1: \documentclass{PoS}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3:
4: \PoS{PoS(LAT2005)357}
5:
6: \title{Kaon semileptonic decay form factors in two-flavor QCD}
7:
8: \ShortTitle{Kaon semileptonic decay form factors in two-flavor QCD}
9:
10: \author{
11: JLQCD Collaboration:\\
12: \speaker{N.~Tsutsui}${}^a$\thanks{E-mail: naoto.tsutsui@kek.jp},
13: S.~Aoki${}^b$, M.~Fukugita${}^c$, S.~Hashimoto${}^{a,d}$, K-I.~Ishikawa${}^e$, N.~Ishizuka${}^{b,f}$,
14: Y.~Iwasaki${}^b$, K.~Kanaya${}^b$, T.~Kaneko${}^{a,d}$, Y.~Kuramashi${}^{b,f}$, M.~Okawa${}^e$,
15: A.~Ukawa${}^{b,f}$, N.~Yamada${}^{a,d}$, and T.~Yoshi\'e${}^{b,f}$\\
16: ${}^a$High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan.\\
17: ${}^b$Graduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8571, Japan.\\
18: ${}^c$Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8572, Japan.\\
19: ${}^d$School of High Energy Accelerator Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai), Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan.\\
20: ${}^e$Department of Physics, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan.\\
21: ${}^f$Center for Computational Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 305-8577, Japan.\\
22: }
23:
24: \abstract{
25: We present a calculation of the kaon form factors in two-flavor QCD with
26: the non-perturbatively $O(a)$-improved Wilson quark action. In order to
27: achieve a few percent accuracy in the study of SU(3) breaking effects,
28: we use a set of double ratios of the matrix elements, with which the
29: bulk of the statistical fluctuation and the multiplicative
30: renormalization factors cancel.
31: }
32:
33: \FullConference{XXIIIrd International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory\\
34: 25-30 July 2005\\
35: Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland}
36:
37: \begin{document}
38: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
39: \section{Introduction}
40: One of the most important quantities in the low energy kaon physics is
41: the form factor $f_+$ at zero momentum transfer, which provides a
42: theoretical input for the determination of the Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix
43: element $|V_{us}|$ through the $K_{l3}$ decay.
44:
45: For this form factor it is known that
46: \begin{enumerate}
47: \item The leading contribution is unity, which is exact in the SU(3) limit,
48: \item There is no contribution of $O(m_s-\bar{m})$ due to the
49: Ademollo-Gatto theorem where $\bar{m}=(m_u+m_d)/2$.
50: \end{enumerate}
51: In 1984, Leutwyler and Roos estimated this form factor analytically
52: \cite{Leutwyler:1984je} and their result $f_+(0)=0.961\pm0.008$ has been
53: used as the standard in the phenomenological analysis. Though the
54: leading correction was determined unambiguously using chiral
55: perturbation theory, the next-to-leading order correction was estimated
56: using a model of the wave function of the pseudoscalar meson, with which
57: only a crude error estimate is available. The numerical simulation of
58: lattice QCD could help this situation. Indeed, a quenched result appears
59: recently~\cite{Becirevic:2004ya} and several groups carry out the
60: unquenched calculation with different lattice setups~\cite{other}.
61:
62: Our calculation is performed on two-flavor QCD gauge configurations
63: generated with the non-perturbatively $O(a)$-improved Wilson fermion by
64: the JLQCD Collaboration~\cite{Aoki:2002uc}. The lattice size is $20^3
65: \times 48$ at $\beta=5.2$ and 12,000 HMC trajectories are
66: accumulated. Five sea quark masses corresponding to $m_{PS}/m_V \sim
67: 0.8-0.6$ enable us to make a careful study of the quark mass dependence
68: of the form factors. Especially, we focus on the consistency between the
69: lattice data and the ChPT predictions. The pion form factors are
70: obtained as a by-product of the calculation. The results are presented
71: in the poster session by S.~Hashimoto~\cite{Hashimoto:lattice2005}.
72:
73: \section{Kaon form factors}
74: The kaon semileptonic decay form factors $f_+(q^2)$ and $f_-(q^2)$ are
75: defined as
76: \begin{equation}
77: \langle \pi(\vec{p}) | V_\mu | K(\vec{k}) \rangle =
78: f_+(q^2)(k+p)_\mu + f_-(q^2)(k-p)_\mu,
79: \end{equation}
80: where $q^2=(k-p)^2$ and $V_\mu$ is the vector part of the weak
81: current. Reliable theoretical estimate of $f_+(0)$ is necessary for the
82: precise determination of the Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element $|V_{us}|$
83: from the $K_{l3}$ decay. Our goal is to calculate the form factor in a
84: few percent accuracy from the first principle of QCD. To do that,
85: careful study of SU(3) breaking effects and the chiral extrapolation are
86: vital.
87:
88: The scalar form factor $f_0(q^2)$ can be expressed as a linear
89: combination of $f_+(q^2)$ and $f_-(q^2)$
90: \begin{equation}
91: f_0(q^2) = f_+(q^2) + \frac{q^2}{m_K^2-m_\pi^2}f_-(q^2),
92: \end{equation}
93: and the ratio of $f_-(q^2)$ and $f_+(q^2)$ is denoted as $\xi(q^2)$
94: \begin{equation}
95: \xi(q^2) = \frac{f_-(q^2)}{f_+(q^2)}.
96: \end{equation}
97:
98: \section{Lattice calculation}
99: Our calculation proceeds in three steps, and the form factor $f_+(0)$ is
100: expressed by a product of three factors
101: \begin{equation}
102: f_+(0) =
103: f_0(q_{max}^2) \times
104: \frac{f_+(0)\left[1+\xi(0)\displaystyle\frac{m_K-m_\pi}{m_K+m_\pi}\right]}
105: {f_0(q_{max}^2)} \times
106: \frac{1}{1+\xi(0)\displaystyle\frac{m_K-m_\pi}{m_K+m_\pi}}.
107: \label{eq:three_steps}
108: \end{equation}
109: In the first step, the scalar form factor at the maximum momentum
110: transfer squared $q_{max}^2=(m_K-m_\pi)^2$ is estimated and the
111: interpolation to $q^2=0$ is done in the second step. The unnecessary
112: contribution from $\xi(0)$ is subtracted in the last step. A double
113: ratio of the three-point functions is used to obtain each factor. We
114: explain the details of each step in the following subsections.
115:
116: \subsection{Double ratio I}
117: \begin{figure}
118: \centering
119: \epsfig{file=double_ratio_k1355.eps,width=.7\textwidth,clip}
120: \caption{Double ratio $R^{K\to\pi}(t)$ for the scalar form factor
121: $f_0(q_{max}^2)$ at $K_{sea}=0.1355$.}
122: \label{fig:double_ratio_k1355}
123: \end{figure}%
124:
125: The scalar form factor at the maximum momentum transfer squared
126: $f_0(q_{max}^2)$ is obtained from the double ratio of three-point
127: functions
128: \begin{equation}
129: R^{K\to\pi}(t) =
130: \frac{C_{\pi V_4 K}(t,T/2;\vec{0},\vec{0}) C_{K V_4 \pi}(t,T/2;\vec{0},\vec{0})}
131: {C_{\pi V_4 \pi}(t,T/2;\vec{0},\vec{0}) C_{K V_4 K}(t,T/2;\vec{0},\vec{0})}
132: \rightarrow
133: \left[
134: \frac{m_K+m_\pi}{2\sqrt{m_Km_\pi}}f_0(q_{max}^2)
135: \right]^2,
136: \;\;\;\;0 \ll t \ll T/2,
137: \label{eq:double_ratio_I}
138: \end{equation}
139: where the three-point function is given by
140: \begin{equation}
141: C_{\pi V_\mu K}(t_x,t_y;\vec{p},\vec{q}) =
142: \sum_{\vec{x},\vec{y}}
143: \langle
144: O_\pi(t_y,\vec{y})V_\mu(t_x,\vec{x})O_K(0)
145: \rangle
146: e^{+i\vec{q}\cdot\vec{x}} e^{-i\vec{p}\cdot\vec{y}},
147: \end{equation}
148: and $O_\pi$, $O_K$ is the interpolating operator of pion and kaon. This
149: double ratio is essentially the same as that used before in the
150: calculation of the $B \to Dl\nu$ form factor by the Fermilab
151: group~\cite{Hashimoto:1999yp}.
152:
153: A typical time dependence of the double ratio $R^{K\to\pi}(t)$ at the
154: lightest sea quark mass $K_{sea}=0.1355$ is plotted in
155: Figure~\ref{fig:double_ratio_k1355}. Smeared kaon and pion sources are
156: set at time $t=0,T/2$, respectively. The vector current is inserted at
157: $t$. Because not only the bulk of the statistical fluctuation but the
158: multiplicative renormalization factors and other systematic errors
159: cancel, we can determine $f_0(q_{max}^2)$ with an accuracy better than
160: one percent.
161:
162: \subsection{Double ratio II}
163: The second double ratio with the pion two-point function
164: $C_{\pi\pi}(t;\vec{p})$
165: \begin{equation}
166: \frac{\displaystyle\frac{C_{\pi V_4 K}(t,T/2;\vec{p},\vec{p})}
167: {C_{\pi V_4 K}(t,T/2;\vec{0},\vec{0})}}
168: {\displaystyle\frac{C_{\pi\pi}(t;\vec{p})}
169: {C_{\pi\pi}(t;\vec{0})}}
170: \to
171: \frac{m_K+E_\pi(\vec{p})}{m_K+m_\pi}
172: \frac{f_+(q^2)\left[1+\xi(q^2)\displaystyle\frac{m_K-E_\pi(\vec{p})}
173: {m_K+E_\pi(\vec{p})}\right]}
174: {f_+(q_{max}^2)\left[1+\xi(q_{max}^2)\displaystyle\frac{m_K-m_\pi}
175: {m_K+m_\pi}\right]},
176: \;\;\;\;0 \ll t \ll T/2,
177: \label{eq:double_ratio_II}
178: \end{equation}
179: is used to interpolate the form factor to $q^2=0$. This is the second
180: factor in (\ref{eq:three_steps}), because
181: $f_0(q_{max}^2)=f_+(q_{max}^2)\left[1+\xi(q_{max}^2)
182: \frac{m_K-m_\pi}{m_K+m_\pi}\right]$.
183: In this case, the momentum is inserted at $t$ and $T/2$ so that the pion
184: has a finite momentum and the kaon is at rest. The double ratio
185: (\ref{eq:double_ratio_II}) is statistically noisier than the double
186: ratio (\ref{eq:double_ratio_I}) in the previous subsection. The data
187: corresponding to the pion momenta $\vec{p}=2\pi/20\times(\pm1,0,0)$,
188: $(\pm1,\pm1,0)$ and $(\pm1,\pm1,\pm1)$ are obtained and the quadratic
189: function is used to interpolate to $q^2=0$, which is shown in
190: Figure~\ref{fig:xi_k1355} (left).
191:
192: \subsection{Double ratio III}
193: \begin{figure}
194: \centering
195: \begin{tabular}{cc}
196: \epsfig{file=factor_k1355.eps, width=.45\textwidth,clip} &
197: \epsfig{file=xi_k1355.eps, width=.45\textwidth,clip}
198: \end{tabular}
199: \caption{The ratio of form factor $f_+^\prime(t)/f_+^\prime(t_0)$ (left)
200: and $\xi(t)$ (right) as a function of momentum transfer squared $t=q^2$ at
201: $K_{sea}=0.1355$. A notation
202: $f_+^\prime(t)=f_+(t)\left[1+\xi(t)\frac{m_K-E_\pi(\vec{p})}{m_K+E_\pi(\vec{p})}\right]$
203: is used here.}
204: \label{fig:xi_k1355}
205: \end{figure}%
206:
207: The last double ratio is for the determination of $\xi(0)$
208: \begin{equation}
209: \frac{C_{\pi V_i K}(t,T/2;\vec{p},\vec{p}) C_{\pi V_4 \pi}(t,T/2;\vec{p},\vec{p})}
210: {C_{\pi V_4 K}(t,T/2;\vec{p},\vec{p}) C_{\pi V_i \pi}(t,T/2;\vec{p},\vec{p})}
211: \to
212: \frac{1-\xi(q^2)}{\displaystyle\frac{m_K+E_\pi(\vec{p})}{m_\pi+E_\pi(\vec{p})} +
213: \xi(q^2)\frac{m_K-E_\pi(\vec{p})}{m_\pi+E_\pi(\vec{p})}},
214: \;\;\;\;0 \ll t \ll T/2,
215: \end{equation}
216: where we have to measure the spatial component of the matrix
217: element. The extrapolation to $q^2=0$ is done by assuming the linear
218: dependence on $q^2$, which is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:xi_k1355}
219: (right). We see that the $q^2$ dependence of the $\xi$ is very weak and
220: independent of the strange quark mass.
221:
222: \section{Result for $f_+(0)$}
223: \begin{figure}
224: \centering
225: \begin{tabular}{cc}
226: \epsfig{file=all_quadfit.eps, width=.45\textwidth,clip} &
227: \epsfig{file=all_chptfit.eps, width=.45\textwidth,clip}
228: \end{tabular}
229: \caption{Chiral extrapolation of the form factor $f_+(0)$ with quadratic
230: function (left) and the one-loop ChPT formula plus a quadratic function (right).}
231: \label{fig:all_quadfit}
232: \end{figure}%
233:
234: Following the method explained in the previous subsections, the form
235: factor $f_+(0)$ is estimated as a function of the up/down and strange
236: quark masses. In order to obtain the form factor at the physical pion
237: and kaon masses, we first use a simple fitting function
238: \begin{equation}
239: f_+(0) = 1-(c_0+c_1[(r_0m_K)^2+(r_0m_\pi)^2])[(r_0m_K)^2-(r_0m_\pi)^2]^2,
240: \label{eq:quadfit}
241: \end{equation}
242: where the meson masses are normalized by the Sommer scale $r_0$. The
243: result is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:all_quadfit}. Our data are well
244: represented by function (\ref{eq:quadfit}) and the preliminary result
245: $f_+(0)=0.967(6)$ is consistent with Leutwyler-Roos's value
246: $0.961(8)$~\cite{Leutwyler:1984je}, and the quenched result $0.960(9)$
247: by Be\'cirevi\'c {\it et al}.~\cite{Becirevic:2004ya}
248:
249: For small pion and kaon masses the ChPT predicts the mass dependence of
250: the form factor
251: \begin{equation}
252: f_+(0)=1+\frac{3}{2}H_{K\pi}(0)+\frac{3}{2}H_{K\eta}(0),\;\;\;\;
253: H_{PQ}(0) = -\frac{1}{128\pi^2f^2}
254: \left[m_P^2 + m_Q^2 + \frac{2m_P^2m_Q^2}{m_P^2-m_Q^2}\ln\frac{m_Q^2}{m_P^2}\right].
255: \end{equation}
256: We try to fit the data with
257: \begin{equation}
258: f_+(0)=1+\frac{3}{2}H_{K\pi}(0)+\frac{3}{2}H_{K\eta}(0)-
259: (c_0+c_1[(r_0m_K)^2+(r_0m_\pi)^2])[(r_0m_K)^2-(r_0m_\pi)^2]^2.
260: \end{equation}
261: At this order the one-loop ChPT formula has no tunable parameters. The
262: chiral logarithm is significant only in the region where $m_\pi^2 \ll
263: m_K^2$, while the data in the region $1/2 \leq m_\pi^2/m_K^2 \leq 2$ are
264: well approximated by the quadratic form (\ref{eq:quadfit}).
265: The extrapolated value at
266: physical pion and kaon mass is affected by the chiral logarithm. The
267: result is $f_+(0)=0.952(6)$.
268:
269: \section{Charge radius}
270: The charge radius $\langle r^2 \rangle$ parametrizes the slope of the
271: form factor near $q^2=0$
272: \begin{equation}
273: f(q^2) = f(0)\left[1 + \frac{1}{6}\langle r^2 \rangle q^2 + \cdots\right].
274: \end{equation}
275: The parameter $\lambda=\langle r^2 \rangle m_\pi^2/6$ is often used in
276: the literature.
277:
278: For the vector form factor, our result extrapolated with the one-loop
279: ChPT plus a quadratic function shown in Figure~\ref{fig:charge_radius}
280: is $\langle r^2 \rangle^{K\pi}_V=0.26(3)$ fm$^2$. It corresponds to
281: $\lambda_+=0.021(2)$, which is significantly smaller than the
282: experimental value 0.0278(7) or the quenched lattice result 0.026(2) by
283: Be\'cirevi\'c {\it et al}.~\cite{Becirevic:2004ya} Our result for the
284: charge radius of the scalar form factor (Figure~\ref{fig:charge_radius})
285: is $\langle r^2 \rangle^{K\pi}_S=0.37(6)$ fm$^2$, which corresponds to
286: $\lambda_0=0.031(5)$ that overshoots the experimental value 0.0174(22)
287: or the quenched lattice result 0.012(2).
288:
289: Our calculation shows that the kaon form factors can be calculated
290: on the lattice with good precision using the double ratio
291: method. Further study on systematic errors, especially scaling violation
292: effects, is needed to obtain the definitive value.
293:
294: This work is supported by the Large Scale Simulation Program No. 132
295: (FY2005) of High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), and
296: also in part by the Grant-in-Aid of the Ministry of Education
297: (Nos. 13135204, 13640260, 14046202, 14740173, 15204015, 15540251,
298: 15540279, 15740134, 16028201, 16540228, 17340066).
299: %
300: N.T. is supported by the JSPS Research Fellowship.
301:
302: \begin{figure}
303: \centering
304: \begin{tabular}{cc}
305: \epsfig{file=radius_Kpi.eps, width=.45\textwidth,clip} &
306: \epsfig{file=scalar_radius.eps, width=.45\textwidth,clip}
307: \end{tabular}
308: \caption{Chiral extrapolation of the vector (left) and scalar
309: (right) charge radius.}
310: \label{fig:charge_radius}
311: \end{figure}%
312:
313:
314:
315: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
316: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
317:
318: \bibitem{Leutwyler:1984je}
319: H.~Leutwyler and M.~Roos, \emph{Determination of the elements $V_{us}$
320: and $V_{ud}$ of the Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix},
321: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 25} (1984) 91.
322:
323: \bibitem{Becirevic:2004ya}
324: D.~Be\'cirevi\'c {\it et al.},
325: \emph{The $K\to\pi$ vector form factor at zero momentum transfer on the lattice},
326: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 705} (2005) 339 [{\tt hep-ph/0403217}].
327:
328: \bibitem{other}
329: C.~Dawson, in these proceedings;
330: T.~Kaneko {\it et al.} [RBC Collaboration], in these proceedings;
331: M.~Okamoto {\it et al.} [Fermilab, MILC and HPQCD Collaboration],
332: [{\tt arXiv:hep-lat/0412044}].
333:
334: \bibitem{Aoki:2002uc}
335: S.~Aoki {\it et al.} [JLQCD Collaboration],
336: \emph{Light hadron spectroscopy with two flavors of O(a)-improved dynamical quarks},
337: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 054502 [{\tt arXiv:hep-lat/0212039}].
338:
339: \bibitem{Hashimoto:lattice2005}
340: S.~Hashimoto {\it et al.} [JLQCD Collaboration], in these proceedings.
341:
342: \bibitem{Hashimoto:1999yp}
343: S.~Hashimoto, A.~X.~El-Khadra, A.~S.~Kronfeld, P.~B.~Mackenzie, S.~M.~Ryan and J.~N.~Simone,
344: \emph{Lattice QCD calculation of $\bar{B} \to D l \bar{\nu}$ decay
345: form factors at zero recoil},
346: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61} (2000) 014502 [{\tt arXiv:hep-ph/9906376}].
347:
348: \end{thebibliography}
349: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
350: \end{document}
351: