1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%% Begin of paper %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \documentclass{elsart}
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Font Selection %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% End of Font Selection %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6: %\usepackage{amssymb}
7: %\usepackage{epsf}
8: %\usepackage{epsfig}
9: %\addtolength{\textwidth}{0.20\textwidth}
10: %\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{ 0.5cm}
11: %\setlength{\evensidemargin}{ 0.5cm}
12: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
13: %
14: % put your own definitions here:
15: % \renewcommand{\topfraction}{0.90}
16: % \renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{0.90}
17: % \renewcommand{\textfraction}{0.05}
18: % \renewcommand{\floatpagefraction}{0.90}
19: % \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.9}
20: \addtolength{\tabcolsep}{-.55\tabcolsep}
21: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}
22: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}
23: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
24: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
25: \newcommand{\oo}{{\rm {\bf \"{o}}}}
26: \newcommand{\psb}{\bar{\psi}}
27: \newcommand{\phd}{\phi^{\dagger}}
28: \newcommand {\bk} {{\mathbf k}}
29: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
30: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2%
31: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
32: \newcommand{\bu}{{\bf u}}
33: \newcommand{\bv}{{\bf v}}
34: \newcommand{\bw}{{\bf w}}
35: \newcommand{\bx}{{\bf x}}
36: \newcommand{\by}{{\bf y}}
37: \newcommand{\bz}{{\bf z}}
38: \newcommand{\mS}{{\mathcal S}}
39: \newcommand{\mK}{{\mathcal K}}
40:
41: % declarations for front matter
42: \begin{document}
43: \runauthor{PKU}
44: \begin{frontmatter}
45:
46: \title{Lattice study on kaon pion scattering length%
47: \ in the $I=3/2$ channel}
48:
49:
50: \author[PKU]{Chuan Miao},
51: \author[PKU]{Xining Du},
52: \author[PKU]{Guangwei Meng}
53: \author[PKU]{and Chuan Liu}
54: %\author[IHEP]{Ying Chen}
55: %\author[ITP]{and J.~P.~Ma}
56: \address[PKU]{School of Physics\\
57: Peking University\\
58: Beijing, 100871, P.~R.~China}
59: %\address[ITP]{Institute of Theoretical Physics\\
60: % Academia Sinica\\
61: % Beijing, 100080, P.~R.~China}
62: %\address[IHEP]{Institute of High Energy Physics\\
63: % Academia Sinica\\
64: % P.~O.~Box 918\\
65: % Beijing, 100039, P.~R.~China}
66:
67: \begin{abstract}
68: Using the tadpole improved Wilson quark action on small, coarse
69: and anisotropic lattices, $K\pi$ scattering length in the $I=3/2$
70: channel is calculated within quenched approximation. The results
71: are extrapolated towards the chiral and physical kaon mass region.
72: Finite volume and finite lattice spacing errors are also analyzed
73: and a result in the infinite volume and continuum limit is
74: obtained. Our result is compared with the results obtained using
75: Roy equations, Chiral Perturbation Theory, dispersion relations
76: and the experimental data.
77: \end{abstract}
78: \begin{keyword}
79: $K\pi$ scattering length, lattice QCD, improved actions.
80: \PACS 12.38Gc, 11.15Ha
81: \end{keyword}
82: \end{frontmatter}
83:
84: %\newpage
85:
86: \section{Introduction}
87:
88: Low-energy $K\pi$ scattering experiment is an
89: important experimental method in the study of interactions among
90: mesons~\cite{matison74:Kpi_exp_a,johannesson73:Kpi_exp_b,shaw80:Kpi_exp_c}.
91: It is also a good testing ground for our understanding
92: of the low-energy structure of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD).
93: Chiral Perturbation Theory~\cite{meissner91:Kpi_a,meissner91:Kpi_b},
94: Roy equations~\cite{buettiker03:Kpi_Roy},
95: dispersion relations~\cite{lang77:Kpi_dispersion,zheng04:Kpi_dispersion}
96: and other theoretical methods~\cite{buettiker01:Kpi_sumrule} have
97: been used in the study of low-energy $K\pi$ scattering.
98: However, if the hadrons being scattered involve strange quarks,
99: as in the case of $K\pi$ scattering, predictions
100: within Chiral perturbation theory usually suffer from sizable
101: corrections due to $SU(3)$ flavor symmetry breaking, as compared with
102: the case of pion-pion scattering.
103: Lattice QCD is a genuine non-perturbative method which
104: can handle hadron-hadron scattering at low-energies.
105: Therefore, a lattice QCD calculation will offer an important
106: and independent check on these results.
107: In fact, pion-pion~\cite{gupta93:scat,fukugita95:scat,jlqcd99:scat,%
108: chuan02:pipiI2,JLQCD02:pipi_length,juge03:pipi_length,%
109: ishizuka03:pipi_length,CPPACS03:pipi_phase,CPPACS03:pipi_phase_unquench},
110: pion-nucleon~\cite{fukugita95:scat} and
111: kaon-nucleon~\cite{chuan04:KN} scattering
112: have been studied using lattice QCD.
113: In this letter, we report our quenched lattice
114: results on the $K\pi$ scattering length in the $I=3/2$ channel.
115: This quantity is of phenomenological importance for
116: $K\pi$ scattering since the value of the scattering
117: length in the $I=3/2$ channel is correlated with
118: that in the $I=1/2$ channel and the value of the
119: latter is crucial for the determination of
120: the possible $\kappa$ resonance in the $I=1/2$
121: channel~\cite{zheng04:Kpi_dispersion}.
122:
123: The lattice gauge action that is used in our study is
124: the tadpole improved clover action on anisotropic
125: lattices~\cite{colin97,colin99}.
126: % In our previous works, the following tadpole improved
127: % gluonic action on anisotropic lattices has been utilized:
128: % \ba
129: % \label{eq:gauge_action}
130: % S=&-&\beta\sum_{i>j} \left[
131: % {5\over 9}{TrP_{ij} \over \xi u^4_s}
132: % -{1\over 36}{TrR_{ij} \over \xi u^6_s}
133: % -{1\over 36}{TrR_{ji} \over \xi u^6_s} \right] \nonumber \\
134: % &-&\beta\sum_{i} \left[ {4\over 9}{\xi TrP_{0i} \over u^2_s}
135: % -{1\over 36}{\xi TrR_{i0} \over u^4_s} \right] \;\;,
136: % \ea
137: % where $P_{0i}$ and $P_{ij}$ represents the usual temporal and
138: % spatial plaquette variable, respectively.
139: % $R_{ij}$ and $R_{i0}$ designates the $2\times 1$
140: % spatial and temporal Wilson loops, where, in order to eliminate
141: % the spurious states, we have restricted the coupling of
142: % fields in the temporal direction
143: % to be within one lattice spacing. The parameter $u_s$,
144: % which is taken to be the fourth root of the average
145: % spatial plaquette value, implements the tadpole improvement.
146: % With the tadpole improvement factor, the renormalization of the anisotropy
147: % (or aspect ratio) $\xi=a_s/a_t$ would be small.
148: % In this work, we will not differentiate the bare aspect
149: % ratio and the renormalized one in this work.
150: Using this gauge action, glueball and hadron spectra have been studied
151: within quenched approximation \cite{colin97,colin99,%
152: chuan01:gluea,chuan01:glueb,chuan01:canton1,chuan01:canton2,chuan01:india}.
153: In our previous works, configurations generated from this
154: improved action have also been utilized to calculate the
155: $\pi\pi$ scattering lengths in the $I=2$ channel
156: \cite{chuan02:pipiI2} and the $KN$ scattering length in
157: the $I=1$ channel~\cite{chuan04:KN}.
158: The fermion action used in this study is the
159: tadpole improved clover Wilson action on anisotropic
160: lattices \cite{klassen99:aniso_wilson,chuan01:tune,chuan02:pipiI2}:
161: \ba
162: \label{eq:fmatrix}
163: {\mathcal M}_{xy} &=&\delta_{xy}\sigma + {\mathcal A}_{xy}
164: \nonumber \\
165: {\mathcal A}_{xy} &=&\delta_{xy}\left[{1\over 2\kappa_{\max}}
166: +\rho_t \sum^3_{i=1} \sigma_{0i} {\mathcal F}_{0i}
167: +\rho_s (\sigma_{12}{\mathcal F}_{12} +\sigma_{23}{\mathcal F}_{23}
168: +\sigma_{31}{\mathcal F}_{31})\right]
169: \nonumber \\
170: &-&\sum_{\mu} \eta_{\mu} \left[
171: (1-\gamma_\mu) U_\mu(x) \delta_{x+\mu,y}
172: +(1+\gamma_\mu) U^\dagger_\mu(x-\mu) \delta_{x-\mu,y}\right] \;\;,
173: \ea
174: where various coefficients in the fermion matrix
175: ${\mathcal M}$ are given by:
176: \ba
177: \eta_i &=&\nu/(2u_s) \;\;, \;\;
178: \eta_0=\xi/2 \;\;, \;\;\sigma=1/(2\kappa)-1/(1\kappa_{max})\;\;,
179: \nonumber \\
180: \rho_t &=& c_{SW}(1+\xi)/(4u^2_s) \;\;, \;\;
181: \rho_s = c_{SW}/(2u^4_s) \;\;.
182: \ea
183: Among the parameters which appear in the fermion matrix, $c_{SW}=1$
184: is the tree-level clover coefficient and $\nu$ is the so-called
185: bare velocity of light, which has to be tuned non-perturbatively
186: using the single pion dispersion relations \cite{chuan01:tune}.
187: In the fermion matrix~(\ref{eq:fmatrix}), the bare quark mass
188: dependence is singled out into the parameter $\sigma$ and the
189: matrix ${\mathcal A}$ remains unchanged if the bare quark mass is
190: varied. This shifted structure of the matrix ${\mathcal M}$ can be utilized
191: to solve for quark propagators at various values of valance quark mass
192: $m_0$ (or equivalently $\kappa$)
193: at the cost of solving only the lightest valance
194: quark mass value at $\kappa=\kappa_{\max}$,
195: using the so-called Multi-mass Minimal
196: Residual ($M^3R$ for short) algorithm %
197: \cite{frommer95:multimass,glaessner96:multimass,beat96:multimass}.
198: This is particularly advantageous in a quenched calculation
199: since one needs the results at various quark mass values
200: to perform the chiral extrapolation.
201:
202: The basic procedure for the calculation of $K\pi$ scattering
203: length is similar to that adopted in the $\pi\pi$ scattering length
204: calculation~\cite{chuan02:pipiI2}.
205:
206: \section{Numerical calculation of the scattering length}
207: \label{sec:theory}
208:
209: In order to calculate the elastic scattering lengths
210: for hadron-hadron scattering on the lattice,
211: or the scattering phase shifts in general, one uses L\"uscher's
212: formula which relates the exact energy level of two hadron states
213: in a finite box to the elastic scattering phase shift in the continuum.
214: In the case of $K\pi$ scattering at
215: zero relative three momentum, this formula amounts to a relation
216: between the {\em exact} energy $E^{(I)}_{K\pi}$ of the
217: $K\pi$ system with vanishing relative momentum
218: in a finite box of size $L$ with isospin $I$, and
219: the corresponding scattering length
220: $a^{(I)}_0$ in the continuum.
221: This formula reads \cite{luscher86:finiteb}:
222: \be
223: \label{eq:luescher}
224: E^{(I)}_{K\pi}-(m_K+m_\pi)=-\frac{2\pi a^{(I)}_0}{\mu_{K\pi} L^3}
225: \left[1+c_1\frac{a^{(I)}_0}{L}+c_2(\frac{a^{(I)}_0}{L})^2
226: \right]+O(L^{-6}) \;\;,
227: \ee
228: where $c_1=-2.837297$, $c_2=6.375183$ are numerical constants
229: and $\mu_{K\pi}=m_Km_\pi/(m_K+m_\pi)$ is the reduced mass of the
230: $K\pi$ system. In this letter, the $K\pi$ scattering length $a^{(3/2)}_0$
231: in the isospin $I=3/2$ channel will be calculated.
232:
233: To measure the hadron mass values $m_\pi$, $m_K$, $m_\rho$ and
234: to extract the energy shift $\delta E^{(3/2)}_{K\pi}$,
235: one constructs the correlation
236: functions from the corresponding one meson and two meson operators
237: in the appropriate symmetry channel. For example,
238: the $K\pi$ operator in the $I=3/2$ channel is given by:
239: \be
240: O^{I=3/2}_{K\pi}(t) = K^+_0(t)\pi^+_0(t+1)\;\;,
241: \ee
242: where $K^+_0(t)$ and $\pi^+_0(t)$ are the zero momentum kaon and
243: pion operators respectively. The $K\pi$ correlation
244: function in the $I=3/2$ channel then reads:
245: \be
246: C^{I=1}_{K\pi}(t)=\langle
247: O^{I=3/2\dagger}_{K\pi}(t)
248: O^{I=3/2}_{K\pi}(0)\rangle \;\;.
249: \ee
250: Numerically, it is more advantageous to construct
251: the ratio of the correlation functions defined above:
252: \be
253: {\mathcal R}^{I=1}(t) = C^{I=3/2}_{K\pi}(t) / (C_K(t)C_\pi(t)) \;\;.
254: \ee
255: In this case, one uses the linear fitting function:
256: \be
257: \label{eq:linear_fit}
258: {\mathcal R}^{I=3/2}(t) \stackrel{T >> t >>1}{\sim} 1-\delta E^{(3/2)}_{K\pi}t
259: \;\;,
260: \ee
261: to determine the energy shift $\delta E^{(3/2)}_{K\pi}$.
262: $K\pi$ correlation function, or equivalently, the ratio
263: ${\mathcal R}^{I=3/2}(t)$ is constructed from quark propagators,
264: which are obtained using the Multi-mass Minimal
265: Residue algorithm with wall sources.
266: Periodic boundary condition is applied to all three
267: spatial directions while in the temporal direction, Dirichlet
268: boundary condition is utilized.
269:
270: Configurations used in this calculation are generated using the pure
271: gauge action for $6^340$, $8^340$ and $10^350$ lattices with the gauge
272: coupling $\beta=1.9$, $2.2$, $2.4$, $2.6$ and $3.0$. The spatial lattice
273: spacing $a_s$ is roughly between $0.1$fm and $0.4$fm while
274: the spatial physical size of the lattice ranges from
275: $0.7$fm to $4.0$fm. For each set of parameters, several hundred
276: decorrelated gauge field configurations are used to measure
277: the fermionic quantities. Statistical errors are all analyzed
278: using the usual jack-knife method.
279: Single pion, kaon and rho mass values
280: are obtained from the plateau of their corresponding effective
281: mass plots. The fitting interval is automatically
282: chosen by minimal $\chi^2$ per degree of freedom.
283: Due to the usage of finer lattice spacing in
284: the temporal direction, good plateau behavior was observed
285: in these effective mass plots. Therefore, contaminations from
286: excited states should be negligible.
287: These mass values will be utilized in the chiral
288: extrapolation.
289: %
290: % %%%%%%%%%
291: % \begin{figure}[thb]
292: % \begin{center}
293: % \includegraphics[height=12.0cm,angle=0]{Kpi_ratio.ps}
294: % \end{center}
295: % \caption{The ratio $R^{(3/2)}(t)$ as a function of $t$ obtained from the
296: % $K\pi$ correlation functions for $8$ different values of the bare quark mass.
297: % The lattice size is $8^340$ and the gauge coupling
298: % $\beta=2.4$. The optimal bare velocity of light is taken to be $\nu=0.93$.
299: % The straight lines are linear fits according to
300: % Eq.~(\ref{eq:linear_fit}), from which the energy
301: % shifts $\delta E\equiv E^{(3/2)}_{K\pi}-m_K-m_\pi$ are extracted
302: % for all possible values of $(\kappa_u, \kappa_s)$.}
303: % \label{fig:Kpi_ratio}
304: % \end{figure}
305: %%%%%%%%%
306: % In Fig.~\ref{fig:Kpi_ratio} we show the ratio
307: % ${\mathcal R}^{(1)}(t)$ for different pairs of $\kappa$ values
308: % as a function of the temporal separation $t$,
309: % together with the corresponding linear fit~(\ref{eq:linear_fit}) for
310: % $\beta=2.4$ on $8^340$ lattices.
311: % The starting and ending positions of the straight lines
312: % indicate the appropriate fitting
313: % range which minimizes the $\chi^2$ per degree of freedom.
314:
315: After obtaining the energy shifts $\delta E^{(3/2)}_{K\pi}$,
316: these values are substituted into L\"uscher's formula to solve
317: for the scattering length $a^{(3/2)}_0$ for all possible
318: hopping parameter pairs: $(\kappa_u,\kappa_s)$, which
319: corresponds to the up (down) and the strange
320: bare quark mass values, respectively.
321: This is done for lattices of all sizes being
322: simulated and for all values of $\beta$.
323: From these results, attempts are made to perform
324: an extrapolation towards the chiral, infinite volume
325: and continuum limit.
326:
327: \section{Extrapolations of the scattering length}
328: \label{sec:extrap}
329:
330: The chiral extrapolations of physical quantities involving both
331: the up (down) and the strange quarks consists of two
332: steps. In the first step, the bare strange quark mass, or equivalently
333: the corresponding hopping parameter $\kappa_s$, is kept
334: fixed while the hopping parameter of the up/down quark, $\kappa_u$,
335: is brought to their physical value $\kappa^{(phy)}_u$.
336: The precise value of $\kappa^{(phy)}_u$ can be obtained by
337: inspecting the chiral behavior of the pseudo-scalar (pion)
338: and the vector meson (rho) mass values.
339: In the second step, one fixes the up/down quark
340: hopping parameter at its physical value obtained in the first step
341: and extrapolate/interpolate in
342: the strange quark mass. The physical strange quark hopping parameter
343: $\kappa^{(phy)}_s$ is determined by demanding the mass of
344: the kaon being exactly at its physical value (the so-called K-input).
345:
346: We now come to the chiral extrapolation of the scattering length.
347: In the chiral limit, the $K\pi$ scattering length in
348: the $I=3/2$ channel is given by the current algebra result:
349: \be
350: \label{eq:CA}
351: a^{(3/2)}_0 =-{1 \over 8 \pi} {\mu_{K\pi} \over f^2_\pi} \;\;,
352: \ee
353: where $a^{(3/2)}_0$ is the $K\pi$ scattering length in
354: the $I=3/2$ channel and $f_\pi\sim 93$MeV is the pion
355: decay constant.
356: To perform the chiral extrapolation of the scattering length,
357: it is more convenient to use the quantity
358: $F=a^{(3/2)}_0m^2_\rho/\mu_{K\pi}$, which in the chiral
359: limit reads: \cite{chuan02:pipiI2}
360: \be
361: \label{eq:chiral}
362: F\equiv {a^{(3/2)}_0m^2_\rho \over \mu_{K\pi}}
363: =-{1 \over 8 \pi} {m^2_\rho \over f^2_\pi}
364: \sim -2.728\;\;,
365: \ee
366: where the final numerical value is obtained
367: by substituting in the experimental values for
368: $m_\rho\sim 770$MeV and $f_\pi\sim 93$MeV.
369: One-loop corrections reduce the central value
370: of the scattering length by
371: about $28$\%, with
372: an estimated error of $40$\% \cite{meissner91:Kpi_a,meissner91:Kpi_b}.
373: The factor $F$ can be calculated on the lattice with good
374: precision {\em without} the lattice calculation of meson
375: decay constants.
376: Since we have calculated the factor $F$ for several different
377: values of valance quark mass, we could make a chiral
378: extrapolation and extract the corresponding results in the chiral limit.
379:
380: In chiral extrapolations, we have adopted a
381: quadratic functional form and
382: the fitting range of the extrapolation is self-adjusted by the
383: program to yield a minimal $\chi^2$ per degree of freedom.
384: First, we extrapolate the factor $F$ in the up/down quark mass values.
385: Second, the extrapolated values for the factor $F$ are then
386: extrapolate/interpolate in the strange quark mass.
387: In Fig.~\ref{fig:chiral_extrapolation}, we have shown the
388: extrapolation in the strange quark mass
389: for one of our simulation points.
390: %%%%%%%%%
391: \begin{figure}[thb]
392: \begin{center}
393: \vspace{-50mm}
394: \includegraphics[height=10.0cm,angle=0]{Kpi_chiralX.ps}
395: \end{center}
396: \caption{Chiral extrapolation for the quantity
397: $F\equiv a^{(1)}_0m^2_\rho/\mu_{KN}$ for our simulation results
398: at $\beta=2.4$ on $8^340$ lattices. In this plot,
399: quantity $F$, with the up and down quark mass already
400: extrapolated to the chiral limit, is plotted (open squares)
401: as a function of strange quark mass parameter $1/(2\kappa_s)$.
402: The line represents the quadratic
403: interpolation/extrapolation to the physical strange quark mass, where
404: the result is depicted as a solid square.
405: \label{fig:chiral_extrapolation}}
406: \end{figure}
407: %%%%%%%%%
408: The resulting factor $F$ after the up and down
409: quark mass extrapolation are plotted in
410: Fig.~\ref{fig:chiral_extrapolation} versus
411: the strange quark mass parameter $1/(2\kappa_s)$.
412: The line represents the quadratic extrapolation/interpolation
413: and the final result is depicted as a solid square at the physical strange
414: quark mass. The fitting quality $Q$ for this fit is also displayed.
415:
416: After the chiral extrapolation, we now turn to study
417: the finite volume effects of the simulation. According
418: to formula~(\ref{eq:luescher}), the quantity $F$ obtained
419: from finite lattices differs from
420: its infinite volume value by corrections of the form $1/L^3$.
421: In Fig.~\ref{fig:volumeX},
422: we have shown the infinite volume extrapolation for
423: our simulation points at
424: $\beta=3.0$, $2.6$, $2.4$, $2.2$ and $1.9$.
425: The extrapolated results for the factor $F$ are
426: then used for the continuum limit extrapolation.
427: %%%%%%%%%
428: \begin{figure}[thb]
429: \begin{center}
430: \vspace{-10mm}
431: \includegraphics[height=10.0cm,angle=0]{Kpi_volumeX.ps}
432: \end{center}
433: \caption{Infinite volume extrapolation for the quantity
434: $F=a^{(3/2)}_0m^2_\rho/\mu_{K\pi}$ obtained from our simulation results
435: at $\beta=3.0$, $2.6$, $2.4$, $2.2$ and $1.9$.
436: The straight line represents the linear extrapolation in $a_s/r_0$.
437: The extrapolated results are shown with solid squares at $L^{-3}=0$.
438: \label{fig:volumeX}}
439: \end{figure}
440: %%%%%%%%%
441:
442: %%%%%%%%%
443: \begin{figure}[thb]
444: \begin{center}
445: \vspace{-50mm}
446: \includegraphics[height=10.0cm,angle=0]{Kpi_continuumX.ps}
447: \end{center}
448: \caption{Continuum extrapolation for the quantity
449: $F=a^{(3/2)}_0m^2_\rho/\mu_{K\pi}$ obtained from our simulation results
450: at $\beta=3.0$, $2.6$, $2.4$, $2.2$ and $1.9$.
451: The straight line represents the linear extrapolation in $a_s/r_0$.
452: The extrapolated result is also shown as solid square with
453: the corresponding error. Also shown are the
454: result from current algebra and dispersion relations~\cite{lang77:Kpi_dispersion}.
455: They coincide numerically and the value is show as an open circle.
456: The chiral perturbation theory result is shown as
457: a solid circle with error bar.
458: \label{fig:continuum_extrapolation}}
459: \end{figure}
460: %%%%%%%%%
461: Finally, we can make an extrapolation towards the
462: continuum limit by eliminating the finite lattice
463: spacing errors. Since we have used the tadpole
464: improved clover Wilson action, all physical quantities
465: differ from their continuum counterparts by
466: terms that are proportional to $a_s$. The physical
467: value of $a_s$ for each value of $\beta$ can be
468: found from Ref. \cite{colin99,chuan01:india}.
469:
470: The result of the continuum extrapolation is shown in
471: Fig.~\ref{fig:continuum_extrapolation} where
472: the results from the chiral and infinite volume
473: extrapolation discussed above are indicated as
474: data points in the plot for all $5$ values of
475: $\beta$ that have been simulated.
476: The straight line shows
477: the extrapolation towards the $a_s=0$ limit and the
478: extrapolated result is also shown as a solid square together with
479: the chiral result from Ref.\cite{meissner91:Kpi_a,meissner91:Kpi_b}
480: which is shown as the open (tree-level, or current algebra result)
481: and filled (one-loop) circles. Result from dispersion relations
482: from Ref.~\cite{lang77:Kpi_dispersion} happens to coincide with the current
483: algebra result (open circle) numerically.
484: It is seen that these results are compatible within error bars.
485: To summarize, we obtain from the linear extrapolation the following
486: result for the quantity
487: $F=a^{(3/2)}_0m^2_\rho/\mu_{K\pi}=(-1.87\pm 0.55)$.
488: If we substitute in the physical values, we obtain the
489: $K\pi$ scattering length in the $I=3/2$ channel:
490: $a^{(3/2)}_0m_\pi= (-0.048 \pm 0.014)$, which is to be compared
491: with the one-loop chiral result of $(-0.05 \pm 0.02)$ and
492: the tree-level result (and also the early dispersion relation result) $-0.07$.
493: Our lattice study also indicates a value consistent with
494: the chiral result that is smaller in magnitude than the experimental result.
495: The experimental results for the $K\pi$ scattering
496: length $a^{(3/2)}_0m_\pi$ show sizable
497: variation~\cite{matison74:Kpi_exp_a,johannesson73:Kpi_exp_b,shaw80:Kpi_exp_c}.
498: It lies between $-0.13$ and $-0.05$, significantly larger in
499: magnitude compared with chiral and early dispersion relation results.
500: In a recent analysis~\cite{zheng04:Kpi_dispersion},
501: a value of $a^{(3/2)}_0m_\pi=-0.129\pm 0.006$
502: was obtained using dispersion relations incorporated
503: with chiral perturbation theory to fit the experimental data.
504:
505:
506: \section{Conclusions}
507: \label{sec:conclude}
508:
509: In this paper, we have calculated kaon-pion scattering
510: lengths in isospin $I=3/2$ channel using quenched
511: lattice QCD. It is shown that such a calculation
512: is feasible using relatively small, coarse and anisotropic lattices.
513: The calculation is done using the
514: tadpole improved clover Wilson action on anisotropic
515: lattices. Simulations are performed on lattices
516: with various sizes, ranging from $0.7$fm to about
517: $4$fm and with five different values of lattice spacing.
518: Quark propagators are measured with different
519: valence quark mass values. These enable us to
520: explore the finite volume and the finite
521: lattice spacing errors in a systematic fashion.
522: The infinite volume extrapolation is made.
523: The lattice result for the scattering length is
524: extrapolated towards the chiral
525: and continuum limit where a result consistent with
526: Chiral Perturbation Theory and early dispersion relation
527: calculation is found. Our result for the scattering length
528: is smaller in magnitude when compared with the
529: experimental data results.
530:
531: \section*{Acknowledgments}
532:
533: This work is supported by the National Natural
534: Science Foundation (NFS) of China under grant
535: No. 90103006, No. 10235040 and supported by the Trans-century fund from Chinese
536: Ministry of Education. C. Liu would like
537: to thank Prof.~H.~Q.~Zheng and Prof.~S.~L.~Zhu for helpful discussions.
538:
539:
540: %\bibliography{mybib}
541: %\bibliographystyle{unsrt_nt}
542: \input{Kpi.bbl}
543: \end{document}
544: