1: \documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{book}

2: 

3: \usepackage{amsmath}

4: \usepackage{amsfonts}

5: \usepackage{amssymb}

6: \usepackage{slashed}

7: \usepackage{a4wide}

8: \usepackage{graphicx}

9: \usepackage{slashed}

10: \usepackage[dvips]{feynmp}

11: \usepackage{picins}

12: 

13: 

14: \usepackage{mathbbol}

15: \usepackage{wick}

16: \usepackage{xcolor}

17: 

18: 

19: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

20: 

21: \usepackage{fancyheadings}

22: \usepackage{overpic}

23: \usepackage[nottoc]{tocbibind}

24: %\usepackage{floatflt}

25: 

26: \usepackage{fancyheadings}

27: \usepackage[a4paper,inner=35mm,outer=25mm,nofoot,bmargin=3cm,tmargin=35mm,headheight=1cm,headsep=10mm,footnotesep=10mm]{geometry}

28: %\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}

29: %\setlength{\parskip}{5pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}

30: %\setlength{\headsep}{10mm}

31: %\setlength{\footskip}{10mm}

32: 

33: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Textclass specific LaTeX commands.

34: \newenvironment{lyxlist}[1]

35:   {\begin{list}{}

36:     {\settowidth{\labelwidth}{#1}

37:      \setlength{\leftmargin}{\labelwidth}

38:      \addtolength{\leftmargin}{\labelsep}

39:      \renewcommand{\makelabel}[1]{##1 \hfill}}}

40:   {\end{list}}

41: 

42: 

43: \newcommand{\units}[1]{\ensuremath{\,\mathrm{#1}}}

44: \newcommand{\chem}[1]{\ensuremath{\mathrm{#1}}}

45: \newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left\langle #1 \right|}

46: \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left| #1 \right\rangle}

47: \newcommand{\braket}[1]{\left\langle #1 \right\rangle}

48: \newcommand{\ul}[1]{\underline{#1}}

49: % \newcommand{\ul}[1]{#1}

50: \newcommand{\mmax}{\text{max}}

51: \newcommand{\mmin}{\text{min}}

52: \newcommand{\Tr}{\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}}

53: \newcommand{\elll}{l}

54: 

55: \newcommand{\note}[2]{\emph{#1} #2}

56: \newcommand{\crossout}[1]{\setbox0\hbox{#1} \hbox to \wd0{\rlap{\rule[.6ex]{\wd0}{.5pt}}\box0}} 

57: \newcommand\topalignbox[1]{\leavevmode\vtop{\vskip-1.5ex\hbox{#1}}} 

58: \newcommand{\Small}[1]{{\fontsize{9pt}{9pt} \selectfont #1}}

59: 

60: \newcommand{\terminol}[1]{\textit{\textbf{#1}}}

61: 

62: \newlength{\savearraycolsep} 

63: 

64: \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}

65: \setlength{\parskip}{0.5\baselineskip}

66: 

67: 

68: \newcommand{\todo}[1]{$\langle$\textbf{TODO:} \emph{#1}$\rangle$}

69: 

70: \sloppy

71: 

72: \begin{document}

73: 

74: \pagestyle{empty}

75: 

76: \include{titlepage}

77: 

78: $\phantom{+}$\\

79: \clearpage

80: \newpage

81: 

82: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%headings

83: \pagestyle{fancyplain}

84: 

85: %\addtolength{\headwidth}{\marginparsep}

86: %\addtolength{\headwidth}{\marginparwidth}

87: \renewcommand{\chaptermark}[1]{\markboth{#1}{}}

88: \renewcommand{\sectionmark}[1]{\markright{\thesection\ #1}{}}

89: \lhead[\fancyplain{}{\thepage}]

90: 	{\fancyplain{}{\rightmark}}

91: \rhead[\fancyplain{}{\leftmark}]

92: 	{\fancyplain{}{\thepage}}

93: \cfoot{}

94: 

95: \pagenumbering{arabic}

96: \setcounter{page}{1}

97: 

98: \tableofcontents

99: \newpage

100: 

101: 

102: \chapter{Introduction}

103: 

104: %The \terminol{Standard Model of Particle Physics}, developed in the 1970s, has been a milestone in the search for the basic laws governing physics. It is thought that all observable microscopic processes, up to energies available in today's most powerful particle colliders, follow the rules of the Standard Model\footnote{with improved neutrino sector}. 

105: %Notwithstanding present discussions of theories beyond the Standard Model, one part of it, \terminol{Quantum Chromodynamics}, is an intrinsically consistent gauge field theory which poses special and exciting challenges in its low-energy limit.

106: %In order to test this hypothesis and to profit from the theory, one must calculate measurable quantities (particle masses, charges, cross sections...) which can be compared to experimental data. Yet one part of the Standard Model, \terminol{Quantum Chromo Dynamics} (\terminol{QCD}), makes such calculations particularly hard at low energies. \par

107: 

108: \terminol{Quantum Chromodynamics} (\terminol{QCD}) describes the interactions of \terminol{quarks} and \nobreak\terminol{gluons}, particles which carry a charge called \terminol{color}. For small momentum transfer, quantum fluctuations of interactions between color charged particles become so important that they cannot be treated any more as small corrections. In fact, the interactions become so strong that on larger scales ($\gtrsim 1\units{fm}$), quarks and gluons are never observed individually, but are confined in \terminol{hadrons}, composite particles which have no net color. \terminol{Nucleons} (neutrons and protons), the constituents of atomic nuclei, belong to the class of hadrons. Analyzing their inner structure in terms of QCD with the usual method of \terminol{perturbation theory} fails due to the strong interactions \cite{TW01}. A different approach is needed. In the long run, it is vital to describe hadrons quantitatively using Standard Model QCD. It helps us to gain accuracy in the interpretation of low- and high-energy experiments, adds to our understanding of nuclear physics and plays a role in the attempt to go beyond the Standard Model. \par

109: %Thus it is worth while to make an effort to devise alternative calculation methods.\par

110: 

111: One idea is to set up an \terminol{Effective Field Theory} (\terminol{EFT}), like \terminol{Chiral Perturbation Theory} (\terminol{$\chi$PT}). Instead of quarks and gluons, the theory is formulated in terms of the composite particles (\terminol{effective degrees of freedom}) that are thought to be physically relevant in the regime of interest, e.g., pions and nucleons. A systematic approach guarantees that the symmetry features of QCD are preserved in $\chi$PT. A disadvantage is the infinite number of interaction terms and coupling parameters (\terminol{low energy constants}, or \terminol{LECs}) that enter $\chi$PT. Among other things, they encode the form factors, i.e. the shape and size of the composite particles. In practice, one works with an expansion in small parameters. Then, only a finite number of interaction terms yield significant contributions. The numerical values of the coupling parameters are a priori unknown. Usually they are determined by fitting the parametric expressions of a set of observables to empirical data. Once they are known, predictions for observables inaccessible to experiment are feasible.

112: However, the necessity to make use of empirical data conflicts with the wish to calculate hadron properties \terminol{ab initio}, i.e., from Standard Model parameters only.

113: 

114: This is the point where numerical \terminol{Lattice Field Theory} calculations become useful. These calculations evaluate the dynamics of quark and gluon fields numerically in a four dimensional cube of space-time. Continuous fields are approximated by the field values specified at lattice points inside the cube. This is a good approximation as long as the cube is larger than the hadrons and the lattice is finer than structural sizes within hadrons. Thus by putting the fields on the lattice, we have a method that permits ab-initio calculations of masses, form factors and other properties of hadrons. Since calculations within Quantum Field Theory require in principle the consideration of all possible field configurations, lattice calculations become numerically very expensive. In order to obtain results on modern computers, the up- and down-quark masses are set to much higher values than they are in physical reality. Simulations at the true quark masses still seem to be a long way off.

115: Thus one needs some kind of extrapolation to lower quark masses in order to extract \emph{physical} quantities.

116: 

117: The obvious means for extrapolations of lattice QCD results is chiral perturbation theory, which offers quark mass dependent formulas for observables in the low energy domain.

118: 

119: The prime examples of quantities that can be calculated using lattice QCD are the pion mass and the nucleon mass.\footnote{At this stage, one can neglect the comparatively small difference between neutron and proton mass due to \terminol{isospin breaking}.}

120: Experiments yield for the pion mass $m_\pi^\text{phys}$ and the nucleon mass $m_N^\text{phys}$ realized in nature

121: \begin{equation*}

122: 	m_\pi^\text{phys} \approx 0.14\units{GeV}\ , \qquad m_N^\text{phys} \approx 0.94\units{GeV} 

123: 	\end{equation*}

124: With highly accurate experimental results available, why does one engage in complicated calculations for these two observables? Firstly, they can show us how well lattice extra\-polations really work and what obstacles to look out for. Secondly, it is possible to extract information from the quark mass dependence that is difficult or impossible to measure in experiments. Last but not least, it would be a brilliant scientific feat to demonstrate that the nucleon mass really follows from the Standard Model.

125: 

126: Lattice data with quark masses low enough to attempt extrapolation using $\chi$PT have become available only recently and are still scarce.

127: Promising results have been published in reference \cite{PHW04}, showing a successful fit to nucleon mass data from the lattice.

128: Not all information entering this fit comes from lattice calculations. Some of the LECs have been fixed to values obtained from empirical data. Additionally, the authors included the nucleon mass at the physical point as input.

129: 

130: My task in this diploma thesis is to discuss the reliability, possible obstacles and the future perspective of chiral extrapolations, with particular focus on the nucleon mass. How large are the statistical uncertainties of the fit in ref. \cite{PHW04}? Do we observe convergence of the perturbative series? Are the assumptions made well founded? Are the extracted LECs compatible with empirical information? Will it be possible any time soon to perform the fit with information purely from the lattice? 

131: This work cannot give final solutions, but it can present tools and strategies for the future, when more data become available.

132: 

133: The following four chapters are intended to give novices a quick-start introduction to the mechanisms and terminology of the theoretical fields that have been brought together in this work: Chiral Perturbation Theory, Lattice Field Theory and error analysis. Furthermore, chapter 4 describes the algorithms used for the statistical analysis. 

134: 

135: Chapter 6 constitutes the principal part and is devoted to fitting $\chi$PT to two-flavor lattice data for the nucleon mass. It starts out with a discussion of the existing fit of ref. \cite{PHW04}. A simple numerical experiment reveals important insight about the strategy needed to perform ab-initio extrapolations. In an attempt to match our results to empirical pion-nucleon scattering measurements, we stumble over discrepancies, but we resolve the issue by taking effects of the delta resonance into account. Finally, use of a finite volume correction formula extends the selection of lattice data usable for our fit.

136: 

137: The pion mass is a crucial input variable in many chiral extrapolations. Its precise dependence on the quark mass has yet to be clarified. Chapter 7 presents a step in that direction, making use of a simultaneous fit to pion and kaon mass from three-flavor lattice data. The chapter also demonstrates the transfer of three-flavor results to the two-flavor framework.

138: 

139: Finally, chapter 8 gives a brief summary of my conclusions.

140: 

141: \input{ChiPT.tex} 

142: 

143: \input{Lattice.tex}

144: 

145: \input{Statistics.tex}

146: 

147: \input{TheoryError.tex}

148: 

149: \chapter{Chiral Extrapolation of Nucleon Mass Lattice Data}

150: 

151: We turn to the numerical application of the machinery introduced in the previous chapters, fitting infrared regularized SU(2) B$\chi$PT nucleon mass expressions to unquenched two-flavor lattice data. 

152: 

153: \input{LatDat.tex}

154: 

155: \input{SU2LargeVol.tex}

156: 

157: \input{EmpirConstr.tex}

158: 

159: \input{FiniteVol.tex}

160: 

161: \chapter{Chiral Extrapolation of Meson Mass Lattice Data}

162: 

163: \input{SU3Mesons}

164: 

165: \input{Conclusion.tex}

166: 

167: \input{Appendix}

168: 

169: \bibliography{DA}

170: \bibliographystyle{mybibstyle} 

171: 

172: \chapter*{Danksagung}

173: 

174: Hiermit bedanke ich mich bei allen, die mich bei meiner Diplomarbeit unterst{\"u}tzt haben, insbesondere 

175: \begin{itemize}

176: \item

177: bei Prof. Wolfram Weise, der mich dieses Thema an seinem Lehrstuhl bearbeiten lie{\ss}. Seiner physikalischen Intuition entsprangen wertvolle pragmatische Ratschl{\"a}ge, die ganz wesentlich zum Gelingen dieser Arbeit beigetragen haben.

178: \item

179: bei Massimiliano Procura f{\"u}r die hervorragende und freundschaftliche Zusammen\-arbeit. Er stand mir bei Fragen jederzeit zur Verf{\"u}gung und gab mir wichtige Li\-teraturhinweise.

180: \item

181: bei Dr. Thomas Hemmert, der mir im Rahmen anregender Diskussionen Einblicke in die Bedenken, Vorschl{\"a}ge und Einsichten eines langj{\"a}hrigen Experten gew{\"a}hrte.

182: \item

183: bei Dr. habil. Norbert Kaiser und Dr. habil. Harald Grie{\ss}hammer f{\"u}r weiteren Expertenrat.

184: \item

185: bei allen, die mir beim Korrekturlesen geholfen haben: Bernhard M{\"u}ller, Massimiliano Procura, Prof. Wolfram Weise, Dr. Philipp H{\"a}gler, Rainer H{\"a}rtle und Monika Musch.

186: \item

187: bei Michael Thaler und Dr. Stefan Fritsch. Ihrer Administrationst{\"a}tigkeit ist es zu verdanken, dass es eine Freude war, mit den Computern des Lehrstuhls zu arbeiten. 

188: \item 

189: bei allen Mitarbeitern des Lehrstuhls T39 f{\"u}r das freundliche Arbeitsklima und die willkommenen Abwechslungen wie gelegentliches Frisbeewerfen, Baden oder Grillen.

190: \item

191: beim Freistaat Bayern f{\"u}r finanzielle F{\"o}rderung im Rahmen eines Stipendiums f{\"u}r besonders Begabte.

192: %beim Freistaat Bayern f{\"u}r die Gew{\"a}hrung des Stipendiums der Bayerischen Begabtenf{\"o}rderung.

193: \item

194: bei meinen Eltern f{\"u}r ihre Unterst{\"u}tzung w{\"a}hrend des gesamten Studiums.

195: \end{itemize}

196: 

197: \end{document}          

198: