1: \documentclass[twocolumn,twoside,slac_two]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{fancyhdr}
4: \pagestyle{fancy}
5: \fancyhead{} % clear all fields
6: \fancyhead[C]{\it {XXVI Physics in Collision, B\'uzios, Rio de Janeiro, 6-9 July 2006}}
7: \fancyhead[RO,LE]{\thepage}
8: \fancyfoot{} % clear all fields
9: \fancyfoot[LE,LO]{\bf THUPL04}
10: \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
11: \renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0pt}
12: \renewcommand{\sfdefault}{phv}
13: \newcommand{\etal}{{\it et~al.}}
14: \newcommand\GeV{\ifmmode {\mathrm{\ Ge\kern -0.1em V}}\else\textrm{Ge\kern -0.1em V}\fi}%
15:
16: \setlength{\textheight}{235mm}
17: \setlength{\textwidth}{170mm}
18: \setlength{\topmargin}{-20mm}
19:
20:
21: % You should use BibTeX and apsrev.bst for references
22:
23: \bibliographystyle{apsrev}
24:
25: \begin{document}
26:
27: \title{Measurements of the Running of the Electromagnetic Coupling at LEP}
28:
29: \author{Salvatore Mele}
30: \affiliation{INFN, Sezione di Napoli, I-80125, Napoli, Italy}
31:
32: \begin{abstract}
33: The study of Bhabha scattering at $\rm e^+e^-$ colliders probes the
34: running of the electromagnetic coupling. After early
35: measurements by the VENUS collaboration at TRISTAN and the by L3
36: collaboration at LEP, two recent analyses have been performed by the
37: OPAL and L3 collaborations. The OPAL collaboration studied
38: high-statistics low-angle Bhabha scattering at LEP, achieving a precise determination
39: of the running of $\alpha$ in the region
40: $1.8\GeV^2<-Q^2<6.1\GeV^2$. The L3 collaboration investigated
41: high-energy large-angle Bhabha scattering to
42: first probe the region $1800 \GeV^{2} < -Q^{2} <
43: 21600 \GeV^{2}$. All measurements are described and a global
44: overview of their agreement with QED predictions is given.
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \maketitle
48:
49: \thispagestyle{fancy}
50:
51: \section{THE RUNNING OF {\boldmath $\alpha$}}
52:
53: A fundamental idea in quantum field theory is that coupling constants
54: which describe the strength of a given process are not actually
55: constant but rather depend on the energy scale at which the process
56: occurs; in other words, the constants {\it run}. In QED this running implies the
57: increase of the electromagnetic coupling, $\alpha$, with the squared
58: four-momentum transfer, $Q^2$. Figure~\ref{fig:1} sketches the origin
59: of this phenomenon in the case of Bhabha scattering, $\rm e^+e^-\rightarrow
60: e^+e^-$: larger momentum transfers probe virtual-loop
61: corrections to the photon propagator.
62:
63:
64: \begin{figure}
65: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Figure1.eps}
66: \caption{$t$-channel Feynman diagrams contributing to Bhabha
67: scattering and the phenomenon of vacuum-polarisation. The
68: sum of all diagrams including zero, one, two or more
69: vacuum-polarisation insertions is denoted by the diagram to
70: the left with the double-wavy photon propagator, with an
71: electromagnetic coupling $\alpha(Q^2)$.}
72: \label{fig:1}
73: \end{figure}
74:
75: The running of $\alpha$ is parametrised as~\cite{ref:running}:
76: \begin{equation}\label{eq:alfa}
77: \alpha(Q^{2}) = \frac{\alpha_0}{1-\Delta\alpha(Q^{2})},
78: \end{equation}
79: where $\alpha_0$ is the fine-structure constant. This is measured with
80: high accuracy in solid-state processes and via the study of the
81: anomalous magnetic moment of the electron to be~\cite{ref:codata}:
82: \begin{displaymath}
83: 1/\alpha_0 =
84: 137.03599911\pm0.00000046
85: \end{displaymath}
86: The term $\Delta\alpha(Q^{2})$ describes the
87: running of $\alpha$ in Equation~\ref{eq:alfa}. It
88: receives contributions
89: from three sources: lepton loops, top-quark loops and loops involving
90: the five lighter quark flavours. At the scale of Z-boson mass, $m_{\rm
91: Z}$, the
92: first two contributions to $\Delta\alpha(Q^{2})$ are precisely calculated as:
93: \begin{equation}
94: \Delta\alpha_{\rm e\mu\tau}(m_{\rm Z}^{2}) = 0.03150
95: \end{equation}
96: \begin{equation}
97: \Delta\alpha_{\rm top}(m_{\rm Z}^{2}) = -0.00007 \pm 0.00001,
98: \end{equation}
99: as discussed in References~\cite{ref:leptons} and~\cite{ref:top}, respectively.
100: The contribution from the five lighter quarks, $\Delta\alpha^{(5)}_{had}$,
101: is difficult to calculate due to
102: non-perturbative QCD effects and is estimated using
103: dispersion-integral techniques as~\cite{ref:burkhardt_new}:
104: \begin{equation}
105: \Delta\alpha^{(5)}_{had}(m_{\rm Z}^{2}) = 0.02758 \pm 0.00035.
106: \end{equation}
107: The electromagnetic coupling at the scale of the Z-boson
108: mass is therefore~\cite{ref:burkhardt_new}:
109: \begin{equation}\label{eq:alphabolek}
110: 1/\alpha(m_{\rm Z}^{2}) = 128.940 \pm 0.048.
111: \end{equation}
112:
113: The study of fermion-pair production at LEP, $\rm e^+e^-\rightarrow
114: Z\rightarrow f\bar{f}$, allows a precise measurement of the Z-boson
115: couplings. These couplings are sensitive to electroweak
116: vacuum-polarisation effects and therefore also to the running of
117: $\alpha$. The quantity most sensitive to the running of $\alpha$ is
118: the effective vector coupling constant of Z bosons and electrons. It
119: is measured as $g_{\rm Ve}=-0.03816\pm 0.00047$~\cite{ref:smreport}.
120: In the absence of the running of $\alpha$ its value would be $g_{\rm
121: Ve}=-0.076$. A global fit to several Standard Model observables allows
122: to constrain the value of $\alpha$ at the scale of the Z-boson mass
123: as~\cite{ref:smreport}:
124: \begin{equation}
125: 1/\alpha^{fit}(m_{\rm Z}^{2}) = 128.937 \pm 0.047,
126: \end{equation}
127: which is in remarkable agreement with the expected value of
128: Equation~\ref{eq:alphabolek}. However, this determination of $\alpha(m_{\rm Z}^{2})$
129: is based on the assumption of the full electroweak theory and a determination
130: which relies on less hypotheses is desirable. The
131: study of Bhabha scattering, discussed in the following, allows a more
132: direct insight in the running of $\alpha$.
133:
134: \section{BHABHA SCATTERING AND THE RUNNING OF {\boldmath$\alpha$}}
135:
136: The study of Bhabha scattering at $\rm e^+e^-$ colliders offers a unique window
137: on the vacuum-polarisation
138: insertions depicted in Figure~\ref{fig:1}. Its measurement gives access to the
139: running of $\alpha$ in the {\it space-like} region, $Q^2<0$. The
140: experimental conditions at $\rm e^+e^-$ colliders are extremely favourable as they allow a
141: precise determination of the
142: four-momentum transfer through its dependence on the squared centre-of-mass energy,
143: $s$, and on the scattering angle, $\theta$:
144: \begin{displaymath}
145: Q^{2} = t \simeq -s(1-\cos\theta)/2.
146: \end{displaymath}
147: Indeed, at $\rm e^+e^-$ colliders, $s$ is
148: accurately known and detectors are conceived for a precise measurement
149: of $\theta$. In the following, Bhabha scattering is studied in
150: two angular regions:
151: low-angle, $\theta\sim 1.5^\circ-3.5^\circ$, and large-angle, $\theta\sim
152: 20^\circ-90^\circ$. These angular regions correspond to two energy regimes:
153: low-$Q^2$ and high-$Q^2$, respectively.
154:
155: The relation between the differential cross section of Bhabha scattering and the
156: electromagnetic coupling is:
157: \begin{equation}\label{eq:sigma}
158: {{\rm d}\sigma \over {\rm d}t} = {{\rm d}\sigma^0 \over {\rm
159: d}t} \left( {\alpha(t) \over \alpha_0}\right )^2
160: (1+\varepsilon)(1+\delta_\gamma)+\delta_{\rm Z},
161: \end{equation}
162: where the tree-level cross section is:
163: \begin{equation}
164: {{\rm
165: d}\sigma^0 \over {\rm d}t} = { 4 \pi \alpha_0^2 \over t^2 }.
166: \end{equation}
167: The $s$-channel contributions, $\delta_\gamma$ and $\delta_{\rm Z}$,
168: are much smaller than
169: the radiative corrections, $\varepsilon$. These three quantities
170: are known with a good accuracy compared to the experimental precision
171: of the study of low- and large-angle Bhabha scattering.
172: Na\"ively, one could imagine to measure the cross section for Bhabha
173: scattering and then insert the result in the
174: left-hand side of Equation~\ref{eq:sigma} in order to extract a value for
175: $\alpha(t)$. This argument is unfortunately flawed: the measurement
176: of the cross section requires knowledge of the integrated luminosity.
177: At LEP this is estimated by counting events from low-angle Bhabha
178: scattering and assuming the cross section of this process to be known,
179: what can only happen if $\alpha(t)$ is known to start with: a {\it catch-22}~\cite{catch22}!
180:
181: As discussed above, the information on $\alpha(t)$ contained in the
182: scale of the differential cross section ${{\rm d}\sigma / {\rm
183: d}t}$ cannot be directly unlocked. On the other hand, the shape of this
184: differential cross section contains information on the running of
185: $\alpha(t)$ over the $Q^{2}$ range in which the cross section is
186: measured. QED predicts that $\alpha(t)$ increases with $t$: if the running is slower
187: than the one expected in QED, the differential cross section will be
188: steeper than expected; if the running is faster than expected in QED,
189: the differential cross section will be flatter than expected.
190: The strategy to access information on the running of $\alpha$ is
191: therefore to analyse the shape of the differential cross section over
192: a $Q^{2}$ range and compare it with the expectation from QED. Five
193: such analyses exist and are presented below: we first discuss three
194: early measurements of the running of
195: $\alpha$ at TRISTAN and LEP,
196: and then describe two recent measurements performed by the
197: OPAL and L3 collaborations by investigating low-angle and large-angle
198: Bhabha scattering at LEP.
199:
200: \section{EARLY MEASUREMENTS AT TRISTAN AND LEP}
201:
202: LEP experiments were equipped with low-angle calorimeters, called
203: luminosity monitors, engineered
204: to detect events from low-angle Bhabha scattering in order to measure
205: the integrated luminosity. The event counts in
206: different polar-angle regions of the luminosity monitors depend on the
207: shape of the differential cross section of Bhabha scattering and,
208: through Equation~\ref{eq:sigma}, give access to the running of
209: $\alpha(t)$.
210:
211: The first study of the running of $\alpha$ using low-angle Bhabha
212: scattering was performed by the L3 collaboration. A total of about 7 million events
213: collected at $\sqrt{s}=m_{\rm Z}$ in the luminosity monitor,
214: covering a polar angle $1.8^\circ < \theta < 3.1^\circ$, were used to
215: probe the running of $\alpha$ in the region
216: $2.1\GeV^2<-Q^2<6.2\GeV^2$~\cite{l3-197}.
217:
218: \begin{figure}[h]
219: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Figure2.eps}
220: \caption{Ratio of measured and expected events in four
221: different angular regions of the L3 luminosity monitor,
222: corresponding to four values of $-Q^2,$ for a
223: subset of data collected at the Z-boson pole. The solid circles
224: correspond to the QED prediction and the open circles to the
225: hypothesis of no running of the electromagnetic coupling. The
226: data favours the QED predictions and excludes the no-running
227: hypothesis. From Reference~\cite{l3-197}.}
228: \label{fig:l3old}
229: \end{figure}
230:
231:
232: Figure~\ref{fig:l3old}
233: presents the ratio between the observed number of events and the QED
234: prediction, as well as the hypothesis of a constant value of $\alpha$
235: over the entire $Q^2$ range. This ratio of data and predictions is
236: fitted to determine the running of $\alpha$ between the two extremes
237: of the $Q^2$ range as:
238: \begin{equation}\label{eq:l3old1}
239: \alpha^{-1}(-2.1 \GeV^{2}) - \alpha^{-1}(-6.2 \GeV^{2}) = 0.78 \pm
240: 0.26,
241: \end{equation}
242: where the uncertainty combines statistical and systematic
243: uncertainties. This result is in good agreement with the QED
244: prediction of 0.56 and first established the running of $\alpha$
245: in this energy range, excluding the no-running hypothesis at 4.5
246: standard deviations.
247:
248: The running of $\alpha$ in large-angle Bhabha scattering was first
249: investigated by the VENUS Collaboration at TRISTAN. They studied
250: events collected at $\sqrt{s}=57.8\GeV$ in the angular range $47^\circ
251: < \theta < 90^\circ$ to cover the $Q^2$ range
252: $100\GeV^2<-Q^2<3337\GeV^2$~\cite{ref:venus}.
253:
254: Figure~\ref{fig:venus}
255: shows the measured differential cross section as a function of the
256: cosine of the scattering angle, normalised to the QED predictions with
257: a fixed value of $\alpha$. The effects of the running are evident and
258: the data favour a scenario in which both the hadronic and leptonic
259: contributions are present in the running, as opposed to a scenario with just
260: lepton loops. The results can be expressed as the change over the
261: $Q^2$ range of the term
262: $\Delta\alpha$ describing the running of $\alpha$ in Equation~\ref{eq:alfa}:
263: \begin{eqnarray}
264: \Delta\alpha(-3337 \GeV^{2}) - \Delta\alpha(-100 \GeV^{2}) =\nonumber\\ 0.0186 \pm
265: 0.0059,
266: \end{eqnarray}
267: where the uncertainty includes statistical and systematic
268: effects.
269:
270:
271: \begin{figure}
272: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Figure3.eps}
273: \caption{Ratio of the differential cross section for
274: Bhabha scattering measured by the VENUS collaboration
275: and the predictions for a fixed value of $\alpha$. The solid
276: line shows the QED prediction for a running $\alpha$ and the
277: dashed line the prediction if the running is only due to lepton
278: corrections. The data favours the QED predictions. From Reference~\cite{ref:venus}.}
279: \label{fig:venus}
280: \end{figure}
281:
282: A similar study at higher centre-of-mass energies and lower polar
283: angles was performed by the L3 Collaboration. Bhabha-scattering
284: events are selected at $\sqrt{s}=189\GeV$ for scattering angles
285: $20^\circ <\theta<36^\circ$, probing the intermediate-$Q^2$ range
286: $12.25\GeV^2<-Q^2<3434\GeV^2$~\cite{l3-197}. The measured differential
287: cross section as a function of the scattering angle is compared to the
288: predictions as a function of $\alpha$, allowing to measure its running
289: over the $Q^2$ range as:
290: \begin{equation}\label{eq:l3old2}
291: \alpha^{-1}(-12.25 \GeV^{2}) - \alpha^{-1}(-3434 \GeV^{2}) = 3.8 \pm
292: 1.3,
293: \end{equation}
294: where the uncertainty comprises statistical and systematic
295: sources. This value is in good agreement with the QED prediction of 4.07.
296:
297: \section{PRECISION MEASUREMENT AT LOW {\boldmath$Q^2$}}
298:
299: The OPAL collaboration analysed low-angle Bhabha scattering events to
300: study the running of $\alpha$ at low $Q^2$~\cite{ref:opal}. Data
301: collected at $\sqrt{s}=m_{\rm Z}$ with the
302: luminosity monitor, consisting of layers of tungsten absorber and
303: 32-pad silicon detectors, were used. This detector covered a polar
304: region $1.4^\circ <\theta<3.3^\circ$, corresponding to a momentum
305: transfer $1.8\GeV^2<-Q^2<6.1\GeV^2$.
306:
307: The analysis selects 10 million high-energy back-to-back cluster pairs
308: and studies their $t$ spectrum to extract information on
309: $\alpha(t)$. Data are divided in five $t$ bins and are compared with
310: the BHLUMI Monte Carlo~\cite{ref:bhlumi}. The results of the study
311: are quantified by studying the ratio of the $t$ spectrum observed in
312: data and the Monte Carlo spectrum for the hypothesis
313: $\alpha(t)=\alpha_0$, as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:opal}.
314:
315:
316: \begin{figure}[h]
317: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Figure4.eps}
318: \caption{The ratio of event counts five
319: radial regions of the OPAL luminosity monitor,
320: corresponding to five $Q^2$ values, for data and a Monte Carlo simulation
321: with $\alpha(t)=\alpha_0$. The
322: data favour the QED prediction for the running of $\Delta\alpha(t)$ and exclude
323: scenarios with no running or a running due only to electron or
324: lepton virtual loops. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. From Reference~\cite{ref:opal}.}
325: \label{fig:opal}
326: \end{figure}
327:
328:
329: The data in Figure~\ref{fig:opal} are fitted with the function $a+b\ln(t/t_0)$, where
330: $t_0=-3.3\GeV^2$ is the mean value of $t$ in the data sample. The
331: parameter $b$ is related to the running of $\alpha$ by:
332: \begin{equation}\label{eq:b}
333: \Delta\alpha(t_2)-\Delta\alpha(t_1)\approx {b\over 2} \ln {t_2 \over
334: t_1}.
335: \end{equation}
336: Four hypotheses are tested by the OPAL analysis: no running of $\alpha$; a running only due
337: to electron virtual-loops; a running only due to lepton virtual-loops;
338: the QED hypothesis of a running induced by virtual loops of leptons
339: and quarks. The first three hypotheses are found to be completely
340: excluded by data.
341:
342: The observed running of $\alpha$ is derived from the fitted value of
343: $b$ and Equation~\ref{eq:b} to be:
344: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:opal}
345: \Delta\alpha(-6.1\GeV^2)-\Delta\alpha(-1.8\GeV^2) =\nonumber\\ (440 \pm 58 \pm 43
346: \pm 30) \times 10^{-5},
347: \end{eqnarray}
348: where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic and
349: the third theoretical. The main sources of systematic uncertainties
350: are the simulation of the detector material and the reconstruction
351: of the radial coordinates of the energy clusters in the
352: calorimeter. This results is in excellent agreement with the QED
353: prediction of $460 \times 10 ^{-5}$.
354:
355: This measurement proves the running of $\alpha$ at low $Q^2$ with a
356: significance of $5.6\sigma$. In addition, it establishes for the first
357: time the hadronic contribution to the running with a significance of
358: $3.0\sigma$ as:
359: \begin{eqnarray}
360: \Delta\alpha_{had}(-6.07\GeV^2)-\Delta\alpha_{had}(-1.81\GeV^2) =\nonumber\\ (237
361: \pm 58 \pm 43 \pm 30) \times 10^{-5}.
362: \end{eqnarray}
363:
364: \section{FIRST MEASUREMENT AT LARGE {\boldmath$Q^2$}}
365:
366: The L3 collaboration probed the running of $\alpha$ at large $Q^{2}$
367: by studying large-angle Bhabha scattering in the angular region
368: $26^\circ < \theta < 90^\circ$~\cite{ref:l3}. Data collected at eight centre-of-mass energies
369: in the range $\sqrt{s}=189-209\GeV$ were
370: considered, corresponding to a four-momentum transfer $ 1800
371: \GeV^{2} < -Q^{2} < 21600 \GeV^{2}$.
372: About 40\,000 events are selected as back-to-back
373: clusters in the high-resolution BGO electromagnetic calorimeter with
374: matched tracks. These events are used to measure the differential cross
375: section of Bhabha scattering in ten different angular ranges, for each
376: of the eight energy points, for a
377: total of 80 measurements. The measured cross section are compared to
378: the predictions of the BHWIDE Monte
379: Carlo~\cite{ref:BHWIDE} to extract information on the running of
380: $\alpha$. As an example, Figure~\ref{fig:l3} compares the data and the
381: predictions for the ten centre-of-mass-averaged cross sections.
382:
383: \begin{figure}
384: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Figure5.eps}
385: \caption{
386: The ratio of the centre-of-mass-averaged differential cross section of
387: for large-angle Bhabha scattering measured by L3 and the corresponding
388: theoretical predictions. The inner error
389: bars denote the statistical uncertainties, the outer the
390: combination of statistical and systematic uncertainties. The data
391: exclude the scenario $\alpha(t)=\alpha_0$, represented by the
392: dotted line. From Reference~\cite{ref:l3}.}
393: \label{fig:l3}
394: \end{figure}
395:
396: The results of the study are expressed by inserting an additional
397: parameter, $C$, in the description of the
398: running of $\alpha$ of Equation~\ref{eq:alfa}:
399: \begin{equation}\label{eq:runC}
400: \alpha(Q^{2}) = \frac{\alpha_0}{1-C\Delta\alpha(Q^{2})}.
401: \end{equation}
402: A fit to the 80 data points, which takes into account the dependence of the
403: measured integrated luminosity on $C$ shows that the value $C=0$,
404: corresponding to absence of running, is completely excluded. The data
405: are in excellent agreement with the running predicted in QED,
406: corresponding to $C=1$, and the fit yields:
407: \begin{equation}\label{eq:c}
408: C= 1.05 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.14,
409: \end{equation}
410: where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second
411: systematic. The systematic uncertainty is dominated by theoretical
412: uncertainties on the prediction of the Bhabha scattering differential
413: cross section both at large angles and in the luminosity monitor. Some
414: additional systematic contributions also come from the modelling of
415: the detector response.
416:
417: \section{COMBINED RESULTS}
418:
419:
420: Figure~\ref{fig:7}
421: summarises the LEP results on the
422: running of the electromagnetic coupling. The L3
423: measurement at $ 1800 \GeV^{2} < -Q^{2} < 21600
424: \GeV^{2}$~\cite{ref:l3} is represented as a band, obtained by
425: inserting the measured value of $C$ from Equation~\ref{eq:c} into
426: Equation~\ref{eq:runC} and assuming the QED description of
427: $\Delta\alpha(Q^2)$ given in Reference~\cite{ref:burkhardt_new}.
428: The two low-$Q^2$ measurements by the OPAL and L3 collaborations at
429: $1.8\GeV^2<-Q^2<6.1\GeV^2$ (Equation~\ref{eq:opal}) and
430: $2.1\GeV^2<-Q^2<6.2\GeV^2$ (Equation~\ref{eq:l3old1}), respectively, as well as
431: the intermediate-$Q^2$ measurement of L3 at
432: $12.25\GeV^2<-Q^2<3434\GeV^2$ (Equation~\ref{eq:l3old2}) are represented with two symbols each.
433: The empty symbols represent the values of
434: $\alpha^{-1}(Q^2)$ at the lower end of each $Q^2$ range. They are
435: fixed by using
436: Equation~\ref{eq:alfa} and the QED description of $\Delta\alpha(Q^2)$
437: of Reference~\cite{ref:burkhardt_new}. The full symbols represent the
438: values of $\alpha^{-1}(Q^2)$ at the higher end of each $Q^2$ range
439: extracted from the fixed values and from the measurements in
440: Equations~\ref{eq:opal},~\ref{eq:l3old1} and~\ref{eq:l3old2}. All
441: measurements are in excellent agreement with the QED predictions of
442: Reference~\cite{ref:burkhardt_new}, presented as a solid line.
443:
444: \begin{figure}
445: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Figure7.eps}
446: \caption{Summary of LEP results on the measurement of the
447: running of the electromagnetic coupling. The band
448: represents the L3 measurement at high $Q^2$. The full symbols
449: represent the OPAL and the L3 measurements at low and
450: intermediate $Q^2$. The open symbols are the reference values to
451: which the measurement are anchored, as discussed in the last
452: section of the text. The solid line shows the QED predictions of
453: Reference~\cite{ref:burkhardt_new}.}
454: \label{fig:7}
455: \end{figure}
456:
457:
458: Figure~\ref{fig:8} presents a combination of all LEP results. This
459: combination is obtained in
460: several steps. First, the L3 measurement
461: at $2.1\GeV^2<-Q^2<6.2\GeV^2$ and the OPAL measurement at
462: $1.8\GeV^2<-Q^2<6.1\GeV^2$, from Equations~\ref{eq:opal}
463: and~\ref{eq:l3old1} respectively,
464: are combined into a single measurement. In order to perform this
465: combination the L3 measurement is transported to
466: the $Q^2$ range of the OPAL measurement. The combined result is:
467: \begin{equation}\label{eq:combi}
468: \alpha(-6.1\GeV^2)-\alpha(-1.8\GeV^2)=(363\pm 52)\times 10^{-7},
469: \end{equation}
470: where the uncertainty combines statistical and systematic effects.
471: This combined result and the L3 measurement at intermediate $Q^2$ are
472: plotted in Figure~\ref{fig:8} as two single points at $Q^2=-6.1\GeV^2$
473: and $Q^2=-3434 \GeV^{2}$, respectively. The values of $\alpha(Q^2)$ at these two
474: points are extracted by
475: anchoring the value of $\alpha(Q^2)$ at the lower end of
476: each $Q^2$ range by using the L3 measurement of $C$ at $ 1800
477: \GeV^{2} < -Q^{2} < 21600 \GeV^{2}$ and assuming it also describes
478: the running of $\alpha$ for lower values of $Q^2$:
479: the
480: values of $\alpha(-1.8\GeV^2)$ and $\alpha(-12.25 \GeV^{2})$ are
481: fixed by using the measured
482: value of $C$ from Equation~\ref{eq:c}, the evolution expected from
483: Equation~\ref{eq:runC} and the QED description of $\Delta\alpha(Q^2)$
484: of Reference~\cite{ref:burkhardt_new}. The value of
485: $\alpha(-6.1\GeV^2)$ is finally extracted by using this fixed value of
486: $\alpha(-1.8\GeV^2)$ and Equation~\ref{eq:combi}, with an additional uncertainty which follows
487: from the 14\% uncertainty on $C$. A similar procedure is followed to
488: extract the value of $\alpha(-3434 \GeV^{2})$ from
489: Equation~\ref{eq:l3old2}.
490:
491: \begin{figure}[h]
492: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Figure8.eps}\\
493: \caption{Combined LEP results on the measurement of the running of
494: the electromagnetic coupling in three different $Q^2$ regimes,
495: compared with the QED predictions of
496: Reference~\cite{ref:burkhardt_new}. The treatment of data is
497: discussed in the last section of the text.}
498: \label{fig:8}
499: \end{figure}
500:
501: In conclusion, the LEP experiments have established the
502: the evolution of the electromagnetic coupling with the
503: squared four-momentum transfer in a new energy domain. These measurements, combined
504: in Figure~\ref{fig:8}, span three orders of magnitude in $Q^2$ and
505: confirm the QED predictions for the running of $\alpha$.
506:
507:
508: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
509:
510: \bibitem{ref:running}
511: E.C.G.~St\"uckelberg and A.~Petermann, Helv. Phys. Acta {\bf 26} (1953) 499;\\
512: M.~Gell-Mann and F.~Low, Phys. Rev. {\bf 95} (1954) 1300;\\
513: N.N.~Bogoliubov and D.V.~Shirkov, Dokl. AN SSSR {\bf 103} (1955) 203.
514:
515: \bibitem{ref:codata}
516: CODATA Task Group, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 72} (2000) 351;\\
517: \texttt{http://physics.nist.gov/constants}.
518:
519: \bibitem{ref:leptons}
520: M.~Steinhauser, Phys. Lett {\bf B 429} (1998) 158
521:
522: \bibitem{ref:top}
523: G.~Montagna \etal, Comp. Phys. Comm {\bf 117} (1999) 278;\\
524: A.B.~Arbuzov \etal, Comp. Phys. Comm {\bf 174} (2006) 728.
525:
526: \bibitem{ref:burkhardt_new}
527: H.~Burkhardt and B.~Pietrzyk, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 513} (2001) 46;\\
528: H.~Burkhardt and B.~Pietrzyk, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 72} (2005) 057501.
529:
530: \bibitem{ref:smreport}
531: ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL and SLD Collab, Phys. Rept. {\bf 427} (2006) 257.
532:
533: \bibitem{catch22}
534: J.~Heller, {\it Catch-22}, ISBN 0-684-83339-5.
535:
536: \bibitem{l3-197}
537: L3 Collab., M.\ Acciarri \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 476} (2000) 40.
538:
539: \bibitem{ref:venus}
540: VENUS Collab., S.~Odaka \etal, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81} (1998) 2428; \\
541: VENUS Collab., T.~Arima \etal, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 55} (1997) 19.
542:
543: \bibitem{ref:opal}
544: OPAL Collab. G.~Abbiendi \etal, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 45} (2006) 1.
545:
546: \bibitem{ref:bhlumi}
547: S.~Jadach \etal, Comput. Phys. Commun. {\bf 102} (1997) 229.
548:
549: \bibitem{ref:l3}
550: L3 Collab., P.~Achard \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 623} (2005) 26.
551:
552: \bibitem{ref:BHWIDE}
553: S.~Jadach, W.~Placzek and B.F.L.~Ward, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 390} (1997) 298.
554:
555:
556: \end{thebibliography}
557:
558: \end{document}
559: