1:
2: \section 5. Computation of meson masses and decay constants
3:
4: The masses and matrix elements tabulated in appendix C
5: were calculated using a combination of methods,
6: most of which being entirely standard by now.
7: We consider two valence quarks, labelled $r$ and $s$,
8: and study the vector and pseudo-scalar mesons in the $\rbar s$-channel.
9: The masses of the valence quarks
10: may be set to the sea-quark mass, but we are
11: also interested in the partially quenched situation where one
12: of the quark masses is different from the sea-quark mass.
13:
14:
15: \subsection 5.1 Two-point correlation functions
16:
17: The pseudo-scalar density, the axial current and the vector current
18: in the $\rbar s$-channel are given by
19: \equation{
20: P^{rs}=\rbar\dirac{5}s,
21: \qquad
22: A_{\mu}^{rs}=\rbar\dirac{\mu}\dirac{5}s,
23: \qquad
24: V_{\mu}^{rs}=\rbar\dirac{\mu}s.
25: \enum
26: }
27: All masses and decay constants we are interested in
28: were extracted from the two-point functions
29: \equation{
30: \fpp(x_0)=a^3\sum_{x_1,x_2,x_3}
31: \left\langle P^{rs}(x)P^{sr}(0)\right\rangle,
32: \enum
33: \next{2ex}
34: \fap(x_0)=a^3\sum_{x_1,x_2,x_3}
35: \left\langle A_0^{rs}(x)P^{sr}(0)\right\rangle,
36: \enum
37: \next{2ex}
38: \fvv(x_0)=a^3\sum_{x_1,x_2,x_3}\sum_{k=1}^3
39: \left\langle W_k^{rs}(x)W_k^{sr}(0)\right\rangle,
40: \enum
41: }
42: where $W_{\mu}^{rs}$ is
43: a linear combination of the vector current $V^{rs}_{\mu}$ and
44: a Jacobi smeared form of it [\ref{Jacobi}],
45: slightly tuned so as to suppress the high-energy intermediate
46: states
47: in the two-point function.
48:
49: The correlation functions were evaluated in the standard manner
50: by first expressing them as an expectation value of a
51: product of two quark propagators.
52: These were calculated
53: by solving the lattice Dirac equation,
54: using the Schwarz-preconditioned GCR solver [\ref{SchwarzII}]
55: and requiring the
56: normalized residue of the solution to be less than $10^{-10}$.
57: In order to reduce the statistical fluctuations,
58: the results were averaged over time-reflections and $5$
59: distant source points in the case of the
60: $A$ and $B$ runs and over $3$ source points in the case
61: of the $D$ runs.
62:
63:
64: \subsection 5.2 Masses and matrix elements
65:
66: On a lattice of infinite time-like extent,
67: and at large times $x_0$,
68: the correlation function $\fpp(x_0)$ is saturated by
69: the one-particle pseudo-scalar meson state in the $\rbar s$-channel.
70: If we denote the mass of the meson by $\Mps$ and the associated
71: vacuum-to-meson matrix element by $\Gps$,
72: the asymptotic form of the correlation function is
73: \equation{
74: \fpp(x_0)=-{\Gps^2\over\Mps}\rme^{-\Mps x_0}+\ldots,
75: \enum
76: }
77: where the ellipsis stands for a series of more rapidly decaying terms.
78: The mass $\Mv$ of the $\rbar s$ vector meson may be defined similarly
79: through the asymptotic behaviour of the vector correlation function
80: $\fvv(x_0)$,
81: but the definition requires further explanation if the meson is unstable
82: in infinite volume (see subsect.~5.6).
83:
84: Next we note that the ratio
85: \equation{
86: \meff(x_0)=\left\{\frac{1}{2}\left(\drv{0}+\drvstar{0}\right)\fap(x_0)+
87: \cA a\drvstar{0}\drv{0}\fpp(x_0)\right\}\bigm/\fpp(x_0)
88: \enum
89: }
90: converges to a constant $m_{rs}$ at large times $x_0$,
91: for any fixed value of the parameter $\cA$,
92: because both $\fap(x_0)$ and $\fpp(x_0)$ are proportional
93: to $\rme^{-\Mps x_0}$ in this limit.
94: Moreover, in the continuum limit,
95: $\meff(x_0)$ is expected to converge to the sum of
96: the bare current-quark masses of the $r$ and the $s$ quark,
97: at all times $x_0$,
98: with a rate proportional to $a$
99: in the unimproved theory (where we set $\cA$ to zero)
100: or $a^2$ if the improvement
101: coefficients $\csw$ and $\cA$ are
102: properly tuned [\ref{OaImp},\ref{NPimp},\ref{NPimpCurrent}]%
103: \kern1.5pt\footnote{$\dagger$}{\footnotefont%
104: The effects of the $1+\rmO(am)$ renormalization
105: factors (C.2) are expected to be small in practice and are neglected
106: here for simplicity.
107: }.
108:
109: All our numerical data for $\meff(x_0)$ in fact
110: turned out to be statistically consistent with a constant value,
111: over a large range of $x_0$, and the quark mass sum $m_{rs}$
112: was therefore always unambiguously and accurately determined.
113: In particular, the current-quark mass $\msea=\frac{1}{2}m_{rr}$
114: of the sea quarks is obtained by
115: setting the hopping parameters of the valence quarks to $\ksea$.
116: Whether in general $m_{rs}$ coincides with
117: $\frac{1}{2}(m_{rr}+m_{ss})$, as one expects to be the case if
118: the lattice effects are small, is a question
119: to which we shall return in sect.~6.
120:
121: The bare pseudo-scalar decay constant $\Fps$ in the $\rbar s$-channel
122: is normally extracted from the asymptotic behaviour of
123: the two-point functions $\fap(x_0)$ and $\fpp(x_0)$.
124: In this paper, however, we first computed $m_{rs}$, $\Mps$ and $\Gps$
125: and then used the formula
126: \equation{
127: \Fps={m_{rs}\over\Mps^2}\Gps
128: \enum
129: }
130: for the decay constant. Starting
131: from eq.~(5.6), it is straightforward to show that
132: equivalent results are obtained in this way, up to
133: small corrections of O($a^2$).
134: Note that $\Fps$ is automatically O($a$)-improved
135: if $m_{rs}$ is.
136:
137:
138: \subsection 5.3 Spectral decomposition in finite volume
139:
140: On a finite lattice with time-like extent $T$, the
141: calculation of the pseudo-scalar and vector meson masses
142: requires some care and must address the issue of
143: higher-states contributions. This is, incidentally, not
144: so in the case of the quark mass sum $m_{rs}$, which
145: is expected to be independent of the lattice size up
146: to lattice-spacing effects.
147:
148: For $0<x_0<T$,
149: the correlation function $\fpp(x_0)$ (and similarly
150: $\fvv(x_0)$) can be expanded in a
151: rapidly convergent series of the form
152: \equation{
153: \fpp(x_0)=-\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\sum_{j=i}^{\infty}
154: c_{ij}h(x_0;E_i,E_j),
155: \enum
156: \next{2ex}
157: h(t;E,E')=\exp\{-Et-E'(T-t)\}+\exp\{-E't-E(T-t)\},
158: \enum
159: }
160: where $0=E_0<E_1<E_2<\ldots$ are the intermediate-state energies
161: and $c_{ij}\geq0$ the associated spectral weights%
162: \kern1.5pt\footnote{$\ddagger$}{\footnotefont%
163: Equation (5.8) assumes the existence of a positive hermitian transfer
164: matrix which may not be guaranteed in the improved theory.
165: It seems likely to us, however, that a transfer matrix can still
166: be defined,
167: as is the case in O($a^2$)-improved gauge theories
168: [\ref{LuscherWeiszTrans}], although complex energy values and negative
169: weights may occur at energies on the order of the cutoff scale $1/a$.
170: }.
171: In the channel considered here, the lowest intermediate state is
172: the $\rbar s$ pseudo-scalar meson state at zero spatial momentum. Then come
173: the multi-meson scattering states and more and more complicated
174: states as one moves up the energy scale.
175:
176: At large $x_0$ and $T$, the dominant term in the series (5.8) is
177: thus the one where $E_i=0$ and $E_j=\Mps$.
178: Moreover, using the product inequality (B.3),
179: the contributions of all higher-energy states can be shown to be
180: exponentially suppressed with respect to this term.
181: In practice their effects are seen in the simulation data
182: only when either $x_0$ or $T-x_0$ is not too large.
183: The leading terms in this range are then
184: \equation{
185: \fpp(x_0)=c_0h(x_0;0,M_0)+c_1h(x_0;0,M_1)+\ldots,
186: \qquad M_0=\Mps,
187: \enum
188: }
189: where $M_1$ denotes the energy
190: of the next-to-lowest state in the $\rbar s$-channel
191: (if the spatial volume of the lattice is large enough, this
192: will be a three-meson state with all particles at rest).
193:
194: Note that each term in the spectral series (5.8)
195: decreases exponentially in the range
196: $0\leq x_0\ll\frac{1}{2}T$, with an exponent equal to $E_j-E_i$ that
197: can be as small as the pseudo-scalar meson mass,
198: for example, even if both
199: $E_i$ and $E_j$ are not small.
200: The presence of such contributions complicates the analysis
201: of the correlation functions considerably unless
202: the time-like extent $T$ of the lattice is
203: sufficiently large to strongly suppress them.
204: This condition was barely satisfied in the case of the run $A_4$,
205: which is why we decided to discard it from
206: the physics analysis (as already mentioned in the first paper in this
207: series).
208:
209:
210: \subsection 5.4 Effective masses and matrix elements
211:
212: Slightly departing from what is usually done,
213: we define the effective pseudo-scalar meson mass
214: $\Meff(x_0)$ in the $\rbar s$-channel to be the value of $M\geq0$ where
215: \equation{
216: {h(x_0-a;0,M)\over h(x_0;0,M)}=
217: {\fpp(x_0-a)\over\fpp(x_0)}.
218: \enum
219: }
220: Using the results obtained in appendix B, it is not difficult to prove
221: that this equation has one and only one solution.
222: Moreover, with this definition of the effective mass it is
223: guaranteed that $\Meff(x_0)=\Mps$ at large $x_0$,
224: up to exponentially small terms.
225: We then also introduce the effective matrix element
226: \equation{
227: \Geff(x_0)=
228: \left\{-\Meff(x_0){\fpp(x_0)\over h(x_0;0,\Meff(x_0))}\right\}^{1/2},
229: \enum
230: }
231: which converges to $\Gps$ in the large-time limit.
232:
233: The asymptotic behaviour
234: of the effective mass at large $x_0$ and $T$
235: can be worked out explicitly, starting from the
236: spectral representation (5.10).
237: Setting
238: \equation{
239: \eps(x_0)={c_1h(x_0;0,M_1)\over c_0h(x_0;0,M_0)},
240: \qquad
241: \del(x_0)=\left\{M{\partial\over\partial M}\ln h(x_0;0,M)\right\}_{M=M_0},
242: \enum
243: }
244: and going through a few lines of algebra,
245: it is straightforward to derive the expansion
246: \equation{
247: \Meff(x_0)=\Mps\left\{1+{\eps(x_0)-\eps(x_0-a)\over\del(x_0)-\del(x_0-a)}
248: +\ldots\right\},
249: \enum
250: }
251: where the ellipsis stands for terms that are
252: exponentially small with respect to the next-to-leading term.
253: A similar formula,
254: \equation{
255: \Geff(x_0)=\Gps\left\{1+\frac{1}{2}\eps(x_0)+
256: \frac{1}{2}\left(1-\delta(x_0)\right)
257: {\eps(x_0)-\eps(x_0-a)\over\del(x_0)-\del(x_0-a)}+\ldots\right\},
258: \enum
259: }
260: is obtained in the case of the effective matrix element.
261:
262:
263: \subsection 5.5 Fit procedures
264:
265: From the point of view of the statistical error analysis,
266: the correlation functions $\fpp$, $\fap$ and $\fvv$
267: are the primary quantities, while the effective quark mass sums,
268: meson masses and matrix elements are
269: functions of these.
270: The statistical errors of all these quantities
271: tend to be strongly correlated.
272: We took the correlations fully into account,
273: from the primary quantities to the final results,
274: by propagating the errors using the jackknife method
275: (appendix A).
276: In particular, fitted and interpolated values were always
277: considered to be functions of the input data,
278: which allows their errors to be calculated in the
279: standard manner.
280:
281: The quark mass sum, the pseudo-scalar
282: meson masses and matrix elements, and the masses of the vector mesons were
283: all obtained by fitting the corresponding effective quantity $\Peff(x_0)$
284: in a range $t_0\leq x_0\leq t_1$ of time with the chosen
285: fit function $\Phi(x_0)$.
286: We performed correlated least-squares fits, where
287: the values of the fit parameters were determined by minimizing
288: \equation{
289: \chi^2=
290: \sum_{x_0,y_0=t_0}^{t_1}
291: \left[\Peff(x_0)-\Phi(x_0)\right]
292: (C^{-1})_{x_0y_0}
293: \left[\Peff(y_0)-\Phi(y_0)\right],
294: \enum
295: }
296: the matrix $C$ being the statistical error covariance of
297: $\Peff(t_0),\ldots,\Peff(t_1)$.
298: The quark mass sum $m_{rs}$, for example, was computed by
299: fitting $\meff(x_0)$ to a constant as shown in fig.~5a.
300:
301: \input figure5
302:
303: In the case of the pseudo-scalar meson masses, we
304: fitted the data with the asymptotic
305: expression (5.14).
306: We first calculated the mass $\Mpi$ of the pions, i.e.~the mesons made of the
307: sea-quarks, by substituting $M_1=3\Mpi$ for the energy of the next-higher
308: state (thus assuming the latter is a three-pion
309: state with small interaction energy) and adjusting
310: $\Mpi$ and $c_1/c_0$ so as to minimize $\chi^2$.
311: While the fit curves obtained in this way represent the data
312: very well, it should be noted that the fitted value of $\Mpi$ is
313: largely determined by the data at large times $x_0$, where
314: a fit to a constant would give nearly the same results
315: (see fig.~5b).
316:
317: Once $\Mpi$ was determined, the mesons made of a sea quark and
318: a valence quark with a mass different from the sea quark
319: were considered. Here we set
320: $M_1=\Mps+2\Mpi$ and otherwise proceeded as in the degenerate case.
321: Next the matrix elements $\Gps$ were computed by fitting the data
322: with the asymptotic expression (5.15), using the same
323: values of $M_1$ as in the fits of the effective meson
324: masses (fig.~5c). We did not set $c_1/c_0$ to the previously
325: computed values, but it turned out that
326: the two fits gave consistent results for this parameter.
327:
328:
329: \subsection 5.6 Energy spectrum in the vector channel
330:
331: At small sea-quark masses, the vector mesons become
332: resonances that decay into two (or more) pseudo-scalar mesons.
333: As was shown long ago [\ref{LuscherResonances}],
334: resonances give rise to a characteristic volume-dependent
335: pattern of the energy spectrum
336: which allows their masses and decay widths to be determined, in principle,
337: from simulation data.
338:
339: As before, we considered the channels
340: where one or both of the $r$ and $s$ quarks is a sea quark.
341: Starting from the correlation functions $\fvv(x_0)$,
342: the lowest energy $\Mv$ in this channel was calculated
343: by fitting the effective mass with the asymptotic formula (5.14)
344: (with $\Mps$ replaced by $\Mv$). For the lowest excited-state energy
345: we substituted
346: \equation{
347: M_1=(\Mps^2+k^2)^{1/2}+(\Mpi^2+k^2)^{1/2},
348: \qquad k=2\pi/L,
349: \enum
350: }
351: in this case, $L$ being the spatial size of the lattice.
352: Excellent fits were obtained with this ansatz
353: and $\Mv$ was determined quite accurately on all lattices.
354:
355: We refer to the energy values $\Mv$
356: as the vector meson masses in this paper,
357: even in those cases where the meson is likely to
358: become a resonance in the infinite volume limit
359: (we estimate this to be so at the lightest quark masses in each
360: series of lattices and perhaps
361: at some of the second-to-lightest as well).
362: This use of language is only slightly incorrect, however,
363: because in all our simulations
364: $\Mv$ turned out to be at most $20\%$ larger than
365: $\Mps+\Mpi$ and significantly smaller than $M_1$,
366: in which case the true resonance energy is
367: expected to be close to $\Mv$ [\ref{LuscherResonances}].
368:
369: We finally note that the statistical errors in the vector channel
370: tend to be larger than those in the pseudo-scalar channel.
371: The effect could be related to the resonance character
372: of the vector mesons and it is conceivable that
373: a coupled channel analysis, such as the one recently presented by
374: Aoki et al.~[\ref{AokiResonances}],
375: will not only allow the vector meson decays to be studied
376: but may also help to reduce the statistical errors.
377:
378: