1: \documentclass[fleqn,twoside]{article}
2: \usepackage{espcrc2}
3:
4: \usepackage[cp850]{inputenc}
5: \usepackage{verbatim}
6:
7:
8: \usepackage{graphicx}
9: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
10: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
11: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
12: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
13:
14:
15: \title{Finite Size Scaling, Fisher Zeroes and $\cal{N}$=4 Super Yang-Mills
16: \vspace{0.2cm}}
17:
18: \author{P.R. Crompton\address
19: {Institut\ f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at Leipzig, Augustusplatz 10/11, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany.
20: \vspace{-0.6cm}},
21: W. Janke\addressmark,
22: Z.X. Xu\address{Zhejiang Institute of Modern Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, People's Republic
23: of China.} and
24: H.P. Ying\addressmark \vspace{0.2cm}}
25:
26: %\address[Halle]{FB Physik, Martin-Luther Universit\"at Halle-Wittenberg,
27: %von-Seckendorff Platz 1, D-06099 Halle, Germany.}
28:
29: \begin{document}
30:
31: \begin{abstract}
32: We investigate critical slowing down in the local updating continuous-time Quantum Monte Carlo
33: method by relating the finite size scaling of Fisher Zeroes to the dynamically generated gap,
34: through the scaling of their respective critical exponents. As we comment, the nonlinear
35: sigma model representation derived through the hamiltonian of our lattice spin model can also be used to give a
36: effective treatment of planar anomalous dimensions in $\cal{N}$=4 SYM. We present scaling arguments from our FSS
37: analysis to discuss quantum corrections and recent 2-loop results, and further comment on the prospects of extending this approach for
38: calculating higher twist parton distributions.
39: \vspace{-1mm}
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \maketitle
43:
44: \section{VBS PHASE TRANSITIONS}
45: We investigate the critical behavior of Valence-Bond-Solid (VBS) states in quantum spin chains by means of Quantum Monte
46: Carlo (QMC) simulation using the continuous-time loop cluster algorithm \cite{qmc}. Following
47: \emph{Haldane's conjecture} a variety of exotic magnetic phenomena can be attributed to the formation of ground states
48: with an energy-gap in integer spin systems at low temperatures. These gapped states are predicted to have transitions
49: with a massless excitation between phases, and can be effectively expressed in terms of a VBS state (spin-singlet)
50: picture. The \emph{Lieb-Schultz-Mattis argument} to this conjecture has led to the recent introduction of a string
51: exact order parameter to characterise these VBS transitions. We investigate the Finite Size Scaling (FSS) properties
52: of a generalised \emph{twist} order parameter for a periodic mixed-spin chain \cite{ying} with a unit cell of the form
53: ($1, 1, \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}$). Also determining the FSS properties of the complex-temperature (Fisher) zeroes of
54: the partition function \cite{zeros}, evaluated in a new scheme through knowledge of the QMC transfer matrix.
55: This enables us to
56: separate pseudocritical and critical point scaling behavior relating to the correlation length exponent and also to
57: locate the VBS state transition points through an independent and expeditious means. Leading corrections to the FSS of
58: the zeroes are also known exactly for comparable models such as the 2D Ising model with Brascamp-Kunz boundary value
59: conditions \cite{wzeros}. We compare the FSS of these indicators to evaluate the critical exponents for the VBS
60: transitions, comparing with nonlinear $\sigma$-model predictions.
61:
62: The Hamiltonian for the AHFM two-spin chain with spins ${\bf S}^{\bf{a}}
63: $ and ${\bf S}^{\bf{b}}$ of period-4 is given as,
64:
65: \begin{figure}
66: \begin{center}
67: \includegraphics[width=4cm]{fig1.EPSF}
68: \end{center}
69: \vspace{-13mm}
70: \caption{Periodic mixed spin cell, \cite{nonlinsig}.}
71: \end{figure}
72:
73:
74: \begin{eqnarray}
75: H && \!\!\!\!\!\!\! = \sum_{j=1}^{N/4} \,
76: ( J_{\bf{aa}} \, {\bf S}^{\bf{a}}_{4j+1} \cdot {\bf S}^{\bf{a}}_{4j+2}
77: + J_{\bf{ab}} \, {\bf S}^{\bf{a}}_{4j+2} \cdot {\bf S}^{\bf{b}}_{4j+3}
78: \nonumber \\
79: && \!\!\!\!\! + J_{\bf{bb}} \, {\bf S}^{\bf{b}}_{4j+3} \cdot {\bf S}^{\bf{b}}_{4j+4}
80: + \,\, J_{\bf{ab}} \, {\bf S}^{\bf{b}}_{4j+4} \cdot {\bf S}^{\bf{a}}_{4j+5} )
81: \end{eqnarray}
82:
83: with $J_{\bf{aa}}$=$J_{\bf{bb}}$=1 and the coupling anisotropy $\alpha =
84: J_{\bf{ab}} / J_{\bf{aa}}$.
85:
86:
87: We anticipate competing low-temperature \emph{VBS} dimer gap states from
88: nonlinear sigma model treatment \cite{nonlinsig}, separated via a quantum phase transition
89: at critical anisotropy at $\alpha_{c}$.
90: We use a Lieb-Schultz-Mattis extension \emph{twist-operator} on the groundstate $(\, |\Psi\rangle = U|\Psi_0\rangle\,\! )$
91: \cite{twist}, as an exact order parameter for the VBS states to signal this transition,
92:
93:
94: \begin{figure}
95: \begin{center}
96: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{zl.eps}
97: \end{center}
98: \vspace{-13mm}
99: \caption{Twist order parameter, $z_L$.}
100: \end{figure}
101:
102:
103: \begin{equation}
104: {\cal{O}}_{\rm string} \!\!= \!\! -\lim_{|k-l|_{\rightarrow\infty}}
105: \! \langle\Psi_0| S_{k}
106: \exp\!\!\left[{\rm i} \pi\!\!\!\sum_{j=k+1}^{l-1} \!\!\!\! S_{j}\right]\!\!S_{l}|\Psi_0\rangle ,
107: \label{eqn:string}
108: \end{equation}
109:
110: \begin{eqnarray}
111: U\equiv\exp\!\left[{\rm i} \frac{2\pi}{L}\sum_{j=1}^L j S_j^z\right]\!,
112: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, z_L
113: \equiv\langle\Psi_0|\Psi\rangle ~,
114: \label{eqn:def_z}
115: \end{eqnarray}
116:
117:
118: Preliminary indications are of a low-temperature 2nd-order transition
119: line at a (constant) $\alpha_{c}$ with a critical endpoint at $\beta_{c}=0.09$
120: followed by a crossover, Fig.2 and Fig.3.
121:
122: \begin{figure}
123: \begin{center}
124: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{chi.eps}
125: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{xi05.eps}
126: \end{center}
127: \vspace{-13mm}
128: \caption{Uniform susceptibility $\chi_{_{\rm{u}}}$ , and $\xi_{2}/L$.}
129: \end{figure}
130:
131: \section{QMC TRANSFER MATRIX}
132:
133: Following the Quantum Monte Carlo \emph{improved-estimator} definitions for
134: conventional thermodynamic (2nd derivative of free energy) observables \cite{stsus}
135: such as the uniform $\chi_{_{\rm{u}}}$ and the second moment definition of correlation length $\xi_{2}$,
136:
137: \begin{equation}
138: C({\bf{r}})=\frac{1}{\beta^{2}}
139: \int_0^{\beta} d\tau d\tau' \big\langle\hat{S}_{{\bf{i}}}(\tau)
140: \hat{S}_{{\bf{i}}+{\bf {r}}}(\tau') \big\rangle~ ,
141: \label{e.defs.cr}
142: \end{equation}
143: \begin{equation}
144: \chi({\bf {q}}) = \beta
145: \sum_{\bf {r}}~e^{i {\bf {q}}\cdot {\bf {r}}}
146: ~ C({\bf {r}}):\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
147: \chi_{_{\rm{u}}}=\chi({\bf {q}}{=}0)~,
148: \label{e.defs.chis}
149: \end{equation}
150: \begin{equation}
151: \xi_{2} = \frac{L}{2 \pi}
152: \sqrt{\frac{\chi (\pi,\pi)}{\chi (\pi+2\pi/L,\pi)} - 1 } ~,
153: \label{secondmom}
154: \end{equation}
155: we introduce a Fisher zeros \emph{improved-estimator} polynomial expansion in the coupling $J_{ab}$ to determine
156: independently the FSS properties of $\alpha_{c}$. We plot the Fisher zeros in the complex $J_{ab}^{ \, 2}$ plane in
157: Fig.4,
158: noting the pinching of the real axis corresponding to
159: the discontinuities in the partition function that in the thermodynamic limit give $\alpha_{c}$.
160: The \emph{inner} edge-singularity gives the quantum phase transition (crossover) point $\alpha_{c}$, and also a clear
161: indication of finite size effects where the zeroes solution
162: reflected from the QMC Euclidean-time boundary conditions on our
163: smallest volume ($L=64$) are lost.
164: The \emph{outer} edge-singularity gives us a new means to study the criticality of the Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking
165: associated with the
166: dimensional reduction of the QMC approach (akin to the $1D$ Ising model, where a nonzero
167: magnetisation gives a non-analyticity in zeroes on the unit circle).
168: Note the volume-dependent deviation from unity for imaginary valued
169: ($J_{ab}^{ \, 2} < 0$) critical couplings with relation to the \emph{twist-operator}. Although evidently there is no VBS quantum
170: interference for imaginary couplings, the action still acquires a nonzero phase expectation, scaling with finite
171: $L$ \cite{PRCim}.
172:
173:
174: \begin{figure}
175: \begin{center}
176: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{zeros64-a.eps}
177: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{20a.eps}
178: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{zeros256-e.eps}
179: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{zeros512-d.eps}
180: \end{center}
181: \vspace{-13mm}
182: \caption{Fisher zeroes in the complex $J_{ab}^{ \, 2}$ plane.}
183: \end{figure}
184:
185: \section{LIGHT CONE \& INTEGRABILITY}
186: The correspondence of spin chains with light cone field theoretic treatments
187: has been noted and studied via exact techniques such as the TBA
188: \cite{light}\cite{str=fhm}\cite{mixrep}.
189: For an explicit determination of twist-3 operators in QCD a further
190: knowledge of the
191: evolution at finite $N_c$ is required, however \cite{xxx=qcd}\cite{anomqcd}. Our Fisher zeroes scaling
192: (under investigation) will now allow us to quantify this scaling in concert
193: with the RG physics of the VBS states.
194:
195: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
196: \bibitem{qmc}B.B.~Beard and U.-J.~Wiese, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. $\bf{53}$, 838 (1997) ; U.-J.~Wiese and
197: H.P.~Ying, Z. Phys .B $\bf{93}$, 147 (1994).
198: \bibitem{ying} Z.~Xu, J.~Dai, H.~Ying and B.~Zheng, Phys. Rev. B $\bf{67}$, 214426 (2003).
199: \bibitem{zeros}M.E.~Fisher, in \emph{Lectures in Theoretical Physics} (University of Colorado Press, Boulder,
200: 1965), Vol. 7c ; C.~Itzykson, R.~B. Pearson and J.~B. Zuber, Nucl .Phys. B $\bf{220}$ [FS8], 415 (1983).
201: \bibitem{nonlinsig}K.~Takano, Phys. Rev. B $\bf{61}$, 8863 (2000).
202: \bibitem{wzeros}W.~Janke and R.~Kenna, Phys. Rev. B $\bf{65}$, 064110 (2002).
203: \bibitem{twist}M.~Nakamura and S.~Todo, Phys. Rev. Lett. $\bf{89}$, 077204 (2002) ; R.~Resta and S.~Sorella,
204: Phys. Rev. Lett. $\bf{82}$, 370 (1999).
205: \bibitem{stsus}A.~Cuccoli, T.~Roscilde, V.~Tognetti, R.~Vaia and P.~Verrucchi, Phys. Rev. B $\bf{67}$, 104414 (2003).
206: \bibitem{PRCim}P.R.~Crompton, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. $\bf{119}$, 550 (2003).
207: \bibitem{light}S.~Dalley, Phys. Lett. B $\bf{334}$, 61 (1994).
208: \bibitem{str=fhm}M.~Kruczenski, A.V.~Ryzhov and A. A.~Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B $\bf{692}$, 3 (2004).
209: \bibitem{mixrep}N.~Beisert, Nucl. Phys. B $\bf{682}$, 487 (2004).
210: %\bibitem{SO6}J.A.~Minahan and K.~Zarembo, JHEP 0303, 013 (2003).
211: \bibitem{xxx=qcd}L.D.~Faddeev and G.P.~Korchemsky, Phys. Lett. B $\bf{342}$, 311 (1995).
212: \bibitem{anomqcd}S.E.~Derkachov, G.P.~Korchemsky and A.N.Manashov, Nucl. Phys. B $\bf{566}$, 203 (2000).
213:
214: \end{thebibliography}
215:
216:
217: \end{document}
218: