1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% ws-procs10x7.tex : 23 January 2003 %%
3: %% Text file to use with ws-procs10x7.cls written in Latex2e. %%
4: %% The content, structure, format and layout of this style file is the %%
5: %% property of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. %%
6: %% Copyright 1995, 2003 by World Scientific Publishing Co. %%
7: %% All rights are reserved. %%
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9:
10: %\documentclass[draft]{ws-procs10x7}
11: \documentclass{ws-procs10x7}
12: \usepackage{balance}
13: \usepackage{epsfig}
14:
15: %new column type
16: \newcolumntype{d}[1]{D{.}{.}{#1}}
17:
18: % A useful Journal macro
19: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{\it #1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}
20:
21:
22: % -- special symbols
23: \def\rmm {\ensuremath{\Delta R(\mu\mu)}}
24: \def\mll {\ensuremath{m_{\mu\mu}}}
25:
26:
27: %% -- All numbers
28: \def\vdef #1{\expandafter\def\csname #1\endcsname}
29: \def\vuse #1{\csname #1\endcsname}
30:
31: \vdef{cut:default:ptlo} {\ensuremath{ 4.0 } }
32: \vdef{cut:default:pthi} {\ensuremath{100.0 } }
33: \vdef{cut:default:etalo} {\ensuremath{ -2.4 } }
34: \vdef{cut:default:etahi} {\ensuremath{ 2.4 } }
35: \vdef{cut:default:rmmlo} {\ensuremath{ 0.3 } }
36: \vdef{cut:default:rmmhi} {\ensuremath{ 1.2 } }
37: \vdef{cut:default:tip} {\ensuremath{0.100 } }
38: \vdef{cut:default:ptbs} {\ensuremath{ 5.0 } }
39: \vdef{cut:default:chi2} {\ensuremath{ 1.0 } }
40: \vdef{cut:default:l3d} {\ensuremath{0.015 } }
41: \vdef{cut:default:lxy/sxy} {\ensuremath{18.0 } }
42: \vdef{cut:default:lxy} {\ensuremath{-0.100 } }
43: \vdef{cut:default:cosalpha} {\ensuremath{0.995 } }
44: \vdef{cut:default:isoveto} {\ensuremath{1000.0 } }
45: \vdef{cut:default:isolation} {\ensuremath{0.85 } }
46: \vdef{cut:default:isocone} {\ensuremath{ 1.0 } }
47:
48:
49: \vdef{mBgSigma:s0}{\ensuremath {36.0 } }
50: \vdef{mBg1s:s0} {\ensuremath {32.1 } }
51: \vdef{mBg1n:s0} {\ensuremath {0.08 } }
52: \vdef{mBg2s:s0} {\ensuremath {60.2 } }
53: \vdef{mBg2n:s0} {\ensuremath {0.03 } }
54:
55:
56: \vdef{eAllCutsFact:s0} {\ensuremath{{0.019 } } }
57: \vdef{eAllCutsFactE:s0} {\ensuremath{{0.002 } } }
58: \vdef{nAllCutsFact:s0} {\ensuremath{{ 6.1} } }
59: \vdef{nAllCutsFactE:s0} {\ensuremath{{ 0.3} } }
60:
61: \vdef{nMassAllCutsFact:m0} {\ensuremath{{ 13.8} } }
62: \vdef{nMassAllCutsFactE:m0} {\ensuremath{{ 22.0} } }
63: \vdef{eAllCutsFact:m0} {\ensuremath{{2.74\times 10^{-7} } } }
64: \vdef{eAllCutsFactE:m0} {\ensuremath{{2.96\times 10^{-8} } } }
65:
66: \vdef{Lumi:d0} {\ensuremath{ {10.0 } } }
67:
68: \vdef{bgError} {\ensuremath{{160 } } }
69: \vdef{sgError} {\ensuremath{{25 } } }
70:
71:
72: \vdef{nMassAllCutsFactE:s0} {\ensuremath{{ 0.6} } }
73: \vdef{nMassAllCutsFactE:m0} {\ensuremath{{ 22.0} } }
74:
75:
76: \vdef{ExpectedUpperLimit} {\ensuremath{{1.4\times 10^{-8}} } }
77:
78:
79: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
80: % BEGINNING OF TEXT %
81: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
82: \input symbols.tex
83: \makeindex
84: \begin{document}
85:
86:
87: \title{STUDY OF \bsmm\ in CMS}
88:
89: \author{Urs~Langenegger$^*$ }
90:
91: \address{Institute for Particle Physics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland\\$^*$E-mail: ursl@phys.ethz.ch}
92:
93:
94: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
95: % You may repeat \author \address as often as necessary %
96: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
97:
98: \twocolumn[\maketitle\abstract{We present a Monte Carlo simulation
99: study of measuring the rare leptonic decay \bsmm\ with the CMS
100: experiment at the LHC. The study is based on a full detector
101: simulation for signal and background events. We discuss the
102: high-level trigger algorithm and the offline event selection. }
103: \keywords{Rare $B$ decays; Supersymmetry; LHC} ]
104:
105:
106:
107: % ----------------------------------------------------------------------
108: \section{Introduction}
109:
110: In the standard model (SM), the decay \bsmm\ has a highly suppressed
111: rate\cite{Buras:2003td} of $\cbf = (3.42\pm0.54)\times 10^{-9}$ since
112: it involves a $b \to s$ transition and requires an internal quark
113: annihilation which further suppresses the decay relative to the
114: electroweak `penguin' $b \to s \gamma$ decay. In addition, the decays
115: are helicity suppressed by factors of $m_{\ell}^{2}$. To date these
116: decays have not been observed; upper limits on these branching
117: fractions are a topic of frequent updates at the
118: $B$-factories\cite{Chang:2003yy,Aubert:2004gm} (for the decay $\bdmm$)
119: and the Tevatron.\cite{Abazov:2004dj,CDF:prelim} Currently the best
120: upper limit is from the CDF collaboration\cite{CDF:prelim} with
121: $\cbf(\bsmm) < 1.0\times 10^{-7}$ at 95\% confidence limit.
122:
123: Since these processes are highly suppressed in the SM, they are
124: potentially sensitive probes of physics beyond the SM (see
125: Fig.~\ref{f:b2llnp}). In the minimal supersymmetric extension of the
126: SM (MSSM) the branching fraction for these decays can be substantially
127: enhanced, especially at large $\tan \beta$.\cite{Babu:1999hn} For MSSM
128: with modified minimal flavor violation at large $\tan\beta$, the
129: branching fraction can be increased by up to four orders of
130: magnitude.\cite{Bobeth:2002ch} \bsdmm\ decays can also be enhanced in
131: specific models containing leptoquarks~\cite{Davidson:1993qk} and
132: supersymmetric (SUSY) models without R-parity.\cite{Roy:1991qr}
133:
134: \begin{figure}[!htb]
135: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig1.eps,width=2.6in}}
136: \caption{Feynman graphs for the decay \bsdmm\ illustrating possible
137: new physics contributions.}
138: \label{f:b2llnp}
139: \end{figure}
140:
141: There has been some
142: interest\cite{Kane:2003wg,Baek:2004tm,Dedes:2004yc} in using the decay
143: mode \bsmm\ to `measure' the key parameter \tb\ of the MSSM and to
144: constrain other extensions of the SM. Lower bounds on \tb\ can be
145: obtained from $\cbf(\bsmm)$ with general model-independent
146: assumptions. Since \tb\ is also constrained from above due to general
147: principles, a lower bound is tantamount to a measurement of \tb.
148:
149:
150:
151: % ----------------------------------------------------------------------
152: \section{The CMS Experiment}
153:
154: The Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) detector is well suited for the study
155: of leptonic $B$ decays. The main components for this analysis are the
156: tracker and muon systems.
157:
158: The CMS tracker is an all-silicon detector, comprises an inner pixel
159: vertex detector plus an outer strip track detector, and is immersed in
160: a magnetic field of 4\Tesla. The pixel detector provides
161: high-precision measurements of space points close to the interaction
162: region for vertexing and effective pattern recognition in the
163: high-track multiplicity environment at the LHC. The pixel detector is
164: composed of 1440 modules arranged in three barrel layers (at a radial
165: distance of $r = 4.4,\, 7.3,\, 10.2\cm$ from the beampipe) and four
166: endcap disks (at $z = \pm34.5,\, \pm46.5\cm$ from the interaction
167: point). The barrel detector comprises 672 modules and 96
168: half-modules, the forward detector is built of 96 blades with 672
169: modules. With a pixel size of $d_\phi\times d_z = 100\mum\times
170: 150\mum$, a hit resolution of 10--20\mum\ is achieved. The strip
171: tracker allows the precise determination of charged particle momenta.
172: It is arranged in the central part as inner (TIB) and outer (TOB)
173: barrel, and in the forward regions as inner discs (TID) and endcaps
174: (TEC). The barrel part consists of 10 layers (4 in the TIB, 6 in the
175: TOB) and 12 layers in the forward part (3 in the TID, 9 in the TEC).
176: The pitch in the strip tracker varies between 80--180\mum. The
177: material inside the active volume of the tracker increases from
178: $\approx 0.4X_0$ at pseudo-rapidity $\eta = 0$ to around $1X_0$ at
179: $|\eta| \approx 1.6$, before decreasing to $\approx 0.6X_0$ at $|\eta|
180: = 2.5$.
181: %The transverse momentum
182: %resolution of the tracker can be approximately parametrized as $\Delta
183: %\pt/\pt = 0.02\%\pt/\gev \oplus 0.5\%$.
184:
185: The CMS muon system, incorporated into the magnet return yoke, is
186: divided into a barrel ($|\eta| < 1.2$) and forward parts ($1.2 <
187: |\eta| < 2.4$). In the barrel region, where the neutron induced
188: background and the muon rate is small, drift tube (DT) chambers are
189: used. In the two endcaps cathode strip chambers (CSC) are deployed.
190: In addition, resistive plate chambers (RPC) are used both in the
191: barrel and the endcap region. The RPC spatial resolution is coarser
192: than for the DT and CSC, but their excellent time resolution allows
193: the unambiguous identification of the correct bunch crossing.
194:
195:
196:
197:
198: % ----------------------------------------------------------------------
199: \section{Event Samples}
200:
201: Monte Carlo (MC) event samples were generated with {\sc Pythia~6.227}
202: and passed through a full detector simulation based on {\sc Geant~4}.
203: On average five pile-up events were included, appropriate for a
204: luminosity of $\clu = 2\times10^{33} \cm^{-2}\sec^{-1}$.
205:
206: Both signal and background MC event samples have been generated as
207: minimum bias QCD events. In the signal sample, \Bs\ mesons decay as
208: \bsmm. The muons are required to have transverse momentum $\pt^\mu >
209: 3\gev$ and $|\eta^\mu| < 2.4$; the \Bs\ must have $\pt^{\Bs} > 5\gev$.
210:
211: The background sample contains two muons with $\pt > 3\gev$ and
212: $|\eta| < 2.4$. Their separation in azimuth and pseudorapidity
213: $\rmm\equiv \sqrt{\Delta\phi^2 + \Delta\eta^2}$ is required to be $0.3
214: < \rmm < 1.8$. Currently the background simulation does not include
215: muons due to hadronic in-flight decays or punch-through. It is
216: estimated that this hadronic component will increase the background
217: level by about 10\%. Background events from rare
218: $B_d,\,B_u,\,B_s,\,B_c,\,\Lambda_b$ decays are not included.
219:
220: In total 20000 signal events and about 15000 background events have
221: been analyzed. The small size of the background sample is the
222: limiting factor of the present study.
223:
224:
225:
226: % ----------------------------------------------------------------------
227: \section{Trigger Strategy}
228:
229: The CMS detector has a twofold trigger strategy. The first level
230: trigger, with a latency of $3.2\,\mu\sec$, is based on information
231: from the calorimeters and the muon system. The threshold for
232: inclusive isolated single muons is at $\pt^\mu>14\gev$, for dimuon
233: events both muons must have $\pt>3\gev$. The expected trigger rates
234: amount to 2.7\kHz\ and 0.9\kHz, respectively. The L1 trigger output
235: rate is at most 100\kHz.
236:
237: The high-level trigger (HLT) is a software trigger, running on a large
238: processor farm. The HLT reduces the overall trigger rate by three
239: orders of magnitude to about 100\Hz. To fit into the tight time
240: constraints imposed by the high input rate, tracking at the HLT is
241: sped up by two concepts: (1) `Regional seed generation' limits track
242: seeding to specific regions of interest, \eg, a cone around the L1
243: muon candidate direction. (2) `Partial tracking' pursues track
244: reconstruction only until some criteria are met, \eg, a resolution of
245: 2\% on the transverse momentum. Already with six reconstructed hits,
246: both the efficiency and the resolution are comparable to the full
247: tracking performance.
248:
249: The HLT strategy for \bsmm\ proceeds along the following path. (1)
250: Verification of the two L1 muon candidates. (2) Tracks reconstructed
251: only with the pixel detector are used to compute a list of possible
252: primary vertices, the three most significant are retained. (3)
253: Regional track reconstruction with up to six hits is performed in
254: cones around the L1 muon candidates. (4) Reconstructed tracks with
255: $\pt > 4\gev$ are paired and retained if their invariant mass falls
256: into predefined regions for the signal and sidebands. (5) The two
257: tracks must have opposite charge and are fit to a common vertex; the
258: event is retained only when the fit $\chi^2 < 20$ and the
259: three-dimensional flight length $l_{3d} > 150\mum$. With this
260: selection, the event rate was estimated\cite{Sphicas:2002gg} to be
261: $<1.7\Hz$.
262:
263:
264: % ----------------------------------------------------------------------
265: \section{Offline Analysis}
266:
267: The offline analysis selection focuses on a secondary vertex that is
268: well measured and separated from the primary vertex and consistent
269: with the decay of an isolated \Bs\ meson.
270:
271: The primary vertex is determined from all tracks with $\pt > 0.9\gev$,
272: because of the rather low-multiplicity track environment.
273:
274: The two muons must have opposite charge, $\pt^\mu >
275: \vuse{cut:default:ptlo} $, and $|\eta^\mu| < \vuse{cut:default:etahi}
276: $. The azimuthal and pseudorapidity separation of the two muons
277: $\vuse{cut:default:rmmlo} < \rmm < \vuse{cut:default:rmmhi} $ provides
278: a powerful reduction of gluon-gluon fusion background with both
279: $b$-hadrons decaying semileptonically: The muons of those $b$-hadrons
280: tend to be back-to-back, while the signal shows a peaked distribution
281: with a maximum at $\rmm \sim 1$.
282:
283: \Bs\ candidates are formed by vertexing the two muon candidates. The
284: vertex quality is required to be $\chi^2 < \vuse{cut:default:chi2} $.
285: The transverse momentum vector of the \Bs\ candidate must be close to
286: the displacement of the secondary vertex from the primary vertex: the
287: cosine of the opening angle $\alpha$ between the two vectors must
288: fulfill $\cos(\alpha) > \vuse{cut:default:cosalpha} $. The
289: significance of the \Bs\ candidate flight length $l_{xy}$ in the
290: transverse plane is defined as $l_{xy}/\sigma_{xy}$ (illustrated in
291: Fig.~\ref{f:selection}), where $\sigma_{xy}$ is the error on the
292: flight length with mean $\langle\sigma_{xy}\rangle = 120\mum$; we
293: require $l_{xy}/\sigma_{xy} > \vuse{cut:default:lxy/sxy} $.
294:
295: \begin{figure}[!htb]
296: %%% \centerline{\psfig{file=fig3.eps,width=2.6in}}
297: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig2.eps,width=2.6in}}
298: \caption{Decay length significance in
299: the transverse plane for signal and background MC events. Both
300: histograms are normalized to unity.}
301: %% \caption{(a) Dimuon isolation and (b) decay length significance measured in
302: %% the transverse plane for signal and background MC events.}
303: \label{f:selection}
304: \end{figure}
305:
306: In high-\pt\ gluon-splitting events the \bbbar\ quark pair moves
307: closely together due to their boost, and the two decay vertices of the
308: resulting $b$-hadrons cannot be well separated in all cases. However,
309: because of color reconnection, the hadronic activity around the dimuon
310: direction is enhanced compared to the signal decay (where only one
311: colorless \Bs\ meson decays). This is exploited in isolation
312: requirements: The isolation $I$ is determined from the dimuon
313: transverse momentum and charged tracks with $\pt>0.9\gev$ in a cone
314: with half-radius $r = \vuse{cut:default:isocone} $ around the dimuon
315: direction as $I \equiv \pt^{\mu\mu}/(\pt^{\mu\mu} + \sum_{trk}|\pt|)$;
316: we require $I > \vuse{cut:default:isolation} $.
317:
318:
319: \begin{figure}[!htb]
320: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig4.eps,width=2.6in}}
321: \caption{Dimuon mass distribution in signal MC events. The curve
322: is a fit of two Gaussians, the displayed parameters indicate the
323: average mean and sigma. The histogram is normalized to unity.}
324: \label{f:breco}
325: \end{figure}
326:
327:
328: Figure~\ref{f:breco} illustrates the mass resolution obtained on the
329: signal MC event sample. The distribution is fit with two Gaussians,
330: the quoted width $\sigma = \vuse{mBgSigma:s0} \mev$ is determined
331: according to
332: \begin{eqnarray*}
333: \sigma^2 = \frac{N_n^2\sigma_n^2 + N_w^2\sigma_w^2}{N_n^2 + N_w^2},
334: \end{eqnarray*}
335: where $\sigma_n = \vuse{mBg1s:s0} \mev $ ($\sigma_w = \vuse{mBg2s:s0} \mev$)
336: and $N_n = \vuse{mBg1n:s0} $ ($N_w = \vuse{mBg2n:s0} $) are the width
337: and normalization of the narrow (wide) Gaussian, respectively.
338:
339: Given the limited statistics of the background sample, no event
340: remains after the application of all selection requirements. However,
341: the absence of correlation to the other selection requirements allows
342: a factorization of the isolation and $\chi^2$ requirements from the
343: other cuts in the determination of the total background rejection
344: factor. The dominant sources of uncertainty on the signal
345: ($\pm\vuse{sgError} \%$) and background ($^{+\vuse{bgError} }_{-100}
346: \%$) yield are the statistical component of the background sample, the
347: impact of the misalignment on the transverse flight length
348: significance, and the assumption of factorizing cuts.
349:
350: The total selection efficiency for signal events is $\varepsilon_S =
351: \vuse{eAllCutsFact:s0} \pm \vuse{eAllCutsFactE:s0} $ and the
352: background reduction factor is $\varepsilon_B = \vuse{eAllCutsFact:m0}
353: $. With this selection, the first $\vuse{Lumi:d0} \invfb$ of
354: integrated luminosity will yield $n_S = \vuse{nAllCutsFact:s0}
355: \pm\vuse{nMassAllCutsFactE:s0} $ signal events and $n_B =
356: \vuse{nMassAllCutsFact:m0} ^{+\vuse{nMassAllCutsFactE:m0}
357: }_{-\vuse{nMassAllCutsFact:m0} } $ background events in a mass window
358: of $m_{\Bs} \pm 0.1\gev$. With this background estimate, the upper
359: limit on the branching fraction is $\cbf(\bsmm) \le
360: \vuse{ExpectedUpperLimit} $ at the 90\% C.L.
361:
362:
363:
364:
365: % ----------------------------------------------------------------------
366: \section{Conclusions}
367:
368: This study is limited by the size of the background MC sample. In the
369: future, it will include larger background samples and a detailed
370: simulation of rare $b$-hadron decays. The search for \bsmm\ promises
371: an interesting start-up analysis with the possibility of setting tight
372: constraints on the MSSM. With sufficient integrated luminosity, the
373: precision measurement of the \bsmm\ branching fraction will set
374: constraints on models of new physics.
375:
376:
377: \input references.tex
378:
379: \end{document}
380: