1: \documentclass[prl,twocolumn,amssymb,showpacs,amsmath,nobibnotes,
2: superscriptaddress,floatfix,aps]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{bm}
5:
6: \renewcommand{\case}[2]{\ensuremath{{\textstyle\frac{#1}{#2}}}}
7: \newcommand{\aXoarse}{0.175}
8: \newcommand{\aCoarse}{0.121}
9: \newcommand{\aFine}{0.086}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12: %
13: \title{Charmed-Meson Decay Constants in Three-Flavor Lattice QCD}
14: %
15: \author{C.~Aubin}
16: \affiliation{Physics Department, Columbia University,
17: New York, New York, USA}
18: \author{C.~Bernard}
19: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Washington University,
20: St.~Louis, Missouri, USA}
21: \author{C.~DeTar}
22: \affiliation{Physics Department, University of Utah,
23: Salt Lake City, Utah, USA}
24: \author{M.~Di Pierro}
25: \affiliation{School of Computer Science, Telecommunications and Information
26: Systems, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA}
27: \author{E. D. Freeland}
28: \affiliation{Liberal Arts Department, The School of the Art Institute
29: of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA}
30: \author{Steven Gottlieb}
31: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Indiana University,
32: Bloomington, Indiana, USA}
33: \author{U.~M.~Heller}
34: \affiliation{American Physical Society, % One Research Road, Box 9000,
35: Ridge, New York, USA}
36: \author{J.~E.~Hetrick}
37: \affiliation{Physics Department, University of the Pacific,
38: Stockton, California, USA}
39: \author{A.~X.~El-Khadra}
40: \affiliation{Physics Department, University of Illinois,
41: Urbana, Illinois, USA}
42: \author{A.~S.~Kronfeld}
43: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA}
44: \author{L.~Levkova}
45: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Indiana University,
46: Bloomington, Indiana, USA}
47: \author{P.~B.~Mackenzie}
48: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA}
49: \author{D.~Menscher}
50: \affiliation{Physics Department, University of Illinois,
51: Urbana, Illinois, USA}
52: \author{F. Maresca}
53: \affiliation{Physics Department, University of Utah,
54: Salt Lake City, Utah, USA}
55: \author{M.~Nobes}
56: \affiliation{Laboratory of Elementary-Particle Physics, Cornell University,
57: Ithaca, New York, USA}
58: \author{M.~Okamoto}
59: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA}
60: \author{D.~Renner}
61: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Arizona,
62: Tucson, Arizona, USA}
63: \author{J.~Simone}
64: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA}
65: \author{R.~Sugar}
66: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of California,
67: Santa Barbara, California, USA}
68: \author{D.~Toussaint}
69: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Arizona,
70: Tucson, Arizona, USA}
71: \author{H.~D.~Trottier}
72: \affiliation{Physics Department, Simon Fraser University,
73: Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada}
74: \collaboration{Fermilab Lattice, MILC, and HPQCD Collaborations}
75: \noaffiliation
76:
77: \date{September 8, 2005}
78: %
79: \pacs{13.20.Fc,12.38.Gc}
80: %
81: \begin{abstract}
82: We present the first lattice QCD calculation with realistic sea quark
83: content of the $D^+$-meson decay constant $f_{D^+}$.
84: We use the MILC Collaboration's publicly available ensembles of lattice
85: gauge fields, which have a quark sea with two flavors (up and down)
86: much lighter than a third (strange).
87: We obtain $f_{D^+} = 201 \pm 3 \pm 17~\textrm{MeV}$, where the errors
88: are statistical and a combination of systematic errors.
89: We also obtain $f_{D_s} = 249 \pm 3 \pm 16~\textrm{MeV}$ for the
90: $D_s$~meson.
91: \end{abstract}
92:
93: \maketitle
94:
95: Flavor physics currently plays a central role in elementary particle
96: physics~\cite{ckm:2005}.
97: To aid the experimental search for physics beyond the standard model,
98: several hadronic matrix elements must be calculated nonperturbatively
99: from quantum chromodynamics (QCD).
100: One of the most important of these is the decay constant of the
101: $B$~meson $f_B$~\cite{Lubicz:2004nn}.
102: Any framework for calculating~$f_B$ should, therefore, be subjected to
103: stringent tests, and such a test is a key aim of this Letter.
104: \vskip -1pt
105:
106: The most promising method for these nonperturbative calculations is
107: numerical lattice~QCD.
108: For many years the results suffered from an unrealistic treatment of the
109: effects of sea quarks.
110: In the last few years, however, this obstacle seems to have been
111: removed: with three flavors of sea quarks lattice QCD now agrees with
112: experiment for a wide variety of hadronic
113: quantities~\cite{Davies:2003ik}.
114: This validation of lattice QCD has been realized, so far, only for
115: so-called ``gold-plated'' quantities:
116: masses and matrix elements of the simplest hadronic states.
117: Note, however, that many of the hadronic matrix elements relevant to
118: flavor physics are in this class, including~$f_B$.
119: \vskip -1pt
120:
121: The challenges in computing~$f_B$ are essentially the same for
122: the $D^+$-meson decay constant~$f_{D^+}$.
123: Experiments have observed the leptonic decay
124: ${D^+}\to l^+\nu_l$, but not $B^+\to l^+\nu_l$.
125: One can, thus, determine $|V_{cd}|f_{D^+}$, where $V_{cd}$ is an element
126: of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix.
127: Taking $|V_{cd}|$ from elsewhere, one gets~$f_{D^+}$.
128: In 2004 the CLEO-c Collaboration measured $f_{D^+}$ with a 20\%
129: error~\cite{Bonvicini:2004gv}, and a more precise measurement is
130: expected soon.
131:
132: This Letter reports the first lattice-QCD calculation of $f_{D^+}$ with
133: three flavors of sea quarks~\cite{Simone:2004fr}.
134: We find
135: \begin{equation}
136: f_{D^+} = 201 \pm 3 \pm 6 \pm 9 \pm 13~\textrm{MeV},
137: \label{eq:fD+}
138: \end{equation}
139: where the uncertainties are statistical,
140: and a sequence of systematic effects, discussed below.
141: We also obtain the decay constant of the $D_s$ meson,
142: \begin{equation}
143: f_{D_s} = 249 \pm 3 \pm 7 \pm 11 \pm 10~\textrm{MeV}.
144: \label{eq:fDs}
145: \end{equation}
146: The second result is more precise than a recent lattice-QCD calculation
147: with the same sea quark content but non-relativistic heavy quarks, which
148: found
149: $f_{D_s}=290\pm 20\pm 41~\textrm{MeV}$~\cite{Wingate:2003gm}.
150: These results are more reliable than older
151: calculations~\cite{El-Khadra:1997hq} because we now incorporate (three)
152: sea quarks and, for $f_{D^+}$, also because the light valence quark
153: masses are smaller than before.
154:
155: These results test the methods of Ref.~\cite{Davies:2003ik}
156: because they are predictions.
157: The input parameters have been fixed
158: previously~\cite{Davies:2003ik,Aubin:2004ck,Aubin:2004fs,%
159: diPierro:2003iw,diPierro:2003bu},
160: and, once comparably precise experimental measurements become
161: available, one can see how Eqs.~(\ref{eq:fD+}) and~(\ref{eq:fDs}) fare.
162: Indeed, this work is part of a program to calculate matrix elements for
163: leptonic and semileptonic
164: decays~\cite{diPierro:2003iw,Aubin:2004ej,Okamoto:2004xg}, neutral-meson
165: mixing, and quarkonium~\cite{diPierro:2003bu,Allison:2004be}.
166: So far, these lattice QCD calculations agree with experiment for the
167: normalization of $D$-meson semileptonic form
168: factors~\cite{Aubin:2004ej,Ablikim:2004ej,Huang:2004fr}.
169: They also have predicted correctly the form-factor
170: shape~\cite{Aubin:2004ej,Link:2004dh},
171: as well as the mass of the $B_c$
172: meson~\cite{Allison:2004be,Acosta:2005us}.
173: \vskip -1pt
174:
175: In this set of calculations we use ensembles of unquenched lattice gauge
176: fields generated by the MILC
177: Collaboration~\cite{Bernard:2001av,Aubin:2004fs},
178: with lattice spacing $a=\aXoarse$, \aCoarse, and \aFine~fm.
179: The key feature of these ensembles is that they incorporate three
180: flavors of sea quarks, one whose mass is close to that of the strange
181: quark, and two with a common mass taken as light as possible.
182: \vskip -1pt
183:
184: For the sea quark and light valence quark we use the ``Asqtad''
185: staggered-fermion action~\cite{asqtad}.
186: Several different quark masses appear in this calculation;
187: for convenience, they are defined in Table~\ref{tbl:masses}.
188: \begin{table}
189: \centering
190: \caption[tbl:masses]{Notation for quark masses used in this Letter.}
191: \label{tbl:masses}
192: \begin{tabular*}{0.48\textwidth}{c@{\extracolsep{\fill}}l@{\extracolsep{\fill}}l}
193: \hline\hline
194: $m$ & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Description} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Remark} \\
195: \hline
196: $m_c$ & Charmed quark &
197: From $m_{D_s}$~\cite{diPierro:2003iw,diPierro:2003bu} \\
198: $m_s$ & Physical strange quark &
199: From $m_K^2$~\cite{Aubin:2004ck} \\
200: $m_u$ & Physical up quark &
201: $m_u = m_s/45.5$~\cite{Aubin:2004fs} \\
202: $m_d$ & Physical down quark &
203: $m_d = m_s/19.6$~\cite{Aubin:2004fs} \\
204: $m_h$ & Simulation's heavier sea quark &
205: $m_h\approx1.1m_s$ \\
206: $m_l$ & Simulation's lighter sea quark &
207: $0.1m_s\leq m_l\lesssim 0.8m_s$ \\
208: $m_q$ & Simulation's light valence quark &
209: $0.1m_s\leq m_q\lesssim m_s$ \\
210: \hline\hline
211: \end{tabular*}
212: \end{table}
213: At $a=\aXoarse$, \aCoarse, and \aFine~fm there are, respectively, 4,~5, and~2
214: ensembles with various sea quark masses
215: $(m_l,m_h)$~\cite{Bernard:2001av,Aubin:2004fs}.
216: The larger simulation mass, $m_h$ is close to the physical
217: strange quark mass~$m_s$.
218: The light pair's mass $m_l$ is not as small as those of the up and
219: down quark in Nature, but the range $0.1m_s\leq m_l\lesssim 0.8m_s$
220: suffices to control the extrapolation in quark mass with chiral
221: perturbation theory ($\chi$PT).
222: For carrying out the chiral extrapolation, it is useful to
223: allow the valence mass~$m_q$ to vary separately from the sea
224: mass~\cite{Bernard:1993sv}.
225: At $a=\aXoarse$, \aCoarse, and \aFine~fm we have, respectively,
226: 6, 12, and 8 or 5 values of the valence mass,
227: in the range $0.1m_s\leq m_q\lesssim m_s$.
228: \vskip -1pt
229:
230: A drawback of staggered fermions is that they come in four species,
231: called tastes.
232: The steps taken to eliminate three extra tastes per flavor are not (yet)
233: proven, although there are several signs that they are valid.
234: Calculations of $f_{D^+}$ and $f_{D_s}$ are sensitive to these steps:
235: if Eqs.~(\ref{eq:fD+}) and~(\ref{eq:fDs}) agree with precise measurements,
236: it should be more plausible
237: that the techniques used to reduce four tastes to one are correct.
238:
239: For the charmed quark we use the Fermilab action for heavy
240: quarks~\cite{El-Khadra:1996mp}.
241: Discretization effects are entangled with the heavy-quark expansion,
242: so we use heavy-quark effective theory (HQET) as a theory of cutoff
243: effects~\cite{Kronfeld:2000ck}.
244: This provides good control, as discussed in Ref.~\cite{Kronfeld:2003sd},
245: and the framework has been tested with the (successful) prediction of
246: the $B_c$ meson mass~\cite{Allison:2004be}.
247: Nevertheless, heavy-quark discretization effects are the largest source
248: of systematic error in~$f_{D_s}$, and the second-largest in~$f_{D^+}$.
249:
250: The decay constant $f_{D_q}$, for a $D_q$ meson with light valence
251: quark~$q$ and momentum $p_\mu$, is defined by~\cite{Eidelman:wy}
252: \begin{equation}
253: \langle0|A_\mu|D_q\rangle = if_{D_q}p_\mu ,
254: % = \phi_{D_q} v_\mu \sqrt{m_{D_q}} ,
255: \label{eq:0AD}
256: \end{equation}
257: % $\langle0|A_\mu|D_q\rangle = if_{D_q}p_\mu$,
258: where $A_\mu=\bar{q}\gamma_\mu\gamma_5c$ is an electroweak axial vector
259: current. % and $v_\mu=p_\mu/m_{D_q}$.
260: The combination $\phi_q=f_{D_q}\sqrt{m_{D_q}}$ emerges directly from the
261: lattice Monte Carlo calculations.
262: As usual in lattice gauge theory, we compute two-point correlation
263: functions
264: $C_2(t)=\langle O_{D_q}^\dagger(t) O_{D_q}(0) \rangle$,
265: $C_A(t)=\langle A_4 (t) O_{D_q}(0) \rangle$,
266: where $O_{D_q}$ is an operator with the quantum numbers of the charmed
267: pseudoscalar meson, and $A_4$ is the (lattice) axial vector current.
268: The operators are built from the heavy-quark and staggered-quark fields
269: as in Ref.~\cite{Wingate:2002fh}.
270: We extract the $D_q$ mass and the amplitudes
271: $\langle D|O_{D_q}|0\rangle$ and $\langle 0|A_4|D\rangle$
272: from fits to the known $t$ dependence.
273: Statistical errors are determined with the bootstrap method, which
274: allows us to keep track of correlations.
275:
276: The lattice axial vector current must be multiplied by a renormalization
277: factor~$Z_{A^{cq}_4}$.
278: We write~\cite{El-Khadra:2001rv}
279: $Z_{A^{cq}_4}=\rho_{A^{cq}_4}(Z_{V^{cc}_4} Z_{V^{qq}_4})^{1/2}$,
280: because the flavor-conserving renormalization factors $Z_{V^{cc}_4}$ and
281: $Z_{V^{qq}_4}$ are easy to compute nonperturbatively.
282: The remaining factor $\rho_{A^{cq}_4}$ should be close to unity
283: because the radiative corrections mostly cancel~\cite{Harada:2001fi}.
284: A one-loop calculation gives~\cite{one-loop}
285: % latticeÊ rho_a4 error=alpha_s(rho-1)
286: % ÊÊ FÊÊÊÊ 1.0319 0.0072
287: % ÊÊ CÊÊÊÊ 1.0438 0.0102
288: % ÊÊ XÊÊÊÊ 1.0524 0.0137
289: $\rho_{A^{cq}_4}=1.052$, 1.044, and 1.032
290: at $a=\aXoarse$, \aCoarse, and \aFine~fm.
291: We estimate the uncertainty of higher-order corrections to be
292: $2\alpha_s(\rho_{A^{cq}_4}-1)\approx1.3\%$;
293: $\alpha_s$ is the strong coupling.
294:
295: The heart of our analysis is the chiral extrapolation, from the
296: simulated to the physical quark masses.
297: It is necessary, and non-trivial, because the cloud of ``pions''
298: surrounding the simulated $D_q$ mesons is not the same as for real
299: pions.
300: With staggered quarks the (squared) pseudoscalar meson masses are
301: \begin{equation}
302: M^2_{ab,\xi} = (m_a+m_b)\mu + a^2\Delta_\xi,
303: \label{eq:mesonmass}
304: \end{equation}
305: where $m_a$ and $m_b$ are quark masses, $\mu$ is a parameter of $\chi$PT,
306: and the representation of the meson under the taste symmetry group is
307: labeled by $\xi=P, A, T, V, I$ \cite{Lee:1999zx}.
308: A symmetry as $m_a,m_b\to0$ ensures that $\Delta_P=0$.
309: The ``pion'' cloud in the simulation includes all these pseudoscalars.
310:
311: According to next-to-leading order $\chi$PT the decay constant takes
312: the form
313: \begin{equation}
314: \phi_q = \Phi\left[1 + \Delta f_q(m_q,m_l,m_h) +
315: p_q(m_q,m_l,m_h) \right],
316: \label{eq:phiq}
317: \end{equation}
318: where $\Phi$ is a quark-mass-independent parameter.
319: $\Delta f_q$ arises from loop processes involving light pseudoscalar
320: mesons, and $p_q$ is an analytic function.
321: To obtain them one must take into account the
322: flavor-taste symmetry of the simulation~\cite{Lee:1999zx} and the
323: inequality (in general) of the valence and sea quark
324: masses~\cite{Bernard:1993sv}.
325: One finds~\cite{Aubin:2004xd}
326: \begin{equation}
327: \Delta f_q = - \frac{1+3g^2}{2(4\pi f_\pi)^2}\left[
328: \bar{h}_q + h_q^I +
329: a^2\left(\delta'_Ah_q^A + \delta'_Vh_q^V \right)\right],
330: \end{equation}
331: where $f_\pi\approx131$~MeV is the pion decay constant,
332: $g$ is the $D$-$D^*$-$\pi$ coupling~\cite{Grinstein:1992qt},
333: and $\delta'_A$, $\delta'_V$ parametrize effects that arise
334: only at non-zero lattice spacing~\cite{Lee:1999zx}.
335: The terms $\bar{h}_q$, $h^I_q$, $h^A_q$, and $h^V_q$ are functions of
336: the pseudoscalar meson masses.
337: The last two, $h^A_q$ and $h^V_q$, are too cumbersome to write out here.
338: It is instructive to show the other two, $\bar{h}_q$ and $h^I_q$,
339: when $m_q=m_l$ or $m_h$: % and assuming $m_h=m_s$,
340: \begin{eqnarray}
341: \bar{h}_q & = & \case{1}{16}{\textstyle\sum_\xi} n_\xi \left[
342: 2 I(M^2_{ql,\xi}) + I(M^2_{qh,\xi}) \right],
343: \label{eq:hq} \\
344: h_l^I & = & - \case{1}{2} I(M^2_{ll,I}) +
345: \case{1}{6}I(M^2_{\eta,I}),
346: \label{eq:hIq} \\
347: h_h^I & = & - I(M^2_{hh,I}) + \case{2}{3}I(M^2_{\eta,I}),
348: \label{eq:hIs}
349: \end{eqnarray}
350: where $I(M^2)=M^2\ln M^2/\Lambda^2_\chi$
351: (with $\Lambda_\chi$ the chiral scale), and
352: $M^2_{\eta,I}=(M^2_{ll,I}+2M^2_{hh,I})/3$.
353: The term $h^I_q$ receives contributions only from taste-singlet mesons
354: (representation~$I$).
355: The term $\bar{h}_q$ receives contributions from all representations,
356: with multiplicity $n_\xi=1,4,6,4,1$ for $\xi=P,A,T,V,I$, respectively.
357: The analytic function is
358: \begin{equation}
359: p_q = (2m_l+m_h)f_1(\Lambda_\chi) + m_q f_2(\Lambda_\chi) + O(a^2),
360: \label{eq:pq}
361: \end{equation}
362: where $f_1$ and $f_2$ are quark-mass-independent parameters.
363: They are essentially couplings of the chiral Lagrangian, and their
364: $\Lambda_\chi$ dependence must cancel that of $\Delta f_q$.
365: This specifies $O(a^2)$ terms proportional to $f_1$ and $f_2$, which can
366: be removed after our fit.
367: We estimate the remaining $O(a^2)$ effects of light quarks to be small:
368: around~4\% at $a=\aCoarse$~fm and $1.4\%$ at $a=\aFine$~fm.
369:
370: The salient feature~\cite{Kronfeld:2002ab} of the chiral extrapolation
371: of $\phi_q$ is that $\Delta f_q$ contains a ``chiral log''
372: $I(2m_q\mu)\sim m_q\ln m_q$, which has a characteristic curvature as
373: $m_q\to 0$.
374: Equations~(\ref{eq:mesonmass})--(\ref{eq:hIq}) show that
375: the chiral log is diluted by discretization effects,
376: because $a^2\Delta_\xi\neq0$ for $\xi\neq P$. % $\xi=A,T,V,I$.
377:
378: We can now discuss how we carry out the chiral extrapolation.
379: Recall that we compute $\phi_q$ for many combinations of the valence and
380: light sea quark masses.
381: At each lattice spacing, we fit all results for $\phi_q$ to the mass
382: dependence prescribed by Eqs.~(\ref{eq:mesonmass})--(\ref{eq:pq}).
383: Of the twelve parameters, eight---$\mu$, the four non-zero
384: $\Delta_\xi$, $f_\pi$, $\delta'_A$, and $\delta'_V$---appear in the
385: $\chi$PT for light pseudoscalar mesons.
386: We constrain them with prior distributions whose central value
387: and width are taken from the $\chi$PT analysis of pseudoscalar meson
388: masses and decay constants on the same ensembles of lattice gauge
389: fields~\cite{Aubin:2004fs}.
390: The rest---$\Phi$, $g^2$, $f_1$, and $f_2$---appear only for
391: charmed mesons.
392: We constrain $g^2$ to its experimentally measured value, within its
393: measured uncertainty~\cite{Anastassov:2001cw}.
394: Thus, only three parameters---$\Phi$, $f_1$, and $f_2$---are determined
395: solely by the $\phi_q$~fit.
396: To obtain physical results we reconstitute the fit setting
397: the light sea quark mass $m_l\to(m_u+m_d)/2$, and
398: $\Delta_\xi=\delta'_{A,V}=0$.
399: For $\phi_d$ ($\phi_s$) we set the light valence mass
400: $m_q\to m_d$~($m_s$).
401:
402: To isolate the uncertainties of the chiral extrapolation from other
403: sources of uncertainty, we consider the ratio
404: $R_{q/s}=\phi_q/\phi_s$.
405: Figure~\ref{fig:chiral:D+} shows $R_{q/s}$ at $a=\aCoarse$~fm
406: as a function of $m_q/m_s$, projected onto $m_q=m_l$.
407: \begin{figure}
408: \includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth]{ratio-mq}
409: \caption[fig:chiral:D+]{Chiral extrapolation of $R_{q/s}$ at
410: $a=\aCoarse$~fm. Data points show only statistical errors,
411: but the systematic error of fitting is shown at left.}
412: \label{fig:chiral:D+}
413: \end{figure}
414: The gray (red) curve is the result of the full fit of $\phi_q$
415: to the separate sea- and valence-mass dependence.
416: The black curve, and the extrapolated value at $m_q/m_s=0.05$, results
417: from setting $\Delta_\xi=\delta'_{A,V}=0$ when reconstituting the fit.
418: At the other lattice spacings we obtain similar results.
419:
420: The precision after the chiral extrapolation is, however, a bit illusory.
421: We tried several variations in the fit procedure:
422: fitting the ratio directly;
423: adding terms quadratic in the quark masses to Eq.~(\ref{eq:pq});
424: variations in the widths of the prior constraints of the parameters.
425: When these possibilities are taken into account, the extrapolated value
426: of $R_{d/s}$ varies by 5\%, which we take as a systematic uncertainty.
427: This variation could be reduced with higher statistics at the lightest
428: sea quark masses.
429:
430: The lattice spacing dependence of $\phi_s=f_{D_s}\sqrt{m_{D_s}}$ is
431: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:lat:Ds}.
432: \begin{figure}
433: \centering
434: \includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth]{phiDs-a2-fm}
435: \caption[fig:lat:Ds]{Dependence of $\phi_s$ on~$a^2$.
436: Circles result from removing the $O(a^2)$ pieces in
437: Eq.~(\ref{eq:pq}); squares omit this step.}
438: \label{fig:lat:Ds}
439: \end{figure}
440: The (blue) circles are the main results.
441: In a preliminary report of this work~\cite{Simone:2004fr}
442: the $O(a^2)$ terms in $\phi_s$ were not removed.
443: The (red) squares illustrate the effect of omitting this step.
444: As one can see, the effect is small at $a=\aFine$~fm, but it is the
445: main reason why the results in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:fD+})
446: and~(\ref{eq:fDs}) are smaller than in Ref.~\cite{Simone:2004fr}.
447:
448: The $\chi$PT expressions for $\phi_q$ assume that the $D_q$ meson is
449: static.
450: Since its mass is around 1900~MeV and the pseudoscalars are a few
451: hundred MeV, this is a good starting point.
452: Some corrections to this approximation can be absorbed into the fit
453: parameters, with no real change in the analysis.
454: A more interesting change arises in the one-loop self-energy diagrams,
455: for which the function $I(M^2)$ is modified, and depends
456: on $m_{D^*}-m_D$ as well as $M$.
457: By replacing our standard extrapolation by one using the modified function,
458: we estimate the associated error to be 1.5\% or less.
459: Finite-volume effects also modify $I(M^2)$: based on our experience with
460: $f_\pi$ and $f_K$~\cite{Aubin:2004fs} and on continuum $\chi$PT
461: \cite{Arndt:2004bg}, we estimate a further error of 1.5\% or~less.
462:
463: Although $\chi$PT is able to remove (most of) the light-quark
464: discretization errors, heavy-quark discretization effects remain.
465: We estimate this uncertainty using HQET as a theory of cutoff
466: effects~\cite{Kronfeld:2000ck,Kronfeld:2003sd}.
467: To arrive at a numerical estimate, one must choose a typical
468: scale~$\bar{\Lambda}$ for the soft interactions;
469: we choose $\bar{\Lambda}\approx500$--$700$~MeV.
470: We then estimate a discretization uncertainty of 2.7--4.2\% at
471: $a=\aFine$~fm.
472: Similarly, the results at $a=\aCoarse$~fm are expected to lie within 1--2\%
473: of those at $a=\aFine$~fm.
474:
475: Because we cannot disentangle heavy- and light-quark discretization
476: effects, to quote final results we average the results at $a=\aFine$ and
477: \aCoarse~fm.
478: We then find
479: \begin{eqnarray}
480: % R_{d/s} & = & 0.7864 \pm 0.0040 \pm 0.0047 \pm 0.0039 \pm 0.0423
481: R_{d/s} & = & 0.786(04)(05)(04)(42)
482: \label{eq:R} \\
483: % \phi_s & = & 0.3493 \pm 0.0049 \pm 0.0098 \pm 0.0154 \pm 0.0138
484: \phi_s & = & 0.349(05)(10)(15)(14)~\textrm{GeV}^{3/2} ,
485: \label{eq:phis}
486: \end{eqnarray}
487: which are the principal results of this work.
488: The uncertainties (in parentheses) are, respectively, from
489: statistics,
490: input parameters $a$ and $m_c$,
491: heavy-quark discretization effects, and
492: chiral extrapolation.
493: A full error budget is in Table~\ref{tbl:errors};
494: \begin{table}
495: \centering
496: \caption[tbl:errors]{Error budget (in per cent)
497: for $R_{d/s}$, $\phi_s$, $\phi_d$.}
498: \label{tbl:errors}
499: \begin{tabular*}{0.48\textwidth}{l@{\extracolsep{\fill}}r@{\extracolsep{\fill}}r@{\extracolsep{\fill}}r}
500: \hline\hline
501: source & $R_{d/s}$ & $\phi_s$ & $\phi_d$ \\
502: \hline
503: statistics & 0.5 & 1.4 & 1.5 \\
504: input parameters $a$ and $m_c$ & 0.6 & 2.8 & 2.9 \\
505: % \quad tuning $m_c$ & 0.2 & 1.5 & 1.5 \\ % 20-30% of dmc/mc = 5%
506: % \quad tuning $m_q$ & -- & -- & -- \\
507: % \quad tuning $(m_l,m_h)$ & -- & -- & -- \\
508: % \quad tuning $a$ & 0.5 & 2.4 & 2.5 \\ % ASK 6/26/05 from r1, 2S-1S
509: higher-order $\rho_{A_4^{cq}}$ & 0 & 1.3 & 1.3 \\ % ASK 06/25/05
510: heavy-quark discretization & 0.5 & 4.2 & 4.2 \\ % ASK 06/25/05
511: light-quark discretization and $\chi$PT fits & 5.0 & 3.9 & 6.3 \\ % ASK 06/26/05
512: static $\chi$PT & 1.4 & 0.5 & 1.5 \\ % CB 06/15/05, ASK 6/26/05
513: finite volume & 1.4 & 0.5 & 1.5 \\ % CB 06/15/05, ASK 6/26/05
514: \hline
515: total systematic & 5.4 & 6.5 & 8.5 \\
516: \hline\hline
517: \end{tabular*}
518: \end{table}
519: all uncertainties are reducible in future work.
520: The results for $f_{D^+}$ and $f_{D_s}$ in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:fD+}) and
521: (\ref{eq:fDs}) are obtained via $f_{D_s}=\phi_s/\sqrt{m_{D_s}}$,
522: $f_{D^+}=R_{d/s}\phi_s/\sqrt{m_{D^+}}$, by inserting the physical meson
523: masses.
524:
525: Present experimental measurements,
526: $f_{D^+} = 202 \pm 41 \pm 17~\textrm{MeV}$~\cite{Bonvicini:2004gv},
527: $f_{D_s} = 267 \pm 33~\textrm{MeV}$~\cite{Eidelman:wy},
528: are not yet precise enough to put our results in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:fD+})
529: and~(\ref{eq:fDs}) to a stringent test.
530: The anticipated measurements of $f_{D^+}$ and, later, $f_{D_s}$
531: from CLEO-c are therefore of great interest.
532: If validated, our calculation of $f_{D^+}$ has important implications
533: for flavor physics.
534: For $B$ physics it is crucial to compute the decay constant~$f_B$.
535: To do so, we must simply change the heavy quark mass.
536: In fact, heavy-quark discretization effects, with the Fermilab method,
537: are expected to be smaller, about half as big.
538:
539: We thank the U.S. National Science Foundation, the Office of Science of
540: the U.S. Department of Energy, Fermilab, and Indiana University for support,
541: particularly for the computing needed for the project.
542: Fermilab is operated by Universities Research Association Inc., under
543: contract with the U.S. Department of Energy.
544:
545: \emph{Note added:}~After this Letter was submitted, the CLEO-c
546: Collaboration announced a new measurement,
547: $f_{D^+}=223\pm16^{+7}_{-9}~\textrm{MeV}$~\cite{Artuso:2005lp}.
548:
549: \begin{thebibliography}{19}
550: %
551: \bibitem{ckm:2005}
552: See, for example, the CKM Unitarity Triangle Workshop,
553: \texttt{http://ckm2005.ucsd.edu/.}
554: \bibitem{Lubicz:2004nn}
555: V.~Lubicz,
556: %``The role of lattice QCD in flavor physics,''
557: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 140}, 48 (2005);
558: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0410051].
559: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0410051;%%
560: M.~Wingate,
561: %``Status of lattice flavor physics,''
562: {\it ibid.}\ {\bf 140}, 68 (2005).
563: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0410008].
564: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0410008;%%
565: %
566: \bibitem{Davies:2003ik}
567: C.~T.~H.~Davies {\it et al.},
568: %``High-precision lattice QCD confronts experiment,''
569: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 92}, 022001 (2004).
570: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0304004].
571: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0304004;%%
572: %
573: \bibitem{Bonvicini:2004gv}
574: G.~Bonvicini {\it et al.}, % [CLEO Collaboration],
575: %``Measuring B(D+ $\to$ mu+ nu) and the pseudoscalar decay constant f(D+),''
576: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 112004 (2004).
577: % [arXiv:hep-ex/0411050].
578: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0411050;%%
579: %
580: \bibitem{Simone:2004fr}
581: For a preliminary report of this work, see
582: J.~N.~Simone {\it et al.},
583: %``Leptonic decay constants f(D/s) and f(D) in three flavor lattice QCD,''
584: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 140}, 443 (2005).
585: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0410030].
586: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0410030;%%
587: %
588: \bibitem{Wingate:2003gm}
589: M.~Wingate \emph{et al.},
590: % C.~T.~H.~Davies, A.~Gray, G.~P.~Lepage and J.~Shigemitsu,
591: %``The $B_s$ and $D_s$ decay constants in 3-flavor lattice QCD,''
592: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 92}, 162001 (2004).
593: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0311130].
594: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311130;%%
595: %
596: \bibitem{El-Khadra:1997hq}
597: For example,
598: A.~X.~El-Khadra \emph{et al.},
599: % A.~S.~Kronfeld, P.~B.~Mackenzie, S.~M.~Ryan and J.~N.~Simone,
600: %``B and D meson decay constants in lattice QCD,''
601: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 014506 (1998);
602: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9711426].
603: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9711426;%%
604: C.~Bernard {\it et al.}, % [MILC Collaboration],
605: %``Lattice calculation of heavy-light decay constants with two flavors of
606: %dynamical quarks,''
607: % Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 094501 (2002).
608: \emph{ibid.}~{\bf 66}, 094501 (2002).
609: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0206016].
610: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0206016;%%
611: %
612: \bibitem{Aubin:2004ck}
613: C.~Aubin {\it et al.}, % [HPQCD and MILC Collaborations],
614: %``First determination of the strange and light quark masses from full
615: %lattice QCD,''
616: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 031504 (2004).
617: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0405022].
618: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0405022;%%
619: %
620: \bibitem{Aubin:2004fs}
621: %``Light pseudoscalar decay constants, quark masses, and low energy
622: %constants from three-flavor lattice QCD,''
623: C.~Aubin {\it et al.}, % [MILC Collaboration],
624: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 114501 (2004).
625: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0407028].
626: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0407028;%%
627: %
628: \bibitem{diPierro:2003iw}
629: M.~Di Pierro {\it et al.},
630: %``D/s spectrum and leptonic decays with Fermilab heavy quarks and improved
631: %staggered light quarks,''
632: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 129}, 328 (2004).
633: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0310045].
634: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0310045;%%
635: %
636: \bibitem{diPierro:2003bu}
637: M.~Di Pierro {\it et al.},
638: %``Properties of charmonium in lattice QCD with 2+1 flavors of improved
639: %staggered sea quarks,''
640: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 129}, 340 (2004).
641: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0310042].
642: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0310042;%%
643: %
644: \bibitem{Aubin:2004ej}
645: C.~Aubin {\it et al.},
646: %``Semileptonic decays of D mesons in three-flavor lattice QCD,''
647: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 94}, 011601 (2005).
648: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0408306].
649: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408306;%%
650: %
651: \bibitem{Okamoto:2004xg}
652: M.~Okamoto {\it et al.},
653: %``Semileptonic $D\to\pi/K$ and $B\to\pi/D$ decays in 2+1 flavor lattice
654: %QCD,''
655: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 140}, 461 (2005);
656: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0409116].
657: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0409116;%%
658: %SG 6/17
659: C. Aubin {\it et al.}, in preparation.
660: %SG end
661: %
662: \bibitem{Allison:2004be}
663: I.~F.~Allison \emph{et al.}, % C.~T.~H.~Davies, A.~Gray, A.~S.~Kronfeld,
664: % P.~B.~Mackenzie and J.~N.~Simone,
665: %``Mass of the B/c meson in three-flavor lattice QCD,''
666: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 94}, 172001 (2005).
667: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0411027].
668: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0411027;%%
669: %
670: \bibitem{Ablikim:2004ej}
671: M.~Ablikim {\it et al.}, % [BES Collaboration],
672: %``Direct measurements of the branching fractions for $D^0\to K^-e^+\nu_e$
673: %and $D^0\to\pi^-e^+\nu_e$ and determinations of the form factors $f_+^K(0)$
674: %and $f_+^\pi(0)$,''
675: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 597}, 39 (2004).
676: % [arXiv:hep-ex/0406028].
677: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0406028;%%
678: %
679: \bibitem{Huang:2004fr}
680: G.~S.~Huang {\it et al.}, % [CLEO Collaboration],
681: %``Study of semileptonic charm decays $D^0\to\pi^-l^+\nu$
682: %and $D^0\to K^-l^+\nu$,''
683: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 94}, 011802 (2005).
684: % [arXiv:hep-ex/0407035].
685: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0407035;%%
686: %
687: \bibitem{Link:2004dh}
688: J.~M.~Link {\it et al.}, % [FOCUS Collaboration],
689: %``Measurements of the $q^2$ dependence of the $D^0\to K^-\mu^+\nu$
690: %and $D^0\to\pi^-\mu^+\nu$ form factors,''
691: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 607}, 233 (2005).
692: % [arXiv:hep-ex/0410037].
693: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0410037;%%
694: %
695: \bibitem{Acosta:2005us}
696: D.~Acosta {\it et al.}, % [CDF Collaboration],
697: % ``Evidence for the exclusive decay $B_c^\pm\to J/\psi\pi^\pm$ and
698: % measurement of the mass of the $B_c$ meson,''
699: hep-ex/0505076.
700: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0505076;%%
701: %
702: \bibitem{Bernard:2001av}
703: %CB 6/15/05
704: %C.~W.~Bernard {\it et al.},
705: C.~Bernard {\it et al.},
706: %``The QCD spectrum with three quark flavors,''
707: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 054506 (2001);
708: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0104002].
709: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0104002;%%
710: C.~Aubin {\it et al.},
711: %``Light hadrons with improved staggered quarks:
712: %Approaching the continuum limit,''
713: \emph{ibid}.\ {\bf 70}, 094505 (2004).
714: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0402030].
715: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0402030;%%
716: %
717: \bibitem{asqtad}
718: T.~Blum {\it et al.},
719: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 1133 (1997);
720: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9609036];
721: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9609036;%%
722: K.~Orginos and D.~Toussaint, % [MILC collaboration],
723: %``Testing improved actions for dynamical Kogut-Susskind quarks,''
724: {\it ibid.} {\bf 59}, 014501 (1999);
725: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9805009].
726: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9805009;%%
727: %CB 6/15/05
728: %J.~Lagae
729: J.~Lag\"ae
730: and D.~Sinclair,
731: {\it ibid.} {\bf 59}, 014511 (1999);
732: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9806014];
733: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9806014;%%
734: G.~P.~Lepage,
735: {\it ibid.} {\bf 59}, 074502 (1999);
736: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9809157];
737: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9809157;%%
738: K.~Orginos, D.~Toussaint and R.~L.~Sugar,
739: {\it ibid.} {\bf 60}, 054503 (1999);
740: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9903032];
741: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9903032;%%
742: C.~Bernard {\it et al.},
743: {\it ibid.} {\bf 61}, 111502 (2000).
744: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9912018].
745: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9912018;%%
746: %
747: %CB 6/15/05 (add reference)
748: \bibitem{Bernard:1993sv}
749: C.~Bernard and M.~Golterman,
750: %``Partially quenched gauge theories and an application to staggered
751: %fermions,''
752: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 486 (1994);
753: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9306005];
754: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9306005;%%
755: S.~R.~Sharpe and N.~Shoresh,
756: %``Physical results from unphysical simulations,''
757: % Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 094503 (2000).
758: {\it ibid.} {\bf 62}, 094503 (2000).
759: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0006017].
760: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0006017;%%
761: %
762: \bibitem{El-Khadra:1996mp}
763: A.~X.~El-Khadra, A.~S.~Kronfeld and P.~B.~Mackenzie,
764: %``Massive Fermions in Lattice Gauge Theory,''
765: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 3933 (1997).
766: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9604004].
767: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9604004;%%
768: %
769: \bibitem{Kronfeld:2000ck}
770: A.~S.~Kronfeld,
771: %``Application of heavy-quark effective theory to lattice QCD.
772: %I: Power corrections,''
773: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 014505 (2000).
774: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0002008].
775: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0002008;%%
776: %
777: \bibitem{Kronfeld:2003sd}
778: A.~S.~Kronfeld,
779: %``Heavy quarks and lattice QCD,''
780: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 129}, 46 (2004).
781: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0310063].
782: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0310063;%%
783: %
784: \bibitem{Eidelman:wy}
785: S.~Eidelman {\it et al.},
786: %``Review Of Particle Physics,''
787: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 592}, 1 (2004).
788: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B592,1;%%
789: %
790: \bibitem{Wingate:2002fh}
791: M.~Wingate {\it et al.},
792: %, J.~Shigemitsu, C.~T.~Davies, G.~P.~Lepage and H.~D.~Trottier,
793: %``Heavy-light mesons with staggered light quarks,''
794: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 054505 (2003)
795: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0211014].
796: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0211014;%%
797: %
798: \bibitem{El-Khadra:2001rv}
799: A.~X. El-Khadra {\it et al.},
800: %, A.~S.~Kronfeld, P.~B.~Mackenzie, S.~M.~Ryan and J.~N.~Simone,
801: %``The semileptonic decays $B\to\pi l\nu$ and $D\to\pi l\nu$
802: %from lattice QCD,''
803: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 014502 (2001).
804: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0101023].
805: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0101023;%%
806: %
807: \bibitem{Harada:2001fi}
808: J.~Harada \emph{et al.},
809: %``Application of heavy-quark effective theory to lattice QCD.
810: %II: Radiative corrections to heavy-light currents,''
811: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 094513 (2002).
812: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0112044].
813: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0112044;%%
814: %
815: \bibitem{one-loop}
816: M.~Nobes {\it et al.}, private communication.
817: %
818: \bibitem{Lee:1999zx}
819: % W.~J.~Lee and S.~R.~Sharpe,
820: W.~Lee and S.~Sharpe,
821: %``Partial flavor symmetry restoration for chiral staggered fermions,''
822: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 114503 (1999);
823: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9905023];
824: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9905023;%%
825: C.~Bernard,
826: %``Chiral logs in the presence of staggered flavor symmetry breaking,''
827: {\it ibid.}\ {\bf 65}, 054031 (2002);
828: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0111051].
829: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0111051;%%
830: %
831: C.~Aubin and C.~Bernard,
832: %``Pion and kaon masses in staggered chiral perturbation theory,''
833: %Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 034014 (2003)
834: {\it ibid.}\ {\bf 68}, 034014 (2003);
835: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0304014;%%
836: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0304014].
837: %``Pseudoscalar decay constants in staggered chiral perturbation theory,''
838: {\bf 68}, 074011 (2003).
839: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0306026].
840: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0306026;%%
841: %
842: \bibitem{Aubin:2004xd}
843: C.~Aubin and C.~Bernard,
844: %``Staggered chiral perturbation theory with heavy-light mesons,''
845: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 140}, 491 (2005).
846: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0409027].
847: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0409027;%%
848: %
849: \bibitem{Grinstein:1992qt}
850: B.~Grinstein \emph{et al.},
851: % E.~Jenkins, A.~V.~Manohar, M.~J.~Savage and M.~B.~Wise,
852: %``Chiral perturbation theory for f D(s) / f D and B B(s) / B B,''
853: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 380}, 369 (1992);
854: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9204207];
855: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9204207;%%
856: J.~L.~Goity,
857: %``Chiral perturbation theory for SU(3) breaking in heavy meson systems,''
858: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 46}, 3929 (1992).
859: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9206230].
860: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9206230;%%
861: %
862: \bibitem{Kronfeld:2002ab}
863: A.~Kronfeld and S.~Ryan,
864: %``Remark on the theoretical uncertainty in B0 anti-B0 mixing,''
865: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 543}, 59 (2002).
866: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0206058].
867: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206058;%%
868: %
869: \bibitem{Anastassov:2001cw}
870: A.~Anastassov {\it et al.}, % [CLEO Collaboration],
871: %``First measurement of $\Gamma_{D^{*+}}$ and precision measurement of
872: %$m_{D^{*+}} - m_{D^0}$,''
873: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 032003 (2002).
874: % [arXiv:hep-ex/0108043].
875: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0108043;%%
876: %
877: \bibitem{Arndt:2004bg}
878: D.~Arndt and C.-J.~Lin,
879: %``Heavy meson chiral perturbation theory in finite volume,''
880: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 014503 (2004).
881: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0403012].
882: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0403012;%%
883: %
884: \bibitem{Artuso:2005lp}
885: % M. Artuso, talk at the
886: % XXII International Symposium on Lepton-Photon
887: % Interactions at High Energy, \linebreak Uppsala, Sweden,
888: % \texttt{http://lp2005.tsl.uu.se/\~{}lp2005/} (June 30--July 5, 2005).
889: M. Artuso {\it et al.}, % [CLEO Collaboration],
890: %``Improved measurement of $B(D^+\to\mu^+\nu)$ and the pseudoscalar decay
891: %constant $f_{D^+}$,''
892: hep-ex/0508057.
893: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0508057;%%
894:
895: \end{thebibliography}
896:
897: \end{document}
898: