1: \documentstyle[12pt,epsfig]{article}
2:
3: \voffset0cm
4: \hoffset0cm
5: \oddsidemargin0cm
6: \evensidemargin0cm
7: \topmargin0cm
8: \textwidth16.cm
9: \textheight22.cm
10: \setlength{\arraycolsep}{0.5mm}
11:
12: \newcommand{\agt}{\,\rlap{\lower 3.5 pt \hbox{$\mathchar \sim$}} \raise 1pt
13: \hbox {$>$}\,}
14: \newcommand{\alt}{\,\rlap{\lower 3.5 pt \hbox{$\mathchar \sim$}} \raise 1pt
15: \hbox {$<$}\,}
16:
17: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
18: %The following macro is from world_sci.sty, originally written for DPF91
19:
20: \catcode`@=11
21: % Collapse citation numbers to ranges. Non-numeric and undefined labels
22: % are handled. No sorting is done. E.g., 1,3,2,3,4,5,foo,1,2,3,?,4,5
23: % gives 1,3,2-5,foo,1-3,?,4,5
24: \newcount\@tempcntc
25: \def\@citex[#1]#2{\if@filesw\immediate\write\@auxout{\string\citation{#2}}\fi
26: \@tempcnta\z@\@tempcntb\m@ne\def\@citea{}\@cite{\@for\@citeb:=#2\do
27: {\@ifundefined
28: {b@\@citeb}{\@citeo\@tempcntb\m@ne\@citea\def\@citea{,}{\bf ?}\@warning
29: {Citation `\@citeb' on page \thepage \space undefined}}%
30: {\setbox\z@\hbox{\global\@tempcntc0\csname b@\@citeb\endcsname\relax}%
31: \ifnum\@tempcntc=\z@ \@citeo\@tempcntb\m@ne
32: \@citea\def\@citea{,}\hbox{\csname b@\@citeb\endcsname}%
33: \else
34: \advance\@tempcntb\@ne
35: \ifnum\@tempcntb=\@tempcntc
36: \else\advance\@tempcntb\m@ne\@citeo
37: \@tempcnta\@tempcntc\@tempcntb\@tempcntc\fi\fi}}\@citeo}{#1}}
38: \def\@citeo{\ifnum\@tempcnta>\@tempcntb\else\@citea\def\@citea{,}%
39: \ifnum\@tempcnta=\@tempcntb\the\@tempcnta\else
40: {\advance\@tempcnta\@ne\ifnum\@tempcnta=\@tempcntb \else \def\@citea{--}\fi
41: \advance\@tempcnta\m@ne\the\@tempcnta\@citea\the\@tempcntb}\fi\fi}
42: \catcode`@=12
43: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
44:
45: \begin{document}
46:
47: \title{\vskip-3cm{\baselineskip14pt
48: \centerline{\normalsize DESY 99-189\hfill ISSN 0418-9833}
49: \centerline{\normalsize MPI/PhT/99-59\hfill}
50: \centerline{\normalsize hep-ph/0002058\hfill}
51: \centerline{\normalsize December 1999\hfill}
52: }
53: \vskip1.5cm
54: Virtual Sfermion Effects on Vector-Boson Pair Production at $e^+e^-$ Colliders
55: }
56: \author{
57: {\sc A.A. Barrientos Bendez\'u,$^1$ K.-P.O. Diener,$^2$ B.A. Kniehl$^1$}\\
58: {\normalsize $^1$ II. Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at
59: Hamburg,}\\
60: {\normalsize Luruper Chaussee 149, 22761 Hamburg, Germany}\\
61: {\normalsize $^2$ Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Physik
62: (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut),}\\
63: {\normalsize F\"ohringer Ring 6, 80805 Munich, Germany}}
64:
65: \date{}
66:
67: \maketitle
68:
69: \thispagestyle{empty}
70:
71: \begin{abstract}
72: We study the quantum effects on vector-boson pair production in $e^+e^-$
73: annihilation induced by the sleptons and squarks of the minimal
74: supersymmetric extension of the standard model (MSSM) in the one-loop
75: approximation.
76: We list full analytic results, and quantitatively analyze the resulting
77: deviation from the standard-model prediction of $e^+e^-\to W^+W^-$ for the
78: supergravity-inspired MSSM.
79: The latter can be rendered small throughout the whole parameter space by an
80: appropriate choice of renormalization scheme.
81:
82: \medskip
83:
84: \noindent
85: PACS numbers: 12.60.Jv, 13.10.+q, 14.80.Ly
86: \end{abstract}
87:
88: \newpage
89:
90: The production of $W$-boson pairs in $e^+e^-$ annihilation offers a unique
91: opportunity to probe the nonabelian gauge structure of the standard model (SM)
92: at the tree level, which manifests itself in a distinctive cancellation
93: between the $s$-, $t$-, and $u$-channel scattering amplitudes.
94: This process is being studied experimentally with high precision at the CERN
95: Large Electron-Positron Collider (LEP2) in the centre-of-mass (CM) energy
96: range $2M_W\alt\sqrt s\alt205$~GeV.
97: At the same time, the related reactions $e^+e^-\to\gamma\gamma,\gamma Z,ZZ$
98: are being measured there, too.
99: With a future $e^+e^-$ linear supercollider, such as JLC, NLC, or TESLA, these
100: measurements can be extended to higher energies, way up to the TeV range, and
101: rendered more precise.
102: On the theoretical side, enormous effort has been invested into the
103: computation of the one-loop radiative corrections to the cross sections of
104: these processes in the SM, both for on- \cite{boh,sac} and off-shell
105: \cite{den} vector bosons, and useful low- \cite{dit} and high-energy
106: \cite{bee} approximations have been elaborated; for a comprehensive review,
107: see Ref.~\cite{wbe}.
108:
109: Significant deviations of the measured cross sections from their SM
110: predictions could signal physics beyond the SM.
111: Since the gauge couplings of the electron are so tightly constrained by
112: low-energy and LEP1 data, such deviations should mainly originate from the
113: triple gauge-boson couplings (TGC's).
114: Generic parameterizations of the so-called anomalous TGC's were introduced and
115: applied to the processes $e^+e^-\to W^+W^-,ZZ$ in Ref.~\cite{gae}.
116: In order to explain the physical origin of anomalous TGC's, it is necessary to
117: consider specific new-physics scenarios.
118: From the theoretical point of view, renormalizable extensions of the SM are
119: most satisfactory.
120: As a rule, the deviations are then induced through loop effects of new
121: particles, which affect not only the TGC's, but also the vector-boson
122: propagators and the renormalizations of the parameters and wave functions of
123: the tree-level amplitudes.
124: Such deviations were investigated at the one-loop level in
125: Refs.~\cite{kat,die} for models with a modified lepton sector including
126: Majorana neutrinos and were found to be generally small.
127: In Ref.~\cite{arh}, the one-loop radiative corrections to the anomalous
128: parameters $\Delta\kappa_V$ and $\lambda_V$ of the $VW^+W^-$ TGC's, with
129: $V=\gamma,Z$, were studied in the minimal supersymmetric extension of the SM
130: (MSSM), using the pinch technique to render them gauge independent.
131: The sfermion contributions were found to generally dominate the Higgs and
132: gaugino contributions.
133: This may be understood by observing that mass splittings between the up and
134: down components of the sfermion doublets give rise to significant
135: contributions \cite{arh} and that the sfermions come in large numbers, due to
136: their multiplicities in flavour and colour.
137:
138: In this letter, we calculate the sfermion contributions to the cross sections
139: of $e^+e^-\to V_1V_2$, with $V_1V_2=\gamma\gamma,\gamma Z,ZZ,W^+W^-$, at one
140: loop in the MSSM.
141: Preliminary results of this study were published in Ref.~\cite{hem}.
142: Our calculation proceeds along the lines of Ref.~\cite{die}, which gives
143: full analytic results.
144: We use the conventions of Ref.~\cite{die} and list only those formulas which
145: need to be substituted therein.
146: In a way, our analysis extends Ref.~\cite{rhe}, where the sfermion-induced
147: radiative corrections to the processes $e^+e^-\to Zh^0$ and $Z\to\gamma h^0$,
148: with $h^0$ being the lightest CP-even Higgs boson, were calculated at one loop
149: in the MSSM.
150: The authors of Ref.~\cite{arh} did not list analytic results that could be
151: compared with ours.
152: In Refs.~\cite{ala1,ala2,ala3}, the one-loop radiative correction to
153: $e^+e^-\to W^+W^-$ in the MSSM was considered for the full supersymmetric
154: particle spectrum, under the simplistic assumption that the mass matrix of
155: each sfermion flavour is proportional to the unit matrix, so that the two weak
156: eigenstates are mass eigenstates with a common mass.
157: We shall compare the sfermion loop correction of Refs.~\cite{ala1,ala2,ala3}
158: with our result below.
159: As we shall see later, the size of the correction is significantly affected
160: by the sfermion mass splittings.
161:
162: The Higgs sector of the MSSM is made up by two complex Higgs isodoublet of
163: opposite hypercharge and accommodates five physical Higgs bosons:
164: the neutral CP-even $h^0$ and $H^0$ bosons, the neutral CP-odd $A^0$ boson,
165: and the charged $H^\pm$-boson pair.
166: At the tree level, it has two free parameters, which are usually taken to be
167: the mass $m_A$ of the $A^0$ boson and the ratio $\tan\beta=v_2/v_1$ of the
168: vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets.
169: For each of these Higgs bosons and each SM fermion and gauge boson there is a
170: supersymmetric partner.
171: Thus, the spectrum of states is more than doubled if one passes from the SM to
172: the MSSM, which gives rise to a proliferation of parameters and weakens the
173: predictive power of the theory.
174: A canonical method to reduce the number of parameters is to embed the MSSM
175: into a grand unified theory (GUT), e.g., a suitable supergravity (SUGRA)
176: model, in such a way that it is recovered in the low-energy limit.
177: The MSSM thus constrained is described by the following parameters at the GUT
178: scale, which come in addition to $\tan\beta$ and $m_A$: the universal scalar
179: mass $m_0$, the universal gaugino mass $m_{1/2}$, the trilinear Higgs-sfermion
180: coupling $A$, the bilinear Higgs coupling $B$, and the Higgs-higgsino mass
181: parameter $\mu$.
182: Notice that $m_A$ is then not an independent parameter anymore, but it is
183: fixed through the renormalization group equation.
184: The number of parameters can be further reduced by making additional
185: assumptions.
186: Unification of the tau and bottom Yukawa couplings at the GUT scale leads to a
187: correlation between $m_t$ and $\tan\beta$.
188: Furthermore, if the electroweak symmetry is broken radiatively, then $B$ and
189: $\mu$ are determined up to the sign of $\mu$.
190: Finally, it turns out that the MSSM parameters are nearly independent of the
191: value of $A$, as long as $|A|\alt500$~GeV at the GUT scale.
192:
193: We now present our analytic results.
194: We denote the four-momenta of $e^+$, $e^-$, and the two produced vector
195: bosons, $V_1$ and $V_2$, by $p_+$, $p_-$, $k_1$, and $k_2$, and define the
196: Mandelstam variables as $s=(p_++p_-)^2$, $t=(p_+-k_1)^2$, and $u=(p_+-k_2)^2$.
197: Neglecting the electron mass, we have $s+t+u=M_1^2+M_2^2$, where $M_1$ and
198: $M_2$ are the masses of $V_1$ and $V_2$, respectively.
199: In this limit, also the $s$-channel contributions due to Higgs-boson exchanges
200: vanish.
201: Because each of the four processes $e^+e^-\to V_1V_2$ has more than one
202: tree-level diagram, it is convenient to introduce helicity amplitudes
203: ${\cal M}^\kappa(\lambda_1,\lambda_2,s,t)$, where $\kappa$, $\lambda_1$, and
204: $\lambda_2$ denote the helicities of $e^-$, $V_1$, and $V_2$ in the CM frame,
205: respectively.
206: The $e^+$ helicity is then $-\kappa$.
207: The helicity amplitudes ${\cal M}^\kappa$ can be decomposed into the standard
208: matrix elements ${\cal M}_i^\kappa$ ($i=0,\ldots,9$) \cite{sac}, which are
209: written down in Appendix~B of Ref.~\cite{die}.
210: In addition to those for $i=0,\ldots,3$, which already appear at the tree
211: level, we only need ${\cal M}_9^\kappa$ for the present analysis.
212:
213: The tree-level cross sections of $e^+e^-\to V_1V_2$ are well known and may be
214: found in Eq.~(3.1) of Ref.~\cite{die}.
215: The sfermion-induced one-loop corrections receive contributions from diagrams
216: containing self-energy corrections, vertex corrections, and counterterm
217: insertions.
218: We work in the Fermi-constant ($G_F$) formulation of the electroweak on-shell
219: renormalization scheme, which is explained in the context of Eq.~(4.1) in
220: Ref.~\cite{die}.
221: Specifically, starting from the results in the pure on-shell renormalization
222: scheme, which uses Sommerfeld's fine-structure constant $\alpha$ and the
223: physical particle masses as basic parameters, we fix
224: $\alpha=\sqrt2G_F\sin^2\theta_wM_W^2/\pi$, where $\theta_w$ is the weak
225: mixing angle, and supplement the radiative corrections with the term
226: $-2\Delta r$, where $\Delta r$ \cite{sir} contains those radiative corrections
227: to the muon lifetime which the SM or its extensions introduce on top of the
228: purely photonic corrections from within the Fermi model.
229: The sfermion contribution to $\Delta r$ in the MSSM was examined in
230: Ref.~\cite{rhe}.
231: All the formulas listed in Section~III and Appendix~D of Ref.~\cite{die} carry
232: over to the sfermion case, except for Eqs.~(3.5) and (3.8), which give the
233: transverse parts of the vector-boson vacuum polarizations $\Pi_T^{V_1V_1}$ and
234: the proper vertex corrections $\delta{\cal M}_V^\kappa$, respectively.
235: The relevant Feynman rules for the MSSM sfermion sector are summarized in
236: Appendix~A of Ref.~\cite{rhe}.
237: For each fermion flavour $Q=U,D$, where $U=\nu_e,\nu_\mu,\nu_\tau,u,c,t$ and
238: $D=e,\mu,\tau,d,s,b$, there is a corresponding sfermion flavour, denoted by a
239: tilde.
240: Except for the sneutrinos, which we assume to be left handed, $\tilde Q$ comes
241: in two mass eigenstates $a=1,2$.
242: The masses $M_{\tilde Qa}$ of the sfermions and their trilinear and quartic
243: couplings, $\tilde V_{Q_aQ_b^\prime}^{V_i}$ and
244: $\tilde U_{Q_aQ_b^\prime}^{V_iV_j}$, respectively, to the vector bosons
245: $V_i=\gamma,Z,W$ are defined in Appendix~A of Ref.~\cite{rhe}.
246: In the absence of flavour-changing neutral currents, we have $Q=Q^\prime$ in
247: $\tilde V_{Q_aQ_b^\prime}^{V_i}$ and $\tilde U_{Q_aQ_b^\prime}^{V_iV_j}$ if
248: $V_i,V_j=\gamma,Z$, which explains the notation $\tilde V_{Qab}^{V_i}$ and
249: $\tilde U_{Qab}^{V_iV_j}$ used in Ref.~\cite{rhe}.
250: As in Ref.~\cite{rhe}, we neglect the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa mixing, so
251: that we may write $\tilde V_{UaDb}^W$ and $\tilde U_{Qab}^{WW}$.
252: The sfermion contributions to the $\Pi_T^{V_1V_2}$ functions read \cite{rhe}
253: \begin{eqnarray}
254: \Pi_T^{V_1V_2}(p^2)&=&\frac{1}{48\pi^2}\sum_{Q,a,b}N_{\mathrm{col}}^Q
255: \tilde V_{Q_aQ_b}^{V_1}\tilde V_{Q_bQ_a}^{V_2}
256: \left\{\left[s-2\left(M_{\tilde Q_a}^2+M_{\tilde Q_b}^2\right)
257: +\frac{\left(M_{\tilde Q_a}^2-M_{\tilde Q_b}^2\right)^2}{s}\right]
258: \right.\nonumber\\
259: &&{}\times B_0\left(p,M_{\tilde Q_a},M_{\tilde Q_b}\right)
260: +M_{\tilde Q_a}^2\left(2-\frac{M_{\tilde Q_a}^2-M_{\tilde Q_b}^2}{s}\right)
261: B_0\left(0,M_{\tilde Q_a},M_{\tilde Q_a}\right)
262: \nonumber\\
263: &&{}+\left.
264: M_{\tilde Q_b}^2\left(2-\frac{M_{\tilde Q_b}^2-M_{\tilde Q_a}^2}{s}\right)
265: B_0\left(0,M_{\tilde Q_b},M_{\tilde Q_b}\right)
266: +\frac{2}{3}s-\frac{\left(M_{\tilde Q_a}^2-M_{\tilde Q_b}^2\right)^2}{s}
267: \right\},\quad
268: \label{eq:pi}
269: \end{eqnarray}
270: where $p$ is the external four-momentum, $N_{\mathrm{col}}^Q=1$ (3) for
271: sleptons (squarks), and the standard two-point scalar function $B_0$ is
272: defined in Eq.~(C.2) of Ref.~\cite{die}.
273: If $V_1=W^-$ and $V_2=W^+$, then $Q_a=U_a$, $Q_b=D_b$, and it is summed over
274: $(U,D)$ instead of $Q$.
275: The sfermion contribution to $\delta{\cal M}_V^\kappa$ is found to be
276: \begin{eqnarray}
277: \delta{\cal M}_V^\kappa&=&-\frac{1}{2\pi^2}\sum_{B=\gamma,Z}
278: \frac{g_{eeB}^\kappa}{s-M_B^2}\sum_{Q,a,b,c}N_{\mathrm{col}}^Q
279: \left(\tilde V_{Q_cQ_b}^B\tilde V_{Q_bQ_a}^{V_1}\tilde V_{Q_aQ_c}^{V_2}
280: -\tilde V_{Q_cQ_a}^{V_2}\tilde V_{Q_aQ_b}^{V_1}\tilde V_{Q_bQ_c}^B\right)
281: \nonumber\\
282: &&{}\times\left[{\cal M}_1^\kappa\left(C_2^0+C_3^{01}+C_3^{02}\right)
283: +{\cal M}_2^\kappa C_3^{01}+{\cal M}_3^\kappa C_3^{02}
284: -{\cal M}_9^\kappa\left(C_2^{12}+C_3^{12}+C_3^{21}\right)\right],
285: \label{eq:dm}
286: \end{eqnarray}
287: where the $C$ functions are the Lorentz coefficients of the standard
288: three-point tensor integrals defined in Eq.~(C4) of Ref.~\cite{die}.
289: In Eq.~(\ref{eq:dm}), we have suppressed their common argument
290: $\left(k_1,-k_2,M_{\tilde Q_a},M_{\tilde Q_b},M_{\tilde Q_c}\right)$.
291: Deviating from Ref.~\cite{die}, the electron gauge couplings appearing in
292: Eq.~(\ref{eq:dm}) are defined as
293: \begin{equation}
294: g_{ee\gamma}^\pm=e,\qquad
295: g_{eeZ}^+=-\frac{e\sin\theta_w}{\cos\theta_w},\qquad
296: g_{eeZ}^-=\frac{e}{\cos\theta_w\sin\theta_w}
297: \left(\frac{1}{2}-\sin^2\theta_w\right),
298: \end{equation}
299: where $e=\sqrt{4\pi\alpha}$.
300: We caution the reader that the Feynman rules used in Refs.~\cite{die,rhe}
301: differ in the sign of $\sin\theta_w$.
302: Consequently, we need to multiply the expression for $\Pi_T^{\gamma Z}$ in
303: Eq.~(\ref{eq:pi}) with an extra minus sign when we insert it into the relevant
304: formulas, Eqs.~(3.6) and (D2), of Ref.~\cite{die}.
305: Notice that Eq.~(\ref{eq:dm}) includes the contributions from both the direct
306: and crossed triangle diagrams, which are proportional to
307: $\tilde V_{Q_cQ_b}^B\tilde V_{Q_bQ_a}^{V_1}\tilde V_{Q_aQ_c}^{V_2}$ and
308: $\tilde V_{Q_cQ_a}^{V_2}\tilde V_{Q_aQ_b}^{V_1}\tilde V_{Q_bQ_c}^B$,
309: respectively.
310: If $V_1=W^-$ and $V_2=W^+$, then the first term contributes for $Q_a=U_a$,
311: $Q_b=D_b$, and $Q_c=D_c$ and the second one for $Q_a=D_a$, $Q_b=U_b$, and
312: $Q_c=U_c$.
313:
314: At this point, we should compare our results with those published in
315: Refs.~\cite{ala1,ala2,ala3}.
316: To that end, we put $M_{\tilde Q_1}=M_{\tilde Q_2}$ and nullify the mixing
317: angle relating the weak and mass eigenstates for each sfermion flavour
318: $\tilde Q$.
319: Then, our Eq.~(\ref{eq:pi}) agrees with Eqs.~(C7), (D5), (E9), and (F8) in
320: Ref.~\cite{ala1}, up to an overall minus sign, if we eliminate the factor 1/2
321: multiplying $T_{3f}^i$ in Eq.~(D5) and the sum over $i$ in Eq.~(F8).
322: As for the $\gamma W^+W^-$ vertex correction, our Eq.~(\ref{eq:dm}) is in
323: accordance with Eqs.~(65) and (B13)--(B18) in Ref.~\cite{ala2} if we replace
324: the first two appearances of $C_{36}$ in Eq.~(B14) by $C_{35}$, substitute
325: $C_{24}$ in Eq.~(B18) by $C_{22}$, and include an overall minus sign in
326: Eqs.~(B17) and (B18).
327: As for the $ZW^+W^-$ vertex correction, we find agreement with Eqs.~(97) and
328: (C48)--(C53) in Ref.~\cite{ala2} if we alter the overall signs of Eqs.~(C52)
329: and (C53).
330:
331: Now, we explore the phenomenological implications of our results.
332: We concentrate on the case of $e^+e^-\to W^+W^-$ because, for
333: $\sqrt s\agt180$~GeV, it has the largest cross section of the four processes
334: under consideration and it is the only one involving TGC's at the tree level
335: in the SM.
336: The SM input parameters for our numerical analysis are taken to be
337: $G_F=1.16639\cdot10^{-5}$~GeV$^{-2}$ \cite{pdg}, $m_W=80.385$~GeV,
338: $m_Z=91.1871$~GeV, $m_t=174.3$~GeV \cite{eww}, and $m_b=4.7$~GeV.
339: We vary $\tan\beta$ and $m_A$ in the ranges $1<\tan\beta<35\approx m_t/m_b$
340: and 100~GeV${}<m_A<600$~TeV, respectively.
341: As for the GUT parameters, we choose $m_{1/2}=150$~GeV, $A=0$, and $\mu<0$,
342: and tune $m_0$ so as to be consistent with the desired value of $m_A$.
343: All other MSSM parameters are then determined according to the SUGRA-inspired
344: scenario as implemented in the program package SUSPECT \cite{djo}.
345: We checked that the results obtained from the program package ISAJET~7.49
346: \cite{bae}, where the electroweak-symmetry-breaking scale is fixed to be
347: $Q=\sqrt{M_{\tilde t_L}M_{\tilde t_R}}$, agree with those from SUSPECT within
348: typically 5\% or less if the same scale convention is implemented in the
349: latter.
350: In our analysis, we adopt the SUSPECT default value $Q=M_Z$.
351: We do not impose the unification of the tau and bottom Yukawa couplings at the
352: GUT scale, which would just constrain the allowed $\tan\beta$ range without
353: any visible effect on the results for these values of $\tan\beta$.
354: We exclude solutions which do not comply with the present experimental lower
355: mass bounds of the sfermions, charginos, neutralinos, and Higgs bosons
356: \cite{ruh}.
357:
358: In Fig.~\ref{fig:one}, the sfermion-induced correction $\delta(\theta)$ in the
359: relationship $d\sigma/d\cos\theta={}$\break
360: $(d\sigma/d\cos\theta)_{\mathrm{Born}}[1+\delta(\theta)]$
361: between the one-loop-corrected and tree-level cross sections of
362: $e^+e^-\to W^+W^-$ is shown as a function of the scattering angle $\theta$,
363: enclosed between the $e^+$ and $W^+$ three-momenta in the CM frame, for
364: $\sqrt s=200$, 500 and 1000~GeV assuming $\tan\beta=10$ and $m_A=250$~GeV.
365: We observe that $\delta(\theta)$ has a typical size of order 0.1\% or less and
366: can be of either sign.
367: In the backward direction, it strongly depends on the CM energy, while the
368: energy dependence is rather feeble in the forward direction.
369: We emphasize that the smallness of $\delta(\theta)$ is a special feature of
370: the $G_F$ scheme.
371: In the $\alpha$ scheme, the correction is given by $\delta(\theta)+2\Delta r$
372: and thus shifted to negative values because we have $\Delta r\approx-0.11\%$,
373: as indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:one}.
374: Next, we study the correction $\Delta$ to the integrated cross section,
375: defined by $\sigma=\sigma_{\mathrm{Born}}(1+\Delta)$, for $\sqrt s=200$~GeV.
376: In Fig.~\ref{fig:two}, the $\tan\beta$ dependences of $\Delta$ and $\Delta r$
377: are shown for $m_A=100$, 250, and 600~GeV, while, in Fig.~\ref{fig:three},
378: the $m_A$ dependences are shown for $\tan\beta=3$, 10, and 30.
379: These dependences are implicit in the sense that our formulas for $\Delta$ and
380: $\Delta r$ do not contain $\tan\beta$ or $m_A$.
381: In fact, $\Delta$ and $\Delta r$ only depend on $\tan\beta$ or $m_A$ via the
382: sfermion masses and gauge couplings, the latter being affected through the
383: mixing angles which rotate the weak eigenstates of the sfermion into their
384: mass eigenstates.
385: We note that the SUGRA-inspired MSSM with our choice of input parameters does
386: not permit $\tan\beta$ and $m_A$ to be simultaneously small, due to the
387: experimental selectron mass lower bound \cite{ruh}.
388: This explains why the curves for $m_A=100$~GeV in Fig.~\ref{fig:two} only
389: start at $\tan\beta\approx11$ and those for $\tan\beta=3$ in
390: Fig.~\ref{fig:three} at $m_A\approx240$~GeV.
391: For large $m_A$, the experimental $m_h$ lower bound \cite{ruh} enforces
392: $\tan\beta\agt3$.
393: On the other hand, the experimental lower bounds on the chargino and
394: neutralino masses \cite{ruh} induce an upper limit on $\tan\beta$, which
395: depends on $m_A$.
396: From Fig.~\ref{fig:two} we observe that the $\tan\beta$ dependence of
397: $\Delta r$ for fixed $m_A$ is modest for intermediate values of $\tan\beta$,
398: while $\Delta r$ increases in magnitude towards the edges of the allowed
399: $\tan\beta$ range.
400: The stau and tau-sneutrino contributions dominate for large $\tan\beta$ and
401: small $m_A$, while the sbottom and stop contributions dominate for small
402: $\tan\beta$ and large $m_A$.
403: The contributions due to the sfermions of the first and second generations are
404: insignificant for all values of $\tan\beta$ and $m_A$.
405: It is interesting to investigate the mixings between the left- and
406: right-handed components of the charged sfermions in the third generation.
407: The mixing is strongest for stop, especially for small $\tan\beta$ and small
408: $m_A$.
409: For stau and sbottom, the mixings are generally feeble for large $\tan\beta$,
410: independently of $m_A$.
411: The magnitude of $\Delta r$ may reach several tenths of percent if $m_A$ is
412: small to medium and $\tan\beta$ is close to its lower or upper limits.
413: For $\tan\beta\approx30$, $\Delta r$ is almost independent of $m_A$, while
414: for smaller (larger) values of $\tan\beta$, the size of $\Delta r$
415: monotonically decreases (increases) as $m_A$ increases.
416: These features are also nicely illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:three}.
417: We learn from Figs.~\ref{fig:two} and \ref{fig:three} that $\Delta$ is
418: insignificant, below 0.02\% in size, for all considered values of $\tan\beta$
419: and $m_A$.
420: We stress that this happens by virtue of the $G_F$ scheme.
421:
422: In summary, we derived analytic results for the sfermion-induced radiative
423: corrections to the cross sections of
424: $e^+e^-\to\gamma\gamma,\gamma Z,ZZ,W^+W^-$ at one loop in the MSSM and
425: presented a phenomenological discussion for the most interesting case,
426: $e^+e^-\to W^+W^-$, adopting a SUGRA-inspired scenario.
427: In the latter case, the correction can essentially be quenched by adopting
428: the $G_F$ scheme, which could not be anticipated without explicit calculation.
429: On the other hand, the sfermions are likely to generate the bulk of the MSSM
430: correction to $e^+e^-\to W^+W^-$ because of their multiplicities in flavour
431: and colour.
432: This expectation is substantiated by a study of the MSSM corrections to the
433: $\gamma W^+W^-$ and $ZW^+W^-$ TGC's \cite{arh}.
434: We conclude that significant deviations of the measured cross section of
435: $e^+e^-\to W^+W^-$ from its SM predictions will not point towards the
436: SUGRA-inspired MSSM.
437:
438: \vspace{1cm}
439: \noindent
440: {\bf Note added}
441: \smallskip
442:
443: \noindent
444: After the completion of this work, we received a preprint \cite{ala} which
445: reports on the MSSM sfermion corrections to the cross section of
446: $e^+e^-\to W^+W^-$ in the modified minimal-subtraction scheme.
447: The analytic results for the vector-boson vacuum polarizations and the proper
448: vertex corrections given in Eqs.~(B.1), (B.3)--(B.5), (B.8) and (B.9) of
449: Ref.~\cite{ala} agree with our Eqs.~(\ref{eq:pi}) and (\ref{eq:dm}),
450: respectively.
451: The agreement was also established numerically to very high precision.
452:
453: \vspace{1cm}
454: \noindent
455: {\bf Acknowledgements}
456: \smallskip
457:
458: \noindent
459: We are grateful to Ralf Hempfling for his collaboration in earlier stages of
460: this work.
461: We thank Jean-Loic Kneur, Gilbert Moultaka, Joannis Papavassiliou, and Jay
462: Watson for useful comments on Ref.~\cite{arh}.
463: The work of A.A.B.B. was supported by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung through
464: Grant No.~219747.
465: The II. Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik is supported by the
466: Bundesministerium f\"ur Bildung und Forschung under Contract No.\ 05~HT9GUA~3,
467: and by the European Commission through the Research Training Network
468: {\it Quantum Chromodynamics and the Deep Structure of Elementary Particles}
469: under Contract No.\ ERBFMRXCT980194.
470:
471: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
472:
473: \bibitem{boh} M. B\"ohm, A. Denner, T. Sack, W. Beenakker, F. Berends,
474: H. Kuijf,
475: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 304 (1988) 463;
476: J. Fleischer, F. Jegerlehner, M. Zralek,
477: Z. Phys.\ C 42 (1989) 409;
478: J. Fleischer, K. Kolodziej, F. Jegerlehner,
479: Phys.\ Rev.\ D 47 (1993) 830.
480:
481: \bibitem{sac} T. Sack,
482: Ph.D. thesis, University of W\"urzburg, 1987;
483: A. Denner, T. Sack,
484: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 306 (1988) 221.
485:
486: \bibitem{den} A. Denner, T. Sack,
487: Z. Phys.\ C 45 (1990) 439;
488: D. Bardin, W. Beenakker, A. Denner,
489: Phys.\ Lett.\ B 317 (1993) 213;
490: K. Melnikov, O. Yakovlev,
491: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 471 (1996) 90;
492: W. Beenakker, A.P. Chapovsky, F.A. Berends,
493: Phys.\ Lett.\ B 411 (1997) 203;
494: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 508 (1997) 17;
495: A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth,
496: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 519 (1998) 39;
497: Phys.\ Lett.\ B 429 (1998) 145;
498: W. Beenakker, F.A. Berends, A.P. Chapovsky,
499: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 548 (1999) 3;
500: A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth, D. Wackeroth,
501: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 560 (1999) 33;
502: Report No.\ BI-TP~99/45, LU-ITP~1999/020, PSI-PR-99-29, UR-1591,
503: hep-ph/9912261, December 1999;
504: Report No.\ BI-TP~99/47, ER/40685/941, LU-ITP~1999/023, PSI-PR-99-34, UR-1594,
505: hep-ph/9912447, December 1999.
506:
507: \bibitem{dit} S. Dittmaier, M. B\"ohm, A. Denner,
508: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 376 (1992) 29; B 391 (1993) 483 (E).
509:
510: \bibitem{bee} W. Beenakker, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, R. Mertig, T. Sack,
511: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 410 (1993) 245;
512: W. Beenakker, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, R. Mertig,
513: Phys.\ Lett.\ B 317 (1993) 622.
514:
515: \bibitem{wbe} W. Beenakker, A. Denner,
516: Int.\ J. Mod.\ Phys.\ A 9 (1994) 4837.
517:
518: \bibitem{gae} K.J.F. Gaemers, G.J. Gounaris,
519: Z. Phys.\ C 1 (1979) 259;
520: K. Hagiwara, R.D. Peccei, D. Zeppenfeld, K. Hikasa,
521: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 282 (1987) 253.
522:
523: \bibitem{kat} Y. Katsuki, M. Marui, R. Najima, J. Saito, A. Sugamoto,
524: Phys.\ Lett.\ B 354 (1995) 363.
525:
526: \bibitem{die} K.-P.O. Diener, B.A. Kniehl, A. Pilaftsis,
527: Phys.\ Rev.\ D 57 (1998) 2771.
528:
529: \bibitem{arh} A. Arhrib, J.-L. Kneur, G. Moultaka,
530: Phys.\ Lett.\ B 376 (1996) 127.
531:
532: \bibitem{hem} R. Hempfling,
533: {\it in} Proceedings of the XXXIst Rencontres de Moriond: `96 Electroweak
534: Interactions and Unified Theories, Les Arcs, France, March 16--23, 1996, ed.\
535: J. Tr\^an Thanh V\^an (Editions Fronti\`eres, Gif-sur-Yvette, 1996) p.~173;
536: E.-A. Siemes, Diploma thesis, Technical University of Munich, 1997.
537:
538: \bibitem{rhe} R. Hempfling, B. Kniehl,
539: Z. Phys.\ C 59 (1993) 263.
540:
541: \bibitem{ala1} S. Alam,
542: Phys.\ Rev.\ D 50 (1994) 124.
543:
544: \bibitem{ala2} S. Alam,
545: Phys.\ Rev.\ D 50 (1994) 148.
546:
547: \bibitem{ala3} S. Alam,
548: Phys.\ Rev.\ D 50 (1994) 174.
549:
550: \bibitem{sir} A. Sirlin,
551: Phys.\ Rev.\ D 22 (1980) 971.
552:
553: \bibitem{pdg} C. Caso et al.\ (Particle Data Group),
554: Eur.\ Phys.\ J. C 3 (1998) 1.
555:
556: \bibitem{eww} D. Abbaneo et al.\ (The LEP Collaborations ALEPH, DELPHI, L3,
557: OPAL, the LEP Electroweak Working Group and the SLD Heavy Flavour and
558: Electroweak Groups),
559: Report No.\ CERN-EP-2000-016, January 2000.
560:
561: \bibitem{djo} A. Djouadi, J.-L. Kneur, G. Moultaka,
562: Report No.\ PM/98-27, GDR-S-017 (1998).
563:
564: \bibitem{bae} H. Baer, F.E. Paige, S.D. Protopopescu, X. Tata,
565: Report No.\ BNL-HET-99-43, hep-ph/0001086, December 1999.
566:
567: \bibitem{ruh} V. Ruhlmann-Kleider,
568: Report No.\ hep-ex/0001061, January 2000, to be published in the Proceedings
569: of 19th International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High
570: Energies (LP 99), Stanford, California, 9--14 August 1999.
571:
572: \bibitem{ala} S. Alam, K. Hagiwara, S. Kanemura, R. Szalapski, Y. Umeda,
573: Report No.\ KEK-TH-670, KA-TP-27-1999, UR-1601, DESY 99-201, hep-ph/0002066,
574: February 2000.
575:
576: \end{thebibliography}
577:
578: \newpage
579: \begin{figure}[ht]
580: \begin{center}
581: \centerline{\epsfig{figure=fig1.eps,height=18cm}}
582: \caption{Relative correction $\delta(\theta)$ to the differential cross
583: section $d\sigma/d\cos\theta$ of $e^+e^-\to W^+W^-$, for
584: $\protect\sqrt s=200$, 500, and 1000~GeV, and contribution to $\Delta r$ due
585: to the sfermions in the SUGRA-inspired MSSM with $\tan\beta=10$ and
586: $m_A=250$~GeV, as functions of $\cos\theta$.}
587: \label{fig:one}
588: \end{center}
589: \end{figure}
590:
591: \newpage
592: \begin{figure}[ht]
593: \begin{center}
594: \centerline{\epsfig{figure=fig2.eps,height=18cm}}
595: \caption{Relative correction $\Delta$ to the total cross section $\sigma$ of
596: $e^+e^-\to W^+W^-$, for $\protect\sqrt s=200$~GeV, and contribution to
597: $\Delta r$ due to the sfermions in the SUGRA-inspired MSSM with $m_A=100$,
598: 250, and 600~GeV, as functions of $\tan\beta$.}
599: \label{fig:two}
600: \end{center}
601: \end{figure}
602:
603: \newpage
604: \begin{figure}[ht]
605: \begin{center}
606: \centerline{\epsfig{figure=fig3.eps,height=18cm}}
607: \caption{Relative correction $\Delta$ to the total cross section $\sigma$ of
608: $e^+e^-\to W^+W^-$, for $\protect\sqrt s=200$~GeV, and contribution to
609: $\Delta r$ due to the sfermions in the SUGRA-inspired MSSM with
610: $\tan\beta=3$, 10, and 30, as functions of $m_A$.}
611: \label{fig:three}
612: \end{center}
613: \end{figure}
614:
615: \end{document}
616: