1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \documentclass[aps,twocolumn,prd,floatfix,tightenlines,final,preprintnumbers,
3: superscriptaddress,showpacs,showkeys]{revtex4}
4: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
5: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
6: \usepackage{color}
7: \usepackage{epsfig}
8: \usepackage{placeins}
9: \usepackage{axodraw}
10: \usepackage{pstricks}
11: \usepackage{graphicx}
12: \usepackage{amsmath}
13: \usepackage{theorem}
14: \usepackage{amssymb}
15: \usepackage{latexsym}
16: \usepackage{epic}
17: \usepackage{graphics}
18: \usepackage{rotating}
19: \bibliographystyle{h-apsrev}
20: \begin{document}
21:
22:
23: \newcommand{\vp}{\vec{p}\hspace{0.5mm}'}
24: \newcommand{\vsq}{\vec{p}^{\hspace{0.5mm}2}}
25:
26: % \draft
27: \preprint{
28: \vbox{
29: \hbox{ADP-07-02/T642}
30: \hbox{Edinburgh 2007/5}
31: }}
32:
33:
34: \title[Meson form factors from lattice QCD]{Pseudoscalar and vector
35: meson form factors from lattice QCD}
36:
37: \author{J.N.~Hedditch}\affiliation{Department of Physics and
38: Mathematical Physics and \\
39: Special Research Centre for the Subatomic Structure of Matter, \\
40: University of Adelaide, 5005, Australia}
41: \author{W.~Kamleh}\affiliation{Department of Physics and
42: Mathematical Physics and \\
43: Special Research Centre for the Subatomic Structure of Matter, \\
44: University of Adelaide, 5005, Australia}
45: \author{B.G.~Lasscock}\affiliation{Department of Physics and
46: Mathematical Physics and \\
47: Special Research Centre for the Subatomic Structure of Matter, \\
48: University of Adelaide, 5005, Australia}
49: \author{D.B.~Leinweber}\affiliation{Department of Physics and
50: Mathematical Physics and \\
51: Special Research Centre for the Subatomic Structure of Matter, \\
52: University of Adelaide, 5005, Australia}
53: \author{A.G.~Williams}\affiliation{Department of Physics and
54: Mathematical Physics and \\
55: Special Research Centre for the Subatomic Structure of Matter, \\
56: University of Adelaide, 5005, Australia}
57:
58: \author{J.M.~Zanotti}\affiliation{School of Physics, University of
59: Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, UK}
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62: We present a study of the pseudoscalar and vector meson
63: form factors, calculated using the Fat-Link Irrelevant Clover (FLIC)
64: action in the framework of Quenched Lattice QCD. Of particular
65: interest is the determination of a negative quadrupole moment,
66: indicating that the $\rho$ meson is not spherically symmetric.
67: \end{abstract}
68:
69: \pacs{12.38.Gc,14.40.Aq}
70:
71:
72: \keywords{Mesons, form factors}
73:
74: \maketitle
75:
76: \section{Introduction}
77:
78: The important role that electromagnetic form factors play in our
79: understanding of hadronic structure has been well documented for more
80: than fifty years.
81: %
82: The reason for their popularity is that they encode information about
83: the shape of hadrons, and provide valuable insights into their
84: internal structure in terms of quark and gluon degrees of freedom.
85:
86: Most of the attention, both experimentally and theoretically, has
87: focused on the electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon (see
88: Refs.~\cite{Gao:2003ag,Hyde-Wright:2004gh,Arrington:2006zm,Perdrisat:2006hj,deJager:2006nt}
89: for recent reviews).
90: %
91: The electromagnetic form factors of pseudoscalar mesons, especially
92: the pion, being the lightest QCD bound state, have also been studied
93: extensively
94: \cite{Woloshyn:1985in,Wilcox:1985bv,Woloshyn:1985vd,Wilcox:1985iy,Draper:1988bp,Draper:1988xv} in
95: lattice QCD.
96: %
97: More recently, there is a renewed interest in calculating the pion form
98: factor on the lattice
99: \cite{Nemoto:2003ng,vanderHeide:2003kh,Abdel-Rehim:2004gx,Bonnet:2004fr,Capitani:2005ce,Hashimoto:2005am,Brommel:2006ww}.
100: %
101: This is especially timely considering the new \cite{Horn:2006tm} and
102: reanalysis of old \cite{Tadevosyan:2006yd} experimental data from
103: JLab.
104:
105: The vector meson form factors, on the other hand, have received less
106: attention (see
107: Refs.~\cite{Samsonov:2003hs,Choi:2004ww,Braguta:2004kx,Aliev:2004uj,Bhagwat:2006pu}
108: for recent work).
109: %
110: Of particular interest is the quadrupole moment of the $\rho$ meson,
111: where theoretical determinations can disagree by as much as a factor
112: of two \cite{Bhagwat:2006pu}.
113: %
114: %In 1980, Arnold {\it et al.} published a paper showing the general
115: %form for $C$- and $T$-invariant form factors for a spin-1
116: %object~\cite{Arnold:1980zj}.
117: %%
118: %Calculations from QCD sum-rules followed, a notable paper being that
119: %of Ioffe and Smilga~\cite{Ioffe:1982qb}.
120: %%
121: %A light-cone calculation was later performed by Brodsky and
122: %Hiller~\cite{Brodsky:1992px}.
123: %%
124: %Lattice studies, using density-density correlation functions have
125: %recently been performed by Alexandrou
126: %{\it et al.}~\cite{Alexandrou:2002nn}.
127: %
128: We aim to resolve this issue by performing the first direct
129: lattice calculation of the $\rho$-meson quadrupole form factor.
130: %
131: Charge and magnetic form factors are also calculated and from these we
132: extract the relevant static quantities, namely the mean square
133: charge-radius and magnetic moment.
134: %
135: We also analyse the dependence of light-quark contributions to these
136: form factors on their environment and contrast these with a new
137: calculation of the corresponding pseudoscalar-sector result.
138:
139: Our aim is to reveal the electromagnetic structure of vector mesons
140: and to study to what extent the qualitative quark model picture is
141: consistent with quenched lattice QCD.
142: %
143: Interestingly, it has been shown in a lattice calculation by
144: Alexandrou et~al.~\cite{Alexandrou:2002nn} that the distribution of
145: charge in the vector meson is oblate, and therefore not consistent
146: with the picture of a quark anti-quark in relative S-wave.
147: %
148: By calculating the vector meson quadrupole form factor we make a
149: direct comparison with the findings of Ref.~\cite{Alexandrou:2002nn}.
150:
151: For each observable we calculate the quark sector contributions
152: separately. Using this additional information we examine the
153: environmental sensitivity of the light-quark contributions to the
154: pseudoscalar and vector meson charge radii. We also evaluate the
155: dominance of the light quark contributions to the $K$ and $K^*$.
156:
157: This paper builds on the preliminary work presented in Ref.~\cite{Lasscock:2006nh}.
158: %
159: In Section~\ref{sec:Mff} we introduce the theoretical formalism of
160: meson form factors, including the techniques required to extract them
161: from a lattice calculation.
162: %
163: Section~3 contains details of our lattice simulation, while in
164: Section~4 we present and discuss our results for both pseudoscalar and
165: vector mesons.
166: %
167: Finally, in Section~5 we summarise our findings and discuss future
168: work.
169:
170: \section{Theoretical formalism}
171:
172: \subsection{Meson form factors}
173: \label{sec:Mff}
174:
175: Meson form factors are extracted from matrix elements involving the
176: vector (electromagnetic) current
177: %
178: \begin{eqnarray}
179: \langle M(\vp)| J^\alpha |M(\vec{p})\rangle\,,
180: \label{eqn:ME}
181: \end{eqnarray}
182: %
183: where $M(\vec{p})$ ($M(\vp)$) denotes a meson state with initial (final)
184: momentum $\vec{p}$ ($\vp$). The momentum transfer is $q_\mu=(p_\mu^\prime
185: -p_\mu)$.
186:
187: For a pion, the matrix element in Eq.~(\ref{eqn:ME}) is described by a
188: single form factor
189: %
190: %
191: \begin{eqnarray}
192: \langle \pi(\vp)| J^\alpha |\pi(\vec{p})\rangle = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{E_{\pi}(\vec{p})
193: E_{\pi}(\vp)}} \, [p^\alpha + p^{\alpha \prime}] F_\pi(Q^2)\,,
194: \label{eqn:pion-ME}
195: \end{eqnarray}
196: %
197: where $Q^2=-q^2$ is the invariant momentum transfer, and the energy of the
198: pion with momentum $\vec{p}$ is $E_{\pi}(\vec{p}) = \sqrt{m_{\pi}^{2} + \vsq}$.
199: The formula for the kaons are exactly analogous.
200: %
201: The $\rho$-meson, on the other hand, is spin-1 and is described by three
202: form factors \cite{Brodsky:1992px},
203: %
204: \begin{eqnarray}
205: \label{eq:vector-current}
206: \left \langle \rho(\vp, s') | J^{\alpha} | \rho(\vec{p}, s) \right \rangle
207: &=& \cr
208: & & \hspace{-2.7cm} \frac{1}{2\sqrt{E_{\rho}(\vec{p})E_{\rho}(\vp)}} \epsilon^{\prime \star }_\tau(p',s')\
209: J^{\tau \alpha \sigma}(p',p)\, \epsilon_\sigma(p,s)
210: \label{ad}
211: \end{eqnarray}
212: %
213: where $\epsilon$ and $\epsilon^\prime$ are
214: the initial and final polarisation vectors, respectively, and
215: %
216: \begin{widetext}
217: \begin{equation}
218: \label{Jexpression}
219: J^{\tau \alpha \sigma}(p^\prime,p) =
220: - \left\{ G_{1}(Q^2)\, g^{\tau \sigma} \, [p^\alpha + p^{\alpha\prime}]
221: + G_2(Q^2)[g^{\alpha \sigma} q^\tau - g^{\alpha \tau} q^\sigma ]
222: - G_3(Q^2) \, q^\sigma q^\tau \ \frac{p^\alpha + p^{\alpha\prime
223: }}{2m_{\rho}^2} \right\}\ .
224: \end{equation}
225: \end{widetext}
226: %
227: The covariant vertex functions $G_{1,2,3}$ can be rewritten in terms
228: of the Sachs charge, magnetic and quadrupole form factors \cite{Brodsky:1992px,Arnold:1980zj},
229: %
230: \begin{eqnarray}
231: G_Q(Q^2) &=& G_1(Q^2) - G_2(Q^2) + (1 +\eta) G_3(Q^2) \\
232: G_M(Q^2) &=& G_2(Q^2) \\
233: G_C(Q^2) &=& G_1(Q^2) + \frac{2}{3} \eta\, G_Q(Q^2) \, ,
234: \end{eqnarray}
235: %
236: where $m_{\rho}$ is the mass of the vector-meson system calculated on
237: the lattice and $\eta = Q^2/ 4 m_{\rho}^2$.
238:
239: The charge $q_{\rho}$, magnetic moment $\mu_{\rho}$, and quadrupole moment $Q_{\rho}$
240: are then extracted from $G_C$, $G_M$, and $G_Q$, respectively at zero
241: momentum transfer
242: %
243: \begin{eqnarray}
244: e \, G_C(0) &=& q_{\rho} \label{eqn:charge}\\
245: e \, G_M(0) &=& 2m_{\rho}\mu_{\rho} \label{eqn:magmom}\\
246: e \, G_Q(0) &=& m^2_{\rho}Q_{\rho} \label{eqn:quadmom}\, .
247: \end{eqnarray}
248: %
249: The formulae for the $K^{*}$ are exactly analogous.
250:
251:
252: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
253:
254: \subsection{Meson form factors on the lattice}
255:
256: The matrix elements in Eqs.~(\ref{eqn:pion-ME}) and (\ref{ad}) are obtained from
257: ratios of three-point and two-point correlation functions
258: %
259: \begin{equation}
260: R^{\alpha}(p',p) = \sqrt{\frac{
261: \left<G^{\alpha}(\vp,\vec{p},t_2,t_1)\right> \,
262: \left<G^{\alpha}(\vec{p},\vp,t_2,t_1)\right>}{
263: \Large{<}G(\vp,t_2)\Large{>} \,
264: \Large{<}G(\vec{p},t_2)\Large{>}}}
265: \label{eqn:3pt-pi}
266: \end{equation}
267: %
268: for pseudoscalar mesons, and
269: %
270: \begin{equation}
271: R^{\alpha}_{\mu\nu}(p',p) = \sqrt{\frac{
272: \left<G^{\alpha}_{\mu\nu}(\vp,\vec{p},t_2,t_1)\right> \,
273: \left<G^{\alpha}_{\nu\mu}(\vec{p},\vp,t_2,t_1)\right>}{
274: \Large{<}G_{\mu\mu}(t_2,\vp)\Large{>} \,
275: \Large{<}G_{\nu\nu}(t_2,\vec{p})\Large{>}}}
276: \label{eqn:3pt-rho}
277: \end{equation}
278: %
279: for vector mesons. Note repeated indices are not summed over.
280:
281: The two-point correlation function for the pseudoscalar mesons is
282: %
283: \begin{eqnarray}
284: %
285: {G}(t_2,\vec{p}) &=& \sum_{\vec{x_2}}e^{-i\vec{p}\cdot\vec{x}_{2}}\
286: \langle\Omega| \chi(x_{2})\chi^{\dagger}(0) |\Omega\rangle\ . %\cr
287: %&\stackrel{=}{t_2\rightarrow\infty}& e^{E_{\pi}(\vec{p})t_{2}}\lambda_{\pi}(\vec{p})\bar{\lambda}_{\pi}(\vec{p})\ ,
288: \label{eqn:2pt-ps}
289: \end{eqnarray}
290: %where $\lambda_{\pi}(\vec{p})$ and $\bar{\lambda}_{\pi}(\vec{p})$ is the coupling of the interpolator
291: %to the pion with momentum $\vec{p}$ at the sink and source respectively.
292: %Similarly for the other pseudoscalar mesons.
293: Similarly for the vector mesons,
294: %
295: \begin{eqnarray}
296: {G}_{\mu\nu}(t_2,\vec{p}) &=& \sum_{\vec{x_2}}e^{-i\vec{p}\cdot\vec{x}_{2}}\
297: \langle\Omega| \chi_{\mu}(x_{2}) \chi_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0) |\Omega\rangle\ .
298: \label{eqn:2pt-vec}
299: \end{eqnarray}
300: %
301: \begin{widetext}
302: The three-point correlation function for the pseudoscalar meson is
303: %
304: \begin{eqnarray}
305: %
306: G^{\alpha}(t_2,t_1,\vp,\vec{p})
307: &=& \sum_{\vec{x_1},\vec{x_2}} e^{-i \vp \cdot (\vec{x}_{2} - \vec{x}_{1})}e ^{-i \vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}_{1}}\
308: \langle \Omega |\
309: \chi(x_{2}) J^{\alpha}(x_{1}) \chi^{\dagger}(0)\
310: | \Omega \rangle \ .
311: \label{eqn:3pt-ps}
312: \end{eqnarray}
313: Similarly the three-point function for the vector meson is
314: \begin{eqnarray}
315: G^{\alpha}_{\mu\nu}(t_2,t_1,\vp,\vec{p})
316: &=& \sum_{\vec{x_1},\vec{x_2}} e^{-i \vp \cdot (\vec{x}_{2} - \vec{x}_{1})}e ^{-i \vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}_{1}}\
317: \langle \Omega |\
318: \chi_{\mu}(x_{2}) J^{\alpha}(x_{1}) \chi_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)\
319: | \Omega \rangle \ .
320: \label{eqn:3pt-vec}
321: \end{eqnarray}
322: \end{widetext}
323: %
324: The Lorentz indices $\mu$ and $\nu$ are only present for the vector mesons,
325: while $\alpha$ is the index of the electromagnetic current.
326:
327: The ratios in Eqs.(\ref{eqn:3pt-pi}) and (\ref{eqn:3pt-rho}) are constructed in
328: such a way as to remove the time-dependence and constants of normalisation from
329: the correlation functions at large time separations, $t_{1}$ and $t_{2}-t_{1}$.
330:
331: %
332: These ratios differ subtly from previous work~\cite{Leinweber:1990dv}, in that
333: we are explicitly enforcing the parity of the terms through
334: the choice of momenta $(p',p)$ and $(p,p')$ vs $(p',p)$ and $(-p,-p')$.
335: %
336: This requires two three-point propagators (with momentum-transfer $q$ and $-q$) for
337: each configuration. However with the well established technique of averaging over
338: $U$ and $U^{*}$ configurations \cite{Leinweber:1990dv,Boinepalli:2006xd}, there is no additional cost.
339: %
340:
341: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
342:
343: \subsubsection{$\pi$-meson case}
344:
345: Since the pion has zero spin, the vertex is extraordinarily simple and takes
346: the form given in Eq.~(\ref{eqn:pion-ME}). Here we show how this function is
347: extracted from the ratio Eq.~\eqref{eqn:3pt-pi} by evaluating the correlation
348: functions at large Euclidean times.
349:
350: First we define the matrix elements as,
351: \begin{eqnarray}
352: \label{eq:matrix_elements-ps}
353: \langle \Omega | \chi_{\mu}(0) | \pi(\vec{p}) \rangle &=& {1 \over \sqrt{2E_{\pi}(\vec{p})}} \lambda_{\pi}(\vec{p}) \ ,\cr
354: \langle \pi(\vec{p}) | \chi_{\mu}^{\dagger}(0) |\Omega\rangle &=& {1 \over \sqrt{2E_{\pi}(\vec{p})}} \bar{\lambda}_{\pi}(\vec{p})\ .
355: \end{eqnarray}
356: Here $\lambda_{\pi}(\vec{p})$ and $\bar{\lambda}_{\pi}(\vec{p})$ are the couplings of the
357: interpolator to the pion with momentum $\vec{p}$ at the sink and source respectively.
358: The momentum dependence allows for the use of smeared fermion sources and sinks. The bar
359: allows for different amounts of smearing at the source and sink.
360: %
361: \begin{widetext}
362: By inserting a complete set of energy and momentum states into
363: Eq.~\eqref{eqn:2pt-ps}, we can show that at large Euclidean time,
364: \begin{eqnarray}
365: \label{eq:2pt_larget-ps}
366: \lim_{t_{2}\rightarrow \infty}{G}(t_2,\vec{p}) = {e^{-E_{\pi}(\vec{p})t_{2}} \over 2 E_{\pi}(\vec{p})}\lambda_{\pi}(\vec{p}) \bar{\lambda}_{\pi}(\vec{p})\ .
367: \end{eqnarray}
368: Following the same treatment, one can show that the three-point function Eq.~\eqref{eqn:3pt-ps}
369: at large Euclidean time is
370: \begin{eqnarray}
371: \label{eq:3pt_larget-ps}
372: \lim_{t_{1},t_{2}-t_{1}\rightarrow \infty} G^{\alpha}(t_2,t_1,\vp,\vec{p}) &=&\
373: {e^{-E_{\pi}(\vp)(t_{2} - t_{1})}e^{-E_{\pi}(\vec{p})t_{1}} \over 2\sqrt{E_{\pi}(\vec{p})E_{\pi}(\vp)}}\
374: \lambda_{\pi}(\vp) \langle \pi(\vp) | J^{\alpha}(0) | \pi(\vec{p}) \rangle\ \bar{\lambda}_{\pi}(\vec{p})\ .
375: \end{eqnarray}
376: \end{widetext}
377:
378: Substituting these expressions into Eq.~\eqref{eqn:3pt-pi} and using Eq.~\eqref{eqn:pion-ME}, the ratio
379: $R^{\alpha}(p',p)$ simply reduces to
380: %
381: \begin{eqnarray}
382: R^{\alpha}(p',p) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{E_{\pi}(\vec{p}) E_{\pi}(\vp)}}\, [p^{\alpha} +
383: {p}^{\alpha\prime}]F_\pi(Q^2)\,,
384: \end{eqnarray}
385: such that the large Euclidean time limits of the ratio $R_{\alpha}$ is a direct
386: measure of $F_\pi(Q^2)$ up to kinematical factors.
387: %Similarly we can derive above formula for the $K$ and $K^{0}$.
388:
389:
390: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
391:
392: \subsubsection{$\rho$-meson case}
393:
394: Following \cite{Brodsky:1992px}, we define the matrix element of the
395: electromagnetic current for $\rho$-meson in terms of the covariant vertex
396: functions $G_{1,2,3}$ as in Eqs.~(\ref{ad}) and (\ref{Jexpression}).
397:
398: The analogues of the matrix elements in Eq.~\eqref{eq:matrix_elements-ps} are
399: %
400: \begin{eqnarray}
401: \langle\Omega|\, \chi_\mu(0) \,| \rho(\vec{p}, s) \rangle &=& {1 \over \sqrt{2E_{\rho}(\vec{p})}}\lambda_{\rho}(\vec{p})
402: \epsilon_{\mu} (p, s) \cr
403: \langle \rho(\vec{p}, s) |\, {\chi_{\nu}}^{\dagger}(0)\, | \Omega\rangle &=& {1 \over \sqrt{2E_{\rho}(\vec{p})}}\
404: \bar{\lambda}_{\rho} (\vec{p})\, \epsilon^{\star}_{\nu} (p, s) \ .
405: \end{eqnarray}
406: %
407: The polarisation vectors obey the transversality condition
408: %
409: \begin{eqnarray}
410: \label{eq:transversality}
411: \sum_s \epsilon_{\mu} (p, s)\, \epsilon^{\star}_{\nu} (p, s) = -
412: \left(g_{\mu\nu} - \frac{p_\mu p_\nu}{m_{\rho}^2} \right)\ ,
413: \end{eqnarray}
414: %
415: because the vector meson current is a conserved current.
416:
417: \begin{widetext}
418: The evaluation of the two- and three-point functions proceeds as for our
419: discussion of the pion. However the completeness relation includes a
420: sum over spin-states. Using the transversality condition
421: Eq.~\eqref{eq:transversality} the analogue of Eq.~\eqref{eq:2pt_larget-ps}
422: becomes
423: \begin{eqnarray}
424: \label{eq:2pt-larget-rho}
425: \lim_{t_{2}\rightarrow \infty}{G}(t_2,\vec{p}) &=& \sum_{s}\
426: {e^{-E_{\rho}(\vec{p})t_{2}}\over 2E_{\rho}(\vec{p})}\
427: \lambda_{\rho}(\vec{p}) \bar{\lambda}_{\rho}(\vec{p})
428: \epsilon_{\mu} (p, s)\, \epsilon^{\star}_{\nu} (p, s)\cr
429: &=& - {e^{-E_{\rho}(\vec{p})t_{2}} \over 2E_{\rho}(\vec{p}) }\
430: \lambda_{\rho}(\vec{p}) \bar{\lambda}_{\rho}(\vec{p})\
431: \left(g_{\mu\nu} - \frac{p_\mu p_\nu}{m_{\rho}^2} \right)\ .
432: \end{eqnarray}
433: Similarly using Eq.~\eqref{eq:vector-current} we can evaluate the three-point function,
434: %
435: \begin{eqnarray}
436: \label{threepointexpr}
437: \label{eq:3pt-larget-rho}
438: \lim_{t_{1},t_{2}-t_{1}\rightarrow \infty} G^{\alpha}_{\mu\nu}(t_2,t_1,\vp,\vec{p}) &=&\
439: \sum_{s,s'}{ e^{-E_{\rho}(\vp)(t_{2}-t_{1})}e^{- E_{\rho}(\vec{p}) t_{1}}\over 4E_\rho(\vec{p}) E_{\rho}(\vp) }\
440: \lambda_{\rho}(\vp) \epsilon_{\mu} (p', s')\
441: \epsilon^{\prime \star }_\tau(p',s') J^{\tau \alpha \sigma}(p',p) \epsilon_\sigma(p,s) \
442: \bar{\lambda}_{\rho} (\vec{p})\, \epsilon^{\star}_{\nu} (p, s) \cr
443: %
444: &=& { e^{-E_{\rho}(\vp)(t_{2}-t_{1})}e^{- E_{\rho}(\vec{p}) t_{1}}\over 4E_\rho(\vec{p}) E_{\rho}(\vp) }\
445: \lambda_{\rho}(\vp) \bar{\lambda}_{\rho}(\vec{p})\
446: \left( g_{\mu\tau} - \frac{p'_\mu p'_\tau}{m_{\rho}^2} \right)\
447: J^{\tau \alpha \sigma}\left( g_{\sigma \nu} - \frac{p_\sigma p_\nu}{m_{\rho}^2} \right) \ .
448: \end{eqnarray}
449: \end{widetext}
450:
451:
452: Inserting the above expressions into the ratio in
453: Eq.~(\ref{eqn:3pt-rho}), together with our choice of momentum used in
454: the simulations, namely $p' = (E_{\rho},p_x,0,0)$ $(E_{\rho} =
455: \sqrt{m_{\rho}^{2} + p_x^{2}})$ and $p = (m_{\rho},0,0,0)$, it is
456: possible to express $R^{\alpha}_{\mu\nu}$ in terms of the Sachs form
457: factors,
458: %
459: \begin{eqnarray*}
460: {R}^{0}_{11} &=& \frac{p_x^2}{3 m_{\rho} \sqrt{E_{\rho} m_{\rho}} } G_Q(Q^2) + \frac{E_{\rho}+m_{\rho}}{2\sqrt{E_{\rho}m_{\rho}}}
461: G_C(Q^2)\,, \\
462: {R}^{0}_{22} = {R}^{0}_{33} &=& - \frac{p_x^2}{6 m_{\rho} \sqrt{E_{\rho}m_{\rho}}} G_Q (Q^2) +
463: \frac{E_{\rho}+m_{\rho}}{2 \sqrt{E_{\rho} m_{\rho}}} G_C(Q^2)\,, \\
464: {R}^{3}_{13} = {R}^{3}_{31} &=& \frac{p_x}{2 \sqrt{E_{\rho}m_{\rho}}} G_M(Q^2) \, .
465: \end{eqnarray*}
466:
467: The individual form factors are isolated as follows:
468: %
469: \begin{eqnarray}
470: G_C(Q^2) &=& \frac{2}{3} \frac{\sqrt{E_{\rho}m_{\rho}}}{E_{\rho}+m_{\rho}} \left( {R}^{0}_{11} +
471: {R}^{0}_{22} + {R}^{0}_{33} \right)\,, \\
472: G_M(Q^2) &=& \frac{\sqrt{E_{\rho}m_{\rho}}}{p_x} \left( {R}^{3}_{13} + {R}^{3}_{31}
473: \right)\,, \\
474: G_Q(Q^2) &=& \frac{m_{\rho} \sqrt{E_{\rho}m_{\rho}}}{p^2_x} \left( 2 {R}^{0}_{11} -
475: {R}^{0}_{22} - {R}^{0}_{33} \right)\,.
476: \label{eqn:sachsquadR}
477: \end{eqnarray}
478: %Similarly we derive the above formula for the $K^{*}$ and $K^{* 0}$.
479: While we have used the subscript $\rho$ to denote a vector meson, the
480: results are applicable to vector mesons in general, including the
481: $K^{*}$ for example.
482:
483: \subsection{Extracting static quantities}
484:
485:
486: The mean squared charge radius $\langle r^2 \rangle$ is obtained from
487: the charge form-factor through the following relation,
488: \begin{equation}
489: \label{eqn:rsqeqn}
490: \langle r^2 \rangle = -6 \frac{\partial}{\partial Q^2} G(Q^2) {\Big
491: |}_{Q^2=0}\,.
492: \end{equation}
493: %
494: To calculate the derivative the monopole form is used,
495: %
496: \begin{equation}
497: \label{eqn:monopole}
498: G_C(Q^2) = \left ( \frac{1}{\frac{Q^2}{\Lambda^2}+1}\right)\ .
499: \end{equation}
500: %
501: $\Lambda$ is referred to as the monopole mass.
502: Inserting this form into Eq.~(\ref{eqn:rsqeqn}) and rearranging provides
503: %to an expression for $\langle r^2 \rangle$
504: %
505: \begin{equation}
506: \langle r^2 \rangle = \frac{6}{Q^2}\left( \frac{1}{G_C(Q^2)} - 1 \right)\ ,
507: \end{equation}
508: valid for quantities with $G_C(Q^2=0) = 1$.
509:
510: As mentioned in Sec.~\ref{sec:Mff}, the charge
511: (Eq.~(\ref{eqn:charge})), magnetic moment (Eq.~(\ref{eqn:magmom})),
512: and quadrupole moment (Eq.~(\ref{eqn:quadmom})) can be extracted from
513: the Sachs form factors at zero momentum transfer. Since we perform
514: our calculations at a single, finite value of $Q^2$, we will need to
515: adjust our results to zero momentum transfer.
516:
517: From studies of nucleon properties, it is observed that $G_M$ and $G_C$
518: have similar $Q^2$-scaling at small $Q^2$~\cite{Litt:1969my}. In the
519: following, we shall assume that this scaling also holds for quark
520: contributions to mesons. If $G_C(0) = 1$,
521: we have
522: %
523: \begin{equation}
524: G_M(0) \simeq \frac{G_M(Q^2)}{G_C(Q^2)} \,.
525: \end{equation}
526:
527: Whilst a similar scaling could be used to relate our quadrupole
528: form-factor to the quadrupole moment, we believe that the form-factor
529: at our small finite $Q^2$ ( $\simeq 0.22 {\rm GeV}$) will be of
530: greater phenomenological interest. We note that for a positively
531: charged meson a negative value of $G_Q$ corresponds to an oblate
532: deformation.
533:
534:
535: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
536: \section{Method}
537:
538: The electromagnetic form factors are obtained using the three-point
539: function techniques established by Leinweber, {\it et al.} in
540: Refs.~\cite{Leinweber:1990dv,Leinweber:1992hy,Leinweber:1992pv} and
541: updated for smeared sources in Ref.~\cite{Boinepalli:2006xd}.
542: %
543: Our quenched gauge fields are generated with the ${\mathcal O}(a^2)$
544: mean-field improved Luscher-Weisz plaquette plus rectangle gauge
545: action \cite{Luscher:1984xn} using the plaquette measure for the mean
546: link. We use an ensemble of 379 quenched gauge field configurations on
547: $20^3 \times 40$ lattices with lattice spacing $a= 0.128$ fm. The
548: gauge field configurations are generated via the Cabibbo-Marinari
549: pseudo-heat-bath algorithm~\cite{Cabibbo:1982zn} using a parallel
550: algorithm with appropriate link partitioning \cite{Bonnet:2000db}.
551:
552: We use the fat-link irrelevant clover (FLIC) Dirac operator
553: \cite{Zanotti:2001yb} which provides a new form of nonperturbative
554: ${\mathcal O}(a)$ improvement \cite{Zanotti:2004dr}. The improved
555: chiral properties of FLIC fermions allow efficient access to the light
556: quark-mass regime \cite{Boinepalli:2004fz}, making them ideal for
557: dynamical fermion simulations now underway \cite{Kamleh:2004xk}.
558: %
559: For the vector current, we an ${\cal O}(a)$-improved FLIC
560: conserved vector current \cite{Boinepalli:2006xd}. We use a
561: smeared source at $t_{2} = 8$. Complete simulation details are described in
562: Ref.~\cite{Boinepalli:2006xd}.
563:
564: Table~\ref{table:parameters} provides the $\kappa$-values used in our
565: simulations, together with the calculated pseudoscalar and vector
566: meson masses.
567: %
568: While we refer to $m_\pi^2$ in our figures and tables to infer the
569: quark masses, we note that the critical value where the pion mass
570: vanishes is $\kappa_{\rm cr}=0.13135$. Importantly the vector mesons
571: remain bound at all quark masses considered in this calculation
572: due to finite volume effects.
573: That is, the mass of the vector mesons is less than the energy
574: of the lowest lying multi-hadron state with the appropriate
575: quantum numbers.
576:
577: The strange quark mass is chosen to be the third heaviest quark mass.
578: This provides a pseudoscalar mass of 697 MeV which compares well with the
579: experimental value of $( 2M_K^2 - M_\pi^2 )^{1/2} = 693\, {\rm MeV}$
580: motivated by chiral perturbation theory.
581: %
582: Two vector-meson interpolating fields are considered, namely $\bar{q} \gamma_i q$ and $\bar{q}\gamma_i \gamma_4 q$.
583: %
584: Since results for the two interpolators agree, we simply present the results for
585: the $\bar{q} \gamma_i q$ interpolator, which displays a significantly stronger
586: signal.
587:
588: The error analysis of the correlation function ratios is performed via
589: a second-order, single-elimination jackknife, with the $\chi^2$ per
590: degree of freedom $(\chi^{2}_{\rm dof})$ obtained via covariance
591: matrix fits.
592: %
593: We perform a series of fits through the ratios after the current insertion at $t=14$.
594: %
595: By examining the $\chi^2_{\rm dof}$ we are able to establish a valid
596: window through which we may fit in order to extract our observables.
597: %
598: In all cases, we required a value of $\chi^2_{\rm dof}$ no larger than 1.5.
599: %
600: The values of the static quantities quoted in this paper on a per
601: quark-sector basis correspond to values for single quarks
602: of unit charge.
603:
604: \begin{table}[tbph]
605: \caption{Meson masses for the respective values of the
606: hopping parameter $\kappa$.}
607: \label{table:parameters}
608: \begin{ruledtabular}
609: \begin{tabular}{lllll}
610: \noalign{\smallskip}
611: $\kappa$ & $am_\pi$ & $am_{K}$ & $am_{\rho}$ & $am_{K^*}$\\
612: \hline
613: \noalign{\smallskip}
614: $0.12780$ & $0.5411(10)$ & $0.4993(11)$ & $0.7312(30)$ & $0.7057(27)$ \\
615: $0.12830$ & $0.5013(11)$ & $0.4782(11)$ & $0.7067(36)$ & $0.6933(40)$ \\
616: $0.12885$ & $0.4539(11)$ & $0.4539(11)$ & $0.6797(46)$ & $0.6796(46)$ \\
617: $0.12940$ & $0.4014(12)$ & $0.4285(11)$ & $0.6537(49)$ & $0.6668(47)$ \\
618: $0.12990$ & $0.3471(15)$ & $0.4044(12)$ & $0.6309(56)$ & $0.6556(50)$ \\
619: $0.13205$ & $0.3020(19)$ & $0.3862(13)$ & $0.6160(64)$ & $0.6484(52)$ \\
620: $0.13060$ & $0.2412(42)$ & $0.3671(19)$ & $0.6039(71)$ & $0.6423(54)$ \\
621: $0.13080$ & $0.1968(52)$ & $0.3574(16)$ & $0.5982(80)$ & $0.6393(56)$ \\
622: \end{tabular}
623: \end{ruledtabular}
624: \end{table}
625:
626: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
627: \section{Results}
628: \subsubsection{Charge radii}
629: \begin{figure}[b]
630: \begin{center}
631: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{Summary.ps}
632: \caption{\label{fig:rsquaredchargedsummary}
633: Strange and non-strange meson mean squared charge radii for charged
634: pseudoscalar and vector mesons. We also include for comparison results for the proton taken from Ref.~{\cite{Boinepalli:2006xd}}.
635: The $\pi$ and $\rho$-meson results are centred
636: on the relevant value of $m_\pi^2$, other symbols are offset horizontally for clarity.
637: }
638: \end{center}
639: \end{figure}
640:
641: We begin the discussion of our results with the charge radii of the
642: vector and pseudoscalar mesons. From the quark model we would expect
643: a hyperfine interaction between the quark and anti-quark of the form
644: $\frac{\vec{\sigma_{q}}\cdot\vec{\sigma}_{\bar{q}}}{m_q m_{\bar{q}}}$.
645: %
646: The interaction is repulsive where the spins are aligned, as
647: in the vector mesons, and attractive where the spins are
648: anti-aligned, as in the pseudoscalar mesons.
649: %
650: In Fig.~\ref{fig:rsquaredchargedsummary} we show the charge radii of the vector and pseudoscalar mesons.
651: %
652: For comparison the charge radius of the proton is also shown.
653: %
654: Indeed we find that the charge radii of the vector mesons are
655: consistently larger than the pseudoscalar mesons, and in fact similar
656: to the charge radii of the proton, even at heavier quark masses.
657: %
658: This is contrary to earlier lattice simulations with relatively small spatial extent~\cite{Draper:1989pi}, that have suggested that the $\pi^+$, $\rho^+$ and proton should have a very similar RMS charge radius at larger quark masses.
659: %
660: It is possible that the agreement obtained in the previous study reflects finite-volume effects attendant with the use of a small spatial volume.
661:
662: By comparing the results for the up-quark contributions to the $\pi$ and $K$ ($\rho$ and $K^*$) charge radii, it is possible to gain insights into the effect that the presence of a heavier strange-quark has on the lighter up-quark in pseudoscalar (vector) mesons.
663: %
664: Figures~\ref{fig:rsquaredpseudoscalarquarksectors} and
665: \ref{fig:rsquaredvectorquarksectors} show the quark sector
666: contributions to the charge radii ($\langle r^2\rangle$) of the
667: pseudoscalar and vector mesons, respectively. The quark sector
668: contributions to the charge radii for the pseudoscalar and vector
669: meson are recorded in Tables~\ref{tab:rsquared.pseudovector} and
670: \ref{tab:rsquared.vector}.
671: %
672: From Fig.~\ref{fig:rsquaredpseudoscalarquarksectors}, we find no
673: evidence of environmental sensitivity in the light-quark contribution
674: the pseudoscalar mesons.
675: %
676: However in the vector sector,
677: Fig.~\ref{fig:rsquaredvectorquarksectors}, we find a consistently
678: broader distribution of up-quark charge in the $\rho$ compared
679: to the up-quark in the $K^{*}$ at the smaller quark masses.
680: %
681: The broadening of the charge distribution in the $\rho$ is
682: consistent with the hyperfine repulsion discussed above.
683: The strange quark in the $K^{*}$ shows a particularly interesting
684: environment sensitivity. While the strange quark mass is held
685: fixed, the distribution broadens as the light-quark regime is
686: approached. This is consistent with the prediction of enhanced
687: hyperfine repulsion as one of the quarks becomes light.
688:
689:
690: \input{rsquared.pseudovector.tbl}
691: \input{rsquared.vector.tbl}
692:
693: \begin{figure}[ht]
694: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{rsquared.pseudovectorquarksectors.ps}%
695: \caption{\label{fig:rsquaredpseudoscalarquarksectors}
696: The quark sector contributions to the mean squared charge radius of the pseudoscalar mesons.
697: The symbols are offset horizontally for clarity.}
698: \end{figure}
699:
700: \begin{figure}[ht]
701: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{rsquared.vectorquarksectors.ps}%
702: \caption{\label{fig:rsquaredvectorquarksectors}
703: As for Figure~\ref{fig:rsquaredpseudoscalarquarksectors} but for vector-mesons.
704: }
705: \end{figure}
706:
707: \begin{figure}[ht]
708: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{rsquared.neutral.ps}%
709: \caption{\label{fig:rsquareduncharged}
710: The mean squared charge radii for the neutral $K^{0}$ and $K^{0 *}$.
711: }
712: \end{figure}
713:
714: The strange neutral pseudoscalar and vector meson mean squared charge
715: radii obtained from the weighted sum of the quark sector radii are
716: displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig:rsquareduncharged}.
717: %
718: For the neutral strange mesons, we see a negative value for $\langle r^2
719: \rangle$, indicating that the negatively charged $d$-quark is lying
720: further from the centre of mass on average than the $\bar{s}$.
721: %
722: We should expect just such a behaviour for two reasons, both stemming from the fact that the $\bar{s}$ quark is considerably heavier than the $d$: the centre of mass must lie closer to the $\bar{s}$, and the $d$-quark will also
723: have a larger Compton wavelength.
724: %
725: Of course with exact isospin symmetry in our simulations, the non-strange charge neutral mesons have a zero electric charge radius.
726: %
727:
728: \begin{figure}[t]
729: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{rsquared_up_pi_to_up_k.ps}%
730: \caption{\label{fig:rsquaredenvironmentdependencepseudo}
731: The ratio of the light quark contributions to the $\pi$ and $K$
732: mean squared charge radius.
733: }
734: \end{figure}
735:
736: \begin{figure}[t]
737: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{rsquared_up_rho_to_up_kstar.ps}%
738: \caption{\label{fig:rsquaredenvironmentdependencevec}
739: As in Fig.~\ref{fig:rsquaredenvironmentdependencepseudo} but for the vector-mesons.
740: }
741: \end{figure}
742:
743: To measure the environmental sensitivity of the light-quark sector
744: more precisely, in Figs.~\ref{fig:rsquaredenvironmentdependencepseudo}
745: and \ref{fig:rsquaredenvironmentdependencevec} we show a fit to the
746: ratio of the light-quark contributions to the pseudoscalar and
747: vector-mesons charge radii respectively.
748: %
749: %In Figures~\ref{fig:rsquaredenvironmentdependencepseudo} and
750: %\ref{fig:rsquaredenvironmentdependencevec}, we contrast the
751: %environment-dependence of the up-quark contributions to the pseudoscalar and
752: %vector meson charge radii.
753: %
754: The difference is striking: for the pseudoscalar case we see no
755: environment-dependence at all, whereas in the vector case we see that
756: the presence of a strange quark acts to heavily suppress the light
757: charge distribution.
758: %
759: This is the effect one predicts from a quark model, where the large
760: mass of the $s$ would act to suppress the hyperfine repulsion between
761: the quark and anti-quark. It is also qualitatively consistent with
762: effective field theory where the couplings of the light mesons are
763: suppressed by the presence of the strange quark.
764:
765:
766: \subsubsection{Magnetic moments}
767: %
768: In Fig.~\ref{fig:magmomhadrons} we present our results for the magnetic moments of the vector mesons.
769: %
770: At the $SU(3)_{{\rm flavour}}$ limit, where we take the light quark
771: flavours to have the same mass as the strange quark, quark model arguments
772: suggest the magnetic moment for a $\rho^{+}$ should be -3 times the strange
773: magnetic moment of the $\Lambda$ (assuming no environmental dependence).
774: %
775: According to the particle data group~\cite{Eidelman:2004wy}, the magnetic moment of the $\Lambda$ is $-0.613\, \mu_N$.
776: %
777: Therefore we would naively expect a value of $1.84\,\mu_N$ for the magnetic moment of the $\rho^+$, which is consistent with our findings.
778:
779: \begin{figure}
780: \begin{center}
781: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{magmom.rhoplusandkstarplus.ps}
782: \caption{\label{fig:magmomhadrons}
783: Charged vector meson magnetic moments.
784: }
785: \end{center}
786: \end{figure}
787:
788: \begin{figure}
789: \begin{center}
790: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{gfactor.rhoplus.ps}
791: \caption{\label{fig:gfactor.rhoplus}
792: The $g$-factor of the $\rho$ meson.
793: }
794: \end{center}
795: \end{figure}
796:
797: In an earlier study, Anderson et al.~\cite{Andersen:1996qb} argued that the magnetic moment of the $\rho$-meson in natural magnetons (otherwise called the g-factor) should be approximately 2 at large quark masses.
798: %
799: Converting our result to natural magnetons, we observe in Fig.~\ref{fig:gfactor.rhoplus} that our calculation of the $\rho$-meson g-factor $(g_{\rho})$ is fairly consistent with this.
800: %
801: At light quark masses, however, we do see some evidence of chiral
802: curvature, which would indicate that the linear chiral
803: extrapolations of that paper should be considered with caution.
804:
805: \begin{figure}
806: \begin{center}
807: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{magmom.vectorquarksectors.ps}%
808: \caption{\label{fig:magmomquarksectors}
809: Quark-sector contributions to the vector meson magnetic moments.
810: }
811: \end{center}
812: \end{figure}
813:
814: In Fig.~\ref{fig:magmomquarksectors} we present the quark sector contributions to the vector meson magnetic moments, the
815: data is recorded in Table.~\ref{tab:magmom.vector}.
816: \input{magmom.vector.tbl}
817: %
818: Here we observe a similar scenario to that observed earlier in the
819: charge radius discussion, namely that the $u$-quark contribution to
820: the $K^*$ is consistently larger than the contribution from the heavier $s$-quark.
821: %
822: We also find that the contribution of the $u$-quark to the magnetic moment of a vector meson is suppressed when it is an environment of a heavier $s$-quark compared to when it is in the presence of another light quark.
823: %
824: This is further supported when we consider the ratio of the contributions of a $u$-quark to the magnetic moments of the $\rho$ and $K^*$ mesons, displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig:magmomdependence}.
825: %
826: This ratio is clearly greater than 1 below the $SU(3)_{\rm flavour}$ limit and is increasing for decreasing $u$-quark mass.
827:
828:
829:
830: \begin{figure}
831: \begin{center}
832: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{magmom_up_rho_to_up_kstar.ps}
833: \caption{\label{fig:magmomdependence}
834: The ratio of the light-quark contributions to the magnetic moment of the
835: $\rho$ and $K^{*}$.
836: }
837: \end{center}
838: \end{figure}
839:
840: The magnetic moment of the vector meson, like the RMS charge radius, shows
841: considerable environment dependence in the quark sector contributions.
842: The larger contribution of a $u$-quark in a $\rho$ relative to a $K^*$ is
843: consistent with what we have already
844: observed with the RMS charge radius, as follows: since $\langle r^2 \rangle$ is
845: larger for the $u$-quark in a
846: $\rho$ meson than for the $u$-quark in a $K^*$, the effective mass is
847: reciprocally smaller for the $u$-quark
848: in a $\rho$. This smaller effective mass gives rise in turn to a larger magnetic
849: moment. Figure \ref{fig:magmomdependence}
850: shows this pattern.
851: %
852: \begin{figure}
853: \begin{center}
854: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{magmom.ks0.ps}
855: \caption{\label{fig:magmomneutralkstar}
856: Neutral $K^*$-meson magnetic moment.
857: }
858: \end{center}
859: \end{figure}
860: %
861: Figure~\ref{fig:magmomneutralkstar} presents our results for the magnetic moment of the neutral $K^{*0}$ meson.
862: %
863: As the $d$-quark becomes lighter than the $\bar{s}$ we see the magnetic moment exhibiting a very linear negative slope.
864: %
865: The magnitude of the magnetic moment is quite small, but clearly differentiable from zero everywhere except at the $SU(3)_{\rm flavour}$ limit where symmetry forces it to be exactly zero.
866: %
867: \subsubsection{Quadrupole form-factors}
868: The quadrupole form-factors of the $\rho^+$ and $K^{*+}$ mesons are shown in Fig~\ref{fig:quadffhadrons}.
869: %
870: We find that the quadrupole form factor is less than zero, indicating that the spatial distribution of charge within the $\rho$ and $K^*$ mesons is oblate.
871: %
872: This is in accord with the findings of Alexandrou {\emph et al.}~\cite{Alexandrou:2002nn} who observed a negative quadrupole moment for spin $\pm 1$ $\rho$-meson states in a density-density analysis.
873: %
874: We note that in a simple quark model, a negative quadrupole form factor requires that the quarks possess an admixture of $s$- and $d$-wave functions.
875: \begin{figure}
876: \begin{center}
877: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{quadff.rhoplusandkstarplus.ps}
878: \caption{\label{fig:quadffhadrons}
879: Vector meson quadrupole form factors for $\rho^+$ and $K^{*+}$.
880: }
881: \end{center}
882: \end{figure}
883: %
884: %
885: \begin{figure}
886: \begin{center}
887: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{quadff.vectorquarksectors.ps}
888: \caption{\label{fig:quadffquarksectors}
889: Quark-sector contributions to the quadrupole form factors.
890: }
891: \end{center}
892: \end{figure}
893: \input{quadff-fm.tbl}
894:
895: The quark sector contributions to the quadrupole form-factor are shown
896: in Fig.~\ref{fig:quadffquarksectors}. The corresponding data is
897: contained in Table~\ref{tab:quadff-fm}. The flavour independence
898: of the results is remarkable.
899: %
900: \begin{figure}
901: \begin{center}
902: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{quadff_up_rho_to_up_kstar.ps}%
903: \caption{\label{fig:quadffdependence}
904: Environment-dependence for light-quark contribution to vector meson quadrupole
905: form-factor.
906: }
907: \end{center}
908: \end{figure}
909: %
910:
911: We also find that the ratio of the light-quark contributions to the quadrupole form factor,
912: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:quadffdependence}, is consistent with one within our statistics.
913: %
914: \begin{figure}
915: \begin{center}
916: \includegraphics[height=1.0\hsize,angle=90]{quadff.ks0.ps}
917: \caption{\label{fig:quadffkstar0}
918: Quadrupole form-factor for neutral $K^*$ meson.
919: }
920: \end{center}
921: \end{figure}
922: %
923: In Fig.~\ref{fig:quadffkstar0}, we show the quadrupole form factor of the charge neutral $K^{*0}$ meson.
924: %
925: We find that the quadrupole moment of the $K^{*0}$ is non-trivial but just outside the one
926: standard deviation level. The chiral trend towards positive values reflecting the negative
927: charge of the larger $d$-quark contributions.
928:
929: The lattice data for the quark sector contributions to the charge form factor is contained
930: in Tables~\ref{tab:chargeff-ps} and ~\ref{tab:chargeff-vec} for the pseudoscalar and
931: vector mesons respectively. The magnetic and quadrupole form factors of the vector
932: mesons is contained in Tables~\ref{tab:magff} and \ref{tab:quadff} respectively.
933:
934: \section{Conclusions}
935:
936: We have established a formalism for determining the charge, magnetic and
937: quadrupole Sachs form factors of vector mesons in lattice QCD. For the
938: first time the electric, magnetic, and quadrupole form factors of the
939: light vector mesons have been calculated. The electric form factor of
940: the pseudoscalar mesons have also been calculated.
941:
942: %
943: With a large lattice volume and high statistics we have
944: resolved a clear difference between the charge radii of the
945: pseudoscalar and vector mesons.
946: %
947: We argue that this is consistent with quark model predictions.
948: %
949: Furthermore, we find significant environmental sensitivity of the light-quark contributions to the charge radii of the vector mesons.
950:
951: We also presented a calculation of the magnetic moments of the
952: vector mesons.
953: %
954: We found that the magnetic moment of the $\rho^{+}$ was
955: consistent with the quark model predication of $1.84\ \mu_N$ at the
956: $SU(3)_{\rm flavour}$ limit.
957: %
958: We determine that there is also an environmental sensitivity in the magnitude of the light-quark contributions to the charged vector meson magnetic moments.
959: %
960: We argue that this is consistent with the environmental sensitivity in the
961: light-quark contributions to the charge vector meson charge radii.
962: %
963:
964: Finally, we have determined that the quadrupole form factor for a
965: charged vector meson is negative in quenched Lattice QCD. This is
966: consistent with previous calculations using density-density
967: analysis. We find that the ratio of quadrupole moment to mean square
968: charge radius is 1:30, so the deformation is small but statistically
969: significant.
970:
971: \section{Appendix}
972:
973: \input{chargeff.ps.tbl}
974: \input{chargeff.vec.tbl}
975: \input{magff.tbl}
976: \input{quadff.tbl}
977:
978:
979:
980: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
981: \begin{acknowledgments}
982:
983: We thank the Australian Partnership for Advanced Computing
984: (APAC) and the South Australian Partnership for Advanced
985: Computing (SAPAC) for generous grants of supercomputer time which have
986: enabled this project. This work was supported by the Australian
987: Research Council.
988: %
989: J.Z. is supported by PPARC grant PP/D000238/1.
990:
991: \end{acknowledgments}
992:
993: %\bibliographystyle{plain}
994: \bibliography{foo}
995:
996:
997: \end{document}
998: