}.
743: The position of the threshold used for the background description
744: depends on the chosen bin.
745: The areas of the plots have been normalized to unity. The
746: plots are not efficiency corrected since the differential efficiency does not depend on
747: $D^+\pi^-$ or $K^+\pi^-$ masses to within the errors of Monte Carlo statistics.
748: No dominant resonant substructure is visible in Fig.~\ref{mdpi_mkpi}.
749:
750: \begin{figure}[htb]
751: \includegraphics[width=0.54\textwidth]{fig3_lp.eps}
752: \caption{Normalized mass spectra of $D^+\pi^-$ (top) and $K^+\pi^-$ (bottom) pairs
753: from $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+$ decay obtained from fits to the $D^+\pi^-K^+$ mass distributions
754: in different $D^+\pi^-$ or $K^+\pi^-$ mass bins.
755: The dashed histograms show the corresponding distributions for the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ phase space decay in Monte Carlo.}
756: \label{mdpi_mkpi}
757: \end{figure}
758:
759: \section{Angular analysis of $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0_S$ decay.}
760:
761: The $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0_S$ decay can be described by three angles $\alpha$, $\beta$ and $\gamma$ defined as shown in Fig.~\ref{angles_scheme}.
762: The angles $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are measured in the $D_{s1}^+$ rest frame with respect to the direction of the boost needed to go from the $e^+e^-$ center of mass
763: frame to the $D_{s1}^+$ rest frame.
764: $\alpha$ is the angle between the boost direction and the $K^0_S$ momentum. $\beta$ is the angle between the decay plane and
765: the plane formed by the $K^0_S$ and the boost direction. The third angle $\gamma$ is defined in the
766: $D^{*+}$ rest frame between $\pi^+$ and $K^0_S$.
767:
768: \begin{figure}[htb]
769: \includegraphics[width=0.54\textwidth]{fig4_lp.eps}
770: \caption{Definitions of the angles $\alpha$, $\beta$ and $\gamma$.
771: The first two are measured in the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ rest frame, the last one -- in the $D^{*+}$ frame.
772: ``Boost'' changes the $e^+e^-$ center of mass system to the $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ frame.}
773: \label{angles_scheme}
774: \end{figure}
775:
776: The measured $\cos\alpha$, $\beta$ and $\cos\gamma$ angular distributions are shown in Fig.~\ref{angles}.
777: They represent the signal yield obtained from fits to the $D^{*+}K^0_S$ mass
778: spectra in bins of individual angular variable.
779: All Gaussian parameters except the normalization are fixed
780: in the fit to the values obtained from the overall spectrum in Fig.~\ref{res}.
781: The first distribution is efficiency corrected
782: since there is a slight linear efficiency dependence on $\cos\alpha$:
783: the relative difference between the values at $-1$ and at $+1$ is about 12\%.
784: Since the differential distribution in $\cos\alpha$ includes only even
785: powers of $\cos\alpha$, such a linear dependence
786: does not induce any biases when integrating over the whole allowed
787: interval $[-1,+1]$ and thus no dependence of the integrated efficiency on
788: the initial polarization of $D_{s1}(2536)^+$.
789: No significant efficiency dependence on $\beta$ and $\cos\gamma$ is observed
790: and therefore the corresponding two spectra in
791: Fig.~\ref{angles} are not efficiency corrected.
792: One can see that the first two distributions are not flat. This means that $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ is produced polarized and that
793: it does not decay in a pure S wave. The last distribution is more important. For a pure S or D wave decay it should either be flat
794: or have the form $(1+3\cos^2\gamma)$, respectively.
795: In the general case of interference between S and D wave amplitudes it becomes a linear combination of $\sin^2\gamma$ and $\cos^2\gamma$:
796: $$ \frac{1}{N}\frac{dN}{d\, \cos\gamma} =
797: \frac{1}{2}\{ R + (1-R)(\frac{1+3\cos^2\gamma}{2}) + \sqrt{2R(1-R)}\cos\phi (1-3\cos^2\gamma)\},$$
798: where $R=\Gamma_S/(\Gamma_S+\Gamma_D)$, $\Gamma_{S,D}$ are the S, D wave partial widths respectively, $\phi$ is the relative phase between
799: the two amplitudes. This is similar to the case of $D^*_1(2420)^0\to D^{*+}\pi^-$ and $D^*_1(2420)^+\to D^{*0}\pi^+$ decays studied by CLEO~\cite{cleo}.
800:
801: \begin{figure}[htb]
802: \includegraphics[width=0.54\textwidth]{fig5_lp.eps}
803: \caption{Angular distributions for the $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0_S$ channel.
804: The definitions of angles $\alpha$, $\beta$ and $\gamma$ are given in the text and in Fig.~\ref{angles_scheme}.
805: $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ reconstruction efficiency depends slightly on $\cos\alpha$, therefore the upper left plot is efficiency corrected.
806: %The others are not.
807: A fit to the $\cos\gamma$ distribution is described in the text.}
808: \label{angles}
809: \end{figure}
810:
811: Fitting the $\cos\gamma$ distribution in Fig.~\ref{angles} to the form $1+A\cos^2\gamma$ yields
812: $A=-0.70\pm0.03$ and a $\chi^2$ per degree of freedom of $1.39$.
813: %
814: It was checked that
815: the $A$ parameter obtained on the subsamples defined by the cuts
816: $\cos\alpha<0$, $\cos\alpha>0$, $\beta<\pi/2$, $\beta>\pi/2$, $x_P<0.93$ or $x_P>0.93$ agree with each other within statistical accuracy.
817: %
818: Knowledge of $A$ constrains the contribution of S wave to the width and the relative phase $\phi$:
819: $$ \cos\phi = \frac{\frac{3-A}{3+A}-R}{2\sqrt{2R(1-R)}}.$$
820: The allowed range $|\cos\phi|\le 1$ is shown in Fig.~\ref{Rphi}. Two lines in this plot bound the region
821: which corresponds to $\pm1\sigma$ deviation in $A$.
822: Regardless of the value of
823: $\phi$, the S wave contribution is limited
824: from below and from above by the values corresponding to $\phi = 0$.
825: Conservatively taking the value of A to be 2$\sigma$ below
826: the central value, the limits
827: obtained are:
828: $$0.277<R<0.955.$$
829: The corresponding limit for $\phi$ is: $|\phi|<42^{\circ}$.
830:
831: \begin{figure}[htb]
832: \includegraphics[width=0.54\textwidth]{fig6_lp.eps}
833: \caption{Plot of cosine of the relative phase of S and D wave amplitudes in the $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0_S$ decay versus
834: $R=\Gamma_S/(\Gamma_S+\Gamma_D)$. The two curves bound the region that corresponds to a $\pm1\sigma$ deviation in the measured parameter $A$.}
835: \label{Rphi}
836: \end{figure}
837:
838: In conclusion, a new decay channel $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+$ is observed. The $D^+\pi^-$ pair is the only $D\pi$ combination that cannot come
839: from a real $D^*$ resonance. It can be produced in $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ two-body decays only through the virtual resonances
840: $D^{*0}$, broad $D^{*0}_0$ or $D^{*0}_2(2460)$.
841: In addition, the $D^+\pi^-K^+$ final state can be formed by two-body decays to a $D^+$ and a virtual $K^{*0}$ or higher $K^*$ resonance.
842: No clear resonant substructure is found in the $D^+\pi^-K^+$ system.
843: The ratio of branching fractions
844: $\frac{\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^+\pi^-K^+)}{\mathcal{B}(D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0)}$ is measured to be
845: $(2.8\pm 0.2\pm0.4)\%$.
846: %The first error is statistical, the second comes from uncertainties in the branching fractions of intermediate resonances.
847: %The total systematic error is still to be evaluated.
848: %In addition
849: An angular analysis of the normalization decay $D_{s1}(2536)^+\to D^{*+}K^0_S$ is also performed.
850: The $D_{s1}(2536)^+$ may mix with another
851: $J^P=1^+$, $j=1/2$ state, which is presumably the recently discovered $D_{sJ}(2460)^+$ meson and can decay in an S wave.
852: Since the energy release in this reaction is small, the D wave is suppressed and the S wave can give a sizeable contribution to the total width
853: even if the mixing is small.
854: The measured $1-(0.70\pm0.03)\cos^2\gamma$ $D^{*+}$ helicity angular distribution
855: constrains the relative
856: fraction of the S wave component to the range $0.277<R<0.955$, independent of the
857: phase $\phi$.
858:
859:
860: % Please paste this acknowledgement into your latex file.
861: % most recent update: 04-07-15
862: %***** Acknowledgments *****
863: % use these two starting with pub # 98 Jan 2005
864: % updated 2/17/05
865: %----------- Long version, for most papers -----------
866: We thank the KEKB group for the excellent operation of the
867: accelerator, the KEK cryogenics group for the efficient
868: operation of the solenoid, and the KEK computer group and
869: the National Institute of Informatics for valuable computing
870: and Super-SINET network support. We acknowledge support from
871: the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and
872: Technology of Japan and the Japan Society for the Promotion
873: of Science; the Australian Research Council and the
874: Australian Department of Education, Science and Training;
875: the National Science Foundation of China under contract
876: No.~10175071; the Department of Science and Technology of
877: India; the BK21 program of the Ministry of Education of
878: Korea and the CHEP SRC program of the Korea Science and
879: Engineering Foundation; the Polish State Committee for
880: Scientific Research under contract No.~2P03B 01324; the
881: Ministry of Science and Technology of the Russian
882: Federation; the Ministry of Higher Education,
883: Science and Technology of the Republic of Slovenia;
884: the Swiss National Science Foundation; the National Science Council and
885: the Ministry of Education of Taiwan; and the U.S.\
886: Department of Energy.
887:
888: %-------- Short version, if necessary, for PRL -----------
889: %We thank the KEKB group for the excellent operation of the
890: %accelerator, the KEK cryogenics group for the efficient
891: %operation of the solenoid, and the KEK computer group and
892: %the NII for valuable computing and Super-SINET network
893: %support. We acknowledge support from MEXT and JSPS (Japan);
894: %ARC and DEST (Australia); NSFC (contract No.~10175071,
895: %China); DST (India); the BK21 program of MOEHRD and the CHEP
896: %SRC program of KOSEF (Korea); KBN (contract No.~2P03B 01324,
897: %Poland); MIST (Russia); MHEST (Slovenia); SNSF (Switzerland); NSC and MOE
898: %(Taiwan); and DOE (USA).
899:
900: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
901:
902: \bibitem{dsj}
903: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} {BaBar Collab.},
904: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90}, 242001 (2003);\\
905: D.~Besson {\it et al.} {CLEO Collab.},
906: Phys. Rev. {\bf D68}, 032002 (2003);\\
907: P.~Krokovny, {\it et al.} {BELLE Collab.},
908: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}, 262002 (2003);\\
909: A.~Drutskoy {\it et al.} {BELLE Collab.},
910: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 061802 (2005).
911:
912: \bibitem{dspipi}
913: Y.~Mikami {\it et al.} {BELLE Collab.},
914: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 012002 (2004).
915:
916: \bibitem{dsj_theory}
917: See P.~Colangelo, F.~De~Fazio and R.~Ferrandes,
918: Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf A19}, 2083 (2004), and references therein.
919:
920: \bibitem{HQET}
921: N.~Isgur and M.~Wise, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 66}, 1130 (1991);\\
922: M.~Lu, M.~Wise and N.~Isgur, Phys. Rev. {\bf D45}, 1553 (1992).
923:
924: \bibitem{cleo}
925: P.~Avery {\it et al.} {CLEO Collab.},
926: Phys. Lett. {\bf B331}, 236 (1994), hep-ph/9403359, Erratum {\bf B342} 453 (1995);\\
927: T.~Bergfeld {\it et al.}, Phys. Lett. {\bf B340}, 194 (1994).
928:
929: \bibitem{KEKB}
930: S.~Kurokawa and E.~Kikutani,
931: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 499}, 1 (2003).
932:
933: \bibitem{Belle}
934: A.~Abashian {\it et al.} (Belle Collab.),
935: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A {\bf 479}, 117 (2002).
936:
937: \bibitem{Ushiroda} Y.~Ushiroda (Belle SVD2 Group),
938: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A {\bf 511} 6 (2003).
939:
940: \bibitem{mcpackages}
941: EvtGen home page http://www.slac.stanford.edu/$\tilde{~\,}$lange/EvtGen,\\
942: see also D.Lange, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A {\bf 462} 152 (2001);\\
943: PYTHIA, T.Sj\"ostrand {\it et al.}, Computer Physics Commun. {\bf 135} 238 (2001),
944: hep-ph/0308153;\\
945: GEANT, R.Brun {\it et al.}, GEANT 3.21, CERN Report DD/EE/84-1 (1984).
946:
947: \bibitem{pdg}
948: S.~Eidelman {\it et al.} (Particle Data Group),
949: Phys. Lett. {\bf B592}, 1 (2004).
950:
951: \end{thebibliography}
952:
953: \end{document}
954:
955: