1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% ws-procs9x6.tex : 20-9-2004
3: %% Text file for Proceedings Trim Size [9in x 6in] written in Latex2E.
4: %% The content, structure, format and layout of this style file is the
5: %% property of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
6: %% Copyright 1995, 2002 by World Scientific Publishing Co.
7: %% All rights are reserved.
8: %%
9: %% Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in
10: %% Text Area: 7.35in (include runningheads) x 4.5in
11: %% Main Text is 10/13pt
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13:
14: %% Use \tbl{...} command for table caption i.e. to fit table width.
15: %% Use \caption{...} command for figure caption.
16: %\documentclass[draft]{ws-procs9x6}
17: \documentclass{ws-procs9x6}
18:
19: \begin{document}
20:
21: \title{Transverse Spin and RHIC}
22:
23: \author{L.C.Bland}
24:
25: \address{Brookhaven National Laboratory, \\
26: Upton, NY 11786, USA \\
27: E-mail: bland@bnl.gov}
28:
29:
30: \maketitle
31:
32: \abstracts{
33: The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven
34: National Laboratory is the first accelerator facility that can accelerate,
35: store and collide spin polarized proton beams. This development
36: enables a physics program aimed at understanding how the
37: spin of the proton results from its quark and gluon substructures.
38: Spin states that are either parallel (longitudinal) or perpendicular
39: (transverse) to the proton momentum reveal important insight into
40: the structure of the proton. This talk outlines future plans for
41: further studies of transverse spin physics at RHIC.}
42:
43: \section{Introduction}
44:
45: There has been renewed experimental and
46: theoretical interest in transverse spin physics. Large transverse single-spin
47: asymmetries (SSA) observed in elastic proton scattering and particle production
48: experiments (hyperon production and pion production) were often viewed
49: as a challenge to QCD, since the chiral properties of the theory should make
50: transverse single spin asymmetries small for inclusive particle
51: production. Many people believed that transverse SSA would disappear
52: when studying polarized p+p collisions at higher collision energies ($\sqrt{s}$)
53: now possible at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)
54: at Brookhaven National Laboratory.
55:
56: The modern perspective views transverse SSA
57: as a challenge to our understanding of hadrons on long distance
58: scales, possibly providing sensitivity to the transversity structure
59: function or to spin- and transverse-momentum dependent distribution functions
60: that are related to parton orbital motion.
61:
62: In this contribution, I briefly review transverse SSA and related
63: measurements completed at RHIC to date and describe what new
64: measurements are expected in the near-term future.
65:
66: \section{Recent developments in transverse spin physics}
67:
68: This workshop surveyed ongoing experimental and theoretical work. A
69: deeper understanding of spin- and transverse-momentum dependent
70: distribution functions (embodied in the Sivers effect\cite{sivers}) and
71: fragmentation functions (one of the keys to the Collins effect\cite{collins}) has
72: recently emerged. The former were known to violate ``naive'' time
73: reversal symmetry. Results from a specific model demonstrate their
74: possible existence\cite{BHS}. This important theoretical development was
75: essentially concurrent with experimental results from semi-inclusive
76: deep inelastic scattering from a transversely polarized proton target
77: that unambiguously observed a non-zero Sivers effect\cite{HERMES}. Also concurrent
78: was the observation of large spin effects in dihadron correlations
79: from $e^+e^-$ collisions that indicates that spin-dependent fragmentation
80: effects are large. This is one of the keys to the Collins
81: effect\cite{Belle}. These experimental developments, coupled with the observation
82: of non-zero single spin asymmetries in inclusive pion production from
83: the first collisions at RHIC, have led to a reinvigoration of
84: transverse spin physics.
85:
86: \begin{figure}[ht]
87: \centerline{\epsfxsize=1.9in\epsfbox{prl_fig3.eps}~~\epsfxsize=2.0in\epsfbox{an-xf.eps}}
88: \caption{(left) First results for $p_{\uparrow}+p\rightarrow\pi^0+X$ analyzing powers
89: ($A_N$) at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV compared to theoretical predictions
90: available prior to the measurements. (right) More precise preliminary results,
91: using on-line measurements of the beam polarization, for
92: $\pi^0$ production $A_N$ obtained in subsequent runs. \label{STAR_AN_results}}
93: \end{figure}
94:
95: Large SSA were observed for $p_{\uparrow}+p\rightarrow\pi^0+X$ at
96: $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV by the STAR collaboration\cite{FPD} in the first
97: polarized proton collisions at RHIC. They confirmed the expectation
98: \cite{anselminocollins,anselminosivers,qiusterman,koike}, not shared
99: by all, that the sizeable SSA observed for pion production at
100: $\sqrt{s}=20$ GeV\cite{E704} would persist at an order of magnitude higher collision
101: energy. These expectations are shown by the theoretical predictions
102: in Fig. \ref{STAR_AN_results}, available prior to the measurements.
103: Subsequent development of full integration over intrinsic transverse
104: momentum has modified the relative contributions to transverse SSA
105: from different sources\cite{kperp}. More recent data\cite{Morozov}
106: have improved the statistical precision of the effect and given the
107: first hint of its separated $x_F$ and $p_T$ dependence. Preliminary
108: results from the BRAHMS collaboration indicate that mirror
109: asymmetries ($A_N(\pi^-)\approx-A_N(\pi^+)$) are observed for large
110: rapidity $\pi^{\pm}$ production\cite{brahms}, similar to the
111: lower-energy results\cite{E704}.
112:
113: \begin{figure}[ht]
114: \centerline{\epsfxsize=1.9in\epsfbox{plot_cross_prelim.eps}~~\epsfxsize=1.9in\epsfbox{xfpt_20050305.eps}}
115: \caption{Results for $p+p\rightarrow\pi^0+X$ cross sections
116: at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV compared to NLO pQCD calculations
117: using conventional parton distribution and fragmentation functions.
118: (right) Parameterized $x_F$ and $p_T$ dependence. \label{STAR_sig_results}}
119: \end{figure}
120:
121: Perhaps most significantly, it has been established that $\pi$
122: production cross sections at RHIC collision energies, in the
123: kinematics where single spin effects are observed, are consistent with
124: next-to-leading order perturbative QCD (NLO pQCD) calculations at
125: $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV (Fig. \ref{STAR_sig_results}). This is in marked
126: contrast to the situation at lower $\sqrt{s}$ where measured cross
127: sections far exceed NLO pQCD predictions\cite{bs}, apparently consistent with
128: the belief that the transverse SSA in hadroproduction were due to beam
129: fragmentation. The NLO pQCD description at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV
130: describes particle production being due to partons from both beams
131: undergoing a hard scattering prior to fragmenting to the observed hadrons. That
132: description is further supported by experimental data that shows a significant
133: back-to-back peak for hadrons detected at midrapidity for events where
134: a large rapidity $\pi^0$ is observed\cite{Ogawa}.
135:
136: Measurements of the cross section for inclusive
137: $\pi^0$,\cite{PHENIX_pi0} charged hadron\cite{PHENIX_had} and jet
138: production\cite{STAR_jet} at midrapidity have been completed and compared with NLO
139: pQCD calculations\cite{QCD_calc}. Quantitative agreement with
140: calculations has been found. This agreement is an important basis for
141: the interpretation of spin observables ($A_N$ and the helicity
142: asymmetry, $A_{LL}$, that is sensitive to gluon polarization).
143: Transverse SSA for midrapidity $\pi^0$ and charged hadron
144: production\cite{PHENIX_had} have been measured and are consistent with
145: zero with a precision comparable to the non-zero $A_N$ found at large
146: rapidity at the same $p_T$ of $\sim$2 GeV/c. The midrapidity
147: results may lead to important constraints on the magnitude of the
148: gluon Sivers function.
149:
150:
151: \section{The future}
152:
153: \begin{figure}[ht]
154: \centerline{\epsfxsize=3.5in\epsfbox{STAR_FPD++.eps}}
155: \caption{Layout of the STAR experiment for RHIC run 6. The Forward $\pi^0$ Detector (FPD)
156: arrays shown east of the STAR magnet were also present in earlier runs west of the
157: STAR magnet. For run 6, the west FPD has been upgraded to become the
158: FPD++. The Forward Time Projection Chamber provides information about
159: charged hadrons in the angular range spanned by the forward calorimetry.\label{STAR}}
160: \end{figure}
161:
162: I'll restrict attention to the near-term future since there will be
163: significant data sets obtained with transverse polarization during the
164: upcoming RHIC run following the resolution of budgetary problems. A
165: main objective for midrapidity studies of $p_{\uparrow}+p$ collisions
166: at $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV is to establish if there are spin effects
167: correlated with $k_T$, a transverse momentum imbalance that is
168: observable if more than one particle, or more than one jet, is
169: observed. Such effects could be a signal of a non-zero Sivers
170: function for gluons\cite{BV}. STAR (Fig. \ref{STAR}) plans to measure $k_T$ for di-jet
171: events (Fig. \ref{STAR_dijets}) and will use vertical polarization.
172: The projected sensitivity is based on existing unpolarized data for
173: the azimuthal angle difference between pairs of midrapidity
174: jets\cite{Henry}. PHENIX plans to measure $k_T$ by detecting pairs of
175: hadrons in their central arms whose symmetry requires radial
176: polarization to observe a spin effect. Non-zero transverse SSA for
177: midrapidity dihadron production may have contributions from both the Sivers
178: effect and the Collins effect\cite{BBMP}.
179:
180: \begin{figure}[ht]
181: \centerline{\epsfxsize=3.5in\epsfbox{asy3+star2.eps}}
182: \caption{Projected sensitivity to the analyzing power versus the
183: azimuthal angle difference between pairs of jets detected at
184: midrapidity for a data sample corresponding to 5 pb$^{-1}$ with beam
185: polarization of 50\% compared to theoretical expectations from
186: different models of the gluon Sivers function as discussed in the
187: text.\label{STAR_dijets}}
188: \end{figure}
189:
190: A portion of the upcoming RHIC run will be devoted to collisions of
191: transversely polarized protons at $\sqrt{s}$=62 GeV. BRAHMS aims to
192: measure transverse SSA for inclusive production of identified charged
193: hadrons at large rapidity ($\eta\approx$3.3 and 3.9) from these
194: collisions. Their particle identification apparatus will permit
195: measurements up to $x_F\approx$0.6 at the lower $\sqrt{s}$. The
196: unpolarized cross section systematics discussed earlier\cite{bs}
197: would greatly benefit from new forward angle results at $\sqrt{s}$=62
198: GeV. In the remainder of this section, I'll discuss plans in the
199: upcoming RHIC run for measurements with increased acceptance forward
200: calorimetry in STAR.
201:
202:
203: \begin{figure}[ht]
204: \centerline{\epsfxsize=2.5in\epsfbox{mgg_overlay_ana_assc.eps}}
205: \caption{(bottom) Di-photon invariant mass distribution for events
206: with at least two reconstructed photons. Data compares well to PYTHIA/GEANT
207: simulations. (top) Contributions to simulated di-photon invariant mass
208: distribution for $N_{\gamma}>1$ events. Jet-like events are evident.
209: \label{jet_like}}
210: \end{figure}
211:
212: An important goal is to address the relative
213: contributions from the Collins and Sivers effects to the transverse
214: SSA observed for inclusive forward pion production. One way to disentangle
215: the contributions is to address the question
216: ``{\it is there a significant transverse single
217: spin asymmetry for jet-like events in p+p collisions?}''
218:
219: Jet-like events are defined as having three or more photons which are
220: mostly a $\pi^0$ and accompanying particles or single photon daughters from two or more
221: $\pi^0$. In either case, multiple fragments of the parton scattered
222: through small angles are observed, making the events manifestly jet
223: like. If the detector acceptance for the observed particles is
224: azimuthally symmetric around the thrust axis of the forward scattered
225: parton, then a transverse SSA for jet-like events must be due to the
226: Sivers effect\cite{sivers}. Integration over all particles detected
227: in an acceptance that is azimuthally symmetric around the thrust axis
228: ensures cancellation of possible contributions from spin- and
229: $k_T$-dependent fragmentation functions that serve to analyze quark
230: polarizations transferred to the final state (Collins effect\cite{collins}).
231: Particularly for events at large $x_F$, the forward
232: $\pi^0$ carries a large fraction of the energy of the forward
233: scattered parton. A precise definition of jet-like behavior is
234: required.
235:
236: We know that jet-like events are present at large $\eta$ from results
237: with the STAR Forward Pion Detector (FPD). Fig. \ref{jet_like} shows
238: the reconstructed invariant
239: mass distribution, where
240: $M_{\gamma\gamma}=E_{trig}\sqrt{1-z_{\gamma\gamma}^2}{\rm
241: sin}(\phi_{\gamma\gamma}/2)$. The total energy ($E_{trig}$)
242: corresponds to the sum of energy from all towers of one of the FPD
243: modules and is taken as the $\pi^0$ energy in the analysis. It is
244: used in conjunction with the opening angle ($\phi_{\gamma\gamma}$) and
245: energy sharing, $z_{\gamma\gamma}= |(E_{\gamma 1} - E_{\gamma 2}| /
246: (E_{\gamma 1}+E_{\gamma 2})$, from the two highest energy photons
247: reconstructed in the event. Jet-like events occur when more than two
248: photons are found, resulting in $E_{trig}>E_{\pi}$ and therefore
249: $M_{\gamma\gamma}>M_{\pi}$. This is observed in Fig. \ref{jet_like}
250: and is accounted for by simulation, which is decomposed
251: into its various contributions. But, events in the FPD at a given
252: $x_F$ occur primarily in portions of the calorimeter closest to the
253: beam because this minimizes $p_T$ (see right panel of
254: Fig. \ref{STAR_sig_results}). For such events the FPD does not have
255: azimuthally symmetric acceptance around the thrust axis for
256: additional particles distributed around the reconstructed $\pi^0$.
257:
258: \begin{figure}[ht]
259: \centerline{\epsfxsize=2.0in\epsfbox{fpdrun5_20060129.eps}~~\epsfxsize=2.0in\epsfbox{fpdpp_photon.eps}}
260: \caption{(left) Layout of STAR forward pion detector used in run 5.
261: (right) Layout of STAR FPD++ that is planned for use in run 6.\label{STAR_FPD++}}
262: \end{figure}
263:
264: The issue of azimuthally symmetric coverage for jet-like events
265: is resolved by an upgrade known as the FPD++ (Fig. \ref{STAR_FPD++})
266: that has been built for the upcoming RHIC run as an engineering
267: test of the STAR Forward Meson Spectrometer (FMS)\cite{FMS}. It consists of
268: two left/right symmetric calorimeters that replace the FPD modules
269: west of the STAR interaction point. The original FPD modules remain
270: on the east side of STAR and are planned to improve the precision of
271: transverse SSA measurements at large $x_F$. As shown in Fig. \ref{STAR_FPD++}, the inner
272: portion of each calorimeter module is essentially identical to the
273: FPD. The outer portion of the calorimeter consists of larger cells\cite{focus}
274: that are placed with azimuthal symmetry about the inner portion. Events can
275: be selected with the FPD++ in an identical manner as used for the FPD
276: that result in sizeable transverse SSA for $\pi^0$ production. The additional detector
277: coverage can be queried for evidence of additional photons that
278: accompany a trigger $\pi^0$ thereby signaling jet-like events. Based on
279: the diphoton invariant mass distribution and the photon multiplicity
280: distribution, at least 16\% of the $\pi^0$ events observed in the FPD
281: with $E_{\pi}\ge 20 $ GeV are accompanied by additional photons in
282: jet-like events.
283:
284: \begin{figure}[ht]
285: \centerline{\epsfxsize=2.8in\epsfbox{ana.eps}}
286: \caption{PYTHIA simulations of FPD++ response for p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV.
287: $E_{trig}$ ($E_{sum}$) is the energy sum in the central section (entire) of the calorimeter
288: (Fig. \ref{STAR_FPD++}. (upper left) most forward hard-scattered parton
289: pseudorapidity distribution; (upper right) distribution of
290: photon energy relative to the thrust axis showing a standard
291: jet shape atop an underlying event contribution; (middle left) photon energy
292: sum scaled by the most forward hard-scattered parton energy; (middle right)
293: difference distribution of the $\eta$ reconstructed from the
294: vector sum of the detected photon momenta and the parton $\eta$;
295: (bottom) projected statistical precision for jet-like events for 5 /
296: pb of polarized proton integrated luminosity. \label{jet_like_sim}}
297: \end{figure}
298:
299: Fig. \ref{jet_like_sim} shows PYTHIA 6.222 \cite{pythia} simulations
300: that provide an operational definition of what we mean by jet-like
301: events. PYTHIA is expected to have predictive power in this
302: kinematics because it has been previously shown to agree with
303: measured forward pion cross sections\cite{dubna}. To explore jet-like
304: events, minimum-bias PYTHIA events are selected when the summed
305: photon energy in the inner portion of a FPD++ module, defined as
306: $E_{trig}$, exceeds 18 GeV. To facilitate possible reconstruction of
307: forward $\pi^0+\pi^0$ pairs, events are further required to have more
308: than 3 photons within the full acceptance of an FPD++ module. These
309: requirements mean that selected events with energy from incident
310: photons summed over the entire FPD++ module ($E_{sum}$) may exhibit
311: jet-like behavior. The upper left panel of Fig. \ref{jet_like_sim}
312: shows the pseudorapidity distribution of the most forward angle
313: hard-scattered parton when $E_{sum}>40$ GeV. It is peaked at $\eta\approx$3.3,
314: corresponding to the location of the triggering portion of the FPD++
315: module. The small background near midrapidity has contributions from
316: large Bjorken $x$ quarks that emit initial-state radiation that
317: subsequently scatters from soft gluons from the other proton. The
318: distribution of the photon energy relative to the thrust axis of the
319: forward scattered parton is shown in the upper right panel of
320: Fig. \ref{jet_like_sim}. Jet-like behavior is evident, although
321: evidence for contributions from the underlying event is also present.
322: The summed photon energy within the FPD++ acceptance gives a good
323: representation of the forward scattered parton, albeit shifted in its
324: energy scale. Furthermore, the vector sum of the detected photon
325: momenta faithfully reconstructs ($\eta_{recon}$) the direction of the
326: scattered parton. From the middle right panel of
327: Fig. \ref{jet_like_sim}, the symmetry of the
328: $\delta\eta=\eta_{recon}-\eta_{parton}^{max}$ distribution indicates
329: that the underlying event is not skewed from fragments of the beam
330: jets. Projections for the uncertainties that could be measured on the
331: $A_N$ for these jet-like events with 5 pb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity
332: recorded in a data sample with beam polarization of 50\% are shown in
333: the bottom panel of Fig. \ref{jet_like_sim}.
334:
335: In addition, the FPD++ is expected to allow for robust detection of
336: large $x_F$ direct photon production. Rather than searching for
337: coincident photons, the outer portion of the calorimeters can serve to
338: remove neutral meson contributions, to extract events with only a
339: single energetic photon observed in the calorimeter. The resulting
340: yield would be predominantly prompt photon events, including direct
341: photons and fragmentation photons. The calorimetric coverage will
342: allow suppression of most of the latter events. We expect
343: $\approx$70,000 direct photon events with $E\ge25$ GeV in a data
344: sample from the FPD++ that records 5 pb$^{-1}$ of $p+p$ collisions at
345: $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV. These photon energies are larger than the
346: simulated cutoff in the distribution of energy deposition by
347: charged hadrons incident on the calorimeter.
348:
349: The left/right symmetry of the FPD++ is important for the cancellation
350: of systematic errors. With that symmetry, so-called cross ratio
351: methods can be used for extracting single-spin asymmetries for $\pi^0$
352: production, jet-like events and prompt photon events. Another benefit
353: of the symmetry is for coincident events. The opening angle between
354: the two calorimeters is well matched to that required for large-$x_F$
355: production of objects with invariant mass of order 3 GeV/c$^2$ that
356: decay to either photons, neutral mesons or electron-positron pairs.
357:
358: The end result is that the upcoming RHIC run should provide exciting
359: results for transverse spin physics. Perhaps of greatest interest is
360: the prospect for isolation of the Sivers function both at midrapidity
361: and for forward particle production. Its isolation may establish
362: the dynamical origin of transverse SSA for large-$x_F$ $\pi$
363: production and may conclusively demonstrate orbital motion of the
364: constituents of the proton.
365:
366:
367: \section{Acknowledgements}
368: The forward calorimetry work is done with the STAR collaboration.
369: I would like to acknowledge all members of the RHIC spin collaboration
370: (RSC) for making the RHIC-spin program a reality. The RSC is a
371: group including members of the RHIC experiments, members of
372: the BNL Collider-Accelerator Department, experts in the RHIC
373: polarimeters required to determine the beam polarization, and
374: theorists. I would also like to thank Akio Ogawa, Hank Crawford, Jack
375: Engelage, Carl Gagliardi, Steve Heppelmann, Larisa Nogach, Greg
376: Rakness, Gerry Bunce and Werner Vogelsang for their comments and help.
377: This work was supported by DOE Medium Energy Physics.
378:
379: \begin{thebibliography}{0}
380:
381: \bibitem{sivers} D. Sivers, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 41} (1990) 83; {\bf 43}
382: (1991) 261.
383:
384: \bibitem{collins} J. Collins, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B396} (1993) 161;
385: J. Collins, S.F. Heppelmann, G.A. Ladinsky, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B420}
386: (1994) 565.
387:
388:
389: \bibitem{BHS} S.J. Brodsky, D.S. Hwang and I. Schmidt,
390: Phys. Lett. {\bf B539} (2002) 99.
391:
392: \bibitem{HERMES} A. Airapetian {\it et al.} (HERMES collaboration),
393: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94} (2005) 012002.
394:
395: \bibitem{Belle} K. Abe {\it et al.} (Belle collaboration), to be
396: published in the proceedings of the Lepton Photon 2005 Conference,
397: [hep-ex/0507063].
398:
399: \bibitem{FPD} J. Adams {\it et al.} (STAR collaboration),
400: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92} (2004) 171801.
401:
402: \bibitem{anselminocollins} M.~Anselmino, M.~Boglione, and F.~Murgia,
403: Phys.\ Rev.\ D\ {\bf 60}, 054027 (1999); M.~Boglione and E.~Leader,
404: Phys.\ Rev.\ D\ {\bf 61}, 114001 (2000).
405:
406: \bibitem{anselminosivers} M.~Anselmino, M.~Boglione, and F.~Murgia,
407: Phys.\ Lett.\ B\ {\bf 362}, 164 (1995); M.~Anselmino and F.~Murgia,
408: {\it ibid.}\ {\bf 442}, 470 (1998); U. D'Alesio and F. Murgia, AIP
409: Conf.\ Proc.\ {\bf 675} 469 (2003).
410:
411: \bibitem{qiusterman} J.~Qiu and G.~Sterman, Phys.\ Rev.\ D\ {\bf
412: 59}, 014004 (1998).
413:
414: \bibitem{koike} Y.~Koike, AIP Conf.\ Proc.\ {\bf 675}, 449 (2003).
415:
416: \bibitem{E704} D.~L.~Adams {\it et al.}, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 261}, 201
417: (1991); {\bf 264}, 462 (1991).
418:
419: \bibitem{kperp} M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D'Alesio, E. Leader and
420: F. Murgia, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 71} (2005) 014002.
421:
422: \bibitem{Morozov} D. Morozov (for the STAR collaboration), to be published in the proceedings of XI
423: Workshop on High Energy Spin Physics [hep-ex/0512013].
424:
425: \bibitem{brahms} F. Vidabaek (for the BRAHMS collaboration), to be published in the proceedings of
426: the PANIC 2005 Conference [nucl-ex/0601008].
427:
428: \bibitem{bs} C. Bourrely and J. Soffer, Eur. Phys. Journ. {\bf C36} (2004)
429: 371.
430:
431: \bibitem{Ogawa} A. Ogawa (for the STAR collaboration), published in the proceedings of DIS2004
432: [hep-ex/0408004].
433:
434: \bibitem{PHENIX_pi0} S.S. Adler {\it et al.} (PHENIX collaboration),
435: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91} (2003) 241803.
436:
437: \bibitem{PHENIX_had} S.S. Adler {\it et al.} (PHENIX collaboration),
438: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 95} (2005) 202001.
439:
440: \bibitem{STAR_jet} M. Miller (for the STAR collaboration), to be
441: published in the proceeding of the PANIC 2005 conference.
442:
443: \bibitem{QCD_calc} F. Aversa {\it et al.}, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B327}
444: (1989) 105; B. Jager {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 67} (2003)
445: 054005; D. de Florian, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 67} (2003) 054004.
446:
447: \bibitem{BV} D. Boer and W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 69} (2004)
448: 094025.
449:
450: \bibitem{BBMP} A. Bacchetta, C.J. Bomhof, P.J. Mulders and F. Pijlman,
451: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 72} (2005) 034030.
452:
453: \bibitem{Henry} T. Henry (for the STAR collaboration), J. Phys. {\bf G30} (2004) S1287.
454:
455: \bibitem{spinplan} C. Aidala {\it et al.}, {\it Research Plan for Spin
456: Physics at RHIC}, February, 2005 (http://spin.riken.bnl.gov/rsc/report/masterspin.pdf).
457:
458: \bibitem{FMS} L.C. Bland {\it et al.}, Eur. Phys. Journ. {\bf C43}
459: (2005) 427.
460:
461: \bibitem{focus} J. Cumalat, Int. J. Mod. Phys. {\bf A20} (2005) 3692.
462:
463: \bibitem{pythia} T. Sj\"{o}strand, P. Eden, C. Friberg,
464: L. L\"{o}nnblad, G. Miu, S. Mrenna, E. Norrbin, Computer Physics
465: Commun. {\bf 135} (2001) 238.
466:
467: \bibitem{dubna} L.C. Bland (for the STAR collaboration), contribution to the 10$^{th}$ Workshop on
468: High Energy Spin Physics [hep-ex/0403012].
469:
470:
471: \end{thebibliography}
472:
473: \end{document}
474: