1: %
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: \documentclass[prl,aps,preprintnumbers,floatfix,byrevtex,twocolumn]{revtex4}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5: %\usepackage{rotate}
6: \usepackage{graphics}
7: %\usepackage{amsmath}
8: %\usepackage{../../../TEX/amsmath}
9: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
10: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: % \draft
14: \preprint{
15: \vbox{
16: \hbox{ADP-04-12/T594}
17: \hbox{DESY 04-074}
18: }}
19:
20:
21:
22: %\title{Light quark simulations with FLIC fermions}
23: \title{Improved chiral properties of FLIC fermions}
24:
25: \author{S.~Boinepalli$^1$, W.~Kamleh$^1$, D.B.~Leinweber$^1$,
26: A.G.~Williams$^1$ and J.M.~Zanotti$^{1,2}$}
27:
28: \affiliation{$^1$ Special Research Centre for the
29: Subatomic Structure of Matter,
30: and Department of Physics,
31: University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia}
32: \affiliation{$^2$ John von Neumann-Institut f\"ur Computing
33: NIC, \\
34: Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, D-15738 Zeuthen,
35: Germany}
36:
37: \begin{abstract}
38: The chiral properties of the fat-link irrelevant clover (FLIC)
39: fermion action are examined. The improved chiral properties of
40: fermion actions incorporating smoothed links are realized in the
41: FLIC action where only the irrelevant operators of the fermion
42: action are constructed with smoothed links. In particular, the
43: histogram of the additive mass renormalization encountered in
44: chiral-symmetry breaking Wilson-type fermion actions is seen to
45: narrow upon introducing fat-links in the irrelevant operators. The
46: exceptional configuration problem of quenched QCD is reduced,
47: enabling access to the light quark mass regime of $m_{\pi} /
48: m_{\rho} \sim 0.35$. In particular, quenched chiral non-analytic
49: behavior is revealed in the light quark mass dependence of the
50: $\Delta$-baryon mass. FLIC fermions offer a promising approach to
51: revealing the properties of full QCD at light quark masses.
52:
53: \end{abstract}
54:
55: \vspace{3mm}
56: \pacs{11.15.Ha, 12.38.Gc, 12.38.Aw}
57:
58: \maketitle
59:
60: The frontier of lattice QCD lies at the challenge of directly
61: simulating the full theory, including the dynamical sea-quark loop
62: contributions, at light quark masses.
63: %
64: In principle, the problem is solved. The advent of fermion actions
65: which provide exact lattice chiral symmetry, in particular the overlap
66: action\cite{overlap}, allows one to directly simulate at the physical
67: quark masses realized in QCD. However the computational cost of such
68: fermion actions are prohibitively expensive. Simulations on
69: physically large volumes with a cutoff sufficiently large to
70: accommodate the physics of interest are not possible at present.
71: Indeed significant breakthroughs are required to reduce the
72: computational cost to a level where leading edge computing resources
73: can have a significant impact.
74:
75: In contrast the staggered fermion action is computationally cheap and
76: is currently having a tremendous impact near the light quark mass
77: regime \cite{staggered}. Had nature presented us with four degenerate
78: light-fermion flavors, the formalism would be ideal. In this
79: formalism, the 16-fold degeneracy of fermion flavors encountered in
80: naively discretising the continuum derivative is
81: reduced to a 4-fold flavor degeneracy. In practice, the fermion determinant
82: describing the contribution of sea-quark loops having their origin in
83: the gluon field is reduced to a single flavor by taking the
84: fourth-root. This operation renders a non-local lattice action,
85: raising concerns about the continuum limit of the staggered theory
86: \cite{staggeredConcerns}.
87:
88: On the other hand the Wilson fermion action defines a local lattice
89: action for a single fermion flavor that is computationally efficient
90: but at the expense of explicitly breaking global chiral symmetry
91: through the introduction of the lattice Laplacian operator in an
92: irrelevant, energy dimension-five operator. This operator solves the
93: fermion doubling problem by giving the doublers a mass proportional to
94: the inverse lattice spacing $a$, but at the expense of introducing
95: large ${\cal O}(a)$ errors. A systematic approach
96: \cite{Symanzik:1983dc} to achieving efficient ${\cal O}(a)$
97: improvement of the lattice fermion action leads to the
98: Sheikholeslami-Wohlert fermion \cite{Sheikholeslami:1985ij} action, or
99: ``clover action'', so named because it is constructed by adding the
100: clover term, $(i\, g\, a\, C_{\rm SW}\, / 4)\,
101: \bar{\psi}(x)\, \sigma_{\mu\nu} F_{\mu\nu}\, \psi(x)$
102: to the standard Wilson action \cite{Wilson}.
103: % (see Eqs. (\ref{FLIC},\ref{MFIW})).
104: %
105: The clover coefficient, $C_{\scriptstyle {\rm SW}}$, can be tuned to
106: remove ${\cal O}(a)$ artifacts to all orders in the gauge coupling
107: constant $g$. Nonperturbative methods have been established
108: \cite{Luscher:1996sc,FATJAMES,FLICscaling} to accurately define
109: improvement coefficients such as $C_{\scriptstyle {\rm SW}}$ in the
110: interacting theory. Traditionally, large renormalizations of the
111: improvement coefficients have hindered the realization of lattice
112: action improvement in practice.
113:
114: While the nonperturbatively improved SW action correctly defines a
115: lattice action for a single fermion flavor, scales well
116: \cite{Edwards:1998nh}, and remains computationally efficient, the
117: breaking of global chiral symmetry makes the approach to the chiral
118: regime difficult. Global chiral symmetry breaking introduces an
119: additive mass renormalization into the Dirac operator that can give
120: rise to singularities in quark propagators at small quark masses. The
121: problem is exacerbated through the use of large lattice volumes; large
122: values of the strong coupling constant, $g$, providing large lattice
123: spacings, $a$; or large values of the improvement coefficient,
124: $C_{\scriptstyle {\rm SW}}$
125: \cite{Luscher:1996sc,Bardeen:1998gv,DeGrand:1998jq}. In practice,
126: this prevents the use of coarse lattices (Wilson: $\beta < 5.7 \sim a
127: > 0.18$~fm) \cite{Bardeen:1998gv,DeGrand:1998jq}.
128:
129: The singularities are caused by the shifting of the point where the
130: renormalized mass is zero, away from the point where the bare mass
131: parameter $m$ is zero. The position of the singularity is both gauge
132: configuration and action dependent \cite{Bardeen:1998gv}. Bare quark
133: masses must be shifted by an amount dependent on the gauge action to
134: restore chiral symmetry. That is, a ``critical mass'' is introduced
135: and fine tuned such that the pion mass vanishes when the quark masses
136: take the critical mass $m=m_{\rm cr}$. All other quark masses are
137: measured relative to $m_{\rm cr}$.
138:
139: The difficulty in approaching the chiral regime becomes apparent once
140: one realizes the critical mass varies on a gauge-field configuration
141: by configuration basis. For fixed input bare mass, the renormalized
142: mass, relevant to the physical properties of the quark, is different
143: on every configuration. Given that most observables encounter rapidly
144: varying chiral nonanalytic behavior in the chiral regime
145: \cite{FRRchiPT}, this small variation in the renormalized mass gives
146: rise to widely varying hadron properties on a configuration by
147: configuration basis which is ultimately realized as a large
148: statistical error bar in hadronic observables.
149: %
150: Thus, for the generation of gluon-field configurations incorporating
151: the effects of dynamical fermion loops, the development of chirally
152: improved fermion actions which minimize the breadth of the
153: distribution of the critical mass obtained on a configuration by
154: configuration basis (while maintaining only nearest neighbor
155: interactions) is highly desirable.
156:
157: In the generation of dynamical-fermion gauge configurations the
158: fermion determinant acts to suppress the probability of creating
159: configurations giving rise to approximate zeromodes of the Dirac
160: operator, $D(m)$. In the quenched approximation, the fermion
161: determinant is set to a constant and a proliferation of approximate
162: zeromodes is encountered. At sufficiently light renormalized quark
163: mass, it is possible to have the critical mass realized on a
164: particular configuration near the bare mass, introducing a divergence
165: in the quark propagator. Such ``exceptional'' configurations provide
166: hadronic correlation functions which differ significantly in magnitude
167: from the average, again introducing large statistical uncertainties
168: and on some occasions spoiling the ensemble average result.
169:
170: Fat-link actions \cite{DeGrand:1998jq,DeGrand:1999gp} have been
171: identified as providing improved chiral properties while maintaining
172: only nearest neighbor interactions. Fat links are obtained by
173: averaging the gauge field links, $U_\mu(x) = \exp[ i g \int_0^a
174: A_\mu(x + \lambda \widehat \mu) d\lambda]$, with their transverse
175: neighbors in an iterative process of APE smearing \cite{APE} or HYP
176: smearing \cite{HYP}. The incorporation of smoothed links throughout
177: the fermion action removes short distance interactions and thus
178: suppresses renormalizations of the critical mass in the interacting
179: theory. DeGrand {\it et al.}~\cite{DeGrand:1998jq} noted that the
180: appearance of spurious zero modes is due to local lattice dislocations
181: with non-zero topology at the scale of the cutoff. By smoothing the
182: gauge field at short distances it was possible to narrow the
183: distribution of the critical mass by about a factor of three, thus
184: reducing the problem of exceptional configurations.
185:
186: However short distance effects are lost in the fat-link theory. FLIC
187: fermions circumvent this problem by introducing fat-links only in the
188: purely irrelevant lattice operators of the clover action
189: \cite{Sheikholeslami:1985ij}, having energy dimension five or more.
190: The untouched gauge fields generated via Monte Carlo methods form the
191: relevant operators associated with the continuum action. FLIC
192: fermions provide near continuum results at finite lattice spacing,
193: while preserving short distance physics.
194: %
195: The FLIC action provides an alternative form of nonperturbative ${\cal
196: O}(a)$ improvement \cite{FLICscaling} which avoids the fine tuning
197: problem of improvement coefficients.
198:
199:
200: The focus of this investigation is to determine the extent to which
201: the improved chiral properties of fat-link fermion actions are
202: realized with FLIC fermions. Previous work
203: \cite{FATJAMES,Kamleh:2001ff} has shown that the FLIC fermion action
204: has extremely impressive convergence rates for matrix inversion, which
205: provides great promise for performing cost effective simulations at
206: quark masses closer to the physical values. In the following, we will
207: illustrate how the distribution of the critical mass $m_{\rm cr}$ is
208: narrowed sufficiently to allow simulations at light quark masses
209: providing $m_{\pi} / m_{\rho} \sim 0.35$ while exceptional
210: configurations, encountered in the quenched approximation, are limited
211: to $\sim 6\%$. Access to the light quark mass region is sufficient to
212: reveal quenched chiral nonanalytic behavior in the quark mass
213: dependence of the $\Delta$-baryon mass.
214:
215: Our simulations are based on gauge fields described by the ${\cal
216: O}(a^2)$-mean-field improved Luscher-Weisz plaquette plus rectangle
217: gauge action \cite{Luscher:1984xn}. We begin with a study of
218: the distribution of zero modes on 100 $12^3\times 24$ lattices at
219: $\beta=4.60$, giving a lattice spacing of $a =
220: 0.116(2)$~fm. The subsequent calculations of
221: baryon masses are performed on a sample of 400 $20^3\times 40$
222: lattices at $\beta=4.53,\ a = 0.128(2)$~fm. The scale is set via $r_0.$
223:
224: The mean-field improved FLIC action is \cite{FATJAMES,FLICscaling}
225: %
226: \be
227: S_{\rm SW}^{\rm FL}
228: = S_{\rm W}^{\rm FL} - \frac{i\, g\, C_{\rm SW}\, \kappa\,
229: r}{2(u_{0}^{\rm FL})^4}\,
230: \bar{\psi}(x)\, \sigma_{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}\, \psi(x)\, ,
231: \label{FLIC}
232: \ee
233: %
234: where $F_{\mu\nu}$ is an ${\cal O}(a^4)$-improved lattice definition
235: \cite{Bilson-Thompson:2002jk} constructed using fat links, $u_{0}^{\rm FL}$ is
236: the plaquette measure of the mean link calculated with fat links, and
237: where the mean-field improved Fat-Link Irrelevant Wilson action is
238: %
239: \begin{eqnarray}
240: S_{\rm W}^{\rm FL}
241: = &\sum_x& \bar{\psi}(x)\psi(x)
242: + \kappa \sum_{x,\mu} \bar{\psi}(x)
243: \bigg[ \gamma_{\mu}
244: \bigg( \frac{U_{\mu}(x)}{u_0} \psi(x+\hat{\mu}) \nonumber \\
245: &-& \frac{U^{\dagger}_{\mu}(x-\hat{\mu})}{u_0} \psi(x-\hat{\mu})
246: \bigg)
247: - r \bigg(
248: \frac{U_{\mu}^{\rm FL}(x)}{u_0^{\rm FL}} \psi(x+\hat{\mu})\nonumber\\
249: &+& \frac{U^{{\rm FL}\dagger}_{\mu}(x-\hat{\mu})}{u_0^{\rm FL}}
250: \psi(x-\hat{\mu})
251: \bigg)
252: \bigg]\ .
253: \label{MFIW}
254: \end{eqnarray}
255: %
256: with $\kappa = 1/(2m+8r)$. We take the standard value $r=1$. Our
257: notation uses the Pauli representation of the Dirac $\gamma$-matrices
258: \cite{SAKURAI}, where the $\gamma$-matrices are hermitian
259: and $\sigma_{\mu\nu} = [\gamma_{\mu},\ \gamma_{\nu}]/(2i)$. Fat links
260: are constructed by performing $n_{\rm APE}$ sweeps of APE smearing,
261: where in each sweep the weights given to the original link and the
262: six transverse staples are 0.3 and $(0.7/6)$ respectively.
263: %
264: The FLIC action is closely related to the mean-field improved clover
265: (MFIC) fermion action in that the latter is described by
266: Eqs.~(\ref{FLIC}) and (\ref{MFIW}) with all fat-links replaced by
267: untouched thin links and $F_{\mu\nu}$ defined by the $1 \times 1$-loop
268: clover definition.
269:
270: The critical mass for a particular configuration is determined by
271: examining the spectral flow of the Hermitian FLIC Dirac operator,
272: $\gamma_5 D(m)$, commencing with quark masses in the physical mass
273: regime and proceeding towards the negative quark mass regime relevant
274: to overlap fermions. The physical regime is characterized by the
275: magnitude of the lowest eigenvalue $\lambda_{\rm min}(m)$ decreasing
276: as $m$ decreases. The negative mass regime is characterized by the
277: presence of eigenvalues crossing zero, due to non-trivial topology.
278: The larger the topological object, the closer to $m_{\rm cr}$ is the
279: induced zero crossing \cite{Kusterer:2001vk}. Hence, we can determine
280: the regime transition point by calculating $\lambda_{\rm min}(m)$ and
281: observing it decrease with $m$ until it either crosses zero or turns
282: away and begins to increase. The critical mass is then defined as the
283: $m$ at which the transition occurs.
284:
285: \begin{figure}[tb]
286: \begin{center}
287: {\includegraphics[height=0.8\hsize,angle=90]{./clovermcrb460.ps}}
288: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
289: \caption{Histogram of the critical mass obtained from the spectral
290: flow of the mean-field improved clover (MFIC) fermion action on 100
291: configurations.}
292: \label{clovermcr}
293: \end{center}
294: \vspace{-0.5cm}
295: \end{figure}
296:
297: \begin{figure}[tb]
298: \begin{center}
299: {\includegraphics[height=0.8\hsize,angle=90]{./flicmcrb460.ps}}
300: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
301: \caption{Histogram of the critical mass obtained from the spectral
302: flow of the fat-link irrelevant clover (FLIC) fermion action ($n_{\rm APE}=4$) on 100
303: configurations.}
304: \label{flicmcr}
305: \end{center}
306: \vspace{-0.6cm}
307: \end{figure}
308:
309: Figures \ref{clovermcr} and \ref{flicmcr} illustrate histograms of the
310: critical mass obtained from the MFIC fermion action and FLIC fermion
311: action respectively. Each histogram is obtained from the same set of
312: 100 configurations (cfgs). The FLIC fermion distribution of the
313: critical mass is significantly narrower than that of the MFIC
314: action, by a factor of two. Since the nonperturbatively improved
315: estimate of $C_{\scriptstyle {\rm SW}}$ typically exceeds that of the
316: mean-field improved estimate, the distribution for the
317: nonperturbatively improved clover (NPIC) action will be broader than
318: that of Fig.~\ref{clovermcr}. Thus FLIC fermions offer a chirally
319: improved alternative to MFIC and NPIC fermion actions. FLIC fermions
320: enjoy a significantly reduced exceptional configuration
321: problem, and provide reduced fluctuations in hadronic observables as
322: the chiral limit is approached in full QCD.
323:
324: To directly examine the chiral properties of the FLIC fermion action,
325: we determine the low-lying hadron mass spectrum. Hadron masses are
326: extracted from the Euclidean-time dependence of the two-point
327: correlation functions using standard techniques. Effective masses are
328: calculated as a function of time and time-fitting intervals and are
329: selected via standard covariance matrix estimates of the $\chi^2 /
330: N_{\rm DF}$. For quark masses lighter than the strange quark mass,
331: effective mass splittings are calculated and fit using the same
332: techniques. By examining mass splittings, excited-state contributions
333: (less dependent on the quark mass) are suppressed and good $\chi^2 /
334: N_{\rm DF}$ are found one-to-two time slices earlier.
335:
336: In searching for exceptional configurations, we follow the
337: technique used by Della Morte {\it et al.} \cite{TMass}.
338: In the absence of exceptional configurations, the standard deviation
339: of an observable is independent of the number of configurations
340: considered in the average. Exceptional configurations reveal
341: themselves by introducing a significant jump in the standard deviation
342: as the configuration is introduced into the average.
343:
344: \begin{figure}[t]
345: \begin{center}
346: {\includegraphics[height=0.90\hsize,angle=90]{./errorMassFit-100.ps}}
347: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
348: \caption{ The standard deviation in the error of the $\pi$ mass
349: calculated on 30 configurations plotted against the starting
350: configuration number for the FLIC-fermion action on a
351: $20^3 \times 40$ lattice with $a=0.128(2)$~fm. See text for details. }
352: \label{PiErrvsCFG}
353: \end{center}
354: \vspace*{-0.7cm}
355: \end{figure}
356:
357: Fig.~\ref{PiErrvsCFG} shows the standard deviation of the pion mass
358: for eight quark masses on subsets of a total of 100 configurations. A
359: moving average of 30 configurations is considered, with a cyclic
360: property enforced from configuration 100 to configuration 1. Configuration 41
361: is revealed to be exceptional by noting that between $N=12$ and $N=41$ the
362: error blows up for several quark masses and then drops again at
363: $N=42$ as configuration 41 leaves the moving average.
364: The observation of
365: a large change in the pion mass as
366: config.\ 41 in included in the ensemble confirms the exceptional behavior.
367: Exceptional behavior is also observed for the lightest quark mass for
368: configurations 2, 13, 30, 34 and 53. Upon removal of these
369: configurations, a near-constant behavior of the standard deviation is
370: observed for all quark masses.
371: %
372: Given the relatively coarse lattice spacing, large volume, and the
373: lightest quark mass providing $m_{\pi} / m_{\rho} \sim 0.35$, an
374: elimination rate of $\sim 6\%$ is a remarkable result.
375:
376: \begin{figure}[t]
377: \begin{center}
378: {\includegraphics[height=0.9\hsize,angle=90]{./massR.RhoNDelta.ps}}
379: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
380: \caption{$\rho$, $N$ and $\Delta$ masses for the
381: FLIC-fermion action ($n_{\rm APE} = 6$) on 400 $20^3 \times 40$
382: lattices with $a=0.128(2)$ fm. }
383: \label{LQM}
384: \end{center}
385: \vspace*{-0.9cm}
386: \end{figure}
387:
388: Figure~\ref{LQM} shows the $\rho$, $N$ and $\Delta$ masses as a function of
389: $m_{\pi}^2$ for the FLIC-fermion action.
390: %
391: An upward curvature in the $\Delta$ mass for decreasing quark mass is
392: observed in the FLIC fermion results. This behavior, increasing the
393: quenched $N-\Delta$ mass spitting, was predicted by Young {\em et al}.\
394: \cite{Young:2002cj} using quenched chiral perturbation theory (Q$\chi$PT)
395: formulated with a finite-range regulator. This is the first time that
396: clear quenched chiral nonanalytic behavior has been observed in a
397: baryon mass. Simulations in quenched QCD with Wilson-type fermions on
398: this lattice spacing for these light quark masses have been previously
399: unattainable. Numerical results are summarized in Table
400: \ref{results}.
401:
402:
403: \begin{table}
404: \caption{Values of $\kappa$ and the corresponding $\pi,\, \rho,\,
405: {N}$ and $\Delta$ masses (in GeV) for the FLIC fermion action
406: on a $20^3 \times 40$ lattice with $a=0.128(2)$ fm.}
407: \label{results}
408: \begin{ruledtabular}
409: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
410: $\kappa$ & $\pi$ & $\rho$ & $N$ & $\Delta$ \\
411: \hline
412: 0.12780 & 0.831(2) & 1.119(04) & 1.629(08) & 1.845(10) \\
413: 0.12830 & 0.770(2) & 1.082(05) & 1.554(09) & 1.791(11) \\
414: 0.12885 & 0.697(2) & 1.041(07) & 1.468(11) & 1.732(12) \\
415: 0.12940 & 0.616(3) & 1.001(07) & 1.383(11) & 1.673(14) \\
416: 0.12990 & 0.533(3) & 0.965(08) & 1.301(11) & 1.622(16) \\
417: 0.13025 & 0.464(4) & 0.941(09) & 1.243(12) & 1.592(17) \\
418: 0.13060 & 0.372(6) & 0.923(11) & 1.190(15) & 1.565(18) \\
419: 0.13080 & 0.306(7) & 0.917(13) & 1.159(21) & 1.550(19) \\
420: \end{tabular}
421: \end{ruledtabular}
422: \vspace*{-0.45cm}
423: \end{table}
424:
425:
426: In summary, the Fat-Link Irrelevant Clover (FLIC) fermion action is an
427: efficient lattice fermion operator with excellent scaling properties,
428: providing near-continuum results at finite lattice spacing. The
429: superior chiral properties of the FLIC fermion action enable access to
430: the light quark-mass regime. With recent breakthroughs in dynamical
431: fermion simulations of fat-link fermion actions \cite{Kamleh:2004xk}
432: FLIC fermions offer a promising approach to revealing the properties
433: of full QCD at light quark masses.
434:
435:
436: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
437:
438: We thank the Australian Partnership for Advanced
439: Computing (APAC) and the Australian National Computing Facility for
440: Lattice Gauge Theory for generous grants of supercomputer time which
441: have enabled this project. This work is supported by the Australian
442: Research Council.
443: \vspace*{-0.7cm}
444:
445: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
446: \begin{thebibliography}{40}
447:
448: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
449:
450: \bibitem{overlap}
451: H.~Neuberger,
452: %``Exactly massless quarks on the lattice,''
453: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 417}, 141 (1998).
454: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9707022;%%
455:
456: \bibitem{staggered}
457: %\cite{Davies:2003ik}
458: %\bibitem{Davies:2003ik}
459: C.~T.~H.~Davies {\it et al.} [HPQCD Collaboration],
460: %``High-precision lattice QCD confronts experiment,''
461: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 92}, 022001 (2004)
462: [hep-lat/0304004].
463: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0304004;%%
464:
465: \bibitem{staggeredConcerns}
466: %\cite{Bunk:2004br}
467: %\bibitem{Bunk:2004br}
468: B.~Bunk {\it et al.},
469: %M.~Della Morte, K.~Jansen and F.~Knechtli,
470: %``Locality with staggered fermions,''
471: hep-lat/0403022.
472: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0403022;%%
473: %\cite{Neuberger:2004ft}
474: H.~Neuberger,
475: %``Lattice field theory: Past, present and future,''
476: hep-ph/0402148.
477: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402148;%%
478:
479: %\cite{Symanzik:1983dc}
480: \bibitem{Symanzik:1983dc}
481: K.~Symanzik,
482: %``Continuum Limit And Improved Action In Lattice Theories. 1. Principles And Phi**4 Theory,''
483: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B226} (1983) 187.
484: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B226,187;%%
485:
486: %\cite{Sheikholeslami:1985ij}
487: \bibitem{Sheikholeslami:1985ij}
488: B.~Sheikholeslami and R.~Wohlert,
489: %``Improved Continuum Limit Lattice Action For QCD With Wilson Fermions,''
490: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B259} (1985) 572.
491: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B259,572;%%
492:
493: \bibitem{Wilson}
494: K.G.~Wilson, in {\it New Phenomena in Subnuclear Physics}, Part A,
495: A.~Zichichi (ed.),
496: Plenum Press, New York, p.~69, 1975.
497:
498: %\cite{Luscher:1996sc}
499: \bibitem{Luscher:1996sc}
500: M.~Luscher {\it et al.},
501: %S.~Sint, R.~Sommer and P.~Weisz,
502: %``Chiral symmetry and O(a) improvement in lattice QCD,''
503: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B478} (1996) 365
504: [hep-lat/9605038];
505: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9605038;%%
506: %\cite{Luscher:1997ug}
507: %\bibitem{Luscher:1997ug}
508: M.~Luscher {\it et al.},
509: %S.~Sint, R.~Sommer, P.~Weisz and U.~Wolff,
510: %``Non-perturbative O(a) improvement of lattice QCD,''
511: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B491} (1997) 323, 344
512: [hep-lat/9609035].
513: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9609035;%%
514:
515: \bibitem{FATJAMES}
516: J.M.~Zanotti {\it et al.},
517: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 074507 (2002)
518: [hep-lat/0110216].
519: %Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl.109:101-105,2002 [hep-lat/0201004].
520: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0110216;%%
521:
522: \bibitem{FLICscaling}
523: J.~M.~Zanotti, B.~Lasscock, D.~B.~Leinweber, and A.~G.~Williams,
524: %``Scaling of FLIC Fermions,''
525: hep-lat/0405015.
526:
527: %\cite{Edwards:1998nh}
528: \bibitem{Edwards:1998nh}
529: R.G.~Edwards, U.M.~Heller and T.R.~Klassen,
530: %``The effectiveness of non-perturbative O(a) improvement in lattice QCD,''
531: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 80} (1998) 3448
532: [hep-lat/9711052].
533: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9711052;%%
534:
535: %\cite{Bardeen:1998gv}
536: \bibitem{Bardeen:1998gv}
537: W.~Bardeen, {\it et al.},
538: % A.~Duncan, E.~Eichten, G.~Hockney and H.~Thacker,
539: %``Light quarks, zero modes, and exceptional configurations,''
540: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57} (1998) 1633
541: [hep-lat/9705008];
542: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9705008;%%
543: %\cite{Bardeen:1998eq}
544: %\bibitem{Bardeen:1998eq}
545: W.~Bardeen, {\it et al.},
546: % A.~Duncan, E.~Eichten and H.~Thacker,
547: %``Quenched approximation artifacts: A Study in two-dimensional QED,''
548: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57} (1998) 3890.
549: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D57,3890;%%
550:
551: %\cite{DeGrand:1998jq}
552: \bibitem{DeGrand:1998jq}
553: T.~DeGrand {\it et al.} (MILC Collaboration),
554: %A.~Hasenfratz and T.~G.~Kovacs (MILC Collaboration)
555: %``Optimizing the chiral properties of lattice fermion actions,''
556: [hep-lat/9807002].
557: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9807002;%%
558:
559: \bibitem{FRRchiPT}
560: %
561: %\cite{Leinweber:2002qb}
562: %\bibitem{Leinweber:2002qb}
563: D.~B.~Leinweber,
564: %``Quark contributions to baryon magnetic moments in full, quenched and
565: %partially quenched QCD,''
566: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 014005 (2004)
567: [hep-lat/0211017];
568: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0211017;%%
569: %
570: %\cite{Hackett-Jones:2000js}
571: %\bibitem{Hackett-Jones:2000js}
572: E.~J.~Hackett-Jones, {\it et al.},
573: % D.~B.~Leinweber and A.~W.~Thomas,
574: %``Incorporating chiral symmetry and heavy quark theory in extrapolations of
575: %octet baryon charge radii,''
576: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 494}, 89 (2000)
577: [hep-lat/0008018];
578: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0008018;%%
579: %
580: %\cite{Hackett-Jones:2000qk}
581: %\bibitem{Hackett-Jones:2000qk}
582: {\it ibid.\ }
583: % E.~J.~Hackett-Jones, {\it et al.},
584: % D.~B.~Leinweber and A.~W.~Thomas,
585: %``Incorporating chiral symmetry in extrapolations of octet baryon magnetic
586: %moments,''
587: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 489}, 143 (2000)
588: [hep-lat/0004006];
589: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0004006;%%
590: %
591: %\cite{Detmold:2001hq}
592: %\bibitem{Detmold:2001hq}
593: W.~Detmold, {\it et al.},
594: % D.~B.~Leinweber, W.~Melnitchouk, A.~W.~Thomas and S.~V.~Wright,
595: %``A new slant on hadron structure,''
596: Pramana {\bf 57}, 251 (2001)
597: [nucl-th/0104043];
598: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0104043;%%
599: %
600: %\cite{Cloet:2003jm}
601: %\bibitem{Cloet:2003jm}
602: I.~C.~Cloet, {\it et al.},
603: % D.~B.~Leinweber and A.~W.~Thomas,
604: %``Delta baryon magnetic moments from lattice QCD,''
605: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 563}, 157 (2003)
606: [hep-lat/0302008].
607: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0302008;%%
608:
609: %\cite{DeGrand:1999gp}
610: \bibitem{DeGrand:1999gp}
611: T.~DeGrand (MILC collaboration),
612: %``Simple observables from fat link fermion actions,''
613: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60} (1999) 094501
614: [hep-lat/9903006].
615: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9903006;%%
616:
617: \bibitem{APE}
618: M.~Falcioni {\it et al.},
619: %M. Paciello, G. Parisi, B. Taglienti,
620: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B251} (1985) 624;
621: M.~Albanese {\it et al.},
622: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 192} (1987) 163.
623:
624: \bibitem{HYP}
625: %\cite{Hasenfratz:2001hp}
626: %\bibitem{Hasenfratz:2001hp}
627: A.~Hasenfratz and F.~Knechtli,
628: %``Flavor symmetry and the static potential with hypercubic blocking,''
629: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 034504 (2001)
630: [hep-lat/0103029].
631: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0103029;%%
632:
633: %\cite{Kamleh:2001ff}
634: \bibitem{Kamleh:2001ff}
635: W.~Kamleh, {\it et al.},
636: % D.~H.~Adams, D.~B.~Leinweber and A.~G.~Williams,
637: %``Accelerated overlap fermions,''
638: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 014501 (2002)
639: [hep-lat/0112041].
640: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0112041;%%
641:
642: %\cite{Luscher:1984xn}
643: \bibitem{Luscher:1984xn}
644: M.~Luscher and P.~Weisz,
645: %``On-Shell Improved Lattice Gauge Theories,''
646: Commun.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 97}, 59 (1985)
647: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 98}, 433 (1985)].
648: %%CITATION = CMPHA,97,59;%%
649:
650: %\cite{Edwards:1997xf}
651: \bibitem{Edwards:1997xf}
652: R.~G.~Edwards, U.~M.~Heller and T.~R.~Klassen,
653: %``Accurate scale determinations for the Wilson gauge action,''
654: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 517}, 377 (1998)
655: [hep-lat/9711003].
656: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9711003;%%
657:
658: %\cite{Bilson-Thompson:2002jk}
659: \bibitem{Bilson-Thompson:2002jk}
660: S.~O.~Bilson-Thompson, {\it et al.},
661: % D.~B.~Leinweber and A.~G.~Williams,
662: %``Highly-improved lattice field-strength tensor,''
663: Annals Phys.\ {\bf 304}, 1 (2003)
664: [hep-lat/0203008].
665: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0203008;%%
666:
667: \bibitem{SAKURAI}
668: J.J.~Sakurai,
669: ``Advanced Quantum Mechanics'' (Addison-Wesley, 1982).
670:
671: %\cite{Kusterer:2001vk}
672: \bibitem{Kusterer:2001vk}
673: D.~J.~Kusterer, {\it et al.},
674: % J.~Hedditch, W.~Kamleh, D.~B.~Leinweber and A.~G.~Williams,
675: %``Low-lying eigenmodes of the Wilson-Dirac operator and correlations with
676: %topological objects,''
677: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 628}, 253 (2002)
678: [hep-lat/0111029].
679: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0111029;%%
680:
681: % %\cite{Gusken:qx}
682: % \bibitem{Gusken:qx}
683: % S.~Gusken,
684: % %``A Study Of Smearing Techniques For Hadron Correlation Functions,''
685: % Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf 17}, 361 (1990).
686: % %%CITATION = NUPHZ,17,361;%%
687:
688: % %\cite{Melnitchouk:2002eg}
689: % \bibitem{NSTAR}
690: % W.~Melnitchouk {\it et al.},
691: % %``Excited baryons in lattice QCD,''
692: % Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 114506 (2003)
693: % [hep-lat/0202022].
694: % %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0202022;%%
695:
696: % %\cite{Zanotti:2003fx}
697: % \bibitem{Spin32}
698: % %\cite{Zanotti:2003fx}
699: % %\bibitem{Zanotti:2003fx}
700: % J.~M.~Zanotti, {\it et al.},
701: % % D.~B.~Leinweber, A.~G.~Williams, J.~B.~Zhang, W.~Melnitchouk and S.~Choe
702: % % [CSSM Lattice collaboration],
703: % %``Spin-3/2 nucleon and Delta baryons in lattice QCD,''
704: % Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 054506 (2003)
705: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0304001].
706: % %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0304001;%%
707:
708: \bibitem{TMass}
709: M.~Della Morte {\it et al.},
710: hep-lat/0111048.
711:
712: %\cite{Young:2002cj}
713: \bibitem{Young:2002cj}
714: R.~D.~Young, {\it et al.},
715: % D.~B.~Leinweber, A.~W.~Thomas and S.~V.~Wright,
716: %``Chiral analysis of quenched baryon masses,''
717: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 094507 (2002)
718: [hep-lat/0205017].
719: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0205017;%%
720:
721: %\cite{Kamleh:2004xk}
722: \bibitem{Kamleh:2004xk}
723: W.~Kamleh, D.~B.~Leinweber and A.~G.~Williams,
724: %``Hybrid Monte Carlo with fat link fermion actions,''
725: hep-lat/0403019;
726: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0403019;%%
727: %
728: %\cite{Kamleh:2004ti}
729: %\bibitem{Kamleh:2004ti}
730: %W.~Kamleh, D.~B.~Leinweber and A.~G.~Williams,
731: {\it ibid.},
732: %``Dynamical fat link fermions,''
733: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 128}, 96 (2004)
734: [hep-lat/0402036];
735: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0402036;%%
736: %
737: %\cite{Kamleh:2003wb}
738: %\bibitem{Kamleh:2003wb}
739: %W.~Kamleh, D.~B.~Leinweber and A.~G.~Williams,
740: {\it ibid.},
741: %``Dynamical FLIC fermions,''
742: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 129-130}, 826 (2004)
743: [hep-lat/0309154].
744: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0309154;%%
745:
746: \end{thebibliography}
747:
748: \end{document}
749: