1: \subsection{Cut-Based Analysis}
2: \label{cut_based_analysis}
3:
4: This analysis takes the discriminating variables, chooses the best subsets, and
5: finds the optimal points to cut on them in order to improve the expected cross
6: section limits by increasing the signal to background ratio.
7:
8: Optimization of the cut positions is performed by using the signal Monte Carlo
9: events to seed the cut values scanned in the algorithm. The signal and
10: background pass rates are determined for each cut point, an expected limit on
11: the cross section is obtained from these, and the best result is used as the
12: operating point of the analysis.
13:
14: The strategy is to look at the $s$- and $t$-channel processes separately to take
15: full advantage of the kinematical differences between the channels. For each
16: channel, there are four orthogonal analyses: two leptons ($e$, $\mu$) $\times$
17: number of tagged $b$~jets ($=1$, $\ge 2$).
18:
19: The most critical part of this analysis is to find the combination of variables
20: and cuts that leads to the lowest expected cross section limit.
21: We first look at single-variable cuts
22: to determine which variables are most effective in each channel.
23: Once an ordered list of variables is found (ordered by their power to lower the
24: expected limit), sets of variables are formed starting with the best
25: variable and consecutively including one-by-one the rest of the
26: variables. For each set, the optimal cut position of each variable is
27: recalculated. Finally, the variable set that gives the lowest expected limit is
28: chosen.
29: Table~\ref{rgs-vars-cuts} shows the optimal variable sets and
30: cuts found for each channel. Table~\ref{tab:rgs_yield} shows the numbers of
31: events and expected background and signal yields after these cuts
32: have been applied.
33:
34: \begin{table*}[!h!tbp]
35: \begin{center}
36: \begin{ruledtabular}
37: \caption[rgs-vars-cuts]{The best set of variables and cuts for
38: each analysis channel.}
39: \label{rgs-vars-cuts}
40: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
41: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$s$-channel}
42: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$t$-channel} \\
43: Channel & Variables & Cuts & Variables & Cuts \\
44: \hline
45: {\bf Electron} & & & & \\
46: ~~=1 tag & $p_T$(jet1$_{\rm tagged}$) & $> 27$~GeV & $H_{T}({\rm alljets})$ & $> 71$~GeV \\
47: & $M({\rm alljets-jet1_{tagged}})$ & $< 70$~GeV & $M({\rm alljets})$ & $> 57$~GeV \\
48: & $\sqrt{\hat{s}}$ & $> 196$~GeV & $\sqrt{\hat{s}}$ & $> 203$~GeV \\
49: & & & $\left|175-M(W,{\rm jet1_{tagged}})\right|$ & $< 57$~GeV \\
50: & & & $p_T$(jet1$_{\rm tagged}$) & $> 21$~GeV
51: \vspace{0.04in} \\
52: ~~$\ge$2 tags & $p_T$(jet1$_{\rm tagged}$) & $> 42$~GeV & $p_T$(jet1$_{\rm tagged}$) & $> 34$~GeV \\
53: & $M({\rm alljets-jet1_{tagged}})$ & $< 98$~GeV & $M({\rm alljets-jet1_{tagged}})$ & $< 75$~GeV \\
54: & $H({\rm alljets-jet_{best}})$ & $< 304$~GeV & $H({\rm alljets-jet1_{tagged}})$ & $< 504$~GeV \\
55: & $H({\rm alljets-jet1_{tagged}})$ & $< 304$~GeV & $H({\rm alljets-jet_{best}})$ & $< 504$~GeV \\
56: {\bf Muon} & & & & \\
57: ~~=1 tag & $p_T$(jet1$_{\rm tagged}$) & $> 33$~GeV & $\left|175-M(W,{\rm jet1_{tagged}})\right|$ & $< 60$~GeV \\
58: & $M({\rm alljets-jet1_{tagged}})$ & $< 74$~GeV & $\sqrt{\hat{s}}$ & $> 210$~GeV \\
59: & $H({\rm alljets-jet_{best}})$ & $< 504$~GeV & $M({\rm alljets})$ & $> 70$~GeV \\
60: & $H({\rm alljets-jet1_{tagged}})$ & $< 504$~GeV & $H_{T}({\rm alljets})$ & $> 58$~GeV
61: \vspace{0.05in} \\
62: ~~$\ge$2 tags & $p_T$(jet1$_{\rm tagged}$) & $> 33$~GeV & $\left|175-M(W,{\rm jet1_{tagged}})\right|$ & $< 213$~GeV \\
63: & $M({\rm alljets-jet1_{tagged}})$ & $< 74$~GeV & & \\
64: & $H({\rm alljets-jet_{best}})$ & $< 504$~GeV & & \\
65: & $H({\rm alljets-jet1_{tagged}})$ & $< 504$~GeV & &
66: \end{tabular}
67: \end{ruledtabular}
68: \end{center}
69: \end{table*}
70:
71: \begin{table*}[!h!tbp]
72: \begin{center}
73: \begin{ruledtabular}
74: \caption[yields-rgs]{Event yields after the cut-based analysis selection.}
75: \label{tab:rgs_yield}
76: \begin{tabular}{lcccccccc}
77: & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Electron Channel}
78: & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Muon Channel} \\
79: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{=1 Tag} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\ge$2 Tags}
80: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{=1 Tag} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\ge$2 Tags} \\
81: & $s$-channel & $t$-channel & $s$-channel & $t$-channel
82: & $s$-channel & $t$-channel & $s$-channel & $t$-channel \\
83: \hline
84: {\bf Signals} & & & & & & & & \\
85: ~~$tb$ & 1.7 & --- & 0.45 & 0.12 & 1.9 & --- & 0.43 & --- \\
86: ~~$tqb$ & --- & 3.4 & --- & 0.23 & --- & 3.1 & --- & 0.23 \\
87: {\bf Backgrounds} & & & & & & & & \\
88: ~~$tb$ & --- & 1.6 & --- & 0.12 & --- & 1.4 & --- & 0.12 \\
89: ~~$tqb$ & 2.5 & --- & 0.14 & --- & 2.8 & --- & 0.01 & --- \\
90: ~~${\ttbar}{\rar}\ell$+jets
91: & 3.8 & 18.5 & 1.14 & 4.61 & 9.7 & 17.8 & 0.61 & 5.20 \\
92: ~~${\ttbar}{\rar}\ell\ell$
93: & 4.3 & 4.1 & 1.15 & 0.62 & 5.8 & 4.3 & 1.12 & 0.73 \\
94: ~~$Wb\bar{b}$ & 8.4 & 6.3 & 1.72 & 0.54 & 10.2 & 5.2 & 1.85 & 0.52 \\
95: ~~$Wjj$ & 33.4 & 28.9 & 0.74 & 0.60 & 43.6 & 28.8 & 0.95 & 0.64 \\
96: ~~$WW$ & 0.4 & 0.3 & 0.01 & 0.00 & 0.6 & 0.3 & 0.00 & 0.00 \\
97: ~~$WZ$ & 0.4 & 0.3 & 0.09 & 0.01 & 0.4 & 0.2 & 0.09 & 0.01 \\
98: ~~Multijet & 6.8 & 6.9 & 0.20 & 0.14 & 10.1 & 9.9 & 0.11 & 0.01 \\
99: {\bf Summed signals} & 4.3 & 4.9 & 0.59 & 0.35 & 4.7 & 4.5 & 0.53 & 0.35 \\
100: {\bf Summed backgrounds} & 57.5 & 65.3 & 5.04 & 6.54 & 80.3 & 66.7 & 4.71 & 7.20 \\
101: {\bf Summed backgrounds+$tqb$} & 60.0 & 68.6 & 5.18 & 6.76 & 83.1 & 69.8 & 4.81 & 7.43 \\
102: {\bf Summed backgrounds+$tb$} & 59.2 & 66.8 & 5.49 & 6.65 & 82.2 & 68.1 & 5.14 & 7.32 \\
103: {\bf Data} & 60 & 73 & 4 & 9 & 78 & 58 & 10 & 8
104: \end{tabular}
105: \end{ruledtabular}
106: \end{center}
107: \end{table*}
108:
109: A summary of the yield estimates for the signal and backgrounds and the numbers
110: of observed events in data after the cut-based selection, including the systematic
111: uncertainties as described in Sec.~\ref{systematics}, is shown in
112: Table~\ref{tab:cut_yield_sys}.
113: \begin{table}[h!tbp]
114: \begin{center}
115: \caption{Estimates of backgrounds and signal yields and the number
116: of observed events in data after the cut-based selection for the
117: electron and muon, =1 tag and $\geq$2 tags analyses combined.}
118: \label{tab:cut_yield_sys}
119: \begin{ruledtabular}
120: \begin{tabular}{lr@{$\,\pm\!\!\!\!$}lr@{$\,\pm\!\!\!\!$}l}
121: Source & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$s$-channel search} &
122: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$t$-channel search} \\ \hline
123: $tb$ & 4.5 & 1.0 & 3.2 & 0.8 \\
124: $tqb$ & 5.5 & 1.2 & 7.0 & 1.6 \\
125: $W$+jets & 27.6 & 7.6 & 55.9 & 12.3 \\
126: $\ttbar$ & 102.9 & 13.7 & 72.6 & 9.7 \\
127: Multijet & 17.2 & 2.0 & 17.0 & 2.0 \\ \hline
128: Total background & ~~~153.1 & 24.5 & ~~~148.7 & 24.8 \\
129: Observed events & \multicolumn{2}{c}{152} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{148} \\
130: \end{tabular}
131: \end{ruledtabular}
132: \end{center}
133: \end{table}
134:
135: Ths $s$- and $t$-channel combined signal to background ratio improves from
136: around 1/20 after the basic selection (Table~\ref{tab:yield_sys}) to around 1/14
137: after these cuts have been applied. It is clear that more sophisticated
138: separation techniques are needed to isolate the signal better from the large
139: backgrounds.
140:
141:
142: