1: \documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2:
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{dcolumn}
5:
6: \graphicspath{{ps}}
7:
8: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.1}
9:
10: \begin{document}
11:
12: \title{ \quad\\[1.0cm] Search for Invisible Decay of the $\Upsilon(1S)$}
13:
14:
15: \affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk}
16: \affiliation{Chiba University, Chiba}
17: \affiliation{Chonnam National University, Kwangju}
18: \affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221}
19: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei}
20: \affiliation{Justus-Liebig-Universit\"at Gie\ss{}en, Gie\ss{}en}
21: \affiliation{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama, Japan}
22: %%%\affiliation{Gyeongsang National University, Chinju}
23: \affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822}
24: \affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba}
25: %%%\affiliation{Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Hiroshima}
26: \affiliation{University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801}
27: \affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing}
28: \affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna}
29: \affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Protvino}
30: \affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow}
31: \affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana}
32: \affiliation{Kanagawa University, Yokohama}
33: \affiliation{Korea University, Seoul}
34: %%%\affiliation{Kyoto University, Kyoto}
35: \affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu}
36: \affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne}
37: \affiliation{University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana}
38: \affiliation{University of Maribor, Maribor}
39: \affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria}
40: \affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya}
41: \affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara}
42: \affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li}
43: \affiliation{National United University, Miao Li}
44: \affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei}
45: \affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow}
46: \affiliation{Nippon Dental University, Niigata}
47: \affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata}
48: \affiliation{University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica}
49: \affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka}
50: \affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka}
51: \affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh}
52: \affiliation{Peking University, Beijing}
53: \affiliation{University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260}
54: %%%\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544}
55: \affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973}
56: \affiliation{Saga University, Saga}
57: \affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei}
58: \affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul}
59: \affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano}
60: \affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon}
61: \affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW}
62: \affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay}
63: \affiliation{Toho University, Funabashi}
64: \affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo}
65: \affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai}
66: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo}
67: \affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo}
68: \affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo}
69: \affiliation{Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo}
70: %%%\affiliation{Toyama National College of Maritime Technology, Toyama}
71: %%%\affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba}
72: \affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061}
73: \affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul}
74: \author{O.~Tajima}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
75: \author{H.~Hayashii}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
76: \author{M.~Hazumi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
77: \author{K.~Inami}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
78: \author{Y.~Iwasaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
79: \author{S.~Uehara}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
80: \author{K.~Abe}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
81: % \author{K.~Abe}\affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo} % TohokuGakuin
82: % \author{N.~Abe}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
83: \author{I.~Adachi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
84: \author{H.~Aihara}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
85: \author{D.~Anipko}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
86: % \author{K.~Aoki}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
87: % \author{K.~Arinstein}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
88: % \author{Y.~Asano}\affiliation{University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba} % Tsukuba
89: % \author{T.~Aso}\affiliation{Toyama National College of Maritime Technology, Toyama} % Toyama
90: \author{V.~Aulchenko}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
91: % \author{T.~Aushev}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
92: % \author{T.~Aziz}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay} % Tata
93: % \author{S.~Bahinipati}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
94: \author{A.~M.~Bakich}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
95: % \author{V.~Balagura}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
96: % \author{Y.~Ban}\affiliation{Peking University, Beijing} % Peking
97: % \author{S.~Banerjee}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay} % Tata
98: \author{E.~Barberio}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
99: % \author{M.~Barbero}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
100: % \author{A.~Bay}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
101: \author{I.~Bedny}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
102: \author{K.~Belous}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Protvino} % Protvino
103: \author{U.~Bitenc}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
104: \author{I.~Bizjak}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
105: % \author{S.~Blyth}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
106: \author{A.~Bondar}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
107: \author{A.~Bozek}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
108: \author{M.~Bra\v cko}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba}\affiliation{University of Maribor, Maribor}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
109: % \author{J.~Brodzicka}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
110: \author{T.~E.~Browder}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
111: \author{M.-C.~Chang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei} % FuJen
112: % \author{P.~Chang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
113: % \author{Y.~Chao}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
114: \author{A.~Chen}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
115: \author{K.-F.~Chen}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
116: \author{W.~T.~Chen}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
117: \author{B.~G.~Cheon}\affiliation{Chonnam National University, Kwangju} % Chonnam
118: \author{R.~Chistov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
119: % \author{S.-K.~Choi}\affiliation{Gyeongsang National University, Chinju} % Gyeongsang
120: \author{Y.~Choi}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
121: \author{Y.~K.~Choi}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
122: % \author{A.~Chuvikov}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
123: \author{S.~Cole}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
124: \author{J.~Dalseno}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
125: \author{M.~Danilov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
126: \author{M.~Dash}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
127: % \author{R.~Dowd}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
128: % \author{J.~Dragic}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
129: \author{A.~Drutskoy}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
130: \author{S.~Eidelman}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
131: % \author{Y.~Enari}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
132: % \author{D.~Epifanov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
133: % \author{F.~Fang}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
134: \author{S.~Fratina}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
135: % \author{H.~Fujii}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
136: % \author{M.~Fujikawa}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
137: \author{N.~Gabyshev}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
138: % \author{A.~Garmash}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
139: \author{T.~Gershon}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
140: \author{A.~Go}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
141: \author{G.~Gokhroo}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay} % Tata
142: % \author{P.~Goldenzweig}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
143: % \author{B.~Golob}\affiliation{University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
144: % \author{A.~Gori\v sek}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
145: % \author{M.~Grosse~Perdekamp}\affiliation{University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % UIUC
146: % \author{H.~Guler}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
147: \author{H.~Ha}\affiliation{Korea University, Seoul} % Korea
148: \author{J.~Haba}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
149: % \author{K.~Hara}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
150: % \author{T.~Hara}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
151: % \author{Y.~Hasegawa}\affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano} % Shinshu
152: % \author{N.~C.~Hastings}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
153: \author{K.~Hayasaka}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
154: \author{D.~Heffernan}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
155: % \author{T.~Higuchi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
156: % \author{L.~Hinz}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
157: % \author{T.~Hojo}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
158: \author{T.~Hokuue}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
159: \author{Y.~Hoshi}\affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo} % TohokuGakuin
160: % \author{K.~Hoshina}\affiliation{Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo} % TUAT
161: \author{S.~Hou}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
162: \author{W.-S.~Hou}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
163: % \author{Y.~B.~Hsiung}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
164: % \author{Y.~Igarashi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
165: \author{T.~Iijima}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
166: \author{K.~Ikado}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
167: % \author{A.~Imoto}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
168: \author{A.~Ishikawa}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
169: \author{H.~Ishino}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
170: % \author{K.~Itoh}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
171: \author{R.~Itoh}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
172: \author{M.~Iwasaki}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
173: % \author{C.~Jacoby}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
174: % \author{C.-M.~Jen}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
175: % \author{M.~Jones}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
176: % \author{R.~Kagan}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
177: % \author{H.~Kakuno}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
178: \author{J.~H.~Kang}\affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul} % Yonsei
179: % \author{P.~Kapusta}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
180: \author{S.~U.~Kataoka}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
181: \author{N.~Katayama}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
182: \author{H.~Kawai}\affiliation{Chiba University, Chiba} % Chiba
183: \author{T.~Kawasaki}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
184: % \author{N.~Kent}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
185: \author{H.~R.~Khan}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
186: % \author{A.~Kibayashi}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
187: \author{H.~Kichimi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
188: \author{H.~J.~Kim}\affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu} % Kyungpook
189: % \author{H.~O.~Kim}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
190: % \author{J.~H.~Kim}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
191: \author{S.~K.~Kim}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
192: % \author{T.~H.~Kim}\affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul} % Yonsei
193: \author{Y.~J.~Kim}\affiliation{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama, Japan} % Sokendai
194: \author{K.~Kinoshita}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
195: % \author{N.~Kishimoto}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
196: \author{S.~Korpar}\affiliation{University of Maribor, Maribor}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
197: % \author{Y.~Kozakai}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
198: \author{P.~Kri\v zan}\affiliation{University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
199: \author{P.~Krokovny}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
200: % \author{T.~Kubota}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
201: % \author{R.~Kulasiri}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
202: \author{R.~Kumar}\affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh} % Panjab
203: \author{C.~C.~Kuo}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
204: % \author{H.~Kurashiro}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
205: % \author{E.~Kurihara}\affiliation{Chiba University, Chiba} % Chiba
206: % \author{A.~Kusaka}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
207: \author{A.~Kuzmin}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
208: \author{Y.-J.~Kwon}\affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul} % Yonsei
209: \author{J.~S.~Lange}\affiliation{Justus-Liebig-Universit\"at Gie\ss{}en, Gie\ss{}en} % Giessen
210: % \author{G.~Leder}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
211: \author{J.~Lee}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
212: \author{M.~J.~Lee}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
213: % \author{S.~E.~Lee}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
214: % \author{Y.-J.~Lee}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
215: \author{T.~Lesiak}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
216: % \author{J.~Li}\affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei} % USTC
217: \author{A.~Limosani}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
218: \author{S.-W.~Lin}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
219: % \author{Y.~Liu}\affiliation{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama, Japan} % Sokendai
220: \author{D.~Liventsev}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
221: % \author{J.~MacNaughton}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
222: \author{G.~Majumder}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay} % Tata
223: \author{F.~Mandl}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
224: % \author{D.~Marlow}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
225: % \author{H.~Matsumoto}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
226: \author{T.~Matsumoto}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
227: % \author{A.~Matyja}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
228: \author{S.~McOnie}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
229: % \author{T.~Medvedeva}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
230: % \author{Y.~Mikami}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
231: % \author{W.~Mitaroff}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
232: \author{K.~Miyabayashi}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
233: \author{H.~Miyake}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
234: \author{H.~Miyata}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
235: \author{Y.~Miyazaki}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
236: \author{R.~Mizuk}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
237: % \author{D.~Mohapatra}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
238: % \author{G.~R.~Moloney}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
239: \author{T.~Mori}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
240: \author{J.~Mueller}\affiliation{University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260} % Pittsburgh
241: % \author{A.~Murakami}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
242: % \author{T.~Nagamine}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
243: % \author{Y.~Nagasaka}\affiliation{Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Hiroshima} % Hiroshima
244: % \author{T.~Nakagawa}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
245: % \author{Y.~Nakahama}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
246: \author{I.~Nakamura}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
247: \author{E.~Nakano}\affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka} % OsakaCity
248: \author{M.~Nakao}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
249: % \author{H.~Nakayama}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
250: \author{H.~Nakazawa}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li}
251: \author{Z.~Natkaniec}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
252: % \author{K.~Neichi}\affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo} % TohokuGakuin
253: \author{S.~Nishida}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
254: \author{O.~Nitoh}\affiliation{Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo} % TUAT
255: \author{S.~Noguchi}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
256: \author{T.~Nozaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
257: % \author{A.~Ogawa}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % RIKEN
258: \author{S.~Ogawa}\affiliation{Toho University, Funabashi} % Toho
259: \author{T.~Ohshima}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
260: % \author{T.~Okabe}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
261: \author{S.~Okuno}\affiliation{Kanagawa University, Yokohama} % Kanagawa
262: \author{S.~L.~Olsen}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
263: % \author{S.~Ono}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
264: \author{Y.~Onuki}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % RIKEN
265: % \author{W.~Ostrowicz}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
266: \author{H.~Ozaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
267: \author{P.~Pakhlov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
268: \author{G.~Pakhlova}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
269: % \author{H.~Palka}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
270: % \author{C.~W.~Park}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
271: \author{H.~Park}\affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu} % Kyungpook
272: % \author{K.~S.~Park}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
273: % \author{N.~Parslow}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
274: % \author{L.~S.~Peak}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
275: % \author{M.~Pernicka}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
276: \author{R.~Pestotnik}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
277: % \author{M.~Peters}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
278: \author{L.~E.~Piilonen}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
279: % \author{A.~Poluektov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
280: % \author{F.~J.~Ronga}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
281: % \author{M.~Rozanska}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
282: \author{H.~Sahoo}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
283: % \author{S.~Saitoh}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
284: \author{Y.~Sakai}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
285: % \author{H.~Sakamoto}\affiliation{Kyoto University, Kyoto} % Kyoto
286: % \author{H.~Sakaue}\affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka} % OsakaCity
287: % \author{T.~R.~Sarangi}\affiliation{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama, Japan} % Sokendai
288: % \author{N.~Sato}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
289: \author{N.~Satoyama}\affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano} % Shinshu
290: % \author{K.~Sayeed}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
291: \author{T.~Schietinger}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
292: \author{O.~Schneider}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
293: % \author{P.~Sch\"onmeier}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
294: \author{J.~Sch\"umann}\affiliation{National United University, Miao Li} % NUU
295: % \author{C.~Schwanda}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
296: \author{A.~J.~Schwartz}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
297: \author{R.~Seidl}\affiliation{University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % UIUC
298: % \author{T.~Seki}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
299: \author{K.~Senyo}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
300: \author{M.~E.~Sevior}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
301: \author{M.~Shapkin}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Protvino} % Protvino
302: % \author{Y.-T.~Shen}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
303: % \author{T.~Shibata}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
304: \author{H.~Shibuya}\affiliation{Toho University, Funabashi} % Toho
305: \author{B.~Shwartz}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
306: % \author{V.~Sidorov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
307: \author{J.~B.~Singh}\affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh} % Panjab
308: \author{A.~Sokolov}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Protvino} % Protvino
309: \author{A.~Somov}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
310: \author{N.~Soni}\affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh} % Panjab
311: % \author{R.~Stamen}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
312: \author{S.~Stani\v c}\affiliation{University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica} % NovaGorica
313: \author{M.~Stari\v c}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
314: \author{H.~Stoeck}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
315: % \author{A.~Sugiyama}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
316: \author{K.~Sumisawa}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
317: \author{T.~Sumiyoshi}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
318: \author{S.~Suzuki}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
319: % \author{S.~Y.~Suzuki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
320: % \author{N.~Takada}\affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano} % Shinshu
321: \author{F.~Takasaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
322: \author{K.~Tamai}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
323: \author{N.~Tamura}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
324: % \author{K.~Tanabe}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
325: \author{M.~Tanaka}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
326: % \author{N.~Taniguchi}\affiliation{Kyoto University, Kyoto} % Kyoto
327: \author{G.~N.~Taylor}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
328: \author{Y.~Teramoto}\affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka} % OsakaCity
329: \author{X.~C.~Tian}\affiliation{Peking University, Beijing} % Peking
330: \author{I.~Tikhomirov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
331: \author{K.~Trabelsi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
332: % \author{Y.~F.~Tse}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
333: \author{T.~Tsuboyama}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
334: \author{T.~Tsukamoto}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
335: % \author{K.~Uchida}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
336: % \author{Y.~Uchida}\affiliation{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama, Japan} % Sokendai
337: \author{T.~Uglov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
338: % \author{K.~Ueno}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
339: % \author{Y.~Unno}\affiliation{Chonnam National University, Kwangju} % Chonnam
340: \author{S.~Uno}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
341: \author{P.~Urquijo}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
342: \author{Y.~Ushiroda}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
343: \author{Y.~Usov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
344: \author{G.~Varner}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
345: % \author{K.~E.~Varvell}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
346: \author{S.~Villa}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
347: % \author{A.~Vinokurova}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
348: \author{C.~C.~Wang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
349: \author{C.~H.~Wang}\affiliation{National United University, Miao Li} % NUU
350: \author{M.-Z.~Wang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
351: % \author{M.~Watanabe}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
352: \author{Y.~Watanabe}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
353: \author{R.~Wedd}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, Victoria} % Melbourne
354: \author{J.~Wicht}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
355: % \author{L.~Widhalm}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
356: % \author{J.~Wiechczynski}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
357: \author{E.~Won}\affiliation{Korea University, Seoul} % Korea
358: % \author{C.-H.~Wu}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
359: \author{Q.~L.~Xie}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
360: \author{B.~D.~Yabsley}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney NSW} % Sydney
361: \author{A.~Yamaguchi}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
362: % \author{H.~Yamamoto}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
363: % \author{S.~Yamamoto}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
364: \author{Y.~Yamashita}\affiliation{Nippon Dental University, Niigata} % NihonDental
365: \author{M.~Yamauchi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
366: % \author{Heyoung~Yang}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
367: % \author{J.~Ying}\affiliation{Peking University, Beijing} % Peking
368: % \author{S.~Yoshino}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
369: % \author{Y.~Yuan}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
370: % \author{Y.~Yusa}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
371: % \author{S.~L.~Zang}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
372: % \author{C.~C.~Zhang}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
373: % \author{J.~Zhang}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
374: % \author{L.~M.~Zhang}\affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei} % USTC
375: \author{Z.~P.~Zhang}\affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei} % USTC
376: \author{V.~Zhilich}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
377: % \author{V.~Zhulanov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
378: % \author{T.~Ziegler}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
379: \author{A.~Zupanc}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
380: % \author{D.~Z\"urcher}\affiliation{Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
381: \collaboration{The Belle Collaboration}
382:
383: \begin{abstract}
384:
385: We report results of a search for the invisible decay of the $\Upsilon(1S)$
386: via the $\Upsilon(3S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon(1S)$ transition
387: using a data sample of
388: $2.9\,{\rm fb}^{-1}$ at the $\Upsilon(3S)$ resonance.
389: The data were collected with the Belle detector
390: at the KEKB asymmetric-energy $e^+ e^-$ collider.
391: No signal is found, and an upper limit for the branching fraction
392: at the 90\% confidence level is determined to be
393: ${\cal B} (\Upsilon(1S) \to {\rm invisible})$ $<$ 2.5 $\times$ $10^{-3}$.
394:
395: \end{abstract}
396:
397: \pacs{13.25.Gv, 95.30.Cq}
398:
399: \maketitle
400:
401: \tighten
402:
403: {\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}}
404: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
405:
406: An invisible particle decay mode is defined as one where the
407: final state particles interact so weakly that they are not observable in
408: a detector.
409: The standard model (SM) predicts that there are
410: no invisible particles except neutrinos.
411: If the invisible decay rate is observed to have a larger branching fraction
412: than the SM prediction,
413: it implies physics beyond the SM.
414: One possibility is a decay into dark matter particles, $\chi$,
415: whose existence is strongly suggested by several astronomical
416: observations~\cite{bib_dm_evidence}.
417: In the SM, quarkonium decay to the two-neutrino final
418: state is predicted to have a branching fraction
419: ${\cal B}(\Upsilon(1S) \to \nu\bar{\nu})$
420: = $(9.9 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-6}$
421: \cite{bib_upsilon2nunubar}.
422: A much larger invisible branching fraction
423: ${\cal B}(\Upsilon(1S) \to \chi \chi) \simeq 6 \times 10^{-3}$
424: is predicted \cite{bib_BobMcElrath_invisble_upsilon}
425: for dark matter particles that are lighter than the $b$ quark.
426: Here, the pair annihilation cross section of dark matter particles
427: to a SM quark pair
428: $\sigma(\chi \chi \to q \bar q)$
429: is estimated based on cosmological arguments,
430: and the time-reversed reaction is assumed to have the same cross section,
431: i.e. $\sigma(q \bar q\to \chi \chi) = \sigma(\chi \chi \to q \bar q)$.
432: The previous upper limits for the invisible $\Upsilon(1S)$ branching fraction
433: were reported by
434: ARGUS (23 $\times$ $10^{-3}$ with 90\% confidence level)
435: \cite{bib_argus}
436: and
437: CLEO (50 $\times$ $10^{-3}$ with 95\% confidence level)
438: \cite{bib_cleo},
439: which are about one order of magnitude above
440: the prediction \cite{bib_BobMcElrath_invisble_upsilon}.
441:
442: In this letter, we present the result of a search for
443: the invisible decay of the $\Upsilon(1S)$.
444: The data sample used consists of
445: $2.9\,{\rm fb}^{-1}$ collected on the $\Upsilon(3S)$ resonance
446: (11 $\times$ $10^6$ $\Upsilon(3S)$)
447: with the Belle detector~\cite{Belle}
448: at the KEKB asymmetric-energy
449: $e^+e^-$ (3.4 on 7.8~GeV on $\Upsilon(3S)$) collider~\cite{KEKB}.
450: The Belle detector is a large-solid-angle magnetic
451: spectrometer that
452: consists of
453: a silicon vertex detector,
454: a central drift chamber (CDC), an array of
455: aerogel threshold \v{C}erenkov counters (ACC),
456: a barrel-like arrangement of time-of-flight
457: scintillation counters (TOF), and an electromagnetic calorimeter
458: comprised of CsI(Tl) crystals (ECL) located inside
459: a superconducting solenoid coil that provides a 1.5~T
460: magnetic field. An iron flux-return located outside
461: the coil is instrumented to detect $K_L^0$ mesons and to identify
462: muons (KLM).
463:
464: For this search, we use the $\Upsilon(3S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon(1S)$
465: decay where only the cascade $\pi^+ \pi^-$ pair is detected.
466: If an $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay into an invisible final state does occur,
467: it would appear as a peak at the $\Upsilon(1S)$ mass (9.46
468: GeV/$c^2$) in the distribution of recoil mass against the
469: $\pi^+ \pi^-$ system
470: ($M_{\pi^+\pi^-}^{\rm recoil}$)
471: without any detected decay products from the $\Upsilon(1S)$.
472: To provide a clean sample of $\Upsilon(1S)$ decays,
473: we choose to run at the $\Upsilon(3S)$ resonance.
474: Although the
475: $\Upsilon(2S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon(1S)$
476: branching fraction is about four times larger,
477: the low energy of the cascade pions results in a low trigger efficiency.
478: The effective cross section on the
479: $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance,
480: $\sigma(e^+e^- \to \Upsilon(4S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon(1S))$,
481: is much smaller than that at the $\Upsilon(3S)$
482: resonance ($\sim$ 1/1,000 \cite{bib_4spipi}).
483: To understand the reconstruction efficiency,
484: it is essential to check that our Monte Carlo (MC) simulation reproduces well
485: the properties of the $\Upsilon(3S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon(1S)$ transition.
486: This is confirmed by using a control sample,
487: $\Upsilon(3S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon(1S)$
488: followed by
489: $\Upsilon(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$.
490:
491: In our trigger system~\cite{bib_trigger}, a charged track is
492: required to have hits
493: in more than half the layers of the CDC.
494: Tracks that reach the outermost layer of the CDC are
495: called ``long tracks''.
496: To suppress beam-induced background events,
497: the trigger system requires
498: two or more charged tracks in an event,
499: and at least one of them should be a long track.
500: The trigger system also requires that the opening angle of the
501: two tracks in the transverse plane be larger than a certain
502: value for the purpose of identifying tracks being different
503: particles.
504: Careful evaluation of the trigger efficiency is important for this analysis.
505: The signal events contain only two charged tracks with relatively small
506: transverse momentum ($p_t$);
507: the available energy for the signal is 0.89 GeV,
508: which is shared between the two pions.
509: To evaluate the trigger efficiency,
510: we took
511: 1.7 ${\rm fb}^{-1}$
512: of data with a trigger condition that required
513: a single long track in an event with a 1/500 pre-scale rate.
514:
515: Charged tracks that are reconstructed in the CDC are required to
516: originate from the interaction point:
517: the nearest approach of the trajectory to the collision point is
518: required to satisfy $dr$ $<$ 1 cm and $|dz|$ $<$ 3 cm,
519: where $dz$ is measured along the direction opposite to the positron beam
520: and $dr$ in the plane perpendicular to it.
521: We also require that the polar angle of the reconstructed track be within the detector acceptance,
522: $17^{\circ}$ $<$ $\theta$ $<$ $150^{\circ}$.
523: Charged kaons are distinguished from pions
524: based on TOF, ACC and CDC $dE/dx$ measurements.
525: Electron candidates are identified based on the ratio of the energy
526: detected in the ECL to the track momentum, the ECL shower shape, the
527: energy loss in the CDC and the response of the ACC.
528: Identification of muons is based on track
529: penetration depth and the hit pattern in the KLM system.
530:
531: To reconstruct events for the control sample,
532: we require four charged tracks in an event,
533: $\mu^+$, $\mu^-$, $\pi^+$, and $\pi^-$.
534: The $\Upsilon(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$ candidates are selected
535: by requiring 9.2 GeV/$c^2$ $<$ $M_{\mu^+\mu^-}$ $<$ 9.7 GeV/$c^2$
536: with muon identification for both tracks.
537: For the pions, we reject tracks that are positively identified as
538: electrons or muons.
539: Figure \ref{fig_upsilon_1s_mumu_dmassfit_dat} shows the distribution of
540: the mass difference
541: $\Delta M$ = $M_{\mu^+\mu^-\pi^+\pi^-}-M_{\mu^+\mu^-}$.
542: The signal yield in the control sample is extracted from
543: an unbinned maximum likelihood fit in $\Delta M$.
544: The signal shape is modeled with a triple Gaussian
545: while
546: the background shape is modeled with a first order polynomial
547: whose slope is floated in the fit.
548: We obtain 4902 $\pm$ 71 (87 $\pm$ 15) signal (background) events
549: in the range of 0.65 GeV/$c^2$ $<$ $\Delta M$ $<$ 1.15 GeV/$c^2$.
550: Using a detection efficiency of 39.7\% for the control sample,
551: which is determined from MC calculations,
552: we estimate that
553: 498 $\times$ $10^3$
554: $\Upsilon(3S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon(1S)$
555: decays are present in our data set.
556: We compare properties of the
557: $\Upsilon(3S) \to \pi^+\pi^- \Upsilon(1S)$
558: decay with MC
559: using events in the region of
560: 0.875 GeV/$c^2$ $<$ $\Delta M$ $<$ 0.910 GeV/$c^2$,
561: where the signal purity is 99.9\%.
562: The distribution of $\pi^+\pi^-$ invariant masses,
563: $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}$ is
564: well reproduced by the MC as shown in Fig. \ref{fig_upsilon_1s_mumu_mpipi},
565: and the shape is
566: consistent with CLEO results \cite{bib_CLEO_3S_property}
567: and theoretical models \cite{bib_Mooxhay}.
568: We also confirm that the MC reproduces well the distributions for other
569: variables in the data such as
570: $p_t$ of pion tracks,
571: the opening angle of the pions in the transverse plane ($\varphi_{\pi\pi}$),
572: the transverse momentum of the $\pi^+\pi^-$ system ($p_t^{\pi\pi}$),
573: the polar angle of the $\pi^+\pi^-$ system ($\cos \theta_{\pi\pi}$),
574: and the polar angle of the muons.
575:
576: \begin{figure}[t]
577: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig1.eps}
578: \caption{
579: Mass difference
580: $\Delta M$ = $M_{\mu^+\mu^-\pi^+\pi^-}-M_{\mu^+\mu^-}$
581: distribution where
582: $M_{\mu^+\mu^-}$ lies in the $\Upsilon(1S)$ mass region.
583: The solid curve shows the fits to signal plus background distribution.
584: }
585: \label{fig_upsilon_1s_mumu_dmassfit_dat}
586: \end{figure}
587: \begin{figure}[t]
588: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig2.eps}
589: \caption{
590: Invariant mass distribution of the two cascade pions for the
591: $\Upsilon(3S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon(1S)$,
592: $\Upsilon(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$ cascade decay candidates.
593: The open histogram shows the same distribution for MC events.
594: }
595: \label{fig_upsilon_1s_mumu_mpipi}
596: \end{figure}
597:
598: For the selection of the invisible decay candidates,
599: we require two oppositely charged tracks in the event,
600: i.e.\ $\pi^+\pi^-$ tracks.
601: The total visible energy in the ECL is required to be less than 3 GeV
602: to reject $\Upsilon(1S)$ decays into
603: final states consisting of neutral particles.
604: To minimize any possible trigger bias,
605: we require $\varphi_{\pi\pi}$ $>$ $30^{\circ}$, $p_t$ $>$ 0.17 GeV/$c$ for the tracks,
606: and $p_t$ $>$ 0.30 GeV/$c$ for at least one of the tracks.
607: Most combinatorial background is from the two-photon
608: processes
609: $e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- X$,
610: where the incident $e^+$ and $e^-$ escape detection
611: and $X \to \pi^+\pi^-, \mu^+\mu^-, \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ or other states.
612: We reject tracks that are positively identified as
613: electrons, muons or kaons.
614: We require that
615: no $\pi^0$ candidates are observed
616: in the event;
617: we form $\pi^0$ candidates using pairs of photons
618: having energies greater than 20 MeV,
619: and requiring a pair invariant mass within
620: $\pm16$ MeV/$c^2$ ($\sim3\sigma$) of the $\pi^0$ mass.
621: Events from two-photon process are typically boosted along the beam
622: direction so that the vector $p_t$ sum tends to be small.
623: For further background suppression,
624: a Fisher discriminant variable ${\cal F}$ is constructed with the
625: linear combination of $|\cos\theta_{\pi\pi}|$, $p_t^{\pi\pi}$
626: and the maximum energy of the $\gamma$ candidates in the event
627: ($E_{\gamma}^{\rm max}$),
628: ${\cal F} = 0.87 \times |\cos\theta_{\pi\pi}|
629: -2.4 \times p_t^{\pi\pi}
630: + 1.43 \times E_{\gamma}^{\rm max}
631: $,
632: where coefficients
633: are optimized by using MC signal events
634: and background events in the $\pi^+\pi^-$ recoil mass sideband
635: (9.42 GeV/$c^2$ $<$ $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}^{\rm recoil}$ $<$ 9.44 GeV/$c^2$ or
636: 9.48 GeV/$c^2$ $<$ $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}^{\rm recoil}$ $<$ 9.50 GeV/$c^2$).
637: We require ${\cal F}$ $<$ $-$0.7;
638: this requirement is determined using the figure-of-merit, $S/\sqrt{B}$,
639: where $S$ is the number of signal events in MC
640: and $B$ is the number of background events
641: as mentioned above.
642: The overall detection efficiency,
643: which is the product of
644: the event reconstruction efficiency (9.1\%)
645: and
646: the trigger efficiency (89.8\%),
647: is 8.2\%;
648: thus we expect
649: 244 signal events in our data sample for
650: ${\cal B}(\Upsilon(1S) \to \chi \chi)$ = 6 $\times$
651: $10^{-3}$.
652: The event reconstruction efficiency
653: is obtained from MC.
654:
655: We estimate the trigger efficiency for signal events by
656: selecting two pion candidates
657: in the single track trigger data
658: under the same condition as for the signal.
659: We examine the trigger bits that are activated in each of the selected events.
660: The track-finding efficiency of the trigger system
661: is the ratio of number of signal candidates
662: that satisfy
663: the two-track trigger requirement to
664: those that satisfy
665: the single track trigger requirement.
666: We evaluate the track-finding efficiency as a function of $p_t$
667: requiring a large opening angle
668: $\varphi_{\pi\pi}$ $>$ $70^{\circ}$
669: (the possible bias for two-track separation is negligible in this case).
670: The efficiency for finding the long track is evaluated
671: with a further requirement that both tracks are long tracks.
672: The efficiency of the long track finding is 97.1\% for $p_t$ $>$ 0.30 GeV/$c$.
673: We also evaluate the two-track separation efficiency as a function
674: of $\varphi_{\pi\pi}$, where we require $p_t$ $>$ 0.30 GeV/$c$ for
675: the long track and $p_t$ $>$ 0.17 GeV/$c$ for the other track.
676: The efficiency for the $\varphi_{\pi\pi}$ $>$ $30^{\circ}$ requirement is 92.5\%.
677: The detection efficiency for the two-pion signal in the trigger system,
678: which is the product of 97.1\% and 92.5\%, is 89.8\%.
679:
680: The systematic uncertainties are summarized in
681: Table \ref{table_syst}.
682: The uncertainty related to the track selection
683: is estimated from the difference of the
684: signal yield in
685: data and MC for the control sample
686: when the $dr$, $dz$, particle identification
687: and other requirements are varied.
688: The error for the $\pi^0$ veto, Fisher discriminant, and other
689: requirements are also estimated in a similar way.
690: Uncertainties associated with the modeling of the
691: $\Upsilon(3S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon(1S)$ decay process are estimated
692: by distorting the $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}$ distribution within the statistical error;
693: possible differences in other distributions are also considered.
694: The error for the trigger efficiency is obtained from the quadratic sum
695: of uncertainties for the track-finding efficiency and
696: the two-track separation efficiency.
697: They are conservatively assigned as
698: the differences from 100\% efficiencies.
699: Various deviations are evaluated by changing the minimum $p_t$ criteria or
700: polar angle dependences.
701: They are negligibly small.
702:
703: \begin{table}[t]
704: \caption{Systematic uncertainties for
705: ${\cal B}( \Upsilon(1S) \to {\rm invisible} )$
706: except for that from peaking background.
707: }
708: \label{table_syst}
709: \begin{tabular}
710: {@{\hspace{0.5cm}}l@{\hspace{0.5cm}} @{\hspace{0.5cm}}r@{\hspace{0.5cm}}}
711: \hline \hline
712: Source & (\%) \\
713: \hline
714: Track selection & 5.6 \\
715: $\pi^0$ veto & 2.4 \\
716: Fisher discriminant & 6.1 \\
717: Other selection requirements & 1.1 \\
718: $\Upsilon(3S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon(1S)$
719: & 7.6 \\
720: Trigger efficiency & 8.7 \\
721: Fit bias & 0.2 \\
722: Statistics of control sample & 1.4 \\
723: ${\cal B}(\Upsilon \to \mu^+\mu^-)$ & 2.0 \\
724: \hline
725: Total & 14.7 \\
726: \hline \hline
727: \end{tabular}
728: \end{table}
729:
730: \begin{table}[b]
731: \caption{
732: Expected number of peaking background events.
733: }
734: \label{table_pbkg}
735: \begin{tabular}
736: {@{\hspace{0.5cm}}l@{\hspace{0.5cm}} @{\hspace{0.5cm}}r c r@{\hspace{0.5cm}}}
737: \hline \hline
738: $\Upsilon(1S) \to \nu\bar{\nu}$ & 0.4 & $\pm$ & 0.1 \\
739: $\Upsilon(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$ & 77.3 & $\pm$ & 12.0 \\
740: $\Upsilon(1S) \to e^+e^-$ & 50.3 & $\pm$ & 8.2 \\
741: $\Upsilon(1S) \to \tau^+\tau^-$ & 5.2 & $\pm$ & 1.0 \\
742: Other $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay modes & 0.0 & $+$ & 2.8 \\
743: Other possible contributions & 0.0 & $+$ & 12.9 \\
744: \hline
745: Total & 133.2 & & $^{+19.7}_{-14.6}$\\
746: \hline \hline
747: \end{tabular}
748: \end{table}
749:
750:
751: For those cases where all of the $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay products go outside
752: of the detector acceptance, the $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}^{\rm recoil}$
753: distribution still peaks at the $\Upsilon(1S)$ mass and becomes
754: a background to the invisible decay signal.
755: The largest sources of this ``peaking background''
756: are from decays to oppositely charged pairs such as
757: $\Upsilon(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$
758: or
759: $e^+e^-$,
760: where the two tracks tend to be back-to-back, so that
761: when one track escapes into the forward acceptance hole,
762: the other track tends to escape into the backward acceptance hole.
763: The estimated contributions from different decay modes, based on MC,
764: are summarized in
765: Table \ref{table_pbkg}.
766: The total number of peaking background events is
767: 133.2 $^{+19.7}_{-14.6}$,
768: where both statistical and systematic errors are included.
769:
770: The systematic errors for the peaking background estimation can come
771: from uncertainties in the detection efficiency, branching fractions,
772: MC statistics and the track-finding efficiency for the tracks from the
773: $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay.
774: For the contribution from the track-finding efficiency,
775: we evaluate the polar angle dependence of the track-finding efficiency
776: by using the control sample data.
777: Even if we select only one muon and two pions,
778: we can calculate the momentum of the other muon track.
779: We compare the data and corresponding MC.
780: The amount of the peaking background differs by 3.5\% between data and MC.
781: The peaking background due to
782: $\Upsilon(1S) \to e^+e^-$
783: is somewhat lower
784: than that due to
785: $\Upsilon(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$.
786: This is due to the fact that the polar angle acceptance of the
787: ECL ($12.4^{\circ}$ -- $155.1^{\circ}$)
788: is larger than that of the CDC ($17.0^{\circ}$ -- $150.0^{\circ}$)
789: and
790: large ECL energy deposits from an electrons can
791: be present in the event,
792: and can veto the event.
793: Other two-body decays, such as
794: $\Upsilon(1S) \to \pi^+\pi^-$
795: and
796: $p\bar{p}$,
797: are not observed,
798: and their contributions are included systematic error
799: using upper limits from the PDG \cite{bib_PDG}.
800: We do not observe any background contribution
801: in MC for other
802: $\Upsilon(1S)$,
803: $\Upsilon(3S)$ decays,
804: or modes
805: originating from initial state radiation.
806: The upper limits corresponding to MC statistics
807: are assigned as uncertainties.
808:
809: The signal extraction is performed by an unbinned extended maximum
810: likelihood fit to the $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}^{\rm recoil}$
811: distribution in the range
812: 9.40 GeV/$c^2$ $<$ $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}^{\rm recoil}$ $<$ 9.52 GeV/$c^2$.
813: The signal shape is modeled with a double Gaussian
814: that is calibrated using the control sample
815: shown in Fig. \ref{fig_invisiblefit_upsmumu}.
816: In the fit, the amount of peaking background is fixed at the estimated
817: value and the same shape as the signal is used.
818: The shape of the combinatorial background
819: is modeled with a first order polynomial
820: whose slope is floated.
821: Figure \ref{fig_invisiblefit_result} shows the
822: $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}^{\rm recoil}$ distribution.
823: The extracted signal yield,
824: $38 \pm 39$ events,
825: is consistent with zero observed events.
826: A $\chi^2$ test is performed for the $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}^{\rm recoil}$
827: distribution; we obtain $\chi^2/ndf$ = 23.4/27.
828: The upper limit for the branching fraction is determined
829: by the Feldman-Cousins frequentist approach \cite{bib_FeldmanCousins},
830: taking into account both statistical and systematic uncertainties.
831: We obtain
832: ${\cal B}( \Upsilon(1S) \to {\rm invisible} )$
833: $<$ 2.5 $\times$ $10^{-3}$ at the 90\% confidence level.
834:
835: \begin{figure}[t]
836: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig3.eps}
837: \caption{
838: $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}^{\rm recoil}$ distribution for
839: the control sample
840: $\Upsilon(3S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon(1S)$,
841: $\Upsilon(1S) \to \mu^+\mu^-$ decay candidates.
842: The solid curve shows the fit results.
843: }
844: \label{fig_invisiblefit_upsmumu}
845: \end{figure}
846:
847: \begin{figure}[t]
848: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig4.eps}
849: \caption{
850: Recoil mass distribution against two pions, $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}^{\rm recoil}$.
851: The solid curve shows the result of the fit to signal plus background distributions,
852: shaded area shows the total background contribution,
853: dashed line shows the combinatorial background contribution,
854: and the dot-dashed line shows the expected signal for
855: ${\cal B}(\Upsilon(1S) \to \chi \chi) = 6 \times 10^{-3}$.
856: }
857: \label{fig_invisiblefit_result}
858: \end{figure}
859:
860:
861: In summary,
862: a search for the invisible decay of the $\Upsilon(1S)$ was performed
863: via the $\Upsilon(3S) \to \pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon(1S)$ transition.
864: In a $2.9\,{\rm fb}^{-1}$ data sample taken at the $\Upsilon(3S)$ resonance,
865: no signals were found.
866: We obtain an upper limit of
867: 2.5 $\times$ $10^{-3}$ at the 90\% confidence level
868: for ${\cal B} (\Upsilon(1S) \to {\rm invisible})$.
869: This result disfavors the prediction
870: in Ref.~\cite{bib_BobMcElrath_invisble_upsilon}
871: for the $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay to a pair
872: of dark matter particles that are lighter than the $b$ quark.
873:
874: We thank the KEKB group for excellent operation of the
875: accelerator, the KEK cryogenics group for efficient solenoid
876: operations, and the KEK computer group and
877: the NII for valuable computing and Super-SINET network
878: support. We acknowledge support from MEXT and JSPS (Japan);
879: ARC and DEST (Australia); NSFC and KIP of CAS (China);
880: DST (India); MOEHRD, KOSEF and KRF (Korea);
881: KBN (Poland); MIST (Russia); ARRS (Slovenia); SNSF (Switzerland);
882: NSC and MOE (Taiwan); and DOE (USA).
883:
884:
885: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
886: \bibitem{bib_dm_evidence}
887: For a review, see
888: G.~Bertone, D.~Hooper and J.~Silk,
889: Phys. Rept. {\bf 405}, 279 (2005).
890: \bibitem{bib_upsilon2nunubar}
891: L.N.~Chang, O.~Lebedev, and J.N.~Ng, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 441},
892: 419 (1998).
893: \bibitem{bib_BobMcElrath_invisble_upsilon}
894: B.~McElrath, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 72}, 103508 (2005);
895: we quote the corrected branching fraction value, $6 \times 10^{-3}$,
896: from the private communication with the author.
897: \bibitem{bib_argus}
898: ARGUS Collaboration, H.~Albrecht {\it et al.},
899: Phys. Lett. {\bf B 179} 403 (1986).
900:
901: \bibitem{bib_cleo}
902: CLEO Collaboration, D.~Besson {\it et al.},
903: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 30}, 1433 (1984).
904:
905: \bibitem{Belle}
906: Belle Collaboration, A.~Abashian {\it et al.},
907: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A {\bf 479}, 117 (2002).
908:
909: \bibitem{KEKB}
910: S.~Kurokawa and E.~Kikutani, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A {\bf 499}, 1 (2003),
911: and other papers included in this Volume.
912:
913: \bibitem{bib_4spipi}
914: BaBar Collaboration, B.~Aubert {\it et al.},
915: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 96}, 232001 (2006).
916:
917:
918: \bibitem{bib_trigger}
919: Y.~Ushiroda {\it et al.},
920: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A {\bf 438} 460 (1999).
921:
922: \bibitem{bib_CLEO_3S_property}
923: CLEO Collaboration,
924: F.~Butler {\it et al.},
925: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 49}, 40 (1994).
926:
927: \bibitem{bib_Mooxhay}
928: P.~Moxhay, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 39}, 3497 (1989).
929: \bibitem{bib_PDG}
930: W.-M.~Yao {\it et al.} (Particle Data Group),
931: J. Phys. G {\bf 33}, 1 (2006).
932:
933: \bibitem{bib_FeldmanCousins}
934: G.~J.~Feldman and R.~D.~Cousins, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57}, 3873
935: (1998).
936:
937: \end{thebibliography}
938:
939: \end{document}
940: