1: The central theme of elementary particle physics is to find new
2: interactions of matter, energy, space and time.
3: When the matter in question is the quarks, one is faced with quark
4: confinement: quarks never appear freely; they are always bound inside
5: hadrons---baryons like the proton, or mesons like the pion or kaon.
6: In the Standard Model of elementary particles, confinement is a
7: phenomenon of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the gauge theory of the
8: strong force.
9:
10: Since only hadrons can be detected, the effects of quark confinement
11: must be calculated with QCD, before the experimental data
12: can be interpreted in terms of quarks.
13: In many cases, the best technique for doing the calculations is to
14: formulate QCD on a space-time lattice.
15: Lattice QCD and the Feynman path integral reduce the problem of to an
16: integral whose dimension scales as~$N^4$, where $N$ is the (linear)
17: lattice size.
18: The problem cries out for supercomputing.
19:
20: In recent years, lattice QCD has reached the stage where many
21: calculations of hadron masses, mass splittings and operator matrix
22: elements agree with experimental measurements.
23: The key has been the inclusion of sea quarks, which are pairs of virtual
24: quarks swirling around inside hadrons.
25: The progress has been especially striking~\cite{Davies:2003ik} when
26: the sea quarks are implemented as staggered quarks,
27: using an action designed to reduce discretization effects.
28:
29: One ingredient of these calculations is controversial.
30: Sea quarks are always computationally demanding, although staggered
31: quarks are by far the fastest.
32: Staggered quarks introduce some extra unwanted quarks, however.
33: The computer algorithms~\cite{Gottlieb:1987mq} and subsequent analysis
34: of the numerical data~\cite{Aubin:2003mg} remove them, but do so
35: differently for valence and sea quarks.
36: The difference can lead to violations of unitarity.
37: In the cases discussed here, it is plausible that such effects are small,
38: but a proof is not yet at hand~\cite{Durr:2005ax}.
39:
40: Less controversial is the treatment of heavy quarks.
41: In practice, the lattice spacing is not small enough to resolve the
42: Compton wavelength of charmed and $b$ quarks.
43: Fortunately, chromodynamics at this length scale is simple enough to
44: factor it out from the computer simulation, and several methods
45: exist~\cite{Kronfeld:2003sd}.
46: Nevertheless, it is good to have check.
47:
48: In this paper, we discuss three topics:
49: the normalization and $q^2$-dependence of the
50: $D\to Kl\nu$ form factor;
51: the decay constants of the $D^+$ and $D_s$ mesons;
52: and the mass of the $B_c$ meson.
53: Each of these lattice-QCD calculations was subsequently confirmed by
54: experimental measurements, satisfying a long-standing demand of
55: experimental physicists~\cite{Shipsey:2004wz}.
56: The quantities discussed here were ideal candidates: they are
57: straightforward to compute; they test the controversial aspects in
58: complementary ways; and the first ``good'' experimental measurements
59: were expected on the same time scale.
60: The success of the predictions is extremely encouraging.
61: In particular, the calculations for $D$ mesons are, in lattice QCD,
62: similar to those for $B$ mesons, whose $b$ quarks are considered likely
63: to exhibit new, non-Standard interactions.
64: