1: \documentstyle[12pt]{article}
2: \textheight 220mm
3: \textwidth 150mm
4: \topmargin 1.5cm
5: \oddsidemargin=0mm
6: \evensidemargin=0mm
7:
8: \newcommand{\Tr}{{\rm Tr}}
9: \newcommand{\sm}{\sum\limits_n\Tr[}
10: \newcommand{\yu}{+DG]+O(a^8)}
11: \newcommand{\pd}{D^2}
12: \newcommand{\pb}{B^2}
13: \newcommand{\oneone}{\setlength{\unitlength}{.2cm}\raisebox{-1cm}{
14: \begin{picture}(1.2,1.2)(-1.8,-1.8)
15: \put(0,0){\line(1,1){2}}
16: \put(2,2){\line(1,0){4}}
17: \put(6,2){\line(0,1){4}}
18: \put(6,6){\line(-1,0){4}}
19: \put(2,6){\line(-1,-1){2}}
20: \put(0,4){\line(-1,0){4}}
21: \put(-4,4){\line(0,-1){4}}
22: \put(-4,0){\line(1,0){4}}
23: \put(0,0){\circle*{.4}}
24: \put(0,-.25){\makebox(0,0)[tr]{\footnotesize $an$}}
25: \put(3,-1){\vector(1,0){2}}
26: \put(3,-1){\vector(0,1){2}}
27: \put(3,-1){\vector(1,1){2}}
28: \put(5.7,-1){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $i$}}
29: \put(2.7,0.5){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $k$}}
30: \put(5.7,0.4){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $j$}}
31: \end{picture}}}
32:
33: \newcommand{\onetwo}{\setlength{\unitlength}{.4cm}\raisebox{-1.5cm}{
34: \begin{picture}(1.2,1.2)(-1.8,-1.8)
35: \put(0,0){\line(1,0){2}}
36: \put(2,0){\line(0,1){2}}
37: \put(2,2){\line(-1,0){2}}
38: \put(0,2){\line(1,1){1}}
39: \put(1,3){\line(-1,0){2}}
40: \put(-1,3){\line(0,-1){2}}
41: \put(-1,1){\line(1,0){2}}
42: \put(1,1){\line(-1,-1){1}}
43: \put(0,0){\circle*{.2}}
44: \put(-.2,-.3){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $an$}}
45: \end{picture}}}
46:
47: \newcommand{\twoone}{\setlength{\unitlength}{.4cm}\raisebox{-1.5cm}{
48: \begin{picture}(3.8,2.4)(-3,-3)
49: \put(0,0){\line(0,1){2}}
50: \put(0,2){\line(1,0){2}}
51: \put(2,2){\line(1,1){1}}
52: \put(3,3){\line(-1,0){2}}
53: \put(1,3){\line(0,-1){2}}
54: \put(1,1){\line(-1,0){2}}
55: \put(-1,1){\line(-1,-1){1}}
56: \put(-2,0){\line(1,0){2}}
57: \put(0,0){\circle*{.2}}
58: \put(0,-.2){\makebox(0,0)[tr]{\footnotesize $an$}}
59: \put(1.5,-0.5){\vector(1,0){1}}
60: \put(1.5,-.5){\vector(0,1){1}}
61: \put(1.5,-.5){\vector(1,1){1}}
62: \put(2.5,-1){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $i$}}
63: \put(2.8,0.4){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $j$}}
64: \put(1.2,0.5){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $k$}}
65: \end{picture}}}
66:
67: \newcommand{\twotwo}{\setlength{\unitlength}{.4cm}\raisebox{-1.5cm}{
68: \begin{picture}(1.6,1.6)(-1.5,-3.2)
69: \put(0,0){\line(1,0){2}}
70: \put(2,0){\line(1,1){1}}
71: \put(3,1){\line(-1,0){2}}
72: \put(1,1){\line(0,1){2}}
73: \put(1,3){\line(-1,0){2}}
74: \put(-1,3){\line(-1,-1){1}}
75: \put(-2,2){\line(1,0){2}}
76: \put(0,2){\line(0,-1){2}}
77: \put(0,0){\circle*{.2}}
78: \put(0,-.2){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $an$}}
79: \end{picture}}}
80:
81: \newcommand{\threeone}{\setlength{\unitlength}{.15cm}\raisebox{-1cm}{
82: \begin{picture}(3.8,2.4)(-6,-3.2)
83: \put(-.5,0){\line(1,6){1}}
84: \put(.5,6){\line(1,1){3}}
85: \put(3.5,9){\line(0,-1){6}}
86: \put(3.5,3){\line(-1,-1){3}}
87: \put(.5,0){\line(-1,6){1}}
88: \put(-.5,6){\line(-1,0){6}}
89: \put(-6.5,6){\line(0,-1){6}}
90: \put(-6.5,0){\line(1,0){6}}
91: \put(0,0){\circle*{.8}}
92: \put(0,-.8){\makebox(0,0)[tr]{\footnotesize $an$}}
93: \put(4,-1){\vector(1,0){3}}
94: \put(4,-1){\vector(0,1){3}}
95: \put(4,-1){\vector(1,1){3}}
96: \put(7,-2.2){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $i$}}
97: \put(6.6,2){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $j$}}
98: \put(3.5,1.2){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $k$}}
99: \end{picture}}}
100:
101: \newcommand{\threetwo}{\setlength{\unitlength}{.15cm}\raisebox{-1cm}{
102: \begin{picture}(3.8,2.4)(-1,-3.2)
103: \put(-.5,0){\line(1,6){1}}
104: \put(.5,6){\line(1,1){3}}
105: \put(3.5,9){\line(0,-1){6}}
106: \put(3.5,3){\line(-1,-1){3}}
107: \put(.5,0){\line(-1,6){1}}
108: \put(-.5,6){\line(1,0){6}}
109: \put(5.5,6){\line(0,-1){6}}
110: \put(5.5,0){\line(-1,0){6}}
111: \put(0,0){\circle*{.8}}
112: \put(0,-.8){\makebox(0,0)[tr]{\footnotesize $an$}}
113: \end{picture}}}
114:
115: \newcommand{\threethree}{\setlength{\unitlength}{.15cm}\raisebox{-1cm}{
116: \begin{picture}(3.8,2.4)(-6,-3.2)
117: \put(-.5,0){\line(1,6){1}}
118: \put(.5,6){\line(-1,-1){3}}
119: \put(-2.5,3){\line(0,-1){6}}
120: \put(-2.5,-3){\line(1,1){3}}
121: \put(.5,0){\line(-1,6){1}}
122: \put(-.5,6){\line(-1,0){6}}
123: \put(-6.5,6){\line(0,-1){6}}
124: \put(-6.5,0){\line(1,0){6}}
125: \put(0,0){\circle*{.8}}
126: \put(3,-.8){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $an$}}
127: \end{picture}}}
128:
129: \newcommand{\threefour}{\setlength{\unitlength}{.15cm}\raisebox{-1cm}{
130: \begin{picture}(3.8,2.4)(-2,-3.2)
131: \put(-.5,0){\line(1,6){1}}
132: \put(.5,6){\line(-1,-1){3}}
133: \put(-2.5,3){\line(0,-1){6}}
134: \put(-2.5,-3){\line(1,1){3}}
135: \put(.5,0){\line(-1,6){1}}
136: \put(-.5,6){\line(1,0){6}}
137: \put(5.5,6){\line(0,-1){6}}
138: \put(5.5,0){\line(-1,0){6}}
139: \put(0,0){\circle*{.8}}
140: \put(2.5,-.8){\makebox(0,0)[tr]{\footnotesize $an$}}
141: \end{picture}}}
142:
143: \newcommand{\ftwo}{\setlength{\unitlength}{.15cm}\raisebox{-.8cm}{
144: \begin{picture}(3.8,2.4)(-1,-3.2)
145: \put(0,-1){\line(3,1){6}}
146: \put(6,1){\line(0,1){6}}
147: \put(6,7){\line(-1,0){6}}
148: \put(0,7){\line(0,-1){6}}
149: \put(0,1){\line(3,-1){6}}
150: \put(6,-1){\line(0,-1){6}}
151: \put(6,-7){\line(-1,0){6}}
152: \put(0,-7){\line(0,1){6}}
153: \put(0,0){\circle*{.8}}
154: \put(-1,0){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $an$}}
155: \put(8.5,-2){\vector(1,0){3}}
156: \put(8.5,-2){\vector(0,1){3}}
157: \put(11.5,-3){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $i$}}
158: \put(8,2){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $j$}}
159: \end{picture}}}
160:
161: \newcommand{\fone}{\setlength{\unitlength}{.15cm}\raisebox{-1cm}{
162: \begin{picture}(3.8,2.4)(-6,-3.2)
163: \put(-.5,0){\line(1,6){1}}
164: \put(.5,6){\line(1,0){6}}
165: \put(6.5,6){\line(0,-1){6}}
166: \put(6.5,0){\line(-1,0){6}}
167: \put(.5,0){\line(-1,6){1}}
168: \put(-.5,6){\line(-1,0){6}}
169: \put(-6.5,6){\line(0,-1){6}}
170: \put(-6.5,0){\line(6,0){6}}
171: \put(0,0){\circle*{.8}}
172: \put(0,-1.2){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $an$}}
173: \end{picture}}}
174:
175: \newcommand{\five}{\setlength{\unitlength}{.4cm}\raisebox{-.8cm}{
176: \begin{picture}(3.8,2.4)(-.8,-.8)
177: \put(0,0){\line(0,1){2}}
178: \put(0,2){\line(1,0){2}}
179: \put(2,2){\line(0,-1){2}}
180: \put(2,0){\line(-1,0){2}}
181: \put(0.2,0.2){\line(0,1){2}}
182: \put(0.2,2.2){\line(1,0){2}}
183: \put(2.2,2.2){\line(0,-1){2}}
184: \put(2.2,0.2){\line(-1,0){2}}
185: \put(0,0){\circle*{.2}}
186: \put(-.1,-.1){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $an$}}
187: \put(3,-0.5){\vector(1,0){1.5}}
188: \put(3,-.5){\vector(0,1){1.5}}
189: \put(4.5,-1){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $i$}}
190: \put(2.8,1){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $j$}}
191: \end{picture}}}
192:
193: \newcommand{\plaq}{\setlength{\unitlength}{.4cm}\raisebox{-.7cm}{
194: \begin{picture}(1.4,1.4)(-1,-1)
195: \put(0,0){\line(0,1){2}}
196: \put(0,2){\line(1,0){2}}
197: \put(2,2){\line(0,-1){2}}
198: \put(2,0){\line(-1,0){2}}
199: \put(0,0){\circle*{.2}}
200: \put(0,-.2){\makebox(0,0)[tr]{\footnotesize $an$}}
201: \put(3,-0.5){\vector(1,0){1.5}}
202: \put(3,-.5){\vector(0,1){1.5}}
203: \put(4.5,0){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $i$}}
204: \put(2.8,1){\makebox(0,0)[r]{\footnotesize $j$}}
205: \end{picture}}}
206:
207: \begin{document}
208: \title{The First Calculation for the Mass of the Ground $4^{++}$ Glueball
209: State on Lattice}
210:
211: \author{{Da Qing Liu$^2$, Ji Min Wu$^{1,~2}$}\\
212: {\small $^1$CCAST(World Lab. ), P. O. Pox 8730, Beijing 100080,
213: China}\\
214: {\small $^2$Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy
215: of
216: Sciences,}\\
217: {\small P. O. Box 918-4, Beijing, 100039, P. R. China}
218: }
219: \maketitle
220:
221: \begin{center}
222: \begin{minipage}{5.5in}
223: \vskip 0.8in
224: {\bf Abstract}\\
225: Under the quenched approximation, we perform a lattice calculation for
226: the mass of the ground $4^{++}$ glueball state in $E^{++}$ channel
227: on a $D=3+1$ lattice. Our calculation shows that the
228: mass of this state is $M_G(4^{++})=3.65(6)(18)GeV$, which rules out the
229: $4^{++}$ or mainly $4^{++}$ glueball state
230: interpretation for $\xi(2230)$.
231:
232:
233: \end{minipage}
234: \end{center}
235: \vskip 1in
236: \indent
237:
238: \newpage
239: \section {Introduction}
240:
241: As the experiments reported$^{\cite{exprm}}$, there maybe exist
242: one candidate for glueball state, namely, $\xi(2230)$, which
243: has been seen mainly in $J/\Psi$ radiative decay with a
244: number of decay channels. But its spin has not been
245: determined experimentally:$^{\cite{exprm1}}$ we don't know whether
246: its spin is $2^{++}$ or $4^{++}$.
247: Therefore, one hopes to calculate the masses of $2^{++}$ and $4^{++}$
248: glueball states on lattice for the spin interpretation of $\xi(2230)$
249: since lattice QCD is regarded as the most reliable theory to study hadron
250: spectra.
251:
252: Meanwhile, lattice simulation has achieved tremendous success in the study
253: of glueball states. For instance, some authors show mass
254: spectra$^{\cite{sim,morning}}$ for glueball states. But, so far we do not know how
255: to calculate the mass of $4^{++}$ glueball state assuredly on $D=3+1$
256: lattice. On a $D=2+1$ cubic lattice, in Ref. \cite{tepper}, Johnson and
257: Teper performed a
258: calculation for these states. Nevertheless, there are some disputes
259: about the interpretation of the calculation, i.e., one does not know
260: whether the mass calculated in Ref. \cite{tepper} is really the mass
261: of $4^{++}$ glueball states. In addition, as authors consider,
262: one can hardly extent the construction of the operator in Ref.
263: \cite{tepper} into the $D=3+1$ lattice.
264:
265: Therefore, from the point of views of both experiment and theory,
266: it is important to calculate the $4^{++}$ glueball mass on lattice.
267: Basing on the connection between the
268: continuum limits of the asymptotic expansion of the chosen operator and
269: the construction of the operator with definite $J^{PC}$, we have developed a
270: new procedure$^{ \cite{liudq}}$
271: which can calculate masses of glueball states with arbitrary
272: $J^{PC}$. According to this procedure,
273: a lattice calculation for the mass of the ground $4^{++}$
274: glueball states is performed in this paper by the construction of
275: operators, corresponding states of which are in $E^{++}$ channel in the
276: simulation. The leading term in expansion of this operator belongs to
277: $4^{++}$ representation of $SO(3)^{PC}$ group. Therefore, from the
278: asymptotic expansion of this constructed operators,
279: we assure that, in continuum case, the spin of corresponding states
280: is $4^{++}$. Then, the mass of $4^{++}$ glueball state was obtained.
281: We found that the calculated mass is prominently different with
282: that of $2^{++}$ glueball states $^{ \cite{liudq}}$
283: and it is about 1.5 and 2 times of that of tensor and scalar
284: glueball state respectively. We should argued that our results rule out
285: the possible interpretation of the ground $4^{++}$ glueball states for
286: $\xi(2230)$.
287:
288: This paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we show how to
289: construct $4^{++}$ glueball operators in $E^{++}$ channel. We
290: should also present our results and conclusions in section 3 and section 4.
291:
292: \section{ The Construction of the Operator Corresponding to $4^{++}$
293: Glueball state}
294:
295: As we know, a definite state $|\psi>$ is generated by a current
296: $o$ acting on vacuum $|0>$:
297: \begin{equation} \label{e1}
298: |\psi>=o|0>,
299: \end{equation}
300: and the character of $|\psi>$ can be described by the current $o$.
301: Therefore, as mentioned in \cite{liudq}, to calculate the
302: mass of glueball state with spin $J^{PC}=4^{++}$, we should carry
303: out three steps. First, we should
304: write out nonet currents
305: which transform as the representation $4^{++}$ under the $SO(3)^{PC}$
306: group and decompose them into irreducible representations
307: $A_1^{++}$,
308: $E^{++}$, $T_1^{++}$ and $T_2^{++}$ of the group $O^{PC}$ ( the cubic
309: group with parity and charge conjugation transform ) in the
310: subduced representation \footnote { The subduced representation used
311: here is the representation obtained by trivially embedding the
312: $O^{PC}$ group into the $SO(3)^{PC}$ group.}. Then we construct
313: corresponding operators on lattice. Its continuum limits
314: should be just those currents mentioned above. Next
315: we should also use the variantional procedure to extract masses
316: of the ground $4^{++}$ states and excited $4^{++}$ states.
317:
318: We shall calculate the mass of the ground $4^{++}$
319: glueball states in this paper.
320: Among nonet currents, there is only one type of such nonet current,
321: the mass dimension of which is the lowest one. This
322: nonet current is of the form
323: $Tr(\vec{B}\vec{D}\vec{D}\vec{B})$ and we expect that it
324: should give the most contribution
325: to the ground states with spin $J^{PC}=4^{++}$ due to dimensional
326: analysis. Therefore, we will only consider such nonet current
327: and the construction of corresponding operators on lattice in this paper.
328: Apparently such disposal will bring up some errors and its affectation
329: will be considered in the error estimate in section 3.
330:
331: \paragraph {The Nonet Current and Its Decomposition}
332:
333: To simplify, we denote magnetic field $B_{x(y,~z)}=
334: B_{x(y,~z)}^a{\lambda^a \over 2}$ by $B_{1(2,~3)}$
335: and covariant derivative $D_{x(y,~z)}$ by
336: $D_{1(2,~3)}$ ($D_i\cdot=\partial_i-i[A_i,\cdot]$) respectively here.
337: Obviously one can treat $B_i$'s as bases of the spin $J=1$,
338: and $B_{\pm}=\mp{1\over \sqrt{2}}(B_1\pm
339: iB_2)$ and $B_0=B_3$ as three standard bases\footnote {Here $B_{\pm}$ and
340: $B_0$ is the eigen-current of the operator $\hat{J}_3$,
341: i.e., $\hat{J}_3(B_{\pm})=\pm B_{\pm}$ and $\hat{J}_3(B_0)=0$.}.
342: It is similar for covariant derivatives $D_i$'s, which can also
343: be combined into three standard bases: $D_{\pm}=\mp{1\over \sqrt{2}}(D_1\pm
344: iD_2)$ and $D_0=D_3$.
345:
346: Since spins of magnetic field $\vec{B}$ and covariant
347: derivative operator $\vec{D}$ are both 1, the nonzero gauge invariant
348: nonet current of the mass dimension 6 is sole, so that
349: according to C-G coefficients, one can write these 9 gauge
350: invariant currents unambiguously in the standard form up to full covariant
351: derivatives (The following $c_i$'s$(i=4,\cdots,-4)$ are eigen-currents of
352: operator $\hat{J}_3$, i.e., $\hat{J}_3(c_i)=i~c_i$.)\footnote{
353: Phenomenologically, we can regard this nonet current as
354: $^5D_4$ multi-current and the corresponding state as $^5D_4$
355: multi-state.}:
356: \begin{eqnarray}
357: \label{a4}
358: c_4&=&\Tr [B_+D_+D_+B_++DG], \\
359: \label {a3}
360: c_3&=&\Tr [B_+D_+D_0B_++B_+D_+D_+B_0+DG], \\
361: \label{a2}
362: c_2&=&{1\over \sqrt{7}}\Tr [(B_+D_+D_-B_++B_+D_0D_0B_++B_+D_+D_+B_-
363: \nonumber \\
364: &&+B_0D_+D_+B_0+2B_+D_+D_0B_0+2B_+D_0D_+B_0)], \\
365: c_1&=&{1\over \sqrt{7}}\Tr [B_+D_0D_-B_++B_0D_+D_+B_-+B_+D_+D_-B_0
366: \nonumber \\
367: &&B_+D_-D_+B_0+2B_+D_0D_0B_0+B_+D_+D_0B_-
368: \nonumber \\
369: \label{a1}
370: &&+B_+D_0D_+B_-+2B_0D_+D_0B_0 + DG], \\
371: c_0&=&{1\over \sqrt{70}}\Tr [B_+D_-D_-B_+ + B_-D_+D_+B_-]
372: \nonumber \\
373: &&+{2\over \sqrt{70}}\Tr [B_+D_+D_-B_- + B_+D_-D_+B_-]
374: \nonumber \\
375: &&+{4\over \sqrt{70}}\Tr [B_+D_-D_0B_0 + B_+D_0D_-B_0
376: \nonumber \\
377: &&+B_-D_+D_0B_0+ B_0D_+D_0B_-
378: \nonumber \\
379: \label{a0}
380: &&+B_+D_0D_0B_- + B_0D_+D_-B_0+B_0D_0D_0B_0 +DG],\\
381: c_{-1}&=&{1\over \sqrt{7}}\Tr [B_-D_0D_+B_- +B_0D_-D_-B_+ + B_-D_-D_+B_0
382: \nonumber \\
383: &&B_-D_+D_-B_0 + 2B_-D_0D_0B_0 + B_-D_-D_0B_+
384: \nonumber \\
385: \label{a-1}
386: &&+B_-D_0D_-B_+ + 2B_0D_-D_0B_0 +DG],\\
387: \label{a-2}
388: c_{-2}&=&{1\over \sqrt{7}}\Tr [(B_-D_-D_+B_- + B_-D_0D_0B_- +
389: B_-D_-D_-B_+
390: \nonumber \\
391: &&+ B_0D_-D_-B_0 + 2B_-D_-D_0B_0 + 2B_-D_0D_-B_0) +DG], \\
392: \label{a-3}
393: c_{-3}&=&\Tr [B_-D_-D_0B_- + B_-D_-D_-B_0 +DG], \\
394: \label{a-4}
395: c_{-4}&=&\Tr [B_-D_-D_-B_- +DG].
396: \end{eqnarray}
397: Here $DG$ is some full covariant derivative terms. In fact,
398: one can get $c_{-i}(i=1,~2,~3,~4)$ easily by the swap $+ \leftrightarrow
399: -$ in $c_i$.
400:
401: Then we turn to the $O^{PC}$ group, the finite
402: subgroup of $SO(3)^{PC}$ group, to form the bases of subduced
403: representation with nonet current mentioned above.
404: As shown in Ref. \cite{berg}, the subduced representation is reducible
405: and one can reduce this representation into irreducible ones $A_1^{++},~E^{++},
406: ~T_1^{++}$ and $T_2^{++}$, the dimension of which are 1,~2,~3,~3
407: respectively. For our aim we only show the result of the decomposition
408: into $E^{++}$ here.
409:
410: According to the procedure introduced in Ref. \cite{liu2},
411: we can get two bases of the representation $E^{++}$
412: \begin{eqnarray}
413: e_1&=&-{1\over \sqrt{2}}(c_2+c_{-2})
414: \nonumber \\
415: & \propto & \Tr [B_1(D_1^2 -D_3^2) B_1 -B_2(D_2^2-D_3^2)B_2
416: +B_3(D_2^2-D_1^2)B_3
417: \nonumber \\
418: && + 4B_2D_3D_2B_3 - 4B_1D_3D_1B_3 +DG];
419: \nonumber \\
420: e_2&=&{1\over 2}(\sqrt{{7\over 6}}c_4+\sqrt{{7\over 6}}c_{-4}-\sqrt{{5\over
421: 3}}c_0)
422: \nonumber \\
423: &\propto & \Tr [B_1(D_1^2+D_3^2-2D_2^2)B_1
424: + B_2(D_2^2+D_3^2-2D_1^2)B_2
425: \nonumber \\
426: &&+ B_3(D_1^2+D_2^2-2D_3^2)B_3 + 4B_1D_3D_1B_3
427: \nonumber \\
428: \label{e-2}
429: &&+ 4B_2D_3D_2B_3 -8B_1D_2D_1B_2 + DG].
430: \end{eqnarray}
431:
432: These two currents are combinations of following three linear dependent ones:
433:
434: \begin{eqnarray}
435: e^{(1)}&=&\Tr [B_2(D_2^2 -D_1^2) B_2 -B_3(D_3^2-D_1^2)B_3
436: +B_1(D_3^2-D_2^2)B_1
437: \nonumber \\
438: && + 4B_3D_1D_3B_1 - 4B_2D_1D_2B_1 +DG];
439: \nonumber \\
440: e^{(2)}&=&\Tr [B_3(D_3^2 -D_2^2) B_3 -B_1(D_1^2-D_2^2)B_1
441: +B_2(D_1^2-D_3^2)B_2
442: \nonumber \\
443: \label{e13}
444: && + 4B_1D_2D_1B_2 - 4B_3D_2D_3B_2 +DG];
445: \nonumber \\
446: e^{(3)}&=&\Tr [B_1(D_1^2 -D_3^2) B_1 -B_2(D_2^2-D_3^2)B_2
447: +B_3(D_2^2-D_1^2)B_3
448: \nonumber \\
449: \label{current}
450: && + 4B_2D_3D_2B_3 - 4B_1D_3D_1B_3 +DG].
451: \end{eqnarray}
452:
453: These three currents are of equivalence up to a cyclic
454: permutation $1 \rightarrow 2 \rightarrow 3 \rightarrow 1$
455: of superscripts and subscripts in Eq. (\ref{current}).
456:
457: Then we consider how to construct operators on lattice, which are in
458: the representation $E^{++}$ and their continuum limits are
459: just $e^{(i)}(i=1,~2,~3)$.
460:
461: \paragraph {The Construction of Operators on Lattice}
462: In this paragraph, we assign that $(i,~j,~k)$ is even permutation of
463: $(1,~2,~3)$, i.e., $(i,~j,~k)=(1,~2,~3),~(2,~3,~1)$ or $(3,~1,~2)$.
464:
465: Using the link variable as defined in the discussion of improved
466: action$^{\cite{s11,s12}}$:
467: \begin{equation}
468: U(n,i)=T\exp( \int^a_0 dt A_i(an+\hat{i}t),
469: \end{equation}
470: we denote Wilson operators by figures
471: \footnote{We use a notation, where $A_i$ is an anti-hermitian,
472: traceless $N\times N$-matrix.}. For instance,
473: we denote the plaquette operator
474: \begin{equation} O_{ij}=\sum\limits_n
475: O_{ij}(n)=Re \sum\limits_n
476: \Tr [U(n,i)U(n+\widehat{i},j)U^{-1}(n+\widehat{j},i)U^{-1}(n,j)]
477: \end{equation}
478: by the figure $\sum\limits_n(\plaq\mbox{}\hspace{0.7in})$ for simplification.
479: Here the summation is only over all the spatial links in the same time slice.
480:
481: Let's consider the following five types of operators $d^{(1)}_k -
482: d^{(5)}_k$:
483: \begin{description}
484: \item[1.] ~~
485: The first type of operators are $d^{(1)}_k(k=1,~2,~3)$. They are from the
486: following operators:
487: \begin{equation}
488: b_k^{(1)}=\epsilon_{ijk}^{(1)}+\epsilon_{jik}^{(1)},
489: \end{equation}
490: where
491: \begin{equation}
492: \epsilon_{ijk}^{(1)}=\sum\limits_{n}(\mbox{}\hspace{0.2in}\oneone
493: \mbox{}\hspace{0.6in}+\onetwo \mbox{}\hspace{0.5in}).
494: \end{equation}
495:
496: The expansion of the operator $b_k^{(1)}$ according to lattice spacing $a$
497: is
498: \begin{eqnarray}
499: b_k^{(1)}&=&\sm {\bf 4}+5a^4(B_j^2+B_i^2)+{a^6\over 12}B_i
500: (17D_j^2+5D_k^2+12D_i^2)B_i
501: \nonumber \\
502: &&+{a^6 \over 12}B_j(17\pd_i+5\pd_k+12\pd_j)B_j-2a^6B_iD_jD_iB_j
503: \nonumber \\
504: &&\yu .
505: \end{eqnarray}
506: Here $B_i=-{1\over 2}\sum\limits_{jk}\epsilon_{ijk}F_{jk}$ and
507: $F_{ij}=\partial_i A_j-\partial_j A_i+[A_i,A_j]$.
508:
509: Then the operator $d_k^{(1)}$ is:
510: \begin{eqnarray}
511: d_k^{(1)}&=&b^{(1)}_i-b^{(1)}_j
512: \nonumber \\
513: &=&\sm 5a^4(\pb_j-\pb_i)+{a^6\over 12}B_j(17\pd_k+5\pd_i+12\pd_j)B_2
514: \nonumber \\
515: &&-{a^6\over 12}B_i(17\pd_k+5\pd_j+12\pd_i)B_i+a^6B_k(\pd_j-\pd_i)B_k
516: \nonumber \\
517: \label{op1}
518: &&-2a^6(B_jD_kD_jB_k-B_iD_kD_iB_k)\yu.
519: \end{eqnarray}
520:
521: \item[2.] ~~
522: Next, we consider operators $d^{(2)}_k(k=1,~2,~3)$. They are from
523: operators
524: \begin{equation}
525: b_k^{(2)}=\epsilon_{ijk}^{(2)}+\epsilon_{jik}^{(2)},
526: \end{equation}
527: where
528: \begin{equation}
529: \epsilon_{ijk}^{(2)}=\sum\limits_{x}(\twoone
530: \mbox{}\hspace{0.6in}+\twotwo \mbox{}\hspace{0.5in}).
531: \end{equation}
532: The definition and the expansion according to lattice spacing $a$
533: of operators $d^{(2)}_k$ are
534: \begin{eqnarray}
535: d_k^{(2)}&=&b^{(2)}_i-b^{(2)}_j
536: \nonumber \\
537: &=&\sm 7a^4(\pb_i-\pb_j)+{a^6\over 12}B_i(19\pd_j+19\pd_k+24\pd_i)B_i
538: \nonumber \\
539: &&-{a^6\over 12}B_j(19\pd_i+19\pd_k+24\pd_j)+a^6(B_jD_kD_jB_k-
540: B_iD_kD_iB_k)
541: \nonumber \\
542: &&\yu.
543: \end{eqnarray}
544:
545: \item[3.] ~~
546: Then we study operators $d^{(3)}_k$, which are from operators
547: \vskip .1in
548: \begin{eqnarray}
549: b^{(3)}_k&=&\epsilon_{ijk}^{(3)}
550: \nonumber \\
551: &=&\sum\limits_{x}(\threeone \mbox{}\hspace{0.6in}+\threetwo\mbox{}
552: \hspace{0.3in} +\threethree\mbox{}\hspace{0.3in} +\threefour
553: \mbox{}\hspace{0.3in}).
554: \end{eqnarray}
555: For $d^{(3)}_k$ we get
556: \begin{eqnarray}
557: d_k^{(3)}&=&b^{(3)}_i-b^{(3)}_j
558: \nonumber \\
559: &=&\sm 2a^4(\pb_j-\pb_i)+{a^6\over 6}B_j(\pd_i+\pd_k)B_j
560: -{a^6\over 6}B_i(\pd_j+\pd_k)B_i
561: \nonumber \\
562: &&+a^6(B_jD_kD_2B_k-B_iD_kD_iB_k)\yu.
563: \end{eqnarray}
564:
565: \item[4.] ~~
566: Operators $d^{(4)}_k$ are from
567: \begin{eqnarray}
568: vb^{(4)}_k&=&\epsilon_{ij}^{(4)}
569: \nonumber \\
570: &=&\sum\limits_{x}(\fone \mbox{}\hspace{0.6in}+\ftwo \mbox{}\hspace{0.6in}).
571: \end{eqnarray}
572: And again
573: \begin{eqnarray}
574: d_k^{(4)}&=&b^{(4)}_i-b^{(4)}_j
575: \nonumber \\
576: &=&\sm {a^6\over 2}(B_j(\pd_i+\pd_k)B_j-B_i(\pd_j+\pd_k)B_i
577: \nonumber \\
578: &&~~~~\yu.
579: \end{eqnarray}
580:
581: \item[5.] ~~
582: At last we study the operator $d^{(5)}_k$ which are constructed by
583: \begin{eqnarray}
584: b^{(5)}_{k}=\epsilon^{(5)}_{ijk}=\sum\limits_n(\five \mbox{}\hspace{0.2in}).
585: \end{eqnarray}
586: The construction is
587: \begin{eqnarray}
588: d_k^{(5)}&=&b^{(5)}_i-b^{(5)}_j
589: \nonumber \\
590: &=&\sm 2a^4(\pb_i-\pb_j)+{a^6\over 6}B_i(\pd_j+\pd_k)B_i
591: \nonumber \\
592: && -{a^6\over 6}B_j(\pd_i+\pd_k)B_j \yu.
593: \end{eqnarray}
594:
595: \end{description}
596:
597: Therefore we let
598: \begin{eqnarray}
599: e^k&=&d^{(1)}_k+d^{(2)}_k+5d^{(3)}_k+2d^{(4)}_k+4d^{(5)}_k
600: \nonumber \\
601: &=&a^6\sm B_i(D_i^2 -D_k^2) B_i -B_j(D_j^2-D_k^2)B_j
602: +B_k(D_j^2-D_i^2)B_k
603: \nonumber \\
604: \label{current1}
605: && + 4B_jD_kD_jB_k - 4B_iD_kD_iB_k \yu.
606: \end{eqnarray}
607:
608: While comparing Eq. (\ref{current1}) and Eq. (\ref{current}), we
609: find that operators $e^k(k=1,~2,~3)$ are just our aimed operators.
610: Noticing that these operators are all 8-link,
611: so that we need not consider the "tadpole" renormalization due
612: to the mean field theory$^{\cite{ren}}$. We should utilize operators $e^k$ to
613: calculate the mass of $4^{++}$ glueball states in this paper.
614:
615: Results and some discussions are shown in the forthcoming section.
616:
617: \section{Calculation Results}
618: Under the quench approximation, we perform our calculation on
619: an anisotropic $8^3\times 40$ lattice with improved action
620: introduced in Ref. \cite{improve}:
621: \begin{equation}
622: S_{II}=\beta \{ {5\Omega_{sp}\over 3\xi u_s^4}+{4\xi\Omega_{tp}\over 3u_s^2u_t^2}
623: -{\Omega_{sr}\over 12 \xi u_s^6}-{\xi\Omega_{str}\over 12u_s^4u_t^2} \},
624: \end{equation}
625: where $\beta=6/g^2,~g$ is the QCD couple constant, $u_s$ and $u_t$ are mean link
626: renormalization parameters(we set $u_t=1$), $\xi=a_s/a_t=5.0$ is the aspect
627: ratio, and $\Omega_{sp}$ includes the summation over all spatial plaquettes
628: on the lattice, $\Omega_{tp}$ indicates the temporal plaquettes,
629: $\Omega_{sr}$ denotes the planar $2\times 1$ spatial rectangular loops and
630: $\Omega_{str}$ refers to the short temporal rectangles( one temporal and two
631: spatial links). More detail is given in Ref. \cite{improve}. In each $\beta$
632: calculation, we set 2880 sweeps to make configurations reach to equilibrium
633: and then make total 8100 measurements in 90 bins ( We perform measurement
634: one time every four sweeps). The other calculation parameters, such as
635: $u_s^4$, $r_s/r_0$ and $a_s$, are as the same as those in Ref. \cite{morning}.
636:
637: Our results in different $\beta$ are shown in Table 1:
638: \begin{center}
639: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline
640: $ \beta$ & 1.7 &1.9 & 2.2 & 2.4 & 2.5 \\ \hline
641: $4^{++}$ &1.61(1) &1.35(7) &0.97(4) &0.79(3) & 0.70(5) \\ \hline
642: $2^{++}$ &1.019(3) &0.95(1) &0.71(2) &0.548(6) &0.519(4) \\ \hline
643: \end{tabular} \\
644: {\small {\bf Table. 1}~ $4^{++}$ glueball energy $ m_{G} a_t$ for each
645: $\beta$. The numerals in the brackets are \\error estimates( The data for
646: $2^{++}$ glueball is from Ref. \cite{liudq}.).
647: }
648: \end{center}
649:
650: Now we discuss a little about the error estimate.
651:
652: As discussed in many papers, one may regard that the chosen improved
653: action
654: breaks the rotation symmetry up to $O(a^4)$ in error estimate. But since
655: the mass dimension of terms which break the rotation symmetry up to $O(a^4)$
656: is eight and the lowest mass dimension of our chosen operators
657: in Eq. (\ref{current1}) is six, the up limit of precision here is $O(a^2)$.
658:
659: On the other hand, among the currents with mass dimension 7 or 9, there is
660: no current with
661: $P=+$. Therefore, the precision calculated here is actually
662: $O(a^2)$ and the systematic error can be written out as the form
663: $c_2a_s^2+c_4a_s^4+\cdots$, which should be used to fit our simulation data.
664: Simulation results and fitting curve are shown in Fig. 1. The bottom curve and
665: data$^{\cite{liudq}}$ in Fig. 1 are for the $2^{++}$ glueball state
666: which
667: also belong to $E^{++}$ channel.
668:
669: From the data and fitting curve, the statistical error of the mass measurement
670: is $0.044GeV$. As argued in ref. \cite{morning}, there are 1\% systematic
671: error dur to aspect ratio. In addition, our approach leads into about
672: 0.5\% systematic error.
673: Therefore, the total systematic error is about 1.1\%( $0.041 GeV$). So
674: the mass of $4^{++}$ glueball states is $3.65(6)GeV$. Including
675: the uncertainty in $r_0^{-1}=410(20)Mev$, our final results are:
676: $M_G(4^{++})=3.65(6)(18)GeV$ which is about 1.5 times and twice of masses
677: of the tensor and scalar glueball states respectively.
678:
679: \section {Conclusion}
680: Through the construction of operators in $E^{++}$ channel which are
681: complicated to some degree, we perform a calculation of mass of
682: the ground $4^{++}$ glueball state under the quenched approximation.
683: Due to the expansion of the chosen operator, we confirm that, in
684: continuum, the mass calculated here is the mass of the ground $4^{++}$
685: glueball state and it is $M_G(4^{++})=3.65(6)(18)GeV$.
686:
687: Apparently, our result rules out the $J^{PC}=4^{++}$ glueball
688: interpretation
689: for $\xi(2230)$ even by taking into account the opinion that
690: the mass will be shifted by as much as 20\% in going to full
691: QCD$^{\cite{wig}}$. While noticing that the common calculated mass
692: for tensor glueball state is about $2.4GeV$ under the quench approximation,
693: we claim that our calculation supports the $2^{++}$ glueball interpretation
694: for $\xi(2230)$ if this state exists and it is confirmed as a glueball.
695:
696: \newpage
697: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
698:
699: \bibitem{exprm}
700: Baltrusaitis, R. M., {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 56}(1986),
701: 107;
702: Caso, C., {\it et al.}, 1998, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C3}, 1.
703:
704: \bibitem{exprm1}
705: Alde, D., {\it et al.}, GAMS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. {\bf B177}(1986),
706: 120;
707: Aston, D., {\it et. al.}, LASS Collaboration, Phys. Lett.
708: {\bf 201B}(1988), 169; Blundell, H. and S. Godfrey Phys. Rev. {\bf D53}(1996),
709: 3700; Bai, J.Z., {\it et al.}, BES Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett.
710: {\bf 76}(1996), 3502.
711:
712: \bibitem{sim}
713: C. Micheal and M. Teper, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B}314(1989) 347;
714: UKQCD collabration et al, Phys. Lett. {\bf B}309(1993) 378;
715: H. Chen $et~al$, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B}(Suppl)34(1994) 357.
716:
717: \bibitem{morning}
718: C. J. Morningstar and M. Peardon, Phys. Rev. {\bf D}60(1999)
719: 034509.
720:
721: \bibitem{tepper}
722: R. Johnson and M. Teper, Nucl. Phys. B(Suppl.) {\bf 73}(1999) 267.
723:
724:
725: \bibitem{berg}
726: B. Berg and A. Billoire, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B221}(1983) 109.
727:
728: \bibitem{liudq}
729: D. Q. Liu {\it et al}, hep-lat/0103018.
730:
731: \bibitem{s12}
732: O. Nachtmann: "High Energy Collision and Nonperturbative QCD" in
733: the lecture notes at the workshop "Topics in Field Theories" held
734: on Oct. 1993, Kloster Banz, Germany.
735:
736: \bibitem{s11}
737: D. Q. Liu {\it et al} hep-lat/0104007.
738:
739: \bibitem{liu2}
740: D. Q. Liu {\it et al} hep-lat/0011087.
741: \bibitem{ren}
742: G. P. Lepage and P. B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. {\bf D48}(1993) 2250.
743:
744: \bibitem{improve}
745: C. J. Morningstar and M. Peardon Phys. Rev. {\bf D}56(1997)
746: 4043-4061.
747:
748: \bibitem{wig}
749: H. Chen, {\it et al}, Nucl. Phys. B(Suppl.) {\bf 34}(1994) 357.
750:
751: \end{thebibliography}
752:
753: \newpage
754: \section*{Figure caption}
755: {\bf Figure 1}~~~~The mass of $4^{++}$ glueball against the lattice
756: spacing $(a_s/r_0)^2$.
757: Our fitting curve for the data of $4^{++}$ glueball state is
758: $m(4^{++},a_s)=3.65-1.22(a_s/r_0)^2+2.74(a_s/r_0)^4(unit:GeV)$.
759: In continuum case, the mass of $4^{++}$ glueball state is
760: $3.65(4)GeV$ if we only consider the statistical error.
761: The bottom data and curve:
762: $m(2^{++},a_s)=2.417+0.783(a_s/r_0)^2-0.787(a_s/r_0)^4 (unit:GeV)$
763: are for the mass of $2^{++}$ glueball state which is shown in
764: Ref. \cite{liudq}.
765:
766:
767: \end{document}
768: