1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc1.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc1.tex,v 1.2 2004/02/24 11:22:11 spepping Exp $
4: %
5: \documentclass[fleqn,12pt,twoside]{article}
6: % \usepackage{espcrc1}
7: % Use the option 'headings' if you want running headings
8: \usepackage[headings]{espcrc1}
9:
10: % identification
11: \readRCS
12: $Id: espcrc1.tex,v 1.2 2004/02/24 11:22:11 spepping Exp $
13: \ProvidesFile{espcrc1.tex}[\filedate \space v\fileversion
14: \space Elsevier 1-column CRC Author Instructions]
15:
16: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
17: % \documentstyle[12pt,twoside,fleqn,espcrc1]{article}
18:
19: % if you want to include PostScript figures
20: \usepackage{graphicx}
21: \usepackage{psfig}
22: % if you have landscape tables
23: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
24:
25: % put your own definitions here:
26: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
27: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
28: % ...
29: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
30: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
31: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
32:
33: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
34: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
35:
36: % set the starting page if not 1
37: % \setcounter{page}{17}
38:
39: % declarations for front matter
40: \title{Lattice QCD at finite temperature}
41:
42: \author{P. Petreczky\address[MCSD]{
43: Physics Department and RIKEN-BNL, \\
44: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton NY 11973, USA}%
45: \thanks{This work has been supported by
46: U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-98CH10886.}
47: }
48: % If you use the option headings,
49: % the title is also used as the running title,
50: % and the authors are also used as the running authors.
51: % You can change that by using \runtitle and \runauthor.
52:
53: \runtitle{1-column format camera-ready paper in \LaTeX}
54: \runauthor{P. Petreczky}
55:
56: \begin{document}
57:
58: % typeset front matter
59: \maketitle
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62: I discuss recent developments in finite temperature lattice QCD,
63: including the calculation of the transition temperature, equation of
64: state, color screening and meson spectral functions.
65: \end{abstract}
66:
67: \section{Introduction}
68:
69: In recent years considerable progress has been made in understanding QCD
70: at finite temperature using lattice simulations. Calculations
71: of bulk thermodynamic quantities have been done in the realistic case
72: of 2+1 flavors with sufficiently small quark masses using different versions of improved
73: staggered actions \cite{milc04,hyp,milclat05,fodor05,us06}. This reduces or can even
74: eliminate the uncertainty of extrapolations in the quark mass in
75: different thermodynamics observables.
76:
77: One of the most prominent features of the deconfined phase of QCD
78: is color screening. In non-Abelian gauge theories it is a very
79: complicated phenomenon. Recently some progress in understanding
80: color screening has been made by calculating the free energy of
81: static charges on the lattice \cite{okacz02,digal03,okaczlat03,petrov04}.
82:
83: For many years lattice QCD did not provide any information on the
84: properties of real time excitations at finite temperature. The situation
85: has changed since few years and first calculations of meson
86: spectral functions at finite temperature appeared \cite{karsch02,umeda02,asakawa04,datta02,datta04,jhw}.
87: In this contribution I am going to review some of these
88: recent developments.
89:
90:
91: \section{Transition temperature and the equation of state}
92:
93: One of the most interesting question for the lattice
94: is the question about the nature of the finite temperature transition
95: and the value of the temperature $T_c$ where it takes place.
96: For very heavy quarks we have a 1st order deconfining transition.
97: In the
98: case of QCD with three degenerate flavors of quarks we expect a 1st order
99: chiral transition for sufficiently small quark masses.
100: In other cases there is no true phase transition but just a rapid
101: crossover.
102: Lattice simulations of 3 flavor QCD with improved staggered quarks (p4) using
103: $N_t=4$ lattices indicate that
104: the transition is first order only for very small quark masses,
105: corresponding to pseudo-scalar meson masses of about $60$ MeV
106: \cite{karschlat03}.
107: A recent study of the transition using effective models
108: of QCD resulted in a similar estimate for the boundary in the quark mass
109: plane, where the transition is 1st order \cite{szepzs}.
110: This makes it unlikely that for the interesting case of one heavier strange
111: quark and two light $u,d$ quarks corresponding to $140$ MeV pion the
112: transition is 1st order. However, calculations with unimproved staggered
113: quarks suggest that the transition is 1st order for pseudo-scalar
114: meson mass of about $300$ MeV \cite{norman}.
115: Thus the effect of the improvement is
116: significant and we may expect that the improvement of flavor symmetry,
117: which is broken in the staggered formulation, is very important.
118: But even when using improved staggered fermions it is necessary to do the calculations at several
119: lattice spacings in order to establish the continuum limit.
120: Recently, extensive calculations have been done to clarify the nature
121: of the transition in the 2+1 flavor QCD for physical quark masses using
122: $N_t=4,~6,~8$ and $10$ lattices.
123: These calculations were done using the
124: so-called $stout$ improved staggered fermion formulations which is even
125: superior to other more commonly used improved staggered actions ($p4,~asqtad$)
126: in terms of improvement of flavor symmetry. The result of this study was
127: that the transition is not a true phase transition but only a rapid
128: crossover \cite{nature}.
129:
130: Even-though there is no true phase transition in QCD thermodynamic observables change rapidly in a small
131: temperature interval and the value of
132: the transition temperature plays an important role.
133: The flavor and quark mass dependence of
134: many thermodynamic quantities is largely determined by the flavor and
135: quark mass dependence of $T_c$. For example, the pressure normalized by
136: its ideal gas value for pure gauge theory, 2 flavor, 2+1 flavor and 3 flavor
137: QCD shows almost universal behavior as function of $T/T_c$ \cite{cargese}.
138:
139: The current status of lattice calculations of the transition temperature
140: is summarized in Fig. 1a.
141: Early calculations with $p4$ action have been done for 2- and 3- flavor QCD
142: for pion masses $m_{\pi} \ge 400$ MeV \cite{karsch01}.
143: Calculations with Wilson fermions have
144: large uncertainties from chiral extrapolation. This is
145: because the actual simulations are done in the
146: region of large quark masses, corresponding to pion masses
147: $m_{\pi} \ge 700 MeV$ \cite{cppacsnf2,nakamuralat05}.
148: There is also a calculation of $T_c$ using standard staggered fermion for the
149: physical pion mass \cite{fodor04muc}.
150:
151: To better understand the systematics of the determination of $T_c$ in Fig. 1b I
152: show the transition temperature in units of the Sommer scale $r_0$ as
153: the function of the pion mass based on calculations on lattices with temporal
154: extent $N_t=4$ and $N_t=6$ with $p4$ action \cite{us06}.
155: \begin{figure}
156: \centerline{\hfill a \hspace*{9cm} b \hfill}
157: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{tc.eps}
158: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{tc_r0_pir0_nf2+1_exp.eps}
159: \vspace*{-1.5cm}
160: \caption{Lattice data on the transition temperature from
161: Refs. \cite{karsch01,milc04,hyp,us06,cppacsnf2,nakamuralat05} and the
162: chemical freezout temperature at RHIC \cite{starwhite} (left).
163: The transition temperature in units of the $r_0 T_c$ from Ref. \cite{us06}
164: as function of the pion mass.}
165: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
166: \end{figure}
167: The pion masses in these calculations
168: are smaller than 500 MeV with the smallest pion mass being around the physical
169: value. Note that the value of $T_c$ calculated at two different lattice
170: spacings are clearly different. The thin errorbars in Fig. 1b represent the
171: error in the determination of the lattice spacing $a$, i.e.
172: the error in $r_0/a$. There is also an error in the determination of the
173: gauge coupling constant $\beta_c=6/g^2$. The combined error is shown in
174: Fig. 1b as a thick errorbar. For $N_t=4$ calculations the error is dominated
175: by the error in lattice spacing, while for $N_t=6$ it is dominated by the
176: error in $\beta_c$. With the data on $r_0 T_c$ a chiral and continuum
177: extrapolation has been attempted using the most simple Ansatz
178: $r_0 T_c(m_{\pi},N_t)=r_0 T_c|_{cont}^{chiral}+ A (r_0 m_{\pi})^d + B/N_t^2$.
179: From this extrapolation on gets the continuum value $T_c r_0=0.457(7)[+8][-2]$
180: for the physical pion mass $m_{\pi} r_0=0.321$ {\cite{us06}.
181: The central value was obtained using
182: $d=1.08$ expected
183: from $O(4)$ scaling. To test the sensitivity to the chiral extrapolations
184: $d=2$ and $1$ have also been used.
185: The resulting uncertainty is shown
186: as second and third error in square brackets.
187: Using the
188: best know value of $r_0=0.469(7)$ we obtain
189: $T_c=192(7)(4)MeV$
190: which is higher than the most
191: of the previous values. It is also significantly higher than the
192: chemical freezout temperature at RHIC \cite{starwhite} which is shown in Fig.1a as the
193: vertical band.
194: \begin{figure}
195: \centerline{ a \hspace*{7cm} b }
196: %\hspace*{-0.7cm}
197: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{eosPlot.ps}
198: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{pressure_fodor_milc.eps}
199: %\psfig{eosPlot.ps}
200: \vspace*{-1.0cm}
201: \caption{The energy density
202: calculated with $p4$ and $asqtad$ actions (left) and the
203: pressure calculated with {\em stout} action. Calculation of the
204: pressure with standard staggered action is also shown.
205: }
206: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
207: \end{figure}
208:
209: The equation of state has been calculated using both improved action and standard staggered
210: fermion actions for different quark masses. The first calculation of the equation of state
211: with improved action ($p4$) was done for $N_t=4$ and at quite heavy quark masses,
212: corresponding to pion mass of about $700$ MeV at the transition temperature \cite{karsch00}.
213: The quark mass was kept fixed in units of the temperature and not in physical units \cite{karsch00}.
214: These may have an effect on the high temperature limit of the pressure and energy density \cite{fodor04}.
215: More recent calculations with $asqtad$ and $stout$ improved action were done at smaller quark masses, namely
216: for pions of about $200$ and $300$ MeV for $asqtad$ and for physical pion mass for $stout$ action.
217: The result of these calculations is shown in Fig. 2. In Fig. 2a I show the energy density as function
218: of $T/T_c$ for p4 and asqtad action.
219: Calculations done at $N_t=4$ and $N_t=6$ agree well with each other.
220: One can also see that the energy density calculated with the two
221: different action agrees well despite the fact that the quark masses are significantly different.
222: Close to the transition we may argue that the mass dependence of the energy density is taken care
223: of by the mass dependnce of $T_c$ as discussed above.
224:
225: The pressure calculated
226: with the $stout$ action is shown in Fig 2b. Unlike $p4$ and $asqtad$ the $stout$ action impoves the flavor symmetry breaking but not
227: the breaking of rotational symmetry which is important in the high temperature limit.
228: This is probably the reason why the $N_t=4$ and $N_t=6$ results differ significantly for
229: temperatures $T>1.3T_c$. In fact the cut-off dependence of the pressure for stout action in the high temperature
230: phase seems to be as large as the cut-off dependence in the case of standard (unimproved) staggered action \cite{milc_std_eos}.
231: In Ref. \cite{fodor05} it has been argued that the cutoff dependence can be taken care of by normalizing the
232: pressure by the ideal gass value calculated on the finite lattice $p_{SB}^{latt}$. Indeed, $p/p_{SB}^{latt}$
233: shows significantly reduced cut-off dependence. However, calculations in pure gauge theory show that
234: normalizing by the lattice ideal gas value may overestimate the cut-off effects \cite{boyd96}. Therefore future studies
235: are needed to settle this issue.
236:
237:
238: \section{Static quark and temporal meson correlators}
239: To study screening of static charges in high temperature QCD it is
240: customary to calculate the color singlet $F_1$, octet $F_8$ and averaged free energies of
241: a static quark anti-quark pair \cite{mclerran,nadkarni}
242: \begin{eqnarray}
243: &&
244: e^{-F_1(r,T)+C}=
245: \frac{1}{3} \langle {\rm Tr} W(\vec{r}) W^{\dagger} (0) \rangle ,\\
246: &&
247: e^{-F(r,T)+C} = \frac{1}{9} \langle
248: {\rm Tr} W(\vec{r}) {\rm Tr} W^{\dagger} (0) \rangle
249: =\frac{1}{9} \exp(-F_1(r,T))+\frac{8}{9} \exp(-F_8(r,T)).
250: \label{freee}
251: \end{eqnarray}
252: While the color averaged free energy is gauge invariant, the singlet and octet
253: free energies need gauge fixing. Usually the Coulomb gauge is used
254: \cite{okacz02,digal03,okaczlat03,petrov04,okacz04,okacz05}. There are also gauge invariant
255: definitions of the singlet free energy in terms of Wilson loop \cite{nadkarni,owe04} and eigenfunctions
256: of the covariant Laplacian \cite{owe02}.
257: In the high temperature leading order
258: perturbation theory all definition give the same result. Also in the zero temperature
259: limit different definitions should agree \cite{owe02}.
260: The normalization constant $C$ should be fixed such that the free energy of static
261: quark anti-quark pair coincides with the zero temperature potential \cite{okacz02}.
262: In Fig.3a I show the results of the color singlet free energy in Coulomb gauge in 3
263: flavor QCD \cite{petrov04}. As one can see at very short distances the free energy is temperature independent
264: and agrees with the zero temperature potential. It approaches a constant, $F_{\infty}$, at large
265: separation for all temperatures. However, as temperature is increasing $F_{\infty}$ decreases
266: as well as the distance where the free energy effectively flattens off.
267: This can be thought of as manifestation of color screening.
268: Similar
269: results have been obtained in pure gauge theory \cite{okacz02,digal03,okacz04}
270: and two flavor QCD \cite{okacz05} with the obvious difference that in pure gauge theory
271: $F_{\infty}$ is infinite, as the free energy rises linearly with separation below
272: the deconfinement temperature \cite{okaczlat03}.
273: One can also calculate the entropy and the internal energy of the two static
274: quarks, $S_{\infty}=-\partial F_{\infty}/\partial T$, $U_{\infty}= F_{\infty}+T S_{\infty}$.
275: In Fig. 3b I show
276: the entropy of two separated static quarks as function of the temperature for 2 and 3 flavor
277: QCD as well as pure gauge theory. There is a large peak in $S_{\infty}$ at the transition
278: temperature. At large temperature $S_{\infty}$ seems to approach a constant value. The internal energy is
279: very close to zero at high temperatures.
280: \begin{figure}
281: \centerline{ a \hspace*{7cm} b }
282: \hspace*{-0.4cm}\includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{f1_124_04ms.eps}
283: \includegraphics[width=8.6cm]{sinf_all.eps}
284: \vspace*{-1.1cm}
285: \caption{The singlet free energy in 3 flavor QCD \cite{petrov04} at
286: different temperaure (left) and the entropy of isolated quark and anti-quark
287: in pure gauge theory, 3- and 2-flavor QCD \cite{mehard04,okacz05} (right). }
288: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
289: \end{figure}
290: The decrease
291: of $F_{\infty}$ at high temperature is due to the presence of the entropy contribution, $-T S_{\infty}$, which at
292: asymptotically high temperatures is given by $- \frac{4}{3} T \alpha_s (m_D/T) \sim g^3 T$ and thus
293: dominates the free energy \cite{mehard04}. Here $m_D$ is the leading order Debye mass.
294: The internal energy is zero at order ${\cal O}(g^3)$ and receives contributions from higher order.
295: The above relation can be used for a non-perturbative
296: definition of the Debye mass.
297:
298: The above analysis, done for the singlet free energy, can also be done for the color averaged
299: free energy in the same way. At very small distances we have $F_1=-(4/3) \alpha_s/r$ and
300: $F_8=+(1/6) \alpha_s/r$ and thus $F=F_1+ T \ln 9$ \cite{okacz02}. The color averaged free energy approaches
301: the same constant $F_{\infty}$, thus this quantity is gauge independent. However, the temperature dependence
302: of $F$ is much stronger than of $F_1$ and one should consider much smaller distances to normalize
303: it properly. This makes the lattice study of this quantity more difficult \cite{okacz02}. This is the main reason why most
304: of the recent lattice calculations concentrated on the singlet free energy.
305:
306: Based on the simple picture of color screening it has been argued by Matsui and Satz that quarkonia should
307: disappear at temperatures slightly above the deconfinement temperature \cite{MS86}. To verify this conjecture
308: and gain information about the quarkonium properties above the deconfinement transition meson
309: spectral functions have to be calculated. On the lattice this can be done using the relation between Euclidean
310: and real time meson correlators, which in terms of the spectral function can be written as :
311: \begin{equation}
312: G(\tau, T) = \int_0^{\infty} d \omega
313: \sigma(\omega,T) K(\tau,\omega,T) ,~~
314: K(\tau,\omega,T) = \frac{\cosh(\omega(\tau-1/2
315: T))}{\sinh(\omega/2 T)}.
316: \label{eq.kernel}
317: \end{equation}
318: Given the data on the Euclidean meson correlator $G(\tau, T)$ the meson spectral function can be calculated
319: using the Maximum Entropy Method \cite{mem}. For charmonium this was done by using correlators calculated on
320: isotropic lattices \cite{datta02,datta04} as well as anisotropic lattices \cite{umeda02,asakawa04,jhw}. Different charmonium
321: states are identified as peaks in the spectral functions. It was shown that the spectral functions for the ground state
322: charmonia change little across the deconfinement transition \cite{umeda02,asakawa04,datta04,jhw}. This suggests that
323: $1S$ ($J/\psi$, $\eta_c$) charmonia can survive till temperatures as high as $1.6T_c$.
324: Spectral functions of excited $1P$ ($\chi_c$) states show large changes already at $1.1T_c$ \cite{datta02,datta04,jhw}.
325: This is shown in Fig. 4 where the spectral functions in the pseudo-scalar and scalar channels
326: calculated on anisotropic lattice \cite{jhw} are shown.
327: We see no change in the pseudo-scalar spectral function which corresponds to $\eta_c$ state. On the other
328: hand the scalar spectral function corresponding to $\chi_c$ state shows dramatic modifications.
329: Note that the spectral functions in Fig. 4 are zero above some energy. This is due finite lattice spacing which
330: limits the maximal energy $\omega$.
331: \begin{figure}
332: \centerline{ a \hspace*{7cm} b }
333: \hspace*{-0.4cm}\includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{comp_ps_Tne0.eps}
334: \includegraphics[width=8.6cm]{comp_sc_Tne0.eps}
335: \vspace*{-1.1cm}
336: \caption{The charmonium spectral function in the pseudo-scalar (left) and
337: scalar (right) channels.}
338: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
339: \end{figure}
340: This behavior of the spectral function can be seen already at the level
341: of the correlation function which does not require invoking statistical tools like MEM \cite{datta02,datta04,jhw}.
342: The pseudo-scalar spectral function show almost no temperature dependence across the deconfinement
343: transition temperature, while the scalar correlator shows large enhancement over the zero temperature correlator
344: \cite{datta04,jhw}. These features of the correlators are not easy to accommodate in potential model with
345: screening \cite{mocsy}.
346: One of the problems with the spectral functions obtained using MEM is that it shows peaks even at energies
347: $\omega>5$ GeV where the continuum should dominate. This could be an artifact of the analysis method or the
348: finite lattice spacing. Also the peaks at low $\omega$ appear to be quite broad (see Fig. 4) and thus may contain
349: contributions not only from the ground state but also higher excited states.
350: Clearly the spectral functions calculated on lattice cannot provide yet quantitative
351: information about the charmonia properties at finite temperatures.
352: The calculations of the charmonium spectral functions
353: discussed above were done in quenched approximation. It will be interesting to see how these conclusions are
354: modified when the effect os dynamical light quarks is taken into account. Preliminary calculation of the charmonium
355: spectral functions in 2 flavor QCD suggest that the effect of dynamical quarks does not change the above conculsions
356: significantly \cite{nf2spf}.
357:
358: There also some preliminary studies of bottomonium correlators and spectral functions \cite{datta06,petrovlat05}.
359: An intriguing outcome of these studies is the enhancement the scalar correlators above deconfinement temperature,
360: similar to one observed in charmonium case.
361: The scalar bottomonium correlator corresponds to $\chi_b$ state which is similar in size to 1S charmonia states
362: and thus is expected to survive above the deconfinement temperature.
363:
364: Transport processes should appear as peaks in the spectral
365: functions at very small energies.
366: The width of these peaks is related to transport coefficients.
367: Euclidean correlators are largely insensitive to the detail of these peaks and to very good approximation are
368: determined only by the area under the peaks \cite{gert,derek}.
369: Therefore there is little hope of getting transport coefficients from MEM. Nonetheless the presence of a transport contribution
370: in the vector correlator has been identified \cite{melat05}.
371:
372: Meson correlators and spectral functions have been calculated also for light quarks \cite{karsch02,asakawa03,gertlat}.
373: These studies, however, are less systematic than for the charmonium case. One intriguing outcome of these calculations
374: is the suppression of the vector spectral function at smaller energies which would result in the suppression of the
375: thermal dilepton and photon rates. Clearly much more work is needed to verify or rule out this possibility.
376: The lattice data on the vector correlator on the other hand show only small (about $10\%$ ) deviation from the case of freely
377: propagating quark anti-quark pair and can provide stringent constraint \cite{karsch02} on the vector spectral
378: functions. It would be nice to confront these findings with recent resummed perturbative calculations of the
379: vector spectral function \cite{guy06}.
380:
381:
382: At the end of this section let me finally mentions that the temporal correlators and the corresponding
383: spectral functions are useful not only to study mesonic excitations in high temperature QCD but also any
384: real time excitation, including quark and gluon quasi-particles. This, however, requires gauge fixing.
385: Preliminary results of lattice calculations of quark and gluon
386: spectral functions in Coulomb gauge have been reported in \cite{melat01}.
387:
388:
389: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
390:
391:
392: \bibitem{milc04}
393: C.~Bernard {\it et al.} [MILC Collaboration],
394: %``QCD thermodynamics with three flavors of improved staggered quarks,''
395: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 034504 (2005)
396:
397: \bibitem{hyp}
398: P.~Petreczky,
399: %``The finite temperature transition in (2+1)-flavour QCD with staggered HYP
400: %action,''
401: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 30} , S1259 (2004)
402: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G30,S1259;%%
403:
404: \bibitem{milclat05}
405: %\cite{Bernard:2005mf}
406: %\bibitem{Bernard:2005mf}
407: C.~Bernard {\it et al.},
408: %``The equation of state for QCD with 2+1 flavors of quarks,''
409: PoS {\bf LAT2005}, 156 (2006)
410: [arXiv:hep-lat/0509053].
411: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0509053;%%
412:
413:
414: \bibitem{fodor05}
415: %\cite{Aoki:2005vt}
416: %\bibitem{Aoki:2005vt}
417: Y.~Aoki, Z.~Fodor, S.~D.~Katz and K.~K.~Szabo,
418: %``The equation of state in lattice QCD: With physical quark masses towards
419: %the continuum limit,''
420: JHEP {\bf 0601}, 089 (2006)
421: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0510084].
422: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0510084;%%
423:
424: \bibitem{us06}
425: M. Cheng et al, hep-lat/0608013, to appear in Phys. Rev. D
426:
427: \bibitem{okacz02}
428: %\cite{Kaczmarek:2002mc}
429: %\bibitem{Kaczmarek:2002mc}
430: O.~Kaczmarek, F.~Karsch, P.~Petreczky and F.~Zantow,
431: %``Heavy quark anti-quark free energy and the renormalized Polyakov loop,''
432: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 543}, 41 (2002)
433: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0207002].
434: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0207002;%%
435:
436:
437: \bibitem{digal03}
438: %\cite{Digal:2003jc}
439: %\bibitem{Digal:2003jc}
440: S.~Digal, S.~Fortunato and P.~Petreczky,
441: %``Heavy quark free energies and screening in SU(2) gauge theory,''
442: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 034008 (2003)
443: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0304017].
444: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0304017;%%
445:
446:
447: \bibitem{okaczlat03}
448: %\cite{Kaczmarek:2003dp}
449: %\bibitem{Kaczmarek:2003dp}
450: O.~Kaczmarek, F.~Karsch, P.~Petreczky and F.~Zantow,
451: %``Heavy quark free energies, potentials and the renormalized Polyakov
452: %loop,''
453: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 129}, 560 (2004)
454: [arXiv:hep-lat/0309121].
455: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0309121;%%
456:
457: \bibitem{petrov04}
458: P. Petreczky and K. Petrov, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70} , 054503 (2004)
459:
460: \bibitem{karsch02}
461: %\cite{Karsch:2001uw}
462: %\bibitem{Karsch:2001uw}
463: F.~Karsch et al.,
464: %``A lattice calculation of thermal dilepton rates,''
465: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 530}, 147 (2002)
466: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0110208].
467: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0110208;%%
468:
469:
470:
471: \bibitem {umeda02}
472: T.~Umeda, K.~Nomura and H.~Matsufuru,
473: %``Charmonium at finite temperature in quenched lattice QCD,''
474: hep-lat/0211003
475: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0211003;%%
476:
477: \bibitem {asakawa04}
478: M.~Asakawa and T.~Hatsuda,
479: %``J/psi and eta/c in the deconfined plasma from lattice QCD,''
480: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ \textbf{92}, 012001 (2004)
481: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0308034;%%
482:
483:
484: \bibitem{datta02}
485: %\cite{Datta:2002ck}
486: %\bibitem{Datta:2002ck}
487: S.~Datta, F.~Karsch, P.~Petreczky and I.~Wetzorke,
488: %``A study of charmonium systems across the deconfinement transition,''
489: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 119}, 487 (2003)
490: [arXiv:hep-lat/0208012].
491: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0208012;%%
492:
493: \bibitem {datta04}
494: S.~Datta, F.~Karsch, P.~Petreczky and I.~Wetzorke,
495: %``Behavior of charmonium systems after deconfinement,''
496: Phys.\ Rev.\ D \textbf{69}, 094507 (2004)
497: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0312037].
498: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0312037;%%
499:
500: \bibitem{jhw}
501: A. Jakov\'ac, P. Petreczky, K. Petrov and A. Velytsky, hep-lat/0603005
502:
503: \bibitem{cargese}
504: F. Karsch, Lect. Notes Phys. {\bf 583}, 209 (2002)
505:
506: \bibitem{karschlat03}
507: %\cite{Karsch:2003va}
508: %\bibitem{Karsch:2003va}
509: F.~Karsch, et al.,
510: %``Where is the chiral critical point in 3-flavor QCD?,''
511: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 129}, 614 (2004)
512: [arXiv:hep-lat/0309116].
513: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0309116;%%
514:
515: \bibitem{szepzs}
516: %\cite{Herpay:2005yr}
517: %\bibitem{Herpay:2005yr}
518: T.~Herpay, A.~Patk\'os, Z.~Sz\'ep and P.~Szepfalusy,
519: % ``Mapping the boundary of the first order finite temperature restoration of
520: %chiral symmetry in the (m(pi) - m(K))-plane with a linear sigma model,''
521: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 125017 (2005)
522: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0504167].
523: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0504167;%%
524:
525: \bibitem{norman}
526: C. Schmidt, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl. ) {\bf 119}, 517 (2003); N.H. Christ and X. Liao, Nucl. Phys.
527: B (Proc. Suppl.) {\bf 119}, 514 (2003)
528:
529: \bibitem{nature}
530: Z. Fodor, G. Er\H{o}di, S.D. Katz and K. Szab\'o, to be published in Nature
531:
532: \bibitem{karsch01}
533: %\cite{Karsch:2000kv}
534: %\bibitem{Karsch:2000kv}
535: F.~Karsch, E.~Laermann and A.~Peikert,
536: %``Quark mass and flavor dependence of the QCD phase transition,''
537: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 605}, 579 (2001)
538: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0012023].
539: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0012023;%%
540:
541:
542: \bibitem{cppacsnf2}
543: A.~Ali Khan {\it et al.} [CP-PACS Collaboration],
544: % ``Phase structure and critical temperature of two flavor QCD with
545: %renormalization group improved gauge action and clover improved Wilson quark
546: %action,''
547: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 034502 (2002)
548:
549: \bibitem{nakamuralat05}
550: Y. Nakamura et al, PoS (LAT05), 157 (2005)
551:
552: \bibitem{fodor04muc}
553: %\cite{Fodor:2004nz}
554: %\bibitem{Fodor:2004nz}
555: Z.~Fodor and S.~D.~Katz,
556: % ``Critical point of QCD at finite T and mu, lattice results for physical
557: %quark masses,''
558: JHEP {\bf 0404}, 050 (2004)
559: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0402006].
560: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0402006;%%
561:
562: \bibitem{starwhite}
563: J. Adams et al ( STAR Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A757 (2005) 102-183
564:
565: \bibitem{karsch00}
566: %\cite{Karsch:2000ps}
567: %\bibitem{Karsch:2000ps}
568: F.~Karsch, E.~Laermann and A.~Peikert,
569: %``The pressure in 2, 2+1 and 3 flavour QCD,''
570: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 478}, 447 (2000)
571: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0002003].
572: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0002003;%%
573:
574: \bibitem{fodor04}
575: %\cite{Csikor:2004ik}
576: %\bibitem{Csikor:2004ik}
577: F.~Csikor, et al.,
578: %``Equation of state at finite temperature and chemical potential, lattice
579: %QCD results,''
580: JHEP {\bf 0405}, 046 (2004)
581: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0401016].
582: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0401016;%%
583:
584: \bibitem{milc_std_eos}
585: %\cite{Bernard:1996cs}
586: %\bibitem{Bernard:1996cs}
587: C.~W.~Bernard {\it et al.} [MILC Collaboration],
588: %``The equation of state for two flavor QCD at N(t) = 6,''
589: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 6861 (1997)
590: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9612025].
591: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9612025;%%
592:
593: %\cite{Boyd:1996bx}
594: \bibitem{boyd96}
595: G.~Boyd, et al,
596: %``Thermodynamics of SU(3) Lattice Gauge Theory,''
597: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 469} (1996) 419
598: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9602007].
599: %%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9602007;%%
600:
601:
602:
603:
604: \bibitem{mclerran}
605: L.D. Mclerran and B. Svetitsky,
606: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 24}, 450 (1981)
607:
608: \bibitem{nadkarni}
609: S. Nadkarni, Phys. Rev D {\bf 33} (1986) 3738
610:
611: \bibitem{okacz04}
612: %\cite{Kaczmarek:2004gv}
613: %\bibitem{Kaczmarek:2004gv}
614: O.~Kaczmarek, F.~Karsch, F.~Zantow and P.~Petreczky,
615: % ``Static quark anti-quark free energy and the running coupling at finite
616: %temperature,''
617: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 074505 (2004)
618: %[Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 72}, 059903 (2005)]
619: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0406036].
620: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0406036;%%
621:
622: \bibitem{okacz05}
623: %\cite{Kaczmarek:2005ui}
624: %\bibitem{Kaczmarek:2005ui}
625: O.~Kaczmarek and F.~Zantow,
626: % ``Static quark anti-quark interactions in zero and finite temperature QCD.
627: %I: Heavy quark free energies, running coupling and quarkonium binding,''
628: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 114510 (2005)
629: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0503017];
630: arXiv:hep-lat/0506019.
631: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0503017;%%
632:
633:
634: \bibitem{owe04}
635: %\cite{Jahn:2004qr}
636: %\bibitem{Jahn:2004qr}
637: O.~Jahn and O.~Philipsen,
638: %``The Polyakov loop and its relation to static quark potentials and free
639: %energies,''
640: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 074504 (2004)
641: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0407042].
642: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0407042;%%
643:
644:
645: \bibitem{owe02}
646: %\cite{Philipsen:2002az}
647: %\bibitem{Philipsen:2002az}
648: O.~Philipsen,
649: %``Non-perturbative formulation of the static color octet potential,''
650: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 535}, 138 (2002)
651: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0203018].
652: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0203018;%%
653:
654:
655:
656: \bibitem{mehard04}
657: %\cite{Petreczky:2005bd}
658: %\bibitem{Petreczky:2005bd}
659: P.~Petreczky,
660: %``Heavy quark potentials and quarkonia binding,''
661: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 43}, 51 (2005)
662: [arXiv:hep-lat/0502008].
663: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0502008;%%
664:
665: \bibitem{MS86}
666: %\cite{Matsui:1986dk}
667: %\bibitem{Matsui:1986dk}
668: T.~Matsui and H.~Satz,
669: %``J / psi SUPPRESSION BY QUARK - GLUON PLASMA FORMATION,''
670: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 178}, 416 (1986).
671: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B178,416;%%
672:
673: \bibitem{mem}
674: %\cite{Asakawa:2000tr}
675: %\bibitem{Asakawa:2000tr}
676: M.~Asakawa, T.~Hatsuda and Y.~Nakahara,
677: %``Maximum entropy analysis of the spectral functions in lattice QCD,''
678: Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 46}, 459 (2001)
679: [arXiv:hep-lat/0011040].
680: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0011040;%%
681:
682: \bibitem{mocsy}
683: %\cite{Mocsy:2005qw}
684: %\bibitem{Mocsy:2005qw}
685: A.~Mocsy and P.~Petreczky,
686: %``Quarkonia correlators above deconfinement,''
687: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73}, 074007 (2006);
688: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0512156].
689: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0512156;%%
690: %\cite{Mocsy:2004bv}
691: %\bibitem{Mocsy:2004bv}
692: % A.~Mocsy and P.~Petreczky,
693: %``Heavy quarkonia survival in potential model,''
694: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 43}, 77 (2005)
695: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0411262].
696: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411262;%%
697:
698: \bibitem{datta06}
699: %\cite{Datta:2006ua}
700: %\bibitem{Datta:2006ua}
701: S.~Datta, A.~Jakov\'ac, F.~Karsch and P.~Petreczky,
702: %``Quarkonia in a deconfined gluonic plasma,''
703: arXiv:hep-lat/0603002.
704: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0603002;%%
705:
706: \bibitem{petrovlat05}
707: %\cite{Petrov:2005ej}
708: %\bibitem{Petrov:2005ej}
709: K.~Petrov, A.~Jakov\'ac, P.~Petreczky and A.~Velytsky,
710: % ``Bottomonia correlators and spectral functions at zero and finite
711: %temperature,''
712: PoS {\bf LAT2005}, 153 (2006)
713: [arXiv:hep-lat/0509138].
714: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0509138;%%
715:
716: \bibitem{nf2spf}
717: %\cite{Aarts:2006nn}
718: %\bibitem{Aarts:2006nn}
719: G.~Aarts, et al.,
720: %``Charmonium spectral functions in two-flavour QCD,''
721: arXiv:hep-lat/0608009.
722: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0608009;%%
723:
724:
725:
726: \bibitem{gert}
727: G.~Aarts and J.~M.~Martinez Resco, JHEP 0204, 053 (2002)
728:
729: \bibitem{derek}
730: %\cite{Petreczky:2005nh}
731: %\bibitem{Petreczky:2005nh}
732: P.~Petreczky and D.~Teaney,
733: %``Heavy quark diffusion from the lattice,''
734: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73}, 014508 (2006)
735: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0507318].
736: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0507318;%%
737:
738:
739: \bibitem{melat05}
740: %\cite{Petreczky:2005zy}
741: %\bibitem{Petreczky:2005zy}
742: P.~Petreczky, K.~Petrov, D.~Teaney and A.~Velytsky,
743: %``Heavy quark diffusion and lattice correlators,''
744: PoS {\bf LAT2005}, 185 (2006)
745: % [Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 774}, 765 (2006)]
746: [arXiv:hep-lat/0510021].
747: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0510021;%%
748:
749:
750: \bibitem{asakawa03}
751: %\cite{Asakawa:2002xj}
752: %\bibitem{Asakawa:2002xj}
753: M.~Asakawa, T.~Hatsuda and Y.~Nakahara,
754: %``Hadronic spectral functions above the QCD phase transition,''
755: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 715}, 863 (2003)
756: % [Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 119}, 481 (2003)]
757: [arXiv:hep-lat/0208059].
758: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0208059;%%
759:
760:
761: \bibitem{gertlat}
762: %\cite{Aarts:2006wt}
763: %\bibitem{Aarts:2006wt}
764: G.~Aarts, C.~Allton, J.~Foley, S.~Hands and S.~Kim,
765: %``Meson spectral functions at nonzero momentum in hot QCD,''
766: arXiv:hep-lat/0607012.
767: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0607012;%%
768:
769: \bibitem{guy06}
770: %\cite{Moore:2006qn}
771: %\bibitem{Moore:2006qn}
772: G.~D.~Moore and J.~M.~Robert,
773: %``Dileptons, spectral weights, and conductivity in the quark-gluon plasma,''
774: arXiv:hep-ph/0607172.
775: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0607172;%%
776:
777: \bibitem{melat01}
778: %\cite{Petreczky:2001yp}
779: %\bibitem{Petreczky:2001yp}
780: P.~Petreczky, F.~Karsch, E.~Laermann, S.~Stickan and I.~Wetzorke,
781: % ``Temporal quark and gluon propagators: Measuring the quasiparticle
782: %masses,''
783: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 106}, 513 (2002)
784: [arXiv:hep-lat/0110111].
785: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0110111;%%
786:
787:
788:
789: \end{thebibliography}
790:
791:
792: \end{document}
793: