1: \section{1S Scheme Analysis}
2:
3: \subsection{Theoretical input}
4:
5: The inclusive spectral moments of $B\to X_c\ell\nu$ decays have been
6: derived in the 1S scheme up to
7: $\mathcal{O}(1/m_b^3)$~\cite{Bauer:2004ve}. The theoretical
8: expressions for the truncated moments have the following form (where
9: $\langle X\rangle_{E_\mathrm{min}}$ represents any of the experimental
10: observables):
11: \begin{equation}
12: \begin{split}
13: \langle X\rangle_{E_\mathrm{min}} =
14: X^{(1)}+X^{(2)}\Lambda+X^{(3)}\Lambda^2+X^{(4)}\Lambda^3+X^{(5)}\lambda_1+X^{(6)}\Lambda\lambda_1+X^{(7)}\lambda_2+X^{(8)}\Lambda\lambda_2+X^{(9)}\rho_1\\+X^{(10)}\rho_2+X^{(11)}\tau_1+X^{(12)}\tau_2+X^{(13)}\tau_3+X^{(14)}\tau_4+X^{(15)}\varepsilon+X^{(16)}\varepsilon^2_{\rm{BLM}}+X^{(17)}\varepsilon\Lambda~.
15: \end{split} \label{eq:1}
16: \end{equation}
17: The coefficients $X^{(k)}$, determined by theory, are functions of
18: $E_\mathrm{min}$. The non-perturbative corrections are parametrized by
19: $\Lambda$ ($\mathcal{O}(m_b)$), $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$
20: ($\mathcal{O}(1/m_b^2)$), and $\tau_1$, $\tau_2$, $\tau_3$, $\tau_4$,
21: $\rho_1$ and $\rho_2$ ($\mathcal{O}(1/m_b^3)$).
22:
23: Predictions for the partial branching fractions are obtained using the
24: following expression,
25: \begin{equation}
26: \mathcal{B}(B\to X_c\ell\nu)_{E_\mathrm{min}}=\langle
27: X\rangle_{\mathcal{B},E_\mathrm{min}}\frac{\eta_{QED}|V_{cb}|^2G_F^2m^5}{192\pi^3\tau_B}~,
28: \end{equation}
29: where $\langle X\rangle_{\mathcal{B},E_\mathrm{min}}$ is an expression
30: of the form of Eq.~\ref{eq:1}, $m$ is the 1S reference mass,
31: $m=m_{\Upsilon(1S)}/2$, $\eta_{QED}=1.007$, and $G_F^2
32: m^5/(192\pi^3)=5.4\times 10^{-11}$.
33:
34: In this analysis, we determine a total of seven parameters:
35: $|V_{cb}|$, $\Lambda$, $\lambda_1$, $\tau_1$, $\tau_2$, $\tau_3$ and
36: $\rho_1$. One of the higher order parameters, $\tau_4$ is set to zero
37: , and from available constraints, {\it e.g.} $B^*-B$~mass splitting, the remaining
38: parameters in Eq.~\ref{eq:1} are set to:
39: $\lambda_2=0.1227-0.0145\lambda_1$ and
40: $\rho_2=0.1361+\tau_2$, following advice from Ref.~\cite{Bauer:2004ve}. The parameter~$\Lambda$ is the difference
41: between the $b$-quark mass and the reference value about which it is
42: expanded, {\it i.e.}, $\Lambda=m_{\Upsilon(1S)}/2-m_b^{1S}$. We will
43: present our results in terms of $m_b^{1S}$ in place of $\Lambda$.
44:
45: \subsection{\boldmath The $\chi^2$~function}
46:
47: The fit takes into account both experimental and theoretical
48: uncertainties. Following the approach in Ref.~\cite{Bauer:2004ve}, an
49: element of the combined experimental and theoretical error matrix is
50: given by
51: \begin{equation}
52: \sigma_{ij}^2=\sigma_i \sigma_j c_{ij},
53: \end{equation}
54: where $i$ and $j$ denote the observables and $c_{ij}$ is the
55: experimental correlation matrix element. The total error on the
56: observable~$i$ is defined as
57: \begin{eqnarray}
58: \sigma_i = \sqrt{(\sigma_i^{\rm{exp}})^2 + (A f_n m_B^{2n})^2 +
59: (B_i/2)^2} \mbox{ for the $n$th hadron moment~,}\\
60: \sigma_i = \sqrt{(\sigma_i^{\rm{exp}})^2 + (A f_n (m_B/2)^n)^2 +
61: (B_i/2)^2} \mbox{ for the $n$th lepton moment~,}\\
62: \sigma_i = \sqrt{(\sigma_i^{\rm{exp}})^2 + (A f_n (m_B/2)^n)^2 +
63: (B_i/2)^2} \mbox{ for the $n$th photon moment~,}
64: \end{eqnarray}
65: and $f_0=f_1=1$, $f_2=1/4$ and $f_3=1/(6\sqrt{3})$. Here,
66: $\sigma_i^{\rm{exp}}$ are the experimental errors, $B_i=X^{(16)}$ are
67: the coefficients of the last computed terms in the perturbation series
68: (providing the error on the uncalculated higher order perturbative
69: terms). The dimensionless parameter $A$ contains various theoretical errors (uncalculated
70: power corrections, uncalculated effects of order
71: $(\alpha_s/4\pi)\Lambda_{\rm{QCD}}^2/m_b^2$, and effects not included
72: in the OPE, {\it i.e.}, duality violation), and is multiplied by dimensionful
73: quantities. We fix $A=0.001$ as in Ref.~\cite{Bauer:2004ve}. For $B\to X_s\gamma$, the accessible phase space is
74: limited, and the theoretical extraction of $m_b$ is affected by shape
75: function effects. So, $A$ is multiplied by the ratio of the difference
76: from the end point relative to $E_\mathrm{min}=1.8$~GeV.
77:
78: As the fit does not provide strong constraints on the
79: $\mathcal{O}(1/m_b^3)$~parameters, it is necessary to provide
80: constraints to ensure their convergence to sensible values. We achieve
81: this by introducing extra terms in the $\chi^2$~function of the fit,
82: \begin{equation}
83: \chi^2_{\rm{param}}(m_\chi,M_\chi)=
84: \begin{cases}
85: 0 & |\mathcal{O}| \le m_\chi^3~,\\
86: \left(|\langle\mathcal{O}\rangle|-m_\chi^3\right)^2/M_\chi^6 &
87: |\mathcal{O}|>m_\chi^3~,
88: \end{cases}
89: \end{equation}
90: where ($m_\chi$,$M_\chi$) are both quantities of order
91: $\Lambda_{\rm{QCD}}$, and $\langle\mathcal{O}\rangle$ represents any
92: $\mathcal{O}(1/m_b^3)$~parameters. In the fit, we take
93: $M_\chi=m_\chi=500$~MeV after Ref.~\cite{Bauer:2004ve}. The parameter $m_\chi$ may have a value anywhere
94: between 500~MeV and 1~GeV.
95:
96: The overall form of the $\chi^2$~function used in the 1S~fit is
97: \begin{equation}
98: \chi^2 = \sum_{i,j} (\langle X\rangle_i^\mathrm{meas.}-\langle
99: X\rangle_i^\mathrm{1S})\mathrm{cov}^{-1}_{ij}(\langle
100: X\rangle_j^\mathrm{meas.}-\langle X\rangle_j^\mathrm{1S})+
101: \sum_{i=1}^2\chi^2_{\rho_i}+\sum_{i=1}^3\chi^2_{\tau_i}~,
102: \label{eq:2}
103: \end{equation}
104: where $\langle X\rangle_i^\mathrm{meas.}$ are the measured moments and $\langle
105: X\rangle_i^\mathrm{1S}$ are the corresponding 1S~scheme predictions.
106:
107: \subsection{Fit results and discussion}
108:
109: Minimizing the $\chi^2$~function in Eq.~\ref{eq:2} using
110: MINUIT~\cite{James:1975dr}, we find the following results for the fit
111: parameters,
112: \begin{eqnarray*}
113: |V_{cb}| & = & (41. 49\pm 0.52_\mathrm{fit}\pm 0.20_{\tau_B})\times
114: 10^{-3}~,\\
115: m_b^\mathrm{1S} & = & (4.729\pm 0.048)~\mathrm{GeV}~,{\rm~and}\\
116: \lambda_1 & = & (-0.30\pm 0.04)~\mathrm{GeV}^2~.
117: \end{eqnarray*}
118: The first error is the uncertainty from the fit including experimental and
119: theory errors, and the second error (on $|V_{cb}|$ only) is due to the
120: uncertainty on the average $B$~lifetime. The correlations between
121: these fit parameters are provided in Table~\ref{tab:2}. Using the
122: measurement of the partial branching fraction at
123: $E_\mathrm{min}=0.6$~GeV, we obtain for the semileptonic branching
124: ratio (over the full lepton energy range),
125: \begin{equation*}
126: {\mathcal B}(B\to X_c\ell\nu)=(10.62\pm 0.25)\%~.
127: \end{equation*}
128: The measured moments compared to the 1S~scheme predictions are shown
129: in Figs.~\ref{fig:1} and \ref{fig:2}.
130: \begin{table}
131: \begin{center}
132: \begin{tabular}{c@{\extracolsep{.1cm}}ccc}
133: \hline \hline
134: \rule[-1.3ex]{0pt}{4ex} & $|V_{cb}|$ & $m_b^\mathrm{1S}$ &
135: $\lambda_1$\\
136: \hline
137: \rule{0pt}{2.7ex}$|V_{cb}|$ & 1.000& $-0.539$ & $-0.330$\\
138: $m_b^\mathrm{1S}$ & & $1.000$ & $0.871$\\
139: \rule[-1.3ex]{0pt}{1.3ex}$\lambda_1$ & & & 1.000\\
140: \hline \hline
141: \end{tabular}
142: \end{center}
143: \caption{Correlation coefficients of the parameters in the 1S~fit.}
144: \label{tab:2}
145: \end{table}
146: \begin{figure}
147: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig1a.eps}
148: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig1b.eps}\\
149: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig1c.eps}
150: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig1d.eps}\\
151: \caption{Fit results to the electron energy spectrum moments. The
152: yellow band represents the fit error, and the red band gives the
153: theory and fit errors combined. Filled circles represent data points
154: used in the fit, and open circles are points not used in the fit.}
155: \label{fig:1}
156: \end{figure}
157: \begin{figure}
158: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig2a.eps}
159: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig2b.eps}\\
160: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig2c.eps}
161: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig2d.eps}\\
162: \caption{Fit results to the hadron invariant mass squared and photon
163: energy spectrum moments. The yellow band represents the fit
164: error, and the red band gives the theory and fit errors
165: combined. Filled circles represent data points used in the fit,
166: and open circles are points not used in the fit.} \label{fig:2}
167: \end{figure}
168:
169: We assess the stability of the fit in two ways
170: (Table~\ref{tab:3}): by repeating the fit only to $B\to
171: X_c\ell\nu$~data (21 measurements), (a) to (c); and by releasing the
172: $m_\chi$~constraint on the higher order parameters, (c) and (f). To study the effect of the estimated theoretical uncertainties, we repeat the fit with all theoretical uncertainties set to zero; (b) and (e). All studies give consistent results with acceptable values of $\chi^2/\mathrm{ndf}$. Figure~\ref{fig:3} shows the contour plots for the fits
173: corresponding to Table~\ref{tab:3}(a) ($B\to X_c\ell\nu$~data only) and
174: \ref{tab:3}(d) (full fit).
175: \begin{table}
176: \begin{center}
177: \begin{tabular}{c@{\extracolsep{.1cm}}lcccccc}
178: \hline \hline
179: \rule[-1.3ex]{0pt}{4ex} & Data used & $m_\chi$ &
180: $\sigma^2_\mathrm{theory}$ & $\chi^2/\mathrm{ndf.}$ &
181: $|V_{cb}|\times 10^3$ & $m_b^\mathrm{1S}$ (GeV)& $\lambda_1$ (GeV$^2$)\\
182: \hline
183: \rule[-1.3ex]{0pt}{4ex}(a) & $E_{e(0,1,2,3)}$, $M^2_{X(1,2)}$ &
184: 0.5 & yes & 4.9/13 & $41.52\pm 0.77$ & $4.723\pm 0.103$ &
185: $-0.307\pm 0.083$\\
186: \hline
187: \rule[-1.3ex]{0pt}{4ex}(b) & $E_{e(0,1,2,3)}$, $M^2_{X(1,2)}$ &
188: 0.5 & no & 9.4/13 & $41.64\pm 0.58$ & $4.655\pm 0.075$ &
189: $-0.348\pm 0.052$\\
190: \hline
191: \rule[-1.3ex]{0pt}{4ex}(c) & $E_{e(0,1,2,3)}$, $M^2_{X(1,2)}$ &
192: 0.8 & yes & 1.9/13 & $42.82\pm 1.09$ & $4.588\pm 0.118$ &
193: $-0.505\pm 0.271$\\
194: \hline
195: \rule[-1.3ex]{0pt}{4ex}(d) & $E_{e(0,1,2,3)}$,
196: $E_{\gamma(1,2)}$, $M^2_{X(1,2)}$ & 0.5 & yes & 5.7/17 &
197: $41.49\pm 0.52$ & $4.729\pm 0.048$ & $-0.302\pm 0.043$\\
198: \hline
199: \rule[-1.3ex]{0pt}{4ex}(e) & $E_{e(0,1,2,3)}$,
200: $E_{\gamma(1,2)}$, $M^2_{X(1,2)}$ & 0.5 & no & 10.8/17 &
201: $41.42\pm 0.45$ & $4.695\pm 0.046$ & $-0.321\pm 0.035$\\
202: \hline
203: \rule[-1.3ex]{0pt}{4ex}(f) & $E_{e(0,1,2,3)}$,
204: $E_{\gamma(1,2)}$, $M^2_{X(1,2)}$ & 0.8 & yes & 3.9/17 &
205: $42.19\pm 0.73$ & $ 4.709\pm 0.066$ & $-0.489\pm 0.087$\\
206: \hline\hline
207: \end{tabular}
208: \end{center}
209: \caption{Stability of the 1S~fit result. $\sigma^2_\mathrm{theory}$
210: refers to whether or not the theory error is included in the fit.}
211: \label{tab:3}
212: \end{table}
213: \begin{figure}
214: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig3a.eps}
215: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig3b.eps}
216: \caption{Fit results for $m_b^\mathrm{1S}$ and $\lambda_1$ on the left, and
217: $m_b^\mathrm{1S}$ and $|V_{cb}|$ on the right. The fit to the
218: $B\to X_c\ell\nu$~data only ($B\to X_c\ell\nu$ and $B\to
219: X_s\gamma$~data combined) is shown by a dashed blue line (solid
220: red line). The regions correspond to $\Delta\chi^2=1$.}
221: \label{fig:3}
222: \end{figure}
223: