1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %

3: %

4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5: \documentclass[12pt,epsfig,twoside,a4paper]{article}

6: \special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{ /setpagedevice{pop}def} def end}

7: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}

8: 

9: %\documentstyle[12pt,epsfig]{article}

10: 

11: %%\usepackage{pstricks}

12: \usepackage{amssymb,rotating}

13: %%\usepackage{float}

14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

15: %-------------------------------------------------------------

16: \setlength{\voffset}{0mm}           %marge en haut de 25.4mm

17: \setlength{\topmargin}{0mm}

18: \setlength{\headheight}{0mm}

19: \setlength{\headsep}{0mm}

20: %-------------------------------------------------------------

21: \setlength{\textheight}{240mm}      %marge en bas de 32.6mm

22: %\setlength{\footskip}{15mm}

23: %\setlength{\footheight}{15mm}

24: %-------------------------------------------------------------

25: \setlength{\hoffset}{-0.4 mm}

26: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0mm}     %marge gauche de 25mm

27: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0mm}

28: \setlength{\textwidth}{160mm}       %marge droite de 25mm

29: %-------------------------------------------------------------

30: \setlength{\topsep}{1mm}

31: \setlength{\itemsep}{0.5mm}

32: \setlength{\parsep}{1mm}

33: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

34: %%\setlength{\listparindent}{0pt}

35: %%\setlength{\parskip}{5pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}

36: %%\pretolerance=10000

37: %%\sloppy

38: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

39: 

40: % Make latex less fussy about floats, to improve chances of float being

41: % positioned `here'.

42: \setcounter{topnumber}{4}

43: \def\topfraction{0.95}

44: \setcounter{bottomnumber}{2}

45: \def\bottomfraction{0.9}

46: \setcounter{totalnumber}{6}

47: \def\textfraction{0.2}

48: \def\floatpagefraction{0.7}

49: \setcounter{dbltopnumber}{4}

50: \def\dbltopfraction{0.95}

51: \def\dblfloatpagefraction{0.7}

52: 

53: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

54: 

55: \def\strutl{\protect\rule{0ex}{1.4em}}

56: \def\strutd{\protect\rule[-0.6em]{0ex}{1.9em}}

57: 

58: \newcommand{\lblcaption}[2]{\caption{#2\label{#1}}}

59: \newcommand{\FIG}[3]{\begin{figure}[htbp] \centering

60:                      \includegraphics[width=#2cm]{#1.eps}

61:                      \lblcaption{#1}{#3}

62:                      \end{figure}}

63: \newcommand{\FIGS}[3]{\begin{figure}[htbp] \centering

64:                      \includegraphics[width=#2cm]{#1.eps}

65:                      \lblcaption{#1}{ \small #3}

66:                      \end{figure}}

67: \newcommand{\FIGL}[4]{\begin{figure}[htbp]

68: %                        \begin{flushleft}

69:                           \begin{sloppypar}

70:                             \parbox{#2cm}{

71:                             \includegraphics[width=#2cm]{#1.eps}}

72:                             \hspace{0.1cm}

73:                             \parbox{#3cm}{\lblcaption{#1}{#4} }

74:                           \end{sloppypar}

75: %                        \end{flushleft}

76:                       \end{figure}}

77: \newcommand{\FIGR}[4]{\begin{figure}[htbp]

78: %                        \begin{flushleft}

79:                           \begin{sloppypar}

80:                             \parbox{#3cm}{\lblcaption{#1}{#4} }

81:                             \hspace{0.1cm}

82:                             \parbox{#2cm}{

83:                             \includegraphics[width=#2cm]{#1.eps}}

84:                           \end{sloppypar}

85: %                        \end{flushleft}

86:                       \end{figure}}

87: \newcommand{\FIGLR}[5]{\begin{figure}[htbp]

88: %                        \begin{flushleft}

89:                           \begin{sloppypar}

90:                             \parbox{#3cm}{

91:                             \includegraphics[width=#3cm]{#1.eps}}

92:                             \hspace{0.1cm}

93:                             \parbox{#3cm}{

94:                             \includegraphics[width=#3cm]{#2.eps}}

95:                           \end{sloppypar}

96: %                        \end{flushleft}

97:                          \lblcaption{#1}{#5}

98:                       \end{figure}}

99: \newcommand{\BFIG}     {\begin{figure}\centering}

100: \newcommand{\EFIG}     {\end{figure}}

101: 

102: \newcommand{\mr}[1] {\mbox {${\mathrm {#1}}$}}

103: 

104: \newcommand{\ee}       {${\mathrm e}^+{\mathrm e}^-$}

105: \newcommand{\mumu}     {${\mathrm {\mu^+\mu^-}}$}

106: \newcommand{\tautau}   {${\mathrm {\tau^+\tau^-}}$}

107: \newcommand{\llbar}    {${\mathrm l}^+{\mathrm l}^-$}

108: \newcommand{\qq}       {${\mathrm q} \bar{\mathrm q}$}

109: \newcommand{\cc}       {${\mathrm c} \bar{\mathrm c}$}

110: \newcommand{\bb}       {$\mathrm{b}\bar\mathrm{b}$}

111: \newcommand{\ff}       {${\mathrm f} \bar{\mathrm f}$}

112: \newcommand{\pp}       {${\mathrm p} \bar{\mathrm p}$}

113: \newcommand{\sps}      {$\sqrt{s^\prime/s}$}

114: 

115: \newcommand{\gevcc} {\mbox{$\mathrm GeV/c^2\ $}}

116: \newcommand{\mevcc} {\mbox{$\mathrm MeV/c^2\ $}}

117: \newcommand{\gevc}  {\mbox{$\mathrm GeV/c\ $}}

118: \newcommand{\mevc}  {\mbox{$\mathrm MeV/c\ $}}

119: \newcommand{\tevc}  {\mbox{$\mathrm TeV/c\ $}}

120: \newcommand{\Lu}    {\mbox{$\mathrm {Lep\ I}$}}

121: \newcommand{\Ld}    {\mbox{$\mathrm {Lep\ II}$}}

122: \newcommand{\pb}    {\mbox{$\mathrm {pb^{-1}}$}}

123: \newcommand{\Z}     {\mbox{$\mathrm {Z^0}$}}

124: \newcommand{\fs}    {\mbox{$\mathrm {f_s}$}}

125: \newcommand{\fd}    {\mbox{$\mathrm {f_d}$}}

126: \newcommand {\Zg}   {\mbox{$\Zz/\gamma$}}

127: \newcommand {\Zz}   {\mbox{${\mathrm{Z}}$}}

128: 

129: % b section

130: \newcommand{\Pb}[1]  {\mbox{$ {{\cal  {P}}_{#1}}$}}

131: \newcommand{\Prb}[1]  {\mbox{$ {{\frak {P}}_{#1}}$}}

132: \newcommand{\Pro}[1] {\mbox{$ {{\Bbb  {P}}_{#1}}$}}

133: 

134: % Jet charge section

135: \newcommand{\Afb}[1]        {\mbox{${\mathrm {A_{FB}^{#1}}}$}}

136: \newcommand{\R}[1]        {\mbox{$\mathrm {R_{#1}}$}}

137: \newcommand{\Qfb}           {\mbox{$\langle Q_{\mathrm {FB}}\rangle$}}

138: \newcommand{\qjet}          {\mbox{${\mathrm Q_{jet}}$}}

139: 

140: % For contact term section

141: \newcommand{\lam}  {\mbox{$\Lambda$}}

142: \newcommand{\eps}  {\mbox{$\epsilon$}}

143: \newcommand{\epem} {\mbox{$e^+e^-$}}

144: 

145: % For leptoquark section

146: \newcommand{\MLQ}    {\mbox{$M_{\mathrm LQ}$}}

147: \newcommand{\half}   {\mbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\frac{1}{2}$}}

148: \newcommand{\SL}[1]  {$\mathrm{S_{#1}(L})$}

149: \newcommand{\SR}[1]  {$\mathrm{S_{#1}(R)}$}

150: \newcommand{\SBR}[1] {$\mathrm{\tilde{S}_{#1}(R)}$}

151: \newcommand{\SBL}[1] {$\mathrm{\tilde{S}_{#1}(L)}$}

152: \newcommand{\VR}[1]  {$\mathrm{V_{#1}(R)}$}

153: \newcommand{\VL}[1]  {$\mathrm{V_{#1}(L)}$}

154: \newcommand{\VBL}[1] {$\mathrm{\tilde{V}_{#1}(L)}$}

155: \newcommand{\VBR}[1] {$\mathrm{\tilde{V}_{#1}(R)}$}

156: 

157: % For Z' section

158: \newcommand{\MZP}     {\mbox{$m_{\mathrm Z'}$}}

159: \newcommand{\MZZEROP}     {\mbox{$m_{\mathrm Z'^{0}}$}}

160: \newcommand{\ZP}     {\mbox{$\mathrm Z'$}}

161: \newcommand{\ZS}     {\mbox{$\mathrm Z''$}}

162: \newcommand{\MZS}     {\mbox{$m_{\mathrm Z''}$}}

163: \newcommand{\ZZERO}     {\mbox{$\mathrm Z^{0}$}}

164: \newcommand{\ZZEROP}     {\mbox{$\mathrm Z'^{0}$}}

165: \newcommand{\ZUN}     {\mbox{$\mathrm Z^{1}$}}

166: \newcommand{\ZDEUX}     {\mbox{$\mathrm Z^{2}$}}

167: \newcommand{\ES}      {$E_{6}$}

168: \newcommand{\EECEE}      {${E_{8}}\otimes{E_{8}}$}

169: \newcommand{\ESCHI}      {$E_{6}(\chi)$}

170: \newcommand{\ESPSI}      {$E_{6}(\psi)$}

171: \newcommand{\ESETA}      {$E_{6}(\eta)$}

172: \newcommand{\ESI}      {$E_{6}(I)$}

173: \newcommand{\LRS}      {$LRS$}

174: \newcommand{\TES}     {$\theta_{E_{6}}$}

175: \newcommand{\TMIX}     {$\theta_{\mathrm mix}$}

176: \newcommand{\LG}     {$\lambda_{g}$}

177: \newcommand{\ALR}     {$\alpha_{LR}$}

178: \newcommand{\CHI}     {$\chi^{2}$}

179: \newcommand{\CHISM}     {$\chi^{2}_{SM}$}

180: \newcommand{\DCHI}     {$\Delta\chi^{2}$}

181: \newcommand{\CHIMIN}   {$\chi^{2}_{min}$}

182: 

183: % For sneutrino

184: \newcommand{\sneut} {\tilde{\nu}}

185: \newcommand{\sig}   {\mbox{$\rm \sigma \ $}}

186: \newcommand{\plmo}  {\mbox{$\rm \pm \ $}}

187: \newcommand{\mopl}  {\mbox{$\rm \mp \ $}}

188: 

189: 

190: 

191: 

192: 

193: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}

194: 

195: \def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}

196: \def\NIM{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods}

197: \def\NIMA{{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods} A}

198: \def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.} B}

199: \def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.}  B}

200: \def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}

201: \def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.} D}

202: \def\ZPC{{\em Z. Phys.} C}

203: \def\PPE{{\em CERN-PPE/ }}

204: \def\MPA{{\em Modern Physics A}}

205: % A useful Journal macro

206: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}

207: 

208: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

209: 

210: \def\ra{\rightarrow}

211: 

212: \begin{document}

213: \begin{titlepage}

214: \large{EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN)}

215: 

216: \vspace*{1.5cm}

217: 

218: \begin{flushright}

219: {\small CERN-EP/2006-xxx} \\

220: {\small 26 September 2006} \\

221: %{\small DRAFT 4.14} \\

222: \end{flushright}

223: 

224: 

225: \vspace*{3.cm}

226: \begin{center}

227:  \Large{Fermion pair production in \mr{e^+e^-} collisions at

228: 189-209 GeV and constraints on physics beyond the Standard

229: Model}

230: \end{center}

231: 

232: \vspace*{1.cm} \begin{center}

233:  \large{The ALEPH Collaboration$^*)$}

234:  \end{center}

235: \vspace*{1.5cm}

236: \begin{abstract}

237: Cross sections, angular distributions and forward-backward

238: asymmetries are presented, of two-fermion events produced

239: in \ee collisions at centre-of-mass energies from 189 to 209~GeV at LEP,

240: measured with the ALEPH detector. Results

241: for \ee, \mumu, \tautau, \qq, \bb\ and \cc\ production are in

242: agreement with the Standard Model predictions. Constraints are set

243: on scenarios of new physics such as four-fermion contact

244: interactions, leptoquarks, Z$^\prime$ bosons, TeV-scale quantum gravity

245: and R-parity violating squarks and sneutrinos.

246: \end{abstract}

247: 

248: \vspace*{2.cm}

249: \centerline{\it \small {To be published in The European Physical Journal C}}

250: \vspace*{1.cm}

251: \centerline{\small {Dedicated to the memory of John Strong who died on 

252: July 31, 2006}}

253: \noindent

254: --------------------------------------------\hfil\break

255: {\small {$^*)$ See next pages for the list of authors}}

256: 

257: 

258: \end{titlepage}

259: \newpage

260: 

261: 

262: \input{authb.tex}

263: 

264: \newpage

265: \section{Introduction}

266: 

267:   In the years 1995-2000, the LEP collider

268:   delivered \ee collisions at centre-of-mass

269:  energies from 130 to 209~GeV.

270:   Measurements of the {\mr {e^+e^- \rightarrow f\bar f}} process

271:  with the ALEPH detector up to $\sqrt{s}$\,=\,183~GeV

272:  have been published in~Ref.~\cite{aleph-183}. The

273:  results obtained at seven additional energy values

274:  are presented in this paper with analyses largely unchanged with respect

275: to Ref.~\cite{aleph-183}.

276:   The seven centre-of-mass energies are listed in Table~\ref{tab:lum},

277:   together with the corresponding luminosities. In the

278:  year 2000 the luminosity was delivered in a

279:  range of energies.

280:  The 2000

281:  data are divided into two energy bins, from 202.5~GeV to 205.5~GeV

282:  and above.

283: 

284: This paper is organized as follows. Section~\ref{sec:detector} gives

285: a brief description of the ALEPH detector,  Section~\ref{sec:MC}

286: presents the event generators

287: used for the simulation of the signal and backgrounds, and

288:   Section~\ref{sec:signal} recalls some useful definitions.

289:    Measurements of hadronic, leptonic and heavy-flavour final states

290:   are discussed in Sections~\ref{sec:hadronic},~\ref{sec:leptonic}

291:   and~\ref{sec:hf},

292:    respectively. The results are used to set constraints

293:   on new physics in Section~\ref{sec:newphys}.

294: 

295: \section{The ALEPH detector\label{sec:detector}}

296:  The ALEPH detector and

297: performance are described in Refs.~\cite{aleph-det,aleph-perf},

298:  and only a short summary is given here.

299: 

300: Charged particles are detected in the central part, comprising a

301: precision silicon vertex detector, a cylindrical drift chamber and

302: a large time projection chamber, embedded in a 1.5\,T axial

303: magnetic field. The momentum $p$ of charged particles is measured

304: with a resolution of ${\sigma(p)/p\ =\ 6 \times 10^{-4}p_T \oplus

305: 0.005}$ (where $p_T$ is the momentum component perpendicular to

306: the beam axis in GeV/$c$).  The three-dimensional impact parameter

307: is measured with a resolution of ${(34 + 70/p ) \times (1 + 1.6

308: \cos^4\theta)\mu{\rm m}}$ (where $p$ is measured in GeV/$c$ and

309: $\theta$ is the polar angle with the beam axis). In addition, the

310: time projection chamber provides up to 344 measurements of the

311: specific energy loss by ionisation $dE/dx$.

312: 

313: In the following, only charged particle

314: tracks reconstructed with at least four hits in the time

315: projection chamber, originating from within a cylinder of length

316: 20~cm and radius 2~cm coaxial with the beam and centred at the

317: nominal collision point, and with a polar angle fulfilling ${|\cos

318: \theta|<0.95}$ are considered.

319: 

320: Electrons and photons are identified by the characteristic

321: longitudinal and transverse developments of the associated showers

322: in the electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL), a 22~radiation length thick

323: sandwich of lead planes and proportional wires chambers with fine

324: read-out segmentation. The relative energy resolution achieved is

325: $0.18/\sqrt{E (\rm {GeV})}$ for isolated electrons and photons.

326: 

327: Muons are identified by their characteristic penetration pattern

328: in the hadron calorimeter (HCAL), a 1.5~m thick iron yoke interleaved with 23

329: layers of streamer tubes, together with two surrounding

330: double-layers of muon chambers. In association with the

331: electromagnetic calorimeter, the hadron calorimeter also provides

332: a measurement of the hadronic energy with a relative resolution of

333: $0.85/\sqrt{E ({\rm GeV})}$.

334: 

335: The total visible energy, and therefore the event missing energy, is

336: measured with an energy-flow reconstruction algorithm~\cite{aleph-perf} which combines all the

337: above measurements, supplemented by the energy detected down to

338: 34~mrad from the beam axis by two additional electromagnetic

339: calorimeters, used for the luminosity determination~\cite{aleph-lcal,aleph-sical}. 

340: The relative

341: resolution on the total visible energy is ${0.60/\sqrt{E ({\rm GeV})}}$

342: for high-multiplicity final states. This algorithm also provides

343: a list of reconstructed energy-flow objects,

344:  classified as charged particles, photons and neutral hadrons.

345: 

346: The luminosity is determined with small-angle Bhabha events, detected with the

347: lead-wire luminosity calorimeter (LCAL), using the method described in 

348: Ref.~\cite{aleph-lcal}. The Bhabha cross section in the LCAL acceptance varies

349: from $4.3\,{\rm nb}$ at $189\,{\rm GeV}$ to $3.6\,{\rm nb}$ at 

350: $207\,{\rm GeV}$. The uncertainty on the measurement is smaller than $0.5\%$.

351: 

352: 

353: \section{Event simulation and Standard Model predictions\label{sec:MC}}

354: 

355:  Samples of simulated events are produced as follows. The

356: generator {\tt BHWIDE} version~1.01~\cite{MC-bhwide} is used for the

357: electron pair channel, and {\tt KK}  version~4.14~\cite{MC-kk2f}

358: for di-quark, di-tau and di-muon events. Interference between 

359:  initial-state (ISR) and final-state (FSR)

360: radiation is included in {\tt KK} generator for the leptonic

361: channels, whereas for the \qq\  channel the FSR

362:  is introduced by {\tt PYTHIA} in the parton shower and

363: therefore interferences with ISR are not

364: included. {\tt PYTHIA} version~6.1~\cite{MC-pythia} is used

365: for  ZZ and \mr{Ze^+e^-} production.

366:  Two-photon interactions (\mr{e^+e^- \rightarrow

367: e^+e^-X}) are generated with {\tt PHOT02}~\cite{MC-phot02} and

368: {\tt HERWIG}~\cite{MC-herwig}. 

369: Finally, backgrounds from W-pair

370: production are simulated with the {\tt KORALW} 

371: generator version~1.51~\cite{MC-koralw}.

372: Single-W processes are simulated with

373: {\tt EXCALIBUR}~\cite{MC-excalibur}.

374: Hadronic final states were generated with hadronisation and fragmentation parameters described in Ref.~\cite{QCDmega}.

375:  

376: Standard Model (SM) predictions

377:  in the electron-pair

378: channel are obtained from {\tt BHWIDE}. The

379: analytic program {\tt ZFITTER}~\cite{zfitter} is used in all other

380: cases, with the steering flags and main input parameters listed in

381: the Appendix.

382: 

383: 

384: 

385: \section{Cross section definition\label{sec:signal}}

386: 

387: Cross section results are provided for inclusive and exclusive

388: processes. The inclusive processes include events with hard ISR,

389: which correspond to about 85\% of the selected events,

390: while the exclusive processes exclude these final states.

391: 

392: The inclusive processes correspond to a cut  \sps \mr{>} 0.1,

393:  where $\sqrt{s}$ is the centre-of-mass energy and

394: $\sqrt{s^\prime}$ is defined as the  invariant mass of the outgoing

395:  lepton pair for leptonic final states, and  as

396: the mass of the $s$ channel propagator for hadronic final states.

397:  Differently from Ref.~\cite{aleph-183}, exclusive processes are defined 

398: by a cut  \sps\mr{>} 0.85 .

399: 

400:  When selecting events in the analysis, the measured variable $\sqrt{s^\prime_m}$,

401:   which provides a good approximation to $\sqrt{s^\prime}$ when

402: only one photon is emitted, is used to isolate exclusive

403: processes:

404: $${ {s^\prime_m}\ =\ \frac{\sin\theta_1 +

405: \sin\theta_2 - |\sin(\theta_1 + \theta_2)|}{\sin\theta_1 +

406: \sin\theta_2 + |\sin(\theta_1 + \theta_2)|}\ \times s}.$$ Here

407: \mr{\theta_{1,2}} are the angles of the outgoing fermions

408: measured with respect to the direction of the incoming electron

409: beam or with respect to the direction of the most energetic photon seen in the

410: apparatus and consistent with ISR~\cite{aleph-183}.

411: In order

412: to reduce the uncertainties

413: related to interferences between  ISR and FSR,

414: the exclusive cross sections and asymmetries are not

415: extrapolated to the full acceptance. They are evaluated over the reduced

416: angular range corresponding to $|\cos \theta| < 0.95$, where $\theta$

417: is the polar angle of the outgoing fermion for the hadronic cross section measurements.

418: For the leptonic cross section 

419: and the forward-backward asymmetry measurements $|\cos \theta| < 0.95$ cut applies to both

420: outgoing fermion and anti-fermion polar angles.

421: 

422: 

423: 

424: %\section{Hadronic Final States. \label{sec:hadronic}}

425: % SECTION  HADRON

426: \input{hadron.tex}

427: 

428: 

429: 

430: % SECTION LEPTON

431: 

432: \input{dileptons_cor.tex}

433: 

434: \section{Heavy-flavour production\label{sec:hf}}

435: 

436:  Measurements with heavy-flavour final states are described in this section. 

437: The ratios of the \bb\ and \cc\ cross sections

438: to the hadronic cross section, indicated as $R_{\rm b}$

439: and $R_{\rm c}$ respectively, are discussed in Sections~\ref{sec:Rb}

440: and~\ref{sec:Rc}. The charge forward-backward asymmetry is

441:  measured on a b-enriched ($A_{\rm FB}^{\rm b}$) and a b-depleted

442: (\Qfb ) event sample, as presented in Section~\ref{sec:afbb}.

443: %The latter yields information on the average properties of non-b events

444: %and can constrain the relative fraction of up-type to down-type

445: %quarks.

446: 

447: Results are given for the signal definition as

448: in Ref.~\cite{aleph-183}, with $\sqrt{s^\prime/s}\,>\,0.9$ and an

449: angular range restricted to \mr{|\cos \theta |<\ 0.95}.

450: An additional acceptance

451: cut requiring that both jets have

452: ${\mathrm |\cos \theta _{\rm jet}|<0.9}$\

453: is applied to ensure that they are contained in the

454: vertex detector acceptance. Table~\ref{tab:had-events} gives the

455: number of selected hadronic events at each centre-of-mass energy.

456: The resulting  efficiency is typically 78\%, with a dependence on

457: the quark flavour of less than \mr{\pm 1\%}. The background from

458: \qq\ events produced outside the acceptance, but reconstructed

459: inside, is of the order of 2.6\% and varies within 0.5\% depending

460: on the quark flavour. This variation is 

461:  taken as systematic uncertainty on the

462: contribution of the radiative background.

463:  The total uncertainty of the hadronic selection efficiency in the

464:  considered angular range

465:  is of the order of 1\%.

466: 

467:  The long lifetime and large decay multiplicity of b hadrons allow

468: the separation of \bb\ final states from other quarks. The same

469: tagging variables, complemented by  additional variables,

470: can be used to separate \cc\ final states from light quarks.

471:  These selections have a moderate dependence on b-quark and c-quark

472:  physics modeling

473: uncertainties~\cite{pdg,lep-hf,aleph-cmod},

474:  listed in Tables~\ref{tab:bcmod1} and~\ref{tab:bcmod2}.

475: 

476: 

477: \subsection{Measurement of $R_{\rm b}$\label{sec:Rb}}

478: 

479: Events containing b hadrons are tagged using the procedure

480: developed by ALEPH at LEP1~\cite{aleph-rbz1}. For each charged

481: track, a probability (\Pb{T}) that it originates at the primary vertex is

482: evaluated using the measured impact parameter significance. This

483: is defined as the signed distance of closest approach of the track to the

484: interaction point divided by the uncertainty on that distance. By

485: taking all tracks or by grouping them according to which

486: hemisphere  or which jet they populate, the probability that the

487: event (\Pb{E}), the hemisphere (\Pb{H}) or the jet (\Pb{J}) contains

488: only light-quark jets can be determined. A low value of the

489: probability indicates the presence of long-lived states, which

490: arise dominantly from b-quark production. The b tagging therefore

491: corresponds to a cut on the appropriate probability.

492: 

493: In order to reproduce the detector resolution  in the

494: simulation, the procedure to smear the impact parameter

495: significance used for the LEP1

496: analyses~\cite{aleph-rbz2} is employed. This is based on the \mr{\sim \

497: 3~pb^{-1}} calibration data taken at the Z peak each year,

498:  in order to optimize the smearing parameters for that year's data

499:  (Fig.~\ref{fig:ip-smear}).

500: 

501: The crucial factor in the determination of $R_{\rm b}$ is

502: the b-tag efficiency. The highly accurate measurements of $R_{\rm b}$

503: at LEP1 were made possible  by the use of a double-tag method,

504:  relying on the fact that b-quarks are produced in pairs which

505: populate opposite hemispheres~\cite{aleph-rbz2}. The use of single-

506: and double-hemisphere tags enables the efficiency, as well as the rate

507: of \mr{b\bar b} production, to be determined from the

508: data, leaving only the level of background to be obtained from the

509: simulation. Furthermore, 

510:  uncertainties arising from the background knowledge can be

511: minimized with hard cuts.

512: 

513: %

514: % from Patrick

515: %

516: Unlike at LEP1, the double-tag method is not practical at LEP2 because 

517: of the much smaller statistics. For this reason, previous ALEPH 

518: measurements of $R_{\rm b}$ at 130-183 GeV~\cite{aleph-183} were made with a single overall 

519: event tag. The efficiency was then determined either directly from 

520: the simulation, or by correcting the simulated efficiency by the ratio 

521: of the $R_{\rm b}$ value measured with each year Z peak data to the world average. 

522: Neither method was satisfactory as they both require an extrapolation 

523: (either from the basic simulation or from the Z to LEP2 energies), 

524: with mostly unknown related systematic uncertainties.

525: 

526: The full LEP2 data sample, however, has become sufficiently large for 

527: an average $R_{\rm b}$ value to be measured with the double-tag procedure, with 

528: reduced and controlled systematic uncertainty. An overall efficiency 

529: correction can therefore be obtained by taking the ratio of the average 

530: values of $R_{\rm b}$ over all centre-of-mass energies, measured with the 

531: double- and single-tag methods respectively, so that

532: %

533: %

534: %

535: 

536: %This procedure has worked extremely well at LEP1 thanks to the high-statistics

537: %event samples, and has led to precisions on the \mr{R_{b}} measurements

538: %at the 0.5\% level. The situation is more difficult at LEP2, due to the much

539: %smaller number of events. Consequently, it is impracticable

540: %to use the double-tag method for the individual LEP2 energy values,

541: % and previous ALEPH measurements of \mr{R_{b}} at

542: % 130-183~GeV~\cite{aleph-183} were made using only a single

543: %overall event tag.

544: %

545: %For the single tag, the efficiency can be determined either

546: %directly from the simulation, or by correcting the simulation

547: %using a factor derived from a comparison of the \mr{R_{b}} value measured

548: %each year with the Z-peak  data and the world average.

549: %Neither method is fully satisfactory, as it is difficult to quantify the

550: %significant uncertainty arising either from the basic simulation or from

551: %the extrapolation of efficiency from the Z-pole to the LEP2

552: %energies.

553: %

554: %Therefore, for the measurements presented here a new approach has been

555: %adopted. This takes advantage of the fact that \mr{R_{b}} has a

556: %weak energy dependence over the LEP2 energy range, and that the full LEP2

557: %data sample is sufficient to use the double-tag procedure.

558: %% This assumption is not in contradiction with what is

559: %% observed in the data, within the precision of the double-tag method.

560: % Thus the main measurement is the average value of \mr{R_{b}} obtained with

561: %the double-tag  method over the LEP2 energy range. This reduces

562: %the systematic uncertainty at the expense of the statistical one.

563: % For the individual measurements at each energy point the limited

564: %statistics still necessitates the use of the single-tag method.

565: % However,  by comparing

566: %the average values of \mr{R_{b}} over all energy points,

567: % as measured with the single- and double-tag methods,

568: %  an efficiency correction can be

569: %obtained for the single-tag measurement at each energy, so that

570: 

571: $$ R^{k} = R^{k}_{s} \frac{\overline{R_{d}}}{\overline{R_{s}}} $$

572: 

573: \noindent where $R^{k}$ is the final value of $R_{\rm b}$ at

574:     energy $k$,

575:     $R^{k}_{s}$ is the value of $R_{\rm b}$ determined

576:     by the single-tag procedure at energy $k$, and

577:     ${\overline{R_{d}}}$ and ${\overline{R_{s}}}$ are the values

578:     of $R_{\rm b}$,

579:     averaged over all energy points,

580:     as measured with the double- or  single-tag

581:      method respectively.

582:  The above correction, which amounts to about 1.05, assumes that the ratio 

583: between the double- and single-tag efficiencies

584:  is energy independent,

585: which is true as long as the cuts are not changed on an

586: energy-by-energy basis. It does not require  the b-tag cut to

587: be the same for both methods. 

588: The optimal selection cut for both the event and hemisphere tags is taken to be the point

589: where the total fractional error on $R_{\rm b}$ is minimized. The b-tag cut corresponds to

590: a b-selection efficiency of 49\% (69\%) and to a purity of 80\% (72\%) for the event

591: (hemisphere) tag. The correlation

592: between the single- and double-tag methods is estimated to be 0.95

593: from the simulation.

594: 

595:  The final statistical uncertainty  is dominated by the statistical

596: precision on ${\overline{R_d}}$. To

597: determine  the systematic uncertainty,

598: it is assumed that both the uncertainty for each method and

599: the correlation between them are energy independent. It can then

600: be shown that the relative systematic uncertainty at each

601: energy is given to a good approximation by the relative

602: systematic uncertainty on the average double-tag determination.

603: %, i.e

604: %

605: %$$ \mathrm{\frac{\sigma_{f}^{syst,k}}{R^{k}_{f}} = \frac{\sigma^{syst}}{\overline{R_{d}}}}  $$

606: %

607:  The systematic uncertainties for the double-tag method are

608: calculated over the full data set, and the contributions

609: are given in Table~\ref{tab:rb-syst}. The dominant sources

610: come from the b-tagging parameters (used to define the track selection and the

611: jet reconstruction) and from the smearing procedure~\cite{richard-phd}.

612:  In addition, by comparing the average

613: efficiency obtained with the double-tag method between data and

614: simulation, the uncertainty on the uds

615: and c backgrounds is found to be smaller than 11\%.

616: 

617: 

618: The measured average value of $R_{\rm b}$ is 

619: 

620: 

621: $$ R_{\rm b} = 0.151 \pm 0.012 ({\rm stat}) \pm  0.007 ({\rm syst})

622: \ \ \ \ (\langle\sqrt{s}\rangle = 198\,{\rm GeV}) $$

623: 

624: The individual values determined at each energy point

625: are presented in Table~\ref{tab:rb-final} and in Fig.~\ref{fig:rb-sqrt}.

626: 

627: 

628: \subsection{Measurement of $R_{\rm c}$\label{sec:Rc} }

629: 

630: The ratio of the \cc\ cross section to

631: the hadronic cross section, $R_{\rm c}$, is measured from

632: the hadronic sample pre-selected

633: as described above.

634: 

635:  In a first step, the background from \bb\ events is reduced to 4\%

636: of the hadronic sample with a cut on \Pb{E} ($\log{\cal P}_E > -2$),

637: which retains 86\% of

638: the \cc\ events and close to 100\%\ of the light-quark events.

639: The efficiency of this cut is controlled on a sample of WW

640: events, and the resulting systematic uncertainty is about 1\%. %  (1.5\% at 189 GeV) .

641: 

642: 

643:  The final selection of  \cc\ events uses a Neural Network (NN)

644:  algorithm trained to

645: separate jets originating from c quarks from jets originating from light quarks.

646:  The nine input variables, exploiting the lifetime of  D  mesons,

647:  their masses and their decays into leptons or kaons, are:

648: \begin{itemize}

649: \item{\Pb{J}, as defined in Section~\ref{sec:Rb}.}

650: \item{The probability that tracks having a high rapidity with

651:  respect to the jet axis originate from the primary vertex.}

652: \item{The decay length significance of a reconstructed secondary vertex.~\cite{aleph-bsosc}}

653: \item{The $p_T$, with respect to the jet axis,

654: of the last track used to build a

655: 2~GeV/$c^2$ mass system, tracks being ordered by increasing \Pb{T}.}

656: \item{The sum of the rapidities, with respect to the jet axis, of all energy-flow

657:  objects within 40 degrees of this axis.}

658: \item{The total energy of the four most energetic energy-flow 

659: objects in the jet.}

660: \item{The missing energy per jet defined as the difference between the beam 

661: energy and the reconstructed jet energy.}

662: \item{The largest rapidity of lepton candidates with respect to

663:  the jet axis.}

664: \item{The largest momentum of kaon candidates. 

665: Here a charged particle track is identified as a kaon candidate 

666: if its ionization energy loss ($dE/dx$) is compatible with that 

667: expected from a kaon within three standard deviations, 

668: and more compatible with that expected from a kaon than with that expected from a pion.

669: }

670: \end{itemize}

671: 

672:  The distribution of the NN output for

673:  light-quark jets  in the simulation is corrected

674: with the data by comparing enriched samples of light-quark jets

675: selected with a cut applied to the opposite hemisphere. 

676: The correction is applied energy by energy. The statistical

677: error on this correction is taken as systematic uncertainty; an

678: additional uncertainty originates from the residual \cc\

679: background in the selected sample. An example of the distributions

680: used to derive the correction and the correction itself are

681: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:rc-corr}. A {\bb}-enriched sample is used

682: to control the fraction of \bb\ background in the final

683: event sample to 5\%. Other sources of systematic

684: uncertainties come from the limited statistics of the

685: Monte Carlo samples, the knowledge of the luminosity,

686: detector effects (smearing

687: and momentum corrections), the hadronic pre-selection, and

688: the modeling of c-quark physics.

689:  They are listed in Table~\ref{tab:rc-syst}.

690: 

691: 

692:  The distribution of the sum of the NN outputs for both

693: jets in the event is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:rc-dist-189}.

694:  At each energy point, the NN cuts (indicated

695:  in Fig.~\ref{fig:rc-dist-189} for the $\sqrt{s}$=~189~GeV case)

696:  are chosen so as to minimize the total uncertainty. The upper cut

697: suppresses about 5\% of the remaining b background with a signal loss of

698: less than 1\%. The typical efficiency is 75\% with a signal-to-background ratio of

699: 50\%. The resulting $R_{\rm c}$  measurements are listed in

700: Table~\ref{tab:rc-meas}.

701: 

702: 

703: 

704: \subsection{Measurements of $A_{\rm FB}^{\rm b}$ \textbf{and \Qfb\label{sec:afbb}}}

705: 

706: 

707: The $A_{\rm FB}^{\rm b}$ and \Qfb\ measurements are both extracted from hadronic

708: events pre-selected as described above.

709:  A b-enriched

710: sample and a b-depleted sample are obtained using appropriate cuts on

711: \Pb{E} ($\log{\cal P}_E < -4.3$ and $\log{\cal P}_E > -2$, respectively). 

712: The cuts are set with the aid of the simulation, and

713: correspond to a b content of the order of 90\% and 4\% for the

714: two samples, respectively. The selection efficiencies vary only slightly with

715: the centre-of-mass energy.

716: 

717: The jet charge ${Q_{\rm jet}}$ of each jet is defined as

718: 

719: $$Q_{\rm jet} = \frac{\sum_i q_i\cdot p^{\kappa}_{\|,i}}{\sum_i p^{\kappa}_{\|,i}}$$

720: 

721: \noindent where the sums extend over the reconstructed

722: charged tracks in the jet and $q_i$ and $p_{\|,i}$ are the track charge

723: and track momentum parallel to the jet axis, respectively. The

724: parameter \mr{\kappa} is optimized with simulated events so as to

725: maximize the charge separation between b jets and \mr{\bar b} jets.

726:  It is found to be fairly independent of the

727: centre-of-mass energy and the average value of 0.36 is used. 

728: The same \mr{\kappa} value is also used for

729: the b-depleted event sample.

730: 

731: The mean charge asymmetry 

732: ${\langle Q_{\rm FB}\rangle\ = \langle Q^{\rm F}_{\rm jet} -Q^{\rm B}_{\rm jet}\rangle}$

733: is measured on both the b-enriched and b-depleted samples

734: as the average of the jet charge difference between the forward

735: and backward hemispheres, defined with respect to the thrust axis.

736: It is related to the quark forward-backward asymmetries ($A_{\rm FB}^{\rm q}$)

737: as follows

738: 

739: $${ {\langle Q_{\rm FB}\rangle\ =\

740: \frac{\sum \epsilon _{\rm q}\sigma _{\rm q} \delta _{\rm q} A_{\rm FB}^{\rm q} +

741:         \sum \epsilon _{\rm x}\sigma _{\rm x} \langle Q_{\rm FB}^{\rm x}\rangle}

742:      {\sum \epsilon _{\rm q}\sigma _{\rm q}  + \sum \epsilon _{\rm x} \sigma _{\rm x}} }}$$

743: 

744: \noindent where the index q indicates the quark flavours (u, d, s, c and b)  and

745:  the index ${\rm x}$ indicates the various background components

746:  (WW, ZZ and radiative \mr{q\bar q}).

747: In this expression 

748: ${ \langle Q_{\rm FB}^{\rm x}\rangle}$  indicates

749: the background mean charge asymmetry ,

750: ${\epsilon_{\rm q,x}}$ the selection efficiencies 

751: and ${\delta_{\rm q}}$ the charge separation  (defined as the mean of

752:  the ${Q_{\rm q} - Q_{\rm {\bar q}}}$ distribution).

753: 

754:  The asymmetry $A_{\rm FB}^{\rm b}$ is obtained from the b-enriched sample; it is

755: extracted from ${\langle Q_{\rm FB}^{\rm enr}\rangle}$, 

756: the charge asymmetry measured from the

757: data, using the previous formula.

758: The background mean charge asymmetry, the selection efficiencies and the

759: charge separations are taken from the simulation.

760: The non-b quark cross sections \mr{\sigma_q}\ and asymmetries $A_{\rm FB}^{\rm q}$

761: are computed with {\tt ZFITTER} for the signal definition

762: \sps \mr{>} 0.9, with \mr{|\cos\theta| < 0.9} for both quark and anti-quark.

763:  It is possible to reduce the

764: dependence of this measurement on the b efficiency

765: estimated from the simulation

766:  by replacing the product \mr{\epsilon_b\sigma_b} with ${N_{\rm data}^{\rm b}/{\cal L}}$,

767:   where ${N_{\rm data}^{\rm b}}$ is the number of b events in the data and

768:   \mr{{\cal L}} is the integrated luminosity.

769:  It follows:

770: 

771: $${{A_{\rm FB}^{\rm b}\ =\

772: \frac{N_{\rm data}^{\rm b} \langle Q_{\rm FB}^{\rm enr}\rangle

773:         - \sum^{\rm q\neq b} {\cal L} \epsilon _{\rm q}\sigma _{\rm q} \delta _{\rm q} 

774:          A_{\rm FB}^{\rm q}

775:         - \sum {\cal L} \epsilon _{\rm x}\sigma _{\rm x} \langle Q_{\rm FB}^{\rm x}\rangle}

776:      {(N_{\rm data}^{\rm b} - N_{\rm MC}^{\rm bkg})\delta _{\rm b}} }}$$

777: 

778: \noindent where ${N_{\rm MC}^{\rm bkg}}$ is the number of background

779:  events predicted by the simulation.

780: The measurement is corrected by a factor 1.03 to extrapolate

781: from the range \mr{|\cos \theta|<0.9} to

782: the nominal range \mr{|\cos \theta|<0.95}.

783:  The potentially large uncertainty originating from the

784: \cc\ contamination in the b-enriched sample is reduced

785: to a negligible level by a tight cut on \Pb{E}.

786: 

787: In order to evaluate the systematic uncertainty on the jet charge separation,

788: $\delta_q$ is measured with the data, using

789: semileptonic b decays for b quarks and

790: semileptonic WW events for light and c quarks.

791:  Semileptonic b decays are selected by requiring an electron or muon

792: with high transverse momentum in one jet. The charge of the

793: opposite b jet is then known. Because of the low event

794: statistics surviving this

795: selection, data taken at all energies must be combined. 

796: The difference between the jet charge distributions in data and simulation 

797: (Fig.~\ref{fig:afbb-qjet})

798: is propagated as systematic uncertainty to the $A_{\rm FB}^{\rm b}$ measurement,

799: representing the dominant systematic effect.

800: A similar procedure is applied to a selected sample 

801: of semileptonic W-pair events to measure the average lighter quarks charge separation.

802: 

803:  These and other sources of systematic uncertainties are summarized in

804:  Table~\ref{tab:afbb-syst}. The  $A_{\rm FB}^{\rm b}$ measurements

805:  are presented in Table~\ref{tab:afbb-meas}.

806: 

807: 

808:  Finally, the difference

809:  ${\Delta\ =\ \langle Q_{\rm FB}^{\rm depl}\rangle-\langle Q_{\rm FB}^{\rm MC}\rangle }$,

810:  measured with

811:  b-depleted samples, constrains

812: simultaneously $A_{\rm FB}^{\rm q}$ and \mr{\sigma_{q}} (q=u,d,s or c), 

813: providing additional sensitivity to physics beyond the

814: Standard Model. 

815: %

816: Assuming small deviations from the SM, the linearized equation

817: \[{\mathrm \Delta = \sum_{\rm q}

818: \frac{\partial\langle Q_{\rm FB}\rangle}{\partial \sigma_{\rm q}}\Delta\sigma _{\rm q} +

819: \sum_{\rm q}

820: \frac{\partial\langle Q_{\rm FB}\rangle}{\partial A^{\rm q}_{\rm FB}} 

821: \Delta A^{\rm q}_{\rm FB}}\]

822: \noindent is used to constrain

823: the deviations of $A_{\rm FB}^{\rm q}$ and \mr{\sigma_{q}} from the SM with the measured

824: values of

825: $\Delta$ at each centre-of-mass energy, as described in Ref.~\cite{aleph-183}. 

826: Examples of the coefficients of the above equations are shown in Table~\ref{tab:qfb-coef}.

827: %

828: 

829: The dominant systematic uncertainty originates from the

830:  jet charge, determined as explained

831: above. This and other sources are listed in Table~\ref{tab:qfb-syst}, while

832: the measurement results are reported in Table~\ref{tab:qfb-meas}.

833: 

834: 

835: \section{Interpretation in terms of new physics\label{sec:newphys}}

836: 

837:   New physics, if present, 

838:  could give rise to deviations of the measured

839:  cross sections and asymmetries from the Standard Model expectations.

840:  The results presented in the previous Sections indicate good agreement

841:  between the data and the SM predictions. As an example the global fit of the muon, tau

842: and hadronic exclusive cross sections and of the muon and tau asymmetries at the seven energies gives

843: $\chi^2/{\rm d.o.f.} = 29.79/35$. Stringent limits can be placed on scenarios beyond

844:  the Standard Model.

845: 

846:   Predictions of several models of new physics 

847:   are fitted to the

848:  data using binned maximum likelihoods, as explained in~\cite{aleph-183}.

849:   For this purpose, the measurements described in this

850:  paper are combined with those at lower energies reported

851:  in~\cite{aleph-183}.

852: 

853: Following the conclusions in Ref.~\cite{Lep2-WS}, theoretical

854: uncertainties of 0.26\%, 0.4\%, 0.4\%, 0.5\% and 2.0\%  are

855: assigned to the \qq , \mumu , \tautau , \ee\ (forward) and \ee\

856: (central) cross section predictions, respectively.

857: 

858: 

859: \subsection{Contact interactions}

860: 

861:  Four-fermion contact interactions, expected to occur for example

862:  if fermions are composite,  are characterized by a scale

863:  $\Lambda$, interpreted as the mass of a new heavy particle

864:  exchanged between the incoming

865: and outgoing fermions, and a coupling \emph{g} giving the strength

866: of the interaction. Conventionally, $g$ is assumed to satisfy

867: $g/\sqrt{4\pi}=1$. Following the notation of Ref.~\cite{th-ci}, the

868: effective Lagrangian for the four-fermion contact interaction in

869: the process \mr{e^+e^- \rightarrow f\bar f} is given by

870: 

871: $$ L^{\rm CI} = \frac{g^2\eta_{\rm sign}}{(1+\delta)\Lambda^2} 

872: \sum_{i,j={\rm L,R}} \eta_{ij}[\bar e_{i}\gamma^{\mu}e_{i}]

873:                         [\bar f_{j}\gamma_{\mu}f_{j}] $$

874: 

875: \noindent with

876: $\delta$~=~1 if $f=e$ and $\delta$~=~0 otherwise.

877:  The fields $e_{\rm L,R}\ (f_{\rm L,R})$

878: are left- or right-handed projections of electron (fermion) spinors,

879: and the coefficients $\eta_{ij}$ specify the relative contribution of

880: the different chirality combinations.  

881:  New physics can add

882: constructively or destructively to the SM Lagrangian, according to the

883: sign of $\eta_{\rm sign}$.

884:  Several models, defined in Table~\ref{tab:ci-models}, are considered in 

885: this analysis.

886: 

887: In the presence of

888: contact interactions, the differential cross section for \mr{e^+e^-

889: \rightarrow f\bar f} as a function of the polar angle $\theta$ of

890: the outgoing fermion with respect to the e$^-$ beam can be written

891: as

892: %

893: \[

894: \frac{{\mathrm d}\sigma}{{\mathrm d}\cos\theta} =

895: F_{\mathrm{SM}}(s,t)

896:   \left[1 + \eps   \frac{F_{\mathrm{IF}}^{\mathrm{Born}}(s,t)}

897:                         {F_{\mathrm{SM}}^{\mathrm{Born}}(s,t)}

898:           + \eps^2 \frac{F_{\mathrm{CI}}^{\mathrm{Born}}(s,t)}

899:                         {F_{\mathrm{SM}}^{\mathrm{Born}}(s,t)} \right]

900: \]

901: %

902: where $s,t$ are the Mandelstam variables and $\eps =

903: g^2\eta_{\mathrm{sign}}/(4\pi\lam^2)$. $F_{\mathrm{SM}}$ is

904: the Standard Model cross section. $F_{\mathrm{IF}}^{\mathrm{Born}}$

905: and $F_{\mathrm{CI}}^{\mathrm{Born}}$ are the contributions 

906:  from the interference between 

907:  the Standard Model and the contact interaction and from

908: the pure contact interaction, respectively. The above formula

909: is fitted to the data using a binned maximum likelihood function, 

910: as described in Ref.~\cite{aleph-183}. Limits are quoted at the 95\% C.L.

911: for $\Lambda^\pm$ corresponding to $\eta_{\rm sign}=\pm 1$.

912: 

913:  For leptonic final states, limits on the  scale $\Lambda$  are derived

914:  from the leptonic differential cross sections.

915:  The results are shown in Table~\ref{tab:contact_lepton} 

916:  and Fig.~\ref{fig:cont_ll}.

917: 

918:  For generic hadronic final states, limits on $\Lambda$ are obtained from fits

919: to the hadronic cross sections assuming that the contact interaction

920: affects all flavours with equal strength.

921:  In addition, limits on models involving only couplings to

922: c or b quarks can be derived from the $R_{\rm c}$ and $Q_{\rm FB}^{\rm depl}$

923: or $R_{\rm b}$ and $A_{\rm FB}^{\rm b}$

924:  measurements respectively. The results are

925:  shown in Table~\ref{tab:ci-hadron} and Fig.~\ref{fig:cont_had}.

926:  Combining hadronic cross section measurements

927:  with observables in the charm sector

928:  improves the overall sensitivity, % and

929: %in this case, the correlation between both sets of measurements

930: %are neglected.

931:  whereas the gain is marginal for the bottom sector.

932: 

933: In summary, the ALEPH limits on the scale of contact interactions

934: $\Lambda$ are in the range 2-17~TeV, and most stringent

935: for the VV and AA models.

936:  Constraints on \mr{e^{+}e^{-}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}},

937:  \mr{e^{+}e^{-}b\bar{b}} and \mr{e^{+}e^{-}c\bar{c}} contact interactions

938: are of particular

939: interest because these couplings are not accessible

940: at \mr{p\bar{p}} and \mr{ep} colliders.

941: %Limits for models of

942: %$e^{+}e^{-}u\bar{u}$, $e^{+}e^{-}d\bar{d}$ contact interactions which violate parity

943: %(LL,RR,LR and RL) are severely constrained by atomic physics parity violation

944: %experiments and are the order of 15 \tevc ~\cite{exp-at-ci}.

945: 

946: 

947: \subsection{R-parity violating sneutrinos}

948: 

949:  Supersymmetric theories with R-parity violation have terms in the

950:  Lagrangian of the form ${\lambda_{ijk}{\rm L}_i{\rm L}_j\bar{\rm E}_k}$, where L

951:  denotes a left-handed lepton doublet superfield and \mr{\bar E}  a

952:  right-handed lepton singlet superfield~\cite{th-sneu}.

953:   The parameters \mr{\lambda} are Yukawa

954:  couplings and $i,j,k$ are generation indices. The couplings

955:  ${\lambda_{ijk}}$,

956:  assumed to be real in this analysis, are non-vanishing only for $i<j$.

957:   These terms allow for single production of sleptons in \mr {e^+e^-}

958:   collisions.

959: 

960:   At LEP, R-parity violating sneutrinos could be exchanged in the

961:  $s$ or $t$ channel, leading to deviations of di-lepton production

962:  from the SM expectations. Table~\ref{tab:sneu-models} shows the

963:  most interesting cases.

964:  Sneutrino exchange in the $s$ channel gives rise to a resonant state,

965:  assumed here to have a width of 1~GeV/$c^2$~\cite{th-sneu}.

966:  Limits on couplings are extracted as explained in Ref.~\cite{aleph-183}

967:  using leptonic differential cross section measurements.

968:   Figures~\ref{fig:snu-e}-\ref{fig:snu-t} show the resulting

969:   constraints for processes

970:  involving sneutrino exchange.

971: 

972: 

973: \subsection{Leptoquarks and R-Parity violating squarks}

974: 

975:  At LEP, the $t$ channel exchange of a leptoquark can modify the \qq\

976: cross section and jet charge asymmetry. In scenarios where

977: leptoquarks couple to the first-generation  leptons and to the

978: second- or third-generation quarks, more stringent limits can be

979: placed by using in addition the relevant heavy-flavour observables

980: $R_{\rm b}$, $R_{\rm c}$ and $A_{\rm FB}^{\rm b}$. Comparisons of the measurements with

981: the predictions given in

982: Ref.~\cite{th-lq} allow upper limits to be set on the leptoquark

983: coupling  as a function of its mass.

984: 

985:  Leptoquarks are classified according to the spin, weak

986: isospin I and hypercharge. Scalar and vector leptoquarks are

987: denoted by symbols \mr{S_I} and \mr{V_I}, and different

988: hypercharge states are indicated by a tilde. In addition, ``L" or ``R"

989: specifies if the leptoquark couples to the right- or

990: left-handed leptons exclusively.

991:  The \mr{\tilde S_{\frac{1}{2}}(L)} and \mr{S_0(L)} leptoquarks are

992: equivalent to up-type anti-squarks and down-type squarks,

993:  respectively, in supersymmetric theories with an R-parity breaking

994: term ${\lambda^\prime_{1jk}{\rm L}_1{\rm Q}_j\bar{\rm D}_k}$ ($j,k$=1,2,3). Limits

995: on leptoquark couplings are then equivalent to limits on

996: ${\lambda_{1jk}}$.

997: 

998:  Table~\ref{tab:lq-limits} gives, for various

999: leptoquark type, the 95\% C.L. lower limit on the mass

1000: $M_{\rm LQ}$ assuming the leptoquark couples with strength

1001: $g^2=4\pi$$\alpha_{em}^{2}$.

1002:  Figure~\ref{fig:lq-lim} shows the exclusion contour in the plane

1003:  coupling-mass for leptoquarks coupling to the third quark

1004: generation.

1005: %The inclusion of the forward-backward charge

1006: %asymmetry \mr{Q_{FB}} measurement improves the sensitivity.

1007: 

1008: % Constraints on leptoquarks coupling to the 1st quark generation are

1009: %complementary to

1010: % HERA~\cite{exp-lq-h1} and Tevatron limits

1011: %~\cite{exp-lq-tevatron}.

1012: 

1013: 

1014: \input{ze}

1015: 

1016: \subsection{Limits on TeV-scale gravity}

1017: 

1018:  A solution to the hierarchy problem has been proposed

1019: in Ref.~\cite{th-grav}, where gravity is characterized by a

1020: fundamental scale $M_{\rm D}$ which could be as low as 1~TeV,

1021:  provided that

1022:  space has \mr{\delta} extra dimensions compactified

1023:  to a size $R$. The effective Gravitational constant is

1024:  then given by ${g_{\rm N}^{-1} = 8\pi R^\delta M_{\rm D}^{2+\delta}}$.

1025:  Hence, gravity can become strong

1026: at small distances, leading for example to deviations

1027:  of the \mr{e^+e^-\rightarrow\ e^+e^-} differential cross section

1028: from the SM  expectation. These deviations are

1029: parametrized by a cut-off \mr{\Lambda_T}~\cite{th-grav-param} of

1030: the same order of magnitude as $M_{\rm D}$.

1031: 

1032:   Figure~\ref{fig:grav} shows the  \mr{e^+e^-\ \rightarrow\ e^+e^-}

1033:  differential cross sections measured with

1034:   data collected at $\sqrt{s}$=189-209~GeV,

1035:   normalized to the SM prediction, together with the expected

1036:   deviations from

1037:   TeV-scale gravity models. Using all data,

1038:    a lower limit of 1.1~TeV (1.2~TeV) is obtained on

1039:    \mr{\Lambda_T^-} (\mr{\Lambda_T^+}), for

1040:    destructive (constructive) interference with the SM prediction.

1041: In computing the limits the luminosity measurement was assumed unaffected and the theoretical

1042: errors of 0.5\% (2.0\%) assigned to the forward (central) \mr{e^+e^-} cross sections were 

1043: taken as uncorrelated.

1044: 

1045: \section{Conclusions\label{sec:conclu}}

1046: 

1047:    Several measurements of di-fermion final states

1048:   using data collected by ALEPH at $\sqrt{s}$=189-209~GeV

1049:  have been presented. In the leptonic sector, total

1050:  and 

1051:  differential cross sections, as well 

1052:  as muon and tau forward-backward asymmetries, have

1053:  been derived. In the hadronic sector,  cross sections,

1054:   forward-backward charge asymmetries for light and c quarks,

1055:   b quark forward-backward asymmetries, 

1056:   and the $R_{\rm b}$ and $R_{\rm c}$ ratios have been measured. 

1057: Similar measurements have been performed by the DELPHI~\cite{exp-delphi}, 

1058: L3~\cite{exp-l3}  and OPAL~\cite{exp-opal-ci} Collaborations.

1059: 

1060:  The results are consistent with the Standard Model expectations and

1061:  have been used to place constraints on several

1062:   scenarios of new physics:

1063:  four-fermion contact interactions, R-parity violating

1064:  sneutrinos and squarks, leptoquarks, additional Z bosons

1065:  and TeV-scale gravity. These constraints improve on previous ALEPH

1066:  limits, and are similar to those obtained by the other LEP Collaborations.

1067: 

1068: Additional interpretations in terms of new physics, using measurements presented in this paper,

1069: can be found in Refs.~\cite{strumia-1,strumia-2}.

1070: 

1071: %The limits on the energy scale $\Lambda$ of four-fermion contact

1072: %interactions are in the range 2-17 TeV depending on the model.

1073: %For R-parity violating sneutrinos, the values of the Yukawa coupling $\lambda >

1074: %0.12$ can be excluded for \mr{m_{\tilde{\nu}}} in the range 130 - 210 \gevcc for

1075: %processes involving sneutrino exchange in the s-channel.

1076: %Limits on the LQ mass for leptoquarks coupling to the first, second or third

1077: %generationof quark are extracted.

1078: %The limits for TeV scale gravity reach 1.2 TeV in the sensitive channel

1079: %\mr{e^+e^-\ \rightarrow\ e^+e^-}.

1080: 

1081: \section*{Acknowledgments}

1082: We thank our colleagues from the CERN accelerator divisions for

1083: the successful running of LEP at high energy. We are

1084: indebted to the engineers and technicians in all our institutions

1085: for their contribution to the good performance of

1086: ALEPH. Those of us from non-member states thank CERN for its

1087: hospitality.

1088: 

1089: \clearpage

1090: \newpage

1091: 

1092: %% Tables

1093: \input{tab-lum_cor.tex}

1094: %% Hadrons

1095: \input{tab-had.tex}

1096: %% Leptons

1097: \clearpage

1098: \input{tab-leptons.tex}

1099: \clearpage

1100: %% HF

1101: \input{tab-had-events.tex}

1102: \input{tab-bmod.tex}

1103: \input{tab-cmod.tex}

1104: %\input{tab-rb-syst.tex}

1105: \input{tab-rb-syst-comb.tex}

1106: \input{tab-rb-meas.tex}

1107: %\input{tab-rc-syst.tex}

1108: \input{tab-rc-syst-comb.tex}

1109: \input{tab-rc-meas.tex}

1110: %\input{tab-afbb-syst.tex}

1111: \input{tab-afbb-syst-comb.tex}

1112: \input{tab-afbb-meas.tex}

1113: \input{tab-coef.tex}

1114: %\input{tab-qfb-syst.tex}

1115: \input{tab-qfb-syst-comb.tex}

1116: \input{tab-qfb-meas.tex}

1117: \input{tab-ci-models}

1118: \input{tab-ci-lepton}

1119: \input{tab-ci-hadron}

1120: \input{tab-sneu-models}

1121: \input{tab-lq-limits}

1122: \input{tab-zprime}

1123: 

1124: \clearpage

1125: \newpage

1126: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1127: \begin{center}

1128: \includegraphics[width=12cm]{sprim_207_1_all.eps}

1129:  \end{center}

1130: % \vspace{-6cm}

1131:  {\lblcaption{fig:sprim_207}{The $\sqrt{s^{\prime}_m/s}$ distribution

1132:  for hadronic events collected at $\sqrt{s}=$207~GeV.

1133:   The data (dots) are compared to the

1134:  Monte Carlo expectation (histogram). The shaded area shows the background

1135:  contribution.}}

1136:  \end{figure}

1137: 

1138: \clearpage

1139: \newpage

1140: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1141: \begin{center}

1142: %\begin{flushleft}

1143: %\begin{sloppypar}

1144: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{thrust_207.eps}

1145:                         \hspace{0.1cm}

1146: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{mvis_207.eps}

1147:                         \hspace{0.1cm}

1148: %                            \end{sloppypar}

1149: %                           \end{flushleft}

1150:                            \end{center}

1151:                        { \lblcaption{fig:mvis_207}{For exclusive hadronic final states,

1152:                 at $\sqrt{s}=207\,{\rm GeV}$, 

1153:                 the distributions of the event thrust (a) and of the visible mass

1154:              (normalized to the collision energy)

1155:             for events with thrust $>$ 0.85 (b). The data

1156:             (dots) are compared to the

1157:                         Monte Carlo expectation (histograms).

1158:                  The shaded areas show the background

1159:                        contribution.}}

1160: \end{figure}

1161: 

1162: \clearpage

1163: \newpage

1164: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1165: \begin{center}

1166:  \includegraphics[width=15cm]{cross_all_01_pourcent.eps}

1167:                         \hspace{0.1cm}

1168:                            \end{center}

1169:                         {\lblcaption{fig:cross_had_01}{Measured inclusive

1170:             hadronic cross section (dots), as a function of the centre-of-mass

1171:             energy. The full curve indicates the {\tt ZFITTER} prediction.

1172:                         The insert shows the difference between the measurements

1173:             and the Standard Model predictions, normalized to the predicted cross

1174:             sections. Measurements at centre-of-mass energies below 189~GeV are

1175: from Ref.~\cite{aleph-lep1} and \cite{aleph-183}.}}

1176: \end{figure}

1177: 

1178: \clearpage

1179: \newpage

1180: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1181: \begin{center}

1182:                         \includegraphics[width=14cm]{cross_had_085-pourcent.eps}

1183:                       \end{center}

1184:                         {\lblcaption{fig:cross_had_085}{Measured exclusive

1185:             hadronic cross section (dots), as a function of the centre-of-mass

1186:             energy. The full curve indicates the {\tt ZFITTER} prediction.

1187:                     The insert shows the difference between the measurements

1188:             and the Standard Model predictions, normalized to the predicted cross

1189:             sections. The deviation of the seven highest energy points with respect to the Standard

1190: Model prediction, with correlations taken into account, corresponds to 

1191: $\chi^2/{\rm d.o.f.} =1.8$. Measurements at centre-of-mass energies below 189~GeV are

1192: from Ref.~\cite{aleph-183}, corrected for the different definition of the exclusive

1193: processes.}}

1194:  \end{figure}

1195: 

1196: \clearpage

1197: \newpage

1198: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1199: \begin{center}

1200: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{xdiff-qq.eps}

1201:    \end{center}

1202:                          {\lblcaption{fig:diff-cross-had}{Measured differential

1203:              cross sections for \qq\ exclusive production (closed symbols),

1204:               as a function of polar

1205:              angle and for several centre-of-mass energies.

1206:       The full curves indicate the {\tt ZFITTER} predictions.

1207:       The right bottom plot shows the luminosity weighted sum of the 

1208: differences between the measurements and the Standard Model predictions,

1209: normalized to the luminosity weighted sum of the predicted cross sections, for all

1210: energy points together.}}

1211:                        \end{figure}

1212: 

1213: \clearpage

1214: \newpage

1215: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1216: \begin{center}

1217: \includegraphics[width=14cm]{sps2mu_207_2f.eps}

1218:  \end{center}

1219: % \vspace{-6cm}

1220:  {\lblcaption{fig:spsmu_207}{The $\sqrt{s^{\prime}_m/s}$ distribution

1221:  for muon-pair events collected at $\sqrt{s}=$207~GeV.

1222:   The data (dots) are compared to the

1223:  Monte Carlo expectation (histogram). The filled area shows the background

1224:  contribution.}}

1225:  \end{figure}

1226: 

1227: \clearpage

1228: \newpage

1229: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1230: \begin{center}

1231: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{lep_line_EB2_01.eps}

1232: \end{center}

1233: \caption{\label{fig:lep_line_01}{Measured inclusive cross

1234: sections for muon-pair (dots) and tau-pair (squares) production,

1235: as a function of the centre-of-mass

1236: energy (points are shifted for visibility). The full curve indicates the

1237: {\tt ZFITTER} prediction (for the \mr{\mu^+\mu^-} channel). The insert shows the difference

1238: between the measurements and the Standard Model predictions, normalized to

1239: the predicted cross sections.  Measurements at centre-of-mass energies below 189~GeV are

1240: from Ref.~\cite{aleph-lep1} and \cite{aleph-183}.}}

1241: \end{figure}

1242: 

1243: \clearpage

1244: \newpage

1245: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1246: \begin{center}

1247: \includegraphics[width=14cm]{lep_line_EB2_085.eps}

1248: \end{center}

1249: \caption{\label{fig:lep_line_085}{Measured exclusive

1250:              cross sections for di-lepton production ($|\cos\theta^*|<0.9$ range

1251:              for the \mr {e^+e^-} channel),

1252:              as a function of the centre-of-mass

1253:             energy (points are shifted for visibility). 

1254:             The full curvess indicate the {\tt BHWIDE} prediction

1255:             for the \mr{e^+e^-} channel and the {\tt ZFITTER} prediction for

1256:             the \mr{\mu^+\mu^-} channel.

1257:             The insert shows the difference between the measurements

1258:             and the Standard Model predictions, normalized to the predicted 

1259:             cross sections.  Measurements at centre-of-mass energies below 189~GeV are

1260: from Ref.~\cite{aleph-183}, corrected for the different definition of the exclusive 

1261: processes.}}

1262: \end{figure}

1263: 

1264: 

1265: \clearpage

1266: \newpage

1267: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1268: \begin{center}

1269: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{xdiff_m_2f_pb_EB.eps}

1270: \end{center}

1271: \caption{\label{fig:xdiff_m}{Measured differential

1272:              cross sections for \mr {\mu^+\mu^-} production (dots),

1273:              as a function of polar

1274:              angle and for several centre-of-mass energies.

1275:       The full curves indicate the {\tt ZFITTER} predictions.

1276:       The right bottom plot shows the luminosity weighted sum of the 

1277: differences between the measurements and the Standard Model predictions,

1278:  normalized to the luminosity weighted sum of the predicted cross sections, for all

1279: energy points together.}}

1280: \end{figure}

1281: 

1282: \clearpage

1283: \newpage

1284: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1285: \begin{center}

1286: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{asym_EB_mod_085.eps}

1287: \end{center}

1288: \caption{\label{fig:asym}{Measured forward-backward asymmetries for muon-pair

1289: and tau-pair production, over the $|\cos\theta|<0.95$ range, 

1290: as a function of the centre-of-mass energy.

1291:  The curve indicates the {\tt ZFITTER} prediction.

1292:  The insert shows the difference between the measurements and the Standard Model 

1293:   predictions.

1294:   Measurements at centre-of-mass energies below 189~GeV are from Ref.~\cite{aleph-183},

1295: corrected for the different definition of the exclusive processes.}}

1296: \end{figure}

1297: 

1298: 

1299: \clearpage

1300: \newpage

1301: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1302: \begin{center}

1303: \includegraphics[width=14cm]{sps2tau_207_2f.eps}

1304:  \end{center}

1305: % \vspace{-6cm}

1306:  {\lblcaption{fig:spstau_207}{The $\sqrt{s^{\prime}_m/s}$ distribution

1307:  for tau-pair events collected at $\sqrt{s}=$207~GeV.

1308:   The data (dots) are compared to the

1309:  Monte Carlo expectation (histogram). The filled area shows the background

1310:  contribution.}}

1311:  \end{figure}

1312: 

1313: \clearpage

1314: \newpage

1315: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1316: \begin{center}

1317: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{xdiff_t_2f.eps}

1318: \end{center}

1319: \caption{\label{fig:xdiff_t}{Measured differential

1320:              cross sections for \mr {\tau^+\tau^-} production (dots),

1321:               as a function of polar

1322:              angle and for several centre-of-mass energies.

1323:       The full curves indicate the {\tt ZFITTER} predictions.

1324:       The right bottom plot shows the luminosity weighted sum of the

1325: differences between the measurements and the Standard Model predictions,

1326:  normalized to the luminosity weighted sum of the predicted cross sections,  

1327: for all energy points together. }}

1328: \end{figure}

1329: 

1330: \clearpage

1331: \newpage

1332: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1333: \begin{center}

1334: \includegraphics[width=14cm]{xmel207_2f_80.eps}

1335:  \end{center}

1336: % \vspace{-6cm}

1337:  {\lblcaption{fig:mee_207}{The $M_{{\rm e}^+{\rm e}^-}$ distribution

1338:  for electron-pair events collected at $\sqrt{s}=$207~GeV in the angular range

1339: $-0.9<\cos\theta <0.7$.

1340:   The data (dots) are compared to the

1341:  Monte Carlo expectation (histogram). The filled area shows the background

1342:  contribution.}}

1343:  \end{figure}

1344: 

1345: \clearpage

1346: \newpage

1347: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1348: \begin{center}

1349: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{xdiff_e_2f_pb_EB.eps}

1350: \end{center}

1351: \caption{\label{fig:xdiff_e}{Measured differential

1352:              cross sections for \mr {e^+e^-} production (dots),

1353:               as a function of polar

1354:              angle and for several centre-of-mass energies.

1355:       The full curves indicate the {\tt BHWIDE} predictions.

1356:       The right bottom plot shows the luminosity weighted sum of the

1357: differences between the measurements and the Standard Model predictions,

1358:  normalized to the luminosity weighted sum of the predicted cross sections, for all

1359: energy points together.}}

1360: \end{figure}

1361: 

1362: \clearpage

1363: \newpage

1364: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1365: \begin{center}

1366: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{ip_rat_corr.eps}

1367: \caption{\label{fig:ip-smear}{Ratio between Z-peak data and Monte Carlo simulation,

1368:  as a function of the impact parameter significance, before (dots)

1369:  and after (open symbols) smearing the Monte Carlo resolution.}}

1370: \end{center}

1371: \end{figure}

1372: 

1373: 

1374: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1375: \begin{center}

1376: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{rb_corr.eps}

1377: \caption{\label{fig:rb-sqrt}{Measured values of $R_{\rm b}$  (open symbols), as

1378:  a function of centre-of-mass energy, together with the SM prediction (dashed curve).

1379:  The dots show previous results~\cite{{aleph-183}} and 

1380:  the triangle the average value obtained over

1381:  the 189-209~GeV energy range.}}

1382: \end{center}

1383: \end{figure}

1384: 

1385: \clearpage

1386: \newpage

1387: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1388: \begin{center}

1389: \includegraphics[width=14cm]{rc-1.eps}

1390: \includegraphics[width=14cm]{rc-2.eps}

1391: \end{center}

1392: \caption{\label{fig:rc-corr}{Top: output of the c-tag Neural Network

1393: for a uds-enriched sample  from the data (dots)  and the simulation (histograms).

1394:  The Monte Carlo distribution is normalized to the data.

1395:  Bottom: ratio between data and Monte Carlo as a function

1396: of the Neural Network output for a uds-enriched sample. The third degree polynomial fit

1397: to this distribution (full curve with the

1398: error band) is used to correct the

1399: simulation (see text).}}

1400: \end{figure}

1401: 

1402: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1403: \begin{center}

1404: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{rc-3.eps}

1405: \end{center}

1406: \caption{\label{fig:rc-dist-189} {Distribution of the sum of the c-tag

1407: Neural Network outputs for the two jets in the event for the data (dots) and

1408: the simulation (histograms).

1409:  The region between the two vertical lines is selected for the $R_{\rm c}$ measurement. The

1410: bin at NN output$=-2$ contains events for which some of the NN input variables are not 

1411: available.}}

1412: \end{figure}

1413: 

1414: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1415: \begin{center}

1416: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{afb-lept-1.eps}

1417: \end{center}

1418: \caption{\label{fig:afbb-qjet}{Distributions of the b-jet charge

1419: from b-enriched event samples with a high-$p_T$ lepton

1420: in the hemisphere opposite to the jet, for the data

1421: (dots) and the simulation (histograms). The top (bottom) plots

1422: are for $p_T>1$~GeV/$c$ ($p_T>1.7$~GeV/$c$), the left (right) plots

1423: are for positive (negative) leptons.}}

1424: \end{figure}

1425: 

1426: 

1427: %\begin{figure}[htbp]

1428: %\begin{center}

1429: %\includegraphics[width=14cm]{afb-lept-2.eps}

1430: %\includegraphics[width=14cm]{afb-lept-3.eps}

1431: %\end{center}

1432: %\caption{\label{fig:afbb-ratio} {Normalized difference between

1433: %data and Monte Carlo for the mean (dots) and the RMS (open symbols)

1434: %values of the b-jet charge, as a function of the $p_T$ cut

1435: %on the positive (top) or negative (bottom) lepton. Data collected

1436: %at all LEP2 energies are combined.}}

1437: %\end{figure}

1438: 

1439: 

1440: 

1441: \clearpage

1442: \newpage

1443: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1444: \begin{center}

1445: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{contact_ll.eps}

1446: %\epsfig{figure=contact_ll.eps,width=15cm\linewidth}\\

1447: \caption{\label{fig:cont_ll}{The $95$\%~C.L. excluded values of the scale of

1448: contact interaction $\Lambda$ from di-lepton final states and

1449: for various models. The results for the \mr {e^+e^-\to\ell^+\ell^-} 

1450: process assume lepton universality of the contact interactions.}}

1451: \end{center}

1452: \end{figure}

1453: 

1454: 

1455: \clearpage

1456: \newpage

1457: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1458: \begin{center}

1459: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{cont_had_1col_EB.eps}

1460: \caption{\label{fig:cont_had}{The $95$\%~C.L. excluded values

1461:  of the scale of contact interaction $\Lambda$ from hadronic final states.

1462:  The results for \cc\ and \bb\ final states

1463:  assume that the contact interactions affect only c and b quarks.}}

1464: \end{center}

1465: \end{figure}

1466: 

1467: 

1468: \clearpage

1469: \newpage

1470: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1471: \begin{center}

1472: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{snu_e.eps}

1473: %\epsfig{figure=snu_e.eps,width=15cm\linewidth}\\

1474: \caption{\label{fig:snu-e}{The 95\%~C.L.  upper limits

1475:  on the \mr{|{\lambda_{121}}|} coupling

1476: versus the assumed \mr{\tilde{\nu}_{\mu}} mass and on

1477: the \mr{|{\lambda_{131}}|} coupling versus the

1478: assumed \mr{\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}}

1479: mass, as obtained from the Bhabha cross section measurement.

1480: The \mr{\tilde{\nu}_{\mu/\tau}} width is assumed to be 1~GeV/$c^2$.}}

1481: \end{center}

1482: \end{figure}

1483: 

1484: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1485: \begin{center}

1486: \includegraphics[width=14cm]{snu_m.eps}

1487: \end{center}

1488: \caption{\label{fig:snu-m}{The 95\%~C.L. upper limits

1489: on \mr{\sqrt{|\lambda_{131}\lambda_{232}|}} versus the assumed

1490: \mr{\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}} mass, as obtained from

1491:  the \mr{\mu^+\mu^-} cross section measurement.

1492: The \mr{\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}} width is assumed to be 1~GeV/$c^2$.}}

1493: \end{figure}

1494: 

1495: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1496: \begin{center}

1497: \includegraphics[width=14cm]{snu_t.eps}

1498: \end{center}

1499: \caption{\label{fig:snu-t}{The 95\%~C.L. upper limits

1500:  on \mr{\sqrt{|\lambda_{121}\lambda_{233}}|}

1501: versus the assumed \mr{\tilde{\nu}_{\mu}} mass,

1502:  as obtained from the \mr{\tau^+\tau^-} cross section measurement.

1503: The \mr{\tilde{\nu}_{\mu}} width is assumed to be 1~GeV/$c^2$.}}

1504: \end{figure}

1505: 

1506: \clearpage

1507: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1508: \begin{center}

1509: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{lq-lim.eps}

1510: \end{center}

1511: \caption{\label{fig:lq-lim}{The 95\%~C.L. upper limits on the

1512: coupling versus mass for leptoquarks coupling

1513: to the third quark generation.}}

1514: \end{figure}

1515: 

1516: 

1517: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1518: \begin{center}

1519: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{graviton_189-207.eps}

1520: \end{center}

1521: \caption{\label{fig:grav}{Ratio between the measured cross sections

1522:  and the SM

1523: cross sections for Bhabha scattering, as a function of polar angle,

1524:  obtained using data collected at $\sqrt{s}=189-209$~GeV.

1525:  The dashed and dotted curves indicate the expected ratios in the

1526:  presence of TeV-scale gravity, for  two values of the cut-off

1527:  parameters \mr{\Lambda_T^{\pm}}.}}

1528: \end{figure}

1529: 

1530: 

1531: \clearpage

1532: \newpage

1533: 

1534: \renewcommand{\thesection}{\Alph{section}}

1535: \setcounter{section}{0}

1536: \section*{Appendix : {\tt ZFITTER} steering flags and input parameters \label{annexe-zf}}

1537: 

1538:  The main flags used in the {\tt ZFITTER} Monte Carlo are listed below:

1539: 

1540: \begin{itemize}

1541: 

1542:     \item{General flags.}

1543:     As advised in Ref.~\cite{Lep2-WS}, CONV=2 is used to properly take into account

1544:     the angular dependence of the electroweak box diagrams; INTF=2

1545:     is used to include the contribution from initial and

1546:     final state interferences; BOXD=2 is selected to take into account box

1547:     contributions.

1548: 

1549:     \item{Hadron flags.} FINR=0 describes $\sqrt{s^\prime}$ as the mass of the propagator

1550:     excluding FSR.

1551:     \item{Lepton flags.} FINR=1 describes $\sqrt{s^\prime}$ as the

1552:     invariant mass of the outgoing lepton system.

1553: \end{itemize}

1554: 

1555:  The input parameters required by {\tt ZFITTER} have been set as follows:

1556: 

1557: \begin{itemize}

1558:     \item{ $m_{\rm {Z}}\ =\ 91.1875 \ {\rm GeV}/c^2 $}

1559:     \item{ $m_t\ =\ 174.3 \ {\rm GeV}/c^2 $}

1560:     \item{ $m_H\ =\ 150 \ {\rm GeV}/c^2 $}

1561:     \item{ $1/\alpha_{QED}^{\rm Z}\ = 128.896 $}

1562:     \item{ $\alpha_S = 0.118 $ }

1563:  %   \item{ $\Delta\alpha^{(5)}_{\rm had}=0.02761 $}

1564: 

1565: \end{itemize}

1566: %

1567: \newpage

1568: 

1569: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1570: 

1571: \bibitem{aleph-183} The ALEPH Coll., {\it ``Study of Fermion Pair

1572:  Production in $e^+e^-$ Collisions at 130-183~GeV"},

1573:  Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 12} (2000) 183.

1574: 

1575: \bibitem{aleph-det} The ALEPH Coll., {\it ``ALEPH: a detector for

1576: electron-positron annihilations at LEP"},

1577:  Nucl. Instrum. and Methods {\bf A 294} (1990) 121.

1578: 

1579: \bibitem{aleph-perf} The ALEPH Coll., {\it ``Performance of the ALEPH

1580: detector at LEP"}, Nucl. Instrum. and Methods {\bf A 360} (1995) 481.

1581: 

1582: %luminosity monitors

1583: 

1584: \bibitem{aleph-lcal} The ALEPH Coll., {\em``Measurement of the absolute luminosity with the

1585: ALEPH detector''}, Z. Phys. {\bf C 53}  (1992) 375.

1586: 

1587: \bibitem{aleph-sical} The ALEPH Coll., {\em ``SICAL - a high precision silicon-tungsten

1588: luminosity calorimeter for ALEPH ''} Nucl. Instrum. and Methods {\bf A 365} (1995)

1589: 117.

1590: 

1591: % generators

1592: 

1593: \bibitem{MC-bhwide} S. Jadach {\it et al.}, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 390}

1594: (1997) 298.

1595: 

1596: \bibitem{MC-kk2f} S. Jadach, B.F.L Ward and Z. Was,

1597:  Comput. Phys. Commun. {\bf 130} (2000) 260.

1598: 

1599: 

1600: \bibitem{MC-pythia} T. Sj\"ostrand {\it et al.},

1601:  Comput. Phys. Commun. {\bf 130} (2001) 238.

1602: 

1603: \bibitem{MC-phot02}  J.A.M.\,Vermaseren,{\em``Two gamma physics

1604: versus one gamma physics and whatever lies in between}, Proceedings of the

1605: IV International Workshop on Gamma Gamma Interactions, eds. G.~Cochard, 

1606: P.~Kessler (1980).

1607: 

1608: \bibitem{MC-herwig} G. Corcella {\it et al.},

1609: JHEP {\bf 0101} (2001) 10.

1610: 

1611: \bibitem{MC-koralw}  S. Jadach {\it et al.},

1612: Comput. Phys. Commun. {\bf 140} (2001) 475.

1613: 

1614: \bibitem{MC-excalibur} F.A.~Berends, R.~Pittau, R.~Kleiss, 

1615: Comput. Phys. Commun. {\bf 85} (1995) 437

1616: 

1617: \bibitem{QCDmega} The ALEPH Coll., {\it ``Studies of quantum chromodynamics 

1618: with the ALEPH detector''}, Phys. Rep. {\bf 294} (1998) 1.

1619: 

1620: \bibitem{zfitter} {\tt ZFITTER} version 6.36, D. Bardin {\em et al.}, 

1621: Comput. Phys. Commun. {\bf 133} (2001) 229. 

1622:  The relevant input parameters are given in the Appendix.

1623: 

1624: 

1625: \bibitem{aleph-wmass} The ALEPH Coll., {\it ``Measurements of the W boson mass

1626: and width in e$^+$e$^-$ collisions at LEP''},

1627: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 47} (2006) 309.

1628: 

1629: \bibitem{aleph-lep1} The ALEPH Coll., {\it ``Measurements of the Z resonance 

1630: parameters at LEP''},

1631: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 14} (2000) 1.

1632: 

1633: \bibitem{pdg} Particle Data Group, S.Eidelman {\it et al.}, 

1634: {\em ``Review of particle physics''},

1635:  Phys. Lett. {\bf B 592} (2004) 1.

1636: 

1637: \bibitem{lep-hf} The LEP Heavy Flavour Working Group, {\em ``Input parameters for the

1638: LEP/SLD electroweak heavy flavour results for Summer 1998 conferences''},

1639:  LEPHF/98-01 (1998).

1640: 

1641: % c modelling

1642: 

1643: \bibitem{aleph-cmod} The ALEPH Coll., {\em ``Study of charm production in Z decays''},

1644: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 16} (2000) 597.

1645: 

1646: 

1647: \bibitem{aleph-rbz1} The ALEPH Coll., {\em ``A precise measurement of 

1648: $\Gamma$(Z$\to b\overline{b}$)/$\Gamma$(Z$\to$ hadrons)''},

1649: Phys. Lett. {\bf B 313} (1993) 535.

1650: 

1651: \bibitem{aleph-rbz2} The ALEPH Coll.,{\em ``A measurement of R$_b$ using mutually 

1652: exclusive tags''}, 

1653: Phys. Lett. {\bf B 401} (1997) 163.

1654: 

1655: \bibitem{richard-phd} R.~D.~Hill, {\it ``A measurement of R$_b$ at LEP2 with the ALEPH

1656: detector''}, PhD Thesis (2003), Imperial College, London.

1657: 

1658: \bibitem{aleph-bsosc} The ALEPH Coll.,{\em ``Limit on $B^0_s$ oscillation using a jet

1659: charge method''}, 

1660: Phys. Lett. {\bf B 356} (1995) 409.

1661: 

1662: \bibitem{Lep2-WS} {\em ``Reports of the working groups on precision calculations 

1663: for LEP2 Physics''}, CERN 2000-009, eds. S.~Jadach, G.~Passarino and R.~Pittau (2000).

1664: 

1665: % interpretation

1666: 

1667: \bibitem{th-ci} H. Kroha, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 46} (1992) 58.

1668: 

1669: 

1670: %\bibitem{exp-ep-ci} The H1 Coll., {\em ``Search for compositeness, leptoquarks

1671: %and large extra dimensions in eq contact interactions at HERA''}, 

1672: %Phys. Lett. {\bf B 479} (2000) 358;\\

1673: % The ZEUS Coll., {\em ``Search for contact interactions in deep inelastic 

1674: %$e^+p\to e^+X$ scattering at HERA''}, Eur. Phys J. {\bf C 14} (2000) 239.

1675: 

1676: %\bibitem{exp-pp-ci} The D0 Coll., {\em ``Limits on quark compositeness from high energy jets in

1677: %$p\overline{p}$ collisions at 1.8~TeV''}, 

1678: %Phys. Rev. {\bf D 62} (2000) 031101; \\

1679: % The CDF Coll., {\em ``Limits on quark-lepton compositeness scales from

1680: %dileptons produced in 1.8~TeV $p\overline{p}$ collisions''}, 

1681: %Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79} (1997) 2198.

1682: 

1683: %\bibitem{exp-at-ci}  A. Deandrea, Phys. Rev.

1684: %Lett.\textbf{409}, (1997), 277.

1685: 

1686: \bibitem{th-sneu} J. Kalinowski {\it et al.}, Phys. Lett.

1687: {\bf B 406} (1997) 314.

1688: 

1689: \bibitem{th-lq} J. Kalinowski \emph{et al.},

1690: Z. Phys. {\bf C 74} (1997) 595.

1691: 

1692: %\bibitem{exp-lq-h1} The H1 Coll., xxx, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 568} (2003) 35.

1693: 

1694: %\bibitem{exp-lq-tevatron} The D0 Coll., xxx, Phys. Rev. Lett.

1695: % {\bf 79} (1997) 4322; \\

1696: % The CDF Coll., xxx, Phys. Rev. Lett. {bf 79} (1997) 4327.

1697: 

1698: \bibitem{bib-Zprime} G.Altarelli et al., Phys.Lett. {\bf B 318}

1699: (1993) 139 and references therein.

1700: 

1701: \bibitem{bib-ZEFIT} A.Leike,S.Riemann and T.Riemann,

1702: Phys.Lett. {\bf B 291} (1992) 187.

1703: 

1704: \bibitem{CDF}

1705: CDF Collab., {\em ``Search for new gauge bosons decaying into

1706: dileptons in \pp\ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 1.8$~TeV''}, Phys.

1707: Rev. Lett. {\bf 79}, (1997) 2192.

1708: 

1709: \bibitem{CDF2} CDF Collab., {\em ``Search for $Z^\prime \to e^+e^-$ 

1710: using mass and angular distribution''}, 

1711: hep-ex/0602045, submitted to Physical Review Letters.

1712: 

1713: \bibitem{D0} D0 Collab., {\em ``Search for heavy particles decaying into electron-positron 

1714: pairs in $p \bar p$ collisions''}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87} (2001) 061802.

1715: 

1716: 

1717: \bibitem{th-grav} N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali,

1718:  Phys. Lett. {\bf B 429} (1998) 263.

1719: 

1720: \bibitem{th-grav-param} G. Giudice, R. Rattazzi and J.D. Wells,

1721: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 544} (1999) 3 (corr. in hep-ph/9811291 v2).

1722: %\bibitem{Hewett}

1723: %J. Hewett, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{82}, (1999) 4765.

1724: 

1725: \bibitem{exp-delphi} The DELPHI Coll., {\em ``Measurement and interpretation of fermion-pair production

1726: at LEP energies above the Z Resonance''},

1727: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 45} (2006) 589.

1728: 

1729: \bibitem{exp-l3} The L3 Coll., {\em ``Measurement of hadron and lepton-pair production in $e^{+}e^{-}$ 

1730: collisions at $\sqrt{s}=192-208\,$GeV at LEP''},

1731: CERN-PH-EP/2005-044, submitted to Eur. Phys. J.

1732: 

1733: \bibitem{exp-opal-ci} The OPAL Coll.,{\em ``Tests of the Standard Model and constraints

1734: on new physics from measurements of fermion-pair production at 189-209 GeV at LEP''},

1735: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 33} (2004) 173.

1736: 

1737: \bibitem{strumia-1}  R.~Barbieri, A.~Pomarol, R.~Rattazzi, A.~Strumia, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 703} 

1738: (2004) 127. 

1739: 

1740: \bibitem{strumia-2}  G.~F.~Giudice, T.~Plehn, A.~Strumia, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 706} (2005) 455.

1741: 

1742: 

1743: \end{thebibliography}

1744: 

1745: \end{document}

1746: