1: %% ****** Start of file template.aps ****** %
2: %%
3: %%
4: %% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
5: %% Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
6: %%
7: %%
8: %% Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
9: %%
10: %% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
11: %%
12: %
13: % This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.0
14: % Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
15: % That way, you always have this original template file to use.
16: %
17: % Group addresses by affiliation; use superscriptaddress for long
18: % author lists, or if there are many overlapping affiliations.
19: % For Phys. Rev. appearance, change preprint to twocolumn.
20: % Choose pra, prb, prc, prd, pre, prl, prstab, or rmp for journal
21: % Add 'draft' option to mark overfull boxes with black boxes
22: % Add 'showpacs' option to make PACS codes appear
23: \documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,showpacs,groupedaddress]{revtex4} % for review and submission
24: %\documentclass[aps,preprint,showpacs,groupedaddress]{revtex4} % for double-spaced preprint
25: \usepackage{graphicx} % needed for figures
26: \usepackage{dcolumn} % needed for some tables
27: \usepackage{bm} % for math
28: \usepackage{amssymb} % for math
29: \usepackage[dvips]{color}
30: \usepackage{ifthen}
31:
32: \newboolean{color}
33: %\setboolean{color}{true} %%% use color figures
34: \setboolean{color}{false} %%% use gray-level figures
35:
36:
37: \def \ud {{1 \over 2} }
38: \newcommand{\rpv}{\mbox{$\not \hspace{-0.10cm} R_p$}}
39: \newcommand{\MET}{\mbox{$\not \hspace{-0.10cm} E_T$}}
40: \newcommand{\ld}{$\lambda'_{211}$~}
41: \newcommand{\Do}{D0~}
42: \newcommand{\lqd}{\mbox{$LQ\bar{D}$}}
43:
44: \begin{document}
45:
46: % the following line is for submission
47: \hspace{5.2in} \mbox{Fermilab-Pub-06-094-E}
48:
49: \title{Search for resonant second generation slepton production at the Tevatron}
50: \input list_of_authors_r2.tex % input Dzero author list
51: \date{May 3, 2006}
52:
53: %% Abstract -------------------------------------------------------------------
54: \begin{abstract}
55: We present a search for supersymmetry in the $R$-parity violating resonant
56: production and decay of smuons and muon-sneutrinos in the channels
57: $\tilde{\mu}\to\tilde{\chi}^0_1\,\mu$,
58: $\tilde{\mu}\to\tilde{\chi}^0_{2,3,4}\,\mu$, and
59: $\tilde{\nu}_\mu\to\tilde{\chi}^\pm_{1,2}\,\mu$. We analyzed
60: $0.38$~fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity collected between April 2002 and
61: August 2004 with the D0 detector at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider. The
62: observed number of events is in agreement with the standard model
63: expectation, and we calculate 95\%~C.L. limits on the slepton
64: production cross section times branching fraction to gaugino plus muon, as a
65: function of slepton and gaugino masses. In the framework of minimal
66: supergravity, we set limits on the coupling parameter $\lambda'_{211}$,
67: extending significantly previous results obtained in Run I of the Tevatron
68: and at the CERN LEP collider.
69: \end{abstract}
70: \pacs{11.30.Pb, 04.65.+e, 12.60.Jv}
71: \maketitle
72:
73: %% Theory ---------------------------------------------------------------------
74:
75: % $R$-parity
76: Supersymmetry (SUSY) predicts the existence of a new particle for every
77: standard model (SM) particle, differing by half a unit in spin. The quantum
78: number $R$-parity~\cite{farrar}, defined as $R = (-1)^{3B+L+2S}$, where $B$,
79: $L$ and $S$ are the baryon, lepton and spin quantum numbers, is $+1$ for SM
80: and $-1$ for SUSY particles. Often $R$-parity is assumed to be conserved,
81: which leaves the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) stable. However, SUSY
82: does not require $R$-parity conservation.
83:
84: % $R$-parity violating Lagrangian
85: If $R$-parity violation (\rpv) is allowed, the following trilinear and bilinear
86: terms appear in the superpotential~\cite{rpv}:
87: \begin{eqnarray}
88: W_{\scriptsize \rpv}&=& \ud \lambda _{ijk} L_i^{\alpha} L_j^{\beta} \bar{E}_k
89: +\lambda ' _{ijk} L_i^{\alpha} Q_j^{\beta} \bar{D}_k \nonumber\\
90: && + \ud \lambda '' _{ijk} \bar{U}_i^{\xi} \bar{D}_j^{\psi} \bar{D}_k^{\zeta}
91: + \mu_i L_i H_1
92: \label{super}
93: \end{eqnarray}
94: where $L$ and $Q$ are the lepton and quark SU(2) doublet superfields and $E$, $U$,
95: $D$ denote the singlet fields. The indices have the following meaning: $i,j,k =
96: 1,2,3$ = family index; $\alpha, \beta = 1,2 $ = weak isospin index; $\xi,
97: \psi, \zeta = 1,2,3 $ = color index.
98: The coupling strengths are given by the Yukawa coupling constants
99: $\lambda, \lambda'$ and $\lambda''$. The last term, $\mu_i L_i H_1$, mixes
100: the lepton and the Higgs superfields.
101: The $\lambda$ and $\lambda'$ couplings give rise to final states with multiple
102: leptons, which provide excellent signatures at the Tevatron.
103:
104: % L violation and indirect limit from lepton universality
105: In the following we assume that only $\lambda'_{211}$ can be non-zero. This
106: implies (muon) lepton number violation. The \rpv\ coupling constants are already
107: constrained by low-energy experiments, in particular $\lambda'_{211} < 0.059 \cdot
108: m_{\tilde q}/100 \, \mathrm{GeV}$~\cite{referbound}.
109: For the squark masses $m_{\tilde q}$ kinematically accessible at the Tevatron, this limit on
110: $\lambda'_{211}$ is significantly improved by the present analysis.
111:
112: % Existing Limits from previous searches
113: The D0 Collaboration searched for resonant slepton production in
114: Run~I~\cite{d0run1}. The H1 experiment at DESY searched for resonant squark
115: production~\cite{h1squark} in the framework of $R$-parity violating
116: supersymmetry and published limits on the couplings $\lambda'_{1jk}$. The
117: combined limits from the LEP collider at CERN \cite{barbier}, assuming
118: $R$-parity violating decay via \lqd-couplings, are $m$($\tilde{\chi}^0_1$)$\ge
119: 39$~GeV, $m$($\tilde{\chi}^\pm_1$)$\ge 103$~GeV, $m$($\tilde{\nu}_\mu$)$\ge 78$~GeV
120: and $m$($\tilde{\mu}$)$\ge 90$~GeV.
121:
122: % Production
123: At $p\bar{p}$ colliders, an initial $q\bar{q}$ pair can produce a single
124: smuon or muon-sneutrino assuming a non-zero $\lambda'_{211}$ coupling.
125: The $s$-channel production is dominant and depends on the value of this
126: coupling. The contributions of the $t$ and $u$ channels are negligible compared to the
127: resonant $s$ channel~\cite{deliot}.
128:
129: % Decay
130: The slepton can then decay into a lepton and a gaugino without violating
131: $R$-parity. The $\lambda'_{211}$ coupling allows neutralino decays via virtual
132: sparticles (such as muon-sneutrinos, smuons and squarks) into two $1^{\rm st}$
133: generation quarks and one $2^{\rm nd}$ generation lepton. The
134: $\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ decay branching fractions as predicted by mSUGRA, with the
135: ratio of the Higgs expectation values $\tan\beta=5$, the sign of the Higgsino
136: mass parameter $\mu<0$, and the common trilinear scalar coupling $A_0=0$, are
137: assumed, leading to BR($\tilde{\chi}^0_1\to\mu q_1\bar{q}_1'$) $\approx$
138: BR($\tilde{\chi}^0_1\to\nu_\mu q_1\bar{q_1}$). In this analysis, the value of
139: \ld is always larger than $0.03$, therefore the corresponding decay length is
140: negligible. The dominant slepton intermediate decays as well as the
141: corresponding final states are indicated in Table~\ref{table:sl_decays}.
142:
143: \begin{table}[h]
144: \begin{ruledtabular}
145: \begin{tabular}{llll}
146: &$\tilde{l}$ decay channel & Dominant final states \\ \hline
147: &$\tilde \mu \; \to \; \tilde \chi^{0} \, \mu $ & 2~$\mu$, 2~jets \\
148: &$\tilde \mu \; \to \; \tilde \chi^{\pm} \, \nu_\mu $ & 1~$\mu$, \MET, 4~jets\\
149: &$\tilde{\nu}_\mu \; \to \; \tilde \chi^{0} \, \nu_\mu $ & 1~$\mu$, \MET, 2~jets\\
150: &$\tilde{\nu}_\mu \; \to \; \tilde \chi^{\pm} \, \mu $ & 2~$\mu$, 4~jets \\
151: \end{tabular}
152: \end{ruledtabular}
153: \caption{Smuon and muon-sneutrino decay channels: the final states correspond
154: to $\tilde{\chi}^0_1\to\mu q_1\bar{q}_1'$ and $\tilde{\chi}^\pm_1\to
155: qq'\tilde{\chi}^0_1$.}
156: \label{table:sl_decays}
157: \end{table}
158: Because of the challenging multi-jet QCD environment and the advantage of the ability to
159: reconstruct the neutralino and smuon masses, at least two muons were required in the final
160: state. This leaves the three channels (i)~$\tilde{\mu}\to\tilde{\chi}^0_1\,\mu$,
161: (ii)~$\tilde{\mu}\to\tilde{\chi}^0_{2,3,4}\,\mu$, and
162: (iii)~$\tilde{\nu}_\mu\to\tilde{\chi}^\pm_{1,2}\,\mu$ which are analyzed independently.
163: The analysis is insensitive to events where the $\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ decays into
164: $\nu_{\mu}\bar{q}q'$ and where no second muon is created in the cascade.
165:
166: The data for this analysis were recorded by the D0 detector between April 2002 and
167: August 2004 at a center-of-mass energy of 1.96 TeV. The integrated luminosity
168: corresponds to $380\pm 25$~pb$^{-1}$.
169:
170: %%Detector section-------------------------------------------------------------
171:
172: \begin{figure*}[!t]
173: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
174: \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{figure_1a.eps} & \,\,\,\,\,\,&
175: \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{figure_1b.eps}
176: \end{tabular}
177: \caption{\label{fig:prslmet} Invariant di-muon mass in the two-muon sample
178: (a) and reconstructed 4-body mass of two muons and two jets
179: (b). The cascade decays in channels (ii) and (iii) lead to less
180: energy per particle, thus lower invariant masses. The signal
181: expectation for the point with $m_{\tilde{l}}=260$~GeV and
182: $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}=100$~GeV is scaled in plot (a) by a factor of
183: $100$ and in plot (b) by a factor of $5$. The dominant SM
184: background is $Z/\gamma^*\to\mu\mu$; other SM backgrounds are
185: $Z/\gamma^*\to\tau\tau$;
186: $WW$, $WZ$, $ZZ$, $t\bar{t}$ and $\Upsilon$ production. The total SM
187: uncertainty is shown as a dashed black line. The data is
188: in good agreement with the SM expectation.}
189: \end{figure*}
190: The D0 detector~\cite{d0det} has a central tracking system consisting of a
191: silicon microstrip tracker and a central fiber tracker, both located within a
192: 2~T superconducting solenoidal magnet, with designs optimized for tracking
193: and vertexing at pseudorapidities $|\eta|<3$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, respectively. A
194: liquid-argon and uranium calorimeter has a central section covering
195: pseudorapidities $|\eta| \lesssim 1.1$, and two end calorimeters that extend
196: coverage to $|\eta|\approx 4.2$. The muon system covering $|\eta|<2.0$
197: consists of a layer of tracking detectors and scintillation trigger counters in
198: front of 1.8~T iron toroids, followed by two similar layers behind the toroids.
199: %
200: The first level of the trigger (level 1) is based on fast information from
201: the tracking, calorimetry, and muon systems. At the next trigger stage (level
202: 2), the rate is reduced further. These first two levels of
203: triggering rely mainly on hardware and firmware. The final level of the
204: trigger, level 3, with access to the full event information, uses software
205: algorithms to reduce the rate to tape to $50$~Hz.
206:
207: The signal was simulated with {\sc susygen}~\cite{susygen}. The leading-order
208: {\sc susygen} signal cross sections have been multiplied by higher order,
209: slepton-mass dependent QCD-correction factors~\cite{inder} of size
210: $1.4-1.5$ calculated with the CTEQ6M~\cite{cteq} parton distribution functions
211: (PDFs). The influence of the PDF uncertainty on the cross section is $3\%-6\%$,
212: estimated from the CTEQ6M error functions. The influence of the
213: renormalization scale and the factorization scale $\mu_F$ is less than $5\%$
214: for all slepton masses below 500~GeV, if $m(\tilde{l})/2\leq\mu_F\leq2\cdot
215: m(\tilde{l})$~\cite{maike}.
216:
217: The dominant background is inclusive production of $Z/\gamma^*\to\mu\mu$. It
218: was simulated with the {\sc pythia}~\cite{pythia} Monte Carlo (MC) generator
219: and normalized using the predicted next-to-next-to leading order cross section~\cite{dy},
220: calculated with the CTEQ6 PDFs. All other SM processes contribute only
221: slightly to the total background as seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:prslmet}. These
222: contributions were simulated using the {\sc pythia} and {\sc alpgen} generators
223: and normalized using next-to leading order cross section predictions calculated
224: using CTEQ6M PDFs. All MC events were passed through a detailed detector
225: simulation based on {\sc geant} \cite{geant}, followed by the reconstruction
226: program used for data.
227:
228: Events were collected with di-muon triggers requiring at least two muons at
229: level~1. At level~3 at least
230: one track or one muon with a varying transverse momentum $p_T$ threshold of
231: typically $5-15$~GeV was required. To account for the trigger effects,
232: simulated events were weighted using efficiencies determined from the data.
233:
234: All events were required to contain two muons. One of the muons was required
235: to have $p_T>15$~GeV, and the second muon was required to have
236: $p_T>8$~GeV. A central track match was required for both muons.
237: The muons in the signal are expected to be isolated. We define muons as
238: ``loose'' (``tight'') isolated, if the sum of the $p_T$ of the tracks in a
239: cone with radius $R_{\text{cone}}=\sqrt{\Delta\phi^2+\Delta\eta^2}=0.5$,
240: where $\eta=-\ln \tan \frac{\theta}{2}$ is the pseudorapidity and $\theta$
241: is the azimuthal angle, around the muon direction is less than $10$~GeV
242: ($2.5$~GeV), and the sum of the transverse energies of the calorimeter cells
243: in a hollow cone ($0.1 \le R_{\rm cone} \le 0.4)$) is less than $10$~GeV ($2.5$~GeV). Both selected
244: muons were required to pass the tight isolation
245: requirement. The invariant di-muon mass
246: distribution of this di-muon sample is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:prslmet}a.
247: %
248: At least two jets with transverse momentum $p_T \ge 15$~GeV and
249: reconstructed with a cone algorithm
250: ($R_{\text{cone}}=0.5$)~\cite{Blazey:2000qt} were required. Only jets within $|\eta|<2.0$
251: were used. The reconstructed slepton mass with two muons and two jets is
252: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:prslmet}b. The event selection is summarized in
253: Table~\ref{table:cutflow}.
254: \begin{table}[!b]
255: \begin{ruledtabular}
256: \begin{tabular}{lrr@{$\,\pm$}l@{$\,\pm$}rrr}
257: Cut & Data & \multicolumn{3}{c}{SM expectation} &
258: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Signal eff.}\\\hline%\rule{0mm}{2.5ex}%
259: 2$\mu$ selection & 23206 & 22700 &70 &2900 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{5.5$\%$ $\pm$ 0.7$\%$} \\
260: $p_T$ jet$_1 >$~15 GeV & 3852 & 3760 &40 &560 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{4.8$\%$ $\pm$ 0.6$\%$} \\
261: $p_T$ jet$_2 >$~15 GeV & 475 & 430 &10 & 80 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{2.4$\%$ $\pm$ 0.3$\%$} \\
262: \end{tabular}
263: \end{ruledtabular}
264: \caption{ Expected and observed events at different stages of the event selection. The signal
265: efficiency is given for the point with $m_{\tilde{l}}=260$~GeV and
266: $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}=100$~GeV with respect to the total slepton
267: production. The first uncertainty on the SM expectation is statistical, the second
268: is due to systematics.}
269: \label{table:cutflow}
270: \end{table}
271: \begin{figure*}[!t]
272: \begin{tabular}{lcr}
273: \ifthenelse{\boolean{color}}
274: {\includegraphics[scale=1.0]{figure_2a_color.eps}}
275: {\includegraphics[scale=1.0]{figure_2a_bw.eps}}
276: \,\,\,&
277: \ifthenelse{\boolean{color}}
278: {\includegraphics[scale=1.0]{figure_2b_color.eps}}
279: {\includegraphics[scale=1.0]{figure_2b_bw.eps}}
280: \,\,\,&
281: \ifthenelse{\boolean{color}}
282: {\includegraphics[scale=1.0]{figure_2c_color.eps}}
283: {\includegraphics[scale=1.0]{figure_2c_bw.eps}}
284: \end{tabular}
285: \caption{\label{fig:limxsecch1} $95\%$ C.L. limit on slepton production cross
286: section times branching fraction to gaugino plus muon for the
287: channels (i)~$\tilde{\mu}\to\tilde{\chi}^0_1\,\mu$ (a),
288: (ii)~$\tilde{\mu}\to\tilde{\chi}^0_{2,3,4}\,\mu$ (b) and
289: (iii)~$\tilde{\nu}_\mu\to\tilde{\chi}^\pm_{1,2}\,\mu$ (c) as a
290: function of slepton and gaugino masses. The darkest region
291: corresponds to a cross section of less that $2$~pb. Successively
292: lighter regions have successively higher limits.
293: }
294: \end{figure*}
295: \begin{figure}[h]
296: \begin{tabular}{c}
297: \ifthenelse{\boolean{color}}
298: {\includegraphics[scale=1.0]{figure_3_color.eps}}
299: {\includegraphics[scale=1.0]{figure_3_bw.eps}}
300: \end{tabular}
301: \caption{\label{fig:limldcomb} $95\%$ C.L. exclusion contour on $\lambda'_{211}$ couplings
302: within the mSUGRA framework for $\tan\beta=5$ and $\mu<0$. The arrows indicate
303: %%absolute
304: limits on the slepton mass $\tilde{l}$, for a given coupling $\lambda'_{211}$. }
305: \end{figure}
306:
307: Background from multi-jet QCD events was extracted from data using loose muon isolation requirements. This QCD
308: enriched data sample was scaled to match the data in a signal free region. At least one isolation criterion with
309: respect to other energy depositions in the calorimeter or to other tracks must not be tight for at least one muon to
310: separate QCD and the data sample.
311:
312: %% 2D cut final selection ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
313: Two-dimensional selection requirements in planes spanned by the reconstructed
314: $\tilde{l}$ and $\tilde{\chi}$ candidate masses, the invariant di-muon and
315: di-jet masses, and the sums of muon momenta and jet momenta were used to
316: separate the signal $s$ from SM backgrounds $b$. The selection requirements
317: were chosen so that the {\it signal efficiency $\times$ signal purity}
318: $\propto \frac{s}{\sqrt{s+b}}$ of a specific cut, applied on a training
319: sample, was maximized. The selection requirements were optimized for each
320: (slepton mass, gaugino mass) combination (117 in total).
321:
322: In the $\tilde{\mu}\to\tilde{\chi}^0_1\,\mu$ analysis (i), the slepton mass was
323: reconstructed with the two leading muons and the two jets.
324: In the signal MC, the leading muon usually originates from the slepton
325: decay vertex. The neutralino mass was therefore reconstructed with both jets
326: and the next-to-leading muon.
327:
328: Hadronic decays of vector bosons from the gaugino cascade to $\tilde{\chi}^0_1$
329: can lead to additional jets in channels (ii) and (iii). A simple likelihood
330: was calculated for each combination to reconstruct a vector boson and the
331: neutralino candidate mass.
332: The slepton mass was reconstructed from all jets with $E_T>15$~GeV and
333: the two leading muons.
334:
335: After the optimization, for the point with $m_{\tilde{l}}=260$~GeV and
336: $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}=100$~GeV, we find $14/28/8$ events in the data while
337: $11.9\pm 2.1^{+1.5}_{-1.6}\ /\ 25.4\pm 3.2^{+6.7}_{-4.2}\ /\ 6.5\pm
338: 1.6^{+2.0}_{-1.2}$ events are expected from SM backgrounds for the three
339: channels, respectively, with a typical signal efficiency of up to $2\%$. For all
340: $117$ mass combinations, the data is in agreement with the SM expectation
341: throughout the entire event selection range.
342:
343:
344: %% systematic errors ---------------------------------------------------------------------
345: The systematic uncertainties from different sources were added in quadrature.
346: For the limit calculation, the total systematic uncertainties of the
347: background and signal samples were taken to be $100\%$ correlated. A summary
348: of the uncertainties is given in Table \ref{table:syserrors} with their
349: contributions to the two muon and two jet sample.
350: \begin{table}[h]
351: \begin{ruledtabular}
352: \begin{tabular}{lcc}
353: Uncertainty & Background & Signal \\ \hline
354: Jet energy scale & 13.7\% & 2 -- 26\% \\
355: Muon ID & 7.8\% & 8 --14\% \\
356: Luminosity (does not apply to QCD) & 5.5\% & 6.5\% \\
357: Trigger efficiency & 5.2\% & 4 -- 9\% \\
358: MC $\sigma$, $K$-factor, PDF & 3.7\% & 5\% \\
359: QCD background estimation & 3.1\% & --- \\
360: MC statistics & 2.2\% & 3 -- 24\% \\
361: \end{tabular}
362: \end{ruledtabular}
363: \caption{Effect of the systematic uncertainties in the two muon and
364: two jet sample on background and signal cross sections. The muon ID
365: contribution comprises the uncertainties due to muon reconstruction,
366: isolation, track finding and matching, and resolution for the two
367: muons. The systematic uncertainties on the signal strongly depend on the
368: neutralino mass, so a typical range is given.}
369: \label{table:syserrors}
370: \end{table}
371:
372: %% Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
373: In the absence of an excess in the data, we set cross section limits on
374: resonant slepton production. To be as model independent as possible, we
375: calculated 95\%~C.L. limits with respect to the slepton production
376: cross section times branching fraction to gaugino plus muon using the CL$_{s}$
377: method \cite{junk}. The limit is then given in the slepton-mass and
378: gaugino-mass plane, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:limxsecch1}.
379: %
380: In addition, our results are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:limldcomb} as
381: $\lambda'_{211}$ exclusion contours interpreted within the mSUGRA framework,
382: with $\tan\beta=5$, $\mu<0$, and $A_0=0$. The slepton-mass and
383: gaugino-mass pair define the universal scalar and fermion masses $m_0$ and
384: $m_{1/2}$. All three channels were combined to form one limit for
385: $q\bar{q}\to\tilde{l}$, with $\tilde{l}=\tilde{\mu},\tilde{\nu}_\mu$.
386:
387: A lower limit on the slepton mass for a given \lqd-coupling
388: $\lambda'_{211}$ can be extracted from Fig.~\ref{fig:limldcomb}. These limits
389: do not depend on other masses. They are indicated by arrows and summarized in
390: Table~\ref{tab:abs_lim_sl_sq}. Similarly, the exclusion contour can be
391: translated within mSUGRA into constraints on other masses and parameters.
392: \begin{table}[h]
393: \begin{ruledtabular}
394: \begin{tabular}{cclc}
395: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{Excluded slepton mass range} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Coupling strength}& \\ \hline
396: & $m$($\tilde{l}$) $\le\,210$~GeV & for $\lambda'_{211}\,\ge\,0.04$& \hfill \\
397: & $m$($\tilde{l}$) $\le\,340$~GeV & for $\lambda'_{211}\,\ge\,0.06$& \\
398: & $m$($\tilde{l}$) $\le\,363$~GeV & for $\lambda'_{211}\,\ge\,0.10$& \\
399: \end{tabular}
400: \end{ruledtabular}
401: \caption{ Limits on the slepton mass $\tilde{l}$
402: for a given \lqd-coupling $\lambda'_{211}$ and $\tan\beta=5$,
403: $\mu<0$ from Fig.~\ref{fig:limldcomb}.}
404: \label{tab:abs_lim_sl_sq}
405: \end{table}
406:
407: In summary, we have searched for $R$-parity violating supersymmetry via a
408: non-zero \lqd-coupling $\lambda'_{211}$ in final states with at least two muons
409: and two jets. No excess in comparison with SM expectation was found and we set
410: model independent cross section limits, improved compared to D0 Run~I by one
411: order of magnitude. The limits are interpreted within the mSUGRA framework and
412: translated into the best constraints to date on the coupling strength
413: $\lambda'_{211}$. D0 Run~I excluded slepton masses up to $280$~GeV for
414: $\lambda'_{211}=0.09$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=\nolinebreak200$~GeV. Now,
415: slepton masses up to $358$~GeV can be excluded, for $\lambda'_{211}=0.09$
416: independent of other masses.
417:
418:
419: %% Acknowledgement ------------------------------------------------------------------------
420: \input acknowledgement_paragraph_r2.tex % input acknowledgement
421: %\\
422:
423: %% Bibliography ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
424:
425: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
426: \input list_of_visitor_addresses_r2.tex % input visitors address
427:
428: \bibitem{farrar} G.~R.~Farrar and P.~Fayet, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 76}, 575 (1978).
429:
430: \bibitem{rpv} S.~Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 26}, 287 (1982);
431: N.~Sakai and T.~Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 197}, 533 (1982).
432:
433: \bibitem{referbound} B.~C.~Allanach, A.~Dedes, and H.~Dreiner, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 075014 (1999);
434: F.~Ledroit and G.~Sajot, GDR-S-008 (ISN, Grenoble, 1998);
435: V.~Barger, G.~F.~Giudice, and T.~Han, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 40}, 2987 (1989).
436:
437: \bibitem{d0run1} V.~Abazov {\it et al.} (D0~Collaboration),
438: %{\em Search for the Production of Single Sleptons through $R$-parity Violation in $p\bar{p}$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s}=1.8$~TeV},
439: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 89}, 261801 (2002).
440:
441: \bibitem{h1squark} A.~Aktas {\it et al.} (H1 Collaboration),
442: %{\em Search for Squark Production in $R$-parity Violating supersymmetry at HERA,}
443: Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 36}, 425 (2004).
444:
445: \bibitem{barbier} R.~Barbier {\it et. al.}, % $R$-parity Violating supersymmetry,
446: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 420}, 1 (2005).
447:
448: \bibitem{deliot} F.~Deliot, G.~Moreau, and C.~Royon, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 19}, 155 (2001).
449:
450: \bibitem{d0det} V.~Abazov {\it et al.} (D0 Collaboration),
451: %{\it The Upgraded D0 Detector}, (2005)
452: submitted to Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A,
453: arXiv-physics/0507191.
454:
455: \bibitem{susygen} N.~Ghodbane, S.~Katsanevas, P.~Morawitz, and E.~Perez,
456: {\sc susygen}3, arXiv:hep-ph/9909499, a modified version by E.~Perez was used.
457:
458: \bibitem{inder} D.~Choudhury, S.~Majhi, and V.~Ravindran, % {\em QCD Corrections to Resonant Slepton Production in Hadron Colliders},
459: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 660}, 343 (2003).
460:
461: \bibitem{cteq} J. Pumplin {\it et al.}, JHEP {\bf 0207}, 012 (2002);
462: D. Stump {\it et al.}, JHEP {\bf 0310}, 046 (2003).
463:
464: \bibitem{maike} H.~Dreiner, S.~Grab, M.~Kr\"amer, and M.~Trenkel,
465: paper in preparation.
466:
467: \bibitem{pythia} T.~Sj\"{o}strand {\it et al.}, Comput. Phys. Commun. {\bf 135}, 238 (2001).
468:
469: \bibitem{dy} R.~Hamberg, W.~L.~van Neerven and T.~Matsuura, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 359}, 343 (1991).
470:
471: \bibitem{geant} R. Brun and F. Carminati, CERN Program Library Long Writeup W5013, unpublished (1993).
472:
473: \bibitem{Blazey:2000qt} G.~C.~Blazey {\it et al.}, %``Run II jet physics,''
474: arXiv:hep-ex/0005012.
475:
476:
477: \bibitem{junk} T.~Junk, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A {\bf 434}, 435 (1999).
478: \end{thebibliography}
479:
480: \end{document}
481: %
482: