1: \documentclass[12pt]{report}
2: \hfuzz 10pt
3: \newcommand{\linha}{\enlargethispage{1\baselineskip}}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5: \usepackage{amsfonts}
6: \usepackage{amssymb}
7: \usepackage{amsmath}
8: \setlength{\parskip}{2mm}
9: \usepackage{newcent}
10: \newcommand{\slb}[1]{\textbf{\textsl{#1}}}
11: \def\thefootnote{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
12: \newcommand{\nin}{\noindent}
13: \def\text#1{{\scriptstyle\mathrm{#1}}}
14: \renewcommand{\lesssim}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}
15: \renewcommand{\gtrsim}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}
16: \newcommand{\gc}{\gamma_5}
17: \newcommand{\g}{\gamma}
18: \newcommand{\sla}[1]{\not \!\! #1}
19: \newcommand{\ld}{\mbox{\sf L}}
20: \newcommand{\rs}{\mbox{\sf R}}
21: \newcommand{\lag}{{\cal L}}
22: \newcommand{\obs}{{\cal O}}
23: \newcommand{\del}{\partial}
24: \newcommand{\dels}{\not \! \partial}
25: \newcommand{\et}{{\it et al.\/}}
26: \newcommand{\imp}{~~$\Longrightarrow$~~}
27: \newcommand{\beqar}{\begin{eqnarray*}}
28: \newcommand{\eeqar}[1]{\label{#1} \end{eqnarray*}}
29: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{array}}
30: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{array}}
31: \newcommand{\rar}{$\longrightarrow$}
32: \newcommand{\lar}{$\longleftarrow$}
33: \newcommand{\uar}{$\uparrow$}
34: \newcommand{\dar}{$\downarrow$}
35: \newcommand{\ner}{$\nearrow$}
36: \newcommand{\nor}{$\nwarrow$}
37: \newcommand{\ser}{$\searrow$}
38: \newcommand{\sor}{$\swarrow$}
39: \newcommand{\btab}{\begin{tabular}{ll}}
40: \newcommand{\etab}{\end{tabular}}
41:
42: %##########################################################################
43: \begin{document}
44: \thispagestyle{empty}
45:
46: \hfill IFT--P/010/2000
47:
48: \vskip 1.5cm
49: \begin{center}
50: {\LARGE \slb{Standard Model: An Introduction}}
51: \footnote{To be published in {\it Particle and Fields}, Proceedings of the X
52: ~J.\ A.\ Swieca Summer School (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000)}
53:
54: \vskip 1.5cm
55: {\large\slb{S.\ F.\ Novaes}}
56:
57: \vskip 0.8cm
58: \textsl{Instituto de F\'{\i}sica Te\'orica}
59:
60: \textsl{Universidade Estadual Paulista}
61:
62: \textsl{Rua Pamplona 145, 01405--900, S\~ao Paulo}
63:
64: \textsl{Brazil}
65: \end{center}
66: \vspace{2cm}
67:
68: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
69: \centerline{\large\bf Abstract}
70:
71: \vspace{1.2cm}
72:
73: \hskip 1cm
74: We present a primer on the Standard Model of the electroweak
75: interaction. Emphasis is given to the historical aspects of the
76: theory's formulation. The radiative corrections to the Standard
77: Model are presented and its predictions for the electroweak
78: parameters are compared with the precise experimental data obtained
79: at the $Z$ pole. Finally, we make some remarks on the perspectives
80: for the discovery of the Higgs boson, the most important challenge of
81: the Standard Model.
82: \end{minipage}
83:
84:
85: \tableofcontents
86:
87: \newpage
88: %###############################################################################
89: \chapter{Introduction} \indent
90:
91: The joint description of the electromagnetic and the weak
92: interaction by a single theory certainly is one of major
93: achievements of the physical science in this century. The model
94: proposed by Glashow, Salam and Weinberg in the middle sixties, has
95: been extensively tested during the last 30 years. The discovery of
96: neutral weak interactions and the production of intermediate vector
97: bosons ($W^\pm$ and $Z^0$) with the expected properties increased
98: our confidence in the model. Even after the recent precise
99: measurements of the electroweak parameters in electron--positron
100: collisions at the $Z^0$ pole, there is no experimental result that
101: contradicts the Standard Model predictions.
102:
103: The description of the electroweak interaction is implemented by a
104: gauge theory based on the $SU(2)_L \otimes U(1)_Y$ group, which is
105: spontaneously broken via the Higgs mechanism. The matter fields ---
106: leptons and quarks --- are organized in families, with the
107: left--handed fermions belonging to weak isodoublets while the
108: right--handed components transform as weak isosinglets. The vector
109: bosons, $W^\pm$, $Z^0$ and $\gamma$, that mediate the interactions
110: are introduced via minimal coupling to the matter fields. An
111: essential ingredient of the model is the scalar potential that is
112: added to the Lagrangian to generate the vector--boson (and fermion)
113: masses in a gauge invariant way, via the Higgs mechanism. A remnant
114: scalar field, the Higgs boson, is part of the physical spectrum. This
115: is the only missing piece of the Standard Model that still awaits
116: experimental confirmation.
117:
118: In this course, we intend to give a quite pedestrian introduction to
119: the main concepts involved in the construction of the Standard Model
120: of electroweak interactions. We should not touch any subject ``beyond
121: the Standard Model''. This primer should provide the necessary
122: background for the lectures on more advanced topics that were
123: covered in this school, such as $W$ physics and extensions of the
124: Standard Model. A special emphasis will be given to the historical
125: aspects of the formulation of the theory. The interplay of new ideas
126: and experimental results make the history of weak interactions a very
127: fruitful laboratory for understanding how the development of a
128: scientific theory works in practice. More formal aspects and details
129: of the model can be found in the vast literature on this subject,
130: from textbooks
131: \cite{Quigg:83,Cheng:84,Halzen:84,Aitchison:90,Renton:90,Donoghue:92,Leader:96}
132: to reviews \cite{Abers:73,Kim:81,Beg:82,Chanowitz:88}.
133:
134: We start these lectures with a chronological account of the ideas
135: related to the development of electromagnetic and weak theories
136: (Section \ref{chrono}). The gauge principle (Sec.\ \ref{gau:pri})
137: and the concepts of spontaneous symmetry breaking (Sec.\ \ref{ssb})
138: and the Higgs mechanism (Section \ref{higgs}) are presented. In the
139: Chapter \ref{sm}, we introduce the Standard Model, following the
140: general principles that should guide the construction of a gauge
141: theory. We discuss topics like the mass matrix of the neutral bosons,
142: the measurement of the Weinberg angle, the lepton mass, anomaly
143: cancelation, and the introduction of quarks in the model. We finalize
144: this chapter giving an overview on the Standard Model Lagrangian in
145: Sec.\ \ref{sm:lag}. In Chapter \ref{loops}, we give an introduction
146: to the radiative corrections to the Standard Model. Loop
147: calculations are important to compare the predictions of the
148: Standard Model with the precise experimental results of $Z$ physics
149: that are presented in Sec.\ \ref{z:phy}. We finish our lectures with
150: an account on the most important challenge to the Standard Model: the
151: discovery of the Higgs boson. In Chapter \ref{higgs:bos}, we discuss
152: the main properties of the Higgs, like mass, couplings and decay
153: modes and discuss the phenomenological prospects for the search of the
154: Higgs in different colliders.
155:
156: Most of the material covered in these lectures can be found in a
157: series of very good textbook on the subject. Among them we can point
158: out the books from Quigg \cite{Quigg:83}, Aitchison and Hey
159: \cite{Aitchison:90}, and Leader and Predazzi \cite{Leader:96}.
160:
161: \section{A Chronology of the Weak Interactions} \label{chrono} \indent
162:
163: We will present in this section the main steps given towards a
164: unified description of the electromagnetic and weak interactions. In
165: order to give a historical flavor to the presentation, we will
166: mention some parallel achievements in Particle Physics in this
167: century, from theoretical developments and predictions to
168: experimental confirmation and surprises. The topics closely related
169: to the evolution and construction of the model will be worked with
170: more details.
171:
172: \linha
173:
174: The chronology of the developments and discoveries in Particle
175: Phy\-sics can be found in the books of Cahn and Goldhaber
176: \cite{Cahn:89} and the annotated bibliography from COMPAS and
177: Particle Data Groups \cite{AIP:96}. An extensive selection of
178: original papers on Quantum Electrodynamics can be found in the book
179: edited by Schwinger \cite{Schwinger:58}. Original papers on gauge
180: theory of weak and electromagnetic interactions appear in Ref.\
181: \cite{Lai:81}.
182:
183: \vskip 1cm
184:
185: \nin
186: \fbox{\slb{1896}} $^\star$\footnotetext{${}^{\star}$The ``star''
187: ($\star$) means that the author(s) have received the Nobel Prize in
188: Physics for this particular work.} Becquerel \cite{Becquerel:96}:
189: evidence for spontaneous radioactivity effect in uranium decay, using
190: photographic film.
191:
192: \nin
193: \fbox{\slb{1897}} $^\star$ Thomson: discovery of the electron in cathode
194: rays.
195:
196: \nin
197: \fbox{\slb{1900}} $^\star$ Planck: start of the quantum era.
198:
199: \nin
200: \fbox{\slb{1905}} Einstein: start of the relativistic era.
201:
202: \nin
203: \fbox{\slb{1911}} $^\star$ Millikan: measurement of the electron charge.
204:
205: \nin
206: \fbox{\slb{1911}} Rutherford: evidence for the atomic nucleus.
207:
208: \nin
209: \fbox{\slb{1913}} $^\star$ Bohr: invention of the quantum theory of atomic
210: spectra.
211:
212: \nin
213: \fbox{\slb{1914}} Chadwick \cite{Chadwick:14}: first observation
214: that the $\beta$ spectrum is continuous. Indirect evidence on the
215: existence of neutral penetrating particles.
216:
217: \nin
218: \fbox{\slb{1919}} Rutherford: discovery of the proton, constituent of the
219: nucleus.
220:
221: \nin
222: \fbox{\slb{1923}} $^\star$ Compton: experimental confirmation
223: that the photon is an elementary particle in $\gamma + C \to \gamma +
224: C$.
225:
226: \linha
227:
228: \nin
229: \fbox{\slb{1923}} $^\star$ de Broglie: corpuscular--wave dualism for electrons.
230:
231: \nin
232: \fbox{\slb{1925}} $^\star$ Pauli: discovery of the exclusion principle.
233:
234: \nin
235: \fbox{\slb{1925}} $^\star$ Heisenberg: foundation of quantum mechanics.
236:
237: \nin
238: \fbox{\slb{1926}} $^\star$ Schr\"odinger: creation of wave quantum mechanics.
239:
240: \nin
241: \fbox{\slb{1927}} Ellis and Wooster \cite{Ellis:27}: confirmation
242: that the $\beta$ spectrum is continuous.
243:
244:
245: %###############################################################################
246:
247: \nin
248: \fbox{\slb{1927}} Dirac \cite{Dirac:27}: foundations of Quantum
249: Electrodynamics (QED).
250:
251: \nin
252: \fbox{\slb{1928}} $^\star$ Dirac: discovery of the relativistic wave
253: equation for electrons; prediction of the magnetic moment of the
254: electron.
255:
256: \nin
257: \fbox{\slb{1929}} Skobelzyn: observation of cosmic ray showers
258: produced by energetic electrons in a cloud chamber.
259:
260: \nin
261: \fbox{\slb{1930}} Pauli \cite{Pauli:30}: first proposal, in an open
262: letter, of the existence of a light, neutral and feebly interacting
263: particle emitted in $\beta$ decay.
264:
265: \nin
266: \fbox{\slb{1930}} Oppenheimer \cite{Oppenheimer:30}: self--energy of
267: the electron: the first ultraviolet divergence in QED.
268:
269: \nin
270: \fbox{\slb{1931}} Dirac: prediction of the positron and anti--proton.
271:
272: \nin
273: \fbox{\slb{1932}} $^\star$ Anderson: first evidence for the positron.
274:
275: \nin
276: \fbox{\slb{1932}} $^\star$ Chadwick: first evidence for the neutron
277: in $\alpha + Be \to C + n$.
278:
279: \nin
280: \fbox{\slb{1932}} Heisenberg: suggestion that nuclei are composed of
281: protons and neutrons.
282:
283: \nin
284: \fbox{\slb{1934}} Pauli \cite{Pauli:34}: explanation of continuous electron
285: spectrum of $\beta$ decay --- proposal for the neutrino.
286: \[
287: n \to p + e^- + {\bar{\nu}_e} \; .
288: \]
289:
290: \nin
291: \fbox{\slb{1934}} Fermi \cite{Fermi:34}: field theory for $\beta$
292: decay, assuming the existence of the neutrino. In analogy to ``the
293: theory of radiation that describes the emission of a quantum of light
294: from an excited atom'', $e J_\mu A^\mu$, Fermi proposed a
295: current--current Lagrangian to describe the $\beta$ decay:
296: \[
297: \lag_{\text{weak}} = \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}
298: \left( \bar{\psi}_p \, \g_\mu \, \psi_n \right)
299: \left( \bar{\psi}_e \, \g^\mu \, \psi_\nu \right) \; .
300: \]
301:
302: %###############################################################################
303:
304:
305: \nin
306: \fbox{\slb{1936}} Gamow and Teller \cite{Gamow:36}: proposed an
307: extension of the Fermi theory to describe also transitions with
308: $\Delta J^{\text{nuc}} \neq 0$. The vector currents proposed by Fermi
309: are generalized to:
310: \[
311: \lag_{\text{weak}} = \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}
312: \sum_i C_i \left( \bar{\psi}_p \, \Gamma^i \, \psi_n \right)
313: \left( \bar{\psi}_e \, \Gamma^i \, \psi_\nu \right) \; ,
314: \]
315: with the scalar, pseudo--scalar, vector, axial and tensor structures:
316: \[
317: \Gamma^S = 1 \, , \;\;\;
318: \Gamma^P = \gc \, , \;\;\;
319: \Gamma^V_\mu = \g_\mu \, , \;\;\;
320: \Gamma^A_\mu = \g_\mu \gc \, , \;\;\;
321: \Gamma^T_{\mu\nu} = \sigma_{\mu\nu} \; .
322: \]
323: Nuclear transitions with $\Delta J = 0$ are described by the
324: interactions $S.S \;\; \mbox{and/or} \;\; V.V$, while $\Delta J = 0,
325: \pm 1 \; (0 \not \! \to 0)$ transitions can be taken into account by
326: $A.A \;\; \mbox{and/or} \;\; T.T$ interactions ($\Gamma^P \to 0$ in
327: the non--relativistic limit). However, interference between them are
328: proportional to $m_e/E_e$ and should increase the emission of low energy
329: electrons. Since this behavior was not observed, the weak Lagrangian
330: should contain,
331: \[
332: S.S \;\; \mbox{\underline{or}} \;\;\; V.V \;\;\;
333: \mbox{\underline{and}} \;\;\;
334: A.A \;\; \mbox{\underline{or}} \;\;\; T.T \; .
335: \]
336:
337: \nin
338: \fbox{\slb{1937}} Neddermeyer and Anderson: first evidence for the muon.
339:
340: \nin
341: \fbox{\slb{1937}} Majorana: Majorana neutrino theory.
342:
343: \nin
344: \fbox{\slb{1937}} Bloch and Nordsieck \cite{Block:37}: treatment of
345: infrared divergences.
346:
347: \nin
348: \fbox{\slb{1940}} Williams and Roberts \cite{Williams:40}: first
349: observation of muon decay
350: \[
351: \mu^- \to e^- + (\bar{\nu}_e + \nu_\mu) \; .
352: \]
353:
354:
355: %###############################################################################
356:
357:
358: \nin
359: \fbox{\slb{1943}} Heisenberg: invention of the S--matrix formalism.
360:
361: \nin
362: \fbox{\slb{1943}} $^\star$ Tomonaga \cite{Tomonaga:43}: creation of
363: the covariant quantum electrodynamic theory.
364:
365: \nin
366: \fbox{\slb{1947}} Pontecorvo \cite{Pontecorvo:47}: first idea about
367: the universality of the Fermi weak interactions {\it i.e.} decay and
368: capture processes have the same origin.
369:
370: \nin
371: \fbox{\slb{1947}} Bethe \cite{Bethe:47}: first theoretical
372: calculation of the Lamb shift in non--relativistic QED.
373:
374: \nin
375: \fbox{\slb{1947}} $^\star$ Kusch and Foley \cite{Kusch:47}: first
376: measurement of $g_e-2$ for the electron using the Zeeman effect: $g_e =
377: 2 (1 + 1.19 \times 10^{-3})$.
378:
379: \nin
380: \fbox{\slb{1947}} $^\star$ Lattes, Occhialini and Powell:
381: confirmation of the $\pi^-$ and first evidence for pion decay
382: $\pi^\pm \to \mu^\pm + (\nu_\mu)$.
383:
384: \nin
385: \fbox{\slb{1947}} Rochester and Butler: first evidence for $V$
386: events (strange particles).
387:
388: \nin
389: \fbox{\slb{1948}} Schwinger \cite{Schwinger:48a}: first theoretical
390: calculation of $g_e-2$ for the electron: $g_e = 2 (1 + \alpha/2\pi) =
391: 2 (1 + 1.16 \times 10^{-3})$. The high--precision measurement of the
392: anomalous magnetic moment of the electron is the most stringent QED test.
393: The present theoretical and experimental value of $a_e = (g_e - 2)/2$,
394: are \cite{pdg:98},
395: \begin{eqnarray*}
396: a_e^{\text{thr}}&=& (115 \; 965 \; 215.4 \pm 2.4) \times 10^{-11}\; ,
397: \\
398: a_e^{\text{exp}}&=& (115 \; 965 \; 219.3 \pm 1.0) \times 10^{-11}\; ,
399: \end{eqnarray*}
400: where we notice the impressive agreement at the 9 digit level!
401:
402: \nin
403: \fbox{\slb{1948}} $^\star$ Feynman \cite{Feynman:48}; Schwinger
404: \cite{Schwinger:48b}; Tati and Tomonaga \cite{Tati:48}:
405: creation of the covariant theory of QED.
406:
407: \nin
408: \fbox{\slb{1949}} Dyson \cite{Dyson:49}: covariant QED and
409: equivalence of Tomonaga, Sch\-winger and Feynman methods.
410:
411: %###############################################################################
412:
413: \nin
414: \fbox{\slb{1949}} Wheeler and Tiomno \cite{Wheeler:49}; Lee,
415: Rosenbluth and Yang \cite{Lee:49}: proposal of the universality of
416: the Fermi weak interactions. Different processes like,
417: \begin{eqnarray*}
418: \beta-\mbox{decay} \; &:& \; n \to p + e^- + \bar{\nu}_e \; ,\\
419: \mu-\mbox{decay} \; &:& \; \mu^- \to e^- + \bar{\nu}_e + \nu_\mu \; , \\
420: \mu-\mbox{capture} \; &:& \; \mu^- + p \to \nu_\mu + n \; ,
421: \end{eqnarray*}
422: must have the same nature and should share the same coupling
423: constant,
424: \[
425: G_F = \frac{1.03 \times 10^{-5}}{M_p^2} \; ,
426: \]
427: the so--called Fermi constant.
428:
429: \nin
430: \fbox{\slb{50's}} A large number of new particles where discovered in
431: the 50's: $\pi^0$, $K^\pm$, $\Lambda$, $K^0$, $\Delta^{++}$,
432: $\Xi^-$, $\Sigma^\pm$, $\bar{\nu}_e$, $\bar{p}$, $K_{L,S}$,
433: $\bar{n}$, $\Sigma^0$, $\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^0$, $\cdots$
434:
435: \nin
436: \fbox{\slb{1950}} Ward \cite{Ward:50}: Ward identity in QED.
437:
438: \nin
439: \fbox{\slb{1953}} St\"uckelberg; Gell--Mann: invention and
440: exploration of renormalization group.
441:
442: \nin
443: \fbox{\slb{1954}} Yang and Mills \cite{Yang:54}: introduction of
444: local gauge isotopic invariance in quantum field theory. This was one
445: of the key theoretical developments that lead to the invention of
446: non--abelian gauge theories.
447:
448: \nin
449: \fbox{\slb{1955}} Alvarez and Goldhaber \cite{Alvarez:55}; Birge \et\
450: \cite{Birge:55}:
451: $\theta-\tau$ puzzle: The ``two'' particles seem to be a single state
452: since they have the same width ($\Gamma_\theta = \Gamma_\tau$), and
453: the same mass ($M_\theta = M_\tau$). However the observation of
454: different decay modes, into states with opposite parity:
455: \begin{eqnarray*}
456: \theta^+ & \to & \pi^+ + \pi^0 \; , \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; J^P = 0^+
457: \; ,
458: \\
459: \tau^+ & \to & \pi^+ + \pi^+ + \pi^- \; , \;\; J^P = 0^- \; ,
460: \end{eqnarray*}
461: suggested that parity could be violated in weak transitions.
462:
463: \nin
464: \fbox{\slb{1955}} Lehmann, Symanzik and Zimmermann: beginnings
465: of the axiomatic field theory of the S--matrix.
466:
467: \nin
468: \fbox{\slb{1955}} Nishijima: classification of strange
469: particles and prediction of $\Sigma^0$ and $\Xi^0$.
470:
471:
472: %###############################################################################
473:
474: \nin
475: \fbox{\slb{1956}} $^\star$ Lee and Yang \cite{Lee:56}: proposals to
476: test spatial parity conservation in weak interactions.
477:
478: \nin
479: \fbox{\slb{1957}} Wu \et\ \cite{Wu:57}: obtained the first evidence
480: for parity nonconservation in weak decays. They measured the angular
481: distribution of the electrons in $\beta$ decay,
482: \[
483: ^{60}\mbox{Co} \; (\mbox{polarized}) \to \;
484: ^{60}\mbox{Ni} + e^- + \bar{\nu}_e \; ,
485: \]
486: and observed that the decay rate depend on the pseudo--scalar
487: quantity: $<\vec{J}_{\text{nuc}}> . \; \vec{p}_e$.
488:
489: \nin
490: \fbox{\slb{1957}} Garwin, Lederman and Weinrich \cite{Garwin:57};
491: Friedman and Telegdi \cite{Friedman:57}: confirmation of parity
492: violation in weak decays. They make the measurement of the electron
493: asymmetry (muon polarization) in the decay chain,
494: \begin{eqnarray*}
495: \pi^+ & \to & \mu^+ + \nu_\mu \\
496: && \;\; \hookrightarrow e^+ + \nu_e + \bar{\nu}_\mu \; .
497: \end{eqnarray*}
498:
499: \nin
500: \fbox{\slb{1957}} Frauenfelder \et\ \cite{Frauenfelder:57}: further
501: confirmation of parity nonconservation in weak decays. The
502: measurement of the longitudinal polarization of the electron
503: ($\vec{\sigma}_e . \vec{p}_e$) emitted in $\beta$ decay,
504: \[
505: ^{60}\mbox{Co} \to \; e^- \; (\mbox{long.\ polar.}) + \bar{\nu}_e + X
506: \; ,
507: \]
508: showed that the electrons emitted in weak transitions are mostly
509: left--handed.
510:
511: The confirmation of the parity violation by the weak interaction
512: showed that it is necessary to have a term containing a $\gc$ in the
513: weak current:
514: \[
515: \lag_{\text{weak}} \; \to \; \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}
516: \sum_i C_i \left( \bar{\psi}_p \, \Gamma^i \, \psi_n \right)
517: \left[ \bar{\psi}_e \, \Gamma^i \, (1 \pm \gc) \, \psi_\nu \right]
518: \; .
519: \]
520:
521: Note that $CP$ remains conserved since $C$ is also violated.
522:
523: %###############################################################################
524:
525: \nin
526: \fbox{\slb{1957}} Salam \cite{Salam:57} ; Lee and Yang
527: \cite{Lee:57a}; Landau \cite{Landau:57}: two--component theory of
528: neutrino. This requires that the neutrino is either right
529: \underline{or} left--handed.
530:
531: Since it was known that electrons (positrons) involved in weak
532: decays are left (right) handed, the leptonic current should be written
533: as:
534: \[
535: J^i_{\text{lept}} \equiv
536: \left[ \bar{\psi}_e \, \Gamma^i \, (1 \pm \gc) \, \psi_\nu \right] \to
537: \left[ \bar{\psi}_e \, \frac{(1 + \gc)}{2} \, \Gamma^i \, (1 \pm \gc) \,
538: \psi_\nu \right] \; .
539: \]
540:
541: Therefore the measurement of the neutrino helicity is crucial to
542: determine the structure of the weak current. If $\Gamma^i$ = $V$ or
543: $A$ then $\{\gc, \Gamma^i\} =0$ and the neutrino should be
544: left--handed, otherwise the current is zero. On the other hand, if
545: $\Gamma^i$ = $S$ or $T$, then $[\gc, \Gamma^i] = 0$, and the neutrino
546: should be right--handed.
547:
548: \nin
549: \fbox{\slb{1957}} Schwinger \cite{Schwinger:57}; Lee and Yang
550: \cite{Lee:57b}: development of the idea of the intermediate vector
551: boson in weak interaction. The four--fermion Fermi interaction is
552: ``point--like'' {\it i.e.} a $s$--wave interaction. Partial wave
553: unitarity requires that such interaction must give rise to a cross
554: section that is bound by $\sigma < 4\pi / p^2_{\text{cm}}$. However,
555: since $G_F$ has dimension of $M^{-2}$, the cross section for the
556: Fermi weak interaction should go like $\sigma \sim G_F^2
557: p^2_{\text{cm}}$. Therefore the Fermi theory violates unitarity for
558: $p_{\text{cm}} \simeq 300$ GeV.
559:
560: This violation can be delayed by imposing that the interaction is
561: transmitted by a intermediate vector boson (IVB) in analogy, once
562: again, with the quantum electrodynamics. Here, the IVB should have
563: quite different characteristics, due to the properties of the weak
564: interaction. The IVB should be charged since the $\beta$ decay
565: requires charge--changing currents. They should also be very massive
566: to account for short range of the weak interaction and they should not
567: have a definite parity to allow, for instance, a $V-A$ structure for
568: the weak current.
569:
570: With the introduction of the IVB, the Fermi Lagrangian for leptons,
571: \[
572: \lag_{\text{weak}} = \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}
573: \left[ J^\alpha (\ell) J_\alpha^\dagger (\ell^\prime) + \mbox{h.c.} \right]
574: \; ,
575: \]
576: where $J^\alpha (\ell) = \bar{\psi}_{{\nu}_\ell} \Gamma^\alpha \psi_\ell$,
577: becomes:
578: \begin{equation}
579: \lag_{\text{weak}}^W = G_W
580: \left( J^\alpha W_\alpha^+ + J^{\dagger\,\alpha} W_\alpha^- \right)
581: \; ,
582: \label{l:w}
583: \end{equation}
584: with a new coupling constant $G_W$.
585:
586: Let us compare the invariant amplitude for $\mu$--decay, in the
587: low--energy limit in both cases. For the Fermi Lagrangian, we have,
588: \begin{equation}
589: {\cal M}_{\text{weak}} = i
590: { \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}} } J^{\alpha}{(\mu)} J_{\alpha} (e) \; .
591: \label{amp:fer}
592: \end{equation}
593:
594: On the other hand, when we take into account the exchange of the IVB,
595: the invariant amplitude should include the vector boson propagator,
596: \[
597: {\cal M}_{\text{weak}}^W = \left[ i \, G_W J^{\alpha}{(\mu)}
598: \right]
599: \left[\frac{-i}{k^2 - M_W^2}\left( g_{\alpha\beta} -
600: \frac{k_\alpha k_\beta}{M_W^2}\right)
601: \right] \left[ i \, G_W J^{\beta}{(e)} \right] \; .
602: \]
603: At low energies, {\it i.e.} for $k^2 \ll M_W^2$,
604: \begin{equation}
605: {\cal M}_{\text{weak}}^W \; \longrightarrow \;
606: i \frac{G_W^2}{M_W^2} J^{\alpha}{(\mu)} J_{\alpha} (e) \; ,
607: \label{amp:ivb}
608: \end{equation}
609: and, comparing (\ref{amp:ivb}) with (\ref{amp:fer}) we obtain the relation
610: \begin{equation}
611: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{G_W^2 = \frac{M_W^2 G_F}{\sqrt{2}}} \; $} \; ,
612: \label{gw}
613: \end{equation}
614: which shows that $G_W$ is dimensionless.
615:
616: However, at high energies, the theory of IVB still violates unitarity,
617: for instance, in the cross section for $\nu \bar{\nu} \to W^+ W^-$
618: (see Fig.\ 1).
619:
620: Let us consider the $W^\pm$ polarization states. At the $W^\pm$ rest
621: frame, we can define the transversal and longitudinal polarizations as
622: \begin{eqnarray*}
623: \epsilon^\mu_{T_1} (0) = (0,1,0,0) \; , \\
624: \epsilon^\mu_{T_2} (0) = (0,0,1,0) \; , \\
625: \epsilon^\mu_{L} (0) = (0,0,0,1) \; .
626: \end{eqnarray*}
627:
628: \begin{figure}[ht]
629: \protect
630: \epsfxsize=10cm
631: \begin{center}
632: % nnww.eps
633: \centerline{\epsfig{figure=fig01.eps,width=1.2\textwidth}}
634: \end{center}
635: \end{figure}
636: \nobreak
637: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
638: \begin{center}
639: \centerline{\it Fig.\ 1: Feynman diagram for the process $\nu +
640: \bar{\nu} \to W^+ + W^-$.}
641: \end{center}
642: \end{minipage}
643:
644: After a boost along the $z$ direction, {\it i.e.} for $p^\mu = (E,
645: 0,0, p)$, the transversal states remain unchanged while the
646: longitudinal state becomes,
647: \[
648: \epsilon^\mu_{L} (p) = \left(\frac{|\vec{p}|}{M_W},
649: \frac{E}{M_W}\hat{p} \right)
650: \simeq \frac{p^\mu}{M_W} \; .
651: \]
652: Since the longitudinal polarization is proportional to the vector
653: boson momentum, at high energies the longitudinal amplitudes should
654: give rise to the worst behavior.
655:
656: In fact, in high energy limit, the polarized cross section for $\nu
657: \bar{\nu} \to W^+ W^-$ behaves like,
658: \begin{eqnarray*}
659: \sigma (\nu\bar{\nu} \to W^+_T W^-_T) & \longrightarrow &
660: \mbox{constant}
661: \\
662: \sigma (\nu\bar{\nu} \to W^+_L W^-_L) & \longrightarrow &
663: \frac{G_F^2 s}{3 \pi} \; ,
664: \end{eqnarray*}
665: which still violates unitarity for large values of $s$.
666:
667: \nin
668: \fbox{\slb{1958}} Feynman and Gell--Mann \cite{Feynman:58}; Marshak
669: and Sudarshan \cite{Marshak:58}; Sakurai \cite{Sakurai:58}: universal
670: $V-A$ weak interactions.
671: \begin{equation}
672: J^{+ \; \mu}_{\text{lept}} =
673: \left[ \bar{\psi}_e \, \g^\mu (1 - \gc) \, \psi_\nu \right] \; .
674: \label{wea:cur}
675: \end{equation}
676:
677: \nin
678: \fbox{\slb{1958}} Leite Lopes \cite{Lopes:58}: hypothesis of neutral
679: vector mesons exchanged in weak interaction. Prediction of its mass of
680: $\sim 60 \; m_{\text{proton}}$.
681:
682: \nin
683: \fbox{\slb{1958}} Goldhaber, Grodzins and Sunyar \cite{Goldhaber:58}:
684: first evidence for the negative $\nu_e$ helicity. As mentioned
685: before, this result requires that the structure of the weak
686: interaction is $V-A$.
687:
688: \nin
689: \fbox{\slb{1959}} $^\star$ Reines and Cowan: confirmation of the
690: detection of the $\bar{\nu}_e$ in $\bar{\nu}_e + p \to e^+ + n$.
691:
692: \nin
693: \fbox{\slb{1961}} Goldstone \cite{Goldstone:61}: prediction of
694: unavoidable massless bosons if global symmetry of the Lagrangian is
695: spontaneously broken.
696:
697: \nin
698: \fbox{\slb{1961}} Salam and Ward \cite{Salam:61}: invention of the
699: gauge principle as basis to construct quantum field theories of
700: interacting fundamental fields.
701:
702: \nin
703: \fbox{\slb{1961}} $^\star$ Glashow \cite{Glashow:61}: first
704: introduction of the neutral intermediate weak boson ($Z^0$).
705:
706: \nin
707: \fbox{\slb{1962}} $^\star$ Danby \et: first evidence of $\nu_\mu$
708: from $\pi^\pm \to \mu^\pm + (\nu/\bar{\nu})$.
709:
710: \nin
711: \fbox{\slb{1963}} Cabibbo \cite{Cabibbo:63}: introduction of the
712: Cabibbo angle and hadronic weak currents.
713:
714: It was observed experimentally that weak decays with change of
715: strangeness ($\Delta s = 1$) are strongly suppressed in nature.
716: For instance, the width of the neutron is much larger than the
717: $\Lambda$'s,
718: \[
719: \Gamma_{\Delta s = 0} \left( n_{udd} \to p_{uud} \; e \bar{\nu}
720: \right) \gg
721: \Gamma_{\Delta s = 1} \left( \Lambda _{uds} \to p_{uud}\; e
722: \bar{\nu} \right) \; ,
723: \]
724: which yield a branching ratio of 100\% in the case of neutron and
725: just $\sim 8 \times 10^{-4}$ for the $\Lambda$.
726:
727: The hadronic current, in analogy with leptonic current
728: (\ref{wea:cur}), can be written in terms of the $u$, $d$, and $s$ quarks,
729: \begin{equation}
730: J_\mu^H = \bar{d} \g_\mu (1 - \gc) u + \bar{s} \g_\mu (1 - \gc) u
731: \; ,
732: \label{had:cur:0}
733: \end{equation}
734: where the first term is responsible for the $\Delta s =0$ transitions
735: while the latter one gives rise to the $\Delta s =1$ processes. In order
736: to make the hadronic current also universal, with a common coupling
737: constant $G_F$, Cabibbo introduced a mixing angle to give the right
738: weight to the $\Delta s =0$ and $\Delta s =1$ parts of the hadronic current,
739: \begin{eqnarray}
740: \left( \ba{c}
741: { d^\prime}\\
742: { s^\prime}
743: \ea \right) & = &
744: \left( \ba{cc}
745: \cos\theta_C & \sin\theta_C \\
746: -\sin\theta_C & \cos\theta_C
747: \ea \right)
748: \left( \ba{c}
749: { d} \\
750: { s}
751: \ea \right) \; ,
752: \label{cab:ang}
753: \end{eqnarray}
754: where $d^\prime$, $s^\prime$ ($d$, $s$) are interaction (mass)
755: eigenstates. Now the transition $\bar{d} \leftrightarrow u$ is
756: proportional to $G_F \cos\theta_C \simeq 0.97 \; G_F$ and the
757: $\bar{s} \leftrightarrow u$ goes like $G_F \sin\theta_C \simeq 0.24
758: \; G_F$.
759:
760: The hadronic current should now be given in terms of the new
761: interaction eigenstates,
762: \begin{eqnarray}
763: J_\mu^H &=& \bar{d} {}^\prime \g_\mu (1 - \gc) u
764: \nonumber \\
765: &=& \cos\theta_C \; \bar{d} \g_\mu (1 - \gc) u +
766: \sin\theta_C \; \bar{s} \g_\mu (1 - \gc) u \; .
767: \label{had:cur}
768: \end{eqnarray}
769:
770: \nin
771: \fbox{\slb{1964}} Bjorken and Glashow \cite{Bjorken:64}: proposal for
772: the existence of a charm\-ed fundamental fermion ($c$).
773:
774: \nin
775: \fbox{\slb{1964}} Higgs \cite{Higgs:64}; Englert and Brout
776: \cite{Englert:64}; Guralnik, Hagen and Kibble \cite{Guralnik:64}:
777: example of a field theory with spontaneous symmetry breakdown, no
778: massless Goldstone boson, and massive vector boson.
779:
780: \nin
781: \fbox{\slb{1964}} $^\star$ Christenson, Cronin, Fitch and Turlay
782: \cite{Christenson:64}: first evidence of CP violation in the decay of
783: $K^0$ mesons.
784:
785: \nin
786: \fbox{\slb{1964}} $^\star$ Salam and Ward \cite{Salam:64}: Lagrangian
787: for the electroweak synthesis, estimation of the $W$ mass.
788:
789: \nin
790: \fbox{\slb{1964}} $^\star$ Gell--Mann; Zweig: introduction of quarks
791: as fundamental building blocks for hadrons.
792:
793: \nin
794: \fbox{\slb{1964}} Greenberg; Han and Nambu: introduction of color quantum
795: number and colored quarks and gluons.
796:
797:
798: %###############################################################################
799:
800:
801: \nin
802: \fbox{\slb{1967}} Kibble \cite{Kibble:67}: extension of the Higgs
803: mechanism of mass generation for non--abelian gauge field theories.
804:
805: \nin
806: \fbox{\slb{1967}} $^\star$ Weinberg \cite{Weinberg:67}: Lagrangian for the
807: electroweak synthesis and estimation of $W$ and $Z$ masses.
808:
809: \nin
810: \fbox{\slb{1967}} Faddeev and Popov \cite{Faddeev:67}: method for
811: construction of Feynman rules for Yang--Mills gauge theories.
812:
813: \nin
814: \fbox{\slb{1968}} $^\star$ Salam \cite{Salam:68}: Lagrangian for the
815: electroweak synthesis.
816:
817: \nin
818: \fbox{\slb{1969}} Bjorken: invention of the Bjorken scaling behavior.
819:
820: \nin
821: \fbox{\slb{1969}} Feynman: birth of the partonic picture of hadron
822: collisions.
823:
824: \nin
825: \fbox{\slb{1970}} Glashow, Iliopoulos and Maiani \cite{Glashow:70}:
826: introduction of lepton-- quark symmetry and the proposal of
827: charmed quark (GIM mechanism).
828:
829: \nin
830: \fbox{\slb{1971}} $^\star$ 't Hooft \cite{Hooft:71}: rigorous proof
831: of renormalizability of the massless and massive Yang-- Mills quantum
832: field theory with spontaneously broken gauge invariance.
833:
834: \nin
835: \fbox{\slb{1973}} Kobayashi and Maskawa \cite{Kobayashi:73}: CP
836: violation is accommodated in the Standard Model with six favours.
837:
838: \nin
839: \fbox{\slb{1973}} Hasert \et\ (CERN) \cite{Hasert:73a}: first experimental
840: indication of the existence of weak neutral currents.
841: \[
842: \bar{\nu}_\mu + e^- \to \bar{\nu}_\mu + e^-
843: \;\; , \;\;\;\;
844: \nu_\mu + N \to \nu_\mu + X \; .
845: \]
846: This was a dramatic prediction of the Standard Model and its discovery
847: was a major success for the model. They also measured the ratio of
848: neutral--current to charged--current events giving a estimate for the
849: Weinberg angle $\sin^2\theta_W$ in the range 0.3 to 0.4.
850:
851: \nin
852: \fbox{\slb{1973}} Gross and Wilczek; Politzer: discovery of
853: asymptotic freedom property of interacting Yang--Mills field
854: theories.
855:
856: \nin
857: \fbox{\slb{1973}} Fritzsch, Gell--Mann and Leutwyler: invention of the QCD
858: Lagrangian.
859:
860:
861: %###############################################################################
862:
863:
864: \nin
865: \fbox{\slb{1974}} Benvenuti \et\ (Fermilab) \cite{Benvenuti:74}:
866: confirmation of the existence of weak neutral currents in the reaction
867: \[
868: \nu_\mu + N \to \nu_\mu + X \; .
869: \]
870:
871: \nin
872: \fbox{\slb{1974}} $^\star$ Aubert \et\ (Brookhaven); Augustin \et\
873: (SLAC): evidence for the $J/\psi$ ($c\bar{c}$).
874:
875: \nin
876: \fbox{\slb{1975}} $^\star$ Perl \et\ (SLAC) \cite{Perl:75}: first
877: indication of the $\tau$ lepton.
878:
879: \nin
880: \fbox{\slb{1977}} Herb \et\ (Fermilab) \cite{Herb:77}: first evidence
881: of $\Upsilon$ ($b\bar{b}$).
882:
883: \newpage
884: \nin
885: \fbox{\slb{1979}} Barber \et\ (MARK J Collab.); Brandelik \et\ (TASSO
886: Collab.); Berger \et\ (PLUTO Collab.); W. Bartel (JADE Collab.):
887: evidence for the gluon jet in $e^+e^- \to 3$ jet.
888:
889: \nin
890: \fbox{\slb{1983}} $^\star$ Arnison \et\ (UA1 Collab.) \cite{Arnison:83a};
891: Banner \et\ (UA2 Collab.) \cite{Banner:83}: evidence for the charged
892: intermediate bosons $W^\pm$ in the reactions
893: \[
894: p + \bar{p} \to W (\to \ell + \nu) + X \; .
895: \]
896: They were able to estimate the $W$ boson mass ($M_W = 81 \pm 5$ GeV)
897: in good agreement with the predictions of the Standard Model.
898:
899: \nin \fbox{\slb{1983}} $^\star$ Arnison \et\ (UA1 Collab.)
900: \cite{Arnison:83b}; Bagnaia \et\ (UA2 Collab.) \cite{Bagnaia:83}:
901: evidence for the neutral intermediate boson $Z^0$ in the reaction
902: \[
903: p + \bar{p} \to Z (\to \ell^+ + \ell^-) + X \; .
904: \]
905: This was another important confirmation of the electroweak theory.
906:
907: \nin
908: \fbox{\slb{1986}} $^\star$ Van Dyck, Schwinberg and Dehmelt
909: \cite{Dyck:86}: high precision measurement of the electron $g_e-2$
910: factor.
911:
912: \nin
913: \fbox{\slb{1987}} Albrecht \et\ (ARGUS Collab.) \cite{Albrecht:87}:
914: first evidence of $B^0-\bar{B}^0$ mixing.
915:
916: \nin
917: \fbox{\slb{1989}} Abrams \et\ (MARK-II Collab.) \cite{Abrams:89}:
918: first evidence that the number of light neutrinos is 3.
919:
920: \nin
921: \fbox{\slb{1992}} LEP Collaborations (ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL)
922: \cite{Lep:92}: precise determination of the $Z^0$ parameters.
923:
924: \nin
925: \fbox{\slb{1995}} Abe \et\ (CDF Collab.) \cite{Abe:95}; Abachi \et\
926: (D\O\ Collab.) \cite{Abachi:95}: observation of the top quark
927: production.
928:
929:
930: %###############################################################################
931:
932: \newpage
933: \section{The Gauge Principle}
934: \label{gau:pri}
935: \indent
936:
937: As it is well known, symmetry has always played a very important
938: r\^ole in the development of physics. From the spacetime symmetry of
939: special relativity, up to the internal and gauge invariances, the
940: symmetries have mapped out the route to most of the physical theories
941: in this last century.
942:
943: An important result for field theory and particle physics is provided
944: by the Noether's theorem. If an action is invariant under some group
945: of transformations (symmetry), then there exist one or more conserved
946: quantities (constants of motion) which are associated to these
947: transformations. In this sense, Noether's theorem establishes that
948: symmetries imply conservation laws.
949:
950: A natural question to ask would be: upon imposing to a given
951: Lagrangian the invariance under a certain symmetry, would it be
952: possible to determine the form of the interaction among the
953: particles? In other words, could symmetry also imply dynamics?
954:
955: In fact, this happens in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), the best
956: theory ever built to describe Nature, which had become a prototype
957: of a successful quantum field theory. In QED the existence and some of
958: the properties of the gauge field --- the photon --- follow from a
959: principle of invariance under {\it local gauge transformations} of
960: the $U(1)$ group.
961:
962: Could this principle be generalized to other interactions? For Salam
963: and Ward \cite{Salam:61}, who invented the gauge principle as the
964: basis to construct the quantum field theory of interacting fields,
965: this was a possible dream:
966:
967: \begin{center}
968: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
969: {\it ``Our basic postulate is that it should be possible to generate
970: strong, weak and electromagnetic interaction terms (with all their
971: correct symmetry properties and also with clues regarding their
972: relative strengths) by making local gauge transformations on the
973: kinetic--energy terms in the free Lagrangian for all particles.''}
974: \end{minipage}
975: \end{center}
976:
977: In fact, those ideas could be accomplished just after some new and
978: important ingredients were introduced to describe short distance
979: (weak) and strong interactions. In the case of weak interactions the
980: presence of very heavy weak gauge bosons require the new concept of
981: spontaneous breakdown of the gauge symmetry and the Higgs mechanism
982: \cite{Higgs:64,Englert:64,Guralnik:64}. On the other hand, the
983: concept of asymptotic freedom \cite{Gross:73,Politzer:73} played a
984: crucial r\^ole to describe perturbatively the strong interaction at
985: short distances, making the strong gauge bosons trapped. The Quantum
986: Chromodynamics (QCD), the gauge theory for strong interactions, is
987: the subject of Mangano's lecture at this school.
988:
989:
990: %###############################################################################
991:
992:
993: \subsection{Gauge Invariance in Quantum Mechanics} \indent
994:
995: The gauge principle and the concept of gauge invariance are already
996: present in Quantum Mechanics of a particle in the presence of an
997: electromagnetic field \cite{Aitchison:90}. Let us start from the
998: classical Hamiltonian that gives rise to the Lorentz force ($\vec{F}
999: = q \vec{E} + q \vec{v}\times\vec{B}$),
1000: \begin{equation}
1001: {\cal H} = \frac{1}{2m} \left(\vec{p} - q \vec{A}\right)^2 + q \phi
1002: \; ,
1003: \label{h:em}
1004: \end{equation}
1005: where the electric and magnetic fields can be described in terms of
1006: the potentials $A^\mu = (\phi, \vec{A})$,
1007: \[
1008: \vec{E} = - \vec{\nabla} \phi - \frac{\del \vec{A}}{\del t} ;\;,
1009: \;\;\;\;
1010: \vec{B} = \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A} \; .
1011: \]
1012: These fields remain exactly the same when we make the {\it gauge
1013: transformation} ($G$) in the potentials:
1014: \begin{equation}
1015: { \phi \to \phi^\prime = \phi - \frac{\del \chi}{\del t}
1016: \;\;, \;\;\;\;
1017: \vec{A} \to \vec{A}^\prime = \vec{A} + \vec{\nabla} \chi } \; .
1018: \label{gauge:em}
1019: \end{equation}
1020:
1021: When we quantize the Hamiltonian (\ref{h:em}) by applying the
1022: usual prescription $\vec{p} \to -i \vec{\nabla}$, we get the
1023: Schr\"odinger equation for a particle in an electromagnetic field,
1024: \[
1025: \left[ \frac{1}{2m} \left(-i \vec{\nabla} - q \vec{A}\right)^2
1026: + q \phi \right] \psi(x,t) = i \frac{\del \psi(x,t)}{\del t} \; ,
1027: \]
1028: which can be written in a compact form as
1029: \begin{equation}
1030: \frac{1}{2m} (-i \vec{D})^2 \psi = i D_0 \psi \; ,
1031: \label{schr}
1032: \end{equation}
1033: The equation (\ref{schr}) is equivalent to make the substitution
1034: \[
1035: \vec{\nabla} \to \vec{D} = \vec{\nabla} - i q \vec{A}
1036: \;\;, \;\;\;\;
1037: \frac{\del}{\del t} \to D_0 = \frac{\del}{\del t} + i q
1038: \phi \; .
1039: \]
1040: in the free Schr\"odinger equation.
1041:
1042: If we make the gauge transformation, $(\phi, \vec{A})
1043: \stackrel{G}{\longrightarrow} (\phi^\prime, \vec{A}^\prime)$, given
1044: by (\ref{gauge:em}), does the new field $\psi^\prime$ which is
1045: solution of
1046: \[
1047: \frac{1}{2m} (-i \vec{D}^\prime)^2 \; \psi^\prime = i D_0^\prime \;
1048: \psi^\prime \;\; ,
1049: \]
1050: describe the same physics?
1051:
1052: The answer to this question is {\it no}. However, we can recover the
1053: invariance of our theory by making, at the same time, the phase
1054: transformation in the matter field
1055: \begin{equation}
1056: \psi^\prime = \exp\left(i q \chi \right) \psi
1057: \label{gauge:psi}
1058: \end {equation}
1059: with the same function $\chi = \chi (x,t)$ used in the transformation
1060: of electromagnetic fields (\ref{gauge:em}). The derivative of
1061: $\psi^\prime$ transforms as,
1062: \begin{eqnarray}
1063: \vec{D}^\prime \psi^\prime &=&
1064: \left[\vec{\nabla} - i q ( \vec{A} + \vec{\nabla}
1065: \chi ) \right] \exp\left(i q \chi\right) \psi
1066: \nonumber \\
1067: &=& \exp\left(i q \chi\right) ( \vec{\nabla} \psi )
1068: { + i q (\vec{\nabla} \chi ) \exp\left(i q \chi\right)\psi }
1069: \nonumber\\
1070: &&- i q \vec{A} \exp\left(i q \chi\right) \psi
1071: { - i q (\vec{\nabla} \chi ) \exp\left(i q \chi\right) \psi }
1072: \nonumber \\
1073: &=& \exp\left(i q \chi\right) \vec{D} \psi \; ,
1074: \label{gauge:d}
1075: \end{eqnarray}
1076: and in the same way, we have for $D_0$,
1077: \begin{equation}
1078: D_0^\prime \psi^\prime =
1079: \exp\left(i q \chi\right) D_0 \psi \; .
1080: \label{gauge:d0}
1081: \end{equation}
1082:
1083: We should mention that now the field $\psi$ (\ref{gauge:psi}) and its
1084: derivatives $\vec{D}\psi$ (\ref{gauge:d}), and $D_0 \psi$
1085: (\ref{gauge:d0}), all transform exactly in the same way: they
1086: are all multiplied by the same phase factor.
1087:
1088: Therefore, the Schr\"odinger equation (\ref{schr}) for $\psi^\prime$
1089: becomes
1090: \begin{eqnarray*}
1091: { \frac{1}{2m} (-i\vec{D}^\prime)^2 \psi^\prime } &=&
1092: \frac{1}{2m} (-i \vec{D}^\prime) ( -i \vec{D}^\prime \psi^\prime)
1093: \\
1094: &=&\frac{1}{2m} (-i \vec{D}^\prime)
1095: \left[ -i \exp\left(i q \chi\right) \vec{D} \psi \right]
1096: \\
1097: &=& \exp\left(i q \chi\right) { \frac{1}{2m} (-i \vec{D})^2 \psi }
1098: \\
1099: &=&
1100: \exp\left(i q \chi\right) { ( i D_0 ) \psi} =
1101: { i D_0^\prime \psi^\prime} \; .
1102: \end{eqnarray*}
1103: and now both $\psi$ and $\psi^\prime$ describe the same physics,
1104: since $|\psi|^2 = |\psi'|^2$. In order to get the invariance for all
1105: observables, we should assure that the following substitution is made:
1106: \[
1107: \vec{\nabla} \to \vec{D} \;\;, \;\;\;\; \frac{\del}{\del t} \to D_0
1108: \; ,
1109: \]
1110: For instance, the current
1111: \[
1112: \vec{J} \propto \psi^* (\vec{\nabla} \psi) - (\vec{\nabla} \psi)^* \psi
1113: \; ,
1114: \]
1115: becomes also gauge invariant with this substitution since
1116: \[
1117: \psi^{* \, \prime} (\vec{D}^\prime \psi^\prime) =
1118: \psi^* \exp\left(-i q \chi\right)
1119: \exp\left(i q \chi\right) (\vec{D} \psi) = \psi^* (\vec{D} \psi)
1120: \; .
1121: \]
1122:
1123: After we have shown how to obtain a gauge invariant quantum
1124: description of a particle in an electromagnetic field, could we
1125: reverse the argument? That is: when we demand that a theory is
1126: invariant under a spacetime dependent phase transformation, can
1127: this procedure impose the specific form of the interaction with the
1128: gauge field? In other words, can the {\it symmetry imply dynamics}?
1129:
1130: Let us examine what happens when we start from the Dirac free Lagrangian
1131: \[
1132: \lag_\psi = \bar{\psi} (i \dels - m) \psi \; ,
1133: \]
1134: that is not invariant under the {\it local gauge transformation},
1135: \[
1136: \psi \to \psi^\prime = \exp\left[-i \alpha(x) \right] \psi \; ,
1137: \]
1138: since
1139: \[
1140: \lag_\psi \to \lag_\psi^\prime = \lag_\psi
1141: { \; + \; \bar{\psi} \g_\mu \psi (\del^\mu \alpha)} \; ,
1142: \]
1143:
1144: However, if we introduce the {\it gauge field} $A_\mu$ through
1145: the {\it minimal coupling}
1146: \[
1147: D_\mu \equiv \del_\mu + i e A_\mu \; ,
1148: \]
1149: and, at the same time, require that $A_\mu$ transforms like
1150: \begin{equation}
1151: A_\mu \to A_\mu^\prime = A_\mu + \frac{1}{e} \del_\mu \alpha \; .
1152: \label{gauge:a}
1153: \end{equation}
1154: we have
1155: \begin{eqnarray}
1156: \lag_\psi \to \lag_\psi^\prime &=&
1157: \bar{\psi}^\prime \left[(i \dels - e \sla{A}^\prime) - m \right] \psi^\prime
1158: \nonumber \\
1159: &=& \bar{\psi} \exp(+i \alpha )
1160: \left[i \dels - e \left(\sla{A} + \frac{1}{e}\dels\alpha\right) - m\right]
1161: \exp(-i \alpha) \psi
1162: \nonumber \\
1163: &=& \lag_\psi \; { - \; e \bar{\psi} \g_\mu \psi A^\mu} \; .
1164: \label{l:psi}
1165: \end{eqnarray}
1166: The coupling between $\psi$ ({\it e.g.} electrons) and the gauge
1167: field $A_\mu$ (photon) arises naturally when we require the
1168: invariance under local gauge transformations of the kinetic--energy
1169: terms in the free fermion Lagrangian.
1170:
1171: Since, the electromagnetic strength tensor
1172: \begin{equation}
1173: F_{\mu\nu} \equiv \del_\mu A_\nu - \del_\nu A_\mu \; ,
1174: \label{abe:f}
1175: \end{equation}
1176: is invariant under the gauge transformation (\ref{gauge:a}), so is
1177: the Lagrangian for free gauge field,
1178: \begin{equation}
1179: \lag_A = - \frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} \; ,
1180: \label{abe:l}
1181: \end{equation}
1182: This Lagrangian together with (\ref{l:psi}) describes the Quantum
1183: Electrodynamics.
1184:
1185: We should point out that a hypothetical mass term for the gauge field,
1186: \[
1187: \lag_A^m = - \frac{1}{2} A_\mu A^{\mu} \; ,
1188: \]
1189: is not invariant under the transformation (\ref{gauge:a}).
1190: Therefore, something else should be necessary to describe massive
1191: vector bosons in a gauge invariant way, preserving the
1192: renormalizability of the theory.
1193:
1194: %###############################################################################
1195:
1196: \subsection{Gauge Invariance for Non--Abelian Groups} \indent
1197:
1198: As suggested by Heisenberg \cite{Heisenberg:32} in 1932, under
1199: nuclear interactions, protons and neutron can be regarded as
1200: degenerated since their mass are quite similar and electromagnetic
1201: interaction is negligible.
1202:
1203: Therefore any arbitrary combination of their wave function would be
1204: equivalent,
1205: \[
1206: \psi \equiv \left( \ba{c}
1207: \psi_p\\
1208: \psi_n
1209: \ea \right) \to \psi^\prime = U \psi \; ,
1210: \]
1211: where $U$ is unitary transformation ($U^\dagger U = U U^\dagger =1$)
1212: to preserve normalization (probability). Moreover, if det$|U|$ = 1,
1213: $U$ represents the Lie group $SU(2)$:
1214: \[
1215: U = \exp\left(-i \frac{\tau^a}{2} \alpha^a \right)
1216: \simeq 1 - i \frac{\tau^a}{2} \alpha^a \; ,
1217: \]
1218: where $\tau^a$, $a = 1,2,3$ are the Pauli matrices.
1219:
1220: In 1954, Yang and Mills \cite{Yang:54} introduced the idea of local
1221: gauge isotopic invariance in quantum field theory.
1222: \begin{center}
1223: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
1224: {\it ``The differentiation between a neutron and a proton
1225: is then a purely arbitrary process. As usually conceived, however,
1226: this arbitrariness is subject to the following limitation: once
1227: one chooses what to call a proton, what a neutron, at one
1228: spacetime point, one is then not free to make any choices at
1229: other spacetime points. It seems that this is not consistent
1230: with the localized field concept that underlies the usual
1231: physical theories.''}
1232: \end{minipage}
1233: \end{center}
1234:
1235: Following their argument, we should preserve our freedom to choose
1236: what to call a proton or a neutron {\it no matter when or where we
1237: are}. This can be implemented by requiring that the gauge parameters
1238: depend on the spacetime points, {\it i.e.} $\alpha^a \to \alpha^a
1239: (x)$.
1240:
1241: This idea was generalized by Utiyama \cite{Utiyama:56} in 1956 for
1242: any non--Abelian group $G$ with generators $t_a$ satisfying the Lie
1243: algebra \cite{Abers:73},
1244: \[
1245: \left[ t_a, t_b \right] = i \; C_{abc} \; t_c \; ,
1246: \]
1247: with $C_{abc}$ being the structure constant of the group.
1248:
1249: The Lagrangian $\lag_\psi$ should be invariant under the {\it matter
1250: field transformation}
1251: \[
1252: \psi \to \psi^\prime = \Omega \; \psi \; ,
1253: \]
1254: with
1255: \[
1256: \Omega \equiv \exp\left[-i \, T^a \alpha^a(x)\right] \; ,
1257: \]
1258: where $T^a$ is a convenient representation ({\it i.e.} according to
1259: the fields $\psi$) of the generators $t^a$.
1260:
1261: Introducing one gauge field for each generator, and defining the
1262: {\it covariant derivative} by
1263: \[
1264: D_\mu \equiv \del_\mu - i g T^a A_\mu^a \; ,
1265: \]
1266:
1267: Since the covariant derivative transforms just like the matter field,
1268: {\it i.e.} $D_\mu \psi \to \Omega \; (D_\mu \psi)$, this will ensure
1269: the invariance under the local non--Abelian gauge transformation for
1270: the terms containing the fields and its gradients as long as the
1271: {\it gauge field transformation} is
1272: \[
1273: T^a A^a_\mu \to \Omega \left(T^a A^a_\mu +
1274: \frac{i}{g} \del_\mu \right) \Omega^{-1} \; ,
1275: \]
1276: or, in infinitesimal form, {\it i.e.} for
1277: $\Omega \simeq 1 - i \, T^a \alpha^a(x)$,
1278: \[
1279: A^{a \, \prime}_\mu = A^a_\mu - \frac{1}{g} \del_\mu \alpha^a +
1280: C_{abc} \, \alpha^b A^c_\mu \; .
1281: \]
1282:
1283: Finally, we should generalize the {\it strength tensor} (\ref{abe:f})
1284: for a non--abelian Lie group,
1285: \begin{equation}
1286: F_{\mu\nu}^a \equiv \del_\mu A_\nu^a - \del_\nu A_\mu^a + g \,
1287: C_{abc} \, A_\mu^b A_\nu^c \; ,
1288: \label{nonab:f}
1289: \end{equation}
1290: which transforms like $F_{\mu\nu}^{a \; \prime} \to F_{\mu\nu}^a +
1291: C_{abc} \alpha^b F_{\mu\nu}^c$. Therefore, the invariant kinetic term
1292: for the gauge bosons, can be written as
1293: \begin{equation}
1294: \lag_A = - \frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu}^a F^{a \; \mu\nu} \; ,
1295: \label{nonab:l}
1296: \end{equation}
1297: and is invariant under the local gauge transformation. However, a
1298: {\it mass term} for the gauge bosons like
1299: \[
1300: A_\mu^a A^{a \; \mu} \to
1301: \left( A^a_\mu - \frac{1}{g} \del_\mu \alpha^a + C_{abc} \alpha^b
1302: A^c_\mu \right)
1303: \left( A^{a \; \mu} - \frac{1}{g} \del_\mu \alpha^a + C_{ade}
1304: \alpha^d A^{e \; \mu} \right) \; ,
1305: \]
1306: is still {\it not} gauge invariant.
1307:
1308: Note that since
1309: \[
1310: F \propto (\del A - \del A) + g A A \; ,
1311: \]
1312: unlike the Abelian case, there is a new feature: the gauge fields
1313: have triple and quartic {\it self--couplings},
1314: \[
1315: \ba{ccccc}
1316: \lag_A & \propto & (\del A - \del A)^2 \; + & g (\del A - \del A) A A
1317: \; + & g^2 A A A A \\
1318: &&\mbox{propagator} & \mbox{triple} & \mbox{quartic}\\
1319: \ea \; .
1320: \]
1321:
1322: %###############################################################################
1323: \section{Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking} \label{ssb} \indent
1324:
1325: Exact symmetries give rise, in general, to exact conservation laws.
1326: In this case both the Lagrangian and the vacuum (the ground state of
1327: the theory) are invariant. However, there are some conservation laws
1328: which are not exact, {\it e.g.} isospin, strangeness, etc. These
1329: situations can be described by adding to the invariant Lagrangian
1330: ($\lag_{\text{sym}}$) a small term that breaks this symmetry
1331: ($\lag_{\text{sb}}$),
1332: \[
1333: \lag = \lag_{\text{sym}} + \varepsilon \; \lag_{\text{sb}} \; .
1334: \]
1335:
1336: Another situation occurs when the system has a Lagrangian that is
1337: invariant and a non--invariant vacuum. A classic example of
1338: the situation is provided by a ferromagnet where the Lagrangian
1339: describing the spin--spin interaction is invariant under
1340: tridimensional rotations. For temperatures above the ferromagnetic
1341: transition temperature ($T_C$) the spin system is completely
1342: disordered (paramagnetic phase), and therefore the vacuum is also
1343: $SO(3)$ invariant [see Fig.\ 2(a)].
1344:
1345: However, for temperatures below $T_C$ (ferromagnetic phase) a
1346: spontaneous magnetisation of the system occurs, aligning the spins in
1347: some specific direction [see Fig.\ 2(b)]. In this case, the vacuum is
1348: not invariant under the $SO(3)$ group. This symmetry is broken to
1349: $SO(2)$, representing the rotation of the whole system around the
1350: spin directions.
1351:
1352: \vskip 0.3cm
1353: \begin{center}
1354: \begin{tabular}{cc}
1355: { \rar ~ \nor ~ \ser ~ \uar ~ \rar ~ \sor } ~~~~~~~~ & ~~~~~~~~
1356: { \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner }\\[0.2cm]
1357: { \nor ~ \dar ~ \ner ~ \nor ~ \sor ~ \sor }~~~~~~~~ & ~~~~~~~~
1358: { \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner }\\[0.2cm]
1359: { \uar ~ \rar ~ \sor ~ \rar ~ \nor ~ \ser }~~~~~~~~ & ~~~~~~~~
1360: { \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner }\\[0.2cm]
1361: { \lar ~ \ner ~ \nor ~ \nor ~ \sor ~ \sor }~~~~~~~~ & ~~~~~~~~
1362: { \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner }\\[0.2cm]
1363: { \rar ~ \rar ~ \sor ~ \nor ~ \rar ~ \ner }~~~~~~~~ & ~~~~~~~~
1364: { \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner ~ \ner }\\[0.2cm]
1365: & \\
1366: {\it (a)} ~~~~~~~~&~~~~~~~~ {\it (b)} \\
1367: \end{tabular}
1368: \end{center}
1369:
1370: \begin{center}
1371: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
1372: \begin{center}
1373: {\it Fig.\ 2: Representation of the spin orientation in the paramagnetic
1374: (a) and ferromagnetic (b) phases.}
1375: \end{center}
1376: \end{minipage}
1377: \end{center}
1378:
1379: %###############################################################################
1380:
1381: Let us analyze the simple example of a scalar self--interacting real
1382: field with Lagrangian,
1383: \begin{equation}
1384: \lag = \frac{1}{2} \del_\mu \phi \; \del^\mu \phi - V(\phi) \; ,
1385: \label{lag}
1386: \end{equation}
1387: with
1388: \begin{equation}
1389: V(\phi) = \frac{1}{2} \mu^2 \phi^2 + \frac{1}{4} \lambda \phi^4 \; .
1390: \label{sca:pot}
1391: \end{equation}
1392: In the theory of the phase transition of a ferromagnet, the
1393: Gibbs free energy density is analogous to $V(\phi)$ with $\phi$
1394: playing the r\^ole of the average spontaneous magnetisation $M$.
1395:
1396: The whole Lagrangian (\ref{lag}) is invariant under the discrete
1397: transformation
1398: \begin{equation}
1399: \phi \to - \phi \; .
1400: \label{sym:phi}
1401: \end{equation}
1402: Is the vacuum also invariant under this transformation? The
1403: vacuum ($\phi_0$) can be obtained from the Hamiltonian
1404: \[
1405: {\cal H} = \frac{1}{2} \left[(\del_0 \phi)^2 + (\nabla \phi)^2 \right]
1406: + V(\phi) \; .
1407: \]
1408:
1409: We notice that $\phi_0 = constant$ corresponds to the minimum of $V(\phi)$
1410: and consequently of the energy:
1411: \[
1412: \phi_0 (\mu^2 + \lambda \phi_0^2) = 0 \; .
1413: \]
1414:
1415: Since $\lambda$ should be positive to guarantee that ${\cal H}$ is
1416: bounded, the minimum depends on the {\it sign of $\mu$}. For $\mu^2
1417: >0$, we have just one vacuum at $\phi_0 = 0$ and it is also invariant
1418: under (\ref{sym:phi}) [see Fig.\ 3 (a)]. However, for $\mu^2 < 0$, we
1419: have two vacua states corresponding to $\phi_0^\pm = \pm
1420: \sqrt{-\mu^2/\lambda}$ [see Fig.\ 3 (b)]. This case corresponds to a
1421: wrong sign for the $\phi$ mass term.
1422:
1423: \begin{figure}[ht]
1424: \protect
1425: \epsfxsize=12cm
1426: \begin{center}
1427: % v1.eps & v2.eps
1428: \mbox{\psfig{file=fig03a.eps,width=0.35\textwidth}} ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1429: \mbox{\psfig{file=fig03b.eps,width=0.4\textwidth}}
1430: \end{center}
1431: \end{figure}
1432: \begin{center}
1433: \vspace{-1cm}
1434: \begin{tabular}{cc}
1435: {\it (a)} ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ &
1436: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ {\it (b)} \\
1437: \end{tabular}
1438: \end{center}
1439: \begin{center}
1440: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
1441: \begin{center}
1442: {\it Fig.\ 3: Scalar potential (\ref{sca:pot}) for $\mu^2 > 0$ (a) and
1443: for $\mu^2 < 0$ (b).}
1444: \end{center}
1445: \end{minipage}
1446: \end{center}
1447:
1448: Since the Lagrangian is invariant under (\ref{sym:phi}) the choice
1449: between $\phi_0^+$ or $\phi_0^-$ is irrelevant \footnote{For an
1450: interesting discussion discarding the invariant state $(\phi_0^+ \pm
1451: \phi_0^-)$ as the true vacuum see Ref.\ \cite{Weinberg:96}}.
1452: Nevertheless, once one choice is made ({\it e.g.} $v = \phi_0^+$) the
1453: symmetry is {\it spontaneously broken} since $\lag$ is invariant but
1454: the vacuum is {\it not}.
1455:
1456: Defining a new field $\phi^\prime$ by shifting the old field by $v =
1457: \sqrt{-\mu^2/\lambda}$,
1458: \[
1459: \phi^\prime \equiv \phi - v \; ,
1460: \]
1461: we verify that the vacuum of the new field is $\phi^\prime_0 = 0$,
1462: making the theory suitable for small oscillations around the vacuum
1463: state. The Lagrangian becomes:
1464: \[
1465: \lag = \frac{1}{2} \del_\mu \phi^\prime \del^\mu \phi^\prime -
1466: \frac{1}{2} \left( { \sqrt{-2 \mu^2}} \right)^2 \phi^{\prime \; 2} -
1467: \lambda \, v \, \phi^{\prime \; 3} - \frac{1}{4} \lambda
1468: \phi^{\prime \; 4} \; .
1469: \]
1470: This Lagrangian describes a scalar field $\phi^\prime$ with real and
1471: positive mass, $M_{\phi^\prime}=\sqrt{-2 \mu^2}$, but it lost the
1472: original symmetry due to the $\phi^{\prime \; 3}$ term.
1473:
1474: A new interesting phenomenon happens when a {\it continuous}
1475: symmetry is spontaneously broken. Let us analyze the case of a
1476: charged self--interacting scalar field,
1477: \begin{equation}
1478: \lag = \del_\mu \phi^\ast \del^\mu \phi - V(\phi^\ast\phi) \; ,
1479: \label{lag:com}
1480: \end{equation}
1481: with a similar potential,
1482: \begin{equation}
1483: V(\phi^\ast\phi) = \mu^2 (\phi^\ast\phi) + \lambda (\phi^\ast\phi)^2
1484: \; .
1485: \label{pot:com}
1486: \end{equation}
1487:
1488: Notice that the Lagrangian (\ref{lag:com}) is invariant under the {\it global
1489: phase} transformation
1490: \[
1491: \phi \to \exp(-i\theta) \phi \; .
1492: \]
1493:
1494: When we redefine the complex field in terms of two real fields by
1495: \[
1496: \phi = \frac{(\phi_1 + i \phi_2)}{\sqrt{2}} \; ,
1497: \]
1498: the Lagrangian (\ref{lag:com}) becomes
1499: \begin{equation}
1500: \lag = \frac{1}{2} \left( \del_\mu \phi_1 \del^\mu \phi_1
1501: + \del_\mu \phi_2 \del^\mu \phi_2 \right) -
1502: V(\phi_1, \phi_2 ) \; ,
1503: \label{lag2:com}
1504: \end{equation}
1505: which is invariant under $SO(2)$ rotations,
1506: \[
1507: \left( \ba{c}
1508: \phi_1 \\
1509: \phi_2
1510: \ea \right) \longrightarrow
1511: \left( \ba{cc}
1512: \cos\theta & -\sin\theta\\
1513: \sin\theta & \cos\theta
1514: \ea \right) \;
1515: \left( \ba{c}
1516: \phi_1\\
1517: \phi_2
1518: \ea \right) \; .
1519: \]
1520:
1521: For $\mu^2 > 0$ the vacuum is at $\phi_1 = \phi_2 = 0$, and
1522: for small oscillations,
1523: \[
1524: \lag = \sum_{i = 1}^2 \frac{1}{2}
1525: \left(\del_\mu \phi_i \del^\mu \phi_i - \mu^2 \phi_i^2 \right) \; ,
1526: \]
1527: which means that we have two scalar fields $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ with
1528: mass $m^2 = \mu^2 > 0$.
1529:
1530: In the case of $\mu^2 < 0$ we have a continuum of distinct vacua [see
1531: Fig.\ 4 (a)] located at
1532: \begin{equation}
1533: <|\phi|^2>= \frac{(<\phi_1>^2 + <\phi_2>^2)}{2}
1534: =\frac{ - \mu^2}{2 \lambda} \equiv \frac{v^2}{2} \; .
1535: \label{vac:com}
1536: \end{equation}
1537:
1538: %\vspace{-1cm}
1539: \begin{figure}[ht]
1540: \protect
1541: \epsfxsize=12cm
1542: \begin{center}
1543: % v3.eps & c3.eps
1544: \begin{tabular}{cc}
1545: \mbox{\psfig{file=fig04a.eps,width=0.5\textwidth}} ~~~ & ~~~
1546: \mbox{\psfig{file=fig04b.eps,width=0.35\textwidth}} \\
1547: {\it (a)} ~~~~~~~ &
1548: ~~~~~~~ {\it (b)} \\
1549: \end{tabular}
1550: \end{center}
1551: \begin{center}
1552: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
1553: \begin{center}
1554: {\it Fig.\ 4: The potential $V(\phi_1, \phi_2 )$ (a) and its contour
1555: plot (b)}
1556: \end{center}
1557: \end{minipage}
1558: \end{center}
1559: \end{figure}
1560:
1561: We can see from the contour plot [Fig.\ 4 (b)] that the vacua are
1562: also invariant under $SO(2)$. However, this symmetry is spontaneously
1563: broken when we choose a particular vacuum. Let us choose, for
1564: instance, the configuration,
1565: \begin{eqnarray*}
1566: \phi_1 & = & v \; ,
1567: \\
1568: \phi_2 & = & 0 \; .
1569: \end{eqnarray*}
1570:
1571: The new fields, suitable for small perturbations, can be defined as,
1572: \begin{eqnarray*}
1573: \phi_1^\prime & = & \phi_1 - v \; ,\\
1574: \phi_2^\prime & = & \phi_2 \; .
1575: \end{eqnarray*}
1576:
1577: In terms of these new fields the Lagrangian (\ref{lag2:com}) becomes,
1578: \[
1579: \lag = \frac{1}{2} \del_\mu \phi_1^\prime \del^\mu \phi_1^\prime
1580: - \frac{1}{2} ({ -2 \mu^2}) \phi_1^{\prime \; 2} + \frac{1}{2}
1581: \del_\mu \phi_2^\prime \del^\mu \phi_2^\prime + \; \mbox{interaction
1582: terms} \; .
1583: \]
1584:
1585: Now we identify in the particle spectrum a scalar field
1586: $\phi_1^\prime$ with real and positive mass and a massless scalar
1587: boson ($\phi_2^\prime$). This could be seen from Fig.\ 4 (b), when we
1588: consider the mass matrix in tree approximation,
1589: \[
1590: M_{ij}^2 = \left . \frac{\partial^2 V(\phi_1^\prime, \phi_2^\prime)}
1591: {\partial \phi_i^\prime\partial\phi_j^\prime} \right
1592: |_{\phi^\prime = \phi_0^\prime} \; .
1593: \]
1594: The second derivative of $V(\phi_1^\prime, \phi_2^\prime)$ in the
1595: $\phi_2^\prime$ direction corresponds to the zero eigenvalue of the
1596: mass matrix, while for $\phi_1^\prime$ it is positive.
1597:
1598: This is an example of the prediction of the so called Goldstone
1599: theorem \cite{Goldstone:61} which states that when an exact
1600: continuous global symmetry is spontaneously broken, {\it i.e.} it is
1601: not a symmetry of the physical vacuum, the theory contains one
1602: massless scalar particle for each broken generator of the original
1603: symmetry group.
1604:
1605: The Goldstone theorem can be proven as follows. Let us consider a
1606: Lagrangian of $N_G$ real scalar fields $\phi_i$, belonging to a
1607: $N_G$--dimensional vector $\Phi$,
1608: \[
1609: \lag = \frac{1}{2} (\partial_\mu \Phi)(\partial^\mu \Phi) - V(\Phi)
1610: \; .
1611: \]
1612: Suppose that $G$ is a continuous group that let the Lagrangian
1613: invariant and that $\Phi$ transforms like
1614: \[
1615: \delta \Phi = - i \; \alpha^a \; T^a \; \Phi \; .
1616: \]
1617: Since the potential is invariant under $G$, we have
1618: \[
1619: \delta V(\Phi) = \frac{\partial V(\Phi)}{\partial \phi_i} \; \delta
1620: \phi_i = -i \; \frac{\partial V(\Phi)}{\partial \phi_i} \; \alpha^a
1621: \; (T^a)_{ij} \; \phi_j = 0 \; .
1622: \]
1623: The gauge parameters $\alpha^a$ are arbitrary, and we have $N_G$
1624: equations
1625: \[
1626: \frac{\partial V(\Phi)}{\partial \phi_i} \; (T^a)_{ij} \; \phi_j = 0
1627: \; ,
1628: \]
1629: for $a = 1, \cdots, N_G$. Taking another derivative of this equation, we
1630: obtain
1631: \[
1632: \frac{\partial^2 V(\Phi)}{\partial \phi_k \partial\phi_i} \;
1633: (T^a)_{ij} \; \phi_j +
1634: \frac{\partial V(\Phi)}{\partial \phi_i} \; (T^a)_{ik} = 0 \; .
1635: \]
1636:
1637: If we evaluate this result at the vacuum state, $\Phi = \Phi_0$, which
1638: minimizes the potential, we get
1639: \[
1640: \left . \frac{\partial^2 V(\Phi)}{\partial \phi_k \partial\phi_i}
1641: \right |_{\Phi = \Phi_0} (T^a)_{ij} \; \phi_{j}^0 = 0 \; ,
1642: \]
1643: or, in terms of the mass matrix,
1644: \begin{equation}
1645: M^2_{ki} \; (T^a)_{ij} \; \phi_{j}^0 = 0 \; .
1646: \label{mm}
1647: \end{equation}
1648:
1649: If, after we choose a ground state, a sub-group $g$ of $G$, with
1650: dimension $n_g$, remains a symmetry of the vacuum, then for each
1651: generator of $g$,
1652: \[
1653: (T^a)_{ij} \; \phi_{j}^0 = 0 \;\; \mbox{for} \;\; a = 1, \cdots , n_g
1654: \leq N_G \; ,
1655: \]
1656: while for the $(N_G - n_g)$ generators that break the symmetry,
1657: \[
1658: (T^a)_{ij} \; \phi_{j}^0 \neq 0 \;\; \mbox{for} \;\; a = n_g + 1, \cdots
1659: , N_G \; .
1660: \]
1661:
1662: Therefore, the relation (\ref{mm}) shows that there are $(N_G - n_g)$ zero
1663: eigenvalues of the mass matrix: the massless Goldstone bosons.
1664:
1665: %###############################################################################
1666:
1667: \section{The Higgs Mechanism} \label{higgs} \indent
1668:
1669: \subsection{The Abelian Higgs Mechanism}
1670:
1671: The Goldstone theorem implies the existence of massless scalar
1672: particle(s). However, we do not have any experimental evidence in
1673: nature of these particles. In 1964 several authors independently
1674: \cite{Higgs:64,Englert:64,Guralnik:64} were able to provide a way out
1675: to the Goldstone theorem, that is, a field theory with spontaneous
1676: symmetry breakdown, but with no massless Goldstone boson(s). The so
1677: called Higgs mechanism has an extra bonus: the gauge boson(s) becomes
1678: massive. This is accomplished by requiring that the Lagrangian that
1679: exhibits the spontaneous symmetry breakdown is also invariant under
1680: {\it local}, rather than global, gauge transformations. This feature
1681: fits very well in the requirements for a gauge theory of electroweak
1682: interactions where the short range character of this interaction
1683: requires a very massive intermediate particle.
1684:
1685: In order to see how this works let us consider again the charged
1686: self--inter\-act\-ing scalar Lagrangian (\ref{lag:com}) with the
1687: potential (\ref{pot:com}), and let us require a invariance under
1688: the {\it local} phase transformation,
1689: \begin{equation}
1690: \phi \to \exp\left[i \, q \, \alpha (x)\right] \phi \; .
1691: \label{gau:par}
1692: \end{equation}
1693:
1694: In order to make the Lagrangian invariant, we introduce a {\it gauge
1695: boson} ($A_\mu$) and the {\it covariant derivative} ($D_\mu$),
1696: following the same principles of Section \ref{gau:pri}
1697:
1698: We introduce a {\it gauge boson} ($A_\mu$) and the {\it covariant
1699: derivative} ($D_\mu$), so that the Lagrangian becomes invariant,
1700: following the same principles of Section \ref{gau:pri}
1701: \[
1702: \del_\mu \longrightarrow D_\mu = \del_\mu + i q A_\mu
1703: \;\; , \;\;\; \mbox{with} \;\;\;
1704: A_\mu \longrightarrow A_\mu^\prime = A_\mu - \del_\mu \alpha(x) \; .
1705: \]
1706:
1707: The spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs for $\mu^2 < 0$, with the
1708: vacuum $<|\phi|^2>$ given by (\ref{vac:com}). There is a very
1709: convenient way of parametrizing the new fields, $\phi^\prime$, that
1710: are suitable for small perturbations, {\it i.e.},
1711: \begin{equation}
1712: \phi = \exp\left(i \frac{\phi_2^\prime}{v} \right)
1713: \frac{(\phi_1^\prime + v)}{\sqrt{2}}
1714: \simeq \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
1715: \left( \phi_1^\prime + v + i \phi_2^\prime \right)
1716: = \phi^\prime + \frac{v}{\sqrt{2}} \; .
1717: \label{par:phi}
1718: \end{equation}
1719:
1720: Therefore the Lagrangian (\ref{lag:com}) becomes,
1721: \begin{eqnarray}
1722: \lag & = & { \frac{1}{2} \del_\mu \phi_1^\prime \del^\mu \phi_1^\prime -
1723: \frac{1}{2} (-2 \mu^2) \phi_1^{\prime \; 2} } +
1724: \frac{1}{2} \del_\mu \phi_2^\prime \del^\mu \phi_2^\prime + \;
1725: {\mbox{interact.}}
1726: \nonumber \\
1727: && { - \frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} +
1728: \frac{q^2 v^2}{2} A_\mu A^\mu } + { q v A_\mu \del^\mu \phi_2^\prime }
1729: \; .
1730: \label{lag:com:2}
1731: \end{eqnarray}
1732:
1733: This Lagrangian presents a scalar field $\phi_1^\prime$ with mass
1734: $M_{\phi_1^\prime} = \sqrt{-2 \mu^2}$, a massless scalar boson
1735: $\phi_2^\prime$ (the Goldstone boson) and a massive vector boson
1736: $A_\mu$, with mass $M_{A} = q v$.
1737:
1738: However the presence of the last term in (\ref{lag:com:2}), which is
1739: proportional to $A_\mu \del^\mu \phi_2^\prime$ is quite inconvenient
1740: since it mixes the propagators of $A_\mu$ and $\phi_2^\prime$
1741: particles. In order to eliminate this term, we can choose the gauge
1742: parameter in (\ref{gau:par}) to be proportional to $\phi_2^\prime$
1743: as
1744: \[
1745: \alpha (x) = - \frac{1}{qv} \phi_2^\prime (x) \; .
1746: \]
1747: In this way, the field $\phi$ (\ref{par:phi}) becomes,
1748: \[
1749: \phi = { \exp\left[i q \left( - \frac{\phi_2^\prime }{qv} \right)\right]}
1750: \exp\left(i \frac{\phi_2^\prime}{v} \right)
1751: \frac{(\phi_1^\prime + v)}{\sqrt{2}}
1752: = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \phi_1^\prime + v \right) \; .
1753: \]
1754:
1755: With this choice of gauge (called unitary gauge) the Goldstone boson
1756: disappears, and we get the Lagrangian
1757: \begin{eqnarray}
1758: \lag & = & { \frac{1}{2} \del_\mu \phi_1^\prime \del^\mu \phi_1^\prime -
1759: \frac{1}{2} (-2 \mu^2) \phi_1^{\prime \; 2}}
1760: { - \frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} +
1761: \frac{q^2 v^2}{2} A_\mu^\prime A^{\mu \; \prime} }
1762: \nonumber \\
1763: &&
1764: + \frac{1}{2} q^2 \left( \phi_1^\prime + 2 v \right) \phi_1^\prime
1765: A_\mu^\prime A^{\mu \; \prime}
1766: - \frac{\lambda}{4} \phi_1^{\prime \; 3} \left( \phi_1^\prime + 4 v
1767: \right) \; .
1768: \label{lag:com:3}
1769: \end{eqnarray}
1770:
1771:
1772: Where is $\phi_2^\prime$, the Goldstone boson? To answer this
1773: question, it is convenient to count the total number of degrees of
1774: freedom from the initial (\ref{lag:com}) and final (\ref{lag:com:3})
1775: Lagrangians:
1776:
1777: \vskip 1.2cm
1778: \begin{center}
1779: \begin{tabular}{cc}
1780: { Initial $\lag$ ~ (\ref{lag:com})} ~~~~~~ & ~~~~~~ { Final $\lag$ ~
1781: (\ref{lag:com:3})} \\[0.5cm]
1782: $\phi^{(\ast)}$ charged scalar : 2 ~~~~~~ & ~~~~~~
1783: $\phi_1^\prime $ neutral scalar : ~ 1 \\
1784: $A_\mu$ massless vector : 2 ~~~~~~ & ~~~~~~
1785: $A_\mu^\prime$ massive vector : 3 \\[-0.3cm]
1786: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \underline{~~~~~~~~~} &
1787: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \underline{~~~~~~~~~} \\
1788: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4 & ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4
1789: \end{tabular}
1790: \end{center}
1791: \vskip 0.5cm
1792:
1793: As we can see, the corresponding degree of freedom of the Goldstone
1794: boson was absorbed by the vector boson that acquires mass. The
1795: Goldstone turned into the longitudinal degree of freedom of the vector
1796: boson.
1797:
1798: %###############################################################################
1799:
1800: \newpage
1801: \subsection{The Non--Abelian Case} \label{hig:nonabe} \indent
1802:
1803: It is straightforward to generalize the last section's results for a
1804: non--Abelian group $G$ of dimension $N_G$, and generators $T^a$. In
1805: this case, we introduce $N_G$ gauge bosons, such that the covariant
1806: derivative is written as
1807: \[
1808: \del_\mu \longrightarrow D_\mu = \del_\mu - i g T^a B^a_\mu \; .
1809: \]
1810: After the spontaneous symmetry breaking, a {\it sub--group $g$} of
1811: dimension $n_g$ remains as a symmetry of the vacuum, that is,
1812: \[
1813: T^a_{ij} \; \phi^0_j = 0 \;\; , \;\;\;\; \mbox{for} \;\;\;\; a =
1814: 1, \cdots , n_g \; .
1815: \]
1816:
1817: We would expect the appearance of $(N_G - n_g)$ massless Goldstone bosons.
1818: Like in (\ref{par:phi}), we parametrize the original scalar field as
1819: \[
1820: \phi = (\tilde{\phi} + v) \;
1821: \exp\left(i \frac{\phi_{\text{GB}}^a T^a}{v} \right) \; ,
1822: \]
1823: where $T^a$ are the $(N_G - n_g)$ broken generators that do {\it not}
1824: annihilate the vacuum.
1825:
1826: Choose the gauge parameter $\alpha^a(x)$ in order to to eliminate
1827: $\phi_{\text{GB}}^a$. This will give rise to $(N_G - n_g)$ massive
1828: gauge bosons. Counting the total number of degrees of freedom we
1829: obtain $N_\phi + 2 N_G$, both before and after the spontaneous
1830: symmetry breaking:
1831:
1832: \vskip 1.2cm
1833: \begin{center}
1834: \begin{tabular}{cc}
1835: Before SSB & After SSB \\
1836: & \\
1837: $\phi$ massless scalar : $N_\phi$ &
1838: $\tilde{\phi}$ massive scalar : $N_\phi - (N_G - n_g)$ \\
1839: $B^a_\mu$ massless vector : 2 $N_G$ &
1840: $\tilde{B}^a_\mu$ massive vector : 3 $(N_G - n_g)$ \\
1841: & $B^a_\mu$ massless vector : 2 $n_g$
1842: \end{tabular}
1843: \end{center}
1844:
1845: %###############################################################################
1846: %*******************************************************************************
1847: %###############################################################################
1848: \newpage
1849: \chapter{The Standard Model} \label{sm}
1850:
1851: \section{Constructing the Model}
1852:
1853: \subsection{General Principles to Construct Gauge Theories}
1854: \indent
1855:
1856: Based on what we have learned from the previous sections, we can
1857: establish some quite general principles to construct a gauge theory.
1858: The recipe is as follows,
1859:
1860: \begin{itemize}
1861: \item Choose the gauge group $G$ with $N_G$ generators;
1862:
1863: \item Add $N_G$ vector fields (gauge bosons) in a specific
1864: representation of the gauge group;
1865:
1866: \item Choose the representation, in general the fundamental
1867: representation, for the matter fields (elementary particles);
1868:
1869: \item Add scalar fields to give mass to (some) vector bosons;
1870:
1871: \item Define the covariant derivative and write the most general
1872: renormalizable Lagrangian, invariant under $G$, which couples all
1873: these fields;
1874:
1875: \item Shift the scalar fields in such a way that the minimum of the
1876: potential is at zero;
1877:
1878: \item Apply the usual techniques of quantum field theory to verify
1879: the renormalizability and to make predictions;
1880:
1881: \item Check with Nature if the model has anything to do with reality;
1882:
1883: \item If not, restart from the very beginning!
1884: \end{itemize}
1885:
1886: In fact, there were several attempts to construct a gauge theory for
1887: the (electro)weak interaction. In 1957, Schwinger \cite{Schwinger:57}
1888: suggested a model based on the group $O(3)$ with a triplet gauge
1889: fields $(V^+, V^-, V^0)$. The charged gauge bosons were associated
1890: to weak bosons and the neutral $V^0$ was identified with the photon.
1891: This model was proposed before the structure $V-A$ of the weak
1892: currents have been established \cite{Feynman:58,Marshak:58,Sakurai:58}.
1893:
1894: The first attempt to incorporate the $V-A$ structure in a gauge
1895: theory for the weak interactions was made by Bludman
1896: \cite{Bludman:58} in 1958. His model, based on the $SU(2)$ weak
1897: isospin group, also required three vector bosons. However in this
1898: case the neutral gauge boson was associated to a new massive vector
1899: boson that was responsible for weak interactions without exchange of
1900: charge (neutral currents). The hypothesis of a neutral vector boson
1901: exchanged in weak interaction was also suggested independently by
1902: Leite Lopes \cite{Lopes:58} in the same year. This kind of process
1903: was observed experimentally for the first time in 1973 at the CERN
1904: neutrino experiment \cite{Hasert:73a}.
1905:
1906: Glashow \cite{Glashow:61} in 1961 noticed that in order to
1907: accommodate both weak and electromagnetic interactions we should go
1908: beyond the $SU(2)$ isospin structure. He suggested the gauge group
1909: $SU(2) \otimes U(1)$, where the $U(1)$ was associated to the leptonic
1910: hypercharge ($Y$) that is related to the weak isospin ($T$) and the
1911: electric charge through the analogous of the Gell-Mann--Nishijima
1912: formula ($Q = T_3 + Y/2$). The theory now requires four gauge bosons:
1913: a triplet ($W^1, W^2, W^3$) associated to the generators of $SU(2)$
1914: and a neutral field ($B$) related to $U(1)$. The charged weak bosons
1915: appear as a linear combination of $W^1$ and $W^2$, while the photon
1916: and a neutral weak boson $Z^0$ are both given by a mixture of $W^3$
1917: and $B$. A similar model was proposed by Salam and Ward
1918: \cite{Salam:64} in 1964.
1919:
1920: The mass terms for $W^\pm$ and $Z^0$ were put ``by hand''. However,
1921: as we have seen, this procedure breaks explicitly the gauge
1922: invariance of the theory. In 1967, Weinberg \cite{Weinberg:67} and
1923: independently Salam \cite{Salam:68} in 1968, employed the idea of
1924: spontaneous symmetry breaking and the Higgs mechanism to give mass to
1925: the weak bosons and, at the same time, to preserve the gauge
1926: invariance, making the theory renormalizable as shown later by 't
1927: Hooft \cite{Hooft:71}. The Glashow--Weinberg--Salam model is known,
1928: at the present time, as the {\it Standard Model of Electroweak
1929: Interactions}, reflecting its impressive success.
1930:
1931: %###############################################################################
1932:
1933: \subsection{Right-- and Left-- Handed Fermions} \indent
1934:
1935: Before the introduction of the Standard Model, let us make an interlude
1936: and discuss some properties of the fermionic helicity states. At high
1937: energies ({\it i.e.} for $E \gg m$), the Dirac spinors
1938: \[
1939: u(p,s) \;\; , \;\;\;\; \mbox{and} \;\;\;\;\;
1940: v(p,s) \equiv C \, \bar{u}^T (p,s) = i
1941: \, \gamma_2 \, u^\ast(p,s) \; ,
1942: \]
1943: are eigenstates of the $\gc$ matrix.
1944:
1945: The helicity $+1/2$ (right--handed, $R$) and helicity $-1/2$
1946: (left--handed, $L$) states satisfy
1947: \[
1948: u \, _{\stackrel{\text{R}}{\text{L}}} = \frac{1}{2} \left(1 \pm \gc \right) u
1949: \;\;\; \mbox{and} \;\;\;
1950: v \, _{\stackrel{\text{R}}{\text{L}}} = \frac{1}{2} \left(1 \mp \gc \right) v
1951: \; .
1952: \]
1953: It is convenient to define the {\it helicity projectors}:
1954: \begin{equation}
1955: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{L \equiv \frac{1}{2} \left(1 - \gc \right)} \;
1956: $}
1957: \;\;\;\; , \;\;\;\;\;\;
1958: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{R \equiv \frac{1}{2} \left(1 + \gc \right)}
1959: \; $} \; ,
1960: \label{proj}
1961: \end{equation}
1962: which satisfy the usual properties of projection operators,
1963: \begin{eqnarray*}
1964: L + R &=& 1 \; ,\\
1965: R \, L = L \, R & = & 0 \; ,\\
1966: L^2 & = & L \; ,\\
1967: R^2 & = & R \; .
1968: \end{eqnarray*}
1969:
1970: For the conjugate spinors we have,
1971: \begin{eqnarray*}
1972: \bar{\psi}_L &=& (L \psi)^\dagger \gamma_0 = \psi^\dagger L^\dagger
1973: \gamma_0 = \psi^\dagger L \gamma_0 = \psi^\dagger \gamma_0 R =
1974: \bar{\psi} R \\
1975: \bar{\psi}_R &=& \bar{\psi} L \; .
1976: \end{eqnarray*}
1977:
1978: Let us make some general remarks. First of all, we should notice that
1979: fermion mass term mixes right-- and left--handed fermion components,
1980: \begin{equation}
1981: \bar{\psi} \psi = \bar{\psi}_R \psi_L + \bar{\psi}_L \psi_R \; .
1982: \label{m}
1983: \end{equation}
1984: On the other hand, the electromagnetic (vector) current, does not mix
1985: those components, {\it i.e.}
1986: \begin{equation}
1987: \bar{\psi} \g^\mu \psi = \bar{\psi}_R \g^\mu \psi_R + \bar{\psi}_L
1988: \g^\mu \psi_L \; .
1989: \label{v:cur}
1990: \end{equation}
1991: Finally, the $(V-A)$ fermionic weak current can be written in terms of the
1992: helicity states as,
1993: \begin{equation}
1994: \bar{\psi}_L \g^\mu \psi_L = \bar{\psi} R \g^\mu L \psi =
1995: \bar{\psi} \g^\mu L^2 \psi = \bar{\psi} \g^\mu L \psi =
1996: \frac{1}{2} \; \bar{\psi} \g^\mu (1 - \gc) \psi \; ,
1997: \label{va}
1998: \end{equation}
1999: what shows that only left--handed fermions play a r\^ole in weak
2000: interactions.
2001:
2002: %###############################################################################
2003:
2004: \subsection{Choosing the gauge group} \indent
2005:
2006: Let us investigate which gauge group would be able to unify the
2007: electromagnetic and weak interactions. We start with the charged weak
2008: current for leptons. Since electron--type and muon--type lepton
2009: numbers are separately conserved, they must form separate
2010: representations of the gauge group. Therefore, we refer as $\ell$ any
2011: lepton flavor ($\ell = e,\, \mu,\, \tau$), and the final Lagrangian
2012: will be given by a sum over all these flavors.
2013:
2014: From Eq.\ (\ref{va}), we see that the weak current (\ref{wea:cur}),
2015: for a generic lepton $\ell$, is given by,
2016: \begin{equation}
2017: J_\mu^+ = \bar{\ell} \g_\mu (1 - \gc) \nu = 2 \; \bar{\ell}_L \g_\mu
2018: \nu_L \; .
2019: \label{wea:cur:2}
2020: \end{equation}
2021:
2022: If we introduce the left--handed isospin doublet ($T = 1/2$),
2023: \begin{equation}
2024: \ld \equiv \left( \ba{c}
2025: \nu\\
2026: \ell
2027: \ea \right)_L =
2028: \left( \ba{c}
2029: L \, \nu\\
2030: L \, \ell
2031: \ea \right) =
2032: \left( \ba{c}
2033: \nu_L\\
2034: \ell_L
2035: \ea \right) \; ,
2036: \label{l}
2037: \end{equation}
2038: where the $T_3 = + 1/2$ and $T_3 = - 1/2$ components are the
2039: left--handed parts of the neutrino and of the charged lepton
2040: respectively. Since, there is no right--handed component for the
2041: neutrino \footnote{At this moment, we consider that the neutrinos
2042: are massless. The possible mass term for the neutrinos will be
2043: discussed later, Sec.\ \ref{sm:lag}.}, the right--handed part of the
2044: charged lepton is accommodated in a weak isospin singlet ($T =0$)
2045: \begin{equation}
2046: \rs \equiv R \, \ell = \ell_R \; .
2047: \label{r}
2048: \end{equation}
2049:
2050: The charged weak current (\ref{wea:cur:2}) can be written in terms of
2051: leptonic isospin currents:
2052: \[
2053: J_\mu^i = \bar{\ld} \; \g_\mu \; \frac{\tau^i}{2} \; \ld \; ,
2054: \]
2055: where $\tau^i$ are the Pauli matrices. In a explicit form,
2056: \begin{eqnarray*}
2057: J_\mu^1 &=& \frac{1}{2} ( \bar{\nu}_L \;\; \bar{\ell}_L) \; \g_\mu
2058: \left( \ba{cc}
2059: 0 & 1 \\
2060: 1 & 0
2061: \ea \right)
2062: \left( \ba{c}
2063: \nu_L\\
2064: \ell_L
2065: \ea \right)
2066: = \frac{1}{2} \left(\bar{\ell}_L \g_\mu \nu_L +
2067: \bar{\nu}_L \g_\mu \ell_L
2068: \right) \; , \\
2069: J_\mu^2 &=& \frac{1}{2} ( \bar{\nu}_L \;\; \bar{\ell}_L) \; \g_\mu
2070: \left( \ba{cc}
2071: 0 & -i \\
2072: i & 0
2073: \ea \right)
2074: \left( \ba{c}
2075: \nu_L\\
2076: \ell_L
2077: \ea \right)
2078: = \frac{i}{2} \left( \bar{\ell}_L \g_\mu \nu_L -
2079: \bar{\nu}_L \g_\mu \ell_L \right) \; , \\
2080: J_\mu^3 &=& \frac{1}{2} ( \bar{\nu}_L \;\; \bar{\ell}_L) \; \g_\mu
2081: \left( \ba{cc}
2082: 1 & 0 \\
2083: 0 & -1
2084: \ea \right)
2085: \left( \ba{c}
2086: \nu_L\\
2087: \ell_L
2088: \ea \right) =
2089: \frac{1}{2} \left( \bar{\nu}_L \g_\mu \nu_L -
2090: \bar{\ell}_L \g_\mu \ell_L \right) \; .\\
2091: \end{eqnarray*}
2092:
2093: %###############################################################################
2094:
2095: Therefore, the weak charged current (\ref{wea:cur:2}), that couples
2096: with intermediate vector boson $W^-_\mu$, can be written in terms of
2097: $J^1$ and $J^2$ as,
2098: \[
2099: J_\mu^+ = 2 \; \left( J_\mu^1 - i J_\mu^2\right) \; .
2100: \]
2101:
2102: In order to accommodate the third (neutral) current $J^3$, we can
2103: define the {\it hypercharge current} by,
2104: \[
2105: J_\mu^Y \equiv - \left( \bar{\ld} \; \g_\mu \; \ld +
2106: 2 \; \bar{\rs} \; \g_\mu \; \rs \right) =
2107: - \left( \bar{\nu}_L \g_\mu \nu_L +
2108: \bar{\ell}_L \g_\mu \ell_L +
2109: 2 \; \bar{\ell}_R \g_\mu \ell_R \right) \; .
2110: \]
2111:
2112: The {\it electromagnetic current} can be written as
2113: \[
2114: J_\mu^{\text{em}} = - \; \bar{\ell} \; \g_\mu \; \ell
2115: = - \left(\bar{\ell}_L \g_\mu \ell_L + \bar{\ell}_R \g_\mu \ell_R \right)
2116: = J_\mu^{3} + \frac{1}{2} J_\mu^Y \; .
2117: \]
2118:
2119: We should notice that neither $T_3$ nor $Q$ commute with $T_{1,2}$.
2120: However, the `charges' associated to the currents $J^i$ and $J^Y$,
2121: \[
2122: T^i = \int d^3 x \; J_0^i \;\;\;\;\;\; \mbox{and} \;\;\;\;\;\;
2123: Y = \int d^3 x \; J_0^Y \; ,
2124: \]
2125: satisfy the algebra of the $SU(2) \otimes U(1)$ group:
2126: \[
2127: [T^i , T^j] = i \; \epsilon^{ijk} T^k \;\; , \;\;\;\; \mbox{and}
2128: \;\;\;\;
2129: [T^i, Y] = 0 \; ,
2130: \]
2131: and the Gell-Mann--Nishijima relation between $Q$ and $T_3$
2132: emerges in a natural way,
2133: \begin{equation}
2134: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{Q = T_3 + \frac{1}{2} Y} \; $} \; .
2135: \label{gell:nish}
2136: \end{equation}
2137: With the aid of (\ref{gell:nish}) we can define the weak hypercharge
2138: of the doublet ($Y_{\ld} = -1$) and of the fermion singlet ($Y_{\rs}
2139: = -2$).
2140:
2141: Let us follow our previous recipe for building a general gauge
2142: theory. We have just chosen the candidate for the gauge group,
2143: \[
2144: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{SU(2)_L \otimes U(1)_Y} \; $} \; .
2145: \]
2146: The next step is to introduce {\it gauge fields} corresponding to
2147: each generator, that is,
2148: \begin{eqnarray*}
2149: SU(2)_L \;\; & \longrightarrow & \;\;
2150: W^1_\mu \; , \;\; W^2_\mu \; , \;\; W^3_\mu \; ,\\
2151: U(1)_Y \;\; & \longrightarrow & \;\; B_\mu \; .
2152: \end{eqnarray*}
2153:
2154: Defining the {\it strength tensors} for the gauge fields according to
2155: (\ref{abe:f}) and (\ref{nonab:f}),
2156: \begin{eqnarray*}
2157: W_{\mu\nu}^i & \equiv & \del_\mu W^i_\nu - \del_\nu W^i_\mu + g \,
2158: \epsilon^{ijk} \, W_\mu^j W_\nu^k \; , \\
2159: B_{\mu\nu} & \equiv & \del_\mu B_\nu - \del_\nu B_\mu \; ,
2160: \end{eqnarray*}
2161: we can write the free Lagrangian for the gauge fields following the
2162: results (\ref{abe:l}) and (\ref{nonab:l}),
2163: \begin{equation}
2164: \lag_{\text{gauge}} = - \frac{1}{4} W_{\mu\nu}^i W^{i \;\; \mu\nu} -
2165: \frac{1}{4} B_{\mu\nu} B^{\mu\nu} \; .
2166: \label{l:gau}
2167: \end{equation}
2168:
2169: For the leptons, we write the free Lagrangian,
2170: \begin{eqnarray}
2171: \lag_{\text{leptons}} &=& \bar{\rs} \; i \dels \; \rs +
2172: \bar{\ld} \; i \dels \; \ld \nonumber \\
2173: &=& \bar{\ell}_R \; i \dels \; \ell_R +
2174: \bar{\ell}_L \; i \dels \; \ell_L +
2175: \bar{\nu}_L \; i \dels \; \nu_L \nonumber \\
2176: &=& \bar{\ell} \; i \dels \; \ell + \bar{\nu} \; i \dels \;
2177: \nu \; .
2178: \label{free:fer}
2179: \end{eqnarray}
2180: Remember that a mass term for the fermions (\ref{m}) mixes the
2181: right-- and left--components and would break the gauge invariance of
2182: the theory from the very beginning.
2183:
2184: The next step is to introduce the fermion--gauge boson coupling via
2185: the {\it covariant derivative}, {\it i.e.}
2186: \begin{equation}
2187: \ld \;\; : \;\; \;\; \del_\mu + i \; \frac{g}{2} \; { \tau^i} \; W^i_\mu
2188: + i \; \frac{g'}{2} \; { Y} B_\mu \; ,
2189: \label{cov:l}
2190: \end{equation}
2191: \begin{equation}
2192: \rs \;\; : \;\; \;\; \del_\mu + i \; \frac{g'}{2}\; { Y} \; B_\mu \; ,
2193: \label{cov:r}
2194: \end{equation}
2195: where $g$ and $g'$ are the coupling constant associated to the groups
2196: $SU(2)_L$ and $U(1)_Y$ respectively, and
2197: \begin{equation}
2198: Y_{\ld_\ell} = -1 \;\;\; , \;\;\;\;\;\; Y_{\rs_\ell} = -2 \; .
2199: \label{hyp:lep}
2200: \end{equation}
2201:
2202: Therefore, the fermion Lagrangian (\ref{free:fer}) becomes
2203: \begin{eqnarray}
2204: \lag_{\text{leptons}} & \longrightarrow & \lag_{\text{leptons}}
2205: + \;
2206: \bar{\ld} \; i \g^\mu \left( i\frac{g}{2} \tau^i W^i_\mu
2207: + i \frac{g'}{2} Y B_\mu \right ) \ld \nonumber \\
2208: && \; + \; \bar{\rs} \; i \g^\mu \left(i \frac{g'}{2} Y B_\mu \right) \rs
2209: \; .
2210: \label{free:fer1}
2211: \end{eqnarray}
2212:
2213: Let us first pick up just the ``left'' piece of (\ref{free:fer1}),
2214: \[
2215: \lag_{\text{leptons}}^{\ld} = - g \; \bar{\ld} \; \g^\mu
2216: \left(\frac{\tau^1}{2} W^1_\mu + \frac{\tau^2}{2} W^2_\mu \right) \ld
2217: - g \; \bar{\ld} \; \g^\mu \frac{\tau^3}{2} \ld \; W^3_\mu
2218: - \frac{g'}{2} Y \bar{\ld} \; \g^\mu \ld \; B_\mu \; .
2219: \]
2220:
2221: The first term is {\it charged} and can be written as
2222: \[
2223: \lag_{\text{leptons}}^{\ld (\pm)} =
2224: - \frac{g}{2} \; \bar{\ld} \; \g^\mu
2225: \left( \ba{cc}
2226: 0 & W^1_\mu - i W^2_\mu \\
2227: W^1_\mu + i W^2_\mu & 0
2228: \ea \right) \ld \; .
2229: \]
2230:
2231: This suggests the definition of the {\it charged gauge bosons} as
2232: \begin{equation}
2233: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{W^\pm_\mu =
2234: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (W_\mu^1 \mp W_\mu^2)} \; $} \; ,
2235: \label{w}
2236: \end{equation}
2237: in such a way that
2238: \begin{equation}
2239: \lag_{\text{leptons}}^{\ld (\pm)} = - { \frac{g}{2\sqrt{2}}}
2240: \left[ \bar{\nu} \g^\mu (1 - \gc) \ell \; W^+_\mu +
2241: \bar{\ell} \g^\mu (1 - \gc) \nu \; W^-_\mu \right] \; ,
2242: \label{l:w2}
2243: \end{equation}
2244: reproduces exactly the $(V-A)$ structure of the weak charged current .
2245:
2246: When we compare the Lagrangian (\ref{l:w2}) with (\ref{l:w}) and take
2247: into account the result from low--energy phenomenology (\ref{gw})
2248: we see that $G_W = g/2\sqrt{2}$ and we obtain the
2249: relation
2250: \begin{equation}
2251: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{\frac{g}{2\sqrt{2}} =
2252: \left(\frac{M_W^2 G_F}{\sqrt{2}} \right)^{1/2}} \; $} \; .
2253: \label{g:rel}
2254: \end{equation}
2255:
2256: %###############################################################################
2257:
2258: Now let us treat the neutral piece of
2259: $\lag_{\text{leptons}}$ (\ref{free:fer1}) that contains both left and
2260: right fermion components,
2261: \begin{eqnarray}
2262: \lag_{\text{leptons}}^{(\ld + \rs) (0)} &=&
2263: - g \; { \bar{\ld} \; \left( \g^\mu \frac{\tau^3}{2} \right)
2264: \ld} \; W^3_\mu
2265: - \frac{g'}{2} \; { \left( \bar{\ld} \g^\mu Y \ld +
2266: \bar{\rs} \g^\mu Y \rs \right) } B_\mu
2267: \nonumber \\
2268: &=& - g \; { J_3^\mu} \; W^3_\mu -
2269: \frac{g'}{2} \; { J_Y^\mu} \; B_\mu \; ,
2270: \label{l:0}
2271: \end{eqnarray}
2272: where the currents $J_3$ and $J_Y$ have been defined before,
2273: \begin{eqnarray*}
2274: J_3^\mu &=& \frac{1}{2} (\bar{\nu}_L \g^\mu \nu_L - \bar{\ell}_L \g^\mu \ell_L)
2275: \\
2276: J_Y^\mu &=& - \left(\bar{\nu}_L \g^\mu \nu_L + \bar{\ell}_L \g^\mu \ell_L
2277: + 2 \bar{\ell}_R \g^\mu \ell_R \right) \; .
2278: \end{eqnarray*}
2279:
2280: Note that the `charges' respect the Gell-Mann--Nishijima relation
2281: (\ref{gell:nish}) and currents satisfy,
2282: \[
2283: J_{\text{em}} = J_3 + \frac{1}{2} J_Y \; .
2284: \]
2285:
2286: In order to obtain the right combination of fields that couples to the
2287: electromagnetic current, let us make the rotation in the neutral
2288: fields, defining the new fields $A$ and $Z$ by,
2289: \begin{equation}
2290: \left( \ba{c}
2291: { A_\mu} \\
2292: { Z_\mu}
2293: \ea \right) =
2294: \left( \ba{cc}
2295: \cos \theta_W & \sin\theta_W \\
2296: -\sin\theta_W & \cos \theta_W
2297: \ea \right)
2298: \left( \ba{c}
2299: B_\mu \\
2300: W^3_\mu
2301: \ea \right) \; ,
2302: \label{az}
2303: \end{equation}
2304: or,
2305: \begin{eqnarray*}
2306: W^3_\mu &=& \sin\theta_W A_\mu + \cos \theta_W Z_\mu \; , \\
2307: B_\mu &=& \cos \theta_W A_\mu - \sin\theta_W Z_\mu \; ,
2308: \end{eqnarray*}
2309: where $\theta_W$ is called the Weinberg angle and the relation with
2310: the $SU(2)$ and $U(1)$ coupling constants hold,
2311: \begin{equation}
2312: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{\sin\theta_W =
2313: \frac{g'}{\sqrt{g^2 + {g'}^2}}} \; $} \;\;\;\;\;
2314: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{\cos\theta_W =
2315: \frac{g}{\sqrt{g^2 + {g'}^2}}} \; $} \; .
2316: \label{theta}
2317: \end{equation}
2318:
2319: In terms of the new fields, the neutral part of the fermion
2320: Lagrangian (\ref{l:0}) becomes
2321: \begin{eqnarray}
2322: \lag_{\text{leptons}}^{(\ld + \rs) (0)} &=& - ( { g \sin\theta_W}
2323: J_3^\mu +
2324: \frac{1}{2} { g' \cos \theta_W} J_Y^\mu) A_\mu
2325: \nonumber \\
2326: && + (- g \cos\theta_W J_3^\mu + \frac{1}{2} g' \sin \theta_W J_Y^\mu) Z_\mu
2327: \nonumber \\
2328: &=& - { g \sin\theta_W} \; { (\bar{\ell} \g^\mu \ell)}
2329: \; A_\mu \nonumber \\
2330: && - \frac{g}{2 \cos\theta_W} \sum_{\psi_i = \nu, \ell}
2331: \bar{\psi_i} \g^\mu (g_V^i - g_A^i \gc) \psi_i Z_\mu \; ,
2332: \label{neu:cur}
2333: \end{eqnarray}
2334: and we easily identify the electromagnetic current coupled to the
2335: photon field $A_\mu$ and the {\it electromagnetic charge},
2336: \begin{equation}
2337: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{e = g \sin\theta_W = g' \cos\theta_W} \; $}
2338: \; .
2339: \label{e}
2340: \end{equation}
2341:
2342: The Standard Model introduces a new ingredient, weak interactions
2343: without change of charge, and make a specific prediction for the
2344: vector ($V$) and axial ($A$) couplings of the $Z$ to the fermions,
2345: \begin{equation}
2346: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{g_V^i \equiv T_3^i - 2 Q_i \sin^2\theta_W} \;
2347: $} \; ,
2348: \label{gv}
2349: \end{equation}
2350: \begin{equation}
2351: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{g_A^i \equiv T_3^i} \; $} \; .
2352: \label{ga}
2353: \end{equation}
2354:
2355: This was a very successful prediction of the Standard Model since at
2356: that time we had no hint about this new kind of weak interaction.
2357: The experimental confirmation of the existence of weak neutral
2358: currents occurred more than five years after the model was proposed
2359: \cite{Hasert:73a}.
2360:
2361: %\newpage
2362: Up to now we have in the theory:
2363: \begin{itemize}
2364: \item 4 massless gauge fields $W^i_\mu$, $B_\mu$ or equivalently,
2365: $W^\pm_\mu$, $Z_\mu$, and $A_\mu$;
2366:
2367: \item 2 massless fermions: $\nu$, $\ell$.
2368: \end{itemize}
2369:
2370: The next step will be to add scalar fields in order to break
2371: spontaneously the symmetry and use the Higgs mechanism to give mass
2372: to the three weak intermediate vector bosons, making sure that the
2373: photon remains massless.
2374:
2375: %###############################################################################
2376:
2377: \subsection{The Higgs Mechanism and the $W$ and $Z$ mass} \indent
2378:
2379: In order to apply the Higgs mechanism to give mass to $W^\pm$ and
2380: $Z^0$, let us introduce the scalar doublet
2381: \begin{equation}
2382: \Phi \equiv \left( \ba{c}
2383: \phi^+\\
2384: \phi^0
2385: \ea \right) \; .
2386: \label{phi}
2387: \end{equation}
2388: From the relation (\ref{gell:nish}), we verify that the hypercharge of
2389: the Higgs doublet is $Y = 1$. We introduce the Lagrangian
2390: \[
2391: \lag_{\text{scalar}} = \del_\mu \Phi^\dagger \; \del^\mu \Phi -
2392: V(\Phi^\dagger\Phi) \; ,
2393: \]
2394: where the potential is given by
2395: \begin{equation}
2396: V(\Phi^\dagger\Phi) = \mu^2 \; \Phi^\dagger\Phi +
2397: \lambda \; (\Phi^\dagger\Phi)^2 \; .
2398: \label{hig:pot}
2399: \end{equation}
2400:
2401: In order to maintain the gauge invariance under the $SU(2)_L \otimes
2402: U(1)_Y$, we should introduce the covariant derivative
2403: \[
2404: \del_\mu \to D_\mu = \del_\mu + i \; g \frac{\tau^i}{2} W^i_\mu
2405: + i \; \frac{g'}{2} Y B_\mu \; .
2406: \]
2407:
2408: We can choose the {vacuum expectation value} of the Higgs field as,
2409: \[
2410: <\Phi>_0 = \left( \ba{c}
2411: 0\\
2412: v/\sqrt{2}
2413: \ea \right) \; ,
2414: \]
2415: where
2416: \begin{equation}
2417: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{
2418: v = \sqrt{ - \frac{\mu^2}{\lambda} }} \; $} \; .
2419: \label{v}
2420: \end{equation}
2421:
2422: Since we want to preserve the exact electromagnetic symmetry to
2423: maintain the electric charged conserved, we must break the original
2424: symmetry group as
2425: \[
2426: SU(2)_L \otimes U(1)_Y \to U(1)_{\text{em}} \; ,
2427: \]
2428: {\it i.e.} after the spontaneous symmetry breaking, the sub--group $
2429: U(1)_{\text{em}}$, of dimension $1$, should remain as a symmetry of
2430: the vacuum.
2431:
2432: In this case the corresponding gauge boson, the photon, will remain
2433: massless, according to results of section \ref{hig:nonabe}. We can
2434: verify that our choice let indeed the vacuum invariant under
2435: $U(1)_{\text{em}}$. This invariance requires that
2436: \[
2437: e^{i \alpha Q} <\Phi>_0 \; \simeq \; \left(1 + i \; \alpha \; Q \right)
2438: <\Phi>_0 \; = \; <\Phi>_0 \; ,
2439: \]
2440: or, the operator $Q$ annihilates the vacuum, $Q <\Phi>_0 \; = \; 0$.
2441: This is exactly what happens: the electric charge of the vacuum is
2442: zero,
2443: \begin{eqnarray*}
2444: Q <\Phi>_0 &=& \left( T_3 + \frac{1}{2} Y \right) <\Phi>_0
2445: \\
2446: &=& \frac{1}{2}\left[ \left( \ba{cc}
2447: 1 & 0 \\
2448: 0 & -1
2449: \ea \right) + \left( \ba{cc}
2450: 1 & 0 \\
2451: 0 & 1
2452: \ea \right) \right] \left( \ba{c}
2453: 0\\
2454: v/\sqrt{2}
2455: \ea \right) = 0 \; .
2456: \end{eqnarray*}
2457:
2458: The other gauge bosons, corresponding to the {\it broken generators}
2459: $T_1$, $T_2$, and $(T_3 - Y/2) = 2 T_3 - Q$ should acquire mass. In
2460: order to make this explicit, let us parametrize the Higgs doublet
2461: {\it c.f.} (\ref{par:phi}),
2462: \begin{eqnarray*}
2463: \Phi &\equiv& \exp\left( i \frac{\tau^i}{2} \frac{\chi_i}{v} \right)
2464: \left( \ba{c}
2465: 0\\
2466: (v + H)/\sqrt{2}
2467: \ea \right)
2468: \\
2469: &\simeq& <\Phi>_0 + \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}
2470: \left( \ba{c}
2471: \chi_2 + i \chi_1\\
2472: 2H - i \chi_3
2473: \ea \right) =
2474: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
2475: \left( \ba{c}
2476: i\sqrt{2} \omega^+\\
2477: v + H - i z^0
2478: \ea \right) \; .
2479: \end{eqnarray*}
2480: where {$\omega^\pm$} and {$z^0$} are the {Goldstone
2481: bosons}.
2482:
2483: Now, if we make a $SU(2)_L$ gauge transformation with {$\alpha_i =
2484: \chi_i/v$} (unitary gauge) the fields become
2485: \begin{equation}
2486: \Phi \to \Phi' =
2487: \exp\left(- i \frac{\tau^i}{2} \frac{\chi_i}{v} \right) \Phi
2488: = { \frac{(v + H)}{\sqrt{2}}
2489: \left( \ba{c}
2490: 0\\
2491: 1
2492: \ea \right) } \; .
2493: \label{hig:dou}
2494: \end{equation}
2495: and the scalar Lagrangian can be written in terms of these new field
2496: as
2497: \begin{eqnarray}
2498: \lag_{\text{scalar}} &=& \left|
2499: \left(\del_\mu + i g \frac{\tau^i}{2} W^i_\mu + i \frac{g'}{2} Y B_\mu
2500: \right) \frac{(v + H)}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \ba{c}
2501: 0\\
2502: 1
2503: \ea \right) \right|^2
2504: \nonumber \\
2505: && - \, \mu^2 \, \frac{(v + H)^2}{2} - \lambda \, \frac{(v + H)^4}{4}
2506: \; .
2507: \label{l:sca}
2508: \end{eqnarray}
2509:
2510: In terms of the physical fields $W^\pm$ (\ref{w}) and $Z^0$
2511: (\ref{az}) the first term of (\ref{l:sca}), that contain the
2512: vector bosons, is
2513: \begin{eqnarray}
2514: \left|
2515: \left( \ba{c}
2516: 0\\
2517: \del_\mu H/\sqrt{2}
2518: \ea \right) +
2519: i \frac{g}{2} (v + H) \left( \ba{c}
2520: W_\mu^+\\
2521: (-1/\sqrt{2}c_W) Z_\mu
2522: \ea \right) \right|^2
2523: \nonumber \\
2524: = \frac{1}{2} \del_\mu H \del^\mu H +
2525: \frac{g^2}{4} (v + H)^2 \left(W_\mu^+ W^{- \; \mu} +
2526: \frac{1}{2 c_W^2} Z_\mu Z^\mu \right) \; ,
2527: \label{l:sca:1}
2528: \end{eqnarray}
2529: where we defined $c_W \equiv \cos\theta_W$.
2530:
2531: The quadratic terms in the vector fields, are,
2532: \[
2533: \frac{g^2 v^2}{4} W_\mu^+ W^{- \; \mu} +
2534: \frac{g^2 v^2}{8\cos^2\theta_W} Z_\mu Z^\mu \; ,
2535: \]
2536: When compared with the usual mass terms for a charged and neutral
2537: vector bosons,
2538: \[
2539: M_W^2 W_\mu^+ W^{- \; \mu} + \frac{1}{2} M_Z^2 Z_\mu Z^\mu \; ,
2540: \]
2541: and we can easily identify
2542: \begin{equation}
2543: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{M_W = \frac{g v}{2}} \; $} \;\;\;\;\;
2544: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{M_Z = \frac{g v}{2 c_W} = \frac{M_W}{c_W}} \;
2545: $} \; .
2546: \label{mw:mz}
2547: \end{equation}
2548: We can see from (\ref{l:sca:1}) that no quadratic term in $A_\mu$
2549: appears, and therefore, the photon remains massless, as we could
2550: expect since the $U(1)_{\text{em}}$ remains as a symmetry of the
2551: theory.
2552:
2553: Taking into account the low--energy phenomenology via the relation
2554: (\ref{g:rel}), we obtain for the vacuum expectation value
2555: \begin{equation}
2556: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{v = \left( \sqrt{2} G_F\right )^{1/2}
2557: \simeq 246}$ GeV \; } \; ,
2558: \label{v:num}
2559: \end{equation}
2560: and the Standard Model predictions for the $W$ and $Z$ masses are
2561: \[
2562: M_W^2 = \frac{e^2}{4 s_W^2} v^2 = \frac{\pi \alpha}{s_W^2} v^2
2563: \simeq \left(\frac{37.2}{s_W} \; \mbox{GeV} \right)^2
2564: \sim (80 \; \mbox{GeV})^2 \; ,
2565: \]
2566: \[
2567: M_Z^2 \simeq \left(\frac{37.2}{s_W c_W} \; \mbox{GeV}\right)^2 \sim
2568: (90 \; \mbox{GeV})^2 \; ,
2569: \]
2570: where we assumed a experimental value for $s_W^2 \equiv \sin^2\theta_W
2571: \sim 0.22$.
2572:
2573: We can learn from (\ref{l:sca}) that one scalar boson, out of the
2574: four degrees of freedom introduced in (\ref{phi}), is remnant of the
2575: symmetry breaking. The search for the so called Higgs boson, remains
2576: as one of the major challenges of the experimental high energy
2577: physics, and will be discussed later in this course (see Sec.\
2578: \ref{higgs:bos}).
2579:
2580: The second term of (\ref{l:sca}) gives rise to terms involving
2581: exclusively the scalar field $H$, namely,
2582: \begin{equation}
2583: -\frac{1}{2} (- 2 \mu^2) H^2 + \frac{1}{4} \mu^2 v^2
2584: \left(\frac{4}{v^3} H^3 + \frac{1}{v^4} H^4 - 1 \right) \; .
2585: \label{h:self}
2586: \end{equation}
2587:
2588: In (\ref{h:self}) we can also identify the Higgs boson mass term with
2589: \begin{equation}
2590: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{M_H = \sqrt{- 2 \mu^2}} \; $} \; ,
2591: \label{mh}
2592: \end{equation}
2593: and the self--interactions of the $H$ field. In spite of predicting
2594: the existence of the Higgs boson, the Standard Model does not give a
2595: hint on the value of its mass since $\mu^2$ is {\it a priori}
2596: unknown.
2597:
2598: %###############################################################################
2599:
2600: \section{Some General Remarks} \label{remarks} \indent
2601:
2602: Let us address some general features of the Standard Model:
2603:
2604: \subsection{On the mass matrix of the neutral bosons} \indent
2605:
2606: In order to have a different view of the rotation (\ref{az}) we
2607: analyze the mass term for $W^3_\mu$ and $B_\mu$ in (\ref{l:sca}).
2608: It can be written as
2609: \begin{eqnarray*}
2610: \lag^{W^3-B}_{\text{scalar}} &=& \frac{v^2}{2} \left|
2611: \left(g \frac{\tau^3}{2} W^3_\mu + \frac{g'}{2} Y B_\mu
2612: \right) \left( \ba{c}
2613: 0\\
2614: 1
2615: \ea \right) \right|^2
2616: \\
2617: &=& \frac{v^2}{8} \left[
2618: \left( B_\mu \;\; W^3_\mu \right)
2619: \left( \ba{cc}
2620: g^{\prime \, 2} & - g g^\prime \\
2621: - g g^\prime & g^2
2622: \ea \right)
2623: \left( \ba{c}
2624: B^\mu \\
2625: W^{3 \, \mu}
2626: \ea \right) \right] \; .
2627: \end{eqnarray*}
2628:
2629: The mass matrix is not diagonal and has two eigenvalues, namely,
2630: \[
2631: { 0} \;\;\;\; \mbox{and} \;\;\;\;
2632: { \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)
2633: \frac{(g^2 + g^{\prime \, 2})v^2}{4} =
2634: \frac{1}{2} M_Z^2 } \; ,
2635: \]
2636: which correspond exactly to the photon ($M_A =0$) and $Z$ mass
2637: (\ref{mw:mz}).
2638:
2639: We obtain a better understanding of the meaning of the Weinberg
2640: angle rotation by noticing that the same rotation matrix used to
2641: define the physical fields in (\ref{az}),
2642: \[
2643: R_W =
2644: \left( \ba{cc}
2645: \cos \theta_W & \sin\theta_W \\
2646: -\sin\theta_W & \cos \theta_W
2647: \ea \right) \; ,
2648: \]
2649: is the one that diagonalizes the mass matrix for the neutral gauge
2650: bosons, {\it i.e.}
2651: \[
2652: R_W \; \frac{v^2}{4} \left( \ba{cc}
2653: g^{\prime \, 2} & - g g^\prime \\
2654: - g g^\prime & g^2
2655: \ea \right) R_W^T =
2656: \left( \ba{cc}
2657: 0 & 0 \\
2658: 0 & M_Z^2
2659: \ea \right) \; .
2660: \]
2661:
2662: %###############################################################################
2663:
2664: \subsection{On the $\rho$ Parameter}\indent
2665:
2666: We can define a dimensionless parameter $\rho$ by:
2667: \[
2668: \rho = \frac{M_W^2}{\cos^2 \theta_W M_Z^2} \; ,
2669: \]
2670: that represents the relative strength of the neutral and charged
2671: effective Lagrangians
2672: ($J^{0 \; \mu} J^0_\mu/J^{+ \; \mu} J^-_\mu$),
2673: \[
2674: \rho = \frac{g^2}{8 \cos^2 \theta_W M_Z^2}\left/ \frac{g^2}{8
2675: M_W^2}\right. \; .
2676: \]
2677:
2678: In the Standard Model, at tree level, the $\rho$ parameter is 1. This
2679: is not a general consequence of the gauge invariance of the model, but
2680: it is, in fact, a successful prediction of the model.
2681:
2682: In a model with an arbitrary number of Higgs multiplets $\phi_i$
2683: with isospin $T_i$ and third component $T_i^3$, and vacuum expectation
2684: value $v_i$, the $\rho$ parameter is given by
2685: \[
2686: \rho =
2687: \frac{\sum_i \left[ T_i (T_i + 1) - (T_{3 \; i})^2 \right] v_i^2}{2
2688: \sum_i (T_{3 \; i})^2 v_i^2} \; ,
2689: \]
2690: which is 1 for an arbitrary number of doublets.
2691:
2692: Therefore, $\rho$ represents a good test for the isospin structure of
2693: the Higgs sector. As we will see later, it is also sensitive to
2694: radiative corrections.
2695:
2696: %###############################################################################
2697:
2698: \subsection{On the Gauge Fixing Term} \indent
2699:
2700: The unitary gauge chosen in (\ref{hig:dou}) has the great
2701: advantage of making the physical spectrum clear: the $W^\pm$ and $Z^0$
2702: become massive and no massless Goldstone boson appears in the
2703: spectrum.
2704:
2705: In this gauge the vector boson ($V$) propagator is given by
2706: \[
2707: P_{\mu\nu}^U (V) = \frac{-i}{q^2 - M_V^2} \left(g_{\mu\nu} -
2708: { \frac{q_{\mu} q_{\nu}}{M_V^2} } \right) \; .
2709: \]
2710:
2711: Notice that $P_{\mu\nu}^U$ does {\it not} go like $\sim 1/q^2$ as $q
2712: \to \infty$ due to the term proportional to $q_{\mu} q_{\nu}$. This
2713: feature has some very unpleasant consequences. First of all there are
2714: very complicated cancellations in the invariant amplitudes involving
2715: the vector boson propagation at high energies. More dramatic is the
2716: fact that it is very hard to prove the renormalizability of the
2717: theory since it makes use of power counting analysis in the loop
2718: diagrams.
2719:
2720: A way out to this problem \cite{Hooft:71,Fujikawa:72} is to add a {\it
2721: gauge--fixing} term to the original Lagrangian,
2722: \[
2723: \lag_{\text{gf}} = -\frac{1}{2}
2724: \left(2 G_W^+ G_W^- + G_Z^{\; 2} + G_A^{\; 2} \right) \; ,
2725: \]
2726: with
2727: \begin{eqnarray*}
2728: G_W^\pm &=& \frac{1}{\sqrt{\xi_W}} \left(\del^\mu W^\pm_\mu \mp i
2729: \xi_W M_W \omega^\pm \right) \; , \\
2730: G_Z &=& \frac{1}{\sqrt{\xi_Z}} \left(\del^\mu Z_\mu -
2731: \xi_Z M_Z z \right) \; , \\
2732: G_A &=& \frac{1}{\sqrt{\xi_A}} \del^\mu A_\mu \; ,
2733: \end{eqnarray*}
2734: where $ \omega^\pm$ and $z$ are the Goldstone bosons. This is called
2735: the R$_\xi$ gauge.
2736:
2737: Notice, for instance, that,
2738: \begin{eqnarray*}
2739: - \frac{1}{2} G_Z^{\; 2} &=& - \frac{1}{2 \xi_Z} (\del_\mu Z^\mu -
2740: \xi_Z M_Z z)^2 \\
2741: &=& \frac{1}{2} Z_\mu \left( \frac{1}{\xi_Z} \del^\mu \del^\nu
2742: \right)Z_\nu
2743: - \frac{1}{2} \; \xi_Z \; M_Z^2 \; z^2 + M_Z \; z \; \del^\mu Z_\mu \; ,
2744: \end{eqnarray*}
2745: where the last term that mixes the Goldstone ($z$) and the vector
2746: boson ($\del^\mu Z_\mu$) is canceled by an identical term that comes
2747: from the scalar Lagrangian [see Eq.\ (\ref{lag:com:2})].
2748:
2749: In the R$_\xi$ gauge the vector boson propagators is
2750: \begin{equation}
2751: P_{\mu\nu}^{R_\xi} (V) = \frac{-i}{q^2 - M_V^2} \left[ g_{\mu\nu} -
2752: (1 - \xi_V) \frac{q_{\mu} q_{\nu}}{q^2 - \xi_V M_V^2} \right] \; .
2753: \label{rx}
2754: \end{equation}
2755:
2756: In this gauge the Goldstone bosons, with mass $\sqrt{\xi_V} M_V$, remain in
2757: the spectrum and their propagators are given by,
2758: \[
2759: P^{R_\xi} (GB) = \frac{i}{q^2 - \xi_V M_V^2} \; .
2760: \]
2761: and the physical Higgs propagator remains the same.
2762:
2763: In the limit of $\xi_V \to \infty$ the Goldstone bosons disappear and
2764: the unitary gauge is recovered. Other gauge choices like Landau gauge
2765: ($\xi_V \to 0$) and Feynman gauge ($\xi_V \to 1$) are contained in
2766: (\ref{rx}). Therefore, all physical processes should not depend on the
2767: parameter $\xi_V$.
2768:
2769: %###############################################################################
2770:
2771: \subsection{On the Measurement of $\sin^2\theta_W$ at Low Energies}
2772: \indent
2773:
2774: The value of the Weinberg angle is not predicted by the Standard
2775: Model and should be extract from the experimental data. Once we have
2776: measured $\theta_W$ (and of course, $e$) the value of the $SU(2)_L$
2777: and $U(1)_Y$ coupling constants are determined via (\ref{e}).
2778:
2779: At low energies the value of $\sin^2\theta_W$ can be obtained from
2780: different reactions. For instance:
2781:
2782: $\bullet$ The cross section for elastic neutrino--lepton
2783: scattering
2784: \[
2785: \stackrel{\mbox{$\nu_\mu$}}{\mbox{$\bar{\nu}_\mu$}} + \; e \; \to \;\;
2786: \stackrel{\mbox{$\nu_\mu$}}{\mbox{$\bar{\nu}_\mu$}} + \; e \; ,
2787: \]
2788: which involve a $t$--channel $Z^0$ exchange is given by
2789: \[
2790: \sigma = \frac{G_F^2 M_e E_\nu}{2 \pi}
2791: \left[ \left(g_V^e \pm g_A^e \right)^2 +
2792: \frac{1}{3} \left( g_V^e \mp g_A^e \right)^2 \right] \; .
2793: \]
2794: The vector and axial couplings of the electron to the $Z$ are
2795: given by (\ref{gv}) and (\ref{ga}),
2796: \[
2797: g_V^e = -\frac{1}{2} + 2 \; { \sin^2\theta_W}
2798: \;\; , \;\;\;\;
2799: g_A^e = -\frac{1}{2} \; ,
2800: \]
2801: and depend on the $\sin^2\theta_W$. For $\nu_e$ reaction we should
2802: make the substitution $g_{V,A}^e \to (g_{V,A}^e + 1)$ since in this
2803: case there is also a $W$ exchange contribution. When the ratio $\sigma
2804: (\nu_\mu e)/\sigma (\bar{\nu}_\mu e)$ is measured the systematic
2805: uncertainties cancel out and yields $\sin^2\theta_W = 0.221 \pm 0.008$
2806: \cite{pdg:98}.
2807:
2808: $\bullet$ Deep inelastic neutrino scattering from isoscalar targets
2809: ($N$). The ratio between the neutral ($NC$) and charged ($CC$) current
2810: cross sections
2811: \[
2812: R_{\nu (\bar{\nu})} \equiv \frac{\sigma^{\text{NC}}[\nu (\bar{\nu}) N]}
2813: {\sigma^{\text{CC}}[\nu (\bar{\nu}) N]}
2814: \; ,
2815: \]
2816: depends on the $\sin^2\theta_W$ as
2817: \[
2818: R_{\nu ({ \bar{\nu}})} \simeq \frac{1}{2} -
2819: { \sin^2\theta_W} +
2820: \frac{5}{9} [1 + r { (1/r)}] \; { \sin^4\theta_W} \; ,
2821: \]
2822: with $r \equiv \sigma^{\text{CC}}(\bar{\nu} N)/
2823: \sigma^{\text{CC}}(\nu N)\simeq 0.44$. The measurement of these
2824: reactions yields $\sin^2\theta_W = 0.226 \pm 0.004$ \cite{pdg:98}.
2825:
2826: $\bullet$ {Atomic parity violation}. The $Z^0$ mediated
2827: electron--nucleus interaction in cesium, thallium, lead and
2828: bismuth can be described by the interaction Hamiltonian,
2829: \[
2830: {\cal H} = \frac{G_F}{2\sqrt{2}} \; Q_W \; \gc \;
2831: \rho_{\, _{\text{nuc}}} \; ,
2832: \]
2833: with $Q_W$ being the ``weak charge'' that depends on the Weinberg
2834: angle,
2835: \[
2836: Q_W \simeq Z (1 - 4 \; { \sin^2\theta_W}) - N \; ,
2837: \]
2838: where $Z(N)$ is the number of protons (neutrons). This measurement
2839: furnishes $\sin^2\theta_W = 0.220 \pm 0.003$ \cite{pdg:98}.
2840:
2841: Nevertheless, the most precise measurements of the Weinberg angle are
2842: obtained at high energies, for instance in electron--positron
2843: collisions at the $Z$ pole (see section \ref{z:phy}).
2844:
2845: %###############################################################################
2846:
2847: \subsection{On the Lepton Mass} \indent
2848:
2849: Note that the charged lepton is still massless, since
2850: \[
2851: M_\ell \; \bar{\ell} \; \ell = M_\ell \; (\bar{\ell}_R \; \ell_L +
2852: \bar{\ell}_L \; \ell_R) \; ,
2853: \]
2854: mixes $L$ and $R$ components and breaks gauge invariance. A way to
2855: give mass in a gauge invariant way is via the Yukawa coupling of the
2856: leptons with the Higgs field (\ref{hig:dou}), that is,
2857: \begin{eqnarray}
2858: \lag_{\text{yuk}}^\ell &=& - G_\ell
2859: \left[ \bar{\rs} \; \left( \Phi^\dagger \; \ld \right) +
2860: \left( \bar{\ld} \; \Phi \right) \; \rs \right]
2861: \nonumber \\
2862: &=& - G_\ell \frac{(v + H)}{\sqrt{2}}
2863: \left[ \bar{\ell}_R \; (0 \;\;\; 1) \left( \ba{c}
2864: \nu_L\\
2865: \ell_L
2866: \ea \right) +
2867: (\bar{\nu_L} \;\;\; \bar{\ell_L}) \left( \ba{c}
2868: 0\\
2869: 1
2870: \ea \right) \ell_R \right]
2871: \nonumber \\
2872: &=& - \frac{G_\ell \; v}{\sqrt{2}} \; \bar{\ell} \; \ell -
2873: \frac{G_\ell}{\sqrt{2}} \; \bar{\ell} \; \ell \; H \; .
2874: \label{yuk:lep}
2875: \end{eqnarray}
2876:
2877: Thus, we can identify the charged lepton mass,
2878: \begin{equation}
2879: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{M_\ell = \frac{G_\ell \; v}{\sqrt{2}}} \; $}
2880: \; .
2881: \label{ml}
2882: \end{equation}
2883:
2884: We notice that this procedure is able to generate a mass term for the
2885: fermion in a gauge invariant way. However, it does not specify the
2886: value of the mass since the Yukawa constant $G_\ell$ introduced in
2887: (\ref{yuk:lep}) is arbitrary.
2888:
2889: As a consequence, we obtain the Higgs--lepton coupling with strength,
2890: \begin{equation}
2891: \fbox{$ \; \displaystyle{C_{\bar{\ell}\ell H} = \frac{M_\ell}{v}} \; $} \; ,
2892: \label{hl}
2893: \end{equation}
2894: which is a precise prediction of the Standard Model that should also
2895: be checked experimentally.
2896:
2897: %###############################################################################
2898:
2899: \subsection{On the Cross Sections $e^+ e^- \to W^+ W^-$} \indent
2900:
2901: A very interesting example on how the Standard Model is able to
2902: improve the unitarity behavior of the cross sections is provided by
2903: the $e^+ e^- \to W^+ W^-$ processes, which is presented in Fig.\ 5.
2904:
2905: The first two diagrams are the $t$--channel neutrino exchange,
2906: similar to the contribution of Fig.\ 1, and the $s$--channel photon
2907: exchange. Both of them are present in any theory containing charged
2908: intermediate vector boson. However, the Standard Model introduces two
2909: new contributions: the neutral current contribution ($Z$ exchange)
2910: and the Higgs boson exchange ($H$).
2911:
2912: The leading $p$--wave divergence of the neutrino diagram, which is
2913: proportional to $s$, is analogous to the one found in the reaction
2914: $\nu \bar{\nu} \to W^+ W^-$. However, in this case it is exactly
2915: canceled by the sum of the contributions of the photon ($A$) and the
2916: $Z$. This delicate canceling is a direct consequence of the gauge
2917: structure of the theory \cite{Llwellyn:73}.
2918:
2919: % eeww.eps
2920: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig05.eps}
2921: \vskip 0.3cm
2922: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
2923: \begin{center}
2924: {\it Fig.\ 5: Feynman diagram for the reaction $e^+ e^- \to W^+ W^-$.}
2925: \end{center}
2926: \end{minipage}
2927:
2928: \vskip 1cm
2929: However, the $s$--wave scattering amplitude is proportional to ($
2930: m_f \, \sqrt{s}$) and, therefore, is also divergent at high energies.
2931: This remaining divergence is canceled by the Higgs exchange diagram.
2932: Therefore, the existence of a scalar boson, that gives rise to a
2933: $s$--wave contribution and couples proportionally to the fermion mass,
2934: is an essential ingredient of the theory. In Quigg's words
2935: \cite{Quigg:83},
2936:
2937: \begin{center}
2938: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
2939: {\it ``If the Higgs boson did not exist, we should have to invent
2940: something very much like it.''}
2941: \end{minipage}
2942: \end{center}
2943:
2944:
2945: %###############################################################################
2946: %###############################################################################
2947: \newpage
2948: \section{Introducing the Quarks} \indent
2949:
2950: In order to introduce the strong interacting particles in the
2951: Standard Model we shall first examine what happens with the hadronic
2952: neutral current when the Cabibbo angle (\ref{cab:ang}) is taken into
2953: account.
2954: We can write the hadronic neutral current in terms of the quarks $u$
2955: and $d^\prime$,
2956: \begin{eqnarray*}
2957: J_\mu^H (0) &=& \bar{u} \g_\mu (1 - \gc) u +
2958: \bar{d} {}^\prime \g_\mu (1 - \gc) d^\prime
2959: \\
2960: &=&\bar{u} \g_\mu (1 - \gc) u + \cos^2\theta_C \; \bar{d} \g_\mu (1 - \gc) d
2961: + \sin^2\theta_C \; \bar{s} \g_\mu (1 - \gc) s
2962: \\
2963: &+& \cos\theta_C \sin\theta_C \; {
2964: \left[\bar{d} \g_\mu (1 - \gc) s + \bar{s} \g_\mu (1 - \gc) d \right]}
2965: \; .
2966: \end{eqnarray*}
2967: We should notice that the last term generates flavor changing neutral
2968: currents (FCNC), {\it i.e.} transitions like $d + \bar{s}
2969: \leftrightarrow \bar{d} + s$, with the same strength of the usual
2970: weak interaction. However, the observed FCNC processes are extremely
2971: small. For instance, the branching ratio of charged kaons decaying
2972: via charged current is,
2973: \[
2974: BR\left( K^+_{u\bar{s}} \to W^+ \to \mu^+ \nu\right) \simeq 63.5\% \; ,
2975: \]
2976: while process involving FCNC are very small \cite{pdg:98}:
2977: \begin{eqnarray*}
2978: BR\left(K^+_{u\bar{s}} \to \pi^+_{u\bar{d}} \nu \bar{\nu}
2979: \right) & \simeq & 4.2 \times 10^{-10} \; , \\
2980: BR\left(K^L_{d\bar{s}} \to \mu^+ \mu^-\right) & \simeq & 7.2
2981: \times 10^{-9} \; .
2982: \end{eqnarray*}
2983:
2984: In 1970, Glashow, Iliopoulos, and Maiani proposed the GIM mechanism
2985: \cite{Glashow:70}. They consider a fourth quark flavor, the charm
2986: ($c$), already introduced by Bjorken and Glashow in 1963. This extra
2987: quark completes the symmetry between quarks ($u$, $d$, $c$, and $s$)
2988: and leptons ($\nu_e$, $e$, $\nu_\mu$, and $\mu$) and suggests the
2989: introduction of the weak doublets
2990: \begin{eqnarray}
2991: \ld_U & \equiv & \left( \ba{c}
2992: u\\
2993: d^\prime
2994: \ea \right)_L =
2995: \left( \ba{c}
2996: u\\
2997: \cos\theta_C \; d + \sin\theta_C \; s
2998: \ea \right)_L
2999: \; , \nonumber \\
3000: \ld_C & \equiv & \left( \ba{c}
3001: c\\
3002: s^\prime
3003: \ea \right)_L =
3004: \left( \ba{c}
3005: c\\
3006: -\sin\theta_C \; d + \cos\theta_C \; s
3007: \ea \right)_L \; .
3008: \label{dou:qua}
3009: \end{eqnarray}
3010: and the right--handed quark singlets,
3011: \begin{equation}
3012: \rs_U \;\;\; , \;\;\;\;\; \rs_D \;\;\; , \;\;\;\;\;
3013: \rs_S \;\;\; , \;\;\;\;\; \rs_C \; .
3014: \label{sin:qua}
3015: \end{equation}
3016: Notice that now all particles, {\it i.e.} the $T_3 = \pm 1/2$
3017: fields, have also the right components to enable a mass term for
3018: them.
3019:
3020: In order to introduce the quarks in the Standard Model, we should
3021: start, just like in the leptonic case (\ref{free:fer}), from the free
3022: massless Dirac Lagrangian for the quarks,
3023: \begin{eqnarray}
3024: \lag_{\text{quarks}} &=& \bar{\ld}_U \; i \dels \; \ld_U
3025: + \bar{\ld}_C \; i \dels \; \ld_C \nonumber \\
3026: && + \bar{\rs}_U \; i \dels \; \rs_U + \cdots +
3027: \bar{\rs}_C \; i \dels \; \rs_C \; .
3028: \label{l:qua}
3029: \end{eqnarray}
3030:
3031: We should now introduce the gauge bosons interaction via the
3032: covariant derivatives (\ref{cov:l}) with the quark hypercharges
3033: determined by the Gell-Mann--Ni\-shi\-ji\-ma relation
3034: (\ref{gell:nish}), in such a way that the up--type quark charge is
3035: $+2/3$ and the down--type $-1/3$,
3036: \begin{equation}
3037: Y_{\ld_Q} = \frac{1}{3} \;\;\; , \;\;\;\;\;
3038: Y_{\rs_U} = \frac{4}{3} \;\;\; , \;\;\;\;\;
3039: Y_{\rs_D} = - \frac{2}{3} \; .
3040: \label{hyp:qua}
3041: \end{equation}
3042:
3043: Therefore, the charged weak couplings quark--gauge bosons, is given
3044: by,
3045: \begin{equation}
3046: \lag_{\text{quarks}}^{(\pm)} = \frac{g}{2\sqrt{2}}
3047: \left[ \bar{u} \g^\mu (1 - \gc) d^\prime +
3048: \bar{c} \g^\mu (1 - \gc) s^\prime \right]
3049: W_\mu^+ + \mbox{h.c.} \; .
3050: \label{cha:qua}
3051: \end{equation}
3052:
3053: On the other hand, the neutral current receives a new contribution
3054: proportional to \[ \bar{c} \g_\mu (1 - \gc) c + \bar{s} {}^\prime
3055: \g_\mu (1 - \gc) s^\prime \] and becomes diagonal in the quarks
3056: flavors, since the inconvenient terms of $J_\mu^H (0)$ cancels out,
3057: avoiding the phenomenological problem with the FCNC. For instance,
3058: for the process $K^L \to \mu^+ \mu^-$, the GIM mechanism introduces a
3059: new box contribution containing the $c$--quark that cancels most of
3060: the $u$--box contribution and gives a result in agreement with
3061: experiment \cite{Gaillard:74}.
3062:
3063: Finally, the neutral current interaction of the quarks become,
3064: \begin{equation}
3065: \lag_{\text{quarks}}^{(0)} = - \frac{g}{2c_W}
3066: \sum_{\psi_q = u, \cdots, c}
3067: \bar{\psi_q} \g^\mu (g_V^q - g_A^q \gc) \psi_q \; Z_\mu \; ,
3068: \label{neu:qua}
3069: \end{equation}
3070: with the vector and axial couplings for the quarks given by (\ref{gv})
3071: and (\ref{ga}), for $i=q$.
3072:
3073:
3074:
3075: %###############################################################################
3076: %###############################################################################
3077:
3078:
3079: \subsection{On Anomaly Cancellation} \indent
3080:
3081: In field theory, some loop corrections can violate a classical local
3082: conservation law, derived from gauge invariance via Noether's theorem
3083: The so--called anomaly is a disaster since it breaks Ward--Takahashi
3084: identities and invalidate the proofs of renormalizability. The
3085: vanishing of the anomalies is so important that have been used as a
3086: guide for constructing realistic theories.
3087:
3088: Let us consider a generic theory with Lagrangian
3089: \[
3090: \lag_{\text{int}} = - g \left( \bar{R} \; \g^\mu \; T^a_+ \; R +
3091: \bar{L} \; \g^\mu \; T^a_- \; L \right) \; {\cal V}^a_\mu \; ,
3092: \]
3093: where $T^a_\pm$ are the generators in the right ($+$) and left
3094: ($-$) representation of the matter fields, and ${\cal V}^a_\mu$
3095: are the gauge bosons. This theory will be anomaly free if
3096: \[
3097: {\cal A}^{abc} = {\cal A}^{abc}_+ - {\cal A}^{abc}_- = 0 \; ,
3098: \]
3099: where ${\cal A}^{abc}_{\pm}$ is given by the following trace of
3100: generators
3101: \[
3102: {\cal A}^{abc}_{\pm} \equiv
3103: \mbox{Tr} \left[ \{ T^a_{\pm} , T^b_{\pm}\} T^c_{\pm} \right] \; .
3104: \]
3105:
3106: In a $V-A$ gauge theory like the Standard Model, the only possible
3107: anomalies come from $VVA$ triangle loops, {\it i.e.} loops with two
3108: vectors and one axial vertex and are proportional to:
3109: \begin{eqnarray*}
3110: {SU(2)^2 U(1)} \; & : & \;\;\;
3111: \mbox{Tr} \left[ \{ \tau^a , \tau^b \} Y \right] =
3112: \mbox{Tr} \left[ \{ \tau^a , \tau^b \} \right] \mbox{Tr} \left[ Y \right]
3113: \propto \sum_{doub.} Y \\
3114: {U(1)^3} \; & : & \;\;\;
3115: \mbox{Tr} \left[ Y^3 \right] \propto \sum_{ferm.} Y^3 \; .
3116: \end{eqnarray*}
3117:
3118: Remembering the value of the hypercharge of the leptons
3119: (\ref{hyp:lep}) and quarks (\ref{hyp:qua}), we can write for the
3120: ${SU(2)^2 U(1)}$ case,
3121: \[
3122: {\cal A}^{abc} \propto - \sum_{doub.} Y
3123: = - \left[ - 1 + { 3} \left(\frac{1}{3} \right) \right] = 0 \; ,
3124: \]
3125: and for the ${U(1)^3}$ case,
3126: \begin{eqnarray*}
3127: {\cal A}^{abc} \propto \sum_{ferm} Y^3_+ - Y^3_- &=&
3128: \left\{ (-2)^3 + { 3} \left[ \left(
3129: \frac{4}{3} \right)^3 + \left(\frac{- 2}{3}\right)^3 \right] \right\}
3130: \\
3131: & - & \left\{ (-1)^3 + (-1)^3 +
3132: { 3} \left[ \left( \frac{1}{3} \right)^3 +
3133: \left( \frac{1}{3} \right)^3 \right] \right\} = 0 \; .
3134: \end{eqnarray*}
3135: where the 3 colors of the quarks were taken into account.
3136:
3137: This shows that the Standard Model is free from anomalies if the
3138: fermions appears in complete multiplets, with the general structure:
3139: \[
3140: \left\{ \left( \ba{c}
3141: \nu_e \\
3142: e
3143: \ea \right)_L , \;\; e_R \; , \;\;
3144: \left( \ba{c}
3145: u \\
3146: d
3147: \ea \right)_L , \;\; u_R \; , \;\; d_R
3148: \right\} \; ,
3149: \]
3150: that should be repeated always respecting this same structure:
3151: \[
3152: \left\{ \left( \ba{c}
3153: \nu_\mu \\
3154: \mu
3155: \ea \right)_L , \;\; \mu_R \; , \;\;
3156: \left( \ba{c}
3157: c \\
3158: s
3159: \ea \right)_L , \;\; c_R \; , \;\; s_R
3160: \right\} \; ,
3161: \]
3162:
3163: The discovery of the $\tau$ lepton in 1975 \cite{Perl:75}, and
3164: of a fifth quark flavor, the $b$ \cite{Herb:77}, two years later, were
3165: the evidence for a third fermion generation,
3166: \[
3167: \left\{ \left( \ba{c}
3168: \nu_\tau \\
3169: \tau
3170: \ea \right)_L , \;\; \tau_R \; , \;\;
3171: \left( \ba{c}
3172: t \\
3173: b
3174: \ea \right)_L , \;\; t_R \; , \;\; b_R
3175: \right\} \; .
3176: \]
3177:
3178: The existence of complete {\it generations}, with no missing
3179: partner, is essential for the vanishing of anomalies. This was a
3180: compelling theoretical argument in favor of the existence of a top
3181: quark before its discovery in 1995 \cite{Abe:95,Abachi:95}.
3182:
3183:
3184: %###############################################################################
3185: %###############################################################################
3186:
3187: \subsection{The Quark Masses} \indent
3188:
3189: In order to generate mass for both the up ($U_i = u$, $c$, and $t$)
3190: and down ($D_i = d$, $s$, and $b$) quarks, we need a $Y = -1$ Higgs
3191: doublet. Defining the conjugate doublet Higgs as,
3192: \begin{equation}
3193: \tilde{\Phi} = i \; \sigma_2 \; \Phi^* = \left( \ba{c}
3194: \phi^{0^*} \\
3195: - \phi^-
3196: \ea \right) \; ,
3197: \label{conj:hig}
3198: \end{equation}
3199: we can write the Yukawa Lagrangian for three generations of quarks
3200: as,
3201: \begin{equation}
3202: \lag_{\text{yuk}}^q = - \sum_{i,j = 1}^3
3203: \left[ G^U_{ij} \; \bar{\rs}_{U_i} \left( \tilde{\Phi}^\dagger \ld_j \right) +
3204: G^D_{ij}\; \bar{\rs}_{D_i} \left( \Phi^\dagger \ld_j \right) \right] +
3205: \mbox{h.c.} \; .
3206: \label{yuk:qua}
3207: \end{equation}
3208:
3209: From the vacuum expectation values of $\Phi$ and $\tilde{\Phi}$
3210: doublets, we obtain the mass terms for the up
3211: \[
3212: \overline{(u^\prime, \; c^\prime, \; t^\prime)_R} \; {\cal M}^U \; \left( \ba{c}
3213: u^\prime\\
3214: c^\prime\\
3215: t^\prime
3216: \ea \right)_L +
3217: \; \mbox{h.c.} \; ,
3218: \]
3219: and down quarks
3220: \[
3221: \overline{(d^\prime, \; s^\prime, \; b^\prime)_R} \; {\cal M}^D \; \left( \ba{c}
3222: d^\prime\\
3223: s^\prime\\
3224: b^\prime
3225: \ea \right)_L +
3226: \; \mbox{h.c.} \; ,
3227: \]
3228: with the non--diagonal matrices ${\cal M}^{U(D)}_{ij} = (v/\sqrt{2})
3229: \, G^{U(D)}_{ij}$.
3230:
3231: The weak eigenstates ($q^\prime$) are linear superposition of the
3232: mass eigenstates ($q$) given by the unitary transformations:
3233: \[
3234: \left( \ba{c}
3235: { u^\prime}\\
3236: { c^\prime}\\
3237: { t^\prime}
3238: \ea \right)_{L,R} = U_{L,R} \left( \ba{c}
3239: { u} \\
3240: { c} \\
3241: { t}
3242: \ea \right)_{L,R} \;\; , \;\;\;\;\;\;\;
3243: \left( \ba{c}
3244: { d^\prime}\\
3245: { s^\prime}\\
3246: { b^\prime}
3247: \ea \right)_{L,R} = D_{L,R} \left( \ba{c}
3248: { d} \\
3249: { s} \\
3250: { b}
3251: \ea \right)_{L,R} \; ,
3252: \]
3253: where $U(D)_{L,R}$ are unitary matrices to preserve the form of the
3254: kinetic terms of the quarks (\ref{l:qua}). These matrices diagonalize the mass
3255: matrices, {\it i.e.},
3256: \begin{eqnarray*}
3257: U_R^{-1} {\cal M}^U U_L &=&
3258: \left( \ba{ccc}
3259: m_u & 0 & 0\\
3260: 0 & m_c & 0\\
3261: 0 & 0 & m_t
3262: \ea \right)
3263: \\
3264: D_R^{-1} {\cal M}^D D_L &=&
3265: \left( \ba{ccc}
3266: m_d & 0 & 0\\
3267: 0 & m_s & 0\\
3268: 0 & 0 & m_b
3269: \ea \right) \; .
3270: \end{eqnarray*}
3271:
3272: The $(V-A)$ charged weak current (\ref{cha:qua}), for three
3273: generations, will be proportional to
3274: \[
3275: \overline{(u^\prime, \; c^\prime, \; t^\prime)_L} \; \g_\mu \; \left( \ba{c}
3276: d^\prime\\
3277: s^\prime\\
3278: b^\prime
3279: \ea \right)_L =
3280: \overline{(u, \; c, \; t)_L} \;\; (U^\dagger_L D_L) \; \g_\mu \;
3281: \left( \ba{c}
3282: d\\
3283: s\\
3284: b
3285: \ea \right)_L \; ,
3286: \]
3287: with the generation mixing of the mass eigenstates ($q$) described by:
3288: \[
3289: V \equiv (U^\dagger_L \; D_L) \; .
3290: \]
3291:
3292: On the other hand, for the neutral current of the quarks
3293: (\ref{neu:qua}), now becomes,
3294: \[
3295: \overline{(u^\prime, \; c^\prime, \; t^\prime)_L} \; \g_\mu \; \left( \ba{c}
3296: u^\prime\\
3297: c^\prime\\
3298: t^\prime
3299: \ea \right)_L =
3300: \overline{(u, \; c, \; t)_L} \;\; (U^\dagger_L U_L) \; \g_\mu \;
3301: \left( \ba{c}
3302: u\\
3303: c\\
3304: t
3305: \ea \right)_L \; .
3306: \]
3307: We can notice that there is no mixing in the neutral sector (FCNC) since
3308: the matrix $U_{L}$ is unitary: $U^\dagger_{L} U_{L} = 1$.
3309:
3310: %###############################################################################
3311: %###############################################################################
3312:
3313: The quark mixing, by convention, is restricted to the down quarks,
3314: that is with $T_3^q = -1/2$,
3315: \[
3316: \left( \ba{c}
3317: d^\prime\\
3318: s^\prime\\
3319: b^\prime
3320: \ea \right)_L = V \; \left( \ba{c}
3321: d\\
3322: s\\
3323: b
3324: \ea \right)_L \; .
3325: \]
3326:
3327: $V$ is the Cabibbo--Kobayashi--Maskawa matrix
3328: \cite{Cabibbo:63,Kobayashi:73}, that can be parame\-tri\-zed as
3329: \[
3330: V = R_1 (\theta_{23}) R_2(\theta_{13}, \delta_{13}) R_3(\theta_{12})
3331: \; ,
3332: \]
3333: where $R_i(\theta_{jk})$ are rotation matrices around the axis $i$,
3334: the angle $\theta_{jk}$ describes the mixing of the generations $j$
3335: and $k$ and $\delta_{13}$ is a phase.
3336:
3337: We should notice that, for three generations, it is not always
3338: possible to choose the $V$ matrix to be real, that is $\delta_{13}
3339: =0$, and therefore the weak interaction can violate $CP$ and $T$
3340: \footnote{The violation of $CP$ can also occur in the interaction of
3341: scalar bosons, when we have two or more scalar doublets. For a review
3342: see Ref.\ \cite{Winstein:93}.}.
3343:
3344: The Cabibbo--Kobayashi--Maskawa matrix can be written as
3345: \[
3346: V = \left( \ba{ccc}
3347: c_{12}c_{13} &
3348: s_{12}c_{13} &
3349: s_{13} \; e^{-i\delta_{13}} \\
3350: -s_{12}c_{23} - c_{12}s_{23}s_{13} \; e^{i\delta_{13}} &
3351: c_{12}c_{23} - s_{12}s_{23}s_{13} \; e^{i\delta_{13}} &
3352: s_{23}c_{13} \\
3353: s_{12}s_{23} - c_{12}c_{23}s_{13} \; e^{i\delta_{13}} &
3354: -c_{12}s_{23} - s_{12}c_{23}s_{13} \; e^{i\delta_{13}} &
3355: c_{23}c_{13}
3356: \ea \right) \; ,
3357: \]
3358: where $s_{ij}(c_{ij}) \equiv \sin (\cos) \theta_ij$. Notice that, in
3359: the limit of $\theta_{23} = \theta_{13} \to 0$, we associate
3360: $\theta_{12} \to \theta_{C}$, the Cabibbo angle (\ref{cab:ang}), and
3361: \[
3362: V \to
3363: \left( \ba{ccc}
3364: c_{12} &
3365: s_{12} &
3366: 0 \\
3367: -s_{12} &
3368: c_{12} &
3369: 0 \\
3370: 0 &
3371: 0 &
3372: 1
3373: \ea \right) \; .
3374: \]
3375:
3376: Using unitarity constraints and assuming only three generations the
3377: experimental value for the elements of the matrix $V$, with 90\% of
3378: C.L., can be extract from weak quark decays and from deep inelastic
3379: neutrino scattering \cite{pdg:98},
3380: \[
3381: V = \left( \ba{ccc}
3382: 0.9742-0.9757 &
3383: 0.219-0226 &
3384: 0.002-0.005 \\
3385: 0.219-0.225 &
3386: 0.9734-09749 &
3387: 0.037-0.043 \\
3388: 0.004-0.014 &
3389: 0.035-0.043 &
3390: 0.9990-0.9993
3391: \ea \right) \; .
3392: \]
3393:
3394:
3395: %###############################################################################
3396: %###############################################################################
3397:
3398: \section{The Standard Model Lagrangian} \label{sm:lag} \indent
3399:
3400: We end this chapter giving a birds' eye view of the Standard Model,
3401: putting all terms together and writing the whole Lagrangian in a
3402: sche\-ma\-tic way.
3403:
3404: \subsubsection{Gauge--boson + Scalar} \indent
3405:
3406: The gauge--boson (\ref{l:gau}) and the scalar (\ref{l:sca})
3407: Lagrangians give rise to the free Lagrangian for the photon, $W$,
3408: $Z$, and the Higgs boson. Besides that, they generate triple and
3409: quartic couplings among the vector bosons and also couplings involving
3410: the Higgs boson:
3411: \begin{eqnarray}
3412: &&\lag_{\text{gauge}} + \lag_{\text{scalar}} =
3413: \label{gau:sca}
3414: \\
3415: &-& \frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}
3416: - \frac{1}{2} W^+_{\mu\nu} W^{-\;\mu\nu} + M_W^2 W^+_{\mu} W^{-\;\mu}
3417: \nonumber \\
3418: &-& \frac{1}{4} Z_{\mu\nu} Z^{\;\mu\nu} + M_Z^2 Z_{\mu} Z^{\mu}
3419: + \frac{1}{2} \del_\mu H \del^\mu H - \frac{1}{2} M_H^2 H^2
3420: \nonumber \\
3421: &+& \fbox{$W^+W^-A$} + \fbox{$W^+W^-Z$}
3422: \nonumber \\
3423: &+& \fbox{$W^+W^-AA$}+\fbox{$W^+W^-ZZ$}+\fbox{$W^+W^-AZ$}+\fbox{$W^+W^-W^+W^-$}
3424: \nonumber \\
3425: &+&\fbox{$HHH$} + \fbox{$HHHH$}
3426: \nonumber \\
3427: &+&\fbox{$W^+W^-H$} + \fbox{$W^+W^-HH$} + \fbox{$ZZH$} + \fbox{$ZZHH$}
3428: \; .
3429: \nonumber
3430: \end{eqnarray}
3431:
3432: The vector--boson self--couplings that appear in (\ref{gau:sca}) are
3433: strictly constrained by the $SU(2)_L \otimes U(1)_Y$ gauge invariance
3434: and any small deviation from the Standard Model predictions would
3435: destroy, for instance, the precise cancellation of the high--energy
3436: behavior between the various diagrams, giving rise to an anomalous
3437: growth of the cross section with energy. Therefore, the careful study
3438: of the vector--boson self--interactions is a important test of the
3439: Standard Model (see M.\ E.\ Pol, these Proceedings).
3440:
3441: %###############################################################################
3442:
3443: \subsubsection{Leptons + Yukawa} \indent
3444:
3445: The leptonic (\ref{free:fer1}) and the Yukawa (\ref{yuk:lep})
3446: Lagrangians are responsible for the lepton free Lagrangian and for the
3447: couplings with the gauge bosons: photon (QED interaction), $W$ (charged
3448: weak current) and $Z$ (neutral weak current). The mass terms are
3449: generated by the Yukawa interaction which also gives rise to the coupling
3450: of the massive lepton with the Higgs boson:
3451: \begin{eqnarray}
3452: &&\lag_{\text{leptons}} + \lag_{\text{yuk}}^\ell =
3453: \label{lep:yuk} \\
3454: && \sum_{\ell = e, \mu, \tau} \bar{\ell} (i \dels - m_\ell) \ell +
3455: \sum_{\nu_\ell = \nu_e, \nu_\mu, \nu_\tau}
3456: \bar{\nu}_\ell (i \dels) \nu_\ell
3457: \nonumber \\
3458: &+& \fbox{$\bar{\ell} \, \ell \, A$}
3459: + \fbox{$\bar{\nu}_\ell \, \ell \, W^+$} +
3460: \fbox{$\bar{\ell} \, \nu_\ell \, W^-$}
3461: + \fbox{$\bar{\ell} \, \ell \, Z$} + \fbox{$\bar{\nu}_\ell \, \nu_\ell \, Z$}
3462: \nonumber \\
3463: &+& \fbox{$\bar{\ell} \, \ell \, H$} \; .\nonumber
3464: \end{eqnarray}
3465:
3466: Even if the neutrinos have mass, as seems to suggest the recent
3467: experimental results \cite{SolarNeutrino:99,AtmosphericNeutrino:99},
3468: their Dirac mass terms could be incorporated in the framework of the
3469: Standard Model without any difficulty. The procedure would be similar
3470: to the one that lead to the quark mass terms, that is, introducing a
3471: right--handed component of the neutrino and a Yukawa coupling with
3472: the conjugate Higgs doublet (\ref{conj:hig}). One may notice,
3473: however, than being electrically neutral neutrinos may also have a
3474: Majorana mass which violates lepton number. The simultaneous
3475: existence of both type of mass terms, Dirac and Majorana, can be used
3476: to explain the smallness of the neutrino mass as compared to the
3477: charged leptons via the so called see-saw mechanism \cite{Seesaw:79}.
3478:
3479: %###############################################################################
3480:
3481: \subsubsection{Quarks + Yukawa} \indent
3482:
3483: The quark Lagrangian (\ref{l:qua}) and the corresponding Yukawa
3484: interaction (\ref{yuk:qua}) give rise to the free Dirac term and to
3485: the electromagnetic and weak interaction of the quarks. A quark--Higgs
3486: coupling is also generated,
3487: \begin{eqnarray}
3488: &&\lag_{\text{quarks}} + \lag_{\text{Yuk}}^q =
3489: \label{qua:yuk} \\
3490: &&\sum_{q = u, \cdots , t} \bar{q} (i \dels - m_q) q
3491: \nonumber \\
3492: &+& \fbox{$\bar{q} \, q \, A$}
3493: \nonumber \\
3494: &+& \fbox{$\bar{u} \, d^\prime \, W^+$} + \fbox{$\bar{d}^\prime \, u \, W^-$} +
3495: \fbox{$\bar{q} \, q \, Z$}
3496: \nonumber \\
3497: &+& \fbox{$\bar{q} \, q \, H$} \; . \nonumber
3498: \end{eqnarray}
3499:
3500: Besides the propagators and couplings presented above, in a general
3501: R$_\xi$ gauge, we should also take into account the contribution of
3502: the Goldstone bosons and of the ghosts. The Faddeev--Popov ghosts
3503: \cite{Faddeev:67} are important to cancel the contribution of the
3504: unphysical (timelike and longitudinal) degrees of freedom of the gauge
3505: bosons.
3506:
3507: A practical guide to derive the Feynman rules for the vertex and
3508: propagators can be found, for instance, in Ref.\ \cite{Cheng:84},
3509: where the complete set of rules for the Standard Model is presented.
3510:
3511: %###############################################################################
3512: %###############################################################################
3513:
3514: \chapter{ ~ Beyond the Trees} \label{loops}
3515:
3516: \section{Radiative Corrections to the Standard Model}\indent
3517:
3518: It was shown that the Standard Model is a renormalizable field
3519: theory. This means that when we go beyond the tree level (Born
3520: approximation) we are still able to make definite predictions for
3521: observables. The general procedure to evaluate these quantities at
3522: the quantum level is to collect and evaluate all the loop diagrams up
3523: to a certain level. Many of these contributions are ultraviolet
3524: divergent and a convenient regularization method ({\it e.g.}
3525: dimensional regularization) should be used to isolate the divergent
3526: parts. These divergences are absorbed in the bare couplings and
3527: masses of the theory. Assuming a renormalization condition ({\it
3528: e.g.} on--shell or $\overline{\mbox{MS}}$ scheme), we can evaluate
3529: all the counterterms. After all these ingredients are put together we
3530: are able to obtain finite results for S--matrix elements that can be
3531: translated in, for instance, cross sections and decay widths. The
3532: predictions of the Standard Model for several observables are
3533: obtained and can be compared with the experimental results for these
3534: quantities enabling the theory to be falsified (in the Popperian
3535: sense).
3536:
3537: The subject of renormalization is very cumbersome and deserves a
3538: whole course by itself. Here we want to give just the minimum
3539: necessary tools to enable the reader to appreciate the astonishing
3540: agreement of the Standard Model, even at the quantum level, with the
3541: recent experimental results. Very good accounts of the electroweak
3542: radiative corrections can be found elsewhere
3543: \cite{Hollik:94,Barbieri:95,Sirlin:99}.
3544:
3545: Let us start considering the Standard Model Lagrangian which is given
3546: by the sum of the contributions (\ref{gau:sca}), (\ref{lep:yuk}), and
3547: (\ref{qua:yuk}). The $\lag_{SM}$ is a function of coupling constants
3548: $g$ and $g^\prime$ and of the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs
3549: field, $v$. The observables can be determined in terms of these
3550: parameters and any possible dependence on other quantities like
3551: $M_H$ or $m_t$ appears just through radiative corrections.
3552:
3553: \linha
3554:
3555: Therefore, we need three precisely known observables in order
3556: to determine the basic input parameters of the model. A natural choice
3557: will be the most well measured quantities, like, {\it e.g.}:
3558: \begin{itemize}
3559: \item The electromagnetic fine structure constant that can be
3560: extracted, for instance, from the electron $g_e-2$ or from the quantum
3561: Hall effect,
3562: \[
3563: \alpha (0) = 1/137.0359895 (61) \; ;
3564: \]
3565: \item The Fermi constant measured from the muon lifetime,
3566: \[
3567: G_F (\mu) = 1.16639 (1) \times 10^{-5} \; \mbox{GeV}^{-2} \; ;
3568: \]
3569: \item The Z boson mass that was obtained by LEP at the $Z$ pole,
3570: \[
3571: M_Z = 91.1867(21) \; \mbox{GeV} \; .
3572: \]
3573: \end{itemize}
3574: These input parameters can be written, at tree level, in terms of
3575: just $g$, $g^\prime$ and $v$ as
3576: \begin{eqnarray}
3577: \alpha_0 (0) &=& \frac{g^2 s_W^2}{4\pi} \; ,
3578: \nonumber \\
3579: G_{F_0} &=& \frac{1}{\sqrt{2} v^2} \; , \\
3580: M_{Z_0}^2 &=& \frac{g^2 v^2}{4 c_W^2} \; . \nonumber
3581: \label{input}
3582: \end{eqnarray}
3583: where the subscript $0$ indicates that these relations are valid at
3584: tree level, and
3585: \[
3586: s_W^2 \equiv \frac{g^{\prime \; 2}}{g^2 + g^{\prime \; 2}}
3587: \;\; , \;\;\;\; \mbox{and} \;\;
3588: {c_W^2} \equiv \frac{g^{2}}{g^2 + g^{\prime \; 2}} \; ,
3589: \]
3590: depend only on $g$ and $g^\prime$:
3591:
3592: %###############################################################################
3593:
3594: \subsection{One Loop Calculations} \indent
3595:
3596:
3597: Let us write the vacuum polarization amplitude (self--energy)
3598: for vector bosons ($a, b = \gamma, W, Z$) as
3599: \[
3600: \Pi^{\mu\nu}_{ab} (q^2) \equiv g^{\mu\nu} \; \Pi_{ab}(q^2) + (q^\mu
3601: q^\nu \;
3602: \mbox{terms}) \; .
3603: \]
3604:
3605: The terms proportional to $q^\mu q^\nu$ can be dropped since these
3606: amplitudes should be plugged in conserved fermion currents, and from the
3607: Dirac equation, they will give rise to terms that goes with the external
3608: fermion mass that can be neglected in the usual experimental situation.
3609:
3610: We can summarize the relevant quantities for the loop corrections of
3611: the Standard Model \cite{Barbieri:95}:
3612:
3613: \begin{itemize}
3614: \item The vector and axial form factors of the $Z^0$ coupling, at $q^2
3615: = M_Z^2$, which include both the vertex and the fermion self--energy
3616: radiative corrections. From (\ref{neu:cur}) we can write
3617: \[
3618: V_{Zf\bar{f}}^\mu = - i \frac{g}{2 \cos\theta_W}
3619: \bar{\psi_f} \g^\mu ( { g_V^f} -
3620: { g_A^f} \; \gc) \psi_f \; ,
3621: \]
3622: where (\ref{gv}) and (\ref{ga}) now are given by
3623: \begin{eqnarray}
3624: g_V^f & = & { \sqrt{\rho}} \; \left( T_3^f - 2 \; {\kappa_f} \;
3625: Q_f \sin^2\theta_W \right) \; ,
3626: \nonumber \\
3627: g_A^f & = & { \sqrt{\rho}} \; T_3^f \; .
3628: \label{cor:gvga}
3629: \end{eqnarray}
3630: which define the relative strength of the neutral and charged
3631: currents, $\rho$, and the coefficient of the $\sin^2\theta_W$,
3632: $\kappa_f$. Notice that at tree level, $\rho = \kappa_f =1$.
3633:
3634: \item Correction to $\mu$--decay amplitude at $q^2 = 0$, which
3635: includes the box ($B$), vertex ($V$) and the fermion self--energy
3636: corrections
3637: \[
3638: {\cal M} (\mu) = -i \; { \delta G_{(B,V)} }
3639: \left[ \bar{\psi_e} \g^\mu (1 - \gc) \psi_{\nu_e} \right]
3640: \left[ \bar{\psi_{\nu_\mu}} \g^\mu (1 - \gc) \psi_{\mu} \right] \; .
3641: \]
3642: \end{itemize}
3643:
3644: We can write the corrections to the input parameters as,
3645: \begin{eqnarray}
3646: \alpha &=& \alpha_0 + { \delta \alpha}\; , \nonumber \\
3647: M_Z^2 &=& M_{Z_0}^2 + { \delta M_Z^2} \; , \\
3648: G_F &=& G_{F_0} + { \delta G_F} \; , \nonumber
3649: \label{cor:imp:1}
3650: \end{eqnarray}
3651: where, in terms of the vacuum polarization amplitude, and $\delta
3652: G_{(B,V)}$ the corrections become
3653: \begin{eqnarray}
3654: \frac{\delta \alpha}{\alpha} &=& - \Pi_{\gamma\gamma} (0) - 2
3655: \frac{s_W}{c_W} \frac{\Pi_{\gamma Z} (0)}{M_Z^2} \; , \nonumber \\
3656: \frac{\delta M_Z^2}{M_Z^2} &=& - \frac{\Pi_{ZZ}(M_Z^2)}{M_Z^2} \; , \\
3657: \frac{\delta G_F}{G_F} &=& \frac{\Pi_{WW}(0)}{M_W^2} +
3658: \frac{\delta G_{(B,V)}}{G_F} \; . \nonumber
3659: \label{cor:imp:2}
3660: \end{eqnarray}
3661:
3662: %###############################################################################
3663:
3664: \subsubsection{Correction to the Derived Observables} \indent
3665:
3666: From the corrections to the input parameters we can estimate the
3667: radiative corrections to the derived observables. Let us write the
3668: tree level input variables $\alpha_0$, $G_{F_0}$, and $M_{Z_0}$ as
3669: ${\cal I}_0^i$. When we compute the radiative correction to the input
3670: parameters ${\cal I}_0^i$, we have
3671: \[
3672: {\cal I}_0^i \;\; \longrightarrow \;\; {\cal I}^i ({\cal I}_0^i) =
3673: {\cal I}_0^i + \delta {\cal I}^i ({\cal I}_0^i) \; .
3674: \]
3675: The relation for the renormalized input variables, ${\cal I}^i$, can
3676: be inverted to write $ {\cal I}_0^i = {\cal I}_0^i ({\cal I}^i)$.
3677:
3678: The same holds true for any derived observable (${\cal O}$) or any
3679: $S$--matrix element, that is,
3680: \begin{eqnarray}
3681: {\cal O}[{\cal I}^i_0 ({\cal I}^i)] &=&
3682: {\cal O}_0({\cal I}^i_0) + \delta {\cal O}({\cal I}^i_0) \nonumber\\
3683: &=& {\cal O}_0({\cal I}^i - \delta {\cal I}^i) + \delta {\cal O}({\cal I}^i
3684: - \delta {\cal I}^i) \nonumber \\
3685: &=& {\cal O}_0({\cal I}^i) -
3686: \sum_i \frac{\del {\cal O}_0}{\del {\cal I}^i} \, \delta {\cal I}^i
3687: + \delta {\cal O}({\cal I}^i)
3688: \nonumber \\
3689: &\equiv& {\cal O}_0({\cal I}^i) + \Delta {\cal O}({\cal I}^i) \; .
3690: \label{cor:obs}
3691: \end{eqnarray}
3692: At one loop it is enough to renormalize just the input variables
3693: ${\cal I}^i$. However, at two loops it is necessary also to
3694: renormalize all other parameters that intervene at one loop level
3695: like $m_t$ and $M_H$.
3696:
3697: As an example, let us compute the radiative correction to the $W$
3698: boson mass. At tree level $M_W$ is given by [see (\ref{mw:mz})]
3699: \[
3700: M_{W_0}^2 = c_{W_0}^2 M_{Z_0}^2 \; .
3701: \]
3702:
3703: Writing $c_W^2$ in terms of the input variables, we have
3704: \[
3705: { c_W^2} = (1 - s_W^2) =
3706: \left[1 - \left(\frac{4 \pi \alpha}{g^2}\right) \right] =
3707: \left[1 -
3708: \left(\frac{\pi \alpha}{\sqrt{2} G_F M_Z^2 { c_W^2}}\right) \right] \; .
3709: \]
3710: Solving for $c_W^2$, we get
3711: \[
3712: M_{W_0}^2 ({\cal I}^i) = \left\{ \frac{1}{2} \left[ 1 +
3713: \left(1 - \frac{4 \pi \alpha}{\sqrt{2} G_F M_Z^2} \right)^{1/2} \right]
3714: \right\} M_Z^2 \; .
3715: \]
3716: Taking into account the derivatives,
3717: \begin{eqnarray*}
3718: \frac{\del M_{W_0}^2}{\del \alpha} & = & \frac{s_W^2 c_W^2}{s_W^2 - c_W^2}
3719: \frac{M_Z^2}{\alpha}
3720: \; , \\
3721: \frac{\del M_{W_0}^2}{\del G_F} & = & - \frac{s_W^2 c_W^2}{s_W^2 - c_W^2}
3722: \frac{M_Z^2}{G_F}
3723: \; , \\
3724: \frac{\del M_{W_0}^2}{\del M_Z^2} & = & - \frac{c_W^4}{s_W^2 - c_W^2}
3725: \; .
3726: \end{eqnarray*}
3727: We obtain from (\ref{cor:obs}) the $M_W$ correction
3728: \begin{eqnarray*}
3729: M_W^2 &=& M_{W_0}^2 ({\cal I}^i) -
3730: \sum_i \frac{\del M_{W_0}^2}{\del {\cal I}^i} \, \delta {\cal I}^i
3731: + \delta M_{W}^2 ({\cal I}^i) \\
3732: &=& c_W^2 M_{Z}^2 - \frac{c_W^2 M_Z^2}{s_W^2 - c_W^2}
3733: \left(s_W^2 \frac{\delta \alpha}{\alpha}
3734: - s_W^2 \frac{\delta G_F}{G_F}
3735: - c_W^2 \frac{\delta M_Z^2}{M_Z^2} \right) + \delta M_W^2 \; ,
3736: \end{eqnarray*}
3737: with
3738: \[
3739: \delta M_W^2 = - \Pi_{WW} (M_W^2) \; .
3740: \]
3741:
3742:
3743: %###############################################################################
3744:
3745: \section{The $Z$ boson Physics} \label{z:phy}
3746:
3747: \subsection{Introduction} \indent
3748:
3749: The most important experimental tests of the Standard Model in this
3750: decade was performed at the $Z$ pole. The four LEP
3751: Collaborations (Aleph, Delphi, L3, and Opal)\cite{Lep:99} and the
3752: SLAC SLD Collaboration \cite{Sld:97} studied the reaction,
3753: \[
3754: e^+ e^- \to Z^0 \to f \bar{f} \; .
3755: \]
3756: The main purpose of these experiments was to test the Standard Model
3757: at the level of its quantum corrections and also to try to obtain
3758: some hint on the top quark mass and on the Higgs boson.
3759:
3760: \begin{figure}[ht]
3761: \protect
3762: \epsfxsize=10cm
3763: \begin{center}
3764: % zpeak.eps
3765: \mbox{\centerline{\psfig{file=fig06.eps,width=0.5\textwidth}}}
3766: \end{center}
3767: \end{figure}
3768: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
3769: \begin{center}
3770: {\it Fig.\ 6: The $Z$ profile measured by the L3 Collab. \cite{Adeva:90}}
3771: \end{center}
3772: \end{minipage}
3773:
3774: \vskip 0.5cm
3775: At CERN, after scanning the $Z$ resonance (see Fig.\ 6), data were
3776: collected at the $Z$ peak, and around 17 millions of $Z$'s were
3777: produced and studied.
3778:
3779: The shape of the resonance is characterised by the cross section for the
3780: fermion pair ($f\bar{f}$) production at the $Z$ peak,
3781: \[
3782: \sigma^0_{f\bar{f}} = \frac{12 \pi}{M_Z^2}
3783: \frac{\Gamma_e \; \Gamma_f}{\Gamma_Z^2} \; ,
3784: \]
3785: where the position of the peak gives the value $M_Z = 91186.7 \pm
3786: 2.1$ MeV, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) represents the $Z$
3787: width, $\Gamma_Z = 2493.9 \pm 2.4$ MeV, and the height of the peak
3788: gives the value of the total cross section for $f\bar{f}$
3789: production, $\sigma^0_{f\bar{f}}$.
3790:
3791: For the analysis of the $Z$ physics it is necessary to choose the
3792: input parameters at the appropriate scale, $M_Z$. The
3793: relative uncertainty of the input parameters are:
3794: \begin{center}
3795: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
3796: \hline\hline
3797: &&\\[-0.2cm]
3798: Parameter & Value & Uncertainty \\[0.2cm]
3799: \hline
3800: &&\\[-0.2cm]
3801: $m_t$ \cite{Kim:99}
3802: & $174.3 \pm 5.1$ GeV & 2.9 \% \\[0.2cm]
3803: $\alpha_s (M_Z^2)$ \cite{Lep:99}
3804: & $0.119 \pm 0.002$ & 1.7 \% \\[0.2cm]
3805: $\alpha^{-1}(M_Z^2)$ \cite{Eidelmann:95,Steinhauser:98}
3806: & $128.878 \pm 0.090$ & 0.07 \%\\[0.2cm]
3807: $M_Z$ \cite{Lep:99}
3808: & $91186.7 \pm 2.1$ MeV & 0.0023 \% \\[0.2cm]
3809: $G_F (\mu)$ \cite{pdg:98}
3810: & $(1.16639 \pm 0.00001) \times 10^{-5}$ GeV$^{-2}$ &
3811: 0.00086 \% \\[0.2cm]
3812: \hline\hline
3813: \end{tabular}
3814: \end{center}
3815: \centerline{\it Table I: Relative uncertainty of the input parameters.}
3816:
3817: \vskip 0.5cm
3818: \noindent
3819: For the Higgs boson mass we just have available a lower bound of $M_H
3820: > 95.2$ GeV at 95\% of C.L. \cite{Higgs:99}.
3821:
3822: Notice that, in spite of the very precise measurement of the
3823: electromagnetic structure constant at low energy, which has a
3824: relative uncertainty of just 0.0000045 \%, its value at $M_Z$ is much
3825: less precise. This uncertainty arises from the contribution of
3826: light quarks to the vacuum polarization. The evolution of
3827: $\alpha$ is given by
3828: \begin{equation}
3829: \alpha(M_Z^2) = \frac{\alpha (0)}{1 - \Delta\alpha} \; ,
3830: \label{alp:mz}
3831: \end{equation}
3832: where
3833: \[
3834: \Delta\alpha = \Delta\alpha_{\text{lep}} + \Delta\alpha_{\text{had}} +
3835: \Delta\alpha_{\text{top}} \; .
3836: \]
3837: The top quark contribution is proportional to $1/m_t^2 \sim 10^{-5}$.
3838: The contributions from leptons ($\ell$) \cite{Steinhauser:98} and
3839: light quarks ($q$) \cite{Eidelmann:95} are:
3840: \begin{eqnarray}
3841: \Delta\alpha_{\text{lep}} &=& 0.031498
3842: \; ,
3843: \nonumber \\
3844: \Delta\alpha_{\text{had}} &=& - (0.02804 \pm
3845: 0.00065) \; .
3846: \label{del:alp}
3847: \end{eqnarray}
3848: where the error in $\Delta\alpha_{\text{lep}}$ is negligible.
3849: Therefore, the loss of precision comes from
3850: $\Delta\alpha_{\text{had}}$ due to non--perturba\-ti\-ve QCD effects
3851: that are large at low energies and to the imprecision in the light
3852: quark masses.
3853:
3854: Other important pure QED corrections are the initial and
3855: final state photon radiation. The initial state radiation is taken
3856: into account by convoluting the cross section with the radiator
3857: function $H(k)$,
3858: \[
3859: \sigma(s) = \int_0^{k_{\text{max}}} dk \; H(k) \sigma_0[s(1-k)] \; ,
3860: \]
3861: where $k_{\text{max}}$ represents a cut in the maximum radiated
3862: energy. The radiator function takes into account virtual and real photon
3863: emissions and includes soft photon resummation \cite{Montagna:97}.
3864:
3865: The final state radiation is included by multiplying the bare cross
3866: sections and widths by the QED correction factor,
3867: \[
3868: \left(1 + \frac{3\alpha Q_f^2}{4\pi}\right)
3869: \simeq ( 1 + 0.002 \; Q_f^2 ) \; .
3870: \]
3871: where $Q_f$ is the fermion charge.
3872:
3873: %###############################################################################
3874:
3875: \subsection{The Standard Model Parameters} \indent
3876:
3877: We present in the following sections the Standard Model predictions
3878: for some observables. We compare these predictions with the values
3879: measured by the CERN LEP and at the SLAC SLD Collaborations, and
3880: stress the very impressive agreement between them.
3881:
3882: \subsubsection{$Z$ Partial Widths} \indent
3883:
3884: The $Z$ width into a fermion pair, at tree level, is given in the
3885: Standard Model by,
3886: \begin{equation}
3887: \Gamma(Z \to f \bar{f} ) =
3888: C \frac{G_F M_Z^3}{6\sqrt{2}\pi} \left[ (g_A^f)^2 + (g_V^f)^2 \right] \; ,
3889: \label{gam:l}
3890: \end{equation}
3891: where $C$ refers to the fermion color, {\it i.e.},
3892: \[
3893: C = \left\{ \ba{l}
3894: 1 \; , \;\; \mbox{for { leptons}} \; ,\\
3895: 3 \left[ 1 + \alpha_s(M_Z)/\pi + 1.409 \alpha_s^2 (M_Z)/\pi^2 +
3896: \cdots \right] \; , \;\; \mbox{for quarks} \; .
3897: \ea \right.
3898: \]
3899: where the QCD corrections were included for quarks. At loop level we
3900: should consider the modifications to $g_V^f$ and $g_A^f$
3901: (\ref{cor:gvga}) and the appropriate QED corrections discussed in the
3902: last section.
3903:
3904: The value of the partial width for the different fermion flavors are
3905: \begin{center}
3906: \begin{tabular}{cr}
3907: \hline\hline
3908: &\\[-0.2cm]
3909: ~~~ $f \bar{f}$ Pair ~~~ & ~~~~~ Partial Width ~~~ \\[0.2cm]
3910: \hline
3911: &\\[-0.2cm]
3912: $\nu \bar{\nu}$ & ~~~ 167.25 MeV \\
3913: $e^+e^-$ & ~~~ 84.01 MeV \\
3914: $u\bar{u}$ & ~~~ 300.30 MeV \\
3915: $d\bar{d}$ & ~~~ 383.10 MeV \\
3916: $b\bar{b}$ & ~~~ 376.00 MeV \\ [0.2cm]
3917: \hline\hline
3918: \end{tabular}
3919: \end{center}
3920: \centerline{\it Table II: $Z \to f \bar{f}$ partial widths.}
3921:
3922: \vskip 0.5cm
3923: The experimental results for the partial widths are \cite{Lep:99},
3924: \begin{eqnarray*}
3925: \Gamma_\ell & \equiv & \Gamma(Z \to \ell^+ \ell^-) =
3926: 83.90 \pm 0.10 \; \mbox{MeV} \; ,
3927: \\
3928: \Gamma_{\text{had}} & \equiv & \Gamma(Z \to \mbox{hadrons}) =
3929: 1742.3 \pm 2.3 \; \mbox{MeV} \; ,
3930: \\
3931: \Gamma_Z & \equiv & \Gamma(Z \to \mbox{all}) = 2493.9 \pm 2.4 \;
3932: \mbox{MeV} \; ,
3933: \\
3934: \Gamma_{\text{inv}} & \equiv & \Gamma_Z - 3 \,
3935: \Gamma_\ell - \Gamma_{\text{had}} = 500.1 \pm 1.9 \; \mbox{GeV} \; ,
3936: \end{eqnarray*}
3937: where we assume three leptonic channels ($e^+e^-$, $\mu^+\mu^-$, and
3938: $\tau^+\tau^-$), and $\Gamma_{\text{inv}}$ is the invisible $Z$
3939: width.
3940:
3941: \subsubsection{Number of Neutrino Species} \indent
3942:
3943: We can extract information on the number of light neutrino species by
3944: supposing that they are responsible for the invisible width, {\it
3945: i.e.} $\Gamma_{\text{inv}} = N_\nu \Gamma_\nu$. The LEP data
3946: \cite{Lep:99} gives the ratio of the invisible and leptonic $Z$
3947: partial widths, $\Gamma_{\text{inv}}/\Gamma_\ell = 5.961 \pm
3948: 0.023$. On the other hand, Standard Model predicts the
3949: $(\Gamma_\nu/\Gamma_\ell)_{\text{SM}} = 1.991 \pm 0.001$, where the
3950: error is associated to the variation of $m_t$ and $M_H$. In the ratio
3951: of these two expressions, $\Gamma_\ell$ cancels out and yields the
3952: number of neutrino species,
3953: \[
3954: N_\nu = 2.994 \pm 0.011 \; ,
3955: \]
3956: where $N_\nu$ represents the total number of neutrino flavors that
3957: are accessible kinematically to the $Z$, that is $M_\nu < M_Z/2$.
3958: This result indicates that, if the observed pattern of the first
3959: three generations is assumed, then we have only these families of
3960: fermions in nature.
3961:
3962: %###############################################################################
3963:
3964: \subsubsection{Radiative Corrections Beyond QED}\indent
3965:
3966: An important question to be asked when comparing the Standard Model
3967: predictions with experimental data is if the effect of pure weak
3968: radiative correction could indeed be measured. This question can be
3969: answered by looking, for instance, at the plot of $\sin^2
3970: \theta_{\text{eff}} \times \Gamma_\ell$ (Fig.\ 7), where
3971: $\Gamma_\ell$ is given by (\ref{gam:l}) and,
3972: \[
3973: {\sin^2 \theta_{\text{eff}}} \equiv \frac{1}{4}
3974: \left(1 - \frac{g_V^\ell}{g_A^\ell} \right) = 0.23157 \pm 0.00018 \; .
3975: \]
3976:
3977: The point at the lower--left corner shows the prediction when only
3978: the QED (photon vacuum polarization) correction is included and the
3979: respective variation for $\alpha(M_Z^2)$ varying by one standard
3980: deviation. The Standard Model prediction, with the full (QED + weak)
3981: radiative correction, is represented by the band that reflects the
3982: dependence on the Higgs (95 GeV $< M_H <$ 1000 GeV) and on the top
3983: mass (169.2 GeV $< m_t <$ 179.4 GeV). We notice that the presence of
3984: genuine electroweak correction is quite evident.
3985:
3986: \begin{figure}[ht]
3987: \protect
3988: \epsfxsize=10cm
3989: \begin{center}
3990: % t99_gl_s2_new_cont.eps
3991: \mbox{\psfig{file=fig07.eps,width=0.7\textwidth}}
3992: \end{center}
3993: \begin{center}
3994: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
3995: \begin{center}
3996: {\it Fig.\ 7: LEP + SLD measurements of $\sin^2
3997: \theta_{\text{eff}}$ and $\Gamma_\ell$, compared to the Standard
3998: Model prediction \cite{LepSite}.}
3999: \end{center}
4000: \end{minipage}
4001: \end{center}
4002: \end{figure}
4003:
4004: Another important evidence for pure electroweak correction comes from
4005: the radiative correction ${\Delta r_W}$ to the relation between $M_W$
4006: and $G_F$,
4007: \begin{equation}
4008: \left(1 - \frac{M_W^2}{M_Z^2} \right) \frac{M_W^2}{M_Z^2} =
4009: \frac{\pi \alpha(M_Z^2)}{\sqrt{2} G_F M_Z^2 (1- {\Delta r_W})} \; ,
4010: \label{mw:gf}
4011: \end{equation}
4012: where $\alpha(M_Z^2)$ is given by (\ref{alp:mz}), and therefore, the
4013: effect of the running of $\alpha$ was subtracted in the definition of
4014: ${\Delta r_W}$. Taking into account the value measured at LEP and
4015: Tevatron, $M_W = 80.394 \pm 0.042$ GeV, we have \cite{Sirlin:99}:
4016: ${(\Delta r)}_W^{\text{exp}} = - 0.02507 \pm 0.00259$. Thus, the
4017: correction representing only the electroweak contribution, not
4018: associated with the running of $\alpha$, is $\sim 10 \; \sigma$
4019: different from zero.
4020:
4021: \linha
4022:
4023: %###############################################################################
4024:
4025: \subsubsection{$g_V^\ell$, $g_A^\ell$, and the Lepton Universality} \indent
4026:
4027: The partial $Z$ width in the different lepton flavors is able to
4028: provide a very important information on the universality of the
4029: electroweak interactions. The values of $g_V^\ell$ and
4030: $g_A^\ell$ can be plotted for $\ell = e$, $\mu$ and $\tau$.
4031:
4032: \begin{figure}[ht]
4033: \protect
4034: \epsfxsize=10cm
4035: \begin{center}
4036: % t99_ga_gv_contours.eps
4037: \mbox{\psfig{file=fig08.eps,width=0.7\textwidth}}
4038: \end{center}
4039: \begin{center}
4040: \begin{minipage}[ht]{12cm}
4041: \begin{center}
4042: {\it Fig.\ 8: 68\% C.L. contours in the $g_V^\ell \times g_A^\ell$
4043: plane. The solid line is a fit assuming lepton universality. The band
4044: corresponds to the SLD result from $A_{LR}$ (\ref{alr}) measurements
4045: \cite{LepSite}.}
4046: \end{center}
4047: \end{minipage}
4048: \end{center}
4049: \end{figure}
4050:
4051: The result present in Fig.\ 8 shows that the measurements of
4052: $g_V^\ell \times g_A^\ell$ are consistent with the hypothesis that the
4053: electroweak interaction is universal and yields
4054: \[
4055: g_V^\ell = -0.03703 \pm 0.00068 \;\; , \;\;\;\;
4056: g_A^\ell = -0.50105 \pm 0.00030 \; .
4057: \]
4058: Notice that the value of $g_A^\ell$ disagrees with the Born
4059: prediction of $-0.5$ (\ref{ga}) by 3.5 $\sigma$. However they are in
4060: very good agreement with the Standard Model values \cite{pdg:98}:
4061: $(g_V^\ell)^{\text{SM}} = -0.0397 \pm 0.0003$ and
4062: $(g_A^\ell)^{\text{SM}} = -0.5064 \pm 0.0001$.
4063: This is another important evidence of the weak radiative corrections.
4064:
4065: %###############################################################################
4066:
4067: \subsubsection{Asymmetries} \indent
4068:
4069: Since parity violation comes from the difference between the right
4070: and left couplings of the $Z^0$ to fermions, it is convenient to
4071: define the combination of the vector and axial couplings of the
4072: fermions as
4073: \begin{equation}
4074: A_f = \frac{2 g_V^f g_A^f}{(g_V^f)^2 + (g_A^f)^2} \; .
4075: \label{af}
4076: \end{equation}
4077:
4078: The events $e^+ e^- \to f^+ f^-$ can be characterized by
4079: the momentum direction of the emitted fermion. We say that the final
4080: state fermion ($f^-$) travels forward ($F$) or backward ($B$) with
4081: respect to the electron ($e^-$) beam. Therefore, we can define the
4082: forward--backward asymmetry by
4083: \[
4084: {A_{FB}} \equiv \frac{\sigma_F - \sigma_B}{\sigma_F + \sigma_B} \; ,
4085: \]
4086: and at the $Z$ pole, this asymmetry is given by
4087: \begin{equation}
4088: A_{FB}^{0\, , \, f} = \frac{3}{4} A_e A_f \; .
4089: \label{afb}
4090: \end{equation}
4091:
4092: The measurement of $A_{FB}^{0\, , \, f}$ for charged leptons, and
4093: $c$ and $b$ quarks give us information only on the product of
4094: $A_e$ and $A_f$. On the other hand, the measurement of the $\tau$
4095: lepton polarization is able to determine the values of $A_e$ and
4096: $A_\tau$ separately. The longitudinal $\tau$ polarization is defined
4097: as
4098: \[
4099: {\cal P}_\tau \equiv \frac{\sigma_R - \sigma_L}{\sigma_R + \sigma_L}
4100: \; ,
4101: \]
4102: where $\sigma_{R(L)}$ is the cross section for tau--lepton pair
4103: production of a right (left) handed $\tau^-$. At the $Z$ pole, ${\cal
4104: P}_\tau$ can be written in terms of scattering $(e^-,\tau^-)$ angle
4105: $\theta$ as,
4106: \[
4107: {\cal P}_\tau = - \frac{A_\tau (1 +\cos^2\theta) + 2 A_e \cos\theta}
4108: {1 + \cos^2\theta + 2 A_e A_\tau\cos\theta} \; .
4109: \]
4110: This yields \cite{Lep:99}
4111: \[
4112: A_e = 0.1479 \pm 0.0051 \;\; , \;\;\; A_\tau = 0.1431 \pm 0.0045 \; ,
4113: \]
4114: which are in agreement with the lepton universality ($A_\ell = 0.1469
4115: \pm 0.0027$). They are also in agreement with the Standard Model
4116: prediction: $A_\ell^{\text{SM}} = 0.1475 \pm 0.0013$.
4117:
4118: This result can be used to extract information on the heavy quark
4119: couplings: $A_c = 0.646 \pm 0.043$ and $A_b = 0.899 \pm 0.025$, which
4120: should be compared with the Standard Model values of
4121: $A_c^{\text{SM}} = 0.6679 \pm 0.0006$ and $A_b^{\text{SM}} = 0.9348
4122: \pm 0.0001$.
4123:
4124: Another interesting asymmetry that can be measured by SLD is the
4125: left--right cross section asymmetry,
4126: \begin{equation}
4127: A_{\text{LR}} = \frac{\sigma_L - \sigma_R}{\sigma_L + \sigma_R} \; ,
4128: \label{alr}
4129: \end{equation}
4130: where $\sigma_{L(R)}$ is the cross section for (left--) right--handed
4131: incident electron with the positron kept unpolarized. Since, at the
4132: $Z$ pole, $A_{\text{LR}} = A_e$, we can get the best measurement of the
4133: electron couplings: $A_e = 0.1510 \pm 0.0025$ (see Fig.\ 8).
4134:
4135: %###############################################################################
4136:
4137: \subsubsection{Higgs Mass Sensitivity} \indent
4138:
4139: In order to give an idea of the sensitivity of the different
4140: electroweak observables to the Higgs boson mass, we compare in Fig.\
4141: 9 the experimental values with the the Standard Model theoretical
4142: predictions, as a function of $M_H$.
4143:
4144: The vertical band represents the experimental measurement with the
4145: respective error. The theoretical prediction includes the errors in
4146: $\alpha(M_Z^2)$, from $\Delta\alpha_{\text{had}}$ (\ref{del:alp}),
4147: $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$, and $m_t$ (see Table I).
4148:
4149: \newpage
4150: % t99_higgs_sensitivity_1.eps & t99_higgs_sensitivity_2.eps
4151: \null
4152: \vspace{-2cm}
4153: \includegraphics[width=13cm,height=9.8cm]{fig09a.eps}
4154:
4155: \vspace{-0.5cm}
4156: \hspace{1.8pt}
4157: \includegraphics[width=13cm,height=9.8cm]{fig09b.eps}
4158: \begin{center}
4159: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
4160: \begin{center}
4161: {\it Fig.\ 9: LEP measurements compared with the Standard Model
4162: predictions, as a function of $M_H$ \cite{LepSite}.}
4163: \end{center}
4164: \end{minipage}
4165: \end{center}
4166:
4167: In this figure $\sigma_h^0$ is the hadronic cross section at the $Z$
4168: pole, $R_\ell \equiv (\Gamma_{\text{had}}/\Gamma_\ell)$. $A_{FB}^{0\,
4169: , \, f}$ is defined in (\ref{afb}) and $A_f$ in (\ref{af}).
4170: $<Q_{FB}>$ is the average charge, which is related to the
4171: forward--backward asymmetries by
4172: \[
4173: < Q_{FB} > = \sum_q \; \delta_q \; A_{FB}^q \;
4174: \frac{ \Gamma_{q\bar{q}}}{\Gamma_{\text{hadr}}} \; ,
4175: \]
4176: where $\delta_q$ is the average charge difference between the $q$ and
4177: $\bar{q}$ hemispheres. For the sake of comparison $A_e$, extracted by
4178: SLD from $A_{LR}$ (\ref{alr}), is also shown. We can see from Fig.\ 9
4179: that dependence on the Higgs mass varying in the range 95 GeV $< M_H
4180: <$ 1000 GeV is quite mild for all the observables, since the Higgs
4181: effect enters only via $\log(M_H^2/M_Z^2)$ factors.
4182:
4183: \begin{center}
4184: % t99_blueband.eps
4185: \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{fig10.eps}
4186: \end{center}
4187:
4188: \begin{center}
4189: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
4190: \begin{center}
4191: {\it Fig.\ 10: $\Delta \chi^2 \equiv \chi^2 - \chi^2_{\text{min}}$ as
4192: a function of $M_H$ \cite{Lep:99,LepSite}.}
4193: \end{center}
4194: \end{minipage}
4195: \end{center}
4196:
4197: However we can extract information on $M_H$ from the global fit
4198: including all data on the different observables. In Fig.\ 10 we show
4199: the plot of $\Delta \chi^2 \equiv \chi^2 - \chi^2_{\text{min}}$
4200: versus $M_H$. The left vertical band represents the excluded region
4201: due to the direct search for the Higgs ($M_H \gtrsim 95$ GeV). The
4202: band represents an estimate of the theoretical error due to missing
4203: higher order corrections. The global fit results in $M_H =
4204: 91^{+64}_{-41}$ GeV.
4205:
4206: \null
4207: \vspace{-1cm}
4208: \begin{center}
4209: % t99_show_pull_bw.eps
4210: \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig11.eps}
4211: \end{center}
4212:
4213: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
4214: \begin{center}
4215: {\it Fig.\ 11: Comparison of the precision electroweak measurements
4216: with the Standard Model predictions \cite{LepSite}.}
4217: \end{center}
4218: \end{minipage}
4219:
4220: \vskip 0.5cm
4221: As a final comparison, we present in Fig.\ 11 a list of several
4222: electroweak observables. The experimental values are compared with
4223: the Standard Model theoretical predictions. The Pull $\equiv
4224: (O_{\text{meas}} - O_{\text{fit}})/{\sigma_{\text{meas}}}$,
4225: represents the number of standard deviations that separate the
4226: central values. This results show an impressive agreement with the
4227: Standard Model expectations.
4228:
4229: %###############################################################################
4230: %*******************************************************************************
4231: %###############################################################################
4232:
4233: %\newpage
4234: \chapter{~ The Higgs Boson Physics} \label{higgs:bos} \indent
4235:
4236:
4237: \section{Introduction}\indent
4238:
4239: The procedure of generating vector boson masses in a gauge invariant
4240: way requires the introduction of a complex doublet of scalar fields
4241: (\ref{phi}) which corresponds to four degrees of freedom. Three out
4242: of these are ``eaten'' by the gauge bosons, $W^+$, $W^-$, and $Z^0$,
4243: and become their longitudinal degree of freedom. Therefore, it
4244: remains in the physical spectrum of the theory the combination
4245: \[
4246: \frac{(\phi^0 + \bar{\phi^0} )}{\sqrt{2}} = { H + v} \; ,
4247: \]
4248: where $v$ is given by (\ref{v}), and $H$ is the physical Higgs boson
4249: field.
4250:
4251: The Higgs boson mass (\ref{mh}) can be written as
4252: \begin{equation}
4253: M_H = \sqrt{- 2 { \mu^2}} = \sqrt{2 { \lambda}} \; v =
4254: \left(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{G_F}\right)^{1/2} \sqrt{{ \lambda}} \; .
4255: \label{mass:higgs}
4256: \end{equation}
4257: Both Higgs potential parameters, $\mu^2$ and $\lambda$, are {\it a
4258: priori} unknown --- just their ratio is fixed by the low energy data
4259: [see (\ref{g:rel}) and (\ref{mw:mz})]. Therefore the Standard Model
4260: does not provide any direct information on the Higgs boson mass.
4261:
4262: The discovery of this particle is one of the challenges of the
4263: high--energy colliders. This is the most important missing piece of the
4264: Standard Model and its experimental verification could furnish very
4265: important information on the spontaneous breaking of the electroweak
4266: symmetry and on the mechanism for generating fermion masses. The
4267: phenomenology of the Standard Model Higgs boson is covered in great
4268: detail in reference \cite{Gunion:90}. Recent review articles include
4269: Ref.\ \cite{Kniehl:94}, \cite{Djouadi:95}, \cite{Spira:98},
4270: \cite{Quigg:99}. We intend to emphasize here the most relevant
4271: properties of Higgs particle and make a brief summary of the prospects
4272: for its search in the near future.
4273:
4274: \section{Higgs Boson Properties}
4275:
4276:
4277: \subsubsection{The Higgs Couplings} \indent
4278:
4279: The Higgs boson couples to all particles that get mass ($\propto v$)
4280: through the spontaneous symmetry breaking of $SU(2)_L \otimes
4281: U(1)_Y$. We collect in Table III the intensity of the coupling to
4282: the different particles from (\ref{l:sca:1}),
4283: (\ref{h:self}), (\ref{yuk:lep}), and (\ref{yuk:qua}),
4284: \begin{center}
4285: \begin{tabular}{cc}
4286: \hline\hline
4287: &\\[-0.2cm]
4288: ~~~ Coupling ~~~ & ~~~~~ Intensity ~~~ \\[0.2cm]
4289: \hline
4290: &\\[-0.2cm]
4291: $H f \bar{f}$ & $M_f/v$ \\
4292: $H W^+ W^-$ & $2 M_W^2/v$ \\
4293: $H Z^0 Z^0$ & $M_Z^2/v$ \\
4294: $H H W^+ W^-$ & $M_W^2/v^2$ \\
4295: $H H Z^0 Z^0$ & $M_Z^2/2v^2$\\
4296: $H H H$ & $M_H^2/2v$ \\
4297: $H H H H$ & $M_H^2/8v^2$\\[0.2cm]
4298: \hline\hline
4299: \end{tabular}
4300: \end{center}
4301: \centerline{\it Table III: The Higgs coupling to different particles.}
4302:
4303: \vskip 0.5cm
4304: From the results of Table III it becomes evident that the Higgs
4305: couples proportionally to the particle masses. Therefore we can
4306: establish two general principles that should guide the search of the
4307: Higgs boson: $(i)$ it will be produced in association with heavy
4308: particles; $(ii)$ it will decay into the heaviest particles that
4309: are accessible kinematically.
4310:
4311: Besides the couplings presented in Table III, the Higgs can also
4312: couple to $\gamma\gamma$ \cite{Ellis:76}, $Z\gamma$
4313: \cite{Cahn:79,Barroso:86} and also to gluons
4314: \cite{Georgi:78,Novaes:83}, at one loop level. The neutral and weak
4315: interacting Higgs boson can interact with photons through loops of
4316: charged particles that share the weak and electromagnetic
4317: interactions: leptons, quarks and $W$ boson. In the same way the
4318: Higgs couples indirectly with the gluons via loops of (weak and
4319: strong interacting) quarks.
4320:
4321: \subsubsection{Bounds on the Higgs Boson Mass} \indent
4322:
4323: Since the Higgs boson mass is not predicted by the model we should
4324: rely on some experimental and theoretical bounds to guide our future
4325: searches. The most stringent lower bound was recently established by the LEP
4326: Collaborations \cite{Higgs:99} and read
4327: \[
4328: M_H > 95.2 \; \mbox{GeV} \; .
4329: \]
4330: at 95\% C.L..
4331:
4332: It is also possible to obtain a theoretical lower bound on the Higgs
4333: boson mass based on the stability of the Higgs potential when
4334: quantum corrections to the classical potential (\ref{hig:pot}) are
4335: taken into account \cite{Sher:89}. Requiring that the standard
4336: electroweak minimum is stable ({\it i.e.} the vacuum is an absolute
4337: minimum) up to the Planck scale, $\Lambda = 10^{19}$ GeV, the
4338: following bound can be established \cite{Casas:95}:
4339: \[
4340: M_H \; \mbox {(in GeV)} > 133 + 1.92 (m_t - 175) -
4341: 4.28 \left(\frac{\alpha_s - 0.12}{0.006} \right)\; .
4342: \]
4343: The behavior of $M_H$ as a function of the scale $\Lambda$ is given
4344: in the lower curve of Fig.\ 13, for $m_t=175$ GeV and $\alpha_s =
4345: 0.118$. We see from this figure that, if a Higgs boson is discovered
4346: with $M_H \simeq 100$ GeV, it would mean that the electroweak vacuum
4347: is instable at $\Lambda \sim 10^5$ GeV \footnote{Reversing the
4348: argument, since we live in a stable vacuum, this means that the
4349: Standard Model must break down at this same scale.}.
4350:
4351:
4352: There are also some theoretical upper bounds on the Higgs boson mass.
4353: A bound can be obtained by requiring that unitarity is not violated in
4354: the scattering of vector bosons \cite{Lee:77}. Let us take as an
4355: example the $WW$ scattering represented in Fig.\ 12.
4356:
4357: \begin{figure}[ht]
4358: \protect
4359: \epsfxsize=10cm
4360: \begin{center}
4361: % wpwm_wpwm.eps
4362: \mbox{\psfig{file=fig12.eps,width=0.7\textwidth}}
4363: \end{center}
4364: \begin{center}
4365: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
4366: \begin{center}
4367: {\it Fig.\ 12: Feynman contributions to $W^+ W^- \to W^+ W^-$.}
4368: \end{center}
4369: \end{minipage}
4370: \end{center}
4371: \end{figure}
4372:
4373: We should notice that if we exclude the Higgs boson contribution by
4374: taking $M_H \to \infty$, we expect that the remaining amplitudes
4375: would eventually violate unitarity, since the theory is not
4376: renormalisable without the Higgs. Therefore, it is natural to expect
4377: that the Higgs mass should play an important r\^ole in high energy
4378: behaviour of the scattering amplitudes of longitudinally polarized
4379: vector bosons. This is what happened for instance in the reaction
4380: $e^+e^- \to W^+ W^-$ discussed in section \ref{remarks}.
4381:
4382: A convenient way to estimate amplitudes involving longitudinal gau\-ge
4383: bosons is through the use of the Goldstone Boson Equivalence
4384: Theorem \cite{Lee:77,Chanowitz:85}.
4385: This theorem states that at high energies, the amplitude ${\cal M}$
4386: for emission or absorption of a longitudinally polarized gauge boson
4387: is equal to the amplitude for emission or absorption of the
4388: corresponding Goldstone boson, up to terms that fall like $1/E^2$,
4389: {\it i.e.},
4390: \begin{equation}
4391: {\cal M}(W^\pm_L, Z^0_L) = {\cal M} (\omega^\pm, z^0) +
4392: {\cal O} \left( M_{W,Z}^2/E^2 \right) \; .
4393: \label{equ:the}
4394: \end{equation}
4395:
4396: We can use an effective Lagrangian approach to describe the Goldstone
4397: boson interactions. Starting from the Higgs doublet in terms of
4398: $\omega^\pm$ and $z^0$,
4399: \[
4400: \Phi =
4401: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
4402: \left( \ba{c}
4403: i\sqrt{2} \omega^+\\
4404: v + H - i z^0
4405: \ea \right) \; ,
4406: \]
4407: we can write the Higgs potential as
4408: \begin{eqnarray*}
4409: V(\Phi^\dagger\Phi) &=& \mu^2 \Phi^\dagger\Phi + \lambda (\Phi^\dagger\Phi)^2
4410: \\
4411: &=& \frac{1}{2} M_H^2 H^2 + \frac{g}{4} \frac{M_H^2}{M_W} H ( H^2
4412: + 2 \omega^+ \omega^- + z^{0^2}) \\
4413: && + \frac{g^2}{32} \frac{M_H^2}{M_W^2} ( H^2 + 2 \omega^+
4414: \omega^- + z^{0^2})^2 \; .
4415: \end{eqnarray*}
4416:
4417: Therefore, with the aid of (\ref{equ:the}), the amplitude for $W^+_L
4418: W^-_L \to W^+_L W^-_L$ is obtained as,
4419: \begin{eqnarray*}
4420: {\cal M} (W^+_L W^-_L \to W^+_L W^-_L) &\simeq&
4421: {\cal M} (\omega^+ \omega^- \to \omega^+ \omega^-)
4422: \\
4423: &=& - i \; \frac{g^2}{4}
4424: \frac{M_H^2}{M_W^2} \left( 2 + \frac{M_H^2}{s - M_H^2} +
4425: \frac{M_H^2}{t - M_H^2} \right) \; .
4426: \end{eqnarray*}
4427: and, at high energies, we have:
4428: \[
4429: {\cal M} (\omega^+ \omega^- \to \omega^+ \omega^-) \simeq
4430: - i \; \frac{g^2}{2} \frac{M_H^2}{M_W^2} =
4431: - i \; 2 \sqrt{2} G_F M_H^2 \; .
4432: \]
4433: Therefore, for $s$-wave, unitarity requires
4434: \[
4435: A_0 = \frac{1}{16\pi} |{\cal M}(\omega^+ \omega^- \to \omega^+
4436: \omega^-)| = \frac{2 G_F}{8 \pi \sqrt{2}} M_H^2 < 1 \; .
4437: \]
4438:
4439: When this result is combined with the other possible channels ($z^0
4440: z^0$, $z^0 h$, $hh$) it leads to the requirement that $\lambda \lesssim
4441: 8 \pi/3$ or, translated in terms of the Higgs mass,
4442: \[
4443: M_H \lesssim \left( \frac{8 \pi \sqrt{2}}{3 G_F} \right)^{1/2} \simeq
4444: 1 \, \mbox{TeV} \; .
4445: \]
4446:
4447: Another way of imposing a bound on the Higgs mass is provided by the
4448: analysis of the triviality of the Higgs potential \cite{Sher:89}. The
4449: renormalization group equation, at one loop, for the quartic coupling
4450: $\lambda$ is
4451: \[
4452: \frac{d\lambda}{dt} = \frac{1}{16 \pi^2} \left(12 \lambda^2 \right) +
4453: \; (\mbox{terms involving} \; g, g^\prime, \mbox{Yukawa}) \; ,
4454: \]
4455: where $t=\log(Q^2/\mu^2)$. Therefore, for a pure $\phi^4$ potential,
4456: {\it i.e.}, when the gauge and Yukawa couplings are neglected, we have
4457: the solution
4458: \[
4459: \frac{1}{\lambda(\mu)} - \frac{1}{\lambda(Q)} =
4460: \frac{3}{4 \pi^2} \log\left(\frac{Q^2}{\mu^2}\right) \; .
4461: \]
4462:
4463: \begin{figure}[ht]
4464: \protect
4465: \epsfxsize=10cm
4466: \begin{center}
4467: % quiros.eps
4468: \mbox{\psfig{file=fig13.eps,width=0.6\textwidth}}
4469: \end{center}
4470: \begin{center}
4471: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
4472: \begin{center}
4473: {\it Fig.\ 13: Perturbative and stability bound on $M_H$ as a
4474: function of the scale $\Lambda$, from Ref.\ \cite{Casas:95}.}
4475: \end{center}
4476: \end{minipage}
4477: \end{center}
4478: \end{figure}
4479:
4480: Since the stability of the Higgs potential requires that $\lambda(Q)
4481: \geq 0$, we can write
4482: \begin{equation}
4483: \lambda(\mu) \leq \frac{4 \pi^2}{3\log(Q^2/\mu^2)} \; ,
4484: \label{lambda:1}
4485: \end{equation}
4486: and, for large values of $Q^2$, we can see that $\lambda(\mu) \to 0$ and
4487: the theory becomes trivial, that is, not interacting. The relation
4488: (\ref{lambda:1}), can be written as
4489: \[
4490: Q^2 \leq \mu^2 \exp\left[\frac{4 \pi^2}{3 \lambda(\mu)} \right] \; .
4491: \]
4492:
4493: This result gives rise to a bound in the Higgs boson mass when we
4494: consider the scale $\mu^2 = M_H^2$ and take into account
4495: (\ref{mass:higgs}),
4496: \[
4497: Q^2 \leq M_H^2 \exp\left[\frac{8 \pi^2 v^2}{3 M_H^2} \right]\; .
4498: \]
4499: Therefore, there is a maximum scale $Q^2 = \Lambda^2$, for a given
4500: Higgs boson mass, up to where the Standard Model theory should be
4501: valid.
4502:
4503: In Fig.\ 13, we present the stability bound (lower curve) and the
4504: triviality bound (upper curve) on the Higgs boson mass as a function
4505: of the scale $\Lambda$. If we expect that the Standard Model is valid
4506: up to a given scale --- let us say $\Lambda_{\text{GUT}} \sim
4507: 10^{16}$ GeV \cite{Ross:84} --- a bound on the Higgs mass should lie
4508: between both curves, in this case $140$ GeV $\lesssim M_H \lesssim
4509: 180$ GeV.
4510:
4511: %###############################################################################
4512: \section{Production and Decay Modes}
4513:
4514: \subsection{The Decay Modes of the Higgs Boson} \indent
4515:
4516: The possible decay modes of the Higgs boson are essentially determined
4517: by the value of its mass. In Fig.\ 14 we present the Higgs branching
4518: ratio for different $M_H$.
4519:
4520: \begin{figure}[ht]
4521: \protect
4522: \epsfxsize=10cm
4523: \begin{center}
4524: % wid_br.eps
4525: \mbox{\psfig{file=fig14.eps,width=0.9\textwidth}}
4526: \end{center}
4527: \begin{center}
4528: \begin{minipage}[h]{12cm}
4529: \begin{center}
4530: {\it Fig.\ 14: The branching ratios of the Higgs boson as a function of
4531: its mass from Ref.\ \cite{Spira:98}.}
4532: \end{center}
4533: \end{minipage}
4534: \end{center}
4535: \end{figure}
4536:
4537: When the Higgs boson mass lies in the range $95$ GeV $< M_H < 130$
4538: GeV, the Higgs is quite narrow $\Gamma_H < 10$ MeV and the main
4539: branching ratios come from the heaviest fermions that are accessible
4540: kinematically:
4541: \begin{eqnarray*}
4542: BR(H \to b \bar{b}) &\sim & 90 \% \; , \\
4543: BR(H \to c \bar{c}) &\simeq & BR(H \to \tau^+ \tau^-) \sim 5 \% \; .
4544: \end{eqnarray*}
4545: For $M_H \simeq 120$ GeV the gluon--gluon channel is important
4546: giving a contribution of $\sim 5 \%$ of the width. For a heavier
4547: Higgs, {\it i.e.} $M_H > 130$ GeV, the vector boson channels $H \to V
4548: V^\ast$, with $V = W$, $Z$, are dominant,
4549: \begin{eqnarray*}
4550: BR(H \to W^+ W^-) & \sim & 65 \% \; ,\\
4551: BR(H \to Z^0 Z^0) & \sim & 35 \% \; .
4552: \end{eqnarray*}
4553: For $M_H \simeq 500$ GeV the top quark pair production contributes
4554: with $\sim \; 20 \%$ of the width. Note that the BR($H \to
4555: \gamma\gamma$) is always small ${\cal O}(10^{-3})$. However, we can
4556: think of some alternative models that give rise to larger
4557: $H\gamma\gamma$ couplings (for a review see \cite{Concha:99} and
4558: references therein). For large values of $M_H$ the Higgs becomes a
4559: very wide resonance: $\Gamma_H \sim [M_H \; \mbox{(in TeV)}]^3/2$.
4560:
4561:
4562: %###############################################################################
4563: \subsection{Production Mechanisms at Colliders}
4564:
4565: \subsubsection{Electron--Positron Colliders}\indent
4566:
4567: The Higgs boson can be produced in electron--positron collisions via
4568: the Bjorken mechanism \cite{Bjorken:76} or vector boson fusion
4569: \cite{Cahn:84},
4570: \[
4571: \ba{ll}
4572: \mbox{($i$) Bjorken:} & ~~~ e^+ + e^- \to Z \to Z \; H \; , \\[0.2cm]
4573: \mbox{($ii$) WW Fusion:} & ~~~ e^+ + e^- \to \nu \bar{\nu}
4574: (WW) \to \nu \bar{\nu} \; H \; , \\[0.2cm]
4575: \mbox{($iii$) ZZ Fusion:} & ~~~ e^+ + e^- \to e^+ e^- (ZZ) \to
4576: e^+ e^- \; H \; .
4577: \ea
4578: \]
4579:
4580: At LEPI and II, where $\sqrt{s} \simeq M_Z$ or $2 \, M_W$ the Higgs
4581: production is dominated by the Bjorken mechanism and they were able
4582: to rule out from very small Higgs masses up to 95.2 GeV
4583: \cite{Higgs:99}. Maybe, when the whole analysis is complete, they will
4584: be able to rule out up to $M_H \sim 106$ GeV.
4585:
4586: At the future $e^+e^-$ accelerators, like the Next Linear Collider
4587: \cite{Nlc:Review}, where $\sqrt{s} = 500$ GeV, the production of a
4588: Higgs with $100 < M_H < 200$ GeV will be dominated by the $WW$
4589: fusion, since its cross section behaves like $\sigma \propto
4590: \log(s/M_H^2)$ and therefore dominates at high energies. We can
4591: expect around $2000$ events per year for an integrated luminosity of
4592: ${\cal L} \simeq 50$ fb$^{-1}$, and the Next Linear Collider should
4593: be able to explore up to $M_H \sim 350$ GeV.
4594:
4595: %###############################################################################
4596:
4597: \subsubsection{Hadron Colliders} \indent
4598:
4599: At proton--(anti)proton collisions the Higgs boson can be produced via
4600: the gluon fusion mechanism \cite{Georgi:78,Novaes:83}, through the vector
4601: boson fusion and in association with a $W^\pm$ or a $Z^0$,
4602:
4603: \[
4604: \ba{ll}
4605: \mbox{($i$) Gluon fusion:} &
4606: ~~~ p \bar{p} \to gg \to H \; , \\[0.2cm]
4607: \mbox{($ii$) VV Fusion:} &
4608: ~~~ p \bar{p} \to VV \to H \; , \\[0.2cm]
4609: \mbox{($iii$) Association with V:} &
4610: ~~~ p \bar{p} \to q\bar{q}^\prime \to V \; H \; .
4611: \ea
4612: \]
4613:
4614: At the Fermilab Tevatron \cite{Stange:94}, with $\sqrt{s} = 1.8$
4615: ($2$) TeV, the Higgs is better produced in association with vector
4616: boson and they look for the $V H (\to b \bar{b})$ signature. After the
4617: improvement in the luminosity at TEV33 they will need ${\cal L} \sim 10$
4618: fb$^{-1}$ to explore up to $M_H \sim 100$ GeV with $5 \, \sigma$.
4619:
4620: At the CERN Large Hadron Collider \cite{Spira:95}, that will operate
4621: with $\sqrt{s} = 14$ TeV, the dominant production mechanism is
4622: through the gluon fusion and the best signature will be $H \to ZZ
4623: \to 4 \, \ell^\pm$ for $M_H > 130$ GeV. For $M_H < 130$ GeV they
4624: should rely on the small BR$(H \to \gamma\gamma) \sim 10^{-3}$. We
4625: expect that the LHC can explore up to $M_H \sim 700$ GeV with an
4626: integrated luminosity of ${\cal L} \sim 100$ fb$^{-1}$.
4627:
4628: %\newpage
4629: Once the Higgs boson is discovered it is important to establish with
4630: precision several of its properties like mass, spin, parity and width.
4631: The next step would be to search for processes involving multiple Higgs
4632: production, like $VV \to HH$ or $gg \to HH$, which could give some
4633: information on the Higgs self--coupling.
4634:
4635: %\newpage
4636: \chapter{Closing Remarks} \indent
4637:
4638: In the last 30 years, we have witnessed the striking success of a
4639: gauge theory for the electroweak interactions. The Standard Model
4640: made some new and crucial predictions. The existence of a weak
4641: neutral current and of intermediate vector bosons, with definite
4642: relation between their masses, were confirmed by the experiments.
4643:
4644: Recently, a set of very precise tests were performed by Tevatron, LEP
4645: and SLC colliders that were able to reach an accuracy of 0.1\% or
4646: even better, in the measurement of the electroweak parameters. This
4647: guarantees that even the quantum structure of the model was
4648: successfully confronted with the experimental data. It was verified
4649: that the $W$ and $Z$ couplings to leptons and quarks have exactly the
4650: same values anticipated by the Standard Model. We already have some
4651: strong hints that the triple--gauge--boson couplings respect the
4652: structure prescribed by the $SU(2)_L \otimes U(1)_Y$ gauge symmetry.
4653: The Higgs boson, remnant of the spontaneous symmetry breaking, has
4654: not yet been discovered. However, important information, extracted
4655: from the global fitting of data taking into account the loop effects
4656: of the Higgs, assures that this particle is just around the corner.
4657: The Higgs mass should be less than $\sim 260$ GeV at 95\% C.L., in
4658: full agreement with the theoretical upper bounds for the Higgs mass.
4659:
4660: These remarkable achievements let just a small room for the new
4661: physics beyond the Standard Model. Nevertheless, we still have some
4662: conceptual difficulties like the hierarchy problem, that may indicate
4663: that the explanation provided by the Standard Model should not be
4664: the end of the story.
4665:
4666: \linha
4667:
4668: A series of alternative theories --- technicolour, grand unified
4669: theory, supersymmetric extensions, superstrings, extra dimension
4670: theories, etc --- have been proposed, but they all suffer from lack
4671: of an experimental spark. Nevertheless, the physics beyond the
4672: Standard Model is also beyond the scope of these lectures . . .
4673:
4674: \subsection*{Acknowledgments} \indent
4675:
4676: We are grateful to M.\ C.\ Gonzalez--Garcia and T.\ L.\ Lungov for
4677: the critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by
4678: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cien\-t\'{\i}\-fi\-co e
4679: Tecnol\'ogico (CNPq), by Funda\c{c}\~ao de Amparo \`a Pesquisa do
4680: Estado de S\~ao Paulo (FAPESP), by Programa de Apoio a N\'ucleos de
4681: Excel\^encia (PRONEX), and by Funda\c{c}\~ao para o Desenvolvimento
4682: da Universidade Estadual Paulista (FUNDUNESP).
4683:
4684: %###############################################################################
4685: %*******************************************************************************
4686:
4687: \begin{thebibliography}{100}
4688: \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{\protect\numberline{}{References}}
4689:
4690: \bibitem{Quigg:83}
4691: C. Quigg, {\em Gauge Theories of the Strong, Weak, and Electromagnetc
4692: Interactions} (Addison--Wesley Pub. Co., Menlo Park, 1983).
4693:
4694: \bibitem{Cheng:84}
4695: T.~P. Cheng and L.-F. Li, {\em Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Physics}
4696: (Claredon Press, Oxford, 1984).
4697:
4698: \bibitem{Halzen:84}
4699: The partial $Z$ width in the different lepton flavors is able to
4700: provide a very important information on the universality of the
4701: electroweak interactions. The values of $g_V^\ell$ and
4702: F. Halzen and A.~D. Martin, {\em Quarks and Leptons: An Introductory Course on
4703: Modern Particle Physics} (John Wiley \& Sons, New York, 1984).
4704:
4705: \bibitem{Aitchison:90}
4706: I.~J.~R. Aitchison and A.~J.~G. Hey, {\em Gauge Theories in Particle Physics :
4707: A Practical Introduction} (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1990).
4708:
4709: \bibitem{Renton:90}
4710: P. Renton, {\em Electroweak Interactions: An Introduction to the Physics of
4711: Quarks and Leptons} (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).
4712:
4713: \bibitem{Donoghue:92}
4714: E.~Golowich J.~F.~Donoghue and B.~R. Holstein, {\em Dynamics of the Standard
4715: Model} (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
4716:
4717: \bibitem{Leader:96}
4718: E.~Predazzi E.~Leader, {\em An Introduction to Gauge Theories and Modern
4719: Particle Physics} (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
4720:
4721: \bibitem{Abers:73}
4722: E.~S. Abers and B.~W. Lee, Phys.\ Rep.\ {\bf 9}, 1 (1973).
4723:
4724: \bibitem{Kim:81}
4725: M.~Levine J.~E.~Kim, P.~Langacker and H.~H. Williams, Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf
4726: 53}, 211 (1981).
4727:
4728: \bibitem{Beg:82}
4729: M.~A.~B. Beg and A. Sirlin, Phys.\ Rep.\ {\bf 88}, 1 (1982).
4730:
4731: \bibitem{Chanowitz:88}
4732: M.~S. Chanowitz, Ann.\ Rev.\ Nucl.\ Part.\ Sci.\ {\bf 38}, 323 (1988).
4733:
4734: \bibitem{Cahn:89}
4735: R.~N. Cahn and G. Goldhaber, {\em The Experimental Foundations of Particle
4736: Physics} (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1989).
4737:
4738: \bibitem{AIP:96}
4739: V.~V.~Ezhela {{\it et al.}}, {\em Particle Physics: One Hundred Years of
4740: Discoveries} (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1996).
4741:
4742: \bibitem{Schwinger:58}
4743: J.~Schwinger {(editor)}, {\em Selected Papers on Quantum Electrodynamics}
4744: (Dover Pub., Inc., New York, 1981).
4745:
4746: \bibitem{Lai:81}
4747: C.~H.~Lai {(editor)}, {\em Selected Papers on Gauge Theory of Weak and
4748: Electromagnetic Interactions} (World Scientific, Singapore, 1981).
4749:
4750: \bibitem{Becquerel:96}
4751: H. Becquerel, Compt. Ren. {\bf 122}, 501 (1896), ({F}ive papers were
4752: published in the same issue. See also pages 559, 689, 762, and 1086).
4753:
4754: \bibitem{Chadwick:14}
4755: J. Chadwick, Verhandl Dtsch. Phys. Ges. {\bf 16}, 383 (1914).
4756:
4757: \bibitem{Ellis:27}
4758: C.~D. Ellis and W.~A. Wooster, Proc. Roy. Soc. {\bf A117}, 109 (1927).
4759:
4760: \bibitem{Dirac:27}
4761: P.~A.~M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. {\bf A114}, 243 (1927); {\it idem}, A114, 710
4762: (1927).
4763:
4764: \bibitem{Pauli:30}
4765: W. Pauli, {\it Open Letter to Radioactive Persons}, 1930, for an English
4766: translation see: Physics Today {\bf 31}, 27 (1978).
4767:
4768: \bibitem{Oppenheimer:30}
4769: J.~R. Oppenheimer, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 35}, 461 (1930).
4770:
4771: \bibitem{Pauli:34}
4772: W. Pauli, in {\em Septi\`eme Conseil de Physique, Solvay} (Gauthier--Villars,
4773: Paris, 1934), p.\ 324.
4774:
4775: \bibitem{Fermi:34}
4776: E. Fermi, Z.\ Phys.\ {\bf 88}, 161 (1934); {\it idem}, Nuovo Cim.\ {\bf 11},
4777: 1 (1934).
4778:
4779: \bibitem{Gamow:36}
4780: G. Gamow and E. Teller, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 49}, 895 (1936).
4781:
4782: \bibitem{Block:37}
4783: F. Bloch and A. Nordsieck, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 52}, 54 (1937).
4784:
4785: \bibitem{Williams:40}
4786: E.~J. Williams and G.~E. Roberts, Nature {\bf 145}, 102 (1940).
4787:
4788: \bibitem{Tomonaga:43}
4789: S. Tomonaga, Bull. I. P. C. R. (Riken Iho) {\bf 22}, 545 (1943), for the
4790: English translation see Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\, {\bf 1}, 27 (1946).
4791:
4792: \bibitem{Pontecorvo:47}
4793: B. Pontecorvo, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 72}, 246 (1947).
4794:
4795: \bibitem{Bethe:47}
4796: H.~A. Bethe, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 72}, 339 (1947).
4797:
4798: \bibitem{Kusch:47}
4799: P. Kusch and H.~M. Foley, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 72}, 1256 (1947).
4800:
4801: \bibitem{Schwinger:48a}
4802: J. Schwinger, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 73}, 416 (1948).
4803:
4804: \bibitem{pdg:98}
4805: C.~Caso {\it et al.}, The European Physical Journal 1 (1998).
4806:
4807: \bibitem{Feynman:48}
4808: R.~P. Feynman, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 74}, 1430 (1948); {\it idem}, {\bf 76}, 769
4809: (1949).
4810:
4811: \bibitem{Schwinger:48b}
4812: J. Schwinger, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 74}, 1439 (1948); {\it idem}, {\bf 75}, 651
4813: (1949).
4814:
4815: \bibitem{Tati:48}
4816: T. Tati and S. Tomonaga, Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 3}, 391 (1948); see also:
4817: Z. Koba, T. Tati and S. Tomonaga, Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 2}, 101 and 198
4818: (1947).
4819:
4820: \bibitem{Dyson:49}
4821: F.J. Dyson, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 75}, 486 (1949).
4822:
4823: \bibitem{Wheeler:49}
4824: J. Tiomno and J.~A. Wheeler, Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 21}, 144 (1949).
4825:
4826: \bibitem{Lee:49}
4827: T.~D. Lee, M.~N. Rosenbluth, and C.~N. Yang, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 75}, 905
4828: (1949).
4829:
4830: \bibitem{Ward:50}
4831: J.~C. Ward, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 78}, 182 (1950).
4832:
4833: \bibitem{Yang:54}
4834: C.~N. Yang and R.~L. Mills, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 96}, 191 (1954).
4835:
4836: \bibitem{Alvarez:55}
4837: L.~W. Alvarez and S. Goldhaber, Nuovo Cim.\ {\bf 2}, 344 (1955).
4838:
4839: \bibitem{Birge:55}
4840: R.~W.~Birge {{\it et al.}}, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 100}, 430 (1955).
4841:
4842: \bibitem{Lee:56}
4843: T.~D. Lee and C.~N. Yang, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 104}, 254 (1956).
4844:
4845: \bibitem{Wu:57}
4846: C.~S.~Wu {{\it et al.}}, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 105}, 1413 (1957).
4847:
4848: \bibitem{Garwin:57}
4849: R.~L. Garwin, L.~M. Lederman, and M. Weinrich, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 105}, 1415
4850: (1957).
4851:
4852: \bibitem{Friedman:57}
4853: J.~I. Friedman and V.~L. Teledgi, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 105}, 1681 (1957).
4854:
4855: \bibitem{Frauenfelder:57}
4856: H.~Frauenfelder {{\it et al.}}, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 106}, 386 (1957).
4857:
4858: \bibitem{Salam:57}
4859: A. Salam, Nuovo Cim.\ {\bf 5}, 299 (1957).
4860:
4861: \bibitem{Lee:57a}
4862: T.~D. Lee and C.~N. Yang, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 105}, 1671 (1957).
4863:
4864: \bibitem{Landau:57}
4865: L.~D. Landau, Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 32}, 407 (1957); see also JETP
4866: {\bf 5}, 337 (1957).
4867:
4868: \bibitem{Schwinger:57}
4869: J. Schwinger, Ann.\ Phys.\ {\bf 2}, 407 (1957).
4870:
4871: \bibitem{Lee:57b}
4872: T.~D. Lee and C.~N. Yang, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 108}, 1611 (1957).
4873:
4874: \bibitem{Feynman:58}
4875: R.~P. Feynman and M. Gell-Mann, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 109}, 193 (1958).
4876:
4877: \bibitem{Marshak:58}
4878: R.~E. Marshak and E.~C.~G. Sudarshan, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 109}, 1860 (1958).
4879:
4880: \bibitem{Sakurai:58}
4881: J.~J. Sakurai, Nuovo Cim.\ {\bf 7}, 649 (1958).
4882:
4883: \bibitem{Lopes:58}
4884: J.~Leite Lopes, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 8}, 234 (1958).
4885:
4886: \bibitem{Goldhaber:58}
4887: M. Goldhaber, L. Grodzins, and A.~W. Sunyar, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 109}, 1015
4888: (1958).
4889:
4890: \bibitem{Goldstone:61}
4891: J. Goldstone, Nuovo Cim.\ {\bf 19}, 154 (1961); see also: Y. Nambu, Phys.\
4892: Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 4}, 380 (1962).
4893:
4894: \bibitem{Salam:61}
4895: A. Salam and J.~C. Ward, Nuovo Cim.\ {\bf 19}, 165 (1961).
4896:
4897: \bibitem{Glashow:61}
4898: S.~L. Glashow, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 22}, 579 (1961).
4899:
4900: \bibitem{Cabibbo:63}
4901: N. Cabibbo, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 10}, 531 (1963).
4902:
4903: \bibitem{Bjorken:64}
4904: S.~L.~Glashow J.~D.~Bjorken, Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf 11}, 255 (1964).
4905:
4906: \bibitem{Higgs:64}
4907: P.~W. Higgs, Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf 12}, 132 (1964).
4908:
4909: \bibitem{Englert:64}
4910: F. Englert and R. Brout, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 13}, 321 (1964).
4911:
4912: \bibitem{Guralnik:64}
4913: G.~S. Guralnik, C.~R. Hagen, and T.~W.~B. Kibble, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 13},
4914: 585 (1964).
4915:
4916: \bibitem{Christenson:64}
4917: J.~H. Christenson, J.~W. Cronin, V.~L. Fitch, and R. Turlay, Phys.\ Rev.\
4918: Lett.\ {\bf 13}, 138 (1964).
4919:
4920: \bibitem{Salam:64}
4921: A. Salam and J.~C. Ward, Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf 13}, 168 (1964).
4922:
4923: \bibitem{Kibble:67}
4924: T.~W.~B. Kibble, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 155}, 1554 (1967).
4925:
4926: \bibitem{Weinberg:67}
4927: S. Weinberg, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 19}, 1264 (1967).
4928:
4929: \bibitem{Faddeev:67}
4930: L.~D. Faddeev and V.~N. Popov, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 25}, 29 (1967).
4931:
4932: \bibitem{Salam:68}
4933: A. Salam, in {\em ``Elementary Particle Theory'', The Nobel Symposium n\b{o}
4934: 8}, edited by N. Svartholm (Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1968), p.\ 367.
4935:
4936: \bibitem{Glashow:70}
4937: S.~L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 2}, 1285
4938: (1970).
4939:
4940: \bibitem{Hooft:71}
4941: G. 't~Hooft, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B33}, 173 (1971); {\it idem}, {\bf B35}, 167
4942: (1971).
4943:
4944: \bibitem{Kobayashi:73}
4945: M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 49}, 652 (1973).
4946:
4947: \bibitem{Hasert:73a}
4948: F.~J.~Hasert {{\it et al.}}, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 46}, 121 (1973); {\it
4949: idem}, B {\bf 46}, 138 (1973).
4950:
4951: \bibitem{Benvenuti:74}
4952: A.~Benvenuti {{\it et al.}}, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 32}, 800 (1974).
4953:
4954: \bibitem{Perl:75}
4955: M.~L.~Perl {{\it et al.}}, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 35}, 1489 (1975).
4956:
4957: \bibitem{Herb:77}
4958: S.~W.~Herb {{\it et al.}}, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 39}, 252 (1977).
4959:
4960: \bibitem{Arnison:83a}
4961: G.~Arnison~{{\it et al.}} {(UA1 Collab.)}, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 122}, 103
4962: (1983).
4963:
4964: \bibitem{Banner:83}
4965: M.~Banner~{{\it et al.}} {(UA2 Collab.)}, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 122}, 476
4966: (1983).
4967:
4968: \bibitem{Arnison:83b}
4969: G.~Arnison~{{\it et al.}} {(UA1 Collab.)}, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 126}, 398
4970: (1983).
4971:
4972: \bibitem{Bagnaia:83}
4973: P.~Bagnaia~{{\it et al.}} {(UA2 Collab.)}, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 129}, 130
4974: (1983).
4975:
4976: \bibitem{Dyck:86}
4977: R.~S.~Van Dyck, P.~B. Schwinberg, and H.~G. Dehmelt, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 34},
4978: 722 (1986).
4979:
4980: \bibitem{Albrecht:87}
4981: H.~Albrecht~{{\it et al.}} {(ARGUS Collab.)}, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 192}, 245
4982: (1987).
4983:
4984: \bibitem{Abrams:89}
4985: G.~S. Abrams~{{\it et al.}} {(MARK--II Collab.)}, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 63},
4986: 2173 (1989).
4987:
4988: \bibitem{Lep:92}
4989: {LEP Collaborations: ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL}, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 276},
4990: 247 (1992).
4991:
4992: \bibitem{Abe:95}
4993: F.~Abe~{{\it et al.}} {(CDF Collab.)}, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 2626
4994: (1995).
4995:
4996: \bibitem{Abachi:95}
4997: S.~Abachi~{{\it et al.}} {(D\O\ Collab.)}, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 2632
4998: (1995).
4999:
5000: \bibitem{Gross:73}
5001: D.~J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 30}, 1343 (1973).
5002:
5003: \bibitem{Politzer:73}
5004: H.~D. Politzer, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 30}, 1346 (1973).
5005:
5006: \bibitem{Heisenberg:32}
5007: W. Heisenberg, Z.\ Phys.\ {\bf 77}, 1 (1932).
5008:
5009: \bibitem{Utiyama:56}
5010: R. Utiyama, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 101}, 1597 (1956).
5011:
5012: \bibitem{Weinberg:96}
5013: S. Weinberg, {\em The Quantum Theory of Fields} (Cambridge University Press,
5014: Cambridge, 1996), vol.\ II, pp. 164--167.
5015:
5016: \bibitem{Bludman:58}
5017: S.~A. Bludman, Nuovo Cim.\ {\bf 9}, 433 (1958).
5018:
5019: \bibitem{Fujikawa:72}
5020: B.~W.~Lee K.~Fujikawa and Sanda, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 6}, 2923 (1972).
5021:
5022: \bibitem{Llwellyn:73}
5023: C.~H.~Llwellyn Smith, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 46}, 233 (1973).
5024:
5025: \bibitem{Gaillard:74}
5026: M.~K. Gaillard and B.~W. Lee, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 10}, 897 (1974).
5027:
5028: \bibitem{Winstein:93}
5029: B. Winstein and L. Wolfenstein, Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 65}, 1113 (1993).
5030:
5031: \bibitem{SolarNeutrino:99}
5032: Y. Suzuki, talk given at the XIX International Symposium on Lepton and Photon
5033: Interactions at High Energies Stanford University (1999).
5034:
5035: \bibitem{AtmosphericNeutrino:99}
5036: T. Mann, talk given at the XIX International Symposium on Lepton and Photon
5037: Interactions at High Energies Stanford University (1999).
5038:
5039: \bibitem{Seesaw:79}
5040: R.~Slansky M.~Gell-Mann, P.~Ramond, in {\em Supergravity}, {}, edited by P.
5041: van Nieuwenhuizen and D.~Z. Freedman (North Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdan,
5042: 1979), pp.\ Print--80--0576 (CERN); see also, R. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,
5043: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 44}, 912 (1980).
5044:
5045: \bibitem{Hollik:94}
5046: W. Hollik, in {\em Particle and Fields}, Proceedings of the VII J. A. Swieca
5047: Summer School, edited by O.~J.~P. \'Eboli and V.~O. Rivelles (World
5048: Scientific, Singapore, 1994), p.\ 169.
5049:
5050: \bibitem{Barbieri:95}
5051: R. Barbieri, in {\em 1994 European School of High Energy Phys\-ics},
5052: Proceedings of the 1994 European School of High Energy Phys\-ics, edited by
5053: N. Ellis and M.~B. Gavela (CERN, Geneva, 1995), p.\ 43.
5054:
5055: \bibitem{Sirlin:99}
5056: A. Sirlin, talk given at the XIX International Symposium on Lepton and Photon
5057: Interactions at High Energies Stanford University (1999), hep-ph/9912227.
5058:
5059: \bibitem{Lep:99}
5060: {The LEP Collaborations ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, the LEP Electroweak Working
5061: Group and the SLD Heavy Flavour and Electroweak Groups}, Technical Report
5062: No.~CERN--EP/99--15 (unpublished).
5063:
5064: \bibitem{Sld:97}
5065: S.~Willocq (for~the SLD~Collaboration), in {\em The strong interaction, from
5066: hadrons to partons}, Proceedings of the 24th Annual SLAC Summer Institute on
5067: Particle Physics: The Strong Interaction, From Hadrons to Protons, edited by
5068: L.~Dixon J.~Chan, L.~DePorcel (Springfield, NTIS, 1997), p.\ 405.
5069:
5070: \bibitem{Adeva:90}
5071: B.~Adeva~{{\it et al.}} {(L3 Collab.)}, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 247}, 473
5072: (1990).
5073:
5074: \bibitem{Kim:99}
5075: {S. Kim (for the CDF and D\O\ Collaborations)}, Technical Report
5076: No.~FERMILAB--Conf-99/262--E (unpublished).
5077:
5078: \bibitem{Eidelmann:95}
5079: S. Eidelmann and F. Jegerlehmer, Z.\ Phys.\ 585 (1995).
5080:
5081: \bibitem{Steinhauser:98}
5082: M. Steinhauser, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 429}, 158 (1998).
5083:
5084: \bibitem{Higgs:99}
5085: {ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, and the LEP Working Group for Higgs Boson Searches},
5086: Technical Report No.~ALEPH 99--081 CONF 99-052, submitted to the
5087: International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Tampere, Finland
5088: (unpublished).
5089:
5090: \bibitem{Montagna:97}
5091: O.~Nicrosini G.~Montagna and F. Piccinini, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 406}, 243
5092: (1997).
5093:
5094: \bibitem{LepSite}
5095: See also~the LEP Electroweak Working Group Home~Page, {{\tt
5096: http://www.cern.ch/LEPEWWG/}} (Summer 99 Plots).
5097:
5098: \bibitem{Gunion:90}
5099: G.~Kane J.~F.~Gunion, H. E.~Haber and S. Dawson, {\em The Higgs Hunter's Guide}
5100: (Addison--Wesley Pub. Co., Menlo Park, 1990), and references therein.
5101:
5102: \bibitem{Kniehl:94}
5103: B.~A. Kniehl, Phys.\ Rep.\ {\bf 240}, 211 (1994).
5104:
5105: \bibitem{Djouadi:95}
5106: A. Djouadi, Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 10}, 1 (1995).
5107:
5108: \bibitem{Spira:98}
5109: M. Spira and P. Zerwas, in {\em 36th International University School of
5110: Nuclear and Particle Physics: Computing Particle Properties (36 IUKT)},
5111: Lecture Notes in Physics 512, edited by C.~B.~Land H.~Gausterer (Springer,
5112: Berlin, 1998), p.\ 161.
5113:
5114: \bibitem{Quigg:99}
5115: C. Quigg, Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ {\bf B30}, 2145 (1999).
5116:
5117: \bibitem{Ellis:76}
5118: M.~K.~Gaillard J.~Ellis and D.~V. Nanopoulos, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 106}, 292
5119: (1976).
5120:
5121: \bibitem{Cahn:79}
5122: N.~Fleishon R.~N.~Cahn, M. S.~Chanowitz, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 82}, 113
5123: (1979).
5124:
5125: \bibitem{Barroso:86}
5126: J.~C.~Rom\~ao A.~Barroso, J.~Pulido, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 267}, 509 (1986).
5127:
5128: \bibitem{Georgi:78}
5129: M.~E. Machacek D. V.~Nanopoulos H.~M.~Georgi, S. L.~Glashow, Phys.\ Rev.\
5130: Lett.\ {\bf 40}, 692 (1978).
5131:
5132: \bibitem{Novaes:83}
5133: S.~F. Novaes, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 27}, 2211 (1983).
5134:
5135: \bibitem{Sher:89}
5136: M. Sher, Phys.\ Rep.\ {\bf 179}, 273 (1989).
5137:
5138: \bibitem{Casas:95}
5139: M.~Quiros J.~A.~Casas, J. R.~Espinosa, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 342}, 171
5140: (1995); see also M. Quiros, in {\it Perspectives on Higgs Physics II},
5141: edited by G. L. Kane (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), hep-ph/9703412.
5142:
5143: \bibitem{Lee:77}
5144: H.~B.~Thacker B.~W.~Lee, C.~Quigg, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 16}, 1519 (1977).
5145:
5146: \bibitem{Chanowitz:85}
5147: M. Chanowitz and M.~K. Gaillard, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 261}, 379 (1985).
5148:
5149: \bibitem{Ross:84}
5150: G.~G. Ross, {\em Grand Unified Theories} (Addison--Wesley Pub. Co., Menlo Park,
5151: 1984), and references therein.
5152:
5153: \bibitem{Concha:99}
5154: M.~C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 14}, 3121 (1999).
5155:
5156: \bibitem{Bjorken:76}
5157: {J. D. Bjorken, {\it Proccedings of the Summer Institute on Particle Physics}},
5158: Technical Report No.~SLAC-198 (unpublished).
5159:
5160: \bibitem{Cahn:84}
5161: R. Cahn and S. Dawson, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 136}, 196 (1984), [{E}: B {\bf
5162: 138}, 464 (1984)].
5163:
5164: \bibitem{Nlc:Review}
5165: H. Murayama and M.~E. Peskin, Ann.\ Rev.\ Nucl.\ Part.\ Sci.\ {\bf 46}, 533
5166: (1996), ~ {E.} Accomando {{\it et al.}}, Phys. Rep. {\bf 299}, 1 (1998).
5167:
5168: \bibitem{Stange:94}
5169: W.~Marciano A.~Stange and S. Willenbrock, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 1354
5170: (1994); {\it idem}, D {\bf 50}, 4491 (1994).
5171:
5172: \bibitem{Spira:95}
5173: D.~Graudenz M.~Spira, A.~Djouadi and P.~M. Zerwas, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 453},
5174: 17 (1995).
5175:
5176: \end{thebibliography}
5177:
5178: %###############################################################################
5179:
5180: \end{document}
5181:
5182: