1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4: \documentstyle[12pt,a41,epsfig]{article}

5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7: \newcommand\XINT{\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}}

8: \newcommand\YINT{\int_{-1}^{+1}}

9: \newcommand{\DIRJ}{{\cal Q}^J_{\alpha}(p_2,p_1)}

10: \newcommand{\DIRJF}{{\cal Q}^{J,5}_{\alpha}(p_2,p_1)}

11: \newcommand{\DIRA}{{\cal Q}_{D \alpha}(p_2,p_1)}

12: \newcommand{\PAULA}{{\cal Q}_{P \alpha}(p_2,p_1)}

13: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

14: \newcommand{\bq}{\begin{equation}}

15: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

16: \newcommand{\eq}{\end{equation}}

17: \newcommand{\gap}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}

18: \newcommand{\lap}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}

19: \newcommand{\fem}{$f_2^{em}$}

20: \newcommand{\lam}{$\Lambda$}

21: \newcommand{\qsq}{$Q^2$}

22: \newcommand{\alsq}{$\alpha_s(Q^2)$}

23: \newcommand{\dals}{$\delta \alpha_s$}

24: \newcommand{\pbinv}{pb^{-1}}

25: \newcommand{\lsim}{\raisebox{-0.07cm   }

26: {$\, \stackrel{<}{{\scriptstyle\sim}}\, $}}

27: \newcommand{\gsim}{\raisebox{-0.07cm   }

28: {$\, \stackrel{>}{{\scriptstyle\sim}}\, $}}

29: %\newcommand{\gsim}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}

30: %\newcommand{\lsim}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}

31: \newcommand{\dfeq}{\stackrel{\scriptsize =}{\scriptsize df}}

32: \newcommand{\als}{\alpha_s}

33: \newcommand{\aqu}{\langle Q^2 \rangle}

34: \newcommand\pB{[\mbox{pb}]}

35: \newcommand\MSbar{$\overline{\mbox{MS}}$}

36: \newcommand\order{{\cal O}}

37: \newcommand\mat{{\cal M}}

38: \newcommand\ds{\displaystyle}

39: \newcommand\MeV{\,\mbox{MeV}}

40: \newcommand\GeV{\,\mbox{GeV}}

41: \newcommand\TeV{\,\mbox{TeV}}

42: \newcommand\secu{\,\mbox{sec}}

43: \newcommand\kvec{\mbox{\boldmath $k$}}

44: \newcommand\MT{Morfin and Tung}

45: \newcommand\CALL{{\cal L}}

46: \newcommand\KG{\kappa_G}

47: \newcommand\KA{\kappa_A}

48: \newcommand\LG{\lambda_G}

49: \newcommand\LA{\lambda_A}

50: \newcommand\PD{\not p}

51: \newcommand\MP{M^2_{\Phi}}

52: \newcommand\B{\beta}

53: \newcommand\XL{\log \left| \frac{1 + \B}{1 -\B}\right |}

54: \newcommand\SM{\frac{\hat{s}}{M_{\Phi}^2}}

55: \newcommand\SMM{\frac{\hat{s}^2}{M_{\Phi}^4}}

56: \newcommand\SMMM{\frac{\hat{s}^3}{M_{\Phi}^6}}

57: \newcommand\SMMMM{\frac{\hat{s}^4}{M_{\Phi}^8}}

58: \newcommand\BC{\beta^2 \cos^2 \theta}

59: \newcommand\CB{\beta^2 \cos^2 \theta}

60: \newcommand\CBB{\beta^4 \cos^4 \theta}

61: \newcommand\CBBB{\beta^6 \cos^6 \theta}

62: \newcommand\CBBBB{\beta^8 \cos^8 \theta}

63: \newcommand\SH{\hat{s}}

64: \newcommand\uh{\hat{u}}

65: \newcommand\thh{\hat{t}}

66: \newcommand\sh{\hat{s}}

67: \newcommand\epsi{\varepsilon}

68: \newcommand\ea{\varepsilon_1}

69: \newcommand\eb{\varepsilon_2}

70: \newcommand\Ea{\epsilon_1}

71: \newcommand\Eb{\epsilon_2}

72: \newcommand\ch{{\rm{ch}}}

73: \newcommand\shh{{\rm{sh}}}

74: \newcommand\thhh{{\rm{th}}}

75: \newcommand\st{\sin^2 \theta}

76: \newcommand\BR{\left(1 - \CB \right)}

77: \newcommand\ka{\kappa_1}

78: \newcommand\kb{\kappa_2}

79: \newcommand\kap{\kappa_1'}

80: \newcommand\kbp{\kappa_2'}

81: \newcommand\xx{\tilde{x}}

82: \newcommand\GG{\tilde{g}}

83: \newcommand\hh{\tilde{h}}

84: \newcommand\AAA{\alpha_1}

85: \newcommand\AB{\alpha_2}

86: \newcommand\Kvec{\mbox{\boldmath $K$}}

87: \newcommand\Pvec{\mbox{\boldmath $P$}}

88: \newcommand\Uvec{\mbox{\boldmath $U$}}

89: \newcommand\Vvec{\mbox{\boldmath $V$}}

90: \newcommand\bx{\overline{x}}

91: \newcommand\by{\overline{y}}

92: \newcommand\FFA{\mbox{$\widetilde{F}^a$}}

93: \newcommand\ub{\mbox{$\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)$}}

94: \newcommand\uu{\mbox{$u(p_1,S_1)$}}

95: \newcommand\g{\mbox{$\gamma$}}

96: \newcommand\T{{\sf T}}

97: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

98: %\setcounter{page}{11}

99: %\setcounter{equation}{46}

100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

101: \begin{document}

102: \noindent

103: %

104: \sloppy

105: \thispagestyle{empty}

106: \begin{flushleft}

107: DESY 00--005 \hfill

108: {\tt hep-ph/0002071}\\

109: UNIGRAZ UTP 11-01-00\\

110: January 2000

111: \end{flushleft}

112: %

113: %\setcounter{page}{0}

114: % 1

115: %\mbox{}

116: \vspace*{\fill}

117: \begin{center}

118: {\LARGE\bf  On the Structure of the Virtual Compton}\\

119: %

120: \vspace{2mm}

121: {\LARGE\bf

122: Amplitude in the

123: Generalized Bjorken Region:}\\

124: %

125: \vspace{2mm}

126: {\LARGE\bf Integral Relations}\\

127: 

128: \vspace{2cm}

129: \large

130: Johannes Bl\"umlein$^a$  and

131: Dieter Robaschik$^{a,b}$

132: \\

133: \vspace{2em}

134: \normalsize

135: {\it $^a$~Deutsche Elektronen--Synchrotron,\\

136: DESY -- Zeuthen, Platanenallee 6, D--15735 Zeuthen, Germany}

137: \\

138: \vspace{2em}

139: {\it $^b$~Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,

140:  Karl--Franzens--Universit\"at Graz,}\\

141: {\it  Universit\"atsplatz  5, A--8010 Graz, Austria} \\

142: %\today

143: \end{center}

144: \vspace*{\fill}

145: %

146: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

147: \begin{abstract}

148: \noindent

149: A systematic study is performed of the structure of the twist--2

150: contributions to the virtual Compton amplitude in deep--inelastic 

151: non--forward scattering for general spin states in the non--local

152: light cone expansion. The gauge invariance is proven in this approach

153: for the twist--2 contributions for non--forward scattering. Relations 

154: are derived between the contributing non--forward amplitudes.

155: %

156: \end{abstract}

157: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

158: \vspace*{\fill}

159: \newpage

160: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

161: \section{Introduction}

162: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

163: \setcounter{equation}{0}

164: \label{sec-1}

165: %\section{1}

166: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

167: 

168: \vspace{1mm}

169: \noindent

170: The Compton amplitude for the scattering of a virtual photon off a hadron

171: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

172: \begin{equation}

173: \label{eqpro}

174: \gamma^*_1 + p_1 \rightarrow \gamma_2^{(*)'} + p_2

175: \end{equation}

176: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

177: provides one of the basic tools to understand the short--distance

178: behavior of the nucleon and to test Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) at

179: large space--like virtualities. In this kinematic regime the Compton

180: amplitude is dominated by the singularities of the light--cone and can be

181: described by the light--cone expansion~\cite{LC1,LC2} in terms of the

182: contributions of different twist~\cite{TW}. Many investigations were

183: devoted to the process of deep--inelastic forward scattering in the past, 

184: for which the leading, next--to--leading order, and partly the 3--loop

185: order corrections were calculated~\cite{RC}. There the absorptive part of

186: the Compton amplitude, the hadronic tensor $W_{\mu\nu}$, is described

187: by the four independent structure functions $F_1(x,Q^2), F_2(x,Q^2),

188: g_1(x,Q^2)$ and $g_2(x,Q^2)$~\cite{DER}.\footnote{In the case of general 

189: electroweak currents eight structure functions contribute in the massless

190: limit, cf.~\cite{BK,BT}.}

191: 

192: A more general view is obtained studying the non--forward 

193: process~(\ref{eqpro}) without restricting it to the absorptive 

194: contributions only. In this more general kinematics a systematic 

195: description of a whole class of physical processes in the deep--inelastic

196: region can be given and common properties of these processes can be

197: derived. Moreover, relations 

198: obtained for forward scattering become more transparent under this 

199: generalized point of view. It is the aim of this paper to calculate the 

200: Compton amplitude for non--forward scattering in this kinematic range

201: in lowest order in QCD. General spin states are considered which allows

202: us to study besides the unpolarized contributions also those due to

203: target polarization. The present analysis is devoted to the study of the

204: twist--2 terms. The twist--decomposition of the Compton amplitude in

205: the generalized Bjorken region is necessary since the scaling violations 

206: of the respective amplitude functions differ due to the set of

207: the contributing operators and their anomalous dimensions~\cite{ADI}.

208: The different contributions to the Compton amplitude are described by 

209: non--perturbative amplitude functions, which can be measured 

210: experimentally in the various non--forward processes.

211: Analogously to the case of forward scattering some of the amplitude

212: functions are experimentally easier accessible than others\footnote{

213: Both the measurement of the unpolarized longitudinal structure function 

214: $F_L(x,Q^2) = F_2(x,Q^2) - 2x F_1(x,Q^2)$~\cite{FL} and the polarized

215: structure function $g_2(x,Q^2)$~\cite{G2} are experimentally much more

216: demanding than the measurement of the structure functions $F_2(x,Q^2)$ 

217: and $g_1(x,Q^2)$.}. Therefore it is important to know the relations

218: between the different amplitude functions due to which predictions can be

219: made for experiment. One of the main objectives of this investigation 

220: is to derive these relations for the twist--2 parts of the amplitude 

221: functions.

222: 

223: The paper is organized as follows. In Section~2 the twist--2

224: contributions to the Compton amplitude are calculated. We apply the

225: non--local light--cone expansion~\cite{NLC,BGR} to express the operator

226: products. The non--forward expectation values are calculated for general

227: spin states and the corresponding Lorentz--structure is derived. A 

228: helicity basis of both (virtual) photons is constructed (Section~3) which

229: is subsequently used to determine the twist--2 contributions to the 

230: operator matrix elements. The light--cone expansion does not a priori

231: lead to an explicit gauge--invariant representation of the different

232: contributions to the Compton amplitude. Since the Compton amplitude 

233: itself is gauge invariant, the expansion has to be formulated in such a 

234: way that the respective contributions under discussion form 

235: gauge--invariant sub--sets. In Section~4 we show that this is the case

236: for the twist--2 contributions for non--forward scattering.

237: The helicity projections of the Compton amplitude are discussed

238: in detail in Section~5. In Section~6 we derive the relations between the

239: twist--2 contributions to the different amplitude functions, which are

240: generalizations of the relations known in the case of forward 

241: scattering~\cite{CG,WW}. 

242: Section~7 contains the conclusions.

243: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

244: \section{The Compton Amplitude}

245: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

246: \setcounter{equation}{0}

247: \label{sec-2}

248: %\section{2}

249: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

250: The Compton amplitude for the general case of

251: non--forward scattering is given by

252: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

253: \begin{equation}

254: \label{COMP}

255: T_{\mu\nu}(p_+,p_-,q)

256: = i \int d^4x \,e^{iqx}\,

257: \langle p_2, S_2\,|T (J_{\mu}(x/2) J_{\nu}(-x/2))|\,p_1,

258: S_1\rangle~.

259: \end{equation}

260: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

261: Here,

262: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

263: \begin{eqnarray}

264: p_+ &=& p_2 + p_1,~~~~~~~~~~p_- = p_2 - p_1 = q_1 - q_2, \\

265: q   &=& \hbox{\large $\frac{1}{2}$}

266:         \left(q_1 + q_2\right),~~~~~~~~p_1 + q_1 = p_2 + q_2~,

267: \end{eqnarray}

268: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

269: where $q_1~(q_2)$ and $p_1~(p_2)$ denote the four--momenta of the

270: incoming~(outgoing) photon and hadron, respectively, and $S_{1}, S_{2}$

271: are the spins of the initial-- and final--state hadron.

272: Representations of the Lorentz--structure of the Compton amplitude were

273: given in Refs.~\cite{LR}. In the following we will consider the

274: Compton amplitude in the {\it generalized Bjorken region} only which

275: is defined by the conditions

276: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

277: \begin{eqnarray}

278: \label{gBr1}

279: \nu =  qp_+ \longrightarrow \infty, \qquad

280: - q^2 \longrightarrow \infty~,

281: \end{eqnarray}

282: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

283: keeping the variables

284: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

285: \begin{eqnarray}

286: \label{gBr2}

287: \xi  = - \frac{q^2 }{qp_+}, \qquad

288: \eta = \frac{qp_-}{qp_+} = \frac{q_1^2 - q_2^2}{2\nu}

289: \end{eqnarray}

290: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

291: fixed. The subsequent analysis will be performed demanding furthermore

292: that the vector $q_1$ is spacelike and the vector $q_2$ can be

293: space--, light--, or time--like,

294: where

295: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

296: \begin{eqnarray}

297: q_1 &=& q + \hbox{\large $\frac{1}{2}$}p_- \\

298: q_2 &=& q - \hbox{\large $\frac{1}{2}$}p_-~.

299: \end{eqnarray}

300: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

301: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

302: In the generalized Bjorken region the Compton amplitude is dominated by

303: the light--cone singularities. It is therefore possible to apply the

304: light--cone expansion for its representation. In the following we use

305: the non--local light-cone expansion~\cite{NLC,BGR}, which is a 

306: summed--up form of the local light--cone expansion with respect to the

307: spin indices. The respective expressions in the local light--cone

308: expansion can be obtained from the former one by a Taylor expansion.

309: In this way more compact representations can be obtained, 

310: cf.~section~\ref{sec-6}.

311: 

312: In this paper we study the twist--2 contributions to the 

313: non--forward Compton amplitude. They are obtained from the expectation

314: values of the non-local twist--2 light cone operators, 

315: cf.~\cite{BGR,GLR}. Here the notion of twist is used in its original

316: form as canonical dimension - spin~\cite{TW} for the local operators

317: which are summed up to the non--local operators. In calculating the

318: non--forward operator expectation values it turns out that the 

319: twist--decomposition performed for the operators is not necessarily

320: complete in the case of the expectation values unlike the case for

321: forward scattering. The emergence of new hadronic mass scales, such as

322: $p_+.p_-$ or also of off--shell terms $\propto

323: p_+^2, p_-^2$ open  the possibility that expectation values of operators

324: of lower twist mix with expectation values of operators of higher twist

325: by virtue of these terms, cf. e.g.~\cite{BN}. The light cone expansion in

326: the

327: non--forward case bears therefore additional complications to be dealt

328: with. The impact of the hadronic mass scales $p_+^2, 

329: p_-^2$ and $p_+.p_-$,

330: which is of relevance for the contributions beyond leading twist, can in

331: general not be dealt with as target mass-- or final--state mass

332: corrections only~cf.~\cite{MIR,BT} for a discussion. Furthermore,

333: the scales $p_+^2$ and $p_-^2$  dependend on the factorization

334: of non--perturbative quantities as the distribution

335: amplitudes and are arbitrary in this sense. In size they are comparable

336: to the mass scales of the expectaion values of higher twist operators.

337: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

338: \subsection{Operator Structure}

339: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

340: \label{sec-2.1}

341: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

342: 

343: \vspace{1mm}

344: \noindent

345: The product of the two currents 

346: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

347: \begin{eqnarray}

348: \hat{T}_{\mu\nu}(x)  =

349: i RT \left[J_\mu\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)

350: J_\nu\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) S \right]

351: \end{eqnarray}

352: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

353: is then given by~\footnote{Here and in the following, 

354: the normal product symbols for the operator products will be omitted.}

355: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

356: \begin{eqnarray}

357: \label{Tmunu}

358:  \hat{T}^{\mu\nu}(x) = 

359:  -e^2 \frac{\tilde x^\lambda}{2 \pi^2 (x^2-i\epsilon)^2}

360:  RT

361:  \left[

362: \overline{\psi}

363: \left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

364: \gamma^\mu \gamma^\lambda \gamma^\nu \psi

365: \left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

366: - \overline{\psi}

367: \left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

368: \gamma^\mu \gamma^\lambda \gamma^\nu \psi

369: \left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

370: \right] S~.

371: \end{eqnarray}

372: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

373: $\tilde x$ denotes a light--like vector corresponding to $x$,

374: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

375: \begin{eqnarray}

376: \label{xtil}

377: \tilde x = x + \frac{\zeta}{\zeta^2}\left[ \sqrt{x.\zeta^2 - x^2 \zeta^2}

378: - x.\zeta\right]~,

379: \end{eqnarray}

380: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

381: and $\zeta$ is a subsidiary vector. The leading order expressions

382: turn out to be independent  of $\zeta$.~\footnote{The 

383: respective terms are

384: suppressed $\propto \sqrt{|\zeta^2/q^2|}$ and do therefore not contribute

385: at the twist--2 level but might be of relevance for the higher twist 

386: terms beginning with twist--3.} $e$ denotes the charge of the fermion 

387: field $\psi$, which is either a quark-- or an antiquark field.

388: $\hat{T}_{\mu\nu}(x)$,~Eq.~(\ref{Tmunu}), refers therefore to the 

389: contribution of

390: one of these fields for a single flavor. In the subsequent treatment

391: there is no essential structural difference considering quark or 

392: antiquark fields since we work in the massless approximation. The

393: expectation values of the bilocal quark and antiquark operators between 

394: nucleon states introduced below are of course different and do also

395: depend on the quark flavor. The complete Compton amplitude is obtained 

396: summing 

397: Eq.~(\ref{Tmunu}) over all quark and antiquark flavors contributing in

398: the kinematic domain considered.

399: 

400: The operators 

401: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

402: \begin{eqnarray}

403: \overline{\psi}\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

404: \gamma^\mu \gamma^\lambda \gamma^\nu \psi

405: \left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)  \nonumber

406: \end{eqnarray}

407: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

408: are bilocal operators  on the light ray $ \tilde x $. These are

409: renormalized and time ordered operators~\cite{BGR}. One may rewrite the 

410: operator $\hat{T}_{\mu\nu}(x)$ in terms of a symmetric and an asymmetric

411: contribution by

412: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

413: \begin{eqnarray}

414:  \hat{T}_{\mu\nu}(x)  =

415:  - e^2 \frac{\tilde x^\lambda}{i \pi^2 (x^2-i\epsilon)^2}

416:  \left[S_{\alpha \mu\lambda \nu} 

417:  O^\alpha\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}, -\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

418: +i \varepsilon_{\mu\lambda \nu \sigma} 

419: O_5^\alpha  \left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}, -\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

420: \right]~,

421: \end{eqnarray}

422: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

423: where

424: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

425: \begin{eqnarray}

426: S_{\alpha \mu\lambda \nu} = g_{\alpha\mu}g_{\lambda \nu}

427:                           + g_{\lambda\mu}g_{\alpha \nu}

428:                           - g_{\mu\nu}g_{\lambda \alpha}~.

429: \end{eqnarray}

430: The essential objects are the bilocal light--ray operators

431: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

432: \begin{eqnarray}

433: \label{oo}

434: O^{\alpha}\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2},-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

435: &=&

436: \frac{i}{2}\left[\overline{\psi}\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

437: \gamma^\alpha\psi\left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

438: - \overline{\psi}\left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

439: \gamma^\alpha\psi\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)\right]~,

440: \\

441: \label{oo5}

442: O^{\alpha}_5\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2},-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

443: &=&

444: \frac{i}{2}

445: \left[\overline{\psi}\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

446: \gamma_5\gamma^\alpha\psi\left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

447: + \overline{\psi}\left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

448: \gamma_5\gamma^\alpha\psi\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)\right]~.

449: \end{eqnarray}

450: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

451: These operators do still contain higher twist contributions. In the 

452: present paper we are going to discuss the twist--2 contributions only

453: and have therefore to perform a twist decomposition.

454: The scalar twist--2 operators on the light--cone are  given by

455: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

456: \begin{eqnarray}

457: O\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2},-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

458: &=&

459: \tilde{x}_{\alpha}\,

460: O^{\alpha}\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2},-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right) \\

461: O_5\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2},-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

462: &=&

463: \tilde{x}_{\alpha}\,

464: O^{\alpha}_5\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2},-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)~.

465: \end{eqnarray}

466: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

467: Their general definition off the light--cone can be found in 

468: Refs.~\cite{GLR,BGR}. The operators satisfy the condition

469: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

470: \begin{eqnarray}

471: \label{co1}

472: \Box O^{q,\;\rm traceless}_{(5)}(-\kappa x,\kappa x) = 0~.

473: \end{eqnarray}

474: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

475: Here $\kappa$ parametrizes   the position on the $x$--ray. The twist--2

476: vector operators can now be constructed referring to the 

477: scalar operator by

478: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

479: \begin{eqnarray}

480: \label{optw2}

481: O_{\sigma}^{q,\, \rm twist 2} (- \kappa \xx, \kappa \xx)

482: & = & \int_0^{1} d {\tau} \;

483: \partial_\sigma

484: \left.

485: O^q_{\rm traceless}(-\kappa\tau x, \kappa\tau x)

486: \right|_{x \rightarrow \xx}

487: \nonumber\\

488: & = & \int_0^{1} d {\tau}

489:  \left[ \partial_\sigma

490: + \hbox{$\frac{1}{2}$}

491: (\ln \tau) x_\sigma \Box\right]

492: \left. O^q(-\kappa\tau x, \kappa\tau x)\right|_{x=\xx}~.

493: \end{eqnarray}

494: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

495: These operators satisfy the relations

496: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

497: \begin{eqnarray}

498: \label{co2}

499: \partial^\sigma O^{q,\;\rm traceless}_\sigma(-\kappa x,\kappa x)

500: = 0~,

501: \quad

502: \Box O^{q,\;\rm traceless}_\sigma(-\kappa x,\kappa x) = 0~.

503: \end{eqnarray}

504: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

505: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

506: \subsection{Operator Matrix Elements}

507: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

508: \label{sec-2.2}

509: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

510: 

511: \vspace{1mm}

512: \noindent

513: Up to now we have considered an expression for the product of the two 

514: electromagnetic currents. As the next step we form matrix elements of 

515: the respective operators. Let us first consider the matrix element of the

516: scalar operator. We use the kinematic decomposition into a {\sc Dirac}--

517: and a {\sc Pauli}--type contribution, the latter of which vanishes

518: in the case of forward scattering, $p_-, \eta \rightarrow 0$.

519: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

520: \begin{eqnarray}

521: e^2

522: \Biggl

523: \langle p_2, S_2 \left|O\left(\frac{x}{2}, - \frac{x}{2}\right)

524: \right |p_1, S_1 \Biggr \rangle

525:  &=&

526: i\,\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma x u(p_1,S_1) 

527: \int Dz e^{-ixp_z/2} f(z_1,z_2, p_i p_j x^2, p_i p_j,\mu^2_R) \nonumber\\

528:  &+&

529: i\,\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)x \sigma p_-  u(p_1,S_1) 

530: \int Dz e^{-ixp_z/2}

531:  g(z_1,z_2 , p_i p_j x^2, p_i p_j,\mu^2_R)   \nonumber\\

532: \end{eqnarray}

533: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

534: Here $\mu_R$ denotes the renormalization scale and

535: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

536: \begin{eqnarray}

537: \label{Dz}

538: Dz

539: &=& \frac{1}{2}

540: d z_1 d z_2 \theta(1-z_1) \theta(1+z_1) \theta(1-z_2) \theta(1+z_2) \\

541: &=&

542: d z_+ d z_-

543: \theta(1 + z_+ + z_-) \theta(1 + z_+ - z_-)

544: \theta(1 - z_+ + z_-) \theta(1 - z_+ - z_-)

545: \nonumber\\

546: p_z &=& p_+ z_+ +p_- z_- \nonumber\\ 

547: z_{\pm} &=& \frac{1}{2} ( z_2 \pm  z_1 ) \nonumber\\

548: \sigma_{\alpha\beta} &=& \frac{i}{2} \left[\gamma_\alpha \gamma_\beta

549: - \gamma_\beta \gamma_\alpha \right]~.

550: \end{eqnarray}

551: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

552: We consider all hadronic mass scales $p_i.p_j \approx 0$ as small 

553: compared to the large

554: invariants $p_{\pm}.q$ and $q^2$. Therefore the on--shell relations

555: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

556: \begin{eqnarray}

557: \gamma_\mu p_1^\mu~u(p_1,S_1) &=& 0 \nonumber\\

558: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)~\gamma_\mu p_2^\mu &=& 0

559: \end{eqnarray}

560: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

561: hold. Under these assumptions we show that

562: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

563: the scalar matrix element satisfies the condition (\ref{co1}):

564: %\newpage

565: \begin{eqnarray}

566: \lefteqn{

567: \Box  e^2

568: \Biggl \langle p_2,S_2\left|O\left(\frac{x}{2},

569: - \frac{x}{2}\right)\right |p_1,S_1 \Biggr \rangle |_{x \rightarrow \tilde x}}

570: \\

571: &=&

572: i \Box \left [

573:  \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma x u(p_1,S_1) 

574: \int Dz e^{-i x p_z/2} f(z_1,z_2)  \right.

575:   \nonumber\\ & &

576: \left.

577: +

578: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)x \sigma p_  u(p_1,S_1) 

579: \int Dz e^{-i x p_z/2}

580:  g(z_1,z_2 ) \right]|_{x \rightarrow \tilde x}

581:  \nonumber\\ 

582: &= &        

583: i\,\int Dz e^{-i\tilde x p(z)/2} f(z_1,z_2) 

584: \left[- \frac{i}{2} p_{z\mu} + 2\tilde{x}_{\mu}\left(-\frac{i}{2} p_z

585: \right)^2 \right]

586: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma^\mu u(p_1,S_1)

587: \nonumber \\

588: &+& 

589: i\,\int Dz e^{-i\tilde x p(z)/2} f(z_1,z_2) 

590: \left[- \frac{i}{2} p_{z\mu} + 2\tilde{x}_{\mu}\left(-\frac{i}{2} p_z

591: \right)^2 \right]

592: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\sigma^{\mu\nu} p_{-\nu} u(p_1,S_1)          

593: \simeq 0~.

594: \nonumber

595: \end{eqnarray}

596: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

597: Analogously to the construction of the vector operator out of the scalar 

598: operator~(\ref{optw2}) one obtains the matrix element

599: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

600: \begin{eqnarray}

601: e^2

602: \Biggl \langle p_2,S_2 \left|O^{\mu}\left(\frac{{\tilde x}}{2},

603: - \frac{{\tilde x}}{2}\right)\right |p_1,S_1 \Biggr \rangle

604: &=&

605: i\,\int_0^1 d\lambda~\partial_x^\mu\Biggl\{

606: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma x u(p_1,S_1) 

607: \int Dz e^{-i\lambda x p_z/2}

608: f(z_1,z_2) \nonumber\\

609:  & & ~~~~~+

610: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)x \sigma p_- u(p_1,S_1)

611: \int Dz e^{-i \lambda  x p_z/2}

612:  g(z_1,z_2)  \Biggr\}|_{x \rightarrow \tilde x} \nonumber\\

613: %------- 

614: &=& i\int Dz \partial_x^\mu \Biggl\{

615: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma x u(p_1,S_1) 

616:  e^{-i x  p_z/2} \int_0^1 \frac{d\lambda}{\lambda^2}

617: f\left(\frac{z_1}{\lambda},\frac{z_2}{\lambda}\right) \nonumber\\

618:  & & ~~~~~+

619: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)x \sigma p_-  u(p_1,S_1) 

620:  e^{-i x  p_z/2}\int_0^1 \frac{d\lambda}{\lambda^2}

621: g\left(\frac{z_1}{\lambda},\frac{z_2}{\lambda}\right)

622:  \Biggr\}|_{x \rightarrow \tilde x}.

623:  \nonumber\\

624: \end{eqnarray}

625: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

626: The expectation values of the operators $O^\mu$ and $Q^\mu_5$ are finally

627: expressed by

628: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

629: \begin{eqnarray}

630: \label{eqOM}

631: e^2

632: \lefteqn{

633: \Biggl \langle p_2,S_2 \left|O^{\mu}\left(\frac{{\tilde x}}{2},

634: - \frac{{\tilde x}}{2}\right)\right |p_1,S_1 \Biggr \rangle}  \\

635: &=& 

636: i\,\int Dz e^{-i\tilde x p_z/2} F(z_1,z_2)\left

637: [\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma^\mu  u(p_1,S_1) 

638: -\frac{i}{2} p_z^\mu  

639: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma \tilde x  u(p_1,S_1) \right]

640: \nonumber

641: \\

642: &+&

643: i\int Dz e^{-i\tilde x p_z/2} G(z_1,z_2) \left

644: [\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\sigma^{\mu\nu }{p_-}_\nu  u(p_1,S_1) 

645: -\frac{i}{2} p_z^\mu  \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\sigma^{\alpha\beta}

646: \tilde x_\alpha {p_-}_\beta  u(p_1,S_1)\right]~.\nonumber

647: \end{eqnarray}

648: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

649: and

650: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

651: \begin{eqnarray}

652: \label{eqO5M}

653: \lefteqn{

654: e^2

655: \Biggl \langle p_2,S_2 \left|O^{\mu}_5\left(\frac{{\tilde x}}{2},

656: - \frac{{\tilde x}}{2}\right)\right |p_1,S_1 \Biggr \rangle}

657: \\

658: &=& 

659: \hspace*{-3mm}

660: i\,\int Dz e^{-i\tilde x p_z/2} F_5(z_1,z_2)\left

661: [\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma_5

662: \gamma^\mu  u(p_1,S_1) 

663: -\frac{i}{2} p_z^\mu  

664: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma_5

665: \gamma \tilde x  u(p_1,S_1) \right]

666: \nonumber

667: \\

668: &+&

669: \hspace*{-3mm}

670: i\int Dz e^{-i\tilde x p_z/2} G_5(z_1,z_2) \left

671: [\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma_5

672: \sigma^{\mu\nu }{p_-}_\nu  u(p_1,S_1) 

673: -\frac{i}{2} p_z^\mu  \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma_5

674: \sigma^{\alpha\beta}

675: \tilde x_\alpha {p_-}_\beta  u(p_1,S_1)\right], 

676: \nonumber

677: \end{eqnarray}

678: 

679: respectively. The new functions $F,G \equiv H$ and $F_5,G_5 \equiv H_5$

680: are defined by

681: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

682: \begin{eqnarray}

683: H_{(5)}(z_1, z_2)=\int_0^1 \frac{d\lambda}{\lambda^2}

684: h_{(5)}\left(\frac{z_1}{\lambda},\frac{z_2}{\lambda}\right)~,

685: \end{eqnarray}

686: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

687: with $h_{(5)} \equiv f,g,f_5,g_5$. In the same manner as for the scalar 

688: operator it can be shown that the conditions (\ref{co2}) for the vector 

689: operator are satisfied by the matrix element. 

690: 

691: The functions $H$ and $H_5$ obey the relations

692: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

693: \begin{eqnarray}

694: \label{symrel1}

695:   H(z_1, z_2) &=& - H(-z_1,-z_2)\\

696: \label{symrel2}

697: H_5(z_1, z_2) &=& + H_5(-z_1,-z_2)~,

698: \end{eqnarray}

699: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

700: which follow  from Eqs.~(\ref{oo},\ref{oo5}) interchanging

701: $x$ and $-x$, in the limit in which contributions due to $\zeta$, 

702: Eq.~(\ref{xtil}), can be disregarded.

703: 

704: The contributions due to the above operators to the Compton amplitude 

705: read

706: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

707: \begin{eqnarray}

708: \label{COMPB}

709: T_{\mu\nu}(p_+,p_-,q)

710:  & = & i \int d^4x \,e^{iqx}\,

711: \langle p_2, S_2\,|T (J_{\mu}(x/2) J_{\nu}(-x/2))|\,p_1,

712: S_1 

713: \rangle~ \nonumber \\

714:  &=& \int d^4x \,e^{iqx}\,

715: \Biggl\{ -  \frac{\tilde x^\lambda}{i \pi^2 (x^2-i\varepsilon)^2}

716:  \Biggl[S_{\alpha \mu\lambda \nu}

717: \Biggl\langle p_2\Biggl

718: | O^\alpha\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}, -\frac{\tilde x}{2}

719: \right)\Biggr

720: |p_1\Biggr\rangle

721: \nonumber \\

722: & &~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

723: +i \varepsilon_{\mu\lambda \nu \sigma}

724: \Biggl\langle p_2\Biggl

725: | O^\alpha_5\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}, -\frac{\tilde x}{2}

726: \right)\Biggr

727: |p_1\Biggr\rangle   \Biggr]\Biggr\}~.

728: \end{eqnarray}

729: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

730: We rewrite Eq.~(\ref{COMPB}) referring to the distribution functions

731: $F_{(5)}, G_{(5)}$,

732: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

733: \begin{eqnarray}

734: \label{COMPB1}

735: \lefteqn{

736: T_{\mu\nu}(p_+,p_-,q)

737:   =  - \int d^4x \,e^{i(q- p_z/2)x}\,

738:       \frac{\tilde x^\lambda}{  \pi^2 (x^2-i\varepsilon)^2} }  \\

739: %---

740:  & & \times \Biggl\{

741:      S_{\alpha \mu\lambda \nu} \Biggl\{

742: \int Dz \left[

743: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma^\alpha  u(p_1,S_1)

744: - \frac{i}{2} p_z^\mu  

745: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma \tilde x  u(p_1,S_1) \right] F(z_+,z_-)

746: \nonumber\\

747: & & +

748: \int Dz  

749: \left[\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\sigma^{\alpha\beta}{p_-}_\beta  u(p_1,S_1)

750: -\frac{i}{2} p_z^\alpha  \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\sigma^{\beta\gamma}

751: \tilde x_\beta {p_-}_\gamma  u(p_1,S_1) \right]

752: G(z_+,z_-) 

753: \Biggr\}  \nonumber \\

754: %---

755: & & +i \varepsilon_{\mu\lambda \nu \sigma} \Biggl\{

756: \int Dz 

757: \left[\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma_5\gamma^\sigma  u(p_1,S_1)

758: -\frac{i}{2}  p_z^\sigma   \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma_5

759: \gamma \tilde x  u(p_1,S_1) \right] F_5(z_+,z_-)

760: \nonumber\\

761: & & +

762: \int Dz  

763: \left[\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma_5\sigma^{\sigma\alpha}{p_-}_\alpha 

764: u(p_1,S_1)

765: - \frac{i}{2} p_z^\sigma   \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma_5

766: \sigma^{\alpha\beta }

767: \tilde x_\alpha {p_-}_\beta  u(p_1,S_1)\right]

768: G_5(z_+,z_-) \Biggr\} \Biggr \}~. \nonumber

769: \end{eqnarray}

770: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

771: Finally the Fourier transform to momentum space is performed,

772: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

773: \begin{eqnarray}

774: \label{comp4}

775: T_{\mu\nu}(q,p_+,p_-)

776:  &=&  -2

777:  \int Dz

778:  \frac{1}{Q^2 + i \varepsilon} \Biggl\{

779: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\Gamma^F_{\mu\nu}(q,p_+,p_-) u(p_1,S_1)~F(z_+,z_-)

780: \nonumber\\ &&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

781: + \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\Gamma^{F5}_{\mu\nu}(q,p_+,p_-) 

782: u(p_1,S_1)~F_5(z_+,z_-) \nonumber\\   &&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

783: +\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\Gamma^G_{\mu\nu}(q,p_+,p_-) u(p_1,S_1)~G(z_+,z_-)

784: \nonumber\\ &&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

785: +\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\Gamma^{G5}_{\mu\nu}(q,p_+,p_-) 

786: u(p_1,S_1)~G_5(z_+,z_-) \Biggr\}~.

787: \label{comp1}

788: \end{eqnarray}

789: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

790: The matrices $\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^O$  are given by

791: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

792: \begin{eqnarray}

793: \Gamma^F_{\mu\nu}(q,p_z) &=& ~~\Bigl [

794: Q_{\mu} \gamma_{\nu}  +

795: Q_{\nu} \gamma_{\mu}  -

796: g_{\mu\nu} \gamma_{\alpha} Q^{\alpha}  \Bigr]

797: \nonumber\\ &&

798: - \frac{1}{2}

799: \Bigl [

800: p_{z \mu} \gamma_{\nu} +

801: p_{z \nu} \gamma_{\mu} - g_{\mu\nu} \gamma_{\alpha} p_z^{\alpha} \Bigr]

802: \nonumber\\ && +

803: \frac{1}{Q^2+i\varepsilon} \gamma_{\alpha} Q^{\alpha} 

804: \Bigl [Q_{\nu} p_{z \mu} + Q_{\mu} p_{z \nu} - g_{\mu\nu} Q.p_z \Bigr]

805: \nonumber\\

806:                 &\simeq&         ~~\Bigl [

807: q_{\mu} \gamma_{\nu}  +

808: q_{\nu} \gamma_{\mu}  -

809: g_{\mu\nu} \gamma_{\alpha} q^{\alpha}  \Bigr]

810: - \left[p_{z\mu} \gamma_\nu + p_{z\nu} \gamma_\mu\right]

811: \nonumber\\ &&

812: + \frac{1}{Q^2+i\varepsilon} \gamma_{\alpha} q^{\alpha}

813: \Bigl [

814:      -p_{z \nu} p_{z \mu} +

815: q_{\nu} p_{z \mu} + q_{\mu} p_{z \nu} - g_{\mu\nu} q.p_z

816: \Bigr]

817: \\                               

818: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

819: \Gamma^{F5}_{\mu\nu}(q,p_z) &=& i~\gamma_5

820: \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}

821: \left[Q^{\lambda} \gamma^{\sigma}

822: - \frac{1}{2} p_{z}^{\sigma} \gamma^{\lambda}

823: + \frac{1}{Q^2 + i \varepsilon} Q^{\lambda}

824: p_{z}^{\sigma} \gamma_{\alpha} Q^{\alpha}

825: \right] \nonumber\\

826:                                 &\simeq&

827: i~\gamma_5

828: \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}

829: \left[q^{\lambda} \gamma^{\sigma}

830: + \frac{1}{Q^2 + i \varepsilon} q^{\lambda}

831: p_{z}^{\sigma} \gamma_{\alpha} q^{\alpha}

832: \right]     

833: \\

834: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

835: \Gamma^{G}_{\mu\nu}(q,p_z) &=& ~~\Bigl [

836: Q_{\mu} \sigma_{\nu\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} +

837: Q_{\nu} \sigma_{\mu\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} -

838: g_{\mu\nu} \sigma_{\alpha\beta} p_-^{\beta} Q^{\alpha}  \Bigr]

839: \nonumber\\ &&

840: - \frac{1}{2}

841: \Bigl [

842: p_{z \mu} \sigma_{\nu\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} +

843: p_{z \nu} \sigma_{\mu\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} -

844: g_{\mu\nu} \sigma_{\beta\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} p_z^{\beta}  \Bigr]

845: \nonumber\\ && +

846: \frac{1}{Q^2+i\varepsilon} \sigma_{\beta\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} Q^{\beta}

847: \Bigl [Q_{\nu} p_{z \mu} + Q_{\mu} p_{z \nu} - g_{\mu\nu} Q.p_z \Bigr]

848: \nonumber\\

849:                                &\simeq&~~~\Bigl [

850: q_{\mu} \sigma_{\nu\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} +

851: q_{\nu} \sigma_{\mu\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} -

852: g_{\mu\nu} \sigma_{\beta\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} q^{\beta}  \Bigr]

853: -\Bigl [

854: p_{z \mu} \sigma_{\nu\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} +

855: p_{z \nu} \sigma_{\mu\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} \Bigr]

856: \nonumber\\ & & +

857: \frac{1}{Q^2+i\varepsilon} \sigma_{\beta\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} q^{\beta}

858: \Bigl [-p_{z \mu} p_{z \nu} +

859: q_{\nu} p_{z \mu} + q_{\mu} p_{z \nu} - g_{\mu\nu} q.p_z \Bigr]

860: \nonumber\\

861: \\

862: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

863: \Gamma^{G5}_{\mu\nu}(q,p_z) &=& i~\gamma_5

864: \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}

865: \left[Q^{\lambda} \sigma^{\sigma\alpha} p_{-\alpha}

866: - \frac{1}{2} p_{z}^{\sigma} \sigma^{\lambda\alpha} p_{-\alpha}

867: + \frac{1}{Q^2 + i \varepsilon} Q^{\lambda}

868: p_{z}^{\sigma} \sigma^{\alpha\beta} Q_{\alpha} p_{-\beta}

869: \right] \nonumber\\

870:                                 &\simeq&

871: i~\gamma_5

872: \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}

873: \left[q^{\lambda} \sigma^{\sigma\alpha} p_{-\alpha}

874: + \frac{1}{Q^2 + i \varepsilon} q^{\lambda}

875: p_{z}^{\sigma} \sigma^{\alpha\beta} q_{\alpha} p_{-\beta}

876: \right]~,

877: \end{eqnarray}

878: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

879: where

880: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

881: \begin{eqnarray}

882: Q=q-\frac{p_z}{2}~.

883: \end{eqnarray}

884: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

885: The equivalence--sign denotes that the other contributions vanish between

886: the bi--spinor states according to the assumption that 

887: $p_i.p_j \approx 0$.

888: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

889: \subsection{Lorentz Structure}

890: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

891: \label{sec-2.3}

892: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

893: 

894: \vspace{1mm}

895: \noindent

896: Let us now discuss the Lorentz structure of the Compton amplitude in 

897: more detail. The matrices $\Gamma^{O}_{\mu\nu}/(Q^2 + i \varepsilon)$ 

898: consist out of two parts which are $\propto 1/Q^2$ and

899: $\propto 1/Q^4$, respectively. The numerators of the former terms

900: depend on $q$ only, whereas the second terms contain the vectors $q$ and

901: $p_z = z_+ p_+ + z_- p_-$. The $(z_+,z_-)$--dependence may be factored 

902: out of the quantities

903: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

904: \begin{eqnarray}

905: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)\gamma_{\mu_1} \ldots \gamma_{\mu_k} (\gamma_5)

906: u(p_1,S_1)

907: \end{eqnarray}

908: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

909: and the form factors related to the contributions $\propto 1/Q^2$ and

910: $\propto 1/Q^4$ are of different structure, graded by the 

911: $z_{\pm}$ dependence in the numerators. Due to the different

912: numerator structure individual variations in $q$, $p_+$ and $p_-$ may

913: allow to disentangle the different contributions experimentally. 

914: The Compton amplitude is given by

915: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

916: \begin{eqnarray}

917: \label{comp5}

918: T_{\mu\nu}(q,p_+,p_-)

919:  &=& -2

920:  \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \left[

921:  \Gamma_{\mu\nu}^{F}(q,p_+,p_-)+

922:  \Gamma_{\mu\nu}^{F5}(q,p_+,p_-)  \right.

923:  \nonumber\\  

924:  & &~~~~~~~~~~~~\left.

925:  +\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^{G}(q,p_+,p_-)+

926:  \Gamma_{\mu\nu}^{G5}(q,p_+,p_-)\right]

927:  u(p_1,S_1)~,

928: \label{comp1a}

929: \end{eqnarray}

930: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

931: with

932: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

933: \begin{eqnarray}

934: \label{galo1}

935: \Gamma^F_{\mu\nu}(q,p_+,p_-) &=& 

936: \Bigl [

937: q_{\mu} \gamma_{\nu}  +

938: q_{\nu} \gamma_{\mu}  -

939: g_{\mu\nu} \gamma_{\alpha} q^{\alpha}  

940: \Bigr] F_1(\xi,\eta) \nonumber\\ & &

941: - \gamma_\mu F_{1,\nu}(\xi,\eta)

942: - \gamma_\nu F_{1,\mu}(\xi,\eta)

943: + \gamma_{\alpha} q^{\alpha} F_{2,\mu\nu}(\xi,\eta)

944: \\                               

945: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

946: \Gamma^{F5}_{\mu\nu}(q,p_+,p_-) &=& 

947: i~\gamma_5

948: \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}

949: \left[q^{\lambda} \gamma^{\sigma} F^5_1(\xi,\eta)

950: + q^{\lambda}  \gamma_{\alpha} q^{\alpha} F_2^{\sigma,5}(\xi,\eta)

951: \right]\\

952: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

953: \Gamma^G_{\mu\nu}(q,p_+,p_-) &=&

954: \Bigl [

955: q_{\mu} \sigma_{\nu\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} +

956: q_{\nu} \sigma_{\mu\alpha} p_-^{\alpha}

957: -

958: g_{\mu\nu} \sigma_{\beta\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} q^{\beta} 

959: \Bigr] 

960: G_1(\xi,\eta) \nonumber\\ & &

961: - \sigma_{\mu\alpha} p_-^\alpha G_{1,\nu}(\xi,\eta)

962: - \sigma_{\nu\alpha} p_-^\alpha G_{1,\mu}(\xi,\eta)

963: p_-^\alpha

964: + \sigma_{\beta\alpha} p_-^{\alpha} q^{\beta} G_{2,\mu\nu}(\xi,\eta)

965: \\                               

966: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

967: \label{galo2}

968: \Gamma^{G5}_{\mu\nu}(q,p_+,p_-) &=&

969: i~\gamma_5

970: \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}

971: \left[q^{\lambda} \sigma^{\sigma\alpha} p_{-\alpha} G_1^5(\xi,\eta)+

972:  q^{\lambda}  \sigma^{\alpha\beta} q_{\alpha} p_{-\beta} 

973:  G_2^{\sigma,5}(\xi,\eta)

974: \right]~.

975: \end{eqnarray}

976: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

977: The different amplitude functions are given by

978: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

979: \begin{eqnarray}

980: H_1(\xi,\eta) &=& \int Dz \frac{1}{Q^2+i\varepsilon} H(z_+,z_-) \\

981: \label{eqH1}

982: H_k^{\sigma}(\xi,\eta) &=& \int Dz \frac{p_+^{\sigma} z_+

983: + p_-^{\sigma} z_-}{(Q^2+i\varepsilon)^k} H(z_+,z_-) =

984:                            \int Dz \frac{p_+^{\sigma} t + \pi_{\sigma}

985: z_-}             

986: {(Q^2+i\varepsilon)^k} H(z_+,z_-)

987: \\

988: \label{eqH2}

989: H_{2,\mu\nu}(\xi,\eta) 

990: &=& \int Dz \frac{1}{(Q^2+i\varepsilon)^2}

991: \left[

992: -p_{z\mu}p_{z\nu}

993:     + q_{\nu} p_{z\mu} +q_{\mu} p_{z\nu} -g_{\mu\nu} q.p_z\right]

994: H(z_+,z_-)          \\

995: &=& \int Dz \frac{1}{(Q^2+i\varepsilon)^2}

996: \left[

997: -p_{+\mu}p_{+\nu} t^2

998:     + \left(

999: q_{\nu} p_{+\mu} +q_{\mu} p_{+\nu} \right)

1000: t -g_{\mu\nu} q.p_z

1001: \right. \nonumber\\ & &~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \left.

1002: -\pi_{\mu}\pi_{\nu} z_-^2

1003:     + \left(q_{\nu} \pi_{\mu} +q_{\mu} \pi_{\nu}\right) z_-

1004:     + \left(p_{+\nu} \pi_{\mu} +p_{+\mu} \pi_{\nu}\right) t z_-

1005: \right] \nonumber\\ & & 

1006: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1007: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~\times

1008: H(z_+,z_-)~,  \nonumber

1009: \end{eqnarray}

1010: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1011: where

1012: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1013: \begin{eqnarray}

1014: t &=& z_+ + \eta z_-\\

1015: \pi_\sigma &=& p_{-\sigma} - \eta p_{+\sigma}

1016: \end{eqnarray}

1017: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1018: and $q.p_z = q.p_+ t$.

1019: Here $H$ denotes either $F$ or $G$. 

1020: The amplitude functions  in Eqs.~(\ref{galo1}--\ref{galo2}) depend on the 

1021: scaling variables $\xi$ and $\eta$. In the limit of forward scattering  

1022: ($\eta \rightarrow 0, \xi \rightarrow x_B$) the structure functions

1023: $F_{1,2}(x_B)$ and $g_{1,2}(x_B)$ occur as the limit of the amplitude

1024: functions of respective helicity projections from the {\sc Dirac}--type 

1025: terms. The relations between these amplitude

1026: functions are derived in

1027: Section~\ref{sec-6}.

1028: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1029: \section{Kinematic Relations}

1030: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

1031: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1032: \label{sec-3}

1033: %\section{3}

1034: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1035: 

1036: \vspace{1mm}

1037: \noindent

1038: For convenience we construct the helicity basis for the photons 

1039: $\gamma_1^*$ and $\gamma_2^{(*)}$ in the Breit--frame

1040: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1041: \begin{eqnarray}

1042: p_+ &=& p_1 + p_2 = (2 E_p;~\vec{0}) \nonumber\\

1043: -p_-&=& p_1 - p_2 = (0;~2 \vec{p})  = (0;~0,0,2p_3)

1044: \nonumber\\

1045: q &=&  \hbox{\large $\frac{1}{2}$} \left(q_1 + q_2\right) 

1046: = (q_0;~q_1,0,q_3)~.

1047: \end{eqnarray}

1048: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1049: The matrix elements 

1050: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1051: \begin{equation}

1052: \T_{kl} = \epsi_{2,k}^\mu T_{\mu\nu} \epsi_{1,l}^{\nu},~~k,l~\epsilon~

1053: \{0,1,2,3\}

1054: \end{equation}

1055: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1056: are independent of the reference frame.

1057: 

1058: In the generalized Bjorken region we classify the various contributions

1059: to $\T_{kl}$ by their $\nu$--dependence, where the leading terms are

1060: kept respectively. There the kinematic invariants are given by

1061: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1062: \begin{eqnarray}

1063: \label{eqq1}

1064: q_1.q_1 &=& - \nu (\xi-\eta)     \\

1065: \label{eqq2}

1066: q_2.q_2 &=& - \nu (\xi+\eta)     \\

1067: q.p_+ &=& \nu  \\

1068: q.p_- &=& \eta \nu  \\

1069: q.q   &=& -\xi \nu  \\

1070: q.p_z &=& q^2-Q^2 = (z_+  + z_- \eta ) \nu \equiv t~\nu  \\

1071: p_+^2 &\approx& p_-^2 \approx p_+ p_- \approx 0~.

1072: \end{eqnarray}

1073: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1074: 

1075: To define the helicity basis we introduce the two reference vectors

1076: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1077: \begin{eqnarray}

1078: n_0 &=& (1;~0,0,0)\\

1079: n_2 &=& (0;~0,1,0)~.

1080: \end{eqnarray}

1081: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1082: The polarization vectors of the photons $\gamma_1^*$ and $\gamma_2^*$

1083: are then given by

1084: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1085: \begin{eqnarray}

1086: \label{eqep1}

1087: \varepsilon_{0 \mu}^{(1)} &=& \frac{q_{1\mu}}{\sqrt{|q_1^2|}}

1088: = \frac{q_{1\mu}}{\nu^{1/2}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{|\xi-\eta|}}

1089: \nonumber\\

1090: \varepsilon_{0 \mu}^{(2)} &=& \frac{q_{2\mu}}{\sqrt{|q_2^2|}}

1091: = \frac{q_{2\mu}}{\nu^{1/2}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{|\xi+\eta|}}

1092: \\

1093: \varepsilon_{1 \mu}^{(i)} &=& n_{2\mu}\\

1094: \varepsilon_{2 \mu}^{(i)} &=& \frac{1}{N_{2i}}

1095: \varepsilon_{\mu \alpha \beta \gamma} n_0^{\alpha} n_2^{\beta}

1096: q_i^{\gamma}  \\

1097: \label{eqep2}

1098: \varepsilon_{3 \mu}^{(i)} &=& \frac{1}{N_{3i}}

1099: \left[q_{i\mu} q_i.n_0 - n_{0\mu} q_i.q_i \right]~,

1100: \end{eqnarray}

1101: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1102: with $i = 1,2$ and

1103: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1104: \begin{eqnarray}

1105: N_{21} &=& \frac{\nu}{\mu}

1106: \sqrt{\left|1 + \frac{\mu^2}{\nu}(\xi-\eta)\right|}

1107: \nonumber\\

1108: N_{22} &=& \frac{\nu}{\mu} 

1109: \sqrt{\left|1 + \frac{\mu^2}{\nu}(\xi+\eta)\right|}

1110: \nonumber\\

1111: N_{31} &=& \frac{\nu^{3/2}}{\mu} \sqrt{|\xi - \eta|}

1112: \sqrt{\left|1 + \frac{\mu^2}{\nu}(\xi-\eta)\right|}

1113: \nonumber\\

1114: N_{32} &=& \frac{\nu^{3/2}}{\mu} \sqrt{|\xi + \eta|}

1115: \sqrt{\left|1 + \frac{\mu^2}{\nu}(\xi+\eta)\right|}~,

1116: \end{eqnarray}

1117: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1118: with $\mu^2 = p_+^2$.

1119: 

1120: With respect to the vector $q_2$, Eq.~(\ref{eqq2}),

1121: the above notation applies

1122: for space- or time-like vectors, for which

1123: $|\xi \pm \eta| \neq 0$ and

1124: all the above terms are regular.

1125: The polarization vectors obey

1126: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1127: \begin{eqnarray}

1128: \varepsilon_{k \mu}^{(i)}.

1129: \varepsilon_{l}^{(i) \mu} =   s_k \delta_{kl}~,

1130: \end{eqnarray}

1131: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1132: with $s_k=-1$ for $k=0,1,2$ and $s_k=+1$ for $k=3$ if both vectors are

1133: space-like and analogous  relations if $q_2$ is time-like.

1134: $\varepsilon_{1,2\mu}^{(i)}$ are the transversal and

1135: $\varepsilon_{3\mu}^{(i)}$ is the longitudinal polarization vector of the

1136: photon $\gamma_i^*$.

1137: 

1138: As will be shown below the hadronic mass scale $\mu^2 = p_+^2$ occurring

1139: as a normalization parameter cancels in the helicity projections

1140: of the Compton amplitude in leading order in $1/\nu$, 

1141: cf. Section~\ref{sec-5}.

1142: 

1143: For the limit to the forward case and the understanding of the results

1144: in the limit $\mu^2 \ll \nu$ it is useful to rewrite the  polarization

1145: vectors (\ref{eqep1}--\ref{eqep2}) as

1146: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1147: \begin{eqnarray}

1148: \varepsilon_{0 \rho}^{(1(2))} &=&  \frac{1}{\sqrt{|\xi|}}

1149: \left[\frac{q_{\rho}}{\nu^{1/2}}

1150: \pm \frac{p_{-\rho}}{2 \nu^{1/2}}\right]

1151:  \frac{1}{\sqrt{|1\mp\eta/\xi|}}

1152: \\

1153: \varepsilon_{1 \rho}^{(1(2))} &=& n_{2\rho}\\

1154: \varepsilon_{2 \rho}^{(1(2))} &=& \frac{\mu}{\nu} \left|1 - \frac{\mu^2}

1155: {2\nu} (\xi \mp \eta)\right| \varepsilon_{\rho\alpha\beta\gamma}

1156: n_0^\alpha n_2^\beta \left(q^\gamma \pm \frac{1}{2} p_-^\gamma\right)\\

1157: \varepsilon_{3 \rho}^{(1(2))} &=& 

1158: \frac{1}{\nu^{1/2}} \frac{1}

1159: {\sqrt{|\xi|}} \left|1 - \frac{\mu^2}{2\nu} (\xi \mp \eta)\right|

1160: \left[q_\rho \pm \frac{1}{2} p_{-\rho}

1161: + \mu n_{0\rho} (\xi \mp \eta)\right]

1162: \frac{1}{\sqrt{|1\mp\eta/\xi|}}~.

1163: \end{eqnarray}

1164: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1165: In the limit $p_{-\rho}, \eta \rightarrow 0$ the polarization vectors of 

1166: the first and the second photon become identical. On the other hand,

1167: in the limit that terms of

1168: $O(\mu^2)$ can be neglected against terms of $O(\nu)$ the polarization

1169: vectors $\varepsilon_{3\rho}^{(i)}$ and $\varepsilon_{0\rho}^{(i)}$

1170: become identical for $i = 1,2$. The latter aspect induces that current

1171: conservation for the twist--2 contributions, cf.~section~4, enforces

1172: that helicity projections in the direction of the longitudinal 

1173: polarization

1174: vectors vanish in the generalized Bjorken region in lowest order QCD.

1175: 

1176: If $q_2$ is light--like the respective set of polarization vectors

1177: reads

1178: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1179: \begin{eqnarray}

1180: \label{eqep4a}

1181: \varepsilon_{0 \mu}^{(2)} &=& 

1182: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2} q_0^{(2)}} q_{\mu} =

1183: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2} q_0^{(2)}} (q_0,~\vec{q}_2)\\

1184: \varepsilon_{1 \mu}^{(2)} &=& n_{2\mu}\\

1185: \label{eqep4b}

1186: \varepsilon_{2 \mu}^{(2)} &=& \frac{1}{q_0^{(2)}} 

1187: \varepsilon_{\mu\alpha\beta\gamma} n_0^\alpha n_2^\beta q_2^\gamma~,

1188: \end{eqnarray}

1189: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1190: with

1191: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1192: \begin{eqnarray}

1193: \label{eqep5}

1194: q_0^{(2)} = \frac{\nu}{\mu}~.

1195: \end{eqnarray}

1196: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1197: A fourth linearly independent vector associated to the above set is

1198: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1199: \begin{eqnarray}

1200: \label{eqep6}

1201: \widetilde{\varepsilon}_{0 \mu}^{(2)} &=&

1202: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2} q_0^{(2)}} (q_0,~-\vec{q}_2)

1203: \end{eqnarray}

1204: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1205: with

1206: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1207: \begin{eqnarray}

1208: \label{eqep7}

1209: \widetilde{\varepsilon}_{0 \mu}^{(2)} + 

1210: \varepsilon_{0 \mu}^{(2)} = \sqrt{2} n_{0\mu}~.

1211: \end{eqnarray}

1212: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1213: The vectors $\widetilde{\varepsilon}_{0 \mu}^{(2)},

1214: \varepsilon_{0 \mu}^{(2)}, \varepsilon_{1 \mu}^{(2)}$ and

1215: $\varepsilon_{2 \mu}^{(2)}$ span the Minkowski space.

1216: For later use we also note that the vectors

1217: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1218: \begin{eqnarray}

1219: p_+^\mu~,p_-^\mu~,~q^\mu~~~~{\rm and}~~~~n_2^\mu \nonumber

1220: \end{eqnarray}

1221: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1222: span the Minkowski space for the general case of non--forward

1223: scattering, excluding special cases as forward scattering $p_- = 0$ and

1224: vacuum--meson transition $p_+=p_-$.

1225: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1226: \section{Current Conservation}

1227: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

1228: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1229: \label{sec-4}

1230: %\section{4}

1231: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1232: 

1233: \vspace{1mm}

1234: \noindent

1235: The conservation of the electromagnetic current

1236: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1237: \begin{eqnarray}

1238: \partial_\mu^x J^\mu(x) = 0

1239: \end{eqnarray}

1240: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1241: implies for the Compton amplitude

1242: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1243: \begin{eqnarray}

1244: T_{\mu\nu}(p_+,p_-,q) &=&

1245: i\,\int d^4 e^{-iq_2 x} \langle p_2,S_2|RT(J_{\mu}(0)J_{\nu}(x)|p_1,S_1

1246: \rangle \nonumber\\ &=&

1247: i\,\int d^4 e^{-iq_1 x} \langle p_2,S_2|RT(J_{\mu}(-x)J_{\nu}(0)|p_1,S_1

1248: \rangle 

1249: \end{eqnarray}

1250: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1251: the relations

1252: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1253: \begin{eqnarray}

1254: q_2^{\mu} T_{\mu\nu} = T_{\mu\nu} q^{\nu}_1 = 0~.

1255: \end{eqnarray}

1256: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1257: Expanding the Compton amplitude according to the (non--local) operator 

1258: product expansion for deep inelastic non--forward scattering in the 

1259: generalized Bjorken region the terms obtained forming the matrix elements

1260: (\ref{COMPB1}) are not necessarily yet the twist--2 contributions only. 

1261: The explicit calculation shows, that still terms of the order 

1262: $(\mu^2/\nu)^{1/2+k},~k \geq 0$ are contained. These terms are of higher

1263: twist and vanish for $\nu \rightarrow \infty$ if compared to the leading

1264: twist--2 contributions. To prove the current conservation for the

1265: twist--2 contributions to the Compton amplitude these terms have to be

1266: dealt with in common with the respective higher twist contributions

1267: resulting from the operator matrix elements of the higher twist

1268: operators.

1269: 

1270: We are firstly considering the helicity projections of the Compton

1271: amplitude onto the states $\varepsilon_{0\mu}^{(2)}$ and

1272: $\varepsilon_{0\nu}^{(1)}$, respectively, if $q_2$ is either space- 

1273: or time-like.

1274:  The remaining index is

1275: contracted by all the four helicity vectors. As each of the sets

1276: of four helicity vectors corresponding to the virtual photons 

1277: $\gamma_{1,2}^*$ spans the complete Minkowski--space, vanishing

1278: of the

1279: projections in all components proves the current conservation for

1280: the twist--2 contributions. We list the individual projections for the

1281: contributions to the different distribution functions $F,F_5,G$ and $G_5$

1282: separately.

1283: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1284: \begin{eqnarray}

1285: \label{eqgau1}

1286: \T^F_{00} &=& -

1287: \frac{2}{\nu} \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \gamma_{\mu} q^{\mu} u(p_1,S_1)

1288: \frac{1}{\sqrt{|\xi^2-\eta^2|}}

1289: \int Dz~ F(z_+,z_-)\\

1290: \T^F_{01},

1291: \T^F_{10},

1292: \T^F_{02},

1293: \T^F_{20}

1294: &=& O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\nu}}\right)\\

1295: \T^F_{03} &=& -

1296:  \frac{2}{\nu} \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \gamma_{\mu} q^{\mu} u(p_1,S_1)

1297: \frac{1}{|\xi-\eta| \sqrt{|\xi^2-\eta^2|}}

1298: \int Dz~ F(z_+,z_-)\\

1299: \T^F_{30} &=&  -

1300:  \frac{2}{\nu} \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \gamma_{\mu} q^{\mu} u(p_1,S_1)

1301: \frac{1}{|\xi+\eta| \sqrt{|\xi^2-\eta^2|}}

1302: \int Dz~ F(z_+,z_-)\\

1303: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1304: \T^{F5}_{00} &=&  0\\

1305: \T^{F5}_{01},

1306: \T^{F5}_{10},

1307: \T^{F5}_{02},

1308: \T^{F5}_{20} &=& O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\nu}}\right)\\

1309: \T^{F5}_{03},

1310: \T^{F5}_{30} &=& O\left(\frac{1}{\nu}\right)\\

1311: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1312: \T^G_{00} &=& -

1313: \frac{2}{\nu} \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \gamma_{\mu} q^{\mu} u(p_1,S_1)

1314: \frac{1}{\sqrt{|\xi^2-\eta^2|}}

1315: \int Dz~ G(z_+,z_-)

1316: \\

1317: \T^G_{01},

1318: \T^G_{10},

1319: \T^G_{02},

1320: \T^G_{20}

1321: &=& O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\nu}}\right)\\

1322: \T^G_{03} &=&  -

1323:  \frac{2}{\nu} \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \sigma_{\beta\alpha}  p_-^{\alpha}

1324: q^{\beta} u(p_1,S_1)

1325: \frac{1}{|\xi-\eta| \sqrt{|\xi^2-\eta^2|}}

1326: \int Dz~ G(z_+,z_-)\nonumber\\

1327: \\

1328: \T^G_{30} &=& -

1329:  \frac{2}{\nu} \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \sigma_{\beta\alpha}  p_-^{\alpha}

1330: q^{\beta} u(p_1,S_1)

1331: \frac{1}{|\xi+\eta| \sqrt{|\xi^2-\eta^2|}}

1332: \int Dz~ G(z_+,z_-)\nonumber\\ \\

1333: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1334: \T^{G5}_{00} &=&  0\\

1335: \T^{G5}_{01},

1336: \T^{G5}_{10},

1337: \T^{G5}_{02},

1338: \T^{G5}_{20} &=& O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\nu}}\right)\\

1339: \label{eqgau2}

1340: \T^{G5}_{03},

1341: \T^{G5}_{30} &=& O\left(\frac{1}{\nu}\right)~.

1342: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1343: \end{eqnarray}

1344: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1345: Note that

1346: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1347: \begin{eqnarray}

1348: \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \gamma_{\mu} q^{\mu} u(p_1,S_1) &\propto& \nu

1349: \nonumber\\

1350: \varepsilon_{\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta}~p_{\pm}^{\gamma} q^{\delta}

1351: &\propto& \nu~,

1352: \end{eqnarray}

1353: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1354: etc. The contributions to ${\sf T}_{kl}^{H(5)}$ of $O(1/\sqrt{\nu})$ or

1355: $O(1/\nu)$ are of higher twist since the expectation values of the

1356: twist--2 operators are multiplied by a further mass ratio, cf.~\cite{BN}.

1357: Since the integrals

1358: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1359: \begin{eqnarray}

1360: \label{eqint}

1361: \int~Dz~H(z_+,z_-) = \int_{-1}^{+1} d z_+ \int_{-1+|z_+|}^{+1-|z_+|}

1362: H(z_+,z_-) = 0

1363: \end{eqnarray}

1364: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1365: for $H = F,~G$ vanish, all projections Eqs.~(\ref{eqgau1}--\ref{eqgau2})

1366: vanish in the Bjorken limit proving current conservation for the

1367: twist--2 contributions in the generalized Bjorken region.

1368: 

1369: In the case of forward scattering the evaluation of

1370: the current--current operator in terms of the twist--2 operators 

1371: current conservation is easily obtained, cf. Ref.~\cite{BT}. In the limit

1372: $p_-, \eta \rightarrow 0$ the above expressions 

1373: (\ref{eqgau1}--\ref{eqgau2}) vanish for all values of $\nu$ by virtue

1374: of Eq.~(\ref{eqint}).  Unlike the forward case which is characterized

1375: by only two kinematic vectors $q$ and $p$, the presence of the vector

1376: $p_-$ in the non--forward case allows for twist--3 terms also for 

1377: spin--averaged matrix elements. These are of $O(1/\sqrt{\nu})$ relative 

1378: to the twist--2 contributions.

1379: 

1380: The above conclusions hold analogously if $q_2$ is a light--like vector.

1381: Here the polarization vectors 

1382: Eqs.~(\ref{eqep4a}--\ref{eqep4b}, \ref{eqep6}) have to be used.

1383: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1384: \section{The Helicity Projections of the Compton Amplitude}

1385: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

1386: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1387: \label{sec-5}

1388: %\section{5}

1389: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1390: 

1391: \vspace{1mm}

1392: \noindent

1393: In the following we calculate the helicity projections of the twist--2 

1394: contributions to the  Compton amplitude (\ref{comp1a}) representing the 

1395: matrices $\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^O$ (\ref{galo1}--\ref{galo2}) in the 

1396: generalized Bjorken region. The unpolarized {\sc Dirac}--type terms 

1397: are\footnote{Here and in the following we will use the terms

1398: {\sf unpolarized} and {\sf polarized} for the symmetric and anti-symmetric

1399: contributions to the Compton amplitude, respectively. In the 

1400: spin-averaged

1401: case the anti-symmetric terms cancel.}

1402: ~:

1403: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1404: \begin{eqnarray}

1405: \label{TF11L}

1406: \T^F_{11} &=&

1407: 2 \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \gamma_{\mu} q^{\mu} u(p_1,S_1)

1408:   \left[F_1(\xi,\eta) + \varepsilon_{1}^{(2)\mu} \varepsilon_{1}^{(1)\nu}

1409:   F_{2,\mu\nu}(\xi,\eta)\right]\\

1410: \label{TF22L}

1411: \T^F_{22} &=&

1412: 2 \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \gamma_{\mu} q^{\mu} u(p_1,S_1)

1413:   \left[F_1(\xi,\eta) 

1414:   + \varepsilon_{2}^{(2)\mu} \varepsilon_{2}^{(1)\nu}

1415:   F_{2,\mu\nu}(\xi,\eta)\right]\\

1416: \T^{F}_{kl} &\propto& \left(\frac{1}{\nu}\right)

1417: ^{1/2+n}~~~~~~{\rm for~the~other~projections}~~{k,l~\epsilon~\{1,2,3\}}~~

1418: {\rm and}~~~{n \geq 0}~,

1419: \end{eqnarray}

1420: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1421: with

1422: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1423: \begin{eqnarray}

1424: \label{eqF2H}

1425: \varepsilon_{1}^{(2)\mu} \varepsilon_{1}^{(1)\nu}

1426: F_{2\mu\nu}(\xi,\eta) = 

1427: \varepsilon_{2}^{(2)\mu} \varepsilon_{2}^{(1)\nu}

1428: F_{2\mu\nu}(\xi,\eta) = 

1429: \int Dz \frac{q.p_z}{(Q^2+i\varepsilon)^2} F(z_+,z_-)~,

1430: \end{eqnarray}

1431: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1432: leading to

1433: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1434: \begin{eqnarray}

1435: \T_{11}^F = \T_{22}^F~.

1436: \end{eqnarray}

1437: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1438: Correspondingly the polarized {\sc Dirac}--type terms yield~:

1439: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1440: \begin{eqnarray}

1441: \label{eqpol}

1442: \T_{12}^{F5} = -\T_{21}^{F5}

1443: \end{eqnarray}

1444: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1445: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1446: \begin{eqnarray}

1447: \T^{F5}_{kl} &\propto& \left(\frac{1}{\nu}\right)

1448: ^{1/2+n}~~~~~~{\rm for~the~other~projections}~~{k,l~\epsilon~\{1,2,3\}}~~

1449: {\rm and}~~~{n \geq 0}~.

1450: \end{eqnarray}

1451: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1452: We define the vector

1453: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1454: \begin{eqnarray}

1455: S_{21}^{\sigma} := 

1456: - \frac{1}{2} \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \gamma_5 \gamma^{\sigma} u(p_1,S_1)~.

1457: \end{eqnarray}

1458: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1459: In the case of forward scattering, $(p_2,S_2) \rightarrow (p_1,S_1)$,

1460: $S_{21}^{\sigma}$ denotes the nucleon spin vector $S^{\sigma}$.

1461: $\T^{F5}_{12}$ is given by

1462: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1463: \begin{eqnarray}

1464: \label{EQF5}

1465: \T^{F5}_{12} &=& i~\varepsilon^{\mu\lambda\nu\sigma}

1466: \varepsilon_{1\mu}^{(2)} \varepsilon_{2\nu}^{(1)}

1467: \int Dz \frac{q_{\lambda}}{Q^2 + i\varepsilon} \left[S_{21,\sigma}

1468: + \frac{q.S_{21}} {Q^2 + i\varepsilon} p_{z\sigma}

1469: \right] F_5(z_+,z_-)~.

1470: \end{eqnarray}

1471: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1472: 

1473: A similar structure is obtained for the {\sc Pauli}--type terms. The

1474: unpolarized contributions read

1475: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1476: \begin{eqnarray}

1477: \label{TG11L}

1478: \T^G_{11} &=&

1479:  2  \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)

1480: \sigma_{\alpha\beta} q^{\alpha} p_-^{\beta} u(p_1,S_1)

1481:   \left[G_1(\xi,\eta) + \varepsilon_{1}^{(2)\mu} \varepsilon_{1}^{(1)\nu}

1482:   G_{2,\mu\nu}(\xi,\eta)\right]\\

1483: \label{TG22L}

1484: \T^G_{22} &=&

1485: 2 \overline{u}(p_2,S_2)

1486: \sigma_{\alpha\beta} q^{\alpha} p_-^{\beta} u(p_1,S_1)

1487:   \left[G_1(\xi,\eta) + \varepsilon_{2}^{(2)\mu} \varepsilon_{2}^{(1)\nu}

1488:   G_{2,\mu\nu}(\xi,\eta)\right] \\

1489: \T^{G}_{kl} &\propto& \left(\frac{1}{\nu}\right)

1490: ^{1/2+n}~~~~~~{\rm for~the~other~projections}~~{k,l~\epsilon~\{1,2,3\}}~~

1491: {\rm and}~~~{n \geq 0}~,

1492: \end{eqnarray}

1493: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1494: resulting into

1495: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1496: \begin{eqnarray}

1497: \T_{11}^G = \T_{22}^G~.

1498: \end{eqnarray}

1499: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1500: Here the tensor $G_{2,\mu\nu}$ is obtained from Eq.~(\ref{eqF2H})

1501: substituting $F$ into $G$.

1502: 

1503: The polarized {\sc Pauli}--type terms obey~:

1504: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1505: \begin{eqnarray}

1506: \T_{12}^{G5} = -\T_{21}^{G5}

1507: \end{eqnarray}

1508: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1509: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1510: \begin{eqnarray}

1511: \label{EQG5}

1512: \T^{G5}_{kl} &\propto& \left(\frac{1}{\nu}\right)

1513: ^{1/2+n}~~~~~~{\rm for~the~other~projections}~~{k,l~\epsilon~\{1,2,3\}}~~

1514: {\rm and}~~~{n \geq 0}~,

1515: \end{eqnarray}

1516: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1517: with

1518: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1519: \begin{eqnarray}

1520: \T^{G5}_{12} &=&  i~\varepsilon^{\mu\lambda\nu\sigma}

1521: \varepsilon_{1}^{(2)\mu} \varepsilon_{2}^{(1)\nu} 

1522: \int Dz \frac{q_{\lambda}}{Q^2 + i\varepsilon} \left[\Sigma_{21,\sigma}

1523: + \frac{q.\Sigma_{21}}{Q^2 + i\varepsilon} p_{z\sigma} \right]

1524: G_5(z_+,z_-)~,

1525: \end{eqnarray}

1526: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1527: and

1528: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1529: \begin{eqnarray}

1530: \Sigma_{21}^{\sigma} := 

1531: - \frac{1}{2} \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \gamma_5 

1532: \sigma^{\sigma\alpha} p_{-\alpha} u(p_1,S_1)~.

1533: \end{eqnarray}

1534: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1535: A comparison of

1536: the structure of the projections $\T_{12(21)}^{F5,G5}$ with the

1537: corresponding tensor structure for forward scattering, cf.~\cite{BGR,BT},

1538: shows  that the two contributions are related to terms containing

1539: the following contributions of structure functions

1540: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1541: \begin{eqnarray}

1542: \propto  q_{\lambda} S_{\sigma,21} &\rightarrow& g_1(x_B) +g_2(x_B) \\

1543: \propto  q_{\lambda} p_{z\sigma}  &\rightarrow& g_2(x_B)~.

1544: \end{eqnarray}

1545: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1546: 

1547: In summary, the non--forward  Compton amplitude at the level of the 

1548: twist--2  contributions in lowest order QCD in the generalized Bjorken 

1549: region is described by two helicity states of both virtual photons. 

1550: The unpolarized and polarized {\sc Dirac}-- and {\sc Pauli}--terms

1551: are related to two non--perturbative amplitude functions respectively.

1552: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1553: \section{The Integral Relations}

1554: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

1555: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1556: \label{sec-6}

1557: %\section{6}

1558: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1559: 

1560: \vspace{1mm}

1561: \noindent

1562: The amplitude functions describing the twist--2 contributions to the

1563: virtual Compton amplitude in the generalized Bjorken region obey relations

1564: to which we turn now.

1565: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1566: \subsection{Unpolarized Contributions}

1567: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

1568: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1569: \label{sec-6.1}

1570: %\section{6}

1571: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1572: 

1573: \vspace{1mm}

1574: \noindent

1575: For the unpolarized contributions to the Compton amplitude the relations

1576: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1577: \begin{eqnarray}

1578: \label{CGgen}

1579: \T_{11}^{F,G} = \T_{22}^{F,G}

1580: \end{eqnarray}

1581: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1582: hold for the diagonal helicity projections. All other projections vanish

1583: at the level of

1584: the twist--2 contributions in lowest order QCD in the generalized

1585: Bjorken region. 

1586: Although

1587: Eq.~(\ref{CGgen}) holds, the partonic interpretation of $\T_{11}^{F,G}$

1588: and $\T_{22}^{F,G}$ for non--forward scattering as given in the case of

1589: forward scattering by

1590: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1591: \begin{eqnarray}

1592: \label{CGfor}

1593: F_2(x_B) = 2 x F_1(x_B) \equiv \sum_{q} e_q^2 x \left[q(x_B) +

1594: \overline{q}(x_B)\right]

1595: \end{eqnarray}

1596: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1597: has still to be clarified since the representations (\ref{TF11L},

1598: \ref{TF22L}, \ref{TG11L}, \ref{TG22L}) 

1599: contain yet two types of $Dz$--integrals~(\ref{eqH1},\ref{eqF2H}),

1600: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1601: \begin{eqnarray}

1602: \label{EQH1}

1603: {\sf H_1}(\xi,\eta) &=& \int Dz \frac{\nu}{Q^2+i\varepsilon} 

1604: H(z_+,z_-) = - \int Dz \frac{H(z_+,z_-)}

1605: {\xi + t - i \varepsilon} \\

1606: \label{EQH2}

1607: {\sf H_2}(\xi,\eta) &=& \int Dz \frac{\nu~q.p_z}{(Q^2+i\varepsilon)^2}

1608: H(z_+,z_-) = \int Dz \frac{t H(z_+,z_-)}  

1609: {(\xi + t - i \varepsilon)^2}~.

1610: \end{eqnarray}

1611: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1612: Changing the integration variables to

1613: $(t,z_-)$ the integration over $z_-$ can be performed,

1614: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1615: \begin{eqnarray}

1616: \widehat{H}(t,\eta) &=&

1617: \int_{z_-^{\rm min}}^{z_-^{\rm max}}dz_- H(t-\eta z_-, z_-)

1618:                     = \int_0^1 \frac{d\lambda}{\lambda^2} 

1619: \int_{z_-^{\rm min}}^{z_-^{\rm max}} d z_-

1620:                      h\left(\frac{t}{\lambda} -

1621:                     \eta \frac{z_-}{\lambda}, \frac{z_-}{\lambda}

1622:                     \right)   \nonumber\\

1623:            &=& \int_t^{{\rm sign}(t)} \frac{dz}{z} \hat{h}(z,\eta)~,

1624: \end{eqnarray}

1625: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1626: with

1627: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1628: \begin{eqnarray}

1629: z_-^{\rm min, max} = \frac{t \pm 1}{\eta \pm 1}~,

1630: \end{eqnarray}

1631: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1632: and

1633: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1634: \begin{eqnarray}

1635: \label{hath}

1636: \hat{h}(z,\eta) =

1637: \int_{\rho_{\rm min}}^{\rho_{\rm max}} 

1638: d\rho~h\left(z - \eta \rho,\rho\right)~,

1639: \end{eqnarray}

1640: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1641: where $z=t/\lambda, \rho=z_-/\lambda$ and

1642: $\rho_{\rm min(max)} = z_{-,\rm min(max)}\cdot(z/t)$.

1643: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1644: As it

1645: will turn out below  $\hat{h}(z,\eta)$ denotes an amplitude

1646: function on the partonic level. This interpretation does not apply to

1647: $\widehat{H}(t,\eta)$.

1648: 

1649: By partial integration one may rewrite Eq.~(\ref{EQH2}).

1650: The support of the variable $t$ is $t~\epsilon~[-1,+1]$. One obtains

1651: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1652: \begin{eqnarray}

1653: \label{eqpari}

1654: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{t}{(\xi+t-i\varepsilon)^2} 

1655: \int_t^{{\rm sign}(t)} \frac{dz}

1656: {z} \hat{h}(z,\eta)

1657: &=&

1658: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{1}{\xi+t-i\varepsilon} 

1659: \int_t^{{\rm sign}(t)} \frac{dz}{z} \hat{h}(z,\eta) \nonumber\\ & &

1660: -

1661: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{1}{\xi+t-i\varepsilon} \hat{h}(t,\eta)~,

1662: \end{eqnarray}

1663: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1664: which yields

1665: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1666: \begin{eqnarray}

1667: {\sf H_2}(\xi,\eta) = - {\sf H_1}(\xi,\eta) - \int_{-1}^{+1} dt

1668: \frac{\hat{h}(t,\eta)}{\xi+t - i\varepsilon}~.

1669: \end{eqnarray}

1670: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1671: The $z$--integral contributions in 

1672: Eqs.~(\ref{TF11L},\ref{TF22L},\ref{TG11L},\ref{TG22L})

1673: cancel and  the helicity projections $T_{11(22)}^{F,G}$ are

1674: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1675: \begin{eqnarray}

1676: \label{par1}

1677: \T_{11(22)}^{H}(\xi,\eta)

1678: \propto - \int_{-1}^{+1}

1679: \frac{\hat{h}(t,\eta)}{\xi+t - i\varepsilon} = - {\sf P} \int_{-1}^{+1}

1680: dt \frac{\hat{h}(t,\eta)}{\xi+t} - i\pi \hat{h}(\xi,\eta)~,

1681: \end{eqnarray}

1682: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1683: which shows that $\T_{11(22)}^{H}$ obeys a `partonic' description. 

1684: For the

1685: {\sc Dirac}--type terms the

1686: function $\hat{h}(\xi,\eta) = \hat{f}(\xi,\eta)$    turns 

1687: into the quark and antiquark densities in the

1688: forward limit $\eta \rightarrow 0, \xi \rightarrow x_B$.

1689: 

1690: To derive the relations on the Lorentz level, we consider 

1691: Eq.~(\ref{comp5}). The unpolarized part of $T_{\mu\nu}$ contains the

1692: following functions~:

1693: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1694: \begin{eqnarray}

1695: \label{hi1}

1696: H_1(\xi,\eta) &=& - \frac{1}{\nu}

1697: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{1}{\xi+t-i\varepsilon}

1698: {\sf \hat{H}}(t,\eta) \\

1699: %--------

1700: \label{hi2}

1701: H_k^{\sigma}(\xi,\eta) &=&

1702: \frac{p_+^\sigma}{(-\nu)^k}

1703: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{t}

1704: {(\xi+t-i\varepsilon)^k}

1705: {\sf \hat{H}}(t,\eta) +

1706: \frac{\pi^\sigma}{(-\nu)^k}

1707: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{1}

1708: {(\xi+t-i\varepsilon)^2}

1709: {\sf \tilde{H}_1}(t,\eta)

1710: \\

1711: %--------

1712: \label{hi3}

1713: H_{2,\mu\nu}(\xi,\eta) &=& \frac{1}{\nu^2} \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{1}

1714: {(\xi+t-i\varepsilon)^2} \Biggl\{

1715: \left[-p_{+\mu}p_{+\nu} t^2 +(q_\nu p_{+\mu}

1716: +q_\mu p_{+\nu}) t - g_{\mu\nu} q.p_+ t\right]

1717: {\sf \hat{H}}(t,\eta) \nonumber\\ & &

1718: + \left[(p_{+\nu} \pi_\mu + p_{+\mu} \pi_{\nu}) t + (q_\nu \pi_\mu +

1719: q_\mu \pi_\nu) \right] {\sf \tilde{H}_1}(t,\eta)

1720: - \pi_{\mu} \pi_{\nu} {\sf \tilde{H}_2}(t,\eta)\Biggr\}~,

1721: \end{eqnarray}

1722: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1723: where $k = 1,2$ and

1724: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1725: \begin{eqnarray}

1726: \label{eqhat}

1727: {\sf \hat{H}}(t,\eta) &=& \int_t^{{\rm sign}(t)} \frac{dz}{z} 

1728: \hat{h}(z,\eta) \\

1729: \label{eqtilde}

1730: {\sf \tilde{H}_k}(t,\eta) &=& \int_t^{{\rm sign}(t)} \frac{dz}{z}

1731: \tilde{h}_k(z,t,\eta)~,

1732: \end{eqnarray}

1733: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1734: with

1735: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1736: \begin{eqnarray}

1737: \tilde{h}_k(z,t,\eta) = \left(\frac{t}{z}\right)^k

1738: \int_{\rho_{\rm min}}^{\rho_{\rm max}} d\rho~\rho^k~h(z-\eta\rho,\rho)~.

1739: \end{eqnarray}

1740: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1741: Note that contractions of the vector $\pi_{\sigma}$ in the above 

1742: equations

1743: with one of the vectors $q^\mu, p_\pm^\mu$ or $n_2^\mu$, which span the

1744:  Minkowski space, yields contributions of at most

1745: $O(\mu^2)$ if compared to the large invariants which are of $O(\nu)$.

1746: The contributions due to these terms are therefore hadronic mass scale

1747: corrections or of higher twist. These terms vanish also both for forward

1748: scattering and in the case of vacuum--meson transition 

1749: $p_+ = p_-, \eta=1$. Due to this we will consider only the terms which

1750: do not contain the vectors $\pi_{\sigma}$ in the following. The integrals

1751: (\ref{hi2},\ref{hi3}) may be rewritten by partial integration.

1752: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1753: \begin{eqnarray}

1754: \label{hi2a}

1755: H_2^{\sigma}(\xi,\eta) &=&

1756: \frac{p_+^\sigma}{\nu^2}

1757: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{1}

1758: {\xi+t-i\varepsilon}\left[

1759: {\sf \hat{H}}(t,\eta) - \hat{h}(t,\eta)\right] + O(\pi^{\sigma})

1760: \\

1761: %--------

1762: \label{hi3a}

1763: H_{2,\mu\nu}(\xi,\eta) &=& \frac{1}{\nu^2} \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{1}

1764: {\xi+t-i\varepsilon} \Biggl\{-p_{+\mu} p_{+\nu} t \left[2

1765: {\sf \hat{H}}(t,\eta) - \hat{h}(t,\eta) \right] \nonumber\\

1766:  & &~~~~~~~~~

1767: +

1768: \left[(q_\nu p_{+\mu}

1769: +q_\mu p_{+\nu})   - g_{\mu\nu} q.p_+  \right]\left[

1770: {\sf \hat{H}}(t,\eta) - \hat{h}(t,\eta) \right] \Biggr\} 

1771: + O(\pi_{\mu(\nu)})

1772: \end{eqnarray}

1773: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1774: Let us define the vector

1775: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1776: \begin{eqnarray}

1777: P_{21}^{\sigma} := \overline{u}(p_2,S_2) \gamma^{\sigma} u(p_1,S_1),

1778: \end{eqnarray}

1779: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1780: with $P_{21}^{\sigma} = p_+^{\sigma}$ for forward scattering. For the

1781: unpolarized part of $T^{\mu\nu}$,~Eq.~(\ref{comp5}), $A^{\mu\nu}$,

1782: one obtains

1783: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1784: \begin{eqnarray}

1785: \label{eqAmn}

1786: A^{\mu\nu} &=&  -2

1787: \frac{q.P_{21}}{\nu} 

1788: \left[g^{\mu\nu} - \frac{q^\mu p_+^\nu + q^\nu p_+^\mu }{q.p_+}\right] 

1789: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{{\sf F_1}(t,\eta)}{\xi + t -i\varepsilon} 

1790: \nonumber\\ & &

1791: + \frac{2}{\nu} \left[q^\mu\left(P_{21}^\nu - p_+^\nu \frac{q.P_{21}}

1792: {\nu}\right) +   q^\nu \left(P_{21}^\mu - p_+^\mu \frac{q.P_{21}}

1793: {\nu}\right) \right]

1794: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt

1795: \frac{{\sf \hat{H}}(t,\eta)}{\xi + t -i\varepsilon}~,

1796: \nonumber\\ & &

1797: - \frac{q.P_{21}}{\nu^2}       p_+^\mu p_+^\nu     \int_{-1}^{+1}

1798: dt \frac{{\sf F_2}(t,\eta)}{\xi + t - i \varepsilon}

1799: \nonumber\\ & &

1800: - \frac{2}{\nu} \left[p^\mu_+\left(p_{21}^\nu - p_+^\nu \frac{q.P_{21}}

1801: {\nu}\right) +

1802:                       p^\nu_+\left(p_{21}^\mu - p_+^\mu \frac{q.P_{21}}

1803: {\nu}\right) \right]

1804: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt

1805: \frac{t~{\sf \hat{H}}(t,\eta)}{\xi + t -i\varepsilon}~.

1806: \end{eqnarray}

1807: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1808: Here we defined

1809: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1810: \begin{eqnarray}

1811: \label{eqF1}

1812: {\sf F_1}(t,\eta) &=& \hat{h}(t,\eta) \\

1813: \label{eqF2}

1814: {\sf F_2}(t,\eta) &=& 2 t~\hat{h}(t,\eta)~.

1815: \end{eqnarray}

1816: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1817: The vector

1818: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1819: \begin{eqnarray}

1820: \Pi^{\mu} = P_{21}^{\mu} - p_+^\mu \frac{q.P_{21}}{\nu}

1821: \end{eqnarray}

1822: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1823: in Eq.~(\ref{eqAmn}), as also the case for the vector $\pi^{\mu}$ above,

1824: has contractions with the vectors $q^\mu, p_\pm^\mu$ and $n_2^\mu$

1825: which either vanish or are of $O(\mu^2)$ only. Therefore these 

1826: terms         do not contribute at the lowest twist level unlike those

1827: due to ${\sf F_1}(t,\eta)$ and ${\sf F_2}(t,\eta)$.

1828: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1829: \begin{eqnarray}

1830: {\sf F_2}(t,\eta) = 2 t~{\sf F_1}(t,\eta)

1831: \end{eqnarray}

1832: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1833: is the generalization of the {\sc Callan}--{\sc Gross} relation for

1834: non--forward scattering. These distribution amplitudes have the partonic

1835: representation~(\ref{eqF1}, \ref{eqF2}), whereas the other distribution

1836: amplitudes of non-leading twist in Eq.~(\ref{eqAmn}) 

1837: depend on the function

1838: ${\sf \hat{H}}

1839: (t,\eta)$, which is related to $\hat{h}(t,\eta)$ by the

1840: integral~Eq.~(\ref{eqhat}).

1841: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1842: \subsection{Polarized Contributions}

1843: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

1844: \label{sec-6.2}

1845: %\section{6}

1846: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1847: 

1848: \vspace{1mm}

1849: \noindent

1850: The matrix element ${\sf T}_{12}^{H5}$, Eq.~(\ref{eqpol}),

1851: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1852: \begin{eqnarray}

1853: {\sf T}_{12}^{H5} = i~\varepsilon^{\mu\lambda\nu\sigma}

1854: \varepsilon_{1\mu}^{(2)}

1855: \varepsilon_{2\nu}^{(1)} B_{\lambda\sigma}

1856: \end{eqnarray}

1857: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1858: contains the tensor

1859: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1860: \begin{eqnarray}

1861: B_{\lambda\sigma} =

1862: \int Dz \frac{q_{\lambda}}{Q^2 + i\varepsilon} \left[S^H_{21,\sigma}

1863: + \frac{q.S^H_{21}}{Q^2 + i\varepsilon} p_{z\sigma} \right]

1864: H_5(z_+,z_-), \nonumber

1865: \end{eqnarray}

1866: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1867: with  $S^H_{21} = S_{21} (\Sigma_{21})$

1868: for $H = F(G)$. It may be rewritten as

1869: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1870: \begin{eqnarray}

1871: \label{eqbls1}

1872: B_{\lambda\sigma} =

1873: - \frac{1}{\nu}

1874: \int Dz \frac{q_{\lambda}}{\xi + t - i\varepsilon} \left[S^H_{21,\sigma}

1875: - \frac{1}{\nu}

1876: \frac{t~q.S^H_{21}}{\xi + t - i\varepsilon} p_{+\sigma}

1877:  + \frac{1}{\nu} \frac{q.S^H_{21}}{\xi + t - i \varepsilon}

1878: z_- \pi_{\sigma} \right] H_5(z_+,z_-)~. \nonumber\\

1879: \end{eqnarray}

1880: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1881: The latter term in Eq.~(\ref{eqbls1})

1882: vanishes for forward scattering and in the case

1883: of vacuum--meson transition. We perform the integration over

1884: $z_-$ and obtain

1885: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1886: \begin{eqnarray}

1887: \label{Beq}

1888: B_{\lambda\sigma} &=& - \frac{1}{\nu} q_{\lambda} S^H_{21,\sigma}

1889: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{1}{\xi+t-i\varepsilon} \int_t^{{\rm sign}(t)}

1890: \frac{dz}{z} \hat{h}_5(z,\eta) \nonumber\\  & &

1891: - \frac{1}{\nu^2} q_{\lambda} p_{+\sigma}~q.S^H_{21} \int_{-1}^{+1}

1892: dt \frac{1}{\xi + t - i \varepsilon} \left[\hat{h}_5(t,\eta) -

1893: \int_t^{{\rm sign}(t)} \frac{dz}{z} \hat{h}_5(z,\eta) \right]

1894: \nonumber\\ & &

1895: - \frac{1}{\nu^2} q_{\lambda} \pi_{\sigma}~q.S^H_{21}

1896: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt

1897: \frac{1}{\xi + t - i\varepsilon} \int_t^{{\rm sign}(t)} \frac{dz}{z}

1898: \widetilde{h}_5(z,t,\eta)~.

1899: \end{eqnarray}

1900: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1901: Here the distribution amplitude $\widetilde{h}_5$ denotes the first

1902: moment with respect to $z_-$ of the function $H_5(z_+,z_-)$

1903: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1904: \begin{eqnarray}

1905: \label{htil}

1906: \widetilde{h}_5(z,t,\eta) = \left(\frac{t}{z}\right)

1907: \int_{\rho_{\rm min}}^{\rho_{\rm max}} 

1908: d\rho~\rho h\left(z - \eta \rho,\rho\right)~,

1909: \end{eqnarray}

1910: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1911: whereas $\hat{h}(z,\eta)$, Eq.~(\ref{hath}), is the

1912: corresponding 0th moment.

1913: 

1914: Let us rewrite Eq.~(\ref{Beq}) choosing the notation in analogy to the

1915: forward case by

1916: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1917: \begin{eqnarray}

1918: \label{Beq1}

1919: \lefteqn{

1920: B_{\lambda\sigma} = - \frac{1}{\nu} q_{\lambda} \int_{-1}^{+1} 

1921: \frac{dt}{\xi + t - i\varepsilon}} \nonumber\\  & &

1922: \times

1923: \left\{

1924: S^H_{21,\sigma} \left[

1925: {\sf G_1}(t,\eta) +

1926: {\sf G_2}(t,\eta) \right]

1927: + \frac{1}{\nu} p_{+\sigma}~q.S^H_{21}

1928: {\sf G_2}(t,\eta)

1929: + \frac{1}{\nu}  \pi_{\sigma}~q.S^H_{21}

1930: {\sf G_3}(t,\eta) \right\}~.

1931: \end{eqnarray}

1932: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1933: One obtains

1934: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1935: \begin{eqnarray}

1936: \label{par2}

1937: {\sf G_1}(t,\eta) &:=& \hat{h}_5(t,\eta)\\

1938: \label{WWNEW}

1939: {\sf G_2}(t,\eta) &=& - {\sf G_1}(t,\eta) + \int_{t}^{{\rm sign}(t)}

1940: \frac{dz}{z}{\sf G_1}(z,\eta)\\

1941: \label{SFnew}

1942: {\sf G_3}(t,\eta) &:=&  \int_t^{{\rm sign}(t)} \frac{dz}{z}

1943: \widetilde{h}_5(z,t,\eta)~.

1944: \end{eqnarray}

1945: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1946: The $t$--integrals in Eq.~(\ref{Beq1}) are performed further according to

1947: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1948: \begin{eqnarray}

1949: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{A(t)}{\xi+t-i\varepsilon} =

1950: {\sf P} \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \frac{A(t)}{\xi+t} + i \pi A(-\xi)~.

1951: \end{eqnarray}

1952: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1953: 

1954: The polarized non--forward

1955: distribution amplitude ${\sf G_1}(t,\eta)$ has a partonic interpretation

1956: as in the unpolarized

1957: case~Eq.~(\ref{par1}). Eq.~(\ref{WWNEW})

1958: is the non--forward generalization of the {\sc Wandzura}--{\sc Wilczek}

1959: relation. For the special case of vacuum--meson transition according

1960: integral relations were discussed in~\cite{BBKT}.

1961: In Eq.~(\ref{SFnew})  a {\it new} distribution amplitude 

1962: ${\sf G_3}(t,\eta)$ emerges  which is, however, not of twist--2  since

1963: the contractions of $\pi_{\sigma}$ with the       4--momenta of the

1964: scattering process are of $O(\mu^2)$ if compared to the other terms

1965: which are of $O(\nu)$.

1966: 

1967: The above results show that the well--known results for forward

1968: scattering, the {\sc Callan}-{\sc Gross} and the {\sc Wandzura}--{\sc

1969: Wilczek} relation are not bound to forward scattering only, but are

1970: of more general validity. In particular their derivation does not 

1971: require

1972: to use the optical theorem. Furthermore, the above relations hold for

1973: quite general functions $H_{(5)}(z_+,z_-)$. In deriving the above

1974: relations assumptions on their complex structure had not to be made.

1975: The $O(\mu^2/\nu)$ corrections are associated with new distribution 

1976: amplitudes,

1977: cf. the contributions $\propto \pi_{\sigma}$ or $\Pi_{\sigma}$ 

1978: in Eqs.~(\ref{eqH1},

1979: \ref{eqH2}, \ref{hi2}, \ref{hi3}, \ref{eqAmn},

1980: \ref{Beq1}), which are either representable by integral

1981: relations of leading twist distribution amplitudes or are

1982: higher moments in $z_-$

1983: of the functions $H(z_+,z_-)$ and $H^5(z_+,z_-)$, respectively.

1984: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1985: \subsection{Forward Scattering}

1986: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

1987: \label{sec-6.3}

1988: %\section{6}

1989: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1990: After the above considerations the limit to forward scattering is easily

1991: performed. Because the {\sc Pauli}--type terms vanish linearly with

1992: $p_-$ only the {\sc Dirac}--type terms remain.  For forward scattering 

1993: both the functions ${\sf F_1}(\xi,\eta)$ and ${\sf G_1}(\xi,\eta)$ are

1994: real. The absorptive part of the Compton amplitude, the hadronic tensor

1995: $W_{\mu\nu}$, is given by

1996: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1997: \begin{eqnarray}

1998: W_{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{2\pi} {\sf Im}~T_{\mu\nu}~.

1999: \end{eqnarray}

2000: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2001: To derive the forward structure functions

2002: we rewrite

2003: Eqs.~(\ref{eqAmn}, \ref{Beq}) applying the symmetry relations

2004: Eqs.~(\ref{symrel1}, \ref{symrel2}) interchanging $(z_+,z_-)

2005: \leftrightarrow (-z_+,-z_-)$, i.e. $t \leftrightarrow -t$, respectively.

2006: We define the branches of the functions ${\sf F_1}(t,0)$

2007: and ${\sf G_1}(t,0)$ for $-1 \leq t < 0$ and $0 < t \leq +1$ as

2008: the antiquark and quark distribution function     by

2009: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2010: \begin{eqnarray}

2011: \label{qdis1}

2012: {\sf F_1}(t,0) &=&              \sum_q~e_q^2 \left[

2013: q(t) \theta(t) 

2014:                   -  \overline{q}(-t) \theta(-t)\right] \\

2015: \label{qdis2}

2016: {\sf G_1}(t,0) &=&              \sum_q~e_q^2 \left[

2017: \Delta q(t) \theta(t) 

2018:                   +  \Delta \overline{q}(-t) \theta(-t)\right]~.

2019: \end{eqnarray}

2020: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2021: For the unpolarized contributions one obtains for forward scattering,

2022:  $q = q_1 = q_2,~p=p_+/2$,

2023: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2024: \begin{eqnarray}

2025: q_{\mu} A^{\mu\nu}     =             p^\nu \left[

2026: \int_{-1}^{+1}

2027: \frac{2\xi {\sf F_1}(t,0) - {\sf F_2}(t,0)}{\xi-t - i\varepsilon}

2028: - \int_{-1}^{+1}

2029: \frac{2\xi {\sf F_1}(t,0) + {\sf F_2}(t,0)}{\xi+t - i\varepsilon}

2030: \right]  = 0~.

2031: \end{eqnarray}

2032: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2033: Taking the absorptive part yields

2034: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2035: \begin{eqnarray}

2036: \pm 2 \xi {\sf F_1}(\pm \xi,0) = {\sf F_2}(\pm \xi,0)~.

2037: \end{eqnarray}

2038: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2039: The structure functions are now given by

2040: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2041: \begin{eqnarray}

2042: F_1(x_B) &=& \frac{1}{2} \left[{\sf F_1}(\xi,0) - {\sf F_1}(-\xi,0)\right]

2043: = \frac{1}{2} \sum_q e_q^2 \left[q(x_B) + \overline{q}(x_B)\right]~,

2044: \\

2045: F_2(x_B) &=& {\sf F_2}(\xi,0) + {\sf F_2}(-\xi,0)~,

2046: \end{eqnarray}

2047: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2048: with the Bjorken variable $x_B = \lim_{\eta \rightarrow 0} \xi$. The

2049: structure functions obey

2050: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2051: \begin{eqnarray}

2052: F_2(x_B) &=& 2 x_B F_1(x_B)

2053: \end{eqnarray}

2054: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2055: the {\sc Callan}--{\sc Gross} relation~\cite{CG}.

2056: 

2057: Correspondingly, for the polarized part one obtains

2058: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2059: \begin{eqnarray}

2060: \label{Beqa}

2061: B_{\lambda\sigma} &=& - \frac{1}{2\nu} q_{\lambda} S^H_{21,\sigma}

2062: \int_{-1}^{+1} dt \left[

2063: \frac{{\sf G_1}(t,0)+{\sf G_2}(t,0)}{\xi+t-i\varepsilon} +

2064: \frac{{\sf G_1}(t,0)+{\sf G_2}(t,0)}{\xi-t-i\varepsilon} \right]

2065: \\  & &

2066: - \frac{1}{2\nu^2} q_{\lambda} p_{+\sigma}~q.S^H_{21} \int_{-1}^{+1}

2067: dt \left[

2068: \frac{{\sf G_2}(t,0)}{\xi + t - i \varepsilon} +

2069: \frac{{\sf G_2}(t,0)}{\xi - t - i \varepsilon} \right]~.

2070: \nonumber

2071: \end{eqnarray}

2072: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2073: The absorptive part is described by the  structure functions

2074: $g_1(x_B)$ and $g_2(x_B)$ with, cf.~(\ref{Beq}),

2075: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2076: \begin{eqnarray}

2077: \label{eqg1}

2078: g_1(x_B) &=& \frac{1}{2} \left[{\sf G_1}(\xi,0) + {\sf G_1}(-\xi,0)\right]

2079: = \frac{1}{2} \sum_q e_q^2 \left[\Delta q(x_B) 

2080: + \Delta \overline{q}(x_B)\right]  \\

2081: \label{eqg2}

2082: g_2(x_B)       &=& - g_1(x_B)       + \int_{x_B}^{1}

2083: \frac{dz}{z} g_1(z)~.

2084: \end{eqnarray}

2085: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2086: Eq.~(\ref{eqg2}) is the {\sc Wandzura}--{\sc Wilczek} relation\footnote{

2087: In the presence of electroweak currents five polarized structure functions

2088: contribute on the level of twist-2 and for the quark operators

2089: also for twist--3. These structure functions are connected by two

2090: further relations for the twist--2 contributions, the

2091: {\sc Dicus}-relation~\cite{DIC} and a relation by {\sc Bl\"umlein} and 

2092: {\sc Kochelev}~\cite{BK}. The three twist--3 relations among the

2093: respective contributions to the polarized structure functions due to the

2094: quark operators at lowest order QCD have been derived in Ref.~\cite{BT} 

2095: recently. One of these relations applies to the case of pure 

2096: electromagnetic interactions.}~\cite{WW}.

2097: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2098: \section{Conclusions}

2099: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

2100: \setcounter{equation}{0}

2101: \label{sec-8}

2102: %\section{8}

2103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2104: We studied the structure of the virtual Compton amplitude for

2105: deep--inelastic non--forward scattering $\gamma^* + p \rightarrow

2106: \gamma^{(*)'} +p'$ in lowest order in QCD in the massless limit. In the

2107: generalized Bjorken region $q.p_+, -q^2 \rightarrow \infty$ the twist--2 

2108: contributions to the Compton amplitude were calculated using the 

2109: non--local operator product expansion for general spin states. In this 

2110: approximation the Compton amplitude consists of an unpolarized and a 

2111: polarized {\sc Dirac}-- and {\sc Pauli}--type amplitude, the latter of 

2112: which vanishes in the case of forward scattering. The expectation values 

2113: of the (non--local) twist--2 vector operators in the non--forward case do

2114: still contain terms $\propto 1/\nu^{1/2+k},~k \geq 0$, which are 

2115: contributions of twist--3 and higher to the Compton amplitude. 

2116: These contributions have to be considered in common with the non--forward

2117: expectation values of the higher twist operators.

2118: A decomposition of the 

2119: amplitude was performed with respect to the helicity states of both 

2120: (virtual) photons. The twist--2 contributions are due to two polarization

2121: states only, which are for the unpolarized part $\T_{11}$ and $\T_{22}$ 

2122: and for the polarized part $\T_{12}$ and $\T_{21}$. For the twist--2

2123: contributions the gauge invariance of the non--local light cone expansion

2124: was proven in the non--forward case in  the generalized  Bjorken region.

2125: The relations between the twist--2 contributions of the unpolarized and 

2126: polarized amplitude functions were derived. They are the non--forward 

2127: generalizations of the {\sc Callan}--{\sc Gross} and 

2128: {\sc Wandzura}--{\sc Wilczek} relations for unpolarized and polarized 

2129: deep--inelastic forward scattering. The relations for the {\sc Dirac} and

2130: {\sc Pauli} parts are of the same form.

2131: 

2132: \vspace{1mm}

2133: \noindent

2134: {\bf Acknowledgement}\\

2135: Our thanks are due to B. Geyer for fruitful discussions and U.~Gensch for

2136: his constant support. Discussions with A. Tkabladze  in an early phase of 

2137: this project are acknowledged. J.B. would like to thank the Institute of 

2138: Theoretical Physics at Graz University for their kind hospitality. D.R. 

2139: likes to thank DESY Zeuthen and the Institute of Theoretical Physics at 

2140: Graz University for the kind hospitality extended to him, in particular

2141: to C.B. Lang, H. Mitter, N. Pucker, and W.~Schweiger.

2142: \newpage

2143: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2144: \begin{thebibliography}{999}

2145: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2146: %[1]

2147: \bibitem{LC1}

2148: K.G.~Wilson, Phys. Rev. {\bf 179} (1969) 1699;\\

2149: R.A.~Brandt and G.~Preparata, Fortschr. Phys. {\bf 18} (1970)

2150: 249;\\

2151: W.~Zimmermann, {\sf Lect. on Elementary Particle Physics and

2152: Quantum

2153: Field Theory}, Brandeis Summer Inst., Vol.~1,

2154: (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1970),~p. 395.

2155: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2156: %[2]

2157: \bibitem{LC2}

2158: Y.~Frishman, Ann. Phys. {\bf 66} (1971) 373.

2159: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2160: %

2161: %[3]

2162: \bibitem{TW}

2163: D.J.~Gross and S.B.~Treiman, Phys. Rev. {\bf D4} (1971) 1059.

2164: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2165: %

2166: %[4]

2167: \bibitem{RC}

2168: D.J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. {\bf D8} (1973) 3633; {\bf D9}

2169: (1974) 980;\\

2170: H. Georgi and D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. {\bf D9} (1974) 416;\\

2171: W. Furmanski and R. Petronzio, Z. Phys. {\bf C11} (1982) 293 

2172: and references therein;\\

2173: G. Floratos, P. Lacaze, and C. Kounnas, 

2174: Phys. Lett. {\bf B98} (1980) 437;

2175: Nucl. Phys. {\bf 192} (1981) 417; \\

2176: G. Curci, W. Furmanski, and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B175} (1980)

2177: 27;\\

2178: W. Furmanski and R. Petronzio, Phys. Lett. {\bf B97} (1980) 437;\\

2179: R. Hamberg and W.L. van Neerven, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B379} (1992) 143;\\

2180: E.B. Zijlstra and W.L. van Neerven, Phys. Lett. {\bf B273} (1991) 476;

2181: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B383} (1992) 525;\\

2182: W.L. van Neerven and E.B. Zijlstra, Phys. Lett. {\bf B272} (1991) 127;\\

2183: S. Moch and J. Vermaseren, {\tt hep-ph/9912355};\\

2184: S. Larin, T. van Ritbergen, and. J. Vermaseren, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B427}

2185: (1994) 41;\\

2186: S. Larin, P. Nogueira, T. van Ritbergen, and. J. Vermaseren, 

2187: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B492} (1997) 338;\\

2188: Y. Matiounine, J. Smith, and W.L. van Neerven, Phys. Rev. {\bf D57} (1998)

2189: 6701; {\bf D58} (1998) 076002;\\

2190: G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B126} (1977) 298 and

2191: references therein;\\

2192: R. Mertig and W.L. van Neerven, Z. Phys. {\bf C70} (1996) 637;\\

2193: W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. {\bf D54} (1996) 2023;\\

2194: E.B. Zijlstra and W.L. van Neerven, Phys. Lett. {\bf B297} (1992) 377;

2195: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B417} (1994) 61; E: {\bf B426} (1994) 245.

2196: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2197: %

2198: %[5]

2199: \bibitem{DER}

2200: E. Derman, Phys. Rev. {\bf D19} (1979) 133.

2201: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2202: %

2203: %[6]

2204: \bibitem{BK}

2205: J. Bl\"umlein and N. Kochelev, Phys. Lett. {\bf B381} (1996) 296;

2206: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B498} (1997) 285.

2207: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2208: %

2209: %[7]

2210: \bibitem{BT}

2211: J. Bl\"umlein and A. Tkabladze , Nucl. Phys. {\bf B553} (1999) 427.

2212: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2213: %

2214: %[8]

2215: \bibitem{ADI}

2216: T.~Braunschweig, B.~Geyer, and D.~Robaschik, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 

2217: {\bf 44} (1987) 407;\\

2218: I.I.~Balitsky and V.M.~Braun, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B311} (1988/89) 541;\\

2219: A.V.~Radyushkin,

2220: Phys. Lett. {\bf B385} (1996) 333; Phys. Rev. {\bf D56} (1997) 5524;\\

2221: J.~Bl\"umlein, B.~Geyer, and D.~Robaschik, Phys. Lett. {\bf B406} (1997) 

2222: 161 and Erratum;\\

2223: I.I. Balitsky and A.V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. {\bf B413} (1997) 114;\\

2224: J.~Bl\"umlein, B.~Geyer, and D.~Robaschik, {\tt hep-ph/9711405}, in~:

2225: Proc. of the Workshop~{\sf Deep Inelastic Scattering Off Polarized

2226: Targets: Theory Meets Experiment}, eds.~J.~Bl\"umlein et al., (DESY,

2227: Hamburg, 1997) DESY 97--200, p.~196.\\

2228: X.~Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78} (1997) 610; Phys. Rev. {\bf D55} (1997)

2229: 7114;\\

2230: L. Mankiewicz, G. Piller, and T. Weigl, Eur. J. Phys. {\bf C5} (1998) 

2231: 119;\\

2232: X. Ji, J. Phys. {\bf G24} (1998) 1181.

2233: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2234: %

2235: %[9]

2236: \bibitem{FL}

2237: H1 collaboration, C. Adloff et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B393} (1997) 452 and

2238: references therein.

2239: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2240: %

2241: %[10]

2242: \bibitem{G2}

2243: E143 collaboration, K. Abe  et al., Phys. Rev. {\bf D58} (1998) 112003;\\

2244: E155 collaboration, P. Anthony  et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B458} (1999) 

2245: 529.

2246: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2247: %

2248: %[11]

2249: \bibitem{NLC}

2250: S.A. Anikin, M.C. Polivanov, and O.I. Zavialov, Fortschr. Physik {\bf 27}

2251: (1977) 459;\\

2252: S.A. Anikin and O.I. Zavialov, Ann. Phys. (NY) {\bf 116} (1978)

2253: 135;\\

2254: O.I.~Zavialov, {\sf Renormalized Feynman Diagrams},

2255: (Nauka, Moscow, 1979), in Russian;  \\

2256: {\sf Renormalized Quantum Field Theory} (Kluwer Academic Press,

2257: Dordrecht, 1990);\\

2258: D.~M\"uller, D. Robaschik, B.~Geyer, F.~Dittes, and J.~Ho\v{r}ej\v{s}i,

2259: Fortschr. Phys.  {\bf 42} (1994) 2.

2260: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2261: %

2262: %[12]

2263: \bibitem{BGR}

2264: J. Bl\"umlein, B. Geyer, and D. Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B560} (1999)

2265: 283.

2266: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2267: %

2268: %[13]

2269: \bibitem{CG}

2270: C.G. Callan and D.J. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 22} (1969) 156.

2271: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2272: %

2273: %[14]

2274: \bibitem{WW}

2275: S. Wandzura and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. {\bf B72} (1977) 95.

2276: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2277: %

2278: %[15]

2279: \bibitem{LR}

2280: W.A. Bardeen and Wu--Ki Tung, Phys. Rev. {\bf 173} (1968) 1423;\\

2281: A. De R\'ujula  and E. De Rafael, Ann. Phys. (NY) {\bf 78} (1973) 132;\\

2282: R. Tarrach, Nuovo Cim. {\bf 28A} (1975) 409;\\

2283: D. Drechsel, G. Kn\"ochlein, A.Y. Korchin, A. Metz, and S. Scherer,

2284: Phys. Rev. {\bf C57} (1998) 941.

2285: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2286: %

2287: %[16]

2288: \bibitem{GLR}

2289: B. Geyer, M.~Lazar, and D. Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B559} (1999) 339.

2290: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2291: %

2292: %[17]

2293: \bibitem{BN}

2294: J. Bl\"umlein and W.L. van Neerven, in preparation.

2295: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2296: %

2297: %[18]

2298: \bibitem{MIR}

2299: J.L. Miramontes and J. S\'anchez Guill\'en, Z. Phys. {\bf C41} (1988) 247.

2300: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2301: %

2302: %[19]

2303: \bibitem{BBKT}

2304: P. Ball, V.M. Braun, Y. Koike, and K. Tanaka, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B529}

2305: (1998) 323.

2306: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2307: %

2308: %[20]

2309: \bibitem{DIC}

2310: D.A. Dicus, Phys. Rev. {\bf D5} (1972) 1367.

2311: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2312: \end{thebibliography}

2313: \end{document}

2314: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2315: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2316: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2317: