1: 

2: %====================================================================%

3: %                  MORIOND.TEX     2-Feb-1995                        %

4: % This latex file rewritten from various sources for use in the      %

5: % preparation of the standard proceedings Volume, latest version     %

6: % for the Neutrino'96 Helsinki conference proceedings                %

7: % by Susan Hezlet with acknowledgments to Lukas Nellen.              %

8: % Some changes are due to David Cassel.                              %

9: %                                                                    %

10: % Updated to LaTeX2e and adapted to Moriond 2001 conditions          %

11: %                     by F.Montanet 24/04/2001                       %

12: %====================================================================%

13: 

14: \documentclass[11pt]{article}

15: \usepackage{Blois,epsfig}

16: \usepackage{wrapfig}

17: %\documentstyle[11pt,Blois,epsfig]{article}

18: 

19: 

20: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}

21: % for BibTeX - sorted numerical labels by order of

22: % first citation.

23: 

24: % A useful Journal macro

25: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}

26: 

27: % Some useful journal names

28: \def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}

29: \def\NIM{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods}

30: \def\NIMA{{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods} A}

31: \def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.} B}

32: \def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.}  B}

33: \def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}

34: \def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.} D}

35: \def\ZPC{{\em Z. Phys.} C}

36: 

37: % Some other macros used in the sample text

38: \def\st{\scriptstyle}

39: \def\sst{\scriptscriptstyle}

40: \def\mco{\multicolumn}

41: \def\epp{\epsilon^{\prime}}

42: \def\vep{\varepsilon}

43: \def\ra{\rightarrow}

44: \def\ppg{\pi^+\pi^-\gamma}

45: \def\vp{{\bf p}}

46: \def\ko{K^0}

47: \def\kb{\bar{K^0}}

48: \def\al{\alpha}

49: \def\ab{\bar{\alpha}}

50: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

51: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

52: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}

53: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}

54: \def\CPbar{\hbox{{\rm CP}\hskip-1.80em{/}}}

55: %temp replacement due to no font

56: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

57: %                                                %

58: %    BEGINNING OF TEXT                           %

59: %                                                %

60: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

61: \begin{document}

62: \vspace*{2cm}

63: \begin{center}

64: \Large{\textbf{XIth International Conference on\\ Elastic and Diffractive Scattering\\ Ch\^{a}teau de Blois, France, May 15 - 20, 2005}}

65: \end{center}

66: 

67: \vspace*{2cm}

68: \title{DEEPLY VIRTUAL COMPTON SCATTERING AND PROMPT PHOTON PRODUCTION AT

69: HERA}

70: 

71: \author{L. FAVART}

72: 

73: \address{I.I.H.E., Universit\'e Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium}

74: 

75: \maketitle\abstracts{

76: Recent results on the Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering (DVCS) and

77: prompt photon productions from H1 and ZEUS experiments on the $ep$ 

78: collider HERA are presented. 

79: A new DVCS cross section measurements of the H1 Collaboration,

80: for photon virtualities $Q^2>4$ GeV$^2$ and photon-proton c.m.s. 

81: energy $30<W<140$ GeV, are

82: discussed and compared to NLO QCD calculations encoding Generalized

83: Parton Distributions (GPDs) and to Colour Dipole model predictions. 

84: For the first time the cross section dependence is reported

85: on the momentum transfer squared at the proton vertex, $t$.

86: Prompt photon production in deep inelastic scattering and 

87: photoproduction are presented both in the inclusive case and in the 

88: presence of a jet. The results are compared to NLO QCD predictions.

89: }

90: 

91: \section{Introduction}

92: This paper presents new and recent results on two processes 

93: allowing for test of QCD in the perturbative regime (pQCD) and 

94: containing a measured photon in the final state.\\

95: %% DVCS

96: 1) Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering (DVCS), $ep \to e\gamma p$,

97: sketched in Fig.~\ref{fig:diag}a,

98: consists of the hard diffractive

99: scattering of a virtual photon off a proton.

100: The interest of the DVCS process resides in the

101: particular insight it gives to the applicability of

102: perturbative Quantum Chromo Dynamics (QCD) in the field of

103: diffractive interactions and to the nucleon partonic structure.\\

104: %% Prompt Photon

105: 2) Prompt photons in the final state of high energy collisions 

106: (Fig.~\ref{fig:diag}b and c) allow for a

107: detailed study of pQCD and of the hadronic structure of the incoming particles.

108: The term ``prompt'' refers to photons which are radiated directly from

109: the partons of the hard interaction.

110: In contrast to jets, photons are not affected by hadronisation,

111: resulting in a more direct correspondence to the underlying partonic 

112: event structure.

113: %Moreover, the experimental uncertainties connected to the energy

114: %determination of an electromagnetic shower

115: %initiated by a photon are smaller compared to the measurement of jets of

116: %hadrons.

117: 

118: 

119: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

120: \begin{figure}[htb]

121:  \begin{center}

122:   \vspace*{-0.3cm}

123:   \epsfig{figure=figures/fig1.eps,width=0.88\textwidth}

124:   \vspace*{-1.0cm}

125:   %\epsfig{figure=figures/dvcs_gen_kin.eps,width=0.31\textwidth}

126:   %$\quad$

127:   %\epsfig{figure=figures/dir_prompt.eps,width=0.23\textwidth} 

128:   %$\quad$

129:   %\epsfig{figure=figures/res_prompt.eps,width=0.23\textwidth}

130:   %\caption{\sl The DVCS (a), direct prompt photon (b) and resolved

131:   %  prompt photon (c).}

132:   \addtocounter{figure}{1}

133:   \label{fig:diag}

134:  \end{center}

135: \end{figure}

136: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

137: 

138: 

139: 

140: \section{Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering}

141: 

142: %The study of hard exclusive reactions in the Bjorken limit is

143: %crutial to constrain further the partons densities towards low $x$ and 

144: %to obtain information on parton dynamical correlations in the

145: %nucleon.

146: DVCS cross section measurements~\cite{h1dvcs97,zeusdvcs} at HERA, 

147: similar to diffractive vector meson electroproduction~\cite{alessia} 

148: but with a real 

149: photon replacing the final state vector meson,  

150: become an important source of information to study the partons, in

151: particular gluons,

152: inside the proton for nonforward kinematics and its relation with

153: the forward one.

154: %In the presence of a hard scale, the DVCS scattering amplitude

155: %factorises into a hard scattering part calculable in perturbative QCD

156: %and parton distributions which contain the non-perturbative

157: %effects due to the proton structure. 

158: In hard exclusive production 

159: the proton structure has to be encoded in a generalized form

160: (Generalised Parton Distributions or GPDs)

161: to include the difference of longitudinal momentum fractions of the two 

162: partons, $\xi$ and transverse momentum exchange at the proton vertex. 

163: \\

164: 

165:  This paper presents a measurement of 

166: DVCS cross section based on 46.5$pb^{-1}$ of data collected with the H1

167: detector at HERA in years 1996 to 2000~\cite{h1dvcs00}.

168: The cross section is presented as a function of $Q^2$, $W$ and $t$.

169: 

170: %On the other hand, recently the color

171: %dipole formalism has been provided a simultaneous description of photon

172: %induced process. The inclusive deep inelastic reaction and the photon

173: %diffractive dissociation has been successfully described and the study

174: %of

175: %other exclusive process as DVCS is an important test of the color dipole

176: %approach.

177: %\\

178: 

179: \subsection{Data Analysis}

180: 

181: At the present small values of $|t|$ the reaction

182: $e p \rightarrow e \gamma p\,$

183: is dominated by the purely electromagnetic

184: Bethe-Heitler (BH) process whose cross section,

185: depending only on QED calculations and proton elastic form factors, is

186: precisely known and therefore can be subtracted.

187: To enhance the ratio of selected DVCS

188: events to BH events the outgoing photon is selected in the

189: forward, or outgoing proton, region with transverse momentum larger than

190: $1\,{\rm GeV}$. Large values of

191: the incoming photon virtuality $Q^2$ are selected by detecting the

192: scattered

193: electron in the backward calorimeter with energy larger than 

194: $15\,{\rm GeV}$. The outgoing proton escapes down the

195: beam-pipe in the forward direction.

196: In order to reject inelastic and proton dissociation events,

197: no further cluster in the calorimeters with energy above

198: noise level is allowed and an absence of activity

199: in forward detectors is required.

200: \\

201: 

202: %Nevertheless an important contamination subsists from the

203: %DVCS process with proton dissociation:

204: %$ e^+ + p \rightarrow e^+ + \gamma + Y ,$

205: %when the decay products of the baryonic system $Y$ are not detected in

206: %the forward detectors.

207: %This typically occurs for $Y$ systems with masses below 1.6 GeV.

208: %The sum of DVCS and BH contributions, in which the proton does not

209: %survive intact, has been estimated to be $11\pm 6\,\%$ of the final

210: %sample. This uncertainty constitutes the main systematic error on the

211: %measurement, with the 7\% uncertainty due to acceptance and bin center

212: %corrections.

213: 

214: The selected DVCS sample contains 1243 events. To extract the cross

215: section, the data are corrected for

216: detector acceptance and initial state radiation using the Monte Carlo

217: simulation program MILOU~\cite{Milou}.

218: The measured $e p \rightarrow e \gamma p$ cross

219: section is converted to the $\gamma^* p \rightarrow \gamma p$

220: cross section using equivalent photon approximation.

221: 

222: \subsection{Results}

223: 

224: For triggering reasons, the cross sections are measured separately

225: in 1996-1997 and

226: 1999-2000, covering different $Q^2$ ranges, and are then combined.

227: The differential cross section in $t$ is measured at two different $Q^2$

228: values as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:dsdt}. The  $t$ dependence is

229: parametrised as $e^{-b|t|}$. Combining the two data sets, the

230: $t$ slope is measured to be 

231: $b = 6.02\pm 0.35{\rm(stat)} \pm 0.39{\rm(sys)}$ GeV$^{-2}$ 

232: for $Q^2 = 8$ GeV$^2$ and $W = 82$ GeV.\\

233: 

234: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

235: \begin{wrapfigure}[15]{L}{0.55\linewidth}

236:  \begin{center}

237:   \epsfig{figure=figures/dsig_dt.eps,width=0.55\textwidth}

238:  \end{center}

239:  \vspace*{-0.4cm}

240:  \caption{\sl The cross section $\gamma^* p \rightarrow \gamma p$

241:   differential in $t$, for $Q^2=4$~GeV$^2$ and $Q^2=8$~GeV$^2$.

242:   The inner error bars represent the statistical and the

243:   full error bars the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic

244:   uncertainties.}

245:  \label{fig:dsdt}

246:  \vspace*{-0.4cm}

247: \end{wrapfigure}

248: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

249: 

250: Fig.~\ref{fig:sqcd} shows the cross section as a function

251: of $Q^2$ for $W=82$~GeV and as a function of $W$ for $Q^2=8$~GeV$^2$.

252: Fitting the $Q^2$ dependence with a form

253: $(1/Q2)^n$ gives $n = 1.54 \pm 0.09 {\rm(stat)} \pm 0.04{\rm(sys)}$. 

254: Fitting the W dependence with a form $W^\delta$ gives 

255: $\delta=0.77\pm0.23\pm0.19$.

256: No $Q^2$ dependence is observed for $\delta$. The steep rise of the cross

257: section with $W$ indicates the presence of a hard

258: scattering process. The value of $\delta$ is similar to that measured in

259: exclusive $J/\Psi$ production. 

260: The new H1 measurement is

261: found to be in agreement with the published ZEUS results~\cite{zeusdvcs}.

262: Fig. \ref{fig:sqcd} also compares the measurements with QCD predictions 

263: calculated at NLO by Freund and McDermott~\cite{Freund:2002qf}.

264: In this prediction, the classic PDF $q(x,\mu^2)$ of MRST2001

265: and CTEQ6 are used in the DGLAP region

266: ($|x|>\xi$) such that $\cal H$, which is the only important GPD at small

267: $x$ is given at the scale $\mu$ by:

268: ${\cal H}^q(x,\xi,t;\mu^2)=q(x;\mu^2) \, e^{-b|t|}$ for quark singlet

269: and

270: $ {\cal H}^g(x,\xi,t;\mu^2)=x\ g(x;\mu^2) \, e^{-b|t|}$ for gluons,

271: i.e. independent of the skewing parameter $\xi$,

272: the skewing as the $Q^2$ dependences being generated dynamically (i.e.\ no

273: intrinsic skewing).

274: In the ERBL region ($|x| < \xi$), these parametrisations

275: have to be modified, ensuring a smooth continuation to the DGLAP 

276: region~\cite{Freund:2002qf}.

277: The theoretical estimates agree well with the data for both shape and

278: absolute normalisation. The uncertainty in the normalization for the

279: theory is significantly reduced

280: owing to the H1 measurement of the cross section (exponential) $t$ slope; 

281: this uncertainty becomes smaller than

282: the input PDF uncertainty which is quantified comparing MRST and CTEQ PDF

283: set based predictions.

284:  Furthermore, this shows that no intrinsic skewing is needed to describe

285: the DVCS cross section in the small Bjorken $x$ region.  

286: Comparison to Colour dipole models also provide a reasonable

287: description of the data (see~\cite{h1dvcs00}), 

288: both in shape and in normalisation.

289: The $Q^2$ dependence is better described by the Favart-Machado

290: prediction~\cite{Favart:2004uv}

291: when DGLAP evolution of the dipole is included.

292: 

293: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

294: \begin{figure}[htb]

295:  \begin{center}

296:   \epsfig{figure=figures/sig_q2_qcd.eps,width=0.49\textwidth}

297:   \epsfig{figure=figures/sig_w_qcd.eps,width=0.49\textwidth}

298:   \vspace*{-0.4cm}

299:  \end{center}

300:  \caption{\sl The $\gamma^* p \rightarrow  \gamma p$ cross section

301:   as a function of $Q^2$ for $W=82$ GeV (left) and 

302:   as a function of $W$ for $ Q^2=8$ GeV$^2$ (right).

303:   The H1 measurement is shown together with the results of

304:   ZEUS and NLO QCD predictions based on MRST 2001 

305:   and CTEQ6 PDFs.

306:   The band associated with each prediction corresponds to the

307:   uncertainty on the measured $t$-slope.

308:   }

309:  \label{fig:sqcd}

310:  \vspace*{-0.4cm}

311: \end{figure}

312: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

313: 

314: \section{Prompt Photon}

315: 

316: Fig.~\ref{fig:prompt}a shows the differential inclusive prompt photon cross

317: section $\mathrm{d}\sigma/\mathrm{d}\eta^\gamma$ as a function

318:  of the pseudorapidity of the photon in photoproduction regime

319: ($Q^2<1\,\mathrm{GeV}^2$ and $142<W<266\,\mathrm{GeV}$) by 

320: H1~\cite{Aktas:2004uv}. These results are compatible with ZEUS

321: measurement~\cite{Breitweg:1999su} (not shown). 

322: A comparison to NLO pQCD calculations by Fontannaz,

323: Guillet and Heinrich (FGH~\cite{Fontannaz:2001ek})

324: and Krawczyk and Zembrzuski (K\&Z~\cite{Krawczyk:2001tz}) shows a good

325: shape description but a normalisation $20\%-40\%$ below the data.

326: On Fig.~\ref{fig:prompt}b the cross section is shown differentially in 

327: the transverse jet energy, when an additional jet 

328: ($E_t>4.5\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $-1<\eta^{jet}<2.3$) is required.

329: Here both NLO calculations~\cite{Fontannaz:2001nq,Zembrzuski:2003nu} are

330: consistent with the data in most bins. 

331: The hadronic and multiple interactions corrections improve the description 

332: of the data only in some regions.

333: %

334: The ZEUS Collaboration~\cite{Chekanov:2004wr} has measured the inclusive

335: prompt photon in DIS ($Q^2>35\,\mathrm{GeV}^2$) with a jet 

336: ($E_{T}^{jet}>6\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $-1.5<\eta^{jet}<1.8$), see

337: Fig.~\ref{fig:prompt}c.

338: A pQCD calculation~\cite{Gehrmann-DeRidder:2000ce} to order

339: $\mathcal{O}(\alpha^3\alpha_s^1)$ on parton level

340: describes the normalisation except at low $E_T$ and in the

341: more forward (proton beam) direction.

342: The PYTHIA and HERWIG Monte Carlo predictions undershoot the data

343: in all cases (photoproduction and DIS),

344: see~\cite{Aktas:2004uv,Chekanov:2004wr} for more details.

345: 

346: \begin{figure}

347:  \vskip 2.3cm

348:  \begin{picture}(100,100)(0,0)

349:  \put(-15,0){\epsfig{figure=figures/d04-118f4b_nt.eps,width=0.32\textwidth}}

350:  \put(139,0){\epsfig{figure=figures/d04-118f5a_nt.eps,width=0.32\textwidth}}

351:  \put(300,13){\epsfig{figure=figures/DESY-04-016_5b.eps,width=0.32\textwidth}}

352:  \end{picture}

353:  \vspace*{-0.6cm}

354:  \caption{Prompt photon differential cross sections.

355:   {\bf a)} in inclusive photoproduction,

356:   {\bf b)} in photoproduction with jet,

357:   {\bf c)} in DIS with jet - the hashed band represent the 

358:            NLO QCD prediction, the full one the energy scale

359:            uncertainty.

360:   }

361:  \vspace*{-0.4cm}

362:  \label{fig:prompt}

363: \end{figure}

364: 

365: 

366: 

367: 

368: 

369: \section*{References}

370: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

371: 

372: \bibitem{h1dvcs97}

373: %\bibitem{Adloff:2001cn}

374: C.~Adloff {\it et al.}  [H1 Collaboration],

375: %``Measurement of deeply virtual Compton scattering at HERA,''

376:  Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 517} (2001) 47

377: [hep-ex/0107005].

378: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0107005;%%

379: 

380: \bibitem{zeusdvcs}

381: %\bibitem{:2003ya}

382: S.Chekanov {\it et al.} [ZEUS collaboration],

383: %``Measurement of deeply virtual Compton scattering at HERA,''

384:  Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 573} (2003) 46-62

385: %DESY-03-059,

386: [hep-ex/0305028].

387: 

388: \bibitem{alessia}

389: A.\ Bruni, these proceedings.

390: 

391: \bibitem{h1dvcs00}

392: A.~Altas {\it et al.}  [H1 Collaboration],

393: DESY 05-065, accepted by Eur.\ Phys.\ J.C,

394: [hep-ex/0505061].

395: 

396: \bibitem{Milou}

397: E.~Perez, L.~Schoeffel and L.~Favart, DESY-04-228 [hep-ph/0411389].

398: 

399: % NLO QCD Calculation

400: %\bibitem{Freund:2001hm}

401: %A.~Freund and M.F.~McDermott,

402: %%``A next-to-leading order analysis of Deeply Virtual Compton

403: %%Scattering,''

404: % Phys. Rev. D {\bf 65} (2002) {091901}

405: % [hep-ph/0106124].

406: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106124;%%

407: 

408: \bibitem{Freund:2002qf}

409: A.~Freund, M.F.~McDermott and M.~Strikman,

410: %``Modelling generalized parton distributions to describe deeply virtual

411: %Compton scattering data,''

412:  Phys. Rev. D {\bf 67} (2003) {036001}

413: [hep-ph/0208160].

414: 

415: %\bibitem{Favart:2003cu}

416: % L.~Favart and M.V.~Machado,

417: % %``Deeply virtual Compton scattering and saturation approach,''

418: % Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 29} (2003) 365-371

419: % [hep-ph/0302079].

420: 

421: %\cite{Favart:2004uv}

422: \bibitem{Favart:2004uv}

423:  L.~Favart and M.V.~Machado,

424:  %``QCD evolution and skewedness effects in color dipole description of

425:  %DVCS,''

426:  Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 34} (2004) 429,

427:  [hep-ph/0402018].

428:  %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402018;%%

429: 

430: %% PROMPT PHOTONS

431: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

432: %\cite{Aktas:2004uv}

433: \bibitem{Aktas:2004uv}

434: A.~Aktas {\it et al.}  [H1 Collaboration],

435: %``Measurement of prompt photon cross sections in photoproduction at

436: %HERA,''

437:  Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 38} (2005) 437-445,

438: [hep-ex/0407018].

439: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0407018;%%

440: 

441: %\cite{Breitweg:1999su}

442: \bibitem{Breitweg:1999su}

443: J.~Breitweg {\it et al.}  [ZEUS Collaboration],

444: %``Measurement of inclusive prompt photon photoproduction at HERA,''

445: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 472} (2000) 175

446: [hep-ex/9910045].

447: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9910045;%%

448: 

449: %\cite{Fontannaz:2001ek}

450: \bibitem{Fontannaz:2001ek}

451: M.~Fontannaz, J.~P.~Guillet and G.~Heinrich,

452: %``Isolated prompt photon photoproduction at NLO,''

453: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 21} (2001) 303

454: [hep-ph/0105121].

455: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105121;%%

456: 

457: %\cite{Krawczyk:2001tz}

458: \bibitem{Krawczyk:2001tz}

459: M.~Krawczyk and A.~Zembrzuski,

460: %``Photoproduction of the isolated photon at DESY HERA in

461: %next-to-leading order

462: %QCD,''

463: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} (2001) 114017

464: [hep-ph/0105166].

465: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105166;%%

466: 

467: %\cite{Fontannaz:2001nq}

468: \bibitem{Fontannaz:2001nq}

469: M.~Fontannaz, J.~P.~Guillet and G.~Heinrich,

470: %``Is a large intrinsic k(T) needed to describe photon + jet

471: %photoproduction at

472: %HERA?,''

473: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 22} (2001) 303

474: [hep-ph/0107262].

475: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107262;%%

476: 

477: %\cite{Zembrzuski:2003nu}

478: \bibitem{Zembrzuski:2003nu}

479: A.~Zembrzuski and M.~Krawczyk,

480: %``Photoproduction of isolated photon and jet at the DESY HERA,''

481: hep-ph/0309308.

482: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309308;%%

483: 

484: %\cite{Chekanov:2004wr}

485: \bibitem{Chekanov:2004wr}

486: S.~Chekanov {\it et al.}  [ZEUS Collaboration],

487: %``Observation of isolated high-E(T) photons in deep inelastic

488: %scattering,''

489: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 595} (2004) 86

490: [hep-ex/0402019].

491: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0402019;%%

492: 

493: %\cite{Gehrmann-DeRidder:2000ce}

494: \bibitem{Gehrmann-DeRidder:2000ce}

495: A.~Gehrmann-De Ridder, G.~Kramer and H.~Spiesberger,

496: %``Photon plus jet cross sections in deep inelastic e p collisions at

497: %order

498: %O(alpha**2 alpha(s)),''

499: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 578} (2000) 326

500: [hep-ph/0003082].

501: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003082;%%

502: 

503: 

504: \end{thebibliography}

505: \begin{flushright}

506: {\small

507: The author is supported by the {\it Fonds National \\

508: de la Recherche Scientifique} of Belgium.}

509: \end{flushright}

510: \end{document}

511: 

512: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

513: % End of Blois.tex  %

514: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

515: