1: \documentclass[11pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{amsmath}
4:
5: %%% $Id: note.tex,v 1.15 2006/07/24 20:33:19 chcheng Exp $
6:
7: % Set the following numbers to the correct values for your paper
8: \newcommand{\BABARPubYear} {06}
9: \newcommand{\BABARPubNumber} {00}
10: \newcommand{\BABARConfNumber} {017}
11: \newcommand{\SLACPubNumber} {11991}
12: \newcommand{\LANLNumber} {0000}
13:
14: % Input the symbols file
15: \input pubboard/babarsym
16:
17:
18: %% define symbols and particles.
19: \newcommand{\DE}{\ensuremath{\Delta E}\xspace}
20: \newcommand{\mES}{\ensuremath{m_\mathrm{ES}}\xspace}
21: \newcommand{\mDz}{\ensuremath{m_{\Dz}}\xspace}
22: \newcommand{\hz}{\ensuremath{h^0}\xspace}
23: \newcommand{\half}{\ensuremath{\frac{1}{2}}}
24: \newcommand{\dm}{\ensuremath{\Delta m}\xspace}
25: \newcommand{\dt}{\ensuremath{\Delta t}\xspace}
26: \newcommand{\ttag}{\ensuremath{t_\mathrm{tag}}\xspace}
27: \newcommand{\trec}{\ensuremath{t_\mathrm{rec}}\xspace}
28: \newcommand{\sigmadt}{\ensuremath{\sigma_{\Delta t}}\xspace}
29: \newcommand{\qoverp}{\ensuremath{\frac{q}{p}}}
30: \newcommand{\poverq}{\ensuremath{\frac{p}{q}}}
31: \newcommand{\absqoverp}{\ensuremath{\Big\vert\qoverp\Big\vert}}
32: \newcommand{\abspoverq}{\ensuremath{\Big\vert\poverq\Big\vert}}
33: \newcommand{\Abar}{\ensuremath{\overline{A}}\xspace}
34: \newcommand{\fbar}{\ensuremath{\overline{f}}\xspace}
35: \newcommand{\Abarf}{\ensuremath{\Abar_f}\xspace}
36: \newcommand{\Abarfbar}{\ensuremath{\Abar_{\fbar}}\xspace}
37: \newcommand{\D}{\ensuremath{D}\xspace}
38: \newcommand{\etagg}{\ensuremath{\eta_{\gamma\gamma}}\xspace}
39: \newcommand{\etappp}{\ensuremath{\eta_{3\pi}}\xspace}
40: \newcommand{\etal}{{\it et al.}}
41: \newcommand{\bra}[1]{\ensuremath{\langle #1 \vert}}
42: \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\ensuremath{\vert #1 \rangle}}
43: \newcommand{\bracket}[2]{\ensuremath{\langle #1 \vert #2 \rangle}}
44: \newcommand{\braHket}[3]{\ensuremath{\langle #1 \vert #2 \vert #3 \rangle}}
45: \newcommand{\Btag}{\ensuremath{B_{\rm{tag}}}\xspace}
46: \newcommand{\Brec}{\ensuremath{B_{\rm{rec}}}\xspace}
47: \newcommand{\msqKsp}{\ensuremath{m^{2}_{\KS\pip}}\xspace}
48: \newcommand{\msqpm}{\ensuremath{m^{2}_{\pip\pim}}\xspace}
49: \newcommand{\msqKsm}{\ensuremath{m^{2}_{\KS\pim}}\xspace}
50: \newcommand{\sinbb}{\ensuremath{\sin2\beta}\xspace}
51: \newcommand{\cosbb}{\ensuremath{\cos2\beta}\xspace}
52: \newcommand{\abslambda}{\ensuremath{|\lambda|}\xspace}
53:
54: \def\invps {\ensuremath{\mbox{\,ps}^{-1}}\xspace}
55:
56:
57: \setlength{\textwidth}{16.5cm}
58: \setlength{\textheight}{22.2cm}
59: \setlength{\hoffset}{-2.0cm}
60: \setlength{\voffset}{-2.3cm}
61:
62: % This is needed to format the full author list
63: \long\def\inst#1{\par\nobreak\kern 4pt\nobreak
64: {\it #1}\par\vskip 10pt plus 3pt minus 3pt}
65:
66: \begin{document}
67:
68: \global\emergencystretch = .9\hsize
69:
70: {\pagestyle{empty}
71:
72: \begin{flushright}
73: %BAD \#1545, version 06 \\
74: \babar-CONF-\BABARPubYear/\BABARConfNumber \\
75: %\babar-PUB-\BABARPubYear/\BABARPubNumber \\
76: SLAC-PUB-\SLACPubNumber \\
77: %hep-ex/\LANLNumber \\
78: July 2006 \\
79: \end{flushright}
80:
81: \par\vskip 5cm
82:
83: % Title of the paper
84: \begin{center}
85: \Large \boldmath Measurement of \cosbb in $\Bz\ra\D^{(*)0}\hz$ decays
86: with a time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of $\Dz\ra\KS\pip\pim$
87: \end{center}
88: \bigskip
89:
90: \begin{center}
91: \large The \babar\ Collaboration\\
92: \mbox{ }\\
93: \today
94: \end{center}
95: \bigskip \bigskip
96:
97: % Abstract
98: \begin{center}
99: \large \bf Abstract
100: \end{center}
101: We report a preliminary measurement of \cosbb in
102: $\Bz\ra\D^{(*)0}\hz$ decays with a time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of
103: $\Dz\ra\KS\pip\pim$, where \hz is a light neutral meson such as
104: $\piz$, $\eta$, $\eta'$ or $\omega$. The strong phase variation on the
105: Dalitz plot allows the access to the angle $\beta$ with only a
106: two-fold ambiguity ($\beta+\pi$). Using $311\times 10^{6}$ \BB
107: pairs collected at the \babar\
108: detector, we obtain
109: $\cosbb = 0.54 \pm 0.54 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.18$,
110: $\sinbb = 0.45 \pm 0.36 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.07$, and
111: $\abslambda = 0.975^{+0.093}_{-0.085} \pm 0.012 \pm 0.002 $,
112: where the first errors are
113: statistical, the second are experimental systematic uncertainties, and
114: the third are the signal Dalitz model uncertainties.
115: This measurement
116: favors the solution of $\beta= 22^\circ$ over $68^\circ$ at an $87\%$
117: confidence level.
118:
119: \vfill
120: \begin{center}
121:
122: Submitted to the 33$^{\rm rd}$ International Conference on High-Energy Physics, ICHEP 06,\\
123: 26 July---2 August 2006, Moscow, Russia.
124:
125: \end{center}
126:
127: \vspace{1.0cm}
128: \begin{center}
129: {\em Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University,
130: Stanford, CA 94309} \\ \vspace{0.1cm}\hrule\vspace{0.1cm}
131: Work supported in part by Department of Energy contract DE-AC03-76SF00515.
132: \end{center}
133:
134: \newpage
135: } % end of pagestyle{empty}
136:
137: % Input author list file
138: %
139: %author list removed temporarily to save trees 7/9/04 RNC
140: %
141: \input pubboard/authors_ICHEP2006.tex
142:
143: % The body of the paper starts here
144: \section{INTRODUCTION}
145: \label{sec:Introduction}
146:
147: The Standard Model of electroweak interactions describes charge-parity
148: (\CP) violation as a consequence of an irreducible phase in the
149: three-generation Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) quark-mixing
150: matrix~\cite{ref:CKM}. In this framework, the \CP parameter $\sin 2\beta$
151: can be measured by examining the proper-time distribution of neutral
152: \B decays to \CP eigenstates. This parameter has been measured with a
153: high precision by the \B-factories using final states containing a
154: charmonium and a neutral kaon~\cite{BabarBelleS2B}. The current average
155: from \B-factories is $\sin2\beta= 0.685\pm 0.032$~\cite{HFAG}, which leads to a
156: four-fold solution
157: of the angle $\beta= 22\degrees$, $68\degrees$,
158: ($22\degrees+180\degrees$), and ($68\degrees+180\degrees$).
159: The ambiguity can leave possible new physics undetected even with very
160: high precision measurements of $\sin2\beta$.
161:
162: Analyses have been attempted to resolve the ($\beta$, $\pi/2-\beta$)
163: ambiguity using a time-dependent angular analysis in $\Bz\ra J/\psi
164: \Kstarz (\KS\piz)$ decays~\cite{ref:C2B}.
165: In this analysis we use
166: a new method
167: proposed by Bondar \etal~\cite{Bondar:2005gk}, which uses
168: $\Bz\ra\D^{(*)0}\hz$ decays with
169: a time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of $\Dz\ra\KS\pip\pim$, where \hz is
170: a light neutral meson such as \piz, $\eta^{(\prime)}$, and
171: $\omega$. This method takes advantage of the varying strong phase on
172: the $\Dz\ra\KS\pip\pim$ Dalitz plot to resolve the ambiguity of the
173: phase $2\beta$ from the \sinbb measurements alone.
174: The Belle Collaboration has recently reported a measurement using this
175: technique~\cite{Krokovny:2006sv}; they obtained $\cosbb=
176: 1.87^{+0.40+0.22}_{-0.53-0.32}$ and determined the sign of \cosbb to
177: be positive at a 98.3\% confidence level.
178:
179: The leading order diagram of $\Bz\ra\D^{(*)0}\hz$ is color-suppressed,
180: as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:diag1}. The next order diagram is
181: suppressed by ${\cal O}(\sin^2\theta_\mathrm{Cabibbo})$.
182: There are no penguin diagram contributions.
183: A sizable new physics effect due to supersymmetry without R-parity is
184: possible in $\b\ra\c\ubar\d$ decays, while the Standard Model
185: uncertainty is relatively small~\cite{Grossman:1996ke}.
186: Interference between $\Bz\ra\Dzb\hz$ and $\Bz\ra\Bzb\ra\Dz\hz$ via
187: mixing occurs when \Dz and \Dzb decay to a common final state, such as
188: $\KS\pip\pim$.
189:
190: \begin{figure}[htb]
191: \begin{center}
192: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{B0D0bpi0.eps}
193: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{B0bD0pi0.eps}
194: \end{center}
195: \caption{Leading diagrams for $\Bz\ra\Dz\hz$ decays. }
196: \label{fig:diag1}
197: \end{figure}
198:
199: Assuming \CPT symmetry is conserved and the decay rate difference
200: $\Delta \Gamma$ is negligible, the time evolution function for
201: a state that is known to be a \Bz at a time $t=\ttag$ can be expressed
202: as
203: \begin{equation}
204: \ket{\Bz_\mathrm{phys}(t)}= e^{-\Gamma \dt/2} \Big[
205: \ket{\Bz} \cos(\dm\dt/2) + i\qoverp \ket{\Bzb} \sin(\dm\dt/2) \Big] \;,
206: \end{equation}
207: where $\Gamma$ is the average decay rate of the two mass eigenstates of
208: \Bz meson, \dm is the
209: mixing frequency, $\dt = \trec-\ttag$ is the time difference
210: between \Bz decay time \trec and \ttag, and $q/p$ is the ratio of
211: $\ket{\Bzb}$ and $\ket{\Bz}$ coefficients in \Bz mass
212: eigenstates. Neglecting \CP violation in \Bz mixing, we assume
213: $|q/p|=1$.
214: Expressing the decay amplitude of the decay chain
215: $\Bz\ra\Dzb\hz\ra[\KS\pip\pim]\hz$ as $A_f = AA_{\Dbar}$ and similarly
216: for \Bzb as $\Abarfbar = \Abar A_D$, the decay probability of a
217: neutral \B meson in an $\Upsilon(4S)$ system can be shown to be
218: \begin{eqnarray}
219: {\cal P}_\pm = \frac{1}{2} e^{-\Gamma \dt}|A|^2
220: \cdot \Big[ (|A_{\Dbar}|^2 + \abslambda^2 |A_D|^2) & \mp &
221: (|A_{\Dbar}|^2 - \abslambda^2|A_D|^2)\cos(\dm \dt) \notag \\
222: & \pm &
223: 2\abslambda \eta_{\hz}(-1)^L \mathrm{Im}\Big( e^{-2i\beta}
224: A_D A^*_{\Dbar}\Big) \sin(\dm\dt)\Big] \;,
225: \label{eq:Probpm}
226: \end{eqnarray}
227: where the upper (lower) sign is for \Bz(\Bzb)-tagged events,
228: $\lambda= \frac{q\Abarfbar}{p A_f}$, $-2i\beta$ is the phase of $q/p$,
229: $\eta_{\hz}$ is the \CP eigenvalue of \hz, and $L$ is the orbital
230: angular momentum in the $D^{(*)0}\hz$ system. In the case of
231: $\Bz\ra\Dstarz\hz$ (where \hz is a pseudoscalar)
232: with $\Dstarz\ra\Dz\piz$, $L=1$ and two additional factors need to be
233: considered: the angular momentum in $\Dstarz\ra\Dz\piz$ ($L^\prime=1$)
234: and the \CP eigenvalue of the soft \piz from \Dstarz decay
235: ($\eta_{\piz}=-1$)~\cite{Bondar:2004bi}.
236: The decay amplitudes $A_D$ and $A_{\Dbar}$ can be expressed as a
237: function of two Lorentz invariant variables
238: $m_+^2\equiv (p_{\KS}+p_{\pip})^2$ and
239: $m_-^2\equiv (p_{\KS}+p_{\pi-})^2$. That is,
240: $A_D = A_D(m_+^2,m_-^2)$ and $A_{\Dbar} = A_D(m_-^2,m_+^2)$.
241: Here we have assumed that \CP is conserved in the \Dz decay and neglected
242: \Dz mixing.
243:
244: In the last term of Equation(\ref{eq:Probpm}), one can rewrite
245: \begin{equation}
246: \mathrm{Im}\Big( e^{-2i\beta} A_D A^*_{\Dbar}\Big)
247: = \mathrm{Im}(A_D A^*_{\Dbar}) \cos 2\beta -
248: \mathrm{Re}(A_D A^*_{\Dbar}) \sin 2\beta \;,
249: \label{eq:sc2bsindmt}
250: \end{equation}
251: and treat \cosbb and \sinbb as independent parameters.
252:
253: In this analysis, we use an unbinned maximum-likelihood method to fit
254: for \cosbb, \sinbb and \abslambda, and use a parameterized
255: Monte Carlo method based on the observed data to estimate the
256: confidence level of \cosbb being positive.
257:
258: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
259: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
260: \input babar
261:
262: \input selection
263:
264: \input dalitzmodel
265:
266: \input analysis
267:
268: \input systematic
269:
270: \input result
271:
272: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
273: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
274:
275:
276: \section{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
277: \label{sec:Acknowledgments}
278:
279: % Standard acknowledgments paragraph; must always be included.
280: \input pubboard/acknowledgements
281:
282: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
283:
284: \bibitem{ref:CKM}
285: N.~Cabibbo, Phys.~Rev.~Lett, {\bf 10}, 531 (1963); M.~Kobayashi and
286: T.~Maskawa, Prog.~Theor.~Phys. {\bf 49}, 652 (1973).
287:
288: \bibitem{BabarBelleS2B}
289: B.~Aubert \etal, [\babar\ Collaboration], Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 94},
290: 161803 (2005);
291: K.~Abe \etal, [Belle Collaboration], hep-ex/0507037 (2005).
292:
293: \bibitem{HFAG}
294: E.~Barberio \etal, [HFAG], hep-ex/0603003 and online update at
295: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag.
296:
297: \bibitem{ref:C2B}
298: B.~Aubert \etal, [\babar\ Collaboration], Phys.~Rev.~D {\bf 71},
299: 032005 (2005);
300: R.~Itoh, Y.~Onuki \etal, [Belle Collaboration], Phys.~Rev.~Lett.
301: {\bf 95}, 091601 (2005).
302:
303: \bibitem{Bondar:2005gk}
304: A.~Bondar, T.~Gershon and P.~Krokovny,
305: %``A method to measure phi(1) using anti-B0 $\to$ D h0 with multibody D
306: %decay,''
307: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 624}, 1 (2005).
308: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0503174].
309: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503174;%%
310:
311: \bibitem{Krokovny:2006sv}
312: P.~Krokovny \etal, [Belle Collaboration],
313: %``Resolution of the quadratic ambiguity in the CKM angle phi(1) using
314: %time-dependent Dalitz analysis of anti-B0 $\to$ D (K0(S) pi+ pi-) h0,''
315: hep-ex/0605023 (2006).
316: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0605023;%%
317:
318: \bibitem{Grossman:1996ke}
319: Y.~Grossman and M.~P.~Worah,
320: %``CP asymmetries in B decays with new physics in decay amplitudes,''
321: Phys.~Lett.~B {\bf 395}, 241 (1997);
322: R.~Fleischer,
323: % ``New, Efficient And Clean Strategies To Explore CP Violation Through
324: %Neutral B Decays,''
325: Phys.~Lett.~B {\bf 562}, 234 (2003).
326:
327: \bibitem{Aubert:2004xg}
328: B.~Aubert \etal, [\babar\ Collaboration],
329: %``Limits on the decay rate difference of neutral-B mesons and on CP, T, and
330: %CPT violation in B0 anti-B0 oscillations,''
331: Phys.~Rev.~D {\bf 70}, 012007 (2004).
332: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0403002].
333:
334: \bibitem{Bondar:2004bi}
335: A.~Bondar and T.~Gershon,
336: %``On phi(3) measurements using B- $\to$ D* K- decays,''
337: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 091503 (2004).
338: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0409281].
339: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0409281;%%
340:
341: % reference for Geant4
342: \bibitem{ref:Geant4}
343: S. Agostinelli \etal, [GEANT4], Nucl.~Instrum.~Methods A~{\bf 506}, 250
344: (2003), and \itns {1}, 270 (2006).
345:
346: % The NIM detector performance paper
347: \bibitem{ref:babar}
348: B.~Aubert \etal, [\babar\ Collaboration],
349: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Methods A {\bf 479}, 1 (2002).
350:
351: \bibitem{ref:PDG}
352: Particle Data Group,
353: S.~Eidelman \etal, Phys.~Rev.~B {\bf 592}, 1 (2004).
354:
355: \bibitem{ref:R2}
356: G.C.~Fox and S.~Wolfram, \jprlBase {\bf 41}, 1581 (1978).
357:
358: %\bibitem{ref:Fisher}
359: %R. A.~Fisher, Annals of Eugenics 7, 179 (1936).
360:
361: \bibitem{ref:ARGUS}
362: H.~Albrecht \etal, [ARGUS Collaboration], \zpc {48}, 543 (1990).
363:
364: \bibitem{ref:CB}
365: T.~Skwarnicki [Crystal Ball Collaboration], {\it A Study of the Radiative
366: Cascade Transitions Between the $\Upsilon'$ and $\Upsilon$ Resonances}
367: DESY F31-86-02, Ph.D thesis.
368:
369: \bibitem{isobarCLEO}
370: S.~Kopp \etal, [CLEO Collaboration], Phys.~Rev.~D {\bf 63},
371: 092001 (2001); H.~Muramatsu \etal, [CLEO Collaboration],
372: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 89}, 251802 (2002); Erratum-ibid: {\bf 90},
373: 059901 (2003).
374:
375: \bibitem{babar_gamma}
376: B.~Aubert \etal, [\babar\ Collaboration], Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 95},
377: 121802 (2005). %%hep-ex/0504039.
378:
379: \bibitem{GJGJJS}
380: G. J. Gounaris and J. J. Sakurai, Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 21}, 244 (1968).
381:
382: \bibitem{tagging}
383: See, for example, B.~Aubert \etal, [\babar\ Collaboration],
384: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 94}, 161803 (2005), and the references therein.
385:
386: \bibitem{ref:PDG2006}
387: Y.-M.~Yao \etal, [Particle Data Group], J.~Phys.~G33,~1 (2006).
388:
389: \end{thebibliography}
390:
391: \end{document}
392: