1: \documentstyle[epsfig,epsf]{article}

2: \pretolerance=10000 \tolerance=10000 \hyphenpenalty=10000 \hbadness =10000

3: \textheight 234mm \textwidth 164mm

4: \topmargin -20mm  \oddsidemargin -2mm \evensidemargin 1mm

5: \newcommand{\ndt}{\noindent}

6: \newcommand{\Lpbar}{\hbox{{\it $\Lambda p$}\hskip-7.7pt/}}

7: \baselineskip=6truemm plus 2truemm minus 2truemm

8: \newcommand{\und}{\underline}

9: \newcommand{\pr}{\prime}

10: \newcommand{\ov}{\overline}

11: \newcommand{\cen}{\centerline}

12: 

13: \def\nmne {\nu_\mu \longleftrightarrow \nu_e}

14: \def\nmnt {\nu_\mu \longleftrightarrow \nu_\tau}

15: \def\nmns {\nu_\mu \longleftrightarrow \nu_{sterile}}

16: \def\ne {\nu_e}

17: \def\nm {\nu_\mu}

18: \def\nt {\nu_\tau}

19: \def\Dm2{\Delta m^2}

20: \def\s2t{\sin^2 2\theta}

21: \def\Dv{\Delta v}

22: \def\aprle{\buildrel < \over {_{\sim}}}

23: \def\aprge{\buildrel > \over {_{\sim}}}

24: \def\ll{\langle}

25: \def\rr{\rangle}

26: \def\ra{\rightarrow}

27: \def\lra{\leftrightarrow}

28: \def\be{\begin {equation}}

29: \def\ee{\end {equation}}

30: 

31: \begin{document}

32: 

33: \begin{center}

34: {\Large {\bf Summary of MACRO results on exotic physics}}

35: \end{center}

36: 

37: \vskip .7 cm

38: 

39: \begin{center}

40: Miriam Giorgini \par~\par

41: {\it Dept of Physics, Univ. of Bologna and INFN, \\

42: V.le C. Berti Pichat 6/2, Bologna, I-40127, Italy\\} 

43: 

44: E-mail: miriam.giorgini@bo.infn.it

45: 

46: \par~\par

47: Invited talk at Workshop on Exotic Physics with Neutrino Telescopes, \\ 

48: Uppsala, Sweden, September 2006.

49: 

50: \vskip .7 cm

51: {\large \bf Abstract}\par

52: \end{center}

53: 

54: 

55: {\small

56: MACRO was a multi-purpose experiment that took data from 1989 to 2000, at 

57: the underground Laboratory of Gran Sasso (Italy). MACRO gave important 

58: results/limits concerning: (i) the oscillation of atmospheric 

59: neutrinos, also in the non-conventional scenario of violations of 

60: Lorentz invariance, (ii) the searches for exotic particles (supermassive 

61: GUT magnetic monopoles, nuclearites, WIMPs), (iii) muon physics and 

62: astrophysics. A summary of the MACRO results will be presented and 

63: discussed, focusing the attention on the exotica searches.}

64: 

65: \vspace{5mm}

66: 

67: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}

68: MACRO was a large area multipurpose underground detector \cite{r1} 

69: designed to search for rare events and rare phenomena in the cosmic radiation.

70: The detector was located in Hall B of the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory 

71: (Italy). It was optimised to search for the supermassive magnetic monopoles 

72: \cite{mono,pdecay} predicted by Grand Unified Theories (GUT).

73: The experiment obtained important results on atmospheric neutrino oscillations 

74: \cite{high,low,sterile,scatt,ultimo} and performed neutrino astronomy studies 

75: \cite{nuastro}, indirect searches for WIMPs \cite{wimps},

76:  search for low energy stellar gravitational collapse neutrinos \cite{grcol}, 

77: studies of the high energy underground muon flux (which is an indirect tool 

78: to study the primary cosmic ray composition and high energy hadronic 

79: interactions \cite{cr}), searches for fractionally charged particles (LIPs) 

80: \cite{lips} and other rare particles that may exist in the cosmic radiation. 

81: 

82: The detector started data taking in 1989 and it was running until December 

83: 2000. The apparatus had global dimensions of $76.6 \times 12 \times 9.3$ 

84: m$^3$ and was composed of three sub-detectors: liquid scintillation counters, 

85: limited streamer tubes and nuclear track detectors. Each one of them could 

86: be used in ``stand-alone'' and in ``combined'' mode.

87: It may be worth to stress that all the physics and

88: astrophysics items listed in the 1984 proposal were covered and good results 

89: were obtained on each of them.

90: 

91: \section{Atmospheric neutrino oscillations}

92: \label{sec:nu-osc}

93: 

94: MACRO detected $\nm$-induced muon events in 4 different topologies. 

95: 

96: The {\it upthroughgoing muons} come from $\nm$ interactions in the rock below 

97: the detector; the $\nm$'s have a median energy of $\sim 50$ GeV.

98: 

99: Fig. \ref{fig:zenith} shows the zenith distribution of the measured 

100: 902 upthroughgoing muons (black circles) compared with two 

101: MonteCarlo (MC) predictions: the Bartol96 \cite{bartol} flux with and 

102: without oscillations (the dashed and solid lines, respectively) and the 

103: Honda2001 flux \cite{honda}. The FLUKA MC predictions \cite{fluka} agree 

104: perfectly with the Honda2001.  

105: 

106: For a subsample of $\sim 300$ upthroughgoing events, we estimated the muon 

107: energy through Multiple Coulomb Scattering in the rock absorbers in the

108: lower apparatus \cite{scatt}. The evaluated resolution on $E_\nu$ is 

109: $\sim 100 \%$. The parent neutrino path length is $L \sim 2 R_E \cos \Theta$, 

110: where $R_E$ is the Earth radius. Fig. \ref{fig:le} shows the 

111: ratio data/MC as a function of the estimated $L/E_\nu$ for the 

112: upthroughgoing muon sample. 

113: The black circles are data/Bartol96 MC (assuming no oscillations); the

114: solid line is the oscillated MC prediction for $\Dm2 = 2.3 \cdot 10^{-3}$ 

115: eV$^2$ and $\s2t_m =1$. The shaded region represents the simulation 

116: uncertainties. The last point (black square) is obtained

117: from semicontained upward going muons.

118: 

119: The low energy events ($IU$, $ID+UGS$ \cite{low}) are produced 

120: by parent $\nm$ interacting inside the lower detector, or by upgoing muons 

121: stopping in the detector. The median energy of the parent neutrino is 

122: $\sim 3-4$ GeV for all topologies. In both cases, the zenith distributions are 

123: in agreement with the oscillation prediction with the optimised parameters

124: \cite{ultimo}. 

125: 

126: In order to reduce the effects of systematic uncertainties in the MC 

127: absolute fluxes we used the following three independent ratios 

128: \cite{ultimo}:

129: \begin{enumerate}

130:         \item [(i)] High Energy data: vertical/horizontal ratio,

131:         $R_{1} = N_{vert}/N_{hor}$

132:         \item [(ii)] High Energy data: low energy/high energy ratio,

133:         $R_{2} = N_{low}/N_{high}$

134:         \item [(iii)] Low Energy data: 

135:         $R_{3} = (Data/MC)_{IU}/(Data/MC)_{ID+UGS}$

136: \end{enumerate}

137: Combining the three independent results, the no oscillation hypothesis 

138: is ruled out at the $\sim 5 \sigma$ level ($6 \sigma$ if the absolute 

139: values compared to the Bartol96 flux are used) \cite{trieste}. 

140: 

141: To evaluate the hypothesis of oscillation for different values of $\Dm2$ and 

142:  $\s2t_m$, the Feldman-Cousins \cite{fel_cou} procedure was used and the 

143: corresponding $90\%$ C.L. region for the $\nmnt$ oscillation is 

144: given in ref \cite{ultimo}. The best fit is reached at $\Dm2 = 

145: 2.3 \cdot 10^{-3}$ eV$^2$ and $\s2t_m = 1$.

146: 

147: \begin{figure*}[t]

148: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.4\linewidth}

149: \hspace{-1cm}

150: \epsfig{file=zenith.eps,width=7.3cm,height=6cm}

151: \caption{Comparison of the MACRO upward-throughgoing muons (black circles) 

152: with the predictions of the Bartol96 and of the Honda2001 MC oscillated 

153: and non oscillated fluxes (oscillation parameters $\Dm2 = 2.3 \cdot 10^{-3}$ 

154: eV$^2$ and $\s2t_m =1$).}

155: \label{fig:zenith}

156: \end{minipage}\hfill

157: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.55\linewidth}

158: \centering\epsfig{file=lsue.eps,width=\linewidth}

159: \caption{Ratio Data/MC$_{\mbox{no~osc}}$ 

160: as a function of the estimated $L/ E_\nu$ for the upthroughgoing muon 

161: sample (black points). The solid line is the MC expectation assuming 

162: $\Dm2 = 2.3 \cdot 10^{-3}$ eV$^2$ and $\s2t_m = 1$. The last point 

163: (black square) is obtained from the IU sample.}

164: \label{fig:le}

165: \end{minipage}

166: \end{figure*}

167: 

168: \subsection{Search for exotic contributions to atmospheric neutrino 

169: oscillations} \label{sec:lorentz}

170: 

171: MACRO searched for ``exotic'' contributions to standard mass-induced

172: atmospheric neutrino oscillations, arising from a possible violation of Lorentz

173: invariance (VLI) , using two different and complementary analyses. The first 

174: approach uses the low energy ($E_\nu < 28$ GeV) and the high energy 

175: ($E_\nu > 142$ GeV) samples. The mass neutrino

176: oscillation parameters have the values given in Sect. \ref{sec:nu-osc} and 

177:  we mapped the evolution of the $\chi^2$ estimator

178: in the plane of the VLI parameters $\Delta v$ and $\sin^2 2 \theta_v$. No

179: $\chi^2$ improvement was found, so we applied the Feldman-Cousins 

180: \cite{fel_cou} method to determine $90\%$ C.L. limits on the parameter:

181: $|\Delta v| < 3 \cdot 10^{-25}$ \cite{lorentz}.

182: 

183: The second approach exploits a data subsample

184: characterised by intermediate neutrino energies. It is based on the maximum

185: likelihood technique and 

186: considers the mass neutrino oscillation parameters varying in the $90\%$ C.L. 

187: border \cite{ultimo}. The obtained $90\%$ C.L. limit 

188: on the $\Delta v$ parameter is also around $10^{-25}$ \cite{praga} .

189: 

190: 

191: \section{\label{sec:nu-astrophysical} Neutrinos from astrophysical sources}

192: \subsection{\label{sec:HE} Search for astrophysical HE muon neutrinos}  

193: High energy $\nm$'s are expected to come from several galactic 

194: and extra-galactic sources. An excess of events was searched for around 

195: the positions of known sources in $3^{\circ }$ (half width) angular bins. The 

196: $90\%$ C.L. upper limits on the muon fluxes from specific celestial sources

197: were in the range $10^{-15} \div 10^{-14}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ 

198: \cite{mudiffu}. A search for 

199: time coincidences of the upgoing muons with $\gamma$-ray bursts was also 

200: made. No statistically significant time correlation was found \cite{nuastro}.

201: 

202: A different analysis was made for the search for a diffuse astrophysical 

203: neutrino flux, using a dedicated method to select higher energy upthroughgoing

204: muons. The flux upper limit was set at the level of $1.5 \cdot 10^{-14}$ 

205: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \cite{nudiffu}.

206: 

207: \subsection{\label{sec:WIMPs} Indirect searches for WIMPs}

208: Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) could be part of the

209: galactic dark matter; they could be intercepted by celestial bodies,

210: slowed down and trapped in their centres, where WIMPs and anti-WIMPs could

211: annihilate and yield neutrinos of GeV or TeV energy,

212: in small angular windows from their centres. One WIMP candidate 

213: is the lowest mass neutralino.

214: 

215: To look for a WIMP signal, we searched for upthroughgoing muons from the 

216: Earth centre, using $10^{\circ} \div 15^{\circ}$ cones around the Nadir; the 

217: $90\%$ C.L. muon flux limits are $0.8 \div 1.4 \cdot 10^{-14}$ 

218: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \cite{wimps}. These limits, when compared with 

219: the predictions of a supersymmetric model, eliminate a sizable range 

220: of parameters used in the model. 

221: 

222: A similar procedure was used to search for $\nm$ from the

223: Sun: the muon upper limits are at the level of about 

224: $1.5 \div 2 \cdot 10^{-14}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \cite{wimps}. 

225: 

226: 

227: \subsection{\label{sec:GC} Neutrinos from stellar gravitational collapses} 

228: A stellar gravitational collapse of the core of a massive star is expected 

229: to produce a large burst of all types of neutrinos and antineutrinos with 

230: energies of $ 5 \div 60$ MeV and with a duration of $\sim 10$ s. No stellar 

231: gravitational collapses in our Galaxy were observed from 1989 to 2000 

232: \cite{grcol}. 

233: 

234: \begin{figure*}[t]

235: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.5\linewidth}

236: \hspace{-1cm}

237: \epsfig{file=mm-final.eps,width=9cm,height=8cm}

238: \caption{$90\%$ C.L. upper limit obtained by MACRO for an isotropic flux 

239: of GUT MMs with $g=g_D$ compared with direct limits given by other 

240: experiments.}

241: \label{fig:mm}

242: \end{minipage}\hfill

243: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.47\linewidth}

244: \hspace{-0.4cm}

245: \centering\epsfig{file=nucl-final.eps,height=6.5cm,width=8cm}

246: \caption{$90\%$ C.L. upper limits versus mass for downgoing nuclearites

247: with $\beta=2 \cdot 10^{-3}$ at ground level. The MACRO limit for nuclearite 

248: masses larger than $5 \cdot 10^{22}$ GeV/c$^2$ has been extended and 

249: corresponds to an isotropic flux.}

250: \label{fig:nucl}

251: \end{minipage}

252: \end{figure*}

253: 

254: 

255: \section{\label{sec:exotic} Search for exotic particles}

256: \subsection{\label{sec:MM} Search for GUT magnetic monopoles (MMs)} 

257: Supermassive magnetic monopoles predicted by Grand Unified Theories

258: (GUT) of the electroweak and strong interactions should have 

259: masses $m_M \sim 10^{17}$ GeV. 

260: 

261: MACRO was optimised to search for an isotropic flux of GUT MMs in the cosmic

262: radiation. The three sub-detectors had sensitivities in different $\beta$ 

263: regions, covering the velocity range $4 \cdot 10^{-5} < \beta < 1$.

264: They allowed multiple signatures of the same rare event candidate. No 

265: candidates were found by any of the three subdetectors. Fig. \ref{fig:mm} 

266: shows the $90\%$ C.L. flux upper limits for $g=g_D$ poles (one unit of Dirac 

267: magnetic charge) plotted versus $\beta$ \cite{mono} together with direct 

268: limits set by other experiments \cite{mono_altri}. The MACRO MM direct limits

269:  are by far the best existing over a very wide range of $\beta$.

270: 

271: The interaction of the GUT monopole core with a nucleon can lead to a 

272: reaction in which the nucleon decays, $M+p \rightarrow M + e^+ + \pi^0$. 

273:  MACRO dedicated an analysis procedure to detect nucleon decays induced 

274: by the passage of a GUT MM in the streamer tube system (a fast $e^+$

275: track from a slow ($\beta \sim 10^{-3}$) MM track). The $90\%$ C.L. flux 

276: upper limits established by this search are at the level of 

277: $\sim 3 \cdot 10^{-16}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$ for 

278: $10^{-4} \leq \beta \leq 0.5 \cdot 10^{-2}$; they are valid for catalysis 

279: cross sections $5\cdot 10^2 < \sigma_{cat} < 10^3$ mb \cite{pdecay}. 

280: 

281: \subsection{\label{sec:nucl} Search for nuclearites, Q-balls and LIPs} 

282: Strangelets should consist of aggregates of $u,~d$ and $s$ quarks in almost 

283: equal proportion \cite{nucl} and would have typical galactic velocities 

284: $\beta \sim 10^{-3}$. The MACRO $90\%$ C.L. upper limits for an isotropic 

285: flux of nuclearites with $10^{-5} \le \beta \le 1$ was at the level of 

286: $1.5 \cdot 10^{-16}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$ \cite{nuclea}.

287: 

288: MACRO searched also for charged Q-balls (aggregates of squarks, sleptons 

289: and Higgs fields) \cite{qballs}, giving an upper limit of 

290: $\sim 10^{-16}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$ \cite{qballs2}.

291: 

292: Fractionally charged particles could be expected in Grand Unified 

293: Theories as deconfined quarks; the expected charges range 

294: from $Q=e/5$ to $Q= 2/3e$. LIPs should release a fraction $(Q/e)^2$ of the

295: energy deposited by a muon traversing a medium. The $90\%$ C.L. flux upper 

296: limits for LIPs with charges $e/3,~2/3e$ and $e/5$ are at the level 

297: of $10^{-15}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$ \cite{lips}.

298: 

299: \section{\label{sec:conclu} Conclusions}

300: 

301: $-$ Standard atmospheric $\nm$ oscillations: no-oscillation hypothesis 

302: ruled out at $5 \div 6 \sigma$. 

303: 

304: Best fit parameters: 

305:  $\Dm2 = 2.3 \cdot 10^{-3}$ eV$^2$ and $\s2t_m =1$. \par

306: \ndt $-$ VLI: $|\Delta_v|$ upper limits of the order of $10^{-25}$. \par

307: \ndt $-$ MM search: upper flux limit of $1.4 \cdot 10^{-16}$ 

308: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$ for $4 \cdot 10^{-5} < \beta < 1$.  \par

309: \ndt $-$ Nuclearite search: upper flux limit of $10^{-16}$  

310: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$ for $\beta \simeq 10^{-3}$. \par

311: \ndt $-$ Charged Q-balls search: upper flux limit of $\sim 10^{-16}$ 

312: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$. \par

313: \ndt $-$ WIMP search: upper flux limit of $\sim 10^{-14}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ 

314: sr$^{-1}$. \par 

315: \ndt $-$ LIP search: upper flux limit of $6.1 \cdot 10^{-16}$ 

316: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$. \par~\par

317: 

318: {\bf Acknowledgements} 

319: 

320: I acknowledge the cooperation 

321: of the members of the MACRO Collaboration and, in particular, of the 

322: Bologna group.

323: 

324: \newpage

325: 

326: \begin{thebibliography}{15}

327: 

328: \bibitem{r1} S. Ahlen {\em et al.}, Nucl. Instr. Meth. {\bfseries A324} 

329: 337, (1993). \\ 

330: M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Nucl. Instr. Meth. {\bfseries A486} 663, (2002). 

331: \bibitem{mono} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Astrop. Phys. {\bfseries 18}

332: 27, (2002); Eur. Phys. J. {\bfseries C25} 511, (2002). 

333: \bibitem{pdecay} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Eur. Phys. J. {\bfseries C26}

334: 163, (2002).

335: \bibitem{high} S. Ahlen {\em et al.}, Phys. Lett. {\bfseries B357} 

336: 481, (1995). \\ 

337: M. Ambrosio {\em et al.},  Phys. Lett. {\bfseries B434} 451, (1998).

338: \bibitem{low} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Phys. Lett. {\bfseries B478} 5, (2000).

339: \bibitem{sterile} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Phys. Lett. {\bfseries B517} 

340: 59, (2001).

341: \bibitem{scatt} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Nucl. Instr. Meth. {\bfseries A492} 

342: 376, (2002); Phys. Lett. {\bfseries B566} 35, (2003).

343: \bibitem{ultimo} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Eur. Phys. J. {\bfseries C36} 323, 

344: (2004).

345: \bibitem{nuastro} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Astrop. J. {\bfseries 546} 1038, 

346: (2001).

347: \bibitem{wimps} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bfseries D60} 

348: 082002, (1999).

349: \bibitem{grcol} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Eur. Phys. J. {\bfseries C37} 

350: 265, (2004). 

351: \bibitem{cr} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Astrop. Phys. {\bfseries 20} 

352: 641, (2004); Astrop. Phys. {\bfseries 21} 223, (2004).

353: \bibitem{lips} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bfseries D62} 

354: 052003, (2000). M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, hep-ex/0402006.

355: \bibitem{bartol} V. Agrawal {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bfseries D53} 

356: 1314, (1996). 

357: \bibitem{honda} M. Honda {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bfseries D64} 

358:  053011, (2001).

359: \bibitem{fluka} G. Battistoni {\em et al.}, Astrop. Phys. {\bfseries 19} 

360: 291, (2003). G. Battistoni {\em et al.}, hep-ph/0305208.

361: \bibitem{trieste} G. Giacomelli and M. Giorgini, hep-ex/0504002.

362: \bibitem{fel_cou} G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, Phys. Rev. {\bfseries D57}

363: 3873, (1998).

364: \bibitem{lorentz} G. Battistoni {\em et al.}, Phys. Lett. {\bfseries B615} 

365: 14, (2005).

366: \bibitem{praga} M. Giorgini, Czech. J. Phys. {\bfseries 56} Suppl. A 291, 

367:  (2006); hep-ex/0512075.

368: \bibitem{mudiffu} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Astrop. Phys. {\bfseries 18}

369: 615, (2003). 

370: \bibitem{nudiffu} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Astrop. Phys. {\bfseries 19}

371: 1, (2003).

372:  \bibitem{mono_altri} S. Orito {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bfseries 66} 

373: 1951, (1991). \\ 

374: S. Nakamura {\em et al.}, Phys. Lett. {\bfseries B263} 529, (1991).

375: \bibitem{nucl} E. Witten, Phys. Rev. {\bfseries D30} 272, (1984). \\ 

376: A. De Rujula and S. L. Glashow, Nature {\bfseries 312} 734, (1984).

377: \bibitem{nuclea} M. Ambrosio {\em et al.}, Eur. Phys. J. {\bfseries C13} 

378: 453, (2000).

379: \bibitem{qballs} S. Coleman, Nucl. Phys. {\bfseries B262} 293, (1985).

380: A. Kusenko, Phys. Lett. {\bfseries B405} 108, (1997).

381: \bibitem{qballs2} D. Bakari {\em et al.}, Astrop. Phys. 

382: {\bfseries 15} 137, (2001).

383: 

384: \end{thebibliography}

385: 

386: \end{document}

387: 

388: 

389: 

390: