1: % Dalitz analysis writeup - Beauty 2005
2: % J. Rosner - September 7, 2005 draft
3: % For Proceedings to be published by Elsevier
4: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc2.tex %%%%%%%%%%
5: %
6: % $Id: espcrc2.tex,v 1.2 2004/02/24 11:22:11 spepping Exp $
7: %
8: \documentclass[fleqn,twoside]{article}
9: % \usepackage{espcrc2}
10: % Use the option 'headings' if you want running headings
11: \usepackage[headings]{espcrc2}
12:
13: % identification
14: \readRCS
15: $Id: espcrc2.tex,v 1.2 2004/02/24 11:22:11 spepping Exp $
16: \ProvidesFile{espcrc2.tex}[\filedate \space v\fileversion
17: \space Elsevier 2-column CRC Author Instructions]
18:
19: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
20: % \documentstyle[twoside,fleqn,espcrc2]{article}
21:
22: % if you want to include PostScript figures
23: \usepackage{graphicx}
24: % if you have landscape tables
25: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
26:
27: % put your own definitions here:
28: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
29: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
30: % ...
31: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
32: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
33: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
34:
35: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
36: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
37:
38: % set the starting page if not 1
39: % \setcounter{page}{17}
40:
41: % declarations for front matter
42: \title{CLEO Dalitz plot results}
43:
44: \author{Jonathan L. Rosner\address{Enrico Fermi Institute and Department of
45: Physics, University of Chicago \\
46: 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637 USA}}
47:
48: % If you use the option headings,
49: % the title is also used as the running title,
50: % and the authors are also used as the running authors.
51: % You can change that by using \runtitle and \runauthor.
52:
53: \runtitle{CLEO Dalitz plot results}
54: \runauthor{J. Rosner}
55:
56: \begin{document}
57:
58: \begin{abstract}
59: Present and future contributions of the CLEO experiment to the study of $D$
60: Dalitz plots are presented. Such Dalitz plots can be of help in determining
61: weak phases from $B \to D K$ decays.
62: \vspace{1pc}
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65: % typeset front matter (including abstract)
66: \maketitle
67:
68: \section{INTRODUCTION}
69:
70: $B \to D_{\rm CP} K$ decays are a source of information on the weak phase
71: $\gamma$. For $D$ modes such as $K_S \pi^+ \pi^-$, $\pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$, $K^+
72: K^- \pi^0$, and $K_S K^\pm \pi^\mp$, Dalitz plots yield information on
73: CP-eigenstate and flavor-eigenstate modes and their relative phases
74: \cite{Asner:2003gh}.
75: This report will briefly review $B \to D_{\rm CP} K$ decays and show
76: how they determine $\gamma$. Results from CLEO on the Dalitz plots for the
77: decays $D^0 \to K^+ K^- \pi^0$, $D^0 \to K_S \pi^+ \pi^-$, and $D^0 \to \pi^+
78: \pi^- \pi^0$ will be presented, and remaining steps will be described.
79:
80: \section{THE CLEO-c DETECTOR}
81:
82: Key elements of the CLEO-c detector \cite{Kubota} are the Ring
83: Imaging Cherenkov Counter for particle identification, momentum resolution
84: $\Delta p /p \simeq 0.6\%$ at 1 GeV/$c$ for charged particles, and a CsI
85: calorimeter with resolution 2.2\% for $E_\gamma = 1$ GeV and 5\% at 100 MeV.
86: The detector makes use of a new all-stereo inner drift chamber.
87:
88: \section{$\gamma$ FROM $B \to D K$ DECAYS}
89:
90: The interference of $b \to c \bar u s$ (real) and $b \to u \bar c s ~(\sim \!
91: e^{-i \gamma})$ subprocesses in $B^- \to D^0 K^-$ and $B^- \to \overline{D}^0
92: K^-$, respectively, is sensitive to the weak phase $\gamma$. Graphs for the
93: two processes are a tree graph $\sim V_{cb}V^*_{us}$ and a color-suppressed
94: graph $\sim V_{ub}V^*_{cs} r$ ($r \ll 1$). This interference may be probed by
95: studying common decay products of $D^0$ and $\overline{D}^0$ into neutral $D$
96: CP eigenstates or into doubly-Cabibbo-suppressed modes \cite{Bigi:1988ym}.
97:
98: \section{$D^0 \to K^+ K^- \pi^0$}
99:
100: The four rates $B^\pm \to K^\pm (K^{*+} K^-)_D$ and $B^\pm \to
101: K^\pm (K^{*-} K^+)_D$ provide information on $\gamma$ if the relative (strong)
102: phase between $D^0 \to K^{*+} K^-$ and $D^0 \to K^{*-} K^+$ is known
103: \cite{Grossman:2002aq}. One can learn this relative phase from the study of
104: $D^0 \to K^+ K^- \pi^0$ since both final states occur and interfere with one
105: another where $K^{*+}$ and $K^{*-}$ bands cross on the Dalitz
106: plot \cite{Rosner:2003yk}.
107:
108: A sample of $D^0 \to K^+ K^- \pi^0$ decays based on 9 fb$^{-1}$
109: at CLEO III (the predecessor to CLEO-c with an inner silicon vertex
110: detector instead of the inner drift chamber) shows this interference
111: clearly \cite{Naik:2005}. The Dalitz plot is shown in Fig.\ \ref{fig:paras}.
112: The $K^{*+}$ and $K^{*-}$ bands are found to interfere destructively where they
113: cross. The deficit in the $M(K \pi)$ projection above $M[K^*(892)]$ is
114: difficult to fit using known resonances. The diagonal band at the upper right
115: of the plot is the $\phi(1020)$ resonance, with fit fraction (as defined in
116: \cite{Asner:2003uz}) $\simeq 10\%$.
117:
118: These data were taken at an $e^+ e^-$ energy at or near the $\Upsilon(4S)$.
119: The $K^{*+}$ band is $\simeq 3$--4 times as strong as the $K^{*-}$ band,
120: reflecting differences in form factors and $f_{K^*} > f_K$. Note the opposite
121: signs of interference with background on the low sides of the $K^{*+}$ and
122: $K^{*-}$ bands. Fits with Breit-Wigner and K-matrix forms are in progress.
123:
124: % This is Figure 1
125: \begin{figure}[t]
126: \includegraphics[width=0.92 \columnwidth]{paras.ps}
127: \vskip -0.3in
128: \caption{Dalitz plot for $D^0 \to K^+ K^- \pi^0$ \cite{Naik:2005}. The $D^0$
129: is tagged via $D^{*+} \to \pi^+ D^0$. Inclusion of charge-conjugate states is
130: implied.
131: \label{fig:paras}}
132: \vskip -0.2in
133: \end{figure}
134:
135: \section{$D^0 \to K^0_S \pi^+ \pi^-$}
136:
137: One can determine $\gamma$ using $B^\pm \to D K^\pm$ followed by (e.g.) $D \to
138: K_S \pi^+ \pi^-$, $K_S K^+ K^-,~K_S \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$ \cite{Giri:2003ty}. The
139: method uses interference between $b \to c \bar u s$ and $b \to u \bar c s$
140: subprocesses. Its advantages are: (1) Resonances entail large strong phases,
141: useful for direct CP asymmetries; (2) one uses only Cabibbo-favored $D$ decay
142: modes; and (3) one can consider final states involving only charged particles
143: (e.g., $K_S \pi^+ \pi^-$). The method has been utilized by Belle
144: \cite{Poluektov:2004mf}, yielding $\phi_3 [= \gamma] = (68^{+14}_{-15} \pm 13
145: \pm 11)^\circ$ for $D K$ and $D^* K$ modes combined based on 275 M $B \bar B$
146: pairs, and by BaBar \cite{Aubert:2005yj}, yielding $\gamma = (67 \pm 28 \pm 13
147: \pm 11) ^\circ$ for $D K$, $D^* K$, and $D K^*$ modes combined, based on 227 M
148: $B \bar B$ pairs. In each case the last error corresponds to uncertainty
149: in $D$ decay modeling, which CLEO can help to resolve \cite{Asner:2005}.
150:
151: The Dalitz plots for $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ and $\overline{D}^0 \to K_S^0
152: \pi^+ \pi^-$ obtained from 9.0 fb$^{-1}$ at the CLEO II.V detector are shown
153: in Fig.\ \ref{fig:kppdal} \cite{Asner:2003uz}.
154: The doubly-Cabibbo-suppressed $D^0 \to K^{*+} \pi^-$ mode is visible through
155: destructive interference with the Cabibbo-favored $D^0 \to K^{*-} \pi^+$
156: ``right-sign'' mode. The dominant fit fractions are $K^{*-}(892) \pi^+$
157: ($\sim 2/3$) and $\overline{K}^0 \rho^0$ ($\sim 27\%$). The latter is CP-odd
158: for $\overline{K}^0$ detected as $K_S^0$. CP-even modes such as $K_S^0
159: f_2(1270)$, $K_S^0 f_0(980,1370)$ give rise to a fit fraction of $\sim 1/3$.
160: As usual in such analyses, fit fractions need not add up to 100\%.
161:
162: % This is Figure 2
163: \begin{figure}[t]
164: \includegraphics[width=0.94\columnwidth]{3280103-002.ps}
165: \vskip -0.3in
166: \caption{Dalitz plots for (a) $D^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ and
167: (b) $\overline{D}^0 \to K_S^0 \pi^+ \pi^-$ \cite{Asner:2003uz}.
168: \label{fig:kppdal}}
169: \vskip -0.2in
170: \end{figure}
171:
172: One can use the Dalitz plot of $D^0 \to K^0_S \pi^+ \pi^-$ to search for
173: $D^0$--$\overline{D}^0$ mixing \cite{Asner:2005sz}. We define $\Gamma \equiv
174: \frac{\Gamma_1+\Gamma_2}{2}$, $x \equiv \frac{m_1 - m_2}{\Gamma}$, $y \equiv
175: \frac{\Gamma_1 - \Gamma_2}{2}$. Mass eigenstates evolve in time as
176: $|D_{1,2}(t) \rangle= |D_{1,2}(0) \rangle e^{[-i(m_{1,2} - \frac{i\Gamma_{1,2}}
177: {2})t]}$. One tags $D^0(t=0)$ flavor using $D^{*+} \to \pi^+ D^0$. A
178: time-dependent Dalitz plot fit then is sensitive to $D^0$--$\overline{D}^0$
179: mixing, leading to the CLEO 95\% c.l.\ moon-shaped region shown in Fig.\
180: \ref{fig:moon}. In the fit shown (``A'') no CP conservation was assumed.
181:
182: % This is Figure 3
183: \begin{figure}[t]
184: \includegraphics[width=0.92\columnwidth]{3960305-003.eps}
185: \vskip -0.3in
186: \caption{Constraints in the $x$--$y$ plane from various experiments on
187: $D^0$--$\overline{D}^0$ mixing.
188: \label{fig:moon}}
189: \vskip -0.2in
190: \end{figure}
191:
192: \section{$D^0 \to \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$}
193:
194: A search for CP violation and a study of the $\pi \pi$ S-wave in the decay $D^0
195: \to \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$ has been performed using 9.0 fb$^{-1}$ of CLEO II.V data
196: \cite{Cronin-Hennessy:2005sy}. The corresponding Dalitz plot and some of its
197: projections are shown in Fig.\ \ref{fig:dal3pi}. In the projections, points
198: correspond to data while curves are based on a fit describing the S waves
199: with a K-matrix following the formalism of \cite{Au:1986vs}.
200:
201: % This is Figure 4
202: \begin{figure}[t]
203: \includegraphics[width=0.98\columnwidth]{3960305-007.eps}
204: \vskip -0.3in
205: \caption{(a) $D^0 \to \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$ Dalitz plot; (b) $\pi^+ \pi^0$
206: projection; (c) $\pi^+\pi^-$ projection; (d) $\pi^-\pi^0$ projection.
207: \label{fig:dal3pi}}
208: \vskip -0.2in
209: \end{figure}
210:
211: The CP asymmetry as defined in Ref.\ \cite{Asner:2003uz} is found to be
212: ${\cal A}_{\rm CP} = 0.01^{+0.09}_{-0.07}\pm0.05$. This mode may be useful
213: in analyzing $B$ decays since $B^- \to D_{\pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0} K^-$ has been
214: seen \cite{Aubert:2005hi}, with a sample of 133 events in 229 M $B \bar B$
215: pairs, corresponding to a combined branching ratio of ${\cal B} = (5.5 \pm 1.0
216: \pm 0.7) \times 10^{-6}$. The decay asymmetry in this mode has been found to
217: be $A = 0.02 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.03$.
218:
219: All fits to the $D^0 \to \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$ Dalitz plot are dominated by the
220: $\rho^\pm$ and $\rho^0$ bands, with negligible S-wave contributions. These are
221: found to be small and fitted adequately by a variety of parametrizations, as
222: shown in Fig.\ \ref{fig:3pifits}. This is in contrast to a large S-wave
223: contribution found by the FOCUS Collaboration in $D^+ \to \pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^-$
224: \cite{Link:2003gb}. This could be due to dominance of different processes in
225: the two decays. The dominant tree contribution to $D^0 \to \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$
226: involves $D^0 \to \rho^+ \pi^-$ with a fit fraction of 75--80\%, while the
227: dominant tree contribution to $D^+ \to \pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^-$ involves $D^+ \to
228: \pi^+ d \bar d$, where $d \bar d$ can fragment into an S-wave. The
229: corresponding $D^0 \to \pi^0 u \bar u$ or $\pi^0 d \bar d$ decay is
230: color-suppressed.
231:
232: % This is Figure 5
233: \begin{figure}[t]
234: \includegraphics[width=0.92\columnwidth]{3960305-008.eps}
235: \vskip -0.4in
236: \caption{Fits to S-wave component in $D^0 \to \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0$. (a)
237: Flat non-resonant; (b) Breit-Wigner $\sigma(500)$; (c) Breit-Wigner $f_0(980)$;
238: (d) K-matrix.
239: \label{fig:3pifits}}
240: \vskip -0.2in
241: \end{figure}
242:
243: % This is Figure 6
244: \begin{figure}[t]
245: \includegraphics[width=0.94\columnwidth]{kspipi.eps}
246: \vskip -0.4in
247: \caption{Dalitz plot for $D \to K_S \pi^+ \pi^-$ based on 281 pb$^{-1}$
248: of CLEO-c data.
249: \label{fig:kspipi}}
250: \vskip -0.2in
251: \end{figure}
252:
253: \section{REMAINING STEPS}
254:
255: So far CESR has accumulated $281$ pb$^{-1}$ at the $\psi''(3770)$. More data
256: at this energy will provide a clean sample of $D^0 \bar D^0$ and $D^+ D^-$,
257: with tagging on one side giving the flavor or CP eigenvalue
258: on the other. Examples of CP-odd three-body $D^0$ modes are
259: $K_S \rho$, $K_S \omega$, $K_S \phi$, while some CP-even three-body $D^0$
260: modes are $K_S f_0(980)$, $K_S f_2(1270)$, $K_S f_0(1370)$.
261:
262: Once a sufficient sample of $\psi''(3770)$ has been accumulated, it is planned
263: to run at an energy optimized for $D_s$ production. Optimization studies are
264: to begin in August 2005. Subsequently a year's worth of $J/\psi$ data will
265: shed light on light-quark and glue states.
266:
267: In future Dalitz plot analyses the approximate relative phase of $\pi$ between
268: $K^{*+} K^-$ and $K^{*-} K^+$ in $D^0 \to K^+ K^- \pi^0$ may be used to obtain
269: $\gamma$ from $B^- \to D^0 K^-$ as suggested in Ref.\ \cite{Grossman:2002aq}.
270: A sample of $D \to K_S \pi^+ \pi^-$ based 281 pb$^{-1}$ from CLEO-c, for which
271: the Dalitz plot is shown in Fig.\ \ref{fig:kspipi}, is currently under analysis.
272: This sample will permit reduction of the Dalitz plot modeling error in
273: obtaining $\gamma$ from $B^\pm \to D K^\pm$ followed by $D^0 \to K_S \pi^+
274: \pi^-$ from its current value of $\pm 10^\circ$ to about $\pm 7^\circ$. One
275: expects about 100 each of even and odd CP tags in the present sample, and
276: eventually up to 10 times that if CLEO-c's luminosity goals are met.
277:
278: The CLEO Collaboration gratefully acknowledges the effort of the CESR staff
279: in providing us with excellent luminosity and running conditions.
280: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation
281: and the United States Department of Energy. I thank M. Tigner
282: for hospitality of the Laboratory for Elementary-Particle
283: Physics at Cornell and the John Simon Guggenheim
284: Foundation for partial support.
285:
286: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
287:
288: \bibitem{Asner:2003gh}
289: D.~Asner, hep-ex/0410014, expanded version of review in
290: Eidelman et al., Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004), pp.\ 664-667.
291:
292: \bibitem{Kubota}
293: Y.~Kubota {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration], Nucl. Instrum. Methods
294: Phys. Res., Sect. A {\bf 320}, 66 (1992);
295: D.~Peterson {\it et al.},
296: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 478}, 142 (2002);
297: M.~Artuso {\it et al.},
298: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 502}, 91 (2003);
299: R.~A.~Briere {\it et al.}, Cornell University Report CLNS-01-1742.
300:
301: \bibitem{Bigi:1988ym}
302: I.~I.~Y.~Bigi and A.~I.~Sanda, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 211}, 213 (1988);
303: M.~Gronau and D.~Wyler, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 265}, 172 (1991);
304: D.~Atwood, I.~Dunietz and A.~Soni, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 036005 (2001);
305: D.~Atwood and A.~Soni, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 033003 (2003).
306:
307: \bibitem{Grossman:2002aq}
308: Y.~Grossman, Z.~Ligeti and A.~Soffer, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 071301 (2003).
309:
310: \bibitem{Rosner:2003yk}
311: J.~L.~Rosner and D.~A.~Suprun, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 054010 (2003).
312:
313: \bibitem{Naik:2005}
314: Paras Naik, presented at Spring 2005 APS Meeting, Tampa, Florida.
315:
316: \bibitem{Asner:2003uz}
317: D.~M.~Asner {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
318: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 091101 (2004);
319: H.~Muramatsu {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
320: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 251802 (2002)
321: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 90}, 059901 (2003)].
322:
323: \bibitem{Giri:2003ty}
324: A.~Giri, Y.~Grossman, A.~Soffer and J.~Zupan,
325: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 054018 (2003).
326:
327: \bibitem{Poluektov:2004mf}
328: A.~Poluektov {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
329: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 072003 (2004);
330: K.~Abe {\it et al.}, hep-ex/0411049; hep-ex/0504013.
331:
332: \bibitem{Aubert:2005yj}
333: B.~Aubert [BABAR Collaboration], hep-ex/0507101.
334:
335: \bibitem{Asner:2005}
336: D.~M.~Asner, presented at CKM05 Workshop, La Colla, CA, March 2005.
337:
338: \bibitem{Asner:2005sz}
339: D.~M.~Asner [CLEO Collaboration],
340: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 012001 (2005).
341:
342: \bibitem{Cronin-Hennessy:2005sy}
343: D.~Cronin-Hennessy {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration], hep-ex/0503052.
344:
345: \bibitem{Au:1986vs}
346: K.~L.~Au, D.~Morgan and M.~R.~Pennington,
347: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 35}, 1633 (1987).
348:
349: \bibitem{Aubert:2005hi}
350: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BABAR Collaboration], hep-ex/0505084.
351:
352: \bibitem{Link:2003gb}
353: J.~M.~Link {\it et al.} [FOCUS Collaboration],
354: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 585}, 200 (2004).
355:
356: \end{thebibliography}
357:
358: \end{document}
359: