1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

2: \usepackage{amsmath,epsfig}

3: 

4: 

5: % Meine Konventionen

6: \newcommand{\rd}{\,\mathrm{d}}

7: \newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left\langle #1 \right|}

8: \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left| #1 \right\rangle}

9: \newcommand{\gev}{~{\rm GeV}}

10: \newcommand{\lname}[1]{\marginpar{\small\textsf{#1}}}

11: \newcommand{\gl}[1]{eq.~(\ref{#1})}

12: \newcommand{\rt}{\mathrm{T}}

13: \newcommand{\rl}{\mathrm{L}}

14: \newcommand{\rtl}{\mathrm{TL}}

15: \newcommand{\rli}{\mathrm{L1}}

16: \newcommand{\rlii}{\mathrm{L2}}

17: \newcommand{\rliii}{\mathrm{L12}}

18: \newcommand{\rcs}{\mathrm{CS}}

19: \newcommand{\rgj}{\mathrm{GJ}}

20: \newcommand{\rdh}{\mathrm{DH}}

21: \newcommand{\rsh}{\mathrm{SH}}

22: \DeclareMathOperator{\tr}{Tr}

23: \allowdisplaybreaks[4]

24: 

25: 

26: %\documentstyle[12pt]{article}

27: %

28: \addtolength{\textheight}{154.6pt}

29: 

30: \addtolength{\textwidth}{100pt}

31: 

32: \addtolength{\topmargin}{-92pt}

33: 

34: \addtolength{\topmargin}{0.5cm}

35: 

36: \addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-52pt}

37: 

38: \addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.1cm}

39: %\addtolength{\evensidemargin}{-52pt}

40: 

41: %\addtolength{\evensidemargin}{-0.6cm}

42: %Gleichungeny

43: \newcommand{\beq}[1]{\begin{equation}\label{#1}}

44: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}

45: %

46: \newcommand{\beqar}[1]{\begin{eqnarray}\label{#1}}

47: \newcommand{\eeqar}{\end{eqnarray}}

48: %

49: \newcommand{\Mvariable}[1]{#1}

50: \newcommand{\Mfunction}[1]{{\rm #1}}

51: \newcommand{\lash}[1]{\not\! #1 \,}

52: %\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\big< #1 \big|}

53: %\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\big| #1 \big>}

54: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}

55: %

56: %Roman-Style

57: \newcommand{\g}{{\rm g}} 

58: \newcommand{\f}{{\rm f}} 

59: \newcommand{\dd}{{\rm d}} 

60: 

61: %

62: %Referenz auf Gleichungen und Abbildungen

63: \newcommand{\Gl}[1]{Eq.~(\ref{#1})}

64: \newcommand{\Ab}[1]{Fig.~\ref{#1}}

65: \newcommand{\Ta}[1]{Tab.~(\ref{#1})}

66: %Abkuerzungen

67: \newcommand{\ep}{\varepsilon}

68: \newcommand{\ph}{\varphi}

69: \newcommand{\si}{\sigma}

70: \newcommand{\ro}{\varrho}

71: \newcommand{\Ga}{\Gamma}

72: \newcommand{\om}{\omega}

73: \newcommand{\La}{\Lambda}

74: \newcommand{\tG}{\tilde{G}}

75: %

76: \newcommand{\PR}{Phys. Rev.\ }

77: \newcommand{\PRL}{Phys. Rev. Lett.\ }

78: \newcommand{\PL}{Phys. Lett.\ }

79: \newcommand{\NP}{Nucl. Phys.\ }

80: \newcommand{\ZP}{Z. Phys.\ }

81: \newcommand{\AP}{Ann. Phys.}

82: %%

83: 

84: \begin{document}

85: 

86: 

87: %\vspace*{-2cm}

88: \hfill TPR-00-05

89: \vspace{3cm}

90: \begin{center}

91: {\Large \bf Nuclear Enhanced Higher-Twist Effects in the Drell-Yan Process}

92: \vspace{1cm}

93: \end{center}

94: \centerline{R.~J.~Fries, A.~Sch{\"a}fer, E. Stein}

95: \vspace{0.6 cm}

96: \centerline{\em  Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik , 

97: Universit\"at Regensburg, 

98: D-93040 Regensburg, Germany}

99: \vspace{0.4 cm}

100: \centerline{and}

101: \vspace{0.6 cm}

102: \centerline{B.~M\"uller}

103: \vspace{0.4 cm}

104: \centerline{\em  Department of Physics, Duke University, 

105: Box 90305, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0305}

106: \vspace{1cm}

107: \bigskip

108: 

109: %\centerline{\large \em \today}

110: 

111: \bigskip

112: \noindent{\bf Abstract:}

113: We calculate the Drell-Yan cross section, resolving the full 

114: kinematics of the lepton pair, at high transverse momentum for hadron nucleus 

115: collisions. We use the general framework of Luo, Qiu and Sterman to calculate 

116: double scattering contributions that are of twist-4 and demonstrate their 

117: nuclear enhancement. By comparing single and double scattering at RHIC 

118: energies we find that double scattering 

119: gives contributions of comparable size. 

120: We also show that the angular dependence of the Drell-Yan pair discriminates

121: between the various double scattering contributions.

122: \\ \\

123: \noindent{\bf PACS} numbers: 25.75.-q, 12.38.Bx, 13.85.Qk

124: \\ \\

125: \noindent{\bf Keywords:} QCD, Structure Functions, Power Corrections,

126: Nuclear effects  \\

127: \bigskip

128: %\vspace*{\fill}

129: \eject

130: %\newpage

131: 

132: 

133: 

134: \section{Introduction}

135: 

136: In recent times the interest in understanding hard processes involving nuclei,

137: like electron nucleus collisions ($e+A$) and hadron nucleus collisions 

138: ($h+A$), has rapidly increased. The relativistic heavy ion collider (RHIC) 

139: will provide a new tool for experimental studies of $h+A$ and $A+A$ physics. 

140: This experimental advance provides a challenge to theorists for developing

141: a description of such reactions strictly in terms of the underlying

142: fundamental field theory, i.e.\ quantum chromodynamics (QCD). 

143: 

144: The usual way to proceed in QCD is to use factorization theorems

145: \cite{coll89} that permit a rigorous treatment

146: of hard processes. In this approach, 

147: incalculable soft contributions are factorized

148: into universal, process independent distribution functions.

149: Measurement of the distribution functions in one process then

150: allows the prediction of cross sections for other processes.

151: An example is the Drell-Yan (DY) process where two hadrons 

152: scatter to produce a lepton pair of large invariant mass $Q^2$.

153: If $Q^2$ is large enough the factorization theorems state, that the inclusive

154: Drell Yan cross section can be expressed as the product of a calculable 

155: hard part and universal twist-2 parton distribution functions that can be 

156: measured, for instance in deeply inelastic lepton nucleon scattering.

157: Such universal distribution functions have been successfully

158: extracted from existing data.

159: The natural question arises how this 

160: picture is changed for hadron-nucleus collisions.

161: Differences between the twist-2 distribution of a single nucleon and those of a nucleus of mass number $A>1$ were  first discovered by the 

162: European Muon Collaboration. 

163: This phenomenon is known as the EMC effect at large values of the Bjorken 

164: scaling variable $x$ and as shadowing at lower values of $x$ 

165: \cite{Arneodo:1994wf}.

166: 

167: However, strong interaction dynamics cannot solely be described in terms of 

168: twist-2 structure functions. 

169: These functions are simple one-particle correlators and

170: have the interpretation of a probability to find a parton in the 

171: hadron with certain momentum fraction $x$. These distribution

172: functions are measured when the hard probe scatters off a single parton in the

173: nucleon. 

174: Of course, the probe may scatter off more than one parton in the target.

175: Such processes are related to multi-parton correlators and describe corrections

176: to the single-parton scattering process. In general they are suppressed by 

177: powers of the large scale, and are called contributions of 

178: higher twist.

179: 

180: If we consider processes involving large nuclei it is quite obvious that 

181: multiple scattering will be enhanced and even dominate in the limit 

182: $A \rightarrow \infty$. 

183: The classical example for enhancement of multiple scattering in 

184: $h+A$ processes is the Cronin 

185: effect, i.e.\ the anomalous $A$-dependence of the Drell-Yan cross section

186: at large values of the transverse momentum

187: of the lepton pair \cite{Boymond:1974ns}.

188: Instead of a scaling of the cross section with the volume $\sim A$

189: as expected in the twist-2 case, one observes an $A$-dependence parametrized by

190: $\sigma^{h+A} = A^\alpha \sigma^{h+p}$ with $\alpha \approx 4/3$ 

191: \cite{Alde:1990im}.

192: This is a clear signal for multiple scattering and shows that higher-twist

193: multiple scattering is grossly enhanced at large momentum transfer.

194: 

195: The literature contains a wide variety of approaches dealing with multiple 

196: scattering, see e.g.~\cite{bod89}, but a rigorous formulation in the language 

197: of perturbative QCD was attempted only recently.

198: In a series of papers, Luo, Qiu and Sterman (LQS) and recently also Guo, 

199: showed how to extend the factorization theorem beyond leading twist to get a 

200: handle on double scattering in terms of perturbative QCD \cite{Luo94,Luo94b}. 

201: Their twist-4 matrix elements are correlators of two partons in the nucleus 

202: and can describe scattering off partons from different nucleons. 

203: This approach predicts a stronger dependence on the size of the nucleus

204: than the linear scaling with $A$ of single scattering. 

205: LQS argue that ---  due to the geometrical structure of the matrix elements

206: --- some of these twist-4 nuclear matrix elements pick up an additional factor

207: $A^{1/3}$, compensating for some of the inherent suppression of higher 

208: twist corrections. This nuclear enhancement is able to describe the observed 

209: scaling with $A^{4/3}$ in certain kinematical regions.

210: 

211: In this paper we discuss nuclear enhanced double scattering contributions to 

212: DY pair production off nuclear targets 

213: \begin{equation}

214:   \label{process}

215:   h(P_2) + A (P_1 A) \longrightarrow l^+ l^- + X

216: \end{equation}

217: in the framework of the LQS approach. 

218: It was already shown some time ago by Guo \cite{Guo98,Guo98b} that 

219: higher-twist effects in the process (\ref{process}) are enhanced at large 

220: transverse momentum. Extending the calculations of Guo \cite{Guo98},

221: we have calculated the full kinematical dependence of the cross section

222: $\dd \sigma/\dd Q^2 \,\dd q_\perp^2 \,\dd y \,\dd\Omega$

223: including the angular distribution of the lepton pair and evaluated it, 

224: in particular, for $p+A$ scattering at RHIC. 

225: Our most important results were already published as a letter \cite{fmss99}. 

226: In this contribution we present the complete analytical results together with 

227: a brief review of the LQS approach and some technical details. We also give 

228: some numerical results not contained in \cite{fmss99} and an extended 

229: discussion. 

230: We will argue that nuclear enhanced double scattering corrections cannot be 

231: neglected at RHIC. 

232: 

233: In Fig.~\ref{scattering} we show typical Feynman diagrams contributing to the

234: DY process. 

235: Single scattering means that, e.g., a quark from the single hadron 

236: and an antiquark from the nucleus annihilate into a

237: virtual photon in a hard process. To obtain large transverse momentum

238: an additional unobserved parton, here a gluon, has always to be radiated. 

239: Double scattering in our example implies that the quark can pick up an 

240: additional gluon from the nucleus. 

241: The generalized twist-4 factorization theorem of LQS states

242: that two distinct scattering reactions occur for double scattering.

243: One is referred to as double-hard (DH) scattering. Here the parton from the 

244: single hadron undergoes two subsequent independent hard scattering reactions

245:  in the target. 

246: The other one is called soft-hard (SH) scattering. Here the parton from the 

247: single hadron interacts with the collective soft gluon field in the nucleus 

248: (it can e.g.\ be thought of as feeling the color-magnetic Lorentz force) before

249: producing the virtual photon via the final hard scattering. At large 

250: transverse momentum interference of these two mechanisms can be neglected.

251: 

252: The double-hard reaction resembles the classical double scattering 

253: picture, while soft-hard scattering may have an analogy in plasma physics,

254: where a hard scattering event can be accompanied by initial- or final-state

255: interaction with the mean field.

256: The first process might be accounted for by event generators in simulations 

257: of heavy-ion reactions whereas the implementation of soft-hard scattering has 

258: yet to be formulated in a fully consistent manner (see \cite{bmp99} for a 

259: conceptual discussion).

260: 

261: 

262: \begin{figure}[t]

263:   \label{scattering}

264:   \epsfig{file=singlesc.eps,width=6cm}\hspace{2cm}

265:   \epsfig{file=doublesc.eps,width=6cm}

266:   \caption{Single- (a) and double-scattering (b) schematically for a 

267:     hadron $h$ colliding with a nucleus $A$ producing a $\mu^+\mu^-$ pair. 

268:     One additional unobserved parton is radiated in the leading contribution 

269:     to high transverse momentum $q_\perp$.}

270: \end{figure}

271: 

272: It would be helpful to find observables with vanishing or at least very small 

273: contributions from single scattering. 

274: The measurement of such observables would permit the identification of 

275: twist-4 effects at larger values of $Q^2$ where perturbation theory is more

276: reliable and thus provide a clearer evidence for the occurrence of double 

277: scattering.

278: We find these observables in the angular distribution of DY pairs, namely the 

279: helicity amplitude $W_\Delta$ and the Lam-Tung relation 

280: $W_{\Delta\Delta}=W_\rl/2$ \cite{lt80}, both introduced in section 2.

281: The Lam-Tung relation is analogous to the Callan-Gross relation in 

282: deep-inelastic electron nucleon scattering (DIS).

283: Furthermore it would be helpful to find observables where double-hard and 

284: soft-hard contributions can be disentangled. These can also be found in the 

285: angular distribution of DY pairs. While SH scattering leads to non-trivial 

286: angular patterns, DH scattering does not. 

287: Any anomalous $A$-dependent angular distribution therefore would be a 

288: clear sign of non trivial twist-4 correlations.

289: 

290: Although we will focus on $h+A$ collisions, our work has been primarily 

291: motivated by the fact that higher-twist effects or multiple scattering should

292: be most prominent in nucleus-nucleus ($A+A$) collisions at high energy, 

293: as they will be routinely studied at RHIC. 

294: Two microscopic, QCD-inspired descriptions of

295: nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC energies and beyond have been proposed in

296: recent years. In one, the parton cascade picture \cite{ekl89,kgbm92,kg95},

297: the collision is modeled as a sequence of incoherent binary scattering events

298: among partons (``minijets''), which can be cast in a probabilistic formulation

299: as a multiple scattering process. In the other one, the random mean-field

300: model \cite{mv94} the collision is described as a nonlinear interaction

301: among coherent color fields carried by the colliding nuclei. We hope that the

302: study of the interplay between soft-hard and multiple-hard processes in a

303: simpler framework, such as $h+A$ interactions, will help to elucidate the

304: competition between these processes in $A+A$ collisions.

305: 

306: The determination of multiparton correlation functions in nuclei is also an 

307: important step towards the application of QCD to nuclear physics in general. 

308: The generic enhancement of higher-twist effects in reactions involving nuclei 

309: facilitates their extraction and give the chance for a deeper theoretical

310: understanding. They encode the essential aspects of the difference in the 

311: quark-gluon structure between isolated nucleons and nuclei. From the practical

312: point of view a better understanding of such medium effects is necessary to

313: be able to interpret the so called ``hard probes'' of high-energy heavy-ion

314: collisions in a convincing manner.

315: 

316: 

317: The unintegrated Drell-Yan cross section is actually the classic example

318: for a typical two-scale process. Both $Q^2$ and $q_\perp$, the mass and 

319: transverse momentum of the photon, are detected. The perturbative

320: treatment then gives rise to logs of the type $\log^2(Q^2/q_\perp^2)$

321: which can become large if the scales differ substantially. In such a case

322: they have to be resummed. Resumming large logs in the

323: presence of additional soft gluons contained in the twist-4 correlators

324: is a delicate task that could  not be solved yet. We therefore

325: follow a less ambitious procedure and require that

326: both scales are of the same order, thus reducing the

327: original two-scale problem to an effective one-scale problem. In addition the

328: LQS formalism in its present form requires $q_\perp^2$ to be not much smaller 

329: than $Q^2$ in order to neglect interference terms that are not calculated up 

330: to now and which would introduce additional twist-4 matrix elements. 

331: Recently Guo, Qiu and Zhang proposed a method to describe the region

332: of low transverse momentum and how to match it to the perturbative calculation

333: at high $q_\perp$ \cite{gqz99}.

334: 

335: Finally we would like to comment on the experimental situation.

336: There exist data for angular coefficients on $\pi+A$ scattering, e.g. from the 

337: NA10 \cite{na10} and E615 \cite{e615} experiments which are not yet completely

338: understood in terms of conventional QCD-treatment.

339: %, see e.g.\ \cite{bbkm94}. 

340: These experiments measure pair masses $Q \approx 4\ldots8.5 \gev$ and 

341: transverse momenta $q_\perp< 3\gev$ which is certainly at the limit of 

342: where we could still trust our calculation. We will focus on future RHIC 

343: perspectives where we could hopefully reach higher 

344: transverse momenta.

345: 

346: The paper is organized as follows:

347: In section 2 we give the general definition of the 

348: Drell-Yan kinematics, we introduce our observables --- helicity amplitudes and 

349: angular coefficients --- and explain possible choices of the photon rest frame.

350: In section 3 we remind the reader of the known twist-2 results

351: for the helicity amplitudes. Section 4 is devoted to the calculation of the 

352: double-scattering contribution. We explain some essential features of the 

353: factorization procedure of LQS.

354: In particular we discuss the distinction between double-hard and soft-hard 

355: scattering and give an introduction of how to calculate them practically.

356: Finally section 5 contains our numerical results along with a discussion 

357: and we close with  a summary of our final conclusions. In the appendices we 

358: have collected some technical details referred to in the text.

359: 

360: 

361: 

362: \section{General Definitions}

363: 

364: \subsection{Kinematics}

365: 

366: Let a nucleus with momentum $P_1^\mu$ per nucleon collide with a hadron

367: with momentum $P_2^\mu$. We study lepton pair decay of virtual photons with 

368: momentum $q^\mu$ and mass $Q^2=q^2$. In the hadron 

369: center-of-mass (c.m.) frame we take   

370: %\lname{momenta}

371: \begin{equation}

372:   \label{momenta}

373:   P_1^\mu =\frac{1}{2}(\sqrt{S},0,0,\sqrt{S}) ,\quad P_2^\mu =\frac{1}{2}

374:   (\sqrt{S},0,0,-\sqrt{S})

375: \end{equation}

376: where $\sqrt{S}$ is the total center-of-mass energy.

377: The differential cross section for Drell-Yan pair production is then given by

378: %\lname{cross}

379: \begin{equation}

380:   \label{cross}

381:   d \sigma = \frac{\alpha^2_{em}}{2 S Q^4} L_{\mu\nu} W^{\mu\nu} 

382:   \frac{\dd^4 q}{(2 \pi)^4} \dd\Omega.

383: \end{equation}

384: The solid angle $\Omega$ is parametrized by the polar and azimuthal angles 

385: $\theta$ and $\phi$ of one decay lepton in the rest frame of the virtual 

386: photon. We have the freedom to choose the axes in the photon rest frame 

387: conveniently. We will discuss this point after eq.~(\ref{as}).

388: 

389: The hadronic tensor follows the standard definition and is given by

390: %\lname{wmunu}

391: \begin{equation}

392:   \label{wmunu}

393:   W_{\mu\nu} = \int \dd^4 x \, e^{i q\cdot x} 

394:   \bra{P_1 P_2} j_{\mu}(x) j_\nu(0)\ket{P_1 P_2} \; .

395: \end{equation}

396: The leptonic tensor is

397: %\lname{lmunu}

398: \begin{equation}

399:   \label{lmunu}

400:   L^{\mu\nu} = 2 \left(l^{\mu}_1 l^{\nu}_2 + l^{\mu}_2 l^{\nu}_1 \right)-

401:              g^{\mu\nu} Q^2 \; ,

402: \end{equation}

403: where $l_1$ and $l_2$ are the momenta of the leptons.

404: 

405: We rewrite the $q$-dependence of the cross section in terms of rapidity $y$, 

406: transverse momentum $q_\perp$ and mass $Q$ of the virtual photon in the hadron 

407: c.m.~frame. Introducing the hadronic Mandelstam invariants 

408: %\lname{mandelh}

409: \begin{eqnarray}

410:   \label{mandelh}

411:   S &=& (P_1 + P_2)^2 \nn \\

412:   T &=& (P_1 -q)^2 \\

413:   U &=& (P_2 -q)^2 \nn

414: \end{eqnarray}

415: the rapidity $y$ of the photon is

416: %\lname{rap}

417: \begin{equation}

418: \label{rap}

419:   y =  \frac{1}{2} \ln\left(\frac{q^0 + q^3}{q^0 - q^3}\right)

420:   = \frac{1}{2} \ln\left(\frac{Q^2-U}{Q^2 - T}\right)\; .

421: \end{equation}

422: Likewise we can express the transverse momentum of the lepton pair

423: in the hadron c.m. system by

424: %\lname{transm}

425: \begin{equation}

426: \label{transm}

427:   q_\perp^2 = \frac{(Q^2-U)(Q^2 - T)}{S} - Q^2 \; .

428: \end{equation}

429: and we can rewrite the differential cross section as:

430: %\lname{cross1}

431: \begin{equation}

432: \label{cross1}

433:   \frac{\dd \sigma}{\dd Q^2 \,\dd q_\perp^2 \,\dd y \,\dd\Omega} = 

434:   \frac{\alpha^2_{em} \pi}{4 S Q^4} L_{\mu\nu} W^{\mu\nu} 

435:   \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^4} 

436: \end{equation}

437: 

438: 

439: \subsection{Helicity amplitudes and their frame dependence}

440: 

441: To discuss the angular distribution of the lepton pair it is

442: convenient to introduce helicity amplitudes $W_{\sigma,\sigma'}$ defined

443: as 

444: %\lname{helicity}

445: \begin{equation}

446: \label{helicity}

447:   W_{\si,\si'} = \epsilon_{\mu}^{(\sigma)} \epsilon_{\nu}^{(\sigma')*}

448:   W^{\mu\nu}

449: \end{equation}

450: where $\epsilon_{\mu}^{(\si)}$, $\sigma \in\{ \pm 1, 0\}$ is a set of 

451: polarization vectors of the virtual photon with respect to the axes defined 

452: by the spatial unit vectors {\bf X}, {\bf Y}, {\bf Z} in its rest frame:

453: %\lname{vectors}

454: \begin{equation}

455: \label{vectors}

456:   \ep_{\mu}^{(\pm)} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\mp X - i Y)_\mu , \qquad

457:   \ep_{\mu}^{(0)} = Z_\mu

458: \end{equation}

459: Following \cite{lt78} it is advantageous to introduce a complete set of 

460: structure functions 

461: %\lname{helicity2}

462: \begin{equation}

463:   \label{helicity2}

464:   \begin{split}

465:   W_\rt &= W_{1,1} \\

466:   W_\rl &= W_{0,0} \\

467:   W_\Delta &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(W_{1,0} + W_{0,1}\right) \\

468:   W_{\Delta\Delta} &= W_{1,-1}

469:   \end{split}

470: \end{equation}

471: which are referred to as the transverse, longitudinal, spin flip, and 

472: double spin flip helicity  amplitudes.

473: Due to parity conservation other combinations are related to these by 

474: $W_{\si,\si'} = (-)^{\si+\si'} W_{-\si,-\si'}$.

475: In terms of these helicity structure functions the cross section 

476: can be written as

477: %\lname{cross2}

478: \begin{multline}

479:   \label{cross2}

480:   \frac{\dd \sigma}{\dd Q^2 \,\dd q_\perp^2 \,\dd y \,\dd\Omega} =

481:   \frac{\alpha^2_{em}}{64 \pi^3 S Q^2}  \\

482:   \left( W_\rtl\left(1+\cos^2\theta\right) +

483:      W_\rl\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{3}{2}\cos^2\theta\right) +

484:      W_\Delta\left(\sin 2\theta\cos\phi \right) +

485:      W_{\Delta\Delta}\left(\sin^2\theta\cos 2\phi \right)\right).

486: \end{multline}

487: 

488: 

489: The angular dependence can be integrated out which reduces the cross section 

490: to 

491: \beq{total}

492: \frac{\dd \sigma}{\dd Q^2 \,\dd q_\perp^2 \,\dd y } =

493: \frac{\alpha^2_{em}}{64\pi^3 S Q^2} \left(\frac{16}{3}\pi \right) W_\rtl

494: \end{equation}

495: with $W_\rtl = W_\rt + \frac{1}{2} W_\rl = -\frac{1}{2} W_{\mu}^{\mu}$.

496: The ratio of the angular dependent and angular integrated cross sections is 

497: usually parametrized in two standard forms \cite{na10,cs77}: 

498: %\lname{angcoeff}

499: \begin{equation}

500:   \label{angcoeff}

501:   \begin{split}

502:   \frac{16 \pi}{3} 

503:   \left(\frac{

504:   \frac{\dd \sigma}{\dd Q^2 \,\dd q_\perp^2 \,\dd y \,\dd\Omega}}

505:   {\frac{\dd \sigma}{\dd Q^2 \,\dd q_\perp^2 \,\dd y}} \right) 

506:    & = (1 + \cos^2\theta) + A_0 \left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{3}{2} \cos^2\theta

507:   \right) + A_1 \sin 2\theta \, \cos\phi +

508:   \frac{A_2}{2} \sin^2\theta \, \cos 2\phi = \\

509:    & = \frac{4}{\lambda+3} \left( 1+ \lambda \cos^2\theta + \mu \sin 2\theta \,

510:   \cos \phi + \frac{\nu}{2} \sin^2 \theta \, \cos 2\phi \right)

511:   \end{split}

512: \end{equation}

513: in terms of two sets of angular coefficients

514: %\lname{as}

515: \begin{align}

516:   \label{as}

517:   A_0 &= \frac{W_\rl}{W_\rtl} & A_1 &= \frac{W_\Delta}{W_\rtl} & 

518:   A_2 &= \frac{2\,W_{\Delta\Delta}}{W_\rtl}, \\

519:   \lambda &= \frac{2-3A_0}{2+A_0} &  \mu &= \frac{2 A_1}{2+A_0} &

520:   \nu &= \frac{2 A_2}{2+A_0}.

521: \end{align}

522: At this point it is necessary to comment on the proper choice of coordinate 

523: axes in the photon rest system with respect to which the polar and azimuthal 

524: angles $\theta$ and $\phi$ are defined. Clearly the helicity amplitudes and 

525: angular coefficients depend on the chosen frame.

526: Two prominent examples are

527: the Collins-Soper frame (CS) and the Gottfried-Jackson frame (GJ) which 

528: are discussed in detail in \cite{lt78}.

529: When we boost from the hadron c.m.\ frame to a lepton c.m.\ frame,

530: the collinearity of the hadron 

531: momenta ${\mathbf P}_1$ and ${\mathbf P}_2$ is lost and they

532: span a plane which we identify with the $\mathbf X$-$\mathbf Z$-plane. 

533: We are still free to fix $\mathbf Z$ within this plane. 

534: In the Collins-Soper frame we choose $\mathbf Z$ to bisect the angle between 

535: ${\mathbf P}_1$ and $-{\mathbf P}_2$, see Fig.~\ref{framec}. The angle between

536: $\mathbf Z$ and ${\mathbf P}_1$ and between $\mathbf Z$ and $-{\mathbf P}_2$ is

537: called $\gamma_\rcs$  In the Gottfried-Jackson frame $\mathbf Z$ lies in the 

538: direction of ${\mathbf P}_1$. We have introduced the the angle $\gamma_\rgj$

539: between ${\mathbf P}_1$ and ${\mathbf P}_2$ for short notations in that case.

540: Obviously we have $2 \gamma_\rcs + \gamma_\rgj = \pi$. See Appendix 7.1 for 

541: more details. Also note that for $q_\perp= 0$ both frames are equal and 

542: $\phi$ is no longer defined. 

543: 

544: \begin{figure}[t]

545:   \centerline{\epsfig{file=frame.eps,width=13.5cm}}

546:   \caption{Definition of the angles $\theta$ and $\phi$ in the rest frame

547:     of the lepton-pair. The frame shown here is the Collins-Soper frame.}

548:   \label{framec}

549: \end{figure}

550: 

551: In order to obtain the results in both frames in a straightforward way we use 

552: the projectors given by Mirkes \cite{mir92}

553: %\lname{mirkesproj}

554: \begin{align}

555:   \label{mirkesproj}

556:   P^{\mu\nu}_{\rtl} &= -g^{\mu\nu} &

557:   P^{\mu\nu}_{\rli} &= \frac{P_1^\mu P_1^\nu}{E_1^2}  \nn \\ 

558:   P^{\mu\nu}_{\rliii} &= \frac{P_1^\mu P_2^\nu +P_2^\mu P_1^\nu}{E_1 E_2} &

559:   P^{\mu\nu}_{\rlii}  &= \frac{P_2^\mu P_2^\nu}{E_2^2} 

560: \end{align}

561: where $E_1$ and $E_2$ are the energies of the hadrons in the lepton c.m.\ 

562: frame. In terms of hadronic Mandelstam variables and the photon momentum 

563: these are

564: \begin{equation}

565:   E_1 = \frac{Q^2-T}{2Q}=\frac{e^{-y}}{2Q}\sqrt{S(Q^2+q_\perp^2)} ,\qquad

566:   E_2 = \frac{Q^2-U}{2Q}=\frac{e^{y}}{2Q}\sqrt{S(Q^2+q_\perp^2)}.

567: \end{equation}

568: Contracting the hadronic tensor with these projectors gives amplitudes 

569: $T_\alpha = P^{\mu\nu}_\alpha W_{\mu\nu}$, $\alpha \in \{ \rtl,\rli,\rlii,

570: \rliii \}$ which are just linear combinations of the helicity amplitudes in 

571: the different frames. These can be found by linear transformations

572: %\lname{mirkes2}

573: \begin{equation}

574:   \label{mirkes2}

575:   \left( \begin{array}{c} W_{\rtl}^{(\beta)} \\ W_\rl^{(\beta)} \\ 

576:            W_\Delta^{(\beta)} \\ W_{\Delta\Delta}^{(\beta)} 

577:          \end{array} 

578:   \right) = M_{(\beta)}  

579:   \left( \begin{array}{c} T_{\rtl} \\ T_\rl1 \\ T_\rl2 \\ T_\rl12

580:          \end{array} 

581:   \right),

582: \end{equation}

583: with $\beta \in \{ \rcs, \rgj \}$. The transformation matrices 

584: $M_{(\beta)}$ follow from simple geometry and are given in Appendix 7.1 for 

585: the CS and GJ frames.

586: 

587: 

588: \section{Leading twist results}

589: 

590: To make this paper self contained we give the leading order

591: results for the angular coefficients.

592: Due to twist-2 factorization the hadronic tensor is given by a convolution

593: of a perturbatively calculable partonic tensor and two twist-2 distribution 

594: functions:

595: %\lname{tw2fac}

596: \begin{equation}

597:   \label{tw2fac}

598:   W_{\mu\nu} = g^2 e_q^2 \sum_{a,b}\int \frac{\dd \xi_1}{\xi_1} 

599:   \int \frac{\dd \xi_2}{\xi_2}

600:   H_{\mu\nu}^{a+b}(\xi_1,\xi_2) f_{a/A}(\xi_1) f_{b/h}(\xi_2) 

601:   2\pi \delta(s+t+u-Q^2).

602: \end{equation}

603: The sum runs over partons $a$ and $b$ in the nucleus $A$ and the single hadron

604: $h$ respectively and $\xi_1$, $\xi_2$ are their momentum fractions. We denote 

605: the strong coupling by $g$ and $e_q$ is the fractional electric  charge of the

606: quark flavour coupling to the virtual photon.

607: The $f(\xi)$ correspond to twist-2 parton distribution functions

608: defined in the usual way as

609: %\lname{pardis}

610: \begin{equation}

611:   \label{pardis}

612:   \begin{split}

613:   f_{q/h} (\xi) &= \frac{1}{P^+}

614:   \int \frac{\dd y^-}{2\pi} P^+ e^{i \xi P^+ y^-} \,

615:   \frac{1}{2}\bra{P} \bar{q}(0) \gamma^+ {\cal P}q(y^-) \ket{P}

616:    \\

617:   f_{g/h}(\xi) &= \frac{1}{\xi P^+} \int \frac {\dd y^-}{2\pi} 

618:   e^{i \xi P^+ y^-} \bra{P} F_a^{+\nu}(0) {\cal P} 

619:   F_{a \, \nu }^{\hspace{1.5 ex} +} (y^-) \ket{P} 

620:   \end{split}

621: \end{equation}

622: for quarks and gluons, respectively in a hadron moving with 

623: momentum $P^+$ along the light cone \cite{coll89}. $q$ and $F$ denote quark 

624: fields and gluon field strength tensors and

625: ${\cal P}$ is the path-ordered exponential 

626: %\lname{parallel}

627: \begin{equation}

628:   \label{parallel}

629:   {\cal P} = P \exp \left\{ ig \int_{y^-}^0 \dd x^- A^+(x^-)\right\}

630: \end{equation}

631: which makes the definition gauge invariant.

632: In the following we will not write this path-ordered exponential

633: explicitly, but it is assumed to be inserted between all factors in a 

634: product of operators referring to different space-time points. In the 

635: $A^+ = 0$ gauge this term will disappear but we will always use covariant 

636: gauge. Note that we also suppressed the dependence

637: of the distribution function on the factorization scale $\mu^2$.

638: 

639: 

640: The partonic tensor $H_{\mu \nu}^{a+b}$ represents the hard part of 

641: the process. 

642: We have introduced partonic Mandelstam variables by

643: %\lname{mandpar}

644: \begin{eqnarray}

645:   \label{mandpar}

646:   s &=& (\xi_1 P_1 + \xi_2 P_2)^2 = \xi_1\xi_2 S \nn \\

647:   t &=& (\xi_1 P_1 -q)^2 = \xi_1 (T-Q^2) + Q^2 \\ 

648:   u &=& (\xi_2 P_2 -q)^2 = \xi_2 (U-Q^2) + Q^2. \nn

649: \end{eqnarray}

650: The $\delta$-function in eq.~(\ref{tw2fac}) stems from the on-shell condition 

651: for the unobserved emitted parton with momentum $l$. It can be used for trivial

652: integration of $\xi_2$ via

653: %\lname{delta}

654: \begin{equation}

655:   \label{delta}

656:   \delta(l^2)=\delta(s+t+u-Q^2) = \frac{1}{\xi_1 S + U -Q^2} 

657:   \delta\left(\xi_2 + \frac{Q^2 + \xi_1(T-Q^2)}{\xi_1 S + U - Q^2}\right).

658: \end{equation}

659: 

660: We can decompose the partonic tensor in a way completely analogous to the 

661: decomposition of the hadronic tensor $W_{\mu\nu}$ in terms of helicity 

662: amplitudes. Therefore we define the four projections $H_\rtl^{a+b}, 

663: H_\rl^{a+b}, H_{\Delta}^{a+b}, H_{\Delta\Delta}^{a+b}$ which are obtained in 

664: the same way as in eqs.~(\ref{helicity},\ref{helicity2}).

665: This allows us to write hadronic tensor and helicity amplitudes as

666: %\lname{t2result}

667: \begin{equation}

668:   \label{t2result}

669:   W_\alpha = 8\pi^2 \alpha_s e_q^2 \sum_{a,b}\int\limits_B^1 

670:   \frac{\dd \xi_1}{\xi_1} \frac{1}{\xi_1 (Q^2-T) -Q^2}

671:   f_{a/A}(\xi_1) f_{b/h}(\bar{\xi}_2) H_\alpha^{a+b}(\xi_1, \bar{\xi}_2).

672: \end{equation}

673: with  $B = \frac{-U}{S+T-Q^2}$, $\bar{\xi}_2 = -\frac{Q^2 + \xi_1(T-Q^2)}{

674: \xi_1 S + U - Q^2}$, $\alpha_s=g^2/4\pi$ and $\alpha \in \{ \mu\nu, TL, L, 

675: \Delta, \Delta\Delta \}$.

676: There are three kinds of partonic processes contributing to the leading-twist 

677: process at large transverse momentum: quark-antiquark annihilation 

678: ($\bar q+ q$) and Compton processes with a gluon from the single hadron 

679: ($q+g$) or the nucleus ($g+q$). They are shown in Fig.~\ref{twist2fig}.

680: 

681: The cross section for the leading twist DY pair production 

682: at large transverse momentum is well-known \cite{mir92,Cleymans:1979ip}. 

683: For completeness we give the results in the Collins-Soper frame in Appendix 

684: 7.2. The relation $H_{\Delta\Delta} = \frac{1}{2} H_\rl$ is precisely the 

685: so-called Lam-Tung relation \cite{lt80}. It can be expressed in terms of 

686: angular coefficients as $A_0=A_2$ or $2\nu-(1-\lambda)=0$. This relation holds

687: for all partonic subprocesses and is not specific for the Collins-Soper frame 

688: but holds in any photon rest frame as long as the $\mathbf Z$-axis lies in the 

689: reaction plane.

690: Corrections arise at next-to-leading order (NLO) \cite{mir92}.

691: Note that $H_{\Delta}^{a+b}$ picks up an additional sign compared with 

692: $H_{\Delta}^{b+a}$ in contrast to the other helicity amplitudes. 

693: This is due to the inversion of 

694: the orientation of the angle $\gamma_\rcs$ if we interchange the roles of 

695: $P_1$ and $P_2$. For symmetric collisions, e.\,g.\ $p+p$, this leads to the 

696: leading-twist result $W_\Delta=0$.

697: \begin{figure}[t]

698:   \label{twist2fig}

699:   \epsfig{file=tw2qq.eps,width=5.5cm}

700:   \epsfig{file=tw2qg.eps,width=5.5cm}

701:   \epsfig{file=tw2gq.eps,width=5.5cm}

702:   \caption{Twist-2 contributions to order $\alpha_s$: annihilation (a), 

703:     and Compton processes (b and c). The blobs L and R stand for 

704:     all possible tree-level diagrams.}

705: \end{figure}

706: 

707: 

708: \section{Twist-4 Factorisation} 

709: 

710: \subsection{Soft-hard and double-hard scattering}

711: 

712: For the calculation of the double scattering contributions we use the 

713: approach of Luo, Qiu and Sterman which is presented e.\,g.\ in 

714: \cite{Luo94,Guo98}. We consider it worthwile to repeat some aspects here.

715: In Fig.~\ref{overview} we illustrate the forward diagrams that need to be 

716: calculated for double scattering. The box denotes all possible partonic 

717: subprocesses. We have to introduce a cut to obtain the corresponding hadronic 

718: tensors. This is not only possible in the middle but we also have to include 

719: interference graphs which appear if the forward diagram is cut in an 

720: asymmetrical way. In Fig.~\ref{exmpl} we give concrete examples for graphs 

721: which involve a quark-gluon matrix element in the nucleus and an antiquark 

722: coming from the single hadron. The first diagram is cut in the middle (M), 

723: the others are cut left (L) and right (R).

724: \begin{figure}[t]

725:   \epsfig{file=forwqg+q.eps,width=5cm}

726:   \epsfig{file=forwqg+g.eps,width=5cm}  

727:   \epsfig{file=forwqq+g.eps,width=5cm}

728: \end{figure}

729: \begin{figure}[t] 

730:   \epsfig{file=forwqq+q.eps,width=5cm}  

731:   \epsfig{file=forwgg+q.eps,width=5cm}

732:   \caption{Collection of the schematic forward processes we want to consider 

733:     for double scattering. Factorization allows separate treatment of twist-4 

734:     and twist-2 matrix elements ($T$ and $f$) and hard part ($H$).}

735:   \label{overview}

736: \end{figure}

737: 

738: \begin{figure}[b]

739:   \epsfig{file=mexmpl.eps,width=5cm}

740:   \epsfig{file=rexmpl.eps,width=5cm}  

741:   \epsfig{file=lexmpl.eps,width=5cm}

742:   \caption{Examples for double-scattering diagrams with the partonic 

743:     process $qg+\bar q$ cut in the middle (a), right (b) 

744:     and left (c). Circles in Fig. (a) indicate poles from propagators 

745:     which lead to finite gluon momentum (open) or soft gluon momentum 

746:     (filled).}

747:   \label{exmpl}

748: \end{figure}

749: 

750: The starting point for the calculation of the hadronic tensor is the forward

751: scattering amplitude in fourth order of the strong coupling 

752: constant $g$:

753: %\lname{forwtensor}

754: \begin{equation}

755:   \label{forwtensor}

756:   \begin{split}

757:   T_{\mu\nu} &= \frac{g^4 e_q^2}{4!}\int \rd^4 x \rd^4 x_1 \rd^4 x_2 \rd^4 x_3 

758:   \rd x_4 e^{iqx} 

759:   \bra{P_1 P_2} T\left[ J_\rho (x_3) J_\alpha (x_1) j_\mu(0) j_\nu(x) 

760:   \right. \\  

761:   & \left. J_\beta (x_2) J_\sigma(x_4) 

762:   A^\rho(x_3) A^\alpha(x_1) A^\beta(x_2) A^\sigma(x_4) + \ldots \right]

763:   \ket{P_1 P_2}

764:   \end{split}

765: \end{equation}

766: where $j$ ($J$) are electromagnetic (color) quark

767: currents and $A$ denotes gluon fields. $T$ is the time-ordering operator. 

768: Dots indicate further contributions involving more gluon fields with gluon 

769: self interaction and less quark currents such that the power of $g$ remains

770: four. By application of Wick's theorem we obtain all diagrams which 

771: potentially contribute to the forward process. 

772: 

773: We classify diagrams by their partonic subprocess $ab+c$ where $a$ and $b$ are

774: partons from the nucleus and $c$ comes from the single hadron. Our notation 

775: for the parton momenta is shown in Fig.~\ref{overview}. 

776: We concentrate first on $qg+\bar q$ which can be realized e.g.\ by the 

777: diagrams of Fig.~\ref{exmpl}.

778: As a first step towards factorization we perform Fierz transformations 

779: in color and Dirac space for the fermion lines entering and leaving the blobs: 

780: \begin{equation}

781: \label{fierz}

782:   q^i_\alpha(0) \bar{q}^j_\beta (z) = -\frac{1}{4} \left(\gamma_\mu

783:   \right)_{\alpha\beta} \bar{q}^{j'}(z) \gamma^\mu q^{i'}(0) \left( 

784:   \frac{1}{N_c} \delta_{j'i'} \delta_{i j} +2 t^A_{j'i'} t^A_{ij} \right) + 

785:   \ldots.

786: \end{equation}

787: Here the $t^A$ are the $SU(N_c)$ Gell-Mann matrices, and $N_c$ is the number 

788: of colors. Latin characters are color indices, greek one are Dirac indices.

789: We keep only Dirac structures which give leading contributions to 

790: the unpolarized Drell-Yan process. After Fourier transformations of the fields

791: we end up with

792: %\lname{forw2}

793: \begin{multline}

794:   \label{forw2}

795:   T_{\mu\nu}^{qg+\bar q}  =  \int \frac{\rd^4 l}{(2\pi)^4} 

796:   \frac{\rd^4 r_1}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{\rd^4 r_2}{(2\pi)^4} 

797:   \frac{\rd^4 K} {(2\pi)^4} \frac{\rd^4 K'}{(2\pi)^4}

798:   \int \rd^4 y \rd^4 z_1 \rd^4 z_3 \rd^4 z_4 \\    

799:    (2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)}(r_1+r_2+K-l-q)

800:   e^{ir_1 z_1} e^{-ir_2 y} e^{iK z_3}  e^{-i{K'} z_4} 

801:   \frac{1}{2}\bra{P_1} \bar{q}(0) \gamma^\eta q(z_1) A^\rho(z_3) 

802:   A^\sigma(z_4) \ket{P_1} \\

803:    \big(-\frac{1}{2}\big) \bra{P_2} \bar{q}(0) \gamma^\tau q(y) \ket{P_2} 

804:   e_q^2 g^4 \frac{1}{N_c^2}\frac{\delta^{RS}}{N_c^2-1} \sum_d

805:   S(d)^{RS}_{\nu\sigma\tau\rho\mu\eta}.  \qquad

806: \end{multline} 

807: We used the fact that forward matrix elements only depend on the relative 

808: coordinates. So, after shifting positions in each matrix element separately, 

809: we introduced a new set of space-time coordinates ($y$,$z_1$,$z_3$,$z_4$). 

810: $l$ is the momentum of the unobserved radiated parton.

811: The index $d$ runs over all diagrams of the class $qg+\bar q$ and 

812: $S(d)^{RS}_{\rho\mu\epsilon\nu\sigma\tau}$ contains all perturbative 

813: propagators and vertices of the hard part of diagram $d$, with $\gamma_\eta$ 

814: ($\gamma_\tau$) inserted for the upper (lower) blob,  and traces over color

815:  and Dirac indices.

816: For the diagram of Fig.~\ref{exmpl}(a) we have e.\,g.\

817: %\lname{hardex}

818: \begin{equation}

819:   \label{hardex}

820:   \begin{split} 

821:   S_{\nu\sigma\tau\rho\mu\eta}^{RS} = \frac{1}{4}\tr \left[ (-i\gamma_\nu) 

822:   \frac{i(\not r_1 + \not K -\not K' -\not q)}{(r_1+K-K'-q)^2 +i\epsilon}

823:   (-i\gamma_\beta t^B) \frac{i(-\not r_2 -\not K')}{(r_2+K')^2+i\epsilon}

824:   (-i\gamma_\sigma t^S) \right. \\ \left.

825:   \gamma_\tau (-i\gamma_\rho t^R) 

826:   \frac{i(-\not r_2 -\not K)}{(r_2+K)^2+i\epsilon} (-i\gamma_\alpha t^A)

827:   \frac{i(\not r_1 -\not q)}{(r_1-q)^2 +i \epsilon} (-i \gamma_\mu)

828:   \gamma_\eta  \right] 

829:   \frac{i (-g^{\alpha\beta})\delta^{AB}}{l^2+ i\epsilon}.

830:   \end{split}

831: \end{equation}

832: $R$ and $S$ are color indices of gluon fields.

833: Note that we have coupled quark and gluon field operators in the nuclear 

834: matrix elements separately to color singlets. We have omitted a term 

835: proportional to 

836: $(d^{RES}+if^{RES}) \bra{P_1} \bar{q} \gamma^\eta t^E q A^{R\rho} A^{S\sigma} 

837: \ket{P_1}$ 

838: which would induce color forces between quark and gluon in the

839: nucleus. This would not allow to factorize quarks and gluons in color space to 

840: test the size of the nucleus. Such contributions are not expected to show 

841: nuclear enhancement, i.e.\ scaling by $A^{4/3}$. 

842: 

843: Next we perform the light cone expansion, i.e. we use that the partons move 

844: almost collinear to the hadron in the infinite momentum frame.

845: We introduce the parton momentum fractions by setting

846: $r_1 = \xi_1 P_1$, $r_2 = \xi_2 P_2$, $K = x P_1 + K_\perp$ and 

847: $K' = x' P_1 + K_\perp'$. $r'_1 = r_1+ K -K'$ is fixed by momentum 

848: conservation in the upper forward matrix element.

849: Note that we have to allow one parton (called $b$ here) from the nucleus to 

850: be soft with essentially zero longitudinal momentum. Therefore we must take 

851: into account transverse momenta $K_\perp$ and $K'_\perp$ to get a contribution

852: in higher orders of the collinear expansion as we will see later.

853: Now one can integrate the trivial degrees of freedom in 

854: eq.~(\ref{forw2}).

855: To complete the factorization we perform a Sudakov decomposition of the 

856: $\gamma$-matrices in the forward matrix elements on the light cone and retain 

857: only the leading terms $\gamma^\eta = \frac{P_1^\eta}{P_1^+}

858: \gamma^+$, $\gamma^\tau = \frac{P_2^\tau}{P_2^-}\gamma^-$.

859: Then we can introduce twist-2 distribution functions $f_{c/h}(\xi_2)$, given 

860: in eq.~(\ref{pardis}), for the lower blob. 

861: Finally we cut the forward diagram. This sets the radiated unobserved parton

862: with momentum $l$ on the mass shell and in the hard part all expressions right

863: to the cut receive a complex conjugation. 

864: 

865: Hence after these first steps we have factorized the hadronic tensor in a 

866: straightforward way. We get

867: %\lname{hadr1}

868: \begin{equation}

869: \label{hadr1}

870:   \begin{split}

871:   W^{ab+c}_{\mu\nu} = (4\pi\alpha_s)^2 e_q^2 \int \frac{\rd\xi_1}{\xi_1} 

872:   \frac{\rd\xi_2}{\xi_2} \rd x P_1^+ \rd^2K_\perp \rd x' P_1^+ 

873:   \rd^2 K'_\perp f_{c/h} (\xi_2) (2\pi) \delta(l^2)  \\

874:   \bar{T}_{ab}(\xi_1,x,x',K_\perp,K'_\perp)

875:   \bar{H}_{\mu\nu}^{ab+c}(\xi_1,\xi_2,x,x',K_\perp,K'_\perp).

876:   \end{split}

877: \end{equation}

878: We have derived eq.~\ref{hadr1} for our examples of Fig.~\ref{exmpl}, but this equation holds for all processes shown in Fig.\ref{overview}.

879: We have separated the soft part involving the twist-2 distribution function 

880: $f_{c/h}$ and the nuclear matrix element $\bar T_{ab}$ from the hard part

881: $\bar H^{ab+c}_{\mu\nu}$. 

882: 

883: 

884: For our example $qg+\bar q$ we are left with a quark-gluon matrix element in 

885: the nucleus

886: %\lname{rawqgsoft}

887: \begin{equation}

888:   \label{rawqgsoft}

889:   \begin{split}

890:   \bar{T}_{qg}(\xi_1,x,x',K_\perp,K'_\perp) = \int \frac{\rd 

891:   z_1^-}{2\pi} \frac{\rd z_3^- \rd^2 z_3^\perp}{(2\pi)^3} 

892:   \frac{\rd z_4^- \rd^2 z_4^\perp}{(2\pi)^3} e^{ir_1^+ z_1^-} e^{iK^+ z_3^-}

893:   e^{-iK_\perp z_3^\perp} e^{-i{K'}^+ z_4^-} e^{iK'_\perp z_4^\perp} \\

894:   \frac{1}{2} \bra{P_1} \bar{q}(0) \gamma^+  q(z_1^-) A^\rho(z_3^-,z_3^\perp) 

895:   A^\sigma(z_4^-,z_4^\perp) \ket{P_1}.

896:   \end{split}

897: \end{equation}

898: For other classes of processes we also need the quark-quark and gluon-gluon 

899: correlators $\bar T_{gg}$ and $\bar T_{qq}$ which are given by 

900: eq.~(\ref{rawqgsoft}) with the second line replaced by

901: %\lname{rawsoft}

902: \begin{equation}

903: \label{rawsoft}

904:   \begin{split}

905:     \frac{1}{\xi_1 P_1^+} \bra{P_1} F^{\omega +} (0) F^+_{\>\omega}(z_1^-) 

906:     A^\rho(z_1^-,z_1^\perp) A^\sigma(z_4^-,z_4^\perp) \ket{P_1} 

907:     \quad\text{for~}\bar T_{gg} \\

908:     \frac{1}{2} \bra{P_1} \bar{q}(0) \gamma^+  q(z_1^-) 

909:     \bar{q}(z_3^-,z_3^\perp) \gamma^\kappa  q(z_4^-,z_4^\perp)  

910:     \ket{P_1} \quad\text{for~}\bar T_{qq}.

911:   \end{split}

912: \end{equation}

913: Again here the field operators of each single parton form color singlets 

914: separately. We have arranged the first two field operators referring to the

915: nuclear parton $a$ in the way they appear in the corresponding twist-2 

916: structure function while the remaining two field operators of parton $b$ are 

917: still in their original form.

918: 

919: The hard part for the $qg+\bar{q}$-process is 

920: %\lname{rawqghard}

921: \begin{equation}

922:   \label{rawqghard}

923:   \bar{H}^{qg+\bar q}_{\mu\nu}(\xi_1,\xi_2,x,x',K_\perp,K'_\perp) = 

924:   \frac{1}{N_c^2}\frac{1}{N_c^2-1}

925:   (-g^{\alpha \beta}) r_1^\eta r_2^\tau \frac{1}{4} \sum_d S(d)^{RR}_{

926:   \nu\sigma\tau\rho\mu\eta}\Big\vert_{\rm cut}.

927: \end{equation}

928: Hard parts for other processes are obtained analogously.

929: The delta function in eq.~(\ref{hadr1}) can be rewritten for the cases in which

930: the diagrams are cut in the middle (M), right (R) or left (L) as

931: %\lname{deltas}

932: \begin{eqnarray}

933:   \label{deltas}

934:   {\rm (M):}\qquad \delta(l^2) &=& (\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)^{-1} 

935:      \delta(\xi_1+x- \tilde \xi_b) \nn \\

936:   {\rm (R):}\qquad \delta(l^2) &=& (\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)^{-1} 

937:      \delta(\xi_1+x-x'- \xi_c) \\

938:   {\rm (L):}\qquad \delta(l^2) &=& (\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)^{-1} 

939:      \delta(\xi_1- \xi_c) \nn

940: \end{eqnarray}

941: where

942: %\lname{xis}

943: \begin{equation}

944:   \label{xis}

945:   \tilde\xi_b = -\frac{\xi_2(U-Q^2)+Q^2-2q K_\perp +K_\perp^2}{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2}

946:   \qquad\text{ and }\qquad \tilde\xi_c= \tilde\xi_b

947:   \big\vert_{K_\perp=0}.

948: \end{equation}

949: 

950: As pointed out in various papers \cite{Luo94b,Guo98} there are in principle 

951: two contributions to double scattering: 

952: There can be two hard scattering reactions of the parton $c$ from the single 

953: hadron or the outgoing unobserved parton on one side and partons $a$ and $b$ 

954: from the nucleus on the other side. This is called double-hard scattering. 

955: Furthermore there can occur processes where the parton $c$ from the single 

956: hadron or the outgoing parton picks up one soft nuclear parton $b$ in addition

957: to one hard scattering off the nuclear parton $a$. This is called soft-hard 

958: scattering.

959: These are not only qualitative notions but they can be rigorously derived from

960: the equations given above.  

961: One can understand them in terms of poles in the hard part of the scattering 

962: tensor. In eq.~\eqref{hadr1} we have four momentum integrations 

963: $\rd\xi_1\rd\xi_2\rd x\rd x'$ and four propagators. We will perform the

964: $\xi_1$-integration by making use of the delta function $\delta(l^2)$. The 

965: propagators provide poles

966: with respect to $x$ and $x'$. In general we expect two poles in $x$ and two 

967: poles in $x'$. Application of the residue theorem will fix the momenta 

968: and it is easy to check that two poles give large momenta $x=x_{\rm hard}=x'$,

969: respectively and the other ones give small momenta $x=x_{\rm soft}=x'$ with 

970: $x_{\rm hard}\gg x_{\rm soft}\ll 1$ as long as $q_\perp \sim Q$.

971: 

972: To be more precise the pole structure we expect for our example in 

973: Fig.~\ref{exmpl}(a) is

974: %\lname{poles}

975: \begin{equation}

976:   \label{poles}

977:   W_{\mu\nu} \sim \int \rd x \frac{L(x)}{(x-x_{\rm soft}+i\epsilon)

978:   (x-x_{\rm hard}+i\epsilon)}

979:   \int \rd x' \frac{R(x')}{(x'-x_{\rm soft}-i\epsilon)(x'-x_{\rm hard}

980:   -i\epsilon)} ,

981: \end{equation}

982: where $L$ and $R$ stand for the numerators of the amplitudes left and right

983: of the cut depending on $x$ and $x'$. The residue theorem implies

984: %\lname{poles2}

985: \begin{equation}

986:   \label{poles2}

987:   W_{\mu\nu} \sim \left[ \frac{L(x=x_{\rm soft})}{x_{\rm soft}-x_{\rm hard}}

988:   -\frac{L(x=x_{\rm hard})}{x_{\rm soft}-x_{\rm hard}} \right]

989:   \left[ \frac{R(x'=x_{\rm soft})}{x_{\rm soft}-x_{\rm hard}}

990:   -\frac{R(x'=x_{\rm hard})}{x_{\rm soft}-x_{\rm hard}} \right] 

991: \end{equation}

992: Soft-hard and double-hard scattering correspond to the quadratic terms 

993: proportional to $L(x=x_{\rm soft})R(x'=x_{\rm soft})$ and $L(x=x_{\rm hard})

994: R(x'=x_{\rm hard})$ respectively.

995: We follow the arguments of reference \cite{Luo94b,Guo98} and neglect the 

996: remaining mixed terms of eq.~(\ref{poles2}) which are interference terms 

997: between soft and hard rescattering. 

998: This is permitted if $q_\perp$ is not too small. In the case 

999: $q_\perp^2 \ll Q^2$ however we obtain $x_{\rm soft} \approx x_{\rm hard}$.

1000:  The interference will then be important and eventually spoil nuclear 

1001: enhancement due to the negative signs in eq.~\eqref{poles2} \cite{Guo98}. 

1002: Since the integrated Drell-Yan cross section does not exhibit nuclear 

1003: enhancement, we even expect a suppression effect at low values of transverse 

1004: momenta \cite{Guo98b}.

1005: 

1006: Most diagrams we naively get from Wick's theorem for double scattering show a 

1007: different behaviour. For them the propagators do not provide four but 

1008: only three or two poles ---  but at least one in each variable $x$ and $x'$. 

1009: This implies that only soft-hard, only double-hard or neither of these 

1010: contributions can occur. For example it is easy to understand from this 

1011: analysis that only symmetrically (M) cut diagrams can contribute to 

1012: double-hard 

1013: scattering.

1014: Consider the diagram of Fig.~\ref{exmpl}(b). The propagator on the right-hand

1015: side has denominator $[(r_1'-q)^2-i\epsilon]$, from which $x$ and $x'$ 

1016: dependences cancel out. On the left-hand side, the propagator at the bottom of

1017: the diagram contributes a denominator $(r_2+K)^2+i\epsilon=\xi_2 S(x+

1018: \frac{K_\perp^2}{\xi_2 S} +i\epsilon)$. This is a soft pole which fixes $x$ to 

1019: $x_{\rm soft}=-\frac{K_\perp^2}{\xi_2 S}\ll 1$. The remaining two propagators 

1020: on the left-hand side fix $x'$ to either a soft or a hard value. 

1021: Therefore we have two contributions: (i) $x=x'$ is small. This

1022: means that parton $b$ is soft --- in Fig.~\ref{exmpl}(b) this is the gluon 

1023: from the nucleus. Together with the production of the virtual photon which is 

1024: always a hard process, this constitutes a soft-hard double scattering process. 

1025: (ii) $x$ is soft and $x'$ is hard. This is what we called a soft-hard 

1026: interference because parton $b$ has different momenta on the left and the

1027: right side of the diagram, i.e.\ momentum is transferred between partons $a$ 

1028: and $b$. We omit this contribution as explained above.

1029: We conclude that there is no double-hard scattering contribution from the 

1030: diagram in Fig.~\ref{exmpl}(b) since $x$ cannot be hard. On the other hand the

1031: diagram in Fig.~\ref{exmpl}(a) is an example in which all four poles occur, 

1032: indicated by small circles.

1033: 

1034: We now discuss another technical point which has some relevance for nuclear 

1035: enhancement. Consider again eq.~\eqref{poles} and the example of 

1036: Fig.~\ref{dhgraphs}(a) and note that the numerators $L$ and $R$ contain 

1037: exponential functions $e^{ix P_1^+ z_3^-}e^{i(\tilde\xi_b-x)P_1^+ z_1^-}$ and 

1038: $e^{-ix'P_1^+z_4^-}$. 

1039: To apply the residue theorem we have to close the integration contours. 

1040: For $z_3^- -z_1^- >0$ we have to close the $x$-integration in the upper 

1041: complex $x$-plane with no poles encircled and therefore vanishing integral.

1042: On the other hand for $z_3^- -z_1^- <0$ we must close in the lower complex 

1043: $x$-plane with soft and hard pole encircled.

1044: Therefore these poles always introduce additional theta functions in 

1045: coordinate space, in our example $\Theta(z_1^- -z_3^-)$ from the $x$ 

1046: integration and $\Theta(-z_4^-)$ from the $x'$ integral. 

1047: The presence of these $\Theta$ functions in the matrix elements is an 

1048: essential ingredient of the proof of the following rule about the cancellation

1049: of final state interactions for soft-hard scattering:

1050: If at least one soft parton from the twist-4 matrix element is directly 

1051: coupled to the outgoing unobserved parton line these graphs do not contribute 

1052: to soft-hard scattering. 

1053: These graphs exhibit more than one possibility to set the cut and the nuclear 

1054: enhancement cancels between the contributions with different cuts due to the 

1055: particular arrangement of $\Theta$-functions in that case \cite{Luo94b}. 

1056: 

1057: Hence, after a careful discussion of the pole structure of each diagram the 

1058: number of diagrams we are finally forced to evaluate can be reduced. 

1059: Figs.~\ref{dhgraphs} and \ref{shgraphs} show the diagrams that contribute to 

1060: double-hard and soft-hard scattering, respectively. 

1061: We marked the poles used to fix momenta. Also we omitted soft-hard contributions with soft quarks since they should be suppressed compared to their counterparts with soft gluons.

1062: 

1063: \begin{figure}[h]

1064:    \epsfig{file=dhqg+q.eps,width=4cm}

1065:    \epsfig{file=dhqg+g.eps,width=4cm}

1066:    \epsfig{file=dhqq+g.eps,width=4cm}

1067:    \epsfig{file=dhqq+q.eps,width=4cm}

1068:    \caption{Graphs contributing to double-hard scattering: $qg+\bar q$, 

1069:      $qg+g$, $q\bar q+g$ and $qq+\bar q$. There are additional processes with 

1070:      structures similar to the last one, e.g.\ $q\bar q +q$. This is discussed 

1071:      in the next section. The blobs (L) and (R) stand for all possible 

1072:      tree-level diagramms. Propagators providing poles which are used to fix 

1073:      hard momenta are indicated by small open circles.}

1074:    \label{dhgraphs}  

1075: \end{figure}

1076: \begin{figure}[b]

1077:   \epsfig{file=shqg+q.eps,width=4cm}

1078:   \epsfig{file=shqg+g.eps,width=4cm}

1079:   \epsfig{file=shgg+q.eps,width=4cm}  

1080:   \caption{Graphs contributing to soft-hard scattering: $qg+\bar q$, $qg+g$ 

1081:   and $gg+q$. The blobs (L) and (R) stand for all possible tree-level 

1082:   diagramms. Only symmetrically cut diagrams (M) are shown. Corresponding

1083:   right (R) and left (L) cut diagrams have to be added. Propagators providing 

1084:   poles which are used to fix soft momenta are indicated by small filled 

1085:   circles.} 

1086:   \label{shgraphs} 

1087: \end{figure}

1088: 

1089: 

1090: \subsection{Calculation of the double-hard processes}

1091: 

1092: First we investigate the case of double-hard scattering. Since all parton 

1093: momenta are hard we can work in the collinear limit and set 

1094: $K_\perp=0=K'_\perp$ immediately. We perform the integrations over $x$ 

1095: and $x'$ only taking into account contributions from hard poles.

1096: These poles are marked with circles in Fig.~\ref{dhgraphs}. They fix momenta 

1097: to the values $x=x_h=x'$ and $\xi_1=x_a$ with

1098: %\lname{dhfrac}

1099: \begin{align}

1100:   \label{dhfrac}

1101:   x_a &= \frac{Q^2}{Q^2-T} \\

1102:   x_h &= \tilde\xi_a -x_a = -\frac{\xi_2 (U-Q^2)+Q^2}{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2} 

1103:        -\frac{Q^2}{Q^2-T}

1104: \end{align}

1105: Note that $x_a$ is determined by kinematical variables only whereas $x_h$ 

1106: depends on the integration variable $\xi_2$. Two additional $\Theta$-functions

1107: in the light cone space-time coordinates show up as explained above.

1108: 

1109: The field operators  of the second parton in the nuclear matrix element are 

1110: selected in such a way that we get the usual twist-2 light cone operator 

1111: $\bar q \gamma^+ q$ for quarks and field strength tensors $F^{\omega +} 

1112: F^+_{\phantom{+}\omega}$ for gluons.

1113: In the latter case we have to turn two factors of $P_1^+$ into light cone 

1114: derivatives $(ix_h)^{-1} \partial_{z_3^-}$, $(-ix_h)^{-1} \partial_{z_4^-}$ 

1115: and perform partial integrations to let them act on the gluon fields in the 

1116: matrix element.

1117: Hard gluons carry only physical polarizations, this allows us to set

1118: $\partial^+ A^\rho(z_3^-) \partial^+ A^\sigma(z_4^-) = 

1119: F^{\omega+}(z_3^-) F^+_{\phantom{+}\omega} (z_4^-) 

1120: \frac{1}{2} (-g^{\rho\sigma} +\bar n^\rho n^\sigma

1121: +n^\rho \bar n^\sigma )$ with the usual light cone basis vectors $\bar n^\rho=

1122: P_1^\rho/P_1^+$, $\bar n^\rho=P_2^\rho/P_2^-$.

1123: 

1124: We are now able to give the final result for double-hard scattering. For a 

1125: partonic subprocess of the type $ab+c$ we have

1126: %\lname{dhtensor}

1127: \begin{equation}

1128:   \label{dhtensor}

1129:   W^{ab+c}_{\alpha} = 

1130:   \frac{(2\pi)^2(4\pi\alpha_s)^2 e_q^2}{Q^2-T} \int_B^1 \frac{\rd\xi_2}{\xi_2} 

1131:   \frac{1}{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2} f_{c/H}(\xi_2) T^\rdh_{ab}(x_a,x_h) \frac{1}{x_h} 

1132:   H^{\rdh/ab+c}_\alpha(x_a,x_h,\xi_2)

1133: \end{equation}

1134: with $\alpha \in \{\mu\nu,TL,L,\Delta,\Delta\Delta\}$.

1135: Note that parton $a$ is always a quark or antiquark for double-hard scattering

1136: and $e_q$ denotes its electric charge.

1137: As in the helicity amplitudes which arise from contractions of the hadronic 

1138: tensor $W_{\mu\nu}$ defined in eq.~\ref{helicity}, here we use the same 

1139: contractions for the hard partonic part $H_{\mu\nu}$, defining amplitudes

1140: $H_\rtl$, $H_\rl$, $H_\Delta$ and $H_{\Delta\Delta}$ depending on the frame.

1141: The hard parts for the relevant diagrams can be written as

1142: %\lname{dhhard1}

1143: \begin{align}

1144:   \label{dhhard1}

1145:   H_{\mu\nu}^{\rdh,qg+\bar q} &= 

1146:   \mathcal{C} \frac{1}{Q^2}\frac{1}{4} 

1147:   \tr\left[ (\not r_1-\not q) R_{\sigma\beta} \not r_2

1148:   L_{\rho\alpha} (\not r_1-\not q) \gamma_\mu \not r_1 \gamma_\nu 

1149:   \right]_{\substack{\xi_1=x_a \\ x=x'=x_h}} \frac{1}{2}\,g^{\alpha \beta} 

1150:   g^{\rho\sigma} \nn \\

1151:   H_{\mu\nu}^{\rdh,qg+g} &= \mathcal{C}

1152:   \frac{1}{Q^2}\frac{1}{4} 

1153:   \tr\left[ (\not r_1-\not q) R_{\sigma\beta} \not l

1154:   L_{\rho\alpha} (\not r_1-\not q) \gamma_\mu \not r_1 \gamma_\nu 

1155:   \right]_{\substack{\xi_1=x_a \\ x=x'=x_h}} \frac{1}{2}\, g^{\alpha \beta} 

1156:   g^{\rho\sigma} \\

1157:   H_{\mu\nu}^{\rdh,q \bar q +g} &= \mathcal{C}

1158:   \frac{1}{Q^2}\frac{1}{4} 

1159:   \tr\left[ (\not r_1-\not q) R_{\sigma\beta} \not K

1160:   L_{\rho\alpha} (\not r_1-\not q) \gamma_\mu \not r_1 \gamma_\nu 

1161:   \right]_{\substack{\xi_1=x_a \\ x=x'=x_h}} \frac{1}{2}\, g^{\alpha \beta} 

1162:   g^{\rho\sigma}. \nn

1163: \end{align}

1164: $L_{\rho\alpha}$ and $R_{\sigma\beta}$ indicate the sum over all possible tree

1165: level diagrams for the blobs at the left and the right side of the 

1166: corresponding diagram in Fig.~\ref{dhgraphs}. 

1167: Each diagram provides an individual color factor which is indicated 

1168: symbolically by the factor $\mathcal{C}$. 

1169: For partonic processes with three participating fermions we have to 

1170: distinguish between different possible combinations of quark and antiquarks 

1171: and different flavours. In principle there are contributions written in our 

1172: short notation as $q\bar q +q$, $q\bar q +\bar q$ and $qq + \bar q$. 

1173: Each of these contributes four diagrams contained in 

1174: Fig.~\ref{dhgraphs}(d).

1175: In addition, there are processes of the type $q\bar q +q'$, $qq'+\bar q$ and 

1176: $qq' + \bar q'$, which are each represented by a single diagram. In our 

1177: notation $q$ is a quark or antiquark, $\bar q$ the corresponding antiparticle 

1178: and $q'$ denotes a quark or antiquark of a different flavour than $q$.

1179: As an example we give the hard part for the $q \bar q +q$ subprocess:

1180: %\lname{dhhard2}

1181: \begin{multline}

1182:   \label{dhhard2}

1183:   H_{\mu\nu}^{\rdh,q \bar q +q} = 

1184:   \mathcal{C} \frac{1}{Q^2}\frac{1}{8} \left\{

1185:   \tr\left[ (\not r_1-\not q) \gamma_\sigma \not K \gamma_\beta

1186:   (\not r_1-\not q) \gamma_\mu \not r_1 \gamma_\nu \right]

1187:   \tr\left[ \not r_2 \gamma_\rho \not l \gamma_\alpha \right] (r_1+K-q)^{-4} 

1188:   - \right.  \\

1189:   - \tr\left[ (\not r_1-\not q) \gamma_\sigma \not l \gamma_\beta \not r_2

1190:   \gamma_\rho \not K \gamma_\alpha (\not r_1-\not q) \gamma_\mu \not r_1 

1191:   \gamma_\nu \right] (r_1+K-q)^{-2}(r_2+K)^{-2}  +  \\ 

1192:   + \left. (K \leftrightarrow l) \right\}_{\substack{\xi_1=x_a \\ 

1193:   x=x'=x_h}} g^{\alpha \beta} g^{\rho\sigma}.

1194: \end{multline}

1195: Note the relative sign that is due to the different number of fermion loops in

1196:  the corresponding diagrams.

1197: 

1198: The $T^\rdh_{ab}(x_a,x_h)$ are the universal nuclear matrix 

1199: elements for double-hard scattering introduced in 

1200: \cite{Luo94,mq86}. They depend on the momentum fractions $x_a$, $x_h$ of both 

1201: hard partons from the nucleus and are given by

1202: %\lname{dhkorr}

1203: \begin{equation}

1204:   \label{dhkorr}

1205:   \begin{split}

1206:   T^\rdh_{qg}(x_a,x_h) &= \frac{1}{x_h}\frac{1}{2}  \int \rd z_4^-

1207:   \frac{\rd z_3^-}{2\pi} \frac{\rd z_1^-}{2\pi} \Theta(z_1^- -z_3^-)

1208:   \Theta(-z_4^-) e^{ix_a P_1^+ z_1^-} e^{ix_h P_1^+(z_3^--z_4^-)}  \\ &

1209:   \bra{P_1} F^{\omega +}(z_4^-) F^{+}_{\quad\omega}(z_3^-) 

1210:    \bar{q}(0) \gamma^+  q(z_1^-)  \ket{P_1} \\

1211:   T^\rdh_{q\bar q}(x_a,x_h) &= - \frac{1}{4} \int \rd z_4^- P_1^+

1212:   \frac{\rd z_3^-}{2\pi} \frac{\rd z_1^-}{2\pi} \Theta(z_1^- -z_3^-)

1213:   \Theta(-z_4^-) e^{ix_a P_1^+ z_1^-} e^{ix_h P_1^+(z_3^--z_4^-)}  \\ &

1214:   \bra{P_1} \bar{q}(0) \gamma^+  q(z_1^-) 

1215:   \bar q(z_3^-) \gamma^+ q(z_4^-) \ket{P_1} \\

1216:   T^\rdh_{qq}(x_a,x_h) &= \frac{1}{4} \int \rd z_4^- P_1^+

1217:   \frac{\rd z_3^-}{2\pi} \frac{\rd z_1^-}{2\pi} \Theta(z_1^- -z_3^-)

1218:   \Theta(-z_4^-) e^{ix_a P_1^+ z_1^-} e^{ix_h P_1^+(z_3^--z_4^-)}  \\ &

1219:   \bra{P_1} \bar{q}(0) \gamma^+  q(z_1^-) 

1220:   \bar q(z_4^-) \gamma^+ q(z_3^-) \ket{P_1}.

1221:   \end{split}

1222: \end{equation}

1223: We are now ready to explain the origin of nuclear enhancement in these matrix 

1224: elements. As mentioned above the fields of both partons are coupled separately

1225: to colour singlets.

1226: This allows to probe distances up to the diameter of a large nucleus. 

1227: Each spatial integration of the matrix element

1228: arises from a Fourier transformation and we 

1229: expect it to be accompanied by a rapidly oscillating exponential function 

1230: (since $P_1^+ \longrightarrow \infty$). At first glance,

1231: this seems to rule out coherence over the whole nucleus.

1232: However only $z_1^-$ and $z_3^--z_4^-$ in eq.~(\ref{dhkorr}) are restricted by 

1233: phase factors while $z_3^-+z_4^-$ is not. Hence, we can set 

1234: $\int \rd(z_3^-+z_4^-)$ to be proportional to the nuclear radius 

1235: $R_A \approx r_0 A^{1/3}$ and obtain an additional factor of $A^{1/3}$. Here

1236: $r_0 \approx 1.1~\mathrm{fm}$ is the radius of a nucleon. 

1237: 

1238: To find a reasonable model for the double-hard matrix elements

1239: imagine the insertion of a complete set of states 

1240: $\sum_P \ket{P}\bra{P}/(2 P^+ V) = 1$ where $V$ is the volume of the

1241: nucleus. Neglecting for a moment the $\Theta$-function and the integration 

1242: over $z_3^- + z_4^-$ we can compare these definitions with the

1243: common definitions of twist-2 structure functions in eq.~(\ref{pardis}).

1244: Assuming that the sum over states is saturated by the lowest

1245: lying nucleon state double hard matrix elements reduce to a 

1246: product of two twist-2 structure functions times a dimensional factor 

1247: which scales like $A^{4/3}$

1248: \begin{equation}

1249:   \label{dhmodel}

1250:   T^\rdh_{ab}(x_a,x_h) = C A^{4/3} f_{a/A}(x_a) f_{b/A}(x_h).

1251: \end{equation}

1252: $f_{a/A}$ is the nuclear parton distribution per nucleon in a nucleus with 

1253: mass number $A$ and proton number $Z$, $N=A-Z$, given by

1254: \begin{equation}

1255:   f_{a/A}(x) = \frac{Z}{A} f_{a/p}(x) + \frac{N}{A} f_{a/n}(x).

1256: \end{equation}

1257: In a primitive model one can simply set the remaining free integration 

1258: with respect to $z_4^-+z_3^-$ equal to $R_A$ and obtains $C=3/(8 \pi r_0^2)

1259: \approx 0.005~\gev^2$. Although the factorization of the double-hard matrix

1260: element into a product of two twist-2 distribution functions and the scaling 

1261: by $A^{4/3}$ seems to provide a reasonable model, the choice of the

1262: normalization factor $C$ is a hot matter of discussion, see section 5.

1263: The $\Theta$-functions provide an ordering of both single scattering events

1264: on the light cone. They simply express the fact that scattering off parton $b$

1265: takes place before the scattering off parton $a$. This corresponds to 

1266: $z_4^-<0$ on the left side and to $z_3^- < z_1^-$ on the right side of each 

1267: diagram.

1268: 

1269: 

1270: Now we give the final results for the hard parts. For the evaluation it is 

1271: important also to include ghosts, whenever one can close gluon lines through 

1272: the non-perturbative blobs.

1273: For $H^\rdh_\rtl=-\frac{1}{2} H^{\rdh\phantom{\mu}\mu}_{\phantom{\rdh}\mu}$, 

1274: which enters the angular integrated cross section, we reproduce the results of

1275: \cite{Guo98}. We have listed them in Appendix 7.3 for all subprocesses.

1276: The helicity amplitude $W_\rtl$ is independent of the frame. 

1277: Due to the special form of all diagrams contributing to double-hard scattering

1278: we easily see that the contractions $P_\rli^{\mu\nu} H^\rdh_{\mu\nu}$ and 

1279: $P_\rliii^{\mu\nu} H^\rdh_{\mu\nu}$ in eq.~(\ref{dhhard1}) always vanish, and for 

1280: the last contraction we get

1281: \begin{equation}

1282:   P_\rlii^{\mu\nu} H_{\mu\nu}^\rdh = \frac{Q^2S\left[ (Q^2-T)(Q^2-U)-Q^2S 

1283:   \right]}{{(Q^2-T)}^2{(Q^2-U)}^2} H_\rtl^\rdh = 

1284:   \frac{Q^2q_\perp^2}{{(Q^2+q_\perp^2)}^2} H_\rtl^\rdh

1285: \end{equation}

1286: for all processes.

1287: For the Collins-Soper frame this leads to the simple relations

1288: \begin{eqnarray}

1289:   W^\rdh_\rl =& \sin^2 \gamma_\rcs W^\rdh_\rtl &=

1290:     \frac{q_\perp^2}{Q^2+q_\perp^2} W_\rtl^\rdh \\

1291:   W_\Delta^\rdh =& \sin \gamma_\rcs \cos \gamma_\rcs W_\rtl^\rdh &=

1292:     -\frac{Qq_\perp}{Q^2+q_\perp^2} W_\rtl^\rdh \\

1293:   W_{\Delta\Delta}^\rdh =& \frac{1}{2} W^\rdh_L.

1294: \end{eqnarray}

1295: Immediately one observes that the Lam-Tung relation holds in the CS frame and 

1296: all other frames considered here. For the 

1297: Gottfried-Jackson frame the results get particularly simple. The double-hard 

1298: contributions for deviations 

1299: from the simple $1+\cos^2\theta$ behaviour vanish completely:

1300: \begin{equation}

1301:   W^\rdh_{\rm L} = 0\; ,\quad

1302:   W^\rdh_\Delta = 0\; ,\quad

1303:   W^\rdh_{\Delta\Delta} = 0\; .

1304: \end{equation}

1305: At first glance this seems to be rather surprising but it is a direct

1306: consequence of the special form of all double-hard contributions

1307: and therefore has a simple explanation.

1308: 

1309: The double hard process resembles the classical double

1310: scattering picture. To understand this we consider again the process depicted 

1311: in Fig.~\ref{scattering}. The antiquark from the hadron undergoes a

1312: first scattering with a hard gluon from the nucleus. 

1313: By subsequently radiating a gluon with large transverse momentum

1314: the antiquark returns to the mass shell, but now with transverse momentum 

1315: $q_\perp$. The second scattering then corresponds to the lowest-order 

1316: annihilation process of two massless quarks. Therefore the double-hard 

1317: process can be factored as the product of two single scattering cross sections,

1318: supported by our model that the double-hard matrix element can

1319: in good approximation be written as a product of two twist 2 distribution 

1320: functions. This process naturally fulfills the Lam-Tung relation and depends

1321: only on the structure function $W_\rtl \sim W_\mu^\mu$. 

1322: Other helicity amplitudes differ only by kinematical factors, i.e.\ can 

1323: be obtained from $W_\rtl$ in the Gottfried-Jackson frame by simple rotations.

1324: In this probabilistic picture scaling by $A^{4/3}$ appears to be very natural.

1325: The cross section of the first scattering obviously scales by the volume 

1326: $\sim A$ of the nucleus. Afterwards the projectile parton travels further 

1327: through the nucleus and has to penetrate the nuclear matter. 

1328: The probability whether a second interaction takes place on the way to the 

1329: boundary of the nucleus scales then by the nuclear radius $\sim A^{1/3}$.

1330: 

1331: 

1332: 

1333: \subsection{Calculation of the soft-hard processes}

1334: 

1335: 

1336: For soft-hard scattering we have to keep $K_\perp$ in the expansion of the 

1337: gluon momenta. The limit $K_\perp=0$ would lead to $K=0$ which gives no 

1338: contribution to physical double scattering but just a contribution of the 

1339: eikonal phase. Note that we are always using covariant gauge where these 

1340: factors are present.

1341: Starting from equation~(\ref{hadr1}) we do a collinear expansion 

1342: %\lname{expand}

1343: \begin{equation}

1344:   \label{expand}

1345:   \tilde H = \tilde H\vert_{\substack{K_\perp=0\\K_\perp'=0}} + 

1346:   K^\lambda_\perp \frac{\rd}{\rd K^\lambda_\perp} 

1347:   \tilde H\vert_{K_\perp=0} + \frac{1}{2!} K_\perp^\lambda

1348:   K_\perp^\kappa \frac{\rd^2}{\rd K_\perp^\lambda \rd K_\perp^\kappa} 

1349:   \tilde H\vert_{K_\perp=0} + \dots.

1350: \end{equation}

1351: of the terms depending on intrinsic transverse momentum 

1352: %\lname{expand2}

1353: \begin{equation}

1354:   \label{expand2}

1355:   \tilde H = \int \frac{\rd x \rd x'}{\xi_1} e^{ir_1^+ z_1^-} e^{iK^+ z_3^-}

1356:   e^{-i{K'}^+ z_4^-} \bar H(\xi_1,\xi_2,x,x',K_\perp,K_\perp').

1357: \end{equation}

1358: We have used $K_\perp=K_\perp'$ which allows us to write

1359: %\lname{expand3}

1360: \begin{equation}

1361:   \label{expand3}

1362:   K_\perp^\lambda \frac{\rd}{\rd K^\lambda_\perp} = K^\lambda_\perp 

1363:   \frac{\partial}{\partial K^\lambda_\perp} + 

1364:   {K'_\perp}^\lambda \frac{\partial}{\partial {K'_\perp}^\lambda}.

1365: \end{equation}

1366: The mixed terms of second order proportional to $K_\perp^\lambda 

1367: {K'_\perp}^\kappa$ give the leading contribution to soft hard scattering. 

1368: The factor $K_\perp^\lambda {K'_\perp}^\kappa$ can be converted into partial 

1369: derivatives with respect to $z_3^-$, $z_4^-$. A partial integration and 

1370: an expansion $A^\rho = A^+ P_1^\rho/P_1^+ + \ldots$ for soft gluon fields

1371: in the nuclear matrix elements turns them into field strength tensors. 

1372: The $K_\perp$ and $K_\perp'$ integrals can then be carried out.

1373: Note that having soft quarks with transverse momentum and converting the 

1374: corresponding $K_\perp$ into covariant derivatives acting on the quark fields 

1375: would lead to operators contributing only at the level of twist-6 

1376: \cite{Luo94}. 

1377: 

1378: We perform the pole integrations for the symmetrically cut graphs (M) in 

1379: Figs.\ref{shgraphs} and the corresponding asymmetrically cut ones (R) and (L).

1380: The residues fix the momentum fractions of the soft gluons to $x=x_s=x'$ 

1381: while the hard partons carry $\xi_1=x_b$ for the symmetric diagrams and 

1382: $\xi_1=x_c$ for the asymmetric diagrams and

1383: %\lname{shfrac}

1384: \begin{align} 

1385:   \label{shfrac}

1386:   x_s &= \frac{k_\perp^2}{\xi_2 S},  \\

1387:   x_b &= \tilde \xi_b - x_s = 

1388:     -\frac{\xi_2(U-Q^2)+Q^2-2q K_\perp -k_\perp^2}{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2} 

1389:     -\frac{k_\perp^2}{\xi_2 S},   \\

1390:   x_c &= \tilde \xi_c = - \frac{\xi_2(U-Q^2)+Q^2}{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2}.

1391: \end{align}

1392: We have introduced the notation $k_\perp^2=-K_\perp^2 \ge 0$.

1393: When we take a forward diagram 

1394: for soft-hard scattering then the sum of differently cut diagrams (M), (R) and

1395: (L) can be divided into two terms. This procedure is described in detail in 

1396: \cite{Luo94b,Guo98}. In the first term, phase factors and 

1397: $\Theta$-functions arrange in such a way that this term is bounded in 

1398: space-time by geometrical arguments and cannot pick up an additional factor 

1399: $A^{1/3}$. This contribution shows no nuclear enhancement. 

1400: The second term is not bounded and only depends on the hard part of the 

1401: symmetric diagram (M). We therefore neglect the first term and arrive at

1402: %\lname{shtensor}

1403: \begin{multline}

1404:   \label{shtensor}

1405:   W_{\alpha}^{\rsh/ab+c} = (2\pi)^2(4\pi\alpha_s)^2 e_q^2 \int_B^1 

1406:   \frac{\rd \xi_2}{\xi_2} 

1407:   \frac{1}{\xi_2 S +T-Q^2} f_{c/H} (\xi_2)  \\

1408:   \big( -\frac{g^{\lambda\kappa}}{4} \big) 

1409:   \frac{\rd^2}{\rd K_\perp^\lambda \rd K_\perp^\kappa}\Big\vert_{K_\perp=0} 

1410:   T^\rsh_{ab}(x_b) \frac{1}{x_b} H^{\rsh,ab+c}_{\alpha}(x_b,x_s,\xi_2)

1411: \end{multline}

1412: where $\alpha\in \{\mu\nu,\rtl,\rl,\Delta,\Delta\Delta\}$. 

1413: The hard part for the $qg+\bar q$ process shown in Fig.~\ref{shgraphs}(a) is

1414: %\lname{shhard1}

1415: \begin{equation}

1416:   \label{shhard1}

1417:   H_{\mu\nu}^{\rsh/qg+\bar q} = \mathcal{C} 

1418:   \frac{1}{(\xi_2 S)^2} \frac{1}{4} \tr \left[

1419:   R_{\nu\beta} (-\not r_2 -\not K) \not P_1 \not r_2 \not P_1 (-\not r_2 -

1420:   \not K) L_{\alpha\mu} \gamma_\mu \not r_1 \gamma_\nu \right]_{\substack{

1421:   \xi_1=x_b \\ x=x'=x_s}} (-g^{\alpha\beta} )

1422: \end{equation}

1423: $L_{\alpha\mu}$ and $R_{\nu\beta}$ stand for the tree-level diagrams on the 

1424: left- and the right-hand side of the diagram in Fig.~\ref{shgraphs}(a) 

1425: indicated by the blobs. $\mathcal{C}$ symbolizes the color factor of each 

1426: single diagram. Hard parts for $qg+g$ and $gg+q$ subprocesses are obtained in 

1427: an analogous fashion.

1428: 

1429: The universal matrix elements appearing for soft-hard scattering depend only 

1430: on the momentum fraction $x_b$ of the hard parton and are given by

1431: %\lname{shkorr}

1432: \begin{equation}

1433:   \label{shkorr}

1434:   \begin{split}

1435:   T^\rsh_{qg}(x_b) &= \frac{1}{2} \int \rd z_4^- \frac{\rd z_1^-}{2\pi}

1436:   \frac{\rd z_3^-}{2\pi} \Theta(z_1^- -z_3^-) \Theta(-z_4^-) 

1437:   e^{i x_b P_1^+ z_1^-} \\

1438:   & \bra{P_1} F^{\omega +}(z_4^-)\bar{q}(0) \gamma^+  q(z_1^-) 

1439:   F^{+}_{\quad\omega}(z_3^-) \ket{P_1} \\

1440:   T^\rsh_{gg}(x_b) &= \frac{1}{x_b P_1^+} \int \rd z_4^- \frac{\rd z_1^-}{2\pi}

1441:   \frac{\rd z_3^-}{2\pi} \Theta(z_1^- -z_3^-) \Theta(-z_4^-) 

1442:   e^{i x_b P_1^+ z_1^-} \\ 

1443:   & \bra{P_1} F^{\omega +}(z_4^-) F^{+}_{\quad\omega}(z_3^-)

1444:   F^{\lambda +}(0) F^{+}_{\quad\lambda}(z_1^-) \ket{P_1}

1445:   \end{split}

1446: \end{equation}

1447: for scattering off a quark-gluon and a gluon-gluon pair in the nucleus,

1448: respectively. We can repeat the arguments given below eq.~(\ref{dhkorr}) for 

1449: the nuclear enhancement. 

1450: Since the longitudinal momentum fraction of the gluons is essentially zero,

1451: we even encounter only one phase factor $e^{i x_b P_1^+ z_1^-}$

1452: contrary to the case of double hard scattering discussed before.

1453: One therefore might expect that soft-hard matrix elements lead to an 

1454: enhancement factor proportional to the square of the nuclear radius $A^{2/3}$ 

1455: since only one out of three integrations is limited by phase factors.

1456: However, the fields at positions $z_3^-$ and $z_4^-$ are correlated by color 

1457: forces. The anticipated absence of long-range color correlations in a nucleus 

1458: implies that integration over $z_4^--z_3^-$ is still restricted to a region 

1459: of the size of a nucleon.

1460: 

1461: To build a model for the soft hard matrix elements one again can compare 

1462: eq.~(\ref{shkorr}) with the definition of the usual twist-2 matrix elements 

1463: eq.~(\ref{pardis}). Neglecting for a moment the $\Theta$-functions we see that

1464: the twist-4 pieces differ only by an additional $x_b$ independent 

1465: renormalization. Assuming that this can be factored into a term proportional to

1466: the nuclear radius and a (possibly scale dependent) constant $\lambda^2$ 	%\lname{shkorr}

1467: \begin{align}

1468:   \label{lambda}

1469:   A^{1/3} \lambda^2 &\sim  \int \rd z_4^- 

1470:   \frac{\rd z_3^-}{2\pi} 

1471:   F^{\omega +}(z_4^-) F^{+}_{\quad\omega}(z_3^-) 

1472: \end{align}

1473: the $x_b$ dependence of the twist-4 matrix element can be modeled by the usual

1474: twist-2 structure function.

1475: \begin{equation}

1476:   \label{shmodel}

1477:   T^\rsh_{ab}(x) = \lambda^2 A^\frac{4}{3} f_{a/A}(x)

1478: \end{equation}

1479: Eq. (\ref{lambda}) can be interpreted as the 

1480: collective color-magnetic Lorentz force experienced by the projectile parton 

1481: while traveling through nuclear matter \cite{Luo94}.

1482: 

1483: The only $K_\perp$-dependence of the hard part will be implicit in $x_b$ and 

1484: $x_s$. Therefore we can rewrite the derivatives in the form

1485: \begin{equation}

1486:   \begin{split}

1487:   W^{\rsh,ab+c}_{\alpha} =& (2\pi)^2(4\pi\alpha_s)^2 e_q^2 \int_B^1 

1488:   \frac{\rd \xi_2}{\xi_2} 

1489:   \frac{1}{\xi_2 S +T-Q^2} f_{c/H} (\xi_2)  \\

1490:   & \frac{1}{2} \left[ \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_c^2} \left( T^\rsh_{ab}

1491:   (x_c) \frac{1}{x_c} H_{\alpha}^{\rsh,ab+c} (x_c,\xi_2) \right) 

1492:   \frac{2q_\perp^2}{(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)^2} + \right. \\

1493:   & + \frac{\partial}{\partial x_c} \left( T^\rsh_{ab}(x_c) 

1494:   \frac{1}{x_c} H_{\alpha}^{\rsh,ab+c} (x_c,\xi_2) \right) 

1495:   \frac{2(Q^2-T)}{\xi_2 S(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)} + \\

1496:   & + \left. T^\rsh_{ab}(x_c) \frac{1}{x_c} {(H_{\alpha}^{\rsh,ab+c})}'

1497:   (x_c,\xi_2) \frac{2}{\xi_2 S} \right]

1498:   \end{split}

1499: \end{equation}

1500: where $H(x_c,\xi_2) =  H(x_c,x_s=0,\xi_2)$ and $H'(x_c,\xi_2) = \frac{

1501: \partial}{\partial x_s} H(x_c,x_s=0,\xi_2)$. Note that in \cite{Guo98} the 

1502: last term containing a derivative with respect to $x_s$ is absent since 

1503: it turns out that $H^\rsh_\rtl$ does not depend explicitly on $x_s$. We give 

1504: the results for the hard parts in the Collins-Soper frame in Appendix 7.4. 

1505: There are some subtleties in removing the unphysical degrees of freedom

1506: for processes of the class $qg+g$. There we have soft quarks from the nucleus

1507: with dominating component $A^+$ and for the hard gluons from the single hadron

1508: we have to take only the transverse polarizations.

1509: For $W^\rsh_\rtl$ we reproduce the results of \cite{Guo98}.

1510: Unlike for double-hard scattering the amplitudes $W^\rsh_L$, $W^\rsh_\Delta$ 

1511: and $W^\rsh_{\Delta\Delta}$ cannot be obtained in a trivial way from $W_\rtl$. 

1512: Related to that is an obvious violation of the Lam-Tung relation. 

1513: 

1514: 

1515: 

1516: \section{Numerical Results}

1517:  

1518: In order to cover different energies $S$ we calculated helicity amplitudes and

1519: angular coefficients for two different settings: for $252\gev$ $\pi^-$ on 

1520: tungsten as in the Fermilab E615 experiment \cite{e615} 

1521: and for future $p+A$ collider experiments at RHIC energies with $250\gev$ 

1522: protons and $A \times 100\gev$ large nuclei.

1523: The main task before doing the numerics is to insert a suitable model for the 

1524: twist-4 matrix elements in the nucleus. The models introduced in the last 

1525: sections for the double-hard matrix elements 

1526: \begin{equation}

1527:   \label{dhmodel1}

1528:   T^\rdh_{ab}(x_a,x_h) =  C A^\frac{4}{3} f_{a/A}(x_a) f_{b/A}(x_h).

1529: \end{equation}

1530: and for the soft-hard matrix elements 

1531: \begin{equation}

1532:   \label{shmodel1}

1533:   T^\rsh_{ab}(x) = \lambda^2 A^\frac{4}{3} f_{a/A}(x)

1534: \end{equation}

1535: are already given by LQS \cite{Luo94b,Guo98}. We tried to argue above that 

1536: their dependence on the parton momentum fractions and their scaling behaviour 

1537: with respect to $A$ seem to be quite natural. 

1538: 

1539: Nevertheless the correct normalization of the models is not yet clear.

1540: The hope is that $C$ and $\lambda$ are universal constants.

1541: In the early days of the model a value of $C=0.072\gev^2$ 

1542: was taken from theory \cite{Guo98,mq86} while $\lambda^2$ was taken from 

1543: comparison with experiment. This was done by analyzing 

1544: dijet photoproduction on nuclei \cite{Luo94,Naples:1994uz}

1545: leading to a value $\lambda^2=0.05-0.1 \gev^2$. 

1546: Later an analysis of $q_\perp$-broadening in hadron-nucleon Drell-Yan 

1547: processes \cite{Guo98b} implied a value of $\lambda^2=0.01 \gev^2$. 

1548: Obviously there is a discrepancy, which may either point to a strong scale 

1549: dependence or questions the universality of the soft-hard nuclear matrix 

1550: elements. Note that the soft interaction besides the hard process 

1551: in soft-hard double scattering is a final state interaction for dijet 

1552: photoproduction but an initial state interaction for the Drell-Yan process.

1553: 

1554: In their latest work Guo, Qiu and Zhang \cite{gqz99} used the fact that there

1555: is a formal connection between soft-hard and double-hard matrix elements via 

1556: the limit

1557: \begin{equation}

1558:   \lim_{x_g\to 0} x_g T^\rdh_{qg}(x_q,x_g) = T^\rsh_{qg}(x_q)

1559: \end{equation}

1560: which leads with the models of eqs.~(\ref{dhmodel1}),(\ref{shmodel1}) to 

1561: \begin{equation}

1562:   C \approx \frac{\lambda^2}{x_g g(x_g)|_{x_g\approx 0}}.

1563: \end{equation}

1564: They take $x_g g(x_g)|_{x_g\approx 0} \approx 3$ as the gluon momentum 

1565: density at $x_g\longrightarrow 0$.

1566: Taking into account the later value of $\lambda^2$ this leads to a 

1567: normalization factor $C$ which is an order of magnitude below the 

1568: former theoretical value. But it is more consistent with the value of

1569: $C\approx 0.005\gev^2$ which we obtained in 

1570: section 4 from a naive normalization argument.

1571: 

1572: In another, more geometrical, model one can estimate the two-parton area 

1573: density that can be seen by the projectile parton in the nucleus by the 

1574: product of two single-parton area densities. Integration of the two-parton 

1575: area density over the effective transverse area of the nucleus yields exactly

1576: the right-hand side of eq.~(\ref{dhmodel1}) with a constant $C= 9/(8\pi r_0^2)

1577: \approx 0.01\gev^2$.

1578: Obviously $C$ is presently basically unknown and a true improvement can only 

1579: be expected if comparisons of a larger number of observables with more precise

1580: experimental data are available.

1581: 

1582: For soft-hard scattering we use the smaller value of $\lambda^2=0.01

1583: \gev^2$ obtained from Drell-Yan data to maintain consistency.

1584: For double-hard scattering we have chosen the maximal value $C=0.072\gev^2$

1585: to give a feeling how big the effects of double scattering might be.

1586: We take the twist-2 distribution functions from the CTEQ3M 

1587: parameterization for the nucleons \cite{cteq3} and from the recent GRS fits 

1588: for the pion \cite{grs}. Where nuclear effects on twist-2 distribution 

1589: functions are taken into account the EKS98 parametrization \cite{eks98} is 

1590: used.

1591: 

1592: \begin{figure}[t]

1593:   \epsfig{file=lqt_e615.eps,width=5.5cm}

1594:   \epsfig{file=muqt_e615.eps,width=5.5cm}

1595:   \epsfig{file=nuqt_e615.eps,width=5.5cm}

1596:   \caption{The angular coefficients $\lambda$, $\mu$ and $\nu$ 

1597:     (from left to right) as functions

1598:     of $q_\perp$ in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for $252\gev$ $\pi^-$ on 

1599:     tungsten at $Q= 5\gev$, $y=0$. The dashed line is the result for 

1600:     single-scattering and the thick line is given by the full calculation 

1601:     with single- and double-scattering. We also show results of the 

1602:     E615 experiment at low transverse momentum.}

1603:   \label{picoeff}

1604: \end{figure}

1605: 

1606: \begin{figure}[b]

1607:   \epsfig{file=ekscomptl.eps,width=5.5cm}

1608:   \epsfig{file=ekscompl.eps,width=5.5cm} 

1609:   \epsfig{file=ekscompd.eps,width=5.5cm} 

1610:   \caption{The helicity amplitudes $w_\rtl$, $w_\rl$ and $w_\Delta$ 

1611:     for $p+Au$ collisions at $S=10^5\gev$, $Q= 5\gev$ and 

1612:     $q_\perp=4\gev$. We show

1613:     the twist-2 contribution (solid lines), double-hard (dashed lines), and 

1614:     soft-hard (dashed-dotted lines). Soft-hard is scaled up by a factor of 10.

1615:     We give results with (thin lines) and without (thick lines) EKS98 

1616:     modifications for nuclear parton distributions.} 

1617:   \label{yfig}  

1618: \end{figure}

1619: 

1620: Let us first address the question how this approach works with the pion data 

1621: from E615. In Fig.~\ref{picoeff} we show our results for the angular 

1622: coefficients $\lambda$, $\mu$ and $\nu$ in the Gottfried-Jackson frame for the

1623: process $\pi^- + W$ at E615 energy. We also give experimental data from the 

1624: E615 collaboration. We can fairly well describe the data for $\lambda$ at low 

1625: transverse momentum but fail for $\mu$ and $\nu$. 

1626: It seems to be an essential feature that corrections due to nuclear enhanced 

1627: twist-4 matrix elements can be quite large for the helicity amplitudes but the 

1628: effects largely cancel for the angular coefficients which are ratios

1629: thereof. Therefore changes of the

1630: angular coefficients in the range $q_\perp\approx Q$ are small compared with

1631: the pure twist-2 calculation. 

1632: Experimental values have large error bars above $q_\perp = 2 \gev$.

1633: We already pointed out that data at $q_\perp/Q \approx 1$ would provide a much

1634: better test for the twist-4 calculation because of the absence of soft-hard 

1635: interference terms and the absence of double logarithmic corrections of the 

1636: type $\log^2(Q^2/q_\perp^2)$ which have to be resummed. 

1637: We have to conclude that nuclear enhanced double scattering contributions are

1638: not able to yield substantial improvement for the old pion data.

1639: Deviations of the $\pi-W$ data from the naive perturbative QCD-predictions 

1640: might be explained by other approaches like the Berger-Brodsky mechanism 

1641: which takes into account higher twist contributions of the pion wave function

1642: \cite{bbkm94}, in terms of non-trivial spin correlations in the QCD-vacuum 

1643: \cite{Brandenburg:1993cj} or via contributions of the chiral-odd $T$-odd

1644: distribution function $h_1^\perp$ \cite{db:99}.

1645:  

1646: 

1647: \begin{figure}[t]

1648:   \epsfig{file=a0-a2.eps,width=5.5cm}

1649:   \caption{Violation of the Lam-Tung relation. Difference of angular 

1650:   coefficients $A_0$ and $A_2$ is shown. Calculation are with (solid line) and

1651:   without (dashed line) EKS98 corrections to nuclear parton distributions.}

1652:   \label{lamtfig} 

1653: \end{figure}

1654: 

1655: \begin{figure}[b]

1656:   \epsfig{file=rhicwtldh.eps,width=5.5cm}

1657:   \epsfig{file=rhicwtlsh.eps,width=5.5cm}

1658:   \caption{Contributions of different subprocesses to $w_\rtl$ for

1659:   double-hard (a) and soft-hard (b) scattering. Double-hard subprocesses 

1660:   are $qg+\bar q$

1661:   (solid line), $qg+g$ (dashed line), $q\bar q+g$ (dotted line) and 

1662:   $q\bar q+q$ plus all pure fermionic processes

1663:   (dash-dotted line). Soft-hard processes are $qg+\bar q$

1664:   (solid line), $qg+g$ (dashed line) and $gg+q$ (dotted line).}   

1665:   \label{tlcontr}

1666: \end{figure}

1667: 

1668: \begin{figure}[t]

1669:   \epsfig{file=wtlqt.eps,width=5.5cm}

1670:   \epsfig{file=wtlq.eps,width=5.5cm}

1671:   \caption{$w_\rtl$ as a function of transverse momentum $q_\perp$ at 

1672:   fixed $Q=5 \gev$, $y=0$ 

1673:   (left) and as a function of photon mass $Q$ at $q_\perp=4 \gev$ and $y=0$

1674:   (right). 

1675:   Curves are shown for single scattering (solid line), double-hard 

1676:   (dashed line) and soft-hard scattering (dotted line).}

1677:   \label{tlqt} 

1678: \end{figure}

1679: 

1680: We turn to $p+Au$ collisions at RHIC with $S=10^5\gev^2$ per nucleon pair. We 

1681: give helicity amplitudes instead of angular coefficients since these provide a

1682: clearer measure of nuclear enhanced higher twist effects as explained 

1683: above. To make numerical results of helicity amplitudes $W_\alpha$, $\alpha 

1684: \in \{\rtl,\rl,\Delta,\Delta\Delta \}$ more meaningful, we introduce the 

1685: prefactor given in eq.~\eqref{cross2},

1686: \begin{equation}

1687:   w_\alpha = \frac{\alpha^2}{64 \pi^3 SQ^2} W_\alpha,

1688: \end{equation}

1689: to convert the quantities $W_\alpha$ into differential cross sections.

1690: In Fig.~\ref{yfig} we give single scattering, double-hard and soft-hard 

1691: results for the helicity amplitudes $w_\rtl$, $w_\rtl$ and $w_\Delta$ as 

1692: functions of rapidity $y$ in the Collins-Soper frame.

1693: One can read off the main results already given in \cite{fmss99}. First the 

1694: nuclear enhanced twist-4 contribution is absolutely important at RHIC 

1695: energies. Even at quite large values of $Q=5\gev$ and $q_\perp=4\gev$ used

1696: for the calculation its effect can exceed the leading-twist result for the 

1697: parameters used. 

1698: Second the double-hard contribution is by far larger than the soft-hard part 

1699: in the kinematical range under consideration. This can be seen for all 

1700: helicity amplitudes in Fig.~\ref{yfig}. Even if we use smaller values of $C$

1701: proposed above double-hard scattering would reach the same order of magnitude

1702: as single scattering.

1703: 

1704: We also give results with EKS98 modifications to nuclear parton distributions.

1705: These para\-metrizations take into account shadowing, antishadowing and other 

1706: nuclear effects on parton distributions, first described by the European Muon 

1707: Collaboration. The numerical effect of these modifications on the single 

1708: scattering results are small, but they turn out to be quite large for 

1709: double-hard  scattering. Note that it is not clear whether these nuclear 

1710: effects for twist-2 parton distributions should be carried over to the models 

1711: for twist-4

1712: matrix elements. We give results for modified and unmodified distributions to

1713: indicate the further uncertainty of the twist-4 matrix elements. The 

1714: sensitivity of double-hard scattering to these EKS98 modifications is simply 

1715: related to the fact that they involve a product of two nuclear parton 

1716: distributions. The general question about the correct small-$x$ behaviour of 

1717: the twist-4 nuclear matrix elements is very interesting since it has a big

1718: influence at RHIC energies. 

1719: 

1720: We return to the question of the Lam-Tung relation. We already saw analytically

1721: that double-hard scattering respects this relation  while soft-hard does not. 

1722: In Fig.~\ref{lamtfig} we show the difference $A_0-A_2$. It only picks up 

1723: contributions from soft-hard scattering and therefore this quantity is very 

1724: small. That means that violation of the Lam-Tung sum rule is a tiny effect for

1725: the process under consideration.

1726: 

1727: The characteristic feature of the rapidity distribution is the peak of the 

1728: double-hard distribution at negative rapidities (i.e.\ for the photon emitted 

1729: in direction of the initial single hadron). The reason for this is that 

1730: negative rapidity prefers small Bjorken-$x$ for partons from the nucleus. 

1731: Parton distributions at small parton momentum fractions are large particularly

1732: for gluons and they enter quadratically for double-hard scattering.

1733: In Fig.~\ref{tlcontr} we separated the different partonic subprocesses 

1734: contributing to double-hard and soft-hard scattering to enable a deeper 

1735: analysis. One can see that double-hard processes with a quark and a gluon from

1736: the nucleus dominate over those with two quarks at negative rapidities (i.e. 

1737: small $x_h$). On the other hand $qg+\bar q$ is more important than $qg+g$ in 

1738: this region since momentum fraction $\xi_2$ of the parton from the single 

1739: hadron is large and quarks dominate over gluons in that case. 

1740: All the rapidity spectra can be understood in this way.

1741: 

1742: Fig.~\ref{tlqt} shows dependence of $w_\rtl$ on photon mass $Q$ and transverse

1743: momentum $q_\perp$. It can be seen that soft-hard and double-hard 

1744: contributions as expected for higher-twist processes fall off more rapidly 

1745: with $Q$ and $q_\perp$ than (twist-2) single-scattering.

1746: 

1747: 

1748: 

1749: \section{Summary}

1750: 

1751: We have calculated nuclear enhanced double-scattering contributions to 

1752: Drell-Yan pair production in hadron-nucleus collisions using the framework of

1753:  Luo, Qiu and Sterman. We found that the nuclear enhancement at RHIC energies 

1754: and large transverse momentum makes double scattering a contribution that is 

1755: equally important as single scattering. 

1756: Measurements of angular coefficients and helicity amplitudes can distinguish 

1757: double-hard and soft-hard 

1758: scattering. Double-hard scattering has the interpretation of two sequential 

1759: hard scatterings of onshell partons and is therefore related to probabilistic 

1760: pictures of multiple scattering that are widely used in the phenomenology of 

1761: heavy-ion reactions. In this spirit further comparision with alternative

1762: approaches to multiple scattering \cite{bod89,kts99} would be very interesting.

1763:  

1764: Double-hard scattering respects the Lam-Tung relation and, in contrast to 

1765: soft-hard scattering, does not show  non-trivial deviations from the 

1766: $1+\cos^2\theta$ angular distribution. Numerically double-hard scattering 

1767: dominates over the soft-hard contribution. Soft-hard scattering violates 

1768: the Lam-Tung relation but this violation is an effect of order $10^{-3}$ 

1769: for the model used. 

1770: 

1771: Double-hard scattering can be modeled as the product of two twist-2 structure

1772: functions which give the probability for finding two partons in the nucleus.

1773: The soft-hard matrix elements on the other hand encodes essential 

1774: non-perturbative properties  of the nucleus, describing the influence of the 

1775: collective color field on the transverse momentum of the produced lepton pair. 

1776: Inserting reasonable models for the corresponding matrix elements we predict,

1777: that collective color effects are negligible compared to the effects of 

1778: subsequent independent hard scatterings in the kinematical range considered 

1779: here. However the absolute normalization of the twist-4 matrix elements in 

1780: these models is not yet clear.

1781: 

1782: The double-hard scattering shows an interesting asymmetry in the rapidity

1783: distribution of the Drell-Yan pair. The pair is predominantly produced in the 

1784: projectile, i.e. single hadron rapidity region.

1785: Although the absolute counting rates for the DY pairs at large transverse 

1786: momentum are not high \cite{fmss99} the predicted effect fits perfectly well 

1787: in the PHENIX detector acceptance \cite{phenix}. This asymmetry therefore 

1788: should be observable.

1789: 

1790: An analysis of $W_L$ and $W_\Delta$, particularly in the Gottfried-Jackson 

1791: frame, as well as the measurement of $W_\rtl$ (i.e.~the angular integrated 

1792: cross section) as a function of rapidity can check whether double-hard 

1793: scattering is the dominant contribution. A possible violation of the 

1794: Lam-Tung sum rule provides a further possibility to check the picture of 

1795: soft-hard and double-hard scattering in general. If our predictions with

1796: respect to the ratio of soft-hard and double-hard scattering are confirmed by 

1797: experiment it would provide support for the description of heavy ion reactions 

1798: in terms of incoherent multiple scattering of free partons.

1799: Note that the prediction of a trivial frame dependence of double-hard 

1800: scattering and the conservation of the Lam-Tung relation are independent of 

1801: the models for the twist-4 distribution functions and provide good tests 

1802: for the entire LQS approach.

1803: \vspace*{5mm}

1804: 

1805: {\bf Acknowledgements.}

1806: We are grateful to X.~Guo for helpful correspondence. 

1807: In course of the work we benefitted from discussions with V.~Braun, 

1808: L.~Syzmanowsky, and O.~Teryaev. 

1809: E.~S.\ thanks G.~Sterman and X.N.~Wang for useful discussions.

1810: 

1811: 

1812: 

1813: 

1814: \section{Appendix} 

1815: 

1816: 

1817: \subsection{Transformation of amplitudes to different frames}

1818: 

1819: Here we list the matrices $M_{(\beta)}$ defined in eq.~(\ref{mirkes2}) that 

1820: map the invariant projections of the hadronic tensor to the set of helicity 

1821: amplitudes ($W_\rtl$, $W_L$, $W_\Delta$, $W_{\Delta\Delta}$). They are

1822: %\lname{map}

1823: \begin{equation}

1824:   \label{mapcs}

1825:   \begin{split}

1826:   M_\rcs &= \displaystyle \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{2} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\

1827:         0 & \frac{1}{4 \cos^2\gamma_\rcs} & \frac{1}{4 \cos^2\gamma_\rcs} &

1828:         -\frac{1}{4 \cos^2\gamma_\rcs} \\

1829:         0 & -\frac{1}{4 \sin\gamma_\rcs\cos\gamma_\rcs} & 

1830:         \frac{1}{4 \sin\gamma_\rcs\cos\gamma_\rcs} & 0 \\

1831:         \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1+\cos^2\gamma_\rcs}{8\cos^2\gamma_\rcs

1832:         \sin^2\gamma_\rcs} & -\frac{1+\cos^2\gamma_\rcs}{8\cos^2\gamma_\rcs

1833:         \sin^2\gamma_\rcs} & \frac{1-3\cos^2\gamma_\rcs}{8\cos^2\gamma_\rcs

1834:         \sin^2\gamma_\rcs}

1835:            \end{pmatrix}    \\

1836:   \medskip

1837:   M_\rgj &= \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{2} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\

1838:         0 & -\cot \gamma_\rgj & 0 & -\frac{1}{2\sin\gamma_\rgj} \\

1839:         \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1+\cos^2\gamma_\rgj}{2\sin^2\gamma_\rgj} &

1840:         -\frac{1}{\sin^2\gamma_\rgj} & 

1841:         \frac{\cos\gamma_\rgj}{\sin^2\gamma_\rgj}

1842:            \end{pmatrix} 

1843:   \end{split}

1844: \end{equation}

1845: for the Collins-Soper and the Gottfried-Jackson frame, respectively. 

1846: $\gamma_\rcs$ denotes the angle between ${\mathbf P}_1$ and the $\mathbf Z$ 

1847: axis in the photon rest frame and $\gamma_\rgj$ is the angle between 

1848: ${\mathbf P}_1$ and ${\mathbf P}_2$. Obviously $2\gamma_\rcs + \gamma_\rgj = 

1849: \pi$ and in terms of hadronic Mandelstam variables we have

1850: \begin{eqnarray}

1851:   \cos\gamma_\rcs = \sqrt{\frac{Q^2 S}{(Q^2-T)(Q^2-U)}}, &\quad &

1852:   \sin\gamma_\rcs = -\sqrt{1-\frac{Q^2 S}{(Q^2-T)(Q^2-U)}} \\

1853:   \cos\gamma_\rgj = 1-\frac{2Q^2 S}{(Q^2-T)(Q^2-U)},     &\quad &

1854:   \sin\gamma_\rgj = \frac{2Q^2 S}{(Q^2-T)(Q^2-U)}\sqrt{\frac{(Q^2-T)(Q^2-U)}{

1855:    Q^2S} -1}. \nn

1856: \end{eqnarray}

1857: 

1858: \pagebreak

1859: 

1860: \subsection{Single-scattering results}

1861: 

1862: 

1863: Here we list the results for the hard parts $H_\alpha$ of single-scattering 

1864: helicity amplitudes in the Collins-Soper frame. They are defined in 

1865: eq.~(\ref{t2result}). We distinguish annihilation and Compton processes. 

1866: \begin{equation}

1867: \label{loresults}

1868: \begin{split}

1869: H_\rtl^{q+\bar{q}} &= \mathcal{C}_1 \frac{1}{t u }

1870:   \left((Q^2 -t)^2 + (Q^2-u)^2\right)

1871:    \\

1872: H_\rl^{q+\bar{q}} &= \mathcal{C}_1 \left(

1873:   \frac{Q^2 -t}{Q^2-u} + \frac{Q^2 -u}{Q^2-t}  \right)

1874:    \\

1875: H_{\Delta}^{q+\bar{q}} &= \mathcal{C}_1 \sqrt{\frac{Q^2 s}{t u}}

1876:   \left( \frac{Q^2 -u}{Q^2-t}  - \frac{Q^2 -t}{Q^2-u} \right)

1877:    \\

1878: H_{\Delta\Delta}^{q+\bar{q}} &= \frac{1}{2} H_L^{q+\bar{q}}

1879:    \\

1880: H_\rtl^{q+g} &= - \mathcal{C}_2 \frac{(Q^2-s)^2+(Q^2-t)^2}{st}

1881:    \\

1882: H_\rl^{q+g}  &= - \mathcal{C}_2 \frac{u}{s}

1883:   \frac{(Q^2+s)^2+(Q^2-t)^2}{(Q^2-t)(Q^2-u)}

1884:   \\  

1885: H_{\Delta}^{q+g}  &= - \mathcal{C}_2 \sqrt{\frac{Q^2 u}{st}} 

1886:   \frac{2(Q^2-t)^2-(Q^2-u)^2}{(Q^2-t)(Q^2-u)} 

1887:    \\

1888: H_{\Delta\Delta}^{q+g} &= \frac{1}{2} H_L^{q+g}

1889:    \\

1890: H_\rtl^{g+q} &= - \mathcal{C}_2 \frac{(Q^2-s)^2+(Q^2-u)^2}{su}

1891:    \\

1892: H_\rl^{g+q}  &= - \mathcal{C}_2 \frac{t}{s}

1893:   \frac{(Q^2+s)^2+(Q^2-u)^2}{(Q^2-t)(Q^2-u)}

1894:    \\

1895: H_{\Delta}^{g+q}  &= \mathcal{C}_2 \sqrt{\frac{Q^2 t}{su}} 

1896:   \frac{2(Q^2-u)^2-(Q^2-t)^2}{(Q^2-t)(Q^2-u)} 

1897:    \\

1898: H_{\Delta\Delta}^{g+q} &= \frac{1}{2} H_L^{g+q}.

1899: \end{split}

1900: \end{equation}

1901: $\mathcal{C}_1 = C_F/N_c = 4/9$ and $\mathcal{C}_2 = 1/(2N_c)=1/6$ are 

1902: essentially the color factors.

1903: 

1904: 

1905: 

1906: \subsection{Double-hard results}

1907: 

1908: 

1909: In this section we give the hard parts $H_\rtl$ of the projections

1910: $W^\rdh_\rtl$ for double-hard processes. They do not depend on the frame. 

1911: \begin{equation}

1912:   \begin{split}

1913:   H_\rtl^{DH,qg+\bar q} &= 

1914:   \frac{2}{27} \left( \frac{(Q^2-T)}{\xi_2 S} + \frac{\xi_2 S}{Q^2-T}

1915:   \right) + \frac{1}{6} \frac{{(Q^2-T)}^2+(\xi_2 S)^2}{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2} \\

1916:   H_\rtl^{DH,qg+g} &= \frac{1}{36} \left( \frac{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2}{Q^2-T}+

1917:   \frac{Q^2-T}{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2} \right) - \frac{1}{16} \frac{{(Q^2-T)}^2+

1918:   {(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}^2}{(\xi_2 S)^2} \\

1919:   H_\rtl^{DH,q \bar q +g} &= \frac{2}{27} \left( 

1920:   \frac{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2}{\xi_2 S} + \frac{\xi_2 S}{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2} \right)

1921:   + \frac{1}{6} \frac{(\xi_2 S)^2 + {(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}^2}{{(Q^2-T)}^2} \\

1922:   H_\rtl^{DH,q \bar q +q} &= \frac{2}{27} \left( \frac{(\xi_2 S)^2 + 

1923:   {(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}^2}{{(Q^2-T)}^2} + \frac{{(Q^2-T)}^2+

1924:   {(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}^2}{(\xi_2 S)^2} \right) + \\

1925:   & + \frac{4}{81} \frac{{(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}^2}{\xi_2 S(Q^2-T)}   \\

1926:   H_\rtl^{DH,q\bar q +\bar q} &= \frac{2}{27} \left( \frac{(\xi_2 S)^2 + 

1927:   {(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}^2}{{(Q^2-T)}^2} + \frac{{(Q^2-T)}^2+

1928:   {(\xi_2 S)}^2}{(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)^2} \right) - \\

1929:   & -\frac{4}{81} \frac{{(\xi_2 S)}^2}{(Q^2-T)(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}  \\

1930:   H_\rtl^{DH,qq +\bar q} &= \frac{2}{27} \left( \frac{{(Q^2-T)}^2 + 

1931:   {(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}^2}{{(Q^2-T)}^2} + \frac{{(Q^2-T)}^2+

1932:   {(\xi_2 S)}^2}{(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)^2} \right) + \\

1933:   & +\frac{4}{81} 

1934:   \frac{{(Q^2-T)}^2}{\xi_2 S(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}  \\

1935:   H_\rtl^{DH,q\bar q +q'} &= \frac{2}{27} \frac{{(\xi_2 S)}^2 + 

1936:   {(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}^2}{{(Q^2-T)}^2}  \\

1937:   H_\rtl^{DH,qq' +\bar q'} &= \frac{2}{27} \frac{{(Q^2-T)}^2 + 

1938:   {(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}^2}{{(\xi_2 S)}^2} \\

1939:   H_\rtl^{DH,qq' +\bar q} &= \frac{2}{27} \frac{{(Q^2-T)}^2 + 

1940:   {(\xi_2 S)}^2}{{(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}^2}  

1941:   \end{split}

1942: \end{equation}

1943: 

1944: 

1945: 

1946: \subsection{Soft-hard results}

1947: 

1948: 

1949: Here we list the hard parts $H(T_\alpha)$ of the invariant projections 

1950: $T^\rsh_\rtl$, $T^\rsh_\rli$, $T^\rsh_\rlii$ and $T^\rsh_\rliii$ of the 

1951: hadronic tensor, defined in section 2.2, for soft-hard processes. The results 

1952: can be projected into a specific frame via eq.~(\ref{mirkes2})

1953: and the matrices given in Appendix 7.1. This is mathematically trivial but it 

1954: complicates the expressions substantially. For this reason we give only the 

1955: invariant projections. Note that especially $H_\rtl = H(T_\rtl)/2$ for every 

1956: frame described in section 2.2.

1957: \begin{equation}

1958:   \begin{split}

1959:   H(T_\rtl^{qg+\bar q}) &= \frac{4}{27} \left( \frac{(Q^2-T)(x_c-x_a)}{

1960:     x_c (\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)} + \frac{2 x_a \xi_2 S}{(x_c-x_a) (\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}

1961:     + \frac{x_c(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}{(Q^2-T)(x_c-x_a)} \right)

1962:   \\

1963:   H(T_\rli^{qg+\bar q}) & = \frac{8}{27} \frac{x_a \xi_2 S}{x_c (Q^2-T)}

1964:   \\ 

1965:   H(T_\rlii^{qg+\bar q}) &= \frac{8}{27} \left( \frac{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2}{

1966:     (x_c+x_s) S +U-Q^2} \frac{x_s Q^2 S}{(Q^2-U)^2}

1967:     - \frac{x_a}{x_a-x_c} \frac{x_c S ((x_c+x_s) S +U-Q^2)}{

1968:     (Q^2-U)^2} \right. \\

1969:     & \left. - \frac{x_a}{x_a-x_c} \frac{S^2}{(Q^2-U)^2} 

1970:     \frac{(x_c+x_s)((x_c-x_s)(Q^2-T) + \xi_2 (Q^2-U) -x_c\xi_2 S) - 

1971:     (x_c-x_s) Q^2}{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2} \right)

1972:   \\  

1973:   H(T_\rliii^{qg+\bar q}) &= - \frac{8}{27} \left( 

1974:     \frac{x_a}{x_a-x_c} \frac{\xi_2 S^2}{(Q^2-T)(Q^2-T)} \frac{(x_c-x_s)

1975:     (Q^2-T) + \xi_2 (Q^2-U) -Q^2 -x_c\xi_2 S}{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2} + \right. \\

1976:     & \left. + \frac{x_a s}{x_c (Q^2-U)} \frac{(x_c+x_s)(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)+\xi_2

1977:     ((x_c+x_s) S +U-Q^2)-Q^2+x_c\xi_2 S }{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2} \right)

1978:   \\

1979:   H(T_\rtl^{qg+g}) &= \frac{1}{8} \left( \frac{x_c \xi_2 S}{(x_c-x_a)(Q^2-T)} 

1980:     - \frac{2x_a(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}{\xi_2 S(x_c-x_a)} +

1981:     \frac{(x_c-x_a)(Q^2-T)}{x_c \xi_2 S}  \right)

1982:   \\

1983:   H(T_\rli^{qg+g}) &= \frac{1}{4} \frac{x_a(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)}{x_c(Q^2-T)}

1984:   \\ 

1985:   H(T_\rlii^{qg+g}) &= \frac{1}{4} \left( \frac{x_s Q^2}{x_c(Q^2-U)}

1986:     \frac{(x_c+x_s) S +U-Q^2}{\xi_2 (Q^2-U)} - \right. \\

1987:     & - \frac{x_a}{x_a-x_c} \frac{(x_c+x_s) S +U-Q^2}{\xi_2(Q^2-U)}

1988:     \frac{(x_c-x_s)(Q^2-T) + \xi_2 (Q^2-U)-Q^2 - x_c \xi_2 S}{Q^2-U} - \\

1989:     & \left. - \frac{x_a x_c}{x_a-x_c} \frac{((x_c+x_s) S +U-Q^2)

1990:     (\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)+(Q^2-T)(Q^2-U)-Q^2 S}{\xi_2(Q^2-U)^2} \right)

1991:   \\  

1992:   H(T_\rliii^{qg+g}) &= \frac{1}{4} \left( \frac{x_a}{x_a-x_c} 

1993:     \frac{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2}{Q^2-T)} \frac{(x_c+x_s)(Q^2-T)-\xi_2(Q^2-U)-Q^2

1994:     +x_c \xi_2 S}{\xi_2 (Q^2-U)} + \right. \\

1995:     & \left. + \frac{x_a}{x_c} \frac{(x_c+x_s)(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)+\xi_2

1996:     ((x_c+x_s) S +U-Q^2)+Q^2-x_c\xi_2 S}{\xi_2(Q^2-U)} \right)

1997:   \\

1998:   H(T_\rtl^{qg+g}) &=  \frac{1}{18} \left( \frac{\xi_2 S}{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2} -

1999:     \frac{2Q^2(Q^2-T)(x_c-x_a)}{x_c^2 \xi_2 S(\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)} 

2000:     \frac{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2}{\xi_2 S} \right)

2001:   \\

2002:   H(T_\rl^{qg+g}) &= -\frac{2}{9} \frac{x_a*(x_a-x_c)}{x_c^2} 

2003:   \\ 

2004:   H(T_{\Delta}^{qg+g}) &= \frac{1}{9} \frac{Q^2}{Q^2-U} \left( 

2005:     \frac{(x_c+x_s) S +U-Q^2}{\xi_2 (Q^2-U)} + \frac{x_s S}{(Q^2-U)}

2006:     \frac{S}{\xi_2 S+T-Q^2} - \right. \\

2007:     & -\frac{(x_c S+U-Q^2) ((x_c+x_s)(\xi_2 

2008:     S+T-Q^2)+\xi_2 ((x_c+x_s) S +U-Q^2)+Q^2-x_c\xi_2 S)}{x_c \xi_2 (Q^2-U) 

2009:     (\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)} - \\

2010:     & \left. \frac{2x_s Q^2((x_c+x_s) S +U-Q^2)}{x_c^2 \xi_2 (Q^2-U) 

2011:     (\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)} \right)

2012:   \\  

2013:   H(T_{\Delta\Delta}^{qg+g}) &= -\frac{1}{9} \frac{x_a}{\xi_2 x_c} \left(

2014:     \frac{2x_c \xi_2 (Q^2-U) +x_c(x_c+x_s)(Q^2-T) + x_c^2 \xi_2 S 

2015:     +2x_2 Q^2}{Q^2-U} + \right. \\

2016:     & \left. + \frac{\xi_2((x_c+x_s) S +U-Q^2)(2Q^2+x_c (Q^2-T)) 

2017:     +3x_c Q^2 (Q^2-T) +2Q^4 +x_c^2\xi_2^2 S^2}{(Q^2-U) (\xi_2 S+T-Q^2)} 

2018:     \right)

2019:   \end{split} \nn

2020: \end{equation}

2021: 

2022: 

2023: \vfill

2024: \eject

2025: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

2026: 

2027: \bibitem{coll89}

2028:   J.~C.~Collins, D.~E.~Soper and G.~Sterman,in 

2029:   {\em Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics}, ed.  

2030:   A.H.~Mueller (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989) and references therein.

2031: 

2032: \bibitem{Arneodo:1994wf}

2033: M.~Arneodo,

2034: %``Nuclear effects in structure functions,''

2035: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 240}, 301 (1994).

2036: 

2037: %\cite{Boymond:1974ns}

2038: \bibitem{Boymond:1974ns}

2039: J.P.~Boymond {\it et al.},

2040: %R.~Mermod, P.A.~Piroue, R.L.~Sumner, J.W.~Cronin, H.J.~Frisch and 

2041: %M.J.~Shochet, ``Observation Of Large Transverse Momentum Muons Directly 

2042: %Produced By 300-Gev Protons,''

2043: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 33}, 112 (1974); 

2044: %\cite{Cronin:1975zm}

2045: J.W.~Cronin {\it et al.},

2046: %H.J.~Frisch, M.J.~Shochet, J.P.~Boymond, R.~Mermod, P.A.~Piroue and 

2047: %R.L.~Sumner, ``Production Of Hadrons With Large Transverse Momentum At 

2048: %200-Gev, 300-Gev, And 400-Gev,''

2049: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 11}, 3105 (1975).

2050: 

2051: 

2052: \bibitem{Alde:1990im}

2053: D.M.~Alde {\it et al.},

2054: %``Nuclear Dependence Of Dimuon Production At 800-Gev. Fnal-772 Experiment,''

2055: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 64}, 2479 (1990).

2056: 

2057: \bibitem{bod89}

2058:   G.T.~Bodwin, S.J.~Brodsky and G.P.~Lepage,

2059:   Phys. Rev. {\bf D 39}, 3287 (1989); 

2060:   R.~Baier, Y.~L.~Dokshitzer, A.~H.~Mueller, S.~Peigne, and D.~Schiff,

2061:   Nucl.~Phys.~{\bf B 484}, 265 (1997)

2062: 

2063: %\cite{Luo94}

2064: \bibitem{Luo94}

2065: M.~Luo, J.~Qiu and G.~Sterman,

2066: %``Twist-4 nuclear parton distributions from photoproduction,''

2067: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 49}, 4493 (1994).

2068: 

2069: %\cite{Luo94b}

2070: \bibitem{Luo94b}

2071: M.~Luo, J.W.~Qiu and G.~Sterman,

2072: %``Anomalous nuclear enhancement in deeply inelastic scattering and 

2073: %photoproduction,''

2074: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 50}, 1951 (1994).

2075: 

2076: \bibitem{Guo98}

2077: X.~Guo,

2078: %``Nuclear dependence in Drell-Yan transverse momentum distribution,''

2079: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 58}, 036001 (1998).

2080: %hep-ph/9711453.

2081: 

2082: %\cite{Guo98b}

2083: \bibitem{Guo98b}

2084: X.~Guo,

2085: %``Jet broadening in deeply inelastic scattering,''

2086: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 58}, 114033 (1998).

2087: %hep-ph/9804234.

2088: 

2089: \bibitem{fmss99}

2090:   R.~J.~Fries, B.~M\"uller, A.~Sch\"afer and E. Stein,

2091:   Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf 83}, 4261 (1999).

2092: 

2093: \bibitem{bmp99}

2094:   S.~A.~Bass, B.~M\"uller, and W.~P\"oschl,

2095:   J.\ Phys.\ {\bf G 25}, 109 (1999).

2096: 

2097: %\cite{lt78}

2098: \bibitem{lt80}

2099: C.S.~Lam and W.~Tung,

2100: %``A Parton Model Relation Sans QCD Modifications In Lepton Pair Productions,''

2101: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 21}, 2712 (1980).

2102: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D21,2712;%%

2103: 

2104: 

2105: \bibitem{ekl89}

2106: K.J.~Eskola, K.~Kajantie, and J.~Lindfors,

2107: Phys.~Lett.~{\bf B 214}, 613 (1988).

2108: 

2109: \bibitem{kgbm92}

2110: K.~Geiger and B.~M\"uller,

2111: Nucl.~Phys.~{\bf B 369}, 600 (1992).

2112: 

2113: \bibitem{kg95}

2114: K.~Geiger, Phys.~Rept. {\bf 258}, 237 (1995).

2115: 

2116: \bibitem{mv94}

2117: L.~McLerran and R.~Venugopalan,

2118: Phys.~Rev.~{\bf D 49}, 2233 and 3352 (1994).

2119: 

2120: \bibitem{gqz99}

2121:   X.~Guo, J.~Qiu and X. Zhang, Eprint hep-ph/9911476 and Eprint hep-ph/9912361.

2122: 

2123: \bibitem{na10}

2124: S.~Falciano {\it et al.}[NA10 Collaboration],

2125: %``Angular Distributions Of Muon Pairs Produced By 194-Gev/C Negative Pions,''

2126: Z.\ Phys.\ {\bf C 31}, 513 (1986).

2127: 

2128: \bibitem{e615}

2129: J.S.~Conway {\it et al.},

2130: %``Experimental Study Of Muon Pairs Produced By 252-Gev Pions On Tungsten,''

2131: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 39}, 92 (1989).

2132: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D39,92;%%

2133: 

2134: %\cite{lt78}

2135: \bibitem{lt78}

2136: C.S.~Lam and W.~Tung,

2137: %``A Systematic Approach To Inclusive Lepton Pair Production In Hadronic 

2138: %Collisions,''

2139: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 18}, 2447 (1978).

2140: 

2141:   

2142: \bibitem{cs77}

2143: J.C.~Collins and D.E.~Soper,

2144: %``Angular Distribution Of Dileptons In High-Energy Hadron Collisions,''

2145: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 16}, 2219 (1977).

2146: 

2147: \bibitem{mir92}

2148: E.~Mirkes,

2149: %``Angular decay distribution of leptons from W bosons at NLO in hadronic 

2150: %collisions,''

2151: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B 387}, 3 (1992).

2152: 

2153: \bibitem{Cleymans:1979ip}

2154: J.~Cleymans and M.~Kuroda,

2155: %``Angular Distribution Of Dileptons In Hadronic Collisions,''

2156: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B 155}, 480 (1979).

2157: 

2158: \bibitem{mq86}

2159: A.H.~Mueller and J.~Qiu,

2160: %``Gluon Recombination And Shadowing At Small Values Of X,''

2161: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B 268}, 427 (1986).

2162: 

2163: %\cite{Naples:1994uz}

2164: \bibitem{Naples:1994uz}

2165: D.~Naples {\it et al.}

2166: [E683 Collaboration],

2167: %``A-dependence of photoproduced dijets,''

2168: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 72}, 2341 (1994).

2169: 

2170: \bibitem{e866}

2171: M.A.~Vasilev {\it et al.}

2172: [FNAL E866 Collaboration],

2173: %``Parton energy loss limits and shadowing in Drell-Yan dimuon production,''

2174: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 83}, 2304 (1999).

2175: %hep-ex/9906010.

2176: %%CITATION = PRLTA,83,2304;%%

2177: 

2178: \bibitem{cteq3}

2179: H.L.~Lai {\it et al.},

2180: %``Global QCD analysis and the CTEQ parton distributions,''

2181: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 51}, 4763 (1995).

2182: %hep-ph/9410404.

2183: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D51,4763;%%

2184: 

2185: \bibitem{grs}

2186: M.~Gl{\"u}ck, E.~Reya and I.~Schienbein,

2187: %``Pionic parton distributions revisited,''

2188: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ {\bf C 10}, 313 (1999).

2189: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C10,313;%%

2190: 

2191: \bibitem{eks98}

2192: K.J.~Eskola, V.J.~Kolhinen and C.A.~Salgado,

2193: %``The scale dependent nuclear effects in parton distributions for  practical 

2194: %applications,''

2195: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ {\bf C 9}, 61 (1999).

2196: %hep-ph/9807297.

2197: 

2198: \bibitem{bbkm94}

2199:   A.~Brandenburg, S.~J.~Brodsky, V.~V.~Khoze and D.~ M{\"u}ller,

2200:   Phys.Rev.Lett. {\bf 73}, 939 (1994);

2201: K.J.~Eskola, P.~Hoyer, M.~Vanttinen and R.~Vogt,

2202: %``Higher twist effects in the Drell-Yan angular distribution,''

2203: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B 333}, 526 (1994).

2204: 

2205: %\cite{Brandenburg:1993cj}

2206: \bibitem{Brandenburg:1993cj}

2207: A.~Brandenburg, O.~Nachtmann and E.~Mirkes,

2208: %``Spin effects and factorization in the Drell-Yan process,''

2209: Z.\ Phys.\ {\bf C 60}, 697 (1993).

2210: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C60,697;%%

2211: 

2212: \bibitem{db:99}

2213:   D.~Boer, Phys.Rev.\ {\bf D 60}, 014012 (1999)

2214: 

2215: 

2216: \bibitem{phenix}

2217:   S.~R.~Tonse and J.~H.~Thomas,

2218:   in: {\em Pre-Equilibrium Parton Dynamics},

2219:   ed. X.-N.~Wang, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report No.~LBL-34831, 

2220:   p.~341 (1993).

2221: 

2222: \bibitem{kts99}

2223: B.Z.~Kopeliovich, A.V.~Tarasov and A.~Sch\"afer,

2224: %``Bremsstrahlung of a quark propagating through a nucleus,''

2225: Phys. Rev. {\bf C 59}, 1609 (1999) ; 

2226: B.Z.~Kopeliovich, A.V.~Tarasov and A.~Sch\"afer,

2227: hep-ph/9908245; 

2228: U.A.~Wiedemann and M.~Gyulassy,

2229: %``Transverse momentum dependence of the Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal effect,''

2230: Nucl.Phys.\ {\bf B 560}, 345 (1999) 

2231: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9906257;%%

2232: 

2233: \end{thebibliography}

2234: 

2235: \end{document}

2236: 

2237: 

2238: 

2239: