1: \documentclass{elsart}
2: \sloppy
3: \usepackage{epsf}
4: \usepackage{pst-node}
5: \usepackage{graphics}
6: \pagenumbering{arabic}
7:
8: \usepackage{amssymb}
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \begin{frontmatter}
12:
13: \title{\mbox{Measurement of the $\boldmath\Upsilon$ Production Cross Section}\\
14: \mbox{in 920\,\,GeV Fixed-Target Proton-Nucleus Collisions}
15: }
16:
17: \begin{center}
18: {\bf The HERA-B collaboration}
19: \end{center}
20: \input{authors_epjc.tex}
21: \vspace*{-3ex}
22: \begin{abstract}
23: % Text of abstract
24: The proton-nucleon cross section ratio
25: $R=\mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to{}l^+l^-)\cdot{d\sigma(\Upsilon)/dy}|_{y=0}\,/\,{\sigma(J/\psi)}$
26: has been measured
27: with the HERA-B spectrometer
28: in fixed-target
29: proton-nucleus collisions at 920~GeV proton beam energy
30: corresponding to a proton-nucleon cms energy of $\sqrt{s}=41.6$~GeV.
31: The combined results for the %$\Upsilon$~
32: decay channels
33: $\Upsilon\to e^+e^-$ and $\Upsilon\to\mu^+\mu^-$
34: yield a ratio $R=(9.0 \pm 2.1)\cdot 10^{-6}$.
35: The corresponding
36: $\Upsilon$~production cross section per nucleon at mid-rapidity ($y=0$) has been determined
37: to be
38: $\mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to{}l^+l^-)\cdot{d\sigma(\Upsilon)/dy}|_{y=0}= 4.5 \pm 1.1 $~pb/nucleon.
39: \end{abstract}
40:
41:
42: \date{ }
43: \begin{keyword}
44:
45: $\Upsilon$~mesons
46: \sep
47: cross section
48: \sep
49: proton-nucleus collisions
50: \sep
51: $\sqrt{s}=41.6$~GeV
52:
53: % PACS codes here, in the form: \PACS code \sep code
54: \PACS
55: {13.20.Gd} % Decays of $J/\psi$, $\Upsilon$, and other quarkonia
56: \sep
57: {13.85.Qk} % Inclusive production with identified leptons, photons, or other nonhadronic particles
58: \sep
59: {14.40.Gx} % Mesons with $S=C=B=0$, mass~$>2.5$~GeV (including quarkonia)
60: \sep
61: {24.85.+p} % Quarks, gluons, and QCD in nuclei and nuclear processes
62: \end{keyword}
63:
64: \end{frontmatter}
65:
66: %%upright Greek letters (example below: upright ``mu'')
67: \newcommand{\greeksym}[1]{{\usefont{U}{psy}{m}{n}#1}}
68: \newcommand{\umu}{\mbox{\greeksym{m}}}
69: \newcommand{\udelta}{\mbox{\greeksym{d}}}
70: \newcommand{\uDelta}{\mbox{\greeksym{D}}}
71: \newcommand{\uPi}{\mbox{\greeksym{P}}}
72: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
73:
74: %=======================
75: \section{Introduction}
76: %=======================
77:
78:
79: In recent years, there has been a rapid development of models
80: describing quarkonium, especially charmonium,
81: production, with great success both in the high- and low-energy
82: range (see e.g.\ review \cite{vogt,QWG} and references therein).
83: These developments are driven by the
84: available measurements of charmonium production, and the implication
85: of a possible suppression of charmonium production
86: as an indicator for a Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) \cite{QGP1,QGP2}.
87: Bottomonium production represents a natural field for testing
88: the predictions of these models~\cite{vogt}.
89: Measurements of the $\Upsilon$~production cross
90: section\footnote{Throughout this paper we refer to the sum of
91: $\Upsilon(1S)+\Upsilon(2S)+\Upsilon(3S)$ cross sections
92: as the $\Upsilon$~cross section.} have been performed
93: by many experiments \cite{badier}--\cite{cdf}
94: in the wide range of the proton-nucleon centre-of-mass (cms) energy $\sqrt{s}$ of 19 to 1800~GeV,
95: and with targets ranging from proton ($A=1$) to platinum ($A=195$)
96: with both proton and antiproton beams.
97:
98:
99: Usually, the result of bottomonium production measurements is
100: presented as the product of the differential cross section at
101: mid-rapidity $d\sigma(\Upsilon)/dy\big|_{y=0}$
102: times branching ratio~\cite{vogt}.
103: However, the acceptance of most of the fixed-target experiments
104: which have so far measured bottomonium production, is not in the
105: region of central collisions, $y=0$, so that systematic
106: effects in determining the total cross section can be substantial.
107: More specifically, precisely in the energy region of HERA-B,
108: the available results \cite{moreno,McGaughey}
109: disagree by about a factor of two
110: (see Table~\ref{tab-exper}%
111: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
112: \footnote{Both papers \cite{moreno,McGaughey} quote the differential cross section
113: in terms of the Feynman scaling variable $x_F$ which we transform to rapidity $y$.
114: The two quantities are related via
115: $d\sigma(\Upsilon)/dx_F\big|_{x_F=0}=F(\sqrt{s})\cdot d\sigma(\Upsilon)/dy|_{y=0}$,
116: where $F(\sqrt{s})$ is a coefficient which depends on the
117: (measured) transverse momentum distribution of the produced $\Upsilon$ mesons.
118: Its numerical value is $1.98\pm0.03$ and $2.12\pm0.03$ for $\sqrt{s}=38.8$~GeV and
119: $\sqrt{s}=41.6$~GeV, respectively.}%
120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
121: ) which cannot be explained by a large nuclear suppression~\cite{e866-alpha}.
122: HERA-B covers the region of mid-rapidity, implying less uncertainty
123: in the determination of the total cross section,
124: and can thus contribute to the
125: know\-ledge of $\Upsilon$~production, despite its rather small sample size.
126: Furthermore, both $\Upsilon\to\mu^+\mu^-$ and $\Upsilon\to e^+e^-$
127: decay channels are measured simultaneously, providing an additional statistically
128: independent cross check.
129:
130:
131: %==============================================================================
132: % Table 1
133: %==============================================================================
134: \begin{table}
135: \begin{center}
136: \caption{Summary of the available measurements of the $\Upsilon$~production cross section
137: in $p$A collisions near $\sqrt{s}$ = 41.6~GeV.
138: The published result of \cite{McGaughey} refers to the
139: production of $\Upsilon$(1S) only and has been rescaled using Eq.\,(\ref{e605-fractions}) to also include
140: $\Upsilon$(2S) and $\Upsilon$(3S).
141: In the case of E771 \cite{e771}, the published value has been corrected
142: to include the $\Upsilon$(3S) state and the coefficient $\Delta y_{\rm eff}$ (see Sect.\,\ref{sect-syst}).
143: Overall normalization uncertainties of 15\% (Ref.\,\cite{moreno}) and 10\% (Ref.\,\cite{McGaughey})
144: have been included.
145: }
146: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
147: \label{tab-exper}
148: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
149: \hline
150: $\sqrt{s}$, & $\mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to{}l^+l^-) \cdot d\sigma(\Upsilon)/dy\big|_{y=0}$, & Tar- & Expe- \\[-1ex]
151: GeV & pb/nucleon & get & riment \\
152: \hline
153: 38.8 & $2.11\pm 0.33$ & Cu & E605 \cite{moreno} \\
154: 38.8 & $2.31\pm 0.38$ & Be & E605 \cite{yoshida} \\
155: 38.8 & $4.7 \pm 0.5$ & D & E772 \cite{McGaughey}\\
156: 38.8 & $7.7 \pm 3.2$ & Si & E771 \cite{e771}\\
157: \hline
158: \end{tabular}
159: \end{center}
160: \end{table}
161: %==============================================================================
162:
163: %=======================
164: \section{Measurement method}
165: %=======================
166:
167: We determine the $\Upsilon$~production cross section
168: by comparing the relative
169: yields of $\Upsilon$ and $J/\psi$ production, and normalizing to
170: the known $J/\psi$ cross section: % (\cite{e789,e771-jpsi}).
171: \begin{eqnarray}
172: \hspace*{-8mm}
173: \mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to l^+l^-)\cdot{d\sigma\over dy}(\Upsilon)\Big|_{y=0}=
174: \mbox{Br}(J/\psi\to l^+l^-)
175: % \nonumber \\
176: \cdot \,\sigma(J/\psi)
177: \cdot {N(\Upsilon)\over N(J/\psi)}
178: \, {\varepsilon(J/\psi) \over {\varepsilon(\Upsilon)}}
179: \, {1\over\Delta y_{\rm eff}}
180: \hspace*{5mm}
181: \label{basic}
182: \end{eqnarray}
183: and in addition, we define the ratio of the mid-rapidity $\Upsilon$ cross section
184: to the total $J/\psi$ cross section as
185: \begin{equation}
186: R_{J/\psi} \equiv {{\mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to l^+l^-)\cdot
187: {d\sigma(\Upsilon)/dy}}|_{y=0} \over \sigma(J/\psi)}\,\,.
188: \label{eq-rjpsi}
189: \end{equation}
190:
191:
192:
193: Here, $\sigma(J/\psi)$ is the $J/\psi$ production cross section, and
194: $N(\Upsilon)$ and $N(J/\psi)$ are the numbers of observed $\Upsilon$
195: and $J/\psi$ decays, respectively.
196: The branching ratio $J/\psi\to l^+l^-$ is taken as the average of
197: the most recent values for $J/\psi\to e^+e^-$ and $J/\psi\to \mu^+\mu^-$~\cite{pdg},
198: $\varepsilon(J/\psi)/\varepsilon(\Upsilon)$ is the ratio of
199: $J/\psi$ and $\Upsilon$~trigger and reconstruction efficiencies
200: determined from Monte Carlo simulations,
201: and $\Delta y_{\rm eff}$ is the coefficient relating the full and
202: differential $\Upsilon$ cross section at mid-rapidity $y=0$:
203: $\sigma(\Upsilon) = \Delta y_{\rm eff} \,\, d\sigma(\Upsilon)/dy\big|_{y=0}$
204: (see Sect.\,\ref{sect-syst}).
205: In this way the result is independent of the luminosity determination, and
206: systematic uncertainties due to
207: absolute trigger efficiencies cancel out to a large extent, since only relative
208: efficiencies between $\Upsilon$ and $J/\psi$ and relative acceptances enter the final result.
209: For $\sigma(J/\psi)$ at $\sqrt{s}=41.6$~GeV we use the value
210: \begin{equation}
211: \sigma_{pN}(J/\psi)=502 \pm 44\,{\mbox{nb}\over\mbox{nucleon}}
212: \label{jpsi-reference}
213: \end{equation}
214: obtained
215: from a global fit \cite{jpsi-reference} of $J/\psi$ production data%
216: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
217: \footnote{The global fit includes our own measurement of the $J/\psi$ cross section
218: $
219: % \sigma_{pN}^{HERA-B}(J/\psi)=
220: 663 \pm 74 \pm 46\,{\mbox{nb}/\mbox{nucleon}}$
221: \cite{herab-jpsi}.
222: We prefer to normalize the present measurement to the value given by
223: the global fit since the fit provides a complete summary of all
224: available measurements.}%
225: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
226: , after adjusting the data using a common nuclear suppression parameter
227: $\alpha=0.96\pm0.01$ ~\cite{e866-alpha} and the latest value of branching ratio
228: $\mbox{Br}(J/\psi\to l^+l^-)$ \cite{pdg}.
229: Eq.\,(\ref{basic}) assumes the same numerical values of $\alpha$ parameters
230: for $\Upsilon$ and $J/\psi$ production in accordance with the
231: experimental data~\cite{e866-alpha,alde}.
232:
233: \section{The HERA-B detector and the data sample}
234: %=======================
235:
236:
237: HERA-B is a fixed-target experiment at the 920-GeV HERA proton storage ring of DESY
238: and consists of a forward magnetic spectrometer
239: featuring a high resolution vertexing and tracking system and offering
240: a good coverage of the central region of collisions
241: (the $x_F$ range is about $[-0.6, 0.15]$ for $\Upsilon$ production and
242: about $[-0.35, 0.15]$ for $J/\psi$ production,
243: corresponding to the rapidity ranges about $[-1.2, 0.3]$
244: and $[-1.5, 0.5]$, respectively).
245:
246: The main components of the detector
247: are sketched in Fig.\,\ref{herab-setup}.
248: The target consists of wires of various materials which are
249: inserted into the halo of the HERA proton beam.
250: Data are taken with carbon, tungsten and titanium target wires operated at an interaction
251: rate between 5 and 8~MHz.
252: The Vertex Detector System (VDS) consists of silicon micro-strip
253: detectors located within the vacuum vessel of the target.
254: The first station of the main tracker is placed upstream
255: of the 2.13~T$\cdot$m
256: dipole magnet and
257: the remaining 6 tracking stations are placed downstream.
258: Muon identification is performed by
259: the muon detector (MUON), while the electrons are
260: detected and identified by the electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL).
261:
262: The trigger chain includes pretriggers provided by ECAL and MUON
263: for the lepton candidate search, and a first level trigger (FLT) which
264: finds tracks downstream of the magnet starting from the pretrigger seeds.
265: The FLT requires that at least two pretrigger candidates be present in
266: an event and that an FLT track be found from at least one of them.
267: The (software) second level trigger (SLT) starts from pretrigger candidate tracks,
268: confirms them in the tracker and VDS using a simplified Kalman filter algorithm, and
269: accepts the event if either two electron or two muon candidates with a common vertex are found.
270: The trigger imposes
271: a cut on the transverse energy $E_T$ of the electrons,
272: and an implicit cut on the transverse momentum $p_T$ of the muons.
273: A more detailed description of the HERA-B detector, trigger and
274: reconstruction chain can be found in Refs.\,\cite{herab,bbar-2005}, and references therein.
275: This analysis is based on
276: $134\cdot10^6$ events
277: obtained in the 2002--2003 physics run.
278:
279: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
280: \begin{figure}[tb]
281: \begin{center}
282: \epsfxsize=1.05\textwidth\epsfbox{herab-setup.eps}
283: \caption{Plan view of the HERA-B detector.}
284: \label{herab-setup}
285: \end{center}
286: \end{figure}
287: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
288:
289: %=======================
290: \section{Data analysis}
291: %=======================%=======================
292: \subsection{Monte Carlo simulation, trigger and reconstruction efficiency}
293: \label{mumu-recoeffi}
294: %=======================
295:
296: Monte Carlo simulation is performed for $J/\psi$, $\Upsilon$ and
297: Drell-Yan production.
298: Heavy quarkonia and Drell-Yan production are simulated with
299: PYTHIA 5.7 \cite{PYTHIA}.
300: The energy remaining after the quarkonium or Drell-Yan
301: generation is passed to FRITIOF 7.02 \cite{FRITIOF}
302: to simulate the underlying $p$A interaction.
303: Finally, additional inelastic $p$A interactions, generated by FRITIOF, are
304: superimposed according to the multiple-interaction probabilities
305: of five separate running periods.
306: After tracking the particles through the detector material with GEANT
307: 3.21 \cite{GEANT} and a realistic digitization simulation, the event is
308: reconstructed by the same reconstruction program which is used for
309: the real events.
310: The trigger and the detector parameters are tuned for the
311: individual data taking periods.
312: To have a realistic description of the kinematic distributions for $J/\psi$
313: and $\Upsilon$, the PYTHIA generation has been tuned
314: by reweighting
315: according to the differential distributions
316: from the high-statistics data of Refs.\,\cite{moreno,McGaughey,e789,e771-jpsi}.
317: The relative trigger and reconstruction efficiencies are determined
318: from Monte Carlo simulations. For the muon channel, the ratio of
319: efficiencies is
320: ${\varepsilon(J/\psi)/\varepsilon(\Upsilon)} = 0.76\pm0.05$.
321: The departure from unity is a result of the trigger
322: $p_T$ cut which affects muons from $J/\psi$ decay more strongly than
323: muons from $\Upsilon$ decay due to the different mass scale. Because
324: of a harder cut on $E_T$ at the trigger level, the difference is even
325: larger in the electron channel:
326: ${\varepsilon(J/\psi)/\varepsilon(\Upsilon)} = 0.31\pm0.03$.
327:
328:
329: \subsection{Event selection}
330: %=======================
331:
332:
333: The event selection includes cuts on the quality of tracks,
334: most notably, that the tracks must have segments in both
335: the VDS and the main tracker and that ``clones''
336: (nearby reconstructed tracks originating from the same real physical track)
337: be removed.
338: Further requirements are that either two muon or two electron candidates of opposite
339: charge and with a common vertex are present. Muon candidates are required to penetrate to
340: the muon detector layers behind the absorber material.
341: Electrons are identified by requiring an energy deposit (cluster) in the ECAL.
342: Bremsstrahlung photons emitted by electrons in front of the magnet are recovered
343: for better energy resolution and
344: additional electron identification \cite{bbar-2005}.
345: The transverse energy $E_T$ at ECAL must exceed 0.95~GeV,
346: and the ratio between the energy as measured
347: by the ECAL and the momentum must be close to unity
348: ($0.85<E/p<1.25$ and, in addition, $E/p>0.9$ when no
349: bremsstrahlung photon is found).
350:
351:
352: To suppress background from secondaries produced
353: in the beam pipe which reach the muon chambers,
354: we impose cuts on the muon transverse momentum, $p_T$,
355: which are linear functions of the mass with cut ranges:
356: $p_T\in[3,6]\mbox{~GeV}/c$ for the invariant mass $m=m_\Upsilon$,
357: $p_T\in[0.7,4]\mbox{~GeV}/c$ for $m=m_{J/\psi}$
358: and cuts on the muon total momentum $p$:
359: $p\in[15,190]\mbox{~GeV}/c$ for $m=m_\Upsilon$,
360: $p\in[4,100]\mbox{~GeV}/c$ for $m=m_{J/\psi}$;
361: for intermediate dilepton masses a linear interpolation of the cut limits is used.
362: For electrons which do not suffer from a similar background, the cut
363: for the electron total momentum is $p\in[4,190]\mbox{~GeV}/c$
364: and for the transverse momentum $p_T\in[0.7,6]\mbox{~GeV}/c$.
365: After applying these cuts, the lepton momentum spectra
366: for the mixture of signal and all background sources
367: are similar in the data and Monte Carlo.
368:
369:
370: %=======================
371: \subsection{Description of signal and background}
372: %=======================
373: \subsubsection{Muon channel}
374: \label{mumu-channel}
375: %=======================
376:
377:
378: %------------------------------------------------------
379: \begin{figure}[t]
380: \begin{center}
381: \epsfxsize=0.99\textwidth\epsfbox{pic-jpsmm.eps}
382: \caption{Fit of the dimuon mass spectrum obtained after $J/\psi$ selection cuts.}
383: \label{fig-mumu-jpsi}
384: \end{center}
385: \end{figure}
386: %------------------------------------------------------
387:
388: The dimuon mass spectrum in the $J/\psi$ mass region (Fig.\,\ref{fig-mumu-jpsi})
389: is fitted with a Gaussian folded with contributions from
390: $J/\psi \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^- \gamma$~\cite{spiridonovradiative} for
391: the signal shape, and an exponential
392: of a second-order polynomial for the background.
393: For the combined sample of the three target materials
394: (64\% C, 33\% W, 3\% Ti)
395: we obtain a total of $152900\pm490\,J/\psi$ decays
396: and a width of
397: $38.8\pm0.1$~MeV/$c^2$.
398:
399:
400: For the mass region $m>5$~GeV/$c^2$ (Fig.\,\ref{fig-mumu-fit})
401: we use a similar function to describe the $\Upsilon$~peaks to that used for the description of the $J/\psi$.
402: Due to the lack of statistics, the positions of the $\Upsilon(2S)$ and
403: $\Upsilon(3S)$ states are fixed relative to the $\Upsilon(1S)$
404: state using the PDG mass values~\cite{pdg}, and
405: the relative contributions of the three states are fixed according to the
406: E605 results~\cite{moreno}:
407: \begin{equation}
408: N(1S):N(2S):N(3S)= (70 \pm 3) : (20 \pm 2) : (10 \pm 1). % 9.8 +- 1.4
409: \label{e605-fractions}
410: \end{equation}
411: The width of the $\Upsilon(1S)$
412: state is fixed to the width of the $J/\psi$ scaled by the ratio of
413: the expected momentum resolution for muons from $\Upsilon$ and $J/\psi$ decays resulting in 159~MeV/$c^2$.
414: The widths of the $\Upsilon(2S)$ and $\Upsilon(3S)$ states are scaled
415: proportionally to their masses.
416:
417: In this mass region,
418: the Drell-Yan process as well as random combinations between leptons
419: contribute to the background.
420: As before, we describe the combinatorial background by
421: an exponential of a second-order polynomial, whose shape is determined from a
422: fit to the like-sign $\mu^\pm\mu^\pm$ pair spectrum~(Fig.\,\ref{fig-mumu-likesign}),
423: and a normalization factor which is left as a free parameter.
424: The shape of the Drell-Yan spectrum is determined from a fit to the
425: corresponding reconstructed Monte Carlo events.
426:
427: %------------------------------------------------------
428: \begin{figure}[hbt]
429: \begin{center}
430: \epsfxsize=0.99\textwidth\epsfbox{pic-upsmm.eps}
431: \caption{Fit of the $\Upsilon\to \mu^+\mu^-$ signal (thick line)
432: with the individual contributions of the $\Upsilon(1S)$, $\Upsilon(2S)$, $\Upsilon(3S)$ states
433: shown in thin solid lines.
434: The background consists of Drell-Yan pairs (dashed line) and combinatorial contribution
435: estimated from the $\mu^{\pm}\mu^{\pm}$ spectrum (dotted line).}
436: \label{fig-mumu-fit}
437: \end{center}
438: \end{figure}
439: %------------------------------------------------------
440: %------------------------------------------------------
441: \begin{figure}[hbt]
442: \begin{center}
443: \epsfxsize=0.99\textwidth\epsfbox{pic-likes.eps}
444: \caption{Spectrum of like-sign $\mu^\pm\mu^\pm$ pairs,
445: together with a fit to an exponential of a second-order polynomial.}
446: \label{fig-mumu-likesign}
447: \end{center}
448: \end{figure}
449: %------------------------------------------------------
450:
451: Thus, the free fit parameters for the spectrum
452: with $m>5$~GeV/$c^2$ (Fig.\,\ref{fig-mumu-fit}) are:
453: the total $\Upsilon$~yield, the $\Upsilon(1S)$ mass,
454: the yield of Drell-Yan dileptons, and the height of the combinatorial background.
455: The total $\Upsilon$~yield in the log likelihood fit is
456: $N(\Upsilon) = 30.8 \pm 7.4 _{\rm stat}$.
457: The fit function describes the data well ($\chi^2/\mbox{ndf}=51/54$).
458: Using this value in Eq.\,(\ref{basic}) we obtain
459: $R^{\mu\mu}_{J/\psi} = (7.9 \pm 1.9_{\rm stat})\cdot10^{-6}$,
460: and using the value of the $J/\psi$ cross section Eq.\,(\ref{jpsi-reference}),
461: the cross section for $\Upsilon$~production at mid-rapidity as determined from
462: $\Upsilon \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-$
463: becomes
464: $\mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to\mu^+\mu^-) \cdot {d\sigma(\Upsilon)/dy}|_{y=0} = 4.0 \pm 1.0_{\rm stat}\,{\mbox{pb}/\mbox{nucleon}}$.
465:
466: The fit (Fig.\,\ref{fig-mumu-fit}) shows that the combinatorial background dominates below
467: 7~GeV/$c^2$ but becomes negligible at the $\Upsilon$~mass.
468: We have verified that the generated shape of the Drell-Yan background
469: in Monte Carlo simulations agrees with the published data
470: \cite{moreno,McGaughey,nusea-drell-yan}.
471: Further support for the correctness of the background curves in
472: Fig.\,\ref{fig-mumu-fit} comes from studying
473: a number of sensitive kinematic variables
474: (such as the average momentum asymmetry between the muons).
475: The observed values
476: are compatible with the mixture of signal and background contributions
477: obtained from the fit to the mass spectrum.
478:
479:
480: The fit
481: also provides a measurement of the Drell-Yan (DY)
482: differential cross section $d^2\sigma/(dm\,dy)|_{y=0}$ in the region
483: of the $\Upsilon$~mass, or equivalently
484: the ratio $R_{\rm DY}$~\cite{childress,moreno,yoshida} of
485: the $\Upsilon$~production to the Drell-Yan cross sections
486: $$\displaystyle R_{\rm DY}=
487: {\mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to l^+l^-)\cdot{d\sigma\over dy}(\Upsilon)\Big|_{y=0} \,\,\Big/\,\,
488: \displaystyle {d^2\sigma \over dm\,dy}({\rm DY}){\Big|}_{\rput(2.2ex,3.5ex){\mbox{\scriptsize $y=0$}}m=9.46}}\;\;.$$
489: Similarly to Eq.\,(\ref{basic})
490: we determine for the Drell-Yan cross section:
491: ${ {d^2\sigma \over dm\,dy}({\rm DY})\big|
492: _{\rput(2.2ex,2.5ex){\mbox{\scriptsize $y=0$}}m=9.46}}=
493: 2.0 \pm 0.5 \,{\mbox{pb}/(\mbox{nucleon}\cdot\mbox{GeV/$c^2$}})$
494: and $R^{\mu\mu}_{\rm DY} = 2.0 \pm 0.8 \mbox{~GeV/$c^2$}$
495: where statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined.
496:
497:
498: To compare these results with the published data of the Fermilab
499: fixed-target experiments \cite{moreno,yoshida,McGaughey,nusea-drell-yan}
500: at $\sqrt{s}=38.8$~GeV, we scale the Drell-Yan
501: production cross section with the variable $\tau=m^2/s$ leading to
502: a factor of $1.28\pm0.03$%
503: \footnote{This number agrees well with the theoretical
504: prediction~\cite{vogt-private} of about 1.275 for
505: the mass region $8<m<11$~GeV/$c^2$ .},
506: and the $\Upsilon$~cross section by a factor 1.32
507: (obtained from the fit to the $\Upsilon$~data, see Sect.\,\ref{sect-fits}).
508: The results, scaled to $\sqrt{s}=38.8$~GeV, then become:
509: ${{d^2\sigma \over dm\,dy}({\rm DY})\Big|
510: _{\rput(2.2ex,1.9ex){\mbox{\scriptsize $y=0$}}m=9.46}
511: ^{\sqrt{s}=38.8}}=
512: 1.5 \pm 0.4 \,{\mbox{pb}/(\mbox{nucleon}\cdot\mbox{GeV/$c^2$}})$
513: and $R^{\mu\mu}_{\rm DY}|^{\sqrt{s}=38.8} = 2.0 \pm 0.8 \mbox{~GeV/$c^2$}$,
514: which agrees within the uncertainties with the fits of the data from
515: the Fermilab experiments:
516: $R_{\rm DY}$ between 1.3 and 1.6~GeV/$c^2$
517: \cite{moreno,yoshida}
518: and
519: ${{d^2\sigma \over dm\,dy}({\rm DY})\big|
520: _{\rput(2.2ex,2.5ex){\mbox{\scriptsize $y=0$}}m=9.46}}=
521: 1.4 \pm 0.3 \,{\mbox{pb}/(\mbox{nucleon}\cdot\mbox{GeV/$c^2$}})$
522: \cite{moreno,McGaughey,nusea-drell-yan}.
523:
524: %=======================
525: \subsubsection{Electron channel}
526: %=======================
527:
528: The analysis of dielectron events generally follows the path
529: described for dimuon events.
530: Before fitting, the momentum vectors of the leptons are corrected by
531: adding in the energy of bremsstrahlung photons emitted in the material
532: before the magnet and reconstructed in the calorimeter.
533: The fit function takes into account resolution effects as well as a
534: tail due to non-recovered bremsstrahlung and final state radiation \cite{bbar-2005,spiridonovradiative}.
535: The fit yields $N(J/\psi)=109710\pm930$
536: and a width of
537: $59.9\pm0.8\mbox{~MeV/$c^2$}$
538: for the combined sample of the three target materials
539: (62\% C, 32\% W, and 6\% Ti).
540:
541:
542: %------------------------------------------------------
543: \begin{figure}[hbt]
544: \begin{center}
545: \epsfxsize=0.99\textwidth\epsfbox{pic-jpsee.eps}
546: \caption{Fit of the dielectron mass spectrum obtained after $J/\psi$ selection cuts.}
547: \label{fig-ee-jpsi}
548: \end{center}
549: \end{figure}
550: %------------------------------------------------------
551: %------------------------------------------------------
552: \begin{figure}[hbt]
553: \begin{center}
554: \epsfxsize=0.99\textwidth\epsfbox{pic-upsee.eps}
555: \caption{Fit of the $\Upsilon\to e^+e^-$ signal (thick line)
556: with the individual contributions of the $\Upsilon(1S)$, $\Upsilon(2S)$, $\Upsilon(3S)$ states
557: shown in thin solid lines.
558: The background consists of Drell-Yan (dashed line) and combinatorial contributions (dotted line).
559: }
560: \label{fig-ee-fit}
561: \end{center}
562: \end{figure}
563: %------------------------------------------------------
564:
565: The log likelihood fit of the
566: mass region $m>5$~GeV/$c^2$
567: (Fig.\,\ref{fig-ee-fit}), for which the free parameters are
568: the position of the $\Upsilon(1S)$ peak, the contributions of the $\Upsilon$~signal,
569: of Drell-Yan, and of the combinatorial background,
570: results in $75 \pm 14 _{\rm stat}$ $\Upsilon$~events with $\chi^2/\,\mbox{ndf}=19/27$.
571: This leads to a cross section ratio
572: $R^{ee}_{J/\psi}=(11.0 \pm 2.1_{\rm stat})\cdot 10^{-6}$,
573: and a mid-rapidity cross section for $\Upsilon$~production of
574: $\mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to e^+ e^-)\cdot {d\sigma(\Upsilon)/dy}\big|_{y=0} =
575: 5.5 \pm 1.0_{\rm stat}\,\, {\mbox{pb}/\mbox{nucleon}}$.
576:
577:
578: As for the muon channel, the various energy-dependent kinematic
579: distributions of the electron pairs behave as expected from the
580: relative contributions of the different processes.
581: The imposition of an $E_T$ requirement for electrons in the trigger
582: severely suppresses triggers from like-sign leptons, because of the
583: additional $p_T$-bias of the magnet.
584: The resulting like-sign electron mass spectrum therefore does not
585: describe the combinatorial background and is not used in this analysis.
586: Instead, the combinatorial background is evaluated by mixing
587: tracks from different events.
588: For masses greater than about 6~GeV/$c^2$, the combinatorial background is
589: less than the Drell-Yan contribution and becomes negligible for masses
590: above 9~GeV/$c^2$.
591:
592:
593:
594: The Drell-Yan contribution at $m=9.46$~GeV/$c^2$ is
595: ${{d^2\sigma \over dm\,dy}({\rm DY})\Big|
596: _{\rput(2.2ex,2.5ex){\mbox{\scriptsize $y=0$}}m=9.46}} =
597: 3.7 \pm 1.0\,{\mbox{pb}/(\mbox{nucleon}\cdot\mbox{GeV/$c^2$}})$
598: leading to $R^{ee}_{\rm DY}=1.5\pm0.7\mbox{~GeV/$c^2$}$.
599: Scaling these results to $\sqrt{s}=38.8$~GeV we obtain
600: ${{d^2\sigma \over dm\,dy}({\rm DY})
601: \Big|_{\rput(2.2ex,2.5ex){\mbox{\scriptsize $y=0$}}m=9.46}
602: % ^{\sqrt{s}=38.8}
603: }= 2.9 \pm 0.8 \,{\mbox{pb}/(\mbox{nucleon}\cdot\mbox{GeV/$c^2$})}$,
604: and
605: $R^{ee}_{\rm DY}|^{\sqrt{s}=38.8} = 1.4 \pm 0.6 \mbox{~GeV/$c^2$}$.
606: The Drell-Yan cross section measurements for the electron and muon cases differ by a
607: factor of 1.9, corresponding to 1.6~standard deviations;
608: the ratio $R_{DY}^{ee}$ agrees with the muon case and with Fermilab measurements.
609:
610:
611:
612:
613: %=======================
614: \subsection{Systematic uncertainties}
615: \label{sect-syst}
616: %=======================
617:
618:
619: The systematic uncertainties
620: are dominated by the uncertainties in the description of the background
621: which contribute 14\% for muons
622: and 17\% (including uncertainties in the bremsstrahlung tail) for electrons, respectively.
623: The uncertainties of the relative $J/\psi$ and $\Upsilon$~efficiencies are estimated to be
624: 7\% for muons and 9\% for electrons.
625: The systematic uncertainty of the $J/\psi$ reference cross section Eq.\,(\ref{basic}) is 9\%.
626: The parameter $\Delta y_{\rm eff}(\sqrt{s}) =1.14 \pm 0.12_{\rm syst}$ (precision of 11\%)
627: at $\sqrt{s} = 41.6$~GeV is determined from the fits of existing
628: measurements for $x_F$ and $p_T$ distributions for $\Upsilon$ mesons \cite{moreno,McGaughey}.
629:
630:
631: Other systematic uncertainties are small compared with
632: those already mentioned. Among them are
633: the use of a Gaussian function with a fixed width
634: for fitting of the $\Upsilon$ peaks
635: ($<4\%$),
636: uncertainties of the fractions of the various $\Upsilon$~states in Eq.(\ref{e605-fractions})
637: ($<0.1\%$),
638: the polarization effects in $J/\psi$ and $\Upsilon$ production ($<1.8\%$),
639: and the branching ratio $J/\psi \to l^+l^-$
640: ($<1.7\%$).
641: When, in the electron channel, the particle identification
642: requirements are strengthened by requiring either that one of the two
643: lepton candidates have an associated bremsstrahlung cluster in the
644: calorimeter, or that both have associated clusters, the results change
645: by less than 4\%.
646: The results are stable
647: within the statistical uncertainty
648: for a
649: wide variation of the cuts for muon or electron identification.
650: All contributions, added in quadrature, result in a systematic uncertainty
651: of 21\% in the case of muons, and 25\% in the case of electrons.
652:
653:
654:
655:
656:
657:
658:
659:
660: %==============================================================================
661: \begin{table*}[hbt]
662: \caption{Summary of the input values and the resulting cross sections
663: for both muon and electron channels.}
664: \label{tab-firstsummary}
665: \scriptsize
666: \small
667: \scalebox{1.0}{
668: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
669: \hline
670: Parameter & $\mu^+\mu^-$ channel & $e^+e^-$ channel \\ \hline \hline
671: $N(\Upsilon)$ & $30.8 \pm 7.4$ & $75 \pm 14$ \\ \hline
672: $N(J/\psi)$ & $ 152900 \pm 490$ & $ 109710 \pm 930$ \\ \hline
673: $\varepsilon(J/\psi)/\varepsilon(\Upsilon)$ & $0.76 \pm 0.05$ & $0.31 \pm 0.03$ \\ \hline
674: \hline
675: $\sigma_{pN}(J/\psi)$ & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$502\pm 44$}\\[-1.2ex]
676: (nb/nucleon) & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{} \\ \hline
677: $\mbox{Br}(J/\psi\to l^+l^-)$ & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$(5.90\pm0.10)\%$} \\ \hline
678: $\Delta y_{\rm eff}$ & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$1.14 \pm 0.12_{\rm syst}$} \\ \hline
679: \hline
680: $R_{J/\psi}$ (units of $10^{-6}$) & $7.9 \pm 1.9_{\rm stat} \pm 1.5_{\rm syst}$ &
681: $11.0\pm 2.1_{\rm stat} \pm 2.5_{\rm syst}$ \\ \hline
682: \raisebox{-1ex}{$\displaystyle\mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to{}l^+l^-)\cdot{d\sigma\over dy}(\Upsilon)\,\big|_{y=0}$}
683: & $4.0 \pm 1.0_{\rm stat} \pm 0.8_{\rm syst}$ & $5.5 \pm 1.0_{\rm stat} \pm 1.4_{\rm syst}$ \\[-1.5ex]
684: (pb/nucleon) & & \\ \hline
685: \raisebox{-1.7ex}{$\displaystyle {d^2\sigma({\rm DY})\over dm\,dy}$}
686: & $2.0 \pm 0.5$ & $3.7 \pm 1.0 $ \\[-1.4ex]
687: ($\mbox{pb}/\mbox{nucleon}\cdot \mbox{GeV}/c^2) $ && \\ \hline
688: $R_{\rm DY}$ & $2.0 \pm 0.8 $ & $1.5 \pm 0.7 $ \\[-0.6ex]
689: & & \\ \hline
690: \end{tabular}}
691: \end{table*}
692: %=======================
693:
694: \section{Combined results}
695: \label{sect-fits}
696: %==================
697:
698: Table \ref{tab-firstsummary} summarizes all results obtained
699: in the previous sections.
700: One can see that the results in the muon and electron channels are compatible.
701: Combining the muon and electron channels,
702: we have
703: $$
704: {R_{J/\psi} = (9.0 \pm 2.1) \cdot 10^{-6}}
705: $$
706: and, using the $J/\psi$ reference cross section Eq.\,(\ref{jpsi-reference}),
707: we obtain (Fig.\,\ref{fig-final})
708: \begin{equation}
709: \mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to l^+l^-)\cdot{d\sigma\over dy}(\Upsilon)\,\Big|_{y=0}= 4.5 \pm 1.1 \,\,{\mbox{pb}\over\mbox{nucleon}}\,\,
710: \label{res-syst-combined}
711: \end{equation}
712: where the error includes both statistical and systematic contributions.
713: The systematic
714: uncertainties in the muon and electron channel have a common part
715: of 14\% compared to the full values of 21\% and 25\%, respectively,
716: the dominant contributions being due to the uncertainties
717: of $\Delta y_{\rm eff}$ and the $J/\psi$ reference
718: cross section Eq.\,(\ref{jpsi-reference}).
719: After taking this into account,
720: the $\chi^2$ of the combined result is $\chi^2=0.6$.
721:
722:
723:
724:
725: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
726: \begin{figure}[t]
727: \begin{center}
728: \epsfxsize=0.99\textwidth\epsfbox{pic-herab.eps}
729: \caption{This result (HERA-B) compared to the fit (solid curve) of the data of previous experiments
730: \cite{badier}--\cite{angelis} up to $\sqrt{s}=63$~GeV.
731: The NLO theoretical curves (see description in the text), shown
732: as a dashed line, differ by less than the width of the line.
733: }
734: \label{fig-final}
735: \label{upsfit-all}
736: \end{center}
737: \end{figure}
738: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
739:
740:
741: If, instead of normalizing to the $J/\psi$ cross section,
742: we use the yield and efficiency ratio
743: between $\Upsilon$ and Drell-Yan production
744: together with the DY cross section at $\sqrt{s}=38.8$~GeV of
745: ${d^2\sigma \over dy\,dm}({\rm DY})\big|_{y=0} = (1.35 \pm 0.27)
746: \,\,{{\rm pb}/({\rm nucleon}\cdot{\rm GeV}/c^2)}$~\cite{moreno}, scaled by
747: the factor $1.28 \pm 0.03$ to $\sqrt{s}=41.6$~GeV, we obtain for the
748: $\Upsilon$ production cross section:
749: ${\mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to{}l^+l^-) \cdot {d\sigma\over dy}(\Upsilon)\Big|_{y=0}} =
750: 2.9 \pm 1.1\,\,{{\rm pb}\over{\rm nucleon}}$
751: with a $\chi^2$ of 0.3.
752: However,
753: the published data on
754: the DY process are less abundant than those for the $J/\psi$ cross section and
755: are less precise due to limited
756: statistics and difficulties in separating the $\Upsilon$ signal from the DY continuum.
757:
758: We therefore take the value obtained by normalization to the DY cross
759: section as a confirmation of our main result Eq.\,(\ref{res-syst-combined}), which is
760: obtained by normalization to the $J/\psi$ cross section.
761: Scaling this result by a factor of 1.32
762: (obtained from the fit described below)
763: to compare it to the published data at
764: $\sqrt{s}=38.8$~GeV, we obtain:
765: $\mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to l^+l^-)\cdot{d\sigma\over dy}(\Upsilon)\big|_{y=0}^{\sqrt{s}=38.8}
766: = 3.4 \pm 0.8 \,\,{\mbox{pb}/\mbox{nucleon}}.$
767: Our result lies half-way between the results of E605 \cite{moreno,yoshida}
768: and E772 \cite{McGaughey}
769: and does not
770: favour one of these results over the other.
771: In Fig.\,\ref{fig-final} we compare the result Eq.\,(\ref{res-syst-combined})
772: with the measurements of previous experiments.
773: In most cases, the uncertainties are large with the
774: exception of four measurements obtained at Fermilab at cms energy $\sqrt{s}=38.8$~GeV,
775: which are also those closest in energy to \mbox{HERA-B} ($\sqrt{s}=41.6$~GeV).
776: However, these values are in poor agreement with each other,
777: as summarized in Table\,\ref{tab-exper}.
778:
779:
780:
781: The fit of all experiments in Fig.\,\ref{upsfit-all} (solid line) uses the Craigie parameterization \cite{craigie}
782: $f(\sqrt{s})=\sigma_0 \exp\left(-{m_0/\sqrt{s}}\right)$,
783: yielding
784: $\sigma_0 = 182 \pm 21 $~pb/nucleon,
785: $m_0 = 167 \pm 4 $~GeV,
786: $\chi^2/\mbox{ndf}=37/14$.
787: The dotted line in Fig.\,\ref{upsfit-all} shows fits
788: to predictions of next-to-leading order (NLO) calculations
789: from Ref.\,\cite{vogt-hard-probes}
790: in the framework of the colour evaporation model (CEM) using the MRST~HO parton
791: distribution functions \cite{mrst}.
792: The thickness of the line corresponds to the
793: variations of results in the three sets of input parameters of the model
794: which describe the open beauty production data \cite{vogt-hard-probes}:
795: $m_b=\mu=4.75$~GeV/$c^2$; $m_b=4.5$~GeV/$c^2$, $\mu=2m_b$; and $m_b=5$~GeV/$c^2$, $\mu=m_b/2$,
796: where $m_b$ is the $b$-quark mass and $\mu$ is
797: the renormalization scale
798: (assumed to be equal to the factorization scale).
799: The NLO predictions are
800: normalized according to a fit of the experimental data
801: using the mentioned values of the parameters
802: $m_b$ and $\mu$ \cite{vogt-hard-probes}.
803:
804:
805: %=======================
806: \section{Conclusion}
807: %=======================
808:
809: The $\Upsilon$ production yield at
810: mid-rapidity in $p$A collisions at a
811: proton momentum $p=920$~GeV/$c$ has been measured
812: in both channels $\Upsilon\to\mu^+\mu^-$ and $\Upsilon\to{}e^+e^-$.
813: The $J/\psi$ cross section (\ref{jpsi-reference}) has been used for normalization,
814: and the ratio of $\Upsilon$ and $J/\psi$ cross sections Eq.\,(\ref{eq-rjpsi}) is determined to be
815: $$
816: R_{J/\psi}=(9.0 \pm 2.1)\cdot 10^{-6}.
817: $$
818: The resulting $\Upsilon$ production cross section (both
819: lepton channels combined) is
820: $$
821: \mbox{Br}(\Upsilon\to l^+l^-)\cdot{d\sigma\over dy}(\Upsilon)\,\Big|_{y=0}=
822: 4.5 \pm 1.1 \,\,{\mbox{pb}\over\mbox{nucleon}}\,\,.
823: $$
824: Our result, scaled for $\sqrt{s}$ dependence,
825: lies half-way between those of E605 \cite{moreno,yoshida}
826: and E772 \cite{McGaughey}.
827: Normalization with respect to the Drell-Yan process confirms this result.
828: The result agrees within 1.4 standard deviations
829: with current CEM NLO predictions \cite{vogt-hard-probes} (see Fig.\,\ref{fig-final}).
830:
831:
832: %------------------------------------------------------
833: \vspace{5mm}
834: {\bf Acknowledgments:}
835:
836: We express our gratitude to the DESY laboratory and to the DESY
837: accelerator group for their strong support since the conception of the
838: HERA-B experiment.
839: The HERA-B experiment would not have been possible without the enormous
840: effort and commitment of our technical and administrative staff. It is a
841: pleasure to thank all of them.
842: We would like to thank R.\,Vogt for many stimulating discussions and suggestions.
843:
844:
845: \def\largelinestretch{\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{0.93}}
846: \largelinestretch\small\normalsize
847: %====================================================
848: %
849: % References
850: %
851: %====================================================
852: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
853: %\vspace{-2mm}
854: %\newcommand{\tit}[1]{{}}
855: \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\mbox{References}}
856:
857: \bibitem{vogt} R. Vogt, Phys.~Rept. 310 (1999) 197.
858:
859: \bibitem{QWG}
860: N. Brambilla et al., CERN Yellow Report CERN-2005-005, hep-ph/0412158.
861: %\tit{``Heavy quarkonium physics''.}
862:
863: \bibitem{QGP1}
864: J.F. Gunion and R. Vogt, Nucl. Phys. B492 (1997) 301.
865: %\tit{``Determining the existence and nature of the quark-gluon plasma by $\Upsilon$ suppression at the LHC.''}
866:
867: \bibitem{QGP2}
868: F. Karsch, M.T. Mehr and H. Satz, Z. Phys. C37 (1988) 617.
869: %\tit{``Color screening and deconfinement for bound states of heavy quarks.''}
870:
871: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Experiments
872: \newcommand{\collaboratio}[1]{#1} % To restore collaboration names in the references
873:
874: %\tit{\\ A high-statistics study of $\Upsilon$-meson production in pi-W reactions at 286 GeV/$c$.}
875: \bibitem{badier} \collaboratio{NA3 collab.,} J. Badier et al., Phys.~Lett. B86 (1979) 98.
876: %\tit{\\ First evidence for $\Upsilon$ production by pions.}
877: \bibitem{yoh} J.K. Yoh et al., Phys.~Rev.~Lett. 41 (1978) 684; Erratum ibid. 41 (1978) 1083.
878: \bibitem{innes} W.R. Innes et al., Phys.~Rev.~Lett. 39 (1977) 1240;
879: Erratum ibid. 39 (1977) 1640.
880: \bibitem{ueno} K. Ueno et al., Phys.~Rev.~Lett. 42 (1979) 486.
881: \bibitem{childress} S. Childress et al., Phys.~Rev.~Lett. 55 (1985) 1962.
882: %\tit{\\ Production dynamics of the $\Upsilon$ in proton-nucleon interactions.}
883:
884: \bibitem{moreno} \collaboratio{E605 collab.,} G. Moreno et al., Phys.~Rev. D43 (1991) 2815.
885: %\tit{\\ dimuon production in proton - copper collisions at $s^{(1/2)} = 38.8$ GeV.}
886:
887: \bibitem{yoshida} \collaboratio{E605 collab.,} T. Yoshida et al., Phys.~Rev. D39 (1989) 3516.
888: %\tit{\\ High resolution measurement of massive dielectron production in 800 GeV proton beryllium collisions.}
889:
890: \bibitem{McGaughey}
891: \collaboratio{E772 collab.,} P.L. McGaughey et al., Phys.~Rev. D50 (1994) 3038; Erratum ibid. D60 (1999) 119903.
892: %\tit{\\ cross-sections for the production of high mass muon pairs from 800 GeV proton bombardment of h-2.}
893:
894: \bibitem{e771} \collaboratio{E771 collab.,} T. Alexopoulos et al., Phys.~Lett. B374 (1996) 271.
895:
896: \bibitem{camilleri} \collaboratio{R-108 (CCOR collab.),} L. Camilleri,
897: in: T.B.W. Kirk, H.D.I. Abarbanel (Eds.),
898: Proc. 1979 Int. Symp. on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies,
899: \mbox{Fermilab}
900: (1979), p.282.
901: \bibitem{kourkoumelis} C. Kourkoumelis et al., Phys.~Lett. B91 (1980) 481.
902: %\tit{\\ Characteristics of J/$\psi$ and $\Upsilon$ production at the CERN intersecting storage rings.}
903: \bibitem{angelis} CCOR collab., A.L.S. Angelis et al., Phys.~Lett. B87 (1979) 398.
904: %\tit{\\ A measurement of the production of massive e+ e- pairs in proton proton collisions at s**(1/2) = 62.4 GeV.}
905: \bibitem{albajar} \collaboratio{UA1 collab.,} C. Albajar et al., Phys.~Lett. B186 (1987) 237.
906: %\tit{\\ Beauty production at the CERN proton-antiproton collider.}
907:
908: \bibitem{cdf} \collaboratio{CDF collab.,} F.~Abe et al., Phys.~Rev.~Lett. 75 (1995) 4358.
909:
910: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
911:
912: \bibitem{e866-alpha} \collaboratio{E866/NuSea collab.,} M.J. Leitch et al., Phys.~Rev.~Lett. 84 (2000) 3256.
913:
914: \bibitem{pdg} S.~Eidelman et al., Phys.~Lett. {B592} (2004) 1.
915:
916: \bibitem{jpsi-reference}
917: F. Maltoni et al.,
918: %{Analysis of Charmonium Production at Fixed-Target Experiments in the NRQCD Approach},
919: % Preprint DESY,
920: hep-ph/0601203 (2003), submitted to Phys.~Lett.~B.
921:
922: \bibitem{herab-jpsi}
923: \collaboratio{HERA-B collab.,} I. Abt et al.,
924: % {``Measurement of the $J/\psi$ Production Cross Section in 920~GeV$/c$ Fixed-Target Proton-Nucleus Interactions''},
925: Preprint DESY 05-232, Hamburg (2005), hep-ex/0512029, submitted to Phys.~Lett.~B.
926:
927: \bibitem{alde}
928: E772 collab., D.M. Alde et al., Phys.~Rev.~Lett. 64 (1990) 2479.
929:
930: \bibitem{herab} \collaboratio{HERA-B collab.,} E.~Hartouni {et al.},
931: HERA-B Design Report, DESY-PRC 95-01 (1995);
932: % can be found at\\{http://www-hera-b.desy.de/general/publications/proposal/tdr/tdr.ps.gz}
933: HERA-B collab., HERA-B Status Report, DESY-PRC 00-04 (2000).
934: % \\can be found at {http://www-hera-b.desy.de/general/publications/hb2k/}
935:
936: \bibitem{bbar-2005}
937: \collaboratio{HERA-B collab.,} I. Abt et al.,
938: % {``Improved measurement of the $b\bar{b}$ Production Cross Section in 920~GeV Fixed-Target Proton-Nucleus Collisions''},
939: Preprint DESY 05-233, Hamburg (2005), hep-ex/0512030, Phys.~Rev.~D (in press).
940:
941: \bibitem{PYTHIA} T.~Sj\"ostrand, Comp.~Phys.~Comm. {82} (1994) 74.
942: \bibitem{FRITIOF} H.~Pi, Comp.~Phys.~Comm. {71} (1992) 173.
943: \bibitem{GEANT} R.~Brun {et al.}, GEANT3, CERN-DD-EE-84-1 (1987).
944:
945: \bibitem{e789} \collaboratio{E789 collab.,} M.H.~Schub et al., Phys.~Rev. D52 (1995) 1307;
946: Erratum ibid. D53 (1996) 570.
947: %\tit{\\ Measurement of J/$\psi$ and $\psi$-prime production in 800 GeV/$c$ proton - gold collisions.}
948: \bibitem{e771-jpsi} \collaboratio{E771 collab.,} T. Alexopoulos et al., Phys.~Rev. D55 (1997) 3927.
949:
950: \bibitem{spiridonovradiative} A. Spiridonov,
951: % ``Bremsstrahlung in Leptonic Onia Decays: Effects on Mass Spectra'',
952: Preprint DESY 04-105, Hamburg (2004), hep-ex/0510076.
953:
954: \bibitem{nusea-drell-yan}
955: \collaboratio{E866/NuSea collab.,} J.C. Webb et al.,
956: %Fermilab-Pub-03-302-E (2003);
957: hep-ex/0302019 (2003);
958: %\tit{\\Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. }
959: %\tit{\\Absolute Drell-Yan dimuon cross-sections in 800 GeV/$c$ pp and pd collisions.}
960: \\
961: J.C. Webb,
962: % FERMILAB-THESIS-2002-56 (2003);
963: hep-ex/0301031 (2003);
964: %\tit{\\ Measurement of continuum dimuon production in 800 GeV/$c$ proton-nucleon collisions.}
965: \\
966: E866/NuSea Collab., C.A. Gagliardi et al.,
967: AIP Conf.~Proc. 698 (2004) 100.
968: % Measurement of the Absolute Drell-Yan Dimuon Cross Sections in 800-GeV/c p p and p d collisions.
969: % Prepared for 16th International Conference on Particles and Nuclei (PANIC 02), Osaka, Japan, 30 Sep - 4 Oct 2002.
970:
971: \bibitem{vogt-private} R.~Vogt, private communication (Feb. 2005).
972:
973: \bibitem{craigie} N.S.~Craigie, Phys. Rept. 47 (1978) 1.
974:
975: \bibitem{vogt-hard-probes}
976: % R. Vogt's contribution in
977: M. Bedjidian et al.,
978: % CERN Yellow Book of the Workshop Hard Probes in Heavy Ion Collisions at the LHC,
979: hep-ph/0311048 (2003).
980: %\tit{Hard probes in heavy ion collisions at the LHC: heavy flavor physics.}
981:
982: \bibitem{mrst}
983: A.D. Martin et al., % R.G. Roberts, W.J. Stirling, R.S. Thorne,
984: Eur. Phys. J. C28 (2003) 455.
985: %\tit{``Uncertainties of predictions from parton distributions. 1: experimental errors''.}
986:
987:
988: \end{thebibliography}
989: \end{document}
990:
991: %==============================================================================
992: % END
993: %==============================================================================
994: